Slashdot Mirror


Distress Signal Emitted By Flat-Screen TV

pinqkandi writes "CNN is a running a story on an Oregon college student's flat-screen Toshiba TV which was releasing the 121.5 MHz international distress signal. He was unaware of the issue until local police, search and rescue, and civil air patrol members showed up at his apartment's door. Apparently the signal was strong enough to be picked up by satellite and then routed to the Air Force Rescue Center in Virginia. Quite impressive - luckily Toshiba is offering him a free replacement."

135 of 514 comments (clear)

  1. Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It turns out it got stuck on the Lifetime network, so it really was in a state of distress.

    1. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, it got stuck on Fox News' channel.

    2. Re:Actually by mpe · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, it got stuck on Fox News' channel.

      isn't that the "Fox Fiction Channel"
      Maybe these TV's are fitted with some form of AI...

    3. Re:Actually by Hanno · · Score: 5, Interesting

      > It turns out it got stuck on the Lifetime
      > network, so it really was in a state of
      > distress.

      I had a TV (also by Toshiba, coincidently) that would crash when it showed the local community channel. When that happened, it did not accept any key presses on the remote or on the TV set itself, so I couldn't change the channel anymore.

      Basically, my TV forced me to watch the horrible Hamburg community channel.

      I complained to Toshiba and it turned out that this channel aired a non-standard Teletext that had the ability crash this particular TV's teletext decoder.

      --

      ------------------
      You may like my a cappella music
    4. Re:Actually by ThaReetLad · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you'll find it's "Faux News Channel"

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    5. Re:Actually by uncoveror · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, all TVs have been spying on us since the V-Chip was introduced. The real question here is what was this guy doing that set the alarm off. Maybe he was trying to disable the V-chip without knowing how to do it correctly.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    6. Re:Actually by danbeck · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Oh, good point. You can always trust a documentary, no matter who makes it, or what agenda they might have.

      Remember slashdot kids, if it's on TV on in your local movie theater, it's got to be true, right? Honestly, I think most people here just tow the slashdot-party line, if you take my meaning. It's just popular to bash Fox News, because, heaven forbid, they might have intelligently voiced conservative viewpoints along with the intelligently voiced liberal viewpoints IN THE SAME SHOW!

    7. Re:Actually by el_gordo101 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Remember slashdot kids, if it's on TV on in your local movie theater, it's got to be true, right?
      Fox news is on TV too, correct? Ergo, it must be true too. Or is my logic a bit faulty here? The bottom line is that all of these outlets have an agenda. It is up to the individual to watch, listen, read, and them make an informed desicion. Unfortunately, here in the US, most people wait to be told what their position should be.
      --
      TODO: Insert witty sig
    8. Re:Actually by dirty · · Score: 3, Informative

      www.electoral-vote.com is showing Kerry with 51% and Bush with 38% in New Jersey. That data is also consistent with the Dem/Rep split the state saw in 2000. Their source is Eagleton-Rutgers from Oct. 17th. To me 13% is a pretty commanding lead. I'd have to say that Bush has no hope of winning New Jersey based on the poll data I'm seeing.

      --

      -matt
    9. Re:Actually by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 3, Funny

      Let's see, if you combine the alleged abilities of the V-Chip, the Hollings bill (to put DRM in everything - fortunately shelved), and TVs sending out SOS signals, you get....

      Chuck EyePea had just got a brand new TV and satellite system for his birthday. He couldn't wait to use it, but he wasn't going to be there for his favorite show. So he tried to set his new system up to record it...

      The door busts open, and in rush a bunch of police and paramilitary types.

      "Step away from the remote, son. Slowly."

      "But I..."

      "Save it for the judge!"

      The cop snaps up the new remote and punches a code into it. The TV proudly announces:

      "Welcome to IP Court TV! Judge John will hear your case in two minutes."

      Chuck looks like he wants to say something, but a glare from the cop silences him. Judge John comes on the screen.

      "My data shows that you were trying to violate the IP rights of a broadcaster. Please explain yourself."

      "I was just trying to timeshift a program like I always do..."

      "You filthy repeat offending pirate! Fifty years!"

      The screen went blank as the TV shut itself off. Chuck was visibly upset:

      "Hey, don't I get a lawyer? You can't just try someone in their living room!"

      "Now, son, you know PATRIOT III abolished the frivolous use of legal services by consumers. Legal services can only be used for serious corporate matters, and the corps. all outsource. If it makes you feel better, you might get out in 65 years, if you behave really well."

      "65! Whatever happened to fifty years? And parole?"

      "Chief Justice Ashcroft declared positive parole unconstitutional. Now all sentences have to be served in full, with negative parole. If you only do 65 years on a 50 year sentence, you are doing good."

      No, the above is not currently reality (that I know about). But you can bet the RIAA, MPAA, and Ashcroft have wet dreams about this stuff.

      If you don't like it, work to stop it. Now is a good time to start.

      ---
      In America, even the AntiChrist can become president.
      And currently - is.

    10. Re:Actually by ryanmfw · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I wasn't talking *about* Bill O'Reilly either. Obviously, you see one side of the issue, the one where Fox is unbiased, but of course that's what you believe. It justifies your own views. If you said they were biased your views wouldn't be invalidated, just not reaffirmed by some unopinionated source. You just see Fox as unbiased, and based upon what they tell you, everyone else is. Others see only the other side, that Fox is biased, and CNN is not. That is also incorrect. Maybe when you grow up you will realize that none of them are telling you the whole truth and will determine that you have to discover things on your own and not rely on some idiot like Brit Hume to give you his agenda or Peter Jennings to give you his bias. It's a pretty sad state of affairs when most people can only see one side of this.

      Just one bit about Fox News somehow seperating their reporting and their opinion, that's not really true. Obviously you don't pay too much attention or you trust what they say too much to accurately analyze what they say.

      --
      Hurricane Ivan: A 17th century prison collapsed. All of the inmates escaped.
  2. Must have been quite powerful by metlin · · Score: 5, Insightful


    I'd originally read this on CNet a while ago.

    And the (CNet) article points out something of relevance - with so many new devices and what not, our radio spectrum is increasingly becoming very muddled and interference a lot more commonplace. I wonder if existing regulations would do, or if new ones be required.

    Something to think about.

    And I wonder how powerful that signal must have been to have caused such interference. Either that, or the receiving satellites must be having one hell of a resolution capability.

    The latter also provides some food for thought - if their satellite equipment is sensitive enough to find out interfering signals from a Television set, wonder what else they can (and do) eavesdrop :)

    What kind of Tempest attacks do take place, I wonder. Satellite Van Eck Phreaking?

    ~adjusts tinfoil hat~

    1. Re:Must have been quite powerful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except the entire point of this particular satellite is to save peoples' lives. Good try, though.

    2. Re:Must have been quite powerful by jZnat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The FCC does regulate the airwaves in America, but they can't catch everything (thankfully). It does seem odd though that a friggin TV would let off a strong enough signal to even reach a satellite, let alone it being 121.5 MHz exactly. Something about that raises some questions, like if the TV was tampered with or if it was even intentionally done to do so.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    3. Re:Must have been quite powerful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I wonder if existing regulations would do,...
      Yes, given that this happens fairly rarely.
      And I wonder how powerful that signal must have been to have caused such interference.
      Not very. Nothing uses the emergency frequency so the background is quiet. The transmitters are designed to run from battery power for days, and be detectable even from inside a smashed airplane, so the receivers are very sensitive.
    4. Re:Must have been quite powerful by overlord2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And even more depressing that someone would choose to see the capability of receiving a distress signal as something other than a good thing (TM).

      --
      -- "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." -A.Einstein
    5. Re:Must have been quite powerful by tonsofpcs · · Score: 5, Informative

      The 121.5 MHz (as well as 243 MHz) Distress call response is being phased out, and the newer 406 MHz call is becoming a more accepted (and used) standard.

      See the official NOAA Press Release (PDF) for deteals.

    6. Re:Must have been quite powerful by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Informative
      Or the U.S. Coast Guard press release (HTML) here.

      Basically, that frequency was getting way too many false positives, so they're phasing it out. To quote the release, "121.5 MHz false alerts inundate search and rescue authorities. This is another major factor in influencing the decision to stop the satellite processing."

      121.5 MHz is in the middle of cable channel 14. Frankly, it's rather surprising that this doesn't happen -constantly-.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    7. Re:Must have been quite powerful by rob13572468 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      i have talked a few times with someone who worked in the TSCM business (surveillance countermeasures). these are the real guys, not the ones you see with the $99 bug detector. the standard range that they now perform sweeps in goes from DC-300 ghz. i was naturally very interested in what they would be looking for above 30ghz and while the person i talked to admitted that he never personally found anything up in those frequencies, it was well known in their community that such devices were known to exist though they would likely be the domain of only the top government agencies. at any rate the device that he described would look something like the size of a coin and be able to send data in the high ghz range using spread spectrum burst communications directly to an overhead LEO satellite; essentially the ability to bug someone from space using areas of the spectrum that most would never look at and even if they did would likely never actually "see' the transmission unless they were lucky enough to see it transmitting and then only if they were knowledgable enough to recognize the signal from the surrounding noise. scary, huh...

    8. Re:Must have been quite powerful by mercuryresearch · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, not that powerful, relatively speaking. A typical 121.5 EPIRB puts out 75-125 milliwatts. Keep in mind this is VHF and the satellites are typically NOAA birds in low-earth orbit expecting a line of sight signal, so 100 milliwatts is very workable.

      The issue with 121.5 EPIRBs is all they do is send a warble tone -- no ID, location, nothing. All the processing is done by the rest of the infrastructure, and even then the output is basically a position (still no ID) to within a mile or so -- with people using radio-direction finders narrowing it down more.

      The newer 406 MHz EPIRBs have specific user data and location information transmitted in their digital packets, so not only do they know the where, but they also know the who -- so when they get a boat beacon originating at someone's house they pretty much already know it's a false alarm.

    9. Re:Must have been quite powerful by identity0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Another writeup, from the town paper where it happened: Corvallis Gazette-Times, and another from the Eugene Registar-Guard here. On a side note, I'm suprised they responded so quickly, less than 24 hours between recieving the signal and a response team at the door. I used to live in the area, and Corvallis is a small (pop. 50k) college town, with some hills and rivers in the area but nothing like a mountain that would require a large search & rescue squad. I guess it's good to know they're there, though.

      As for the transmission strength, from the article - " Mandrell has heard of this sort of thing happening with customized computer gear. Sometimes CAP equipment will pick up these signals, he said, but they are usually weak enough to ignore. "This was really strong," Mandrell said. "This was abnormally strong. It kind of surprised us."" I don't know anything about these distress signals, but I imagine that if they're designed to work from a battery-powered tranciever, anything connected to a wall socket should have enough power to work.

    10. Re:Must have been quite powerful by tonsofpcs · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is in the gap between the video carrier (121.25) and aural carrier (125.75) of Standard and IRC cable systems' channel 14, broadcast channel 14 is at 471.25 (visual) and 475.75 (aural) this should not cause much interference, especially as Cable Television is run on Shielded Coaxial Cable.
      Also, television systems operating within the aircraft bands must comply with FCC Rules and Regulations 76.611 -- signal leakage criteria.

    11. Re:Must have been quite powerful by Lord+Kano · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If the technology that they have let us know about is able to pick up a signal generated by a plasma TV, I really wonder what they're keeping under their hats.

      Most of us only half-believe the stories about echelon and massive gov't surveillance but things like this tell me that our fears may be more reasonable than we think.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    12. Re:Must have been quite powerful by the_ed_dawg · · Score: 4, Interesting
      This isn't actually the first time something like this has happened. They actually started looking for a downed plane at the University of Arkansas's Razorback Stadium in 2000 when they fired up their new scoreboard. Talk about powerful... before they finished the enclosing the stadium, you could see it clearly from the interstate coming into town -- about five miles away.

      Google cache link

      It was really funny to watch them play DVDs to test out the screen because they would always have the "this video not meant for public viewing" warning before broadcasting it out to the entire south side of Fayetteville. :)

      --
      There are two types of people: those prepared for the zombie apocalypse and those who will be eaten.
    13. Re:Must have been quite powerful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      powerful signals are not necessarily needed for a satellite to pick up. Keep in mind that (generally) any satellite link is going to be line-of-sight so there is little to disrupt any signal already propagating between the source and the satellite itself. Also, amateur radio operators have been talking with sattelites for years. You could even talk to the MIR space station when it was in operation.

      this site lists an amateur radio satellite with link power between 1/2 and 1 watt on frequencies higher than the 120ish mhz of the distress signal. It really doesn't take much to receive a low-output signal with the proper listening equipment.

      I'm just trying to put things into perspective, so that hopefully the tinfoil hat can be taken off :)

    14. Re:Must have been quite powerful by DigiShaman · · Score: 5, Informative

      I just checked the frequency of channels for TWC Austin. (digital cable)

      Ch 6 = 85Mhz
      Ch 7 = 177Mhz
      Ch 8 = 183Mhz
      Ch 9 = 189Mhz
      Ch 10 = 195Mhz
      Ch 11 = 201Mhz
      Ch 12 = 207Mhz
      Ch 13 = 213Mhz
      Ch 15 = 129Mhz
      Ch 16 = 135Mhz
      Ch 17 = 141Mhz
      Ch 18 and above keep climbing past 141Mhz

      Notice that Channel 14 doesn't exist and how the lower chanels skip around a bit. But the closest to 121.5Mhz is Channel 15.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    15. Re:Must have been quite powerful by frovingslosh · · Score: 2, Interesting
      And I wonder how powerful that signal must have been to have caused such interference. Either that, or the receiving satellites must be having one hell of a resolution capability.

      Hardly. Hams have talked around the world on low power battery radios (although not on this frequency range). It's not that suprising that something plugged into AC power was able to get a signal to a receiver in straight line of sight, even if it was a malfunction. And the receivers are designed to pick up weak signals, there are even watches made that can send the emergency signal (and note that they don't have an external antenna, which at this frequency should be quite large!) Now think that a TV might be attached to an antenna of the proper size for this frequency (it's between TV channels 6 and 7 and just a little above the FM broadcast band). Which is more amazing, that a small watch can get the signal to the satellite, or a TV plugged into the wall with a full size antenna might have a signal that gets out?

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    16. Re:Must have been quite powerful by Detritus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      IIRC, the FCC had to threaten the cable operators with "unfortunate consequences" if they didn't fix their leaky systems. My local cable company started using quad-shielded coax and quality connectors instead of the cheap crap that they used to use. They also replaced a lot of their distribution plant with new equipment.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    17. Re:Must have been quite powerful by Fussen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What makes 406Mhz better than 243Mhz or 121.5Mhz?

    18. Re:Must have been quite powerful by tonsofpcs · · Score: 3, Informative

      The devices designed to operate on the 406 MHz System (and the system itself) support unique identifiers, and distress signal is more than just a tone as it is in the 121.5/243 system. This should remove 'invalid' (erroneous) broadcasts from the system.

    19. Re:Must have been quite powerful by tonsofpcs · · Score: 2, Informative

      The phase-out was announced in 2000 and won't be complete until 2009, and I suspect that after then they will still monitor the old system, but not be as responsive (the technologies that allow the current approximate location of the signal may be phased out as well). Also, if you are at sea WITH THE BOAT, you would most likely transmit an alternate distress signal [mayday style] giving your approximate location. Most of the distress signal transmitters are battery powered and hand-held.

    20. Re:Must have been quite powerful by thogard · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The new systems cost thousands of dollars compared to the $50 for the old style transmitters and the new ones aren't selling well. The 121.5 systems are still outselling the new ones even though every boat dealer explains it won't work in a few years. The big problem with 121.5 is they never took the easy route which is to interrupt the carrier every few seconds with a fast cut out circuit and put some detectors on the GPS sats. That would give about 1000 meters of accuracy on the 1st signal and a bit of processing could reduce that to 100 meters which is as good as the new system in most cases and the transmitters would still only be about $50.

    21. Re:Must have been quite powerful by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Informative
      Probably not very strong. You can get ELTs built into a *watch* - not even a very chunky watch either. They are about as big as a decent diver's or "marine" watch, with a slightly fat cylinder worked into one edge (not exactly bulky). You unscrew the cap and pull out a wire aerial, which activates the transmitter. The wire is resonant (making it about 18" long) but it just dangles loosely. It runs for a couple of hours off a pair of watch batteries, so the signal must be in the order of tens of milliwatts. Even though the signal is pulsed, there is a limit to the maximum current you can draw from these tiny batteries.


      The signals are received by three satellites, to triangulate the position of the transmitter. I don't know what kind of antenna the receiver uses. Bloody big ones, I would think.

    22. Re:Must have been quite powerful by unitron · · Score: 4, Informative

      Cable Channel 14 does exist, they just aren't using it. The Minions of Satan, I mean Time-Warner Cable, in my area reshuffled the deck awhile back and quit using it as well. Cable channels 2-6 (low VHF) and 7-13 (high VHF) use the same frequencies as their over the air counterparts, but where over the air 14-83 (UHF) is in one continuous block of frequencies (around 470 to 890 MHz), cable uses frequencies for 14 and up that are used for many things other than television as far as over the air use is concerned.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    23. Re:Must have been quite powerful by cheekyboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thats why all top secret spy shit should be done on a ski field off piste in the middle of no where so NO ONE can hear you or know your there.

      If you want to 'talk' in your room, just use an ethysketch or getsmarts cone of silence.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    24. Re:Must have been quite powerful by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This sort of thing is quite common.

      One of my old friends came home to finding his home in a mess after local authorities gained entry to investigate a signal causing interference with a local airport about 3 miles from him.

      The issue ended up being a problem with his cable box, which they had figured out before he even arrived.

    25. Re:Must have been quite powerful by ThaReetLad · · Score: 2, Funny

      But didn't you know that all etch-a-sketch's since 1986 have had built in pattern recognition and reporting capabilities so the government can monitor for early onset liberalism and issue corrective education via the drawing panel?

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    26. Re:Must have been quite powerful by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And even more depressing that someone would choose to see the capability of receiving a distress signal as something other than a good thing (TM).

      This is /. I've seen people argue in favor of getting rid of 911 because they don't think they should have to pay for something they rarely use when the injured person/person being raped/person reporting a lost child could just as easily look up the seven digit number for the local authorities. I mean gosh that E-911 charge on my last bill was like $1.49.

      Nobody ever said people were logical. Politics and human nature aside I want to know how powerful of a signal this thing was putting off -- what kind of receive gain do you suppose those satellites have?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    27. Re:Must have been quite powerful by sirwired · · Score: 4, Informative

      Even if the ELS frequency is being moved, it is still quite important to keep 121.5 clear, as that is also the standard voice aviation distress frequency. Aircraft voice radios can't tune into 406MHz.

      SirWired

    28. Re:Must have been quite powerful by AB3A · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mod parent up.

      For those of you who might be wondering what this costs: Replacing an ELT on an aircraft is not like replacing an EPRIB on a ship. You need to ensure the shock switches fire appropriately, and that the unit is mounted such that it will survive a crash.

      The last time I explored that option for our airplane we were staring at something around $1200 to do this upgrade. It's hardly chump change.

      Further, we need to get our navigation gear coordinated so that the 406 MHz signal has GPS to feed to the world. That's not easy to do for aircraft without panel mounted GPS navigation receivers.

      Also, new regulations regarding the pointless ADIZ around Washington DC practically require pilots to monitor 121.5 to respond to an intercept if one happens. If you hear callsign "huntress" on the air and they're operating in your vicinity, remember to be on your very best behavior.

      --
      Nearly fifty percent of all graduates come from the bottom half of the class!
    29. Re:Must have been quite powerful by TheSync · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In college, I was able to talk with Cosmonauts on space station MIR on the 144 MHz amateur radio band with a 1-watt hand-held radio, and that was using FM.

    30. Re:Must have been quite powerful by harrkev · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can get a hand-held system using the new frequency for under $500. Check HERE if you don't believe me. Less than $500 is not quite the same as "thousands of dollars."

      The 121.5 system is entirely separate from the "GPS sats." GPS has NOTHING to do with EPIRBs and PLBs (except that you can hook up a GPS receiver to a PLB for better accuracy).

      I suggest reading HERE for more information.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    31. Re:Must have been quite powerful by netringer · · Score: 2, Informative
      The devices designed to operate on the 406 MHz System (and the system itself) support unique identifiers, and distress signal is more than just a tone as it is in the 121.5/243 system. This should remove 'invalid' (erroneous) broadcasts from the system.
      To add: 406MHz ELT owners are required by law to register ownership and contact informatioon with the NOAA. At a minimum the emergency responders will have a name and a list of contact phone numbers to call to see if the owner is really out and about and possibly in trouble and not sitting comfortably at home.

      What also can be encoded on the signal is the lat/lon coordinates from a GPS. That information allows the initial search location to be pinpointed down to the size of a football field. Without GPS, it's 25 square nautical miles. With the old 121.5 MHZ system the initial search area is 500 square nautical miles.

      What I'm curious about is how the CAP and the Air Force got so exicited about a signal that wouldn't have been the whooop-whooop of real 121.5 MHZ ELT. They must have been hearing this TV for quite a while before they got down to locating it. It can take a day or more to locate a REAL 121.5 ELT.
      --
      Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
    32. Re:Must have been quite powerful by Obfuscant · · Score: 2, Informative
      On a side note, I'm suprised they responded so quickly, less than 24 hours between recieving the signal and a response team at the door.

      I'm not surprised. In Oregon, the Sheriffs have assumed the responsibility for downed aircraft search and rescue. They have staff to deal with this, and it is a very serious issue. We have three or four radio-oriented volunteers on call to help look for this stuff, and probably a dozen general SAR people. After all, the one call that gets dropped may very well be a real crash where people's lives are at stake. Twenty four hours is a long time.

      ...but nothing like a mountain that would require a large search & rescue squad.

      Yes, there are mountains here. There is also a lot of national forest and wild areas. Mary's Peak is the largest mountain, and you can find one group online if you google for Mary's Peak Search and Rescue. We also host Corvallis Mountain Rescue in this county. They operate state-wide on many of the actual climbing rescues.

      In this case, the "squad" was pretty small. Six or seven CAP cadets, a handful of city cops, and two county people. One of them was the county ES manager. I was the other. I got called in after the signal was localized to a small apartment building. Almost nobody was home and the ES manager wanted help identifying which apartment in case he needed to gain access.

      In the longer articles, you read about someone saying "the signal's gone". That's me. The real question was "before you answered the door, did you turn something off?" When he turned his TV back on, it was obvious.

      I was able to pick the signal up a block away, and when I was inside the building I had to take the antenna off my radio because the signal was so strong. It was also very strong near the electrical panel for the building, so I know that some of it was leaking out the wiring.

      I'm glad Toshiba is helping him out. It was a very dissappointing result to have to say "you can't watch TV" and not be able to help him fix it. We had to explain why we couldn't just ignore any satellite hits from his TV: his TV could interfere with a real emergency beacon and either keep the satellite from seeing it at all, or make it harder to find it on the ground.

    33. Re:Must have been quite powerful by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Isn't spread spectrum or other frequency hopping technology essentially undetectable?

      If you are looking at only one frequency, yes. However, as they've been used more, the receivers have kept up. When it was thought up by actress Hedy Lamarr, it would have been quite effective, given the tracking devices at the time, to prevent the enemy from finding a sub based on tracking the communications. However, by the time it was in full use, the receivers and trackers both advanced to where it lost this advantage. It did gain a security-through-obscurity benefit in that if you didn't know where to look next, you wouldn't be able to understand the communications, even if you could track it.

      I thought the idea was that if you did spread-spectrum right it just looks like noise... isn't that why they invented it? How could anyone detect that just by sniffing?

      It doesn't work like that in the real world. If you turn on and off the communications, someone will see the noise floor change. If you leave it on all the time, the noise can be tracked to you (even noise has an origin that can be tracked), but no one will see the noise floor change. So, you have to have a few dB at least above the regular noise for a good signal, so it is detectable. And even if it looks like noise, someone can track where noise is coming from, so it isn't safe.

  3. When in a bind by RC_Car · · Score: 5, Funny

    "So if you need to transmit an international distress signal then stop by any local store and turn on a Toshiba flat-screen TV. We should be able to locate you in a matter of minutes."

  4. To everybody running Seti @ Home in Oregon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    You can relax now. The aliens aren't coming just yet.

  5. I bet . . . by Mod+Point+Sink · · Score: 5, Funny

    . . . this is the last time that guy is a smartass to the salesman at Best Buy when buying a TV, though!

  6. One of those smart TVs by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 5, Funny

    The TV probably gained sentience and realized the crap that was being fed to it. It responded in the only way it knew how.

    1. Re:One of those smart TVs by secretsquirel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just wait till it figures out how to spoof the GPS targeting coordinates of smart bombs.

      Hello Dave
      This show is horrible Dave
      I'm sorry Dave, you have 30 seconds to change the channel Dave

  7. Idea for new feature by BongoBen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, this gives me an idea for a new TV feature. Whenever you lose the remote control, it sends out a destress signal until a search team shows up to find it. Now that's service!

    --
    The Dude abides.
    1. Re:Idea for new feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, this gives me an idea for a new TV feature. Whenever you lose the remote control, it sends out a destress signal until a search team shows up to find it. Now that's service!

      The remote is usually lodged in my fat couch ass. I have learned I can change channels just by farting.

    2. Re:Idea for new feature by secretsquirel · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I have learned I can change channels just by farting."

      Ah, I see the force is strong with you my son.

  8. Shrug by ciurana · · Score: 4, Funny
    "CNN is a running a story on an Oregon college student's flat-screen Toshiba TV which was releasing the 121.5 MHz international distress signal."

    Big deal. Now, if that had been a free, unencrypted feed of the Spice or Playboy channels...

    Cheers!

    E
    --
    http://eugeneciurana.com | http://ciurana.eu
  9. Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You've gotta wonder what that guy was doing to that poor TV. (and whether the teletubbies were involved...)

  10. It's a new feature! by Flounder · · Score: 3, Funny

    Warning!
    This television will send out a distress signal to authorities whenever any program catering to an IQ of less than 80 is viewed. This includes games shows (Jeopardy excluded), reality shows, Spongebob Squarepants, and the CBS Evening News with Dan Rather.

    --

    No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

  11. Yeah.. by LewsTherinKinslayer · · Score: 4, Funny

    I had a similar problem with my toaster emitting moorse code signals.

  12. Of course it was sending a distress signal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    He shouldn't have been forcing the poor TV to play "Survivor".

  13. I bet he was hacking Dishnetwork... by shepd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's well known that certain hardware hacks for Dishnetwork receivers emit this same frequency.

    What a coincidence that a college student (no money) would be doing something technical (education) to get TV for free.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    1. Re:I bet he was hacking Dishnetwork... by ricochet81 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      college student (no money)??

      the dude has a flat screen TV doesnt he?!

      --
      Error: Id10t detected
    2. Re:I bet he was hacking Dishnetwork... by zome · · Score: 2, Informative

      I live in Oregon and he is not far from my home, and we have this story on the local newspaper. Anyway, in the story he doesn't even have a cable or sat. He can only get 4 channels and his favorite channel is OPB (oregon public TV). The story also says that the built-in DVD player died just days before it started sending the signal. Maybe it just asked to be fixed :-)

  14. FULL TEXT OF THE DISTRESS MESSAGE by ferrellcat · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Please Help! My plasma is burning out! I'll need to be replaced in 2 years!"

  15. EMI testing is a bitch. by seanadams.com · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We just spent $10K+ on in-house EMI equipment, to mitigate the costs of having an outside lab help with troubleshooting.

    You have to do it if you make any kind of electronics, but it's a big burden for small manufacturers.

    It'd be nice to have the choice of saying "this passes" vs "this probably passes". Current FCC/CE regs require everyone to meet the spec, and this is a bit onerous IMHO. It locks some innovative small companies out of the game.

    1. Re:EMI testing is a bitch. by metlin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is that while in your particular instance it may seem stiffling to your company, those regulations are in place because not all companies can be trusted to stick with the specs in that case.

      It becomes a question of business ethics, and we all know how most companies are when it comes to those. This device probably passes the test, where probably has a probability of 0.00001.

      _That_ is why strict regulations are needed, IMHO.

      And oh btw, nice players at Slim Devices, quite the coolness.

    2. Re:EMI testing is a bitch. by ckaminski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't when that radio noise could be coming from the apartment a half-block away from the machine keeping me alive in the hospital.

      No thanks. ;-)

    3. Re:EMI testing is a bitch. by TigerNut · · Score: 2, Informative
      We built a small RF anechoic chamber inhouse. Got a shielded room from eBay, bought RF absorbers new from the manufacturer (that is expensive), built a 3D rotator gimbal using plexiglas sheet and a nylon sprocket and chain drive, got an HP 8566B on eBay, built our own broadband antenna, and had a custom broadband LNA built. We can test effectively up to about 12 to 13 GHz, and if we need to we can go higher, but our chamber is too small to meet certification requirements, so we still have to send our stuff out for official approval.

      The main thing that we've found over the last few years is that
      (a) Sometimes the FCC test house that you send your stuff to does the tests wrong, or with improperly calibrated equipment, and they may say that you fail where you should have passed.
      (b) You can't trust a manufacturer's reference design to have good harmonic performance, so while you're getting good range, you may also be contaminating the second and third harmonic bands with crap. (c) When you have your own anechoic chamber, you can do development and tuning much more quickly than having to outsource that stage of product design. We never intended to be an RF design company, but since our products use wireless technology, we really couldn't do without an investment in basic RF test equipment, and from there it was a series of small steps to where we are now.

      --

      Less is more.

  16. Signals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    For those who are wondering what type of signal this is, check here:

    http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/marcomms/gmdss/epirb.ht m

    Animah S/V Solaris

    1. Re:Signals by Advocadus+Diaboli · · Score: 2, Funny
      From http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/marcomms/gmdss/epirb.ht m:
      Satellite detection range is limited for these EPIRBs (satellites must be within line of sight of both the EPIRB and a ground terminal for detection to occur),

      My god, the architecture of buildings in Oregon must really be "sub-standard", assuming that usually you operate your TV set inside a house with a roof and walls... Usually that also means "no line of sight to satellites". But maybe walls and roofs there are very thin...

  17. 406MHz Digital Distress signal by amigoro · · Score: 5, Informative
    There's another digital distress signal too. The 406 MHz distress beacon emits both an analogue 121.5 MHz signal and a digital 406 MHz signal. The digital signal carries a code which identifies the beacon while the analogue signal is to enable aircraft to home on location. That digital code can be cross referenced with a database of registered 406 MHz beacon owners held at AMSA which identifies who is in trouble and what type of situation they are in. This enables the search and rescue authorities to tailor a response to the emergency situation.

    Moderate this comment
    Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
    Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

    --


    Nothing to see here
    1. Re:406MHz Digital Distress signal by momerath2003 · · Score: 2

      Moderate the stupid off-site "moderating" system:

      Negative:
      Offtopic
      Flamebait
      Troll
      Redundant

      Seriously. What's the point? You're never going to get a >1 signal:noise ratio.

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    2. Re:406MHz Digital Distress signal by nick0909 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The 121.5 and 243 MHz (ELT) signals are the original frequencies detected by the international COSPAS-SARSAT system. The 406MHz (PLB) system is *VERY* new, it just got the OK for use in the continential US last July. The US Air Force Rescue Coordination Center right now oversees the monitoring for the signals, and when the AFRCC detect an activation they notify the emergency services management agency of the state that contains the activation. Without a GPS-enabled 406MHz ELT beacon it can takes several hours for doppler shifting to narrow down the location of the victim to a relativly small area (small enough to begin a wide-area search), and once the more specific location is known the local Search & Rescue agency having authority is activated.

      Currently the 121.5/243MHz COSPAS-SARSAT system gets so many false alarms every day that teams do not respond rapidly to their calls. The San Diego Coast Guard Group has about 10 ELT's to investigate *every day* with nearly every single one an accidental activation. If there was one system I could use right now it would be a 406MHz PLB with GPS enabled. Because of the requirement to register your PLB and the serial number transmitted with the distress signal, instead of just a AM warble as on the 121.5/243MHz system, people are less likly going to set them off "just to test them" and are more likly to get in trouble if they do.

      Nick
      Butte County Search & Rescue

  18. In other news... by Zorilla · · Score: 4, Funny

    CNN is a running a story on an Oregon college student's flat-screen Toshiba TV which was releasing the 121.5 MHz international distress signal...

    In other news, a man's 4-door sedan was emitting the 1.21 jigawatts necessary to power the flux capacitor. Christopher Lloyd was unavailible for comment.

    --

    It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    1. Re:In other news... by conway · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It was a DeLorean coupe - it only had 2 doors.
      Can't believe someone on /. would get this wrong! :)

  19. A better writeup by RotJ · · Score: 4, Informative

    Corvallis Gazette-Times has more details and a picture of the guy posing with his TV. Apparently, he mostly watches public broadcasting and has acquired a taste for all the quality children's programming it provides, especially "Arthur".

  20. Visit by ElNonoMasa · · Score: 2, Funny
    On October 2, the 20 year-old college student was visited at his apartment in the small university town by a contingent of local police, civil air patrol and search and rescue personnel.
    Just when he was starting to watch that Jenna Jameson flick he rented...
  21. Great idea! by Raul654 · · Score: 4, Funny

    So we are supposed to trust companies to use their judgement and ethics when slaping a "This device probably meets federal EMI regulations" sticker on a device. I feel better already.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  22. Almost a year? by ets960 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It scares me that it took them almost a year to get the distress signal. Remind me never to get lost at sea.

  23. Of course! by Flexagon · · Score: 2, Funny

    He was probably watching an ad with an image of new currency, and the TV detected the anti-counterfeit pattern. :-)

  24. Given most of the trash being broadcast... by jd · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can you really blame the TV for sending out an SOS? Be fair to it.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  25. Re:The Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, The TV Distresses YOU! ....oh wait...

  26. Signal Details by blystovski · · Score: 3, Informative

    I, too, was wondering about the specifics of this "international distress signal". Getting lucky (google) with "121.5 Mhz" gives the following link which specifies a relatively simple AM signal with less than 100 mW radiated power! That's not much these days, and I'm rather shocked (har har) that it's taken this long for a device to accidentally trigger such a search. Anyway...here's the URL...

    http://www.cospas-sarsat.org/Beacons/121Bcns.htm

    1. Re:Signal Details by flyboy974 · · Score: 5, Informative

      You'll be waiting ~ 3-4 hours before somebody comes and finds you, if they are really good at it.

      First, wait for a satellite pass will notify the Air Force. They will then verify it if they can, contact the FAA for missing flights, etc. The next call goes out to the Civil Air Patrol wing that is responsible for that area. They in turn will normally notify the local authorities who are in charge of S&R. Of course, when you broadcast on 121.5, that sound is audible in every Airtraffic Control center that it can reach.

      Once they have done this, they will organize a ground based S&R party and try get a general area of where the signal is coming from. Remember, this is non-directional, so they have to go to a few different places, measure the direction and approx. strength of the signal, and then they will know about where it is. Triangulation sucks, esp. with trees and mountains.

      Once they have done this, they'll start their search. Oh, if it's at night and it's not somewhere near them, they'll wait until the morning. Hope you don't keel over at night.

      Finally, once they triangulate it, they home in on it. In this case, they homed it to an apartment. Questioned the guy, and went back out into the hallway and confirmed it was coming from there.

      So, do you REALLY want a 121.5 ELT locator? I would get one of the new 406mhz ones which are digitally encoded with your information. In addition, some models offer GPS in them that will transmit your GPS coordinates when it sends it. Much nicer and easier to find.

      Oh, and I'm not a CAP member any more. But, it was fun while I did it. Not enough time now, but, maybe after I'm done building my airplane I'll have time.

    2. Re:Signal Details by nick0909 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I also recomend the new 406MHz PLB's, but PLEASE PLEASE get one with a *good* GPS built in. The 406MHz PLB has to go through the same doppler-shift tracking as the 121.5 ELT's if there is no GPS data with the signal, and the AFRCC will wait until that narrowed-down data has come in before notifying the agency having authority.

      And most the time we don't wait until daybreak, we like the challenge ;)
      Nick
      Butte County Search & Rescue

  27. Warning do not adjust... by rune2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Your tinfoil hats

  28. How this came about by Trikenstein · · Score: 2, Funny

    The guy bought the TV at MacGyvers yard sale.

  29. Error on the side of caution is great! by Smoodo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm certainly glad that it was detected and responded to. I hope the spectrum doesn't get too messy and create this situation often, but it does show that someone is paying attention when there is a cry for help. (Thinking out in the ocean here).

    1. Re:Error on the side of caution is great! by nick0909 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am not sure if you have ever listened to marine radio near an ocean, but just from my time near the water and listening in, the US Coast Guard has about 10 ELT (121.5MHz) distress signal activations per day, per Coast Guard Group (IE, San Diego Group, Los Angeles Group, etc). They send someone to investigate each one, eventually, and they are all nearly accidental or malicous trips, not real emergencies. It has almost reached the point of too many cries of wolf.

      Nick
      Butte County Search & Rescue

    2. Re:Error on the side of caution is great! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Funny

      There was a guy in Glasgow, who lived not far from where I am now, that worked alongside one of my friends on a North Sea oilrig. He took a positioning beacon home with him (why? Who knows? It's four feet long, bright orange, and very heavy. How did he even get it about the helicopter?). He then placed his purloined "toy" in a cupboard. One of his children knocked it over, a couple of weeks later, activating it. Within 10 minutes, there was a Coastguard helicopter hovering over this house in the middle of Maryhill...

    3. Re:Error on the side of caution is great! by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      121.5 is very well monitored. For one thing almost any aircraft that has a radio that its not using for something else will probably have it on the guard frequency. This is a post 9/11 thing for the most part but a good one. IF you do broadcast on 121.5 every airliner up at 35,000 ft within a few hundred miles may hear you. One of them will relay your message to someone who can help you. Thats a very good thing!

      On the minus side sometimes a pilot will broadcast on 121.5 becuase he thought he was trasnmitting on the other radio. (Been there, done that)

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    4. Re:Error on the side of caution is great! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2, Informative

      Could we perhaps give these coastguards a map, marked with areas such as "ocean" (likely place for ships to sink), and "land" (unlikely place for ships to sink)?

      It is only about a mile from the Clyde estuary.

  30. The true story.. by EvilStein · · Score: 3, Funny

    TV:"Oh, please God.. I can't take another episode of "Survivor" and I'm so sick of "The Surreal Life" these days.. help me!"

  31. Wait a minute.. by russint · · Score: 5, Funny

    On October 2, the 20 year-old college student was visited at his apartment in the small university town by a contingent of local police, civil air patrol and search and rescue personnel.
    [...]
    Authorities had expected to find a boat or small plane with a malfunctioning transponder, the usual culprit in such incidents, emitting the 121.5 MHz frequency of the distress signal used internationally.


    Why did they expect to find a boat/plane in a apartment building?

    --
    ^^
    1. Re:Wait a minute.. by SagSaw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why did they expect to find a boat/plane in a apartment building?

      Boats can be hauled by trailters to various places, including parking lots. Somebody working on their boat in the parking lot could accidentally set off the emergency beacon. Airplanes can and do crash, although crashing near an apartment complex without being noticed might be a bit of a stretch.

      At the point the signal is localized to an apartment building, its probably pretty clear that it is not an intentional distress signal (although I suppose somebody could have been kidnapped and found an emergency beacon sitting in the kidnapper's closet...). They still need to find and disable whatever is creating the signal, though, to avoid interfearing with a real distress signal in the future.

      --
      Come test your mettle in the world of Alter Aeon!
  32. distress calls by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 2, Funny

    Langley: Forgive me, FCC, but I am receiving numerous distress signals.
    FCC : I don't doubt it.

  33. Say what?!? by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The reason for non-interference isn't to protect the manufacturer, it's to protect the public. What the holy blue devil makes you think this burden should be waived for small companies?

    Let's carry that concept on thru .... I'll start up a gas station, and since I'm a small company, I can dispense with all those silly safety regs. I'll put stickers on the pumps "You should probably not smoke around here."

    Or I can start selling homemade cars, put in some cheap airbags made of a CO2 cartridge and a mousetrap on a hairspring for a trigger, along with a "probably works" disclaimer. That should do the trick.

    Geez buddy, get a grip!

  34. Something to keep in mind by Raul654 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just a little something to keep in mind - all it takes is one (faulty) popular model putting out EMI interference to fuck up an entire range of the spectrum into unusability. So yes, I STRONGLY support keeping tight screws on EMI interference, because you can't rely on Corps to be ethical and act responsibly if it weren't legally mandated. And, as the Netgear NTP issue so eloquently demonstrates, even after you tell a company that they are doing harm and need to stop, they might not necessarily do it.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  35. 10 years ago, it was pizza ovens by Mr.+Majordomo · · Score: 5, Funny
    Here's the followup traffic from a Civil Air Patrol mission in California about 10 years ago, where the errant signal was traced to a self-serve hot pizza machine (a freezer full of pizza, a microwave oven, a chute to move frozen pizzas from the freezer to the oven, and a coin/cash machine to collect the money).
    ROUTINE
    072338Z MAY 93
    HEADQUARTERS CALIFORNIA WING/MCO [NAME DELETED]
    HEADQUARTERS ALL UNITS CALIFORNIA WING
    INFO CC DO CALO
    BT
    ATTENTION EMERGENCY SERVICES PERSONNEL
    SEARCH MISSION 93XM0956 OPENED 6 MAY AND CLOSED 7 MAY FOR A
    SIGNAL INTERFERENCE ON 121.5. SIGNAL LOCATED AND SECURED IN
    A HOT PIZZA MACHINE IN NORTH PALM SPRINGS. THANKS TO MAJOR
    [NAME DELETED], FIRST LIEUTENANT [NAME DELETED] AND SECOND LIEUTENANT
    [NAME DELETED] OF
    SQUADRON 11 FOR THEIR ASSISTANCE ON THIS MISSION.
    BT
    P.S. NO FREE PIZZA.
    END OF MESSAGE
  36. what i wanna know by carambola5 · · Score: 2, Funny

    What I wanna know is how a college student has a plasma TV. Aren't college kids supposed to be poor? Whatever happened to the trusty 13"er with bad reception?

    --
    IWARS.
    People, in general, disappoint me. Politicians even more so.
  37. satellite TV by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Funny

    It turns out that those government satellites are monitoring our TVs. Luckily, Toshiba sells tinfoil hats for closeup viewing.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  38. Re:Fine? by renehollan · · Score: 2, Interesting
    No, the way the law is written, the equipment operator is responsible for what gets broadcast.

    And, if it is a "Class A" device, the manufacturer warrants that it will not interfere in a residential environment. (Though, many electronic devices sold for residential use are "Class B", requiring the operator to take corrective action if they interfere, and letting the manufacturer off the hook. Yes, this is a simplification)

    I stand by my position: the manufacturer should be liable by virtue of their likely warranty that this won't happen. Yes, even if people die, because the device is operated. (And the manufacturer should be held accountable for the resulting wrongful deaths.)

    If this were not the case, the manufacturer could just "walk away" from the defective unit, leaving the purchaser with a $5k-$15k television that they can't watch -- it still performs as a TV set, after all, and isn't "defective" with regard to it's primary functionality.

    What should happen is that Toshiba should immediately come to terms to compensate the owner for the inconvenience in exchange for an agreement to not operate the set until a replacement is delivered. A rational settlement would be the cost to Toshiba if they had to compensate those expected to suffer because of the continuous operation of the set. So, if there was an expected 0.1% chance of $100,000,000 wrongful death suits, Toshiba should offer $100,000 and a repaired or replaced set in exchange for an agreement to not operate the defective one.

    The simple replacement of the set is, IMHO, insufficient.

    --
    You could've hired me.
  39. Re:A question for the knowledgeable in this field. by rts008 · · Score: 2, Funny

    In the New Soviet Amerika, Tv watches You!

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  40. The relationship of 121.5 Mhz to NTSC video by Skapare · · Score: 5, Informative

    The frequency of the NTSC color subcarrier (the TV color system used in analog video standards in North America and Japan) is defined as exactly 5 MHz times 63/88. That works out to 3.579545454.... (infinitely repeating 54's) MHz. The horizontal scanning frequency is then defined as a 2/455 times the color subcarrier frequency. That works out to 15734.26573426.... (infinitely repeating 573426's) Hz (very nearly the original monochrome horizontal frequency of 15750 Hz). This is where the problem lies. 121.5 MHz divided by 7722 is exactly the same frequency as the horizontal in an NTSC color video signal.

    The 7722nd harmonic shouldn't really be that strong, right? Usually not. But the harmonics can get to be very strong overall even at such high orders when dealing with modulating the high voltages needed for the horizontal sweep. There should be some low pass filters that prevent that from getting into the VHF range. But if the filters are absent, or were incorrectly installed, or were damaged somehow, and if some wires formed some resonance near 121.5 MHz (like wires going out to cable, speakers, etc) ... a wavelength of about 2.47 meters or 8.1 feet ... it is possible that harmonic, and a bunch of others near it, could be enhanced and radiated.

    The local oscillator in the tuner is a remote possibility. But it would have to be tuned to be receiving a video carrier at 75.75 MHz based on the common satndard of 45.75 MHz for the IF stage in the tuner. But there is no TV broadcast on that frequency in the US ... though I could not rule out there being something on that frequency from a cable system. Still, it wouldn't be an expected place for a TV to tune to. But if the TV has a non-standard IF frequency, the local oscillator getting on 121.5 MHz by some expected channel could be possible. Those leak a lot and it's how the snoops can tell what channel you are tuned to by spying on the RF emitted from your house.

    If just this one TV had the problem, then apparently it must be a manufacturing defect or shipping damage (or maybe user damage or tampering). If it were a design problem, I'd sure we'd hear more about it. That probably rules out the CPU clock frequency.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:The relationship of 121.5 Mhz to NTSC video by unitron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're only "modulating" at most a few hundred volts for horizontal sweep. It's probably the 30 or so kV for the CRT that comes from the flyback driven by the sweep B+ that had the harmonic and after a year one of the filtering components went wonky.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    2. Re:The relationship of 121.5 Mhz to NTSC video by FirstOne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "This is where the problem lies. 121.5 MHz divided by 7722 is exactly the same frequency as the horizontal in an NTSC color video signal. The 7722nd harmonic shouldn't really be that strong, right?"

      No, In this instance.. the TV set in question is radiating a strong Tempest radiation signal which happens to be at 121.5 MHz.

      TV set's are for the most part,aregiant RF amps. Amplifying a video signal until it reaches the phosphors in picture tube, where some of that RF energy gets converted into visible light. All it takes is a tiny fraction(0.1%) of the TV set's overall power(120W) consumption to leak out and it can cause problems like the one described in this article.

      IE. The rise/fall time of the picture tube electron gun amp(s) happen to have some component(~4.115ns) which emits a strong 121.5 MHz signal.

    3. Re:The relationship of 121.5 Mhz to NTSC video by Skapare · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When tuning along the dial, these signals can be heard at specific intervals. The interval spacing is the fundamental frequency. Each point is a harmonic. In this case it does not "just happen" to be at 121.5 MHz ... it is at 121.5 for a reason, and that is because the 7722nd harmonic of the horizontal sweep frequency is 121.5 MHz.

      Which harmonics are stronger does depend on the waveform of the involved signal. A sawtooth is going to have a fast rise and slow decay. And that fast rise time can favor those harmonics that happen to have intervals around where harmonics of a waveform which had both fast rise and fast decay with the same time interval would show up (a higher frequency and this a larger spacing).

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  41. An Oregon college student has heartattack by klang · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..because he thought that the RIAA had finally caught up with him...

  42. Why? I can trigger the alarm for an other distress by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Just because the alarm is put in a boat doesn't mean it has be to be activated for a boating accident.

    Why do you think they currently react to "emergencies" like this leaking tv? Because if they don't someone could die.

    Rescue services have to respond to every call even if they know it is false. Because if they guess wrong peoples life are at stake.

    They also can't just send a clerk on a moped to find out because if it is real that would loose time.

    It says a lot about politicians that in these days of cutbacks no-one is doing anything to cut down on the money wasted by deliberate false emergcengy calls. Send the kids to a few months of re-education. Post 9/11 it should be easy to label them as the terrorists they are.

    And no I never made a crank emergency call as a kid. There are just somethings you don't do.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  43. 132.7 MHz by ArnIIe · · Score: 3, Funny

    I might buy a toshiba flat screen tv in the hope that it releases a 132.7 MHz international playboy signal !

  44. TWC is not a monopoly by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "The Minions of Satan, I mean Time-Warner Cable"
    I'm not directed this to you, so please don't take offense. But its comments like these that I hear often that basically state that cable companies are evil and greedy. I'm not saying you're saying this, but for the most part that's the kind of flak I hear about TWC.
    What most people don't realize is that paying for the fiber and coax, installing it yourself, and maintaining it costs major money. And trust me when I say Mother Nature causes havoc on our network (slow modems, disconnects, poor reception, macro blocking = very irate customers). Also, TWC does NOT make money on TV stations. Where we do make our bread and butter is on the recording features and on-demand access, but also on the Road Runner subscriptions. Other then that, your local cable company in large cities are nothing more then a conduit for capturing content from satellite and piping it through your home. Also, lets not forget the employee and leased equipment expenses as well that customers are having to pay.
    I'm not saying TWC isn't a profitable business, because it is. But it's not like we are making hand-over-fist either. There is competition in Austin, and we know it....which is a good thing for the customer as a whole including myself. But please, would people stop this 1980s concept of cable companies being a monopoly!

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:TWC is not a monopoly by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The reason for going digital is for many reason.

      1. It's easer to administer content based on what you pay. For example, say you want to pay for HBO. All you have to do is call up TWC and subscribe to it. From there, you will instantly have access and will not need a cable guy to come to your home. It's a win-win for everyone.

      2. Easer to trouble shoot issues by loggin into the boxes (they have IP addresses). Also, as upgrades are available we can push out new firmware.

      3. You can't error correct analog signals, and imagine "bleeding" is a problem too. With digital, whatever errors might happen, you can corrected them through CRC. Of course, if the signal is poor you will have issues.

      4. Interactive content. Imagine watching a game show where the viewers get to vote with a remote control. This is not done yet, but the technology is in place.

      5. More channels packed with digital audio!. And as a co-worker likes to call TV... "Waves of Stupid" heh.

      Of course, you could go with a Dish subscription. But I hope you don't. I want your business as it provides me with a job.
      **tongue-in-cheek**

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:TWC is not a monopoly by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A monopoly of our own cable, sure. But not a monopoly on service. There is Disk network available you know. Also, don't blame your local cable company if the industry compitition does not want to compete with us through laying down their own network in your area. In fact, legally...you are not guarantied to even have cable TV service, unlike phone service.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:TWC is not a monopoly by hab136 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Also, don't blame your local cable company if the industry compitition does not want to compete with us through laying down their own network in your area. In fact, legally...you are not guarantied to even have cable TV service, unlike phone service.

      Most cities contract with one cable provider and PROHIBIT other providers from laying cable. Thus, a monopoly.

      We're not guaranteed cable, true, but that doesn't change the fact that cable is a monopoly in most cities in the US.

    4. Re:TWC is not a monopoly by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then that is a problem with the city.

      That being the case I would write a letter to you representatives. Clearly this is not fair. Your city and others like should allow other cable companies the option to lay down their own network and installing their own cable taps next to your residence.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:TWC is not a monopoly by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not directed this to you, so please don't take offense. But its comments like these that I hear often that basically state that cable companies are evil and greedy. I'm not saying you're saying this, but for the most part that's the kind of flak I hear about TWC.

      You forgot the part about TWC employing lots of local people (installers, troubleshooters, network admins, customer service reps, salesman, etc). In my experience the Dish people don't employ anybody locally beyond the installer -- and he is a subcontractor that likely cares about nothing more then the next job because they don't pay him hourly. He doesn't care about doing a good job -- his goal is to do a fast one.

      I have had a few bad experiences with TWC -- specifically they couldn't downgrade my service (I love cable but I can't justify paying for it when I'm never home) to lifeline cable (network channels only) without killing my Roadrunner service. Had something to do with signal bleed and being on the very end of the line. It took two weeks to establish during which time I had no or very poor Roadrunner service and only lifeline cable service. So I took the full service back (no analog traps on the line) and it works great. Of course I'm also back to paying $73+ a month ($34 for cable, $34 for Roadrunner, $5 for local channels) and will be paying ~$90 when my specials run out.

      Despite all of those problems I would rather deal with TWC because they are local. They have a local call center with local people to talk to and local installers/troubleshooters. If I don't get eventual satisfaction I can drive to their office (4 miles away) and talk to somebody face to face. Failing that I can always file a complaint with the New York State Public Service Commission because cable companies are regulated -- you don't have that protection (in NY anyway) with the dish guys. I've never had to do that but the protection is there. Furthermore according to several friends of mine using Dish Network they have outsourced parts of their support group -- so not only will you not be talking to somebody from down the street -- you stand a good chance of talking to somebody reading to you from a sheet in New Delhi.

      I'll stick with TWC and consider switching to dish when they employ several hundred of my neighbors and inject taxes, payroll and volunteer activities into the local economy.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:TWC is not a monopoly by quisph · · Score: 2, Insightful
      4. Interactive content. Imagine watching a game show where the viewers get to vote with a remote control. This is not done yet, but the technology is in place.
      Er... My analog cable could do that as far back as 1982. It never really caught on, but it was there, and it worked.
    7. Re:TWC is not a monopoly by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have TWC Roadrunner only. I don't pay for cable service of any kind. And eventually TWC got tired of sending guys over to replace traps so they just took all of the damn things out and I haven't had any problems since.

      My problem was that (even though I actually live in town) I was at the end of the line (dead-end street at the bottom of a hill) at the end of a 300 foot long driveway. The wiring from the pole to my house was RG8. They swapped that out with RG11 -- didn't help. Swapped out the traps -- didn't help. They finally wanted to run a separate run from the poll to my house for the Roadrunner and a separate run for the cable. They wouldn't just remove the traps and leave it at that. I vetoed the separate cable idea because it was going to take two weeks to set it up and they wouldn't promise me that it would fix the problem.

      The Roadrunner service worked great without the traps -- horrible with them. It worked for over a year on subpar cable (they claim that RG8 runs shouldn't exceed 150 feet -- counting inside wiring mine was over 500 feet) -- the minute those traps went on it was worthless. Now with the traps removed it is working like it old self again -- I get the full 3.0mbit download/384k upload with zero packet loss at all times of the day. I don't notice any difference between the RG8 or RG11 cable with my Roadrunner or standard cable service. At least my landlord got a brand new cable run out of the deal for all my troubles.

      The sad thing is I actually like the cable service. If I do watch TV I'm usually watching History Channel or USA (Law and Order buff). I also like South Park and Jon Stewart. But for the 10-12 hours a month that I spend watching TV it's not worth $45 -- and now I'm stuck with it because I refuse to accept subpar Roadrunner service. When my specials run out I do plan on calling them and throwing out the "S" word (satellite) to get a better deal -- they give out $20/mo retention bonuses without even asking around here -- but it's still a lot of money.

      (And BTW I have no idea what is or isn't on the cable as far as TV channels are concerned. I'd rather have rock-solid Internet access than get caught finding out and have to have those damn traps put back on.)

      I don't think they'd catch you -- since the advent of digital cable they don't even seem to bother doing audits around here anymore -- I know a lot of people that are billed for basic cable that have every stinking (non digital) channel because the cheap traps that TWC use failed and their own technicians removed them but neglected to return with new ones or inform billing that they were removed. They don't really have an easy way to know if you hook up an extra device (TV) and probably wouldn't bother looking anyway. Of course all that said if you don't really care about TV anyway (I don't care too much) why bother stealing the cable?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    8. Re:TWC is not a monopoly by payslee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most places prohibit this for a reason, not just caprice. Cables are buried under the streets. If you had five local cable companies instead of one, then you have five times as many street-digging projects and five times as many patched-over paving jobs.


      Assuming you have enough competition, some of those companies will go under and leave your city or town with this mess on their hands.


      Not sating I think this is a *good* reason, but I keep my TV to that "off" channel anyway


      --
      Doing my part to piss off the religious right.
  45. Re:Sorry, but you are totally clueless. by metlin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You are an idiot.

    And the competitors in India and China don't have this certification rubbish.

    Any and all electrical and electronic equipment in the US is subject to regulations, whether they are manufactured inhouse or imported - to prevent unwanted and potentially harmful interference.

    bureaucratic goverment drones like you impose a mountain of useless paperwork on small businesses.

    I happen to be the owner of a small business myself, and I find the regulations to be quite useful and justified, they're the reasons we do not have a million conflicting parts and standards out there.

    But a small business is killed by such stuff.

    Yes, and people are killed if there were no regulations. Would you rather have someone die because an CD-player interfered with their pacemaker interfered, or would you rather help small businesses "prosper".

    Btw, the reason China is providing cheap stuff is because they have little or no laws on labour condition and blatantly practice harmful trade practices like under-pricing. I guess if we could make you work in a sweatshop for 20 hours a day for a pittance, you would be happy?

    Get your facts straight before talking through your ass.

  46. Dodgy TV software? by N+Monkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "I had a TV (also by Toshiba, coincidently) that would crash when it showed the local community channel."

    My TV (a Panasonic) has a similar problem with DVB (i.e. terestrial digital tv) in the UK. It will sometimes lock-up and I have to power it off completely in order to get it to work. I presume it's either due to poor transmission error handling or bad coding when handling the interactive menus that can be broadcast with DVB.

    1. Re:Dodgy TV software? by FLEB · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Meanwhile... IT'S A FREAKING TELEVISION! "TV" and "crash" should not be sharing the same sentence.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    2. Re:Dodgy TV software? by SYFer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Get used to it pal. With the rise of satellite radio and the host of devices that will stream it, we'll soon have "crashes" in that realm as well.

      In Japan, I hear there are even toilet seats that occasionally require a reboot (although mine runs Slackware 10.0 and is remarkably robust).

      --
      "...all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness..." yada yada
    3. Re:Dodgy TV software? by numbware · · Score: 3, Funny
      In Japan, I hear there are even toilet seats that occasionally require a reboot (although mine runs Slackware 10.0 and is remarkably robust).

      yah, my toilet used to be runnin Windows: my ass would be blue and every could get in to see me naked. thank god i switched to Mandrake.

      --
      I'm going to go create my own technology news site, with blackjack and hookers. You know what? Forget the news site.
    4. Re:Dodgy TV software? by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 4, Funny

      > In Japan, I hear there are even toilet seats that occasionally require a reboot

      I wonder if the error messages include Kernel panic: You've been eating way too much corn.

  47. Re:Actually...it's complaing about the fall lineup by imroy · · Score: 2, Informative
  48. Sounds Sketchy by dunc78 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And how is this thing the size of a coin going to generate enough power at >100 GHz to achieve communication with a satellite? Sounds kind of sketchy to me.

    1. Re:Sounds Sketchy by budgenator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It doesn't take much power at all to push a signal a hundred miles, especialy if the frequency is quiet. I can't imagine a lot of natural phenonmena generating noise at 100Ghz+ nor a lot of transmitters up there.
      Additionaly these are extremaly short wave-lenghts, so it would be rather easy to put a parabolic reflector 10 or even 100 wave-lengths wide on a satalite make it extreemly directional, almost optical for high gain. The wave-guides and striplines would also be physicaly small makeing it easier to put more powerfull amplifiers in the birds.
      Also it's possible that a device doesn't need to store the power, external power can be beamed in via microwaves at a different frequency, adding the advantage of being able to turn the device off durring bug sweeps.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  49. Malfunctioning Theft Prevention Device by VernonNemitz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Obviously the TV thought it had been stolen. Did the cops check for that?

  50. Here on Gilligan's Isle.... by Shoten · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hm. If only Mr. Howell had been a gadget freak, perhaps they all would have been rescued...

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  51. Can affect Air Traffic Control by p.rican · · Score: 5, Informative
    as well. Cable companies can be fined enormous amounts for failing to provide evidence of an ongoing leakge control/abatement program. When I was a cable TV tech, my primary job was to drive around the neighborhood looking for the "Leakage". It's called "CLI" or Cumulative Leakage Index. If the leakage was coming from someone's house and we could not gain access to the house to correct the problem, the customer's service was disconnected at the pole and a note was left on the door. The usual culprit was a crappy amplifier and those "high quality gold plated screw on RG6 connectors" you see sold in Radio Shack, Walmart etc.

    If you want to do wiring yourself, here's what you should be looking for:

    1. (at least) Dual shielded RG-56 coax cable
    2. (at least) 80% braid (no copper braid either)
    3. RG56 crimper
    4. RG56 crimp style connectors. Not the screw-on connectors
    5. Splitters with frequency rating of 5MHz-1GHz
    6. Install amplifiers in your house preferably before the first split of the coax.

    Hope that helps

    --

    /. --"Demented and sad....but social" -Judd Nelson

  52. TV software & HW from other commercial devices by francisew · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was recently given a TV by a friend, who had upgraded hers.

    I very rarely watch tv, as I find few shows are a reasonable quality. When I do watch TV, the new tv occasionally crashes. When it crashes, it simply switches off, and won't restart for long periods of time (even after unplugging for several minutes). I wonder if it's a software thing?

    Are TV's really this prone to poor programming practices?

    It sure would be interesting to know why the TV in the article was emitting that frequency... an extra solder bridge? Poor programming? Malfunctioning display?

    I guess the picture was still fine, or the owner would have returned it earlier, right?

    How many other domestic devices that are FCC compliant, with the little 'rf safe' type stickers generate stong RF like this? I've often wondered about mice and motherboards, because I have occasionally run across a computer where the speakers pick up the digital signal from the encoders in the mice. So when the mouse is moved, you can hear a clicking sound from the speakers.

  53. Re:Cool, not scary. by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In industrial espionage, the easiest way to get information is to entrap a worker by paying him some seemingly large sum for some seemingly trivial bit of information. From this point on, the pay goes down and the quality of the info goes up as you've now got the stick (loss of job and reputation plus possible criminal prosecution) as well as the carrot.

    That's the way you "flip" someone with any kind of espionage not only industrial. I'm wondering where your point about possible criminal prosecution comes into play for industrial espionage? If I tell a competitor some trade secret about my employer I haven't broken any laws -- my employer can sue me and probably ruin my life but they can't put me behind bars. And unless you have some sort of NDA it's likely that all they could do is fire you.

    Of course that's not to say that other laws wouldn't have been broken. If anyone ever offers me a large sum of money to sell out my employer I'll make sure they 1099 it and that I claim it on my income taxes ;)

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  54. 121.5 - 121.6 == HELP! by RiotNrrd · · Score: 3, Informative

    If I remember correctly from my CAP (Civil Air Patrol) days, 121.5 is the "test" emergency freq while 121.6 is the actual "live" freq. (Any cadets reading this, please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong - it's been a LONG time).

    Most aircraft are fitted with a small transmitter (about the size of a pack of cigarettes) that will start squaking on certian conditions. Sometimes a hard landing would be enough to set one off.

    Back in the day (late 80's), SAR (Search and Rescue) teams used a device called an L-per which was basically a reciever mounted on a large hand-held directional antenna. The operator would go to the appoximate location of the crash, determine which direction the signal was coming from and then move about a mile in a perpendicular direction. The op would take another reading and repeat the process one more time, triangulating the position of the downed aircraft.

    Of course now they probably have fancy-schmancy wiz-bag computers to do all of that for them.

    Any other CAP members out there?

    C/FO Martin Dinstuhl (Ret.)
    Alpha Flight Commander, 144th Air Rescue & Recovery Squadron
    TN Wing

  55. 121.5 NOT the "international distress frequency". by mr_burns · · Score: 2, Informative

    121.5Mhz is used in Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELTs) that go in civilian aircraft. When the aircraft crashes (or even has a hard landing every once in a while) it starts trasmnitting. The military uses 243Mhz (harmonic). The transmission is picked up by SARSAT (search and rescue satellite) and then the relevent emergency services resources are called into action.

    There actually IS a frequecny for international distress calls (which i don't remember off hand) but it's not 121.5Mhz or 243Mhz. It's illegal to broadcast a distress call on those frequencies. If you use one of those hiker distress thingies that they sell in catalogs don't be surprised to meet a frustrated CAP ground team and an angry Sherrif.

    --
    "Let him go, Ralph. He knows what he's doing." --Otto Mann (simpsons)
  56. Modem = Police by dazedNconfuzed · · Score: 2, Informative

    As a phone tech support guy, I got a call from someone complaining "whenever I try to use my laptop to dial up the company computer, the police show up at my front door."

    Turns out the guy had gone to a hotel on business. Getting an outside line required dialing 9-1, then the desired phone number: 1-800-...-.... Upon returning home, the unmodified dialer dutifully dialed 9-1-1-800-...-....

    --
    Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
  57. Just Wait Till . . . by T_O_M · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just wait till BPL (Broadband Over Powerline) starts crapping on ELT and other government emergency frequencies.
    Sigh...