Slashdot Mirror


Will Your Next Car Run Windows?

An anonymous reader writes "Microsoft is beginning to move into the automotive industry. Their 'Automotive Business Unit' is selling a custom version of Windows CE called Windows Automotive. Microsoft attended a conference in Detroit this week to promote their software."

102 of 732 comments (clear)

  1. Crashes by nmg196 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great - now I can crash my car even after I've already crashed it.

    1. Re:Crashes by Tongo · · Score: 2, Funny

      the horror......
      the horror......
      the horror......

    2. Re:Crashes by cratermoon · · Score: 5, Funny

      You'll get the dreaded Blue Street Of Death

    3. Re:Crashes by INetEngineer · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'll be the first to re-write "Pole Position" for this new car software.

      Most of us have a reason for making "crash jokes" about Windows... so, here goes...

      Blue Screen of Death now becomes the Black Street of Death

      Even if MS software is not tied in with the underlying control systems, software crashes will likely result in more ROAD RAGE! I can see the guys of "Office Space" pounding the $h!t out of their car's printer port because the driving directions are jammed. I can also see hackers driving next to you and your family displaying a printout that reads "See Photos in His Car Files". Perhaps we'll all benefit from a new alien TV series called "Car X-Files". Gas stations will read "Please turn off cell phones and onboard MS software before filling up." :)

      I suppose there will be benefits... I wouldn't mind WAR driving to connect and seek out the best gas prices close to me (which I can w/ my laptop, but it would be nice if it was in the car).

      Tri Harder (triathlon and multisport)

      --
      --I smoked my sig.
    4. Re:Crashes by Alien+Being · · Score: 5, Funny

      MS will surely blame it on the drivers.

    5. Re:Crashes by SilentChris · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Great - now I can crash my car even after I've already crashed it."

      Congratulations! You are the [100,000th] person to make the [same damn joke about Windows], [nmg196]! Surely, you must be [proud] of your [ability to karma whore]! Please [tell your mom I said hi] and [take a lesson in comedic originality]. Sincerely, [Slashdot].

    6. Re:Crashes by mog007 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Funny moderations don't have an affect on karma, so how exactly is nmg karma-whoring?

    7. Re:Crashes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The headline shouldn't read "Will Your Next Car Run Windows?" - it should read "Will Your Next Car Run?"

    8. Re:Crashes by malfunct · · Score: 2, Informative

      This might be funny but BMW has proven it true. They integrated win CE into one of thier cars ages ago and it did LOTS of wierd things (such as shifting into reverse at high speed and popping the trunk lid at random times). It wasn't necessarily CE's fault that it went so poorly but integrating software which is known to be flakey (in general, not any specific application) into a car which must be fairly reliable is not something to take lightly.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    9. Re:Crashes by jacksonj04 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can see the radio antenna right now...

      "It looks like you're attempting to change gear. Would you like me to help you with this?"

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    10. Re:Crashes by Technician · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, what will happen is your car will shut down on the freeway at the 45,000 mile mark.

      Not mine.. It isn't running MS software. There is a taxi that got over 250,000 miles. Toyota was so impressed, they bought the car to find it's potential wear points.

      If MS did that, then the problem of Win95 locking up after a month of just not being re-booted would never have been an issue.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    11. Re:Crashes by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I should probably append to this.

      Automotive Engineers design cars. They hire Automotive workers to do the actual building of them, with equipment that are designed by other engineers, that are built by other workers.

      Software Engineering does not follow suit to most engineering practices. A Software Engineer may be a programmer, an architect, or both. The difference between the Automotive worker and the Software Engineer being that the worker doesn't need to know what the engineer was thinking in the automotive case, he just needs to follow the plan.

      On the contrary, the Software engineer does not design once and build many times. The engineer designs and builds equally. In other words, providing a full plan of the software is writing the source code.

      Also, while it has been streamlined, the Automotive worker needs to know how to use welding tools and the specialized tools that the worker is provided. On the contrary, you can give a software engineer his favorite tools that he's used since birth but if he doesn't know how to write in C++, he's useless for a project based in that language until he learns it. A cleaner description of this is, the software engineer's primary manufacturing tool is his mind.

      This is why you never hear automotive workers talking about the "art" of automotive construction.

      Some may say this is why only the worst software engineers consider unionizing. I think it's too general, but partially accurate.

    12. Re:Crashes by geoffspear · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because on slashdot, any joke about how much Windows sucks is about as likely to get you moderated "Insightful" as it is to get you modded "Funny".

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    13. Re:Crashes by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Because on slashdot, any joke about how much Windows sucks is about as likely to get you moderated "Insightful" as it is to get you modded "Funny".

      Well, true enough, but so what? Are you saying that the jokes aren't insightful or funny enough, or are you admitting that you don't get them? ;-)

  2. I've had my car broken into enough by FosterKanig · · Score: 4, Funny

    No more!!!!

    1. Re:I've had my car broken into enough by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

      At lease he didn't go with a crash joke.

      Look like someone is having bad psychological problems with late payments on his car loan...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:I've had my car broken into enough by micromoog · · Score: 5, Funny
      After this, you won't need to lease any more . . . because (wait for it . . .) all your cars will be 0wn3d!

      *rimshot*

    3. Re:I've had my car broken into enough by tbone1 · · Score: 2, Informative
      • At lease he didn't go with a crash joke.
      Look like someone is having bad psychological problems with late payments on his car loan...

      A mod point! A mod point! My kingdom for a mod point!

      [Gives Rosco a standing ovation]

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
  3. Obligatory by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

    Gives a whole new meaning to "SUV" and "crash test"...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Obligatory by twoflower · · Score: 2, Funny
      Gives a whole new meaning to SUV
      Sport-Utility Virus?
      --


      --
      Twoflower
    2. Re:Obligatory by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sports cars are typically safer and more efficient than other cars; they are easier to see around and less obtrusive. Whether you have a need for an SUV or not it is more obtrusive and more hazardous to the drivers around you. Also, probably about half of the drivers of sports cars are women aged 30 and up who want a car which is responsive, cute, and gets good mileage.

      I am not talking about stopping people from buying SUVs. I'm talking about the mindset that goes into buying an SUV, which is typically pretty fucking stupid. Of course, I'm typically arrogant, so I'm not sure I have any right to talk - but this is slashdot.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Obligatory by RESPAWN · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also note that buying a vehicle because it looks cool is ok - except that big heavy SUVs are impossible to see over, under, through, or around, damage the roads, and consume more resources.

      So, what you're basically saying is that people shouldn't drive SUVs becuase you don't think they look cool. Did you ever think that maybe people who buy SUVs might not have an immediate need for some of the extra features over a van, but decided to go ahead with the SUV becuase they would like the convenience of the extra features. It's actually a lot like my grandfather's cell phone. He doesn't actually need one, but it sure is convenient when his car breaks down on the side of the road.

      And for the record, it's pretty easy to see over, under, through, or around an SUV if you're driving one yourself. (Except for those jackasses with illegal tint.) Anyway, I don't drive an SUV any more, but when I did, I enjoyed the extra ground clearance the vehicle provided. Not to mention the vehicle just felt more robust than many minivans due to its stiffer ladder frame construction as opposed to the unibody construction that many minivans use. Lastly, the vehicle was rear wheel drive, a big plus in mine and many people's books.

      Although, I do want to go on record as saying that any "SUV" based on a car platform, with unibody construction, and featuring front wheel drive, isn't really an SUV. It's just a minivan masquerading as one, partly to be cool, and possibly partly because trucks/SUVs don't have to abide by the same fuel consumption regulations as cars. (To be fair, I'm not sure if minivans are classified as cars or trucks by the government, so they may also have to comply to the less strict truck regulations.)

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    4. Re:Obligatory by pangu · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you reversed
      "Driver: Argrghehahahahahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh......"
      and
      "Clipp y: ...unable to find a driver..."

  4. Here come... by bitchell · · Score: 2, Funny

    the crash jokes...

    1. Re:Here come... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Funny

      Okay, I'll admit, you're right. Let's refresh the "Windows-runs-on-xyz" joke pool:

      * Will the Home edition be installed on Pintos?
      * My car only goes 50mph after downloading SP2 at the pump
      * There's a purple gorilla in the back seat reporting my every moves to bonzibuddy.com
      * Do I call Redmond to get an activation code when I add a set of fog lights to my car?
      * Steve Ballmer says piracy happens because cars are too expensive

      and of course

      * Does it run on unleaded Linux?

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  5. Before "If Microsoft made cars..." jokes ensue by daniil · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Before you start posting stupid "If Microsoft made cars" jokes, RTFA: Windows Automotive, by the way, does not share a network with the low-level systems of a vehicle--so a software crash won't result in, say, brake failure.

    The question is, though, do we need such things in our cars? Do we really need cars equipped with "home entertainment systems," if these cars will only be used for trips to the nearest shop or driving to work?

    --
    Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    1. Re:Before "If Microsoft made cars..." jokes ensue by DaHat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The question is, though, do we need such things in our cars? Do we really need cars equipped with "home entertainment systems," if these cars will only be used for trips to the nearest shop or driving to work?

      Of course we don't *need* such options... few things in life do we actually *need*, however such toys do often make life more enjoyable.

      I dunno about you, but I don't *need* my ipod, cell phone, or laptop... and a 1 bedroom apartment and a smaller vehicle would probably cost me less and be just enough to get me by... but if one is willing and able to plunk down the cash for a little more? Why not?

    2. Re:Before "If Microsoft made cars..." jokes ensue by julesh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The question is, though, do we need such things in our cars? Do we really need cars equipped with "home entertainment systems," if these cars will only be used for trips to the nearest shop or driving to work?

      Of course we don't _need_ them. However, people want them and are will to pay extra money for them -- a guy I work with runs a business installing this kind of stuff. People will pay a small fortune to keep the kids quiet in the back seats...

    3. Re:Before "If Microsoft made cars..." jokes ensue by turboflux · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe not at first - but once they get Windows into your car, whats to say a few years down the road when they're more comfortable, who says they won't start integrating? It wouldn't be the first time...

      "Look! We can improve your fuel economy by 20%!" ... Suddenly your vehicle explodes.

    4. Re:Before "If Microsoft made cars..." jokes ensue by daniil · · Score: 3, Funny
      People will pay a small fortune to keep the kids quiet in the back seats...

      [Obligatory "when i was a kid, we didn't need none of that shit" reply]

      :P

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    5. Re:Before "If Microsoft made cars..." jokes ensue by Speare · · Score: 5, Funny
      Okay, but now that you've posed that fascinating question, is it okay if we resume with the "If Microsoft made cars" jokes?

      [voice name="jayleno"]

      Say! I wonder if those cool crash testing experts Vince and Larry will be available for promotions!? "You can learn a lot from a dummy!"

      What do you do when something goes wrong on a long road trip? "Sorry, ma'am, but the mechanic what can fix that bluescreen of yorn is out fishin' to tomorrah."

      Why does my car tell me to "Press the Brake to Go"?

      "I was going to get my dangling exhaust pipe fixed, but my wife still likes the drag and drop interface."

      I hear the Consumer Reports folks have chimed in on these new computerized dashboards. This is the first year that BMW had more bugs in their product line than Volkswagen!

      [/voice]

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    6. Re:Before "If Microsoft made cars..." jokes ensue by skiman1979 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I can just imagine having Windows software in a car. Sure, this Windows Automotive doesn't integrate with low-end systems (brakes) right now, but you know how Microsoft works... embrace and extend. Next thing you know, Clippy will show up on the entertainment console. "You seem to be trying to park your vehicle. Would you like help?"

      --
      Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
    7. Re:Before "If Microsoft made cars..." jokes ensue by Scowler · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Imagine if you could simply just IM the car in front of you. Type (or speak, or something) in the license number in your auto IM client, and say "you just cut me off, you !@$^#$^@^%!" Now THAT would be fun....

    8. Re:Before "If Microsoft made cars..." jokes ensue by demachina · · Score: 2, Interesting


      I think they are making a rather bold statement there. Cars are turning in to complex interconnected systems. There isn't anything stopping manufacturers from connecting engine controls, brakes etc into a central computer, so it can, for example, warn you of failures or needed maintenance. I'm pretty sure brakes are intimately tied in to the computers in hybrids in particular.

      Most experienced software engineers can tell you when you develop complex systems with a lot of interconnects and multiple computers unexpected shit can happen.

      Me, I am doing a studious job of maintaining my 1997 largely computer free car. Having a computer in it would be nice, especially for maps, but I really dont want to pay an arm and a leg for it and get a very closed Windows computer that has more control over me than I have over it.

      I especially don't want a satellite link/GPS, like OnStar, which gives OnStar more control over my car than me and that makes it relatively easy for the police state to track my every move, and disable my car at their whim. Its kind of like giving up your right to bear arms, you are giving big brother another huge step towards complete control over your life. Chances are my car would never be used against me, but the fact that the potential is there is....disturbing.

      --
      @de_machina
    9. Re:Before "If Microsoft made cars..." jokes ensue by n1ywb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Clearly the intent is to use WinCE for running the radio, DVD player, navigation system, etc. Of course some sort of operating system is necessary to control all of those things through a single multifunction input/display unit.

      I recently moved from Vermont to Westchester Co. New York. The roads around here are like a labrynthine maze. I use my handheld mapping GPS almost every day to find my way around. I would most certainly make effective use of an in-dash navigation system, even just to go to the store. Afterall getting lost and ending up in a bad neighborhood can really ruin your day. And lets face it, sitting in a car is boring, and a DVD player keeps the little brats quiet and entertained.

      BTW don't foget, WinCE shares absolutely zero code with other versions of Windows. Although I am a dedicated Linux proponent, I have spent some time evaluating and writing code on Windows CE and the API and overall architecture are pretty good. I haven't looked at the internals, but (correct me if I am wrong) I think MS makes the source available, don't they? Anyway from a developer's point of view it's a pretty good platform for developing such devices.

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
    10. Re:Before "If Microsoft made cars..." jokes ensue by NardofDoom · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This is true. If we want to use computers while commuting, we (who have it available) would take public transportation.

      And if your kids don't shut up, maybe you shouldn't try to pacify them.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    11. Re:Before "If Microsoft made cars..." jokes ensue by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's an old idea from 1990's they are re-hashing.

      the had a version of windowsCE designed for automotive uses back in 1997, in 1999 I bought a device that had their first release of it.

      it's called AutoPC and it sucked horribly.

      I expected microsoft to rehash that nightmare, but now we get to see it run more than the stereo, you get to have it control your heat, vents, defrost, etc...

      Why does it seem that insftead of innovating, microsoft simply trots out their old ideas every 7-10 years? tablet Pc's for example... they were a failure outside of specalized uses in 1989, and in the late 90's. why do they think it will work now?

      Unless they rewrote windows CE completely, I certianly would not want it in my car after living with it controlling the stereo and navigation for 4 years.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    12. Re:Before "If Microsoft made cars..." jokes ensue by deacon · · Score: 2, Informative
      I dunno about you, but I don't *need* my ipod, cell phone, or laptop... and a 1 bedroom apartment and a smaller vehicle would probably cost me less and be just enough to get me by... but if one is willing and able to plunk down the cash for a little more? Why not?

      Just to adress the very last part of your post, in all seriousness.

      Why not spend more?

      As long as you have zero high interest debt (credit cards, car loans), are building equity in real estate, and have a positive savings rate every month, then by all means spend more.

      Unfortunately, a lot of people carry lots of debt and pay a lot of interest on it. Due to the clever or vicious, (depending on your point of view) way compound interest works, many people cannot escape their debt, as the interest increases to absorb their ability to pay off the principal balance.

      If you do the math, and no-one does becuase it is very boring and depressing, you will find out that every new dollar you spend costs you 1.20 a year, just waving my hands (i'm not spending the time to do the calculation).

      The end result is that many people end up spending far more and getting far less becuase they choose not to delay "spending a few extra bucks" untill AFTER they have cleared all their interest debt.

      To summarize very simply, money you spend on credit card interest is just thrown away. Even tax decutible interest just offsets your income, you do not get to deduct the 3000 you spent in home morgatge interest off the the "PAY US" line on the bottom of you tax form.

      Further, money spent on rent is also essentially lost. A property owner builds equity, takes advantage of property value increases, is his own master, etc. etc.

      A renter can only wait for the landlord to raise the rent.

      I fully grant you that ipods are insanely cool. Next year, some new insanely cool item will come out. Just renember that an ipod deferred will buy you 2 ipods next year.

    13. Re:Before "If Microsoft made cars..." jokes ensue by ebuck · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, an operting system is not needed to control all of these units through a single multifunction input/display unit.

      Each of these systems pre-existed without a traditional operating system, whether those systems were mechanical, simple electrical circuits, PLCs or whatever. Why they would do this is the combination of two reasons.

      Price drops in hardware that can support an OS significant enough to compete with the cost of the alternative mechanical / electrical solution, and the ability to produce intermeidate versions and upgradable versions of the product which removes costs associated with pre-production glitches in the design.

      Needless to say, since the issues won't be heavily scrutinized before the item is produced, there's going to be a much greater chance that the design of these systems will become much more like programming projects instead of traditional manufacturing. With all of the known pressures on programming projects, I'd imagine that the good things in UI design that comes from the manufacturing field will be lost in a maze of widgets, and that project deadline pressures will result in rationalizing the release of less than perfect code, with maybe a "new downloadable" update planned for "when we can get to it in the future"

      There's a lot more pressure to get it right when you're mistake is going to be hardcoded into a manufacturing run of a hundred thousand items or so.

    14. Re:Before "If Microsoft made cars..." jokes ensue by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Afterall getting lost and ending up in a bad neighborhood can really ruin your day.
      I've been lost in bad neighborhoods, not to mention driving through one regularly when I visit my sister down in DC. No one has ever bothered me - in fact, people have been much more helpful a.f.a. directions than suburbanites usually are. There's a sizable segment of suBURPanites that runs and cringes whenever someone in a car slows down and opens their window. BTW - I was carjacked once, in a suburban gas station :)

      And lets face it, sitting in a car is boring, and a DVD player keeps the little brats quiet and entertained.
      Would it be so bad if you talked to your "little brats" or had your spouse do so when he/she was in the car with you? The spouse could even read something to them or play games. Besides, what's wrong with just listening to music instead of having constant canned visual stimuli? Listening to music on the radio can be very worthwhile.

      If I have kids, I'm raising them in a city or small town where they will be able to walk to interesting places rather than being stuck in a glass-and-steel rolling bubble.

      BTW don't foget, WinCE shares absolutely zero code with other versions of Windows.
      The one experience that I've had with WinCE was on a palmtop @work connected to a label printer. The thing kept crashing and/or not recognizing the printer. We finally connected the printer to an old laptop running Win2k, and all was good. Maybe my opinion is biased by a bad experience, though.

      That being said, I think that cars' controls should be as simple as possible, with large buttons that can be easily found without staring at the dash. Only a few buttons are really needed on a radio - adjust volume, balance, equalizer presets, tuning, mode, and CD/MP3 control (skip +/-, album +/-, etc). Heater and A/C controls have become needlessly complex also - give me the controls on an older car any day (one lever for fan speed, one for temp, a third one or a couple buttons for air direction).

      The one thing that I would appreciate is a computerized dashboard that could show readouts of various engine sensors in real time, and show diagnostic data, ideally in plain English. e.g. rather than Code P0014, it should say, "Left Cylinder Bank Oxygen Sensor Erroneous Reading". The dashboard should also be customizable. Certain things like speed and RPM should always show up, but you should have a choice of what other gauges appear there - temperature, outside temperature, trip computer, oil pressure, voltage, etc.. You should also have an easy interface to allow for changes to the car's behavior. For example, you should be able to turn automatic locking at 5mph on or off, according to what you prefer, and without paying a deale^W $tealer to do it for you. Settings to do with emissions should of course be hardcoded and not user-changable.

      -b.

  6. Ow. by CodeWanker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would think Detroit has enough worries about bad perceptions regarding their reliability without adding this to it. There's a reason why it's called "WinCE"

    --


    "Wow. Now THAT'S a lot of angry Indians." - Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer
  7. nope by Mr.Coffee · · Score: 5, Funny

    i only drive stick, therefore i'll run linux.

    --
    Cogito Eggo Sum, I think therefore I'm a waffle
  8. General Motors Protection Fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please step on brake, gas, and clutch simultaneously to reboot.

  9. More importantly by spectrum · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Do I have to pay the M$ tax on my car.

    Can I opt for a -$100 upgrade and use other certain free OSes ?

    Answers in order: probably, and probably not.

    sigh.

    --
    dave.
    1. Re:More importantly by amokk · · Score: 2

      Ahh stupidity and fundamentalism...

      Before even knowing what the software can do, or if it will be useful to you, or if you can opt out entirely of its installation you start the whole Anti-MS thing.

      I guess I can't blame you. Since this is Slashdot you'll quickly be modded up and I'll be called a troll.

      --
      I think, therefore I am an Atheist.
  10. BSOD-BWOD by jockeys · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know it's gonna be bad when the windshield turns blue all of a sudden...

    --

    In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
  11. Who by AcornWeb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    in their right mind is going to trust their life to Microsoft? Thanks, but I think I'll pass.

    --
    Your Windows PC is my other computer.
  12. BMWs by squisher · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I really hope that doesn't get too widespread... aren't there Videos on the net about the BMW (with Windows) where you can't close the trunk anymore and other fun things like these? Of course, maybe BMW is to blame here BUT Windows just doesn't have the reputation for reliability that I'd want for an OS in my car... no matter how many licenses M$ has already sold, that does not proof that it's good.

    ~Squisher

    1. Re:BMWs by The+Conductor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Too lazy to google for it, but there was an incident in Taiwan where a guy got locked inside his BMW 7-series due to a WinCE lock-up. He had to call for help on his cellphone.

    2. Re:BMWs by stubear · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was an older 520 and it was NOT runnign Windows CE of any kind.

  13. It should by computerme · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It should be noted that I read recently (sorry no links but maybe others can chime in) that BMW is working with Apple to replace its Windows in Car solution with something from Apple.

    Will this only extend to the music portion of the car?

    Or will apple oversee other parts like navigation etc..

    It was not known according to the article, but the take away was BMW was not happy with their Microsoft solution.

    So you next car might not have a steering wheel but perhaps a "Clickable scroll wheel" ;)

    1. Re:It should by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 5, Funny

      ``BMW is working with Apple to replace its Windows in Car solution with something from Apple.''

      Does that mean that future BMWs will have only one pedal?

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  14. My car, your car... THEIR CAR. by White+Rabbit+132 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is it! This is how they get the military! Soon, elite Microsoft stormtroopers will swarm thestreets, while all of our military is sitting in vans.

    And those doors won't open.

    --
    If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you.
  15. Finally this topic! by sleighb0y · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does anyone know of a open source project to control a Fuel-Injected engine? I have been thinking about how to set it up, and am not sure of the off-the-shelf hardware that would be needed. But since most engines just use a simple collection of sensors that return a given voltage it probably wouldn't be that hard. And feedback is done by sending X volts to device Y.

    So anyone who knows of USB/PCI/Serial devices that can communicate this way on many (30 - 40) lines. Post them here, please!

    I'd ideally want an embedded solution, but why not a PC-based solution. You'd just have to wait for the PC to boot before you could start the car.

  16. could be a good idea by brainspank · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm looking forward to the System Restore feature, I've had hail damage for 2 years that would cost a fortune to fix the old fashioned way.

    --
    It's only a model.
  17. confusion by justforaday · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can see the confusion now...

    Geek walks into auto dealer:
    "I'd really like a car without Windows, please."

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  18. Use buying power by Zzeep · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I truely don't understand geeks who claim microsoft sucks but still for example have an xbox at home. If you don't want to buy a car with Microsoft software on some device, tell the salesperson that you won;t buy like the car because it uses Microsoft software. It's that simple, really.

    1. Re:Use buying power by Phil246 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      of those xboxes, how many run linux, and how many are a nice little web server :)

  19. RTFA by nblender · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The article doesn't say _anything_ about wince running the fuel injectors, or the ABS, or air bags, or brakes, or steering... It mentions only annoying stuff that has no business being in a car anyway.... Having an in-vehicle DVD player itself is probably more likely to cause crashes than what operating system is being run on said DVD player. Yes, I'm old. I drive a 21 year old diesel truck with no electronics and 440,000 miles on the odometer.

  20. Re:It should - Audio only by lombre · · Score: 2, Informative

    seems like it's audio only

  21. Begs the question... by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 5, Funny

    What would happen if you clicked 'No' to the EULA? Would you have to return the car for a refund?

    BTM

    --
    That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
  22. Obligatory by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Driver: Makes a left turn, a right turn, then presses brake. Car keeps moving

    Clippy: you have made a left turn, a right turn, and pressed the brake, it seems you are trying to evade a road hazard.

    Clippy: would you like to enable the road hazard wizard?

    Driver: Hurridly presses the YES button on the steering wheel?

    Clippy: Windows ME (Mobile Edition), has many new features, it now loads faster than ever...you can even shut down unresponsive programs without rebooting. Car now approaching cliff

    Driver: WTF, hurry up!

    Clippy: Thank, you for installing Windows ME. Would you like to run the AutoEvade Wizard.

    Driver: Ithought I just did that, pushes yes.

    Clippy: What type of hazard are you trying to evade?

    • Pothole
    • pedestrian
    • CowboyNeal
    • The hazard I am trying to evade is not listed here
    Driver selects the last option, car is bouncing of the guardrain now

    Clippy: Windows ME has detected new hardware, and is unable to find a driver for it and must shut down.

    Driver: Argrghehahahahahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh......$^@$^@^@^3cras h^C^C^CC^C^

  23. Old School Joke -- Last Person Without Windows by qweqazfoo · · Score: 5, Funny
    There was a knock on my door. It was the man from Microsoft.

    "Not you again," I said.

    "Sorry," he said, a little sheepishly. "I guess you know why I'm here."

    Indeed I did. Microsoft's $300 million campaign to promote the Windows 95 operating system was meant to be universally effective, to convince every human being on the planet that Windows 95 was an essential, some would say integral, part of living. Problem was, not everyone had bought it. Specifically, I hadn't bought it. I was the Last Human Being Without Windows 95. And now this little man from Microsoft was at my door, and he wouldn't take no for an answer.

    "No," I said.

    "You know I can't take that," he said, pulling out a copy of Windows 95 from a briefcase. "Come on. Just one copy. That's all we ask."

    "Not interested." I said. "Look, isn't there someone else you can go bother for a while? There's got to be someone else on the planet who doesn't have a copy."

    "Well, no," The Microsoft man said. "You're the only one."

    "You can't be serious. Not everyone on the planet has a computer," I said. "Hell, not everyone on the planet has a PC! Some people own Macintoshes, which run their own operating system. And some people who have PCs run OS/2, though I hear that's just a rumor. In short, there are some people who just have no use for Windows 95."

    The Microsoft man looked perplexed. "I'm missing your point," he said.

    "Use!" I screamed. "Use! Use! Use! Why buy it, if you can't use it?"

    "Well, I don't know anything about this 'use' thing you're going on about," The Microsoft man said. "All I know is that according to our records, everyone else on the planet has a copy."

    "People without computers?"

    "Got 'em."

    "Amazonian Indians?"

    "We had to get some malaria shots to go in, but yes."

    "The Amish."

    "Check."

    "Oh, come on," I said. "They don't even wear buttons. How did you get them to buy a computer operating system?"

    "We told them there were actually 95 very small windows in the box," the Microsoft man admitted. "We sort of lied. Which means we are all going to Hell, every single employee of Microsoft." He was somber for a minute, but then perked right up. "But that's not the point!" he said. "The point is, everyone has a copy. Except you."

    "So what?" I said. "If everyone else jumped off a cliff, would you expect me to do it, too?"

    "If we spent $300 million advertising it? Absolutely."

    "No."

    "Jeez, back to that again," the Microsoft man said. "Hey. I'll tell you what. I'll give you a copy. For free. Just take it and install it on your computer." He waved the box in front of me.

    "No," I said again. "No offense, pal. But I don't need it. And frankly, your whole advertising blitz has sort of offended me. I mean, it's a computer operating system! Great. Fine. Swell. Whatever. But you guys are advertising it like it creates world peace or something."

    "It did."

    "Excuse me?"

    "World peace. It was part of the original design. Really. One button access. Click on it, poof, end to strife and hunger. Simple."

    "So what happened?"

    "Well, you know," he said. "It took up a lot of space on the hard drive. We had to decide between it or the Microsoft Network. Anyway, we couldn't figure out how to make a profit off of world peace."

    "Go away," I said.

    "I can't," he said. "I'll be killed if I fail."

    "You have got to be kidding," I said.

    "Look," the Microsoft man said, "We sold this to the Amish. The Amish! Right now, they're opening the boxes and figuring out they've been had. We'll be pitchforked if we ever step into Western Pennsylvania again. But we did it. So to have you holding out, well, it's embarrassing. It's embarrassing to the company. It's embarrassing to the product. It's embarrassing to Bill."

    "Bill Gates does not care about me," I said.

  24. Windows Automotive will just get pirated... by Enzo+the+Baker · · Score: 2, Funny

    because cars are too expensive. Talk about your high hardware costs. How long until Ballmer pushes for $100 cars?

    --
    I may twist orthodoxy to partly justify a tyrant. But I can easily make up a German philosophy to justify him entirely.
  25. And what of viruses?? Hmm?? by ferret70 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, I can just see it now...

    Mandatory Wi-Fi connection with the car...

    When you open the door you have less than a minute to start the car and boot up your firewall before the worms get ya!

    Who in their right mind would trust Microsoft with any critical system? Not to mention having an ugly "Made for WinCE" sticker right next to the already-annoying dealer broach on the rear trunk lid!

  26. No by PotatoHead · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not sure they will get into the core systems anyway. I think this is a likely move toward getting their media formats everywhere they can.

    They know it's going to be hard to compete with Apple because the I-pod already captured the mindshare of the important people. (The cool ones.)

    If they get their stuff built into the car, then they can tie that, their OS, delivery formats and services into a delivery chain that does not leave room for I-pod.

  27. Levels of computerization by BrotherZeoff · · Score: 2, Insightful

    - Stuff unrelated to driving, like the MP3 player.

    - Stuff that can assist driving, like the falling-asleep camera mentioned earlier today, heads-up displays, etc

    - "Drive by wire" like the F16. Electronic ignition timing; intelligent suspension, etc.

    Do we always want physical failsafes on the deepest levels? Do we trust brake lines/brake fluid more than we trust data and power cables to a remote braking mechanism?

    There's certainly a drive to integrate the levels. There are people in the world would would like cars to have speed governors, or breathalyzers. Or features the gently prevent tailgating at high speeds. If Microsoft gets in at the top level through the MP3 player, I can see it bullying its way down to the deeper levels as they integrate.

    1. Re:Levels of computerization by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do we trust brake lines/brake fluid more than we trust data and power cables to a remote braking mechanism?

      Absolutely, yes. When was the last time your brakes failed because of a problem in the fluid or brake lines? Now, when was the last time your car lost power because of a dead battery or alternator?

      This drive to make everything xxxxx-by-wire is a recipe for disaster, plain and simple. It's ok for commercial or military aviation where the planes are rigorously checked every single day, checked at the start of every single flight, and scrupulously maintained. But passenger cars are not maintained this way, and never will be as long as they're privately owned. (Even if they were corporately owned, the company would probably skimp on maintenance to save a buck, since there's no FAA threatening them with severe penalties, and not such a certainty of people dying if something goes wrong.)

      Cars need to have the simplest and most reliable systems possible, even if it prevents fancy integration features from being implemented.

      Moreover, fly-by-wire controls make some sense in planes, because the old hydraulic systems added a lot of weight compared to the electrical systems. Cars aren't as large, so the hydraulic systems don't add much weight, and weight also isn't nearly as important a factor in cars as it is in planes.

  28. Heel toe braking ... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Informative
    Please step on brake, gas, and clutch simultaneously to reboot.


    Laugh What you're describing is Heel Toe Braking and it is used in auto racing.

    Exactly what we've come to expect from Windows upgrades -- breaking a feature people have come to rely on. ;-)

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  29. it is about Brand and Quality Image by gosand · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It should be noted that I read recently (sorry no links but maybe others can chime in) that BMW is working with Apple to replace its Windows in Car solution with something from Apple.

    It should also be noted that BMW is a high-end product, so they aren't necessarily concerned with licensing fees. So it isn't about money. One thing that BMW is concerned with - quality when it comes to their brand image.

    I have owned BMWs for about 9 years now (and no, I can't afford new ones). But BMW is VERY strict when it comes to using their logos and even colors in anything. They are very brand conscious, because they don't want it diluted. They produce phenominal cars, and want to make sure that their brand is associated with quality. I was a little sad when I heard that they had chosen a Microsoft product for their vehicles for that very reason. I actually thought that Apple is a lot like BMW in some respects. They aren't the biggest car maker, they are somewhat of a niche product catering to a very specific customer, and they produce high-quality products. I think Apple would be a great choice, but I think a BMW-home-grown product would also be cool. (Hello? SuSE?)

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  30. Forget flipping off the drivers. by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now, you just hack into their car, and have them rear-end a police car.

  31. BMW already tried it by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 3, Informative
    M$ already partnered with BMW to embed their computers with WinCE back in 2002.

    The results have been less than rosey. One famous example is the Thai Finance Minister who was trapped in his BMW after WinCE crashed and immobilized the vehicle - doors, locks, windows, AC, everything.

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
    1. Re:BMW already tried it by stubear · · Score: 3, Informative

      The thai minister's car was not a BMW model with Windows Automotive, it was an older model. The ONLY BMW with Windows Automotive in it is the 7 series and this is used to control mainly the entertainment and environment controls, it does not run any of the other systems. Your link even mentions this fact but once again stupid moderators mod idiots like you up.

  32. Why Wait? by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
    Great - now I can crash my car even after I've already crashed it.

    You could have it crash before it crashes.

    Things to look forward to:

    Reboot on the San Diego Freeway during rush

    You turn off the ignition and it asks if you're sure you want to do that

    You turn off ignition and it asks if you want to install patches before shutdown (then notice the next morning it's been stuck in a loop installing patches all night [this was the case with my laptop at work])

    You can only hook up MS DRM stereos, installed by MCSE's

    Blue Windscreen of Death

    All the cars in the world get cracked and do syncronized driving or demo-derby

    Yet another mandatory service you must have performed by a certified professional for $$$ (all repairs are insanely expensive now, if you haven't had wiring, eletronics, mechanicals, count yourself lucky!)

    You keep getting passed by that commie nutjob in the the veedub running Linux, despite Ballmer insisting you should have more power.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Why Wait? by Skraut · · Score: 5, Funny
      You turn left out of your driveway and a little paperclip holding a map says "It looks like you are going to work, would you like directions?" you say no and continue down the road. At the next intersection a paperclip holding a map pops up and says "It looks like you are going to your mother-in-law's house, would you like directions?" You say no and continue driving. You turn left onto a large pier overlooking the ocean. A little paperclip appears holding a map and says "It looks like you are lost, would you like directions?" You wedge a brick on the accelerator and step out of the vehicle and watch it sail off the end of the pier.

      a little paperclip holding a map and wearing scuba gear pops up and says "You appear to be underwater, would you like directions?"

      --
      Introducing Microsoft Vacuum 1.0 The first Microsoft product that doesn't suck.
    2. Re:Why Wait? by qray · · Score: 3, Funny

      You missed one of the more exciting aspects of driving with Windows.

      You're driving down the highway and all of a sudden you hear a radio alert. Now instead of the steering wheel controlling the direction of your car, you're changing the volume on your radio.

    3. Re:Why Wait? by gadget+junkie · · Score: 2, Funny

      You forgot: turn the key, and keep it turned for three minutes to start the engine.

      --
      "If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)
    4. Re:Why Wait? by Cade144 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yes, I remember that Mr. Stephenson pointed out that it would be possible to drive a car using a GUI interface, it just wouldn't be very safe.
      His exact words were:
      We want GUIs largely because they are convenient and because they are easy-- or at least the GUI makes it seem that way. Of course, nothing is really easy and simple, and putting a nice interface on top of it does not change that fact. A car controlled through a GUI would be easier to drive than one controlled through pedals and steering wheel, but it would be incredibly dangerous.

      Hopefully, the presence of Windows CE in the car is not an attempt to change the car's user interface.
  33. If it ran on Linux instead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Only one in ten people would actually get it started on their own.

    No owners' manuals. You either know how to drive or you don't.

    There'd be no brake lights, turn signals, gauges, or steering wheel. Real drivers don't need all those extras. They do it the hard way because they can.

    Door locks would be pgp-encrypted

    No windows.

  34. Ding! by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 4, Funny

    You win. The thread is done now.

    1. Re:Ding! by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 2, Funny

      We now have Billwin's Law! Well Bill thinks he's God, and bush said God spoke to him (I'm sure Bill talked to bush this summer), so from now on, when anyone brings up 'the convicted monopoly', just end the thread.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  35. Re:Uh-oh by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Except most of the jokes aren't funny, so you're bound to see most of them multiple times. Oh well.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  36. Pop-up Ads on in-car displays by Demodian · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great, another place for pop-up ads from x10.com or some company selling drugs...

    "Looks like you are heading to the Bater Motel. Would you like to get some discount Viagra for your hot date?"

    Next, we will have to make sure Gator does not get installed when we get a new carburetor put in at the shop.

  37. Or at the same time! by DeadVulcan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Great - now I can crash my car even after I've already crashed it.

    You could have it crash before it crashes.

    You can even crash it at the same time! Oh, the possibilities!

    Actually, I guess we've exhausted all the possibilities.

    Well, that was fun.

    --
    Accountability on the heads of the powerful.
    Power in the hands of the accountable.
    1. Re:Or at the same time! by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 2, Funny
      Actually, I guess we've exhausted all the possibilities.

      But we haven't even got to the DRM in the car radio yet!

  38. Things my car does not need by nuintari · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Things I do not want in my car, ever, and why:

    1. GPS Navigation System: Maybe for some of you, but I have a good direction sense, mapquest, and a printer.
    2. TV/DVD Player: Are you fucking insane? You can't watch tv while your driving, and I do not drive my car only to have the passengers ignore me while they enjoy the latest simpsons. Entertain your driver damnit! And don't give me that, "But it keeps the kids quiet!" argument. Fuck your kids, your kids suck.
    3. OnStar: Apparently, you can use onstar to order flowers, arrange vacations, and have a hooker waiting for you on your lunch break. All things that are safer to do while you are NOT DRIVING. Well, maybe not the hooker, but come on people, cell phones are bad enough, now we have a shopping cart system in every rich man's car to distract him from what he should be paying attention to: the road.
    4. An OS: Since I do not want any of these handy "time saving" services in my car, why in hell's name do I need an OS for in my car? I don't! Last I checked, I don't have one in my current car, and it seems to get me to places just fine. I need windows CE running my car as much as I need MacOSX running the office water cooler.
    Sometimes people get so caught installing a computer in everything that they forget to take a step back and think, "Ya know, this is the dumbest idea I have ever had."
    --

    --Nuintari

    slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

  39. Official Apple link by the+JoshMeister · · Score: 3, Informative


    iPod Your BMW. Says Apple, this is "The first seamless integration of iPod and automobile."

    Others had made similar homebrew iPod and non-iPod solutions before (and iPod and non-iPod after) Apple/BMW's solution.

    At this point, it doesn't look like Apple has any official plans to unveil further integration of Apple technology with automobiles. Of course, Apple almost always "does not comment on unreleased products."

  40. Re:Note to Car Manufacturers by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Funny

    A car without Windows? How will you see the road? Will it have a funky video system, and you'll be surrounded by screens?

    (what a terrible pun)

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  41. BSOD on Thai Finance Minister's BMW by EqualSlash · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Last year the Thai Finance Minister was trapped inside his BMW allegedly due to a software glitch. http://www.thaivisa.com/index.php?514&backPID=514& tt_news=325 But another report said it was due to an electronic failure.. http://asia.cnet.com/news/systems/0,39037054,39130 270,00.htm

    1. Re:BSOD on Thai Finance Minister's BMW by EqualSlash · · Score: 3, Informative
  42. Windows in my car by jmpresto_78 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The windows in my car work just fine and I have 6 of them. Four of them are as interactive as I get with windows anymore. I put it up, I put it down. It even has it's own version of "Shutdown": Push the button, hold for .5 sec and release and it will go down all by itself.

    My question is: If this was in a Jeep, could I "remove the windows" when I go off-roading or would I have to rebuild the Jeep? Will there be an "Add/Remove Hardware" button in the jeep to remove and install my windows? What about the doors or the hard top?

  43. WinCE contains plenty of WinXX code by MarsF · · Score: 3, Interesting

    BTW don't foget, WinCE shares absolutely zero code with other versions of Windows.

    Sorry, but this statement is straight up false. The WinCE kernel is based off of the Windows NT 4.0 kernel. Also, WinCE shares the architecture of Windows 2000.

    Microsoft ripped out a large part of the OS functionality and replaced other parts. Most of the API is the exact same as Win2K, but a lot of function calls with eleven arguments under Win2K require to you pass nine of them as NULL or zero under WinCE.

    Just imagine the security situation this chainsaw OS surgery has created. Think bluesnarfing is fun now? Try it when you can hijack the entire entertainment and navigation system of that expensive SUV that just cut you off!

  44. QNX is doing well in the automotive industry by Animats · · Score: 2, Informative
    Actually, if there's an OS in a car today, it's probably QNX. QNX's maker, QSSL, keeps a low profile; you don't see their logo on end user products. But somewhere inside, there's the little OS that just works.

    I've heard that Microsoft made a presentation to some big car company, and insisted that Microsoft had to control the content of the startup screen. The car people did not like that at all.

  45. Delete key is far to the right by Rufus88 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please step on brake, gas, and clutch simultaneously to reboot.

    More like brake, gas, and passenger-side door lock simultaneously

  46. Blue windshield of death by Nonillion · · Score: 2, Funny

    Microsoft announced that in order to track bugs they will include a new dump screen called the "Blue windshield of death"

    --
    "I bow to no man" - Riddick
  47. Obligatory GM vs M$ joke. by caesar79 · · Score: 3, Funny

    At a recent computer expo, Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated "If GM had kept up with technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving $25.00 cars that got 1,000 miles to the gallon.
    In response to Bill's comments, General Motors issued a press release stating: If GM had developed technology like Microsoft, we would all be driving cars with the following characteristics:

    For no reason whatsoever, your car would crash twice a day.

    Every time they repainted the lines in the road, you would have to buy a new car.

    Occasionally your car would die on the freeway for no reason. You would have to pull over to the side of the road, close all of the windows, shut off the car, restart it, and reopen the windows before you could continue. For some reason you would simply accept this.

    Occasionally, executing a maneuver such as a left turn would cause your car to shut down and refuse to restart, in which case you would have to reinstall the engine.

    Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was reliable, five times as fast and twice as easy to drive - but would run on only five percent of the roads.

    The oil, water temperature, and alternator warning lights would all be replaced by a single "General Protection Fault" warning light.

    The airbag system would ask "Are you sure?" before deploying.

    Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle, turned the key and grabbed hold of the radio antenna.

    Every time GM introduced a new car, car buyers would have to learn to drive all over again because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as the old car.

    You'd have to press the "Start" button to turn the engine off.

  48. Not MY car. I'll rather build my own. by Werrismys · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hate Windows from the bottom of my soulless being as it is now, trying to solve menial tasks running trivial software. I'd rank controlling the vehicle I'm in as mission-critical. The nearest it gets to my car is in the trunk as long as the puter in question is turned off.

    --
    'Once scientists, even the dim-witted social scientists, get muzzled, the Western Civilization is finished.' - oldhack
  49. Nothing new... by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The car was one of the original targets for WinCE V 1.0... about 6 or so years back now. There was a CD-player size thing called the Clarion or some such that never really made any impact.

    Since then they have made glossies for an automotive version (along side their PDA version, Smartphone edition etc), though it isn't apparent that they've got many customers onboard.

    So long as they stay the hell away from brakes and engine control I'm not too worried.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  50. Windows clip helper! And now with synthetic voice! by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Funny

    Scene: Woman tries to start her car at midnight as some vandals are threatening her.

    "Hello! Welcome to the Windows automotive helper. Would you like me to?

    a) Start the car,
    b) Open the doors,
    c) Call for help.

    a a a!!!

    "Hmm... the car doesn't seem to start. Would you like me to?

    a) Check the oil
    b) Check the gas
    c) Check the engine temperature

    Ok, go back! Call the police!

    "Seems you're in an emergency! Is it?
    a) Fire,
    b) Car crash
    c) Other

    c, just hurry!

    "Okay, I don't know what happened in this emergency. So i'll open the doors. Have a nice day".

    NOOOOOOOOOOO

    (Evil assault scene follows)

    Ten minutes later...

    "Hey, looks like you're hurt. Would you like me to?"
    a) Call the paramedics
    b) Call the police
    c) Call the fire dept.

    "**** up you idiot!!"

    "Self destructing... have a nice day."

  51. When was the last time your ethernet cable by Intraloper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    spent 30,000 miles being jounced around subject to flying debris, water, oil, SALT, heat, cold, in a semi-open environment. If I get a hydraulic problem I can spot it quickly by seeing the drip, or noticing the reservoir is down a bit, or the warnign light comes on. If I get contaminated fluid, I can still pump the brakes to a stop. If my 'ethernet controlled' brake system fails, I got nuthin'. I dont like having nuthin', when its my brakes I'm talking about.

  52. Re:WinCE instead of QNX? Why? by Keith+Duhaime · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I also recall somewhere that a number of senior automotive execs became extremely leery of MS after they did a presentation of some grand vision they had for the automotive industry. Apparently they the auto execs) like the fact that QSSL, besides making a solid product in QNX, has decided that is all they are going to do. MS could take a lesson from QSSL- do one thing and do it right.

  53. The wrong mentality by smeenz · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This is the result of the "you can't get fired by buying xxxxx" mentality, and the droids that design these cars figure they're not going to get fired by teaming up with Microsoft, but as we all know, Microsoft is the king of the software world.

    Despite the media attention Microsoft has been getting lately regarding security (or lack thereof) concerns, most end users still don't understand what all the fuss is about, because let's face it - that's a problem for the computer techs to worry about.

    The general public don't even understand who or what Microsoft is. They just click here to go to "mail", which is 99% of the time, Outlook Express, but they don't know that. It's just their mail. Then they click on the attachment and it opens in the word processor, which is of course Word, but again, they don't know that.

    In fact, they don't know, by name, any of the software they use on their computer. They don't know which company made it, and neither do they care.

    Sometimes they hear about these 'linux' people, and they regard them as akin to someone who builds a hotrod from scratch - it's certainly not something that they would be doing themselves.

    Some of these people work for the auto industry. They use computers, but as an end-user, not as a technician or programmer. They have managers, who use the corporate email program, which is of course Outlook, but they don't know what it's called.

    Some of the high ranking managers have PDAs that they use to check their email and show off with in board meetings. They run Windows CE, and once again, they have no idea of that fact.

    At this point, does it surprise anyone that knowing what they do about the computer industy, that these companies choose to work with microsoft to get integrated computers installed in their cars ?

    Microsoft has always targeted the CEO/CIO types the most strongly, because you only need to put the work in to convince a few of those types to use your products and you'll get thousands or more licenses sold. And guess what, it's those same people who are the ones deciding who to partner with for integrated car computers.

    /dev/surprise: No such file or directory