Slashdot Mirror


TiVo Plans More Functionality Reductions

TiVo has been in the news recently with a couple of plans to make their service less useful than it could be: first, TiVos will now auto-delete pay-per-view and video-on-demand movies, and second, TiVo is making sure that you can't use a TiVo to view NFL games outside the specified market area. TiVo's lawyer explains.

109 of 521 comments (clear)

  1. Irony by Prophetic_Truth · · Score: 3, Funny

    it's only fitting that when I clicked this article it read "Nothing for you to see here. Please move along."

    --
    time is a perception of a being's consciousness
    time is your 6th sense, the wierd ones are 7+
  2. Hmmm... by TheSpoom · · Score: 4, Funny

    And I'll continue to not own a TiVo and download the shows I want to watch. Damn that internet! ;^)

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
    1. Re:Hmmm... by Baseclass · · Score: 2, Informative
      As of May 2004 North American MythTv users have been able to legally download schedules from zap2it.com provided we fill out a 5 question survey every 3 months.

      Downloading listings is way faster now too. There is no way I would ever subscribe to Tivo or any other commercial PVR service. Long live open source.

      --
      ^^vv<><>BA
  3. Glad I have myth by FictionPimp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm just glad I have mythTV. Sure I might have a problem if I have to switch to digital cable, but I dont have to worry about people deleting my videos before i'm done with them.

    1. Re:Glad I have myth by conteXXt · · Score: 2, Informative

      dvb-t (digital cable support) or dvb-s (satellite)
      should do the trick :-)

      (myth supports both)

      --
      The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
    2. Re:Glad I have myth by ERJ · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe that you would be limited to non-encrypted signals with dvb capable cards. That would pretty much leave you with local channels...

    3. Re:Glad I have myth by enrico_suave · · Score: 5, Informative

      You won't necessarly have a problem when you switch to digital cable... you'd do the same thing a TiVo user does... You'd use an IR blaster (or a serial cable if you have a motrolla 2k dig cable box that hasn't been crippled by your cable company)

      The IR blaster will be controlled by your mythbox... the ir blaster will simulate your digital cable boxes remote control presses to change teh channel at the appropriate times to record the shows you want... you just pipe the output via svideo or composite into your capture/tuner card =)

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    4. Re:Glad I have myth by Darth+Maul · · Score: 5, Informative

      Amen. MythTV is a great solution for anyone considering a PVR solution. A few points to consider:

      1) Back- and front-end architecture. I have one backend that records, and two front-end lightweight machines that can view content.

      2) Free (not counting computer hardware costs, however).

      3) Can use external channel changer like TiVo (I have a satellite box, so I need an IR transmitter to change channels on it).

      4) More than just TV! I have my entire music collection on there, along with DVDs, games, weather, images...

      5) Need more recording space? Just stick in another hard drive (I know you can do this with TiVO, but your warranty is then void). I currently can record up to 160 hours on my box.

      6) Different themes available.

      7) Auto commercial detection.

      8) Can edit and cut out parts of a video recording so you can burn to DVD without commercials, etc.

      The list goes on... I've used it for well over a year and just love it. The WAF is also quite high (skipping commercials is huge).

      --
      --- witty signature
    5. Re:Glad I have myth by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, I have a tivo right now and am increasingly bumping up against its limitations. I plan to build a MythTV PVR sometime next year, and outfit it with an unholy amount of hard drive space (~1-1.5TB.) That'd also let me run other services off the system, such as nfs/samba file storage for the apartment network. Streaming video to the other systems in the apartment would be a lot easier too.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    6. Re:Glad I have myth by andrew_j_w · · Score: 3, Informative

      ...such as this one . /dev/dvb/adapter0/dvr0 outputs the raw 18Mb/s stream contain all the TV channels (on that band) which can then be split into the raw MPEG2 using the dvbstream program.

    7. Re:Glad I have myth by vashathastampedo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is still not worth the time to me until full HDTV support (cable, etc.) is available. When you get an HD set, you get spoiled.

    8. Re:Glad I have myth by DaveJay · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Rather than attack TiVo for this, consider that they were pressured into it: either accept the limitations on the Macrovision license, or no Macrovision license at all (and therefore no TiVo To Go feature on the new machines).

      Better to attack the content providers by refusing to purchase PPV movies for recording on your TiVo. On the other hand, I sincerely hope that TiVo will continue to offer boxes WITHOUT TiVo To Go, so that this industry-imposed limitation isn't mandatory for a TiVo purchase.

      Think of it like the DivX vs DVD thing from a few years ago -- did we all get angry at the manufacturers who offered DivX boxes? Nope, we just bought non-DivX DVD machines from the same manufacturers, or (at the end of the road) bought the deeply-discounted DivX machines and never, ever purchased a single DivX movie.

    9. Re:Glad I have myth by plover · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You called it "attack", but replace it with your other word: "pressure".

      If TiVo is "pressured" from both sides, something will have to give. Either TiVo will cave to the movie companies, causing a significant loss of goodwill and customer base as people choose cheaper alternatives (such as the DVR that comes built into cable modems these days); or TiVo will cancel the software downgrade, retaining their customer base and revenue stream and POTENTIALLY opening themselves up to lawsuits.

      Lets just hope that TiVo recognizes an existing revenue stream is worth more than the cost of a potential lawsuit. What's the worst that could happen to them if they're sued, anyway? The court could order them to make exactly this change. Then, the ill-will would at least be focused on the real perpetrators: the movie companies who sued TiVo and forced this change upon their customers. They may still lose revenue stream as people head for the cable-box DVRs, but at least their fan-base won't be pissed off at them.

      --
      John
  4. Should read by Phixxr · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Should read "Tivo plans to shrink customer base".

    -phixxr

    --
    ungggghhhh
    1. Re:Should read by retto · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Riiiight.... I'm sure the bulk of Tivo's base is really concerned about live-streaming NFL games to another site. I fail to see how NOT adding that functionality to a new product is going to cause lots of current subscribers to drop their current Tivo service. Tivo markets their product as a way to record shows when you aren't around, and I'm pretty sure their current customers think that is the most important benefit to owning a Tivo.

    2. Re:Should read by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh please. The fact the big media hasn't destroyed the tivo company is something of a miracle. All tivo is doing is obeying corrupt american IP laws. Fight this at the grassroots, then in DC. Complaining to tivo for the laws of your republic is counter productive.

  5. TiVo Shoots Self in Foot by Trikenstein · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can see how they would do this to reduce their legal costs, but it has to be costing them subscribers.

    1. Re:TiVo Shoots Self in Foot by 4of12 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I own 2 TiVo units. Upgraded the disks myself. Bought 2 lifetime subscriptions for program guides.

      For a small company trying to grow its subscriber base and earn more revenue, doing the opposite of what customers want seems to be phenomenonally foot wounding for TiVo.

      I'll soon upgrade to HDTV. But given the restrictions coming down the pike on digital recording, eg, the broadcast flag in July 2005, I'll probably just build my own MythTV box for my future PVR needs, not buying an HD-TiVo.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
  6. TiVo: Less useful everyday by d_jedi · · Score: 4, Funny

    (ie: parody of MSN's "More useful everyday" slogan, for the mods :-> )

    --
    I am the maverick of Slashdot
  7. Knew it by Omniscientist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The reason that TiVo has to auto-delete a PPV movie is because it will be available for sale on DVD later on. " Saw this whole thing coming...of course some gigantic shows that make alot of money off advertising (NFL), and big movie productions were eventually going to start complaining to TiVo...I knew it wouldn't last!!!

    1. Re:Knew it by AgTiger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The markets films are released to are (in this order): Theater, DVD/Video, PPV, Premium, Cable and/or Network/Broadcast.

      PPV doesn't preceed DVD/Video, because otherwise the purchase and rental markets would suffer.

      The movie industry is all about milking the customers completely before going on to the next field of cows.

  8. PPV by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't understand the problem. With Pay Per View, you are QUITE SPECIFICALLY buying a license to watch a movie once. You are PAYing PER VIEW.

    There's no ambiguity about buying physical media vs the content, about buying a license, and so on. You're paying to have a movie playing to your sat/cable box at a specific time and date. Done.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    1. Re:PPV by DroopyStonx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah but... no one loses out on money if you copy it and watch it later.

      How many times have you personally ordered the SAME pay per view movie more than once? Unless you're lying, the answer is none.

      So really, it doesn't matter. They're clearly just doing this to be assholes and try to further put control on what people can record and keep even though the material in question, along with their profits, is completely irrelevant.

      --
      We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    2. Re:PPV by 0123456 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of course, as usual, you completely ignore the difference between renting a DVD and not returning it -- i.e. depriving the owner of their property -- and copying a PPV movie and keeping it, which only deprives the distributor of potential future income that you were probably never going to give them anyway.

      So quite why your post is rated 'Insightful' is beyond me.

    3. Re:PPV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, your amazing skills of logic and reasoning fail to amaze me at all.

      This analogy doesn't survive the laugh test. A video store rents you a movie. That is a physical copy. PPV is a broadcast copy. Keeping a rented video deprives the store of their physical posession. Recording a broadcast does no such thing.

      Your analogy looks something like this:

      I take a photograph of your house. I have just STOLEN YOUR F*CKING HOUSE OMG!!1!1!one!1

    4. Re:PPV by GoofyBoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >it doesn't mean you actually have to give me your house for a move unless you're really really stupid and don't know all your rights.

      Huh?

      Party 1: Give me legal ownership of your house or equivlent money and I will let you watch/own this movie.
      Party 2: Agreed.

      Ok, the Party 2 might be dumb or smart depending on the worth of his house or if he gains rights to something he believes is worth the house.
      But how does Party 2 knowing all his rights makes the agreement invalid?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    5. Re:PPV by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Insightful
      They're clearly just doing this to be assholes and try to further put control on what people can record and keep even though the material in question, along with their profits, is completely irrelevant.

      Or, more likely, they're doing it to stave off possible legal challenges from the purveyors of PPV movies and NFL football. Said purveyors may have already made an issue of it behind the scenes.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    6. Re:PPV by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Insightful
      With Pay Per View, you are QUITE SPECIFICALLY buying a license to watch a movie once. You are PAYing PER VIEW.

      That may be what the provider intends, but unless there is law backing that up, I am entitled record it and view it later as I please.

      Standard copyright case law allows me to timeshift, and I didn't sign any contract with the cable company that said I specifically couldn't record a PPV show.

      There's no ambiguity about buying physical media vs the content, about buying a license, and so on. You're paying to have a movie playing to your sat/cable box at a specific time and date. Done.

      As I just pointed out, you're just plain wrong. I don't need a license as an end user because standard copyright law allows me to timeshift the show without one. There is no license. I payed to have the movie play on my box, and I'm entitled to save it for later viewing.

    7. Re:PPV by jxyama · · Score: 2, Interesting
      i think the problem is, what you do with Tivo is not the concern of the tivo manufacturer. the fact they can delete things on their own is a bit over the top.

      even if you rent an apartment, your landlord still cannot just come into your place even though they "own" it.

    8. Re:PPV by NardofDoom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So if you have a dream about the movie, or you repeat a line from the movie, or visualize a scene in the movie, or tell a friend about a scene, are you stealing? Maybe you should buy the movie again since you want to see it again.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    9. Re:PPV by pyrrhonist · · Score: 3, Insightful
      copying a PPV movie and keeping it, which only deprives the distributor of potential future income that you were probably never going to give them anyway.

      If you aren't going to watch it again, then why do you need to keep it?

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    10. Re:PPV by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How about renting it, copying it and then returning it. You are keeping a permanent copy for a rental price, if you want a permanent copy why not purchase a permenent copy in the first place? Oh thats right, because the arguement 'I wouldnt have bought it anyway, so it isnt hurting anyone' comes into play as it normally does on slashdot. If you werent going to buy it anyway, what entitles you to a free copy? I think $19.99 is a very good price for what I get on a DVD.

    11. Re:PPV by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >since there is a large discrepancy between the market price of the movie and the market price of the house.

      There are alot of assumption you are making.

      Suppose my house is a cardboard box?

      Suppose you gain ownership of Gone With the Wind or Citizen Kane?

      In any case, I would find it hard to believe that any serious judge would hear the case just based on single, sole fact that one party feels they paid too much, with no other factors involved.

      If that was true, the courts would be jammed and you would never buy or sell anything.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    12. Re:PPV by amcguinn · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why not -- that's the copyright owners' argument:

      "We've been selling media for years and nobody has had the equipment to make perfect copies (because it was too expensive or completely unavailable), so that now the technology has made the equipment widely available, it should be banned".

    13. Re:PPV by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think the point is that you are depriving them of future income. The point is that only the copyright owner can copy the work, or allow it to be copied. It's a right you don't have. Even if the rental price was $0, the legality of copying that video doesn't change. Is it less of a violation to copy something you borrow from a library?

      It's a copyright violation, not a depriving-me-of-income violation.

      -ec

    14. Re:PPV by Richard_at_work · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because it's a perfectly good and valid argument: if someone looks at my house, considers buying it, but then decides to build a copy instead, I have no right to demand they pay me money.

      No, it isnt a perfectly good and valid arguement, and that analogy is just plain laughable.

      The simple fact is that 'intellectual property' is an attempt to artificially create scarcity in an environment where there is none: at best it's a moronic abuse of government power, at worst it will prevent a truly information-based economy from arising. It's nothing more than the modern equivalent of buggy-whip manufacturers conspiring with the government to keep those new-fangled automobiles off the road.

      If there wasnt an artificial scarcity on hard to produce, easy to copy items then really how many films would we be enjoying now? How many authors would be producing best sellers? How many musicians would be producing works? How many computer/console games would be being released? I will tell you now, not many at all. When it comes down to it, the majority of items produced for this 'artificial scarcity' are produced for money, not love, and without the artificial scarcity we would have rather less entertainment.

      Like it or not, Hollywood is a huge industry which employs a massive amount of people. Those people arent doing it for love, they are doing it to eat. Would they be there if their wages were on a charity basis? Hell no. They are there for the same reason you are at work, money. There may be a very few at the top end that are doing it for love.

      If we had to rely on amateur works to fill the void this industry would leave behind, then the world would be a dull place. Sure, youd get some gems (like Linux) but then you would get tonnes and tonnes of drivel (majority of sourceforge). Tell me when the last popular free book written in modern times came. Tell me when the last popular free 3d FPS was released. Tell me when the last amateur film made it big, got shown in cinemas world wide. You cant. For the most part, a lot of people dont have the resources to produce Doom3 or Titanic in their spare time (for that is what they will be doing, they have to earn money to eat as well).

      Next time you claim the artificial scarcity is an abuse of power, just think of the diversity and entertainment value that that scarcity has produced. Unless theres money involved, chances are it wouldnt happen otherwise as people dont have the resources. Software is an exception, because resources required are small for entry into this field.

    15. Re:PPV by Control+Group · · Score: 3, Insightful
      This is an intuitively appealing, but false, argument. The fact of the matter is that people are willing to pay for content, whether or not copyright law exists. Your argument is the same one made against VCRs: if people can tape movies, why will they ever buy them? It's the argument that was made against player pianos (who'll buy sheet music?) and against TV (who will go to the movies?).

      Each of those occurrences similarly highlighted the same thing: people are willing to pay for content, particularly if it is made convenient and useful to them.

      Similarly, plenty of music, art and literature was created prior to the institionalization of modern copyright. Modern technology lowers the barriers to entry into the content-creation world; even without imposing artificial scarcity, if content was created absent such protection while it was harder to make, by what rationale is it predicted that less will be made when it's easier to make, even without that protection?

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    16. Re:PPV by numatrix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Tell me when the last popular free book written in modern times came. Tell me when the last popular free 3d FPS was released. Tell me when the last amateur film made it big, got shown in cinemas world wide. You cant.

      Yes, yes I can.
      Books: "Free Culture", "Down and out in the Magic Kingdom"
      Film: Blair Witch
      FPS: Don't game much, but I'm quite sure others could fill the gap here and point out some amazing stuff done by amateurs without profit in mind.

      Sure, lots of amateur stuff is shlock, but lots isn't, it just doesn't get the publicity of corporately sponsored products and thus often doesn't get noticed irrespective of any value. Don't you read whenever a story on major label music comes up on Slashdot and everyone starts posting about all the good indie music they've found once they tuned out the corporate media?

    17. Re:PPV by Kjella · · Score: 3, Informative

      Timeshifting was approved because shows would air at a fixed date. The non-infringing use they based their decision on was to view the show only once, but at a different time. They did not, despite it being a result, give you a right to create a permanent copy that you could view many times (albeit watching it once over several sessions, or starting over due to interruption would go under fair use).

      Since then, there are a number of factors that have improved to ours, the consumers, advantage. No quality loss (digital copies), easy commercial skips but the base non-infringing use has been the same - time-shifting.

      If you take away the time-shifting argument by making content available at any time (on-demand) or close to (say, every hour), that argument is withering. You may argue that you want the movie to start at exactly 19.43, but it would be a much weaker argument.

      Should the specific case of a tool only capable of time-shifting PPV content ever reach the Supreme court, don't be too surprised if the verdict is against you. As for a common TiVo box, the non-infringing use would be all the standard fixed broadcasts, the PPV use merely collateral.

      That being said, there is a much more important case being brought before the Supreme court now, that of P2P applications and their liability for copyright infringement. It is far more fundamental than the Betamax case, because it will shape the future of all digital devices and software, as a sequence of 0s and 1s can be copyrighted. Digital PVRs would be just one small subset of devices whose fate depend on that outcome.

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    18. Re:PPV by Suidae · · Score: 2, Informative

      even if you rent an apartment, your landlord still cannot just come into your place even though they "own" it.

      In the U.S. they can, as long as they give a minimum 24 hour notice.

  9. Build your own... by Standmic · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.byopvr.com/

    1. Re:Build your own... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree. My homebuilt PVR does everything I want without any restrictions. And they're cheap to build and require no monthly fees.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    2. Re:Build your own... by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      you know I hear this mantra every time we have a Tivo article..... and it's not realistic...

      I went down that road, I built a mythbox and a freevo. I fought with them monthly. Then the service provider in the US dries up and forces you to register with them every 3 months with looming promises of having to pay for the right to access it.

      I gave up, sold all the equipment and bought a refurbed ReplayTV for $100.00 and have not looked back cince. I can easily get shows off the replay to a computer for burning to DVD or simply having a media server with lots of content. It always works and is worth the $12.95 a month to keep me from fighting with another change in XMLTV packages or other failure,change or waiting for the listing provider to change their mind again.

      for 99% of the people out there making your own PVR is not an option. hell for most techno-geeks
      it still is not an option.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Build your own... by infochuck · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You, sir, are a) a liar, b) an idiot, and c) a distorter of the facts (only slightly different from (A)).

      A - Zap2It has NEVER SAID they intend to go to a pay-service model. In fact, they have repeatedly said they have NO plans to do so - they may be lying, but so are you if you claim "looming promises of having to pay for the right to access it"

      B - I don't understand how you can "fight with [a modern linux system] monthly" when so many others have gargantuan uptimes and NO problems - ONCE the initial setup has been taken care of. Now, to be fair, XMLTV - the old method of scraping Zap2It's data did break frequently - about once a month, which often involved rpm -U'ing a new package. Oooo, that's tough.

      C - Since going to the DataDirect model, Zap2It hasn't changed anything, and XMLTV is obsolete (in NA, anyway). Yes, every three months you have to sign in to Zap2It's website and answer three questions about what you're using the service for - big deal. It's free.

      You are right on one count - for most of the people out there, building their own PVR is not an option. I disagree that it's not an option for "most techno-geeks". I can see why YOU'D think so; you obviously fancy yourself to be one of these said techno-geeks. Unfortunatly, you are only half-right, at best, and only in the classical sense of the word. You, sir, may bite the heads off of chickens for fun and profit, but you certainly aren't a modern geek.

  10. Too Many KneeJerk Responses by FortKnox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm reading too many "Well I'm glad I don't get TiVo" or "This will KILL TiVo."

    No, what will kill TiVo is all of television, TV, and sporting leagues suing the pants off of them for providing something that the can prove is illegal (like viewing NFL games outside the specified market area). This is a setup to allow people to share shows amongst TiVos, but making sure they have a legal basis to not get sued.

    TiVo has already been hacked (and TiVo doesn't punish for it), so how long do you think it'll be between when TiVo allows program sharing and someone hacks it so you can avoid these new rules?

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Strange, I'm looking for the law that restricts viewing NFL games outside the specified market area and I can't seem to find it.

    2. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I will never understand why some team owners think that blacking out home games is a good idea. If you can't watch your hometown team play on TV, are you going to all of a sudden decide to blow several hundred dollars to go to the stadium to see the game? I suppose some people are this braindead, but I would think most would say "screw the !" This strategy makes as much sense as the MPAA attempts to ban the VCR. Overall team profits should increase with more exposure as fans tend to buy team merchandise, go to games, watch games on TV which leads to advertising revenue, etc. Hint to team owners, if nobody goes to your games it's probably because your team sucks and the tickets are overpriced.

    3. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by rhombic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We're doing the experiment in San Diego, and so far it looks like the blackout is hurting ticket sales.

      For the past decade or so, blackouts were prevented by the city purchasing all the unsold tickets-- every home game was a sell out, courtesy of the taxpayers. This year, the clause was killed and so non-sold out home games (which is every home game) is blacked out. By the NFL's logic, therefore, you'd expect higher attendance at the game, right?

      So far, with three home games this season, average attendance is DOWN 14% ! It looks like even the perennial biggest seller of the year, the Raiders game this weekend, won't sell out and so will be blacked out. The net result of the blackout? NOBODY CARES. The chargers are having a pretty decent season (4-3 so far, usually we're 1-6 at this point) and NOBODY CARES. When you take the games off the TV, the audience doesn't take it upon themselves to spend $100 each to go to the game, they just find something else to do Sunday. Lost ticket revenue, lost TV revenue, lost fans. Idiots.

      --
      1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
    4. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by yetanothermike · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was clear from your post that you don't own the product whose demise you predict BEFORE you you added the disclaimer. The beauty of the TiVo is it's simplicity and the convienence it gives to it's customer base. TiVo is not catering to the hard core geeks that may build their own rigs, but they are also not alienating them by not legislating the hacks out of existence. The future expansion of TiVo will continue until it is as prevalent as the cable box. Companies such as DirecTV, Dish Network, Comcast, etc... are subsidizing the cost of them to keep customers. You really think that the cable/sat companies are going to halt this practice anytime soon? People want it, people pay for it and provide an additional revenue stream for big business. Keeping people from streaming NFL games to different geographic regions and making PPVs go away after they have been watched once (just like the very popular VOD offering) won't hurt anything. So you rent the DVD and shrink it and you build a PC using software that lets you stream from elsewhere. The geeks and hackers will still be able to do it. The general public won't care. The TiVo is STILL doing what they want. We're talking about TV watchers here. The market to expand to is the couch potato. The geeks already have the functionality. The ONLY problem I see here is that there is the impression that TiVo is buckling under to big corps and legal pressure. I don't see it that way, but I understand those who do. When the hacks start getting supressed then I will be ticked. Also, for the record, DirecTV has disabled some of the features that could make providers mad, like the 30 second skip. The NetFlix/TiVo deal is another example that TiVo isn't dying off at all. They're continuing to innovate while dealing with the legal issues that will be around for quite some time.

      --

      [insert sig file here]

  11. probably due to new tivos with dvd-r by acomj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The new Tivos have a dvd-r. It would cut down on selling of sports dvds if you can just "burn your own" so content makers are going to freak. It still doesn't seem to restrictive since I don't watch pay per view or the NFL.

    like this one tivo / burner from pioneer

  12. They aren't getting their greedy hands... by pkx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...on my "Sleeper ISO" hacked series 2 DirecTiVo [info].

  13. Macrovision by St.+Arbirix · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember Macrovision.

    They're the ones who did that funny trick with DVDs so the screen brightness would flicker which prevented anyone from running the television signal through any device that adhered to a standard.

    They're the asshats who slipped that little "suprise" in with Turbo Tax that one year. Appliance rape, I called it.

    TiVo should take the moral high road and at least supply some screwdriver-accessible switch which forces the machine to ignore these things they talk of in the article. The lawyer said they weren't expecting Macrovision to Trojan horse TiVo with this, but I don't think he's ever watched his computer sit in the corner and cry while a baby C_DILLA grows inside of it.

    --
    Direct away from face when opening.
  14. Just Series2 or Series1 also? by Boone^ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Series1 hasn't seen a software update in eons, so I'm assuming us early adopters are safe from this? I can't imagine TivoToGo would be supported on Series 1 anyway.

  15. Jesus, don't blame Tivo. by Gannoc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Blame the NFL, content providers, etc. Do you expect Tivo to say "FUCK YOU WORLD, WE'Z DOING IT OUR WAY!" They'd be sued out of existance.

  16. Re:Stupid. by bastion_xx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I say screw tivo and it's brethren. Build your own system.

    I own a DirecTivo yet am doing what you've suggested and am building a system for my GF and her kids (analog cable only).

    MythTV + ASUS Pundit-R + PVR-350 + Fedora FC2

    I'm now at about 30 hours of effort and climbing. Not that I care too much as I've learned about about the driver structure for ivtv, lirc, and xorg configs (don't get to play with non-MS GUI's too often). Short of it is, roll-your-own is only for those that have the technical expertise and can understand that apt-get of the pre2-100zz packages don't work with the latest firmware in card XYZ.

    When compared to pulling a Tivo out of the box, plugging it in, going through the setup menu and having it work vs the current MythTV more MS MCE crip crap, it's a no brainer. Hopefully HTPC packages will become more refined, both in the OSS environment and off the shelf (I'd love to try MCE but am not willing to pay the cost especially on uncertified hardware).

    Caving in to Macrovision and the content providers will be a blow to Tivo in the long run. It's unfortunate that even if there is a huge backlash from users, thier voices will be a pale echo of the majority of PVR users (those being provided by the cable companies, etc).

    Sad day for Tivo indeed.

  17. Who can blame TiVo? by Ralph+JH+Nader · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You just know that if TiVo hadn't implemented these restrictions that they'd have trouble with lawyers representing the NFL and the movie industry. It may make it less useful, but it's better than nothing. The real problem is the greed that dominates the entertainment industries and their attempts to jew every last dollar out of the hands of ordinary people. This move sucks, but don't blame TiVo.

    1. Re:Who can blame TiVo? by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ... and their attempts to jew every last dollar out ...

      Wow, even my rednecked father has stop using this particular turn of phrase ...

    2. Re:Who can blame TiVo? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, the proper term for the entertainment industry is the opposite.

      NAZI!!

      Where's Godwin when you need him?

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  18. Not a big deal by WebGangsta · · Score: 3, Insightful
    So TiVo and the NFL reached an agreement regarding TiVo's planned ability to send fully recorded programs across the country so that the NFL maintains their localized blackouts. How can anyone have a problem with this? It's the same thing that the NFL did with DirecTV when the NFL Sunday Ticket was created.

    All the NFL is asking TiVo to do is not make recorded programs available for transfer while that program is still being aired. Once the game is finished, feel free to shoot it over. Of course, that would take hours of bandwidth at current speeds, so it's not really an issue anyway.

    I'd rather have companies like TiVo work with the content providers to reach agreements rather than have companies sue each other over supposed 'copyright' violations.

  19. Re:Glad I have Dish PVR by computechnica · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Dish networks PVR is restriction free. It will record anything you want and keep it. It also has the nice 30 second skip on the remote (with out any codes to turn it on). I use my old All-in-Wonder card to permanently record shows from it. The only thing it lacks is the smart recording functions that TIVO has, but then that function sounds like it would be a lot of work to delete things it records that you do not want.

    Best thing about it is that it was free 8^)

  20. accelerating their own death by steelerguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Tivo is in big trouble anyway since all the major cable companies are coming out with their own DVR's with a pretty small monthly fee. This alone is probably enough to get rid of them in 5 years or so.

    Then they go removing features and pretty much pissing off their loyal customer base, the only people they have to keep them going financially. I imagine cable companies will have the same issues with auto deleting pay per view, and no out of market sporting events, but if they never give you that in the first place it won't be so bad. In addition their hardware is going to work on their systems a lot better than adding on a Tivo to your existing cable system.

    Bye bye Tivo.

    1. Re:accelerating their own death by jgordon7 · · Score: 5, Informative

      As a recent owner of one of those Cable DVRs and being a previous tivo owner.

      I hope that is not the case. Since my experience with the cable service DVR is extremely poor. Even though the Cable one can record HD channels and has Dual Tuners, its user interface is down right awful to the point of being almost unuseable. It is slow to react, trying to FF through commericals is almost more painful than watching the commercials. Its conflict management is just plain dumb. If one episode of a show you have as a favorite conflicts with a movie you want to watch you tell it to record the movie and not the favorite show, well it stops recording ALL future shows of that favorite TOO.

      If you start watching a recorded show that is not done recording it starts you at LIVE time, not the beginning of the show. If you rewind to the beginning which is what you have to do, and the show finishes recording before you finish watching the show it JUMPS you forward to LIVE TV. And it does not remember where you were in the show when you go back to watch it.

      Trying to find something to record is damn near impossible. The only search ability is by Title FIRST LETTER, so for say Simpson you have to weed through all of the shows that begin with "S". It has Genre search but is equally useless.

      And for recorded duplicate shows, even if you tell only get first runs, it records every airing of a show. This also make the poor conflict management even worse since it wants to records shows that have repeat showings in a week too.

      I will be dropping this POS, as soon as I get my money together to build a HTPC.

      Its only saving grace is price. However that is big for alot of people and means we will soon see more crappy PVRs in the future.

  21. Re:Stupid. by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is what I've always thought. I can see why Tivo makes it more convenient to record a show, with the menus you can control with your remote, but you could always set up a computer to record shows to your hard disk. Or use the old fashioned VCR. I view Tivo as a convenience item. Kind of like buying bread at the bakery instead of baking your own.

  22. Not a big deal by igrp · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I don't this this is such a big deal. As I understand it - and I might be wrong on this - these limitations only apply to new features (ie. remote access to recorded TV programming). So, I suppose this is basically a CYA maneuver to limit TiVo's liability and to stop costly litigation in its tracks.

    Plus, TiVos are indeed pretty hackable. In contrast to other manufacturers (eg. Microsoft put in a lot of effort to make sure the XBox was "unhackable"), TiVo doesn't really seem to mind people modifying their hardware all that much. And there are a lot of people who have "modded" their TiVos, even if it's just to swap out the harddrive for a bigger one. If you really want to permanently record a show, there's really nothing they can do to stop you. All they can do, is make it harder.

  23. Re: "cince" by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 2, Funny

    Today, a small part of the English language died.

  24. This might help. by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Audio Home Recording Act of 1992

    Section 1008 is interesting:

    "Section 1008. Prohibition on certain infringement actions

    No action may be brought under this title alleging infringement of copyright based on the manufacture, importation, or distribution of a digital audio recording device, a digital audio recording medium, an analog recording device, or an analog recording medium, or based on the noncommercial use by a consumer of such a device or medium for making digital musical recordings or analog musical recordings. "

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  25. This shouldn't be difficult to get around. by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Based on what I know about the tivo's design, I think this will be an easy thing to get around.

    There are only so many ways that tivo can add tags to tell the difference between pay per views and on demand items so that it knows what it should or shouldn't delete. One way is through attributes stored in the MFS structure, another way is maybe a hidden flag somewhere in the MFS filesystem itself, and probably the least likely method would be to tag the tystream itself.

    No matter which of these methods they use, it would be very easy to identify and remove any tags. What would work even better is to patch the tivoapp binary so that it doesn't add these tags in the first place, which is otherwise a hard thing to accomplish, but several people in the tivo hacking scene have done quite well at things like this.

    --
    Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
  26. Business vs. Business by prisonercx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know, it's funny how this looks like a blow to consumers, when actually it's a blow against other businesses. How much revenue does TiVo and the NFL really think they are going to lose with this technology? This technology, in the consumer space, competes only with those "all games nationwide in a sport" package like DirectTV's NBA League Pass. How many consumers will both a) want to buy that package and b) be technically proficient and financially liquid enough to set up TiVo's around the country to stream all the games to their house? Not too many, entirely too much effort to get around paying ~$200/season.

    Where I can see this being used is the sports bar market (for example). You get a bunch of sports bars nationwide which agree to stream each other the games from each market. Now the major cable/dish networks lose the revenue from each of those bars buying a premium sports package. Multiply this by tens of thousands of interested businesses, and it adds up to a significant amount. It seems to me that this is the real issue at hand.

  27. Well, I've owned a Tivo for by bob670 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    about 3.5 years now, I surely couldn't live without it at this point. But I guess the question I have is, who does this really effect? I don't think the average Tivo owner really cares as long as they get what they pay for. And in most cases you are "Paying Per View" for one view of that movie in a certain window, so as long as it's clear you have to watch it by a certain date, what is the issue? Same thing with the NFL, they share revenue based on a fairly complex formula, something like Tivo could really screw that up.

    These debates always boil down to those who are willing to pirate and those who aren't, but we can mask it as a "Fair Use" or "Consumer Rights" issue to keep the post count rolling. As far as Tivo goes, I watch a show, I delete it, I don't need to archive it for historical purposes and I have no right to do anything else with it. If it's really great I'll buy it on DVD and if it's like most shows I won't care. I'll bet I am in the majority of Tivo owners on this usage pattern yet people act like this policy somehow infringes on my right to use the device and it's content as described.

    I know it's hard for some of you to accept, but not everyone purchases consumer electronics to discover exploits and alternative uses, and most people are willing to accept some limitations for the added convenince that Tivo brings. Most people aren't pirating off ST:DS9 and editing out the commercials for their personal archive or for uploading to usenet. It's hardly a stretch to imagine your downloaded copy of Gigli is time limited and you have no friends, so stop playing that hacked version of Counter Strike Source with the aimbot you just found and watch your damn rental.

    1. Re:Well, I've owned a Tivo for by Knight2K · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think the issue really is, in the analog world, I could tape every episode of a TV series that I wanted and keep them as long as the tape lasted. I also could record every football game I was interested in and watch them when I wanted. Some games, like the Patriot's snow bowl, I might want to watch several times or edit together with all the moments of their Super Bowl year. With the advent of CD burners and VCDs I could even convert them to digital format and save some shelf space.

      I know the argument about digital: every copy made is a perfect copy, indistinguisable from the original. In the analog world, I could just keep making copies of my original tape recording and only suffer 1 generational fall-off.

      I'm not interested in taping movies off of PPV and then charging other people to show them. But I would like to be able to tape Game 4 of the World Series and send it to my grandmother. I might want to show friends a tape of the playoff game I went to where it was 20 below zero. Is the NFL really hurt by that?

      The old joke is that nobody can figure out how to set the clock on their VCRs. Yet we still can record using VCRs even though some people don't use that functionality.

      Want to stop piracy, MPAA, et. al.? Bust people who use mass duplicators and sell bootleg DVD's and CD's on street corners. Or look to your own people. How many people do you figure get to see a movie before its official release?

      People who taped movies off of TV still bought commercial tapes and DVD's. The quality was usually better because the transfers were made off of the master copies and the tapes could be sized to accomodate a full standard play version and no more. DVD's can optimize bitrates and provide additional discs. The content producers can also provide extras that you might not get in an OTA broadcast.

      Consumers are limited by compression used in broadcast, compression used by the Tivo to store files, and the expense involved to buy enough media or have enough storage to store content in at a desired quality level. Those prices may drop, but video files haven't been getting much smaller, especially with HD-quality video. Consumer writable DVD's and CD's use ink that degrades, as opposed to pressed plastic.

      Also consider that the piracy loss numbers that the various associations throw out are frequently exposed as over-blown. Frequently, piracy numbers are followed by a report of record profits. I don't think my making a mix CD for a road trip or ripping DVD's to a portable video player is hurting the content producers all that much.

      Accepting degraded functionality only makes it okay for the content distributors to take more capabilities away from you that you used to have. How long until you have to buy the right to Tivo an individual series? Or each episode in a series? Or not be able to timeshift a series at all? And all because you can now get cool sounds out of 6 speakers and can see every pore in Uma Thurman's skin.

      --
      ======
      In X-Windows the client serves YOU!
  28. Victimhood by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 5, Insightful

    TiVo is a victim. They're a victim of doing the right thing. The whole "information wants to be free" thing has gotten insanely out of hand. This is a logical waystation for us to be at, sadly enough, given society today. "If I want it, I should have it, and it doesn't matter that I signed a contract saying something different. Besides, it's not *really* theft, it's just a movie."

    [Wish I could offer you a job, but (a) we're not hiring and (b) we're not in Ohio. But integrity and understanding right and wrong are high on my list for qualifying applicants. And getting harder to find.]

    1. Re:Victimhood by adoarns · · Score: 5, Funny
      The whole "information wants to be free" thing has gotten insanely out of hand.

      Will someone mod this motherfucker up? PLEASE?

      No other person in this thread has correctly identified that
      • Right And Wrong are explicitly dependent on legislative status quo,
      • where potentially monetizable assets are a priori non-exclusive, the erection of artificial barriers to their easy dissemination is not only desirable but a religio-commercio-moral obligation;
      • that theft ipso facto is not simply deprivation of some entity's property, but a moral failing of untouchable classes to respect the limits to all kinds of access reasonably and righteously imposed, and finally
      • that since the sky is obviously falling, politically, culturally, and intellectually in this country, you better start wearing a fucking hardhat.

      And oh man! in so few words! What a guy, this. A true skewerer. "This whole 'Information wants to be free' thing has gotten out of hand" in one fell swoop condemning pile upon pile of hippie thought to obvious absurdity, and then reproving us, the degenerates, for our foolishness.
      --
      Tenemus pyrobolos atqui jacimus cognitiones.
    2. Re:Victimhood by Llama_STi · · Score: 2, Funny

      *zing!*

    3. Re:Victimhood by MacGod · · Score: 2, Funny

      [Wish I could offer you a job, but... we're not in Ohio...

      FYI: Ontario!=Ohio. The original post's sig was "Anyone looking for a sysadmin in Southern Ontario", not Ohio.

      I know you Yanks wish Canada was the 51st state, but that doesn't mean you can claim our provinces as your own just yet. That's reserved for Bush's second term

      --
      "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
  29. a counterpoint to the Tivo will die threads by seibed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have a Tivo, I quite like my Tivo and deleting PPV movies and NFL doesn't make a spot of difference to me because I don't watch them and I don't care. I suspect that 95% of consumers out there are the same way, so its only 5% of people that are even going to weigh the decision. I don't think PPV is competing heavily against the "watch it many times" market becuase then you'd just buy the DVD or Rent&Rip, hell there are 1$ DVD rentals everywhere... PPV is way overpriced IMHO anyway.

  30. Glad I have Snapstream by swordboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For those who are like me and don't want to deal with the configuration of Myth on linux with all of its dependency goodness, have a go at Beyond TV. It worked for me and I like it a lot. The new version (3.5) will do multiple tuners too.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:Glad I have Snapstream by LilMikey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Myth + Fedora is really a 3 step process.

      1. install fedora 2. install atrpms apt 3. apt-get install mythtv-suite.

      I guess for the Debian smart-asses it's only 2 :)

      Myth has been doing multiple tuners for quite a while now. If you do want to upgrade to Myth but the install and set up seems daunting first check out the website called "Fedora Mythology". If you still need help, feel free to contact me personally and I'll give any assistance I can.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
  31. So next we'll see by unsinged+int · · Score: 3, Funny

    neutered Aibos?

  32. Who uses TiVo to "keep" things? by yndrd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In my TiVo experience, it's just been useful for delaying my viewing for my convenience, not for archiving things. That's what DVD is for.

  33. Re:daily updates by Simulant · · Score: 2, Informative



    Some kind soul pretty regularly posts The Daily Show in alt.binaries.multimedia every week.

    I've lived in Europe for two years and have seen nearly all of them within days of them airing in the US.

    Thank you Mr. Poster!!! Please keep them coming.

    Oh am I going to cry when they finally shut USENET down.

  34. sensational? by Starbreeze · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Was the sensational headline really necessary? It's 'pay per view'... it only makes sense.

  35. Re:They just lost 3 sales. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I was going to buy one for my wife and I and a couple for my parents but I will not be doing it now.

    Why? Were you planning on building a huge library of PPV movies and blacked out NFL games?

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  36. Not much to see by AvantLegion · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The NFL one is a non-issue. Blackout rules apply. Although I may argue against the effectiveness of blackouts, their intention is valid: prevent TV coverage from pillaging ticket sales, and ultimately hurting/killing the league. TV contracts are lucrative, but ticket sales are the lifeblood.

    The PPV one is a little more disconcerting. Don't really like the idea. Not that I ever get PPV movies, but I don't like auto-deletion like that.

    But let's be real: does anyone think TiVo WANTS to do any of this?? This is TiVo making small concessions to help hold back the onslaught.

    1. Re:Not much to see by rhombic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "TV contracts are lucrative, but ticket sales are the lifeblood."

      Maybe so, but does blacking out the TV actually increase ticket sales? Our city is doing the experiment, and as far as I can tell (they're not releasing numbers as far as I've heard) bringing the blackout back doesn't seem to be upping attendance.

      I live in San Diego, where we didn't have black-outs the last few seasons, courtesy of an a$$-raping contract between the Chargers and our crooked-as-a-twisty-straw city council that guarenteed them the revenue of a sell-out for every game-- the city would pay them full ticket price for every unsold seat. After much wrangling and public outcry, that clause has been terminated, and every non-sellout home game (which is every game excapt the Raiders) is now blacked out.

      Know what? I don't know a single person who's gone to more games because of it. My group of friends averaged one or two games a year, and we're going to one this year. They lost the TV revenue, and it doesn't look like they're upping seat sales-- the blackout just makes people not care as much. I used to watch pretty much every home game, and the Chargers got the TV revenue from it. This year, I don't even know what their record is, haven't made the effort to watch the away games in a while, just don't care anymore. That is not good marketing.

      --
      1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
  37. Glad I built instead of bought by Mr.+Cancelled · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I made a PVR system about 3 years ago and haven't regretted it since. Mine isn't as complex or capable as MythTV (primarily because MythTV doesn't support my ATI 8500DV), nor is it as simple as a Tivo, but it can fit a 2 hr. movie onto DVD at full DVD resolution with no problems.

    And since I'm using ATI's latest & greatest software, I'm able to record natively at this resolution in DVD-ready mpeg2 format.

    Other solutions, such as ShowShifter, offer a prettier front end, but they're unable to take advantage of ATI's built in codecs, so mpeg recording is a 2 part process, in that you record in full DV, and then re-compress the video to mpeg, or whatever I want.

    It's nice to know that while I'm archiving my girlfriends HBO series, that I don't need to worry about the manufacturer of my equipment suddenly changing what my equipment will, or will not do.

    Thanks again Tivo! It's moves like this that really make me think I made the right choice by building instead of purchasing your product.

  38. so... by shokk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I own a TiVo and don't ever order PPV, so this does not affect me, is a non-issue, and does not make my TiVo Series1 less useful to me. Is there honestly that much stuff on PPV that you want to record and watch again that you will base your PVR buying decision on it? Honestly, are you going to watch that 90 second boxing match from 5 years ago that you paid $50 for?

    I would instead think about getting a TiVo with DVD writer built in so that I could burn it to disc and watch it anywhere outside of TiVo's influence and then they can delete it all they want.

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  39. if anything by asv108 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Tivo should be looking to expand their functionality at this point in time. With companies such Dish network and comcast rolling out their own pvr services, Tivo needs to do more to make a cost justification for the service. Sorry, downloadable movies and dvd burning aren't going to bring the masses or keep your existing customers. Reducing what they can record will drive people away in droves. Unless, Tivo makes a major paradigm shift towards increase the function of the device instead of increasing revenue through partners by sacrificing user freedom.

  40. accelerating their own death by xThinkx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Parent is right about this one. Tivo's real fear should be all of the cable/satellite PVRs that are on the market. The true tivo "fans" will quickly turn when unremovable restrictions are enforced. Let's face it, the guy who's hacking a tivo could just as easily build a mythtv box or a windows equivalent.

    This whole issue illustrates a point I've been pointing out on /. for quite some time: It is impossible for movie/music companies to stifle the free flow of information. So tivo's going to be controlled now, oh well, time for any capable geek to move on to another technology which circumvents these measures. More importantly, time for the inept masses to look to the geek for their solutions as well.

    Something that the majority of people don't understand, even our president doesn't understand, that, is that you cannot rule a mass of intelligent motivated people with mandate. Look at the comparisons, prohibition, the war on drugs, the "war" on music "piracy", all failing, and rather miserably. Why? Because the motivation of the people and the means to accomplish these goals is far superior to that of the government trying to prevent them.

    So sure, let tivo slit their own throats an inch at a time, I'll still watch my ripped movies and I'm sure NFL fans will find a workaround as well.

    --
    Let's get one thing perfectly clear, I did not vote for George W Bush, and I do not endorse what he does or says.
    "
  41. Re:Stupid. by enrico_suave · · Score: 2, Informative

    besides the pvr350 part of your setup (which has it's own quirks), did you consider checking out knoppmyth to potentially cut down on the build/install time?

    *shrug* FWIW there are other "off the shelf" commercial (and free) 3rd party PVR/htpc software solutions out there... although they are on the *gasp* windows platform *ducks*... I liked SageTV... BeyondTV has been getting good reviews... and GBPVR is very full featured, FREE as in beer (not source), and is pretty cool overall. There's a lesser known HTPC solution that's open source for windoze Media Portal... I've got a growing list of PVR/HTPC links here

    Also there are other linux based OSS pvr solutions besides myth/knoppmyth... like freevo, dave and dina multimedia project, and a few others I can't recall...

    *shrug*

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  42. marketing by bellevueGeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is exactly why I think replaytv was so much better a product.



    Not only did it have great features like commerical skip (until the we practically sued to death and tivo grabbed share). But with lots of extensibility like the great oss dvarchive where you create watch, archive and control your networked replaytv boxes, I always think it is a shame that tivo with the cuter name and better marketing campaign which caught so much of the market share.



    I strongly suggest people think about checking out the competition, all the hacker types I know prefer it. But now that tivo has the market, they really don't care what consumers want as long as they sell more units. Tivo has become synonymous with pvr; and utimately we the consumers are really loosing out.

    --

    All ye all ye outs in free!
  43. actual TiVo users know... by chrisbac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Only people who do not own TiVo would say this. It is exactly the smart recording features (such as searching for keywords in description, recording all new showings of a program, record all appearances of an actor, or director, or writer...) that are so valuable. TiVo is definitely NOT just a digital VCR! And those who have ever used a VCR to time shift can attest that it is a pain. Anyway, just a note that only the ignorant would claim the features are not of value. As far as deleting the auto-recorded programs, they get deleted automatically if you run out of space (easily upgraded) and request a show to record. These shows stay happily out of your way until you are bored and want to see if there is anything good on. This just increases your chances that the answer will be yes.

    --
    Relax, Have a homebrew Manuals are for systmes that are either very complex or broken
  44. I Would/Will be Furious - Bait & Switch! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Buy a TiVo lately? Sometime in the next few months, your machine will quietly download a patch that makes it respond to a new copy protection scheme from software maker Macrovision.

    To reduce functionality after you've bought a unit sounds like fraud. Bait & switch. Like buying a fast sports car, and then having them download a patch into your engine computer that speed limits it to 85MPH so that the car company won't be sued for selling fast cars. I'd be looking for a class action lawyer to sue the pants off of TiVo if my box suddenly stopped doing something it used to do -- regardless of any license agreement that may have come with it.

    And it's such a great way to advertise to new customers. Buy the new TiVo. It does less than the old model!

    Now my question is: will this apply to my Dish Network PVR?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  45. Re:obligatory by Em+Ellel · · Score: 2, Funny

    and call her MythGF, cuz you certainly don't have the real thing.

    "MythGF" is probably closer to truth than you think. Spending so much time trying to make MythTV do anything resembling usablity, "RealGF" is getting cranky.

    --
    RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
  46. Nope by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 5, Informative

    DVB-T is DVB for TERRESTRIAL. It's Europe's equivalent of ATSC digital broadcasting in the US.

    DVB-C is for cable, and is Europe-only. US cable uses QAM modulation also, but the coding scheme and other minor details about the signal differ, so DVB-C cards do not work with U.S. cable.

    There ARE QAM-capable tuner cards for US cable on the market now, but since almost all U.S. cable channels are encrypted, they're not very useful.

    PC-based DVB-S receivers won't work in the U.S. except for getting Dish Network's preview channel, as Dish's encryption scheme is modified enough from standard Nagravision that the Nagra access cards compatible with PC-based DVB-S receivers won't work with Dish.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  47. Reasonable balance... by TheRealStyro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, this sounds quite reasonable. Why would you want to keep PPV/VOD programs stuffing up your TIVO/PVR? A reasonable finite time for PPV should be tolerated as long as a more permanent digital media recording (ie DVD) is made available within the timeline. As for VOD, I don't know why you would/should want to record it anyhow - it's 'on demand' - just order it again should you want to see it.

    I don't see how this is any real threat to 'fair use'. You can still record the programs, but you have a limited timeline to watch. If you can't watch within that timeline, maybe you didn't really want to watch.

    --
  48. Seems to mean... nothing by Gorimek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The NFL press release seems to boil down to this sentence.

    After detailed discussions with TiVo, the NFL now concurs that TiVo's current technology will not allow real-time transmissions that would be a cause of concern for the NFL.

    Or in other words, nothing will change in this regard.

    The PPV timeout thing is a real difference, but PPV is not part of the general Tivo service anyway. Don't buy them if you don't like the conditions.

  49. Tivo, here is what needs to happen (and some tech) by telemonster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Okay, why hasn't anyone created their own Linux for the Tivo hardware platform? For some reason, hacking the Tivo is taboo just because the thing runs linux. Oh it runs linux, and they "let us" "hack" it putting in bigger drives. CLUEBAT SAYS, YOU OWN IT. They can't stop you from upgrading it. CLUEBAT SAYS, if you were to replace the program guide system with something based off of XMLTV or some other open source project, they can't cry foul.

    People laugh about the Xbox, Linux, and Microsoft loosing money since the thing is supposidly sold as a loss leader. But Tivo, Nooo can't touch that.

    I called Tivo to inquire about how to add one of those "Press thumbs up to record" to a commercial. They wouldn't talk, they referred me to buy a $30,000 system that inserts the "push thumbs up to record" into the program signal. A EEG Line 21 encoder/decoder in raw mode and a commercial on VHS later I figured out how it was stored but haven't continued to research. They weren't nice, they weren't overflowing with joy. MY opinion is they took Replay's business, kind of like a Microsoft if you will.

    So how does the Tivo work? Is there a software framebuffer rendering the menus to MPEG2 then pushing it to the decoder hardware? My roomate got a new Tivo and upgraded for someone, and I got the chance to peek inside. The new Tivos are using Broadcom KFIR-II chips for MPEG2 encoding (and probably decoding?). These chips are already usable under linux via the Pinnacle PCTV Deluxe USB unit. They use the exact same MPEG2 chipset, I put one of my PCTV boards next to the tivo, and the chips are identical in revision, size and everything else.

    It is my guess that people could make an open source OS replacement for the Tivo hardware platform that would introduce all of the features that Tivo is taking away. Hell, might even be able to make it run on a BSD varient, NetBSD powered Tivo... bring it ON!

    I'm really curious how the Tivo renders the menus... outside of this, I can't think of any really difficult obstacles, unless the architecture is very very proprietary (MIPS core on the new boxes, PPC on the old..).

    --
    Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
  50. MythTV, Freevo etc.. by gilesjuk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If these two systems were easy to install (as easy as installing a Linux firewall distro) then maybe a TiVo or Windows media centre wouldn't seem to attractive.

    Has taken me a good week and a half just to get a DVB card functioning in Linux. Had to play with bios settings like PCI delays to get the card to function. When it works 100% it will be great, but it's not friendly enough for most people yet (it's been ruining my sleep and i'm relatively good with Linux).

  51. Who needs a TIVO anyway? by Capt_Troy · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have a way around all of this. Here's what I do.

    Get about 10 VHS tapes and 2 VCRs. Set the VCRs to record all of your shows. Then, when your VCRs are done recording, take the tapes out and put sticky tabs on them noting what shows are recorded on each tape. Then put the tapes in a big stack and put two new tapes in the VCRs.

    Using this method I've only lost about a dozen shows due to lazyness in sticky tab notation and misplacement of tapes (and occasionally the baby will rearrange them for me).

    Anyway, who needs a TIVO when you can follow these simple steps and keep your shows until the sticky tab falls off.

  52. Amen! by Blitzenn · · Score: 2, Informative

    Amen! Big Ta Do over nothing in my book too. I don't copy payper view stuff anyway. Craps too expensive to begin with. I just want to be able to watch Big Brother, or such at a time most convienient to me. That's how I use my Tivo and love it because of that. I can watch the 6 O'clock news when I want now. I can pause it so I can argue the point being made with the poor sap sitting next to me, (sorry wife), and not miss what is being said next. That's what Tivo is about and anyone who has one knows it.

    This is a nothing story by someone who doesn't have a Tivo, is envious of it and wants to make it seem less valuable to others. Bunch of Phewy!

  53. Get a ReplayTV instead by spiralscratch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've had one for a couple years now. It works as well as the Tivo does, without all of the BS that that they seem to have been pulling recently. And SonicBlue has actually put up money to fight this type of crap in court.

    The killer app for me is that I can fire up DVArchive on my Mac/Windows/Linux box and copy over a program from the ReplayTV with ease. No need to hack hardware or software like I believe you have to with the Tivo.

    About the only feature I would like is the media center. but then, I don't believe I can use it from my Linux server anyways, and that's where all the MP3s are.

    About the only thing I can think of that has done to the ReplayTV that is even remotely similar to this is removal/crippling of the auto-skip feature. But that doesn't work much of the time anyways.

  54. Potential Problem by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Are you talking about zap2it? They still let you sign up for free. If they ever stop, people in the US will go back to using screen scrapers like people in other countries. Where's the problem?

    Screen Scrapers are counter to revenue models so at a certain level you can expect an arms race.

    If Zap2It offered a reliable data feed for $3/mo, how could you argue with that? A good service costs money to operate. Heck, I pay $7/mo to listen to a radio show online, but that's alot more bandwidth.

    If you figure a 5-person shop could offer a data feed with operating costs of about $350,000 per year you'd need twenty thousand subscribers to make a meager profit. Probably do-able.

    If I were Zap2It I'd probably offer the $3/mo feed or a free feed that could be decrypted by authorized players which would agree to show ads.

    Someone smarter can work out the crypto on how to do that when you have the source. :)

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  55. Because you can't trust them. by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What features will the remove in the future? Very simply I do not trust them and I will not give money to companies I do not trust unless I have to.

  56. Re:Irony - parent is obligatory post by LordOfYourPants · · Score: 5, Funny

    I consider it a coincidence, not ironic, that a more elite person replies to correct a parent poster in order to tell them that they are using the word "ironic" incorrectly.

    Responding to a coincidence that responds to a post using the word "ironic" is ironic, and responding to an ironic response to a coincidence that is a response to a post using the word "ironic" is, in itself, idiotic.

    Therefore I am an idiot for replying to you.

    Self-awareness of idiocy therefore makes me not an idiot and the only conclusion can be that none of my parent posters exist.

  57. Re: Artists make art for the sake of art by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Take a look at the demographic you yourself mention. Authors, poets, artists and musicians. All areas which dont take an inordinant amount of resources or personal time to produce something. And all areas which have had mixed success in breaking into the mainstream, but very few have had the same amount of success as professionals have. I did say that you would still find the people doing it for the love, but seriously, how many people have the thousands of dollars available per day for a multicamera, broadcast quality video and audio recording system? How many have the money to take it to locations? How many people have the money to carry out huge stunts? How many people have the money for CGI? The answer really is very very very few, and the number of people willing to make that sort of investment based on a love of the thing? Minimal. People dont want to stump up $10,000 or more for love, with little to no return. You said it yourself, people would do this in their spare time, but the sheer number of people producing would dive dramatically. Musicians dont have the time to put out 2 professional albums a year when theres no return.

  58. Re:That seals the deal for me..... by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Informative
    "I've been looking into purchasing a Tivo for about a month now, but I definitely won't bother now. Anyone got any URL's so I could see how to build one using Linux?"

    MythTv

    PVR Hardware Database

    RedHat install guide

    Gentoo Install Guide(I went this route)

    Knoppix Myth

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  59. Re:daily updates by Simulant · · Score: 2, Informative

    Let me clarify. And I hope I'm wrong but.... ...isn't access to the vast majority of popular binary groups carrying material of provable illegality provided by relatively few "newgroup companies"? They behave as 'central servers'. USENET is distributed yes, but access to the binaries seems fairly concentrated.

    They just seem like an easy target and I'm sure it would be easy to prove that 99% of their traffic is stolen IP. There are free speech issues involved, of course, but but I'll media companies will work their way around them.

    I don't think USENET will really be completely shut down but I do think that things will inevitably occur to make the mass trading of IP via nntp difficult and impractical.

  60. Re:Irony - parent is obligatory post by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.

  61. Tivo, you're giving me the wrong features. by thedarb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know Tivo, Inc., when I bought my Tivo, it was for time-shifting the television shows I really wanted to watch, to pause live television, rewind it, and to save shows for as long as I wanted to keep them (The Daily Show, for example). Now, to offer me a new feature, which I didn't purchase the device for, in favor of letting Macrovision and its closely tied entertainment executives tamper with the features I actually did buy it for, is wrong of you.

    Sure your Tivo Desktop is cool. Sure I would like to download Tivo recorded content to my PC or laptop. The problem is that's not what I bought a Tivo for and now you are starting to cripple the features that sold me on your product to begin with.

    I would prefer you keep my Series 2 Tivo restriction free. Let me record whatever I want and keep it, don't delete it based on some other companies idea of how long I should have it.

    Then you could create a separate product that does the Tivo Desktop for those that want it and find the content restrictions livable.

    I am afraid, Tivo, Inc., you are going to regret this move you have made, because now hundreds or thousands of other content owners are going to rain down on you like hell fire to get you to add restrictions to their productions as well.

    *TheDarb

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.