Slashdot Mirror


Ask Director of 'Trekkies' Roger Nygard

When I was last in California, I had the good fortune to bump into Roger Nygard who agreed to be a Slashdot interview victim. He is the Director of Trekkies, 6 Days in Roswell and the recently released Trekkies 2. He's made quite a name for himself documenting some fairly extreme geek activity, and this is your chance to put him through the wringer. Standard interview rules apply: Post questions. Moderate them. We'll select the best and post Roger's answers in a few weeks.

47 of 190 comments (clear)

  1. At 73:45.03 in Trekkies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Was that a Vulcan or a Romulan?

  2. Is there a LAN Party documentary in the works? by b0r0din · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And if not, how do you establish what sort of cultural phenomena you want to document? What made you decide to make Trekkies, for instance?

  3. AD&D by krymsin01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Have you ever thought to do an AD&D documentary?

    --
    stuff
    1. Re:AD&D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Have you ever thought to do an AD&D documentary?"

      I heard that he was going to but he failed the saving throw and took 3d6 fire damage instead.

    2. Re:AD&D by killmenow · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Lightning bolt! Lightning bolt! Lightning bolt!

      But seriously, this was the first thing I thought of when I read "fairly extreme geek activity"

      So, why not a "gaming" documentary? From the LAN game perspective, the RPG-ers, the FRAGG-ers, etc. Then looking at the people who take it to the real world level (the "lightning bolt" folks).

      Are the people at the Renaissance Festivals the same folks playing EQ?

    3. Re:AD&D by runlvl0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      So, why not a "gaming" documentary?

      You know that one already exists, right?

      --

      Carthago delenda est!
    4. Re:AD&D by Neil+Watson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why look to the so called 'fringes' of society. There are plenty of 'mainstream' people who are just as weird. How about sports fans, (e.g. NFL)? What about teenaged girls and boy bands?

    5. Re:AD&D by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is a great point. I firmly believe that everyone is a geek. Its just the flavor it takes. Think of how many uber macho types paint their bodies and stand in 30 degree weather to support their team. Or snobs who look down on such base fandom, but can tell you what year a wine was made by sniff. So why not a documentery about the "ordinary" geek in all of us?

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  4. Fanatic fan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not really a question, but I would like you to tell me about the most fanatic fan of Star Trek you have encountered.
    Thanks

    1. Re:Fanatic fan by Om242 · · Score: 3, Funny



      I think the more appropriate question to him is:

      While interviewing someone, did you ever become afraid...

      :)

      ++Om242

  5. polarity by Fr05t · · Score: 5, Funny

    In your experiences, have you ever found a problem that couldn't be fixed by reversing the polarity of something?

    1. Re:polarity by zerblat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Many times. However, adjusting the modulation will usually do the trick.

      --
      Please alter my pants as fashion dictates.
  6. Shooting and Editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What format are you using to shoot your documentaries (digital or film)? What workstations and applications do you use to edit your film?

  7. Get a Life? by mfh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The thing I mostly remember from the whole Trek phenomena, especially with Shatner, was when trekkies were told to get a life. It was fairly harsh as I remember, but those who were not Trekkies would always laugh whenever Shatner would say it. Trekkies on the other hand, simply took it in stride.

    What can you say about this kind of negative response to fan adoration and does it prove something about the whole Trek phenomena, the actors and fans, or does it detract from the experience?

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Get a Life? by rjelks · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think it's CleverNickName...

  8. Proposal for a new documentary by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Footies". Where we interview people who watch football all the time, dress in the kits, and go to these whacky "Games" where they get to see their stars performing, and meet up with other fans.

    We should concentrate on how obsessively sad these people are, and find people who have memorised entire games, and spend vast amounts of money collecting memorabilia and signed tat.

    1. Re:Proposal for a new documentary by Jakhel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It wouldn't be quite as interesting unless they were acne infested 30+ year old virgins who lived in their parents basements.

    2. Re:Proposal for a new documentary by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Funny

      European, the African one is non migratory.

  9. The quintessential question: by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Which captain do you think was the best?

    1. Re:The quintessential question: by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Funny

      Silly question.

      Clearly it was Caveman.

    2. Re:The quintessential question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      We all know it was Christopher Pike. You should see the tricks he can do in his hoverchair.

    3. Re:The quintessential question: by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would like to say now that I posted this for its humourous value only. I never expected it to get to the +5, Interesting where it stands right now. If he responds and says "get a life" I will _not_ be held accountable.

  10. Here we go by Jeffery · · Score: 5, Interesting

    do you think the old or new trekkies are more fanatical?

    --
    President Bush Supporter
  11. A question by Lt+Cmdr+Tuvok · · Score: 2, Funny
    Dear Mr. Nygard, You are, of course, aware of the fact that 'Star Trek' is firmly grounded in reality, are you not? I myself am a living testament to that. This is why 'Star Trek' is so deeply respected by the intellectual people who are sometimes given the dubious and degrading title of 'geeks'. They know the real truth behind the alleged fiction.

    I myself am in correspondence with many of these people. In my view, these are some of the most interesting people in all of the particular segment of the spacetime continuum that I am able to project my signals to. Of course, the Prime Directive forbids me to reveal any of the technological details that many 'geeks' hunger for, but these discourses can nevertheless be quite rewarding, if they are confined to matters that are common to my time and theirs.

    I have put my point across. Tuvok Out.

    --
    Without the darkness, how would we recognize the light?
  12. Extreme behavior by warrped · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Have you ever considered juxtaposing the extreme yet socially reviled behavior of the 'Trekkies' against the no less extreme but socially accepted behavior of (for example) sports fans? Is it the 'socially aberrant' element that draws you to the subject?

    --
    - Bachelorhood is the father of necessity.
  13. Trekkie Questions by FerretFrottage · · Score: 3, Funny
    1. Do most trekkies except the way Klingons have changes in appearance since the original series? Changes

    2. What type of car do most trekkies drive? SUV, hybrid, Dodge defiant?

    3. Do any of them buy the fact that even the slightest blast cases fires/sparks on the bridge? Do they hold the lowest price enterprise contractor responsible?

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
    1. Re:Trekkie Questions by OrangeTide · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's spelled "accept"

      The people involved with Star Trek openly admit that there is no reasonable logical explanation for the difference. The audience is just asked to accept that the makeup needed to be changed.

      In an episode of DS9, Wharf was directly asked about it (in the trouble with tribbles remake). And he just avoided the question by saying it was a "long story". It's sort of a trekkie joke because trekkies and most humans know that there is no explanation.

      Why do you accept that the computer technology in old trek looks inferior to our current technology? Oh wait, I know why everyone accepts that. It's just a TV show and is for entertainment purposes only. If the writers, producers, etc could predict the future they would not be making low budget TV shows. That includes being able to predict the best way to do Klingon makeup.

      and no. I'm not a Trekkie.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  14. Re:Schadenfreude? by Chundra · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Similarly...

    Are you a Star Trek fan? If so, do you think your films make trekkies seem like bigger freaks than the average person already assumes them to be? If not, what was your motivation?

  15. How many by frisbeeforfido · · Score: 2, Funny

    Trekkies are Slashdotties? If some Trekkies are Slashies and some Slashies are Trekkies which of the following is true: A. All Trekkies are Slashies B. All Slashies have pointy ears C. Some Trekkies are Slashies with reversed polarity

    --
    "If it wasn't for my horse, I wouldn't have spent that year in college."
    -Lewis Black
  16. More than just fandom with Trekkies? by notmikey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    On the surface, it seems like Trekkies are just really big fans, and that fandom propels them to participate in the universe.

    It seems to me, however, that something different is going on. Fandom is often emulation--the Spock ears, the "Dammit Jim" variations, that sort of thing. But Trekkies take it a step farther: they create new material that is meant to merge with the pre-existing Trek world. In this way, Trekkie-ness is more like playing D&D than being in a Sci-Fi film club.

    What I wonder (and here's my question) is whether you've noticed some common ground that launches people to go past being a fan and becoming a Trekkie. Is it dissatisfaction with new series and recent movies being weaker than past ones? Possibly some other characteristic that fans tend to share that, when merged with fandom will lead into Trekkie-ness? Is there something inherent about the star trek world that encourages people to internalize their identification with the star trek world? Or is there nothing at all consistent about the way Trekkies enter that world?

  17. Are you laughing at them or with them? by FearUncertaintyDoubt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can't tell from watching the film

  18. Why does... by WoodenRobot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In your experience/opinion, why does Star Trek attract such a fanatical following, and why is there such ridicule directed towards those that consider themselves fans? It seems unique even among sci-fi franchises.

    --
    ---
    "I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    1. Re:Why does... by notmikey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Star Trek is unique in that it does all of the things that Sci-Fi can do: it philosophizes about the future, it raises modern moral questions in a unique context, it has strong dramatic elements, it is occasionally action oriented, and it fills other traditional sci-fi roles as well. Furthermore, Star Trek is an entertainment empire, with TV series, movies, video games, RPG's, novels, comics, and more.

      The problem, then, is that Star Trek competes directly with all Sci-fi, thematically and on all mediums. To give other sci-fi personal market share is to deny Star Trek. This isn't necessarily true with other Sci-fi.

      People who are fanatical about Star Trek have no option then but to insulate themselves nationalistically within the Star Trek world, because there is no room to embrace other sci-fi without at least some internal perception of denigrating Star Trek. The cognitive dissonance that would be involved is probably enough to dissuade the fanatical trekkies from pursuing fandom in other sci-fi.

  19. Direction of Star Trek? by darkcamel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As someone who has been around the Star Trek community for a long time, what is your take on the direction of Star Trek in TV, and Movies? Follow-up: Do you think Star Trek should take some time off and regroup, or keep pushing thru the 'rut' some people think the series is in right now?

    --
    The Camel has Spoken!
  20. Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am curious about the audiences of your films. Were you intending for them to cater to the non-nerd community? Nerd community? Only hardcore fans of Star Trek, Alien Conspiracy Theorists, etc.? What audience did your films end up finding?

  21. Subject reaction? by yorgo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Have your subjects been pleased or displeased with the way they were portrayed?

  22. Aging fanbase? by Darth23 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I've seen both Trekkies and Trekkies 2 (thanks Dragon Con) and I've been to science fiction and genre conventions in the 70's and 80's and most recently the last 4 years at Dragon Con in Atlanta.

    It seems to me that the Star Trek fanbase is aging, and there aren't really a lot of new fans getting into it. I first became a serious Star Trek fan years after the show was cancelled, and continued to varying degrees throughout the years. Back in the 70's it seemed like there were some science fiction conventions (and conferences) and lots of Star Trek conventions.

    But with the popularity of so many other genre shows out there now, including Buffy/Angel, Farscape, Babylon 5, Stargate and others it seems that a lot of people who in the past would have gravitated towards Trek and many other shows to get fanatical about.

    The success of Star Trek in its many forms has helped to lay the groundwork for a lot of the fandom centered around other shows, but the Star Trek franchise itself might be suffering a bit because of this.

    My specific question is, during the filming of Trekkies 1 and 2, did you notice large numbers of younger fans, and did there seem to be around the same number when you filmed the sequel - or did you notice any decline in the numbers of younger fans?

    --

    -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

  23. More geeks? by pdboddy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ever thought about doing a movie on Slashdot, and Slashdot-like sites? You'll find the people just as rabid as the Trekkie fans. :P

    --
    Julie Moult is an idiot.
  24. Evercrack by CharAznable · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, when is the documentary about the extreme activities of Everquest players coming?

    --
    The perfect sig is a lot like silence, only louder
  25. A battle for Geekdom by DarthTeufel · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who would win in an all out brawl between Trekkies led by Shatner and Star Wars fanbois led by Hamil? Would Renaissance Fair nerds be an appropiate referee?

  26. Taking advantage of Star Trek geeks..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Some of the Star Trek "fans" in your movies, like the midget Daryl, clearly have mental health issues. Do you feel any need to get some of these people help or do you just profit from their stupidity like the people who make the Girls Gone Wild videos?

  27. Too Nerdy for The Movies by ThePolkapunk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Was there anything you shot or witnessed during the creation of your documentaries that was just too "hardcore" to put in? Were there things that were just so horrifically nerdy you had no choice but to leave them out? Anything that would alienate everyone except the heartiest star trek fans and alien conspiracy theorists? Was there anything that was just so scary you couldn't possibly put it on film?

    --
    Dear diary: Today I stuffed some dolls full of dead rats I put in the blender.
  28. Why weren't Shatner or Stewart interviewed? by GuyMannDude · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sheesh, it was an SNL sketch, not Shatners personal opinion or hatred.

    Maybe Shatner has no outright hatred but I think it's also pretty sad that he doesn't seem to appreciate the fans. Neither Shatner nor Patrick Stewart agreed to be interviewed for Trekkies. I'm assuming the reason was money -- not enough of it. I, however, believe that since Star Trek made these guys so popular that they could afford to command high salaries, they should have agreed to be interviewed for Trekkies for a smaller-than-usual amount.

    My first question of the director is if he could verify my assumption: that Shatner and Stewart weren't interviewed for Trekkies because of money (as opposed to a conscious decision by the director to focus on the other actors). Second, if you did, indeed, want them in the film and they refused, did you work hard to get them? Did you try to negotiate their payment? Did they even consider your offer? Or did you simply get a letter from their agent saying, essentially, "Mr. Statner is too important to be interviewed in your two-bit documentary."

    I'm really dying to know. Shatner, I can believe being a dick. I was a little surprised not to see Stewart in Trekkies, however.

    Thanks,
    GMD

    1. Re:Why weren't Shatner or Stewart interviewed? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What he probably doesn't appreciate is being typecast. How many good jobs do you think he was offered in the few years right after the Trek series? As far as I know he had nothing till T.J. Hooker. And after that... only more Trek movies? No other characters. Until just now he's finally coming back on a law show.

      Being on Trek made him desirable at Trek conventions, but probably pretty much killed his career otherwise. Which do you think and actor would prefer, acting in movies and TV shows and being able to play a wide variety of characters, or going to Trek conventions and being surrounded by geeks? It wouldn't really be surprising if he was bitter, would it?

  29. accusations by Savatte · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How do you respond to accusations that you condescended and were basically laughing at the subjects in Trekkies?

  30. What about a documentary on Slashdot? by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Considering Slashdot can get up to half a million readers a day, and has a subculture of it's own, would you consider doing something like "Trekkies", but for this site... say "Slashdotters"? I wouldn't be surprised how many on this site could possibly be trekkies themselves. And, yes, I am guilty of collecting ST box sets.

  31. Capt. Pike/Dr. Sphincter by Bigboote66 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nygard included Rich Kronfeld in his movie "Trekkies" as the mega-fan who had built his own Captain Pike chair. Kronfeld was a comedian in Minneapolis with a public access show called "Dr. Sphincter", and although he did actually own the chair, his appearance in the film was clearly a fictional exaggeration.

    Here's my question:

    Were there any other people in Trekkies that were clearly "taking the piss", or does Kronfeld believe that the rest of the fans in it were more or less sincere in their devotion to chosen lifestyles?

    -BbT