Slashdot Mirror


Homebrewed Robot Exoskeleton In Alaska

museumpeace writes "CNET has an article about a robotic exoskeleton ginned up by tinkerer from Alaska There are a few cool pictures. The audacity of Mr. Owens project, if you believe the article, compares to the efforts of the old Home Brew Computer Club when compared to the work of GE or Toyota. Inspiration here comes more from sci-fi and video games than from industrial competition. The article is a good roundup of MECHA related developments, some of which sprang from DARPA money, so I am glad at least a few of my tax dollars are having some real geek fun."

202 comments

  1. Dammit by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought they found an ancient robot skeleton buried under the ice or something, it's been a long week.

    1. Re:Dammit by d_force · · Score: 1

      Sorry, it's not Jehuty.

      --
      SELECT * FROM USERS WHERE A_WINNER = "YUO";
    2. Re:Dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man i knew a few people found the movie "Robot Jocks" fun but this is crazy, but hey you gotta give him credit he's got a fun project there!.

      I hope it works out good for him.

      Lurking_linux_user (too lazy to login today)

  2. Good God Tell Me I'm not First? by CygnusXII · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ok, so this is way cool, and all that, but must we mirror, FARK, quite so quickly?

    --
    My cat's picked up a Hammer. HEY! Put down that Hammer. Put Down that Hamm...THUNK!
    1. Re:Good God Tell Me I'm not First? by CygnusXII · · Score: 1

      HAAHA!!!! I guess not. Good, I'd like to think I have some kind of life. Seriously though, I usually find, that alot of the stuff I read here, previously on Fark.com.I imagine, there are a finite amount of sources for good material,though.

      --
      My cat's picked up a Hammer. HEY! Put down that Hammer. Put Down that Hamm...THUNK!
    2. Re:Good God Tell Me I'm not First? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      learn, when, to, use, commas,,,,

    3. Re:Good God Tell Me I'm not First? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      about commas,,,, when, to, *shut up!*, learn,,,

    4. Re:Good God Tell Me I'm not First? by Infinity+Salad · · Score: 2, Funny

      If /. was imitating FARK, the article would have been described as "Man designs mecha; will crush cars, find Sarah Connor."

  3. FM! - (First Meme) by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well I for one, welcome our new Alaskan Mecha overlords.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:FM! - (First Meme) by Richard+Frost · · Score: 1

      Followed by:

      1. Build 18' fall mecha in backyard.
      2. Crush cars at racetrack. (Formerly ???)
      3. Profit!!

    2. Re:FM! - (First Meme) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Korea, only old people build mechas.

    3. Re:FM! - (First Meme) by R.D.Olivaw · · Score: 1

      and to get them all done with In soviet Russia Mech robots build you. now can we move on?

  4. Giant Robot Website Crushed By /. by plover · · Score: 5, Funny

    Y'know, it occurs to me that this is someone you don't want to piss off with a slashdotting. He's developing the perfect retaliation suit!

    --
    John
    1. Re:Giant Robot Website Crushed By /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y'know, it occurs to me that this is someone you don't want to piss off with a slashdotting. He's developing the perfect retaliation suit!

      Yeah well he'd have to find me first and it's an awfully long walk in that thing from Alaska to the east coast. Somehow I doubt he'll get that thing into an airplane.

    2. Re:Giant Robot Website Crushed By /. by k12linux · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sure, but once he straps on the jet engines... watch out! lol

    3. Re:Giant Robot Website Crushed By /. by plover · · Score: 2, Interesting
      He can get on any plane he wants to. Who's going to stop MechaCarlos? Puny airport security guards? Bah! They are but the buzzing of flies to MechaCarlos!

      Now, you get the TSA to hire Gundam, then we'll have security.

      --
      John
  5. Sorry... by Blue-Footed+Boobie · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This is very cool, and geek-factor 11...

    But, I have a feeling the first step is going to put this flat on it's face.

    Anime-ish designs for Mecha (mobile suits) don't translate well into the real world.

    If it were me, I would be looking to emulate some of the designs from the original MechWarrior series. They seem a bit more realistic.

    Still, love to see this walk/work!

    --
    DAMN YOU OCTODOG! DAMN YOU TO HELL!
    1. Re:Sorry... by Nine+Tenths+of+The+W · · Score: 1

      You mean the 60 foot tall 100 ton assault mechs? Yeah, I can see them being within the reach of hobbyists

      --
      Slashdot: News for Nerds, Stuff that matters only to them
    2. Re:Sorry... by Senobyzal · · Score: 1

      The article stated that this was a big challenge for the builder, and that he's tried to account for it by making the lower half of the body heavier than the upper half. Still, it won't be easy to handle the balance aspect. Probably won't be mounting PPCs on it anytime soon. ;)

    3. Re:Sorry... by jangobongo · · Score: 2, Informative

      But, I have a feeling the first step is going to put this flat on it's face.

      Mr. Owens say he has addressed this by making sure the lower half weighs far more than the upper half, and some other design modifications. The whole thing (pic) weighs a ton and a half, though.

      I'd love to see a project like this tackled on "Junkyard Mega-Wars". Dueling Exoskeletons!

      --

      Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
    4. Re:Sorry... by Blue-Footed+Boobie · · Score: 1
      Nice try, but no.

      Those of us that aren't going for the Prick Award would assume that I (just like the builder) would scale the design back within a reasonable realm.

      Do you watch Anime, because the Mobile Suits are larger that the 18ft proto he is building.

      I wish I could patent and sell common sense.

      --
      DAMN YOU OCTODOG! DAMN YOU TO HELL!
    5. Re:Sorry... by Blue-Footed+Boobie · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Problem is, just making the lower half weigh more than the top != balance.

      Back in the day a friend and I were working on designs for a workable mech. About 10ft tall. Chicken-Leg design.

      For balance we used a custom designed counter-weight system that was tied into the drivetrain. From the models we built, it worked great - but only for flat surfaces.

      Mechs and bumps/hills/ditches are a realy tough design problem. But just balanced walking is a huge problem to tackle first. Honda poured billions into the ASIMO just to get stable balanced walking.

      --
      DAMN YOU OCTODOG! DAMN YOU TO HELL!
    6. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Reading the article between the lines, I think the operator/driver is supposed to provide the balance. Similar to stilts, only powered.

      That said, I don't think it will work unless the movement rates for the extremities are really high and very well controlled. That takes lots of power, lots of hydraulic pressure, and lots of testing.

    7. Re:Sorry... by my_haz · · Score: 1

      But, I have a feeling the first step is going to put this flat on it's face.

      And who's going to go down with it :(

    8. Re:Sorry... by zoips · · Score: 1

      I think replicating the mechs in the BattleTech universe would be a bad first step. They're too large, too unwieldy, and balanced by sophisticated gyro systems (which I see no mention of) hooked up to the mechwarrior via a freaking brain-wave scanner.

      Personally, I think that Gears from Dream Pod 9's Heavy Gear universe would be a much better first step. They seem more inline with what he's doing anyway; roughly the same height, tonnage, drive and power systems.

    9. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh sweet jesus shut up

    10. Re:Sorry... by SilentMobius · · Score: 1

      Argh. Just to remind people that Mechwarrior comes from Battletech, and the first Battletech Mechs were ripped straight from Macross (Robotech)

      --
      Loop, twist and loop again.
  6. Combine that with the Bear Proof Suit by Suicyco · · Score: 4, Funny

    http://www.nfb.ca/grizzly/suit.html

    Now THAT would be cool.

    1. Re:Combine that with the Bear Proof Suit by flynns · · Score: 1

      deargod. bearproof suit.

      There are no words.

      --
      'If you're flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit.'
    2. Re:Combine that with the Bear Proof Suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  7. I guess... by nebaz · · Score: 3, Funny

    it gets lonely in Alaska. :-)

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    1. Re:I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...especially if you are the kind of geek who builds giant robot suits in their back yard.

    2. Re:I guess... by badman99 · · Score: 0

      Nah, when I get lonely I just reach for my 2lt squeze carton of budget industrial lube.....

  8. MechWars! by sxltrex · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hereby demand a battle royale to the death between the homebrewed robot exoskelton and this guy.

    1. Re:MechWars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I hereby demand a battle royale to the death between the homebrewed robot exoskelton and this guy.

      And the winner of that battle must fight to the death with him.

    2. Re:MechWars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tronguy is almost as disgusting and retarded as the imbecile Japanese massproduced pseudo-culture that some western geeks fall for, such as "mechas".

    3. Re:MechWars! by iNetRunner · · Score: 1

      And then the winner (Tron Guy obviously.. =) fights with the bear.

      --
      Store with salt
  9. Obvious Anime Influence. by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Cute addition there with the head crests a la "Patlabor." And yet I'm still rather disappointed. Where is the 14' energy sword? Jet boosters? Particle beam rifle? Facetious, yes, but it is strange that amid these dizzying technological advancements, humanity's achievements in the field of robotics, circa 2004, are analagous to the state of automotive technology circa 1904. Nevertheless, that is some pretty damn fine backyard engineering.

    --
    "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    1. Re:Obvious Anime Influence. by Feynman · · Score: 1
      You forgot one other thing:

      </i>

  10. HOW LONG? by wcitechnologies · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh great, put the robots in the place where we can't live. They'll multiply... then they'll develope new, improved A.I. They will take over the economy with their new hoverdrive technology... We won't know if it is us or them who'll attack first-- I just know we're gonna have to scortch the sky because of this.

    --
    Electrons are free; it is moving them that becomes expensive.
  11. Good luck! by ZSpade · · Score: 0

    Owens said he can't afford top-of-the line equipment, like infrared sensors and electronics that would govern the motion.

    In order to even think about getting something like this working, you're going to need a very advanced computer system, and sensors for imput. Honda and Toyota havn't been pooring hundreds of millions of dollars into humanoid robot creation cause the only trick is making the legs heavier that the body. Really, I'll be suprised if this thing takes more than two steps forward before falling flat on it's face... Unless that is, it falls on it's back instead.

    --
    Go ahead and call me unreliable; reliable is just a synonym for predictable.
    1. Re:Good luck! by Quino · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd hate to be negative (and this is a totally cool project, kudos to the guy) but that's the first thing I thought: getting this thing to walk around is going to be a challenge.

      However, he's not trying to build an automonous robot like Honda or Sony. To me it seems that an exoskeleton is the place to start: if it wasn't for the fact that walking upright on two legs is a bit of a controls hat-trick!

      I'd imagine that a robot on wheels, with arms that move as you move your own arms would be a more attainable first step for a hobby.

      Then again, maybe this guy really does have some clever ideas as to how to walk around without tipping over ... still, can you imagine the complexity of staying upright while you lift and lug heavy things around? Heck, even leaning against something to push it while on two robotic legs is complicated, much less ripping up trees by the roots and swinging them over your head Anime-style (I exaggerate, but this more or less seems to be the goal).

    2. Re:Good luck! by ZSpade · · Score: 0

      Yah, don't get my wrong,I've had plenty of my own power armor suit building dreams, but personal ones just aren't in our grasp yet. Maybe this guy should start a donation fund. He'll need computer programmers and engineers though, before he can ever suceed. It's gonna take more than one person, and more money than one person has(in most cases).

      I would love nothing more than to see in the Headlines "Exoskeleton prototype invades Canada in test run. In related news, The united states has annexed Canada today, Oh don't look so surprised! We all knew it was coming."

      --
      Go ahead and call me unreliable; reliable is just a synonym for predictable.
    3. Re:Good luck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He may not need a computer system at all, it sounds like he's using mechanical links to control the limbs. Theoretically, if he sets it up right, the exoskeleton will amplify the force of his movements and give feedback, so it will simply feel like his arms and legs are much longer. It will still take some practice to use it well, but he could very well make it work without help from anyone.

    4. Re:Good luck! by Quino · · Score: 1

      I can understand this, but the challenges remain. In order to balance like a human being, the mecha will have to have a lot of the same flexibility and dexterity -- not impossible but incredibly hard.

      The huge robotic legs (and arms!) will have to be incredibly sensitive and effective to pick up the subtle movements required to even just stand in place. I'm sure he's going to have to figure out how to use proportional control. That is, I think he needs to move a limb slightly and slowly or fast and with more force in order to balance and move like a human. I'm not sure how you'd do this without sensors and computers providing control of motors ....

      Basically, the input required to move a massive and heavy robot arm is different than the movement we might make with a human arm. Since it's more massive / dense / heavy / powerful than a human arm, complicated inputs (reverse power before you need to stop a movement so you don't overshoot your desired position, yet complete movement ASAP) are required for any movement. This analysis is the sort of thing we do subconsciously with our muscles when we move our own limbs, but isn't reflected in the movement itself. Nor is the "controls" that is used by my brain and human arm the same that would be required for an arm with different dynamics.

      So if I rigged a big robotic arm to follow my movements it would have to have computer intelligence that takes into account the dynamics (inertia, degrees of freedom, etc.) of the arm in order to achieve the desired movement. Without computers, the arm will most likely wail around wildly as it tries to match my movement (see below on bang-bang versus proportional control -- well written IMHO). Bang-bang controls are doable mechanically (as simple as switches that trigger movement), and I can only think of one example of proportional control done without computers (James Watt and his flyball governor). I'm sure there are others but purely mechanical proportional control is the exception (and harder to do than to just use a computer).

      I don't understand how the movement will work if he sticks to not using computers for this reason. "No computer on huge heavy powerful limbs" equals "hard to control movement" equals "hard to walk!"

      It is entirely possible that I just don't get it; I just think that a lot of the difficulties in making a robot walk this way are easy to understate since we walk without having to think about everything that has to go on for us to balance on our two legs, or even just move our limbs.

      Don't get me wrong, ever since Robotech I share this dream, and I am very curious to be proven wrong. Hell, I'd be one of the first in line to order one from him it works (well, I'd have to win the lotto first). He does seem convinced that it's going to work out: he's already got plans to sell prototypes when the bugs are all ironed out.

      I found this link on controls that mentions at the bottom

      Proportional control makes systems run smoother than bang-bang. Most biological systems are proportional, while many engineered and all too many political and social systems are bang-bang

      http://www.fourmilab.ch/hackdiet/www/subsection1 _2 _3_0_5.html

  12. Fishing.. by mbrewthx · · Score: 1

    I once caught a fish this big......

    obscure movie reference...

    --
    __________ Leave me alone I'm compiling a RPG II program on my S/36...Thanks to metamucil I'm a Regular Meta Moderator
    1. Re:Fishing.. by mbrewthx · · Score: 1

      you are correct!!!! The scene in the factory where he takes control of the two robot arms.

      --
      __________ Leave me alone I'm compiling a RPG II program on my S/36...Thanks to metamucil I'm a Regular Meta Moderator
    2. Re:Fishing.. by Blue-Footed+Boobie · · Score: 1
      Was it DAVE!

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0106673/

      --
      DAMN YOU OCTODOG! DAMN YOU TO HELL!
    3. Re:Fishing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do people think that quoting a major Hollywood motion picture is an "obscure movie reference"? You are not special. You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake. (oooh! look! I made an obscure movie reference!!!)

      The thing made $60+ million in the U.S. box office and $30+ million in rentals (stats). And this was in 1993.

      Try finding something that wasn't a box office hit and shown in repeats on TV ad nauseum for your "obscure movie" next time.

  13. Techical knowledge is there, but not with this guy by StCredZero · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The control problems are not trivial, and I doubt that this guy will be able to solve them. But a lot of these problems have already been solved by Sarcos. In particular, look at this page, especially at the "Sensuit" and the "Large Arm."

    The Large Arm is especially impressive, holding a freakin anvil like it was a stein of beer!

    If you could build the whole body of the Sensuit to a large enough scale that the whole pilot can be encased in a haptic feedback harness, you'd have a viable mecha.

  14. Limited Usefulness by jgardn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The reason no one has ever actively pursued mecha is because they would be so inefficient. Tanks and such are built with a low profile, and if you ask frontline soldiers, they are only useful in limited roles. My army friend much prefers the new strykers because of their flexibility and reliability.

    A mecha would be standing 20 feet in the battlefied, an open and tempting target to everything from bombers to tanks to helicopters and to RPGs. It would have limited mobility, be extremely difficult to keep in working condition, and will have less load capacity than its tracked or wheeled counterparts. In short, it would look cool, but would be a useless coffin.

    In BattleTech, they make up for the obvious disadvantages of a mecha by giving them advantages over vehicles. Mecha are more reliable, more maneuvarable, able to take more damage and continue to function, and can carry more weapons. Even then, if you pit a balanced vehicle force against a balanced mecha force, ton for ton, credit for credit, the vehicles can easily overpower the mecha in most circumstances.

    I don't want to discourage this backyard project. After all, how many inventions were made when there was no necessity, but a necessity was found at a later time? But I do want folks to exercise a bit of common sense. If mecha were such a great idea, we'd have used them in WWII. We certainly had the technology to build them back then.

    --
    The radical sect of Islam would either see you dead or "reverted" to Islam.
    1. Re:Limited Usefulness by inkdesign · · Score: 2, Funny

      From the looks of it, that thing should have no problem converting to a big-rig, thus being the best of both worlds!

    2. Re:Limited Usefulness by procrastitron · · Score: 1

      Why does the usefulness of a mecha have to be limited to war? Seriously, I think the guy's idea of using it at motor rallies is pretty good. It's also cost effective when you consider the price he's paying for it compared to the long term number of tickets that he'll sale. Also, when the technology advances enough some things like this could be very useful on construction sites. It could have the strength of a crane (a small one anyway), but be much more manuverable and versatile.

    3. Re:Limited Usefulness by Neil+Watson · · Score: 1

      I believe there was a coldwar statistic that stated the life expectancy of a tank in a NATO-Warsaw pact land war was about 6 minutes.

    4. Re:Limited Usefulness by Big_Al_B · · Score: 1

      Maybe mecha is not suitable for battlefield applications, but I could imagine warehouse and loading dock situations where they might be more useful.

      That environment would cause less equipment stress (no terrain, no weather, no small/large arm fire) and would allow for smaller, lighter (no armor) and more simply constructed mecha.

    5. Re:Limited Usefulness by zardo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah but can a tank climb a building and snatch helicopters out of the air like king kong?

    6. Re:Limited Usefulness by CmdrGravy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not too sure where that figure of 20ft for the height comes from.

      I don't think there is any inherent reason why powered exo-skeletons would need to be anything like that big and provided they are reliable and able to cope with much the same terrain as general infantry I think they'd be quite effective in any battle situation.

      I would guess the benefits an effective exo-skeleton could bring are in increased carrying capacity for the solider allowing them to carry more food, ammunition etc which would allow them to operate longer in the field with less reliance on supply lines.

      Another aim would be to design a skeleton which enabled the solider to move more quickly and over longer distances than would normally be possible and maybe provide some increased protection from unfriendly weaponary.

      I don't think anyone is suggesting building giant robots because as you say they would just be too easy to target and destroy.

      I am guessing again that the key components in such a suit would be a lightweight, reliable powersource which preferably doesn't need a massive amount of fuel and strong lightweight materials for the skeleton it's self - this is in addition to all the wizzery needed to actually get the skeleton to function in the first place.

      Any army which does develop an effective exo skeleton would be able to field a very dangerous weapon indeed, something capable of deploying powerful firepower, fielded in dispersed units of hard to hit small units, capable of sustained attacks into your territory, able to be inserted quickly and secretly in helicopters, parachutes etc.

    7. Re:Limited Usefulness by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      Different conditions, differently equipped enemy. The M1A1 Abrams seemed to have survived pretty well in the last two Gulf Wars.

    8. Re:Limited Usefulness by k12linux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or how about disaster sites. Strong enough to pick up debris and slabs of concrete but agile enough to do it without knocking everything else onto victims.

      That'd be cool anyhow. Even if it wouldn't be as fun as picking up your neighbor's house and hiding it while he is gone to the store. Too bad the huge footprints leading to the new location of the home would probably give you away.

    9. Re:Limited Usefulness by Control+Group · · Score: 1
      But that would fall under the heading of powered armor, rather than a true 'mech.

      It may be hairsplitting on my part, but if we're going to talk about actually building devices that have their roots in SF, we should use the appropriate terms.

      Aside from that, though, you're right. Powered armor is far more likely to be practically useful than a honest-to-$deity 'mech.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    10. Re:Limited Usefulness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apparently your friend hasn't been shot at while in a Stryker. their armour is not adequate, which is why they haven't been deployed to the more active regions of Iraq.

    11. Re:Limited Usefulness by StCredZero · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you have a mech that's approaching 20 ft tall, then you can have a cockpit that allows a full range of motion for the pilot in a full-body haptic feedback harness. (See this site for a full-arm haptic harness.) Short of a direct neural interface, this is the only way you're going to provide force-feedback. If you don't have force-feedback, then you won't be able to control a bipedal humaniform robot well enough to do real combat.

      But if you dispense with dynamic balance, then you can build mecha on tracks like these Japanese guys did for real! T-52

    12. Re:Limited Usefulness by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      I agree, what I was describing is powered armour and not a 'mech'

      I guess if you could develop better localised defences, e.g. intercepting cannon shells, rockets etc before they hit you - leaping quickly out of the way of incoming materiel etc then mechs might have a place on the battlefueld.

      However I don't think they would ever be versatile enough on different terrain since all the weight is going to be concetrated into their feet which would limit their area of operations to hard rocky areas which can bear that kind of weight.

      Helicopters and other flying things are very dangerous and if you could protect yourself as mentioned above more effectively would also become even more dangerous - I guess the problem with aircraft at the moment is that although they are very manueverable they can be targetted from a fairly long way off.

      Perhaps super gigantic land tanks would be the way to go but they may be more susepitble to stuff dropped on them from space. Choices, choices

    13. Re:Limited Usefulness by my_haz · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the money could be better spent advancing the development of unmaned tools.

    14. Re:Limited Usefulness by Hays · · Score: 1

      Please back up your statement that "If mecha were such a great idea, we'd have used them in WWII. We certainly had the technology to build them back then." Any links on bipedal robots?

      I think you are mistaken that we've had the technology for automated bipedal motion / balance since world war 2. I think it is a very challenging robotics problem. I know for a fact that active research is being done in this area. Projects like Honda Asimo and Sony QRIO and there are several other lower profile projects.

      I agree with you that wheeled locomotion is clearly superior to legged locomotion with current technology. But I don't see how you can write off legged locomotion in the future. You gain a great deal of flexibility by walking on two legs.

    15. Re:Limited Usefulness by BrynM · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'm not too sure where that figure of 20ft for the height comes from.
      Same here. My first thought of a battlefield mech is the Robotech Cyclone. That seems versatile to me - but hard to build without Protoculture for a fuel source.

      The whole transformer idea is what makes mecha seem useful to me. Maybe I'm just a little old school.

      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    16. Re:Limited Usefulness by Anemophilous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Ah, but to get a 20ft tall battle robot to show up on the front could, at least in certain countries, help inspire fear and awe in the opposition.

      A lot like the fictional cybernetic tank, the Ogre (from Steve Jackson games). While not Mecha styled, it too could be easily overwhelmed by the opposition. But often used as intimidation and sometimes as a lure to draw opposition to it and away from the rest of the attacking force.

      True, most likely a useless coffin...if the operator is truly inside. What they would probably need to do here is put all the new high-speed wireless network the military wants on the battlefield to use here. Have the operator actually exist in the backfield wielding controls to move the legs and arms. The networked vehicles and soldiers allow the movement signals to propagate to the front line where the Mecha will move. Voile, 20ft tall disposable soldier robot.

      Anything that could cause some hesitation or fear in the enemy might be enough for the attacking units to take advantage of.

      - Anemophilous Coward
      - "A non-productive mind is with absolutely zero balance".

    17. Re:Limited Usefulness by Doctor+Crumb · · Score: 1

      What anime was that in? I want to see it.

    18. Re:Limited Usefulness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just critiqued someone's "backyard project" using an analysis from a FICTIONAL ROLE-PLAYING GAME.

      Maybe it's time to get a fucking life, loser.

    19. Re:Limited Usefulness by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

      Maybe a mecha wouldn't be efficient for war-fare, but it could for civil tasks like carrying heavy objects on a construction site, rescue missions where ALOT of strenght is needed but accessibility is limited. There are alot of situations where such machinery would be very usefull.

      Why always with the killing? ^_^

      General rule; first invent/creat/build, then get someone else to think up evil applications with said innoncent invention :P

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    20. Re:Limited Usefulness by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

      I fought this argument on Usenet way back in (pauses to search Usenet archives...) 1992.

      On one side were those who felt that artificial muscles could make mecha more viable than tanks, on the other side were those who pointed out that if the muscles were so great, you could just use them to power a tank instead of a walking coffin (to use your terminology.)

      Eventually I came up with a compromise position: Put the mechs on bicycles.

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    21. Re:Limited Usefulness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make giant fake Bigfoot footprint boots for your mech.

    22. Re:Limited Usefulness by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      "I would guess the benefits an effective exo-skeleton could bring are in increased carrying capacity for the solider allowing them to carry more food, ammunition etc which would allow them to operate longer in the field with less reliance on supply lines."

      Think this through... How much fuel would such a system need? How often do you think it would need to be repaired?

      I highly doubt such a system would reduce a soldiers reliance on supply lines.

    23. Re:Limited Usefulness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because it was pitted against a technologically inferior enemy with limited training whose commanders made stupid decisions, e.g:

      1) In Desert Storm, Iraqi tanks were frequently "bedded" in pits, the idea being to protect their bodies from enemy fire. This does however completely eliminate one of the primary attributes of a tank: mobility.

      2) Iraq made its own tank ammo containing steel penetrator rods instead of sintered tungsten or denatured unranium. This is strictly WWII technology which had no chance of penetrating modern composite tank armour.

      3) Accounts by people who were there indicate that many Iraqi tank crews were incapable of bore-sighting their guns properly (bore-sighting is a process whereby a gunner aligns his sights with where a shell will land at a specific distance. This has to be done with even the most modern tanks, usually prior to being deployed for battle). In one case, a stationary Iraqi T-72 shot at and missed a Bradley at less than 100 yards, something that amply demonstrates how poor some of the Iraqi tank crews were. A tank whose crew are incapable of hitting what they are shooting at is not an effective weapon, period.

      4) Desert Storm was conducted in terrain that was unusually good for tanks: it was essentially a large, flat plain that allowed ample room for manoeuvre, had clear air (i.e. no mist), and little natural cover. This let Allied tank crews engage their enemies at extreme ranges - ranges that were beyond the effective ones of the opposition even if the Iraqis had been able to bore-sight their guns properly (Russian tanks use muzzle-launched anti-tank guided missiles for ranges beyond 2500m - Saddam's army did not however have any of these). Note also that these conditions meant that Iraqi armour was easy prey for airbourne resources such as helicopters and "warthogs", which were once again something that Allied tanks did not have to face (apart from those all-too-frequent "blue-on-blue" incidents).

      5) In the more recent invasion of Iraq, US tanks were not in anything like such ideal conditions. In many cases, they had to move in columns along roads whose location rendered them vulnerable to close-range ambushes from the side (tank armour is of necessity mostly frontal, with the sides, top, and rear carrying much less protection). Predictably, this resulted in a number of M1s being lost to fire from both 106mm anti-tank artillery and RPGs, proving that any tank is vulnerable to quite primitive weaponry under the right circumstances.

    24. Re:Limited Usefulness by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Yes, I agree. My definition of an 'effective' exo-skeleton is one which does not require a significant quantity of fuel and does not break down. Practically this may well be impossible to achieve.

    25. Re:Limited Usefulness by ultranova · · Score: 1

      A mecha would be standing 20 feet in the battlefied, an open and tempting target to everything from bombers to tanks to helicopters and to RPGs. It would have limited mobility, be extremely difficult to keep in working condition, and will have less load capacity than its tracked or wheeled counterparts. In short, it would look cool, but would be a useless coffin.

      Which is why you won't build a 20-meter tall mecha. Instead, you build about human-sized one, pack it with all the top-secret ultra-advanced military technology you can get your hands on, install a cat's brain (coupled with some helpfull coprocessors to increase the cognitive abilities a little) and dress it in Japanese schoolgirl uniform. Oh, and add red hair and big breasts :).

      Big ugly mechas might be cannon fodder, but cute catgirl androids / cyborgs always win. And when the war is over, there is no problem finding people willing to store and maintain them for you ;).

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    26. Re:Limited Usefulness by j0nb0y · · Score: 1

      I've always wanted one of those bikes.

      Mmm, Mospeada...

      --
      If you had super powers, would you use them for good, or for awesome?
    27. Re:Limited Usefulness by kesuki · · Score: 1

      the US millitary Already has a working (leg only) exosuit. Right now it's meant as a gear/supply transport platform... The current practical applications would allow a land based party of infantry to carry rations and munitions for miles and miles away without needing any airdrops of supplys or ther currently employed methods for getting goods into terain not accessable by conventional vehicles.

      Some possible configurations for the suit on a 'real' battle field include a 'practical' flame thrower. you could load half a ton of propellant onto the back of this suit and have enough burntime to kill 100,000 infantry*.. or you could have a really big power plant on the back to power a tank piercing laser... and it could have low power for soldiers... or you could add a missle battery to it, or you could havs two really heavy gattling guns with about 1,000,000** rounds of ammo... Heck, while were at it let's make it a platform for your own personal Ion cannon! because you know it's not enough to just cut a hole in a tank, it needs to be entirely melted into a pile of volcanic debris!

      *= well i'm guessing if they group up for you nicely...

      **== well a lot anyways.

  15. This guy is certifiable. by skids · · Score: 3, Funny

    To build an operational mecha as a hobby is one thing.

    To build it outside in the friggin Alaskan winter... well, there's only one word for that:

    OTAKU!!!

    (which, by the way, is what is on my housemate's vanity plate, so I speak with first-hand knowlege)

    1. Re:This guy is certifiable. by genner · · Score: 1

      Aho or Baka would also work.

    2. Re:This guy is certifiable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Mecha is a racist organization.

      Combining the nationalism of Mexico with the anti-semitism of the worst Nazis, the Mecha movement combines a number of forces to push for a mexican invasion of the lower United States.

      The group, which calls California 'Alta California', openly promotes illegal immigration as a way of 'reclaiming' california for 'the race.'

      It's unfortunate that anyone gives this group money, as they certainly get plenty from their sham media outlets such as 'La Voz de Aztlan', which is used for hate-speech such as:

      http://www.aztlan.net/razajews.htm

    3. Re:This guy is certifiable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong "mecha", troll.

      We now return you to your regularly scheduled geekery.

  16. This is pretty cool. by Video+Gamer+Z · · Score: 1

    Although I do agree that it'll probably fall flat on its first step. Cool backyard project though.

  17. Robot Jox by silicon-pyro · · Score: 1

    My dream of finally being one of the Robot Jox might soon be a reality. Sweet!

    1. Re:Robot Jox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck Yeah!

  18. this is the beginning... by meatflower · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is the beginning I tell you. We must destroy SkyNet while we still can!

  19. Re:I disagree by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

    He's paid for the entire thing himself (about $15,000). DARPA has funded other powered armor projects, but not this one.

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  20. Slashdot Crushed by Giant Robot by infernow · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ah, the irony there would be...

    --

    that that is is that that is not is not

    1. Re:Slashdot Crushed by Giant Robot by plover · · Score: 0, Redundant

      It could only be better if it happened In Soviet Russia!

      --
      John
  21. Re:I disagree by procrastitron · · Score: 1

    No, the Darpa project is completely seperate. Darpa is sponsoring a Berkeley project which already has working legs and can carry oversized packs. For an image of the Darpa-funded, Berkeley project go to here

  22. Three words - Alaska Needs Women by K8Fan · · Score: 4, Funny

    The things men do when there are not enough women around. I guess it keeps his hands from going crazy on those long alaskan nights.

    --
    "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
  23. Re:Techical knowledge is there, but not with this by aliasptr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wow someone used the word "control". After working on a VERY, VERY... VERY simple servo motor control project I have to agree with the skepticism. Who knows though I am stupid, other people aren't. I also haven't dedicated any "real" portion of my life to control systems. Also someone else brought up the impracticality, which seems to be a logical arguement to me. But again I don't really know that much. Overall it is pretty cool for what it's worth!

    --
    It takes all types in this world. I sincerely mean it... This is just my perspective.
  24. By the pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It is obvious that this was not designed by rogue chicken scientists. It is nowhere near sleak enough.

  25. Other *Real* Mecha/Teleop links by StCredZero · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Forget this guy in the post. He clearly doesn't have a clue. But the problems have been largely solved in the past several decades with DARPA money.

    If you put a full body haptic interface around someone strapped into a huge robotic body, you'd have it. (See the Immersion Corp link.) But the thing would have to be freaking huge. A full-body haptic cockpit would be something like a sphere 8' in diameter, implying a mecha 30 foot tall!

    Perhaps have the cockpit controlling separate and much smaller mecha body remotely, and just have the haptic controls on one of those motion simulation platforms.
    1. Re:Other *Real* Mecha/Teleop links by procrastitron · · Score: 1

      Why a haptic interface? The thing doesn't have to have a massive number of motions to be useful. I'd think that a more videogame-controller like interface could be sufficient. Such an interface wouldn't need the cockpit to be so large.

    2. Re:Other *Real* Mecha/Teleop links by CrackedButter · · Score: 1


      I don't like the tone in your post concerning this mans efforts, at least he isn't on a public discussion board comparing another mans efforts with privately funded endevours.
      Yes I looked at the links, they suck. Where are those cool things today helping us out, looks like they are still in the research phase even after 15+ years for some of them.

    3. Re:Other *Real* Mecha/Teleop links by StCredZero · · Score: 1

      The problems in this area are *control* problems. Read the guy's web site. He doesn't give me a lot of confidence he knows what those problems really are. Actually building the Mecha is straightforward. The hard part is keeping it from falling down and letting it be controlled efficiently. Otherwise, this is just going to be like Robosaurus. Good for monster-truck showpieces, but pitiful at any real hand-to-hand combat.

      And as for the stuff being in the research phase, Sarcos Corp, which is linked to in my other post, has solved them using the research pointed to by the links. (Look at the giant arm holding the ANVIL like it was a frying pan.)

      Sorry there wasn't a whole lot of flashy pictures in the links, and only *concepts*. But someone with a brain would read and observe what's on the other side of the links, note the long-ago dates of a lot of the research, and realize that such Mecha are actually within out technical reach. All we need is funding!

    4. Re:Other *Real* Mecha/Teleop links by StCredZero · · Score: 1

      The haptic interface is not to give a lareg degree of motions. Force-feedback is what is critical. Controlling and balancing an entire body in combat is going to be next to impossible, unless the thing is statically balanced -- in which case it will have all the dexterity/manuverability of a walrus on dry land. But for *real* humanoid to humanoid combat at a large scale, the movements are going to have to be dynamically balanced. If you could work up a full bady haptic interface, you could then use a person's natural control system to do this work.

      An alternative would be to control the robot like a fighting video-game character, and actually have the robot itself do the fine coordination of movement and balance. But such tech is on the level of Honda's Asimo. I somehow doubt that this guy can muster that!

    5. Re:Other *Real* Mecha/Teleop links by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      I did realise and also rejected your points. Do you not think this guy is going to realise the problems you mentioned? In any case, he hasn't even finished it yet and you're damning him for at least trying!

    6. Re:Other *Real* Mecha/Teleop links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you put a full body haptic interface around someone strapped into a huge robotic body, you'd have it. (See the Immersion Corp link.) But the thing would have to be freaking huge. A full-body haptic cockpit would be something like a sphere 8' in diameter, implying a mecha 30 foot tall!

      Midgets and Dwarfs are the answer. However this will give them the chance to get back at us for all the dwarf-tossing contests...

    7. Re:Other *Real* Mecha/Teleop links by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      He may not have realized the problems. Quite often I dismiss some part of a problem as "easy" and then have it come back and torment me.

    8. Re:Other *Real* Mecha/Teleop links by StCredZero · · Score: 2, Informative

      For one thing, you seem pretty unclear about what my other points are. (That the control technology already exists to do this, and that it's decades old. And that this guy doesn't seem to appreciate the control problems.)

      You're putting words into my mouth. No one's damning him. But his project is not going to produce anything that looks like *combat* unless there's some pretty sophisticated dynamic balancing capability.

      Imagine that mecha A and mecha B are fighting. A is not dynamically balanced and has no haptic feedback from its limbs, but B is dynamically balanced by a human pilot getting feedback through a full-body haptic interface. B grabs mecha A's arm and gives a good tug. If mecha A was a human being, then it would sense the amount of force exerted through its arm, then shift its feet or stumble to keep its center of gravity over its feet -- perhaps even slacken its arm to prevent the transmission of the impulse. But since mecha A has no dynamic balance, it can do none of this. If mecha B pulls hard enough, then mecha A's left foot might even be levered entirely off the ground, and the pilot would have no immediate feedback.

      Contrast this to what happens when you grab a human's arm a give a tug. If you stop and think about it, dozens of things all happen at once as a reflex to keep you from falling over. A mecha with haptic feedback can leverage this naturally evolved ability. Maybe the monster truck crowd is going to be impressed because of all the heavy metal, and the clashing of big clubs on steel, but the perceptive ones will notice that combat without balancing capability look like a couple of toddlers duking it out.

      Without balancing tech on the level of Asimo, I'd rather put my money on a non-bipedal robot like the
      T-52

    9. Re:Other *Real* Mecha/Teleop links by NolanJurgens · · Score: 1

      A full-body haptic cockpit would be something like a sphere 8' in diameter, implying a mecha 30 foot tall!
      This video shows a design that would reduce that 30 feet to about 10.

    10. Re:Other *Real* Mecha/Teleop links by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Okay, I understand now where you are coming from, fair point, glad you could see where I wasn't getting it the first time round.

  26. How about some prize money... by Goldenhawk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sure, it wouldn't be as "sexy" as the X-Prize, but wouldn't some privately sponsored prize money do wonders for this longtime human dream? Call it, say, the Mecha Prize, and offer a few million bucks to whoever builds the first mecha that can go a half mile, pick up a Dodge Neon and move it in the air for 50 feet, then return to the starting line. Or something similar.

    I have no doubt that someone as creative as Rutan is out there, and with a little incentive and the promise of some real financial gain could use modern actuators and pressure pads and gyro sensors and so forth to finally create a useful mecha.

    I also have no doubt that (unlike Spaceship One) a mecha that could complete the above test would immediately be of great value in quite a few industrial and/or emergency applications.

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

    1. Re:How about some prize money... by GlassHeart · · Score: 2, Insightful
      offer a few million bucks to whoever builds the first mecha that can go a half mile, pick up a Dodge Neon and move it in the air for 50 feet, then return to the starting line.

      Interesting idea, but how would you differentiate a "mecha" from a forklift in this contest?

      It seems to me that a "mecha", like its human inspiration, is most useful as a creature for general purposes, unlike a spaceship which is meant to carry a specific load to a specific location. Thus, the contest should be designed to prove flexibility and generality, rather than competence at a specific task. Lots of industrial robots can already do very specific things very well. The human hand, on the other hand, is so useful because it can lift a hundred pounds as well as pick up an egg.

    2. Re:How about some prize money... by museumpeace · · Score: 1

      DARPA, as above posters mentioned, paid for some moderately effective teleoperated suits or parts of same. But that that same DARPA DOES offer prize money for the autonomous vehicle cross country race [at which all contestants failed miserably] so you might not need private donations to get this prize money.

      --
      SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  27. Aliens got mechas right by leftie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Mechas make perfect forklifts and industrial machines. There's some use for combat mechas in exotic terrain... mountains, underwater, etc

    They'd make excellent car crushers, too :)

    1. Re:Aliens got mechas right by TheHawke · · Score: 1

      Read the follow-on colonial marines handbook that explains some more into the so-called Caterpillar walking forklift. The unit uses gryoscopic stabilization similiar to what segways use, only that the gyros "uncouple" when the user tries to walk with it, causing the unit to become naturally unstable, but within tolerances that are norm with walking. I mean, after all, we humans are naturally unstable while standing.

      As for working in the soft soil or mud with them, forget it! The PSI/Square inch of pressure that the footpads would apply to the ground it walks on, especially when it's under load, the walker would sink up to it's knees in a heartbeat!

      No, these units would be built for in-house, or established sites, where there the terrain is level and firm enough so that the mechas would be able to move about without worry of sinking or toppling over.

      --
      First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
    2. Re:Aliens got mechas right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sink up to it's knees

      "its".

    3. Re:Aliens got mechas right by lordofthechia · · Score: 1

      "here's some use for combat mechas in exotic terrain... mountains, underwater"

      Yes, this suit could be used underwater. Depending of course on how long the wearer could hold his breath...

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    4. Re:Aliens got mechas right by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      I imagine any battle mecha would have its own air supply system so that one could use these system underwater or in other conditions where breathing is inhospitable to human life, like say, downtown Houston.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

  28. Suit by OneArmedMan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Honey!, Where did you put my Super Suit !?!

    1. Re:Suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you need to know?!

  29. Hmmm... by rackhamh · · Score: 1

    Let's hope his server has a hefty exoskeleton as well...

  30. Steel Cage Match by gremlins · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I want to see this guy fight the guy in the Bear Suit

    --
    just because your a schizophrenic doesn't mean people arn't really out to get you
  31. It's not slashdot by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

    it's fark without the boobies

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  32. hope he didn't forget.... by LiquidMind · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "...and a gas engine mounted on the back to generate the power needed."

    i hope he's got intentions to incorporate some sorta personal heating system....-40 and metal is not a good combination

    --
    This sig contains repetition and redundancy.
  33. All your..... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Wait til they team up with the Tron Guy.

    1. Re:All your..... by LithiumX · · Score: 1

      I clicked...

      I saw...

      ...and I expect a few nightmares over it tonight.

      --
      Do not confuse "Freedom of Choice" with "Free Will".
    2. Re:All your..... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I clicked... I saw...and I expect a few nightmares over it tonight.

      Perhaps you need some Goatse therapy to desensatize yourself.

  34. Re:I disagree by JuggleGeek · · Score: 2, Informative
    He isn't getting any DARPA money.

    From the article:

    In all, the materials for the project have cost him $15,000 so far. Not bad for a killing (or at least potentially flame-throwing, car-mashing) machine.

    That's a lot less than the $50 million that the U.S. military, through its Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) division, has devoted to research into a smaller, lighter exoskeleton that can be used on the battlefield.

    DARPA has been pursuing the idea of a "Starship Troopers"-inspired soldier at least since 2000, when it started its Exoskeletons for Human Performance Augmentation program.

  35. I just knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew with certainty that the first homebrewed robot exoskeleton would come from one of the freak states. And you would be too busy enjoying the nice weather in Hawaii.

  36. A good use for this. by sedition · · Score: 1

    It'd make a great extra-planetary exploration device if it were sealed. Could you imagine these things climbing around Valles Marineris where the scale of the enviroment would match the scale of the suit.

  37. a HellCat Mech or a Robotech Veritech..... by Desmoden · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    and even I would join the Army =)

  38. Hmmm... mustache, dark hair, heart problem by leftie · · Score: 1

    Seems like I know this guy from somewhere, but can't quite place where....

  39. Use the coralized link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and save the server some bandwidth, and all of us a PITA (why the hell don't people post Coralized links alongside the main one in the article?!?!?!)

    http://www.neogentronyx.com.nyud.net:8090/

  40. UniBuilder...... by Dark+Demon · · Score: 0

    At least Mr. Kaczynski has found a more productive hobby..........now if management can figure out how to offshore it...

  41. Dr. Stephen Hawking's is better by no_choice · · Score: 1

    http://www.paralinks.net/paralinksarchives/hawking exo.html

  42. Desperate need for metal licking mecha in Alaska by leftie · · Score: 1

    You need a mecha in Alaska to do all that tongue-touching metal work during the long Alaskan winters.

    People get out of Gitmo faster than people get freed from touching their tongue to metal in perma-front country.

  43. Not a robot! by xv4n · · Score: 1

    Why people insist in calling "robot" something that is not a robot?? A robot must be autonomous , that is, no human intervention involved.

  44. Other leg-enhancing system? by tyroney · · Score: 2, Informative
    Anyone? Not the Berkeley exoskelton thing. I seem to recall, back in the 90's, showed up in pop sci... some kind of strap-on device that was supposed to augment your leg motions. (military was interested or actively developing, if I recall) I think it was mostly mechanical, I'm not sure if it merely multiplied the movement or affected the force, and if I recall the bulk of the legs/levers stuck out behind and below the user. (kind of like thick flamingo legs, or some other animal similar but more cool) The end result was supposed to be 2x the leg motion, not tons more effort. Kind of like more efficient and stable and jointed stilts.

    Anyone remember or know what I'm talking about? I can't seem to find anything about it.

    1. Re:Other leg-enhancing system? by electrichamster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do you mean those weird kangaroo leg things? People bounced along with them, and they were supposed to yeild twice the motion for the same amount of legwork.

    2. Re:Other leg-enhancing system? by Log+from+Blammo · · Score: 1

      I recall seeing a Russian Army prototype for an infantry mobility device on one of those science/invention shows on cable. The basic design was a gasoline-powered piston strapped to the user's leg. When the foot rolled forward in a normal run/jog, the piston would fire, giving a boost. The demonstration showed the guy jogging at 40 mi/hr, though I don't recall the range before refueling.

      I thought, at the time, that it would be awesome for commuting. Better than a Segway, even.

      --
      "This quote is a product of the Frobozz Magic Quote Company."
  45. Outdated meme - it's "in Japan" now... by billstewart · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Sure, in Soviet Russia, giant mecha robots build humans in their backyards, but basically, giant mecha robots are popular in Japan!

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  46. Re:Techical knowledge is there, but not with this by StCredZero · · Score: 1

    Take a look at my Other Post for some links relating to the research that led up to the accomplishments of Sarcos. Not flashy stuff. Mostly concepts from old research. But if you put the concepts together, you realize that Mecha are indeed possible. Though I would agree with the other guy that pointed out that these are impractical for real warfare. But I would still watch a TV show with 2 human piloted mecha fighting!

  47. Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    only old korean people signing it digitally

  48. Upright? by tangledweb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Am I the only one who sees an 18 or 35 foot tall mech being build surrounded by scaffolding and thinks that the whole project would have been 75% easier if he judt built it lying down?

    A crane could easily stand it up later, but if it is going to work at all, it would need to be able to stand after a stumble anyway.

    Sure, it looks cooler standing, and probably annoys his neighbours more, but it seems like a very poor design decision.

    1. Re:Upright? by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      If you build it standing up, it can be built from the ground up - create the feet, attach the legs, then the torso, etc.

      Build it lying down and you have to build it from the back up. It's a lot more difficult that way.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    2. Re:Upright? by SlickMcSly · · Score: 1

      You're assuming the machine needs to be built opposite the pull of gravity so that it can rest upon it's own support, but as you can see it's being supported while upright anyway. Since it can't stand on it's own, building from the feet up is completely uneccessary (ntm suspiciously negligent).

      In the same way you'd support the machine in an upright position you could support the orientation of the parts while it's lying down, and just build along the ground where it's easier to work with and secure parts.

      Though how you'd build this pos is irrelevant, the sloppy metal cage that comprises the legs will quickly buckle under the force of any kind of actuator, ntm there doesn't seem to be any room for the mechanics to balance the bot sideways, as many bot enthusiasts forget to do. Ever see those pegs on a wind up toy's feet?

      This mecha project isn't going anywhere. I suggest he build a bear suit or something, he is in Alaska after all.

    3. Re:Upright? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm no engineer or anything but it doesn't look like that scaffold would do much to hold up that much metal by itself. It looks like it might be a ok way of keeping it from blowing over in the wind or (since you as you said, he is in alaska) perhaps it provides support for a sort of tent to try to protect it from the elements when its not being worked on (or photographed).

      Also something to consider is that it'd be much realistic to test it while its standing & while that picture doesn't an exact sense of scale, I'd suspect it'd be a pain to have to lay it on its back through x number of tests. Though I suppose once you had it built sufficiently to stand up, you might be able to make some changes without laying it back down again.

    4. Re:Upright? by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you build it standing up, it can be built from the ground up - create the feet, attach the legs, then the torso, etc.

      EUREKA!

      THAT is what Voltron was trying to teach us! "Form feet and legs! Form arms and body! And then form the head!" Given Earth's current level of technology, this is the only sequence that will permit us to construct giant space combat robots!

      The dilemma, now, is to determine the motives of the mysterious entities that sent us message. Are we to build giant space robots to protect ourselves against mutual enemies? Or are they trying to trick us into violating a now-forgotten treaty (one imposed on ancient cultures banning earthlings from building combat robots), thereby giving them the legal basis for a pre-emptive strike against us?

    5. Re:Upright? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rest upon it's own support
      can't stand on it's own

      "its".

      I suggest he build a bear suit or something, he is in Alaska after all

      "something; he".

    6. Re:Upright? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks. You really added something to this conversation. Jerk.

    7. Re:Upright? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      I think we need a -1 pedantic mod.

      Even if it doesn't affect karma (like funny mods).

    8. Re:Upright? by iamhassi · · Score: 1
      "Sure, it looks cooler standing, and probably annoys his neighbours more..."

      his neighbors the polar bears? He's in freakin alaska, unless the polar bears have freakin lasers on their foreheads I don't think he has anything to worry about, besides a 35 foot mech is the perfect weapon against his neighbors the polar bears with freakin laser on their foreheads.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  49. Re:Techical knowledge is there, but not with this by tafinucane · · Score: 1

    Big difference: he's using mechanical linkages and hydraulics to operate it--not electronically controlled motors.

    Have you ever watched a backhoe operator working? Or, for that matter, driven a car? It's a matter of relying on muscle memory to adjust for slop in the mechanism.

    I don't think his project is much different than other machines on the monster-truck circuit (read center paragraph for a riveting description of two giant battling robots). This guy's design is most notable in that it departs from the traditional transforming metal dino-sar theme.

    The point is it's not rocket science to design a "control system" for what are basically jerry rigged front-end loaders. In fact, it's demolition derby science: rocket science's archnemesis.

    Granted, it would be a bit more tricky to get it to actually walk, but I imagine the operators will just wheel the thing out on a flatbed and wave it's arms around a bit and shoot flames. All his talk of military and forest fighting capabilities is just successful buzz to get rednecks like me out at the local speedway.

  50. Not as sexy? by second+class+skygod · · Score: 1

    I'd say that depends entirely on what human features one chooses to enhance. Think of the possibilities!

    -scsg

  51. Waste of good resources... by Stupidhead · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Shouldn't he be spending time on something useful, like a GIRL ROBOT?

    --
    Contributing to "Judgement Day" one line of
    1. Re:Waste of good resources... by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

      Well you can't justify a few millions on research for a "GIRL ROBOT" which if fully integrated with all sorts of pleasuring features.

      You can however, justify it when you go for "humanoïde robots" and add funky features later.

      You don't think those guys inventing the internet were actually building a "network to withstand a nuclear attack"? : P

      Just be patient my friend. ^_^
      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
  52. Havoc by PersonCJB · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Part of me wants to see this thing fall into the wrong hands.

    --
    -= Person
  53. Motion Control by iamlucky13 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Owens said he can't afford top-of-the line equipment, like infrared sensors and electronics that would govern the motion. Instead he's using a hydraulic system to transfer the motion of his limbs to the larger structure,
    It sounds like he's basically he's relying on his own sense of balance to control this thing. We do it unconsciously as adults, but it took us a long while to learn and a lot of falling down. It may be possible he's got everything figured out and the control is natural enough that he'll just climb in and start walking. Somehow, though, I imagine him lifting the first foot and getting his center of gravity outside the edges of the other foot. Then he's got to shake off the bruises, bring a crane over to lift the thing up and repeat until he gets the hang of it. That's assuming his hydraulics are fast enough and he has enough degrees of freedom to keep the thing balanced to begin with. Having a heavy legs like he mentioned will reduce, but not eliminate the danger of shifting the weight to far out.

    This is way cool and it'd be awesome to see it work, but I'm officially a doubter.
    1. Re:Motion Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having more weight on the bottom increases balance problems in a very real way.

      Try balancing a broom on you hand with the heavy end up, then try with the heavy end down.

      For shuffling along more weight on the bottom might help, but for walking you need a more reasonable distribution of weight.

      Also the electronic control systems (if you build your own) are cheap compared to the price of those
      hydraulics. Without proper PID electronic control systems he is going to have enough problems keeping it standing, muchless walking.

    2. Re:Motion Control by NarrMaster · · Score: 1

      Somehow, though, I imagine him lifting the first foot and getting his center of gravity outside the edges of the other foot. Then he's got to shake off the bruises, bring a crane over to lift the thing up and repeat until he gets the hang of it.

      We call that tenacity. I like it. I hope he succeeds with the design. It just appeals to my scrounger/improvisation personality.

      --
      That's right. All your base.
  54. Russian Tanks in Hungarian Revolution by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Tanks are fine for semi-open country, at least when nobody's throwing tactical nukes or shooting with depleted uranium shells, but they have some vulnerabilities in cities. During the 1956 Hungarian Revolution, the Russians were invading Budapest, and the locals would take out a strip of cobblestone street, pour gasoline in it, and light in when a tank crossed, with negative results to the tank. Probably newer tanks are a bit better protected, but it's still a risk.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  55. Hexapod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't a hexapod be the best? A mech with six legs would be statically stable. Robot kits are already offered in this form and any large scale design could be based off of them. ...Now, it wouldn't be a humanoid, but who is to argue that it doesn't look cool?

  56. Heinlein would have solved it by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    If the Armed Forces wanted such a thing, they could simply subsidise the guy by getting him an assistant, Lord High Everything Else, who asked him what he needed, and got it for him -- no paperwork, no meetings, just did it and didn't bother him with questions on why he needed it or what it cost. The guy needs stuff, but he doesn't need to be organised or worry about the hassles of staff or logistics.

    Read "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" or "The Mythical Man-Month (Brooks)" for references.

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  57. Japan by kai.chan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Korea is not the country with the mecha-craze. It is Japan. The building of a giant robot is not new. Many years ago, this giant robot was already being developed in Japan. Although there is no actual functionality with this Gundam, but I doubt that NMX04-1A can be made to be autonomous any time soon.

  58. The link posted with "URL:" by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

    http://www.paralinks.net/paralinksarchives/hawking exo.html

    Actual, operational link:

    http://www.paralinks.net/paralinksarchives/hawking exo.html

    Please use the URL feature that will auto-link a URL, as shown under the Submit button on the Post Comment page. Those of us who perfer to click rather than copy-paste and then fix the link.

    In your post it has a space that's not in the actual link, dunno why /. does that to a line of text, but the URL thing doesn't add spaces [to the ACTUAL LINK - the text still shows a space in hawkingexo].

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
  59. Other amateur Mecha by TheSync · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On this page there are photos of exosuits which were at Robonexus in October in a mecha lifting contest.

    Mechanicus is another home-made exoskeleton from Austin, TX.

  60. There is a contest for this sort of thing by JohnKitt · · Score: 1

    Anyone ever hear anbout the Tetsujin contest? "Teams build powered exoskeletons to augment the strength of one human in a weight lifting competition." Sounds like fun! I can't wait until more people build these things. Then, as the natural progression of robotic projects seem to always head to, the next generation of robot combat can take place! Think 'RobotJocks'... :/ http://www.servomagazine.com/tetsujin2004/

  61. He's on a budget so... by NolanJurgens · · Score: 1

    he's gonna try the modded Xbox and Steel Battalion controller. Wish him luck.

    1. Re:He's on a budget so... by StCredZero · · Score: 1

      He could do a simple model of the thing's center of gravity, and write a program to keep its feet under that. Then all he'd need is 1 orientation sensor and position sensors for all of the joints.

      I doubt he's going to get that far!

  62. Maybe it would be an improvement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My question has to be will the new robotic overlords replace our current Republican overlords or simply act as another level of government?

  63. Tags? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what Preview is for, stupid.

  64. Re:I disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congratulations. You're an idiot.

    Seriously. That's the stupidest, most ignorant post I've seen on Slashdot. Congratulations, fuckwit: You simply MUST be the product of incest.

  65. ANOTHER Exosuit by TFGeditor · · Score: 1
    This reminded me of this guy's anit-bear suit, http://www.nfb.ca/grizzly/suit.html

    for which he won an Ignoble Prize. http://www.improb.com/ig/ig-pastwinners.html#ig199 8

    --
    Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    1. Re:ANOTHER Exosuit by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know, reply to my own post is lame, but I forgot to mention that I have seen video (on TV) of the guy putting the suit through some rather amazing tests--including getting crashed into by a car at 35 mph--and he WAS inside the suit!

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    2. Re:ANOTHER Exosuit by randallpowell · · Score: 0

      I seen that as well. It's a good idea. I'd love to get one myself. Need to do Christmas shopping.

  66. In Alaska, you don't lose your woman... by human+bean · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...you lose your turn.

    --

    *whup* "Get along, little electrons. Heeyah!"

  67. Re:Techical knowledge is there, but not with this by StCredZero · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, the Sarcos Large Arm uses hydraulics. In fact, only hydraulics are powerful and responsive enough for machinery like this.

    Real science is better than demolition derby science any day. Instead of a couple of humanoid megasaurs lumbering around, imagine two giant robots nimble enough to do Kung-Fu! (Duking it out with giant clubs!)

  68. Honey... by isny · · Score: 2, Funny

    I goth my thung thuck thoo the thoot.

  69. Re:I disagree by victor_the_cleaner · · Score: 1
    when it started its Exoskeletons for Human Performance Augmentation program.

    See I told you, pr0n drives all technological advances! "Exoskeletons for Human Performance Augmentation" is just a fancy name for a strap-on.

  70. Why are haptics needed? by brokeninside · · Score: 1

    Most of the feedback doesn't need to get back to the brains of the unit; instead it can be handled by computational processors. Consider the way that Kamen's iBot and Segway prevent most of the feedback from going to the pilot. In the case of the iBot, 3 Pentiums do the calculations to keep the machine responding in fashion appropriate for the pilot's intent.

    1. Re:Why are haptics needed? by StCredZero · · Score: 1

      If you're going to depend on the pilot's sense of balance to place the feet in the right place, then you need force feedback to the limbs. If you're going to let the machine handle balance on its own, then you're building your own primitive version of Asimo. These are both valid, but I don't see this guy doing either of these.

      Haptics aren't needed, but the technology is there, and can be used to leverage a human beings finely developed sense of kinematics and balance. Otherwise, you're rolling your own, and Honda's R&D team has just gotten the hang of running at 3.6 Mph after a few year's effort.

  71. Re:I disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A strap-on is an accessorial appendige - this thing is what's called a 'waldo', meaning it theoritcally affords leverage multiplication over normal human muscle capability...oh, wait.

  72. Looks like a Mecha-Coffin by Zen+Punk · · Score: 1

    Is that thing supposed to be manned? Someone make sure to find out if he survives when he tries to make that thing walk...

    --
    Sleep is futile.
  73. Who remembers Goldorak aka Grandizer aka Goldrake? by smnoel · · Score: 1

    Ah!
    This was one of my favorite shows in the 80s.
    I saw the French Canadian Version!
    It had songs and lyrics!
    Much better than the american version I believe.

    Here is a link for nostalgia.
    FULGURO-POING!
    http://www.vex.net/~guru/goldorak/goldorak.htm

  74. *grin* The article mentioned Ripley's loader... by geekwench · · Score: 1

    Now, all I want to know is: when can I order one for myself? Not that I have any earthly use for such a device, but it's just too damn cool!

    --
    Doing my level best to piss off the religious right wing...
  75. Re:Techical knowledge is there, but not with this by aXis100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem with backhoes is thery are:
    1) Worked so hard and long (due to fiancial pressures) that their joins develop slop
    2) The hydraulic valves only have a limited amount of proportional control

    With a well maintained machine and good proportinal control valves, hydraulic force can be applied very smoothly and controllably. The power/size radio is incredible and is really required for something like this.

  76. Redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PSI/Square Inch? Whaddaya think the SI is for?

  77. Super powered mecha aye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I don't know about all the comments everyone else has been manufacturing all day, none of them sound very positive which is fine by me because the more negative they are the better, in fact, it only gives me that many more people to totally dissapoint when I fire up my mecha, and walk around for a bit. This chassis, isn't going to be able to hurl a truck through the air, or anything quite so assinine, it is built to simply walk, and throw flames, GEN 2 is where it at, those badboys will be able to RIP the arms off the NMX04-1A, As for the 14ft saber, and jetpacks, gimm'e a sec will ya!? I'll get around to it eventually! maybe next time Ill make an account, until then anonymous coward suits me fine.

  78. Do you GPL? by mu22le · · Score: 1

    What if the guy GPLed the thing?
    What would military do?
    Osama (just to use some wildcard name for the evil character they want you to fear now) could use it as well as caaptain america (insert your favourite hiro/protagonist [blink])
    Would anyone acknowledge the importance of open developing and GPL derivative work or would they just secret it up?
    Ok I really have no idea how open source licences would apply in such a scenario but it could be interesting

    [and this is /. anyway so someone had to bring this up. BTW I see the meme war has already started so let me add:
    now imagine a Beowulf army of theese!]

  79. not the only guy by cakefool · · Score: 1

    Admittedly they have done a lot more theoretical and design work than just slapping angle together then making it move, but http://www.mechaps.com/ have a very clever project ongoing. Check out the images section for up-to-date concept and design sketches.

  80. Well now we're ready for the open lands! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sparrow could've done better, but hey you have to start somewhere! Cut!

  81. Deja Vu? by Shikatsu · · Score: 1

    Y'know... shadow moses island was supposedly in alaska....

  82. Isnt there enough fighting among robots? by mrfatmann · · Score: 1

    Peace, Robot Monster. I just.... wanna....dance...!