Slashdot Mirror


Don't Click Here For A Free iPod

fermion writes "Do you wonder what all those free iPods links are about? Do you wonder why apparently rational Slashdot users would use their .sig line to push an offer that seems little more than a thinly veiled pyramid scheme? Answers to these questions can be found in this NYT article (personal information, with no free iPod, is required). The plan itself seems simple. Rat out your friends to advertisers, and get a free gadget. The firm in question, Gratis, Inc, gets a bounty on each customer. The firm claims to have a revenue of $15 million in 2004. They claim to give away 500 iPods a week. If, as the article claims, each contact earns a bounty of around $50, we might presume that 1 in 12 contacts get a free iPod. This firm seem fairly upfront. Another firm mentioned in the article, Consumer Research Corporation, seems much less so. As always, read the fine print."

93 of 594 comments (clear)

  1. Read this carefully by BWJones · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I want you all to read this very carefully: Nothing is free , except true charity and this is decidedly not charity. Somebody (Gratis Inc.) is making money. Let me tell you a secret.....your identity and demographic information is valuable. Individually, it means very little, but when you sell out your friends to get in on this scheme, numbers start adding up and marketing firms and companies are paying big for this information, thus the 500 iPods/week adding up to $6.5 Million US/year and the company is decidedly making a tidy profit on top of this expenditure.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is the real article this badly formatted?

      You are an idiot. You can't even karma whore on Slashdot properly.

    2. Re:Read this carefully by FlipmodePlaya · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Whenever a /. article is posted about some nifty little DIY project that can save you from spending a few hundred dollars on a consumer model or whatever, the value of one's time always comes into question. How much money are you saving if the project takes X hours of your time?

      I think the deal is similar here. In the end you're getting a free portable music player (I believe they offer TVs and such, too, right?), but you have to sign up for free trials and things like that. You also have to shamelessly whore yourself out to your friends and family, to rope them into the scheme. Then there's the whole personal information thing the parent mentioned. After months of your own ridiculous marketing, is it really worth it?

    3. Re:Read this carefully by eeg3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think most people care their information is being sold away. It's really not that big of a deal.

      You can spam me all you please, if you'll give me a free iPod first.

    4. Re:Read this carefully by Incadenza · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nothing is free

      "There is no such thing as a free lunch, unless you are the lunch."
    5. Re:Read this carefully by LGagnon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nothing is free

      This said on a web site that constantly talks about open source software. Don't get me wrong, nothing tangible is free, but but its a whole different situation with intellectual property.

    6. Re:Read this carefully by Surazal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My mom would have issues with me sending her privacy information to a nameless soulless corporation.

      Hence, you can count me in as one of many people to decline this offer. Hope that helps.

      --
      --- Journals are boring; Go to my web page instead
    7. Re:Read this carefully by anagama · · Score: 2, Insightful

      • I don't think most people care their information is being sold away. It's really not that big of a deal.

      I care.

      That's why I trade supermarket "coupon" cards whenever I get a chance. It is better than avoiding the cards because trading has the potential to poison the data collection. If I simply refuse, they have a valid data set on those who use the cards (most people). But poisoned data can be dangerous if used as the basis for financial decisions. I'd love it if people made card trading a regular process.

      And don't give me any lip about "improving customer service by stocking the right items". Stores have been able to track their stock - what sells and what doesn't for ages. There really is no valid reason for the store to know exactly what I purchase individually. They can get the stock right by looking at things on a storewide level.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    8. Re:Read this carefully by elmegil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Lots of people care. But guess what? Chances are good, your information is already being "mined" by the credit card companies anyway. Might as well get something for your trouble, if you're so inclined. Me, I didn't like the pyramid style of it, so I didn't. But I certainly thought about it a bit, and others I know had their iPods in time for christmas. Could have been a nice stocking stuffer had I opted in....

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    9. Re:Read this carefully by new-black-hand · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why are these companies always portrayed in a negative light with the assumption that they are bad? I see nothing wrong with Gratis - they are filling a need for the companies that are willing to pay up to $60 per lead. Gratis meet all their obligations to both clients and referred customers for their clients. Why must everyone then assume that they are somehow evil? They have made a lot of money doing what they do, and a lot of people have received iPods for their efforts - the owners are even willing to have their full names published in the NYT which shows that they have nothing to hide.

    10. Re:Read this carefully by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's why I trade supermarket "coupon" cards whenever I get a chance. It is better than avoiding the cards because trading has the potential to poison the data collection.

      yeah you must really be psyching those evil supermarket dudes out!

    11. Re:Read this carefully by Zorilla · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, but would offering a cute screensaver for it change things?

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    12. Re:Read this carefully by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've often thought about a website devoted to courtesy card havoc. Maybe everyone uploads their number, and each week you print off a new barcode for yours. We could even have a week where we all use the same number simultaneously...

      Think about it. We'd drive the poor sap crazy that tries to do the actual data mining. "Here he is buying $500 worth of groceries in upstate NY, and 6 minutes later he is buying peanut butter with foodstamps in florida!"

      Of course, how long before the cease and desist letter was mailed?

    13. Re:Read this carefully by k4_pacific · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have two of those cards. One is under the name "Carly Fiorina" and I use it for most purchases. The ither has my real name, and I only use it when I buy condoms or sour cream.

      --
      Unknown host pong.
    14. Re:Read this carefully by adpowers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Reminds me of one of the Ferengi rule of acquisition #59: Free advice is seldom cheap.

      In this case, I think we can say, "Free iPod is seldom cheap."

      Andrew

    15. Re:Read this carefully by polysylabic+psudonym · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Better make up entirly fake cards. In getting a legitimate one and faking the barcode you might be breaching an agreement you have with them. If you don't have an agreement with them, what can they sue over? (that one was a serious question, not rhetorical - feel free to answer).

    16. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
      They collect the data simply for "data mining" purposes. Now that technology has made it possible to retain vast quantities of data (and not just summaries,) retailers are amassing HUGE databases of customer purchasing information. Walmart reportedly has 50 petabytes of sales history saved.

      Most of data mining today answers the mundane questions like "how much more ice cream do people buy when it's hot?" What they're going for is more esoteric links and trends. Things like: if anagama buys lingerie, then buys an EPT test a month later, perhaps they can forecast the demand for EPT tests based on lingerie sales. Or maybe they'll put anagama on a list so that in 9 months they send you coupons for diapers and formula. (BTW, diapers and formula are the holy grail of retail: if they can get new moms to regularly shop at their store for those two items, they believe they have a customer for life. New moms typically harbor good feelings about the places they trust to help provide for their children.)

      Data mining is still a very immature process, despite current marketing hype. So far, it's being used experimentally. Walmart is certainly the king of data mining, but even their latest and greatest example was simply to see what people bought before and after hurricane Charley. (Turns out they sold 7 times the usual number of strawberry pop-tarts and beer, so they shipped trucks with extra poptarts and beer to the stores in the projected paths of the rest of the other hurricanes this season.) Again, nothing that couldn't have been done with raw statistics.

      Retailers view this data as "gold ore", even though it's a lot more like the Emperor's New Clothes. It's got to be valuable, somehow, it's just that we haven't figured out how to process it yet. The people working on the "customer database" teams are quick to shout "yes, it's valuable" because if they didn't they'd be out of a job. Same with the Sun and Oracle salesmen -- buy this valuable database processing engine and mine for gold (or else I get no fat bonus check, boo-hoo.)

      Yes, I am a deeply placed insider who works for a large retailer. I see this stuff all the time, and I know how worthless it's been so far. But it doesn't stop us from trying to mine more data. And it certainly doesn't stop us from collecting it. So go ahead and poison the database it if you want, but there are three reasons why I personally wouldn't bother: first, the number of poisoners is statistically insignificant (good luck changing that). Second, as I mentioned above, the databases are not yielding the gold you might imagine. Finally, I try not to participate in those card gimmicks -- I shop at stores that don't require them.

    17. Re:Read this carefully by omeomi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I currently have six original mp3s and 3 mpegs for free on my website (link above). I ask nothing in return. Some things are free. As to whether or not these files have any actual value is of course up for debate, but the oft-stated claim that nothing is free is an obvious falacy. Open-source software is free. Unwanted stuff left on the curb is free. I have a juicer that was in the garage when I bought my house, and I've never even considered using it. Anyone who wants it (provided they know where I live, and don't mind stopping by to pick it up) is welcome to it. That's also free.

    18. Re:Read this carefully by aliquis · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'll send you an iPod for $1. All you need to do is to send me the $1 bill, then ask 50 of your friends to send me $1 each, then tell 50 of THEIR friends to send me $1 each. In addition, every one of your 50 friends can also get an iPod for $1, as long as every one of their 50 friends send me $1.

      Sure, from the first person you would actually get 1+50+50*50=$2551, but on the last part you would lose... Since you would only get $51 from them, sure you would have some money left after the first round but if all the people wanted an ipod you would get $2551+50*$51=$5101 for 51 ipods.

      But it wouldn't matter since they wouldn't (or even had) get 50 friends to sign up, but anyway! :D

      What a waste of storage and bandwidth this message was.

    19. Re:Read this carefully by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i don't get it.

      my spare time is free.
      i don't pay myself for my spare time, my employer doesn't pay me for my spare time. and i definitely don't want to spend the whole day earning money because in that case the following question arizes:

      what is all the money good for if i don't have any spare time to spend it?

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
  2. Christmas spirit by saskboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems common sense [to me anyway] that to get a "free" iPod from some company or person that is giving one away, they stand to gain something in return. Since I don't know precisely what they are gaining, since it isn't money from me, and I have to assume they aren't doing it in the Christmas Spirit and giving for the sheer joy of it, then it only stands to reason that they are going to loot me in some way.

    Some people might not mind having their personal browsing or comsumer habits monitored at every turn or click, but I'd rather keep some anonymity. Especially from companies which are quite obviously associated with spamming, and pyramid scheming.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  3. Where this thread is going: by AtillaTheKilla · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can easily see this thread degenerating in to hundreds of 'rational' slahdotters begging for refs. We'll see...

  4. while we're at it... by confusion · · Score: 5, Funny
    If you send this email to 10 of your friends, Bill Gates will send you $100. Er send you to Disney world, or refinance your mortgage or something.

    Jerry
    http://www.syslog.org/

    1. Re:while we're at it... by Saeger · · Score: 4, Funny

      The amount of money Bill Gates was giving away was actually $1000, not a piddly $100 cnote. You obviously never got paid and are just jealous of the millions who did.

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    2. Re:while we're at it... by TheAJofOZ · · Score: 5, Informative

      Don't worry there's a hard limit to how long this can last. Lets say it takes 1 month to get the 5 referrals you seem to need (I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to account for people taking longer, dropping out etc):
      Start: 1 person.
      1 Month: 5 new (6 total)
      2 Months: 25 new (31 total)
      3 Months: 125 new (156 total)
      4 Months: 625 new (781 total)
      5 Months: 3125 new (3906 total)
      6 Months: 15625 new (19531 total)
      7 Months: 78125 new (97656 total)
      8 Months: 390625 new (488281 total)
      9 Months: 1953125 new (2441406 total)
      10 Months: 9765625 new (12207031 total)
      11 Months: 48828125 new (61035156 total)
      12 Months: 244140625 new (305175781 total)
      13 Months: 1220703125 new (1525878906 total)
      14 Months: 6103515625 new (7629394531 total)

      Since there are only 6,446,131,400 people in the world the scheme cannot continue longer than 14 months. Sadly, those last few months will suck big time (and a few months after because of people who can't do basic math).

    3. Re:while we're at it... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, I don't dispute your explanation, just the conclusion. Those people who can't do math will continue, encouraging others to try again (hey, if he's still doing it, maybe it still works!). Those people will in turn encourage others... and somehow this becomes self-sustaining.

      Truly, if this logic held, we would have been done with pyramid schemes in the early 20th century.

  5. Question by suso · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do you wonder what all those free iPods links are about?

    No, not really.

  6. old news by esmoothie · · Score: 5, Informative

    freeipods.com has been talked about before. There was even an article on wired about it a while back; http://www.wired.com/news/mac/0,2125,64614,00.html From everything I have read, it seems legit as far as people getting their ipods.

  7. Because it actually works... by eMartin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know several people who got free iPods by signing up for the offers involved and then cancelling. If they paid anything at all, it was certainly a lot less than the cost of the iPod.

    I guess if this company is making money, then not everyone bothers to get out of the offers they sign up for, but even they aren't getting ripped off.

    BTW, there have been a few sites that set up referal pools, where people basically just got together and refered each other with the people in the pool.

    1. Re:Because it actually works... by zoloto · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It does work. You fill out offers from three companies and wait. In my case, two visa's and AOL. Once the iPod came AOL was cancelled (under the no billing time) and the visa's were cancelled. I used a P.O. Box from a company that would accept packages from ups and fedex (MBE). After I had gotten two iPods, the MBE account, AOL, temp hotmail address and Visa cards were cancelled.

      No junk mail at my house. No spam. Free iPods.

      I'm not complaining.

    2. Re:Because it actually works... by Saeger · · Score: 5, Funny
      After I had gotten two iPods, the MBE account, AOL, temp hotmail address and Visa cards were cancelled.

      Well, thanks for scamming the scammers, scammer. Hopefully "Gratis, Inc." will go out of business as fast as AllAdvantage did a few years ago. If anyone remembers them. :)

      "If anyone here is in marketing or advertising... KILL yourself. No joke here, really, seriously, kill yourself, you are no rationalization for what you do, you are Satan's little helpers. Kill yourself. Kill yourself. Kill yourself, now. Now! Back to the show! ... Seriously, I know all the marketing people are gonna be like, "There's gonna be a joke coming up!" There's no fucking joke: suck a tailpipe, hang yourself, borrow a pistol from an NRA buddy, do something to rid the world of your evil fucking presence. OK, back to the show. ... You know what bugs me though, that everyone here who's in marketing is now thinking the same thing: "Oh, cool, Bill's going for that Anti-Marketing dollar. That's a huge market!" Quit it! Don't turn everything into a dollar sign, please! ..."Oohh, the plea for sanity dollar. Huge! Huge market! Look at our research."
      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    3. Re:Because it actually works... by tsalem · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "If anyone here is in marketing or advertising... KILL yourself..." - from one of Bill Hicks' standup routines. (Thought the quote should be credited..)

    4. Re:Because it actually works... by lsmeg · · Score: 5, Informative
      It does work. You fill out offers from three companies and wait. In my case, two visa's and AOL. Once the iPod came AOL was cancelled (under the no billing time) and the visa's were cancelled. I used a P.O. Box from a company that would accept packages from ups and fedex (MBE). After I had gotten two iPods, the MBE account, AOL, temp hotmail address and Visa cards were cancelled.

      Word of caution: be careful about signing up for credit cards and cancelling them. The number of credit cards you own and have ever owned make up a part of your credit rating. Two credit cards you sign up for and cancel probably aren't going to do much... But if you go to get a mortgage and you've had 20 different cards, it could raise some eyebrows.

      --
      It's OK! I'm a limo driver!
    5. Re:Because it actually works... by Lovepump · · Score: 2, Funny

      We need to get only 4 other people to sue you, and I get a free Ipod.

  8. Re:It works... by user9918277462 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Pyramid schemes (going all the way back to Ponzi) were based around the fact that the first participants seemed to recieve whatever was promised (a quick profit, "free" goods, etc). This was the bait used to lure in the next generation of suckers.

    Know what "exponential growth" means? ;)

  9. It's not that it's not legit by the_mad_poster · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's that it's a nasty scheme to harvest contacts for junk mail, telemarketing, etc.

    The company I work for partners with a lot of these companies, offering one of the things you can sign up for as part of your work toward a free whatever. The companies we work with are legit, but the idiots that sign up for this shit don't read the agreement details and then they wind up getting deluged with legally clear spam, junk mail, and telemarketing.

    It's not really free, it's just that you don't pay for what you get with cash. You pay for it with your time. You have to sift through legit spam, junk mailers, hassle with telemarketers who can now legally call you even if you're on the DNC list.

    So, hey, if you sign up and didn't read the agreement, too bad. You're an idiot, and you deserve all the crap that you get deluged with. Hope all that extra advertising was worth the free iPod.

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    1. Re:It's not that it's not legit by bwy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's that it's a nasty scheme to harvest contacts for junk mail, telemarketing, etc.

      Well put. Whether it is "legit" or not is a secondary concern. I don't put much respect towards people who run around spending all their time spamming themselves and friends to get things for free.

      I mean, Christ-o-Mighty, We're talking 250-300 bucks here people. Get a job and earn it the old fashioned way. If true wealth were created merely by sending emails to people or by participating in some other pyramid scheme, everybody would be rich and nobody would work again (unfortunately, it would also mean that money grows on trees.) Also, it is an iPod... we're not talking about going to these extremes to feed a family. People are doing it to get a gadget that they can clearly live without.

      This is similar to the people who continually sign up for store credit cards to get discounts or "free" gifts. Apparently, they either don't understand or don't care how their credit score is derived. I know people who live their whole lives trying to get freebies. If they spent half that effort improving themselves, I'm sure they'd get a raise, better job, or something.

    2. Re:It's not that it's not legit by the_mad_poster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Telemarketers are hired on the cheap. Generally, you hire people who are as unqualified as possible and offer around $7 an hour. Think about it this way: if you read an ad in the paper for a job that requires no previous knowledge and no skills that 99% of the population couldn't technically claim to have, and your only other option is McDonald's at $5.50 an hour, which are you going to choose?

      As a result, turnover rates are very high for the sector. There's no real reason to train the TMs then, so basically, you wind up with a bunch of overpaid High School kids who can best do their jobs by being given a huge list of viable numbers and a few scripts, and then you let them loose on the world.

      In this situation, there's no incentive to train the workers or to purge the lists (although, we do proactively purge the phone lists to some extent anyway) because you have a cost center masquerading as a profit center. Since the point of the TM calls is not so much to get you to buy anything then and there as it is to spread brand recognition, it's most cost effective to just carpet bomb the numbers you have and be done with it.

      That said, all you have to do is say not to call that number again and not to sell your information, and any legitimate group will wipe you from their personal lists anyway. Barring mistakes or people with multiple phone numbers, we don't call anyone or sell anyone's number who asks us not to, whether we're obliged to listen to them or not. I actually had a heavy hand in the programming that allowed us to automate our number removal process, and even though we quote "up to 30 days" for a number removal, it's done in 1 business day now thanks to the system I built for the process. That's more than most groups have, but any legit group will remove you within a month when you ask them to stop calling.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  10. Best way to get a free iPod... by MinutiaeMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...is to get hired to work in one of Apple's retail stores! All permanent (i.e. not seasonal) employees get their very own iPod for "business" uses -- ostensibly, this is to help familiarize the Mac Specialists with the product, and also to give you a "reference" to look up data (stored as notes in the iPod). But you're completely free to store your own music on there and use it for your own purposes, too.

    (I suppose this might be too much "work" for some people, though, plus it doesn't have the fun of selling out your friends to spammers...)

  11. Your milage may vary, but... by Kufat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Disclaimer: No links to sites will be given, so people don't think I'm spamming referrals. I don't plan to do any referral-based offers in the future anyway. Additionally, I'm not affiliated with any of these sites.

    So far, I've received:
    $170 check from a free green xbox offer (now closed)
    Xbox, from another free xbox offer. (Anyfreegift)
    ipod, from freeipods.com
    $700 check, from freelaptops4you.

    Only freeipods.com required referrals. The other grand worth of money/stuff didn't. I'm currently working on a deal for a laptop from another site.

    Are some of the sites scams? Yeah. But some of them are legit, or close enough for you to get your stuff.

  12. click through by zlel · · Score: 5, Informative
  13. Ed McMahon by haffi · · Score: 2, Funny

    You may have won 1,000,000 dollars.

    sound familiar?

    -haffi

  14. Re:It works... by user9918277462 · · Score: 3, Informative
    What you're betting on is that you will be among the small percentage of people on the top who get the reward before the scheme exhausts the pool of potential targets.

    Basically you're hoping to screw five suckers who will probably never get a free iPod (or whatever) before the whole idiotic mess collapses. Not very nice.

  15. I did read the fine print a while ago. by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Informative

    Among the things I read:

    1) The company isn't responsible if you're not ellegible for the free ipod list.

    2) The company doesn't guarantee that if you're ellegible, it will send you the free ipod.

    3) The company doesn't guarantee that when they send it, it will arrive.

    In other words, the company doesn't guarantee A THING.

    It's a scam. Just a SPAM frontend.

    1. Re:I did read the fine print a while ago. by seanismdotcom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And all I have to say is what do you have to loose except for a couple clicks on a website and a disposable email getting spammed? Most offers are free and/or you can cancel in time so you don't get charged a thing. A lot of my friends thought the same way as you and after recieving my iPod I just called them up and let them know the good news. Now some of them are signing up as well.

    2. Re:I did read the fine print a while ago. by seanismdotcom · · Score: 2, Informative

      here is a screenshot of the processing page...
      http://seanism.com/freeipod/ipodorder.gif
      http://seanism.com/freeipod/senttovendor.gif

      and a clip of the screenshot after they sent it...
      http://seanism.com/freeipod/shipped.gif

  16. Re:it's a scam by smashr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am currently listening to the iPod mini i got from the freeipods site. I signed up in late july for one of the AOL offers. The link spent a couple weeks in my AIM profile and I had the five referrals by early august. My order was confirmed on Aug 11 and I had it in my hand by mid October (due to the ipod mini shortages). I canceled the AOL for broadband in a 5min phone call. To date I have not recieved any phone or snail mail spam directly related, and it was a throwaway email address.

    Will it work for absolutely everyone?
    -No

    Will everyone who signs up get a free ipod?
    -Probably not

    Did I get a free ipod for less than an hours worth of work?
    -Yup

    Its not a scam. They make money AND give out "free" ipods.

  17. If anyone by staeiou · · Score: 5, Funny

    I swear, those people with the free iPod links will be FIRST up against the wall when the revolution comes.

    1. Re:If anyone by Hopelessness · · Score: 4, Funny

      Curiously enough, an edition of the NYT that fell through a time warp from 1000 years in the future defined 'those people' as a bunch of mindless jerks who were the first up against the wall when the revolution came.

  18. Re:I will remember to mod down those suckers by MXK · · Score: 5, Funny

    Say what you want, but Free XXX is always good. Unless you're... well, you know...

  19. Re:It works... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's a math formula (which I can't remember) that you can use for any given pyramid scheme. The people who get in the earliest end up making all the gains. Eventually, the potential market is saturated, interest dies out, and the peopole who got in late end up "paying" for the earlier peoples cool stuff while getting nothing for themselves.

    The mechanism works the same as supermarket discount cards. All those club member savings come from somewhere. They come from me. I implicitly pay for part of other people's groceries just because I don't want to sell my identity. Just like pyramid schemes, eventually everyone else will have the card, and they'll have to artificially inflate prices to give the illusion of savings. Once it's said and done, all the legitimate savings stop happening because everyone has the card and there's no one left to exploit. I suppose you could argue that reading ads from the mail makes money for them, so I guess that might count as a legitimate source of savings on your card.

    But either way, those who got in early saved the most since the savings die out eventually. Somewhere along the way we all will have managed to trick ourselves into selling our identity for savings we aren't even making anymore.

  20. Re:What's _really_ wrong with pyramid schemes? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 5, Informative

    While I don't know the validity of this particular offer just beware that the only losers are the guys on the bottom row. Just make sure that isn't you.

    And that ain't gonna happen. Sooner or later you will end up in the bottom row. Why?

    Because your success depends on the pyramid growing. And the pyramid CAN'T GROW FOREVER. At an geometric growth rate, it requires less than 30 generations to reach the world population. It's like a 30 bit number, but this time bits are base 10 or 12.

    This means that sooner or later, the pyramid will experience the so-called "bubble effect". Soon the ones at the bottom will stop generating revenue for you, and this means you'll stop generating revenue for the ones above you, and the pyramid collapses (meaning that the base will always disappear). Then the pyramid becomes VERY narrow and it's like it's started again.

    These pyramid schemes are always fraudulent because they promise you an impossible success. It's impossible because the base growth can't be maintained. It happened with Amway, Scientology, and major bible cults. In the end, the base always suffers the worst consequences. And if you were at the base, you'll be again.

    The fraud in this case is that you don't get the free ipod INSTANTLY. You need to prove your worth. And that means submitting LOTS of e-mails to spammers. And those aren't even IN the pyramid. They're above it.

    And don't tell me that the ad isn't deceptive. Hiding the nasty details in fine print, ON PURPOSE, is one of the greatest frauds in marketing.

    In general, the pyramid scheme is evil, because your earnings depend on how many people you abuse or cause to be abused .

  21. Re:I knew it. by value_added · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Why do people bother asking me why I have this in my sig?"

    Not to worry. I won't. Ever.

    Slashdot -> Preferences -> Comments -> Disable Sigs

    Now if I could only get rid of the excessive whitespace from the HTML-Formatted-But-Don't-Preview crowd, I won't have anything to complain about.

  22. Calculator for the value of your demographics info by rufusdufus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here is a site I found that has a calculator that suggest how much the bits of information about you are "worth".
    They suggest you "refer" agencies which collect information about you to this site so you are properly compensated.

  23. Wrong site? by System.out.println() · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do you wonder why apparently rational Slashdot users ....

    What slashdot have you been reading, exactly?

  24. The math behind this whole scheme by JayBees · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My friend came to me back in the summer, asking me to sign up under him at freeipods.com. At this point there wasn't much information about Gratis' operation on the Internet, so I did some back of the envelope calculations to figure out how the hell these guys could make money by giving away iPods.

    I ended up posting my results here. Quick summary: It's economically viable. I wish I had thought of this first.

  25. And I'll metamoderate that as UNFAIR by YetAnotherName · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Moderations are for the content of the posting, not the signatures. If you don't like what you see in signatures, turn signatures off in your Slashdot settings.

    1. Re:And I'll metamoderate that as UNFAIR by droleary · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you don't like what you see in signatures, turn signatures off in your Slashdot settings.

      I'll second that; I turned off sigs years ago. Further, there is already a system in place to mark when a person is an ass-stick: foe them. Moderating individual articles for some unseen sig offense will likely have me hitting the Unfair radio button as well.

  26. Re:I will remember to mod down those suckers by kesuki · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just for you I have a new sig!

  27. Re:Read with no registration by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "If enough people start using bugmenot, these bastards just might stop requiring us to give them our life history to access a bit of information."

    NYT doesn't require anything, just a unique email address, doesn't even have to be valid. Settle down.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  28. Re:Read with no registration by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sorry pal, but you are wrong. Try filling in only the username, password, and email fields, and watch the following appear:

    There is a problem highlighted in red below. For help, click here.

    # Please enter a GENDER.
    # Please enter a BIRTH YEAR.
    # Please enter a ZIP CODE.
    # Please select an INCOME RANGE.
    # Please select an INDUSTRY.
    # Please select a JOB TITLE.
    # Please select a JOB FUNCTION.
    # Please select a NEWSPAPER USAGE.

    --
    bash: rtfm: command not found
  29. Re:What's _really_ wrong with pyramid schemes? by Aluion · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Because eventually you run out of PEOPLE.

    If everyone who wants to sign up is placed on the list, then there will be a point in time that there is no one else willing to sign up, therefore no one can be refered, and therefore no one at the bottom of the list gets anything (but spam). Why do you think your last 8-9 posts that have been praising their offers haven't inticed anyone? It's because if they were actually intrested in it, they would have clicked on one of the last 10 emails they got with the same offer. I've even seen people give an additional bonus, such as a gmail invite, to people who sign up. There's no one really willing to do just for the free(insertitem) anymore.

    Besides, some people actually value their personal information over a free(insertitem).

    By the way, the free(insertitem) offers are not pyramid schemes. They are matrix scheme varients. However, it doesn't make them any more reliable.

  30. RE: Time is money by King_TJ · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yep! When I first heard about the Gratis, Inc. offer to send a free iPod, I figured "Hey, I'll at least give it a try and see exactly what they're really asking me to do."

    I got through the majority of the thing before I realized it was going to be a huge waste of my time to proceed further. At the beginning, they don't really make it clear that you need to get at least 5 referrals to *sign up for the offers they're emailed* (and I believe, keep them for at least 30 days, too). They make you think that YOU simply have to do so with one (of many) offers you click through, and then give them 5 valid email addresses of friends.

    From my browsing through all the "trial offers", I began to realize that almost all are a royal pain in the butt to get cancelled after you sign up. I might be willing to go through the hassle myself, but I sure don't want to make 5 of my friends do so (if I could even get 5 of them to sign up for these offers in the first place!).

    I think one of the "simplest" ones to cancel was the offer to sign up with AOL, and as most of us probably already know - that's not usually the easiest thing in the world to cancel. (At the very least, you're gonna be waiting on hold for 20 or 30 minutes until you talk to some cust. service clown who keeps trying to give you more "free hours" rather than just cancel you.)

    Worse yet, so many other people already know about these deals, you end up emailing friends who are already trying to get the free iPod themselves.

  31. Re:it's a scam by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So what you're saying is, if two people for some reason fall under the scrutiny of Gratis and are denied their ipods (who knows the real reason why, that's not the point) while hundreds of others have in fact recieved their product, it's still a scam? Right. For all you know your "mysteriously denied" friend could have broken the rules or whatever.

    Also, I signed up for freeipods with my gmail address. The only spam I get is dictionary-type attacks, and i hardly think those would be necessary if my addy had supposedly been sold by Gratis. If you sign up for an offer and THAT company sells your info, that's your own lookout. Gratis does not, as best I can tell.

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  32. I got my iPod by digitalgimpus · · Score: 3, Informative

    I seriously got mine from freeipods.com. I documented the entire thing (play by play) on my blog:

    Free iPod Posts

    That query will display just my free iPod posts. I posted as quick as I can, so the dates are very accurate to the actual events. Even a few photos posted at the end.

    I did sign up for a freeflatscreen, though haven't completed the requirements for that one (if you want to see blog posts for free flat screens... help out :-D ).

    All I can say is: I got mine. I have no idea about everyone else who participated, but mine came to my door. So for me, it worked.

    Just my $0.02

  33. Something is fishy about all the happy customers . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    There seem to be lot of suspiciously satisfied customers just jumping out of the woodwork about how happy they are they got their iPod. Funny, how I didn't see any postings from unhappy folks.

    Back in the day, before I went on to better, more mature things, I ran some porn sites. To get traffic, I sent about 100 spams every day by hand to usenet groups using AOL. The spams said they were giving a pirated login/password to a porn site link that was included.

    Of course, the web-form that opened was bogus, people could have typed in anything and gotten to the porn. But, thinking it was a stolen password, people jumped on it. I was making 3000 or so a month at the peak, all from the same 100 or so daily usenet spams. For some reason, (maybe guilt?) people who used the "free" password were much much more likely to click on the legit banners in my site.

    Eventuanlly, after the the banner affiliate programs got complaints from the usenet police (a singularly dedicated band of activists that have way too much time on their hands) about me, I stopped getting paid. Sluggish AOL even noticed their complaints, and my accounts kept getting turned off. By then I was making much more money at a real job, but the experience a very valuable look at the dark side of net and human psychology.

    It would be really interesting to look at how many of these slashdotters posting about how they got a "free iPod" somehow all set-up their accounts in the last couple of hours or so ... Also, those folks with sigs linking to the iPod offer will also have realized the potential this story offers.

  34. I'll stick with my... by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 4, Funny

    FreeDryerLint.info

    I created this site to put in my sig on various sites after getting annoyed by all the freeipod referal links)

  35. Re:Read with no registration by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Right, and they don't validate any of it. They don't even have you click a link after you've recieved an email from them to activate the account.

    You don't have to give them info. Put garbage in the blanks, then sit down and shut up. I'm tired of you self-righteous loud-mouths with your campaign against NYT. And for what? No more registration screen that NYT has every right to request for providing all that content? Why don't you guys go do something useful and rattle your pitchforks against Microsoft's registration program for XP instead of bitching about something that barely registers as an inconvenience?

    (p.s. Don't take my harsh words too personally, that rant's been building up for quite a while now.)

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  36. Re: Time is money by kinzillah · · Score: 4, Funny

    yes, but the hard part is creating the 5 street addresses, birth certificates and credit cards.

    --
    Douglas P. Price
  37. Re:Yes, these deals are legit...if you spend time by wackysootroom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I got my Ipod and Flatscreen too. I used 2 disposable email addresses that I put into a special mailbox with procmail. To this day, I still haven't had a single piece of spam or any telemarketing calls. I don't get any more junk mail than usual either.

    So what did I get? $800 worth of free electronics for about an hour of work and so did 3 of my friends.

  38. No freebie for you by no-freebie-for-u · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Simply put: there are no free lunches. IMO people that push this pseudo-free crap in their .sigs are leeches. That's why I created this account, to add those leeches to my enemies list and ask people with mod points to mod them down when justified.

    There's even one "thing" that is trading gmail accounts for signing up under his referral id. Sad.

    Please, everyone, stop pushing pseudo-free crap. And telling people to sign up and cancel right away to avoid credit card charges is fraud.

  39. Re:Read with no registration by metamorphage · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is a newspaper you're reading. You get a free copy of one of the country's best papers, and you're whining about entering an email address and some personal info. Stop bitching, you're not paying anything and the Times doesn't sell your soul to the devil.

  40. Re:Read this carefully-Failed reality. by Romancer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One Flaw,

    Physical Property=Time * Effort * Material.

    Intellectual Property=Time * Effort.

    --


    ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
    ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
  41. Re:Read this carefully -- think again by BreadMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is no free lunch. Ever.

    If you're thinking of duplication costs; they're low, but certainly not zero. However, until somebody puts forth effort into producing an original work, there's nothing to duplicate.

    That takes us back to production: somebody had to pay for the engineering time and resources. Skilled engineering labor is expensive and most decent software projects require teams of people writing the software, docs, distro scripts and doing the QA. Even if this work is done "after hours" the worker could be working at a job that paid or be doing some other activity.

  42. There really are ways to earn free IPODs by ddurdle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are ways to get free IPODs. There was a big promotion in Canada by Pepsi that resulted in 2016 IPODs being given away; one every hour of every day from Oct 3rd to Dec 25th (no purchase required). I ended up winning two IPODs - but many teenage Canadians ended up winning between 2-6 IPODs each. I believe there were similiar contests/giveaways by Pepsi in other countries.

  43. Here's another offer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    So far, I've received:
    $170 check from a free green xbox offer (now closed)
    Xbox, from another free xbox offer. (Anyfreegift)
    ipod, from freeipods.com
    $700 check, from freelaptops4you.

    I'll give you $50 to fuck your sister.

  44. Things other than ipods by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Interesting
    As many of you know, this system has been used with everything from free ipods, to free laptops, to free plasma tvs.

    Since there is a mathematical formula for how long it takes for the pyramid to collapse, this cycle would then begin anew for each new item offered correct? So if people keep getting in at the top of each new item offered, they'll still be good right?

    Also, can anybody vouch for the legitimacy of those other things, particularly the plasma and laptop offers?

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  45. Re: Time is money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    has anyone tried making 5 friends?

    is it hard? do you have to go outside?

  46. Too bad you don't get it .... by Gopal.V · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Don't get me wrong, nothing tangible is free

    Software is not "Free" as in beer - when people do publish software Freely , they are doing charity. FOSS software can be sold (RMS sold emacs for 150 USD per copy !!!). But what FOSS tries to seperate is the Cost of Development from Profit per Sale.

    I have been (wioll haven been) paid to do some features on the OSS I work on - because somebody really needed it. That's because I created some wealth with my effort (in a wholly capitalistic point of view). And Everyone else gets the stuff for free and in short - Everybody wins.
  47. A site like these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A site like these? Rob's Giant BonusCard Swap Meet or The Ultimate Shopper (Safeway)

  48. Re:i love my ipod by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Insightful

    what's the insightful thing in that?

    that's like saying that a pyramid scheme isn't a scam because they paid the first 10% who got in.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  49. Friends don't hawk Ponzi-Pods! by bhima · · Score: 2, Funny
    I don't make myself available to advertisers. I don't have a TV, I don't fill out sweepstakes entries, I don't read postal mail not addressed to me, I don't read spam. I don't tolerate having my "Friends" subject me to advertising. That's the real point.

    It has little to do with the reality of the iPod, or the cost of the iPod. But has everything to do with the offensiveness of the distribution mechanism.

    Which is why I systematically 'Foe' everyone I see hawking ponzi-pods.

    --
    Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  50. Re:Read this carefully-Failed reality. by lokedhs · · Score: 2, Informative
    Another flaw:

    physical property = time * effort + material

    This makes the material bit kinda irrelevant to the entire equation, and thefefore can be ignored for the purposes of the grandfather post.

  51. Re:Bitch elsewhere by Russellkhan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you must work for it, it's not free. You're just working, for a wage of one ipod.

    Personally, I'd put in my hours elsewhere and buy one (if an ipod was something I wanted that much) before working for some advertising company as their shill.

    --
    Information doesn't want to be anthropomorphized anymore.
  52. Re:OSS (non tangible goods) is only free by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With open source software it's very rare that the product a) does exactly what you want and b) works perfectly out of the box.

    Whereas closed source never has any bugs and always does exactly what you want?

    --

    People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  53. Because most people WON'T get an iPod by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 5, Informative

    Let's do the math. I'm not going to double check the figures, but I believe you refer 5 people, and once they all sign up, you get a free iPod. Rinse and repeat.

    Okay, so one person hooks up five people, they all sign up (making the company $50 * 6 = $300) and a $249 iPod is sent out to the first guy. Profit so far is $51.

    Each of those five hooks up five people for a total of 25 new people, so 25 * 50 = 1250. Five iPods = 1245, not much profit this time.. so this shows that at $50 there's no real profit for the company at each generation, until...

    25 * 5 * 5 * 5 * 5 * 5 * 5 * 5 * 5 * 5 * 5 = 2.5 billion.

    At this point you've exhausted everyone on the Internet, as you can't sign up more than once. So where's the money?

    As in ANY pyramid scheme, the money is in the last generation of the scheme! Free iPods will reach a point where they have several million on their books, and those several million can't find anyone to sign up! So.. several million * 50 = $A LOT OF PROFIT. And those guys won't get an iPod. Cha-ching.

    1. Re:Because most people WON'T get an iPod by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      These schemes rely on a certain amount of turnover, so maybe you'll get 5 or 6 levels in the pyramid, but a lot of the lower levels will sign up, realise they've been conned and write off the money. This helps keeps the burn rate of eligible suck ..err.. consumers low enough to sustain the pyramid.

      The people at the top will be driving ferrari's, though. I was hired once to write some software to handle one of these schemes (even today a lot of them are paper based) and I got to see the figures for the top 3 layers (mostly the friends/relatives of the guy who set the scheme up). Lets just say I wouldn't mind getting that much every year, let alone every month!

      In this country they banned pyramid schemes, so they renamed themselves to 'multi-level-marketing' schemes to avoid the law (there are some subleties in the way they work too). Same thing though.

  54. FoeBud Privacy-Card by jeti · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In Germany, we have the PayBack system, where you get something like 1% of each purchase on a separate account or something. It's pretty big over here, and I guess it must be comparable to the courtesy cards you mentioned.

    The clue is that these cards are tranferable. So FoeBud got a card, made "Privacy-Cards" with the same barcode, and offered them to people interested in consumer privacy. Several thousand euro were collected, but PayBack wouldn't pay out.

    So the whole thing went before a court. The court apparently decided that FoeBud could tell their barcode number to others, but were not allowed to print it out.

  55. Re:Oh this old and boring by Alioth · · Score: 2, Informative

    A friend of mine made the mistake of signing up to AOL with his debit card. I watched him at work make dozens of phone calls to try and get AOL to stop billing him. Eventually he got frustrated enough he went to his bank and threatened to close his account if they didn't stop it.

    I think he did eventually get AOL to cancel - but the moral is, if you must sign up to AOL, use a credit card rather than a debit card. (Generally, it's also less hassle to cancel a credit card rather than close your bank account and change billing/direct debit instructions for all your bills to a new account)

  56. It's not a pyramid scheme. by raehl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In this case, the money is probably in the FIRST level or two of the scheme. I already don't have 5 people who would get 5 friends to sign up; and I'd be the first level if I signed up, so they'd get maybe $60-$180 out of me and my friends, and give out *NO* I-pods.

    It's also not a true pyramid scheme in the sense that you don't have to pay any money to get in. There's a fine line between a pyramid scheme and just paying people to do sales. My company has a bunch of people we pay JUST to sell stuff. And in fact, some of the people they sell stuff too then turn around and sell it to someone else. We call those people END USERS.

    In this case, the people who sign up for offers but don't get iPods are just the end users. The people who manage to get other people to sign up and get iPods are just a cheap sales force.

  57. Spam: The Old, the New and the Rehash. by Mulletproof · · Score: 2, Informative


    Yes, of course they're making money off of this. It doesn't take a slashnot story to figure that one out. We're not exactly talking about breaking news here. And even so, do you really have a problem with that? I don't. And yes, they ask for personal information, but do you actually give it to them? I gave them an email address I can shut down at a moments notice. I gave them a creditcard that can't be used again. I don't mind giving out a physical address simply becasue these guys aren't interested in sending out real mail-- That costs money. It's not the MO of a spammer anyway.

    Honestly, this story is a little lopsided in nature. Call me biased (see sig for details), but you don't have to play by their rules. I mean, God forbid you use that concept in say, a free email account? Not that they don't attempt to make cash off you either. Or how about slashdot adverts and the story self promotions you see occationally?*

    Seriously, you play this game every day on the internet. Nothing changed just because it's a free ipod or because Slashdot all of a sudden became aware of it.

    * No, I honestly don't care. Unlike some people I've accepted it as something that goes with the territory.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  58. Not really a "scam" ... but... by EvilStein · · Score: 3, Informative

    I used to work for the company that owns freeflixtix.com, evivaclub.com, & tenspot.com - the premise was simple. Sign up, refer 5 friends, and get free movie tickets.
    All of the information was happily sold off to "3rd party marketing partners" and the list (over 7 million people when I left) was also used for the company's spamming arm, Moxio (or Bonus Bonez, whatever they're calling it now) - you and your referrals all got the spam. Lots of it. If you cancelled your freeflixtix.com account, your referrals (and usually you) still got tons of spam. Your address (email, phone number, AND mailing address) was sold off already.

    Yes, people eventually did get some free tickets after jumping through "partner" hoops..some requiring you to keep the "trial" for 2 weeks or more, or to give up MORE personal info & credit card numbers.

    It's worse than the "freecreditreport.com" scam that requires you to sign up for Equifax's "Credit Monitoring Service" and more spam.

    Is there any way that Slashdot can simply dump any post that has that ponzi scheme as a sig?

  59. Re:It works... so far. by Arcturax · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Some people are even modding down folks with that in their .sig. I've metamodded those as fair as I personally think the .sig should not be a tool for spam. We deal with enough ads already, we certainly don't need to put up with them in every .sig.

    --

    --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs