Slashdot Mirror


2005 FIRST Robotics Competition Announced

Gothic_Walrus writes "Dean Kamen strikes again! The 2005 game for FIRST Robotics was announced today through an international sattellite feed provided by NASA. Dubbed 'Triple Play,' the game features two groups of three robots competing to stack pyramid-shaped pieces and to align them in rows. Think Tic-Tac-Toe, but three-dimensional. This game should be a challenge for the 1,000+ active teams in FIRST, which are located throughout the U.S. and Canada (and even Brazil). Video of the game can be found here. Go 818!"

96 comments

  1. Guess What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    First Robotic Post

    1. Re:Guess What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not funny!

  2. w00t for team 281 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go 281!

    Good Luck to all participating teams ;)

  3. Instead of a starting gun.... by PornMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    do the games start with WOPR saying, "Would you like to play a game?"

    1. Re:Instead of a starting gun.... by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1

      More like, "Robot games brought to you by Burger King."

  4. I was in FIRST long, long ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My team made it all the way to the finals at Epcot (Disneyworld, FL, USA).

    1. Re:I was in FIRST long, long ago by JimboTheMagnifico · · Score: 1

      Ahh...the good ol' days of FIRST. Back when they used to have the slushie machine at nationals, and when nationals was CALLED nationals.

  5. GO 1006! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GO 1006!

  6. Interesting and all... by ThisNukes4u · · Score: 1

    Thats nice and all, but its not exactly smart to post videos w/o a bittorrent link or something. Not that I wouldn't do it anyway just to make slashdotters not able to see the video.

    --
    thisnukes4u.net
    1. Re:Interesting and all... by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 1
      To be honest, I forgot to do that.

      Then again, if anyone has the bandwidth to withstand Slashdot, I think that it'd be NASA... :)

      --
      Goo goo g'joob.
    2. Re:Interesting and all... by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Or Akami...

  7. Just wondering here... by Crash24 · · Score: 1

    Pardon me for being out-of-the-loop here, but who is team 818? Are they the Slashdot team or something?

    1. Re:Just wondering here... by ImEric12 · · Score: 1

      Nope, just the team that the author and I are on.

    2. Re:Just wondering here... by jon787 · · Score: 1

      Probably the team that the submitter was on.

      Go 288!

      --
      X(7): A program for managing terminal windows. See also screen(1).
  8. Please destroy the winner by Timesprout · · Score: 1

    So the robot overlords of the future can have a missing link, just like us.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  9. the teams by Hoagy · · Score: 1

    team 818 is the FIRST robotics team #
    like Team 174 - they are at snobot.org

  10. Kamen. What insight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The secret of building a successful team is not to assemble the largest team possible, but rather to assemble a team that can work well together. Dean Kamen, Founder of FIRST.

    Sigh. Now why couldn't I think of something like that?

  11. First Task.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first challenge is to learn how to spell the word "satellite". Does no one proof-read the submissions?

  12. Looks boring this year... by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 2, Informative

    They've done some things to make the programming easier and are practically forcing us to use this camera vision system when most veteran teams didn't bother with infrared sensors that were available last year, which basically destroys any competitive advantage our team (217) seems to have had. (always mechanical problems) I'm kind of disappointed as a programmer since it's all going to come down to lack of mechanical failures and driver skill.

    --
    -insert a witty something-
    1. Re:Looks boring this year... by obsidianr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They're trying to level out the playing field so that rookies can have a chance against veterans. Everyone will have to rely more on strategy than technology. Besides, FIRST isn't about the robots, but the team building and learning for the students.

    2. Re:Looks boring this year... by I82Much · · Score: 1

      My school is competing and did very well last year. I wasn't involved but this year I am involved in the Robotics "winterterm", a weeklong break in between two semesters. Maybe if I enjoy it I'll work on the actual competition, but it's a huge time commitment

    3. Re:Looks boring this year... by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 3, Informative
      To be honest, I'd have to agree with you completely.

      I'm the student head of our programming group, and I'm surprised at how much they gave us. We spent endless hours trying to get our robot to drive in a straight line last year (motor power issues). This year? We've got software that will auto-correct its path...software that FIRST gave us.

      That said, I still think that there's room for the programmers to work here. There are actually many, many options for the autonomous mode - we could block other robots, for example, or maybe go to the human player pad instead of for the magical green pyramids.

      Besides...who said that you have to use the code that FIRST gives us? If it bothers you that much, write your own! :)

      I agree that drivers and mechanical issues will decide the game, but I still think there's room for us to be important in the team's success.

      --
      Goo goo g'joob.
    4. Re:Looks boring this year... by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

      You contradict yourself. Where's the need or even wisdom in learning if you can use a packaged solution?

      --
      -insert a witty something-
    5. Re:Looks boring this year... by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 1
      I'd assume that that was meant to be a reply to my post...

      The answer is a simple one: the skills may be useful for something where a prepackaged answer might not be available...and who knows if that answer will still be available for the next time it's needed?

      --
      Goo goo g'joob.
    6. Re:Looks boring this year... by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 1

      Sorry about that first sentence - I was looking at the wrong post when I clicked on your response. Oops...

      --
      Goo goo g'joob.
    7. Re:Looks boring this year... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We spent endless hours trying to get our robot to drive in a straight line last year (motor power issues)

      you're not on team100 by any chance are you?

    8. Re:Looks boring this year... by IO+ERROR · · Score: 1

      Boring? I'm really excited about the upcoming competition between the pusher robot and the shover robot.

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    9. Re:Looks boring this year... by kaszeta · · Score: 1
      They've done some things to make the programming easier and are practically forcing us to use this camera vision system when most veteran teams didn't bother with infrared sensors that were available last year, which basically destroys any competitive advantage our team (217) seems to have had.

      I'm somewhat ambivalent. As a coach with a team with a fairly good history (Team 95, Lebanon, NH), and last year's programming coach, I'm somewhat disappointed that the playing field has been leveled, since my students worked very hard learning basic PID theory, coding it up, implementing interrupt drivers, etc, and now a good chunk of that has been done. And we had made an art form of turning Bosch drill motors into nice, accurate, and reliable drive systems, only to have those replaced. But it's a minor disappointment...

      Then again, there is a *lot* that can still be done, and a *lot* of room for creativity. It will be nice to see what teams can do if they *don't* have to be as concerned with some of the other issues.

      Then again, who says you have to use the camera vision system? It's slick, but I've seen and programming FIRST bots that can do one heck of a lot in autonomous mode without feedback sensors (Stack Attack in particular had some very clever bots). (always mechanical problems) I'm kind of disappointed as a programmer since it's all going to come down to lack of mechanical failures and driver skill.

      I don't mind that driver skill is a factor---our team has worked hard on training drivers. Mechanical failures don't bother me much either, since in the Real World of engineering you have to design for those sorts of issues as well. No time like the present to learn about redundancy and fall-back strategies (for example, last year we stopped using our large ball handling arm mid-competition and concentrated on what we did well: small-ball handling. And did well because of it).

    10. Re:Looks boring this year... by legocoach · · Score: 1

      I dunno, team 66 won it's regional on a great design well handled. At one point, in the final round, the opposing team thought it had the weakness down, hitting it just as it reached up, and the driver was able to drive the quad-bot on two wheels the length of the field to knock it back into play, rather than flipping over. Designing competition to destroy competitive advantage and instead rely on the skills of the participants seems like a good thing, to me. But then, I support team 66.

    11. Re:Looks boring this year... by MooseGuy529 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm kind of disappointed as a programmer since it's all going to come down to lack of mechanical failures and driver skill.

      What are you talking about? You have a robot vision system to program! You should be excited! For years FIRST has left software to be a last-minute glued-on part of the robot, programmed in PBASIC for lack of an alternative. We now have PIC micros, and they're giving us vision systems and lots of fun sensors to play with. This is going to make it a lot more fun.

      One thing I would like to see in future years is a longer autonomous period. Fifteen seconds is great, but it still has the problem that it's not long enough to put your robot in the place of making a decision--most robots just execute a predetermined "dance" of motions, sometimes with IR beacons, vision sensors, or other stuff as aids. What I wanna see is a little decision-making, i.e. should I go for that vision tetra or is an alliance partner there? Can I block that opponent from putting that tetra on, etc...

      --

      Tired of free iPod sigs? Subscribe to my blacklist

    12. Re:Looks boring this year... by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      I expected a longer aoutonomous period this year. I was a little disappointed.

    13. Re:Looks boring this year... by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

      The vision system has to be the most efficient way to grab the randomly placed tetras during autonomous - you are not allowed to manipulate your robot after the position numbers are revealed, and who wants to randomly search and pray?

      --
      -insert a witty something-
    14. Re:Looks boring this year... by kaszeta · · Score: 1
      The vision system has to be the most efficient way to grab the randomly placed tetras during autonomous

      It probably is. But from my experience watching IR trackers and line-followers do particularly poorly, I truly do expect other non-camera solutions to present themselves, and do well.

  13. Two groups of robots?? by OccidentalSlashy · · Score: 0
    --
    vicious, untreated political sewage...niche entertainment for the spiritually unattractive...worshipless pap
  14. This involving mega bucks or something because... by djsmiley · · Score: 2, Informative

    In the UK, one of the channels BBC, has robot comp.'s each and every year, this involves different robots doing all SORTS of tasks, from swimming, running (2legs), climbing ropes etc etc.

    Also we have Robot Wars where robotic vehicals would battle it out etc, yet none of this ever makes BIG news such as this.

    Is it just because this has N.A.S.A backing that everyone is sitting up and taking notice, or is there something unique about this?

    --
    - http://www.milkme.co.uk
  15. GO 639! by plutonium83 · · Score: 0

    Go 639 wooo wooooooooo! Heres to another great year!

  16. From a team member.... by TheUnknownOne · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thank you wonderful slashdot buddies... Teams have many large files that we have to download today :) (you can only imagine the speed). The game really isnt anything like tic-tac-toe, more like stack the tetras on the other tetras. You get extra points for getting lines, across, diagonal or verticle. (this part is similar to tic-tac-toe, but it is not the point of the game) From Team 263

    1. Re:From a team member.... by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

      The whole point of the game is tic-tac-toe - you get twice as many points for creating a line as you do just by stacking the pieces on top of each other.

      --
      -insert a witty something-
    2. Re:From a team member.... by k512-arch · · Score: 0

      :/ perpetual tic toe + blocking.

    3. Re:From a team member.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Team 1294 responds:

      They decided this year to make everyone equal by providing instructions for chassis and drive train, as well as pre-programmed instructions for the cameras. So now we have less than half the work we used to, but a challenge that requires more stratagy.

  17. Barton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh God. I hope Reid Barton hasn't entered this one yet. Or else its over.

    1. Re:Barton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reid Barton is in college! FIRST is a competition for high schoolers.

  18. lowest team by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder who was on the lowest team number. Low numbers are good like slashdot account numbers. I was on 63. w00t!

  19. Teams Located Around the World by JDHawg · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just a minor correction to the original post, FIRST teams are located all over the world. If you go to the FIRST website they have an interactive map that shows where teams are from. Last year I was able to help reprogram the robot for an Equidorian team (their keyboard was is Spanish!) and work with a team from England. This year there are even 10 new teams in Israel.

    Dean Kamen will tell you, FIRST isn't about building robots. It's about building our future.

    ------------
    Jack Higgs
    Programmer / Mentor / Parent
    Team Fusion #364
    Gulfport High School, Gulfport, Mississippi, USA

  20. Re:This involving mega bucks or something because. by cbrocious · · Score: 1

    It's because FIRST is for young people.

    --
    Disconnect and self-destruct, one bullet at a time.
  21. New successes for team 20721 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have successfully tied my dick in a knot

  22. Re:This involving mega bucks or something because. by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 4, Informative
    I think that the main difference here is the ideals of the program.

    FIRST teams are made up of high school students, people who would never be able to experience this otherwise. The competition isn't an issue - FIRST provides the game every year. The money can be hard to come by, but donations from large companies such as General Motors (our sponsor) or from other groups or individuals take care of a large portion of that. Supervision isn't hard to find either; most teams are led by engineers, teachers, and other volunteers.

    The main empasis of FIRST is not the game itself - as Dean said today, "the robot is just a vehicle, no pun intended." FIRST emphasizes what is known as "gracious professionalism" - in essence, remembering that playing fairly and developing respect and possibly even friendship for your opponents should NEVER come after winning the game. FIRST is trying to get students to become interested in engineering, in math and science. The UK may be different, but America needs those people to fill the holes in the already-falling number of technically skilled employees.

    It may sound corny and stupid, but the main goal of FIRST is literally to change the world. I'd bet that the BBC shows aren't going to benefit society quite as much in the long run. :)

    --
    Goo goo g'joob.
  23. It's the little guys by Horkdoom · · Score: 3, Informative

    The FIRST Competition can only be competed in by highschool teams. That said, they almost always have some sort of sponsorship from a large corporation or many smaller businesses. The fee for a team to go to one event was $3000 when I was on a team (GO 904!) and then $2000 for every competition after that.

    Also another thing that makes this competition unique is that every team starts with the same basic kit of parts, and are limited to certain parts that they can buy separately, despite this there are often huge differences in design, usually due to game strategy theory.

    The largest amount of money involved comes from sponsors and from corporations offering scholarships to team members, some of which are very generous.

  24. Re:This involving mega bucks or something because. by djsmiley · · Score: 1

    Ok thats all kool,

    the teams in the BBC one are all schools and colleges.

    Now, in robot wars we saw some amazing stuff, some were schools, some from other places, some in it for fun, some speading $$$$$$ on their robots (we heard over £2k for some machines). The most heartbreaking part was when two "rival" teams would be fighting, and then one robot would have some kind of malfunction, and then the teams would give each other help to fix the bots, because they would rather win a fair battle (or lose) than they would just win and take the prize.

    its nice to know that we still continue to care, even in times of war.

    --
    - http://www.milkme.co.uk
  25. Be afraid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  26. Familiar plot! by michaeldot · · Score: 1

    Robots? Pyramids? Stacking things? NASA?

    Are they trying to free Sutekh the Destroyer from his Pyramid of Mars?!

    Oh, no one here is a Doctor Who fan... (Backs slowly out of the room, embarrassed.)

  27. Correction by KiyaKaelar · · Score: 1

    By the way, it's tetrahedrons, not pyramids... A student from Team 677: The Wirestrippers

    1. Re:Correction by supersho · · Score: 1

      By the way, it's tetrahedra, not tetrahedrons . . . A student from Team 694: StuyPulse

    2. Re:Correction by KiyaKaelar · · Score: 1

      haha, nice catch

    3. Re:Correction by KiyaKaelar · · Score: 1

      but both ways are acceptable

    4. Re:Correction by clean_stoner · · Score: 1

      By the way, tetrahedrons are pyramids. Triangular pyramids, but pyramids none the less.

      --

      Sigs are for the weak.

  28. Robotics from an insider's perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm in this Robotics competition as part of team 1403 (we were noobs last year) and I think that the best part of this competition is the new paradigms that it teaches kids to think in and the tools it gives us in order to be able to control and direct the inevitable changes and advances in technology in the future. It's really about building a generation of people who will care about and be able to make a difference in the future. It's a noble goal, and I urge all of you to take a look and see if you may want to get involved. It's actually quite fun!

  29. Yes! Now I know!!! by Sinryc · · Score: 1

    Allrighty. I am on a team, but I dont know wich one. Its for George Washington High School in Virginia, so hopefully we will do well. Its our first year in the competition so wish us luck!

    --
    Yay, I have a sig.
    1. Re:Yes! Now I know!!! by Richard+Dick+Head · · Score: 1

      First year sucks for most teams. The ones that start off well find a local small engineering business to get space ane expertise from. Who knows if you're lucky enough to have one of those around, but its worth a look.

  30. No NO NO! by TLouden · · Score: 1

    In the spirit of FIRST go ALL team, but especial 1410. For those of you not involved 1) get involved 2) FIRST encourages gracious profesionalism (spelling optional) which means helping and chearing on all teams, especially newbs.

    --
    -Tim Louden
  31. CMUcam2 and other fun stuff by MooseGuy529 · · Score: 1

    They've really kicked it up a notch, technologically. A lot of time in previous years would be spent brainstorming, designing, and building extremely specialized mechanisms, and our team would have to spend our whole kickoff weekend picking a strategy so we could pick how the robot looks. This time, however, they have created a game that requires specialized software rather than hardware, and they have also included in the kit of parts a ready-to-assemble chassis and gearbox. The end result is that we will have a robot to work with in a week, instead of four, and the programming team can start hacking at that while the drivetrain team finishes our "real" robot with a better drivetrain.

    --

    Tired of free iPod sigs? Subscribe to my blacklist

    1. Re:CMUcam2 and other fun stuff by kaszeta · · Score: 1
      This time, however, they have created a game that requires specialized software rather than hardware, and they have also included in the kit of parts a ready-to-assemble chassis and gearbox

      Oh, so you already have a nice mechanism for scoring tetrahedrons that works reliably and can't be optimized?

      There is still plenty of work to be done, and plenty of design as well.

      The end result is that we will have a robot to work with in a week, instead of four, and the programming team can start hacking at that while the drivetrain team finishes our "real" robot with a better drivetrain.

      Umm, for non-rookie teams this isn't even a real advantage, since unlike last year you can do useful code testing with last year's bot controller since the board is the same (except possibly for firmware.) (Go team 95)

  32. go 1243 by kirisu · · Score: 1

    This is the team I mentor, 1243, second year with FIRST and we are looking forward to it. Kick off at Northville in Michigan was fun, though the workshops I attended were rather boring. I am excited about the new sensors and scripting for autonomous. Though it seems like 6 robots on the field at once is going to make it a little crowded.

    1. Re:go 1243 by ImEric12 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Team 818 attended the Northville kickoff as well.

  33. Re:This involving mega bucks or something because. by adeydas · · Score: 1

    Isn't building better robots another reason too?!

  34. I also used to be in FIRST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when is Nationals not called Nationals anymore? Of course, I have been out of the loop for a long time, since my last year on a team was in 1999. I was on a team 3 years in high school, and we had different team numbers on different years, but we were called the Baxter Bomb Squad.

    FIRST was one of my main incentives to major in Mechanical Engineering in college, and the lessons I learned there about professional courtesy and the real purpose of competition are still influential now. I know Slashdot is read by tons of technically skilled people, and if your city has a local FIRST team you could help out with I would encourage you to do so. I know from experience how important the success of the teams is to the high school students who participate.

  35. site down? Torrent? by epall · · Score: 1

    Hm, the wmv link isn't working for me. I can ping the host, but I can't play the stream. Mplayer hangs on "Connecting to sargasso-3.arc.nasa.gov[128.102.151.19]:80". Are there any mirrors or torrents out there?

    1. Re:site down? Torrent? by epall · · Score: 1

      ah, there we go...

  36. Robots riding Segways? by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Great. So NASA's turning into a place for Robots to play Segway Polo?

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  37. A quick summary by MooseGuy529 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For those who aren't familiar with the US FIRST Robotics Competiton, here's a quick summary.

    Dean Kamen started an organization called For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) because he felt that students were not being inspired to pursue science and engineering. His usual analogy is that while we have immense respect for athletes, celebrities, and entertainers, we don't recognize engineers and scientists in the same way, and he wants to change that.

    The practical implementation of this is the FIRST Robotics Competition. Each January, the kickoff from Manchester, NH is broadcast to teams across the country (and world) on NASA TV, and they find out about a new game. They also receive a kit of parts, and they then have six to seven weeks to design, build, program, practice driving, and ship a robot to play that game.

    This year's game, as many are, is just complex enough that I will not try to explain it fully. Essentially, you earn points by stacking small tetrahedrons ("tetras") on the large tetra-shaped goals. There are 9 of these in a grid. You get 3 points for each tetra of your color stacked (upright) on top of a goal, and 1 point for each that is inside the goal but not stacked. Then you get 10 points for each row of 3 goals where your color is on top, and you get 10 points at the end if all three robots in your alliance (there are two alliances, red and blue, with three teams each) are in your end zone. You also receive bonus tetras (placed directly on top of the goals on your end of the field) for certain actions during autonomous mode: placing vision tetras (these have a green stripe for the camera to track) on the goals in the middle (1 bonus tetra for putting it on the side goals, 2 for the middle) and knocking down the tetras magnetically hung from the goals on your side (1 bonus tetra, and the knocked-down one stays in play; it otherwise would be removed).

    The structure of the match is 15 seconds of autonomous mode, where the robots can't (electronically) receive communications, and must navigate on their own. This is made much more interesting this year by them throwing a CMUcam2 (a small serially-controllable robot vision system--quite cool!) into our bag of sensors. Then the remaining 1:45 of the match is human-controlled. Scoring is probably another "coopertition"-style deal where the winner gets 2x the loser's score or something similar to keep good teams from kicking bad teams' asses completely.

    --

    Tired of free iPod sigs? Subscribe to my blacklist

    1. Re:A quick summary by Coolpup · · Score: 1

      Quick correction. The driver gets a full 2 minutes this year as opposed to the 1:45 of the previous years. As a driver/operator under the old rules (pre-autonomous) I find that to be a huge advantage. 15 seconds may not sound like a lot, but it really is when you have so many tasks to do.

  38. Simple, yet complex by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

    We watched the kickoff broadcast at our own kickoff meeting (Go team 79!). The game itself seems simple in concept, yet very complex in the strategy. We already filled up 3 sheets of paper with possible autonomous mode strategies alone (both for us and alliance partners).

    I'm very excited to get my hands on the software ('specially the math libs) and new compiler for this year. We've done some work with gyros already on our 2004 robot, but the math required to filter the noise was too much to run all our other sensors. The new math libs will be a treat!

    Good luck to all teams! (I know there's a bunch of /. people that were at the championship last year, we should have a meet! hehe)

    --
    There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    1. Re:Simple, yet complex by sciguy125 · · Score: 1
      I didn't watch the kick-off, but my guess for the reasoning behind all the simplification is to level the playing field (so to speak). As rookies last year, my team had to start completely from scratch. After a few weeks of floundering around, we managed to hash stuff together. After managing to organize ourselves, we had to learn some engineering skills. Even though our robot shipped non-functional and untested, we did pretty well. We even made it into the semi-finals in our regional.

      During today's brainstorming, there was some speak of simply modifying last year's design. Veteran teams have this sort of advantage every year. Use the same drive train...use a stronger actuator...scrap one of the appendeges... Veteran teams always have some place to start. But this time around, the rookies have a leg up. They aren't working from nothing.

      Go 1351!

      --
      GE/S/P a- e++ y-- r-- s:++ d+ h! X+++ t++ C+ P+ L++ E W++ w M-- V? PS+ P+
  39. More software oriented this year by MooseGuy529 · · Score: 2, Informative

    This year FIRST has really placed the emphasis on software. They've given us an easy-to-build chassis and gearbox, a game that requires at most one manipulator (for moving tetras), and a boatload of awesome tools. We get a CMUcam2, which lets our robot track things using a camera. (This also offers some interesting possibilities for funny things, like making a cart that follows a student around as they scout teams or something... we're planning on building both the FIRST drivetrain/chassis and our own, and using the FIRST one as a testbed... I want to convert it into a human-following robot cart once we're done using it ;-) They've also apparently written lots of software modules to make it easier to use gyros, position encoders, and the like, and combined them to make a plain-text-scriptable autonomous mode thing, that allows you to write the robot instructions for what to do. (This gives teams with "intelligent" robots an advantage, as more people will take the dead-reckoning route if it's easy and reliable, so smarter bots will face less competition.) Personally I'm a programmer, and our job was usually neglected in previous years, so I look forward a great deal to a season where programming becomes a major portion of our robot, and not some little detail to be filled in at the end.

    --

    Tired of free iPod sigs? Subscribe to my blacklist

  40. wait.... by pimpius+the+impious · · Score: 0

    There are kids in robotics clubs who aren't /.ers? ;) G. Hansel Team 19 Big Red Robotics "If the answer isn't duct tape, you've asked the wrong question."

  41. Wow, this brings back memories.... by Killjoy-Modus · · Score: 1

    I participated in US FIRST back in '95 as a member of the only middle school to compete without co-teaming with an area high school--Austin Academy for Excellence of Garland, Texas. The event took place at Disney's Epcot Center, and lasted roughly four days. Though we didn't win, our team took home the All-Star Rookie Award, and we had a chance to shake hands with Kamen himself. Not bad, considering we took nearly a week off from school to attend the event at one of the nation's best theme parks. Damnit, I wish I was fourteen again.

    --
    A sig is just a sig, unless you can shoot it. Sig Steyr, for the distinguishing CT.
  42. GO TEAM 623 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seeing how there's shameless promotion....

  43. Programming by kg4gyt · · Score: 1
    This year's design seems much simpler, however when you really look at it, its much more complex. The programming has sadly been simplified, however the option is there for everyone to make their own modifications to the language. Essentially, as I understand it, one can create "Macros" to run within their code, all of which would be written in C code. I'm very sad to see the classic C or even PBASIC go, but as long as it doesn't go as far as drag-and-drop to create the instructions, Kamen will manage to keep it at least close to real-world. FLL is great for beginers, but for those that really want to learn how to code, (Yes, I know theres BricOS etc.) the text needs to remain an equally important option.

    Good luck to all and Go 1137

  44. Are you kidding? by CarbonRing · · Score: 1

    This year is going to be incredible. For every thing they've made easier, there are a dozen other things that are still hard, both in hardware and software.

    No one used the IR sensors last year because they were useless; too many sources of IR noise and reflections that are literally invisible and there were better ways to find the posts in autonomous mode. The CMUCam is much more interesting and useful. If you don't like, don't use it, but don't complain because they gave us something better this year.

    FIRST has made it easier for every team to field a functional robot with an autonomous mode, which means the competition is going to be tough and teams will have to really innovate to be competitive.

    With three teams on each side and pretty limited scoring possibilities, design, reliability, scouting, collaboration and strategy will all be critical. New teams will have fun competing with a functional robot and veteran teams will have to get off their laurels and find an edge. I think it's going to be a great year.

    Go team 1318!

  45. No life for the next six weeks by Sowelu · · Score: 1

    Team 824, University of Washington & Roosevelt High School. (I'm on the UW side.) The day of the kickoff it's finally sinking in that I just signed away all my weekends for the next month and a half. Normally I like being busy, but I have a feeling it'll be a big relief when this is over...

  46. Pitching in my team support by darketernal · · Score: 1

    Go 1072!

  47. sattellite? by arjovenzia · · Score: 1

    speeling?

    1. Re:sattellite? by diabolo-nerd · · Score: 1

      go 435

      --
      "there is nothing to fear but fear itself"- Franklin Delano Roosevelt
  48. Re:If any robot wants an A Mind... by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

    Oh my god, he's expanded his horizons from usenet and found slashdot! Run for your lives!

    Whoever moderated this idiot "Informative", you should be incredibly ashamed of yourself!

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  49. Re: FIRST Robotics Teams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Team 818 is one of about 1000 FIRST (For Inspiratation and Recognition of Science and Technology) robotics teams this year. Info on Team 818 can be found at ://www.wcs.k12.mi.us/mmstc/first/first.htm

    Most of these teams are looking for more programmers as these 130 pound robots operate autonomously for the first part of each 3-on-3 match (6 robots at once). For more info or to join a team, see http://www.usfirst.org

  50. FIRST Robotics Competition 2005 - A winner! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This year's competition is a big step up in many ways. For example, previously teams had to come up with their own drive trains so sometimes there were robots that went in circles. Teams now have the option of using professionally designed gear boxes with powerful motors so that won't be an issue.
    Also in the last three year's, there were 4 robots competing 2-on-2 in each match. This year it will be 3-on-3 which will make for lots of action. Picture six robots, each weighing 130 pounds, zooming around a 27 by 54 foot field, initially in autonomous mode, but then being driven by pairs of students with a mentor coach (who can't touch the controls). Those mentors will be busy trying to figure out the current score so as to adjust their strategy.
    I am jazzed. Last year, I had more fun with this than anything else I have done, period. This year will be even better. I consider game creation to be an art form. After all, those playing a game are often deeply involved just as they might be with a good movie play. However in some ways, a game is a superior art form because the players can influence the outcome. To mean, the FIRST Robotics Competition is at the top of the heap of games which have achieved the level of art.

  51. 175 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    go buzz!