Slashdot Mirror


We Pay Our Rent By Buying Coffee

Wired is running a story on Delicious Monster, a startup Mac software company whose main office is a Seattle coffee shop. Hope they're drinking decaf.

50 of 442 comments (clear)

  1. Decaf? by ravenspear · · Score: 5, Funny

    As long as it's not Java.

    1. Re:Decaf? by Durandal64 · · Score: 4, Funny

      No one develops Cocoa with Java. :)

  2. Also fascinating: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Their website is run on a Motorola 68000 chip embedded in a biscotti. Try not to spill, fellas!

  3. Delicious Library by sg3000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    > it generated $250,000 worth of sales in its first month

    Wow, I must have contributed to some of that.

    Delicious Library is cool, if a little bit slow. But it's still new, so that's not surprising. The attention to detail is really amazing. When you add artwork to a catalog item, the application adds a screen to the item image to make it look like it's in a DVD case, or the cover of a book. If you say it's a hard cover or soft cover book, the size of the book changes, too. I wrote a nearly pointless review of it for Gadget Madness.

    Scanning in your books, DVDs, games, or whatever into the system is actually a kind of fun. It's one of those Mac OS X applications that when you show someone who doesn't have a Mac, they get that comically jealous look on their face.

    --
    Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    1. Re:Delicious Library by sg3000 · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Holy crap, if you're not astroturfing for these guys, I'm the
      > queen of England...

      Greetings, your majesty!

      I don't know these guys, and I've never seen them in a coffee shop. I don't work in the software industry.

      I paid full price for the software application over Christmas (to try to find some additional use for my iSight). So, no astroturfing here.

      I mean, no astroturfing, your grace.

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    2. Re:Delicious Library by tdemark · · Score: 5, Informative

      Tellico seems to better about spreading the integration around (Amazon for books, IMDB for movies).

      Don't mean to burst your bubble, but, next time you are in IMDB, scroll to the very bottom of the page and read what it says.

      - Tony

    3. Re:Delicious Library by moggie_xev · · Score: 3, Informative

      Add me to the list of happy customers, the bar code scanning works very well I use a standard sony fireware dv camera. I put it on a tripod about 6 inch's away from a wall to get the scanning distance right. As I am from the UK it used to only work for my books but I note version 1.1 can talk to amazon.co.uk. When I tried a random DVD it now works. So another happy customer who paid full price. I was put on to it at work by a fell sysadmin who had just bought it.

    4. Re:Delicious Library by Squozen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I haven't used DVD Profiler, but it certainly doesn't look as fun to use from the screenshots on their website.

      I don't see any way that DVD Profiler can track your books, CD and games either, or use a webcam to scan product codes, or any mention of being able to find others with similar tastes (coming in the next release of Delicious Library).

      On the positive side, DVD Profiler is cheaper. Grats to you.

  4. Decentralisation by Daxx_61 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why-ever not? A start up has to start up somewhere, and if the company does not require a fixed premises as such, these guys are free to meet in the park, in the high street, in coffee shops. It's really just an extreme example of how decentralised business is becoming these days.

    --
    Quoth the server, "404."
    1. Re:Decentralisation by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Why-ever not? A start up has to start up somewhere, and if the company does not require a fixed premises as such, these guys are free to meet in the park, in the high street, in coffee shops. It's really just an extreme example of how decentralised business is becoming these days.

      Don't you worry, as soon as they have serious money in the bank, they'll feel compelled to set up shop in a regular office building, with a flashy street sign, they'll start wearing suits, and they'll start hiring overhead such as "managers", "VP of sales" or "HR manager".

      And every now and then, they'll gather up in the meeting room to reminisce "how cool and crazy we were in the beginning, dude".

      That's how every start-up I worked for ended up turning into when they had the chance to develop into something...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Decentralisation by sg3000 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      > Don't you worry, as soon as they have serious money in the
      > bank, they'll feel compelled to set up shop in a regular office

      Maybe. But I read on Think Secret that Delicious Monster was started by some guys who left the behemoth software conglomerate Omni Group:
      Two former employees of developer The Omni Group have reportedly founded a new Mac OS X software company called Delicious Monster Software, and exciting products are in the works. The company was formed by Omni Group founder and former President Wil Shipley as well as interface designer Mike Matas, both of whom are said to have formed Omni's user interface team ....

      So it sounds like they left a small company to put together an even smaller company.

      I admit, I just use their software. I know none of these guys and I've never worked for their companies, but it doesn't sound like either company is running to put on the white shirt and tie just yet.
      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    3. Re:Decentralisation by ratnerstar · · Score: 4, Funny

      Office building?! HR Manager?! What horrors we suffer in the name of success....

      --
      Just because you sold your soul to the devil that needn't make you a teetotaler. --The Devil and Daniel Webster
    4. Re:Decentralisation by wjsdelicious · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > They left a smaller company where they didn't have control to form a smaller company where they would.

      I was the president of Omni Group for about 10 years, and I founded it, and I still am the largest shareholder.

      > When they enter middle age they'll not want their 'window office' to be a seat at a coffee bar.

      I'm 35. I had a real window office most of my adult life, and I'm much happier now.

    5. Re:Decentralisation by wjsdelicious · · Score: 3, Informative

      I can't speak for Omni, since I don't have anything to do with their day-to-day business any more. I think it's a fair guess that development will continue on OmniWeb and OmniGraffle and OmniOutliner and OmniDiskSweeper without me, as it has for the last nine months.

      Little Kimberly Anne survived her disease and took off on her own six years ago. She's happy and living in Seattle, and writes book reviews for MSNBC.

  5. easier solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wouldn't it be easier to work from home? That's what I do.

    1. Re:easier solution by TooTechForYou · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you read the article, they say "When there's just two of you, you can't stay in one room all day."

      --
      -- Nic
    2. Re:easier solution by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not everybody *enjoys* working from home.

      Personally, I like to separate my work from my life. It's not that I like one and not the other, it's that I like them to be different.

      I do work in an office, but when I work on my own projects ( robotics & AI ) I do it in a coffee shop. It works for some mindsets. For me it gives me the comfort of *not* being cooped up in my apartment. I get to be surrounded by humanity, and in the chaos of noise, people and music, somehow my mind focuses like a needle.

      When I work at home, I end up just being distracted and watch a movie, or spend time with my GF.

      E.g., not productive ;)

      --

      lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
    3. Re:easier solution by Skidge · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not everybody *enjoys* working from home.

      Very true. I thought I would; I'm a fairly introverted guy and able to focus pretty well on things, so when I had the opportunity to work remotely for my company, I did for about a year and a half. It was great at first, but after a while I found myself longing for more of a division between work. Working from home, for me at least, led to a feeling that I was never not at work; if I had some spare time, there was a small feeling prodding me to spend it finishing up some project for my job.

      I finally had enough, so I found a new job, in which I work for a relatively large company in a large room with 10 or so other developers in it. It's actually quite refreshing to have those other folks around. Just having some other ideas floating around me has greatly increased my motivation. Plus, when I get home, I'm now only at home, not at work.

  6. Security? by locokamil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd wonder about security though. These guys are working on wireless internet on a public network while developing proprietary software. What's to stop one guy with a snooper and a latte-wielding disguise from stealing all their work? Yes, it's quirky. And I'll be damned if I wouldn't love to pay my rent in coffee... but I'm just not sure it's good business. Of course, this is all speculation on my part. We only have a Starbucks here.

    1. Re:Security? by Yaztromo · · Score: 5, Informative
      I'd wonder about security though. These guys are working on wireless internet on a public network while developing proprietary software. What's to stop one guy with a snooper and a latte-wielding disguise from stealing all their work?

      It's called data encryption, in the form of a VPN. Look into it.

      Really -- this problem has been solved for a long, long time. Create your own virtual network within the network by implementing an encryption and authentication system so that only those systems and users belonging to the company can connect and intercommunicate, and your work just looks like garbage to anyone wishing to snoop in on you.

      Yaz.

  7. I'm not much of a coffee drinker.. by neoee · · Score: 5, Funny

    its really a shame they don't have Wi-Fi at my local bar. Paying rent in beer sounds like a much better option.

  8. next version concerns by MoreDruid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While I like this product (I especially think the barcode thing is spiffy), I don't really like some of their ideas for the next version. They state that you will be able to see other peoples profile with the same taste... Well I think marketeers are going to have a field trip with this... a fully free accessible database of online contacts already sorted by the profile you make... all that for only 40 bucks. Don't get me wrong, I like the idea in principle, but it's just too easy to be taken advantage of.

    --
    The best weapon of a dictatorship is secrecy, but the best weapon of a democracy should be the weapon of openness.
    1. Re:next version concerns by wjsdelicious · · Score: 5, Informative

      We will absolutely have sharing your collection be "opt-in," on several levels. We aren't Safeway.

      Amazon already has 1,000,000x the data on people's buying habits and their relations to each other than we'll ever collect, so I suspect that if marketers were going to have a field day, they'd be calling Amazon long before us.

      It's true that it'd be _possible_ for us to do less-than-good things with the data we collect, but we're not going to. We're going to use the data to create new virtual communities of people with common interests, and bring our fragmented society closer together. If you don't want to join in those communities, don't check the preference box.

      Mike has always been against us making the "buy similar items" aspect of our product too prominent, because he didn't want us to seem like a front-end to Amazon. And when we were looking for a way to help the world with our money, It was his idea to give all of our Amazon associates' money to charity, so it's clear to our customers we are NOT trying to encourage them to BUY BUY BUY.

      Any new technology can be used for good or evil. I would expect people on this forum would recognize this truism isn't an argument against progress; it's a caution against recklessness.

  9. Coffee? by DrNibbler · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here I thought that mac developers would be drinking hot cocoa

    --
    Sean.OutaHere()
  10. Re:as long as it's not starbucks by nametaken · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah, and everything is fine until you need to start shipping things UPS from work.

  11. Not surprising when your co-founder was... by tyrione · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Co-founder of OmniGroup in Seattle.
    http://www.omnigroup.com

    I had no idea Wil left his baby, OmniWeb to do a start-up. With his almost 15 years of Cocoa programming experience I'm sure they'll make it.

  12. I met these guys at Macworld... by eobanb · · Score: 3, Informative

    And you know what? They're ordinary, hard-working developers, and they're quite creative. Apple should be hiring them.

    --

    Take off every sig. For great justice.

  13. Nice Software But... by xelph · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... also a complete, utter waste of time.

    I have to admit that I bought the software because I am a Criterion collector and because the developers did a really nice job in terms of look and feel. So I scanned hundreds and hundreds of DVDs in there and now I can see them sitting on gorgeous virtual shelves on my fully loaded PowerBook G4. And I can pat myself in the back. And that is about it.

    The fact that useless software (and products in general) that does not make you nicer, more knowledgeable, or more intelligent can generate so much revenue is beyond common sense. But the saddest part is that I am actually contributing to that trend.

    1. Re:Nice Software But... by siliconjunkie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The fact that useless software (and products in general) that does not make you nicer, more knowledgeable, or more intelligent can generate so much revenue is beyond common sense.

      For starters, I have no interest in spending my money on something that makes me "nicer". What the hell is something that makes you "nicer" anyway? Prozac?

      Secondly, have you looked at the things that people spend money on? You don't have to delve too deeply into the economy to see that people don't spend the majority of their moeny on "things to make them more knowledgeable, or more intelligent". What does "common sense" have to do with anything?

      But the saddest part is that I am actually contributing to that trend.

      No, the saddest part is you didn't have he foresight to realize that a piece of software designed to catalog your software isn't going to make you "nicer", "more knowledgeable" or "more intelligent". It's a goddamn pretty database application. Were you expecting to achieve enlightenment or something after you installed it?

    2. Re:Nice Software But... by wjsdelicious · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's funny, because most people's reaction to our software when they first see it is, "Wow, how useful! Here's my credit card," but for some it is, "Wow, how useless... here's my credit card."

      I don't actually want to argue with your point, although it's worth mentioning, as other people have, that you can print out your list of stuff and tuck it in a safety deposit box, so if you lose your collection to fire or theft it'll all be replaced exactly. Or you can print your collection and take the list to the video/book store and make sure you don't duplicate items. Or you can track your loans and make sure you don't lose items.

      Or you can use the smart recommendations and find items you never knew you'd like, and buy with more confidence that you aren't wasting money. Or you can sell items you're no longer using in just a couple clicks, and make some extra money AND tidy up your life.

      All of these things potentially make and/or save you money.

      But, you may not want to do any of that. What I'd like to point out is, our real goal in writing software is to make you smile.

      Did we succeed at that? Because, for instance, "The Incredibles" probably didn't make you better, stronger, faster (etc), but I'm betting you don't regret the $9 you spent on it. And if every company's goal was to make products that made people smile, I don't think the world would be a bad place at all.

  14. Well that is the core business of coffee shops by MeerCat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Especially in the financial centres of big cities it seems that Starbucks et al are not really a "coffee company", but are in fact selling very on-demand temporary office space ("Regus Lite") with free coffee as an incentive and informal time-billing system.

    Anyone who's worked for a large investment bank and has tried to book an office for a quick meeting will know this is true (especially if the meeting rooms operate as a "profit centre" and so you have be recharged the costs). It's amazing how much you can find out about the state of the IT dept of a large company just by hanging out in the nearest coffee shop - are they hiring or firing, are the staff excited or bitching, what new projects are they working on.... industrial espionage was rarely so cheap.

    Similarly, airports are now in the business of selling multi-day car parking and short term entertainment for an hour or two.

    --
    I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered. - George Best
    1. Re:Well that is the core business of coffee shops by MeerCat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Airports? Can you tell me more?

      Used to be flying was expensive, but parking at the airport was cheap and you got some cheap shopping to soften the blow (in Europe in particular).

      Now the flights cost virtually nothing, but suddenly it costs me more to park my car for a couple of days than it does to fly to Geneva and back. If these were inner city car parks with expensive land, I'd understand, but Stansted Airport in the UK is in the middle of nowhere.

      So the airport is now making money not from the airlines (it's traditional customers) but is instead selling itself to the passengers, and looking to remove as much incidental cash as it can from their wallets as they pass thru on their "cheap flights".

      Not that I'm blaming them, it's just the observation that they're sort of redefining their core business as they follow the money.

      --
      I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered. - George Best
    2. Re:Well that is the core business of coffee shops by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 3, Interesting

      True, although I'd like to know how people actually get a seat at Starbucks. Do you have to get there as soon as it opens?

      Whenever I've gone to a Starbucks (all of twenty times, admittedly) it's always jam packed and there's nowhere to sit. I once got a seat at a Starbucks out in a small country town. In LA? Forget it. The Starbucks in Studio City is full to capacity every time I've been there.

      Luckily you can find nicer coffee shops that are emptier, but those tend not to have wireless. Oh the shame.

  15. Easier to go insane, yes by Infonaut · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Wouldn't it be easier to work from home? That's what I do.

    I started a company with a friend of mine three years ago. We each worked out of own homes, and met twice a week in person (at a coffee shop, natch') to be sure we were synched up. But after a while it started to become difficult for me to stay in the same damned room all day, then move over a few feet into the kitchen for dinner, a few feet over to the living room to watch a movie, and then a few feet again to go to sleep. I felt like a freakin' hamster.

    When we got the chance to share office space with a couple of other guys who ran their own small companies, we jumped at the chance. Splitting the money three ways makes rent much cheaper, and we get human contact. Sometimes you don't need to have specific interaction. You just need to be around people.

    That's part of the appeal of working in a coffee shop. You can focus on what you're doing, but there's enough human activity that you can also get that feeling of connectedness. When you work alone at home by yourself it's easy to feel disconnected from the rest of humanity, no matter how many IMs you get from your buddies.

    But maybe it's just me. I haven't yet transcended meatspace.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Easier to go insane, yes by ruvreve · · Score: 4, Funny

      The irony being that you have a hamster cage sitting on your desk and the furry creature inside is still planning his revenge against the monster that put him in the dungeon and tricked him into running for hours in that little wheel.

    2. Re:Easier to go insane, yes by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 5, Insightful

      it's definately a balance. for a year now ive worked in an office of 10, in a room of 3 people (including me). Increasingly though, ive grown tired of the people; depending on combinations of who's in our room at the time (people often wander in and work with someone/chat), i get different stress levels, and sometimes (very much so in the past few months) find it EXTREMELY hard to work at all with certain people in the room, or just ANYONE in the room. It's pretty much got to a point where there's 1 guy (who is having a break in a week for 2 months, phew) TOTALLY destroys any moral to work. He's just that much of a cock....heh.... loves the sound of his own voice...self righteous...everything *sigh*.

      So... a few days ago i had a big deadline. I was REALLY getting concerned by my workflow (or lack of...) so i took the opportunity to work from home (i live 200 yards away, so the guys dont have a problem with it) and worked 36 hours flat (dont.. ask) because for the first time in months, i felt GENUINELY motivated. i couldnt believe how motivated i was just being able to focus without some idiot slagging me off/boosting his ego.

      And that's my story. too much of one can piss you off, too little can also piss you off... and dont work with wankers, it isnt fun.

  16. It's not as good as it sounds by MrAndrews · · Score: 4, Funny

    I run four companies from my local coffee shop. Sit in the back with my powerbook and always look like I'm waiting for someone to show up. But the downside is that you can easily be tempted into vanilla lattes every hour, which costs as much as a 15th-floor corner office, and will likely get me a kidney transplant in five years.

    Now if only I had products I sold that earned money, I'd be breaking even...

  17. Re:No different than any other virtual company by TheHornedOne · · Score: 5, Funny

    That and their software is probably infinitely cooler than yours was. Have you ever used or seen Delicious Library?

  18. and CEO gets 95% dollars by cheekyboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Dont forget the hardworkers get a dime, while the CEO/leader walks away with millions because his equity was 95%+.

    Its one thing to have controlling interests (>50%) share, but its another quite evil thing to USE your employees to make yourself filthy rich, then sell out, sack the employees and leave em to dry while the CEO walks away super uber rich with 10 lifetimes of assets/money.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  19. Re:as long as it's not starbucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In my town, I am Starbucks direct competitor (as in the majority of the Sunday business they do is in the time period from when they open to fifteen minutes before I do), and while other parts of the country may have coffee priced excessively high (especially in light of low prices on the C market for the past couple years), from my perspective Starbucks is charging an awful lot for a product that is nowhere near as good as it could be (my average cost of green coffee is about three times what Starbucks says they pay, though in many cases they have more lossage from over-roasting). For a concrete example, a small chai at Starbucks costs more than a large chai at my establishment. Unadulterated coffee is likewise more expensive. Starbucks competitors charging Starbucks prices (or higher) are probably doing so only because they can.

  20. Lloyds of London started the same way by jdfox · · Score: 4, Informative

    The famous Lloyd's of London insurance group started out in Lloyd's coffee house in the late 1600s. This bodes well for Delicious Monster. :)

    Excerpts from the book "Against the Gods" by Peter Bernstein:
    "One afternoon in 1637 * a Cretan scholar named Canopius sat down in his chambers at Balliol College, Oxford, and made himself a cup of strong coffee. Canopius's brew is believed to mark the first time coffee was drunk in England; it proved so popular when it was offered to the public that hundreds of coffee houses were soon in operation all over London.

    What does Canopius's coffee have to do with * the concept of risk? Simply that a coffee house was the birthplace of Lloyd's of London, which for more than two centuries was the most famous of all insurance company's. *

    The second half of the seventeenth century was also an era of burgeoning trade. The Dutch were the predominant commercial power of the time, and England was their main rival. Ships arrived daily from colonies and suppliers around the globe to unload a profusion of products that had once been scarce or unknown luxuries-sugar and spice, coffee and tea, raw cotton and fine porcelain. * Information from remote areas of the world was now of crucial importance to the domestic economy. With the volume of shipping constantly expanding, there was a lively demand for current information with which to estimate sailing times between destinations, weather patterns, and the risks lurking in unfamiliar seas.

    In the absence of mass media, the coffee houses emerged as the primary source of news and rumour. In 1675, Charles II,
    suspicious as many rulers are of places where the public trades information, shut the coffee houses down, but the uproar was so great that he had to reverse himself sixteen days later. Samuel Pepys frequented a coffee house to get news of the arrival of ships he was interested in; he deemed the news he received there to be more reliable than what he learned at his job at the Admiralty.

    The coffee house that Edward Lloyd opened in 1687 near the Thames on Tower Street was a favourite haunt of men from the ships that moored at London's docks. The house was "spacious, well built and inhabited by able tradesmen" according to a contemporary publication. It grew so popular that in 1691 Lloyd moved it to much larger and more luxurious quarters on Lombard Street. Nat Ward, a publican whom Alexander Pope accused of trading vile rhymes for tobacco, reported that the tables in the new house were "very neat and shined with rubbing." A staff of five served tea and sherbet as well as coffee.

    Lloyd had grown up under Oliver Cromwell and he had lived through plague, fire, the Dutch invasion up the Thames in 1667, and the Glorious Revolution of 1688. He was a lot more than a skilled coffeehouse host. Recognizing the value of his customer base and responding to the insistent demand for information, he launched "Lloyd's List" in 1696 and filled it with information on the arrivals and departures of ships and intelligence on conditions abroad and at sea. That information was provided by a network of correspondents in major ports on the Continent and in England. Ship auctions took place regularly on the premises, and Lloyd obligingly furnished the paper and ink needed to record the transactions. One corner was reserved for ships' captains where they could compare notes on the hazards of all the new routes that were opening up - routes that led them farther east, farther south, and farther west than ever before. Lloyd's establishment was open almost around the clock and was always crowded.

    Then as now, anyone who was seeking insurance would go to a broker, who would then hawk the risk to the individual risk-takers who gathered in the coffee houses or in the precincts of the Royal Exchange. When a deal was closed, the risk-taker would confirm his agreement to cover the loss in return for a specified premium by writing his name

  21. Re:No different than any other virtual company by jcr · · Score: 4, Funny

    insufferably precious Mac-Seattle-GraphicDesginer disease.

    Somebody's jealous...

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  22. No... It's actually assembly. by siokaos · · Score: 5, Funny

    0xDECAFBAD

    --
    http://siokaos.org/
  23. Cocoa bindings by akuzi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Apple developer site has an interesting article on how Delicious Library's use of the Cocoa bindings framework.

  24. Re: shipping things UPS by wjsdelicious · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We have a fulfillment center in Olympia for the scanners and we have a FedEx Kinko's a block away for other shipments.

  25. Re:Yeah, but... by wjsdelicious · · Score: 3, Informative

    Our web server and store machines are both off-site. We don't do shipping out of the coffee-house either. We do take phone calls and meetings there.

  26. Re:Meetings... by wjsdelicious · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Our whole company is predicated on doing things differently, so when we're meeting with clients it's sort of our badge of courage to tell them to meet us at the Zoka.

    I don't think it's ruffled anyone's feathers. We've done press interviews and met insurance guys and interviewed employees. Everyone seems to feel very at home. I guess it's not much different from meeting a client when you're on the road.

    [The hilarious part is that our Zoka happens to be RIGHT next door to The Omni Group. I mean, literally the next building over. So, for people I've done business with before, it's like, "Uh, remember where I used to be? Well..."]

  27. Am I the only coffee-house user who this annoys? by OnanTheBarbarian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've spent an inordinate amount of the last decade sitting around in coffee houses of varying degrees of corporateness (Starbucks obviously being on one end of the scale). Quite frankly, one of the reasons that I've stopped spending time at coffee houses are people using coffee houses in exactly this way.

    I don't mind people working in coffee houses. I don't mind people meeting in coffee houses. What I do mind is when people start doing things like presentations to enough other people that they have to raise their voices, talk loudly and endlessly on their damn cell phones (not to mention taking endless calls), and blather away like they own the whole place. Guess what - it's not your office, guys. It's really not.

    Tech nerds are usually fairly good about this. Some of the local business types are just complete pricks about this, though. It's like they've never considered the idea that the whole place isn't interested in the unique, dynamic work environment that their chain restaurant is going to provide.

    I'm not under the delusion that coffee houses should be some sort of library-like atmosphere, or that no-one should ever conduct business there, or anything like that. I'd just like (for a change) for people who are doing business in a coffeehouse to recognize that they aren't in their own office.

  28. Re:I see we have it all wrong by wjsdelicious · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Being an espresso snob is very expensive. The machine back at Omni cost us $1500 on close-out, and I think it kind of sucks, now.

    The two La Marzoccos at Zoka cost, no kidding, something over $20,000 each. (They are re-tuned by hand once they come in the United States to be even more frou-frou.) Their entire water supply is run through an enormous Cuno water filter. They roast their own beans (which they sell as far away as Japan) and train baristas from all over the country. Their baristas consistently place tops in the national tournaments.

    Seriously, you have to try an extra-foamy mocha here. Imagine drinking coffee-meringue-pie!

  29. Re:A real company needs an official mailing addres by wjsdelicious · · Score: 5, Funny

    We use my house as a base of operations -- extra scanners are stored there, along with our MacWorld booth, and, if I have my way, that giant TV we had at MacWorld.

    All these assets are guarded by two fierce attack-cats, so don't try looking up our address of incorporation and breaking into my house! You will emerge fuzzy, my friend. FUZZY!