Slashdot Mirror


Washington School Bans Halo 2 Tournament

Pluvius writes "A couple of high-school students in the Washington city of Puyallup wanted to raise money for the tsunami disaster in South Asia, and figured that the best way to do so was to hold a tournament using Bungie's hit XBox title Halo 2. Their school district disagreed, citing an anti-violence policy. Even though all of the parents of the children who would've taken part in the tournament signed waivers acknowledging the game's violence, Puyallup School District felt that due to school shootings across the country, 'anything we do that even looks like we're endorsing violence is not appropriate.'"

126 comments

  1. A mod, please? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is there a mod for this that changes the weapons systems to Nerf guns?

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:A mod, please? by Dr.Opveter · · Score: 1

      yeah, a shooter with sponge bullets i hope they come up with a good alternative to raise the money..

      --
      Sample this!
    2. Re:A mod, please? by Omni+Magnus · · Score: 1

      If they used a mod for Halo 2 (XBOX only), then the school would be accused of endorsing piracy because it would have to be run on a modded XBOX.

    3. Re:A mod, please? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Well, there is a game called Nerf Arena Blast that was derived from Unreal Tournament (1999 version) but I don't think that would've been popular (though the demo was somewhat nice). Or perhaps Laser Arena (Quake-derivative) or Southpark: the Game (c'mon, cows aren't lethal weapons, are they?)?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    4. Re:A mod, please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they're such caring people, why don't they just donate the money. Do you have to get some videogame play-time out of it to be convinced to do a good thing?

      I mean, talk about a no-fucking-brainer . . . uh . . . duh?

    5. Re:A mod, please? by Heftklammerdosierer! · · Score: 1

      You forgot Goldeneye with the paintball cheat.

    6. Re:A mod, please? by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

      Because the people interviewed were the ORGANIZERS.

      The money is coming from the PARTICIPANTS.

      The participants make no claim (in the article) to giving a crap about the tsunami victims. They only want to play Halo 2.

      The organizers are the ones who are doing it because they (supposedly) care.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    7. Re:A mod, please? by chrish · · Score: 1

      You laugh, but there was an Unreal Tournament-based Nerf game (Nerf Arenablast! if I remember correctly) a few years ago that was loads of fun.

      Had a great mode where you had to collect balls worth a certain amount of points and shoot them through a target using a special gun. If you got fragged, your balls would scatter for the other folks to pick up.

      --
      - chrish
  2. *sigh* by Dragoon412 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, because each and every person out there would make the obvious cognitive leap that raising charity money via tournaments of a futuristic game based on fragging aliens equates to condoning kids bringing guns to school and shooting their classmates, right? /sarcasm

    This is asinine. Does the school have a football team? A wrestling team? Or do those not count as violent?

    1. Re:*sigh* by nes11 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It only takes one person, not "each and every person." The fact is, most of the parents are probably paying enough attention to their kids for it not to be a problem, but it only takes that one.

      This is a wise move for the school. If something bad happened, they would be held responsible by the public & the media whether parent's signed permission slips or not.

    2. Re:*sigh* by Dragoon412 · · Score: 1, Insightful
      This is a wise move for the school. If something bad happened, they would be held responsible by the public & the media whether parent's signed permission slips or not.


      Really? How is it different from taking field trips to the zoo, or funding violent sports?

      Parents need to sign wavers for their kids to play football; you don't see the school district being sued every time some kid breaks a bone. You don't see the school being sued over teen pregnancy because they teach anatomy or sex ed.

      There's no media frenzy over video games; there's just a select group of idiots like Lieberman and Buchanon that make a big stink over it.
    3. Re:*sigh* by nes11 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "How is it different from taking field trips to the zoo, or funding violent sports?"

      Kids break bones
      Kids shoot others.

      Can you really not see the difference here? Are you just completely retarded? Tell me something, when was the last time the media spent a full week covering a broken bone or teen pregnancy? Compare that to the uproar over columbine and similar incidents. There is a HUGE difference.

      you said:
      "There's no media frenzy over video games; there's just a select group of idiots like Lieberman and Buchanon that make a big stink over it."

      I never said there was, I said, IF something happened like some random kid going on a rampage, there would be a media stink.

      lol, I had assumed there was some intelligence in /. that spilled over to the games section. guess i was wrong. It's hilarious that mine was modded troll & yours was interesting. The lack of intelligence here is frightening.

    4. Re:*sigh* by wolfmanXUG · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter anyway since the school will be held responcible anyway no matter what they do. People do not want to take responcibility for their actions.

    5. Re:*sigh* by GameNutz · · Score: 1

      100% AGREE with you. I find the "organized" sports to be violent and are non-inclusive based on physical stature. At least in games, everyone can start on equal footing and actually forces teamwork. If you have parental concent and the players/spectators are over 17 years of age as specificed by the ESRB rating on the packaging, what's the problem? This also could have been the chance for a public institution to stand up and demonstrate that just because people engage in violent games does not mean that it will carry over into their lives. This is an unfortunate condition of the schools buckling to pressure from a largely uninformed news media, scared parents that have transferred much of the responsibility of raising their childeren to be prodective and decent members of society to public institutions and another slap for video games.

    6. Re:*sigh* by Hast · · Score: 1

      Kids break bones
      Kids shoot others.

      I find it interesting that you imply that kids shooting each other after playing computer games is as natural as kids playing sports get hurt. Despite a lot of effort there is still no evidence than can demonstrate a causal relationship between playing violent video games and violent behaviour.

      Now media doesn't care about this and apparently you think it's a good idea to avoid this confrontation as it "looks bad" instead of trying to do the right thing.

      I'm flattered that you don't believe that everyone here are too busy attempting to suck up to the "all knowing media" to lose their capacity to think for themselves.
    7. Re:*sigh* by nes11 · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should read the posts before you reply.

      I made the comments "If something bad happened" and "it only takes one person".

      The guy replying to me ignorantly translated that to comparing every kid playing video games with playing football or getting pregnant. I made no such direct correlation or suggested it was "natural". The fact of the matter is that occasionally, yes rarely, it does happen and as I pointed out, it only takes one person freakin out to cause alot of problems.

      My comparison of "Kids break bones, Kids shoot others" was only to point out how rediculous the idea is of comparing the two.

      I completely agree with you that the media is at fault and completely wrong in this issue, but the fact is, the school is wise for making this decision.

    8. Re:*sigh* by Pluvius · · Score: 1

      I put one last line at the end of my submission, but Zonk took it out:

      "One wonders if intermural football has been banned in these schools using the same logic."

      You're definitely not the only one who smells hypocrisy here. I think that the supposed difference is that football is "cool" and "popular" and "lucrative for the schools" and Halo 2 isn't.

      Rob (Guess which of those three is most important)

  3. We suck. by keiferb · · Score: 3, Funny

    Are they really expecting the kids to go home, make a needle gun, and bring it in to school? All the Halo games teach is that you should kill aliens. It says nothing about school teachers or other students.

    Here's a spoon, America. Let's dig our heads out of our asses.

    1. Re:We suck. by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I don't think this is like America's Army where the opponents are always displayed as evildoers. A Halo 2 tournament would obviously involve deathmatches and other competitive gametypes.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    2. Re:We suck. by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      try to play it in coop in a lan setting for a weekend.. gets real old real fast.

      man vs. man.

      anyways.. what's the sad part is that they're disallowing it because they think that somebody might say to them later that they're endorsing violence.. they KNOW that it should be 100% OK - but are too afraid to let it happen.

      bunch of sissies.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:We suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A needle gun, you say? What an idea!!! And to think my mom wouldn't let me play HALO because it's too violent. Who'd have thought I'd get those kinds of ideas reading slashdot posts!

  4. What a non-story by Matt+Perry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What a non-story (not slashdot but the article). The students want it, the parents signed off on it. So what if the school doesn't want it? Then don't involve the school. I'm sure there's plenty of other locations where one could hold the tournament. Maybe a local community center?

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    1. Re:What a non-story by ZephyrXero · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Sorry if some of us are interested in personal freedoms around here besides just tech stuff...

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    2. Re:What a non-story by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Personal freedom doesn't come into play where children and/or schools are involved. There are historical exceptions and legal precedents establishing this fact. Just thought it was worth pointing out before people get all high-and-might on the white horse about bringing "free speech" and other irrelevant arguments into play.

    3. Re:What a non-story by flibuste · · Score: 1

      You have a point but what worth is a school that refuses video games such as HL2 deeming them violent, where the actual goal is to raise funds?

      What does that teaches to the kids? Better be censored and/or politically correct rather than be generous and donate?

      If it the "stellar" coming of Bush that produces such nonsense, I suggest you jump out the mothership and land in Canada.

      It is not because you are not paranoid that Aliens are not out to get you.

  5. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The school *did* have a football team, but they deemed it to violent and closed it down. They now play a form of "peaceball" where opponents hand each other presents, then gently insist the other team is better than their own, and has won.

    1. Re:RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...then gently insist the other team is better than their own, and has won"

      Of course, at the end of the game, *both* teams win, so nobody's feelings get hurt, and everyone's self-esteem gets a boost.

    2. Re:RTFA by Meagermanx · · Score: 1

      Yup, everyone knows footba-Er, Peaceball players need more self-esteem... And don't even get me started on those self-conscious wrestlers...

  6. So what? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    School's policy, school's decision.

    Just have the fundraiser outside of school property.

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    1. Re:So what? by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      Parents' tax dollars, parents' decision, I didn't RTFA(big surprise) but I didn't think this was a private school. This is a result of CYOA so some school board member can run for higher office without looking like they support kids bring guns to school.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    2. Re:So what? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Bingo. And then write to local newspapers and get plenty of press about it, and don't forget to add that despite the school trying to prevent you from raising money, you're doing it anyway.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    3. Re:So what? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >Parents' tax dollars, parents' decision

      But then, using this idea, the parents are the ones who did decide to have a "no violence" policy before this issue.

      The school was correct in what they were doing. I realize that a few parents did permit the event, but what about the majority of parents?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    4. Re:So what? by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      "I realize that a few parents did permit the event, but what about the majority of parents?"

      Rarely trust the mayority; there are places where children are taught that evolution is not science, and creationism deserves equal time. There are places where kids aren't taught propper sex-ed, and teenage pregnancies rise.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    5. Re:So what? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >Rarely trust the mayority

      So we should trust the minority?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    6. Re:So what? by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      Well, usually it's a tiny minority who actually know what is going on/how something works/have studied a problem for a large part of their lives. The mayority only has the information which is derived from this minority, and is filtered by politics and media.

      So, yeah: put your trust in the minority who's expertise is somethng they've worked hard to get, instead of the mayority who has no clue.

      Of course, there's the problem of identifying the minority who actually know what they're talking about, and aren't crackpots...

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
  7. Re:Duh. by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1
    And just how much is $500 from some stupid LAN going to help?

    Keep going down.

    "$380 we were thinking was going to go straight into the Red Cross Tsunami fund," Alston said.
    Oh and don't you dare bring up the other hot spots where genocide and regular slaughter are going on. That's just man against man, whereas the Tsunami represents God against man, and we're going to KICK gOD'S ASS!!!111 WTF!!!!11
    --
    Yeah, right.
  8. *Yawn* by JFitzsimmons · · Score: 0, Troll

    Booooooooooooooooooorrrrrrrrrrrriiiiiiiiiinggggg ggggg!

    No seriously, how is this news? This happens all the time, like when my school tried to fundraise for our robotics team. That certainly didn't make slashdot.

    --
    Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. -Anonymous
    1. Re:*Yawn* by nes11 · · Score: 1

      "That certainly didn't make slashdot."

      maybe you should've posted it.

    2. Re:*Yawn* by JFitzsimmons · · Score: 1
      Maybe, but I didn't because:

      1. It is fully within the school's administration's right to deny us access to the resources
      2. It is a fully understandable policy to have on violent gaming at school
      --
      Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. -Anonymous
    3. Re:*Yawn* by nes11 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree completely. just trying to add some humor. Want something really funny? check out my other post on this topic. I get modded troll for basically saying what you just said & another guy gets +4 insightful for bashing me.

      lol, this is a sad reflection on /. as a whole.

  9. If they refuse to endorse viloence.... by Landak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they refuse to endorse violence in any way, shape, or form; then bye bye Shakespeare, Dickens, Tolstoy (?), Nursery Rhymes; etc, as well as almost all forms of organised sport; modern art, some forms of modern music, etc; etc.

    It's a video game. Just as Romeo and Juliet is a book. Where one has you not-so-elegantly killing your opponents; the other has a very elegant description of someone killing his opponents. Where you conspire with your friends to best your enemies in Halo; the two houses "teams" conspire to best each other in Romeo and Juliet.

    Humanity is violent; its' roots are violence, and if you cannot control your own desire for violence then *you* probably *will* do something stupid at some point in your life- which has nothing to do whatsoever with Halo 2; Half-life 2; Doom 3.....

    --
    My UID is prime. Is yours?
    1. Re:If they refuse to endorse viloence.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Romeo and Juliet is a tragedy. It demonstrates how the violence between the two houses leads to ruin and unhappiness for all.

      Halo 2 is a video game. It rewards people for actively commiting acts of virtual violence.

      See the difference?

      The books you've listed contain violence, but they don't endorse it - very much the opposite. Halo 2, on the other hand, is an endorsement for commiting violent acts, albiet of the virtual variety.

    2. Re:If they refuse to endorse viloence.... by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

      I for one do not welcome our new alien overlords, and feel that we should indeed endorse and reward those who repel their attacks.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    3. Re:If they refuse to endorse viloence.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't it depend on whether the violence is made to come across as appealing, whether or not you are supposed to feel pleasure in killing?

      In books, at least there is usually a moral to the story, giving reason to see the negative in killing. Most classic books have depth, the only depth the video games have is in the rendering.

      In video games, you actually perform the task of killing, and it doesn't matter. You are the killer. You are enjoying killing. There is nothing wrong with killing. This is the main aim of the 'game'.

      It's the psychology in it that causes alarm, and I can fully understand this.

  10. Should... by DrJonesAC2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...have stuck with MonkeyBall

    1. Re:Should... by ayersrj · · Score: 2, Funny

      I for one will not condone a game that encourages the capture and exploitation of animals from temperate climates for your enjoyment. I refuse to hold a tournament in my school.

  11. Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The school can't force them to not do this. It sounds more like they weren't willing to host the event. The kids can do their Halo 2 tournament elsewhere if they like, can't they?

  12. Sucks, but... by eviltypeguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't really blame them. All it would take is some bleeding-heart political activist and suddenly it would look like the school is endorsing violent activities. The school is protecting themselves from possible litigation and some possible embarassment. As much as it sucks, it's the safer decision they've taken.

    1. Re:Sucks, but... by LordEd · · Score: 1

      But does the school have a football team?

      We had a FPS tournament way back in high school (before the whole school shooting thing) and wow, I considered bringing a rocket launcher for a whole 2 seconds before realizing i didn't have access to heavy artillery.

      Maybe the parents should have to sign a waiver if they have a gun in the house.

      I, _________ as a responsible parent with possession of (a) firearm(s), promise to teach my child/children that firearms are not to be used on school property and are not the first solution to all of your problems. I also promise to control access to the firearm(s) and ammunition.

      The students should sign this one:

      I, __________, as a video game playing student, know that video games have nothing to do with real life. I acknowledge that life has no reset button, hacks, mods, or other life-restoring properties, and that I am not easily influenced by images I see in video games, tv, or movies.

      I waive my right to blame video games as my excuse for violence and will choose a more appropriate excuse such as my sheer stupidity, access to a weapon, parents, or myself.

    2. Re:Sucks, but... by secolactico · · Score: 1

      If the kid is a minor, will anything he signs stand up in court?

      In my humble opinion, a lot of violence comes from the fact that we tend to put to much weight to fictitional imagery (me fail english... ;-)

      Lets expose kids (in a safe way) to the consequences of real world violence. Take them to an ER, or a community center for victims. Let them volunteer some of their free time helping others.

      It's a parent's work to protect their children, but excesive sheltering is a disservice to them and perhaps to those who have to relate to them.

      Whenever a kid screws up big time, I blame the parents.

      --
      No sig
  13. He's on the line by czarangelus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know this isn't going to be the most popular opinion, but I sort of feel sorry for the school district here. I mean, imagine if they did allow this and a parent complained, and you know one would. In a society that values censorship over responsibility, these people just did what they needed to to keep their jobs. As asinine as it seems, the district people were taking the safest route for all involved, politically. One more thing- imagine that a week later some nutball came to school and started shooting. You just know Halo 2 would have been blamed, whether the stupid kid went to the touroment or not. I guess if something were to happen, it's better that it not easily be tied to a form of media that a lot of people are trying very hard to censor.

    --
    When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
    1. Re:He's on the line by LordEd · · Score: 1

      Mr. Teacher, I really don't want MY kid hearing about that World War II thing. Its very violent and I don't want him to get any crazy ideas like marching across Europe.

      Now if you don't mind, i'll let little Johnny get back to his TV set.

    2. Re:He's on the line by ZephyrXero · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But that's just the thing... It's all politics. Politics do not belong in our schools. We Americans need to get over ourselves and start being real people again, forget all the politically correct bullshit. Seriously... This stuff is ruining our country. Secondly, if every single parent signed a waiver, then the school has no responcibilites anyway. Also you have to think about the fact that Halo is rated M (17+), how many of those kids are old enough to play the game without their parents consent anyway? Halo 2 is not really meant for children in the first place. But, since the parents agreed, then it's up to them, not the school now.

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    3. Re:He's on the line by czarangelus · · Score: 1

      I totally agree with you. However, the way things should be are very rarely the way things are.

      --
      When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
    4. Re:He's on the line by Alrescha · · Score: 1

      "Also you have to think about the fact that Halo is rated M (17+), how many of those kids are old enough to play the game without their parents consent anyway?"

      All of them are old enough. A game rating says nothing about who is *allowed* to play.

      "Halo 2 is not really meant for children in the first place."

      Ridiculous. Halo/Halo2 are written and intended for exactly those age groups in high school. The fact that it has an M-whatever rating is solely because the manufacturers and stores need to cover *their* butts against stupid lawsuits and attitudes.

      A.

      --
      ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
  14. Re:Duh. by game+kid · · Score: 1
    the Tsunami represents God against man, and we're going to KICK gOD'S ASS!!!111 WTF!!!!11

    Could it be...new sig!

    Seriously, I'm not shocked that Puyallup would cancel such a thing. Schools and guns just don't go together, no matter how innocent the intention. The act of utter insanity and stupidity in Columbine only reinforced that.

    Still, I agree here. The Red Cross needs every dollar it can find, and something popular like Halo 2--complete with violence release form--would have done that. Governments tend to pledge aircraft-carrier loads of money and not give it when it's needed.

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  15. A Call from the ACLU May Fix This by Doug+Dante · · Score: 4, Interesting
    While getting a bad rap for taking on the boy scouts, the ACLU is probably the most useful defender of students' rights in America (defending students rights to wear black arm bands, publish independent student papers, etc).

    IIRC, it's their legal position that student organizations all have an equal right to school facilities (yup even the Boy Scouts - just no 'special rights').

    You may want to contact them via their students' rights web site at ACLU student rights

    --
    The world will not get better through technology. We must seek to be better people.
    1. Re:A Call from the ACLU May Fix This by finkployd · · Score: 1

      I don't know, the issue deals (in a remote and indirect way) with firearms, the ACLU might want nothing to do with it. They are quite selective about the aspects of the bill of rights they support.

      Finkployd

    2. Re:A Call from the ACLU May Fix This by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 1

      It's funny, but I don't remember anything about an inalienable right to run Halo 2 tournaments at school. I mean, video games are chock full of amazing educational lessons (aliens bad, guns good), but I can find many reasons to not let people play games in school. Even if it's not a question of violence. Just host the tournament somwhere else. I'm close to Puyallup: host it at my house.

      --
      Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
    3. Re:A Call from the ACLU May Fix This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, a very remote and indirect way.

      Specifically, supporting this would not run afoul of their stated reasons for not supporting the broad interpretation of the right to bear arms. It is a pure speech issue.

      You just (barely) crossed the line from debate to FUD.

    4. Re:A Call from the ACLU May Fix This by rpillala · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The real answer to this is in the last sentence of the article. The school system says they'll support the fundraiser if a less violent video game is played. The decision doesn't deny any students access, it regulates what they can do in the building. The normal school day is full of this kind of regulation.

      --
      When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
    5. Re:A Call from the ACLU May Fix This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      While getting a bad rap for taking on the boy scouts, the ACLU

      The boy scouts won the court case by saying discrimination against gays was fundamental to being a boy scout. Thankfully someone took them on. It's time to end all public funding for the scouts.

  16. Ban everything by Mr.Dippy · · Score: 1

    I had to read the Red Badge of Courage in 9th grade. However, I didn't feel the need to shoot southerners immediatly after finishing the book.

    --


    -Dipster
  17. Rated M for Mature by CoreyGH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Halo 2 has an ESRB rating of M (17+). Most of the kids in highschool do not fit into that category. If they wanted to have a Mario Party tournament then I would understand people being upset over it being canceled but we have to face facts. Halo 2 is not for kids.

    1. Re:Rated M for Mature by General+Wesc · · Score: 1

      An M rating shouldn't be the concern of the school if the parents don't object. There's no science behind these letters, beyond anthropology/sociology. They're less significant, I'd say, than the 'For ages 7-10' one find on non-computerised game boxes.

    2. Re:Rated M for Mature by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter if it's Mario Party or Manhunt. Parents of all kids said they recognize the violence in this game and allow their children to participate. Ratings are only there to give parents an idea of what is in the game, nothing more. Case closed.

    3. Re:Rated M for Mature by twosmokes · · Score: 1

      An M rating shouldn't be the concern of the school if the parents don't object.

      Yes it should. Little Timmy's parents may sign off on letting him watch porno, but that still doesn't mean that it's appropriate for school.

    4. Re:Rated M for Mature by CoreyGH · · Score: 1

      If the school district is supporting the fund raiser then it isn't the parents' call. The school district is responsable for kids, Halo 2 is not for kids so district pulls its support for the event. If they parents and kids want to hold their own tournament that isn't supported by the district then they are welcome to.

    5. Re:Rated M for Mature by CoreyGH · · Score: 1

      There's no science behind these letters, beyond anthropology/sociology.
      That may be true, however that doesn't change the fact that it's the only ratings system we have. When we have arguments on why these types of games shouldn't be banned from store shelves everyone always shouts "But look, we have a RATING system!" We can't now call that system useless in this situation. You can't have it both ways.

    6. Re:Rated M for Mature by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      No, parents are responsable for kids. The school district is only liable if it did something stupid like not require waivers from all 16- year olds who wanted to join-in/spectate. The school grounds are public property. While not in use for the school, they should be available for any public activity. And yes, this probably means having at least a few school personnel as supervisors to make sure there isn't damaged public property. I mean, why are the parents/tax payers paying money for if not to use the equipment/property?

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    7. Re:Rated M for Mature by General+Wesc · · Score: 1

      No, you're right, of course, that it's not useless. But the usefulness isn't that it takes away parents' choice as to whether their child should play the game. It gives parents a guideline--information--so they can then make a relatively informed decision that's right for their child. If these parents decide to let their kids play the games, fine.

      Providing information to parents is the good. Making the decisions for the parents is not (in the case of violent games).

    8. Re:Rated M for Mature by General+Wesc · · Score: 1

      Why is it any less appropriate than having a senior prom? Why is one within the mission of school and the other not? Neither seems particularly educational.

    9. Re:Rated M for Mature by blueZhift · · Score: 1

      Well, gotta agree on this one. While I don't believe that playing violent video games breeds violent people any more than any other popular media, at least there isn't any solid proof of that yet, there was no way a high school based Halo 2 tournament was going to fly. Even if all of the participants happened to be 17+ and had parental permission and endorsement, our schools have become hypersensitized , especially since the Columbine tragedy. This isn't necessarily a bad thing. If the students still want to raise money via a fun event, just choose something more acceptable or take it to a private location.

    10. Re:Rated M for Mature by CoreyGH · · Score: 1

      No one in the above situation is taking away the parents' choice as to whether their child can play the game. They are welcome to purchase it and play it at home. The school district has only decided not to sanction entertainment on school grounds that involves a product that is not intended for kids under 17. There is nothing wrong with that.

    11. Re:Rated M for Mature by CoreyGH · · Score: 1

      Yes, tax payers pay for school equipment and property. However, most tax payers are not teachers. The tax payers also pay teachers/school administrators to decide what to do with that property and equipment. Liabilty is not the issue here, the district has just decided not to sanction an event centered on material that is not intended for kids.

    12. Re:Rated M for Mature by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      Most tax payers don't have the profession of teacher, yes. I've no idea what that has to do with the conversation. :)

      Tax payers pay for the teachers to teach and the school administrators to properly utilize finance money for the equipment/property for the school children. What's being talked about isn't, for example, a beer festival, which is likely illegal for the children involved (in my state, it's legal for a child to imbibe alcohol with their parents permission, though I forget if it's only on private property). Instead, it's an activity which involves school children *of the school* and approved by the parents (aka, tax payers). The only basis the school administrators have to not "sanction" the activity is if it were deemed too costly.

      Schools are not there to teach morality to the school children, especially overriding the parents who are *right there* teaching morality. Halo 2 may not be "intended for kids", but certainly those who are not "kids" (ie, 17+, according to the ESRB content rating) and those for whom their parents have legally vouched for are not in a position where it's at all a question on whether it's the will of the people who are involved. I mean, *all* the parents signed wavers. It sounds like, more than anything, an attempt to reduce the "liability" of "another Columbine". It is nothing about following the will of the people/tax payers/parents, and so clearly the school district is not doing its job.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    13. Re:Rated M for Mature by CoreyGH · · Score: 1

      Most tax payers don't have the profession of teacher, yes. I've no idea what that has to do with the conversation. :)
      This is why you are missing the point. They aren't teachers so they do not understand how to do a teacher's job. That's why school policy isn't decided by the parents, it's decided by the school. You're making this out to be a bigger deal than it is. No one is trying to force a moral code on these kids. The issue is simple: game is not for kids - school policy is to not sanction or sponsor activities that are not designed for kids. That's it. No one is saying they can't go play the game off of school grounds.

    14. Re:Rated M for Mature by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      And next it'll be:

      "The school district has only decided not to sanction sexual education on school grounds on the grounds that it involves an activity that is not intended for kids under 16. There is nothing wrong with that."

      I swear, you have been conditioned to respect rules which have replaced common sense, all in the name of avoiding law-suits.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    15. Re:Rated M for Mature by CoreyGH · · Score: 1

      Right, because Halo 2 is obviously a necessary biological function and without it our race will cease to exist. Also, engaging in Halo 2 without the proper education and precaution could result in unwanted pregnancies, serious health problems and even life threatening diseases.

    16. Re:Rated M for Mature by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I am missing the point. What does being a teacher have to do with something not involving a teacher? We're not talking about having a teacher sit in front of a class and demonstrate how to best frag in Halo 2. We're talking about using school/public property to play a game, as authorized by the school children's parents. School policy to "not sanction or sponsor activities that are not designed for kids" rather ignores the point that somewhere along the line the "designed for kids" is a moral question, since the only thing that makes it *not* designed for kids is the ESRB rating, which clearly is a moral rating. But clearly the parents are okay with it, so they've designed that it is designed for their child. And *they* are the parents, not the administrator.

      The teachers have nothing to do with this. Teachers don't set school policy. More than that, they aren't charged with controlling access to school property, except in cases where they specifically are by the administration.

      As for the "no one is saying they can't go play the game off of school grounds", the point is there's no *valid* basis for the game to be unplayable on school grounds, except either to (a) follow a policy of moral code known as "designed for kids" or (b) to limit liability of being sued if any kid happens to shoot up the school, and somehow the tournament somehow is associated with the blame by a lawyer. Seeing as that the tournament is the the students of the school, it can be closed to only those with permission from parents, and it doesn't involve outside people, I'm very hard pressed to understand how it would fall into some other nebulous case by which the school has any valid basis of claiming that somehow it's a misuse of school equipment. Administration policy is obviously too anal retentive and a waste of school equipment.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
  18. Wrong point of view by Sierpinski · · Score: 1

    Instead of the school admin worrying that this might lead to school shootings, maybe they should examine the other side of the spectrum. Perhaps, just perhaps, letting these teens take out some frustrations on some virtual characters in some game will help alleviate some stress.

    I know I always feel better when I riddle some poor nameless sod with a few hundred rounds from my MG3 in Ghost Recon...

  19. Re:Duh. by maunleon · · Score: 1

    $500 will help a lot more than sitting around whining on slashdot about something you don't agree with. What are you doing to help?

    Go help. Go volunteer, go write a check, go do something with your life. Putting down people who are trying to help, helps nobody.

    It may be "man against god" but unlike many other genocides going on in the world, this one is not due to politics or religion. There is no bad guy and no good guy.

  20. That's bull by Landshark17 · · Score: 1

    At my school, we have a club that meets every wednesday to play Unreal Tournament on school computers. The administration allows it, and we aren't even as noble as these guys who were working for tsunami releif.

    What some people do in the name of "zero tolerence"...

    --
    This sig is false.
  21. Enforcing policies at random by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    'anything we do that even looks like we're endorsing violence is not appropriate.'

    So I guess this school was -against- the war in Iraq ? As opposed to all the other state-institutes which liked to brainwash people into believing it was a rightous war?

  22. Don't blame the school by nobodyman · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Look, think about it from the school's perspective. Lawyers will try to find even the most obscure link between a shooting and the video games the shooter may have played. If the school *did* allow this tournament to happen, you just know that if there was a shooting five years down the line that the school district would be the first in line to be sued.

    Don't blame the school, blame the sue-happy culture and the negative stigma of videogames for forcing their hand.

  23. Sponge Shooter by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny
    "yeah, a shooter with sponge bullets i hope they come up"

    Even if they don't raise any money, this is sure to reduce the teen pregnancy rate at the school.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  24. This is horrible... by TJ_Phazerhacki · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Back in the day (wow - that sounds corny), we managed to bring in an external drive with UT:GOTYE and "forgot" to leave it plugged into the network. Great times, UT'ing during open lab at lunch. The best part was when a few of the male teachers found out, and "Annonomously" joind games during their breaks.

    It had little effect on productivity, grades didn't change, and we were using otherwise unnocupied resources. And I don't need to tell you the effect it had on morale...

    Few months later, in the next semester, we had some county people in the school. One of them was checking email in the lab. Someone else walked in and booted up UT.

    Not only did we recieve a ridiculous lecture (understand, we are 15 mins from Columbine, maybe 18mos later) but there were suspensions, the lab tech was reprimanded (later left the system - now makes twice the $$ dev'ing software!) And we made the district newsletter.

    Schools over-react to everything, because by default, the only people in district management are the ones who think there is something intrensically wrong with the way the system is run - they do not understand logic - They comprehend only liability.

    --
    Physics is nothing like religion. If it was, we'd have an easier time trying to raise money!
  25. In related news by RedWolves2 · · Score: 1

    Students at a school go on a shooting spree when officials told them that they couldn't play Halo 2 for a good cause.

    Idiots

  26. We had the same sort of thing by Johnny+Doughnuts · · Score: 1

    but not for tsunami relief. My English 10 class ended up bringing in two X-Boxes, 8 controllers and 2 copies of Halo 2. I brought in a crossover cable and we used school projectors. Teacher sanctioned it and maybe five teachers knew about the whole thing. We had a blast, and nobody was the wiser that would have caused us to shut down.

  27. Understandable by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I completely understand and agree with teh schools stance. Should anything have happened after the event, months or even years, you could bet that some parents group somewhere would have held the school liable for it.

    I also think that the students should be commended for wanting to do something to aid the victims of this disaster. It proves that their generation isn't as disenfranchised as we are lead to believe.

    Good job gamers!

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  28. Smart move by the school district by clickster · · Score: 1

    I agree that it's stupid that they have to turn this kind of thing down. But I would do the same thing given today's society. If someone playing the games shot someone later, you know the district could get sued because they "promoted violence" and probably win. Not because it's true, but because we live in a "blame others first" society. It wouldn't be worth it to me to take the risk. Stupid society.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become less powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  29. What this really teaches us... by Black+Art · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is only one small part of a much bigger problem.

    American students are not taught how to distinguish fantasy from reality.

    This has been going on for at least one generation, maybe more, depending on what criteria you use.

    This is why Americans are not allowed to see real phone numbers in fictional movies. If they do, people call the numbers trying to reach the fictional characters. (A film that had a story about God helping people had a real number in it and the people who happened to have that number were swamped by people trying to contact God.)

    Some people say our last election was an example of people who cannot tell fantasy from reality.

    Some of the people who want to protect us from real violence seem to believe that fantasy violence either causes it or encourages real violence when the statistics show no such correleation. Just because they cannot tell the difference does not mean that others do not.

    I can give other examples...

    I doubt that this problem will be solved soon. Too many parts of American culture derive their power from the confusion of fantasy and reality for their to be any real incentive to change.

    --
    "Trademarks are the heraldry of the new feudalism."
    1. Re:What this really teaches us... by JeffTL · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually the phone number bit is more an issue of pranksterism than failure of fantasy distinguishment.

      KLonkdike 5 numbers, the predecessors to our "555-01xx" (usually implemented liberally as "555-xxxx" ), were in the movies over fifty years ago for this reason.

    2. Re:What this really teaches us... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "Too many parts of American culture derive their power from the confusion of fantasy and reality for their to be any real incentive to change."

      And I'm sure reality TV doesn't fuel that fire in the least bit.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    3. Re:What this really teaches us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't an American problem. It is a problem worldwide.

      Some people are just too stupid to live. (Search your hearts. You know this to be true.)

  30. Have I missed something? by bluGill · · Score: 1

    Why have I not heard of all these school shootings? I cannot recall hearing of even one last year!

  31. dammit by MuNansen · · Score: 1

    and here WA was on a good role maintaining it's stature as one of the more intelligent states. Oh well, Puyallup's not really known for its worldliness.

    1. Re:dammit by EvilLile · · Score: 1

      Actually, your massive election recounts had already begun to chip away at it. We Californians will drag you down yet.

      Actually, I lived in Puyallup for a while, so it's pretty crazy hearing that the high school I almost went to was where this was going to happen.

    2. Re:dammit by MuNansen · · Score: 1

      the only chance the GOP has left for this election is felons that voted. And I doubt so many more of them voted for the Dems than GOP that it would turn around the election. And the GOP's just looking like idiots. The dems said "there was a problem in King County balloting, we want to fix that and get a recount." They got what they wanted. GOP, though, started saying "the election is fine, you lost, deal with it" to saying "the entire election was a fraud, we need to do it all over." Can't make a full 180-turn and expect to get the support of the public. Anyways back to Puyallup, at least they'll always have the state fair.

  32. Safer means Cowardly by jimbro2k · · Score: 1

    Not safer, more cowardly. Too chicken-hearted to stand up to the ignorant(school administrators) and the greedy (lawyers). Schools are now teaching kids to be cowards. How long can a nation survive the consequences of that?

    --
    There is not nearly enough love in the world, but there is far too much trust.
  33. No Big Loss! by superultra · · Score: 1

    They should just have an Animal Crossing tourney instead! That would rock!

    "TAKE THAT ASSHOLE, I just got the Purple Flower Stationary! BUUYAH!"

  34. This same school district also cancelled Halloween by foooo · · Score: 1

    This is the same school district that cancelled halloween this year. And they did it to avoid offending Wiccans. An independant survey of Wiccans in the area didn't reveal any who would have been offended.

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,136946,00.ht ml

    This is an issue on which Republicans and Democrats should be able to agree. What we have here is a group of school administrators so extremely left wing and paranoid that they'll cancel just about anything.

  35. And now for extinction news. by pauldy · · Score: 2, Funny

    The newest entry into the endangered lists, common sense. While everyone has been out ranting and raving about saving this animal, that plant, protecting minorities, and not hurting people's feelings we forgot to save one thing.

  36. Better Story by freek_daddy · · Score: 1

    Here's a better story on the issue you cite.

    I'm not sure where you got the information about an independent survey ... it's contradicted in the article. And the other reasons for the cancellation are also covered in this story.

    1. Re:Better Story by foooo · · Score: 1

      That was the quote from my article...

      A real-life witch who lives in nearby Tacoma agreed that the superintendent in Puyallup must be off his broomstick.

      "I see Halloween more as a holiday, a fun time for them. Some of us Wiccan have a deeper meaning under it, but I don't think we should take away from the kids," Wiccan Marjenna Gittings said.

      And the independent survey...
      1) I know a bunch of Wiccans
      2) Call in radio shows were unable to locate offended Wiccans, but managed to find plenty of Wiccans that *weren't* offended
      3) The reporter from the story you quoted was unable to locate any offended Wiccans

      The other reasons for cancellation are just as weak.

      My point is not that there weren't other reasons for cancelling haloween, but that Puyallup School District is way too politically correct for it's own good.

  37. Ah, America. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

    Kids, we can't do anything that looks like we endorse violence. So no video games.

    Now, get your football helmets on, get out there, and you POUND that other team into the GROUND! GO TEAM GO!

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  38. Re:Duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "$380 we were thinking was going to go straight into the Red Cross Tsunami fund," Alston said.

    Charitable organizations such as the Red Cross often end up with funds that they are unable to make use of because those funds are directed towards a specific relief effort. If funds are donated specifically for the Tsunami disaster relief, then those funds may not be redirected to other efforts in the event that they have received a surplus of donations for that specific crisis. The result is that millions of dollars sit in accounts not being used.

    I suggest that the donation be made, but not directed towards a specific relief effort, so that it can be used elsewhere if the Tsunami disaster has been dealt with.

  39. The school's right. by phouka · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm guessing that a high percentage of the folks here condemning the school don't own homes.

    Why? Because homeowners go through this sort of painful deliberation regularly.

    I live in a cul-de-sac and my yard happens to be the recipient of all the snow for the entire street. For a kid, it presents awesome potential for king-of-the-hill, snowball fights, digging tunnels, etc. It's truly a massive amount of snow.

    But can I really let the neighborhood kids play in it? No way. The second one of them got hurt, it's MY homeowner's policy on the line. It's MY insurance that's going to not get renewed, forcing me to double my cost for homeowner's insurance when I have to resort to the state 'pool'. In other words, if I want to be a nice guy I have to accept an unreasonable risk.

    The school is in the same position. You can bet that administrator and the school officials really thought what the kids were doing was cool. You can also bet that they sat back and said: "When we get sued, it's going to require resources in time and money that we *really* can't afford, given ever-tightening school budges."

    So they came to the only reasonable conclusion.

    To all these folks screaming about the state of our country, I pose this question: Are you really, honestly ready to stand up and say "I won't sue my neighbor, even if he's technically culpable"? Because until you are, people are going to be more concerned about protecting themselves than in freeing up their resources to share.

    1. Re:The school's right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in New Zealand (when I was young), I once put a three inch nail (attached to a board) through my foot at a neighbour's house. I had been playing with their son on a firewood pile.

      Did my family sue them? No. My neighbour just washed my foot, removed the board and nail, and I learnt to watch where I stuck my feet. There was absolutely no blame attached - it was an accident.

      Of course, the difference between the litigious culture of America, and New Zealand is that we have a safety net for accidents in the form of social welfare and accident compensation...

  40. Re:This same school district also cancelled Hallow by crashfrog · · Score: 1

    What we have here is a group of school administrators so extremely left wing and paranoid that they'll cancel just about anything.

    "left wing" =/= "dipshit", dipshit.

    --
    I never have frustrations, the reason is, to wit:
    If at first I don't succeed, I quit!
  41. Fuck You, Troll by M1rth · · Score: 0, Troll

    The Boy Scouts have done more good for the world, through millions of boys given a better life and taught to be good citizens both of their nations and world, than the American Criminal Liberties Union ever has.

    The fact that someone attacked them for sticking by a moral position is just disgusting.

    In Conclusion,
    Fuck You.

    --
    If you can read this sig, congratulations, you have your glasses on!
    1. Re:Fuck You, Troll by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      So what if it was some other group? Blacks, or gays?

      Would the fact that the Boyscouts "did good" excuse that too?

      How much good does one have to do to negate this kind of behavior?

      On the other hand, I haven't followed this suit very closley. The BSA is a private organization, no? If they're entirly privatly funded, I don't see any reason to force them to accept anyone. Even if I disagree with it.

      On the other, other hand. What do you mean, boys being taught to be good citizens? Exclusion of someone on completly arbitrary matters seems quite contrary to that end to me.

    2. Re:Fuck You, Troll by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      The BSA is a private organization, no? If they're entirly privatly funded, I don't see any reason to force them to accept anyone.

      No, the BSA is quasi-governmental, and indeed, that is the reason WHY they're officially anti-homosexual. They are a feeder organization for the USA Military (the antithesis of private), and thus inherit it's policy against homosexual membership.

      (The BSA also forbids atheist membership, although that fact is much less reported- so much that individual sub-groups probably ignore it on occasion)

  42. Rifle Team, Anyone? by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1

    I wonder what you'd have to do to start an offical rifle team (or pistol team, or trap team, or any other Olympic shooting sport team) at that school?

    Have high school shooting teams become completely extinct?

    1. Re:Rifle Team, Anyone? by Starsmore · · Score: 1
      Of course!

      Do you think the administrators want to give _training_ to those weird kids that dress in black, read _books_ (BOOKS, for gods sakes!), and don't religiously follow the school's football team?

      Good god, that's insanity! Now, like some other poster said, get your football helmet on and go KILL that other team, for school pride! YEAH!

      --
      "If Common Sense was so common, it wouldn't be such a valued trait."
  43. quit yer bitchin by perrin5 · · Score: 1

    this was a school event that was being funded by the district.

    They are well within their rights to say "no" to anything they feel is inappropriate. Just because the parents signed the waivers wouldn't really solve anything.

    And apparently, as far as I can see, they didn't clear WHICH game they would be playing with the board. Just switch the fucking game. Jesus.

    --
    hmmmm?
  44. Have been missing someghing? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    " Puyallup School District felt that due to school shootings across the country".

    I did a check and found 29 shootings in 10 years. Okay maybe they have a point... But maybe if teens could not get a hold of guns... Naw guns do not kill people video games do? Okay this is just too strange. I give up schools can prevent a wacked out teen from getting a gun from his "parents, uncle, or friend" and shooting up the school by banning violent video games.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  45. Re:This same school district also cancelled Hallow by NaCl · · Score: 1

    What we have here is a group of school administrators so extremely left wing

    I don't know how you can associate the political position on just few facts, but if you want to do so, you should use right wing, instead of left wing.

    --
    I shot the sheriff
  46. Absolutely Absurd by Ieshan · · Score: 1

    I'm not one that would ever say violence in videogames causes school shootings or any of that, but I think the link you're trying to make is tenuous at best, and probably just downright wrong.

    While it can be argued that there are redeeming factors in Halo 2 (strategy, hand-eye coordination, etc), most of them pale in comparison to the literary value of a Shakespeare play. I think you would find it difficult to argue that the lessons of characterization, tragedy, meter, poetry, and theatre are somehow equivalent to those taught by Halo 2. Sure, there's violence in both, but there are highly redeeming qualities in Shakespeare outside of the violence.

    It's a little bit like the arguement that "Lolita" is equivalent to videos of Child Pornography.

  47. Litigation? No. Embarassment? Yes, by MMaestro · · Score: 1
    The school is protecting themselves from possible litigation and some possible embarassment.

    We're not talking about a huge city like New York City, San Francisco or Los Angeles where you can't say the word 'God' without offending 5 different religions. This is Puyallup, Washington. Not a large, metropolis where no one knows your name and no one cares enough to bother knowing your name. Just look at the article :

    But the boys remind us that the district canceled Halloween celebrations because they were insensitive to the Wiccan religion.

    No Halloween? What next? No Thanksgiving because it offends Native Americans? No Christmas cause Jews don't believe in Jesus? No New Year's vacation because the Chinese follow their own Lunar Calendar? Wiccan religion?! Comon! There are probably more Buddists in the city of LA than there are Wiccans in Washington state! Block the event on grounds of violence? Fine, but when you cancel a holiday just 3 months eariler, you're asking for trouble.

    1. Re:Litigation? No. Embarassment? Yes, by Fjornir · · Score: 1
      Wiccan religion?! Comon! There are probably more Buddists in the city of LA than there are Wiccans in Washington state!

      For what it's worth, in the Seattle suburbs students practicing 'alternative religions' make up a larger piece of the student body than you might expect. Perhaps 2-5% of the student body at my highschool was "out of the broom closet" and openly Pagan, most of those Wiccan.

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
  48. Same with my school! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wanted to bring Halo 2 to my video game club at my Canadian high school but several parents called in and told the principle so now we can't play violent games. Really sucks.

  49. School never was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry but i'm from around this area and I can think of no place i've visited that whined and worried as much as Washington. The school board acted appropriately because the parents are whiners, and the school board worries.

    It's depressing that our quality of life is so high that we waste our time crying about the non-proven possible link from vgames to violence instead of the health and wellbeing of others that are dying from tsunami related injuries.

    come on people... think bigger than yourselves... you're just not that important.

    These kids were just trying to help and you stomped their will along with their attempt to send some money. I wonder how many of these kids will try again to raise money... I suspect very few will :(

  50. The school's wrong. They should fight this. by davide+marney · · Score: 1

    Here's the thing: where's the difference between genuine risk and merely being exposed to the idea of risk? Playing Halo is not, in fact, risky. It does not, in fact, put anyone in danger. It will not raise insurance premiums.

    "Some battles are worth the fighting" (with apologies to LOTR). The school system should fight this one, because they would win it, hands down. And what would they gain by the winning? They'd win a stick they can wave at the next person who wants to threaten them with a lawsuit.

    --
    "We receive as friendly that which agrees with, we resist with dislike that which opposes us" - Faraday
  51. Re:This same school district also cancelled Hallow by foooo · · Score: 1

    I am accusing them of being left wing because I think their actions are caused by political correctness.

    If I thought they were clamping down on halloween because of the religious right I would be the first to say so.

    Being a citizen of Washington State (I live about 30 minutes away from Puyallup... prounounced pew- ahl-up by the way) I can say with very little doubt that the majority people involved in this decision were left leaning.