Slashdot Mirror


Dot Con: How Infospace Took Investors For A Ride

Jeff writes "On the subject of the dot com crash, the Seattle Times recently ran an outstanding three day series on the corruption at Infospace, with a follow up today on the company's continued relations with its founder, Naveen Jain. Sunday's cover photo of Jain's new office shows a birthday photo of himself and another self-portrait in the background. Only the reflecting pool is missing."

95 of 161 comments (clear)

  1. This story makes no sense. by karmaflux · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't figure out why either company matters, what the hell this has to do with GNU, Linux, GNU/Linux, the F/OSS community, iPods, Eugenia from OS News, or Microsoft. It's not a MySQL story. Nobody's hammering the Mozilla Foundation. Firefox isn't even mentioned. And there's no question at the end like "what does this mean for Google's world domination plans?"

    I'm sorry, man, I just don't know what to make of this article.

    --

    REM Old programmers don't die. They just GOSUB without RETURN.

    1. Re:This story makes no sense. by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 4, Funny

      The man has a suction cup bow and arrow. A suction cup bow and arrow. That beats an Apple-Firefox-Google threesome any day.

    2. Re:This story makes no sense. by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've seen something like this before. Wow, birth of a new Troll topic/response.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    3. Re:This story makes no sense. by WesG · · Score: 1

      Is it me or does this guy look like an Indian version of Bababooey from Howard Stern???

      yay

    4. Re:This story makes no sense. by Sivar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Infospace was a Microsoft darling because they had a very large number of production servers using Windows 2000 when it was first released, e.g. they were an "early adopter," and a big one at that (Fortune 500).
      I worked for a company that was acquired by them in 2000. They had neat offices and such, but it was hard to take them seriously despite their size. A...guy I know was able to get in to any of their production servers and remote control them. Took about 15 minutes to figure out. Reportedly their main network administrator was a pompous prick with a "you couldn't possibly find a flaw in *my* setup" attitude, but I never went to their HQ to meet him. One of our DBAs, one who really knew his stuff, quit immediately after just such a meeting.

      For those that are curious, they are/were a content provider, e.g. they sold canned news stories, articles, polls, etc. to the media, though this is probably an oversimplification as I declined to relocate when my company was acquired.

      --
      Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
    5. Re:This story makes no sense. by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Bah, back in the day I'd kick his ass with my Nerf Ball-zooka and WildFire suction dart machine gun. (The weapons of choice at my former dot-com employer)

  2. Better Invesment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm still pissed that I lost the money I invested in Infospace. Oh well, I hope to make a large return from the money I've invested in CherryOS and the Phantom console.

    1. Re:Better Invesment by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      I hear the Phantom will launch with... (suspense)... Duke Nukem Forever. Ooooh boy, i can't hardly wait!

    2. Re:Better Invesment by karnal · · Score: 1

      Look on the bright side.

      If you had money, you could start a business advising people what NOT to invest in.

      That might turn a pretty penny... knowing you, it'd fall flat on it's face though.

      --
      Karnal
    3. Re:Better Invesment by VultureMN · · Score: 1

      In that case, I'm going to watch his company closely and do the exact opposite of what he recommends.

      Then, I'm going to pay him for it, so his company is successful.

      Then, the universe will explode.

      It'll be cool.

  3. Re:Screw the greedy capitalist exploiters by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Investors are greedy people. Why all the sympathy? They got what they deserved.

    Yeah, but the way this stuff reads they're companies along the lines of Enron. Shuffling investor money around to report as revenue and then running away with a fortune before the truth hits.

    It's not that investors are greedy, they're like you and me and would like a good return on their money and are attracted to businesses which seem to be doing it better than others. Where they fail is in doing good research on the company or actually being defrauded.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  4. I interviewed there once... by mjfgates · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Their technical lead proudly described the amazing fast database system he'd written to handle full-text search, because none of the commercial DB engines could possibly be fast enough.

    He was using binary search to look through what he was estimating would be about a million records on disk.

    Perhaps it was a mistake to explain that using a hash table would find the correct record in an average of 1.5 disk hits, as opposed to the 19 that his system was taking, because they didn't offer me a job. Then, again, maybe it wasn't a mistake-- after all, I didn't end up working there.

    1. Re:I interviewed there once... by phallstrom · · Score: 4, Interesting

      that's so funny! I was just thinking about whether or not to post the *exact* same story. I too interviewed there and that same gentlement told me quote "I wrote our own database because Oracle was too slow".

      It was at that point that I began to wonder if things weren't quite right with Infospace.

    2. Re:I interviewed there once... by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
      that's so funny! I was just thinking about whether or not to post the *exact* same story. I too interviewed there and that same gentlement told me quote "I wrote our own database because Oracle was too slow".

      It was at that point that I began to wonder if things weren't quite right with Infospace.

      Did he mention anything about the new Bubble Sort they were pioneering, because it was much less code?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:I interviewed there once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually a hashtable based lookup would work for an exact key match, however full text indexing and searching in realtime is an altogether different class of problem and oracle/sybase/informix etc don't quite handle that kind of load under those kind of constraints (realtime). Granted this company doesn't need the realtime performance, but still the idea is intriguing.

    4. Re:I interviewed there once... by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Hey, I once knew a guy who, having just graduated from Harvard, made the rounds of all the interesting high-tech firms that were hiring newbie computer scientists. One company made him a really good offer, but he walked away because he thought the guy in charge was an insufferable idiot.

      Do I need to mention that the II in question was Bill Gates?

    5. Re:I interviewed there once... by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Interesting. So how would your hash algorithm work for

      LIKE 'Sun%'

      ?

  5. Reflections in the windows... by coldmist · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't care about any "reflection pools". I want that 24"+ widescreen LCD monitor you can see in the reflection!

    --
    Don't steal. The government hates competition.
    1. Re:Reflections in the windows... by ePhil_One · · Score: 1
      All other things being equal, smaller pixels are better

      I've heard size does't matter, wider is better, but this is a new one ;)

      All other things being equal, smaller pixels are better. You can always increase your font size on a display with smaller pixels, but you can only fit so much content on a display with a limited number of them.

      I'm looking forward to the day someone delivers a truely resolution independant interface, and I expect it will arrive on the Mac first. But for now, even many web pages choose to force font size on me. So no, I can't always increase font size.

      Run the math, the 24" widescreen (16:10) is 12.7" vertically, the 20" is 12.0" (ballpark); they both push 1200 pixels vertically. So they pixel size is just about identical; but the widescreen has about 35% more screen area/20% more pixels. Perhaps the measure you really want is pixels per square inch.

      14.1"(1400x1050): 15.4kppsi

      15"(1400x1050): 13.6kppsi

      2001FP: 10.0kppsi

      2405FP: 8.9kppsi

      17"(1280x1024): 9.5kppsi

      19"(1280x1024): 7.5kppsi

      So the pixel density is right in line with conventional other desktop panels, a little better than your 213t. I'm not sure about its pixels aren't even close to square, are you refering to trying to force 4x3 images onto a 16x10 screen? Games are the only thing I can see forcing this, and the Dell at least has a mode to handle that, just like widescreen TV's.

      A good review of th dell panel is here

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
  6. Go right ahead. by PornMaster · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's OK. Post the exact same story. We're used to dupes.

    1. Re:Go right ahead. by JNighthawk · · Score: 2, Funny

      The irony here blows my mind. Bravo.

      --
      Wheel in the sky keeps on turnin'.
    2. Re:Go right ahead. by shrhoads · · Score: 1

      OK, They sang the praises of their home grown database while they tried to sell us $11MM worth of web links. Each of their page hits would serve up like 10 links or something silly like that. I remember trying to convince our CTO/etc. that this was the stupidest thing. We ended up not taking the deal, and a VoIP company took the deal. Suckers!

      Those were the days.

      openwap.org wireless wap/j2me/midlet news

  7. tech, who? by lonb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This image displays three desks in this man's office. Yet I don't see any electronic device more complex than a telephone. Um.... He ran a tech firm?

    --
    "Ain't I a stinka..." - Bugs
    1. Re:tech, who? by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point. Didn't you see the suction cup bow and arrow? The man has a suction cup bow and arrow!

    2. Re:tech, who? by puppetman · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, if you look at the window to the right (exactly where the arrow is pointing), you can see the reflection of an LCD monitor in the window.

      If he was sitting in the chair at the bottom left of the picture, he'd be at the keyboard you can also see reflected in the window.

  8. Re:Screw the greedy capitalist exploiters by y0saph · · Score: 1

    exactly they're like you and me. They're greedy What would we not do to make money? I could even think of starting a major software company, sell lousy programs I didn't write on my own if I made money on it. Wonder how come no one came up with that idea before...

    --
    I can now stop time, but the effect is only temporary
  9. It does make sense by camcloud1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If you consider that he just wanted to be like Bill Gates and he achieved that by being a cunning and ruthless manipulator. Only difference is he is going to go to jail.

    1. Re:It does make sense by XorNand · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between being a "cunning and ruthless manipulator" and illegaly trading stock on insider information. The later means you're a criminal, the former: just an asshole.

      --
      Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
  10. Re:Screw the greedy capitalist exploiters by Lobo93 · · Score: 1

    Why all the sympathy?

    It's their world; and if they need sympathy, they'll get it - after all, they've invested much time and resources in creating and sustaining our objective, "consensual" reality.

    Have some sympathy, and some taste
    Use all your well-learned politesse
    Or I'll lay your soul to waste

    --
    "The only clear view is from atop the mountain of our dead selves." - Peter Carroll
  11. What about employees? by nvrrobx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm a (bitter) former InfoSpace employee.

    I was a member of the famed wireless division, who was all laid off because we didn't make the company any money. This was after Jain et al took the company for a ride and nearly got us delisted. I disliked senior management, but my peers at the company were some of the best people I've ever known or worked with, and I still miss that environment.

    Whenever Naveen or Anu (his wife) would get infront of the company and speak, I instantly felt slimy. I got the worst vibes from the man. He honestly thinks he's a fantastic person and was the best thing to ever happen for the company and anyone involved. I hope they have fun explaining to their children how they robbed their trust funds in their insider trading scandal.

    Shortly after my last day in December 2003, the entire executive board was replaced. Now InfoSpace is posting good numbers and wireless makes money.

    Coincidence? I think not.

    1. Re:What about employees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Shortly after my last day in December 2003, the entire executive board was replaced. Now InfoSpace is posting good numbers and wireless makes money.

      Coincidence? I think not.


      Don't be so hard on yourself. I'm sure it had nothing to do with you leaving.

    2. Re:What about employees? by Apoklypse · · Score: 1

      personally, Infospace fell off my radar a couple years ago, I never did know it had experienced any difficulties, thanx for bringing me up to speed ...

  12. Re:Screw the greedy capitalist exploiters by Lisandro · · Score: 1

    Don't sweat it - he's just trolling. "Investor" is not a bad word. Unlike, say, "lawyer"...

  13. So what's the lesson here? by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1
    I RTFA but I'm still not clear on what the outcome of all this is. So this Jain guy gamed the system, rode the dot-com bubble and made tens of millions $, got in some trouble with regulators but settled it, and now he's sitting pretty, aside from some negative press?

    So I guess the lesson is that the stock market is a con job and capitalism sucks?

    1. Re:So what's the lesson here? by wheelbarrow · · Score: 1

      Jain slipped through the cracks of our justice system and now you are ready to toss the whole idea of capitalism aside? What's your preferred alternative?

    2. Re:So what's the lesson here? by the+arbiter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Slipped through the cracks, my ass.

      The whole system is designed to allow people to do exactly what he did, and if he'd even bothered to take the slightest care in his written communications, he'd be sitting pretty on a gigantic pile of your parents' money and no one would be the wiser.

      Only when we stop allowing CEOs to loot the companies they're employed by will this kind of crap stop. Sadly, that day is not even on the horizon.

      --
      Boycott everything - they're all trying to fuck you one way or another
    3. Re:So what's the lesson here? by snuf23 · · Score: 1
      Yes and no:


      "Until he agreed to the $65 million settlement, Jain had avoided paying any claims out of his own pocket, according to interviews and court records. InfoSpace or insurance policies had covered the tab.

      Jain is hoping he won't have to dip into his wallet for the $65 million judgment, either. He has hired new lawyers and is suing his old law firm, Perkins Coie, for legal malpractice. He says the insider-trading snafu was the firm's fault.
      "

      SO he got a judgement against him for $65 million and is STILL trying to worm out of it by claiming he is incredibly stupid and that the law firm coerced him into insider trading.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    4. Re:So what's the lesson here? by wheelbarrow · · Score: 1

      Tell me how to stop allowing CEOs to loot companies. Be specific and be sure to point out things that are not already part of current law.

    5. Re:So what's the lesson here? by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Interesting
      There's a lot of games that can be played in the accounting and finance end of things in a large company, I'm afraid. Laws are good for punishing, but preventing is another thing. Ethically-challenged con-men can fool boards just as easily as shareholders if they're sufficiently clever.

      What is happening with those executives who were the most responsible for the bubble are being punished. There are guys sitting in federal prisons. What more do you want? Investment is, by its very nature, a gamble.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:So what's the lesson here? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      If you were ordered to pay $65 million bucks, what would you do?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    7. Re:So what's the lesson here? by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      If I was ordered to pay $65 million and I got myself into the trouble the way he did of course I would do the same. I seriously doubt that would happen as I don't think I could ever ooze the same kind of slimy business tactics this man is capable of.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    8. Re:So what's the lesson here? by kraut · · Score: 1

      Which is why he'll live & die filthy rich, and you (and I) won't. Life's a bitch.

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    9. Re:So what's the lesson here? by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is the lesson here: the stock market is a con job and capitalism sucks.

      The ensuing introspection that progressives like me are trying to promote is that we should stop thinking that paper and electrons have primacy over the gathering of materials, performing skilled labor upon them, and producing real products.

      Since I'm NOT talking about gaming the financial system to make millions, no doubt that all you're hearing from me above is blah-blah-blah. Money is your religion ... hence, enjoy your collapsed stock portfolio, and all the collapsed portfolios you're quite stupidly going to have in the future in your continued belief that paper and electrons are worth more than real work.

      Tool.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    10. Re:So what's the lesson here? by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      Hey, he stole that money fair and square. But if you dare to bring up how this demonstrates the weakness in monetary capitalism, you get labeled everything from Communist to Terrorist, and then you enter the huge American Marginal Zone of ideas.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    11. Re:So what's the lesson here? by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      So many falsehoods, so little time to apply the 2x4 of logical correction upside your stupid fucking head.

      He didn't "slip through the cracks". He walked with purpose through a gilt-edged door after swiping his American Aristocrat {tm} ID card to gain entry.

      And, yes, we must toss the "whole idea of capitalism aside" if we're NOT going to moderate the excessives of the system with a necessary dose of social controls (i.e. Socialism). A Republic like we had was Republic = Capitalism + Socialism. We are now choosing to devolve the equation into Republic - Socialism = Fascism.

      As for alternatives: We were LIVING in the preferred alternative, you unbelievable jackass. America's moderated capitalism was a pretty good system of general prosperity. The middle class was big and particularly independent. However, tools like you have bought into the basic idea of "I'm gonna get mine, so fuck everyone else". People like Jain walked off with your grandmother's retirement money, and you honestly can't even bring yourself to attack the injustice in the system that allowed him to do it ... because the root cause of that injustice is people exactly like YOU.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    12. Re:So what's the lesson here? by wheelbarrow · · Score: 1

      Your arguments are strong if measured by volume and emotion. Your arguments are weak as measured by logical argument.

      Please describe what you mean by 'moderated capitalism' that America had and how America lost it. If you were given absolute authority, how would you remake America's systems of laws to prevent con men like Jain from being successful? Please be specific. The strength of your arguments will be found in well considered detail rather than emotional attack.

    13. Re:So what's the lesson here? by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      More cognitive resistance on your part. I actually have to explain moderated capitalism, assface? How about this:

      UNMODERATED CAPITALISM: Go into forest, hack down all the fucking trees you can, haul them out, sell them. Tell your migrant workers to take a fucking hike and don't pay them.

      MODERATED CAPITALISM: Check with bevy of Federal, State, and local laws before you step into that forest. Abide by ALL of their provisions as regards labor relations, surface access, tree cutting, equipment maintenance, transportation methods, and finally sale of the proceeds.

      Is THAT clear enough, cockpirate?

      With the concept of "deregulation" applied from the Fascist Reagan years, and with said plan being further applied from the Neo-Liberals from the Clinton years, and now the Neo-Conservatives under another Fascist asshole named Bush, all manner of sensible regulation is being abandoned. It's not just being repealed ... it's being IGNORED, like many of the provisions in the US Constitution. So, people like Jain, who should have been caught out in a matter of a few months, are now routinely ignored by the utterly pwn3d SEC. The SEC, for that matter, has been hamstrung from the early 1990s specifically to enact the rape of America's financial system to effect the transfer of trillions from the People into the pockets of the Elite (and people like Jain have merely ridden that along).

      Pardon my "emotional attack", but this is so blindlingly obvious that fucknuts like yourself send my jumping in chair to hurl invective, to wit:

      WHY DO FUCKHEADS LIKE YOU PRETEND THAT THE PEOPLE ARE NOT TO BE INVOLVED IN REGULATING THE PROCESS OF ECONOMICS?

      Hey, I already KNOW that answer: Because shitballs like yourself want the government the hell out of anything you do (just like Jain), and you are so starry-eyed with imagined (and perversely attained) wealth that you're ready to cancel all social contracts in favor of "I've got mine, and fuck the rest of you!".

      Tool. Now go and mount your mother. That's about all you're good for.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    14. Re:So what's the lesson here? by wheelbarrow · · Score: 1

      Your hysterical straw man world of unmoderated capitalism does not exist today. Ken Lay's criminal trial starts this year. There is more transparency in corporate accounting now, by law, as a reaction to Enron and WorldCom.

      Does that work for you? What would do differently today if we handed the keys of power over to you? You've proved your ability to find fault in today's world. Now, describe the utopia you would create if we wipe the slate clean and let you dictate the new order.

  14. Re:DUPE! by kahei · · Score: 1


    Yeah, we'd like to see the editors do that, too!

    Yuk yuk! Ah, the obvious ones are the funniest ones.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  15. Re:Screw the greedy capitalist exploiters by PurpleFloyd · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Investors aren't like you and me. They are you and me. Most of the people reading Slashdot right now probably have a nest egg stashed away in a 401(k), and many probably have investments in stocks and mutual funds.

    The real reason there isn't the incredible outcry over conmen like Bernie Ebbers, Ken Lay, and the man linked is because people don't realize that they, too, are part of the "investor class." Many people think that Enron's failure resulted in nothing more than a few robber barons transplanted from the 19th century having to switch their Cuban cigars to Dominican; they don't realize that they are being hit in the pocketbook, and that people who invested large amounts their life's savings were taken for a ride.

    As for investors not doing enough research, that's simply not true. If you will remember, it was a fairly large scandal a few months ago that stock analysts - people who are hired by brokerages to deliver an unbiased analysis - were rating stocks highly, but privately commenting that those stocks weren't worth the paper their certificates were printed on. The end result was that investors who did everything "right" and read all the research available were actually more likely to get ripped off than someone who simply picked stocks because they had a cool-sounding name.

    --

    That's it. I'm no longer part of Team Sanity.
  16. My Experience with Naveen and Infospace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I apologize for posting this AC, for obvious reasons.

    I first met Naveen Jain while he was still with Microsoft. It was 1995, and Naveen was telling a bunch of Time Inc. New Media honchos (the folks that brought the world Pathfinder - remember that? First commercial website?) that the Internet was _dead_.

    It seems that Microsoft was intent on replacing all Internet technologies with its own "embraced and extended" versions. A binary version of HTML that allowed for 8 different types of hyperlinks. IRC, but with additional functions. That kind of thing. Pathfinder would be extinguished as the commercial Internet baby was stabbed in the cradle by the upcoming "Winternet". No kidding, he used that term.

    The Time Inc. honchos ponied up a huge sum to get Pathfinder's url on the upcoming MSN. In classic Microsoft style, they took the money, and then hid the icon several levels of navigation down. No one ever saw it, but then again, MSN 1.0 had very few users anyway.

    Naveen started Infospace, and I was sent on a fact-finding group mission to see if Pathfinder wanted to use their technology. Their office looked like a dump - they didn't have a data center, they had a huge mass of PCs piled almost randomly, hooked to the Internet. That was Infospace in '96/'97. They were so arrogant that they thought that'd impress the folks from Time Inc, who served Pathfinder on Sun (and only Sun), and had a datacenter that was a model of datacenters. I remember Time Inc. sysadmins' argument about whether the faraday cage was constructed correctly... but I digress.

    At any rate, the best part of the tour was Jean-Remy showing off all of their home-grown technology. He claimed that _everything_ was home grown - database servers, DNS, web, even the operating system (!). In fact, he confided to me that he had "borrowed the best pieces of NT", including the kernel, in creating their home-grown operating system. And as others have said, he bragged endlessly about how his database was faster than Oracle.

    As before, Time Inc. drank the Kool-Aid and signed up with Infospace - despite these kinds of issues - because they thought that they had to do so, for some stupid .com imperative that I can't recall.

    Naveen Jain is an amazing huckster, I'll give him that. Pity that he escaped the SEC's special brand of torture.

  17. Sounds like it's Infospace's turn by [cx] · · Score: 2, Interesting

    to go for a ride.

    Naveen Jain seems to be at the reins, making a company that directly competed with his previous company incite a war, make Infospace come to an agreement. And now they are partners, with Naveen Jain still getting paid in essence by Infospace, regardless of his current companys success or lack thereof.

    If Infospace had any brains they would get rid of all affiliation with its former founder where he obviously knows how to play his cards. Which has never been good news for Infospace in the past, and likely not in the future.

    [cx]

  18. Give the devil his due by jd · · Score: 4, Informative
    Oracle IS slow. Of course, if they were going to buy a database, then they could still have gone with Informix or DB/2. Those aren't amazing, but they are better. For smaller datasets, then mSql and MySQL would have been logical choices.


    Of course, if the data was flat, rather than relational, the choices would have been Berkeley DB, Gnu DBM and NDBM, which all store data by hashes.


    Binary trees are great for high-school projects. Now, trees are used in serious projects. Game AIs tend to use B+ and B* trees, for example. I'm pretty sure ReiserFS uses trees. One way to write a compiler parser is via an n-ary tree, because the memory and CPU requirements scale much nicer than hash tables. However, none of these are binary trees, they exploit some very specific characteristics of the data, and they aren't intended as a substitute for Oracle.


    People do write their own database engines, but usually only for very specialized needs. I am sure there are plenty of applications out there which are simply not suitable for any existing engine, for reasons of speed, complexity, or whatever.


    From what I understand, Infospace did not have such a need. From what others have said, I doubt anyone working there would have recognized such a need, if one HAD existed.


    It is utter insanity to build a system that is inefficient and unsuitable as a replacement for something that is utterly different in nature. The guy probably swapped his Rottweiler guard dog for a guinea pig, too. Hey, they both make noises and the guinea pig IS cheaper!


    I'll tell you why the Dot Com era went broke. It had nothing to do with technology or expectations. It had to do with rich idiots giving money to wannabe rich idiots so that they could all be fleeced and the consumers with them.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Give the devil his due by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Basically quite true, but frankly, the dot-com era died mostly because of the belief put in the flawed idea that it made good business sense to grow market share at all costs (worrying about the quality of the product or service offered secondarily, if at all).

      There were plenty of "rich idiots" around - but I don't think it's fair to act "holier than thou" about it, claiming to have known all along it was all just a bunch of idiots giving money to other idiots. If this were true, you'd have to ask why eBay is still useful and successful today, or Amazon.com for that matter.

      Some of these dot-coms had viable concepts that "made it" - but they were the minority. Probably, a number of them were even really good business ideas that *should* have made it, but got drug down with the rest of the startups as stockholders decided they were pretty much all a ripoff. In other cases, they just didn't know how to make the good idea succeed in the long term. Better management might have saved them.

      (For example, I still think those "we deliver groceries to your door" ideas like peapod, webvan, etc. were viable. People just didn't quite figure out a profitable way to pull them off. I could see a large food service corp. launching one of these on a nationwide scale (say Pepsi Co. or Frito-Lay or somebody?), and maybe even subcontracting deliveries out to local courier services?)

    2. Re:Give the devil his due by Igottapoop · · Score: 1

      You should come to NYC. The grocery business is alive and well with freshdirect.com.

      Damn good stuff too, some of the best cuts of meat I can find without traveling all over town.

    3. Re:Give the devil his due by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Actually, Peapod is doing quite well out here in Boston, Via Stop 'n Shop. It makes more sense to get into door-to-door delivery if you already have distributions and infrastructure in place.

      Personally I'm surprised more grocery stores don't deliver in such a fashion. You would have to find a way to tie your inventory to an online interface, but overall it is a great way to get lazy people to shop with you... Especially in the winter when it's 5 degrees out and your car is buried under three feet of snow. And 16-year-olds with cars can make quite a lot of deliveries for 8 bucks an hour.

      As a side note, one of the major reasons why the dot-coms collapsed was because people forgot that just because you removed the major expenses related to traditional media doesn't mean that everything is free. I can't count the number of online magazines who thought that because there was no paper or ink or distribution costs that any income would equal a profit. That ad-supported paper mailing service was the epitome of this, as they had a fixed and very clear cost that they totally ignored because "everything online is free."

    4. Re:Give the devil his due by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      People alread know how to manage B* trees? Maybe I am not very up to date, bot a very short time ago, they didn't.

    5. Re:Give the devil his due by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      I could see a large food service corp. launching one of these on a nationwide scale

      Yes, what with gas and insurance being even cheaper nowadays. {rolls eyes}

      Home delivery services will ALWAYS be niche-related. These niches are primarily (1) urban, (2) rich, or (3) subsidized. Hence, the customer who will most prompt a home delivery event is a disabled retiree living in the city. The antitihesis of that would be the healthy suburban or rural worker ... in short, the vast majority of Americans.

      Hence, pervasive home delivery of groceries (note: a tiny-margin business) is a fantasy. Please stop thinking that such a fantasy can ever become true.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
  19. Business as usual by nodehopper · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think we are starting to realize that after the .com boom, bust and now resurgence these businesses are just like all other businesses. You will find the rebel upstarts who do rocket to fame and fortune, the solid business model, and the Enron type corruption.

    During the boom it seemed the .coms were beyond real business....almost "magical". The sector is maturing and along with this comes all the problems that have plagued business since time began because behind all the slick tech are people, common ordinary imperfect people (sorta like Soylent Green----IT"S PEOPLE!!!)

    I do think that there will be good times to come in the tech sector, but this will need to be founded on the same fundamentals that all successful businesses require.

    --
    "We will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends. " Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
  20. yawn, nerd soap opera. by torpor · · Score: 1

    next thing you know, they'll merge and form intelija, inc. or some shit like that.

    wake me up when they're shipping a product, not dedicating their lives to service.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  21. Re:Screw the greedy capitalist exploiters by mc6809e · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The real reason there isn't the incredible outcry over conmen like Bernie Ebbers, Ken Lay, and the man linked is because people don't realize that they, too, are part of the "investor class."

    Why do you say that?

    Aren't these men employees of these companies?

    It seems to me the problem is that shareholders have basically given control of their companies to people that go on to pay themselves huge amounts of money at the expense of everyone else.

    And why shouldn't they? They aren't investors in the company. They don't have an interest in the long term future of the company because they can make the company pay them big money RIGHT NOW.

  22. Woah... by Dejohn · · Score: 1

    That building you see out his window is the one I work in. I drink starbucks in their building on a regular basis...

    1. Re:Woah... by Dejohn · · Score: 1

      Heh. The real geeks shall infiltrate the corporate world.

  23. This is just one more reason why... by Alien+Being · · Score: 1, Troll

    privatized social security is equivalent to no social security. Why does George Bush think it's a good idea for the government to entrust Wall Street with the responsibility for securing the social status of all Americans?

    Is he...

    a) too young to remember the 1929 crash?
    b) too stupid to see what's going on around him?
    c) just a puppet on a string?
    d) a greedy mofo planning to cash in somehow?
    e) a samsquamch?

    1. Re:This is just one more reason why... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Let's see:

      You don't trust Bush and the current administration. You think you are (and you very well might be) smarter than them. Yet you trust them with your money more than you trust yourself.

      Nice disconnect there.

    2. Re:This is just one more reason why... by Alien+Being · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Yet you trust them with your money more than you trust yourself."

      First of all, it's not just my money. Secondly, it's not a matter of trusting GW with the present system.

      What matters is not letting him make changes whereby he can have control over the flow of trillions of dollars of investment and deficit spending.

      The red-staters who put him back into office are the same people who depend most on Social Security. There's the disconnect.

      Fortunately, there's evidence coming back from his roadshow that these people are starting to see the real GW, not the born-again-anti-gay-married-terrorist they voted for.

    3. Re:This is just one more reason why... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, there's evidence coming back from his roadshow that these people are starting to see the real GW, not the born-again-anti-gay-married-terrorist they voted for.

      Big deal. He's a lame duck now. He doesn't have to give a fuck what people think anymore, so he can tell us all to lube up and get ready to get it with both barrels now, and there's fuckall we can do about it.

    4. Re:This is just one more reason why... by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      I think you're right to a high degree. But he still needs congress to vote the stuff in, and some of those critters plan on running again.

    5. Re:This is just one more reason why... by sjlutz · · Score: 1

      Big difference: The government doesn't trust ME with my money. Even after Bush's plan is put into place, how much you wanna bet I cannot just take the small percentage and SAVE it as I like. I'll bet you I have to INVEST it.

    6. Re:This is just one more reason why... by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      f. a stoolie for corporations who would love to see a surge of social security money into the stockmarket

  24. Go right ahead. by s4f · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's OK. Post the exact same story. We're used to dupes.

  25. Re:Amusingly... by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1


    If that photograph (where Jain is holding the bow) was taken at the building in Bellevue, WA where I believe it was, then the building that's visible in the background is Valve Software's headquarters across from Bellevue Square.


    Yeap, it looks like the Citidel alright...

  26. My Experience with Infospace by mihalis · · Score: 2, Funny

    They had a channel on AvantGo, so every day I'd have updated tech news on my Palm Pilot.

    It was absolute garbage

    . It seemed like it was being written by an intern surfing CNET in the mornings, then writing the stories from memory in the afternoons, whilst watching MTV.

    I removed the channel!

    1. Re:My Experience with Infospace by cmacb · · Score: 1

      Same here. I hadn't heard anything about Infospace since those AvantGo days and I never would have thought that content any more than what could be produced by a couple folks grabbing headlines off of Yahoo. I also never would have considered actually paying for any of that content. And now the company makes millions selling RING TONES?!

      The value system the world then (and still) operates under is close to being FUBAR. I just don't get it.

  27. Re:Screw the greedy capitalist exploiters by Hard_Code · · Score: 2, Informative

    Um, i'm pretty sure he meant the pronoun they in:

    "people don't realize that they, too, are part of the "investor class.""

    refers to the people, not to Ebers, Lay, etc.

    People don't realize that they [themselves], too, are part of the "investor class."

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  28. Re:Screw the greedy capitalist exploiters by np_bernstein · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wait, you're right, they should just lend out money to companies that might loose it for nothing. Lending a company money and then asking for them to share in the profits once the money you lent them starts making them money is greedy and vile.

    Think first

    --
    RandomAndInteresting.comdefending the world from stupidity since 1979
  29. What? No SCOX ? by vlad_petric · · Score: 1
    No wonder you're losing money, if you miss such amazing opportunities.

    (Sorry, I meant SCOXE)

    --

    The Raven

  30. Could it have happened in the Valley? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Someone in the blogosphere claimed that in the close-knit gossipy Silicon Valley community, a dishonest CEO would get bounced out and become unemployable before doing much damage. The claim is that there's zero tolerance for anything more unethical than insider trading.

    Anyone from the Valley care to comment? Seems to me that I remember someone who cheated his garage partner and is a CEO today. If someone is making money for investors, or creating the illusion of making money for investors, can s/he really get blackballed?

    If there's really something about the Northwest that makes scandals more likely, then what exactly is the difference?

    1. Re:Could it have happened in the Valley? by DSP_Geek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh, honey, we can't even get rid of the dumb ones. How long did the HP board take to ditch Carly? Three years after the Compaq merger, and well after she screwed up everything else at HP too? Another example: I worked for a guy at [ConsumerProductCompany] who insisted we stick to the the original memory spec even though Moore's law told us we could count on twice the memory by release. Recoding to fit the tight space delayed ship long enough the original RAM was obsoleted, forcing us to redesign the memory controller, and all of which pushed the release late enough that Sony stomped us like a steamroller crushing baby chicks. That guy's now a CTO at another outfit. Hell, Apple alone endured a number of inept CEOs, including a guy who'd crawl under his desk when the going got rough.

      And remember, the VCs funded all the dot-bombs five or six years ago and told them to spend like mad to get "first-mover advantage", so we're not necessarily talking the brightest bulbs on the tree here.

      Long story short, if even the dumb CEOs get multiyear grace periods and chances to screw up again repeatedly, how do you expect to catch the sharks smart enough to cover up their schemes? Especially, I should note, when luminaries such as Gates and Ellison have both prospered and made their venture investors prosper while being accused of sharp trading. That'll tend to discourage scrutiny so long as the numbers remain rosy.

      Long story short, whoever in the blogosphere wrote that fatuous thing you paraphrased is talking out his ass.

  31. No that bad of a deal by delmoi · · Score: 1

    It all depends on how quick the developer was and how dirty the code was. Oracle is expensive, and MySQL and Postgres were not nearly as advanced as they are now in 1995-8 when this custom DB was written.

    His tree system could have been written in just a week or so, and if they only had simple data structures it might have been cheaper then Oracle. OTOH, using a real RDBMS would have allowed them to be much more flexable in what they created, and they could always have simply thrown hardware at the situation if it was too slow.

    --

    ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
    1. Re:No that bad of a deal by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      It all depends on how quick the developer was and how dirty the code was. Oracle is expensive, and MySQL and Postgres were not nearly as advanced as they are now in 1995-8 when this custom DB was written.

      Oracle licenses for a large system can easily run to seven figures and you have to put up with the Oracle DBAs whose agenda usually consists of buying more Oracle and hiring more DBAs.

      If you can fit the database into RAM you can use completely different data management techniques. RAM ande brute CPU is much cheaper than Oracle licenses.

      The thing I found bizare about infospace was they just appeared out of nowhere selling product into a market which did not exist yet. Like how could people be buying all that information through their WAP phones before they were shipping?

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  32. Work with here on this by rs79 · · Score: 1

    "I'm sorry, man, I just don't know what to make of this article."

    It's the slashdot equivalent of Mad Magazine's "Spy vs. Spy".

    ('Cept it sounds more like "Moron vs. Moron")

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  33. Choice quotes on Jean-Remy by delmoi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Like most of the instant millionaires, [Jean-Remy] Facq and the others were not able to sell their stock for six months. But that didn't mean they couldn't start shopping.

    A month after InfoSpace went public, Facq ordered a $103,000 Dodge Viper. He shipped the Viper to Hawaii, where he commissioned an artist to paint its hood with a Hawaiian scene -- the sun setting over dolphins cavorting in blue waters. Tab for the paint job: $150,000 ... Not to be outdone, Facq two days later walked into a dealership and wrote a salesman a $1.1 million check to buy a Lamborghini Diablo and a Ferrari F50. "I just wanted to see the look on his face," Facq said ... Anything Facq wanted, he could have. Disappointed by the jewelry at Tiffany & Co. -- "I wanted something more pimpish" -- Facq designed enormous rings and commissioned a jeweler to make them. He called himself the "Lord of the Rings."

    --

    ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
    1. Re:Choice quotes on Jean-Remy by nvrrobx · · Score: 1

      Not to mention his *FABULOUS* fur coat he wore to the office.

      That man looked like a walking fashion train wreck...

      Oh, and the boat, etc, etc, etc...

  34. Re:Screw the greedy capitalist exploiters by rs79 · · Score: 1

    "Don't sweat it - he's just trolling. "Investor" is not a bad word. Unlike, say, "lawyer"..."

    Your lawyer is a bad word. Mine is great.

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  35. Lawsuit settlement against JAIN is peanuts. by zymano · · Score: 1

    The federal class-action suit was settled last year for $34.3 million.

    In December, Jain and more than a dozen key InfoSpace officials settled the Dreiling lawsuit, with Jain agreeing to pay $3 million. Others are paying $3.4 million. InfoSpace's insurance, covering executive misdeeds, is paying up to $43 million to settle outstanding lawsuits.

    As part of the settlement, Dreiling, Jain and the former InfoSpace executives signed confidentiality agreements and will not comment.


    That's it. What bullshit. Didn't he make hundreds of millions ?

  36. Re:Take a long hard look at him by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

    Good to know you decide whether to trust people or not based on how they look. Let me start a shell company with a supermodel for a front that you can invest your life savings in.

  37. Re:Screw the greedy capitalist exploiters by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

    Investors dont want the type of abuse and deceit that goes on in corporate board rooms. The ones profiting are the Heads of the companies. They just use "the investors" as a convient execuse to mask their immoral behavior.

  38. And if you're curious what happened to his mansion by Kalewa · · Score: 1
    I started looking at houses along the shoreline of the Medina neighborhood and found the guy's old mansion.

    Terraserver Link

    The front yard seems to have been turned into a parking lot. Bummer.

  39. Re:Amusingly... by w42w42 · · Score: 1

    That's it - his new office appears to be separated from Infospaces offices by at most a few floors.

  40. Oracle is slow? Do you know you to optimise? by aug24 · · Score: 1

    You do know that oracle gives you the choice between b-tree and hashed indexes don't you? You need to be a database designer to take advantage of any database engine properly, no matter which one it is.

    Apart from that, you're bang on about the rest of it, especially the rest of it. The only difference between net-enabled businesses and others is communication. If the company can't explain how they leverage that, they're a no-hoper.

    Justin.

    --
    You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  41. The Real Dot Con by nfsilkey · · Score: 1

    Watch Dot Con, a Frontline episode dedicated showing how corporate America cajoled the media into feeding a runaway train of hype which bilked billions.

  42. Grocery deliveries by DavidAtkinson · · Score: 1

    Grocery deliveries are one of the big internet successes here in the UK - most of the food supermarkets do it.

  43. enforce the existing ones by CarrionBird · · Score: 1

    Note how this guy and Ken Lay and others walk free. Do you really think they will get around to doing anything to Lay? LOL!

    --
    Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
    1. Re:enforce the existing ones by wheelbarrow · · Score: 1

      Ken Lay's criminal trial is scheduled for 2005. In 2004, every publicly traded company in the US was held to higher accounting standard practices than in the past. This is known as the Sarbanes Oxely process, federal legislation passed in the wake of the Enron scandal.

      Are you still ready to put an end to capitalism? Describe a better alternative.