Slashdot Mirror


Hitachi Unveils Humanoid Robot

HunahpuMonkey writes "BBC reports that Hitachi has unveiled a humanoid robot, named Emiew, to compete with Honda's Asimo and Sony's Qrio robots. The robot has a vocabulary of about 100 words and could be trained for practical office and factory use. In addition, it is the fastest robot to date, moving 3.7 miles per hour on wheel feet which resemble the bottom half of a Segway scooter."

52 of 245 comments (clear)

  1. Battle Stairs! by BWJones · · Score: 4, Funny

    OK, here is the challenge:

    Hitachi's new wheeled robot versus Honda's Asimo and Sony's Qrio in BATTLE STAIRS! First one down a flight of 100 steps intact wins.

    :-)

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re: Battle Stairs! by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 2, Funny
      "First one down a flight of 100 steps *intact* wins."

      So what do the rules of this competition say about winning? Would that be "to move down the steps fastest", or would they allow "to fall down in the shortest possible time, and built strong enough to survive the impact?"

      The most difficult road is the most interesting one.

    2. Re:Battle Stairs! by stephenisu · · Score: 2, Funny
      In all honesty, if the steps are equal in length and hieght, the Hitachi could slide on its back by accelerating really fast. After sliding down, it would just keep rolling.

      For REAL fun, I say give the stairs various heights and widths, maybe a turn or two and some spikes. I LOOOVE me some spikes.

      --
      Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
    3. Re: Battle Stairs! by Da+Fokka · · Score: 4, Funny

      Meet my unbeatable entry, called the Bowling-Bo. Maybe not as good on manual labour as the Hitachi version but it only has a vocabulary of 100 words less and will pwn the stair challenge.

  2. Cog and Kismet by filmmaker · · Score: 2, Funny

    Totota and Hitachi got nuthin' on MIT's Cog and Kismet

    I foresee a fight scene ala Anchorman; Cog wielding a switch-blade.

    "Como estas, bitches!"

    1. Re:Cog and Kismet by filmmaker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your VCR also actually works. It also has an extremely limited and unambitious feature set.

      That's not to say that the Japanese robots aren't major accomplishments; they are. So is a VCR, if you think about it. Just not when you stack it up against the goal of creating true AI, which is what Cog is all about, "humanoid intelligence."

  3. Intelligencia by oskard · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The robot has a vocabulary of about 100 words and could be trained for practical office and factory use"

    I don't know about you, but a 100 word vocabulary is already vastly superior to some of the factory workers I've worked with.

    --
    Sigs are for Terrorists.
  4. Something about that name... by spawnofbill · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does anyone else get the mental image of a large feathered robot with a tendency to hump sunbathing women? Or is it just me?

    1. Re:Something about that name... by Em+Ellel · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does anyone else get the mental image of a large feathered robot with a tendency to hump sunbathing women? Or is it just me?

      I believe it is just you.

      -Em

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
  5. Segway wheels? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why did we hear no hyperbole from Steve Jobs prior to this?

  6. This is all fine... by Lisandro · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... as long as they don't enslave humans in order to protect them and make a cyborg with prejudice for robots our only hope of freedom.

    Ah, and rape a fine writers' memory in the process!

  7. Oooh by Robotron23 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It bears a likeness to R2-D2...

    Now all they need to do is affix a gin & tonic brewer...

  8. I think the saddest part about this... by ciroknight · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is that the only companies willing to do any practical research in robotics is car companies because they use robotics on such a daily basis (the building of cars, of course).

    Not only that, robotics is one of the most fun branches of modern computing and engineering, and yet so few engineers actually go into it. It's a shame we aren't meeting up with more robots in real life (Fast foods should be relegated to robotics by now, as the food quality tends to resemble it)...

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    1. Re:I think the saddest part about this... by Lisandro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, i find these robot anouncements by major electronic companies pure PR moves. Yes, they look cool and can do nifty things - but they aren't much good for anything else. We're still a far cry away from humanoid robots to become common, and, more important, useful.

      Specialized robots, like you mentioned, it's a whole different deal, and i agree. Automatized construction is the only industry i can think of that invest heavily in robotic research - we could use specialzed robots elsewhere.

    2. Re:I think the saddest part about this... by ciroknight · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One of the coolest specialized robots I've seen to date is the robot that's going to be installed here at the University of Louisville as soon as they complete the renovation of the Library building. (Search for Robotic Retrieval System on your favorite search engine).

      Basically it's going to be a robot to retrieve books in the library, allowing the books to be packed denser on the shelves, thus boosting the capacity of our Library by 1.2M books. This kind of technology is amazing, and we should be finding ways to push it into our lives for much more general work than that. Robotics research shouldn't have to be done by the car companies of the world.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    3. Re:I think the saddest part about this... by omahajim · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Allowing the books to be packed denser on the shelves? You mean they're not already stacked side by side? Or, do you mean that they're getting rid of those pesky wide aisles that humans need to navigate among the stacks?

    4. Re:I think the saddest part about this... by indifferent+children · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You've highlighted one of the major obstacles to automation (including but not limited to robotics). When the 16yo behind the counter screws-up your order, you will get irritated, and might complain to the manager (unless you went through the drive-through, TFYATDT). We demand an inhuman (literally) level of performance/consistency from automated systems.

      About 20,000 Americans are killed every year in automobile accidents. If we introduced automated cars that could get you where you want to go with no human control, and they killed 5,000 people per year, we would be demanding that these things be banned (and the lawsuits would flow like spice). Better isn't good enough; we demand perfect, even in non-mission-critical systems.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
  9. So life-like... by mfender9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Obviously much effort has been put into making this as closely resemble us wheeled humanoids as possible. Hitachi, I applaud you!

  10. I've seen something like this. by Sheetrock · · Score: 5, Interesting
    During a brief sojourn to Japan a couple of years back, there was a music store that had a robotics theme.

    Very little stock was on hand, but you would select the music you wanted on one of the robots. It'd burn the audio CD, print up the liner, and assemble a shrink-wrapped product for a couple of yen more than one you'd get off the shelf, then dance around the room playing the biggest hit off the album.

    The experience would only have been cooler if it could talk with you, although the sushi-dispensing robots did have a few stock phrases and voice recognition (you had to shout for them to hear you however).

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    1. Re:I've seen something like this. by myowntrueself · · Score: 3, Funny

      "although the sushi-dispensing robots did have a few stock phrases and voice recognition"

      I bet that the 'used womens panties' vending machine would be the one with the most interesting conversation...

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  11. Robot on a segway by mzwaterski · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Its a robot on a segway...

    I like the idea, but does it fall over and break when the batteries die? Are they going to add a third wheel for safety reasons. (LOL)

  12. What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by Noose+For+A+Neck · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I'm not robotics expert, I'm just an engineering student, but it seems to me that humanoid robots are a sort of marketing victory more than being a genuine breakthrough.

    Most industrial robots I've seen don't need a humanoid form at all, and I can imagine several cases were the humanoid form is actually an impairment to getting work done. Why not go with more structurally efficient designs, like a spider, instead of focusing on bipedal bots for uses requiring ambulation?

    --

    Software piracy is victimless theft.

    1. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by e2d2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why not go with more structurally efficient designs, like a spider, instead of focusing on bipedal bots for uses requiring ambulation?

      As long as it has a face I can punch I don't care what shape it comes in.

      But in all seriousness I do agree, the quest for human shaped robots is intriguing. We are obviously not the most able bodied creatures when it comes to our "form factor", our superiority is not in our shape but in our huge monkey brain.

      Maybe it's to out people at ease, but I for one do _not_ welcome our new humanoid robot overlords. It creeps me out when things that don't have a soul start talking to me. Call me crazy.

    2. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by hauntedspaceship · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because our environment is designed and optimized for humans. By creating robots that resemble us (same actuators (hands), ability to understand and speak our language, see what we can see), then they already can operate in our environment.

      There is also the idea of robot-human interaction: would you rather interact with Asimo or a spider?

    3. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by utexaspunk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      because what they want to move toward are all-purpose robots capable of serving in a variety of environments shared with humans. most of these environments are currently designed for humans. obviously the best form factor for maneuvering such an environment and manipulating objects designed for humans would be that of a human.

      that, and they look way cool...

    4. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by kid-noodle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Asimov gives a good argument for humanoid robots in Caves of Steel - namely economy.

      Do you buy a robot cooker, microwave, eggbeater etc. etc. Or a robot that can use the tools already?

      --
      fortune -o
    5. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by mikael · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Anything with six or more legs always has a stable centre-of-gravity, and doesn't have to worry about maintaining a stable configuration. With three or four legs, you have unstability as soon as you take one leg off the ground. With only two legs, you always have unstability and need sophisticated real-time circuitry to maintain balance.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    6. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by VoidWraith · · Score: 2, Informative

      For walking, it is. With two you have to deal with vast amounts of balance problems, and its not easy to correct. With eight (or six, or four) you can move a pair of legs without having to worry about stability, because it still has all the rest to fall back on. Controlling the legs isn't the complex part, the motions for walking on two legs are vastly complex compared to simple patterns for four, six, and eight.

    7. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by Dr.+GeneMachine · · Score: 2, Funny
      It creeps me out when things that don't have a soul start talking to me. Call me crazy.

      Ever met a lawyer?

      --
      This comment does not exist.
  13. Ok so what are these good for. by Dimentox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can it do my laundry? Can it Walk the dog? Can it cook my meals? Hrmm... Guess its not a replacement for Wife 1.0, I never shoulda upgraded in the first place.

    --
    string sig = llGetSig("dimentox"); llSay(0,sig);
    1. Re:Ok so what are these good for. by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Can it do my laundry? Can it Walk the dog? Can it cook my meals? Hrmm... Guess its not a replacement for Wife 1.0, I never shoulda upgraded in the first place."

      Being an early adopter is hell. I still haven't gotten any calls on my video phone. I ended up rerouting my cable to it so I could pretend celebrities are calling.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Ok so what are these good for. by anagama · · Score: 2, Funny

      As long as you control the power switch, it will be a huge upgrade from Wife 1.0.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  14. Re:Why don't we have a robotics industry? by ciroknight · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My thoughts exactly. Imagine how much faster things would be if I could go to a McDonalds, punch in what I wanted on the screen, swipe my card, and wait for the robots to put the food together. You could reduce the staff of such an operation from ten people to two, and the food quality would be identical. Of course, this would also be upfront cost for the companies, and would hurt the economy undoubtedly as it would require the firing of multiple thousands of people, but we'd have a progress in technology.

    I guess to sum it up best, I WANT MY DAMNED FLYING CAR.

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
  15. Slow Learners by hopbine · · Score: 2, Insightful

    could be "trained" for practical office and factory use in as little as five to six years. Or is this how long it normally takes.....

    --
    Semper ubi sub ubi
  16. Humanoid robots? by e2d2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Since when did humanoids have wheels?

    Damn I'm behind, I gotta get rid of these stupid legs.

    UPGRADE

  17. It has to be said... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 4, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new office work performing over-

    Awe, crap, who am I kidding? I'm going to be freakin' outsourced to one of these little @#$@#$ers...

    DIE, YOU LITTLE ROTTER! R2D2 WAS TWICE THE BOT YOU WILL EVER BE!

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  18. Why robot research is wasteful by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Japan is pouring billions into robotic software research in part because they don't allow much immigration and migrant workers, and thus want to develop robots to fill those niches instead.

    However, rather than build an artificial brain, it appears more cost effective and closer to improve the bandwidth costs so that such bots can be controlled from low-wage nations. We don't need artificial intelligence because there are billions of idle human brains around the planet.

    I suppose one could argue that remote-control servants could end up causing malice, but artificial alternives may do the same either because AI might go bizerk, or more likely because it is not good enough yet and will make stupid mistakes.

    In short, remote-controll appears the more reachable goal at this stage. Bandwidth cost reduction does not appear to need the giant breakthrus that AI does.

    1. Re:Why robot research is wasteful by bar-agent · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, the japanese are more concerned about having the robots as companions then as servents. ... Look at some of the commercials for sony's humanoid. It is being marketed as a companion for the elderly and lonely. Westerners are more concerned with having the robotic domestic slave.

      I think there are actually three categories of robots: child-like, adult, and non-humanoid. Real robots are either child-like and Japanese, or non-humanoid and American. I do not know if it was intentional, but your comment seems to be saying that Americans want slavery and the Japanese want companionship. This is not the case. Based on what is out there now, Americans want tools and the Japanese want companions.

      If an American company did really come out with an interactive adult humanoid robot, like the NS-1 from the "I, Robot" movie, I think it would not sell too well. Americans, at least me and my friends, are uncomfortable with servants. If someone is getting paid to do a job, that is one thing, but a servant class is bad. We would be compelled to treat an interactive adult humanoid robot like one of a) an equal, b) a friend who helps you out, or c) a tool. And if we treat it as a tool, it had better not look too human or be too personable. Nothing else would be comfortable. Look at the relationship between Luke and C-3PO, or between Picard and Data.

      The Japanese seem to be pushing child-like humanoid robots for companionship. I can see this; child-like humanoids are not expected to be equals of anybody. It is okay if they are limited. But these robots will never do well in the States, because they rely on being cute to offset their simplicity, and in the States, cute things are creepy.

      Look at the Hitachi robot from the article. Anybody else find the styling a little off-putting? I know I did. It looked like a kid, but wasn't. In Japan, cute or child-like things with special powers, such as Pikachu, Astroboy, or magical children, are okay. But the closest equivalents in the U.S. are things like Gremlins, Children of the Corn, Chuckie, or Barney. Cute things with special powers are creepy over here. It would be difficult to market such a thing for home companionship.

      It seems to me, that in Japanese culture, a general-purpose humanoid robot must be harmlessly cute to be accepted, whereas in American culture, a general-purpose humanoid robot must be seen to be satisfied with its duties and treatment.

      But maybe I'm biased.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  19. Holding office by Onan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I first misread the summary as, "...has a vocabulary of about 100 words and could be trained for political office use..."

    (Of course, my first thought was that that's vastly overqualified for what it apparently takes to be elected President these days.)

  20. Re:Why don't we have a robotics industry? by UWC · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Back in the mid/late '90s, there was a Taco Bell near me that installed touch screen ordering stations. You'd get your receipt with a number on it, and a few minutes later you'd hear your number called and maybe barely glimpse a human figure darting back behind the large wall that completely obscured the kitchen area. Then you'd retrieve your order from the very small counter where your food had been placed. In retrospect it was an odd clinical dehumanization of something still carried out by humans. Unless there were robots back there, I guess, one of which was dressed in a purple shirt and a wig.

  21. Actually... by GuyMannDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To me, the saddest part about all this is that the only companies willing to do any practical research in robotics are Japanese car companies because they look farther into the future than the next quarterly earnings report. The Japanese car companies are pumping R&D dollars into developing new technologies that will help them in the long run. The American car companies are taking that money and pumping it into bonuses for CEOs so they can buy a new ivory backscracther every year.

    Face it, we just don't have the drive to improve that companies in other countries do.

    GMD

    1. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yep, those crazy Japanese CAR companies.

      If you'll excuse me, I have to return my Sony rental car and pick up my Hitachi at the body shop.

    2. Re:Actually... by vikstar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To me, the saddest part is that they call a robot on wheels humanoid. Excuse me, but being a researcher in robots, if it doesn't have two legs, its not humanoid.

      --
      The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.
    3. Re:Actually... by isil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...or perhaps it has something to do with the UAW?

  22. The end of the Microsoft Employee by bananahead · · Score: 3, Funny

    This will end the hiring of new employees at Microsoft. Just the fact that it moves AT ALL, much less 3.6 MPH will render the entire program management, middle management and test groups obsolete.

    --
    A most overlooked advantage to owning a computer is if they foul up there's no law against wacking them around a bit.
  23. The problem with .... by LnxAddct · · Score: 5, Informative

    The problem with these robots is how fragile they are. I havent physically seen the other two robots, but Honda's Asimo stays in a little closet when in the lab. Not your typical closet of course, but you get the idea. When in the lab, all you see are other cheaper parts of robots similar or duplicated from Asimo. All the work and main testing is done on these pieces (which makes sense). The thing that I don't like though, and many people don't realize, is that before Asimo is ever unveiled to the public, he undergoes at least 8 hours of configuration. This is each and every time, and then he can only run for maybe an hour and a half iirc. These robots certainly have a lot of potential, and one day possibly could do factory work, but right now the public is being mislead thinking we are further along then we really are. People see this robot and think it probably just walks around all day and they'd like one. There are certainly some huge milestones being made, but the most publically known robots are imho overhyped. I'm not being a pessimist, I would just like to see even more reasearch in humanoid robotics so we can have the future sooner rather then later. Even just a self configuring Asimo would be a huge step in the right direction.
    Regards,
    Steve

  24. I for one... by kryogen1x · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...welcome our segway-like overlords.

  25. Upon the initial system boot.... by machinegunhand · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...the robot used its limited vocabulary to ask who came up with the name "Emiew," followed by the words, "prepare to die."

  26. You have been replaced by a small Perl script.... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 2, Funny


    "You have been replaced by a small Perl script..."

    It's getting closer to reality. I can feel it.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  27. Yeah, but can it do my laundry? by otisg · · Score: 2, Funny

    Until it can get my groceries and do my laundry, I'm not buying! I already have a Rumba - it doesn't talk, but does a good job vacuuming.

    --
    Simpy
  28. Re:How long before they replace us? by cgibbard · · Score: 3, Funny

    "I want to be able to walk about in places like Shinjuku and Shibuya [shopping districts] in the future without bumping into people and cars," Pal told reporters.

    Is it referring to motor control systems? Or something more sinister?

  29. Re:Soul? by e2d2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This isn't an episode of Ghost in the Shell. I have a soul and robots don't. I'm gonna be the robot biggot 50 years from now oppressing them! Sit down machine and shut up! ;-)

    A soul is what made you ask that question in the first place. It's hard to define but you know it when you see it.