Slashdot Mirror


State-Sponsored Solitaire?

jefu writes "According to this story the state of North Carolina may be considering banning solitaire on state owned machines. It seems that state workers are now perceived as having replaced leaning on brooms with playing solitaire or minesweeper. The story provides coverage of both sides of the issue, noting that playing solitaire (or other games) may provide workers with a way to burn off some stress, but that this kind of activity is likely to be perceived as time wasting. My favorite bit (especially as April 15th draws ever closer) is where the author notes that fifty percent of the time an IRS employee is on the computer they are playing games, shopping online or gambling."

83 of 331 comments (clear)

  1. Misses the real problem by bigtallmofo · · Score: 5, Funny

    It sounds to me like the real problem is that government workers aren't able to hit Alt-Tab fast enough. Once we address that, then the problem will be neatly swept under the rug.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:Misses the real problem by elgatozorbas · · Score: 4, Funny
      Once we address that, then the problem will be neatly swept under the rug.

      ...unfortunately their brooms are optimised for leaning, not for sweeping.

    2. Re:Misses the real problem by toxis · · Score: 3, Funny

      Alt-Tab doesn't work if there's no other window open. ;)

  2. PANIC!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's only a matter of time before they ban Slashdot.

    1. Re:PANIC!!! by SimplePaul · · Score: 5, Funny

      then they would be on the right track to stopping time-wasting ;)

  3. Linux, here we come! by zecg · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... and with this regulation fell the last obstacle to Linux acceptance in North Carolina.

    --
    .i lu doi ringos.star. xu do puku'aroroi dunli dopecaku leni virnu li'u
    1. Re:Linux, here we come! by mozingod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      KDE/Gnome come with a lot more games by default than Windows.

    2. Re:Linux, here we come! by arose · · Score: 2, Funny

      Didn't you hear that doing common activities on GNU+Linux requires expensive re-training? They'll just leave 'Solitaire' of the program.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  4. Getting work done... by Ianoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I admit it. I have had to delete Gnome Games and Windows Solitaire/Minesweeper/Freecell/Hearts from my machines at work. I just couldn't get any work done before.

  5. Scientific approach by zecg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    where the author notes that fifty percent of the time an IRS employee is on the computer they are playing games, shopping online or gambling

    Would that mean the IRS employs 50% too many workers?

    --
    .i lu doi ringos.star. xu do puku'aroroi dunli dopecaku leni virnu li'u
    1. Re:Scientific approach by zecg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ach, I was some ten milliseconds too late in realizing that. Slashdot needs a bloody "edit post" function.

      --
      .i lu doi ringos.star. xu do puku'aroroi dunli dopecaku leni virnu li'u
    2. Re:Scientific approach by rzebram · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nope, do you realize how many employees gambling it takes to lose all of the taxpayer money? They get billions in each year, they need to do something with it! Although I guess that whatever money they spend on gambling they get part of back when taxes come due... Damn them, even when they lose they win!

    3. Re:Scientific approach by weighn · · Score: 5, Funny

      OH&S SITE INSPECTOR: So, how many people work here?
      IRS SECTION MANAGER: Oh, about half of them.

      --
      Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  6. Solitaire is boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    All I can say is that it's a good thing Windows doesn't come with Tetris.

  7. OK... How many of you readers... by gardyloo · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... work there?

    1. Re:OK... How many of you readers... by northcat · · Score: 4, Funny

      None.

      (I hope you understand the joke)

  8. Minesweeper by sandstorming · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As soon as I worked out the cheat that shows a colour changing pixel in the top corner of the screen I lost all interest in Minesweeper. Most my friends now believe I am psychic because I can 'sense' whether a square has a mine under it or not :)

    1. Re:Minesweeper by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hmmm. Is that funny or clueless?

      In case you don't know, Minesweeper doesn't lay out the mines until *after* you make your first pick, and won't put a mine where you made that pick, to avoid the "unfairness" of losing on your first move. So a board with only one clear square cannot be lost. You make your pick, Minesweeper puts mines on all the other squares, you win. Every time. Actually, you can't do it any more. On an m by n board, recent editions of Minesweeper won't let you have more than (m-1)*(n-1) bombs. But it's still true that you can't die on your first pick. (Some non-Microsoft Minesweeper clones don't implement this, though)

      Chris Mattern

    2. Re:Minesweeper by arodland · · Score: 3, Funny

      Most people I know think I'm psychic just because I know how to play minesweeper. They don't get that there's actually a logic to it, so they think I have really good luck.

  9. Brilliant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can see it now: employees sneaking in 52-card decks into the office and playing solitaire on their desk. Boss walks buy, they quickly throw their keyboard on top of it and get back to work. Gotta "burn off stress" somehow.

    I just hope Minesweeper addicts don't resort to planting landmines in the office to get their fix.

  10. Great by ornil · · Score: 4, Funny

    fifty percent of the time an IRS employee is on the computer they are playing games, shopping online or gambling.

    So, if we ban Solitaire, the IRS employees will probably spend more time gambling. Whose wise idea was that, I wonder?

  11. Banning of software/protocols... by Krankheit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Slightly OT but... Where I attend they have locked down the Windows machines to the point where you can't do much of anything. Only professors/administrators can use the floppy drive. Mspaint, Solitaire, and Firefox are amoung the banned software (they claim this software is abused). Thankfully, the admin has is using less restriction on my account because he realizes mspaint and firefox can be useful, and not just for abuse circumventing the porn-blocker. I realize there is not likely anything productive to do with Solitaire, but banning of software in general is extremely irritating when you don't have your laptop with you.

    --
    Powered by caffeine and sugar; BSD
  12. Re:Mac OSX Tiger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Tax returns due in the United States.

  13. Thats so 90's! by IAMTHEMEDIA · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Man I was playing Solitare and Minesweeper back in tha day! Day meaning 1995 or so, but the point is, its time for those of us /.ers to acend and transcend. Theres plenty of flash games on the internet that provides way more fun, not to mention it can be easily concealed by clicking on your toolbar to show your fileing those TPS reports.

    1. Re:Thats so 90's! by maotx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why play Minesweeper or Solitare when you can play a SpyHunter like game?
      In Excel under file menu, do 'Save as Web Page'
      Say 'Publish Sheet' and 'Add Interactivity'
      Save to some htm page on your drive.
      Load the htm page with IE. You should have Excel in the middle of the page.
      Scroll to row 2000, column WC. Select row 2000, and tab so that WC is the active column.
      Hold down Shift+Crtl+Alt nad click the Office logo in the upper-left.
      Use the arrow keys to drive, space to fire, O to drop oil slicks, and when it gets dark, use H for your headlights.

      Requires DirectX and Microsoft Office 2000 SP0.
      If you update Office it will no longer work.

      --
      I'm a virgo and on Slashdot. Coincidence? Yes.
  14. 90% of all statistics are made up on the spot... by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "But research done by the IRS has shown that over 50 percent of the time an IRS employee goes on a computer, he or she also hooks up to the Internet to shop, gamble or play games."

    Anyone else wondering where this "research" was published?

  15. Slackers Are a Management Problem by reallocate · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Leaving aside the snobbery and bigotry of that "leaning on brooms" comment, this proposal is seeing some discussion here in North Carolina. Most that I've heard and read correctly points to this as a management issue, not something that merits legislation.

    That is, if an employee is not meeting expectations because he is spending too much time trolling the net, that's his fault, not the Internet's. The same problem would exist if he spent too much time doing crossword puzzles are talking to his girlfriend on the phone. The core problem is the employee not meeting expectations, not what he's doing to divert his attention.

    As for Solitaire, don't install it, OK? And if a manager thinks someone is spending too much time playing online games or whatever, ask the IT guys to verify it and then do a bit of "counseling".

    Now, if this guy really wanted to enhance productivity, he'd propose outlawing watching NCAA basketball playoffs at work. Heh. :-)

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    1. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by mccalli · · Score: 5, Insightful
      That is, if an employee is not meeting expectations because he is spending too much time trolling the net, that's his fault, not the Internet's. The same problem would exist if he spent too much time doing crossword puzzles are talking to his girlfriend on the phone. The core problem is the employee not meeting expectations, not what he's doing to divert his attention.

      Agreed, but I'd like to introduce a slight cautionary note. For some jobs I simply disbelieve that it is possible to be productive 100% of the day for 100% of all working days. I always love these productivity studies which say "600,000 man days of work are lost to <daft activity x> every year, employers say <daft activity x> must be banned from the workplace to ensure productivity rises."

      Which, of course, it doesn't because 600,000 man days of work are now being 'lost' by the employees switching to <daft activity y> instead. That 600,000 days was an illusion - the productivity was never there to be had, in some jobs it's impossible for people to work as if they were machines. I including programming in this by the way.

      I don't play games at work, but I certainly browse the web and spend some time talking to my wife over SMS messages. In days when desktop internet access wasn't common, I'd do crosswords at lunchtime or go for coffee breaks. Granted some of the figures mentioned sound extreme, but still - 100% of everybody's time isn't always a realistic target.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    2. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by KingSkippus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've been saying this to no avail for years now. I wish someone would start listening.

      I get so frustrated at management trying to pass off their responsibilites to the IT folks at companies. Simple example: Internet content filtering. I work at a large (Fortune 100) company, and I handle second-level support calls. One common theme that generates hundreds of calls a month (it is multinational) is, "I need access to such-and-such a site for legitimate business purposes, but it says that it's blocked due to (whatever reason the content filtering company had classified it)." So we have to get on a directly-connected machine, check out the site, verify that the person actually needs access, get approval from the person's manager, put in a request with the guy who manages the content filter, wait a few days until he can get around to it, then call the person back and let them know that the site has been allowed.

      That's an awful lot of work to keep the very few people who may browse porn at work from browsing porn at work, and it's a major pain in the ass to the honest people trying to do their jobs. I haven't done a formal study, but it must cost the company thousands of dollars every month (maybe more) in the cost of the service plus the man hours spent going through this exercise. How much would the company lose if they just stopped content filtering? Significantly less.

      But that doesn't matter. Management looks at this as an IT issue, not a management issue. If they push this responsibility onto us, that's one less thing they have to do, and one more level of blame that separates them from potential violators of corporate policy.

      Going back to topic, games are the same way. If someone goofs off all day playing Solitaire, management looks at it as a problem with the computer or a problem with the IT department. Funny, they never seem to see it for what it really is: a problem with the employee or a problem with the employee's manager.

    3. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by minion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which, of course, it doesn't because 600,000 man days of work are now being 'lost' by the employees switching to instead. That 600,000 days was an illusion - the productivity was never there to be had, in some jobs it's impossible for people to work as if they were machines. I including programming in this by the way.

      That is a very good arguement. I work for a company that realises this: Most of our staff doesn't take coffee breaks, or real lunchtimes. Instead, we prefer to sit spend half of our lunch hour eating and the other half shooting eachother in video games.

      Productivity is higher than if we simply ate our food and went back to work - our minds are refreshed because we took a moment away from critical thinking (IT/Programming job, BTW).

      I'm glad I work for a company like that now, and I wish other companies would realize that as well.

      There'd be a lot less depressed people in the world if more companies treated employees like humans, rather than bottom lines.

      --

      -- If we don't stand up for our rights, now, there will be no right to stand up for them later.
    4. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by mccalli · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Face it, that time you're SMSing your wife and doing crossword puzzles is time you're stealing from your employer.

      I am my employer. I run a one-man contracting business. And whilst my current client requires me to put in x hours it's true, they aren't really paying for that. They're paying me for results.

      And I provide them. Yes, including Slashdot and SMS, all fully known about by my client. If I dropped the web browsing or stopped sending the odd SMS my productivity wouldn't go up - I'd just have to find something else to distract me when needed. When programming, you can't just stare at a computer screen for 8 hours a day and expect to just keep typing (or drawing UML diagrams or whatever else). It's utterly unrealistic - humans just don't work that way.

      no one can really go a straight 8 hours, but the breaks you're taking should be trips to the WC or the like, not something trivial and pointless like reading webpages or doing crossword puzzles.

      It's a very long time since I was a schoolboy asking permission to use the WC - I use it as and when I choose. Similarly, it is my decision whether to continue banging my head against a brick wall on a particular problem, or whether to just take a quick distraction by maybe reading a web page or nipping off to fetch some coffee from outside before returning to the task with a fresher mind. It is my client's decision as to whether they find my approach acceptable, and for that only the results count.

      I'm not advocating lazing your life away at work, but I am rejecting the notion that only work-related things can happen at work. For some jobs that's true - as a summer job when I was still at University I used to work as a kitchen helper, loading vast amounts of cutlery and dishes into an industrial dishwasher as quickly as possible, then getting the servings ready for the waitresses to send out again. I enjoyed that job as it happens, and not a crossword to be seen. But then it wasn't necessary - it was mindless work and you could just get on with it. Programming, and many other jobs, simply aren't like that.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    5. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by cheekyboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I spend 45hrs at work, then I can waste 5hrs doing what I like.

      Sometimes in our techy jobs, our minds need downtime/idle waste time to keep us on the ball. You cant ask an athelete to nonstop run 200miles a day can you. Consider reading the web like training/stretching for a runner.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    6. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by TykeClone · · Score: 4, Insightful
      How much would the company lose if they just stopped content filtering? Significantly less.

      Until the harassment lawsuits start.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  16. Re:90% of all statistics are made up on the spot.. by Luke+Psywalker · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's an editorial from today on this very subject.

    http://www.smh.com.au/news/Heckler/Lies-damn-lies- and-statistics/2005/03/20/1111253883481.html?

    I call every statistic a lie until I see the raw sample figures and how they were gathered. There should be an international standard on how stats are gathered and quoted. I'm sick to fucking death of statistic manipulation. Although in this particular case I don't really care and would not at all be surprised if it was true.

  17. Funny Cartoon by roblaird · · Score: 3, Funny

    We have a cartoon on the door of the IT room that shows some users playing solitaire on their desks with actual decks of cards. The caption reads "Our systems are down, we have to do everything manually."

  18. Suddenly, the available alternative by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 2, Funny

    at sourceforge will be popular =)

  19. How can you 'ban' solitaire? Easy, fire employee by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I assume that there are dozens of online solitaire games avaiable. Unless they take the extra step of blocking all game related websites, the whole thing is pointless.

    You are overanalyzing the problem. All you have to do is have the official poilicy of "no games" and then you are free to fire someone playing at work. OK, maybe they have to get a warning first.

    The "no games" policy should be accompanied with a "no unauthorized installs" policy.

  20. This is STILL stupid. by KingSkippus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have worked at a lot of companies, and one common theme among them is almost always, "Let's get rid of the games." As a sysadmin, I've actually been the one tasked with implementing it. However...

    I think these policies are, in a word, stupid. If someone is going to waste time, they're going to waste time. If it's not on a game of Solitaire, it will be on some other non-work activity. The fact is that you cannot command a person to work for eight (if they're lucky) solid hours. Or as Scott Kirwin put it in the article, "Managers [have] lost sight that workers are real people, not robots."

    Every time I've been asked to delete the games off of machines, I've expressed extreme disapproval. I've tried to explain until I'm blue in the face that it will not increase productivity. I've tried to explain that if you treat employees like they're four years old by taking away their toys, it will only cause resentment and a resulting LOSS of productivity. I've tried to point out that small Solitaire breaks (or any other mindless activity) actually help a lot of people get back into a more productive mindset going forward. I've also tried to point out that games such as Solitaire help people new to computers learn their way around. For example, it taught my mother, who had only used DOS-based accounting software, how to use a mouse. Sure, it sounds simple to you, but keep in mind that she had no idea what left-clicking, dragging-and-dropping, minimizing and maximizing, etc. were, but she was up to speed within a few minutes thanks to Solitaire.

    But in general, all that stuff makes no difference to management. Since companies have layed off and outsourced to the point where they can't function any more, all that matters is that we have to be productive 24x7. Barring that, all that matters is that we have to LOOK productive 24x7.

    So stupid...

    1. Re:This is STILL stupid. by garcia · · Score: 4, Informative

      The fact is that you cannot command a person to work for eight (if they're lucky) solid hours. Or as Scott Kirwin put it in the article, "Managers [have] lost sight that workers are real people, not robots."

      You have never worked in a call center have you? They have supervised slave labor down to a science. Outside of taking advantage of 3 minute leeway for phone logins and clock punches there was very little time available for screwing off.

      They had all the computers locked down, no applications installed other than those you needed for your job, remote screenshot ability, and apparently an alert when you were surfing on a page other than the ones that were permitted.

      You were scored on your performance and adherence to the time schedule.

    2. Re:This is STILL stupid. by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In other words, they wanted to get value for what they were paying. Shocking!!!

      If the employees are getting their paychecks and can quit whenever they like, it isn't slave labor...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    3. Re:This is STILL stupid. by anakin876 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the actual figure thrown around by the statisticians and psychologists is that the amount of money you save by not having to train a new person is aproximately 3 months worth of salary. So for the managers out there, before firing someone ask them if the new person you hire will be worth that 3 months of salary - you won't get an extra productivity boost from the new guy. It will cost you 3 months salary of the current guy.

    4. Re:This is STILL stupid. by Martz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My girlfriend has just left a company which ran the same call center setup as you describe. The "Team leaders" have monitoring applications which show how many calls are in the queue, the longest call waiting, staff logged on etc. More importantly to them - who is logged off either because they are away from their desk, toilet break or aftercall time of 3 minutes to do administration and paperwork.

      However, even this wasn't enough. They decided that people were taking too much time between calls and abusing the aftercall status. Management, who in turn monitor the teams efficiency through a desktop application, decided that aftercall would switch off after 3 minutes and a new call would be put through automatically. This put her and the other call center staff in even more stressful situation where they couldn't even have a minute to recover after a stressful, difficult or administratively complicated incoming call.

      Their machines are also locked down to dedicated applications, there is also some hardcore email monitoring going on when they chat to their work friends, on or off a call. Playing games is completely out of the question to the ~250 or so employees. It surely cannot help performance when they cannot escape from their jobs even for a moment. They are forced to work 100% of the time, or receive a rollocking.

      She is very happy she's had an opportunity to move on to somewhere else now, but from her stories after work it seems that management are forced to trust the accurate stats generated by technology and use it as a benchmark to increase productivity. Staff are leaving left, right and center.. yet they look at their historical performance stats and decide that they weren't worth keeping anyway. Crazy.

    5. Re:This is STILL stupid. by C10H14N2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...and you may have to shell out three months (or more) salary to the poor schmuck you're firing, whether in accrued leave, severance or both on top of the three months you'll waste training the new guy--and it just gets worse the higher up you go. There are horror stories at damn near every company of the worthless manager who just can't seem to get fired barring gunning down the place because the parachute is just a little too golden, so it's cheaper to churn the ranks to keep him/her in a constant state of denial and let the company die the death of 1000 cuts in the process.

    6. Re:This is STILL stupid. by vertinox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the employees are getting their paychecks and can quit whenever they like, it isn't slave labor...

      A slave can quit working whenever they want, too.

      Of course may get beaten, tortured, left to starve to death, or executed at that point in time depending on who is their captors.

      The problem is that people automatically assume that if you are paid money then you are not a slave. If you work out of fear of starving to death or the fact your supervisors will send you to a worse camp in artic cirlce in Siberia even if you are paid money... I would still assume that is slave labor because you have no choice in the matter.

      The same could be said about capitalism if you are afraid to loose your job. Like the bad social stigma and the fear of not having money force many people to work in low paid positions that they feel they have no choice in.

      This is not so bad as one can simply wake up one morning and decide that they can live without income and go into work and tell them they no longer want to work there. However most people will not over come this fear even though no one is physically putting them into a labor camp. They might as well emotionally be in one.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  21. What about smoke breaks? by ccnull · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I wonder how much time the employees collectvely spend smoking cigarettes -- a colossal waste of time, not to mention the associated health issues.

    CN, anti-smoking crusader

    1. Re:What about smoke breaks? by ShaunC · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I wonder how much time the employees collectvely spend smoking cigarettes -- a colossal waste of time, not to mention the associated health issues.
      You're missing the fact that smoking is as much a social activity as it is an unhealthy one. I can't fault you for this, most non-smokers (at least most of the ones who aren't ex-smokers) don't notice this.

      It's hard to explain to non-smokers, but smokers tend to have a subconscious yet very strong social bond with one another. Smokers are generally relegated to a single location (standing just outside of the back entrance, for example) and upon encountering other smokers there, will engage in conversation. It's almost universally true, even with folks like me who for the most part are shy and wouldn't otherwise strike up conversations with random strangers.

      If someone bums a cigarette from me, I won't turn them down, and I've never been turned down the few times I've had to ask others. I've never given a cent to the homeless guys standing at the busy intersections with cardboard signs, but the ones who ask for a smoke will get one, along with an offer of a light. We smokers may indeed be a bunch of arrogant assholes who think that the world is our ashtray, but we look out for each other - and we have something in common.

      What I'm getting at here is that having a few workers go out for a smoke break isn't necessarily a bad thing. They're getting face time with each other that they may not otherwise have had the opportunity to get. This helps to build and reinforce positive relationships between employees; it allows the peons see and interact with the PHBs as real people, and vice versa. Who knows, maybe one day you'll step out for a smoke and run into the C[ETF]O? You'd never have had the chance to speak with him otherwise, but a quick conversation over a cigarette, and you've got "synergy."

      Some co-workers socialize between cubicles. Some co-workers socialize at lunch. Some co-workers socialize on the golf course. Some co-workers socialize at the water fountain. And some of us socialize in the smoking area. Everybody "wastes time" at work (though not to the extent where 50% of their computer time is wasted, maybe I should apply for a job at the IRS!).

      I'm not trying to glorify smoking. If anyone reading this doesn't smoke but finds it appealing, allow me to be the first to say DON'T START. It's filthy, it's expensive, and it will probably eventually kill you after it kills me. But if you're already a smoker and you aren't taking advantage of this to network with other smokers around you (assuming there are others), you _should_ start doing that.

      BTW I've never heard of any company which gave smokers - and only smokers - breaks. Everyone gets a break, the smokers spend it smoking, the non-smokers spend it playing Solitaire...
      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
  22. Duh!! by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oh come on! This is the government we are talking about. In order for each orginization to get more funding, they need a reason to spend it. Either hiring more unnessary employees, or increasing the hourly wage (not going to happen as it raises a red flag).

    I've had friends work for the US gov in IT. From what they've told me, it basically a Union. Once your in the game, you actually have to TRY and get fired. It's totally the opposite of the corporate word.

    And did I mention, your tax dollars are paying for these scams?

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:Duh!! by slashkitty · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It's totally the opposite of the corporate word.

      Uhm, no, it's pretty much like that in many big companies as well. If you've been reading slashdot, you could have read about the support guy that tapped a managers computer and found that he only spend 10% of his time working. I'd have to say that's about how much I worked in my last full time job. (Which I tried to get fired from, but eventually just had to quit.)

      Computers have helped productivity so much, but many companies still have all these jobs for people. It's a shame really, because the whole business world could run on an hour or two instead of the 8+ hours that many people need to see you in the office.

      --
      -- these are only opinions and they might not be mine.
    2. Re:Duh!! by TheGavster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You feel like you have to try to get fired, until you see your first major staff reduction. When you're in, you're in, but they feel no attachment to you. The slackers are the first to go in budget tightening. And every budget gets tightened from time to time.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
  23. Re:Karl Marx? Identity? by 5ynic · · Score: 5, Informative

    Marxian theories have, on the contrary, largely proven correct since his death. Marx did not argue "for" violent overthrow, but rather that violent attempts to overthrow capitalism were at his time of writing inevitable - and therefore not worth arguing "for" or "against".

    --
    ceci n'est pas un sig
  24. The most important question by britneys+9th+husband · · Score: 3, Interesting

    fifty percent of the time an IRS employee is on the computer they are playing games, shopping online or gambling."

    Are these IRS employees paying the full amount of the tax due on their gambling winnings? It is considered income, after all.

    --
    Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
  25. Doh... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Interesting

    More hours =? more productivity?

    I know that it's bad to lose work time into games, but... really, what's worse? A worker who clears up his mind by playing sol 5 minutes, or a bored and tired worker who PRETENDS to be working but his productivity is actually half what it should be?

    Bureaucracy...

  26. I'm not playing Solataire! by HockeyPuck · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm not playing Solataire... I'm studying the Terrorism Deck of Cards...

    Looking for:

    M'Balz Es-Hari
    Graabir Boubi, and
    Haid D'Salaami
    Hous Bin Pharteen, his cousin I-Bin Pharteen, and their close companion I-Zheet M'Drurz

    Shaif Hirboush.. Al-Suq Akweer.. Mustaf Herod Apyur Poupr. I hope I got that right! Awan Afuqya.. Yul Strokheet Al-Wauch.. Apul Madeek - who we believe will be targeting adult bookstores sometime in the near future. And this man, the notorious Yuliqa M'Diq, A.K.A. Uwana M'Diq, A.K.A. Usuqa M'Diq. Uh.. thank you, that is all... [SNL]

  27. But Microsoft said by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    that Solitare and Minesweeper are intergrated with the OS, and removing them can cripple the OS. This is the type of thing that happens at Microsoft, apparently. Microsoft says it would not be possible to make a version of Windows without the Solitare and Minesweeper applications.

    Ah well, if Solitare and Minesweeper are removed, what will stop government employees from installing other games?

    You boss, just wants to challenge you to a Doom 3 Deathmatch anyway. ;)

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  28. You *want* them busy playing Solitaire! by billstewart · · Score: 4, Funny

    These are IRS employees. Almost none of them are ever doing anything you want them to be doing, except occasionally the people who change the ink cartridges on the refund-check-printing machines. The more time they spend playing solitaire, the better.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  29. Re:How can you 'ban' solitaire? Easy, fire employe by R2.0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ahh, memories...

    1995, I was a contractor at an unnamed nuclear powerplant in Maryland. Windows 3.1 and all the BSD's we could stand. Solitaire was all the rage, and Management caught on.

    One day the Solitaire shortcut doesn't work anymore, and a memo is circulated that "Game playing is bad...waste of resources...disciplinary action..." Stopepd us in our tracks? No (I mean, we are engineers for Chrissake)

    Look for Sol.exe on machine...gone.
    Search for "Solitaire" in shared drive...hmmm...that looks like some kind of script file in the root of the Network G: drive. Open it up - so it is: it checks user's machine at login and erases sol.exe. There is also a log in the directory: every instance of Solitaire being played on machines connected to that network for the last couple of months.

    Solution to problem #1: reinstall Sol.exe, rename sol1.exe. No more logging.

    Fun with the existing log:

    "Hey Frank! (da boss)"
    "What"
    "You were playing Solitaire at exactly 1425 on March 3."
    "Uh, how would you know that?"
    "Big Brother is watching, Frank."

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  30. Solitaire and Boring Phone Calls by billstewart · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If you ban solitaire, you'll need to ban boring phone calls as well.

    For some people, it's more critical - my department used to have a secretary who played solitaire a lot. Her most important jobs were to keep track of the managers' appointments and answer their phones, and when she'd done any available paperwork, "answering their phones" meant "sitting around being bored", occasionally interrupted by people calling.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  31. I vote for even more games! by mrcrowbar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let the IRS play all the games they want. The more games they play the less time they have to audit me.

  32. What are "gambing winnings"? by billstewart · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's really not the purpose of online gambling websites. In real casinos, you need to have some people winning to generate enough excitement to keep the other suckers busy losing, but in online casinos, that doesn't happen, so you only need to let the suckers win often enough to keep them steadily losing money while they hope for the next big win. And gambling losses are only deductable up to the amount of your winnings.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  33. As an employee of the State of NC... by jschroering · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can safely say that I don't think this would fix anything. People are creative. If it's not solitaire, it -will- be something else. I read one comment that said something along the lines of 'once you're in [state gov't], you actually have to TRY and get fired'. I believe that too. I know quite a few people that could be more way more productive than they currently are. But it's not just the games. It's the phone, or the email, or the internet, or the conversations in the hall. Passing this bill will only make people spend more time doing those other things. Jimmy

  34. Eliminate all slack time. by srobert · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In any work environment, whether private sector or public, there is slack time. What would be the macro-economic impact of eliminating all that slack time from the workplace? Mass unemployment? Cheaper goods and services? A shorter workweek?
    What would be the impact on the distribution of wealth?. What would be the impact on the quality of life, considering that most of us have to go to work most of the days of our lives?
    You agreed to pay me such and such an amount to do such and such each week. Now you find out that I can do it in ten hours, when you thought that it would take me 40, so you want to punish me by reducing me to 10 hours pay? You just eliminated any incentive I had to be efficient.

  35. Re:taskings... by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 2, Funny

    What if the worker is a programmer?

    Sometimes she or she will be waiting for a compile to finish or for the Java Virtual Machine to start up.

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  36. True Story by telemonster · · Score: 4, Funny

    Check this out,

    Setting is a place I used to work at, a gov't place. We were contractors installing and administrating the network and servers.

    A coworker and myself had to go to the 2nd floor of this other building, to fix one of the fiber optic drops (They ran 10mbps fiber to the desktop, we had to remove the included Intel 10/100 NICs and replace them with $400 10baseFL nics).

    We came in, everything was call. But we had forgotten a tool. The workers were mostly quiet, as the cubes didn't allow us to see them. The old barrick buildings turned offices had a spacious and hollow feel on the 2nd floors. It was my coworkers turn to go get the piece or part we had forgotten. So hung tight as my coworker left.

    The minute the door shut and his footsteps were heard thumping down the stairs, I could hear the mouse clicks increase. Immediately I could hear the Space Cadet pinball game from multiple computers. It was fairly funny. As my coworkers footsteps were heard coming up the stairs, all of the game noises went away as the games were minimized.

    I said really loudly "DOUDE, you MISSED ALL THE ACTION"

    Many gov't jobs = welfare/wealth redistribution.

    --
    Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
  37. Clean Sweep by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Funny

    Following their success boosting productivity by banning brooms...

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  38. My real-world experience on this topic by lowe0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Before: users spend x hours playing solitaire.

    After: users spend x hours trying to get solitaire working again.

    All my management courses drilled into my head the idea that you can only expect six hours of productivity from an employee per day. I don't see any point in fighting it. Why piss them off in the process?

  39. Re:How can you 'ban' solitaire? Easy, fire employe by joeljkp · · Score: 3, Informative

    Maybe in the private sector, but in government (as the article discusses), it is extremely hard to get someone fired. Hearings, evidence, the prying eyes of watchdog groups...

    Some people call it government waste, others call it job security.

    --
    WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
  40. Another joke by roesti · · Score: 2, Funny

    Q. How many people work at Your Government Department?
    A. About a third.

  41. If it's not on the desktop... by Parsa · · Score: 4, Funny
    I work for a government agency and we don't bother removing the default games with Windows. If the program isn't on the desktop then the users don't think it's installed in the first place.

    J

    --
    Abiit, excessit, evasit, erupit.
  42. Re:WHERE are YOU reading this? by jschroering · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm at home, cooking dinner. But I do read /. at work, though I wouldn't say I slack off 50% of the time. Besides, is it wrong to slack off for four hours in a day if you produce more in the other four hours than people who 'worked' eight hours that day? Note that thats a drastic example, but it's not far from the truth sometimes. And I should know, I'm a state employee. Jimmy

  43. Re:Solitare reporting by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Funny

    That gives me a cunning idea.. re-write a solitaire clone and distribute it on all your companies machines, have it produce such a statistic and send it to a server, keeping the employee's name tied to each statistic is optional depending on local privacy laws and how much fun you want to have..

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  44. Re:A scanner darkly by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Inefficient companies like KBR exist because of the government. It's the gov outsourcing their lack of productivity. There's not enough competition and too many political contributions to force KBR to be efficient.

    I think the government has done a lot of good things. But it's only 'efficient' compared to corporations when corporations would require massive redundancy of huge systems (Three internets? Three highway systems?) to foster competition.

    And yeah, gov. funding helps to develop new technologies. It takes a gov to make a phone system. But in situations where the government has to compete with several industries in competition with one another (say fedex vs. the post office) it's pretty consistently cheaper for the gov to farm out their work to the private (but not monopolitic) company.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  45. Microsoft Windows XP NoSol by donkstuff · · Score: 2, Funny

    Time for MS to remove solitare, and sell it as a stripped down version of XP for buisnesses and state/federal employees to use.

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
    Paluminum.net
  46. Not going to stop anything.... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In these days where I get a call in the middle of the night to disable x part of the system while they run Y process or when I get called Saturday morning because Z office can't print, if I take a 1/2 hour to check out things on the web on Slashdot or whatever....that makes up for all those 10-15 minute things I get asked to do after hours. If I end up dialing in and working on something for 2-3 hours in the middle of the night or on the weekend, I tell the boss, hey I am taking off early because I did this and he says sure. I am flexible....the company beter be to. If I have to leave early to go to my kids soccer practice or to watch his game but you need me to do X at 2 am....well, you better be cool with me leaving for the soccer game. Having unlimited net access and the ability to install programs not sanctioned or supported by our PC/Network support lets me get my job done or lets me cool my jets before tapping off that nasty e-mail to the idiot who can't unjam his own printer. Talk to the idiots I constantly have to go spoon feed and get them to work better and I may have more time to do real work.

    Also, you want me to do remote support, BUY ME A LAPTOP. I spent my hard earned money on my machines, they are NOT to be used for my work. It's not like I am a independent contractor and have to pay for my own stuff. Oh and don't complain if I have images or other non work software on it either. You want me to do the support and take it home, then you better let me do what I want to do with it, within reason of course. You have my promise there will be no kiddie porn on it too. Start getting uppity and my laptop and my cell phone just may not make it with me on my next business trip.

    There's no way you, the manager, does work all 8 of those hours either. IN fact, most managers are worse than employees or at least the same. Managers are constantly checking the stocks and the damn NCAA tourney or planning their next "business" trip to Las Vegas...shyeah. Take it easy on the employees, and when you really need them to do that extra 8 hours on Saturday, they just might say sure, I had nothing planned.

    --

    Gorkman

  47. Unintended consequences by wk633 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Some people aren't paid by how much the do, but being there to do what needs to be done, when it needs to be done.

    e.g. Firemen.

    Granted, firemen are usually municipal not state workers. But they have lots of goof-off activities at the station to fight boredom.

    Gee, nothing else to do since they took our T.V. and foosball away. Let's wash the shiny trucks AGAIN!

  48. ManHours != WorkDone by Evanisincontrol · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Face it, that time you're SMSing your wife and doing crossword puzzles is time you're stealing from your employer.

    As a manager, I have a lot of light to shed on this subject.

    Essentially, every time we call in an "efficiency expert" who advises us to cut back on the number of breaks employees get, I shrug it off. An employer with any experience at all knows better than to count productivity simply in "man-hours." Man-hours of work are little more than a theory figure for comparison purposes, but they don't have any real value. When I try to weigh employee productivity, my equation isn't simply "ManHoursWorked/ManHoursPossible". It's something more like "ManHoursWorked*WorkDonePerHour/WorkDonePossible".

    Of course, the real equation isn't THAT simple either, but it does say a lot. If I'm a fun-nazi to all my employees, all it does is create general resentment toward both myself and the job. Unhappy employees have a MUCH larger tendancy to do poorly at work, and slack off even more when I'm not watching. On the other hand, if I'm somewhat lenient about my policy, letting my employees take breaks when they feel it's necessary, they're happy and tend to get more work done in the time they work. End result, I have more more work done at the end of the day. (Which of course makes my salary go up every couple years, so it works out well for me too.) If someone tells me that my employees are "stealing" time from me, I laugh and don't worry about it, because the time they DO put in is much more valuable.

  49. It's Welfare by Art+Tatum · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It has for some time been obvious to me that government bureaucracy is the *real* welfare program in America. It's a jobs program for people who can't get work in the private sector.

  50. IRS spending time playing games -- a good thing?! by intnsred · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My favorite bit (especially as April 15th draws ever closer) is where the author notes that fifty percent of the time an IRS employee is on the computer they are playing games, shopping online or gambling.

    Isn't that a good thing?!

    Considering that the IRS is far more likely to investigate/harass poor or average-income taxpayers as opposed to the rich, I see them wasting their time as a plus.

    Now, if we could only spread this idle time-wasting idea to the Pentagon, maybe Iraqis and other people who are under the thumb of the empire could breath a little easier...

  51. Got it all wrong by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 3, Funny

    Perhaps Solitaire is a blessing. Imagine if instead the IRS had nothing to do. They might get bored and start doing an audit on YOU!

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Got it all wrong by nacturation · · Score: 4, Funny

      Perhaps Solitaire is a blessing. Imagine if instead the IRS had nothing to do. They might get bored and start doing an audit on YOU!

      Wait a sec... isn't that supposed to be: "In Soviet Russia, the IRS audits YOU"? Or do you audit them over there? I'm confused!

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  52. Re:Online gambling? by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Pretty sure its just the Federal Wire Act, and even thats somewhat a grey area on legality.

    The IRS, well so far as I know, they just want your money whether you be crack dealer, bookie, or online gambler. I'm pretty sure its set up so they wont report you to other arms of govt.

  53. Not All IRS Employees by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Some of us have the coveted job of taking all the data on paper tax forms and typing it into the computers. I assure you, none of us in data entry have time to make a phone call, let alone play solitaire. I'm hoping for another dot com bubble so I can get a salary job playing air hockey.

  54. Looks like the old joke by neves · · Score: 2, Funny

    This remembers me of an old joke.

  55. Re:Your off hours are for stress relief by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 2, Informative

    FWIW in certain jurisdiction law enforcement is considered "on duty" at all times, hence the requirement to carry concealed weapons when not "at work". They do have days off and vacations and are free to leave the jurisdiction.