Slashdot Mirror


Toshiba's One-Minute-Recharge Li-ion Batteries

TheGuano writes "No idea if this is related to Altair's six-minute-charge Li-ions,, but Toshiba has just announced a similar Li-ion that recharges to 80% capacity in one minute, while losing only 1% total capacity after 1000 cycles. It's set to debut in 2006 for use in hybrid cars (my current Toshiba Satellite doesn't get very far on battery power, but it's a beautiful shade of blue), but 'should' make its way to other, hopefully smaller devices eventually."

83 of 413 comments (clear)

  1. Nice but... by klatty · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm still waiting out for wireless power :-D

    1. Re:Nice but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Is that you, Nikola?

    2. Re:Nice but... by Marko+DeBeeste · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, if Tesla had only overcome that pesky "Hair-and-teeth-falling-out-in-bloody-clumps" problem.

      --
      Faith: n. -- That human impulse that drives them to steal appliances when the power goes out
  2. Different recharging techniques. by sanityspeech · · Score: 5, Informative
    To answer the submitter's implied question (i.e. No idea if this is related to Altair's six-minute-charge Li-ions...) I would have to say that it is unlikely that both are using the same technology.

    From the New Scientist article:
    Altair's patented modification is ... achieved using a carefully controlled sequence of evaporative steps when making the lithium titanate [nano]crystals.
    From the press release by Toshiba:
    A breakthrough technology applied to the negative electrode uses new nano-particles to prevent organic liquid electrolytes from reducing during battery recharging. The nano-particles quickly absorb and store vast amount of lithium ions, without causing any deterioration in the electrode.
    It would be futile for Toshiba to try to mimic Altair, since the New Scientist article also states:
    ...The firm is keeping the chemistry that allows it to do this pretty close to its chest for commercial reasons. But the patent (US 6689716) reveals that the increased surface area is achieved using a carefully controlled sequence of evaporative steps when making the lithium titanate crystals.
    1. Re:Different recharging techniques. by iammaxus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The parent shouldn't be so confident because he/she is obviously lacking a background in chemistry (or patent law, for that matter...) Simply from the quotes he/she gave, it is likely both technologies are very similar. They both rely on vastly increasing the reactive surface area of chemicals in the battery using nano particles. For those not chemically inclined, if you wanted to soak a loaf of bread with water, it would be a lot easier if you chopped it up into tiny pieces. In this case, pieces on the scale of nanometers, or thousands of times smaller than the thickness of a human hair. I can't comment on any specifics concerning the patents the companies hold, but suffice it to say that the information in the article certainly does not preclude both companies from using nano particles to increase surfaced area of a lithium ion battery. (For example, the short description of Altair's patent given appears to state that the patent covers a specific method for producing these nano particles for lithium ion batteries, not their use in lithium ion batteries period.)

  3. sigh heard round the world by peculiarmethod · · Score: 3, Funny

    women sigh round the world heavily, while dreaming of AA size waterproof versions.

    --
    ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
    1. Re:sigh heard round the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      women sigh round the world heavily, while dreaming of AA size waterproof versions.

      Huh why?

      Oh wait a minute... you mean when they get caught out in the rain.. don't you?

    2. Re:sigh heard round the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      women sigh round the world heavily, while dreaming of AA size waterproof versions.

      My wife is waiting for the D size batteries. She likes 'em big and strong.

    3. Re:sigh heard round the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      If they wanted AA size, I'd be getting a lot more action.

    4. Re:sigh heard round the world by iggymanz · · Score: 4, Funny

      and the goat.se guy is wondering if this technology could be used to make 24V deep cycle marine batteries for his 90 lbs. jack hammer

    5. Re:sigh heard round the world by thisissilly · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Can you wait 15 minutes? Try Radio Shack for Rayovac's 15-minute IC3 technology. AA and AAA batteries that recharge in 15 minutes, no joke. I find it handy for my digital camera.

  4. I'm a beta tester... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ok...I just charged these things for exactly one minute. Everything is working fine so fariweofaidfoiafoaif

  5. Altair's == Toshiba's? by TopSpin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Doesn't look like it. The Altair battery uses "nano-crystals" to vastly increase the surface area of the anode. Toshiba has come up with some kind of "nano-particle" that... absorbs more Lithium ions. Neither of these advances appear to directly contribute to capacity. They improve charging (and discharge) efficiency.

    --
    Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
  6. Fantastic for travelers by mytest23 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I regularly run through airports leeching power briefly between flights. I would pay handsomely to recharge 80% in a minute my: Laptop, Cell Phone, Video Camera Batteries, etc.

  7. Ah... but, here's the catch: by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 4, Funny

    These batteries also drain 80% in one minute!

    --
    Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
    Africus aut Europaeus?
    1. Re:Ah... but, here's the catch: by Infinite+Entropy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually that would be a very usefull ability if in fact it could discharge 80% of its capacity in a minute, for that would lead to a awesome power-density.

    2. Re:Ah... but, here's the catch: by rapidweather · · Score: 2, Informative
      From Toshiba's web site:
      The new battery can quickly store energy produced by locomotives and automobiles.


      So, they intend to use these in large scale applications. I wonder how that would work out on a train that has to climb a long grade, then decend for miles. On the decent, the batteries charge up quickly, then the power is available for the next upgrade.

      I can see where they would want to show these batteries off in cars and trains before bringing them to our favorite Toshiba Laptop.

      Concerning laptop power, don't we have fuel cells being tested in laptops that would do better than these batteries?
      Those are supposed to last all day.

    3. Re:Ah... but, here's the catch: by yincrash · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually that would be a very usefull ability if in fact it could discharge 80% of its capacity in a minute, for that would lead to a awesome power-density.

      ah yes. we call them capicitors. what a crazy hitech world this is!

    4. Re:Ah... but, here's the catch: by Infinite+Entropy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Chemical batteries and capacitors may both store electrical energy, but they are very different. Batteries have a much larger capacity while caps have historically been able to to discharge vastly more quickly. In fact caps are capable of discharging 100% in a second or less, producing very high power levels. Having batteries that can discharge faster can allow them to be used in applications that used to require caps.

  8. Battery Tech: Good and Bad by Thunderstruck · · Score: 2, Funny

    There are good and bad things that come from battery technology finally making some headway:

    The Good: Efficient transportation, long lasting mobile electronic devices, and of course light sabers.

    The Bad: People get totally freaked out when the engine on a hybrid car shuts down as the electric kicks in. That silence is just plain wrong, the engine should stay running. Oh, that and a lot of my clients are oil companies.

    --
    Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
  9. So how much heat do these give off? by DeafDumbBlind · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How hot do these babies get?

    --


    Jesus used to be my co-pilot, but we crashed in the mountains and I had to eat him.
    1. Re:So how much heat do these give off? by Total_Wimp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... and how much power will they require to charge? People are forgetting something. If you expect steady, large power over a large discharge period then you'll need huge power if your charg period is a small fraction of the discharge period.

      It makes me question the scaling the article implied for hybrid cars. The "one minute" charge timeframe is very much depending on having a power source capable of delivering that much energy to the battery. Hybrid batteries are many times the size of standard car batteries. That's a lot of power to deliver in a minute.

      TW

    2. Re:So how much heat do these give off? by Viceice · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're not getting it. Just because the battery is capable of absorbing 80% of it's total capacity in a minute doesnit mean it must.

      The real benefit here is from having a battery that is very efficient at absorbing energy in a situation where energy comes inconsistantly in intermittent intervels.

      See, hybried cars charge the car battries when

      1) The gas engine is running at such a situation where part of the power is used to run the car and part of it to charge it.

      2) When the car is breaking.

      So, when both situations occur isn'ty all that predictable and depends on the drivers driving style, meaning that the battery cannot get it's charge in a slow and steady stream but in occasional big gulps.

      The problem with the big gulp today is that if the gulp is big enough and the battery can't take it, energy is going to waste. So this new battery solves that problem by giving the battery the ability to drink up energy faster then the car can generate it.

      And if the reverse is true and the battery can discharge as fast, imagine what it can do for acceleration.

      --
      Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
  10. Re:Battery Tech: Good and Bad by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You get used to the gas engine cutting off after a few weeks. After that, it sounds weird when you drive a twentieth century car and hear it idling at stop lights.

  11. It is my hope by eobanb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...that this breathes new life into electric vehicles. The real problem with them right now is that it takes hours to recharge, whereas an internal combustion vehicle can just tank up at a service station in a minute or two. If this could work with electric vehicles as well, the scene could TOTALLY change. Imagine plugging in your car at the BP station for a minute or two, and being off on your merry way. The same goes for the insignificant capacity loss over time. Cells for electric vehicles are currently REALLY expensive, and heavy. Lithium ion cells are much lighter, and you could keep them for the life of the car.

    --

    Take off every sig. For great justice.

    1. Re:It is my hope by cartman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The problem wasn't that it takes hours to recharge. The problem was energy density: electric cars used conventional lead-acid or NiCAD batteries which were terribly heavy, relative to the amount of energy they stored. This greatly reduced vehicle range, because so much energy was expended carrying the heavy batteries. Adding batteries helped little, because that increased the weight of the batteries still further.

      An example of these problems was the GM EV1, which had a range of ~40 miles in an underpowered subcompact. The problem was energy density: the EV1 devoted ~90% of its energy to carrying its own batteries.

      Car manufacturers (like GM) considered using Lithium-Ion batteries, but were deterred by two facts: LiIon batteries are very expensive, and they need to be replaced every few years because they lose the ability to hold a charge. Replacing expensive batteries every 2 years or so made the vehicle costs skyrocket.

      A LiIon battery that can be recharged many thousands of times, and that can be recharged in a few minutes, solves all of these problems. An EV can be built with a range >100 miles and an acceptable cost. Even long distances could be tolerated if you don't mind stopping every 100 miles or so for a brief recharge.

      This potentially wouldn't even require a hybrid. Straight electric seems achievable.

    2. Re:It is my hope by Osty · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A LiIon battery that can be recharged many thousands of times, and that can be recharged in a few minutes, solves all of these problems. An EV can be built with a range >100 miles and an acceptable cost. Even long distances could be tolerated if you don't mind stopping every 100 miles or so for a brief recharge.

      How many cycles before the batteries start losing capacity? If a battery has a 3000 cycle life (call it 8 years of daily recharges, more than enough life since most people will have replaced the car by then), but starts losing capacity after 750 recharges (2 years), that's not good. If the range is only 100 miles at 100% capacity and the battery is down to 80% capacity after two years, range has been significantly shortened.

      Also, a range of 100 miles is still very small. 200 miles is really the sweet spot (that's about where the worst gas guzzlers are at today), but to be really fair that measurement should be in terms of end-of-warranty battery state. If the warranty is 4 years and the battery has degraded to 65%, I still want 200 miles. That means the car needs to do better than 300 miles when new.

      100 miles on a new battery is fair for a commuter car in an urban area. However, that's not enough for most people* to replace their existing car. Keep in mind that if you misjudge your remaining charge, you can't just dump a can of gas in the tank and make it to the next stop.

      * By "people", I'm really referring to "Americans, or other folks that live in an expansive country where a typical commute may be 30-40 miles round-trip, and vacation spots may be a couple hours away". Your 100 mile electric car would not be able to get you from LA to Vegas on a single charge, and good luck finding a place to recharge in the long, empty expanses of desert.

    3. Re:It is my hope by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Bugger that... plop the damn things down in front of traffic lights... long left turn boom full power!.

      Auto credit card payment... Have it stick up to the bottom of your car.

    4. Re:It is my hope by tmortn · · Score: 2, Informative

      If the loss rate is 1% every 1000 charge cycles that is 20,000 charge cycles to get to 80%. If it works like that then these would have replacement timelines on the order of engine rebuilds/replacement.

      Ok now I want my T-zero with these batteries in it.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
    5. Re:It is my hope by danila · · Score: 2, Informative

      What's the point of your post? Haven't you heard of S-curves? This technology will not replace internal combustion engines overnight, but if the capacity is sufficient for certain customers, the adoption will gradually increase, supporting additional R&D investments. Eventually both cost and performance will be better than those of existing technologies.

      Complaining that it haven't happened yet is ridiculous.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  12. Nice power density too by PxM · · Score: 4, Insightful

    2) High Energy Density Small and light, the new battery offers a high level of storage efficiency. The prototype battery is only 3.8mm thick, 62mm high and 35mm deep and has a capacity of 600mAh.
    Given the recharge times that is an amazing amount of energy for PDAs, cameras and the like. However, if you're going to scale up that system for cars, you are going to have a hellishly dangerous amount of current flowing in order to get a charge in a minute (or time similar to a gas station) so they better figure out some good safety systems if they want to go to market with this for pure electic cars rather than the hybrids they're planning for in 2006. However, they might not need the one minute charge if they use the charge at home system the some electric car designs. You could charge to full in an hour or get enough of a charge at the supermarket or other store to make short hops without a problem.

    --
    Want a free iPod?
    Or try a free Nintendo DS, GC, PS2, Xbox. (you only need 4 referrals)
    Wired article as proof

    1. Re:Nice power density too by tmortn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Probably a battery farm of these at the gas station similar to the ones in the cars. Since they can charge at this rate they should also be able to discharge at this rate. So you build a bank of batteries that are constantly trickle charging to full off the grid and doing massive discharges as needed to refule cars. You would probably design your sustaining capacity somewhere around your average and be able to maintain peak outputs for rush periods.

      Could also have an onsight Generator capable of zapping a couple of cars at a time running from the gas tanks with a smaller assitent battery bank absorbing idle time from the generators and distributing more power when more cars are being refuled simultaneously. Also big incentive to add solar cells to the gas stations once they get cheap enough.

      Either should avoide needed new super duty power lines to carry massive. In either case utilities have to then start producing that power we used to get by harnessing gas in an ICE.

      If this is for real it is a world changer. And electric car could be a serious alternative to an ICE and the infrastructure is much easier to implement than hydrogen. Then if we make the leap to fusion we can use that to power the utilities and eliminate fossil fule burning altogether. Would still be utilizing them for plastics though.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
  13. Hybrid cars? by spywarearcata.com · · Score: 2, Funny

    If a Lion battery with enough Kwh to run a car can be recharged in one minute, do the lights in the entire block dim? Or after looking at the photograph, is this for a hybrid slot car?

  14. Re:one minute discharge by TheGuano · · Score: 2, Informative
    That's the claim too. Regular Li-ions claim about 300 cycles of useful charge. This one claims 1000. (IIRC Altair claims something like 20k charges).

    Hopefully that means your 1 hour of charge would net you at least 3 minutes ;)

  15. Hybrid car charging is going to be exciting by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Informative
    Let's say you want to charge a 48V 500AH battery from 50% charged in 5 minutes.... That's going to want approx 3000A * 48V = 144kW of juice. At, say, 70% mechanical to electrical efficiency that's 206kW == 275 horse power.... and still leave some for the air conditioner and turning the wheels. Hmmm.

    Maybe this technology will allow the battery size to be reduced in hybrids. That would definitely cut some cost out of hybrids and make them more pocket friendly.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  16. This is cool because it helps efficiency by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Lightly touch the brakes in a Prius, and the drive motor spins backwards as a generator, putting drag on the wheels and transferring the energy to the battery.

    Stomp hard on the brakes in a Prius, and the battery can't absorb current fast enough to deal with the power surge. Mechanical brakes come into play. Energy that could have been recycled turns into heat in the mechanical brakes.

    A super-fast charging battery could eliminate any need for mechanical brakes except as safety backups.

    1. Re:This is cool because it helps efficiency by theLOUDroom · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A super-fast charging battery could eliminate any need for mechanical brakes except as safety backups.

      Except that your electrical system would burst into flames if you did a 60-0 MPH panic stop.
      k=.5*m*v^2=.5*1000*26.82^2=359656.2 joules spread this out over 4 seconds and you get about 90,000 watts!

      If you were using a battery voltage of 100V, you would still need a battery system that could handle 900 amps of current. If you were using 0000 gauage wire, which is 0.46" in diameter, you'd be running 3X the reccommend current for that wire guage. So even if your motors and your batteries could handle the current (which they can't), just your wiring itself would probably end up weighing as much as a set of normal, mechanical brakes.

      It would be neat if all that energy could be recovered, but I expect mechanical brakes are going to be around for quite some time. Of course if you did build a car that could do this, and it ever broke, the electrical system in the car could provide enough current to weld itself together (and a half dozen other cars...simulatneously).

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    2. Re:This is cool because it helps efficiency by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Informative
      You're assuming that the regular brakes come on because the battery can't take the charge quickly enough. I'm not a mechano-electrical engineer, but I'm pretty sure there's only so much force a given engine can put out that way.

      The braking force exerted by a motor/generator is proportional to the load on it. Many diesel-electric locomotives brake by shunting the drive motors into a dynamic braking grid (actually a humongous resistor) which provides resistive loading on the motor/generators. In the case of hybrid cars, the batteries can only absorb so many amps, and therein lies the limitation of their regenerative braking.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    3. Re:This is cool because it helps efficiency by Hal9000_sn3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      900 amperes may seem like a lot, but I have seen electrical systems in aircraft designed (with safety margins) for 1500 A, and have also seen ground equipment peg an ammeter past the 2500 A mark. Starter/generators in larger, general aviation, aircraft typically draw 750 A at room temperature with cooled down engine, to get the engines up to speed. More current when cold, and at altitude they have to be able to spin an engine that could easily be at ambient temperatures around -40 degrees.

      Large bus bars, and multiple 00 or 000 guage wires can easily handle that much current with high temperature insulation. The common tables of ampacity for stationary use are very conservative, and you must take into account the assumptions of those tables.

      Then, my understanding is that most hybrid and electrical cars use more like 250-400 volt battery systems, so current handling would only need to be in the 225 to 360 ampere range.

      Probably you would want actually to stop from 60MPH in about 3.5 seconds, and also you would not likely need to dissipate all the energy as generated electricity. In any case the engineering is not as difficult as it might seem, and with good enough bumpers and airbags, who needs brakes anyway?

    4. Re:This is cool because it helps efficiency by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2, Informative

      Probably you would want actually to stop from 60MPH in about 3.5 seconds, and also you would not likely need to dissipate all the energy as generated electricity.

      The real trouble is that I was being consevative with the energy. An actual car would need to be able to handle a panic stop from 80 MPH plus. So you have to double all your numbers.

      And you have to be pretty conservative with you current ratings, since you may have just done a full-throttle acceleration up to that 80MPH.

      I think there's probably a point of dimishing returns after you're getting a certain percentage your breaking force from regnerative breaking.
      (Consider the extra weight of all the equipment to handle a full panic stop, vs that percent of the time that you're actually going to use it.)
      Also consider the bigger wires, motors and batteries add weight, which in turn makes stopping harder.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    5. Re:This is cool because it helps efficiency by ars · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You have a mistake in how much wire you actually need.

      The reason for the "standard" wire sizes given in electrical code is that they are designed to be stuck in insulation, and conduit and other places where they can't dissipate heat.

      However in this case first or all you are only running current for 4 seconds! So they hardly have time to heat up much, and second you can easily put some cooling fins on them.

      You don't need anywhere near as much wire as you might think.

      (i.e. if it's safe to run 15 amps in a wire for 1 minute - you can run 90 apms in it for 15 seconds! And on top of that the electical codes are spec'd for continuous use.)

      --
      -Ariel
  17. fuel cells by Lotharjade · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Im still waiting for fuel cell vehicles to become standard. If they would just make a car we would ACTUALLY use. None of these tiny little fly traps. Get me a BIG fuel cell vehicle and Ill be there in a flash.

    Im sure we will use the lessons from hybrids and new battery design in the future of fuel cell vehicles, but I suspect that hybrids are only a step on the way to better cars.

    --
    Party at O'zorgnax's Pub! Buy me a Slurmtini aye?
  18. One minute? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What sort of amperage would that be on a typical battery? The articles aren't specific. For laptops, I can see that the limitation would be what can be drawn by wall power.

  19. Mine's better by KFK+-+Wildcat · · Score: 5, Funny
    it's a beautiful shade of blue
    Heh, mine's better; it's painted with a super intelligent shade of blue.
  20. 6 minute batteries by Jaiden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This will go well with my 6 Minute Abs tapes.

    Though I may have to throw them out if they come up with 1 Minute Abs.

    Seriously though, you still have to pump in the energy you want to get out later. For a car this is a LOT of energy. I'd do the calculations if I were more clever. Without distributed power generation (think fuel cells) it may be hard to get that much juice in one spot without frying someone.

    You'd have to bump up the voltage to keep the wires from being too thick to be managed by a single person. Then you have to worry about shocks (rain anyone?) and fumes (presumably there would be filling stations in/near gas pumps for legacy support). Also, some batteries vent hydrogen. not sure if these do though.

    --
    this sig has been rated E for Everyone.
    1. Re:6 minute batteries by TheGuano · · Score: 2, Funny

      So we should all buy stock in manufacturers of three-phase power sockets!

  21. There go the circuit breakers by JoeBuck · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you can put the same power into your battery in one minute that your laptop sucks out in two hours, it follows that, for that one minute, your battery sucks 120x the power. So, if your laptop uses 100W or power, you need 12 kW for a minute to recharge it. It's going to take a special circuit to deliver that power (100 amps at 120V).

    1. Re:There go the circuit breakers by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's even worse - the batteries are for a CAR. Plug a few of those babies into your local power drop at the same time, you'll blow a street transformer.

    2. Re:There go the circuit breakers by wramsdel · · Score: 5, Informative

      The extended-life battery for my laptop is 7.4V, 7800 mAH, discharge rate not stated. That implies that its capacity is 57.72WH. Given that I can run my laptop for ~4 hours on this battery, I think it's safe to say that my laptop does not consume 100W.

      If I wanted (or were able) to charge this battery in one minute, it would require 468 amps at 7.4V, or 28.86A at 120V. Charge it in two minutes (ignoring all system losses and heat issues) and you've solved the 120V issue. You're still trying to push 234A at 7.4V, though, which would be a problem. At 10 minutes charge time, especially if you were able to integrate the charger with the battery pack, I can see how it might be feasible.

    3. Re:There go the circuit breakers by baboon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A quick Google suggests that a typical peak might be 50W, but an average laptop consumption is more like 10W.

      That would be 1200W to recharge, about what a vacuum cleaner uses.

    4. Re:There go the circuit breakers by yincrash · · Score: 3, Informative

      the prototype batteries are 600mAh. I suppose if each of those took a minute, a 7800mAh version for a laptop would take about 13 minutes.

  22. Talk about some amps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How does one charge a ev in 1 minute? I mean the EV1's lead-acid pack is (16.3 kW-hr). So 80% of that is 13.04kw-hr. So what is this magical charger that can do 782.4kw for one min? Its gona be nice sucking 3556 amps from the 220 line.

  23. Re:one minute discharge by ciroknight · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you read the article, you'd see that the battery looses 1% of life after 1000 charge cycles. So you can see they already last quite a bit longer than typical Li-Ion batteries.

    When can I expect one of these beasts in my iPod!!??

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
  24. Re:Battery Tech: Good and Bad by Zeussy · · Score: 2, Funny

    easy way around, decent speakers and a recording of your engine idling. So you have virtual engine idling. Could add Dual Shock ability to make the car rumble as if the engine is idling. But only if you buy the rights 1st :P

  25. Re:Perpetual motion machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unfortunately, energy output will never equal energy input on any machine. The speed that the battery could recharge has nothing to do with the amount of energy that is being put into it. That's 7th grade physics, sir.

  26. Wireless? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny
    "I'm still waiting out for wireless power :-D"

    That's fine, but how about my nutty idea? Imagine a service where music could be transmitted wirelessly, and you could have a receiving device even smaller than an iPod to listen to the music with. I wonder if anyone would or could ever invent something like this?

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Wireless? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So far, two of you moderators just modded the idea for a AM/FM radio as insightful. I know the iPod was mentioned and you probably got excited but you guys need to focus man, focus.

      It was Funny. It was also Insightful, but only because it was Funny in an Ironic way. Unfortunately it was too Subtle for some people to realize it was meant to be a joke, prompting several Clueless posts who have taken the liberty of explaining the punch line to the joke's author, mistaking his Insightfulness for their own. I hate when people do this to my own jokes. Recognizing something as being Funny without realizing it was meant to be Funny means you didn't get the joke!

      And here I was ready to build on this Fiasco, by noting that if such a thing were invented today, it would surely be smothered under a swarm of intellectual property motions and lawyers, forced to incorporate scrambling, subscriptions, and licenses. They certainly knew how to innovate a century ago. Nowadays everything has to be against the law unless it Sucks.

    2. Re:Wireless? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmmmmm. I bet you could do that wirelessly using the vibration sensors attached to both sides of your head. I'd like to try this out, but my vibration sensors seem to be clogged. Would you hand me a Q-tip?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    3. Re:Wireless? by N+Monkey · · Score: 2, Funny
      "I'm still waiting out for wireless power :-D"

      That's fine, but how about my nutty idea? Imagine a service where music could be transmitted wirelessly, and you could have a receiving device even smaller than an iPod to listen to the music with. I wonder if anyone would or could ever invent something like this?

      Yeah but it'd probably go the way the internet: First it'd be a nice public service but eventually they'd start filling it with adverts :-)
    4. Re:Wireless? by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but the toughest part will be building in the DRM.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
  27. Re:Perpetual motion machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey - go easy. It's his first day at the patent office.

  28. Re:one minute discharge by dougmc · · Score: 4, Informative
    But this ignores loss in capacity that may occur to do other factors, primarily exposure to heat.
    To be more precise, Li-ion and Li-poly batteries lost most of their capacity in about two years, no matter how much use they get. (This assumes that they're not abused, of course. Abuse ruins them much faster.)

    NiCd and NiMH cells, on the other hand, last longer, especially if not being charged and discharged a lot.

  29. Re:one minute discharge by websaber · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This might be a great combination with fuel cells. A 5 minute charge and a tank of hydrogen might be good for a couple of hundred miles and still allow service station convenience.

    --
    "A good friend will bail you out of jail. A true friend will be sitting next to you saying, 'damn....that was fun!'"
  30. Re:Battery Tech: Good and Bad by Dominic_Mazzoni · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Bad: People get totally freaked out when the engine on a hybrid car shuts down as the electric kicks in.

    Yeah, kind of like IE users get freaked out the first time they use FireFox and experience browsing without pop-up ads.

    I drive an '05 Prius. I love the fact that the engine cuts off so much. A small fraction of people who ride with me think it's weird at first, but they get used to it after 5 minutes. Most people think it's the coolest thing ever.

  31. interesting? More like fiction by bluGill · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The problem wasn't that it takes hours to recharge. The problem was energy density

    No, it was both. People want a car that they can take on vacation, easily refueling ever once in a while. While refueling every 50 miles isn't ideal, people would live with that if it only took a minute and was cheap. You shouldn't be sitting still for longer than that anyway for health reasons. However nobody is willing to wait hours for a recharge.

    The problem was energy density: the EV1 devoted ~90% of its energy to carrying its own batteries.

    90% that doesn't fit. At high speeds (60mph) most of the energy is spent on wind resistance which is function of frontal area and other such variables, none of which are affected by mass.

    Even if we assume 20mph where rolling resistance is the dominate factor you are making a claim that the the entire car minus batteries weighs -84lbs! (the car specs at 3086 lbs, + 200lbs driver, 90% of that is 2970, which subtracting the driver out again comes out to negative weight!)

  32. Re:What about the remaining 20%? by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Informative
    i was going to moderate, but i'm sure there are a small horde of /.'ers thinking the same thing.

    Short Answer: No

    lithium batteries can take a fast charge, up to a point, after that most chargers (or is it the internal circuitry) will switch to a slower charge rate.

    this is done to avoid thermal runaway = disaster.

    with good cooling, most rechargeables can handle a very high recharge rate (Cx2 or Cx4) till around 75% capacity, but you'll need to slow charge 'em to reach 100%

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  33. Smaller Devices will benefit regardless by Artifakt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The best part of this is the batteries are being developed for cars. Compare this with the various high tech alloys and such that end up being available first in luxury items such as golf clubs or tennis racquets but not making it out to more fundamental products for another generation, or more. If this really starts showing up in 2006 models, it should slow the increase in gas prices within a few years, maybe a great deal if sales are good.
    For Americans, would you rather have these batteries make it more quickly to your MP3 players and laptops, or have 2010 gas prices only rise to say $4.50 instead of $5.75 a gallon?
    (And for most Europeans figure somewhere around EU 8 or 9 instead of EU 12, even if the Euro rises against the Dollar, as most of your governments have already agreed to discout hybred fuel costs in various ways, but a lot of the cost will still be taxes).
    Indirect savings, i.e. from trucked goods costs and smaller winter spikes in heating oil prices would add substantially to that.
    $1.25 a gallon difference (or likely more) will pay for lots of older model batteries for all your smaller appliances, and then some.

    --
    Who is John Cabal?
  34. chewbacca's flux capacitor by goombah99 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    lets suppose that we want a car with the aerodynamic profile of a honda accura to be able to achieve 60 miles per hour. this takes about 25 horsepower to overcome drag. toss in some headroom for decent acceleration and overcoming drive train and wheel friction and we'll want a tad over 30 horsepower. assume we desire ten hours of travel time for a cruise range of 600 miles. and also assume 70% electric to machanical conversion. thats roughly 445 horse-power-hours = 336 kilowatt hours or 1.21 gigajoules. if you push in this much energy in say ten minutes that requires a 2 megawatt power source. if you could live with 1 tenth the horse power and 1 tenth the run time then that is 20,000 watt power source to recharge. ha! this is chewbacca absurd. I must be making a mistake or electric automobiles are infeasible to charge quickly. this makes no sense

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:chewbacca's flux capacitor by smithmc · · Score: 5, Funny

      thats roughly 445 horse-power-hours = 336 kilowatt hours or 1.21 gigajoules. if you push in this much energy in say ten minutes that requires a 2 megawatt power source.

      And if you could push that much energy in one second, it'd be 1.21 gigawatts!!

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    2. Re:chewbacca's flux capacitor by mlyle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's for a hybrid car; so it's for a relatively short runtime that it's being charged repetitively onboard. (To aid in peak acceleration, but to allow the gasoline engine to be sized for cruise consumption).

      Say 50 horsepower for 30 seconds of output; using your numbers for electrical-to-mechanical efficiency, that's about 26kW to charge in a minute; or about 51 horsepower at 70% alternator efficiency. So you could have a 50 horsepower gasoline engine running flat out at a stoplight charging the battery pack, and have 100 horsepower of initial acceleration for 30 seconds. Not so absurd, eh?

    3. Re:chewbacca's flux capacitor by gnuman99 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Drive train? What? Electic cars have motors in the wheels. Well, at least true electric cars. The motors and bearings are sealed. The maintenance is virtually nothing.

      Electric motors bring true 4x4 power to cars. Don't know how that can be done? Look here about Variable Speed Drives http://www.psnh.com/Business/SmallBusiness/Motor.a sp

      Now about recharging, well, true, it will be hell of a lot of current on the battery cells. But that does NOT mean a lot of current in the input. If you want to recharge a 100Ah 24V battery, that's about 24*100=2.4kWh and recharge in 1 minute, you need to provide

      • 6000A @ 24V
      • 1200A @ 120V
      • 300A @ 480V
      • 30A @ 5kV

      ASIDE: Motor effiency is >>95%, not some 70% crap. Even if you have have physical gears, you get >90% efficiency for the entire drive train. http://www.tech-m4.com/eng/tm4transport/moto_centr almotor/

      The answer is high voltage input and it can be done. Especially in the US/Canada where power is distributed at high votage (ie. no need to worry about melting transmission lines).

      Anyway, the battery cannot be recharged this way because the wires feeding the battery would melt, although more research in superconductors could fix this problem.

    4. Re:chewbacca's flux capacitor by bobcat7677 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      RTFA, it says that the new technology not only makes faster charging possible, but also allows the batteries to handle much faster discharge. That's why the first applications will be Hybrid cars and powertools. Both applications beg for batteries that can handle massive power drains and turn around and fast charge without blowing up or shortening their lifespan.

      Personally, this is exactly the type of battery breakthrough I have been waiting for. I opted to buy a standard Honda Civic because I realised that the battery packs in the current hybrids are likely to wear out as quickly as my laptop's battery and cost considerably more to replace...which makes the option fiscally irresponsible for someone like me (not to mention the performance deficit in the current models). But once this new battery tech hits the hybrids, they can be made to perform better and have the battery pack life more in line with the longetivity of the rest of the vehicle's components...which will mean the technology has matured enough to be mainstream.

      Given that they say this tech should be here as soon as NEXT YEAR, I'm excited! There will be no excuse for car makers not to have hybrid models of all shapes and sizes after this.

      One more quick item to note...fast charge/dischare hybrid power packs do already exist in a different form. It was setup as sortof a hybrid of hybrid. The power pack was a combination of huge capacitors for the quick power drains and charges, and then normal batterys along side those for sustained moderate charge/discharge (pulling a long hill or caosting down it). This hybrid/hybrid thing was discussed on slashdot before but here is the link for reference: http://www.ecolectrictechnology.com/

    5. Re:chewbacca's flux capacitor by TarpaKungs · · Score: 3, Informative
      Wheel motors: ~97% efficient. http://www.tech-m4.com/eng/tm4transport/moto_wheel motor/
      The only problem here is you're increasing the unsprung weight, which automobile designers try their utmost to reduce. One could go 1/2 way and chassis mount the motors and use CV joints+driveshafts, but that's introducing losses again.
      --
      Why can't women be like Hedy Lamarr - beautiful, talented and inventors of frequency-hopping spread-spectrum techn
  35. but not backwards! by bluGill · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes motors and generators are essentially the same thing. However a generator is not a motor spinning backwards. A generator is a motor that is being spun by an external power source.

    Connect a motor to a powersource and it will start to turn. Connect the output shaft to an input that is powered (a turbine for example), and the motor will try generate power. However the motor is still turning the same direction, it is just being driving faster than the electrical input would make it go, so it is putting out electric power.

  36. No... by cartman · · Score: 2, Insightful
    No, it was both. People want a car that they can take on vacation...nobody is willing to wait hours for a recharge.
    No, it was energy density (again). Energy density is what determines the range of the car: ICE/gasoline cars get excellent ranges because of the gravimetric density of gasoline which is 13,500WH/kg, compared to ~40WH/kg for lead-acid batteries.

    If you only had to recharge the electric car once per day, waiting a few hours for a recharge wouldn't be that big a burden, since it could be done overnight. This would be less of a burden than stopping every 50 miles on a long trip.

    At high speeds (60mph) most of the energy is spent on wind resistance which is function of frontal area and other such variables, none of which are affected by mass.
    Um, since electric vehicles are much heavier than conventional ICE cars, a greater proportion of the energy is expended on rolling resitance and acceleration of mass.

    Otherwise, why would the range of an EV1 have been only ~40 miles? If aerodynamic resistance were the principal factor, then then EV1 should have had a greater range than conventional cars, since its drag coefficient was much smaller.

    You are taking a figure from ICE cars and wrongly applying it to EVs.

    Even if we assume 20mph where rolling resistance is the dominate factor you are making a claim that the the entire car minus batteries weighs -84lbs!
    I never claimed any such thing. You (wrongly) inferred that my claim implied it.

    Cars obviously do not consistently operate at any speed (they start and stop). The EVs were touted as "commuter vehicles" which obviously won't operate consistently at 60MPH then suddenly stop for the day.

    Even if we assume 20mph where rolling resistance is the dominate factor you are making a claim that the the entire car minus batteries weighs -84lbs! (the car specs at 3086 lbs, + 200lbs driver, 90% of that is 2970, which subtracting the driver out again comes out to negative weight!)
    The original figure did not include the weight of what the car was carrying, which is difficult to estimate and which depends on the number of people in the car, how fat the people are, the weight of their luggage, etc.

    IIRC the EV1 car minus the batteries weighed only a few hundred pounds, and the car with the batteries weighed ~3100 lbs. The car was touted as a "commuter car" and therefore most of its energy was expended in acceleration of its enormous mass, and in rolling resistance. Regenerative braking only recaptures a relatively small proportion of the energy expended during acceleration.

  37. Re:What about the remaining 20%? by inflex · · Score: 2, Informative

    Lithium Ion/Poly batteries charge using "constant voltage" charge, so the last 20% often takes as long as the first 80% (because the voltage difference between the charge source and the batter gets smaller and smaller meaning less power is being transferred for a unit of time).

    I know with my aircraft, we use LiPoly batteries and it's a real curse to sit there and watch your batteries race to 60~70% charge in 30 minutes only to then sit back for another hour waiting for the rest :-\

    Paul.

  38. In other news... by seven+of+five · · Score: 2, Funny

    Toshiba announces a thin stick-on device using nanocrystals that you can use on your cell phone....

  39. It's a sticker! by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Funny

    More details about this amazing technology can be found here.

  40. not stolen - licensed from space aliens by Sean+Clifford · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not stolen - Toshiba *licensed* from space aliens.

  41. What do you mean "waiting"? by jestered1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's called lightning.

  42. Memory? by N+Monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wasn't that supposed to be the big selling point for Li-ion battery's several years ago when they first appeared on the horizon. "No recharge memory like Ni-Cad!".
    Well it's clear they don't have "recharge memory". It's more like "recharge Alzheimer's", i.e. they completely forget how to recharge :-(

  43. Re:Battery Tech: Good and Bad by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are good and bad things that come from battery technology finally making some headway:

    The Good: Efficient transportation,


    are you nuts?

    I recently bought a car that was designed in the 1980's that regularly get's more gas mileage than a honda Insight.

    It's a Geo Metro with a 955cc engine. After adding low rolling resistance tires and adjusting steering camber to 0 (just like the honda) I get on average 58mpg. I have yet to see an insight with that high of an average. (I know of 5 owners of them, the insights are dirt cheap on the used market now)

    Call me when they can take the fuel efficency from 1989 and add hybrid tech to get real increases in fuel economy. the Insight should be getting 70+mpg regularly if an econo-box from the 80's can get almost 60 without any real effort.

    A friend of mine is looking to reduce the diameters and weight of the power steering and alternator pullies on his. he is guessing he will gain 3 hp and possibly another mpg.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  44. Re:one minute discharge by dougmc · · Score: 2, Informative
    The mind abounds with disturbing images of people abusing batteries in all sorts of different ways..
    It's not nearly as interesting as you make it sound.

    Common forms of abuse (not specific to LiPo cells, however) :

    leaving a battery in a hot car, especially in the sun.

    discharging a battery completely in 4 minutes, like many R/C car and plane guys do. The battery generally tolerates it, but it won't last long.

    charging a battery at 4C (full charge in 15 minutes.) (Some batteries can tolerate higher charge rates, some can't.)

    overcharging a battery (like leaving it on a charger for days at a time. LiPo chargers MUST have circuitry to prevent this, as LiPo cells can explode if overcharged, but NiMH and NiCd cells tolerate it, even though it's still abuse.)

    discharging a battery too much (for a NiCd/NiMH cell, you reverse-charge a cell or two, which is bad, and for LiPo/Pb, discharging too much ruins the cell.)

    dropping the battery onto a concrete floor. Yes, physical abuse is still abuse.

    People deliberately overcharging a LiPo pack and filming it to see what happens.

    There's a lot more, but this should give you an idea.