Slashdot Mirror


Star Wars Fans in Line... at the Wrong Theater

Rollie Hawk writes "More than a month before the premiere of Revenge of the Sith, fans are already lining up. Outside Grauman's Chinese Theater, eleven diehard Star Wars fans (i.e. lifelong virgins) are waiting for tickets to go on sale. Unfortunately, it appears that the guys with girlfriends will have the last laugh as the Chinese Theater isn't even premiering the film."

111 of 618 comments (clear)

  1. Triumph by The+I+Shing · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can only imagine what Triumph the Insult Comic Dog would to have to say about this group.

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    1. Re:Triumph by shotgunefx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That segment was so damn funny.
      "Which one of these buttons calls your parents to pick you up?"

      Except for the LOTR kid. That was just kind of sad.

      --

      -William Shatner can be neither created nor destroyed.
    2. Re:Triumph by cablepokerface · · Score: 2, Funny

      Indeed, in line for ages, pulling their own Chuck Norris Texas Ranger lever.

    3. Re:Triumph by TrippTDF · · Score: 4, Funny

      That reminds me- Remember the wizard that shows up in the clip of Triumph making fun of the Star Wars geeks? I was on the subway coming back from Coney Island one day last year (after the Mermaid Parade) and that guy was on the car with me

      All I could do was chuckle to myself while he read proclimations from scrolls.

    4. Re:Triumph by Golias · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What kills me about the "nerds" waiting in line for Star Wars prequels is they are such posers.

      When Empire came out, people waited in line days in advance because it was the only sure way to get in on opening night.

      Today, you can buy your tickets on-line in advance and show up just as the previews are starting. There is no reason to camp out for seats other than pretending to be as "hard core" of a fan as those who slept out for the original movies in '77, '80 and '83.

      Hey, you in the Jedi robes! Here's a clue: Real nerds will have already seen the illegal torrent file of the movie before you even get in the theater anyway. There's no geek-cred to be won simply by being the "first" to see the new movie, and all of the prequels are lame anyway. Go home and take a shower.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    5. Re:Triumph by Golias · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Except for the LOTR kid. That was just kind of sad.

      Blackwolf the Dragon Master was hilarious!

      Besides, as weirdness goes, that kid's quirks were relatively harmless. It's not like his wizard robes were made out of human skin or something.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    6. Re:Triumph by TrippTDF · · Score: 2, Informative

      his homepage can be found here:

      Intro to Blackwolf's Dossier.

    7. Re:Triumph by shotgunefx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      His part was funny at first until I realized, this kid will probably never get laid, EVER.

      Spock flipping them all of was pretty damn funny too.

      --

      -William Shatner can be neither created nor destroyed.
    8. Re:Triumph by Golias · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I dunno. He's excactly the sort of nerd who other nerds look up to. A sort of "alpha nerd" if you will. The more crazy and over-the-top a guy is, the more the "nerd-hags" (yes, just as "chubby chaser" men exist, so too do women who fetishize nerds) will tend to flock to him.

      I'm guessing he can get his share of wicca trim at a typical Ren Fest.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    9. Re:Triumph by shotgunefx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I hope so for his sake. He's definitely an "alpha nerd".

      I dunno, a lot of "embarassing stuff" other people find funny, I don't because it's painful to watch. Almost like I'm doing it. Same with rage. I watch something were someone is screaming and my body gets all worked up like I was mad, but I'm not. I watch someone holding their breath underwater and my breathing just tapers off. Maybe I'm the weird one :)

      --

      -William Shatner can be neither created nor destroyed.
    10. Re:Triumph by Golias · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, there was a study (which I saw a bit about on PBS... "Scientific American Frontiers" I think... anyway, the one with Alan Alda hosting it) which showed that when you watch somebody experience something, your brain reacts in almost exactly the same way as if you experienced it yourself.

      This function of the way our brains are wired is what allows us to feel empathy.

      The corollary to this phenomenon could also be the reason why voyeurs often become crossdressers.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    11. Re:Triumph by wwest4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So let me get this straight -- if you camp out because you must, you're a "real" nerd, and if you have time to do it out of a sense of nostalgia you're... what, cool? I can't think of anything nerdier than those dudes in the Triumph video. Modern-day Star Wars sidewalk campers are the benchmark standard for nerds everywhere.


      > There is no reason to camp out for seats other than pretending to be as "hard
      > core"


      Except, you know, because they want to socialize with Star Wars fans and play with lightsabers, and they think that's cool, despite the fact that it's not cool to the rest of us.

      News flash: "geek cred" is a worthless currency, and has been ever since the dot-com bubble burst. It's now back to just being an oxymoron. You've reached a crossroads: If there's a group deriving value and status from somthing that you deem worthless, and then you proceed to deride them for not sharing your sense of what's worth doing -- then congratulations, you're no longer a nerd. You're a cool person.

      > Go home and take a shower.

      If I stay home and torrent the prequels I already know I'm supposed to hate, why bother showering?

    12. Re:Triumph by Golias · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not being an ass, just being nitpicky

      Hey, don't sell yourself short. You can be both. :)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    13. Re:Triumph by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 3, Funny

      According to the article, these fans are more interested in standing in line than seeing the movie itself:

      "The telling thing is -- for me, at least -- if the film is not playing at the Chinese ... I have zero desire to see it at all," a fan who calls himself Obi Geewhyen posted on the message board at Liningup.net. "I'm in it for the lineup only and don't give a darn about the conclusion of this lackluster, so-called 'Star Wars' series."

      Ladies and Gentlemen, we have found the Comic Book Guy!

    14. Re:Triumph by Spankophile · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ouch. Sounds like I hit a nerve there.

      Nope. Sounds like you got fucking pwnxx03rd.

      ggnorekkthx.

    15. Re:Triumph by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 2, Informative

      Triumph (the insult comic dog) is a regular feature on Late Night with Conan O'Brien. One of the star wars clips is on ifilm and there's a link there to the other one.

      You will either laugh your ass off, or hate it. There's no middle ground.

    16. Re:Triumph by Dirk+the+Daring · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I didn't read the article until after I saw this snippit from the parent. I just had to verify it was in the article... "... a fan who calls himself Obi Geewhyen..." Folks, say it slowly, in syllables.

    17. Re:Triumph by G-funk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What is it with americans and "oh-bee-gee-why-en"? Why cant you just say gynacologist like the rest of the world? Is it a dirty word in the states or something? It took me years to figure out wtf that word meant.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    18. Re:Triumph by mink · · Score: 2, Informative
      OB./GYN. is Obstetrician/Gynacologist. Thats why it's used, because it actually is shorter to say then the whole thing.

      I found this on some site on the web:

      What is an OB/GYN

      An obstetrician is a physician who has successfully completed specialized education and training in the management of pregnancy, labor, and pueperium (the time-period directly following childbirth).

      A gynecologist is a physician who has a successfully completed specialized education and training in the health of the female reproductive system, including the diagnosis and treatment of disorders and diseases.

      Typically, the education and training for both fields occurs concurrently. Thus, an obstetrician/gynecologist is a physician specialist who provides medical and surgical care to women and has particular expertise in pregnancy, childbirth, and disorders of the reproductive system. This includes preventative care, prenatal care, detection of sexually transmitted diseases, Pap test screening, and family planning.

      An obstetrician/gynecologist, commonly abbreviated as OB/GYN, can serve as a primary physician and often serve as consultants to other physicians. OB/GYNs can have private practices, work in hospital or clinic settings, and maintain teaching positions at university hospitals. OB/GYNs may also work public health and preventive medicine administrations.

      OB/GYNs have a broad base of knowledge and can vary their professional focus. Many develop unique practices, providing high-quality health care for women. OB/GYNs may choose to specialize in the following areas:

      * Acute and chronic medical conditions
      * Adolescent gynecology
      * Behavioral problems
      * Cancer
      * Endocrinology
      * Health maintenance during pregnancy
      * Infertility
      * Operative gynecology
      * Pregnancy and delivery
      * Preventative health
      * Urinary tract disorders

      Education and Training Requirements
      The education and training requirements for obstetrics/gynecology are set by the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ABOG) and include the following:

      * Graduation from an approved medical school
      * Completion of an OB/GYN residency program (minimum of 4 years in length) that is accredited by the American Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)
      o Rotations divided between obstetrics, gynecology, gynecologic oncology, reproductive endocrinology, and ultrasonography
      o Experience in primary and preventive care role for the equivalent of at least 6 months of the residency, including inpatient and ambulatory care; diagnosis and management of breast disease and lower urinary tract dysfunction; performance and interpretation of diagnostic pelvic and transvaginal ultrasound
      o Increase in patient responsibility with each year of training
      o Serving as chief (senior) resident during final year of residency

      Board Certification
      Once the above requirements are met, physicians are allowed to take the certifying examinations given by ABOG. Physicians who pass the examination are granted board certified status in Obstetrics and Gynecology, a pre-requisite to subspecialty certification.

      If certified in obstetrics and gynecology after 1986, the physician must complete a recertification process every 10 years to maintain certified status. If certified before 1986, the physician can take a voluntary recertification process.

      Subspecialties
      There are four recognized subspecialties in the field of obstetrics/gynecology: gynecologic oncology, maternal/fetal medicine, reproductive endocrinology and infertility, and urogynecology/reconstructive pelvic surgery. Each subspecialty has its own certification exams administered by ABOG, and physicians can become certified in one or more of them. Certification is valid provided the primary certification in obstetrics and gynecology is up-to-date.

      * Gynecologic Oncology
      o Conce

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  2. Suckers by chrispix · · Score: 5, Funny

    Take that for not having a girl friend!

    1. Re:Suckers by Suhas · · Score: 2, Funny

      How can they be "Suckers" if they do not have a girlfriend.

      pssst... having a boyfriend, while technically correct, does not count.

    2. Re:Suckers by compass46 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Geeks are social. Dorks are not social but good people. Nerds are not social and evil.

      Nerds are the Slashdotters who put on their D&D dungeon master rode to feel empowered as they post on Slashdot and call everyone else in the world losers but themselves. I like geeks and dorks, I can't stand nerds.

    3. Re:Suckers by mboverload · · Score: 5, Interesting
      From Wikipedia:

      Pundits and observers dispute the relationship of the terms "nerd" and "geek" to one another. Some view the geek as a less technically skilled nerd. Some factions maintain that "nerds" have both technical skills and social competence, whereas "geeks" display technical skills while socially incompetent; others hold an exactly reversed view, with "geek" serving as the socially competent counterpart of the socially incompetent "nerd", and call themselves "geeks" with pride (compare Geekcorps, an organization that sends people with technical skills to Third World countries to assist in computer infrastructure development).

      Some regional differences may exist in the use of the words "nerd" and "geek". Some claim that on the North American west coast the population prefers the term "geek" to "nerd", while the North American east coast prefers the word "nerd" to "geek" (see Ellen Spertus's page on The Sexiest Geek Alive (http://www.mills.edu/ACAD_INFO/MCS/SPERTUS/Geek/) ). Others on the east coast dispute this, claiming that they have always found "nerd" used disparagingly and "geek" used in a positive light. In Britain, this latter view tends to apply -- "nerd" has more offensive connotations than "geek", which speakers of British English often use affectionately. Compare anorak.

      Nerd appeared earlier and at a time when being good at school was not seen as "cool". Therefore nerd is a derogatory word (although some people now consider it a compliment), while geek appeared later and has thus avoided many of the negative conotations. Geek is a milder version and is also applied to to people who are socially insignificant, while nerd is used more with people who are socially inept.

    4. Re:Suckers by coopex · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The word nerd was invented by Dr Seuss http://www.bartleby.com/61/32/N0063200.html

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
    5. Re:Suckers by sp0rk173 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not true. You've got the triad all wrong:

      A Geek is an engineer, or, barring that, one who obsessed with obtaining skill in something that really has no real world relevance, but sucks up time from interesting problems as a means of illusionary social superiority. These skills are mainly trivial, done by countless others, and are done in a way that collaboration is almost completely shunned. Examples are D&D, pseudo-religious flame wars (kind of like this), system administration, obtaining an MCSE, gaming, running debian, etc. This goes back to the Geeks of olde, circus geeks, who did horrifying and sometimes amazing acts that really had no utility outside of grossing people out and taking their money. As society has progressed the Geek personality has had to adapt, and now simply is the loner in his mom's basement who chats on IRC about how many bots he has running on his sid server while playing countless command-line MUDs, groaning about trolls and dice logistics. Help me out here dictionary:

      geek geek (g=ek), n.
      1. A performer in a carnival, often presented as a wild man, who performs grotesquely disgusting acts, such as biting the head off a live chicken or snake. PJCM
      2. Hence: Any eccentric or strange person; an oddball; an eccentric.

      The Dork is a more of a fun individual. He or She enjoys making people laugh and being the butt of many-a-jokes. They're fun to be around and generally amiable. When they're on, they're funny, when they're off, they're reserved.

      The Nerd, on the other hand, is your average scientist. They are reserved, hard-minded, generally nice, think-a-holics. They're open minded and realize all of the basic fundamental human truths instinctively. They find average pursuits boring and tedious, feel that they are generally socially inferior, but know it doesn't matter.

      Everyone has some combination of nerd/dork/geek in them. The main theme here, though, is social identity. Geeks think their "skills" make them socially superior to others. Dorks feel they are on the same level as everyone else. Nerds feel they are inferior, but realize it's all a crock of shit anyway. Your classic geek would be a Sports hero or a D&D player. Your classic Dork would be a comedian. Your classic Nerd would be a scientist. None of them are inherhently evil.

      During the 90's you computer people decided to take back the term Geek and adopt it in a way that it had never been used before. Now "hackers" are considered Geeks. Well, they're not, though their followers certainly are. Hackers are nerds. They love thinking about interesting problems, solving them, and sharing them. The entire hacker and open source culture is built on top of Nerdom. However, most of slashdot is awash in geeks. Followers who feel the need to tout their skills, chime in with some so-called insightful statement that is really just a rehash of things said over and over again in the community:

      "Competition is a Good Thing (tm)"
      "Free as in Freedom not free as in Beer"
      "Monopolies are Bad."
      Etc, etc etc...

      Infact, slashdot is built on the Geek model. That is, it's based on social advancement through subjective ratings, rather than pure openness and exchange of thoughts - be they flames or otherwise. It's trolls tend to be more insightful and commentative than it's serious posters, especially those post 600000 UID's. In other words - slashdot is designed, be it intentional or not, to bring out the worst element of the open source world - the Geek. The engineer that works in back rooms on a widget that his boss will then claim for his own. Owned by a company, building and toiling, giving shit back to society other than another magical product to pump to the masses, sold for more than it's really worth. But they're an engineer. That title makes them better than the rest of us! Or, they're a sys-admin or a dungeon master. All labels, titles that are created to make the individual feel superior in some meaningless way.

    6. Re:Suckers by The+Mathinator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      10-6=4

      If only one of the 6 was there because she enjoyed the game, then the other 5 were 'there because of their boyfriends'. By the pigeonhole principle, at least one nerd/geek must be doing very well indeed.

  3. HA! by 2.7182 · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's funnier than any joke I could attempt to post here!

  4. Not virgins... by Flaming+Foobar · · Score: 4, Funny

    You are confusing Star Wars fans with Slashdot posters. I know quite a few female SW fans. Many of them even have kids.

    --
    while true;do echo -e -n "\033[s\n\033[u\134_\033[B";done
    1. Re:Not virgins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, they had to do something while waiting in line.

    2. Re:Not virgins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hell, quite a night when you play Luke for your gal while she playing Leia :]

      Um, you have incest fantasies? Ewww.

    3. Re:Not virgins... by geoffspear · · Score: 4, Informative
      Completely off-topic (and pedantic) here, but "Immaculate conception" does not refer to a conception that takes place without sex, and is only related to the doctrine of Virgin Birth vaguely.

      The conception of Jesus was not the "immaculate conception"; the conception of Mary was; even though she was conceived through normal means, the Catholic Church decided that she'd been given a singular gift of Grace, making her the only person ever born without the stain of Original Sin, to explain how she could possibly be a suitable vessel for Jesus before he died to forgive that sin.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    4. Re:Not virgins... by jd142 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Does this mean the parent is a religion geek?

      And does this mean the Catholic Church made the first and most widely spread retcon?

    5. Re:Not virgins... by laplandsix · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think you're thinking of the immaculate reception a fine bit of Steelers lore. Hmmmm, wait I'm on slashdot, they don't do chicks OR sports. Damn.

      --
      Free The Lapland Six!!!
      http://www.whatiwore.com
      What I wore, now with 100% more pool project!
    6. Re:Not virgins... by Golias · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hell, quite a night when you play Luke for your gal while she playing Leia

      What people do at home is their own business.

      Hopefully your self-esteem can handle it when she asks you, "aren't you a little short for a stormtrooper?"

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    7. Re:Not virgins... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 4, Informative
      "Immaculate conception" does not refer to a conception that takes place without sex, and is only related to the doctrine of Virgin Birth vaguely.

      It's also a typo. In the original Hebrew, the word used meant "without child" or "young girl". Basically, "not a mother", nothing to do with "not had sex", or "a regular on slashdot". So, one of the cornerstones of Christianity is a translation error.

      Makes you think...

    8. Re:Not virgins... by Digz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not really.. "Alma" can refer to either a virgin or a young woman.. The passage in Isaiah was relevant to the contemporaries in that a young woman did give birth and fulfilled that specific prophecy, but also as a foreshadowing of the Messiah.. Just as Gen 3:15 refers to enmity between "the woman's seed" and the serpent..

      --
      SYS 64738
    9. Re:Not virgins... by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Those "translation errors" are all deliberate. ALL OF THEM. We're talking about some of the most learned people of their age making these translations, and they're not doing it in a void. They knew exactly what kind of spin they wanted to put on the bible and they disguised their tampering as translation. Witness all the more recent edits to the bible. If that's the word of God, all you people are going to hell for following a deliberately manipulated version of the Word.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Not virgins... by benw1979 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not a typo; you just didn't finish the story.

      Matthew 1:18 This is how the birth of Jesus Christ came about: His mother Mary was pledged to be married to Joseph, but before they came together, she was found to be with child through the Holy Spirit.

    11. Re:Not virgins... by fritz1968 · · Score: 2, Funny


      Hopefully your self-esteem can handle it when she asks you, "aren't you a little short for a stormtrooper?"


      Or it could get worse! "she" could make a comment along the lines of:

      I see that your schwarz is as big as mine!

      oh! wait a minute... wrong movie! Sorry about that. Nothing to see here... move along... move along.

      --
      It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.
    12. Re:Not virgins... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 4, Insightful
      We're talking about some of the most learned people of their age making these translations, and they're not doing it in a void. They knew exactly what kind of spin they wanted to put on the bible and they disguised their tampering as translation.

      Being modded as troll, but he's right. If you disagree, trace the the origins of the revision of the bible and you will see. Prior to the translation from Latin (King James version), only the elite could read the scriptures. When they translated them, they were the sole purveuors of religious thought in the UK. They were also men, bound by the weaknesses of men. They left out entire sections that they disagreed with, e.g. the book of Mary. Men at that didn't believe women had a place other than in the kitchen.

      Each translation was an attempt to make a bible for the local population, written with the current environment in mind. If the exact same people were to sit down and do a translation today, it would be vastly different. It scares me that most religious people aren't open to the fact there are several hundred different versions of the bible. The one their church uses is the correct one, and that's the end of the discussion as far as they are concerned.

    13. Re:Not virgins... by coronaride · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Men at that didn't believe women had a place other than in the kitchen.

      Simply not true...and if you had actually read the Bible (in particularly, the Gospels) you would have seen that this was not true.

      From the Gospel of Luke:

      "As Jesus and his disciples were on their way, he came to a village where a woman named Martha opened her home to him. 39She had a sister called Mary, who sat at the Lord's feet listening to what he said. 40But Martha was distracted by all the preparations that had to be made. She came to him and asked, "Lord, don't you care that my sister has left me to do the work by myself? Tell her to help me!"
      41"Martha, Martha," the Lord answered, "you are worried and upset about many things, 42but only one thing is needed.[f] Mary has chosen what is better, and it will not be taken away from her." "

      I mean, really, if all that the men were about were making sure that women stayed in the kitchen, wouldn't they have had a little bit more creativity here? Jesus would have told Martha that she was absolutely right and that Mary should get her lazy butt into the kitchen to help with preparing the food.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, go into business for themselves.
    14. Re:Not virgins... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      She had a sister called Mary, who sat at the Lord's feet listening to what he said. 40But Martha was distracted by all the preparations that had to be made. She came to him and asked, "Lord, don't you care that my sister has left me to do the work by myself? Tell her to help me!" 41"Martha, Martha," the Lord answered, "you are worried and upset about many things, 42but only one thing is needed.[f] Mary has chosen what is better, and it will not be taken away from her." "

      That's pretty weak though, just one example, and the teaching you could take from is that earthly pursuits are not as important as spirtual ones. Nothing about women not belonging in the kitchen! ;-) There are countless example of women not being treated equally in the bible. Out of curiosity, did the unmarried men who weren't virgins get stonings? I'm not sure on that.

      I'm not saying they rewrote it. But it was spun to conform with the times.

    15. Re:Not virgins... by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I've heard this argument before... it's interesting, but it's not what's been shown to be true. I'll need to reach for some sources here...

      There are 5,000+ unique manuscripts of the new testament, dated to between 50 to 225 years after the NT was written. So no, it wasn't spread by word of mouth for 1,000 years and got corrupted that way. According to this source and numerous studies, based on just the new testament, 5,000 different (greek!) manuscripts corroborate to an accurancy of 99.5%. (Strobel, Lee. The Case for Christ (Zondervan Publishing House, 1998), p. 83-85). Feel free to take an issue with that.

      They were also men, bound by the weaknesses of men.

      Agreed, of course. Men aren't perfect. But the book of Mary wasn't even written by Mary, nor could it have been proven to be true. All of the books in the modern bible have been corroborated -- hundreds of separate manuscripts... not decided by committee. See The Da Vinci Deception by Erwin W. Lutzer.

      Each translation was an attempt to make a bible for the local population, written with the current environment in mind. If the exact same people were to sit down and do a translation today, it would be vastly different.

      It would only be different in the sense that the words they would come out with from the original Greek translations would be different. There are a few dozen different versions of the Bible out right now. Some a sixth grader could read. Some I can't read aloud. Some have had the modern language applied to them. When you have greek words that can turn in ways more subtle than the modern English language (you know, like how eros, agape, and philia all mean "love", but agape is far more encompassing), that's going to happen.

      It scares me that most religious people aren't open to the fact there are several hundred different versions of the bible. The one their church uses is the correct one, and that's the end of the discussion as far as they are concerned.

      I have a preferred version, but I have a couple of others as well. Yes, the Wisconsin Synod of the Lutheran Church uses solely the King James Bible, as far as I know. There's no biblical precedent for that, nor do I recommend it, and it is dangerously narrow-minded.

      But there is also a difference between using just one Bible and going to another source (the Book of Thomas, the Book of Mary, the Apocrypha) that may not be as "proven" (through the manuscripts of old) as the 62 books that are there.

      Keep in mind there is nothing banning you from reading any of those books. There may even be parts that are helpful to you in the study of 1st century Judaism! They just aren't counted as "the inspired Word of God", given that some of the parables related in those books are clearly unbelievable (as opposed to the corroborated (I cannot emphasize that enough) miracles in the Gospels).

  5. Star Wars Kid by Kimos · · Score: 3, Funny

    Evidently the author of the article isn't aware of how desired the Star Wars Kid is...

  6. In other news... by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, 600,000 Catholics are in line at the wrong basillica....

    1. Re:In other news... by Garabito · · Score: 2, Funny
      600,000 Catholics are in line at the wrong basillica....

      Of course they are! Everybody knows this guy is the real pope.

    2. Re:In other news... by skinfitz · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's 1 million catholics - you don't apply currency exchange rates to numbers in a line.

  7. haha by Cruithne · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hilarious.



    ... so wait, are they still waiting?

  8. The funniest bit by Blapto · · Score: 5, Funny
    From the article:
    "The telling thing is -- for me, at least -- if the film is not playing at the Chinese ... I have zero desire to see it at all," a fan who calls himself Obi Geewhyen posted on the message board at Liningup.net. "I'm in it for the lineup only and don't give a darn about the conclusion of this lackluster, so-called 'Star Wars' series."

    Not only does he have a bit of a geeky tag, the reason he's waiting isn't to see the films but, well, to wait.
    1. Re:The funniest bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Obi Geewhyen?

      Either he's a doctor of the female arts and nerd...

      Or else he's a nerd +5 with absolutely no hope of ever glimpsing what a Doctor of Obstetrics and Gynecology sees all day long... ObGyn indeed!

      Nice job getting his handle into print though! ;)

    2. Re:The funniest bit by Golias · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The lines at the Chinese for the original film have ascended to the status of pop culture legend.

      People who wait in line outside the Chinese for the (shitty) prequels are doing so for the exact same reason kids went to "Woodstock 2" in spite of the fact that nearly all of the bands at the show sucked. They want to feel somehow connected to the phenomenon.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  9. Am I a bad person, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    if I feel a little better about myself after reading that?

    1. Re:Am I a bad person, by jrrl · · Score: 4, Funny

      Only a LITTLE better?

      -John.

      --
      Self Serving Sig: Hosting Comparison
  10. Makes you wonder... by jeffy210 · · Score: 4, Funny

    If they don't have internet access, and no one tells them... how long will they sit out there?
    And then what type of a fit will they throw when they go to the correct theatre and there's already a line.

    --
    ------
    "And may your days be long upon the earth."
  11. It's the experience that's important! by Minute+Work · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe they are doing this just for the sheer enjoyment of it?

    I saw Episodes 1/2 on opening day and waited in line about 6 minutes combined. So it's not like they NEED to camp out to get tickets. Which come to think of it makes the whole idea of them standing in line for tickets anywhere, let alone a theatre that isn't even showing the movie... downright sad.

    What I'm looking forward to more than the movie is the comedy bit where Triumph the Insult Comic Dog shows up and tells the line camping nerds how nice they are... FOR HIM TO POOP ON!

  12. Hey, wait a minute by Dachannien · · Score: 3, Funny

    eleven diehard Star Wars fans (i.e. lifelong virgins)

    Uh, hello, Kettle? This is Pot, returning your call....

    1. Re:Hey, wait a minute by dr_dank · · Score: 5, Informative

      Speaking of call...

      (323)462-9609

      This is the number to the payphone outside of Grauman's Chinese Theater.

      Enjoy.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:Hey, wait a minute by Sc00ter · · Score: 4, Funny

      Slashdotted payphone!

    3. Re:Hey, wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I got through :)

      It was pretty funny. Basically the guy was just telling me that they're not losers and that they have an organization for this kind of thing. They have a system of signing in and signing out and the amount of hours they accumulate indicates their position in line.

      I still think they're a bit freaky, but whatever you find fun, you gotta do.

    4. Re:Hey, wait a minute by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cool!

      Good to know that they have created a Star Wars Episode III Queue Ranking Organization using time accumulation to determine the rank, and aren't geeky at all! :-S

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  13. Movie's already released... by DogDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... in a way. I just played the PS2 game Star Wars: Lego, which lets you play a very accurate game based on episodes 1-3. Episodes 1 & 2 were very accurate, so I'm assuming that Episode 3 was accurate, too. If that was the case, then Obi-Wan follows Annakin to some volcanic planet, where they have a fight, and Annakin ends up losing and falling into lava. Obi-Wan thinks that he's dead. The Emperor finds him, and restores him as Darth Vader. Darth Vader gets pissed as soon as he wakes up with his new body, and smashes all of the machines. There was quite a bit more, too. All in this game that was released some time back. I thought it was one hell of a slip on somebody's part.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  14. Haha by Jakhel · · Score: 2, Funny


    Han SolOWNED

  15. Completely Sensible Behaviour by R.Caley · · Score: 4, Funny

    The best place to be when one of Lucas's abortions is released is in a cinema showing something else.

    --
    _O_
    .|<
    The named which can be named is not the true named
  16. rotflol by http101 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "The force is EXTREMELY WEAK with this crowd!"

    Are you sure the Chinese theatre wasn't showing Space Balls or something??? I mean, really, this is something QUITE obvious. You'd think these people would at least make sure they're at the right theatre!

    {shakes head} Damned Lemmings...

    --
    -- Game Developers: Stop porting badly-textured games from crappy console systems!
  17. It's sad... by ral315 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When we're mocking stupid Star Wars fans while we all wait on bated breath for the next story to appear, so we can karma whore.

  18. erm by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is it me or is this one hell of a frontpage troll? It reads likesome jock found a news story and thought he'd put the boot into us geeks.

    If this is the case then please fuck off to somethingawful or whatever the hellhole is you hang out because here we're beyond judging people on how many women they have fucked or gone out with.

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:erm by cliffski · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Amen. Its pretty tragic when people rail against some harmeless kids just because they love star wars. Would these kids be 'cooler' if they were selling cocaine or heroin on the same street instead?
      People have a fucked up idea of who to slag off.

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    2. Re:erm by Headw1nd · · Score: 5, Insightful
      When I saw this headline, it really made me wish there was some way I could mod the article itself down.

      This is really a sad commentary on the position of slashdot readers in the social order, and I'll illustrate why with a anecdote from middle school: At recess I often used to watch the field behind the soccer goals, because it's where the social outcasts would go to pick on each other. Day after day they would battle to determine the pecking order of the bottom 5th percentile. Fights like those didn't go on in the upper levels, where looks, money, and prestige determined social rank. It was fascinating, and tragic. In the end, the winners gained nothing, and the stuggle only served to make their lives that much more miserable.

      Now for those that didn't understand the moral, here it is; If you pick on the weakest people you can find, it is because you are yourself weak. If you are actually important or noteworthy in some way, you wouldn't have to point out failings in others to try and aggrandize yourself. Hugh Hefner doesn't need to scoff at other's sexual exploits, because he is legendary in that regard. If you do, you are obviously not.

      So for everyone out there who felt the need to say, "har dee har, at least I'm not those guys", congratulations, but recess is over. So point your eyes back down at the floor and don't bump into anyone in the hall, because to everyone else, you're still at the bottom.

    3. Re:erm by mrmag00 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Would these kids be 'cooler' if they were selling cocaine or heroin on the same street instead?

      Yes.

    4. Re:erm by deft · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dear lord those days on the side of the soccer field really sucked the sense of humor out of you.

      It's funny that they could do so much planning to go see a movie, and completely fail to check to see if the movie was showing there. It just is.

      Oops, everyone laughs, and if they have a sense of humor, they will laugh as well and move to the right theater.

      You'd probably be right there to make it a big f'ing deal though, and try to throw your baggage on top of them.

      You think the people waiting for months outside a theater dont already have some thick skin and a healthy defense against some ridicule? You think they don't know exactly how they are perceived and dont give a sh!t because they are having fun? They do, trust me. I was IN that line standing right next to Elijah Wood (of course, we got there just a few hours before).

      You should probably go down there and learn how they got over being the social outcasts and embraced who they are... you could learn something, amybe drop some baggage off too.

      --

      There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    5. Re:erm by Quinn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The "insult" itself was innocuous, but the comedic impotence of the stale "nerds are virgins" commentary was aesthetically offensive.

      --
      #19845
  19. Nerd bashing on Slashdot? by freaksta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Thats not very appropriate.

    --


    Hrrm... I usually just sign my name.
  20. I feel a great disturbance in the force... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...as if a bunch of dorks cried out in anguish, and were suddenly silent...

  21. Line Films by zoomba · · Score: 4, Informative

    This will be the first SW Movie since they started the re-releases I won't be in line for. Though that's more due to work than a lack of desire to be out there camped in front of the theater. Though my stays (2 days 1 night) were never as long as these guys out in CA, they were long enough to get the most enjoyment out of the experience.

    The line is more fun than the movie, by far. Everyone out there is there because they're dorks, nerds, geeks. They enjoy Star Wars, and a film premier is likely one of the few times they get to gather with other fans and geek out about their hobby. It's always a good time with people sitting around playing cards, eating pizza, drinking soda, playing board games (video games one year when the theater owner rolled out a TV on a cart for us to use) etc. Essentially the line ends up being a day or two long party.

    So many here love to mock the line goers, but how many of those people have been to a Linux, gaming or hacker convention? How many have gone to some sort of industry conference? It's the same thing. Lots of geeks gathering in one place to talk about the stuff they enjoy.

    The line is more fun than the movies ever are. By the time the opening crawl starts on the screen, I've been awake for 2-3 days and soon I'm nodding off. I don't care though cause I know I'm not missing anything, I already experienced the most fun part.

    While I won't be in line this year, I will be thinking of my friends back home who will be.

  22. C'mon, it -has- to be said... by mccalli · · Score: 5, Funny
    This not the theatre you're looking for. You can go about your business. Move along...

    Cheers,
    Ian

    1. Re:C'mon, it -has- to be said... by nigham · · Score: 3, Funny

      A long time to stand in a theatre far, far away...

      --
      I don't want to read /. I want to go home and re-think my life.
  23. hmm by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 2, Funny

    Difficult to see, the future is.

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  24. Their response by Vamphyri · · Score: 4, Informative
    The fans in line have heard your pleas and have answered with the following rfom liningup.net :


    Liningup.net is staying in the spot where we have great relationships with the theatre, the local businesses, and the Hollywood Division of the LAPD. We are lining up at the theatre where the first Star Wars premiered in 1977, where all of the prequels have played, where George Lucas, R2D2, Harrison Ford, and Darth Vader have their footprints in the world-famous "Forecourt of the Stars".

    We are raising money for an amazing charity, Starlight Starbright Children's Foundation, that works to brighten the lives of seriously ill children. We've only been in line for 3 days and we have already topped more than $6200 in donations, with hopefully tens of thousansds more to be raised.

    Twice before we've lined up at Grauman's Chinese Theatre without confirmation that the films would play there. Twice before, we've been told it was going to play somewhere else. Hopefully, our luck holds out for a third time. If not, we'll still have an incredibly fun time relaxing with other Star Wars fans and raising both funds and awareness for the Starlight Starbright Children's Foundation.
    1. Re:Their response by Exluddite · · Score: 2
      First I thought "What a bunch of clueless nerds". Man was I wrong.These guys know that the premier won't be there and they're still staying to raise money for charity?

      Star Wars nerds? Maybe. Good People? Definately.

      --
      What does this button do...
  25. This is not the premiere you are looking for by Progman3K · · Score: 2, Funny

    move along...

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  26. STFU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I mean, really, this is something QUITE obvious. You'd think these people would at least make sure they're at the right theatre!

    Please RTFA.

    The Chinesse theatre has shown all of the previous star wars movies. When the last movie came out there were rumors it wouldn't be playing at the Chinese theatre, but it ended up premeiring there despite those rumors.

    AFAIK, the Chinese theatre is a single screen theatre a few blocks away from a huge super-mega-multi-omni-ultraplex. Said plex is trying to work a deal to be the exclusive premeire of the latest lucas craptation, but no deal has been inked as of yet.

    The fans in front of the Chinese theatre are standing there, in part, to protest an exclusive deal at the super-mega...-plex. There's something special about the Chinese theatre, I'm sure tradition and what not, and something about the plex-theatre having assigned seating with tickets sold on line, rather than sit where you like, or something. I'm not all knowing, but for christ's sake, RTFA before you post your garbage!

  27. Don't leave me in suspense... by imag0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...Is the plastic, lifeless acting about the same? ;)

  28. Shortest reigning pope in history... by KlomDark · · Score: 3, Funny

    Pope Goestheveezl was the shortest reigning pope in the history of the Church, reigning for two hours and six minutes on 1 April 1866. The white smoke had hardly faded into the blue of the Vatican skies before it dawned on the assembled multitudes in St. Peter's Square that his name had hilarious possibilities.

    1. Re:Shortest reigning pope in history... by Digz · · Score: 3, Informative

      A bit off-topic, but hey..

      The tradition of popes taking names from predecessors dates to an early time in the Church when a certain man named Mercury became Pope. As he thought it inappropriate to have the head of the Christian Church named after a pagan deity he took the name of a predecessor. The tradition stuck.

      So a pope taking a name such as that would be rather preposterous. ;)

      --
      SYS 64738
    2. Re:Shortest reigning pope in history... by KlomDark · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope, that guy stole it too. The original is from the Armchair Anarchist's Almanac

  29. pictures of the fans waiting in line by huphtur · · Score: 3, Informative
  30. So sad... by Dorf+on+Perl · · Score: 2, Funny

    Last paragraph of the article:

    Hope springs eternal, Sprague said. After the last two "Star Wars" films, "We're all a little beaten down," she said. "But this one could be it!"

    "Lucas loves us, he really does! He doesn't mean it when he craps on us! You'll see! This time for sure...!"

    Bah, I say, bah!

  31. You might be a complete geek if.... by catdevnull · · Score: 3, Funny

    -You spend 6-8 week in line for movie tickets to Star Wars and no one at work really misses you.
    -While you're in line, your mom is just glad to have your ass out of the house so she can fumigate your room.
    -In your zeal to be "first" (you're probably the same geeks that post "first post" trolls on /.), you overlook the possibility that this theatre may not premiere your beloved movie.
    -Even slashdotters make fun of you.

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  32. Dear Pot by Letter · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dear Pot,

    The grandparent post used the expression incorrectly. The correct idiom is "the pot calling the kettle black." The poster thought the pot called the kettle "back", which makes no sense at all.

    The idiom dates back to times when all cookingware was cast iron. It refers to a person finding a fault with someone else while the accuser is guilty of the same fault herself.

    For example:

    "You're calling her forgetful? That's a case of the pot calling the kettle black."

    or

    The case here, where someone submitting a story to Slashdot describing others as "lifelong virgins." Since everyone who reads Slashdot is clearly a lifelong virgin, that's like the pot calling the kettle black.

    Sincerely,
    Kettle

  33. Not so bad by sjonke · · Score: 4, Funny

    They could actually end up seeing a decent movie.

    --
    --- What?
  34. Just change the sign. Show the same movie. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The Chinese Theatre should just change their sign to "Star Wars" when the date comes up, and keep showing whatever Nic Cage or Charlize Theron or Will Smith movie they were going to show anyway. Let the fans see whatever movie this is while the theatre says it is "Star Wars".

    The Star Wars fans will see it, and leave the theatre mildy annoyed by the lack of lightsabres in the movie, but you will hear comments like "When did George Lucas learn to write dialogue? Wow!" and "I was kind of worried going into it, but there was no Jar Jar in the ENTIRE movie!"

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  35. HERE is Black Wolf the Dragon Master's website... by blakespot · · Score: 4, Informative
    His site is down now, but the Way Back machine to the rescue:

    http://web.archive.org/web/20040921083255/http://d arkchambers.tk/

    Enjoy. This guy was insane.

    Here's a few other links:
    --
    -- Heisenberg may have slept here.
    iPod Hacks.com
  36. Field of Geeks by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Oh yeah... they also said that they don't believe the movie isn't showing there and that "they always say that, but it always shows".."

    Ah! The "If we queue, it will show" philosophy of movie-line waiting. I want to see them push it to the limits: line up weeks ahead of the debut day outside an abandoned grain silo in Nebraska. Let's see if their rule works there!

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  37. Considering... by Svartalf · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...that Luke and Leia are brother and sister, wouldn't playing Luke and Leia would be like...um...you know...

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:Considering... by werewolf1031 · · Score: 2, Funny
      [Considering] ...that Luke and Leia are brother and sister, wouldn't playing Luke and Leia would be like...um...you know...

      Your parents? :)

  38. They're the lucky ones by kabdib · · Score: 2, Funny

    Whatever movie they do see on opening day will be better than the movie they got in line for...

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced technology is insufficiently documented.
  39. Re:Star Wars geeks by lgw · · Score: 2, Funny

    For example, LARPers and people who play "deep" indie roleplaying games make fun of other roleplayers (especially D&D players),

    As a "Deep indie" roleplayer who makes fun of D&Ders, I think you're on to something, but *everyone* makes fun of LARPers (except furries, of course).

    Here's a detailed chart of the Geek Hierarchy, for your reference. ;) It needs a "Real RPGer" -> "D&Der" -> "LARPer" column, however.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  40. Got a link? by infinite9 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm very interested in bible translation issues. And since this is a new testament concept, how does hebrew play into this? And was the error caused when going from aramaic to greek or greek to english?

    --
    Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    1. Re:Got a link? by giantsfan89 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Check out Curt Niccum's blog. He's a big Greek nerd that knows a ton about Bible translations. He has even worked on translating parts of the Dead Sea scrolls. Incredible guy.

      --
      Don't ping my cheese with your bandwidth!
    2. Re:Got a link? by Mac+Degger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Then you'll like this one: go find some 16th century paintings of Moses coming down the mountain with the tablets with the commandments on them. Then look at his head. Then stare at the little horns on his head!

      What happenend was a little translation error: the text translated from said something along the lines of '...and Moses came down the mountain with fury...' because he saw that his people where worshipping golden idols. But in hebrew, the word fury [or 'scorn'...I don't remember the exact word] and horns look very similar. Thus a translating error led the best artists of the generation to depict Moses with little horns on his head :)

      Makes you wonder what other crucial information has been missed out on...

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
  41. Re:"nerd-hags" by protolith · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hhave this friend, He um, could really, you know, would like to know more about these "nerd-hags". Where would I, um, He go to meet one.

  42. Re:Geek, nerd, etc. by gothzilla · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The way I always understood it was like this:
    Geek: very smart with good people skills
    Nerd: very smart with poor people skills
    Dork: dumb with poor people skills

  43. Saw Ep IV Premier at the Chinese by SiliconEntity · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I know you guys like these old timer stories...

    I saw Episode IV (the first one, at the time just called Star Wars) on its premier at the Chinese Theater (then called Mann's before the name went back to Graumann's). We didn't camp out but we did spend a couple hours in line.

    Science fiction wasn't a big deal in those days. Probably the biggest sci fi film previously was 2001 from almost 10 years earlier. The last "line around the block" movie was Love Story. I was hoping it wouldn't be too crowded, but the weekend before it opened Time magazine had a big spread on the movie, with pictures that made it look fantastic. So we did have to wait pretty long.

    But we got good seats, and as the lights went down I heard a couple of guys talking in the row behind us. Apparently they were in the industry and had already seen the movie in pre-release.

    "I really envy the people here," he said.

    "Why?" asked his buddy.

    "Because they're about to see Star Wars for the first time."

    1. Re:Saw Ep IV Premier at the Chinese by CrazyTalk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can relate to what the industry folks were talking about. As a fellow old timer, I saw Star Wars for the first time (first 10 times, actually) in the theatre in 1977 and was absolutely blown away by the special effects. When the Star Destroyer flew overhead in the opening scene, the entire audience gasped in astonishment, and everyone was wondering just how BIG that thing was. First (and only) wait in line for the premier was for Return of the Jedi - My friends and I got there at 8:00 AM the day of for an 11:00 AM showing. I still have the ticket stub (from the pre-computerized movie ticket days) that indicates my place in line - 00000020.

  44. Chinese Menu a Mixed Combination by cei · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since moving to LA I've enjoyed many films at the Chinese Theater. In my opinion, it's still the best screen and auditorium in town. It seems like at the Chinese you're more likely to have a good crowd that's really into the film and having a good time. (The room holds close to 1500 people and the energy levels can be contagious... I always get a smile on my face when people start cheering the THX trailer before the film even starts...)

    The one downside is, sometimes they book utter crap onto their main screen. A showing at the Chinese should be about spectacle. It's not where you want to see a small, intimate romantic comedy. It's where you go when you want to see things get blown up and have the speakers blast you out of your seat. As much as the Arclight tries, it really doesn't have the same impact as the Chinese, IMHO.

    If Paramount is indeed a co-owner of Mann's, as the article mentions, that might explain some of their poor booking choices. No, I'm not in line, but I kind of agree with the guy interviewed. If it's not going to show at the Chinese, why bother seeing it on the big screen at all? Any other theater would pale in comparison and not be as enjoyable a movie-going experience.

    --
    This sig intentionally left justified.
  45. Completely fictional! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    As other replies have pointed out, the parent post is plagiarized. However, I would like to add that in addition to being plagiarized, the parent post is fictional. There was no pope elected in 1866. There was no need to elect a pope at that point, as Pope Pius IX (born GIOVANNI MARIA MASTAI-FERRETTI) was alive and well. He was pope from 1846-78. This can easily be verified by consulting http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12272b.htm, a complete listing of popes from an online catholic encyclopedia.

    Incidentally, the shortest reigning pope, according to wikipedia, was # Urban VII (September 15 - September 27, 1590): reigned on 13 calendar days. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_10_shortest-r eigning_Popes

  46. It'll still suck. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 3, Funny

    You know, I thought the preview looked pretty good too. But I don't trust George Lucas. You don't know the power of his urge to make shitty movies! Hayden Christenson will be a whiny bitch, there's going to be some sort of "American Idol" in-joke, and you're going to be so surprised, and you're going to bring your abused, broken heart here, blubbering your sorrow all over another thousand-comment thread, and you're going to receive the biggest "I told you so" ever fucking constructed.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  47. They should get the film now by ebvwfbw · · Score: 2, Funny

    Would be even more hilarious if they change their mind and open the film now that everyone is out of line...

  48. psychology study on homophobia by krunk4ever · · Score: 2, Informative

    another study i recently learnt in my psych class is that people how have high homophobia tend to get more aroused when watching same sex (male or female) erotic films.

    the study was done on middle age men and they took a survey to have their homophobia rated. the independent variable was the erotic film displayed (opposite sexes vs same sexes) and the dependent variable was the increase in radius of the penis.

    low homophobic men's penis grew radially larger than high homophobic men when watching opposite sex erotic films. however, high homophobic men's penis grew radially larger than low homophobic men when watching same sex erotic films.

    this led to the conclusion that high homophobic men are actually in denial and has utilized one of our defense mechanisms known as reaction formation to help them cope with this denial.

  49. Re:"nerd-hags" by yasth · · Score: 2, Funny

    LARP. That is all. Really don't expect the pages of playboy come to life, but bawdy can be good.

    --
    I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
  50. Don't understand why people find it so strange by ArcticCelt · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I like science fiction but I have never dressed like a character or joined any fan club on the subject.

    Still, I don't understand why people find it so strange that a small amount of hardcore fans dress each two years like their favorite hero but then, never make fun of the thousands of stupid jocks that paint their faces and go dressed in a clown looking way to their favorite football game every Sunday.

    --

    Yahh, hiii haaaaa! -Major Kong, from Dr. Strangelove