Slashdot Mirror


Broadband Life and Internet Anxiety Disorder

ChipGuy writes "Broadband brings the world right to your laptop or your handheld. With it comes information, and along with it comes desire to stay connected, and on top of everything. Om Malik calls it Internet Anxiety Disorder. 'The rush to catch-up and living a six megabits per second lifestyle, is what I think is going to be first major malaise of the 21st century - Internet anxiety disorder,' he says. Firefox developer, Blake Ross thinks that 'Internet hardwires developing brains with a click-happy sense of urgency that will not defer to reality. We are addicted to information and seek it even when we know it's not available.' Others have described this info-addiction as Nerd Attention Deficiency Disorder."

181 comments

  1. Internet related dependence by BWJones · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Part of this is that you have to consider that for many of us, the Internet has become a daily part of our workflow and without it we could not perform in our jobs. I absolutely need the Internet to collaborate with colleagues, and because I am paid to know things and to think, the ability to be able to search for information and access online scientific journals is critical. I cannot believe how much time I spent as a beginning undergraduate in the library looking through actual card catalogues! Now one can survey tremendous amounts of data in very little time, but the tradeoff is that we have become dependent upon the Internet for our data gathering. I will admit however, to also becoming dependent upon the Internet for daily news as well and do feel a sense of loss when disconnected. For instance, when taking hikes or going biking in the mountains for longer than a day, I feel the need for an information fix. Even when traveling nationally or internationally, I ensure that I am connected via broadband, can communicate through iChatAV with colleagues, can post to my blog, can get the latest news as it happens and of course, keep up with Slashdot. :-)

    Of course the referenced links do contain valid points, particularly Rand's blog. What Rand alludes to however and needs to be learned is the ability to focus and extract the absolutely relevant information related to the task at hand. I've noticed in the undergraduates in particular that have come through the lab that they tend to try and multitask everything, talking on the phone, performing Internet related searches, writing their reports and listening to music while also running an experiment in the background. Almost always, mistakes ensue, the quality of the work suffers, wrong conclusions are drawn and it takes them a couple of months to learn to focus while eliminating some of the competing tasks to ensure quality work for the essential task at hand. Once they learn to focus, not only does the quality of their work improve, but also their ability to extract information from all sorts of tasks including Internet related work. Confusion goes away and is replaced by efficiency of thought and action.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Internet related dependence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Thing is, there's not much we can do about internet addiction. It's a sobering thought.

    2. Re:Internet related dependence by BWJones · · Score: 1

      How did you type all that in 20 seconds?

      I'm cool like that. :-)

      Seriously though, aside from efficiency of thought and action, a Slashdot membership does help as one gets to see the stories posted a few minutes before they are actually posted to the unwashed masses.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    3. Re:Internet related dependence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one gets to see the stories posted a few minutes before they are actually posted to the unwashed masses.

      The "unwashed" masses are sensible enough not to pay for Slashdot, of all things.

    4. Re:Internet related dependence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The unwashed masses block Google text ads too not to mention all stuff originating from ads.osdn.org.

    5. Re:Internet related dependence by Lord+Pillage · · Score: 1

      I do this with an IP blocker that operates as a driver. Nothing going in or out of my ethernet port gets by it :)

      --
      try { Signature mysig = new CleverAttempt(); } catch(NonCleverSignatureException e) { postanyway(); }
    6. Re:Internet related dependence by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      ...I am paid to know things and to think...

      I too am paid to know things and to think. When the network/computer/software goes down I can haul out a pencil and a sketchpad to do my job. And that alternative works surprisingly well.

      On the other hand, you'd have to do some fabled mafia-type convincing to take my dual processor AMD machine away from me.

    7. Re:Internet related dependence by alex_guy_CA · · Score: 2

      I'd have to say that the internet for me is, like you say, an absolutely necessary part of my work life without which I come to a standstill, and ALSO a disorder. For me I think of it as "Message retrieval disorder" the constant need to be checking email, voice mail, snail mail (I had that one long before I had email, I used to go check the mail box on Sunday, just in case...) It really is a compulsion, but unless my connection goes down or I try to go on (gasp) a vacation, it isn't a big enough problem to worry about.

    8. Re:Internet related dependence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An offer you can't refuse...

      Like how about this quad AMD computer?

  2. True. by Poromenos1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    My line went down yesterday. Longest 10 seconds of my life.

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    1. Re:True. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      My line went down yesterday. Longest 10 seconds of my life.

      which began, what, 14 years ago?

      The longest 10 seconds in your life will be when you get your first pink slip, or when you hear a close relative of yours has died. So enjoy your innurnet line while you can...

    2. Re:True. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my longest 10 seconds where during a car crash. on a second thought, maybe it was only 2 seconds...

    3. Re:True. by RicktheBrick · · Score: 1

      In the future everyone will truly become dependent on the internet as every device we purchase will have it own unique address. You buy a refrigerator and the first thing it will do is go online to verify that you own it and will go through a self test to verify that it is working properly. As with all devices there will be backup circuits which will be used until the primary circuits are replaced. The device will tell you when it has ordered any new device which it thinks it needs. No one will be steal any electronic device since it will notify the owner of where it is after it is pluged in and will refuse to work if it is not authorized to work at that location. In the far future(50 years from now) everyone will have a brain implant and everyone will become an input to the internet(all of our senses). Therefore no crime will be able to be committed without the proper authorities being notified at the same time that the crime is being committed.

    4. Re:True. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the far future(50 years from now) everyone will have a brain implant and everyone will become an input to the internet

      You really think it's gonna be that long? I bet it'll be during Jeb Bush's presidency. (You think America would be smart enough to vote anyone else in next? Then you haven'r watched much TV. Or maybe you've watched too much of it.)

    5. Re:True. by arminw · · Score: 1

      ...You buy a refrigerator and the first thing it will do is go online...

      I will never buy such a refrigerator or whatever appliance connected to the Internet. A virus comes along and turns it off and all the food rots! Thanks, but NO thanks. Just because something CAN be done, does not mean it should be. I think predictions like this are like the flying car articles in Popular Science etc. in the 50s telling us by the turn of the millenium everybody will be flying everywhere in their own personal flying machines, rather than driving. Tell that now to someone stuck in a miles long traffic jam on a modern, "freeway"!!

      --
      All theory is gray
    6. Re:True. by rapidweather · · Score: 1
      I downloaded the AmaroK Livecd, and now I can't stop listening to internet radio stations on Shoutcast.com


      It's based on PClinuxOS, so it's good.

      Guess I'm stuck here. Lemme see... how about some XTC radio 160 kps...

      Yeah, that's the ticket...

    7. Re:True. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The longest 10 seconds in your life will be when you get your first pink slip, or when you hear a close relative of yours has died.

      Err, ten seconds? You stare at your boss, who just fired you, or your dead dad, and ten seconds and he jumps up and says, "only kidding!"?

      BTW: You're a self-important dork.

    8. Re:True. by Eskarel · · Score: 1
      I don't necessarily think that Americans(as much as I used to be and to a certain extent still am one) aren't stupid enough to vote him in. What I do believe however is that Jeb isn't stupid enough to let them.

      From what I can tell Jeb is sort of like Ted Kennedy, both of them could theoretically run or have run for president, but they both have positions to which they will probably be elected until they die. People in that sort of position rarely take a shot at something like the presidency which has a maximum term of 8 years(well somewhat longer if you can go in as VP and experience a well timed assasination).

    9. Re:True. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The internet is serious business.

    10. Re:True. by compu73rg33k · · Score: 1

      The second I get home from school I go on my computers and when the internet is down I immediately call the ISP and beg them to put me back online. I can't stand being restricted to real world.

    11. Re:True. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ted Kennedy didn't run for President because he wanted to stay alive.

  3. painfull by Aroma+7herapy · · Score: 1

    just like me constantly refreshing the "nothing to see here, please move along" page, only to read the comments that aren't even there jet...

    1. Re:painfull by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      Is it possible for us to develope something new without immediately attributing some sort of disorder to it?

      Our brain allows us to filter out material that we don't need. Most normal individuals have no problem dealing with this.

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
  4. Old standards ... by foobsr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even though the online page says "come back on day X", students still checked the page frequently. This is what I mean when I say it's impossible to evaluate my generation's behavior according to old standards or even according to common sense; I really believe the Internet hardwires developing brains with a click-happy sense of urgency that will not defer to reality. We are addicted to information and seek it even when we know it's not available. (Blake Ross)

    Already about thirty years ago I observed people who ran obviously faulty pieces of code a second time hoping for a different outcome; my guess is that humans love voodo but that it ususally does not work. So I do not believe that there is another "Generation X" (whatever).

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    1. Re:Old standards ... by serutan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't forget channel surfing, which has been around for decades. Many people sit in front of the tv for hours, flipping through the channels over and over looking for something good to watch, even though they just cycled through all the same channels a minute ago and know that the same shows are still on.

    2. Re:Old standards ... by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Already about thirty years ago I observed people who ran obviously faulty pieces of code a second time hoping for a different outcome; my guess is that humans love voodo but that it ususally does not work. So I do not believe that there is another "Generation X" (whatever).
      It's like the guy who sits through the horror movie, and shouts "Don't go down into the basement".

      Of course the main character went down into the basement, and got everyone killed.

      Afterwards, he said "I figured they'd have learned by now - I've watched this stupid move 6 times, and they STILL go down into the basement and get killed each time!"

    3. Re:Old standards ... by garethw · · Score: 2, Funny

      Kinda like when I'm hankering for a snack and I go to the fridge, only to find nothing. Then a few minutes later, I'll go again - just to see if anything has magically materialized in the interim...

      --
      garethw
    4. Re:Old standards ... by nkh · · Score: 1
      I observed people who ran obviously faulty pieces of code a second time hoping for a different outcome
      I'm just a student but it happens all the time to my friends when they try to play with pointers in C. Try looking for bugs in typedef char **(*something)(int *, char*);! Another funny behaviour is: program segfaults, debug program and... it works because the debugger initialises all the variables but there are other errors I've got a hard time to find.
    5. Re:Old standards ... by Afrosheen · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I have a Schroedinger's refrigerator also, but mainly because I am so tall and my fridge has alot of low shelves. There are things I'll miss until I really get hungry, squat down, and take a good close look. Excuses aside, I keep hoping for that extra snack which is still edible yet hidden... :)

    6. Re:Old standards ... by ikkonoishi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its just operant conditioning in action.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operant_conditioning
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skinner_box

      You check the link and it has updated off schedule once, and it encourages you to check it repeatedly just in case.

      For me when I run a faulty code segment a second time, I am just trying to figure out what the exact cause of the error is.

    7. Re:Old standards ... by PooF · · Score: 1

      The only problem with the example is that many people realize that the date given is a deadline for a decision / the data to be available and is not necessarily the time that the information will be published. I would imagine this to be true of students in particular as, at least in my experience, schools often will publish information as it is available but publish a deadline they know they can meet.

      Just a thought.

    8. Re:Old standards ... by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      -- The second mouse gets the cheese.

      Who moved my cheese?!

    9. Re:Old standards ... by digitalsushi · · Score: 2, Funny

      If they had a fault in their code, it probably wasn't obvious to them! As an animal with a 2 second "is this useful? no? toss it" memory, I always find myself doing simple things twice. The first time is "did it work? yes? next". If it fails, I probably wasn't paying attention to what may have caused it -- my thoughts were probably elsewhere. Granted, working on a piece of code should lend some merit to more careful concentration, but if I noticed a piece of my code failing, the most likely thing I would try next is running it again. My reasoning for this may not be the next as the same person, perhaps I visualize the code better when I run it again. What would be even more fantastic would be, in my trial and error, guess and check problem solving method, that the code ran the second time! In which case, I would be very likely to not only run it a third time, but beyond even that. Then again, I could be completely wrong, and it could be exactly that everything is so fast these days, there's almost no resource loss in just rolling a new one and trying again. I can't imagine how much better a programmer I would have been 30 years ago -- a recompile of something (or whatever method) could take hours or days -- you had to think before you acted! When I'm doing my CS 101 homework, it's easy to open a second terminal with a simple shell loop that constantly compiles my code and runs my binary! How sloppy is that? So I suppose there's quite a bit of forethought into this article and comment before me, and it.

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    10. Re:Old standards ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even worse; the old joke about guys looking in the fridge, seeing there's nothing worth eating there, then going back 5 minutes later to look again, as if something will have magically appeared.

      I have done this personally on many occasions.

    11. Re:Old standards ... by tentimestwenty · · Score: 1

      I ran broken code lots of times. Seeing an error occur helps focus the mental process to figure out how to fix it. Just think of when anything breaks. You KNOW it's broken, but if you turn it on a few times again it forces you to sequentially go over each part of the process up until the point where it breaks.

    12. Re:Old standards ... by mcrbids · · Score: 1


      Already about thirty years ago I observed people who ran obviously faulty pieces of code a second time hoping for a different outcome; my guess is that humans love voodo but that it ususally does not work. So I do not believe that there is another "Generation X" (whatever).


      Dude, that's just human nature.

      How many times have you stood in an elevator lobby, and watched somebody push the LIT UP arrow button?

      Ask anybody, and they'll tell you that the fact that the light is lit means that somebody's already pushed the button, and that the elevator is on the way.

      So... why do they push it, anyway? For that matter, it's been revealed that the crosswalk buttons in New York have been disconnected for a long time - yet people still push them, despite there being NO EVIDENCE that they do anything at all!

      This not only predates the Intarweb, it predates western civilization, since people haven't really evolved much in the last 100,000 years.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    13. Re:Old standards ... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1
      Already about thirty years ago I observed people who ran obviously faulty pieces of code a second time hoping for a different outcome
      I started doing it myself after I personally witnessed it work once. YMMV.
  5. Me! I Disconnect From You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gary Numan's Replicas is slowly becoming reality...

    1. Re:Me! I Disconnect From You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gary Numan IS GOD.

  6. Brings out other disorders too by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 4, Funny

    Obsessive compulsive disorder for one. And masturbation! And anti-social disorder. And nerdiness!

    --
    Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
    Africus aut Europaeus?
    1. Re:Brings out other disorders too by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      a personality disorder (don't remember which one)
      Generalized Anxiety Disorder
      ADD (for what it's worth)
      depression :)

      I know I won't win the grand prize, though. Let's see who does.

    2. Re:Brings out other disorders too by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      ADD (for what it's worth)

      Yeah i think ADD is a joke too.

    3. Re:Brings out other disorders too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spina bifida
      Scoliosis
      Depression
      Social Anxiety Disorder
      Obesity
      Pre-diabetes
      High cholesterol

    4. Re:Brings out other disorders too by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1
      Obsessive compulsive disorder for one. And masturbation! And anti-social disorder. And nerdiness!

      Stop spying on me, you sick bastard!

    5. Re:Brings out other disorders too by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      Or more likely, this new disorder is irrevlivant to you, because all it's traits can be better explained with your current disorders.

      Disorders should always be a minimum set. Because they are simply classifictions, groups of traits.

      Whether a new disorder is "legit" or a load of BS is pretty much relative to how many people have it, and if it already appears in other disorders.
      If it turns out, that this disorder affects quite a lot of people who don't previously have any disorders, then it makes sence to have this one. Otherwise, it could quite easy be redundant.

    6. Re:Brings out other disorders too by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      Hope you have a good reason, there's a lot of evidence to back it up.

      You're not, of course, simply confusing ADD with a possible overuse of ritalin amoungest kids, are you?

  7. Are you kidding me? by UnCivil+Liberty · · Score: 2, Funny

    NADD? That was seriously the best that they could come up with??

    --
    Distributed proteome folding @ WorldCommunityGrid.org
    Team Slashdot - Members:#1 Run Time:#1 Points:#1 Results:#1
    1. Re:Are you kidding me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well at least it isn't Nerd Attention Deficiency Syndrome.

    2. Re:Are you kidding me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NADD? That was seriously the best that they could come up with??

      Oh yes - they should have found something that abbreviates PORN.

    3. Re:Are you kidding me? by generic-man · · Score: 1

      It was coined by the gentleman who runs Jerkcity (not safe for work). Jerkcity characters tend not to mince words.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    4. Re:Are you kidding me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps the cure will be called GO_NADDs...

  8. Women Rejoice by Physician · · Score: 5, Funny

    While nerds are kept busy with the internet and counseling sessions, gorgeous women everywhere are free to live their lives without fear of nerds asking them out.

    --
    Does God treat us as servants or friends? Check my homepage.
    1. Re:Women Rejoice by Hinhule · · Score: 0

      Until the moment they make the mistake of going into a chatroom saying "Hi my name is Jessica" hoping for some attention.

      Only to get the response "Go away you 50 year old pedohomo!"

    2. Re:Women Rejoice by arvn · · Score: 1

      So women only want to meet people with no NADDs? Their loss;-)

    3. Re:Women Rejoice by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Come on! When was the last time a nerd actually asked a girl out? If anything, it will be a disaster for those girls because they'd have to start doing their own math homework!

    4. Re:Women Rejoice by Ailure · · Score: 0

      There is plenty of womens on the internet. With $9.99 per month...

    5. Re:Women Rejoice by whovian · · Score: 1

      Come on! When was the last time a nerd actually asked a girl out?

      Let's see. Has it been a million years yet? Dang.

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
  9. Strange by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

    The rush to catch-up and living a six megabits per second lifestyle

    and yet the first site they jump on is Slashdot, which usually has the effect of slowing the servers it mentions down to a crawl...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  10. Gah by Cylix · · Score: 1

    I still can't believe this isn't an April Fools article.

    Someone must be late to the game.

    --
    "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
  11. One problem with the Internet by konkani · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thanks to the Internet, the majority are alienated from the mainstream.

    --
    please change me. - sig
    1. Re:One problem with the Internet by anagama · · Score: 1

      Hilarious!

      I recall my first episode. Once in 1993, I lived in a place where the closest dial-up center was a long distance call, my computer was in storage, and I was totally broke. For 3 months I couldn't access my Delphi account. I felt so totally disconnected from the world -- it was horrible -- painful even.

      That was before I had an always on broadband connection. I don't know what I'd do now if I lost it.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  12. This is so old news... by joelparker · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've already read about this on Fark, Boing Boing, and Wired. Blogging on it's so last month and I've already IM'ed on it with my FOAF pals. If you want to know more-- oops gotta go-- my Treo's got an SMS!

    1. Re:This is so old news... by daeley · · Score: 2, Funny

      You forgot to post it on your wiki. I took care of it already.

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  13. Nice acronym by ZorMonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, like I'm going to tell people that I have NADD.

    1. Re:Nice acronym by DigitalCrackPipe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, like I'm going to tell people that I have NADD

      Well, would you rather tell people you're NADD-free?

  14. Yep.. by tehmorph · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I know this thing. It's the reason i've started going downhill in school; I can't get away from my PC. Now, I must revise. Ooh, Half-Life 2!

    --
    Could not open .sig for reading- sanity error
    1. Re:Yep.. by yolospat · · Score: 1

      This is I do online classes!

      --
      yolospat
  15. Anxiety disorder not new- Internet nothing special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sure hunter-gatherers had the same desire to stay on top of everything in the forest. The brain can be overloaded at much less than six megabits per second. You can become paranoid without this so-called click-happy sense of urgency. If you really think about all the smells entering your nose, the wind through the leaves, the snapping of twigs in the distance, you can fully wig yourself out. It's not about technology, it's about devoting too much of your consciousness to any of your senses for too long. I suggest meditation, jogging, or any exercise that turns off that over-active cortex and sends you to another place. The internet is just a new form of stimulus that you can dwell on too much. Nothing special. Nothing new.

  16. Unavailable? by Tackhead · · Score: 1
    > We are addicted to information and seek it even when we know it's not available

    What the hell does he mean by "not available"?

    It's plenty available!

    I mean, I watched the cute Flash animation for ThinkGeek and got my Day Pass. I see the article in the Mysterious Future. I click on it. It's under construction. I click on it again. It's still under construction. I click on it again. I [several hundred pageviews omitted in the interest of brevity] click on it again - at last! I can post!

    1. Re:Unavailable? by bcmm · · Score: 1

      Auto-reload on; over the peak of the bell curve; no mod points...

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    2. Re:Unavailable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Describe the universe and site two examples.

  17. N.A.D.D? by Deitheres · · Score: 5, Funny

    I, for one, am against the usage of any acronym that is so close to nad. In fact, the pronounciation would be exactly the same.

    That would like the Society for Trendy Undeserving People Instigating Debate

    --
    Just like driving a car:
    (D) to go forward
    (R) to go backward

    1. Re:N.A.D.D? by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      "People want to be deceived; therefore, let them be deceived." Amen, brother...

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
  18. NADD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    SHouldn't be Nerd Attention Deficiency Disorder.

    I reckon: Nerd Attention Deficiency Syndrome would be better.

    NADS for short. Perhaps it's a load of bollocks...

  19. Gimme a break.... by HockeyPuck · · Score: 4, Funny

    The rush to catch-up and living a six megabits per second lifestyle...

    I'm sorry but this line kills me... some computer dork trying to sound cool was like a car guy quoting Vin Diesel in Fast and Furious...

    I live my life a quarter mile at a time, nothing else matters, for those ten seconds or less, I'm free.

    1. Re:Gimme a break.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A real car guy would never watch Fast and Furious.

      And Slashdot is like the Taco Bell of information, if you told smart people you go there, they laugh at you.

    2. Re:Gimme a break.... by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      Oh of course. I come here for the intelligent discussions.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    3. Re:Gimme a break.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry but this line kills me... some computer dork trying to sound cool was like a car guy quoting Vin Diesel in Fast and Furious...

      Does he also contribute to Wired magazine by any chance? Sounds right up their street.

  20. For a prime example of this by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

    Shutdown slashdot for a few days, see whether all the geeks become anxious.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:For a prime example of this by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      Actually, we need it, we got a /. overdose on 1112324400 (i don't even want to mention that date ...), rehab anyone?

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    2. Re:For a prime example of this by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Imagines slashdot being down. tick. tick.
      *twitch*

      *refresh*

      *refresh*

      *refresh*

      Where is my daily fix?

      *refresh*

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    3. Re:For a prime example of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagines slashdot being down. tick. tick. *twitch* *refresh* *refresh* *refresh* Where is my daily fix? *refresh*

      Error 503: Service Unavailable.

      Muwahahahaha!

    4. Re:For a prime example of this by isny · · Score: 1

      Happens every year. April 1st.

  21. NAS? by Artifakt · · Score: 1

    This sounds a lot like what William Gibson called NAS (Neural Attenuation Syndrome) in Johnny Mnemonic. It's also been described by Vinge in True Names, and in half a dozen other SF stories under a variety of TLAs (Three Letter Acronyms) and ETLAs (Extended TLAs). This article represents yet another victim of EPAS (Endlessly Proliferating Acronym Syndrome). Add to its list of symptoms, the inability to find out that others have already coined acronyms and there's no need for a new one. Obviously, we must give till it hurts to find a cure.

    --
    Who is John Cabal?
    1. Re:NAS? by andyh1978 · · Score: 1
      This sounds a lot like what William Gibson called NAS (Neural Attenuation Syndrome) in Johnny Mnemonic.
      NAS wasn't in the book, only in the (naff) film adaptation, where it was "Nerve Attenuation Syndrome", not "Neural".
      There's "brain-cell attenuation" in Dogfight, that the ex-fighter pilot Tiny has from being pumped full of drugs whilst flying.
    2. Re:NAS? by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      My mistake on "Neural" v. "Nerve", but Gibson did write the screenplay himself, (or at least that's how the credits read), so he must approve of it.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    3. Re:NAS? by andyh1978 · · Score: 1
      Gibson did write the screenplay himself, (or at least that's how the credits read), so he must approve of it.
      True - but the film was pretty awful.
  22. Slashdot RSS by dantheman82 · · Score: 1

    For this same reason, I check the Slashdot RSS feed continuously when browsing even though fairly often. This despite the fact that I often get the sense that "there is nothing to see here...move along"

    I guess it doesn't help that it is so easy to open a gazillion articles in Firefox tabs and the fact that I have 50+ RSS feeds in the browser.

    --
    This sig donated to Pater. Long live /.
  23. All right...! by KC7GR · · Score: 1

    NOBODY RAID! THIS IS A MOVE!!

    Back off, all of you! I've got an 'OFF' switch in one hand, and a pair of dikes in the other, and I'm NOT AFRAID TO USE THEM!!!

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

    1. Re:All right...! by flynns · · Score: 1

      YAY! A fellow ham. 73 de Sean, KI4IIB

      --
      'If you're flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit.'
  24. Nope, doesn't apply to me! by BandwidthHog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I walk in the door and within thirty seconds of hanging up my keys I've logged back into the main machine and flipped open the lid on the iBook, even if I'm only coming home to change clothes and head back out the door in five minutes. If I'm at home or at work, it's exceedingly rare that I go more than an hour without hitting news.google.com, topix.net and slashdot.org. Of course, I generally know what's going on in the world in a pretty timely manner, even if I don't have (or take) the time to learn anything other than headlines and article summaries.

    I definitely see the web as a detriment to workplace productivity, but there's no simple solution for those of us who make productive use of the web in our jobs. Of course, by and large slashdot doesn't help in my job (although friends here have pointed me to some valuable technical solutions and resources), and it's the vast majority of the non-essential browsing I do at work. Of course, when I'm truly busy my bullshit web use drops sharply, so I guess that means it's not too strong a compulsion.

    Okay, time to stop typing in a browser window and go do some useful stuff on such a beautiful Saturday afternoon.

    *wanders off to check the news sites while another cup of coffee brews*

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  25. We are information processing machines by kfg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's what we do. Information is always available, unless you're in a sensory deprivation tank or something, in which case you may well start hallucinating, because you aren't "addicted" to information; you require it for proper functioning.

    I think some people are addicted to labling everything as an addiction.

    Maybe it has something to do with our rather bizzare cultural perception that if you're enjoying yourself you must be mentally ill.

    Actually, now that I think about it, given the state of our culture, they might have a point.

    KFG

    1. Re:We are information processing machines by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      I Absolutely agree with you. What diferenciates us from the rest of the species on this planet is our mind. We really are information processing beings, And, yes, a big part of this society has developed a fear for knowledge and for joy in general (knowledge is pleasure); and so any activity that is enjoyed and that demands a lot of time, but is not something a dog would enjoy, is called an adiction.

      This is the single most insightfull post i have seen on /. in a long long time ...

      Thank you, you made my day.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    2. Re:We are information processing machines by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Addiction is NOT the *need* for something. It is the *inability to function without* that something.

      So this isn't about the normal need for relevant information. It's about an abnormal requirement for information (relevant or not), and individuals who feel panic when deprived of that information. It's been around forever; availability of a new medium doesn't change that.

      I personally know two people who literally have panic attacks if they are prevented from watching the evening TV news.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:We are information processing machines by opec · · Score: 1

      Addiction is NOT the *need* for something. It is the *inability to function without* that something.

      Wait a minute... So I'm addicted to food?... water?... shelter?...

      Is there a waterholics anonymous group in my area?

    4. Re:We are information processing machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not able to function without oxygen, water or food.

    5. Re:We are information processing machines by Reziac · · Score: 1

      LOL!! For the nitpickers among us, I shoulda said "the ability to function without something *abnormal* to the organism".

      As to the perils of dihydrogen monoxide addiction... http://home.earthlink.net/~thesandpit/misc/water.h tm

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    6. Re:We are information processing machines by kfg · · Score: 1

      Addiction is NOT the *need* for something. It is the *inability to function without* that something.

      Because without something that you have a physical need for you cannot function properly. The alcoholic, heroin junkie, etc. have a body chemistry that does not function properly without the relevant chemicals in the system. I am addicted to coffee myself.

      This physical dependency is the keystone necessary phenomenon of "classicl" addiction, i.e. the correct definition.

      The fact that the "classical" definition has been warped into something that can be applied to any purely psychological state, i.e. any behavior you disaprove of, only supports my thesis.

      Holding your breath until you turn blue and having a panic attack if you don't get what you want is a purely psychological problem (one some used to term "being a jackass"), not a sign of addiction.

      Similarly we used to call video games, dancing and sex "fun," and seeking fun to be a perfectly normal thing to do, even if one failed to show up for "work" to do it. That's why the preachers had to spout fire and brimstone, to make people afraid to have fun so they'd show up at work.

      They called "fun" "sin."

      Which is why we now have to look askance at anyone having fun, especially so much fun that they won't go to "work" and define them as having a "dis-ease," for having no dis-ease, like the rest of the poor schmucks going to "work."

      This idea has taken such strong root that we now even look askance at people who simply enjoy their work. If it were fun, they wouldn't call it "work," right?

      If you have so much fun playing video games that you loose your job, wife, personal hygene, etc, and find these loses undesirable, yeah, you should seek counseling. You have a psychological problem. The inverse of a phobia (funny how noone calls the lack of "normal" function due to fear an "addiction." Fear is what they want you to feel, so fear is ok, as long as the fear means you show up for work, insteand of playing video games. If you fail to show up for work, then you have a phobia, recongnized as a purely psychological problem.)

      But you don't have an addiction. Unless you want to count fun itself as an addiction, to which I could only respond:

      Q.E.D.

      KFG

    7. Re:We are information processing machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We ARE information processing machines, but garbage in still gets you garbage out. Do most people need up to date news on (potpourri topics) when they could be spending the same time processing information on subjects that they actually excel at? Just because you're "processing" a bunch of information doesn't mean that it's useful, productive, or even a good thing.

    8. Re:We are information processing machines by coopex · · Score: 1

      Heroin isn't physically addictive. Sure, you'll go though hell with withdrawl symptons, but it won't kill you like alcohol, barbituates, or benzos will.
      I do strongly agree that society is way too messed up in its view of addiction, and mental and physical health in general. Instead of treating the root cause, all too often it's, oh you're worried about X, have some pills, a bit overweight, have some more pills, not very happy, well it couldn't be that you lost your job or you're too stressed out, better see a shrink. Unfortunately, at least hopefully, most of the people who view this as the correct solution think that the best intentions make up for making fucked up decisions that can ruin the lives of others, forgetting the whole "The road to hell..."

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
    9. Re:We are information processing machines by kfg · · Score: 1

      Sure, you'll go though hell with withdrawl symptons. . .

      This is the fundamental symptom of addiction, not death, as it is indicative of a physical dependency.

      Some addictions are quite harmless, in and of themselves, like my coffee addiction, which provides an example of the "functional addict," which a great many alcoholics are, by the way. You may well know a good many alcholics without knowing that they are alcoholics, as their behavior is quite "normal," so long as they are able to maintain a certain level of alcohol in their systems.

      You have tainted the concept of addiction with morality. There is nothing innately bad, let alone evil, about addiction, nor does a complusive behavior imply a destructive behavior.

      KFG

    10. Re:We are information processing machines by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Actually, you make my point for me :) I don't believe there is any such thing as "psychological addiction" either. In my observation, even if an addictive behaviour *starts* as a purely mental exercise, it soon becomes an *inability to function without* the associated endorphin rush (just because a psycho-active chemical is self-generated doesn't make it any less an addiction). This is especially evident with obsessive-compulsives and paranoid schizophrenics (types I've had the misfortune to know a number of), where doing self-comforting behaviours induces production of the associated brain chemical. The self-comforting behaviour can be very simple and obvious (lining up all the cans on the shelf) or it can be more complex (gaming or gambling to the exclusion of "having a life").

      It can also manifest as a sort of addiction to pain, where the person can't enjoy food unless it's so spicy that eating it hurts, or where they can't seem to do their work unless constantly overstressed, etc. Repetitive pain and/or stress lead to a self-defensive release of soothing brain chemicals, and *that* is what the person is actually addicted to, since by that point, they *can't function without it*.

      Rigid fun-hating Puritanism is, in my observation, a sort of obsessive-compulsive disorder, where the self-hurting/self-comforting behaviour is built from trying to control or castigate others (akin to why some people get off on finding fault and punishing others). In simpler language, they're control freaks, because that's the only way they have of "feeling good" (generating the right brain chemicals), even if they mis-identify the sensation as "feeling righteous".

      OCD is due to a brain chemical dysfunction, and can be treated with drugs. I've known some OCD sufferers who became almost normal when properly medicated, and ceased having panic attacks when prevented from doing whatever was their addictive behaviour(s).

      As to "addiction to news" -- consider it a mild form of obsessive-compulsive disorder, and all becomes clear. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  26. Slashdot version of your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live my life a quarter pounder at a time, nothing else matters, for those ten seconds or less, I'm free.

  27. Dying gasps of an older generation by Dogun · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Our parents were always heading outside to play baseball, while we stay inside and play Quake, leran about obscure topics, or program something we thought about earlier in the day.

    Their parents were always criticizing them for having wild parties and never doing their studies because they're always playing X or Y.

    In turn, they criticize our generation for the different lifestyle that we lead.

    Simple fact of the matter is that these are different times. If you are a parent worried about your kids' attention spans, find them something to do online that won't 'rot their brains' or 'decrease their attention span'. Teach them to play Bridge or Go or something that is genuinely fun but requires a bit of study and practice. They're very rewarding and at least you won't have to worry that your kid is getting dumber. It's hard to think of someone as less intelligent than they used to be when they can kick your ass at a game like that.

    Parents, find a healthier outlet for your anachronisms.

    That having been said, I haven't read TFA. They may well be right that attention spans are decreased. All I'm saying is that's not the end of the world.

    1. Re:Dying gasps of an older generation by kjamez · · Score: 1

      ur parents were always heading outside to play baseball, while we stay inside and play Quake, leran about obscure topics, or program something we thought about earlier in the day.

      Their parents were always criticizing them for having wild parties and never doing their studies because they're always playing X or Y.

      In turn, they criticize our generation for the different lifestyle that we lead.


      i agree with you, except that "going outside to play baseball" and "sitting on the internet all day and night" are worlds apart in regards to health. We have many many many EXTREMEMLY obsese no exercise barely walking much less jogging or playing sports tv watching internet addicted anti social children ... i see that to be a problem.

      on the other hand (you have different fingers and) i am always personally drawn to computers/information. i wake extra early to have quiet and coffee and check my overnight emails, jump on /., read the (currently worthless) UF comic, etc ... i'll get back online if i come home for even a moment, more as a force-of-habbit. but i also frequently go on hikes/walks, and ride bikes, and do yard work, and exercise, which is the part of the balance of all things.

      i would hesitate to call it an 'addiction' until we start sacrificing our health (or hygine for that matter) because of a fascination with information. i simply love computers and technology and reading and hearing other people's points of views on things.

      --
      you can't have everything, where would you put it?
    2. Re:Dying gasps of an older generation by Dogun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm the same way.

      With regards to health, I think my original argument made allowances for that; if you are worried about your kids' health, you won't let them sti around on their asses all day. Brianrot and attention span have little to do with parental concerns at that point.

      With regards to the fast paced, check up on /., email, CNN, my favorite 15 different websites 3 times a day, we're all the same way in this respect.

      All I'm saying is that it is no less productive than playing around outside or throwing a wild party. It's a waste of time, true, but everyone wastes time. Physical activity is a copout answer; who feels mentally challenged playing baseball? Online, you are stimulating yourself at least, picking up new information and learning. Two sides of the same coin.

      In all of the arguments that I've made with my parents over my 24 years of life, this is the only one that I really won. There are too many parallels, and they don't think they wasted their youth in a particularly bad way. The same way that if 20 years from now, I have a kid who thinks that GravSkating is the way of his generation, and I'm always telling him he should be stimulating his brain, he can criticize me for sitting on my ass all day and not getting anything accomplished, while at least he gets his blood pumping.

      Every generation lives differently. We just need to accept that and try to steer them in their trends to be less wasteful. If my kid likes GravSkating, then so be it. But I'll do my damnedest to force him to appreciate the nuances of the game and make it a real investment of energy. The same way I wish my parents had taken an interest in my interests. My sisters play soccer, my parents can understand that.

      Hence the Bridge example. My dad spent his college years playing Bridge. I wound up learning Bridge from friends, but he missed out on a real opportunity to interact with his kid by never passing it on. Playing bridge online would have been a lot of fun for me, and he at least would have felt better about my timesuck of choice, seeing some of his passtimes were being passed on.

      I've started playing Go recently, and I think that's given me a new perspective on the generational gap. We can't force our kids to have our same interests, but we can find common interests that allow us to see that they are developing, despite our fears. Acceptance of that is probably the best thing we could ever do for them. I look at my Korean friends and see that most of them have parents who play Baduk (Go) and are in fact, very strong at it. Of those friends, the ones who learned the game from their parents seem to have a decent relationship with their parents, while those who didn't seem very distant. Granted, this is a small sample and doesn't reflect on Korean-American culture as a whole, and of course, only an parent interested in their children's development would bother teaching their kid a time-consuming game like that, but I think this is one of those examples that while not proving my point at least illustrates that it may be valid.

  28. Only In America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Only in America do people feel the need to define themselves by 'disorders'

    1. Re:Only In America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if it could be classified as a disorder that we non-Americans define ourselves by what Americans are doing?

  29. yeap.. recognizing that yeap.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yep.. I definetly suffer from this, I'm not addicted yet and I CAN stay away from my pc for days and weeks even. BUT its stress-mania when I get back, backreading days and weeks of slashdot and other pages. Checking for updated drivers and updated soft etc..

    I wonder how long before this overtakes obesity as the no.1 healt issue in the western world.

  30. Interesting Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Strangely enough, I can relate to the converse of what the article states. I am a 56K user, and I find myself less dependent on fast downloads and fast obtainment of information. I know many people that are DSL (or broadband, in the case of this article) users, and they tend to be much more anxious and impatient.

  31. I2I by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Internet anxiety disorder,' he says. Firefox developer, Blake Ross thinks that 'Internet hardwires developing brains with a click-happy sense of urgency that will not defer to reality."

    "Gotta Have it NOW"

    "We are addicted to information and seek it even when we know it's not available.'"

    Reflected as Consumerism, and Illegal P2P activity.

  32. The Internet can ward off depression I think by confused+philosopher · · Score: 1

    Using the Internet to gather news, it's obvious that there's more news than can be read in a day, created each and every day. It is unfathomable to me that someone could become depressed with such limitless access to information and humour everywhere around them.

    --
    Why slashdot? Why not?
  33. Re:Anxiety disorder not new- Internet nothing spec by BlueFashoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is why people have a large portion of their brain dedicated to ignoring stuff.

    It's True!

    The thalamus filters information heading towards the cortex, and the reticular activating system (in the brain stem) filters out extraneous information, i.e. constantly present odors, background hums, etc. You'd go crazy if this was broken.

    --
    Nice Marmot
  34. So... by kakashiryo · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...if I'm not in denial, I get a cookie and a free iPod, yes?

  35. Hogwash. Stop It! by the0ther · · Score: 0

    I'm tired of people elevating every little habit into a pathology. Ever met a hypochondriac? I've met a few, I think there's a human tendency toward it. Just like this tendency to call everything a disease. I say humbug. Slashdot's losing it when this is the crap they're approving. Sheesh.

    1. Re:Hogwash. Stop It! by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Insightful

      just being on the internet is not the problem... the problem happens when being on the internet interferes with a heathy life style.

      "oops... forgot to go to work"... oopps... "forgot to do the chores"... "ooops for got to pick up the kids"... "oopps... forgot to FEED the kids"...

      at that point you have a problem.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  36. Re:Anxiety disorder not new- Internet nothing spec by Lakche · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While I mostly agree with your comments, there are certainly cultures that would be more prone to this overloading than others (namely, industrialized Western society.) "I'm sure hunter-gatherers had the same desire to stay on top of everything in the forest" contains a bit of naive realism - assuming that other cultures view the world the same way ours does. Hunter-gatherers actually have a very easygoing lifestyle, with much less time per day spent laboring or attaining food than in industrialized or agricultural societies! I remember seeing an anthropological video about the Mbuti Pygmies of the Ituri Rain Forest (a present-day foraging people)... the Mbuti had commented that the forest was a sheltering friend or protector, but the outsiders from "modern" society who inhabited other parts of the forest saw it as an enemy, something to be frightened of and cut down. Clearly there is a difference in how these two groups viewed their world. The Mbuti did not have a controlling world view, felt no need to "dominate" or "be on top of things" - these are Western expressions, where we feel the need to control our surroundings and know everything. So while overloading may be nothing new in United States or industrialized Western cultures, please don't assume this is something that is common to the entire world. ;)

  37. Dial-Up by Gamzarme · · Score: 0

    And if you are still using dial-up? Do you have a greater case of Internet Anxiety Disorder or just slowing getting it?

    --
    Pat
    1. Re:Dial-Up by yolospat · · Score: 1

      I don't know yet, I'm googling it and waiting for the page to load ... trying to get an answer for ya .. *tick tock tick tock*

      --
      yolospat
  38. Not New by cookie_cutter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is just info-porn addiction in a new medium. 15 years ago we were discussing the same topic with regards to people who obsessively watch cable news channels. Sure, the internet version will have it's own unique twists, but let's have some sense of history, please.

    1. Re:Not New by usedcarsalesman.com · · Score: 1

      Yeah exactly...History!. For example, I was using a terminal search function to find news articles on Lexis Nexis way back in the mid 1980's. So the mid-90's roles around and everybody thinks that keyword searching data (even if it is spread all over a world wide computer network) is somehow this great "new" thing. And, search engine founders became billionaires (all i have to say is, "boy, all those 401k geezers who backed this shit are easy impress!").

  39. Dependant since 1994... by Chordonblue · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The few months after I got my cable modem (all 500K of it), I was totally addicted. Having come from a POTS 1200 baud background on the old Atari 800, this was quite a huge difference.

    Soon after, I had a shitload of useless things running in the taskbar (big clock, weather indicator (like I can't look outside once in a while), dl/ul speed indicators, FTP/IRC/etc. - all sorts of crap. All of it designed to give me more information, most of it useless.

    And yet...

    I couldn't...

    Pull...

    Away!

    At one point I called off work for a week. Then came the girlfriend breakup that I kinda ignored. After a while reality set in and I started to pull back a bit. I'm glad I did - I've known some who didn't in time. One guy I knew back in the early 90's started selling drugs to support his computer habit. None of us geeks even knew he was doing it until he called us from prison. He got 6 years of 'no computer'.

    Always wondered how he seemed to be dialed into AOL all the time (before flat rates were in effect)...

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  40. Re: Pain in the NADDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and having no connection out in the hinter lands would be, let me see, a pain to the NADDs.

    You gotta love it....

  41. This explains the dupes! by Hrodvitnir · · Score: 1

    The slashdot editors are merely looking out for our mental well-being. By posting dupes, the chances of missing story drop, effectively (or ineffectively) reducing the urge to check the page.

    Give them a break. They're just trying to help.

    --
    "There are more important things than stopping terrorism. Upholding the Constitution is one of them." - Ars Forumer.
  42. New Anxiety Disorder discovered among scientists.. by Anne+Honime · · Score: 1
    A compulsive behaviour has been identified among comportementalists ; it appears that each time a pleasurable activty goes mainstream, a fair share of those scientists can't help themselves from labelling it "syndrom".

    For instance, they tried for years to prove unsucessfully that coffee drinking was bad, they've put thousands of childs under chemicals for behaving like kids, they managed to put a ban for years on alcohol drinking, they suspiciously look under your bed sheets to make sure you don't obsessively engage into sex, etc.

    This We Want To Control Your Life Addiction Syndrom can hurt anybody, so be careful. You could be next.

  43. Dialup by dcclark · · Score: 1

    I find that any internet addiction I may have disappears very quickly when I visit my parents. They still dial in to the local provider, and because they live in the middle of nowhere, the top speed they get is 24kbps. Even email checking can get really painful at that level, and don't even try to IM someone at the same time!

    A good book and maybe a paper take care of my time then.

  44. Re:Anxiety disorder not new- Internet nothing spec by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

    I set mine up to block webpage advertisements.

    (Actually true. I've been surfing the internet since prodigy was a BBS system. Ever since the ads started I've been dedicatedly ignoring them. Sometimes to the point where I don't even see them.

  45. what disturbs me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I am working on an oil painting and make a mistake, there is just a little part of me that reaches for CMD (CTRL) Z to undo it. In my mind somewhere, I mean. (not joking) And I also have a distinct feeling of "Quit and Save". Unfort. the real world doesn't have a "restore".

    1. Re:what disturbs me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >When I am working on an oil painting and make a mistake, there is just a little part of me that >reaches for CMD (CTRL) Z to undo it.

      I actually had this experience once. I was writing something with a pen on paper and made a mistake. Momentarily, I thought <CTRL>+Z.

      I also think <CTRL>+R every time I blink.

      OK, I made the second one up, but the first one is true.

  46. Did anyone find the new acronym funny? by dbitch · · Score: 1

    Nerd Attention Deficit Disorder - NADD.

    "Mrs. Green, can I be excused? My NADD is kicking in."
    "Dude, I've got NADD too!"
    "I'm going to kick you in the NADDs."
    "We need to talk about your NADD."

    dbitch

    1. Re:Did anyone find the new acronym funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, I'm not from the US, I went to wikipedia, and I was _very_ afraid I won't find the article about NADD ... guess what - I haven't! I'm unable to understand what's that NADD all about (except that your joke was meant to "I'm gonna kick you in the go-NADD")... HELP ME! HELP! HELP!

  47. Is somewhat addictive. by drac0n1z · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was forced offline by my parents for three days for anti-social behaviour (not talking to them) and I ended up extremly depressed by the 3rd day since I couldn't distract myself with information. wikipedia, ./ , http://www.livescience.com/ and http://www.physorg.com/ . when I got back on the net I read everything I missed, got new anime episodes ect.. Right now I'm browsing, playing Dune2 with dosbox, watching an episode of Friends, chatting and compiling wine.. and I feel happy.. sometimes I add an anime with subtitles so I read that also. Thing is when I'm out with friends more I don't need those things, IAD is just a sympton of being alone+bored.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Is somewhat addictive. by 01000011011101000111 · · Score: 1

      You s/****/$expletive/ I'd just about forgotten about Dune2... *wanders off to find a copy*

      --
      Programming is an Art. I am an Artist. Does that mean I get to wear a daft hat?
  48. "News addiction" has been around forever by Reziac · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There have always been people who are addicted to "news". If they don't know "what's happening in the world", or are prevented from accessing their favourite news medium, they actually suffer a sort of panic attack. Some are quite unreasonable about it, such as making everyone else in the house stop talking for the duration of the evening TV news.

    I've observed this disorder not only with the internet, but in previous eras when the primary news media were television, radio, and newspapers. I've read about people in the 1800s who got quite upset if they didn't have access to the latest broadsheet. In one form or another, it probably goes back to the era of town criers.

    I have a suspicion that it derives from an abnormal compulsion to "take control" over one's environment, and knowing "what's happening" helps provide an enabling comfort zone.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    1. Re:"News addiction" has been around forever by arose · · Score: 1

      I'd say it goes all the way back, think rumors.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    2. Re:"News addiction" has been around forever by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Good point. Rumours (word of mouth) were the first "news source".

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  49. F5....F5.....F5..... by Asprin · · Score: 4, Funny

    F5....
    F5....
    F5....

    Come on! Post a new article already!

    F5....
    F5....
    F5....
    F5....

    --
    "Lawyers are for sucks."
    - Doug McKenzie
    1. Re:F5....F5.....F5..... by 01000011011101000111 · · Score: 1

      Which is why noone ever asks the question - which key breaks first on a keyboard...

      --
      Programming is an Art. I am an Artist. Does that mean I get to wear a daft hat?
    2. Re:F5....F5.....F5..... by Ailure · · Score: 0

      It's either ctrl, alt or delete.

  50. Re:Anxiety disorder not new- Internet nothing spec by Reziac · · Score: 1

    See above where I comment about what I hereby dub News Anxiety Disorder, the compulsion to know "what's happening" and a sort of panic attack when prevented from doing so. You make a good point that even in the most primitive times, there probably were people who just HAD to keep track of how many bison were in every herd they knew about, how many birds their neighbour shot last week, how many people complained of the smell from the privy, etc, etc, as if their lives depended on it. Perhaps it's fundamentally a specific survival instinct run amok (or failing to mature**), to the point that it overwhelms other instincts and behaviours.

    ** A lot of little kids exhibit a sort of news anxiety disorder, but most outgrow it, along with the other sociopathic behaviours that are normal in kids but not in adults.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  51. Re:Anxiety disorder not new- Internet nothing spec by parcifal · · Score: 1

    The main reason is that it is cheap to be on the internet. If there were some cost associated with our browsing, I am sure 90% of web browsing would drop to almost nothing. Nothing more than economics, plain and simple.

  52. OMG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IAD & NADD !!!!

  53. Eh... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 3, Insightful
    living a six megabits per second lifestyle

    Constructs like that make me want to hit people with a baseball bat.

    is what I think is going to be first major malaise of the 21st century

    You mispelled "excuse"

  54. Depends on the circumstances. by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

    This may be true if I am at home and the connection goes down. I don't have anything else planned necessarily, so I'm kind of anxious for the connection to come back up. But I can also take 2 weeks to go camping and I feel fine. I would like to be able to check my email to see if anyone is trying to contact me, but I'm not going to be driven insane due to that. But that's no different than having a phone and checking your voicemail.

  55. Could be worse by sagenumen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In today's world where ignorance seems to be praised by many, if there's any addiction we need more of, it's an addiction of information and learning more.

  56. Ah...! by MutantHamster · · Score: 1
    Nothing like a bunch of bullshit to waste my time one!

    This is what passes for an article these days?

    --
    My Greatest Heist - Muisc partly inspired by the unbeatable Qwantz
  57. So how do you learn to focus again? by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 2

    Seriously. Short of unplugging (which I can't do because I need the Internet to do work too) and going cold-turkey.

    1. Re:So how do you learn to focus again? by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Edit your hosts file to redirect any distracting sites to localhost. Change permissions so you can't edit, and change ownership, hopefully to a friend. Give it time. Don't use the web unless you need it for a work related function.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
  58. Re:Anxiety disorder not new- Internet nothing spec by arminw · · Score: 1

    ...Western expressions, where we feel the need to control our surroundings and know everything...

    Even living in an industrialized society does not force anyone to be anxious to control and know. Anyone can march to the beat of a different drummer and there is no need to allow the culture to squeeze anyone into a particular mold. Everyone has choices and then has to live with the results of those. Your TV and computer has an OFF switch, which only YOU control. Use it, and then go outside, especially in this spring time of the year and marvel at the new life bursting forth all around. Admittedly, for us here, living in the mountains of Southern Oregon, this is easier than for someone living in a 29th floor apartment of a large city. Even so, there are green places in most cities where the wonder of spring time can let you forget the frenetic pace of life for a while and think about what is REALLY important, such as the human relationships apart from technology.

    --
    All theory is gray
  59. wrong by floodo1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    as if its such a bad thing to desire information.

    what they call "reality" is just THEIR reality. its their take on how life is to be lived. ie without such desire for information, or at least such motivation to seek out such a desire.

    again another example of selfish people dictating subjective views onto others

    --
    I KUT J00 M4NG!!!
  60. KNOW YOUR DOPE FIEND! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    YOUR LIFE MAY DEPEND ON IT!

    You will not be able to see his eyes because of Tea-Shades, but his knuckles will be white from inner tension and his pants will be crusted with semen from constantly jacking off when he can't find a rape victim...

  61. Since when was being impatient a disease? by zaktheduck · · Score: 2, Funny

    I dunno these days they'll diagnose anything as a disease, disorder or syndrome. In fact anyone that hasn't got a syndrome is probably suffering from "No Syndrome Syndrome".

    --
    Life is like an analogy
  62. Really Nothing New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The internet's exact nature is, of course, different from anything that has come before, but it is still information and we can still control it. I'm certainly not at the top of the heap in my interconnectedness, but I am usually online with my Powerbook, IM over three services, text message, check sites like Slashdot and Fark several times a day, a plethora of other sites at least once a day, and news sites often once an hour or so, use a cell which I also IM from, get entertainment content over P2P, subscribe to Netflix, and watch a little TV.

    The key, I've found as a busy college student, is simply to control the information influx (there is no line between information and entertainment, they are merely a spectrum so I'm going to refer to both as information). When I'm reading, I close my IM client. When I don't feel like it, I don't answer my phone (which can result in "call me or I'll think you're dead" messages from my mother during protracted periods of busyness). When I don't have time, I don't watch TV, the newest Netflix DVD or the newest episode of Battlestar Galactica that finished downloading that day. There are times when anyone, including myself, will fail in controlling the influx of information, but it is important to remember that the majority of information we are "addicted" to is unnecessary. Certainly in business a certain amount of quick response to VM, email, IM, snail mail, and faxes is necessary for both courtesy and business success (or just not getting fired), but the majority of information that people people find themselves awash in they partake in of their own free will. By this, of your own free will you can step out of that flow.

    The same goes for TV, magazines, newspapers and even just gossiping and talking. As a personal example about six months ago I realized that despite how much I get out of The New Yorker's news articles, they took up too much time and we're the best use of that time for what I wanted to do. Most of the information influx we experience anyone can make such a choice about.

  63. Enough of this... by tjcoyle · · Score: 1

    thread. I'm gonna go check out Google News for the 50th time today. :)

  64. This is old, old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why were these articles written as if this was some hot new topic?

    This was a hot topic years ago. Why dig it up again now?

  65. We are addicted to information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (quote) "We are addicted to information and seek it even when we know it's not available."

    As William Armstrong said:
    "However high we climb in the pursuit of knowledge, we shall still see heights above us.
    The more we extend our view, the more conscious we shall be of the imensity which lies ahead"
    Lord William George Armstrong 1810-1900

  66. Log off by sammyo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can log off anytime I want. This is not an addiction, I just choose to be online. I don't have to be connected, it's just, you know, like chocolate, it's good, satisfying, it's where it's at.

    But I could stop anytime I want. Really.

    1. Re:Log off by sammyo · · Score: 1

      No really, anytime I choose. Really I can.

    2. Re:Log off by sammyo · · Score: 1

      Really...

    3. Re:Log off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's true. My sister started playing HabboHotel 24/7 , and taking up our line... after 4 days, I had turned all my socks into puppets and named them after Norse gods.

  67. Re:Anxiety disorder not new- Internet nothing spec by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

    Self-hypnosis is also very relaxing (and arguably, the same thing, or at least an overlapping thing with meditation, yoga, etc..)

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  68. The Control Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    James Beringer's The Control Revolution touches upon this very subject. I'd recommend this book to anyone who's interested in Western society's transition from an industrial economy to one based on information. Fascinating read for anyone who's interested in technology and civilization.

  69. Turning off is way harder than turning on by tentimestwenty · · Score: 1

    I've always worked from home and most times the work computer was in the living room so no separation between life/work. However, it was dialup and the computer would crash every couple of hours. Sometimes it wasn't even on.

    Now that's all different. It's more effort to turn the computer off. All those times during the day when I want a little piece of information like the forecast or when a movie is playing take only 1 second to find out but it encourages you to keep the thing on all the time 24 hours a day. I can be doing the dishes and I'll hear the e-mail "ding". It's pretty hard to ignore that.

    In the old days all those little pieces of information came in one package at one time and if you didn't know something you went out to get it to just winged it. Another poster theorized that it's all about the human desire for more control. We're at the point where we can control so many things excessively that control is becoming an activity in itself.

  70. When the Internet goes down, I resort to... by ylikone · · Score: 1

    reading books. I have a huge collection of paperback fantasy, sci-fi and fiction which I have only read about half of. Sometimes I get on a reading kick for a few weeks.. then one day just stop reading and go back to the Internet exclusive for months at a time. TV does not come into the picture at all anymore. If somebody (the government or microsoft) ever takes over the internet and starts controlling what I can see, thereby ruining the Internet, I am going to have a massive fit of rage... and heads are a gonna roll baby!

    --
    Meh.
  71. keep the addiction under control... by bobinabottle · · Score: 1

    use an rss aggregator =D

  72. Funny...or not so... by mobiGeek · · Score: 1
    My two year old has this kind of anxiety whenever we tell her "no" or "wait".

    Coincidence? I highly doubt it.

    --

    ...Beware the IDEs of Microsoft...

  73. What's in the fridge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget the "what's in the fridge?" phenomena, where you're hungry and you look in the fridge to see what's good to eat. Finding nothing, you go off looking somewhere else or just do something else. Five minutes later, you're back at that fridge, wondering what there is to eat. (even when you're *not* high! ;)

  74. Hmmm a definite Jack Handey Moment: by Alpha_Traveller · · Score: 1

    "I woke up this morning and decided -- you know...I should go online. Someone called me a NADD. Well. I was suitably offended and right away I called them a PIG. See if they call me a NADD again, they'll regret it." -Jack Handey

    --
    "Love is like pi - natural, irrational, and very important." (Lisa Hoffman)
  75. just more propaganda by Robocoastie · · Score: 1

    just more anti-geek propaganda. There's never been a "tv anxiety disorder" or "football anxiety disorder"

  76. FWIW: It's Rands', and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You do realize that you're referring to a guy who, for the past couple of years, has been writing a web comic about HUGE DICKS SLAPPING YOUR TENDER MOUTH (etc) ...right?

    BTW: The last line of your post gave me a very big zen hardon.

  77. Re:NADS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    go NADS!!! sorry, couldn't resist;-)