Slashdot Mirror


Time Travelers' Convention

usermilk writes "Some folks at MIT are holding a time-travelers' convention. The idea is to make it so famous and so widely-known that even thousands of years in the future, people will still know exactly when and where this time-traveler convention went down, and will all come travel to it at some point in their illustrious time-traveling careers. For those interested in attending, it's on May 7, 2005, 10:00pm EDT (08 May 2005 02:00:00 UTC) in the East Campus Courtyard at MIT. 42:21:36.025N, 71:05:16.332W (42.360007,-071.087870 in decimal degrees)."

66 of 836 comments (clear)

  1. Ahh... by metlin · · Score: 4, Funny


    But will John Titor be invited?

    1. Re:Ahh... by Zugok · · Score: 4, Funny

      he's already been and gone.

      --
      "I just can't sit while people are saying nonsense in a meeting without saying it's nonsense" J Watson, Sci Am 288:(4)51
    2. Re:Ahh... by woah · · Score: 5, Informative
      John Titor.

      ...a fun read.

    3. Re:Ahh... by Pseudonym · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I found the John Titor episode very interesting. Many people have characterised him as a hoax, but I think that's unfair. I think it was a very clever piece of Internet performance art, anticipating alternate games like I Love Bees.

      My hat is off to the guy. He's made me think a lot about how future generations will judge our current culture, which I think was the main point of the exercise.

      It reminds me a bit of Confessions of a Dangerous Mind. It was unfair to call that a "hoax" because a hoaxer expects you to believe their bullshit. Chuck Barris was trying to make a point through a clever piece of alternate-reality fiction. Much the same as John Titor, whoever he really was.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    4. Re:Ahh... by glwtta · · Score: 3
      I've read through their discussion and changelog, I think one more person coming along with "Shh! grownups are talking" will yet again be met with "if someone believes it for whatever reason, it's a valid opinion" line of thinking.

      It's really more the attitude in general rather than this silly article that worries me.

      I mean, if I claim that I have invisible aliens called Dvutels living in my attic, who only communicate with me, and only telepathically; I have presented exactly as much evidence for my story as the time traveler has, so would wikipedia be obliged to fairly represent my side in this matter?

      I can even provide a picture of my attic to show that they are invisible. Oh, I can also provide a rich and evocative description of their homeworld and its history, to strengthen my case.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    5. Re:Ahh... by DrLex · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hmm, never heard of this guy until now. It was interesting to read. However, it's almost certain that this is a hoax, albeit done by an intelligent and talented man. What he did was trying to turn insightful predictions into something that people would actually be interested in. Time travel speaks to the imagination of many people, insightful predictions don't. He just used the time travel story as a vehicle to try to make people aware of what is going wrong in our current world. Most of his predictions are based on things that were known somewhere at the moment he made them. It was just a matter of finding that information. It's not because something hasn't been published widely yet, that it's not 'known' yet... Other predictions are just based on plausible extrapolations of current events.
      Of course many people don't buy the time travel story, hence don't believe anything of it. But at least he has managed to address some people. And for the others it was just entertaining :)

    6. Re:Ahh... by RinzeWind · · Score: 3, Funny

      I mean, if I claim that I have invisible aliens called Dvutels living in my attic, who only communicate with me, and only telepathically

      You can call that religion an earn serious cash.

  2. I tried to make it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    But I couldn't figure out where those coordinates posted. Would you mind pointing out where you are at the moment in your galactic and solar orbits relative to a few quasars, please?

    1. Re:I tried to make it by millennial · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha, of course.

      --
      I am scientifically inaccurate.
  3. Why did they set the date in the future? by femto · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why didn't they set the date for yesterday? That way we wouldn't have to wait to see if it was successful.

    1. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by TexVex · · Score: 4, Funny

      Willen haven been. You're forgetting your conjugations.

      --
      Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
  4. Hmmm.... by carterhawk001 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    hmm...things to remember:
    1. if a time travel came back in time and altered the past, no one would know but him/her.
    2. it is impossible to prove that our recorded history now is the same as it was 1 second ago due to rule number 1.
    3. You may be caught in a temporal causality loop, doomed forever to repeat the same period of time over and over.
    4. If time is an expression of entropy, then the only way to travel through time is to prefectly reverse entropy, which is impossible because, iirc, entropy is chaotic.
    5. If the universe is nonlinear, or rather, linear is an illusion, then there is no past or future to travel to, but only the present wich exists at any instant as a snapshot in the cascade towards greater entropy.
    6. The universe is moving towards a state of pure heat, at which time entropy will cease, as all engery, which drives entropy, will have been used. if you intend to travel through time by altering the universe around you, then you can not go past this point, or ever return. if you time travel by using internal independent means, then you may travel past this point, but you would no longer have any external means of measuring the passage of time in the universe. To time travel through external means you must increase the general entropy of the universe such that all events happen faster outside your time machine. to travel through time internaly you must slow down your own entropy. in both instances you must phase away from the universe such that you do not exist in it, lest you collide with something going faster than you can percieve.
    7 If time is a seperate dimension then you must find a way to travel in the direction that is forwards or backwards from where you are now. 4 dimensional travel occurs at a steady, measurable rate. As you approach the speed of light, this rate of passage decreases. Thus, it is logical to assume that by exceeding the speed of light in our universe of spacetime you would travel backwards in time.
    8. You may be your own great great grandparent.
    9. If you change your own past you can not go back to your own future to reap the benifits because the new future would have a new you to match it.
    10. Journeyman Project is t3h roxors!!!!!

    1. Re:Hmmm.... by DirtyDuck · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Nah, you've been watching too much startrek.

      Assuming time travel is possible, it's impossible to alter the past.

      Think of it this way, the way something happened, is the way it happened. If you travel back in time, then you're participating in events however, your paticipation would already have happened. Therefore, anything you've already done would already have happened.

      Think of it this way. You couldn't go back in time and shoot Hilter before he got into power for the very simple reason that it didn't happen. Say you setup a sniper rifle on a building. You could try to fire but you'd either miss, the gun would jam, you'd get arrested, have a heart-attack etc. etc.

      This isn't the universe trying to protect itself or any such mystical mumbo jumbo. It's just the simple fact that a thing didn't happen and your actions in trying to change the past are already part of history.

      Probably didn't explain it very clearly. ;)

    2. Re:Hmmm.... by ravind · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well if you think that it is impossible to change the past, then you have to conclude that it is impossible to change the future too because your future is somebody else's past. Which means the way your life turns out has already been determined and cannot be changed. How do you fit free will into that?

    3. Re:Hmmm.... by CowbertPrime · · Score: 3, Insightful

      actually the entire premise of the convention is flawed because the current model of time traveled dictated by relativity suggests that one cannot travel backwards in time past the point where the time machine was discovered/invented.

    4. Re:Hmmm.... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 5, Funny
      Actually Time Travel by itself is impossible.

      But what you could do is slip into an alternate universe which is exactly like ours, only 60 years behind. Once there you could kill Hitler and alter History... but only in THAT copy of the Universe.

      While useless to alter history, I do find the technique works well for obtaining quality building materials, and collectables for my Ebay super-store.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    5. Re:Hmmm.... by rar · · Score: 5, Funny

      You couldn't go back in time and shoot Hilter before he got into power for the very simple reason that it didn't happen.

      No, no, no; you got it all wrong. It was just exactly because someone went back and shot that Hilter you speak of; that the much worse dictator Hitler we do remember could come to power. :)

    6. Re:Hmmm.... by carterhawk001 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Dont forget the multiverse, aka, the great tree of possibilities. Consider this, going back in time may be likened to moving back down the tree, and when you change something, a new branch forms and you start moving along that, parallel to the old branch. now your stuck in the new branch. The implication here is that nothing you do to alter time will truly alter time, it will just launch you along a new limb of the tree. You arent changing the past, your creating a new future.

    7. Re:Hmmm.... by l810c · · Score: 4, Funny
      8. You may be your own great great grandparent.

      So let me get this straight. You have never met your great great grandma, but the pictures of her in her younger years show that she was one hot babe. You decide to go back in time and do her?

    8. Re:Hmmm.... by servognome · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Everything you do and think is based on the electrochemical reactions in your brain. If we understood how all the wiring of the brain works, and understood all the inputs the output could be predicted. There is no freewill, just a reaction to a given series of inputs.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    9. Re:Hmmm.... by Jeremi · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If we understood how all the wiring of the brain works, and understood all the inputs the output could be predicted.


      Are you sure? If quantum mechanics are involved in any meaningful way, then some of the events may be literally random (i.e. not a function of any observable input). In that case, even perfect knowledge of the inputs and the wiring would be insufficient.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    10. Re:Hmmm.... by LiENUS · · Score: 4, Funny

      Akin to subversion branching. The only question is, is there a "universe merge" command waiting to be discovered?

    11. Re:Hmmm.... by operagost · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Hop into your spaceship, head out for a leisurely cruise at or near the speed of light.
      Half right. Travel at precisely the speed of light is prohibited.
      Want to go backwards in time? I leave that as an exercise to the reader. Hint: think black holes.
      Hint: I believe you really have no fucking idea and just like to watch yourself post.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    12. Re:Hmmm.... by Mattintosh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Better yet... Time travel isn't possible because time doesn't exist.

      We speak of "time" because it's convenient. It allows us to measure our lives and our activities against a single background. We keep track of "time" by observing the predictable patterns of celestial objects, as well as by setting mechanical devices to synchronize with those celestial movement cycles.

      But what exactly is "time"? Time is a series of events. Nothing more. You can't undo things in real life. A broken vase can't be put back together just by reversing the event that caused it to break. Why? Because events are irreversible. You can cause a negating event for some things (like turning a light on or off), but you can never undo an event once it's done.

      So, simply put, time doesn't exist. It's merely perception of a series of events. The fact that it's perception is made clear by the phrase "time flies when you're having fun." Your brain records images of events into your memory, sometimes with a record of celestial body locations or numeric representations thereof.

      The more interested you are in what is happening around you, the more things your brain will record. But having limited processing resources, it will skip the "timestamp" on many of those events. The relative difference between each "timestamp" is much farther apart than is expected or normal, so "time flies."

      When you're disinterested in events around you, the opposite is true. Your brain records some meaningless drivel and since it has lots of resources available, it slaps a "timestamp" on every one of those mental notes. Boring stuff seems to take much longer because of this.

      Let's see the writers for the next Star Trek series (several years from now, I hear) put this tidbit of time-travel logic to work. It'll at least spare us some crappy re-hashes of Nazis in space (spaaaaaaaaaaaace?).

    13. Re:Hmmm.... by droleary · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Think of it this way, the way something happened, is the way it happened.

      Buddy, I've got a cat in a box that would or would not beg to disagree.

    14. Re:Hmmm.... by Headcase88 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Problem is, you wouldn't even have to shoot Hitler or anything drastic like that. Just existing for any amount of time could make huge changes happen over time, which is somewhat explained by the Butterfly Effect.

      Now, here's the tricky part: what if I decide not to go in the past and me going into the past is part of history? That would change history and oh I've gone crosseyed.

      Since I'm not a big fan of predetermined fate, I must assume that no one may go in the past of their own dimension. The two seem to go hand-in-hand as far as I see.

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
  5. Hm by inKubus · · Score: 4, Funny

    They should plan out all the conferences in advance for the next 10,000 years, like the freemasons did in 5000 b.c.

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.
  6. gets the imagination going by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    youve gotta love those mit guys and their uncanny study avoidance manouevres

    1. Re:gets the imagination going by ChairmanMeow · · Score: 3, Funny

      So the lesson in all this is that you should never study.

      --
  7. I was there by Winlin · · Score: 3, Funny

    It was great.

  8. RSVP? by Dachannien · · Score: 5, Funny

    For those interested in attending, it's on May 7, 2005, 10:00pm EDT

    Oh, I'm sure I'll get around to it one of these days.

  9. so naturally by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 5, Funny

    The place will be full of dozens of idiots dressed in spandex and insisting thet they come from the future.

    1. Re:so naturally by grungebox · · Score: 4, Funny

      The place will be full of dozens of idiots dressed in spandex and insisting thet they come from the future.

      Maybe spandex is all the rage in 3166.

    2. Re:so naturally by aarku · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, to prove you're from the mind boggling far off future, a retail box of Duke Nukem Forever will be required to be presented at the door.

    3. Re:so naturally by ErikTheRed · · Score: 4, Funny
      Well, to prove you're from the mind boggling far off future, a retail box of Duke Nukem Forever will be required to be presented at the door.
      Dude, they probably won't be coming from that far in the future.
      --

      Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    4. Re:so naturally by sjbcfh · · Score: 4, Funny
      The place will be full of dozens of idiots dressed in spandex and insisting thet they come from the future.

      Oh, you mean like a Slashdot meetup?

  10. Paradoxes by jesterzog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If no time travellers turn up on May 7th, will everyone stop promoting it after the date?

    Personally I would have thought it'd make sense to give a bit more advanced notice than a week, if only to give people a chance to get the word around more beforehand (thus more likely to be archived).

  11. Fuck by erikharrison · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm a time traveller. Unfortunately, you can't tell, because I travel through time with the help of an angel and an invisible lech, and the process causing me to appear identical to someone in the time I'm travelling to.

    Hold on, I have to go get this Erik kid married to his one true love.

    Oh boy.

    1. Re:Fuck by Aeiri · · Score: 3, Funny

      Al, what does Ziggy say my chances are?

  12. It could be a ruse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It could be a ruse... the organizers may be stranded time travellers trying to send a message to the future to get rescued now. It may not be a genuine convention, but rather a lifeboat technique for the Insiders.

  13. Re:The Convention by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 5, Funny

    > [...]it will have been a blast!

    I believe you mean willan on-be a blast.

  14. I went there next year. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Its gonna be boring. But the after party they're planning last year kicked ass.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  15. marketing idea by British · · Score: 4, Funny

    You could have a Time Traveler supply booth running there:

    - Legit costumes for whatever era. WW2 uniform, peasant outfit, etc
    - Monetary exchange: buy/sell money from different eras, at varying rates. You will always need money(depending on the time)
    - Fake IDs. Going back 20 years? get an ID 20 years prior to your birthday
    - Fake license plates. Travelling in an old car back to an earlier time? Get "legit" license plates that are either from the same car, or just some convincing out-of-state plates.

    WARNING: Management is not responsible to disruptions in history.

    The sales possibilities are endless.

  16. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even if someone time travelled into the past for a few seconds, wouldn't they wind up in the icy cold of space while the planet speeds along on its normal course around the sun?

    --
    [o]_O
    1. Re:zerg by fprefect · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are 2 things involved in 4-dimensional translocation:

      -- Reaching the exact coordinates at the right instant, considering rotation and revolution of the planet, solar system, and galaxy.

      -- Matching the velocity of that location (and timeframe) exactly.

      It's not only useless to appear at the right instant in the right room if your body doesn't exactly match the inertial frame -- it would be fatal. Forgetting to account for just the earth's revolution around the sun would slam the traveller against the wall at 30km/sec.

      --
      Matt Slot / Bitwise Operator / Ambrosia Software, Inc.
    2. Re:zerg by Repton · · Score: 3, Funny

      Even if someone time travelled into the past for a few seconds, wouldn't they wind up in the icy cold of space while the planet speeds along on its normal course around

      Nah, because the rotation of the solar system around the galactic core, combined with the movement of the Milky Way (propelled out by the big bang, and pulled on by the gravity of various neighbouring galaxies) just happen to exactly cancel out the movement of the earth. This means that we are, in fact, absolutely fixed in position in space.

      This is why the aliens keep coming here --- we are the only stable point in the universe where time travel can (safely) happen.

      HTH.

      --
      Repton.
      They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
  17. Re:Sweet! by morcheeba · · Score: 4, Funny

    dude. you totally missed the point!

    Let me hop in my delorean and I'll be there in 5 minutes ago.

  18. Re:so theoretically by johnjay · · Score: 5, Funny

    "So if there is no one present from the future theoretically we never figure out how to transend time." Or the party on May 7th becomes famous throughout time as one of the most suck-ass parties in all history. So, time travelers decide to skip it.

  19. Not Bloody Likely by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pshaw... everybody knows that nobody goes to these things because they are too crowded.

  20. Larry Niven Already Dealt With This by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For a universe in which time travel is possible and the past can be altered by time travelers the only stable state is one in which time travel is never invented. Work it out.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  21. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by Datamonstar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dude, it's not like you don't have time.

    --
    The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
  22. Easier way is, "Time is an illusion" by cfalcon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think "Time is an illusion" is an easier way to say it. If you have a picture you and a friend are looking at, and he wonders if the right side can ever travel to the left side and modify things, you'd wonder what he was talking about. I would argue that time is like that: static if viewed from enough dimensions, available for observation (in theory) as one massive N dimensional statue.

  23. Yeah, like the government won't be watching THAT by Brento · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you were really a time traveler, why would you want to show up at a known place on a known date? The government would be waiting with an awesome arsenal of firepower, waiting to forcefully take your tools from you.

    Or if you're the big-business conspiracy theory type, substitute "government" for "private mercenaries."

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
  24. I already went. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't go. It was boring so a bunch of us went to ancient Babylonia for the invention of beer.

  25. If you came from the future.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..why didn't you get first post?

  26. Re:Sweet! by Rei · · Score: 4, Funny

    Reminds me a bit of what my friends and I did back in high school/college (we were in a program called TAMS in which, for your last two years of high school, you went to college and stayed in a dorm). A few student groups were famous for spamming our mailboxes with notices for the meetings and posting their signs everywhere, and it was quite annoying.

    So, as a countermeasure, we formed a "Time Travellers Club". We put out notices in everyone's boxes, first notifying people of an upcoming meeting a week prior, and the second time thanking everyone for such a large turnout at our meeting a week later. We got permission to post our own sign - a big hanging one that ha our group name, and its motto ("I'll See You Yesterday!").

    Later, we found the notices on at least one RA's and one student's door - the student had apparently actually tried to go to the meeting that we thanked people for the turnout at, because they had it next to a note that said "I went, and it sucked!"

    --
    Dear Lord: One of your creatures may be hurt tonight. Please let it be the other creature.
  27. Most likely by pyth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Most likely, a time travel path would be along a line of freefall (geodesic). ie. Imagine if you could fall through the ground, wobbling back and forth from one side of the planet to the other.

    For any given initial velocity, there would only be certain periodic times when you *wouldn't* end up inside the planet. And the position on the planet where you come out would also be problematic. If you're not satisfied with those precise times and places, then you can adjust your velocity a tad, to get another set of options.

    If you're in orbit then you have much less to worry about.

  28. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by IdleTime · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, I went back about 2000 years with a couple of pound of good hydroponically grown weed and started a groovy movement. It was back in the area that is called Israel today.

    I used this funny hispanic name, Jesus...

    --
    If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
  29. Re:TT is possible by LinuxRulz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Watever everyone says, time travel is possible. The thing is you can only travel to the future and it is incredibly slow...

  30. Re:so theoretically by dj245 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Or the party on May 7th becomes famous throughout time as one of the most suck-ass parties in all history.

    As someone who frequents these types of parties I can tell you they never go bad. Whats so bad about a bunch of engineers having huge drunken bonanza?

    "Dude, why is your volumetric spirit flow rate decreasing exponentially as a function of time while your volumetric elimination flow rate increasing as a logarithmic function of time?"

    Yeah, those types of parties.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  31. Asimov Worked That Out Before Niven Did by kalamazoo904 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Read "The End of Eternity" by Asimov... he also alludes to the episode in other books.

    --
    Your friendly neighborhood nitpicker
  32. One fear... by aXis100 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Seeing the location depicted so accurately, I have only one fear...

    Telefrags.

  33. You too? by Tony · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've read through their discussion and changelog, I think one more person coming along with "Shh! grownups are talking" will yet again be met with "if someone believes it for whatever reason, it's a valid opinion" line of thinking.

    Yeah, it's a rather strange phenomenon. "Fair and balanced" means presenting both sides of a case, even when one side is obviously right (or at least more right), and one side is wrong. The John Titor case is one of those (obviously a very artful hoax). Intelligent Design vs. evolution is another. Both John Titor and Intelligent Design are attractive falsehoods (at least, attractive to some people). That doesn't make them right, or even viable.

    I mean, if I claim that I have invisible aliens called Dvutels living in my attic...

    Jesus, you've got those, too? How do you get rid of them? I've been using invisible Raid, but that ain't working.

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
  34. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by Temsi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, here's the real reason this won't fly...

    Let's assume for the sake of argument, that this convention is discovered in a historylibrary of some sort (archives of /. perhaps), in the distant future by a timetraveler, and he decides to go.

    When he does, he'll instantly split the timeline, and the one he came from will become a parallel universe to the one he's in when he attends the convention.
    Why? Because in order for a time traveler to notice it in the future, it will have to happen at least once without him. Ergo, if I were to go to this meeting, I would not meet a time traveler, because this is "my" timeline.
    However, if this were to happen, an alternate version of me would be able to meet the time traveler, because he came back in time, after having lived later in "my" timeline, where the convention took place without a visitor from the future.
    In fact, the moment he interacts with anything or anyone from our timeline when he arrives, is when the timeline splits, because he wasn't there the first time around. So unless he's already here in our timeline, which would make me the alternate version of me, then I won't meet him.
    It's more than likely nobody from the future will show up at the convention. Unless, like I said, we're already in the alternate timeline.

    Also, when he goes back to the future, his timeline will have been altered and he may not even exist in the timeline he returns to; and he will have no way to get back to his own previous future timeline, unless he goes back again a little earlier and tells his alternate self to go back immediately without going to the convention - which of course would create a grandfather paradox, as he would then have no reason to tell himself not to go and the entire universe would simply cease to exist.

    Is that clear?

    --
    -- This sig for rent.
  35. Re: Freedom of speech is a good thing by glwtta · · Score: 3, Informative
    I'd rather hear both sides and be free to make my own choices and decisions. If the idea of free speech worries you, then you worry me.

    This has nothing to do with free speech (or even Free Speech) whatsoever. Free speech guarantees your right to hold and voice an opinion, unmolested by the powers that be. This concept is often warped into the notion that it obviates the need to defend such an opinion, or that merely holding it requires others to recognize it as valid.

    Nobody is even remotely pondering curtailing the "Titorites"' rights to self expression. What I have a problem with is that the editors of the particular article, in their treatment of the subject matter are giving far too much credence to this particular crackpot theory. They do this in the laudible pursuit of neutrality, but in this case that leads to a product that reflects negatively on the project as a whole.

    Free speech does not mean the abandonment of objective reasoning. Neutral point of view does not mean that wikipedia editors should parrot everything they read on the internet.

    Oh and thank you for providing a link to the article on free speech - how deliciously patronizing.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  36. In a way, you illustrate the REAL problem by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Everyone acts like a thousand years is the equivalent of "yesterday". The very concept that in thousands of years everyone will even know about one particular nerd party, is at best a joke.

    You know how long a thousand years is? Columbus discovering America is _half_ that time ago.

    A thousand years ago, the Vikings were still getting converted to Christianity. Do you know where the big parties have been at this time? If I told you that Bjarni Hrolfsson and Erik Karlsson (made up viking names) had this fabulous party 1000 years ago, would you even know when and where to go?

    Heck, would you have even heard about it? History tends to recall more like royal events and wars from that long ago. We know roughly when and where the saxon earl Harold Goodwinson fought the Vikings and we know where he later lost to William of Normandie. But do you know exactly where some vikings or normans from back then had a party? I don't think so.

    Roughly a thousand years ago, we had the first crusade. We remember that because it's a bloody big war... went awfully wrong, with a bloody huge PR, but even then a lot of details are missing.

    Roughly a thousand years ago, temperatures peaked _higher_ than they are today. In fact so high that Greenland thawed and was green enough to be called that. The Vikings could farm it.

    That's a bloody huge event even on history scale, but even the vast majority the global-warming scare gang doesn't know about it. (E.g., that it happened without driving SUVs. Or that no, all that molten ice did _not_ kill all fish life, and did _not_ reverse the gulf stream either.)

    Roughly a thousand years ago, Leif Eriksson decided to sail west from Greenland, to check out Bjarni Herjolfsson's story that he's seen land there. And he discovered America. That's a bloody huge event, and even about that we have little more than a saga and some ruins that sorta look like a Viking village. And even that's _one_ of the landfalls that Leif made.

    So what makes anyone think that a nerd party would go into every history book for millenia?

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.