Slashdot Mirror


Time Travelers' Convention

usermilk writes "Some folks at MIT are holding a time-travelers' convention. The idea is to make it so famous and so widely-known that even thousands of years in the future, people will still know exactly when and where this time-traveler convention went down, and will all come travel to it at some point in their illustrious time-traveling careers. For those interested in attending, it's on May 7, 2005, 10:00pm EDT (08 May 2005 02:00:00 UTC) in the East Campus Courtyard at MIT. 42:21:36.025N, 71:05:16.332W (42.360007,-071.087870 in decimal degrees)."

127 of 836 comments (clear)

  1. Ahh... by metlin · · Score: 4, Funny


    But will John Titor be invited?

    1. Re:Ahh... by Zugok · · Score: 4, Funny

      he's already been and gone.

      --
      "I just can't sit while people are saying nonsense in a meeting without saying it's nonsense" J Watson, Sci Am 288:(4)51
    2. Re:Ahh... by woah · · Score: 5, Informative
      John Titor.

      ...a fun read.

    3. Re:Ahh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Truth is I never cared if you "buy it", as you are all so fond of saying.

      None of you would be laughing if I wouldn't have alerted the people who needed to know about the Y2K bug. Trust me.

      Nothing changed though, you are all still gluttonous egomanianics. Sometimes I wonder if I should have bothered.

      Oh well, Pamela is still alive anyway. That should count for something.

    4. Re:Ahh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      especially when his prediction of a CJD-like disease epidemic is starting to come true in NY: Google News

    5. Re:Ahh... by Pseudonym · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I found the John Titor episode very interesting. Many people have characterised him as a hoax, but I think that's unfair. I think it was a very clever piece of Internet performance art, anticipating alternate games like I Love Bees.

      My hat is off to the guy. He's made me think a lot about how future generations will judge our current culture, which I think was the main point of the exercise.

      It reminds me a bit of Confessions of a Dangerous Mind. It was unfair to call that a "hoax" because a hoaxer expects you to believe their bullshit. Chuck Barris was trying to make a point through a clever piece of alternate-reality fiction. Much the same as John Titor, whoever he really was.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    6. Re:Ahh... by dswensen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's the matter, John, didn't have "time" to make a Slashdot account?

      Hyuk hyuk

    7. Re:Ahh... by glwtta · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Hm, first time that the wikipedia detractors make sense to me - I know they take their NOPV thing seriously, but shouldn't there be some sort of "stupid hoax considered a stupid hoax until proven otherwise" rule?

      Striving to represent all sides of an issue is one thing, but those who believe a lame hoax and those who don't, do not two valid sides of an issue make.

      I mean, come on: "there are discrepancies between Titor's claims of the future and actual events"? Oh really, cause it all looked pretty solid to me!

      Somehow their reputation just got knocked down a notch for me.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    8. Re:Ahh... by Jonathunder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So fix it. Be bold.

    9. Re:Ahh... by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Funny

      Forget John Titor. Invite Wisest Human Dr. Gene Ray, and admit that Time Cube proves You Educated Stupid.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    10. Re:Ahh... by glwtta · · Score: 3
      I've read through their discussion and changelog, I think one more person coming along with "Shh! grownups are talking" will yet again be met with "if someone believes it for whatever reason, it's a valid opinion" line of thinking.

      It's really more the attitude in general rather than this silly article that worries me.

      I mean, if I claim that I have invisible aliens called Dvutels living in my attic, who only communicate with me, and only telepathically; I have presented exactly as much evidence for my story as the time traveler has, so would wikipedia be obliged to fairly represent my side in this matter?

      I can even provide a picture of my attic to show that they are invisible. Oh, I can also provide a rich and evocative description of their homeworld and its history, to strengthen my case.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    11. Re:Ahh... by kernelfoobar · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can even provide a picture of my attic to show that they are invisible.

      Pffff, they're not even invisible, I can easily see them....

      --
      Here we go again!
    12. Re:Ahh... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I play an alternate personality on a message board other than slashdot, and do what some people would refer to as trolling, but I and at least several others who don't know my true identity, think it's a form of performance art/humour. Many people find my routine funny, and although I should be irritating in how I portray myself, I give enough clues than I'm not as dumb as I come across, and that is humourous to people. John Titor is a performance comic/troll, which sounds to me like an interesting guy/group of people to know.

      Yep, I understand the "Titor urge" well. People are willing to believe the darndest things, so long as they are "told with a straight face". The classic example is the Ouija board. There are two kinds of people when it comes to using a Ouija board as a group: the people saying "look! it's spelling something!", and the one guy who's gently pushing the pointer around and saying "I'm not pushing it!" like everyone else. I've always been the guy pushing the pointer around, myself...

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    13. Re:Ahh... by John+Titor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually none of the previous posts are me.
      This is what happened , the short version.

      I spent too much time in this world line, time travel missions are usually of only a short duration. My lengthy stay on this world line "caused" an increase in divergence greater than expected.
      Effectively my internet fame changed your history, increasing the divergence from my own original world line.

      Towards the end of my stay here the NSA and CIA came calling; I made a quick exit to return home.

      Sadly for myself, the increased divergence between world lines meant that when returning I arrived in a word line closer to this ones future than my own world lines present.

      In other words I can never go home.

      Plans here were changed to fix mistakes and minimize resistance based on the information found on the internet about me.
      I am sorry the good guys lose this time and it is my fault.

      I decided to come back here to see how things play out.

      Unless you can be encouraged to take back the power of government from the corporations, then the future is very bleak.

      Is it me? : Slashdot ID and email John Titor,
      As my story is old someone would have registered these long ago for a prank. They were both registered today.... Now how would I have managed that?

    14. Re:Ahh... by DrLex · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hmm, never heard of this guy until now. It was interesting to read. However, it's almost certain that this is a hoax, albeit done by an intelligent and talented man. What he did was trying to turn insightful predictions into something that people would actually be interested in. Time travel speaks to the imagination of many people, insightful predictions don't. He just used the time travel story as a vehicle to try to make people aware of what is going wrong in our current world. Most of his predictions are based on things that were known somewhere at the moment he made them. It was just a matter of finding that information. It's not because something hasn't been published widely yet, that it's not 'known' yet... Other predictions are just based on plausible extrapolations of current events.
      Of course many people don't buy the time travel story, hence don't believe anything of it. But at least he has managed to address some people. And for the others it was just entertaining :)

    15. Re:Ahh... by RinzeWind · · Score: 3, Funny

      I mean, if I claim that I have invisible aliens called Dvutels living in my attic, who only communicate with me, and only telepathically

      You can call that religion an earn serious cash.

    16. Re:Ahh... by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Funny

      According to the WP article, the future hates us. If he really was from the future, you'd think he'd have a little more tact. There are few bullies that can affect the people of the future more profoundly than the directed anger of six billion forbears.

      My descendents hate me? pshaw. i'll show them. I won't have any. mwa hah ahha haha.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  2. I tried to make it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    But I couldn't figure out where those coordinates posted. Would you mind pointing out where you are at the moment in your galactic and solar orbits relative to a few quasars, please?

    1. Re:I tried to make it by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think I'll bumped into you at a room party there. You'll said that someone on Slashdot told you how to find it, but then you'll said to not tell you when you posted because it wasn't worth the trip.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:I tried to make it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, I don't know where they are at that point in time relative to the nearest quasars, but I know that the RAC (or Relative Andromeda Configuration, a coordinate system that measures coordinates inside the Milky Way from the Line between the Andromeda Core and Milky Way Core) as 4I,2V4590KL2GETV:DN,AF6277PBE74F:8Z,R1417145YG14L with the Date/Time combination being exactly 08 May 2005 02:05:01,141461 UTC.

      For you natives, The numbers are in Base-36 (For quicker accuracy when time is of the essence. Ironic, no? Our ability to travel through time and we can't stop the Eastern Eurasian Federation from launching raids on us back home) The three numbers equate to the position of what you're trying to reach, adjusted with Sardinov's Constant to ensure you don't have any... mishaps. Most current devices have safety checks to ensure you don't hit a wall or another person, but there are many other problems with the Templar...

      Oh, if any of you see me, I'm the one on the roof with the small "laptop" device.

    3. Re:I tried to make it by millennial · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha, of course.

      --
      I am scientifically inaccurate.
  3. Why did they set the date in the future? by femto · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why didn't they set the date for yesterday? That way we wouldn't have to wait to see if it was successful.

    1. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by Aeiri · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because then we would be hearing reports of a massive gathering at MIT, but not know what it is.

      And on top of that, nobody from the "present" would be there.

    2. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by Bradmont · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe they did and someone came back to tell us it was going to happen, so we can go; otherwise, maybe nobody from the present would believe them in the future!

    3. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by Fjornir · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dooom! You've uncovered the secret of Flash Mobbing! Now all of us time travelers will need to go back to using raves as our cover...

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    4. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by k-0s · · Score: 2, Funny

      Been there done that...it wasn't that good. John Titor got drunk and they had to call the campus police. He began yelling about having had sexual relations with the police officers grandmothers and granddaughters. They tazered him and after that the party kind of broke up. Now the 2033 Convention, now *THAT* was a party.

    5. Re:Why did they set the date in the future? by TexVex · · Score: 4, Funny

      Willen haven been. You're forgetting your conjugations.

      --
      Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
  4. Hmmm.... by carterhawk001 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    hmm...things to remember:
    1. if a time travel came back in time and altered the past, no one would know but him/her.
    2. it is impossible to prove that our recorded history now is the same as it was 1 second ago due to rule number 1.
    3. You may be caught in a temporal causality loop, doomed forever to repeat the same period of time over and over.
    4. If time is an expression of entropy, then the only way to travel through time is to prefectly reverse entropy, which is impossible because, iirc, entropy is chaotic.
    5. If the universe is nonlinear, or rather, linear is an illusion, then there is no past or future to travel to, but only the present wich exists at any instant as a snapshot in the cascade towards greater entropy.
    6. The universe is moving towards a state of pure heat, at which time entropy will cease, as all engery, which drives entropy, will have been used. if you intend to travel through time by altering the universe around you, then you can not go past this point, or ever return. if you time travel by using internal independent means, then you may travel past this point, but you would no longer have any external means of measuring the passage of time in the universe. To time travel through external means you must increase the general entropy of the universe such that all events happen faster outside your time machine. to travel through time internaly you must slow down your own entropy. in both instances you must phase away from the universe such that you do not exist in it, lest you collide with something going faster than you can percieve.
    7 If time is a seperate dimension then you must find a way to travel in the direction that is forwards or backwards from where you are now. 4 dimensional travel occurs at a steady, measurable rate. As you approach the speed of light, this rate of passage decreases. Thus, it is logical to assume that by exceeding the speed of light in our universe of spacetime you would travel backwards in time.
    8. You may be your own great great grandparent.
    9. If you change your own past you can not go back to your own future to reap the benifits because the new future would have a new you to match it.
    10. Journeyman Project is t3h roxors!!!!!

    1. Re:Hmmm.... by DirtyDuck · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Nah, you've been watching too much startrek.

      Assuming time travel is possible, it's impossible to alter the past.

      Think of it this way, the way something happened, is the way it happened. If you travel back in time, then you're participating in events however, your paticipation would already have happened. Therefore, anything you've already done would already have happened.

      Think of it this way. You couldn't go back in time and shoot Hilter before he got into power for the very simple reason that it didn't happen. Say you setup a sniper rifle on a building. You could try to fire but you'd either miss, the gun would jam, you'd get arrested, have a heart-attack etc. etc.

      This isn't the universe trying to protect itself or any such mystical mumbo jumbo. It's just the simple fact that a thing didn't happen and your actions in trying to change the past are already part of history.

      Probably didn't explain it very clearly. ;)

    2. Re:Hmmm.... by Basehart · · Score: 2, Funny

      "You couldn't go back in time and shoot Hilter"

      Don't you mean Mr Hilter?

    3. Re:Hmmm.... by gfody · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably didn't explain it very clearly. ;)

      I'm sure you meant to say that if you travel back in time to shoot hitler, you could in fact shoot him, just that once you left on your mission to shoot him you could never return to that same place because that place exists in a relative path from a place where hitler was not shot.

      Of course if you could transcend time and thus travel freely thru the infinite possible dimensions, why would you want to go and shoot hitler.. the dimension in which you shoot hitler would probably cast you a pretty dark lifetime anyways. You'd be better off choosing a dimension where somebody else shot hitler and has yourself cast as a young millionaire or something.

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    4. Re:Hmmm.... by ravind · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well if you think that it is impossible to change the past, then you have to conclude that it is impossible to change the future too because your future is somebody else's past. Which means the way your life turns out has already been determined and cannot be changed. How do you fit free will into that?

    5. Re:Hmmm.... by CowbertPrime · · Score: 3, Insightful

      actually the entire premise of the convention is flawed because the current model of time traveled dictated by relativity suggests that one cannot travel backwards in time past the point where the time machine was discovered/invented.

    6. Re:Hmmm.... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 5, Funny
      Actually Time Travel by itself is impossible.

      But what you could do is slip into an alternate universe which is exactly like ours, only 60 years behind. Once there you could kill Hitler and alter History... but only in THAT copy of the Universe.

      While useless to alter history, I do find the technique works well for obtaining quality building materials, and collectables for my Ebay super-store.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    7. Re:Hmmm.... by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Actually Time Travel by itself is impossible.

      Yeah, almost like it's impossible for objects heavier than air to fly

    8. Re:Hmmm.... by rar · · Score: 5, Funny

      You couldn't go back in time and shoot Hilter before he got into power for the very simple reason that it didn't happen.

      No, no, no; you got it all wrong. It was just exactly because someone went back and shot that Hilter you speak of; that the much worse dictator Hitler we do remember could come to power. :)

    9. Re:Hmmm.... by carterhawk001 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Dont forget the multiverse, aka, the great tree of possibilities. Consider this, going back in time may be likened to moving back down the tree, and when you change something, a new branch forms and you start moving along that, parallel to the old branch. now your stuck in the new branch. The implication here is that nothing you do to alter time will truly alter time, it will just launch you along a new limb of the tree. You arent changing the past, your creating a new future.

    10. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Doh! Free will is an illusion. David Hume demonstrated this three hundred years ago when he pointed out that, as a matter of definition, every process is either deterministic or random.

      There are two common arguments for free will and they are both extremely weak:

      (1) I feel like I have free will, therefore I do.

      (2) Free will must exist because lots of other stuff (like our moral systems, the law, etc.) don't make sense without it.

    11. Re:Hmmm.... by l810c · · Score: 4, Funny
      8. You may be your own great great grandparent.

      So let me get this straight. You have never met your great great grandma, but the pictures of her in her younger years show that she was one hot babe. You decide to go back in time and do her?

    12. Re:Hmmm.... by servognome · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Everything you do and think is based on the electrochemical reactions in your brain. If we understood how all the wiring of the brain works, and understood all the inputs the output could be predicted. There is no freewill, just a reaction to a given series of inputs.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    13. Re:Hmmm.... by Frogbert · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've always wanted to know why anyone would risk changing the past, I mean if I were to go back in time and kill Hitler as a child then perhaps the world would not have had WWII which would be good in the short run but it would mean that most countries probably wouldn't figure out that having all out war is bad for everyone involved. If war was staved off for a little while and weapons got more powerful then the next war they had would be even more devistating.

    14. Re:Hmmm.... by Corporal+Dan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I highly recommend "To Say Nothing of the Dog" by Connie Willis on this same theme.

    15. Re:Hmmm.... by Jeremi · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If we understood how all the wiring of the brain works, and understood all the inputs the output could be predicted.


      Are you sure? If quantum mechanics are involved in any meaningful way, then some of the events may be literally random (i.e. not a function of any observable input). In that case, even perfect knowledge of the inputs and the wiring would be insufficient.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    16. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      Doh! Free will is an illusion.

      These kind of blanket "I know everything" comments make me cringe. Just because you quote a 300 year old philospher does not make it so. And invoking Homer Simpson does not help your cause.


      as a matter of definition
      There are very few definitions in the world of phiolpsphy and free will is certainly not one of them.

      every process is either deterministic or random

      Are not all things that happen in life, the universe and everything built upon previous events? And if this is the case, is there not a chain of causality (from Buddist tradition) which denotes a non random behavior to all things (psedo-random)? Existentialist thought suggests that we have some sort of nebulous/public "free will" (i.e.- we're all in this together), ala Martin Heidegger's Das Eine.


      Not that this is necessarily correct, mind you. That's the beauty of philosophy.. it's a securlar "religion"(at least the non religious part:)).


      Please refrain from assuming that any methaphysical subject is without question, correct, in the future.. at least giving better arguments than "Doh! Free will is an illusion."... because some old dead guy says so... Or at least giving some credence to you "argument". Try not to assume everything your professors harp on is true.



      Just my thoughts.

    17. Re:Hmmm.... by LiENUS · · Score: 4, Funny

      Akin to subversion branching. The only question is, is there a "universe merge" command waiting to be discovered?

    18. Re:Hmmm.... by gfody · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've actually never seen 12 monkeys. I probably wont now that I know it's based on a 12 year olds perception of time travel. Your gun would jam or you'd have a heart attack? Thats nonsense.. wouldn't your time machine break and you wouldn't be able to even try, after all there's no documented history of an attempt on his life or ANY time travellers for that matter.

      Are you a time traveller? Didn't think so. I am, in fact, a time traveller. What happens once you leave this dimension to travel to another one you can do anything you want, however you can't return back to your original dimension because it becomes impossible to find. For instance, I went back about 30 minutes to fix a spelling mistake in my original post. The dimension I left is now missing a me (unless me from another dimension happens to populate it (possibly correcting a different spelling mistake)) and me in this dimension can't return to that one because I'd never find it since I would have to predict all the events in the universe since the fork 30 minutes ago and I'd much rather stay here 30 minutes behind because it's similar enough to the place I left and I don't feel like killing the native version of myself again.

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    19. Re:Hmmm.... by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Funny

      but when you got there she turned you down because she doesn't date geeks and so you can never exist in the future. Thus if you are your own great great grandfather you don't exist.

    20. Re:Hmmm.... by operagost · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Hop into your spaceship, head out for a leisurely cruise at or near the speed of light.
      Half right. Travel at precisely the speed of light is prohibited.
      Want to go backwards in time? I leave that as an exercise to the reader. Hint: think black holes.
      Hint: I believe you really have no fucking idea and just like to watch yourself post.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    21. Re:Hmmm.... by Mattintosh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Better yet... Time travel isn't possible because time doesn't exist.

      We speak of "time" because it's convenient. It allows us to measure our lives and our activities against a single background. We keep track of "time" by observing the predictable patterns of celestial objects, as well as by setting mechanical devices to synchronize with those celestial movement cycles.

      But what exactly is "time"? Time is a series of events. Nothing more. You can't undo things in real life. A broken vase can't be put back together just by reversing the event that caused it to break. Why? Because events are irreversible. You can cause a negating event for some things (like turning a light on or off), but you can never undo an event once it's done.

      So, simply put, time doesn't exist. It's merely perception of a series of events. The fact that it's perception is made clear by the phrase "time flies when you're having fun." Your brain records images of events into your memory, sometimes with a record of celestial body locations or numeric representations thereof.

      The more interested you are in what is happening around you, the more things your brain will record. But having limited processing resources, it will skip the "timestamp" on many of those events. The relative difference between each "timestamp" is much farther apart than is expected or normal, so "time flies."

      When you're disinterested in events around you, the opposite is true. Your brain records some meaningless drivel and since it has lots of resources available, it slaps a "timestamp" on every one of those mental notes. Boring stuff seems to take much longer because of this.

      Let's see the writers for the next Star Trek series (several years from now, I hear) put this tidbit of time-travel logic to work. It'll at least spare us some crappy re-hashes of Nazis in space (spaaaaaaaaaaaace?).

    22. Re:Hmmm.... by droleary · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Think of it this way, the way something happened, is the way it happened.

      Buddy, I've got a cat in a box that would or would not beg to disagree.

    23. Re:Hmmm.... by Headcase88 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Problem is, you wouldn't even have to shoot Hitler or anything drastic like that. Just existing for any amount of time could make huge changes happen over time, which is somewhat explained by the Butterfly Effect.

      Now, here's the tricky part: what if I decide not to go in the past and me going into the past is part of history? That would change history and oh I've gone crosseyed.

      Since I'm not a big fan of predetermined fate, I must assume that no one may go in the past of their own dimension. The two seem to go hand-in-hand as far as I see.

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    24. Re:Hmmm.... by Temposs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My theory is that this(that the past and future are already set constant) is indeed the case and that free will is still possible. The way it would work is that you make your choices independent of time. It is your consciousness by means of your body that travels in linear time, experiencing your choices.

      But they are all your choices. So in my theory you have in fact already chosen your future choices, but not really because it's outside of time so there is no "already chosen".

      It's more like, your choices are as much a part of your being as your left arm or your mind, soul, spirit, whatever. So at the same time that your choices are "set" in advance, you still freely make all your choices, since they are a part of you.

      This roughly solves the paradox of a set time continuum and having free will. It precludes you to believe in your being existng outside of time and such.

      --
      Knowledge is just opinion that you trust enough to act upon. -Orson Scott Card
    25. Re:Hmmm.... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Informative

      tachyons , which (if they exist

      They don't. Tachyons were a weirdness created by some of the early attempts at String Theory. Later work at correcting the mathematical holes in the theory eliminated the possibility of tachyons.

    26. Re:Hmmm.... by EvilNight · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You could kill Hitler.

      It's just that someone would have to take his place. I don't mean some other random person, complete with history and name changes... I mean someone would literally have to step into his name, his life, his shoes, and become him. They would need to carry out Hitler's actions right up to the end. That would particularly suck for Hitler, as well. If there be a judgement day, how much would it suck if you'd been killed (and replaced by an actor) prior to committing your particular line of atrocities? Just who gets the blame in that situation? What if someone killed Einstein in a similar situation, when he was still a patent clerk, leaving him without the knowledge of his life's work? That's a new kind of identity theft, and a particularly nasty crime.

      There's no such thing as "one time traveller." If a time machine is invented, it will lead to a time travelling society, with a multitude of time travellers. The creation of the invention invariably leads to a society (undoubtedly post-human) based upon its use. If you say the device would cause the destruction of the society that created it, then obviously this would have already happened, and no society that would destroy itself with time travelling could come into being. Only one that could use it properly would be able to exist. Any self-invalidating timeline cannot exist.

      The creation of the time machine is inevitable; if it can be done, it will be done once our science permits it. Relativity has ruled it possible, but then we know fuck-all about the universe, really, so as far as I'm concerned it's up for debate. Even if you cannot go back past the creation of the time travelling device (as several ideas suggest), there may still be natural phenomenon that allow travel back to near the big bang (natural wormholes, etc) and subsequent creation of a temporal highway with a very long reach.

      Sure, you can't push a man through that hole, but you could push nanites through, and electrons or information. Star-Trek style transporter technology (digitization via quantum entanglement) could render an information pattern that could be sent over such a highway and assembled from local materials on the far end. A Temporal Area Network sounds like quite an engineering challenge. I wonder if we're up to it.

      There would undoubtedly be temporal pollution (time travellers changing events, intentionally or accidentally), however, none of it would change the known universe in the slightest, because, as you say, it would have already happened. No self-invalidating timeline can exist; therefore this timeline we travel down is not self-invalidating. This does not mean it must make sense to the observer, however. A "paradox" is only an apparent paradox; it exists only in the mind of the observer due to the observer lacking the relevant information to make sense of the apparent paradox. (Or, you can use the many worlds interpretation, if you choose, but frankly that one strikes me as nuts, though it does carry inherent immortality as a bonus, which is rather nice).

      Meddling gets harder and harder the closer we get to an information society, but prior to the mass spread of recording devices, one could get away with a great deal, moreso and moreso as one goes further back in time. Go back even a hundred years from now and one could get away with just about anything. Any event can be tampered with, provided the outcome ends up the same in the end. If you think about this for very long, you will bleed from the ears when you realize just how many things can be altered with ease.

      This logic is very useful in defeating the usual gamut of time-travel paradoxes that confound most people who haven't spent much time thinking about what it really means. No one who would decide to travel back and kill their parents would exist in the first place; if someone existed who could actually make the attempt, it would be because they were adopted and killing the wrong target, or because some other time traveller stepped in and corr

      --
      Hell is being intelligent in a world full of idiots.
  5. Hm by inKubus · · Score: 4, Funny

    They should plan out all the conferences in advance for the next 10,000 years, like the freemasons did in 5000 b.c.

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.
  6. gets the imagination going by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    youve gotta love those mit guys and their uncanny study avoidance manouevres

    1. Re:gets the imagination going by ChairmanMeow · · Score: 3, Funny

      So the lesson in all this is that you should never study.

      --
  7. I was there by Winlin · · Score: 3, Funny

    It was great.

  8. RSVP? by Dachannien · · Score: 5, Funny

    For those interested in attending, it's on May 7, 2005, 10:00pm EDT

    Oh, I'm sure I'll get around to it one of these days.

  9. so naturally by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 5, Funny

    The place will be full of dozens of idiots dressed in spandex and insisting thet they come from the future.

    1. Re:so naturally by grungebox · · Score: 4, Funny

      The place will be full of dozens of idiots dressed in spandex and insisting thet they come from the future.

      Maybe spandex is all the rage in 3166.

    2. Re:so naturally by agm · · Score: 2, Funny

      It is. Or is that "was". I mean it will be,

    3. Re:so naturally by aarku · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, to prove you're from the mind boggling far off future, a retail box of Duke Nukem Forever will be required to be presented at the door.

    4. Re:so naturally by ErikTheRed · · Score: 4, Funny
      Well, to prove you're from the mind boggling far off future, a retail box of Duke Nukem Forever will be required to be presented at the door.
      Dude, they probably won't be coming from that far in the future.
      --

      Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    5. Re:so naturally by sjbcfh · · Score: 4, Funny
      The place will be full of dozens of idiots dressed in spandex and insisting thet they come from the future.

      Oh, you mean like a Slashdot meetup?

  10. Paradoxes by jesterzog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If no time travellers turn up on May 7th, will everyone stop promoting it after the date?

    Personally I would have thought it'd make sense to give a bit more advanced notice than a week, if only to give people a chance to get the word around more beforehand (thus more likely to be archived).

    1. Re:Paradoxes by jdhutchins · · Score: 2, Funny

      If no time travellers turn up on May 7th, will everyone stop promoting it after the date?

      No, it will be continually duped on slashdot until a time machine is invented. That way no one will ever forget about it, and the editors have an excuse for the dupe. MIT probably planned it this way becuase they knew slashdot would carry it for the next 50,000 years.

  11. Fuck by erikharrison · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm a time traveller. Unfortunately, you can't tell, because I travel through time with the help of an angel and an invisible lech, and the process causing me to appear identical to someone in the time I'm travelling to.

    Hold on, I have to go get this Erik kid married to his one true love.

    Oh boy.

    1. Re:Fuck by Aeiri · · Score: 3, Funny

      Al, what does Ziggy say my chances are?

  12. It could be a ruse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It could be a ruse... the organizers may be stranded time travellers trying to send a message to the future to get rescued now. It may not be a genuine convention, but rather a lifeboat technique for the Insiders.

  13. Re:The Convention by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 5, Funny

    > [...]it will have been a blast!

    I believe you mean willan on-be a blast.

  14. I went there next year. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Its gonna be boring. But the after party they're planning last year kicked ass.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  15. marketing idea by British · · Score: 4, Funny

    You could have a Time Traveler supply booth running there:

    - Legit costumes for whatever era. WW2 uniform, peasant outfit, etc
    - Monetary exchange: buy/sell money from different eras, at varying rates. You will always need money(depending on the time)
    - Fake IDs. Going back 20 years? get an ID 20 years prior to your birthday
    - Fake license plates. Travelling in an old car back to an earlier time? Get "legit" license plates that are either from the same car, or just some convincing out-of-state plates.

    WARNING: Management is not responsible to disruptions in history.

    The sales possibilities are endless.

  16. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even if someone time travelled into the past for a few seconds, wouldn't they wind up in the icy cold of space while the planet speeds along on its normal course around the sun?

    --
    [o]_O
    1. Re:zerg by inKubus · · Score: 2, Funny

      As long as you're travelling in time, you are in hyperspace therefore you can come out anywhere. Although you are right, you would want to calculate where you are going or you might end up in the _middle_ of the earth, which might be a little more unpleasant.

      Thankfully, with Windows 64-bit edition coming out, we have adaquate memory addressing capabilties to model all of these possibilities.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    2. Re:zerg by fprefect · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are 2 things involved in 4-dimensional translocation:

      -- Reaching the exact coordinates at the right instant, considering rotation and revolution of the planet, solar system, and galaxy.

      -- Matching the velocity of that location (and timeframe) exactly.

      It's not only useless to appear at the right instant in the right room if your body doesn't exactly match the inertial frame -- it would be fatal. Forgetting to account for just the earth's revolution around the sun would slam the traveller against the wall at 30km/sec.

      --
      Matt Slot / Bitwise Operator / Ambrosia Software, Inc.
    3. Re:zerg by Repton · · Score: 3, Funny

      Even if someone time travelled into the past for a few seconds, wouldn't they wind up in the icy cold of space while the planet speeds along on its normal course around

      Nah, because the rotation of the solar system around the galactic core, combined with the movement of the Milky Way (propelled out by the big bang, and pulled on by the gravity of various neighbouring galaxies) just happen to exactly cancel out the movement of the earth. This means that we are, in fact, absolutely fixed in position in space.

      This is why the aliens keep coming here --- we are the only stable point in the universe where time travel can (safely) happen.

      HTH.

      --
      Repton.
      They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
    4. Re:zerg by EEBaum · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's why you have to be going 88mph.

      Duh.

      --
      -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
    5. Re:zerg by sbaker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem is - Einsteins theories don't permit a 'special' frame of reference. So you don't have any place to measure the 'absolute' motion of the earth *from*. Do you only consider the earth's motion in orbit around the sun - or do you also consider the suns' rotation around the galactic core? How about the motion of our galaxy relative to the other nearby galaxies? What about the expansion of the universe?

      There is no absolute coordinate to dial into...it's a meaningless concept.

      This is a severe problem for any kind of *discontinuous* time travel.

      For time travel into the past to function, it more or less has to work like time travel to the future does (the kind we're engaging in right now as we head to the future at a rate of one second of experienced time for every second of elapsed time).

      As you travel back continuously, your feet would still be resting on the surface of the earth - and still get dragged around by it. If you travelled backwards by simply experiencing time in reverse, there needn't be any physical problems.

      In 'The Time Machine' by H.G.Wells, that's exactly what happens. The time traveller sees things happening in the world around him - but rapidly and in reverse.

      Alternatively, if time travel were via wormhole/blackhole types of things - then the motion of the wormhole or black hole would be the only constraint. Once you can do that, finding the Earth again would simply be a matter of knowing how the earth and the wormhole had been positioned back in the time you went back to.

      Either way, it's not a problem.

      The ikky problems only come about with the kind in which: **ZAP** you disappear - then after 20 seconds of cheap special effects - **UNZAP** you reappear 100 years in the past - now, you have no frame of reference to go by and you could (presumably) pop out a long way from anywhere interesting.

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
  17. Re:so theoretically by kubrick · · Score: 2, Interesting

    in which you can travel anywhere in time after the machine was switched on

    I can do that, but unfortunately the speed is fixed. One second per second.

    --
    deus does not exist but if he does
  18. Re:Sweet! by morcheeba · · Score: 4, Funny

    dude. you totally missed the point!

    Let me hop in my delorean and I'll be there in 5 minutes ago.

  19. Re:so theoretically by johnjay · · Score: 5, Funny

    "So if there is no one present from the future theoretically we never figure out how to transend time." Or the party on May 7th becomes famous throughout time as one of the most suck-ass parties in all history. So, time travelers decide to skip it.

  20. Not Bloody Likely by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pshaw... everybody knows that nobody goes to these things because they are too crowded.

  21. Larry Niven Already Dealt With This by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For a universe in which time travel is possible and the past can be altered by time travelers the only stable state is one in which time travel is never invented. Work it out.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  22. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by Datamonstar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dude, it's not like you don't have time.

    --
    The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
  23. Easier way is, "Time is an illusion" by cfalcon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think "Time is an illusion" is an easier way to say it. If you have a picture you and a friend are looking at, and he wonders if the right side can ever travel to the left side and modify things, you'd wonder what he was talking about. I would argue that time is like that: static if viewed from enough dimensions, available for observation (in theory) as one massive N dimensional statue.

    1. Re:Easier way is, "Time is an illusion" by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It's not so much an illusion, it's more of an abstract. You cannot travel in time because there is no such thing.

      So, what is time? Well, it first started out as a way for man to determine when to plant crops. It later was used by man for navigation & transport, at a time where different villages were on different time zones (sundials). Now we measure it by counting the vibrations of an atom. The key thing is that man was present at each step. We feel so confident about it, we have even created a "Universal Time". This doesn't make it any more real or even universally relevant.

      When scientists say "time slows down" e.g. relativity, the way I see it is that your perception of time slows down. Your atomic vibrations change speed, relative to an external observer. But there is no way that can be seen as time travel.

      What I'm trying to say is that one only one time "exists", NOW! The moment when your eye's hit the N is now gone. It never existed really, but what we do know is that when your eyes got to it, the crystal in your watch had been counted to have vibrated X number of times since point Y. Besides, the grandfather theory, as others describe, completely discounts time travel, unless there are parallel universes with different timelines, which I doubt. The would need to be an infinite amount of them, and the count can only grow exponentially as "time" progresses.

  24. Yeah, like the government won't be watching THAT by Brento · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you were really a time traveler, why would you want to show up at a known place on a known date? The government would be waiting with an awesome arsenal of firepower, waiting to forcefully take your tools from you.

    Or if you're the big-business conspiracy theory type, substitute "government" for "private mercenaries."

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
  25. Queue Red Dwarf... by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 2, Funny
    Lister: Hey, it hasn't happened, has it? It has "will have going to have happened" happened, but it hasn't actually "happened" happened yet, actually.
    Rimmer: Poppycock! It will be happened; it shall be going to be happening; it will be was an event that could will have been taken place in the future. Simple as that. Your bucket's been kicked, baby.
    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  26. I already went. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't go. It was boring so a bunch of us went to ancient Babylonia for the invention of beer.

  27. If you came from the future.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..why didn't you get first post?

  28. Re:Sweet! by Rei · · Score: 4, Funny

    Reminds me a bit of what my friends and I did back in high school/college (we were in a program called TAMS in which, for your last two years of high school, you went to college and stayed in a dorm). A few student groups were famous for spamming our mailboxes with notices for the meetings and posting their signs everywhere, and it was quite annoying.

    So, as a countermeasure, we formed a "Time Travellers Club". We put out notices in everyone's boxes, first notifying people of an upcoming meeting a week prior, and the second time thanking everyone for such a large turnout at our meeting a week later. We got permission to post our own sign - a big hanging one that ha our group name, and its motto ("I'll See You Yesterday!").

    Later, we found the notices on at least one RA's and one student's door - the student had apparently actually tried to go to the meeting that we thanked people for the turnout at, because they had it next to a note that said "I went, and it sucked!"

    --
    Dear Lord: One of your creatures may be hurt tonight. Please let it be the other creature.
  29. Re:Hmmm.... Explanation??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  30. Re:The Convention by Nehle · · Score: 2, Funny

    Though this is hardly the time to be conjugating verbs in the past-impossible-future-never-tense.

  31. References by Yolegoman · · Score: 2, Funny

    But what you could do is slip into an alternate universe which is exactly like ours, only 60 years behind. Once there you could kill Hitler and alter History... but only in THAT copy of the Universe.

    Where are referenced Universe instances when you need them?

  32. If he hadn't... by Yolegoman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He wouldn't be around to decide whether or not to go back in time and do her.

    Obviously, he went back in time. Pervert.

  33. Most likely by pyth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Most likely, a time travel path would be along a line of freefall (geodesic). ie. Imagine if you could fall through the ground, wobbling back and forth from one side of the planet to the other.

    For any given initial velocity, there would only be certain periodic times when you *wouldn't* end up inside the planet. And the position on the planet where you come out would also be problematic. If you're not satisfied with those precise times and places, then you can adjust your velocity a tad, to get another set of options.

    If you're in orbit then you have much less to worry about.

  34. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by IdleTime · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, I went back about 2000 years with a couple of pound of good hydroponically grown weed and started a groovy movement. It was back in the area that is called Israel today.

    I used this funny hispanic name, Jesus...

    --
    If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
  35. Temporal Cold War by teslar · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is where it started. A couple of Sullibans attended (they really are party animals once you get to know them), but unfortunatley one present-time Enterprise fan thought they were just other geeks in a costume and poured his beer over their heads.

    That kinda sparked it, really. We told Bermann that showing history programmes before the events actually happened was really not a good idea, especially given how his documentaries polarise against de Sulliban but that's Rick for you. When he was a kid, he showed the moon landing to Jules Verne, who was rather impressed.

    But no worries about the Temporal Cold War. Admiral Daniels will be dispatching Archer to stop the party from happening, thus preventing the onset of the war. Some of you present-timers might actually look forward to this, as it will result in the purging of all Temporal Cold War references from the documentaries Bermann has slipped into your time.

    Shame about the party though. It really was a good laugh. Well... would have been.

  36. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by B3ryllium · · Score: 2, Funny

    So you'd look like Prince Charles?

  37. What difference do Earth coordinates make? by narcolepticjim · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If a time machine uncouples itself with the current time, wouldn't the planet spin away from it in its orbit? You might turn up at the right time, but in the wrooooong place.

  38. Re:TT is possible by LinuxRulz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Watever everyone says, time travel is possible. The thing is you can only travel to the future and it is incredibly slow...

  39. Re:so theoretically by dj245 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Or the party on May 7th becomes famous throughout time as one of the most suck-ass parties in all history.

    As someone who frequents these types of parties I can tell you they never go bad. Whats so bad about a bunch of engineers having huge drunken bonanza?

    "Dude, why is your volumetric spirit flow rate decreasing exponentially as a function of time while your volumetric elimination flow rate increasing as a logarithmic function of time?"

    Yeah, those types of parties.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  40. Re:Yeah, like the government won't be watching THA by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Will there be an 'awesome aresenal of firepower' at the MIT campus next weekend? Highly doubtful. In either case, a time traveler from the future will know if the FBI/CIA/Army/corporate mercenaries showed up.

    The correct tense might be "The government troops didn't show up, so it's safe to go."

  41. It is just me? by furry_marmot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Now I like a good sci-fi story as much as the next guy and love to watch my wife lose her mind over the loops a writer will go through to make a time-travel story "work". But a few years ago, something occurred to me which I don't think I've ever seen in any story anywhere. Mind you, this is more of a literary sci-fi critique, since time travel probably isn't possible for the many reasons laid out here.

    So let's say you have yourself an Acme Time Machine, and it works. So you set it to transport you back in time 24 hours. Has no one ever considered that the earth has moved? Assuming for the moment that time travel is possible, if you do not calculate precisely where the earth is, and the location you want to go to, then you will most likely end up in space, but with a nasty possibility of "arriving" inside the earth (or possibly even the sun or some other body).

    A time machine would have to also be an instantaneous space travel machine, capable of transporting you anywhere in the universe. I mean, if you can magically transport yourself the 17,640 mi (28,224 km) the earth will have moved in 24 hours, then whatever principle it uses will probably transport you over much greater distances.

  42. Asimov Worked That Out Before Niven Did by kalamazoo904 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Read "The End of Eternity" by Asimov... he also alludes to the episode in other books.

    --
    Your friendly neighborhood nitpicker
  43. 12 Monkeys by robertjw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, that is a misrepresentation of the movie. It does not do anything silly like gun-jamming or heart attack. What's interesting (partial spoiler) is that Bruce Willis' character actually generates the reason for him being sent back in time. It is one of my all time favorite movies due to the complex story nature, Bruce Willis and Brad Pitt's excellent acting ability and Terry Gilliam's genius. Ultimately the mission is accomplished and the people from the future do change the past. Of course the story ends there, so we don't know how the timeline is effected...

  44. One fear... by aXis100 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Seeing the location depicted so accurately, I have only one fear...

    Telefrags.

  45. Time travel by amaiman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ugh, time travel discussion.

    Queue fifty pages of "Yes, I could kill my own grandfather." "No, you couldn't!" "In Soviet Russia, time travels you." "First Post!" "No, this is the first post, I traveled back before you posted yours", and so on...

    Convention's a neat idea, though :-)

  46. Couldn't get hotel rooms at a decent price by billstewart · · Score: 2, Funny

    Really, they've got to schedule it sometime in advance so they could arrange for hotel room space. A few people will show up yesterday anyway just to grab the weekly rate, but they'll probably bop in, hand over their credit card, and not spend much time in the room until next weekend. And the waiting line at Mary Chung's will just be outrageous...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  47. Conference review by SiliconEntity · · Score: 2, Funny

    I attend the "Time Travel" conference, but it is a near-disaster. As far as I can tell the conference is spectacularly devoid of time travellers and instead is full of wannabees wandering around speculating about time travel. Worse, there are glitches at the registration table forcing people to wait in long lines as the students try to get organized. The "food" leaves much to be desired as well, what there is of it. And about the conference sessions, the less I say, the better.

    It certainly doesn't compare with the twin millennium celebrations on December 31, 999 and 1000, where the hostesses pull out all the stops to outdo one another. Now, those are parties!

  48. X, Y, ***Z***, Time, money and politics by starglider29a · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When you gave the coordinates, you neglected to give the "altitude". You may want to have a big safety net over and at the bottom of a big pit, for those who don't have their "Heisenberg Compensators" correctly adjusted. After all, this period is rather high in Uncertainty.

    Ok, but all Star Trek allusions, temporal fugues and jokes aside... how WOULD you specify altitude to a person in the future? Sea Level is not a constant, and not particularly well documented as it rises and falls. I suppose you could use the GPS, but that prolly won't still be in the sky when time travel already became possible (Future Past Tense).

    Also, what about currency? How are you going to set exchange rates even with future humans? PayPal points? Beer?

    One more thing... How do you think the Dept. of Homeland Security will feel about an sudden rush of 'temporal aliens'?
    --
    "Everything is defined in 6 Dimensions: X, Y, Z, Time, Money and Politics"

  49. You too? by Tony · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've read through their discussion and changelog, I think one more person coming along with "Shh! grownups are talking" will yet again be met with "if someone believes it for whatever reason, it's a valid opinion" line of thinking.

    Yeah, it's a rather strange phenomenon. "Fair and balanced" means presenting both sides of a case, even when one side is obviously right (or at least more right), and one side is wrong. The John Titor case is one of those (obviously a very artful hoax). Intelligent Design vs. evolution is another. Both John Titor and Intelligent Design are attractive falsehoods (at least, attractive to some people). That doesn't make them right, or even viable.

    I mean, if I claim that I have invisible aliens called Dvutels living in my attic...

    Jesus, you've got those, too? How do you get rid of them? I've been using invisible Raid, but that ain't working.

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
  50. Or this... by Lendrick · · Score: 2, Funny

    Going back in time and changing the past is akin to trying to lift yourself up off of the ground. Both are equally impossible and equally silly; it's just that people understand space better than time, it's not quite so obvious.

  51. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by Temsi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, here's the real reason this won't fly...

    Let's assume for the sake of argument, that this convention is discovered in a historylibrary of some sort (archives of /. perhaps), in the distant future by a timetraveler, and he decides to go.

    When he does, he'll instantly split the timeline, and the one he came from will become a parallel universe to the one he's in when he attends the convention.
    Why? Because in order for a time traveler to notice it in the future, it will have to happen at least once without him. Ergo, if I were to go to this meeting, I would not meet a time traveler, because this is "my" timeline.
    However, if this were to happen, an alternate version of me would be able to meet the time traveler, because he came back in time, after having lived later in "my" timeline, where the convention took place without a visitor from the future.
    In fact, the moment he interacts with anything or anyone from our timeline when he arrives, is when the timeline splits, because he wasn't there the first time around. So unless he's already here in our timeline, which would make me the alternate version of me, then I won't meet him.
    It's more than likely nobody from the future will show up at the convention. Unless, like I said, we're already in the alternate timeline.

    Also, when he goes back to the future, his timeline will have been altered and he may not even exist in the timeline he returns to; and he will have no way to get back to his own previous future timeline, unless he goes back again a little earlier and tells his alternate self to go back immediately without going to the convention - which of course would create a grandfather paradox, as he would then have no reason to tell himself not to go and the entire universe would simply cease to exist.

    Is that clear?

    --
    -- This sig for rent.
  52. Re: Freedom of speech is a good thing by glwtta · · Score: 3, Informative
    I'd rather hear both sides and be free to make my own choices and decisions. If the idea of free speech worries you, then you worry me.

    This has nothing to do with free speech (or even Free Speech) whatsoever. Free speech guarantees your right to hold and voice an opinion, unmolested by the powers that be. This concept is often warped into the notion that it obviates the need to defend such an opinion, or that merely holding it requires others to recognize it as valid.

    Nobody is even remotely pondering curtailing the "Titorites"' rights to self expression. What I have a problem with is that the editors of the particular article, in their treatment of the subject matter are giving far too much credence to this particular crackpot theory. They do this in the laudible pursuit of neutrality, but in this case that leads to a product that reflects negatively on the project as a whole.

    Free speech does not mean the abandonment of objective reasoning. Neutral point of view does not mean that wikipedia editors should parrot everything they read on the internet.

    Oh and thank you for providing a link to the article on free speech - how deliciously patronizing.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  53. Not true... by raehl · · Score: 2, Informative

    would slam the traveller against the wall at 30km/sec

    The wall slams into the traveller.

  54. YOU ARE ALL STUPID UNEDUCATED IDIOTS by EEBaum · · Score: 2, Funny

    WARNING:
    Cubic time is proven fact and cannot be disputed. Nature's simultaneous 4-day cube proves that there are four parts to a day, and four days occuring always at the four corners of earth. 2x2=4, and people who insist in time as something that can be traveled think of THREE parts, past present and future, but there are in actuality FOUR parts, fact which is ignored by antiHarmony academia criminals. Time "theories" from people educated moronic in evil institutions are ignorant of the four corners of the time and of the world. Denying the existence of four-sided nature of time and universe is to ensure your own demise. You are stupid arrogant curse to all creatures of the planet.

    /obligatory

    --
    -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
  55. Re:Why this ain't gonna fly by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This only holds for a few specific theories of how time(travel) works.
    Sort of a multi line/track switch theory you have for your explanation.
    Now try and work it with single-line editing allowed and still explain away the 'paradox' that implies, for extra credit give two paradox solvers. :)
    Time Travel is one of the more fun things to consider.
    Wish I could remember if anyone fun showed up at this one.

    Mycroft

    --
    https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  56. In a way, you illustrate the REAL problem by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Everyone acts like a thousand years is the equivalent of "yesterday". The very concept that in thousands of years everyone will even know about one particular nerd party, is at best a joke.

    You know how long a thousand years is? Columbus discovering America is _half_ that time ago.

    A thousand years ago, the Vikings were still getting converted to Christianity. Do you know where the big parties have been at this time? If I told you that Bjarni Hrolfsson and Erik Karlsson (made up viking names) had this fabulous party 1000 years ago, would you even know when and where to go?

    Heck, would you have even heard about it? History tends to recall more like royal events and wars from that long ago. We know roughly when and where the saxon earl Harold Goodwinson fought the Vikings and we know where he later lost to William of Normandie. But do you know exactly where some vikings or normans from back then had a party? I don't think so.

    Roughly a thousand years ago, we had the first crusade. We remember that because it's a bloody big war... went awfully wrong, with a bloody huge PR, but even then a lot of details are missing.

    Roughly a thousand years ago, temperatures peaked _higher_ than they are today. In fact so high that Greenland thawed and was green enough to be called that. The Vikings could farm it.

    That's a bloody huge event even on history scale, but even the vast majority the global-warming scare gang doesn't know about it. (E.g., that it happened without driving SUVs. Or that no, all that molten ice did _not_ kill all fish life, and did _not_ reverse the gulf stream either.)

    Roughly a thousand years ago, Leif Eriksson decided to sail west from Greenland, to check out Bjarni Herjolfsson's story that he's seen land there. And he discovered America. That's a bloody huge event, and even about that we have little more than a saga and some ruins that sorta look like a Viking village. And even that's _one_ of the landfalls that Leif made.

    So what makes anyone think that a nerd party would go into every history book for millenia?

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:In a way, you illustrate the REAL problem by maxume · · Score: 2, Interesting
      So what makes anyone think that a nerd party would go into every history book for millenia?

      Because we have about as much written history of 1980 now as we did in 1981. The same thing is pretty true for 1970 and 1960 and 1971 and 1961. We are getting better at storing the inane details of daily life. The internet is so new that we don't have a clue as to how long something like slashdot will survive.

      Sure it might eventually die, but when it does, what do you be that the admins of that time have a copy or two of the entire slashdot database(in a format current for that time) on robust storage?

      I always cringe when people talk about backing up digital photos to cdr so that they have a permanent copy. The cdr should be your emergency copy; your permanent copy should be on two harddisks. Wha? Disk storage is currently very easy to migrate. Super worst case, it only takes a day or two to copy the entire thing. That isn't hard to live with. Migrate every five years and you should be all set. ATA survived for what, 15 years? And it isn't exaclty hard to migrate from ATA to SATA. Another bonus is that purchasing hard disks is something most people do anyway. Don't just buy one for more space, buy two and get rid of all your old ones.

      I don't have numbers, but I bet that the average time to transfer the contents of an entire disk probably hasn't gone up that much in the last 20 years, while the capacity has grown in what can only be called ridiculous amounts. 5MB used to be huge. Now 50GB is getting pretty small...

      max

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  57. It's actually greek... by Ron+Harwood · · Score: 2, Informative

    Jesus is greek for Joshua... apparently Jesus's actual name... go fig - as the catholic church originally used greek as their official language until Pope Victor I changed it to latin (his native language).

    BTW, if you want good alternate history regarding Jesus - I highly recommend Chrisopher Moore's "Lamb: The Gospel According to Biff, Christ's Childhood Pal".

  58. No, au contraire by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "What you are forgetting is that in this day and age, more information is being recorded and stored each day than ever before.
    In a hundred years, I would expect for us to at least have some sort of storage media that is unaffected by time.
    "

    Point well taken, but the summary said _thousands_ of years. In which case, sorry, nope.

    Don't forget that a lot of information before had been engraved on metal, carved on wood (which is why runes look the way they look: they were designed for carving into wood), or inscribed on clay tablets and baked. And it still got lost.

    Do you think someone's backups on CD will be more durable than that?

    Also while we do record more data, also more data is lost every day.

    A clay tablet is still readable in a hundred years if you still know the alphabet. Whereas nowadays can you tell me where can I buy an 8" disk drive for my PC, to read my old CP/M diskettes? Is there even a filesystem driver for any OS that can still read CP/M disks?

    And after less than 2000 years time we needed a Rosetta Stone and some big pictograms to re-discover how to read the ancient Egyptian pictograms. Now think that we had just found a shiny plastic disk. Even if we figured out how to read it, you're left with a string of numbers that say _nothing_ about the actual text. Which combination of bits is Anubis-looking-left?

    So I wouldn't expect that much data to survive us.

    Plus there's a lot to be said about noise-to-signal ratio. Even if all the information did survive, after 1000 years we'd have a mountain of blogs, Counter-Strike clan pages, flamewars, etc. Trying to even search for anything through this data is like looking for the proverbial needle, only this time in a whole mountain of hay.

    Do you really think anyone will look through that data for a nerd party? Or they'll be more interested in our wars?

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  59. It Was Boring by cowgoesmoo2004 · · Score: 2, Funny
    They only did it for a few years, then it fell out of disfavor.

    I do have a nifty t-shirt from 2007 though.

  60. Re:Yeah, like the government won't be watching THA by cowgoesmoo2004 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Interestingly, what if a time traveller was actually there. How would they be able to prove it to you.

    To go through all the effort of risking life and limb to show up at such a lame event, avoiding the government agents, and nobody believes you are from the future anyway.

    That's why I'm not going anyway. There's a much better convention held every year on the dark side of the moon anyway. We get quite a chuckle out of you losers on earth not being able to figure it out!

  61. Time Travellers Hate us by Adelbert · · Score: 2, Informative

    Let's assume for one moment that time travel is possible, and that's its discovered by people at some indeterminate point in the future (or past... ). Obviously time travellers don't interact with us. I haven't seen Hitler be assassinated recently... So either time travellers have some code of ethics that prevents them from changing history, or the Government heavily regulates time travel, or for some other reason interaction is impossible. Whatever, no-one will turn up to this party. Sounds like a lot of parties at MIT.

  62. Feynman diagrams and time reversal by mothas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Years ago when I took physics, we had a lecture or two on an interpretation of anti-particles as time-reversed particles, and annihilation reactions and pair-production reactions as time reversals. (For those interested in the real physics, do a google search on the title of this post). Anyway, it was good for a couple of BS over beer discussions. It did appear to allow time travel, but it didn't let you leave the time line to do it. While traveling back in time, you interact with the universe as if you're made of antimatter, which pretty much meant any time machine had to be a spacecraft. The energy requirements were enormously huge ( greater than twice your rest mass at both ends of the trip). There is a real problem avoiding hitting yourself on the way back (which would be bad), but it looked like it actually did permit the travel.