Slashdot Mirror


Handling Viruses in an Uncontrolled Network?

An anonymous reader asks: "Recently I've gotten a (volunteer) job looking after a small (approximately 500 computer) network, located within a large block of student flats. We've been having numerous problems with viruses over a few years. They spread like crazy on our network, with 100megabit connections in every residents room. Every so often they 'go off' and start a flood, which of course takes the entire residence network down. I've tried desperately to educate users on the virus problem, but those that are the problem don't care - they ignore every warning they get and just buy a faster computer to compensate for their systems sluggishness. As we only need two or three ping flooding computers to bring down the network it's hard to keep our network up whenever a worm starts its payload. What solutions have Slashdot readers came up with this and similar problems?" "Keep in mind that I'm doing this on a volunteer basis, and that my own study time and personal life takes first priority. The residence isn't prepared to spend more money bringing help or a replacement in, which I can understand given that I pay them rent that I would prefer not to increase. I also don't have any control over the network infrastructure itself, just over our DHCP server. I can't force users to keep their computers safe, as I don't own the things - all it seems I can do is point them to the *FREE!* virus scanner and local Windows update mirror and urge them to protect their computer, and offer to help out those that need it - (although due to time constraints, personally helping out everyone in a 500 member network isn't a possibility).

I can also email off a request to have certain IPs dropped off at the switch, but those users have to come back online soon enough. Whenever someone is infected I try and sit them down and make them realize that keeping their computer safe is their responsibility, and they always seem very attentive whenever we're discussing when they get reconnected to the network, but soon after they'll be infected again."

95 of 579 comments (clear)

  1. Is this really that hard? by Scott+Lockwood · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Hm... Seems pretty simple to me.
    1. Have someone at the school make them sign something that says they will have virus protection and spyware protection on their machines, and that it be kept up to date. Failure to keep the machine clean can result in suspention of service at any time.
    2. When one of them has an infected machine that starts pinging the shit out of your network, Unplug them!
    3. Point to document mentioned in step 1 above when they start whinging about it.

    There see, that wasn't too hard!
    --
    But this is slashdot. A slashdoter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber!
    1. Re:Is this really that hard? by fembots · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is 1. "Profit!!" ??

    2. Re:Is this really that hard? by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or slightly faster:

      1. IDS set to trigger on specific patterns and events (if you have been seeing this stuff on your network constantly, you'll know what to look for already.), you can even set some up free using FOSS.
      2. the IDS alerts then trigger shutting down their switch port and notify an admin. Depending on your switch port mapping database, you can even email the user.
      3. See Scott's post above for signature/cleaning cycle.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    3. Re:Is this really that hard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Have someone at the school make them sign something that says they will have virus protection and spyware protection on their machines, and that it be kept up to date.
      The problem with that, is that nobody should care whether or not you have virus protection -- the thing they should care about, is whether or not you run viruses (and that they are noisy viruses that create traffic on the network). If a user doesn't have a policy that running viruses is ok, then that user doesn't need virus protection. So telling them that they're required to run some type of arbitrary, and possibly completely useless software, is draconian. It's inappropriate micromanagement.

      The virus' network activity should be the sole criterion, not the users' methods of preventing it. Users should be allowed to avoid viruses however they see fit.

    4. Re:Is this really that hard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
      But theproblem is these are students and they have work to do. by pulling their plug you are not allowing them to get the work done that they are I presume there to do. So thats not an option.
      That's like saying you can't take a drunk driver's license away, because he needs it to drive to work.

      His "need" is his problem, not yours. He should have thought about that, before he decided to engage in activity that threatened other people.

      Fuck this whole "buy more filters" thing. Place the burden on the users, and then users who behave intelligently, won't have any burden. That is the fair thing to do.

    5. Re:Is this really that hard? by Chyeld · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To put this politely, if they can't be bothered to keep their system clean, they can't have access to the free network.

      To say that 'they have work that must be done' is ignoring the fact that the umpteen (insert hyperbolic number) other users ALSO have work to that must be done and in this case the good of the many out weighs the good of the few or one (damn, did I actually find a good excuse to use that line?).

      Yes, by all means, research methods to contain and control any outbreaks to reduce the issue when they do occur; but in this case prevention is far, far, more effective than mitigation.

    6. Re:Is this really that hard? by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ah... nah. I'd say,
      "1. Write short document stating that in 'reparation for virus damage' computers would occasionally be confiscated when they managed to infect multiple computers connected to the local network
      2. Notify them of this agreement and make them sign it
      3. When one of them has an infected machine that starts pinging the shit out of your network, give them a 'first warning'
      4. Point to document in step 1 kindly, in writing, and create yourself an Ebay account.
      5. Repeat
      6. Profit and learn to laugh evilly."

    7. Re:Is this really that hard? by hrieke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Simple enough, those students who are unplugged due to excessive virus / pinging / flooding / bandwidth hogging app can use the public PCs in the Library, Comptuer Lab, and elsewhere.

      --
      III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
    8. Re:Is this really that hard? by drudd · · Score: 3, Funny

      Unfortunately it appears you'll never get to step 6 due to the infinite loop of step 5.

      --
      Venn ist das nurnstuck git und Slotermeyer? Ya! Beigerhund das oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
    9. Re:Is this really that hard? by CyanDisaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...But theproblem is these are students and they have work to do...

      There are others that have work to do as well.

      ...by pulling their plug you are not allowing them to get the work done that they are I presume there to do...

      But by pulling their plug, it allows the rest of the network to have access to the internet again, in addition to stopping the propagation of the virus that brought down the network in the first place.

      ...So thats not an option...

      So it's much more important to deny everyone access to the network, rather than just a select few who would otherwise ruin it for everyone else?

      ...What you have to do is look for a better firewall for the network so it doesnt allow any virii in in the first place...

      No argument here. Stop the attacks before they start. Prevent the viruses from getting into the network in the first place. Also, maybe make sure that they sign a form stating that if there is any abnormal network traffic coming from their computer, that they know that they will be disconnected in order to (attempt to) prevent additional network problems because of it.

      Just my thoughts...

      Hope be with ye,
      Cyan

    10. Re:Is this really that hard? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2, Informative

      fwiw, Firewalls don't protect against most viruses. They'll stop people from getting directly owned over some RPC port from the internet, but they won't stop people from getting owned by some malicious webpage they visit.

      The only way to keep a Windows computer safe is to install patches and virus protection software on the individual computers. Work *must* be done on the individual computers.

      At my school, there were paid student techs that fixed stuff like that. These guys need someone who will walk from room to room, fixing computers. Doesn't sound like a volunteer job to me.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    11. Re:Is this really that hard? by B747SP · · Score: 2, Insightful
      2. the IDS alerts then trigger shutting down their switch port and notify an admin. Depending on your switch port mapping database, you can even email the user.

      It's not hard, but its harder to get right. Having IDS disable services without human evaluation/intervention has the potential to leave you open to an effectively self-enforced DOS attack.

      The classic example is the IDS that shuts of port 25 for a couple of minutes whenever it detects an apparent attack. All you've gotta do to effectively DOS that is send a single 'looks like an attack' every four and a half minutes and they'll never receive any email.

      --
      I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
    12. Re:Is this really that hard? by TENTH+SHOW+JAM · · Score: 2, Informative

      Start your documentation with "Connection to the in house network is a privilidge, not a right." get them to sign a "take reasonable steps" form. Hand them a bunch of URLs pointing them to the freebie stuff.

      Now, because you have access to the DHCP server, why not assign IP address based on MAC address, and set the lease time to something low (say 30 minutes)? If there is an offending computer, assign them a "jail" IP address that only allows them contact with the patch server. Once they have patched up their system, and added antivirus software, you take them out of "jail". It isn't perfect, but it will cause you a whole bunch less headaches.

      --
      A sig is placed here
      To display how futile
      English Haiku is
    13. Re:Is this really that hard? by tehcrazybob · · Score: 5, Informative

      Indeed.

      My school has a very effective setup for controlling outbreaks. To start, the network is MAC filtered. Any time you connect to the network with an unlisted MAC address, your browser is redirected to a page containing the university Terms of Service for the network. You read this information, toss in your university ID and password and click I AGREE, and the program adds your MAC to the list.

      As outlined in the TOS, there are no warnings. If your computer exibits any viral behavior, your network access is removed. Unless your virus was email-related, you still have access to the mail servers. When you try to use the internet again, you are once again taken to a limited page, which politely tells you that your computer appeared to be infected with a virus. You are given basic cleaning information, as well as the tech department phone number and email address in case you need help. They can also provide you with tools like AdAware, since you won't be able to download these yourself. Then, once you are confident your computer is clean, you call the tech department, and they run a quick check to see that your computer is no longer showing viral activity. At this point, your network access is returned.

      There are no warnings. As soon as you cause a problem, the problem (you) is removed. Once you fix the problem, access is restored. I don't know their policy for repeat offenders, but I assume there is something.

      --
      Computers need to explode more often.
    14. Re:Is this really that hard? by LoRdTAW · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I you really read the whole damn post, you would have noticed that he says he has no physical access to the network itself. He says it here: "I also don't have any control over the network infrastructure itself, just over our DHCP server. " That means he can't sprinkle routers and firewalls around. It's more a social problem for him since he can only try to get the users to shape up. He can probably block there MAC address from the DHCP server but then you just get pissed off users.

      It's a tough call for him because he can't unplug them and he can't make them all magically listen and cooperate with him. If he can't control the actual network and he can't control the end users then what is his job? He sounds more like a free security preacher then an IT tech. If I were him I would just say fuck it and quit. Is it really worth his time and effort to constantly fight a loosing battle? I mean think about it he can't do anything then what is the point?

      And if the poster of the story reads this:
      What are you doing needlessly stressing yourself out and wasting your free time playing security man for the school/dorm? Fuck them. Tell them that they either pay you or give you more power over the network. Don't waste you time doing something for free when you could be off doing other things like making money at a real IT job.

    15. Re:Is this really that hard? by Vengeance_au · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Thats just wrong. Here in Australia, you lose your drivers license for drink driving, and you are not behind the wheel of a car for however long you get pinged (6 months being the minimum). You can plead the case in court, but there are very few exceptions made.

      I fully support this policy - you decide to risk MY life on the roads, you pay the penalty. Can't get to work now that you've committed a crime and are doing the "time"? Well, hopefully you will realise how important having a license is to your life, and you won't ever drink/drive again. And also, be thankful you didn't injure or kill another road user, pedestrian or even yourself...

      To segue this back onto topic, same rules should apply in this situation. You put others at risk or deny them access to the network due to your inability to load a freely available, well publicised and mandatory on the network you are using tool, then you do the "time". Access cut off and you can't work? Well, perhaps next time you will ensure the virus scanner and firewall software is running, you won't have the issue, and those around you are not impacted.

    16. Re:Is this really that hard? by BlueJay465 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have a better solution: become a BOFH, get your hands on a used LART, learn how to properly use it, and the students will be eating out of your hand in no time.

      If that doesn't work, have a little chat with the Admin, present the security scenario, and ask to yank the plug on any offending machine as a security threat. Corporations in the real world don't tolerate unsecure boxen, why should the school? Students will learn VERY quick not to cross you.

    17. Re:Is this really that hard? by Altrag · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's an even more serious problem with the argument. Drunk driving is an active offense. You have to consciously make the choice to drink and you have to (semi-?) consciously make the choice to drive while drunk.

      Letting yourself get infected is a passive offense -- all you have to do is nothing. And nothing is a fairly easy thing to do when you don't even understand the risks (regardless of how many times you're told, in some cases...)

      Its tempting to bring out the old "this is like guns being banned because you might shoot someone" argument, but really its not like that at all..

      Its more along the lines of knives being banned because there's a possibility that some nefarious teenager will break into your dorm, steal the knife, and use it to slash your neighbor's porn collection..

      But then again this is the real world and most teenagers would probably just steal the porn in the first place and be done with it.

    18. Re:Is this really that hard? by Houkster · · Score: 3, Insightful
      His "need" is his problem, not yours. He should have thought about that, before he decided to engage in activity that threatened other people.

      I have to agree.

      The IT mantra should be: "Lack of planning on your part does not nessecarily constitute an emergancy on mine."

      A better example though would be: Imagine, your car has a blown gasket spewing smoke all over the road and is barely moving under its own power, then add all 4 tires are flat further impeeding your movement. Would you keep driving it cause you had to get to work? Would you be pissed at the cop who pulls you over because your car is causing a 10 mile traffic jam on the 405?

      Need I say anything more to get the point across?

      --
      The Houkster "Oh yeah brother, what you gonna do when Houk O' Mania runs wild on you? Besides wet your pants in laughte
    19. Re:Is this really that hard? by CoolVibe · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I have a better solution: become a BOFH, get your hands on a used LART, learn how to properly use it, and the students will be eating out of your hand in no time.

      s/out of your hand/with a straw/g if one applies the LART correctly.

      But seriously, I'd set up a DHCP server, hand out IP's through that, and when a machine misbehaves, nullroute the bugger and yank it's lease. The owner of said machine will come by eventually to complain that "Teh intarweb" doesn't work, and you can apply said LART to educate the luser.

    20. Re:Is this really that hard? by clifyt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "A wonderful Mac user decided to start up an Airport and serve DHCP."

      Heh! I did that once :-)

      I run a small office for my university as well as being the geek for a larger department and thus felt justified by installing an airport for my own needs. We are confined to a 1930s office building in the basement, so its not like I was transmitting into space -- there is so much concrete here that it blocks anything more than 30 feet from the wireless -- just enough so that we didn't have to plug in everytime someone needed to do a presentation or pull out their personal laptop to throw some info on the LAN.

      Anywho, a few weeks later I find out that our network operations people are scouring the building looking for a rogue DHCP server thats killing peoples connections...turns out it was my device.

      Who'd have thunk Apple would have set the damn device to transmit DHCP on the LAN side of things...it was all supposed to happen on the wireless and the local ethernet port. The thing was so well built for its time and so easy to run (unlike most of the other wireless devices when it first came out) that I didn't even think about it.

      Embarassing...

    21. Re:Is this really that hard? by kmk0220 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Computers on a college campus are different than computers in business. A company owns its computers and therefore has full discretion over them. On a college campus, the students bought and payed for their own personal machines. They have a right to download and install whatever they want onto them. And I agree that they are going to be pretty upset if the internet connection they are paying for is turned off. However, in my experience working at a college, the college was able to say that it owned the network and that allowing students to connect to that network was a priviledge, not a right that it offered to its students. If the student's computer was harmful to the network, they were disconnected from the network for the greater good of the students at the college. They could be reconnected when they could prove their computer was clean.

  2. No more access by nizo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Forcing people to have up-to-date virus/firewall software before they can even connect to the network would be a good start. Turning network connectivity off for offending computers/users for progressively longer spans of time after they infect the network seems like a good deterrent as well. I suppose posting the names of people who infect the network and bring it down might work, though the screams from the public beatings might make it hard for you to sleep at night.

  3. You are in control! by suso · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you have gotten a job administrating a network for 500 computers, then it is not an uncontrolled network. YOU ARE THE ONE IN CONTROL. If there is currently no policy for restricting usage of the network based on client problems such as ignoring viruses, then I strongly suggest that you write one up now and implement it. Start blocking the MAC addresses of the users that are the abusers. If you just sit back and don't take control, you will soon find that students have little added value of your network and may start to move out, which might leave you without a job.

    I'll leave it to other slashdotters who are network admins to flame the hell out of this guy.

    1. Re:You are in control! by bfizzle · · Score: 2

      Put everyone on seperate VLAN, put a decent firewall up, and disable ports of problem users. Have a firm policy on what needs to be done to have a port reenabled that includes a fine to be reconnected.

    2. Re:You are in control! by Knara · · Score: 2, Insightful
      He's a fulltime student volunteering in his spare time. If the residence hall isn't going to spend the money for a real admin, he's not going to spend his time making up AUPs, monitoring switches, setting up NIC blacklists for the DHCP server, etc. He has no job to lose, and has no vested interest in keeping the students in the dorm.

      You know, RTFA is pretty commonly ignored, but I've never seen anyone not read the initial post. You sir, have set a new standard for stupidity.

    3. Re:You are in control! by Wilk4 · · Score: 2, Informative
      He's right, YOU are in control. Don't be wishy-washy.

      Definitely cut people off when they are infected until they are cleaned up.

      Hit them in areas they care about and they'll start being more careful. Figure out where those motivational places are (disconnections, fines, losing IM privileges, etc.)

      Post a policy that has escalating punishments for each subsequent time they are infected, particularly if it's obvious it's their fault. This could be a rising fine, or that you don't reconnect them as fast... If they are disconnected 1 day for first offense, 2 for 2nd, etc, they might learn real fast.

      You could also consider cutting off certainly protocols at the firewalls or for particular users, either for security or as punishment.

    4. Re:You are in control! by bazio · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nah, it's a volunteer position, no real power and no pay. The guy probably isn't even allowed to ban MAC addresses (I'd bet), and any policy he comes up with is probably just going to be taken as a "suggestion" by the unwashed masses. If possible, try to come up with a system for re-establishing connections that conveniently "forgets" chronic offenders. If they can't get their daily dose of SWG (or whatever the kids are playing these days), they'll come into line soon enough. Make network problems their problem. If you've got a machine that's ghost pinging away, throttle them down at the switch, or "accidentally" block their IP at the firewall. If you get really frustrated, try making it fun for yourself. I mean, you've got a pretty good idea of whose machines are vulnerable, right? I'm sure you can find some creative way to relieve your stress with a list of vulnerable IPs and open ports. Not that I'm advocating any illegal or unethical activity or anything. *wink wink*

      --
      Set the bar high, then bring a tall ladder.
    5. Re:You are in control! by courcoul · · Score: 4, Informative
      Amen to that! Or, it just may be that his post is only the ceremonial position of "official scapegoat" that takes the fall when the poop really hits the propeller blades... Short recipe for the cure (provided he IS the admin):
      • Get an extra PC on the backbone of the network, so it can monitor all the traffic. Anything bigger than a x486 is good enough, say with 128MB or more of RAM.
      • Install OpenBSD ( http://www.openbsd.org/ ) on it (most hardened free OS around, so the hackers can't take you down so easily).
      • Install SNORT ( http://www.snort.org/ ) on it. Configure to work as a network IDS and keep it up to date with the latest vulnerability/virus plugins.
      • Once SNORT gets wind of an infected machine, set it to do one of three things:
        • If you have the tech skills to set it up, have SNORT block out the switch port where the offending PC is plugged in AND send you a message. When the owner cleans up their act, reactivate the port and restore connectivity.
        • Else, have SNORT send you a message with all the details and YOU do the port blocking, if you can. The rest proceeds as above.
        • Else, have SNORT send you a message so you can bitch whomever has the capability to block the port. The rest proceeds as above.
      • If your authority is so puny that you cannot do any of these things, you could resort to sending out a mail to all the rest of the users of the network, and letting them know who the miscreant screwing up their connectivity is, and let peer pressure do its thing...
      Good luck!
  4. DOOOMMMMED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    You are DOOOOMMMMMED.

  5. chemical castration by Kyle+Hamilton · · Score: 2, Interesting

    chemical castration might work

    --
    Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, no Gates, Apache in house.
  6. Simple. by Skudd · · Score: 5, Funny

    Write your own virus to send them massive payloads of anti-virus software. :P

    1. Re:Simple. by riptide_dot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You need more power. Otherwise you will fail in your job ( unless you take to violence ).
      Students need to be kicked off the network until their computers are clean. If they are kicked off x times, they are off until they come to you and sign a form saying they understand how to keep their computer clean. y more time(s), they are off for the rest of the semester.
      Simple, effective. You will need a couple decent switchs capable of shuting down ports ( or you could just yank the wire ).
      If you don't have this level of power over the network, get rid of any access you do have. The higher ups only want a scape goat.


      I couldn't agree with you more about the idea, but the main thing he needs is backing from the providers of the service (the same ones that collect the rent money), in the form of a written policy. You can't kick people off of a network they're paying for unless you have it in writing that those are the consequences of an infected PC on the network., even though it's unfair to those with uninfected PCs.

      As far as a technical solution goes, I wouldn't make it a manual process at all if I were you - consider investing in an IDS (intrustion detection system) type of product that will automatically deactivate ports on the network from possible offenders. Then you only have to manage the IDS, and it's not "you" that's removing their access, it's the IDS (and it's automatic). Cisco's IDS product is a very good, albeit expensive, solution that is fairly straightforward in installation and very easy to manage...

      --
      I was in the park the other day wondering why frisbees get bigger and bigger the closer they get - and then it hit me.
    2. Re:Simple. by jemenake · · Score: 5, Insightful
      You need more power. Otherwise you will fail in your job
      Just about all of the posts thus far have been along the lines of "Pull the plug on the people who don't care until they *do* care.... IF the administration will let you."

      Here's an alternative to the "IF the administration will let you" part. Make use of the fact that nobody else really understands what it is the wizard (you) does behind the curtain:

      Implement whatever service termination solution you feel necessary (whether by writing/downloading some automated system, or by doing it manually yourself). When the offender calls to complain, *don't* say that they were shut off administratively. Tell them that the massive traffic from their machine "overloaded" the port they were on (tell them it's kinda like a circuit breaker on house wiring).

      They'll say that this never happened before. Tell them that they've got a newer, more-aggressive virus.

      They'll ask that their port be "reset". Tell them that, due to all of the machines that they helped infect, and to the convoluted process for "resetting" a port, there's a backlog of a couple days before you can get their port reset.

      Maybe they'll ask if you can just plug them into a different port. Tell them that they're all maxxed out.

      At some point, Administration might ask why this is happening. Tell them the same thing you told the users... new, nastier viruses. They might ask what new equipment they could get to fix the problem. Tell them that the BFS-9000 can do it... but it's very... very expensive. It would be much cheaper for everyone to just use virus protection.
  7. Uncontrolled Viruses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Have you considered spankings? At least for the hotter co-eds. After all, they should know better.

    1. Re:Uncontrolled Viruses by bakes · · Score: 2

      and after the spanking...?

      --
      Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha! Thrust!
    2. Re:Uncontrolled Viruses by Ziviyr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thats funny, you're pretty fearless given the subject line...

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  8. 3 Strikes policy? by fahrvergnugen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It sounds like you've been completely neutered. If at all possible, talk to the administration about instituting a "3 strikes" policy. That is, if someone's computer causes a network-wide issue 3 times, their network drop stops working for the remained of the year.

    That'll clean their acts up in a hurry, or at least make your life easy.

    --
    Even Jesus hates listening to Creed.
    1. Re:3 Strikes policy? by shadow303 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I prefer a different 3 strikes policy. If you cause a network-wide issue more than once, you get 3 strikes of a bat upside the head. Haven't had many problems with people causing the third issue.

      --
      I've got a mind like a steel trap - it's got an animal's foot stuck in it.
    2. Re:3 Strikes policy? by lakeland · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Remainder of the year probably isn't smart in an environment that previously has seen no enforcement. I'd be using a sliding scale with punsihment at each stage in order to get people used to the idea that you are serious.

      Something like: first offence, 24hr ban; second offence, 7 day ban; 3rd offence, 1 month; 4th offence, one year and an email to all 500 with the photograph of the person who has been stuffing up their computers.

      Once you've got people used to the idea they will be punished you can swap to something like the 3 strikes policy. But at first you're going to get idiots testing you, and so two warnings is too soft while a year-long ban is hellova hard for a first punishment.

      There are alternatives of course. Install an 802.11g network in parallel with strict rules. Disobey them once and you get a stern warning, twice and you're banned for life from it. That way you'll naturally see people migrate to the network which 'works' without the fight with idiots.

      Oh, I'm assuming this is targetted at teenagers at or near college level. If you're dealing with mature adults then it is much easier.

  9. Move out? by Eezy+Bordone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, volunteering to be THE on-site tech support for 500+ users is insane, especially since you're not even getting a discount on your housing. Quit the job or move out so you can worry about your own network.

    --

    -EB

    Do you ever walk alone like a drifter in the dark?

  10. Ban them by nadamsieee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isolate the computers that are spreading the virus and shut down their access to the DHCP server based on their MAC address. Then make the reconnect process as painful (yet educational) as possible. >:)

    1. Re:Ban them by morcego · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm sorry, but I always thought that painful is by itself rated educational: "Don't mess with the netadmin".

      Serious now, I have been administering networks for about 15 years now (a lot less than many people on /., I know), but one thing is for sure. Unless your userbase respects you, there isn't anything you can do. The way to institute that degree of respect will change from network to network. Sometimes it takes a message from a company director, sometimes it take imposing fines for people breaking the rules. Sometimes, all it takes is to let the network crash and burn, so they can see that network administration is important, and it is up to THEM to have it working.

      --
      morcego
  11. Easy fix. by baryon351 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    > What solutions have Slashdot readers came up with this and
    > similar problems?"

    Easy. Disconnect them at the first sign of virus trouble. Don't let them back until they can prove they've fixed it.

    When their fresh new computer lasts an hour on the network before you pull it down, they'll soon decide to fix it.

  12. Seems simple enough. by FyRE666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you can't put the bad users on a slow switch, and force them through an even slower proxy to make their life hell, then see if you can't organise a minimum disconnection period. Say 10 days or so to reconnect the idiots who keep getting infected. Since you control the dhcp server, you could filter them out by their mac address so they can't wander over to someone elses room to connect. Yes, they could probably circumvent this with a little knowhow, but let's face it, an idiot who's managing to become a virus writer's bitch every week isn't likely to have too much in the way of technical knowledge...

  13. A recent Poll... by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 4, Funny

    Regarding revenge might help you come up with, shall we say, colorful solutions to your problem. Either that or figure out a way to have all of their papers "lost" due to the virus;-) In this regards, I would suggest that you channel your inner BOFH.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  14. solution by ShinGouki · · Score: 2, Informative

    myswitch> (enable) set port disable

    --
    -dk
    Dream with the feathers of angels stuffed beneath your head.
  15. Wasting your time by ibpooks · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It really sounds like you're wasting your time.

    You don't have control over the users, the machines, or the routers; so what the hell can you expect to do?

    Sounds like the best option is to unplug the offending machines from the patch panel until they can demonstrate they are virus-free. Although that is likely not a viable solution if these are paying customers.

    1. Re:Wasting your time by Knara · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It can be viable if the students had to sign an AUP from the campus IT department when they moved in (which I get the feeling is fairly common these days on major campuses). Worked at a place where they just turned off the switch port of offending machines, and then if the student wanted to get access back, they had to call in to the help desk and go through the process of setting up a schedule technician visit, which may be pretty far off depending on the time of year.

      Was kinda hairy the first couple weeks of fall semester for the techs and the helpdesk (which will happen no matter what), but very few repeat offenders.

  16. Stop volunteering by lelitsch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, it seem like this is an unsolvable problem and neither the users nor the administration seem to want to spend any effort in fixing it. So the sooner you realize that there is nothing you can do, the better. Help out with the IT system at your local Humane Society, womens shelter, or similar instead.

    Oh, and get your own DSL or cable modem.

    1. Re:Stop volunteering by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What he said. You are being used. In the real world, people get paid $60k a year and up to deal with these kind of nightmares, and they get given the authority to actually solve the problems.

      As long as you keep "helping" people kinda-sorta fix the problem, the people who are actually in a position to fix it for real will keep putting off the pain of actually solving it.

      Get your own $20/month DSL connection, refuse to answer any more questions, and go concentrate happily on your studies.

      --

      News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

  17. Simple. by grasshoppa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You need more power. Otherwise you will fail in your job ( unless you take to violence ).

    Students need to be kicked off the network until their computers are clean. If they are kicked off x times, they are off until they come to you and sign a form saying they understand how to keep their computer clean. y more time(s), they are off for the rest of the semester.

    Simple, effective. You will need a couple decent switchs capable of shuting down ports ( or you could just yank the wire ).

    If you don't have this level of power over the network, get rid of any access you do have. The higher ups only want a scape goat.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  18. DHCP server is all you need. by strredwolf · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just reconfigure the guys that keep spewing to ether deny access, or return that the computer's IP address is 127.0.0.1.

    When they come in complaining, babysit them at their computer.

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
  19. Stage virus drills by bigtallmofo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Send them emails with executable attachments. If they click on the attachments, ban them from the network for a week.

    Send these out frequently. Soon they'll instinctually hit the DEL key when something with an attachment comes in.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
  20. Good steps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    First off - something that EVERYONE should be doing - make sure spoofed packets dont leave your network. This helps you, and it helps those of us (like me) who run websites who are frequent victims of DDoS attacks - you just may reduce my DDoS from 3Gbit/sec to 2.9Gbit/sec :)

    So... you know your internal addresses. You know your external addresses. At the external firewall, block all packets going out that don't have a matching source address in the header. Most all virii nowadays use spoofed headers to hide the actual source - simply block packets that match this criteria.

    Second, you can use QoS at the firewall level to prevent one computer from using more than their share of bandwidth. Nearly all firewalls (even open source Linux and BSD solutions) offer quality QoS.

    Third, you can identify virii that cause issues, and detect them - usually they are built with backdoors on a certain port - check for that port being open, and block their access.

    Fourth, institute a punishment for students who don't fix their issues. One warning, then they lose access for a period of time. This needs to be their responsibility - just make sure that help is available to students who can't protect themselves, perhaps a student IT club can help them or something like that.

    Depending on how sophisticated your switching hardware is, you might be able to implement QoS there, to prevent a single system from flooding the network. Additionally, you may be able to simply throttle back each port (if you have a 100Mbit uplink to the internet, set each port to negotiate only at 10Mbit).

    Also, choose software packages for different platforms that you can recommend they use to fix any problems that arise - standardization makes management easier.

    If you have the budget for it, you could look into locally placed firewall boxes whose focus is to detect and eliminate virii - they're expensive and less common than your standard SonicWall box, but can be found. Might be a last resort unless you have deep pockets.

    Good luck!

  21. Sure it's an option by CarrionBird · · Score: 4, Informative

    by clogging the network, they prevent other people from doing thier work. It's standard procedure at some universities to shut off the ports of problem systems.

    --
    Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
    1. Re:Sure it's an option by caino59 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      all parents are correct.

      detect these ping attacks, network scans - and shut them off.

      after it happens repeatedly, they might not learn.

      if not, oh well, at least the other 98% of the students can continue to work unencumbered by the offending assholes that refuse to respect the network that they are only leasing while they're there. (read: they do not own the network no matter how much they pay)

    2. Re:Sure it's an option by David+Horn · · Score: 4, Informative

      I work as a "student advisor" at Leeds University and every student is issued with a free license to McAfee Virusscan Enterprise.

      When connecting for the first time, they have to enter their university username and password so the IP address can be tied to their MAC address and the computer logged.

      If their software detects viral traffic from their PC, they're automatically cut off from the net and a webpage comes up explaining why. They don't get re-connected until myself (or one of my colleagues) verifies they have virus scanning software installed and their PC is clean.

      First few weeks of term there were a lot of people cut off, but virus infections now are next to nothing because everyone has the software running.

      Apart from this, the internet connection here is extremely good. Fast and reliable, and no port blocking.

      --
      PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
    3. Re:Sure it's an option by budgenator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      repeat offender's: Sure I'll clean your system and reconnect you to the network but remember, I'm doing this on a volunteer basis, and that my own study time and personal life takes first priority. ; call for an appointment, I should have some time after Finals. Of course give serious babes preferential treatment

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    4. Re:Sure it's an option by Darth+Cow · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I really hope that the software isn't required to be running to have access to the internet, because otherwise it would be screwing Linux users over big time." My school (Swarthmore College) uses the same McAfee Virusscan Enterprize. It works well to keep the network clean, and if you're running Linux it doesn't require you have to have it running. The system is in fact a bit buggy and there was quite a number of people who had trouble at the beginning of the year with the scan not determining that their computer was clean and protected, but it got sorted out fairly quickly and is far better than the alternative of having viruses take over the network. The system requires you to have the anti-virus running and be updated with the latest security patches from Microsoft to be let through (SP2 is not required though, for some reason). My friends and I have also figured out how to do some technical fiddling around with port blocking and the like that lets us not run the relatively clunky anti-virus and use our program, but McAfee works just fine for most people.

    5. Re:Sure it's an option by Hanzie · · Score: 2, Funny
      Job's a goodun if you're not fussed about people spoofing MAC addresses,

      Remember, this system is only to stop viruses. If they're clueful enough to run a spoofed MAC address, they probably have a clean system.

      You do remind me of an older job I had. There was a print server in accounting that really liked to surf porn at night...

      --
      ********* sig: If you don't like the law, get filthy stinking rich, and buy a better one.
  22. Egress filtering by MoogMan · · Score: 4, Informative

    The idea is simple: Egress filtering.

    Strict policies on outgoing traffic for untrusted networks is essential.

    I would suggest a default policy of something like www, ssh, msn/aim im, p2p programs (possibly, depending on the uni's rules and regulations).

    Providing you have a mechanism for giving the students access to other ports when necessary, then there should be no problem enforcing a strict egress policy.

  23. NetReg by DA-MAN · · Score: 4, Informative

    I also don't have any control over the network infrastructure itself, just over our DHCP server.

    With this you have all you need to run a NetReg server within your infrastructure. With this you can allow users to register their machines automatically. Any user with a virus or other such malware gets their dhcp entry deleted, and they are on a private network that goes to where you define. I would allow antivirus sites, antispyware sites, and windowsupdate only (or better yet, a local mirror).

    Have them send an e-mail to user@host once this is complete and you can re-activate their lease.

    --
    Can I get an eye poke?
    Dog House Forum
    1. Re:NetReg by vco123 · · Score: 5, Informative
      1. With DHCP and Netreg, you do control the network. Keep your registered leases short ( 2 hrs ).
      2. Be sure to disable external DNS calls at the router ACL, to force people to use Netreg.
      3. Run 2 instances of BIND with Netreg and selective DNS forwarding to allow Windows Updates, LiveUpdate, IT Support and Spyware. ( see Netreg-l from last August).
      4. Bump infected computers out of registration, so that they can't phone home as easily. Alternatively, use groups with ISC DHCP to force an infected MAC to use the Netreg bogus DNS to "quarantine" them.
      5. If you can, ask the network dudes to disable 25,135,445/tcp for your unregistered IP ranges. That'll limit the infected PC a bit.
      6. If you start to see a virus frenzy, shut ports off fast. It'll save time later.
      I've run a 4000 computer RezNet this way for 4 years.
      As to infected computers, I'm working on a Netreg extension that includes a "Your're infected" group. It's like being unregistered, but DNS forwards to a virus notification page.
  24. You're being paid what for this??? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Recently I've gotten a (volunteer) job

    You're doing this for free? I wouldn't even do this job for pay -- unless it was something like Bill G's salary. You will never educate kids who will click on anything that promises free porn, download and use every ad/spyware infested P2P program out there, and not think it's their fault because they can't be bothered to even update their anti-virus.

    The system will be in trouble continuously because even if most were actually responsible users, it only takes a few irresponsible ones to mess it up for everyone, and it will always be your fault!

    And if, pray tell, things actually do run perfectly for a few hours, or days, don't expect any thank you's from that ungrateful crowd.

    And as you said, you're not even getting paid for this. Bet this means you have effectively No Authority to fix anything or punish anyone otherwise. Try to kick off a multiple repeat offender and guess whose ass ends up in a sling when they go whining to the university president.

    Have fun!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  25. Block MS ports by rdejean · · Score: 3, Informative

    Students in our dorms have no need for Microsoft ports, which is the primary reason worms can take down the network. So i block port 137,138,139,445 at the switch port level.

    Granted this doesn't solve the virus problem on the computer, but it sure does prevent it from taking down the rest of the network.

  26. Be realistic about your users by SiliconEntity · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "those that are the problem don't care - they ignore every warning they get and just buy a faster computer to compensate for their systems sluggishness"

    You're not looking at this realistically. The statement above betrays your frustration. You see the users as stereotypes of carelessness and stupidity.

    So they buy faster computers when they get infected? And how often does your typical student buy a faster computer? Every day? Every week? I think not! Yet, how often do people get infected? From the way you describe the problem, it is quite often.

    Users already have incentives to keep their computers virus free. Nobody likes getting a virus. It slows their computer down and makes it hard to use. They can't just run out and buy a new computer! Your harsh stereotyping is ignoring the reality of what students face.

    So, the first step is to get a better understanding of the problem. Why not try talking to some users? Not just your techie friends, talk to the average person who knows only how to turn it on and run the few programs they use? I'll bet you'll find out that the real reason for the problem is not that people don't care, because they can just buy new computers! It is because they don't feel confident in their abilities to download, install and run the AV software, and to continue to use their computers with whatever small operational changes the AV software may impose.

    I can't tell you for sure what the solution is, but the first step will be to understand the problem better. Resorting to stereotypes of users as malicious or uncaring is only going to take you farther from the solution.

  27. Paging IT Department by iridium18 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "I also don't have any control over the network infrastructure itself, just over our DHCP server."

    Well someone has control over the network infrastructure itself, and it's their job.

    --
    Standard I/O Error. Incompetent/Operator.
  28. They have a Virus? CUT THEM OFF. by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Simple as that. If they are damaging the network then they are a threat to the network and even if they buy a super fast machine to compensate... yippee fucking do.

    Anything that damages the network as a whole must be blocked. Revoke their DHCP access, or something similar (I don't know how the network is routed, so I can't give a more detailed answer.)

    When they learn to not get infected, then they can use the network again. It is that simple.

    However, if you are in a position where you cannot do this (then I would walk away personally...) then look into using something like Hogwash (Those guys need some devlopment help BTW (Hint Hint Slashdot community - Hogwash is a wicked project...))

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
  29. Use the DHCP server as a reward by Ktistec+Machine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First, if you have a core of machines you know to be well-configured, set up your DHCP server to give out ip addresses to only those machines, by MAC address. Anyone else who wants to use the DHCP server will need to convince you that they have antivirus software installed (and configured for automatic updates). Once they've convinced you, you add them into the list of MAC addresses recognized by the DHCP server.

  30. Re:Easy fix. -- NOT! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Informative
    Easy. Disconnect them at the first sign of virus trouble. Don't let them back until they can prove they've fixed it.

    That's not an easy fix at all. Who are you kidding? If you had to spend less than 5 minutes a week with each computer that's already over a 40 hour work week right there -- and I doubt any solution is that quick. You're not understanding the numbers involved here -- and that's not including travel time, plus being able to meet then on their schedule. Ain't going to happen with student users on broadband who feel it's their God-given right to abuse.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  31. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  32. Define Your Goals FIRST! by rewinn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of many possible technical & organizational approaches, which you employ depends on what is your goal.

    1. If your goal is to be a nice guy who doesn't bother anyone and gets all your studying done, then the most practical technique is to quit volunteering.

    2. If you're a music or poly sci major who is not really interested in network administration as a career ... then cut your losses ... this sort of volunteering isn't really helping.

    3. But if your goal is to get out of college with something helpful to put on your resume, then treat this like a professional opportunity! Show that you can do a top-notch job of network adminstration by learning the techniques, putting in the time including the hard-nosed ejection of malefactors, and allowing for that time in your study schedule.

    After all, when you get your diploma, how many of your competitors are going to be able to say, "I managed a 500-node network, achieving X% of whatever metric most impresses employers.Given the choice between someone who got all A's and someone who accomplished something useful while getting decent grades ... who would you hire?

  33. Social Solution by kenneth_martens · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It sounds like your hands have been tied. I urge you to first seek more authority to demand that users install antivirus software. If the powers-that-be refuse to grant you the power to enforce that rule, your only solution is a social one.

    Whenever someone's computer brings down the network, publicize his name. Find some way to make his neighbors hold him accountable. Believe me, it will happen. It won't take too many hazings (and rumors of hazings) before people shape up and install antivirus. Most people know about the need for antivirus, they're just too lazy and think "It won't happen to me." So motivate them.

  34. You need L2 & L3 control. by neBelcnU · · Score: 2, Informative

    Had this in tradeshows for years. If you cannot control both Layers 2 & 3, forget it.

    You need to AT LEAST be able to login to the switches/routers to read MAC tables at the instant there's a problem. ARP would be nice too. You need make no changes, but read-only in non-negotiable. Otherwise give up the job.

    Once you have that, you can perfect the steps to find out what's happening when it's happening. THEN you may use whatever eloquently violent steps others are suggesting.

    A b/w mgmt appliance would also be a smart investment, they can provide unusual evidence that's remarkably useful. (We'd look at the top talkers, when TCP sessions >800/5 min, we'd know we're lookin' at a naughty person.)

    If your responsible for an improvement of the situation, and you're not given the tools, then resignation is the only course. Sticking it out with your hands tied is pointless torture: you'll never get a break, and the torturer will get tired.

  35. + ettercap by Jett · · Score: 2, Informative

    I forgot to mention, we used ettercap to detect attacks.

    Ettercap:
    http://ettercap.sourceforge.net/

    Netreg:
    http://www.netreg.org/

    Netdisco:
    http://netdisco.org/

  36. Why does the network go down? by g-san · · Score: 4, Informative

    Have you figured out exactly why a few infected computers is bringing down your whole network? I could see if they are scanning local subnets, you would have a lot of broadcast ARP packets. If they are scanning remote network IPs, you may be filling up a cache on the outbound router. Are you sure you don't have a few people just playing with NMAP? Is it inbound traffic or outbound? Identify the nature of the traffic when the network implodes, look for a pattern, and see if you can mitigate that. Use ethereal for that.

    This is a *switched* network isn't it? Hopefully yes, and with a firewall also. I really can't see why someone would need inbound tcp/135,137,138,139,445,1025 or udp/135,1026-1029 nowadays. That would prevent malware that is not spread by email or Explorer. I won't recommend you dictate the browser or email client people use, but it's a possibility to have a outbound web proxy not forward any requests from IE.

    You might also want to look into snort, you could at least have it alert you when the problem starts, or shut down ports, but sounds like you have not had much luck with that. Note rather than drop people off the face of the earth, at least make sure they can get to antivirus sites and microsoft updates. This is tough without access to the infrastructure but would improve things.

    Another suggestion is if you do not have alot of room to room traffic, and you do not have a 100mb conenction to the net, configure all ports to 10mb. At least that way it takes more than 10 users to flood your 100mbit backbone. And users accessing the net are always throttled by your outbound connection so they won't know the difference.

    I assume you volunteered for this because you like like this stuff. Note that if you *did* spend more time on this problem than your schoolwork, and came up with a solution, you might not even need to finish school.

  37. "Banned this month"-list on a public blackboard by Sweetshark · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Make public who got banned and how often. These guys will start to take care of their security if they get questions like "Surfing porn again, Dude?" and "Why did you get banned _again_ this month? Didnt you just requested access again?"
    Others will get aware of the issue too and might be more careful.

  38. Different audience by grahamsz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Anyone that's smart enough to change their mac address, should be smart enough to keep spyware and viruses off their system.

    Also my school used to require that students REGISTER their mac address in order to get access, and the switches / dhcp server would only allow registered macs in.

  39. we handled ~150-170 student machines like this: by tekn0phile · · Score: 2, Informative

    The student co-op where I lived had around 150-170 machines on the network at any given time. We required each user to 'register' through a php form on the local administrative box. Until the user had registered a given machine (mac address) we redirected all web traffic to the 'you must register to use the internet' page.

    We generated id keys for each house member ahead of time and required that they have this key to register. When the user came to get the key we gave them a quick overview of what they should and shouldn't do and introduced them to the software cache on the local network (free AV software, firefox, ad-aware, etc..).

    Once the user had the registration key in hand they could go back to their room & register their machine in their name (or any number of machines), we then cleared that MAC address for access to our dhcp server.

    The benefit of forcing registration is that we knew who owned each machine and where the person lived. If any virus or trojan was bad enough to endanger network we could go to the switch for that person's floor and pull the plug on their connection.

    Alternately if a machine on the network started spewing virus payloads we could just revoke dhcp access and boot the offender off the network - we didn't have to worry about notifying them of virus infestations, we could wait for them to come to us saying "my internet doesn't work, can you fix it?"

  40. University of Waterloo Solution by Tiberius_Fel · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm a student at the University of Waterloo (Ontario, Canada), and they have a simple solution.

    When you get to residence, you sign a form that says you agree to monitor your computer, keep it clean of viruses, up to date with Windows update, et cetera. The terms are made very clear in it. No agreement, no use of the university network.

    On your first offence (banned p2p, virus, anything like that), your network drop is disabled until you pay $25 (Canadian dollars; cue jokes about 2 cents USD) and sign a form acknowledging what you did wrong and that you will take action to avoid it in the future. In addition you have to clean up whatever triggered the disconnect in the first place.

    Second offense? Disconnected for the rest of the term. That's the end of that.

    Hope it helps!

    --
    Join the Empire! http://www.empirereborn.net/
  41. It's just terms of service by WebCowboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But the problem is these are students and they have work to do.

    So what? Crap happens...virus ate your thesis, power went out, printer ran out of ink, blah blah blah. Thing is that if you are a responsible person you have contingencies in place to minimise or eliminate the impact of such incidents. If the work is important, you keep backups, spare ink cartriges, update your antivirus, OS, apps, etc...and most importantly you don't procrastinate to the point where you are in crisis mode. If you don't do all of the above then you should be prepared to follow Murphy's Law. If a mishap is unavoidable, you could be granted an extension.

    Thing is, it is standard practice for net admins EVERYWHERE to pull the plug at their discretion should your computer be found to causing network disruption. Taht is a standard condition of almost all terms of service. My ISP would knock you off very quickly should they discover an open mail relay, ping flood or other unusual level of activity, and I pay extra for business-grade service. I agree with other posters here--this guy should put in some F/OSS tools to help manage these problems, and immediately terminate all network connectivity of infected machines ASAP.

    "I have work to do" be damned. Seriously. Part of growing up and going to school is to learn--and people have to learn the consequences of their actions or inactions--that's life. You have to keep your house clean, pay your bills on time, obey the speed limit and traffic signals, etc. If you don't there are negative consequences. Same goes for PC use: ignoring the TOS, not updating your machine, downloading comet cursors and talking gorillas and chat icons and P2P warez is just inviting trouble. Users who repeatedly do those things despite warnings deserve no sympathy at all and should recieve all the wrath the BOFH can deliver.

  42. Quarantine VLAN by realyendor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Assuming that clients are on a switched network, move the infected systems to a quarantine VLAN whose gateway IP is the same as the net they came from, but whose outbound requests are NAT'd instead of routed.

    Then, use IPTABLES on the gateway to redirect any request on port 80 to a page that says, "You're infected--clean your system!" Maybe even provide them access to the tools necessary to clean their system via that same webpage.

  43. Re:Easy fix. -- NOT! by argent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Disconnect them and have them pay YOU for a support visit to get decontaminated and reconnected for enough that it's worth YOUR time to do it. Present that to whoever you've volunteered your time to as the only workable solution... and either walk when they say no, or watch the problem fix itself as the word gets around.

  44. Ok.... by Audacious · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We've heard from the:

    1. "It can't be done" crowd.
    2. "Be tough about it" crowd.
    3. "Go behind their backs" crowd.

    and others....

    How about this:

    1. Get everyone's e-mail address so you can send all of them e-mail at the same time. How do you do that? Ask them to e-mail you - that's how. Of course, disinfect anything they send you because they probably will have a virus or two.

    1a. How do you get all of them to send you the e-mail? Go buy some of those blank business card sheets (Avery I believe makes these), print up your message, get someone to help you break them apart, and then just tape them to each person's door. In this way you: 1)Don't have to talk to them, 2)Don't try to force them to do what they don't want to do, and 3)Can do it on your own time (like on a floor-by-floor basis). Cost: Probably about $10.00.

    1b. Your message? It should be something like:

    Dormitory SysAdmin needs your help!
    We need your e-mail address as we
    are trying to remove viruses and want
    to be able to keep you informed. Thanks!
    myemailaddress@thedorms.edu

    1c. Put notices on doors leading into the dorm and/or bulletin boards also asking for e-mail addresses. If you can, have someone hand the things out to people as they come in and out of the dorms.

    2. Set up a blog where everyone can meet and talk about problems. Use the e-mail addresses to send your notice out about the blog and how to access it.

    3. Set up appointments with people to meet with them to show them how to protect their system from viruses, ads, cookies, and other problems.

    Ok, let's say you've gotten some responses and want to start to go to other people's rooms to help them out. You want to:

    4. Use the scheduler built in to every operating system currently in use (ie: Mac OS X, Windows98se and up, Linux, BSD, Solaris, etc...). For those OSs which are older (although I can't see anyone currently in college using an Apple ][+ or even Mac OS 9.x or earlier) download and bring with you some sort of a scheduler. (Even the Apple //gs had a CRONTAB program!). Set their machine up so it automatically, every day, trys to download the latest and greatest updates for the OS, SpyBot, AdAware (or whatever you use), your virus protection program, etc.... The MOST IMPORTANT THING THOUGH - is to always explain what it is you are doing to the person's computer. Don't just dump a bunch of things onto their system. Bring a flyer that explains what it is you are doing and why. Set their system up so they can win and so they don't have to rely on you to be there to make everything function correctly. All of the virus/cookie/ad checking software out there can be set up to function on its own. Some of them (like most virus checkers) have their own scheduling software built in.

    4a. NOW! Here is the important thing! Set the virus/ad/cookie (or VAC for short) to AUTOMATICALLY e-mail you with the results. This too can be done via the scheduler. Give the automatically generated e-mail a special header (like [VIRUS|AD|COOKIE] REPORT FOR ROOM X). There are e-mailer programs for all operating systems which run from the command line. So just make a little batch program/shell script to create your report and e-mail it to you. Again, write it all down in the flyer you are going to give them so they don't freak when their system suddenly starts doing things (like checking for viruses or sending e-mail).

    4b. Most virus software's report will read "VIRUS FOUND" and then tell you where and when the virus was found. Write yourself a short Perl/PHP/C/ script which will read these e-mails and sort out which one have viruses and which ones don't have them. Since you made the title have the room number on it - you automatically know who is having problems. So you can e-mail them back and set up a time to go over to fix any problems they might be having. Further, you can produce statistics on where the greatest problems are and post these fi

    --
    Someone put a black hole in my pocket and now I'm broke. :-)
  45. You are NOT punishing the wrong person. by arete · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You should certainly punish the virus writers, if you can catch them. And you should possibly punish M$ for how big of a hole IE still is, even if Windows itself is better than it used to be. But none of that matters.

    To use society's resources, you have to follow society's rules. I can go buy any car I want and drive it at 200 mph - on my own track. But if I want to drive on streets I have to follow the rules, as they apply to my actions (hitting things) even when they may not necessarily have a direct negative impact (speeding, driving on the sidewalks) have only a paper impact (licensing, insurance, registration) or only a preventative impact (headlights, brake lights...)

    I can also go buy a used car and have the brakes suddenly fail, running over someone's garden. Note that even if I didn't know, I'm still responsible for the cost of that garden, (unless I JUST bought it and can pass the blame to the previous owner) If the brakes were recalled, it's still my fault for not getting them fixed. If they WEREN'T recalled, but should've been, then that's not my fault.

    If you're already providing appropriate, simple, free, publicized resources _that they didn't use_ they are being negligent at best. Kicking them off until sometime after they fix it is a MINIMUM penalty for such negligence.

    Argueably they should have to pay for the cost of your time to fix their computer (mandatory since they didn't do it the first time) and to repair any problems caused by their problem - and STILL be penalized in terms of being online.

    (Personally I believe that a kick-until-fixed first warning is probably a necessary threshold of publicity - but even the second time they aren't listening I think it'd be very reasonable to escalate it.)

    To be clear, I don't think it's reasonable in today's world to hold them accountable for anything their computer does. I think it's NECESSARY to hold them accountable for not following your security procedures to defend against it. Which means you're still going to be snuffed by the virus that exploits the OS hole noone has put out a patch for yet - and I wouldn't blame that on the first kid to get it.

    I agree with the other posts - you have to get kick/ban/unplug authority, you have to quit, and/or you have to get paid. 1 of those might do...

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  46. Ban Windows by Wade+Tregaskis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No point beating around the bush - best to nip the whole problem in the bud.

    FWIW, in a college I lived in for three years we had absolutely no security for as many as 1000 people, and we never had any significant network issues, despite the constant virii and other malware roaming around.

    IMHO, the best solution is to just "shape" bad users down to the slowest speed possible - dialup if your switch supports QoS for it, otherwise just 10 m/bit or similar. One bad user getting disconnected and whining to someone above you could get you in a bit of trouble - but sapping their speed won't be a reprimandable offense, and will curtail a large part of the problem.

    And I wouldn't worry too much about being speedy about removing the limits - just tell them the system is updated once a week, and the next update happens to be just under 7 days from whenever they demand it. :)

  47. Why is this your problem? by new2this · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You say you only control the DHCP server. In that case that's the end of your responsibility. Make sure the DHCP server remains stable and healthy. Make those who control the network deal with the problem. There are ton's of solutions to this problem but since you are not really in control of many parts of the network its not your problem.

  48. DHCP is more than enough by visionsofmcskill · · Score: 2, Informative
    The biggest question here is how much do your users need to connect to each other, and if they need static IP's.

    The most powerfull goal you have here is to segment your network.

    You can do this strictly through the DHCP server by using several scopes.

    Pass out the following IP's and give your main gateway multiple IP's, or have a machine act as proxy (with multiple gateway ip's for your lan's).

    With enough segments, you can isolate problem PC's down to groups of ten or less depending on how you break up your private (or even public) ip's. This will make the majority of others users on your network unroutable to malicous virus's.

    Just make sure your gateway (the one with all the .1 IP's for each segment) doesn't route traffic through itself to the other segments.

    Gateway = 172.30.1.1, *.2.1, *.3.1, *.4.1, etc....

    172.30.1.1 255.255.255.0

    172.30.2.1 255.255.255.0

    172.30.3.1 255.255.255.0

    172.30.4.1 255.255.255.0

    etc........

    If you have a minimal budget, and your users dont need public IP's, you can buy a bunch of SOHO routers... for about 10-15$ a piece.... 300$ can get you 20 linksys's....

    put 25 users on each linksys (with the WAN ports connected to your gateway).... and your users cant directly attack each other (except for the smaller networks behind the linksys's.

    If your users have no need at all for direct access to each other... just set out your scope as 255.255.255.255.

    192.168.1.1-255 / 255.255.255.255 gateway: 192.168.1.1

    now you r users can only reach the gateway and themselves.

    As to email virus's, with DHCP you can force traffic to move through any machine you like, and set up a proxy between your "real" router and the network.... that proxy can filter port 25.... looking for viral email.

    These solutions arent perfect, but they will greatly slow down propagation across your network, allowing you to respond much faster to problem children without having one bad computer infect everyone else. --VISION

    --
    --Idiots, Every single one of YOU, A flaming mass of conglomerated morons, hey wait a second, isnt that how RAID works?
  49. If all you've got is DHCP control..... by Darth_brooks · · Score: 2, Informative

    If all you've got is control of the DHCP server, your hands are pretty tied. I would suggest setting up fixed leases and BOFH'ing students into submission. Kill the lease of infected machines, then bring 'em back once the infected system is clean. You don't have to be a dick about it, just bring the system back on at your leasure. Of course, you've got class all day and an exam tomorrow, oh and you're going home for the weekend...

    Make it clear in polite, simple terms what the users responsabilities are, what will happen if they don't keep their system clean, and why you have to take the action you do. Maybe put together a standard "so you fucked up your system and got kicked off the network" sheet. Educate as much as possible. Yes it feels like you're talking to a wall. But the users will either evolve (get sick of being off the net) or die (find other ways of getting their computering needs met.)

    Some people have suggested Microsoft SUS. You need to be able to apply a group policy, or make registry changes on the remote machine. Since you're not inchage of the domain controller, this is a moot point. Also, SUS only works on XP and 2000, so it may not help all users.

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  50. netsquid software package works well for this by gabesk · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is the method used at Texas A&M University, which I attend, for their residence hall network.

    We use netsquid, http://netsquid.tamu.edu/, which is essentially some code that ties into snort to provide automatic filtering by mac address and notification.

    It works quite well.

  51. Try Plan B by ramblin+billy · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Reading your article, I get the impression that you've tried appealing to both the users and the powers that be without much success. It seems obvious that whatever solution you decide to implement is going to involve a lot of your own time and effort. I suggest you make it worth your while. I don't know what is your particular area of study, but it probably wouldn't be too hard to come up with a way to get some credits for working on this problem. The IT connection is obvious. If you are LA you should be able to work in an angle in psychology, sociology, even some sort of human/technology interface thing for the sciences. Two or three independent study credits might go a long way toward mitigating your frustration. Don't give up if the obvious professors are not responsive - it shouldn't be too hard to find an LA professor delighted to sponsor a program solving a technical problem with a humanistic approach.

    As far as method...I suggest you take your lead from the hacker/cracker community. Implement a Social Engineering attack. There are many fine examples of specific techniques to be found in the comments of this thread. I especially like the "scarlet V" approach. I suggest the following:

    - "anyone who gets infected is a lamer old school twerp who is so behind the technology curve that they can't even stop high school script kiddies from using them like zombie flesh puppets"
    - "allowing your owned machine to infect the local net is dissing everyone in the dorm - especially if you are too clueless to know how to prevent it"
    - "you're getting played, you clueless dork, every time you click that stupid 'yes' button it's like bending over and dropping your drawers"

    I'm sure you can do a much better job coming up with the proper approach. Just remember that establishing the proper attitude is key - even a few people is a good start. Then public humiliation and shame will work wonders. One advantage of this solution is it will stay with the users after they leave the influence of a network tech fix. Hey, maybe you'll change the world. At least it could help you get a little closer to graduating - and add some stretch to your resume. It might also help you get a little more respect from the powers that be when you slap down your independent study paper with the big, fat 'A' on the cover.

    billy - who went to UT - volunteer is NOT a dirty word

  52. Our solution by pehrs · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have been working on a similar network for some time, and dealt with similar problems. I don't know if these are optimal solutions, but here is how we are doing it:

    First of all, we have build a simple management system based around SNMPv3. You want this. Take a course in enterprise management or read up on it yourself. The day you stop writing scripts and use a management system instead is the day when you begin to come out on top of the problem. OpenWBEM can be a start if you want to know what can be done.

    Here is our setup:
    Incoming connections are blocked. There has been a discussion about removing this block and allowing "safe" ports. At the moment the issue is rather pointless as we are behind a NAT due to lack of IP space. Outgoing connections to DNS, SMTP and HTTP/HTTPS are filtered to force people to use our servers. Some of the more notorious p2p protocols are capped to keep the bandwidth usage from going insane.

    We have a central register of users. To use the network you have to register and pay a symbolic sum each month. Then you get access to the connection in your room. You are responsible for what happens from your connection. This register gives us an easy way to contact users. To be allowed to join the network you have to sign a paper stating what you are allowed to do and not do. Our TOS are pretty restrictive, but without them we wouldn't be able to manage the net.

    After some network outages (Code Red...) we have implemented a quarantine VPN. We have several IDS spread out, and if they detect a computer spreading malware they move the computer to the quarantine VPN. On this VPN the computer can /ONLY/ connect to the DNS server and the HTTP/HTTPS proxy server. This server provides the user with a message about the computer being infected, links to several sites with patches, free AV and updates. And a note that they will have to contact an administrator to get access renewed. The user can continue browsing freely, but don't do anything else. If they want to get back to the usual network they have to clean up their computer.

    We also have several special checks for "evilness", most important rouge DHCP servers and ARP spoofing. Anybody caught by these simply get their connection pulled until they have explained themselves. Administrators are notoriously slow when it comes to returning connection to people knowingly doing malicious things on the network.

  53. You need more power. by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How to determine the height of a building with a barometer. Sell the barometer. Buy equipment suitable for measuring the height of a building.

    You're trying to solve the problem with the tools you have. This is not adequate. You need better tools. Talk to other people who run networks. Decide what you need to be able to do your job. Explain the problem to the higher ups. Ask for the right to do certain things to protect the network.

  54. Enforce restrictions by Redwin · · Score: 2, Informative

    I work with exactly the same situation, helping maintain a halls of residence network where machines are owned by the students. We have a the following setup which seems to work pretty well:

    1. the switches drop any traffic between machines in the network to stop malicious traffic propagating, (except to the server obviously :p)

    2. all students data quantities are monitored so if a student is using a large amount of bandwidth consistently over a number of days an enquiry is made into whether the student is aware that they are sending/recieving a lot of data. If they were only downloading linux distros or something thats fine, however if they were only checking email then they machines connection is blocked until a virus scan is complete and the machine is fixed.

    3. Regarding security, a CD and infosheet is handed to users on arrival to the halls with a slip they have to sign saying that if their machine is found to be sending viruses/spam etc then it will be disconnected from the network until it is fixed (by them). The CD contains Spybot/Adaware and AVG antivirus for those who don't have antivirus software.

    4. Ports access is heavily restricted, no p2p traffic for example. (I'm from the UK and the laws that were explained to me are that if a company/organisation runs a network which is engaging in illegal activity then the company is just as liable for copywrite theft as the users are, as they are responsible for their network and must take "reasonable" actions to prevent it)

    As a warning you will get a lot of flak from students for "restricting the access that they paid for!" even though in the actual halls contract that they sign is states that "internet access is provided for academic use only".

    While this seems a little harsh if people really wanted to do LAN gaming for example they can always set up a separate network to do so.

    Hope that helps :-)

    Sam

    --
    Warning, comments may not have been passed by the sanity department of my brain.