Slashdot Mirror


Mac OS X 10.4.1 Is Out

MrBadbar writes "Software Update just informed me that an update to Mac OS X (10.4.1) is now available. The updates include mail, address book, dashboard widgets, Safari, iLife, and other miscellaneous fixes. At this rate, it's only about 18 more weeks until 10.5."

151 comments

  1. Installed fine here... by byolinux · · Score: 1, Interesting

    No noticable problems. Has anyone heard of a 'grinding' noise problem with powerbook g4s (less than a year old) though?

    1. Re:Installed fine here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      my powerbook's hard drive started grinding horrendously a couple of hours after upgrading to tiger. i erased my drive and did a clean install, but the problem persisted, and it kept locking up several times an hour. apple tech support told me to zero my drive and start over, but it crashed 3/4 of the way through the zeroing process, and now my drive will no longer mount.

      good thing i had cloned my system to my fw drive right before installing tiger the first time... but my powerbook is going to have to be sent off for a couple of weeks to get the drive replaced.

      shame i didn't wait until 10.4.1...

      - california geek girl

    2. Re:Installed fine here... by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1
      good thing i had cloned my system to my fw drive right before installing tiger the first time... but my powerbook is going to have to be sent off for a couple of weeks to get the drive replaced.

      shame i didn't wait until 10.4.1...

      That sounds like a regular old hardware failure waiting to happen. You just expedited the drive dying by installing a lot of new files all over the disk. By the way, why on earth do you think it'd take a couple of weeks? I sent my iBook off to Apple to get the logic board replaced and had it back by the end of the week. Their laptops are nice since they ship you the packaging and you just slip it in the sleeve, fill out the manifest sheet, close up the box with the tape strips they provide, and take it to (at the time) Airborne Express.

    3. Re:Installed fine here... by bobinabottle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interestingly enough, this happened to me also in my 3yr old powerbook. When I installed Tiger i zeroed the disk before hand and after installation and so forth the hard disk drive would make these crunching and clicking noises. I'd had a few minor problems prior to this and it was zeroing the disk that put it over the edge.

      I ended up replacing the hard disk myself (warranty expired long time ago) and I was amazed at how the computer was even still booting off that disk - when I took it out and shook it i could hear parts floating around in there like the disk heads were literally hanging off.

      Note that this really doesn't have anything to do with tiger - its a hardware failure (if your problem is the one I was having).

    4. Re:Installed fine here... by Cmdr+TECO · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine has had to send a top-o'-the-line 17" Powerbook in for service more than once. Last year, it was "lost" after repair. Just today, she found out her machine was "lost" again. Apple UK and/or their chosen courier appear to have a slight theft problem. (From here, it looks like the entire UK has a slight theft problem, but that's another story.) It might sound great to get a "free" upgrade every year or two, but she has to travel, and Apple doesn't provide loaners.

      --
      echo 33676832766569823265328479713269.8639857989Pq | dc
    5. Re:Installed fine here... by skingers6894 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I installed 10.4.1 update without incident.

      BUT I had a problem earlier with a grinding noise in the hard-disk area on my powerbook.

      Turned out to be that the hard disk was faulty.

      IDE type Hard drives have an area of space reserved for "reallocating" bad sectors. If your disk is really bad this area will fill up. When there is no more space left to reallocate to you will get a SMART error.

      Click on "About this Mac", click "more info" and select your drive from the ATA section. You will see the SMART status there.

      If you get this then you need to replace the drive.

      I ended up replacing my drive with a 7200RPM Momentus - MAN I'm happy the old one died now!

    6. Re:Installed fine here... by Megane · · Score: 1

      Some laptop hard drives make noise when you shake them even when they're new. In particular, slowly flip one over and it will make a click noise at some point along the way.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    7. Re:Installed fine here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what's the moral of the story? Don't buy Apple?

      Theft happens, but US overnight services are 99.9% reliable. Don't use secondhand horror stories (from Europe, at that) to spread your FUD.

    8. Re:Installed fine here... by nacturation · · Score: 4, Funny

      IDE type Hard drives have an area of space reserved for "reallocating" bad sectors. If your disk is really bad this area will fill up.

      Right, and when it fills up, everything overflows and the loose bits sit on the bottom of the hard drive case... that's why you hear the grinding noise.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    9. Re:Installed fine here... by skingers6894 · · Score: 1

      Correct. The best thing to do is gather those bits in a plastic bag and sprinkle them on your new drive when you get it.

      Go to Disk Utility and click "Import left over bits from plastic bag"

    10. Re:Installed fine here... by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      Yes, mine had this problem, but only when the system was plugged into the wall. Open up Energy Saver and try setting processor speed to automatic instead of highest.

      --
      -mkb
    11. Re:Installed fine here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine did the grinding noise too and then it died - just like this: http://arstechnica.com/articles/culture/hdfailure. ars (except that mine mine was still in warranty and the smart status didn't say anything).

      Backup everything while you can.

    12. Re:Installed fine here... by byolinux · · Score: 1

      I'm in the UK, and when I bought my 17 inch PowerBook (since sold), it initially arrived with a damaged screen, and over the period of about 7 weeks, Apple sent several replacements, all of which were stolen by their courier company. They seem to have changed now, as my copy of Tiger was delivered by TNT, not Initial. I'm not sure which company was actually stealing the things.

    13. Re:Installed fine here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, why on earth do you think it'd take a couple of weeks? I sent my iBook off to Apple to get the logic board replaced and had it back by the end of the week. Their laptops are nice since they ship you the packaging and you just slip it in the sleeve, fill out the manifest sheet, close up the box with the tape strips they provide, and take it to (at the time) Airborne Express.

      i'm studying in the UK at the moment, and the nice irish man at apple UK tech support informed me that the entire turnaround process takes up to 2-3 weeks over here. :( i just got the box, it's from UPS.

      i'm glad at least applecare is global for portable computers :)

      -california geek girl

    14. Re:Installed fine here... by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      Has anyone heard of a 'grinding' noise problem?

      My fan is kicking in a bit more than it used to (under Panther I think I heard it once in a year of use), particularly when I play with Quartz Composer. I tweaked energy saver and it has not returned.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  2. A couple of notes by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Insightful
    First of all, Mac OS X 10.4 has been complete since March 28. So while it wasn't released until April 29, Mac OS X 10.4.1 has been in development for over six weeks.

    Second, Mac OS X 10.4.1 completely fixes the the widget auto-installation issue by adding widgets to the items that Safari prompts for before a download is complete. You will now receive a notice:

    "(file) is an application. Are you sure you want to download the application (file)?"

    ...including when Safari is in its default state, i.e., "Open 'safe' files after downloading" is enabled. This issue is now completely mitigated, as no item can be downloaded or installed without the user's express knowledge and permission. Therefore, this issue is now closed.

    1. Re:A couple of notes by jdb8167 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Mac OS X 10.4.1 completely fixes the the widget auto-installation issue

      I can confirm this. I would disagree on the "completely" but it is certainly good enough for now. It would be better if you couldn't override existing widgets and even better if Apple supplied an advanced button that allowed me to control the sandbox that is built in to Dashboard. As it stands now, Apple has a working sandbox with various levels of security which is completely useless because it isn't exposed to the end user. What is the point of having a AllowFullAccess boolean if the developer can add it without any controls by the user?

      Also, do you know if this fixes the 1GB sparse image problem? I see a HFS resource fork issue vaguely mentioned in the developer release notes but I have no idea if that is the sparse image problem or not.

    2. Re:A couple of notes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell would you copy the post of piracy of the macnn forums and not give him credit? Totally not cool.

    3. Re:A couple of notes by blamanj · · Score: 1

      First of all, Mac OS X 10.4 has been complete since March 28. So while it wasn't released until April 29, Mac OS X 10.4.1 has been in development for over six weeks.

      If Apple is like most large development houses, 10.4.1 went into development well before 10.4 went gold. Typically you start work on the next release as soon as you go from development into test, and work on both paths simultaneously until the first track is released. Bugs that are known in the first track but not deemed severe may be delayed to the second track. Obviously bugs that are not known (shades of Donald Rumsfeld) don't get addressed until they are known.

    4. Re:A couple of notes by argent · · Score: 1

      What is the point of having a AllowFullAccess boolean if the developer can add it without any controls by the user?

      None at all, and it wouldn't make any difference if the user could control it. Dashboard is not inherently sandboxed, and shouldn't be. It's an application environment, not a browser.

      The real problem is still that Safari is treating Dashboard as "safe", when Dashboard is not "safe". Even if "open safe files after downloading" was a good idea, a Dashboard widget is NOT a safe file.

    5. Re:A couple of notes by 1010011010 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Just like other desktop applications are not presumed to be inhernetly safe.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
  3. SMB no change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Updated to 10.4.1 and I still cannot access my lovely debian server from my tiger machine.

    1. Re:SMB no change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You ment lonley? :)

    2. Re:SMB no change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They 'meant' 'lonely'.

    3. Re:SMB no change by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Did you fill out a bug report. This is a big issue and I put in a bug report about it. If more people place in a bug report about it maybe they can fix it quicker. For the short term I am using NFS to connect to the files I need but I really need SMB soon. Lucally for me I don't need my Mac to get my work done. But it makes it a lot more efficient when I have it.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:SMB no change by olcrazypete · · Score: 1

      I've been connecting to my debian machine via samba just fine with 10.4. I'm running unstable, samba version 3.0.14a. P

      --
      -- My dog can beat up your dog.
    5. Re:SMB no change by Squozen · · Score: 3, Informative

      I can access both my Debian boxes fine from my Mac. Didn't change a thing after a clean install except specify the correct workgroup in the Directory Access app. I'm not even sure if I need to do it or not, but everything works and I'm fine with that.

      Have you checked your logs to see why Samba is failing?

    6. Re:SMB no change by jamie · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hm. Works for me. Debian stable running a stock samba, mounted in Tiger from the regular old Network pane of the Finder. Only real change I made to /etc/samba/smb.conf was to bump SO_SNDBUF and SO_RCVBUF from 4096 to 65536.

    7. Re:SMB no change by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Updated to 10.4.1 and I still cannot access my lovely debian server from my tiger machine.

      I have the same problem accessing my FreeBSD samba server (well, maybe - mine just sits there "Connecting..." forever).

      Interestingly enough, the RHEL samba server sitting right next to it works fine...

    8. Re:SMB no change by tf23 · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should switch distro's? ;) for me, 10.4 connects just fine via smb to Fedora Core3 and/or Win2k3SVR.

    9. Re:SMB no change by tyagiUK · · Score: 5, Informative

      I had problems connecting to my Samba server running on Debian when I first installed 10.4.

      It appears as though 10.4 requires the password exchange to be encrypted, so in the smb.conf file:

      ; encrypt passwords = false

      (note the semi colon).

      I used to run plaintext passwords with 10.3 for some reason. I think it was because 10.3 didn't like encrypted password exchange with Samba, but I may be mistaken (poor memory).

      --
      Contribute to the online videogame encyclopedia: GamerWiki
    10. Re:SMB no change by jamie · · Score: 1

      And I should add, that's on 10.4.0. I haven't installed 10.4.1 yet.

    11. Re:SMB no change by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
      Updated to 10.4.1 and I still cannot access my lovely debian server from my tiger machine.

      Is Samba on the Debian box configured to support encrypted passwords?

      If not, either enable encrypted passwords (as per another reply - note that Microsoft changed Windows in Windows 98 and in NT 4.0 SP3 to, by default, reject attempts to connect to servers that don't support encrypted passwords), or configure OS X's SMB client to allow connections to servers that don't support encrypted passwords.

    12. Re:SMB no change by Crow+Song · · Score: 1

      If you are trying to access your Windows 2003 shares from OS X and getting the -43 error, it's the Windows 2003 Server firewall. Turn it off, and you'll have no problem.

    13. Re:SMB no change by rgauthier · · Score: 1

      I had Mac 10.3.9 working fine with Fedora 3 SMB, but since I've upgraded Tiger (10.4) I've been unable to access my files on my Fedora 3 server. Can you share some information from your smb.conf that can help me? Tiger 10.4.1 did not fix it for me.

  4. Well let's hope that this will fix, by famouswhendead · · Score: 0, Troll

    Some weird things that I've heard of:
    Unable to boot and being dropped to safe mode,
    Having to reset QT by changing the international sys prefs,
    Using update and still losing ll your settings etc.
    Sidenote: FCP5 should be here too now and working properly if this is out.

  5. What's new video-wise? by corradokid · · Score: 1

    Software Update mentions ATI and nVidia driver updates, but the Apple KB URL doesn't mention it at all (I was hoping for specific details... as in if Quartz 2D Extreme has been enabled.) ?

    1. Re:What's new video-wise? by bitpart · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nope. Still not enabled, as the Quartz Debug Tools menu shows: you still need to manually enable it.

    2. Re:What's new video-wise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you force Quartz 2d extreme to be enabled at login?

    3. Re:What's new video-wise? by bitpart · · Score: 1
    4. Re:What's new video-wise? by diqmay · · Score: 2, Insightful

      so could anyone explain what advantages Quartz 2D provides? is there a consice explanation someone could point me to?

      Also, what kind of hardware do you need to enjoy any Q 2D benifits?

    5. Re:What's new video-wise? by Gulthek · · Score: 3, Informative

      Benefits of Quartz 2D extreme: speed, quality. Graphics render faster and look better especially during transformations (like the genie effect).

      Can your hardware handle it?

      Go into "About this Mac" and click "More Info"

      Select the video card for more detailed information

      Look for:

      Core Image: Supported

      Core Image-capable graphics cards include:
      ATI Mobility Radeon 9700
      ATI Radeon 9600 XT, 9800 XT, X800 XT
      nVidia GeForce FX Go 5200
      nVidia GeForce FX 5200 Ultra
      nVidia GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL, 6800 GT DDL

      Full details.

    6. Re:What's new video-wise? by diqmay · · Score: 1

      gracias

  6. Stability Issues by moosesocks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've experienced quite a few stability issues since upgrading to Tiger, all of which have required me to manually reboot. Hopefully this update will fix whatever that is.

    Additionally, Tiger occasionally turns off the function and volume keys on certain powerbooks. This has been confirmed by several users and does not appear to be fixed in the update.

    Sigh.......

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  7. Wireless reception lower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything else seems to be running smoothly after the update, save my wireless reception. The signal strength display is lower, but I can't check the distance in the backyard until the rain is past to be certain.

    1. Re:Wireless reception lower by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well lets see if the connection is more reliable. I have a linksys router and I always had loose connection with 10.4 every 20 minutes or so.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Wireless reception lower by kegger64 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Your signal strength isn't any lower with Tiger. The AirPort signal strength indicator has actually been retooled to show, not the signal strength, but the speed of the connection. This is a change from Panther.

      --
      653899 - Another prime Slashdot UID
    3. Re:Wireless reception lower by CaptainPinko · · Score: 1

      I had a similar problem after updating the driver on either my router or on my tablet pc... what it turned out was that authentication had been turned on one of them (can't remember which) and everytime it tried to authenticate after connection it would disconnect. Since it's not a windows specific issue but a protocol issue take a look if the patyc changed any settings or something.

      --
      Your CPU is not doing anything else, at least do something.
  8. I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not getting updates for tiger

    1. Re:I don't get it by Psykechan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you sure that you are using Mac OS X 10.4 and not the online retailer TigerDirect.com? Some people get those confused.

  9. Mail Imap is signicantly faster. by tyrione · · Score: 1

    Having over 8,000 mails via LyX or say over 10,000 mails for Cocoon developer/user list updating is much improved.

    1. Re:Mail Imap is signicantly faster. by bobinabottle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Speaking of mail..

      Mail.app now doesn't support the httpmail plugin.

      Again.

      Just after it was updated.

      How annoying.

    2. Re:Mail Imap is signicantly faster. by supermarsupial · · Score: 1

      I just reinstalled httpmail plugin 1.44, and it works fine.

    3. Re:Mail Imap is signicantly faster. by Gogo+Dodo · · Score: 1
      The bundle probably got disabled.

      The disabling of Mail bundles is documented in the release notes under the Mail and Address Book section:

      Resolves a potential issue in which Mail could unexpectedly quit, stop responding, or fail to import your previous emails if third-party software were installed in a ~/Library/Mail/Bundles or /Library/Mail/Bundles--this update prevents previously-installed plug-ins from loading. (Click here for more information.)

  10. GPGMail 1.1 no longer tiger compatible by artoffacts · · Score: 2, Informative

    The gpgmail 1.1 bundle seems to have broken under 10.4.1. It was working nicely under 10.4.

    ~/Library/Mail/Bundles/

    seems to have been renamed to:

    ~/Library/Mail/Bundles (Disabled)/

    A warning dialog box is displayed notifying you that the bundle is no longer supported the first time you start up Mail under 10.4.1

    1. Re:GPGMail 1.1 no longer tiger compatible by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

      If you had gpgmail installed under 10.3 and upgraded to 10.4, mail.app wouldn't work at all. I suspect they're probably trying to avoid this sort of thing happening in the future.

    2. Re:GPGMail 1.1 no longer tiger compatible by Gogo+Dodo · · Score: 3, Informative
      The disabling of Mail bundles is documented in the release notes under the Mail and Address Book section:

      Resolves a potential issue in which Mail could unexpectedly quit, stop responding, or fail to import your previous emails if third-party software were installed in a ~/Library/Mail/Bundles or /Library/Mail/Bundles--this update prevents previously-installed plug-ins from loading. (Click here for more information.)

    3. Re:GPGMail 1.1 no longer tiger compatible by eske · · Score: 2, Informative

      plz go to the gpgmail homepage http://www.sente.ch/software/GPGMail/English.lproj /GPGMail.html
      or just do this:
      (from homepage)
      GPGMail & 10.4.1
      MacOS X 10.4.1 will automatically disable all Mail bundles when encountering them the first time. To re-enable GPGMail (which works fine with 10.4.1), you need to:

      * Quit Mail
      * In Finder, rename folder $HOME/Library/Mail/Bundles (Disabled) back to $HOME/Library/Mail/Bundles.
      * In Terminal, type:

      defaults write com.apple.mail EnableBundles 1
      defaults write com.apple.mail BundleCompatibilityVersion 2

      * Relaunch Mail

      --
      What rimes on recursion What rimes on recursion What rimes on recursion What rimes on recursion
    4. Re:GPGMail 1.1 no longer tiger compatible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks for the tip!
      I just about crapped my pants when my gpgmail died..
      -

  11. VPN clients still broken by kngfisher · · Score: 1

    Well I thought they were supossed to fix the compatability between and the VPN cleints with this patch...I guess they forgot. I guess I will have to wait till the vendor gets time with apple to fix this issue (unable to even install CheckPoint secureClient with 10.4.x)

    1. Re:VPN clients still broken by mousehouse · · Score: 1

      Cisco released their updated VPN client May 12th. It still doesn't support multi-cpu systems but at least it works on 10.4...

    2. Re:VPN clients still broken by inertia187 · · Score: 0
      If you still can't access the Internet while simultaneously connected to your VPN (or Internet bound traffic is traversing the VPN, causing it to go slow), try this:
      # Remove the default route Apple created.
      sudo route delete -net default

      # Restore the default route back to your local gateway.
      sudo route add -net default [type your local gateway here]

      # Add the correct route for VPN traffic only.
      sudo route add -net [type your subnet here] [type your VPN gateway here]
      If you don't know what to type in those spots, neither does Apple, so quit complaining and talk to your administrator.
      --
      A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    3. Re:VPN clients still broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I notified the folks at CheckPoint a full two weeks before the 10.3.9 update that their client wouldn't work with 10.3.9 or 10.4. They gave me quite a run around. After the 10.3.9 update was released they responded to my email telling me they were aware of the problem. I was hoping that they would warn their clients that they would lose the functionality with the updates but they didn't want to report BAD news. It's awful when the PR departments run the company.

      They have released an update for 10.3.9 but still noting for 10.4.x.

  12. GPGMail by havarv · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Update disables GPGMail, and does not let the user enable it again.

    1. Re:GPGMail by nigham · · Score: 1

      From the article:

      Resolves a potential issue in which Mail could unexpectedly quit, stop responding, or fail to import your previous emails if third-party software were installed in a ~/Library/Mail/Bundles or /Library/Mail/Bundles--this update prevents previously-installed plug-ins from loading.

      --
      I don't want to read /. I want to go home and re-think my life.
  13. FUD'ly AC by dmarcoot · · Score: 1

    that was the "Troubleshooting Automatic Software" page. It is to be used if something doesn't work, not to be confused with actual update procedures to be fair, you would have to give similar info for Windows. But that wasnt your intention.

    Nice FUD. let me give you software update procedures for OS X10.4.1. Click on Software Preferences in Dock. Click On "software update" Check for Update. Install update.

    Yeah, sure was a hassle

    1. Re:FUD'ly AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now show me the MS Document on "Trouble Shooting Windows Update" which says to enable the "built-in ethernet" for update to succeed. WTF? Why can't it just use the available connection to internet? And am far too pissed off with "Server Busy? errors to comment on it - I am yet to encounter one with MS. Enough CRAP.

    2. Re:FUD'ly AC by xen0side · · Score: 1

      I don't usually respond to such obvious flame bait... but does your mom make you wear a helmet before you go on the internet? Go to the apple menu, select software update, and install update. That is all. No messing with network settings. I agree... enough CRAP.

    3. Re:FUD'ly AC by vought · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'll do you one better:

      1. On the Apple menu, choose Software Update
      2. If updates are available, click Install.

      Boy howdy, that Windows Update sure is easy in comparison. "You MUST install Direct X 9 separately from everything else, reboot seventy-eleven times, and dance backwards across the carpet while holding a DDR 2700 DIMM...."

    4. Re:FUD'ly AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May be your mom makes you eat Bill's shit so you don't find it bad to eat Steve's? My friend shit is shit - may it be bill or may it be Steve. Understand that and you will no longer have to eat it.

    5. Re:FUD'ly AC by GaryPatterson · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... and from VirtualPC, you have to do that while standing upside down on one hand, with Yoda on one foot banging you with a stick while you try to balance rocks with your mind. ... and then your X-Wing sinks. I hate it when that happens.

    6. Re:FUD'ly AC by dmarcoot · · Score: 2

      and you think your a IT pro, having updating 10 windows machines, but apparently on your first OSx update you had a problem, and you then immediately post to Slashdot , but as anonymous coward and think you have any credibility in your post implying windows is systematically easier, regardless of security flaws, by posting a article for people who fucked up their installation? yeah, your Kung Foo is the best!

      your are a child updating your High school lab arent you?

    7. Re:FUD'ly AC by dmarcoot · · Score: 1

      sorrry, after OS 9, i forgot thier was a Apple Menu ;):

    8. Re:FUD'ly AC by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Its not a FUD, some JERK out there coded software update control panel in a way that it will crash on non english locale Macs.

      If run from a secondary account giving admin pwd, it will work.

      If set first language of locale settings to English , it will work.

      First time in my life, I have disabled the automatic software updates on any os because of that, glad I am a versiontracker pro subscriber. It does the update checks for me.

      What if I wasn't? What if I didn't pay $50 for my own comfort?

      First lines of warm and fresh crash for you ;)

      Date/Time: 2005-05-30 14:26:52.343 +0300
      OS Version: 10.4.1 (Build 8B15)
      Report Version: 3

      Command: System Preferences
      Path: /Applications/System Preferences.app/Contents/MacOS/System Preferences
      Parent: WindowServer [73]

      Version: 3.1 (3.1)
      Build Version: 19
      Project Name: SystemPrefsApp
      Source Version: 1260000

      PID: 842
      Thread: 7

      Application Specific Information:
      Software
      Update v.2.0 (com.apple.preferences.softwareupdate)

      Exception: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (0x0001)
      Codes: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE (0x0002) at 0x00000000
      __

      I also want to meet with the moron intern out there added javascript to a very critical system part (oops, bug sent to apple,let me crash again)

      Thread 7 Crashed:
      0 libSystem.B.dylib 0x900033c0 strcmp + 192
      1 com.apple.installframework 0x981f40ac _JSArrayOfIORegItemsWithPlane + 272
      2 com.apple.installframework 0x981f35dc _JSBridgedIORegNameMatching + 208
      3 com.apple.JavaScriptGlue 0x9686a42c

      In fact, I have a clue about what happens. If you try to get DVD Player update 4.6 and try to install in same circumstances, INSTALLER will crash. If you run Installer as ROOT (I think superuser) and open DVDPlayer update package, it won't.

      Something checks its ability to work in a real harsh way bound to locale of OS and system says "back off", it has no "B plan", it crashes.

      A real FUD would be Apple employing clueless people thinking only USA exists on this planet in core team. Is it? ;)

  14. Re:Differences! by GaryPatterson · · Score: 2

    So you think there should be no troubleshooting notes for users having difficulty?

    Look on the Windows Update site and you'll find plenty of troubleshooting info there too. In fact, a cursory glance shows me that there are whole forums devoted to helping people whose Windows Update doesn't "just work."

    I run Software Update and it works fine for me. I don't need the troubleshooting notes.

    I've run Windows Update and it's been fine too.

    Perhaps this is one of those things caused by just not understanding how to use a Mac. You don't seem to know much about them.

  15. Right on schedule... by jht · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since Tiger wend GM at the end of March, it's been a month and a half for bug fixing, with the last two-plus weeks of that period essentially the public beta of the OS.

    I've already installed it on my PowerBook, and after a few days' time I'll see if it's the update that makes it worth recommending for most of my clients to start their testing. Usually, it seems to take Apple a couple more point releases to really get the major kinks out, so I'm expecting Tiger to hit its stride around mid-summer.

    For those of you unfamiliar with Apple release cycles - expect to see a point release like this every 4-6 weeks initially, followed by a cutback to every couple of months later on. Security updates are typically released on a separate basis, about once per month, and will be available for Panther as well for the foreseeable future. Even 10.2 still gets some security fixes now and then. And there will be occasional updates to the iApps and other stuff that are done separately.

    There's also a few Safari bugs that snuck in late in the cycle that haven't been addressed yet - Safari is unchanged in 10.4.1.

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    1. Re:Right on schedule... by Frank+Palermo · · Score: 1

      There's also a few Safari bugs that snuck in late in the cycle that haven't been addressed yet

      A few Safari bugs, yes... also there's apparently something about syncing Address Book data with .Mac that was left unfixed. It was listed as a "Known Issue" when this build (8B15) was given to developers last week (I suppose it's fair game to comment on now that the release is public). I've never experienced the issue myself, but I was sort of expecting them to take a bit more time to fix it, and release build 8B17 (or whatever) with a fix included as the public 10.4.1. Apparently they've decided either a) the bug is something they can fix server-side w/ .Mac, or b) it's something sufficiently rare or minor to wait for 10.4.2. I'd probably bet on it being the second one.

      So, as you said, it's "right on schedule." I daresay this update being released just now is mainly about getting over the psychological barrier some Mac users tend to have about upgrading to a "10.x.0" release, and also to tidy up some loose ends for Final Cut Studio (which, if memory serves, should ship soon and originally listed 10.4.1 as a requirement until DVD Player 4.6 came out separately). I realize they can't fix everything in one go, but it could be that this release came just a bit early to meet the deadline imposed by Final Cut Studio.

      -Frank

    2. Re:Right on schedule... by QuickFord · · Score: 0, Troll

      Or maybe it was released early because Apple knows their users are somewhat gullible and will dismiss all the bugs as random features so that Steve Jobs and his programmers can sit around smoking pot instead of fixing them. :P

  16. No, not quite... by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "They" (Apple) weren't supposed to fix anything having to do with VPN clients in 10.4.1.

    Making VPN clients work with 10.4.x is completely up to the vendors, and all vendors have had all the information and everything they have fundamentally needed, from a developer standpoint, to make their clients work with Tiger since *last June*.

    There is absolutely no reason all of the VPN client vendors shouldn't have had their clients out on April 29 alongside Tiger. Any feigned surprise on their part, or finger pointing at Apple, is completely bullshit. Yes, Tiger changed how things work which "broke" the old clients. But they've also had almost a year to fix it.

    1. Re:No, not quite... by McBainLives · · Score: 3, Informative

      Cisco released an update (4.6.03.0160) on 5/13, but be aware that it's for single-processor configs only. Check out http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/ 12696 for some initial reactions.

      --
      I came, I saw, I left. It looked better in the brochure.
  17. Problems with third-party plug-ins (bundles) by bitpart · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to the Knowledge Base about the update, all previously-installled third-party Mail.app plug-ins will not load. I assume that means that you just need to reinstall them.

    1. Re:Problems with third-party plug-ins (bundles) by tbmaddux · · Score: 1
      Actually no, what you need to do are the following steps (I used them to re-enable GPGMail):
      Quit Mail
      In Finder, rename folder $HOME/Library/Mail/Bundles (Disabled) back to $HOME/Library/Mail/Bundles.
      In Terminal, type:
      defaults write com.apple.mail EnableBundles 1
      defaults write com.apple.mail BundleCompatibilityVersion 2
      Relaunch Mail
      --
      Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
    2. Re:Problems with third-party plug-ins (bundles) by bitpart · · Score: 0

      That's right. I did basically those same steps to re-enable GrowlMail.

  18. GPG Bundle remains broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Even if you reinstall after the upgrade.

    I have a PowerBook 1.5GHz with 2GB RAM, and under 10.4 the internal drive and both firewire disks (one a FW400, the other a FW800) would spin perpetually, my load average went from the normal .4 or so, to an AVERAGE of 2, and the temperature inside the box was hovering at 140 degrees.

    All of this has been corrected in 10.4.1 (for me). Load average is back down to .2 to .4, the process table is still full of these:

    483 mdimport 0.0% 0:03.16 4 67 65 1.83M 7.40M 4.72M 41.8M

    but it's no longer grinding all the disks into oblivion.

    I can also reboot now. Since 10.4 I could not shutdown or reboot, had to open terminal and reboot manually.

    So far this update has resolved many issues I was experiencing.

    Anybody know what the deal is with Q2DE?

  19. Obligatory Snappier! by pyrrhonist · · Score: 3, Funny
    Just in case nobody else posts it, here's the obligatory performance increase post:
    I just installed this update, and wow! I don't know how to describe it, but my Mac just seems much snappier! It's amazing how Apple increases the performance of the OS with every release. Thanks Apple, you rule!
    </SATIRE>
    --
    Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    1. Re:Obligatory Snappier! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative


      But you know what? ... It is snappier!

      I'm actually not kidding. I was swapping pretty bad with 10.4.0 which was causing some real pain. So far, no swap.

    2. Re:Obligatory Snappier! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ain't it amazing what a nice reboot will do to free up memory?

    3. Re:Obligatory Snappier! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not satire if you tell us it's satire. Dumb fucking cockhead.

    4. Re:Obligatory Snappier! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aww, the poor Mac wankstain got his feelings hurt.

  20. Build 8B15 by Trillan · · Score: 1

    For those of you who are curious, the build number after updating is 8B15. I didn't see this mentioned anywhere yet.

  21. Has anyone else noticed. . . by dispensa · · Score: 3, Funny

    that this makes their PowerBook 17" waaaaay faster?

    Yeah, me neither. :-)

    1. Re:Has anyone else noticed. . . by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I did notice that after I installed Tiger, I can no longer mark events tentative / confirmed in iCal, and can no longer use the features of QuickTime Pro 6 that I paid for.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  22. Tiger Software Update Service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else here running server?
    My Software Update service is not seeing 10.4.1, is anyone else having this problem?

  23. Quartz 2D Extreme by Mr.+Cancelled · · Score: 4, Informative

    This update still did not enable Quartz 2D-Extreme on my system, so on a hunch, I enabled it manually, as per this hint, and wow... Really nice!

    I had temporarily enabled it under 10.4.0 via the debugging tool, but the speed difference was nowhere near what I'm getting after booting the entire OS with it enabled!

    A lot of people are reporting bugs with this being enabled, which is likely why Apple still hasn't enabled it by default. But I've had absolutely 0 bugs so far - Which to be honest has only been about 2.5 hours, but still... It's enough to at least justify trying it out IMHO. Using the hint I reference above, you ocan always "reset" it to off, if you do run into problems.

    For what it's worth, I'm going to be leaving this on unless some (any!) problems pop up tomorrow. It's very impressive! Even apps which I wouldn't think would be impacted, such as Remote Desktop (controlling an XP box from within OSX) are noticably faster.

    For the record, I'm running a dual 2Ghz w/2gb of ram, and an ATI 9600. Your mileage may vary.

    1. Re:Quartz 2D Extreme by Yaztromo · · Score: 5, Informative
      This update still did not enable Quartz 2D-Extreme on my system, so on a hunch, I enabled it manually, as per this hint, and wow... Really nice!

      That hint enables Q2DX the hard way. The easier way is to open a terminal and paste in the following command:

      sudo defaults write /Library/Preferences/com.apple.windowserver Quartz2DExtremeEnabled 1

      HTH!

      Yaz.

    2. Re:Quartz 2D Extreme by amichalo · · Score: 1

      Why not just go to the control panel Spotlight search and type "Enable Quartz Extreme"?

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    3. Re:Quartz 2D Extreme by Yaztromo · · Score: 2, Informative
      Why not just go to the control panel Spotlight search and type "Enable Quartz Extreme"?

      Because:

      1. Those search terms provide no results (at least over here on 10.4.1), and
      2. There is a difference between Quartz Extreme and Quartz 2D Extreme

      Yaz.

    4. Re:Quartz 2D Extreme by CatOne · · Score: 1

      10.4.1 seemed to enable it on my machine, by default. I checked Quartz Debug and it's enabled by default; this wasn't the case with 10.4.

  24. 10.4.1 - Mail 2.01 - GPGMail.mailbundle by ljPalmer · · Score: 1

    New mail 2.01 removes the new 10.4 compatible GPGMail.mailbundle. I guess they can't tell the difference between the Panter and Tiger Version. Therefore I loose easy gpg. ..lj

    --
    ..lj http://public.xdi.org/=lj
    1. Re:10.4.1 - Mail 2.01 - GPGMail.mailbundle by Halo1 · · Score: 1

      No, you don't

      --
      Donate free food here
  25. Bug in updated version of mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    when i am composing a mail message and i have the spell check set to check as i type the misspelled words are underlined in red. when i control click on one of the words to correct it the underlining is removed from all the misspelled words, giving the false impression that they are correctly spelled.

  26. For the curious... by mithran8 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The 10.4.1 Update changes approximately 500 file system objects, not counting files modified only by prebinding.

    The summary:

    476 changes
    16 additions
    0 removals

    Detailed list of modifications is available here.

    For reference - these changes were captured by the OpenSource build of Tripwire, patched for Mac OS X. It's pretty likely that any changes captured on your system will differ in a few ways, but the basic theme should be consistent.

    Jason

    --
    An object at rest cannot be stopped!
    1. Re:For the curious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were that curious why didn't you just download the package manually, run it, and look at the file list?

  27. What are you doing? by kaiwai · · Score: 1

    Not to sound negative, but I'm mounting and unmounting Windows XP shares all day without so much of a problem. If there are problems, I'd say it has more to do with configuration issues at the Debian end, because quite frankly, if there were something to go wrong, it'd be between Windows XP and SAMBA, not between one SAMBA server and another.

    Then again, like someone else mentioned, why not use NFS? if you've got Windows XP Pro machines, why not chuck services for UNIX on, and mount the NFS shares?

    1. Re:What are you doing? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      So why would all these untouched Samba systems running fine for years (with OS 10.1, 10.2, 10.3) just happen to be misconfigured the same day you install OS 10.4 I for one didn't change any setting sience then. And neither did the company. I call that an OS X bug. Espectially if it has been working and still is working fine for all other OS's except for 10.4, There may be a configuration in Samba to get it to work. But I shouldn't have to, and risk breaking all the other OS's connection. It is a 10.4 problem that doesn't support whatever configuration that we are usings.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:What are you doing? by Paradox · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree. Apple should support the full SAMBA spec.

      But, please enable encrypted passwords. Not only will it get Tiger to interface with your server (small bonus) but it helps increase the security of your LAN. The last thing you'd want to do is give an attacker your password for free, with no effort at all. Then they wouldn't even have to hack your mac, they'd just use the password you graciously gave them.

      This is for the good of the Internet. Get with it.

      --
      Slashdot. It's Not For Common Sense
  28. My biggets complaint... by dmarcoot · · Score: 3, Informative

    Spotlight re-indexes the system HD. that was a unexpected and gave me reason to go to gym while it finished. I hope future updates dont suffer the same performance hit.

    1. Re:My biggets complaint... by skingers6894 · · Score: 1

      Yay! I knew there was a good reason for a separate system partition.

      Saves on system volume reindex time.

      Phew, now I can justify my partitioning fetish again - thanks Tiger!

  29. Re:Or try automatic updates. by dmarcoot · · Score: 1

    that wasn't even worthy of a troll.

    gee, wonder why M@ and Sony both choose IBM?

    maybe its platform of future? at least Mac users can look fwd to 3.2 HGZ IBM PowerPc (that RISC to all you WinDOZE trolls) multi core chips BY NOVEMBER as will M$.

    i guess m$ finally has given up on the PC for gaming by your logic.

    btw, look at Sony PS3 (not 360) specs and cry.

    sony understands future of HD. as does Apple. MS is DOOMED! (required troll hyperbole)

  30. Re:Or try automatic updates. by dmarcoot · · Score: 1

    as first strike against the grammar Nazi's, try drinking 1.5 pints of vodka at 4 am and posting anything that articulate

  31. Re:Differences! by dmarcoot · · Score: 1

    I'd rather have it be optimizing for 5 minutes anything than allowing vhe 80,000+ viruses and spyware windows users are infested with for the liftespan of thier hardware.

    i imagine from your knee jerk, cry baby frustrations, lack of seeking knowledge queries, you are one of the bit torrent installers. poor you.

    poor poor you. whaaa. i had problems on my install so this OS must suck! whaaaa! i seek no information that can allow me to accomplish any adult tasks. so i must cry! Whaaa!

    and you think your a IT pro, having updating 10 windows machines, but apparently on your first OSx update you had a problem, and you then immediately post to Slashdot , but as anonymous coward and think you have any credibility in your post implying windows is systematically easier, regardless of security flaws, by posting a article for people who fucked up their installation? yeah, your Kung Fu is the best!

    your are a child updating your High school lab aren't you?

  32. SMTP over IPv6 in Mail still broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Too bad that I still can't send mail over IPv6 with Mail 2.0.1, like I could with the Panther version of Mail.

    (The reason is that Mail inserts some random characters in the domain name in the EHLO line when the connection is over IPv6.)

  33. Re:Differences! by CoolBru · · Score: 2, Interesting

    FWIW, as easy as it is to use, I've found it's quite common to have a PC completely trashed by Windows update, particularly under Win2k. The symptom is that it deletes ALL DLLs in the system folder (first error you see is something fatal like 'ntoskrnl.dll not found'). I've had this happen on about 5 machines now, usually shortly after clean installs. There are also 2 Windows updates (853732 and 840987) that reproducibly trash Virtual PC for me. You'd have thought that MS would be able to make Windows work on the only PC they actually sell... YMMV of course.

  34. Re:Or try automatic updates. by Gulthek · · Score: 1

    XP was a point release. 5.0 (Windows 2000) -> 5.1 (Windows XP).

    But it's just semantics. Apple uses a nice, consistent versioning scheme.

    a.b.c where:

    A = Complete OS, possibly breaks compatability with A-1

    B = Major OS, significant new features

    C = Update OS, bug and security fixes (generally referred to as a point release)

    Windows has gone from 3.1 -> 5.1 but you'd never know it from their brand names. They haven't really made an "A" revision since Win3.1->Win95, although Longhorn will be one. MS's equivilent to OS X.

  35. Preview annotation bug seems to be fixed! by King+Babar · · Score: 1
    It wasn't on the list of bugs fixed as far as I can tell, but it now appears that you can make and save annotations on a PDF document using Preview.

    This is really great, but, of course, when I really needed this was right after Tiger came out when I was grading a bunch of undergrad papers, and could have done it all electronically...

    I know it will never happen, but it would be nice to see some more bugzilla like representation of current issues with more applications. I also think that the "bug" (reporting) icon that Safari has should work in every app. And they also need to find a way to put a pony in every box...

    --

    Babar

    1. Re:Preview annotation bug seems to be fixed! by pmdboi · · Score: 1

      The only problem with this (as I found out the hard way marking times on a bus schedule) is that, once you save the PDF, you can't undo the annotations when you open it again. It appears that Preview actually adds the annotations to the PDF, rather than using some new hybrid file format or something.

  36. Working here by mccalli · · Score: 1
    Even if you reinstall after the upgrade.

    Not here, no. Worked fine before 10.4.1, works fine after 10.4.1. However, you need to upgrade to v1.1 (v42, Tiger).

    Cheers,
    Ian

  37. Re:Or try automatic updates. by Paradox · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The myth that Windows Auto Updates work without intervention is a beautiful and compelling story, but sadly it is just that for the vast majority of people.

    The truth is, updating your OS can be a hassle, no matter what machine you use. Apple has a fairly good track record, but that doesn't mean it's always going to be painless.

    What does DX9 do for a PC? Well, DX9 is an API that allows games to run. Wouldn't it be nice if gaming on a mac was just a reboot away?


    I guess I could own a PC for gaming, instead of for doing real work like my Mac.

    Or I could get a console and enjoy a wider selection of games, and not be pigeonholed into dozens of boring FPS rehashes (now you're in WWII! Now you're in WWII in space! Now you're in WWII in space as a SpaceNazi!) or a bunch of repetitive MMORPGS (Now you're fighting monsters for experience! Now you're doing it in space!).

    Wouldn't it be nice if the PC gaming industry could be rebooted and start producing more interesting content instead of boring rehashes of the same game over and over? How many Diablo clones, Doom Clones and Warcraft clones can you take before your gag reflex kicks in?
    --
    Slashdot. It's Not For Common Sense
  38. SSH Problems? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

    Is anyone having issues sshing to 10.4.0?
    Mine takes about a minute to authenticate, but once it does it works fine. 10.3.x worked just fine.
    Anyone else?

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    1. Re:SSH Problems? by Westech · · Score: 1

      I had the same issue. Restarting sshd on the 10.4.0 system fixed the problem. I have no idea what caused it.

  39. Gringind noise? by assantisz · · Score: 1

    Yup. I have the exact same noise coming from the area where the right hand speaker is. It's a spanking new 1.67GHz 15" Powerbook and I guess I am going to bring it to the Apple Store for inspection. It doesn't happen right away and usually only when I am playing The Sims.

  40. recovered files problem by legrimpeur · · Score: 1

    I hope they fixed the problem with some recovered files appearing randomly in the trash after reboot.

    In apple forums many people were affected.

    Anybody here had the same problem with 10.4.0?

  41. THIS DOES NOT FIX THE PROBLEM by argent · · Score: 1

    "Second, Mac OS X 10.4.1 completely fixes the the widget auto-installation issue by adding widgets to the items that Safari prompts for before a download is complete."

    THIS DOES NOT FIX THE PROBLEM

    Widgets are still autoinstalled by Safari when "open safe files" is turned on. PROMPTING BEFORE AUTOINSTALLING IS NOT ENOUGH. This is one of the first things Microsoft did to try and paper over ActiveX, and we can all see how successful that was.

    1. Re:THIS DOES NOT FIX THE PROBLEM by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Could you please explain why? Maybe without shouting?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  42. This story should be really useful... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    ...for those people whose "Software Update" doesn't work. I'm lucky I'm not one of them.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  43. Without shouting... by argent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sorry for the shouting, but I've been watching this slow motion train wreck roll itself out for about a year, since Apple failed to properly close the design flaw underlying the "help:" hole, which is another part of the same problem I see here.

    When people are faced with dialog boxes when they do a routine operation saying "what is about to happen may be dangerous", then they pretty soon get in the habit of just clicking "yes" without thinking.

    Do you want to delete this file? (click) (oh, hell)

    Do you want to run this ActiveX control? (click) (damn)

    I spent several years supporting Windows users, and every now and then one of them would come to me and say "I just did something stupid, I got this box, and it asked if I wanted to run something, and I said yes, and now I'm infected". And I'd go clean their PC up. And some of them, a few months later, would come to me again, "I'm sorry, I did it again"...

    This was still pretty rare, for a long time, because I'd set up a policy back around 1997 that Internet Explorer and Outlook and every other application that used the MS HTML control was banned. So the only time these problems came up for many years was when someone was using IE against my instructions. A couple of years back, though, we got merged with the rest of the company and my policy was overridden by the parent's "IE only" policy. Then I started getting this regularly.

    But, most users were using other browsers, like Netscape. And Netscape (and Firefox, mostly) doesn't have any kind of "auto run" mechanism. You have to explicitly download a file and run it. I still had a few people that did that, but I never had one do it twice, and even when most users were using Netscape it was IE and Outlook where the vast majority of my virus and spyware problems came from.

    This is not a hard lesson to learn. Automatically opening safe files after you download them is dangerous. Automatically downloading them is more dangerous. Automatically downloading and installing them when they're not even "safe"? I've watched what happens when you allow that, EVEN WHEN you pop up a dialog box when you do it, and if Apple keeps this up, I'm going to have to treat Safari as the same kind of "Typhoid Mary" as Internet Explorer. It's not quite as bad, I suppose it's like going to work when you've got a contagious cold... it's still not what anyone would call appropriate behaviour.

    A previous thread on the same subject here.

    1. Re:Without shouting... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      It's hard for me to understand how you could have a powerful, flexible system that doesn't allow the user to do stuff by clicking on things.

      Is there really a substantive difference between downloading a file and saying "Yes, I want to run this" and downloading a file and double clicking on it?

      You're absolutely right: Users need to not download harmful things. The OS should, to the largest degree possible, protect them from downloading harmful things.

      But, the user must be the boss. If user says "jump!" computer should say "how high?" even if that's a Bad Idea.

      I don't know how to reconcile this. I'm certainly not one of the people who (foolishly) think that OSX is impregnable to malware. Unfortunately, there IS a critical security hole in any system, and it's sitting between the keyboard and the chair.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:Without shouting... by argent · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is there really a substantive difference between downloading a file and saying "Yes, I want to run this" and downloading a file and double clicking on it?

      Yes. It's the difference between accidentally buying a pallet of junk at an auction by waving your hand at the wrong time, and buying a pallet of junk at a surplus store by pointing to it and saying "I want to buy it".

      It's hard for me to understand how you could have a powerful, flexible system that doesn't allow the user to do stuff by clicking on things.

      You'll have to explain what you're getting at here. I haven't suggested that people shouldn't be allowed to "do stuff by clicking on things". I'm saying that the browser shouldn't interpret a click in a "sandboxed" environment as a request to move an untrusted document outside that environment and open it.

      Clicking on links in a browser is something that is, normally, always a "safe" operation as far as your computer is concerned. The browser is sandboxed, as you mode from page to page the websites can sow you different serts of images and text, even quite sophisticated ones uring Flash or Java, but you can't normally have that take over your computer, any more than reading a book can make your head explode, or watching TV can set your end-tables on fire.

      And that's important, because you can't trust people on the net not to want to set your end-tables on fire or explode your head.

      So moving OUT of the "safe" environment into the "unsafe" environment should require an explicit action. If you're watching TV and someone comes to the door, you have to get up and go down to the door and let them in. You don't yell "yes, who is it" and have your house interpret that "yes" to mean "let them in".

      Well, that's what a dialog box does in this situation. It doesn't make an unsafe operation safe, it just makes it one that can happen by mistake.

    3. Re:Without shouting... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I see what you're getting at. However, I would think that assuming that web sites are safe is a pretty dangerous assumption.

      I'm a pretty computer savvy dude, and I like shortcuts. If I fuck up, it's my fault, and I can fix it. I suppose we can raise a bunch of arbitrary barriers to protect users from screwing up, but that's just what they are: Arbitrary barriers. Those annoy me (me this one, not my grandmother: She needs arbitrary barriers).

      So, maybe there SHOULD be a nanny-interface. As long as I can turn it off, that's fine. I should be able to tell my browser "Look, when I tell you to download a QFX file from my bank, go ahead and open it."

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:Without shouting... by fazookus · · Score: 1
      Yes. It's the difference between accidentally buying a pallet of junk at an auction by waving your hand at the wrong time, and buying a pallet of junk at a surplus store by pointing to it and saying "I want to buy it".
      Excuse me, but that's a fairly brilliant way of putting it. If you haven't patented it, may I borrow it? :-)

      Faz
    5. Re:Without shouting... by argent · · Score: 1

      I would think that assuming that web sites are safe is a pretty dangerous assumption.

      If you can't assume websites are safe, that the next click on a link won't load an untrusted program into an application that was never designed fromthe ground up to handle untrusted data, then you really can't use the web at all. Because the fact is, any click on any site can take you to a page that contains potentially unsafe content. Even within a trusted entity's secure website: the website could have been compromised, someone might have figured out how to inject content through the feedback form, anything... so the browser's job is to make sure that you can't accidentally flinch the wrong way at an annoying dialog bug and let the spyware out of the sandbox.

      You can still DELIBERATELY download and open it. If you want to take responsibility for that action... but clicking "OK" isnt enough to do that.

      This isn't an arbitrary barrier, any more than your front door, the firewall between your engine and the passenger compartment of your car, or the fence running along the edge of a cliff is an arbitrary barrier. This is a natural place to put a door.

      So, maybe there SHOULD be a nanny-interface. As long as I can turn it off, that's fine.

      The "nanny interface" is the one that tells you "hey! you're downloading an application! that could be dangerous!". Yes, you should be able to turn it off, because it's not really keeping you from doing dangerous things... and of course you can't turn it off in Safari. But you can get a browser that doesn't need it...

      Camino is what I'm using these days. It's an Apple-standard-interface version of the Mozilla/Gecko browser family.

      Not only is Camino inherently safer here, but the Camino download manager provides JUST AS MUCH convenience as you get from automatic downloads with the nanny interface. On one case you click on the link, then you click "OK". In the other case you click on the link, then you click on the "open" button.

      The difference? The "open" button is a deliberate request, it's not something that turns into a reflex action... because...

      1. It's unique to the downloading operation. It's not something you also get when you "empty trash" and "move files on top of old versions" and every other time you are about to take an irrevocabe step.

      2. It's not something you have to decide RIGHT THERE what to do to continue. You can leave the file in the download manager, there's no urgency.

      3. There's more things you can do. You can open it, you can show it in Finder, you can copy its location to the clipboard, you can clear it because you want to get back to it later.

      The whole process is deliberate, it's made of choice, not "hey! decide now! hard sell, baby, TAKE AN ACTION". MUCH better design, and JUST as convenient as Safari.

    6. Re:Without shouting... by argent · · Score: 1

      By all means, so long as I can have it back when I need it.

    7. Re:Without shouting... by MacDork · · Score: 1

      Well, at least with the Mac OS, the dialogs are better. Under windows, everything looks the same... "Blah blah blah, 'No' 'Yes'" whereas with a Mac it's more like "Blah Blah Blah, 'Abort Operation' 'Nuke My System'". And not having descriptive button names isn't the only problem. Windows gives you dialogs for EVERYTHING. Whether there's a problem or not, you get these pointless little dialogs like "Operation Succeeded 'OK'". Generally, on a Mac, you only get a dialog if there is an immediate need for user input.

    8. Re:Without shouting... by argent · · Score: 1

      Generally, on a Mac, you only get a dialog if there is an immediate need for user input.

      That used to be true. And generally on the Mac you didn't get supposedly sandboxed environments doing dangerous things, either. These used to be among the reasons Mac OS X was inherently resistant to the kind of scattershot exploits that Windows was famous for.

      Now Apple is starting to change both of these things, in a kind of codependent hobble down the same "road ... paved with good intentions" that Microsoft pranced boldly down in the '90s.

      Which is where we came in, no?

    9. Re:Without shouting... by bitingduck · · Score: 1

      any more than reading a book can make your head explode

      I'm sorry, but that's a terrible example. There have been a number of books that I've read that were so bad they caused my head to explode.

      The most recent instance was Dan Brown's "Digital Fortress" last summer. It was technically so stupid, and the characters so flat, that my head exploded three times while I was reading it. The only reason I finished it was that I was on vacation in the middle of nowhere and it was all there was to read, and my traveling companions used all our duct tape to hold my head together. I later had it disposed of as hazardous waste. I'm just glad I only paid $6 for the trade paperback of that, rather than getting the DaVinci Code, which wasn't available in pb yet. I won't touch another one of his books again, and I'm going to have to go take a shower to cleanse myself after having written so much about DF here.

    10. Re:Without shouting... by argent · · Score: 1

      You need Norton Defuser for Humans V 7.0, it's the absolute best Antiexploder I've ever used. I had a freind who tried Macafee Suppressor and he ended up joining a Tax Cult and leasing his soul back at accelerated depreciation.

    11. Re:Without shouting... by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      When people are faced with dialog boxes when they do a routine operation saying "what is about to happen may be dangerous", then they pretty soon get in the habit of just clicking "yes" without thinking.

      Thats one difference between Windows and OS X. OS X doesn't bombard you with dialog boxes all the time that have "OK" and "Cancel" buttons on them.

      In fact, I don't remember Safari ever putting up a dialog box.

  44. Re:Or try automatic updates. by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

    Here's fun: what 3D API was used to create Quake, Quake II, Quake III and Doom III?

    Clue: It's not the DirectX API.

    Saying DirectX is an API that "allows games to run" is a bit like saying that Word is a program that allows you to write text-based documents. You don't need Word to do that, and you can avoid DirectX if you choose.

    But then, you seem to be trolling. At least you didn't come out with that "sitting here in front of my new G5 Mac while waiting 17 minutes for it to copy a 20MB file" meme, so you're not all bad.

  45. Re:Differences! by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

    And why is Linux any better? (I'm assuming you're a Linux advocate here.)

    In fact, until I see any evidence that OSS is anything more than copying ideas and letting everyone see the code, I'll go out on a limb and say that OSS has little to no innovation.

    As much as I don't like the Windows UI, at least Microsoft are doing new stuff. Well... new-ish at any rate.

    What has Linux given us that a proprietary OS hasn't? Is openness is the only answer? Where are the Linux UI improvements that are completely new? Why is it that the thousands of coders behind Linux still can't hack up a new UI concept that passes muster and makes it into a distribution?

    Open Source is a great thing. But it's not the only way to go, and closed source can generate a revenue stream that open source simply cannot. Where there's money, there's funding for research into new ideas. It's a sad reality, but it's the only one we have.

  46. Re:Or try automatic updates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is the stupidest fucking shit I have ever read.

  47. Re:Or try automatic updates. by Paradox · · Score: 1

    I seem to have hurt your feelings. Did I hit too close to home, here?

    --
    Slashdot. It's Not For Common Sense
  48. It's really sad... by Omestes · · Score: 1

    I've got into the (safer but more aggrivating) habit of automatically clicking "No". Long years of running IE and Windows have trained me to be very negative and paranoid.

    As a poweruser, I get very sick of dialogues, when I click something, I damn well know what I'm doing, and if not, I can fix it. I'm smart enough to know that when website x tries to load "pornmonkeydialer.exe", I say no, and I don't run it if it somehow ends up on my desktop. ActiveX controls are not an issue of course (use only FF and Safari, haven't run IE in over a year, AT ALL). When something asks me if I'm sure, my first reaction is to scream "Yes, or else I wouldn't have told you to do it!". This is especially a problem in Windows, where I've actually had programs ask me TWICE, after typing DELETE or somesuch as well. Some of the populating aren't morons, and we should not be made to suffer.

    Problems, IMHO, are the USERS responsibility, not the operating systems. The user is the boss. I understand the problem in a corporate setting, but it comes down to the admin to safeguard the system, take away the options from the users. At home let them suffer, they support the support industry, and thus strengthen the economy.

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  49. Rewrite finder, please. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    What Apple should do, in my opinion, is make a complete re-write of the Finder. The Finder is, in my opinion, the worst piece of Mac OS.

    I read somewhere that Apple wrote the Finder in Carbon, just to prove to other companies that they could easily port their software to OS X, so that developers would quickly embrace the new OS. Fortunately, this is no longer necessary, because nobody makes software for 9.x anymore. So the Finder should be rewritten from scratch to take advantage of advances in the OS since 10.0, and to get rid of all the weirdness that happens in the Finder all the time.