Slashdot Mirror


AT&T Plans CNN-style Security Channel

An anonymous reader writes "Infoworld has a story about AT&T's upcoming effort to create a CNN of network security. From the article: "Security experts at AT&T are about to take a page from CNN's playbook. Within the next year they will begin delivering a video streaming service that will carry Internet security news 24 hours a day, seven days a week, according to the executive in charge of AT&T Labs.""

169 comments

  1. Early model by BWJones · · Score: 5, Interesting


    Presumably AT&T is going to go deeper into the security game and this is a good move for them. If they want to build credibility, brand this channel with subtlety and simply report the news. But rather than providing this as a service to their existing customers, stream it live to the Internet for everybody's consumption. That will help to build the AT&T brand for security much more so than limiting the audience. The costs cannot be that much more, right?

    Interestingly, the page the article is linked on has a signal to noise ratio for this particular article of about .2. In other words, 80% of the page is noise from advertisements versus 20% actual content that we are interested in by clicking on the link which gets me to thinking.....Given that they are modeling it after the CNN model, hopefully this channel will adhere to the model CNN had in the early days. It was "all news, all the time", kind of like MTVs early days where it was "all music, all the time". Right now CNN has degenerated into talk radio like TV with unbelievably biased commentators, and now they are towing the entertainment news line because they are part of Time Warner and their balance of ads versus news has been going down the tubes for years now. For instance, I had CNN on the other morning from about 9:30 to 10:00 and 60% of the airtime was devoted to commercials. It has been said that with the large conglomerate ownership of media these days, that the Watergate scandal would not have come to light. Think about that for a few minutes and see where it takes you. Scary, is it not?

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Early model by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1


      But rather than providing this as a service to their existing customers, stream it live to the Internet for everybody's consumption. That will help to build the AT&T brand for security much more so than limiting the audience. The costs cannot be that much more, right?

      Actually, I'm thinking that the costs may be less to make this publically available.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    2. Re:Early model by sharlskdy · · Score: 1

      Didn't Babylon 5 have an ISN? Things didn't go so well for them...

      One unintended side-effect might be for hacker types to try to get a mention on ISN as a vanity thing.

    3. Re:Early model by ZephyrXero · · Score: 1

      Still...just like most of the other mainstream news sites manipulating information, does this mean we'll get to hear all about how their competiton has security problems, but very little about their own?

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    4. Re:Early model by xMilkmanDanx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      On top of that, is streaming video really the way to get security updates? Personally an outline text form lets me go straight to the areas that are applicable to me and what I need to keep secure. I definitely wouldn't want to sit through 15 minutes of (personally) irrelevant crap just to get the security info I need.

      In the end, while there are some broad sweep security alerts that affect everyone or nearly so, most updates are probably important to 1 out of 10 people.

    5. Re:Early model by digitalrao · · Score: 1

      TechTV is back but security for all the veggies out there that don't Updates are worth there time .. will this mean TechTV will come back to fill the time up with USEFUL shows and infomation!!! i miss my TechTV/ZDTV!!!

    6. Re:Early model by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1


      Yeah...get something you can prove as your work mentioned on ISN, and all the other people in your hacker group pitch in on a case of beer for you. ^_^

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    7. Re:Early model by htrp · · Score: 2, Funny

      It could also be yet another medium for ATT to tout it's new "security initiatives" and advertise services given by ATT for ATT customers and all. Even if they do make the service free, how many people will actually bother watching it. Personally I think my BugTraq list is good enough. Though it would be entertaining to see a giant breaking news screen of a new worm otubreak with an infographic as each country gets progressively hit, live over video.

    8. Re:Early model by ChiefPilot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's OK. Experimenting on black prisoners with STDs didn't come to light before conglomerates owned the media anyway.

    9. Re:Early model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy crap, you're an annoying little twerp.

    10. Re:Early model by ccarson · · Score: 1

      Brilliant

    11. Re:Early model by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Considering how everything AT&T touches turns to shit (cable TV, wireless phones, long distance), they shouldn't get their hopes up. The AT&T name will not build credibility, in fact I think it will do the opposite.

    12. Re:Early model by timeOday · · Score: 1
      On top of that, is streaming video really the way to get security updates?
      I used to wonder why we spend big bucks sending people away to week long training courses, when they could just read a book.

      Then I realized, most people will never read the book.

    13. Re:Early model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has been said that with the large conglomerate ownership of media these days, that the Watergate scandal would not have come to light.

      And this statement is already being proven to be true -- look at the Downing Street Minutes -- have you seen this in the mainstream media? No? Thought not.

    14. Re:Early model by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Screw ZDTV, I want an O'Reilly TV...

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    15. Re:Early model by xMilkmanDanx · · Score: 1

      With the week long training courses they'll just sleep through them.

    16. Re:Early model by JWW · · Score: 1

      Thats a great idea! It would be fantastic nerd tv. Plus they could intersperse the technical shows with wildlife stuff about their cover animals.

  2. Good concept....bad name... by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 2, Informative

    The service, which currently goes by the code name Internet Security News Network, (ISN) is under development at AT&T Labs...

    Ten good reasons not to use "ISN":
    1. International Relations and Security Network
    2. International Society of Nephrology
    3. Immigrants Support Network
    4. Internet Shopping Network
    5. Prince Edward Island's Internet Company
    6. International Supernovae Network
    7. Institut des Sciences Nucleaires
    8. International Society for Neurochemistry
    9. Interagency Services Network
    10. InfoSec News

    Naming issues aside, this souinds like it could be very cool...but will this ever be available to the public at large, or will it remain restricted to AT&T customers?
    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Good concept....bad name... by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Save yourself some time and use acronym finder.

      ISN is not unique, but neither is CNN. I'm pretty sure that every TLA (even TLA) has been used and reused and reused by now.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:Good concept....bad name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      11. Inter-Steller News Network (Babylon 5)

    3. Re:Good concept....bad name... by sholden · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that every TLA (even TLA) has been used and reused and reused by now.

      http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-query.asp?String=e xact&Acronym=zkj&Find=Find

    4. Re:Good concept....bad name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Zoological Kenetic Jungles?

    5. Re:Good concept....bad name... by jd · · Score: 1
      International Supernovae Network


      A supernovae is exactly what this AT&T network will provide, when it's discovered that 90% of the worst offenders on security issues provide 90% of the high-tech jobs in America and the rest provide most of the political donations.


      If any of the stories from this new network cause the same sort of impact as the news that broke from Enron, the President won't be storing all that radioactive waste in the Yucca Mountains. He'll be piping it into AT&T's HQ, laughing manically in the process.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    6. Re:Good concept....bad name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad zkj.com is already taken, or you could have made a ton of money selling Zodiac Kangaroo Jackhammers.

    7. Re:Good concept....bad name... by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      AT&T donated $1,685,452 to the republican convention last year. I am sure Bush will cut them some slack.

    8. Re:Good concept....bad name... by jd · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be $168-5452? And what happens if that turns out to be the number for some Bush-hating campaign?

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  3. Maybe they won't blow it. by darrint · · Score: 1

    I'd watch it. Maybe it will be available over streaming Theora.

    1. Re:Maybe they won't blow it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you need to shut up and get a life.

  4. AT&T? by VP · · Score: 1

    You mean SBC, right?

    1. Re:AT&T? by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1
      You mean SBC, right?

      No, they mean AT&T. Since when does SBC own AT&T?

    2. Re:AT&T? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give it a few weeks.

    3. Re:AT&T? by KenBot_314 · · Score: 1

      AT&T is in the process of being merged into SBC... Its been a very public affair...

    4. Re:AT&T? by friedmud · · Score: 1

      Looks like they're working on it right now... and lots of people aren't happy about it:

      http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/in dex.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20050623005497& newsLang=en

  5. Serious business! by PopeAlien · · Score: 1

    Eslambolchi likened the effort to former U.S. President Ronald Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative, also known as Star Wars. "My strategy in AT&T is the Star Wars concept because I am not in a cold war with these crooks anymore, I am in a nuclear war," he said. "Every time they form a nuclear missile, I have to know where they are going to hit me and I have to devise a new defense mechanism."

    Go git 'em gipper! We need more nuclear war metaphors in network security, perhaps this will be a more FOX news inspired project?

  6. Boo....rrah! by Kwirl · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow, at first I was going to laugh at AT&T...disgruntled former employee and all. Then I read the article...and wanted to clap. This is a meritous idea that hopefully will provide content to those of us who want more from this field.


    Hopefully they won't outsource the reporting :P

    1. Re:Boo....rrah! by Trigun · · Score: 2, Funny

      And hopefully up-to-date information. Last month I was waching dateline or some similar program, and they did a big expose on....

      wait for it..

      PORN DIALERS!

      C'mon, this was relevant what, seven years ago? That's eons in Internet years. I haven't used a modem in five years or so, and where I live isn't exactly bleeding edge. Maybe they'll do a big story on the Melissa virus next.

  7. More like Fox it seems by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    From TFA:

    ISN will look very much like Time Warner's Cable News Network, except that it will be broadcast exclusively over the Internet, Eslambolchi said. "It's like CNN," he said. "When a new attack is spotted, we'll be able to offer constant updates, monitoring, and advice."

    Because we all know in the US that the only news worthy of reporting are attacks. Attacks by terrorists, attacks by US troops, and basically any violent act that gets the population fearful and anxious, and therefore riveted to the TV set to learn more.

    Of course, economic (unless the economy is threatened one way or another), diplomatic and other news aren't interesting.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  8. How interesting could this be? by qbushido · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean even to people who LIKE technology AND work in networking, how much news relevant to networking could there possibly be in one day? I understand the desire for DoS warnings to be sent and investigated, or even reporting on trade shows...but 24/7?

    1. Re:How interesting could this be? by Scoria · · Score: 1

      It probably won't receive the amount of funding sufficient to provide a real 24/7 broadcast. You'll probably see a few hours of new programming each week that is supplemented primarily by news from last month.

      Wait, maybe we should call it Slashdot TV. ;-)

      --
      Do you like German cars?
    2. Re:How interesting could this be? by convolvatron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      forget funding, how could they possibly come up with that much content on internet security. 'in other late breaking news, the internet still lacks a decent pki, and script kiddies run rampant'

    3. Re:How interesting could this be? by starbird · · Score: 1

      It could be like the weather channel. Put up neat graphics of internet usage, zoom in on 'hotspots'. Put up forecasts and such. Put some elevator music behind it.

  9. Cure by jthayden · · Score: 1

    Sure cure for insomnia.

  10. The new name for the network? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ATTN

    Get it? Like ATTENTION, but hyphenated? Badaboom. I'll be here all week.

    1. Re:The new name for the network? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, that was LOL funny.

  11. Only for existing customers by whizkid042 · · Score: 3, Informative
    As a security professional, I was intrigued by the idea until I read:

    it will be offered as an additional service to the company's customers

    It's only going to be available to AT&T customers. That's too bad. Now it doesn't sound nearly as cool or half as useful to me.

    1. Re:Only for existing customers by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's only going to be available to AT&T customers. That's too bad. Now it doesn't sound nearly as cool or half as useful to me.

      So if you can't have it for free, it's not as useful to you? sounds to me like you confuse usefulness and free-riding.

      But anyone, as a "security professional" (what's that anyway? a bodyguard? a rent-a-cop? a Pentagon-paid mercenary like those operating right now in Iraq?), you probably won't be impressed by AT&T's service anyway, as it probably will be a channel for news coming straight from the administration and other news organisation's pundits, as I doubt they want to keep a staff of real professional journalists on the payroll.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Only for existing customers by hal9000(jr) · · Score: 1

      So AT&T is late to the game. ISS, Symantec, and others already provide this same "news" type of service to their customers as either an additional service or as part of thier existing service. And yes, they all have global scope.

      This isn't that interesting and since there are many companies and people who are not AT&T customers, it not useful.

      Geez, this is almost like shilling for AT&T--hardly worth a /. story.

  12. Someone hacks the video feed, hilarity ensues by n1ywb · · Score: 4, Funny

    How long do you think it will take for that to happen?

    --
    -73, de n1ywb
    www.n1ywb.com
    1. Re:Someone hacks the video feed, hilarity ensues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can just see someone uploading some 'video' with the caption, "Are all your 'ports' secured?" Penguin enter stage right and kung fu the 'intruder'. "Thanks Linux! Now my ports are my own again!"

      At least it's a happy ending...

  13. Re:AT&T Security Headline News ..... by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1


    That part wouldn't scroll...it would just be a static banner on the screen.

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  14. This is ISN. by Scoria · · Score: 3, Funny

    Within the next year they will begin delivering a video streaming service that will carry Internet security news 24 hours a day, seven days a week

    Seen on a job availability notice for this project:

    ANCHOR PREREQUISITES
    - Ability to fluently read and speak '1337' while broadcasting

    --
    Do you like German cars?
    1. Re:This is ISN. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      w00t! 7h4t m33nZ 1 c4n g3t t3h j0b!

  15. I can see this now by suitepotato · · Score: 3, Funny

    95% warnings of new Windows vulnerabilities and ranting about same, 5% advertising the all new Google Commercials.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
    1. Re:I can see this now by HeliumHigh · · Score: 0

      I like your sig. Articles of faith eh? Well, I'm on the BOM SQUAD :)

  16. Delayed disclosure = Old News = Nobody Cares by zanderredux · · Score: 2, Interesting
    A CNN of IT security?

    Most companies deal with IT security in secrecy, only disclosing new attacks and vulns right before they're ready to release a patch.

    By the time it hits the news outlet, they'll be just too old for security professionals to be deemed useful.

  17. Hopefully the metaphor doesn't go that far... by Illix · · Score: 1

    Let's hope it won't be exactly like CNN, by which I mean won't soon come to feature endless "commentary" and "talk" shows devoted to making a lot of noise out of a little news. I'm personally quite sick of hearing rambling, repetitive discussion rather than some actual information.

    Which begs the question of: how much actual security news is there to report? During a large virus or worm attack, as during a war for CNN, there is certainly enough to fill 24 hours; otherwise, what exactly will they talk about all the time?

    1. Re:Hopefully the metaphor doesn't go that far... by game+kid · · Score: 1
      what exactly will they talk about all the time?

      They can take another page from CNN, and keep talking about a few celebrities, adding info to every repeat as gossip is gathered...

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    2. Re:Hopefully the metaphor doesn't go that far... by generic-man · · Score: 1

      I think the AT&T channel will really reach its peak when it starts getting trolled by loudmouths who enjoy yelling at loudmouths just like CNN did.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    3. Re:Hopefully the metaphor doesn't go that far... by rayde · · Score: 1

      i'm hoping more along the lines of CNN's Headline News... less crap, faster pace.

    4. Re:Hopefully the metaphor doesn't go that far... by ArtStone · · Score: 1

      Perhaps like Paris Hilton's cell phone being hacked! (?) Pictures at 11.

      --
      Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
  18. They have their own Lou Dobbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who will keep your border gateways clear of foreign packets.

  19. Re:AT&T Security Headline News ..... by Luscious868 · · Score: 1

    That depends on how big the letters are :-)

  20. I heard you can watch the channel... by game+kid · · Score: 1

    ...here. They say it has some talk about Linux, Apple, politics, books, and the occasional movie too. I gotta see it someday... ;)

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  21. How long... by aws4y · · Score: 1

    until Fox News or Talk radio say this netwrok has a bias towards left wing viruses?

    --
    Did Glenn Beck rape and kill a girl in 1990? gb1990.com
    1. Re:How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long 'til the virus writers have their own Fox News channel accusing ATT of bias?

    2. Re:How long... by jaycontonio · · Score: 1

      Because all talk radio is conservative?

  22. Broad audience by Torontoman · · Score: 1

    Wow, I can see this one just taking off. Move over NBC there's a new kid on the block.

  23. and reason #11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    11. Interstellar News

    Go Babylon 5 go!!!

  24. Babylon 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ISN is the Interstellar Network News channel right? Does this mean that AT&T has been part of the alien conspiracy coverup since Roswell?

    *grin*... Sorry, couldn'r resist - was watching B5 last night and this one made me laugh

  25. There are other sites available. by hal9000(jr) · · Score: 4, Informative

    Andrew Jaquith, senior analyst with The Yankee Group in Boston. "There is really no good, consistent source for security information on the Internet," he said.

    There are already a handful of really good sites out there. How will ATT compete with the likes of: The Internet Storm Center, Security Focus, Packet Storm, and Security Peline which are current and relevant.

    Also in the TFA, there were statements that the news serviecs will be offered to ATT customers. Will non-customers also have access to the site for free? If not, how does this compare to other managed services offerings from the likes of Symantec, ISS, and others?

    1. Re:There are other sites available. by mustangsal66 · · Score: 1

      ...How will ATT compete with the likes of: The Internet Storm Center, Security Focus, Packet Storm, and Security Peline which are current and relevant....

      Where do you think AT&T will get their information?

      --
      Why worry? Each of us is wearing an unlicensed "nucular" accelerator on his back.
      Sig changed for readability by G.W.
  26. The sad reality of this. by British · · Score: 1

    ...is this will probably have more program content and be more interesting than G4Techtv.

    Just imagine the shows you could syndicate:

    Off The Hook - eh, second thought, better not. That show is 99% politics, 1% Emmanuel Goldstein acting like a 21st-century Andy Rooney.

    RISKS Digest - now in video form!

    The Defaced Web page report - attrition.org's newest show featuring defaced websites for the past week, and what vulnerability caused it

    Monday Night Infection - Which Windows worm is spreading faster than the other 'round the world. the battlefield? your computer!

    Oh the possibilities could be endless. Or, it would bore ordinary people to death. We may never know.

    1. Re:The sad reality of this. by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1


      Just imagine the shows you could syndicate:


      Here's one you'll love:
      Dvorak!

      That's right, our own loveable John Dvorak goes on a self-righteous rant about some tech isue or another...while the viewers on the web can vote in on whether or not they found his rant enjoyable and/or informative.

      If they did, John gets pelted with rotten fruit, rotten fish, or extremely old cheese.

      If they didn't, John gets pelted with shurikens, live (enraged) badgers, or dollops of blistering hot tar.

      Either way, it's a ratings shoe-in! ^_^

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    2. Re:The sad reality of this. by xMilkmanDanx · · Score: 1

      I gotta admit... a dark part of me would very much like to see someone pelted with live (enraged) badgers. Give him a spoon to make it a little more fair.

    3. Re:The sad reality of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I thought your mom made it clear that you had to finish your homework before posting.

  27. Content provided by... by Winterblink · · Score: 4, Funny

    Microsoft :)

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
    1. Re:Content provided by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      We're sorry, but in order to view our security alert video, you must be running the latest version of Microsoft® Windows® Media Player®. Click here to upgrade now!

  28. secure security? by matt+me · · Score: 1

    Can't wait to see this channel hacked, before they start 'educating' us about online security.

  29. Microsoft's new Channel? by Pao|o · · Score: 1
    Within the next year they will begin delivering a video streaming service that will carry Internet security news 24 hours a day, seven days a week, according to the executive in charge of AT&T Labs.

    I didnt know Microsoft was putting up another channel dedicated for Windows.

  30. Should've called it PNN by eamonman · · Score: 1

    The Paranoid News Network. 24 hours of the latest vulnerabilities, occasional how-to shows on fixing/upgrading/simple updating your systems, a Mclauglin group/Capital Gang-esqe group of hardware/software security leaders who discuss topics and berate microsoft, and a call in show for frazzled IT admins. That'd be cool ;)

    --
    0- Eamonman Proud member of DNRC
    1. Re:Should've called it PNN by ewhac · · Score: 1
      The Paranoid News Network.

      No no, dude, it's so obvious:

      The Pwn3d News Network.

      :-),
      Schwab

  31. Watergate would have been blogged by PaxTech · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It has been said that with the large conglomerate ownership of media these days, that the Watergate scandal would not have come to light. Think about that for a few minutes and see where it takes you. Scary, is it not?

    I thought about it, and I'm not scared in the least.

    If the Watergate scandal happened today, Deep Throat wouldn't have NEEDED the large conglomerate media to get the story out, he'd have just started a blog. If you doubt that a blog could have penetrated the cover-up and conspiracy, just ask Dan Rather, he's got some nice Word documents to show you. :)

    I agree, mainstream media is a joke these days, luckily there is an alternative. No one needs a big corporate monolith to get news out, we all have access to the biggest printing press there is.

    --
    All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
    1. Re:Watergate would have been blogged by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 4, Insightful

      BS.

      Dan Rather is one thing, Bush is another. If a blog had discredited Bush to that extent, it would either a: be discredited as 'just a blog' or b: be silenced / discredited rather quickly. It took YEARS for the memo from Britain to get around.

      The printing press was working in a vacuum. It made social change because it was completely new when it came to distribuation of information. While it COULD be argued that blogs are the same thing, the main people arguing it would be bloggers. Just because the datalink upstream from individuals is wider doesn't mean the datalink downstream to individuals will get any more varied anytime soon.

      I'm sorry, but that's the way it's probably going to be for a while. I'd like to believe in this viewpoint, but I don't.

    2. Re:Watergate would have been blogged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, today's Watergate could be blogged, but without a framework to verify and authenticate the information (like a traditional news organization), there is a great chance it could get passed by.

      At times, the blogosphere has assembled itself to provide such a function, but in order to create the meme, someone at the top of the food chain (like Powerline, LGF, or Kos) is going to have to be convinced. Bob Woodward was an aquaintance of Mark Felt, and therefore had a greater reason to believe him.

    3. Re:Watergate would have been blogged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm sorry,


      Well, we at least agree on one thing.
    4. Re:Watergate would have been blogged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your confidence in the power of blogging is possibly misplaced.

      are there any particular blogs with absolute credibility amongst the mass populace the way perhaps a newspaper would?

      If blogs started touting something like this, it would have been trivial for whoever was doing it to start countering it with outright falsehoods etc. - you should be no stranger to astroturfing, and we have an administration that has *demonstrably* paid people to say what it wants to say.

      The general populace, who would not really have any idea of the provenance of any particular blogger, would just think "ok some people say this is happening, some people say it isn't... I can't tell. what's on TV?"

      it's actually also unclear if a newspaper today touted something watergate-like that it would be believed - the difference in those days was that there weren't any news organisations that were outright "bought" by the ultra-rich ultra-rightwing and there was therefore nothing to counter it. it's not too hard to imagine fox news pooh-poohing any particular report showing e.g. Enron officials were secretly arranging kickbacks to cheney's friends during the energy meetings they still refuse to give information on.

      BUT between a newspaper and some random blog - I think a newspaper still has better credibility. don't forget it wasn't until the newspapers picked up on the blogs that Dan Rather really got in trouble. The blogs weren't enough.

    5. Re:Watergate would have been blogged by karniv0re · · Score: 1

      Yeah, unfortunately, you're right. I think blogging is an awesome tool in the hands of the public. But the fact is, the ratio of people who read blogs to those who just watch the news is low. I wouldn't know about half of the blogs out there if they weren't reported on the news, and that includes the Dan Rather conspiracy. We've got a ways to go.

    6. Re:Watergate would have been blogged by penix1 · · Score: 1

      "are there any particular blogs with absolute credibility amongst the mass populace the way perhaps a newspaper would?"

      If you can show me a newspaper with credibility let me know...

      "The general populace, who would not really have any idea of the provenance of any particular blogger, would just think "ok some people say this is happening, some people say it isn't... I can't tell. what's on TV?""

      More to the point, "Where's Seinfeld?" People aren't really interested in news these days...Ask yourself this:

      Would you pay to see the news of today at a theater like they did up until the TV became the standard? I didn't think so...

      "BUT between a newspaper and some random blog - I think a newspaper still has better credibility. don't forget it wasn't until the newspapers picked up on the blogs that Dan Rather really got in trouble. The blogs weren't enough."

      Now I do agree with you there. To put it into perspective, how much do you think SCO's stock would be today without Groklaw?

      B.

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    7. Re:Watergate would have been blogged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like very much to agree with you, but...

      The general public still relies heavily on the mainstream media, joke that it is. I've been getting into podcasting lately, and I initially thought, "Cool! You can have alternative newscasts that people can listen to on their commute to work. Alternative media may finally break through!" Then, reality hit me. We have plenty of alternative news on the Web already, and many people sit in front of an Internet-connected computer all day, yet alternative news sites are still...alternative. The problem, I think, has little to do with access. There are four much bigger problems here, namely:

      1. Visibility. How does the everyday user find these sites? You may be tempted to say that they can search for them, or they can ask friends, but ask yourself this: If you were on your way to work and wanted a newspaper, how far out of your way would you go to find one? Your time is limited, so you'd probably get your news where it's convenient. As for asking friends, most people don't have friends who are into blogging, podcasts, or reading the BBC, the Times of London, or the South China Morning Post to get their fix of news. They tune to CNN, MSNBC, or Fox News, or they read the respective Web sites. In summary, if no one knows alternatives exist, they won't go looking for them, and, even if they know, they won't go looking very hard unless they're highly motivated.

      2. Trust. For better or worse, many people trust what the mainstream media tells them. Or, if trust isn't the correct term, they at least view those outlets as a known quantity. If their came across a site called "Fred's World Observer", would they trust the news they get there? Not initially, and there's nothing wrong with that. We've all learned to take a lot of information we get off the Net with a huge grain of salt, and for good reason. So, when you've got all these potential outlets for news, how do you help people find sites that are trustworthy?

      3. Need. This may be the biggest factor of all. People absolutely will not seek out alternative news sites if they think they're getting what they need from the mainstream media. Sure, some people may decide to see what's out there for the hell of it, but most won't. How do you show people that they're missing something so they even believe they need to find other news sources?

      4. Takeover by mainstream media. Remember the early Web, before big corporations discovered it? Many people thought that it would usher in an age of truly democratic publishing, since you had all these little sites providing all sorts of information, and the big corporations were nowhere to be seen. Well, guess what? The corporations jumped in, and now, many people don't venture beyond MSN, AOL, CNN, and Yahoo. Don't think this will happen to things like blogs and podcasting? Well, Rush Limbaugh supposidly has a podcast now. If you want alternative media to survive, you have to find a way to keep them from getting drowned out by all the noise created by the big media companies.

      And whatever solutions you find can't be geeky. I'm a geek, and I can already find what I want on the Internet, but when I show many non-geeks how to do it, their eyes glaze over, and I know I've lost them. The solution is going to have to be technical, yes, but it will also have to be psychological. If you want to get people to embrace and use alternative media, you have to figure out their behavior and how to change it.

      This is all just my $0.02, though.

  32. Bar at the bottom by anandpur · · Score: 4, Funny

    Windows exploit found .... Windows exploit script available .... Linux kernel exploit found .... Linux kernel patched .... Windows user are waiting for patch .... M$ announced patch will be availabe next month .... XXXX nummber of windows system turned zombies ... Linux kernel exploit found .... Linux kernel patched .... M$ relesed long awaited patch .... 1/2 of the windows useres can not install patch .... Only licenced windows users can install patch .... Linux kernel exploit found .... Linux kernel patched .... ISP disconnected un-patched widows systems from the Internet

    1. Re:Bar at the bottom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those damned widows. As soon as their husbands are buried they start spewing viruses, spam and God knows what else into the internet.

    2. Re:Bar at the bottom by Krunaldo · · Score: 1

      OpenBSD exploit found... OMG *news reader shots him/her self*.

      --
      God,root what's the difference? I read slashdot, there for I errr... am stupid?
    3. Re:Bar at the bottom by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      Yep that about sums it up.

      --

      Gorkman

    4. Re:Bar at the bottom by Sven+Tuerpe · · Score: 1

      ... President Gates declares War on Spam(tm) ... Patch Day celebrations around the world ... Slashdot involved in yesterday's DDoS attacks? ... PGP key signing parties the latest trend in Hollywood ... Hundreds of servers killed by packet storms in .cn, .kr, .jp ... Y2K38 fears rising, researchers say ... Man arrested for whistling unlicensed tunes ... Department of Homeland Security: Guantanamo Bay will be essential element of nation-wide rights management system ...

      --
      http://erichsieht.wordpress.com/category/english/
    5. Re:Bar at the bottom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As expected, no Mac exploits.

  33. Damn, now I'll have to redo my schedule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already devote 24 hours a day to reading /.

  34. Noc News... by lrohrer · · Score: 1

    I have worked in Nocs before and there were several reasons why the room was wired for cable. The simplest was to be able to watch CNN for events that might disturb the network. A specialized network could provide direct problems such as:
    1) Weather including solar storms
    2) Network cuts /degrations
    3) Running stats on virus attacks
    4) Coporate outages
    5) Independent outages reports -- so you know who to blame.
    6) Known reasons for increased bandwidth usage (ex Hey new star wars trailer)

    Still I think there are already several sources of independent news that work just fine.

    1. Re:Noc News... by mtenhagen · · Score: 1

      We need to monitor our tv-streams ;-) guess what channel is on the big screen :-)

      --
      200GB/2TB $7.95 Coupon: SAVE90DOLLAR
    2. Re:Noc News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked NOCs too. Yeah. Wired for cable so we could watch CNN for news that might affect the network. Sure. That's what I told the boss too. Of course, that was when he wasn't watching CNN himself. When he was awake, that is.

      CNN was boring enough at 2am. Imagine how hard it'll be to keep NOC techs up with "Special Report: Unix telnet might not be completely secure". At least CNN had occasional eye candy on the commericals.

  35. This just in... by jpellino · · Score: 1, Troll

    N3w VuLn3r481l17132 W3R3 D1C0V3R3d 70D4Y 1n m0s7 w38 8r0wS3r ScR1P71N' l4N9u4932. luCK1ly 0UR n37w0rK 12 1mMUN3 70 sucH 7H1N92, S0 w3'R3 P4s1n' 7h12 1Nf0 4l0n9 70 j00 1n 73h N1Ck 0F 71m3..

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My brain hurts....

    2. Re:This just in... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I should feel proud or ashamed that I could read that at almost normal speed.

      And if I should feel ashamed, is it because I could read it at almost normal speed, or because I couldn't read it right at normal speed?

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    3. Re:This just in... by Mechcozmo · · Score: 1
      So, to mark this as "Troll", do you have to understand it, or is just assumed the poster is Trolling?

      ;-)

    4. Re:This just in... by SComps · · Score: 1

      LOL!!! The original post damn near destroyed my eyes, but if I had mod points (dammit.. I used them up yesterday) I'd mod that badboy right up just for the effort put into it.

      MODS?

  36. Feed Size???? (or news item;) by amcdiarmid · · Score: 1

    I can see it now:

    "In the news today, several major Customers of AT&Ts' network services reported denial of service attacks - coinciding with the inaguration of AT&T's new Internet Security Network.

    According to Mark Manigerium of ReallyMegaBigCo LTD, 'The network guys here told everyone to keep a window open in the background - so everyone could listen to how much they were at risk from, like viruses and stuff. This has completely stopped traffic to out web site and cost us Megayons of Lira.'

    Asked for comment, Brain S. Small,AT&T Sr. VP for network traffic, responded 'We do not know who is responsible for this attack on AT&T's network customers - but we will find them and hold them responsible.'

    We at the Internet Security Network will report more as events unfold, about this massive denial of service attack on AT&T customers.

    Back to you, Slash."

    OK, yes I know about multicast;)

  37. AT&T Internet Protect by DanCentury · · Score: 1
    I imagine that this is part of marketing strategy for their Internet Protect concept/service.


    AT&T Internet ProtectSM is a security alerting and notification service that offers advanced information regarding potential real-time attacks (viruses, worms and distributed denial of service or DDoS attacks) that are in the early formation stages.

  38. This just in from the Well, duh... dept. by RingDev · · Score: 0

    Well, Duh...

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  39. What is really left of AT&T? by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    They sold their Unix business in the 80's. Spun off parts of the company into Lucent and Avaya. Cingular owns their former wireless service. Comcast owns their former cable tv/internet system. SBC just bought their wired phone service. Surely there can't be anything left of them now?

    1. Re:What is really left of AT&T? by RingDev · · Score: 0

      Lots and Lots of dark fiber and copper. -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  40. Good for AT&T by hikerhat · · Score: 1
    It's about time we have some objective, fact based information about computer security on the web. Thank god for companies like AT&T, who clearly have no financial reason to skew any of their security coverage. And thank god for slashdot for advertising for AT&T. That poor little good hearted company probably can't afford any ads at all. And all the ads are probably blocked anyway. Poor old AT&T, and poor old doubleclick.

    As the objective, linked to article says - "This sounds like something pretty innovative to me. Personally, I'd check it out". Then I think it said "And boy oh boy, do I love these fruity Trix! They aren't just for kids you know!"

  41. Ex-AT&T Employee speaks by StreetFire.net · · Score: 4, Informative

    I *WAS* the AT&T Security Sales overlay for Globals and have personally worked for Hussien the AT&T CIO. While I think this is a good move for AT&T to increase brand awareness for their security product offering, I think the SlashDot crowd will be left with an empty feeling as AT&T's security suite focuses almost exclusively on Network based attacks with little to no coverage for application based attacks, spoofs or social engineering. AT&T *does* have some inovative products in their space, but a fairly narrow focus on the total security picture. Because of this, I can only think the "TV-show" will be similarly focused.

    -Adam

    1. Re:Ex-AT&T Employee speaks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm also an ex-employee who also worked with Hossein. What a phony. He was *so* far behind the times. I tried to convince him that the Internet was a threat to AT&T's long distance business, but he didn't believe it. That was in 1994. Once Netscape IPO'ed he believed. He marched up about four layers of management through duplicity. He had a nasty habit of adding his name to every patent he could lay hands on without actually being involved in the work. It's a shame he has risen to this height. A total opportunist. But then again, AT&T doesn't really exist anymore, right? It's just a small subsidiary of Cingular. Or is that Pacific Telephone?? :)

    2. Re:Ex-AT&T Employee speaks by StreetFire.net · · Score: 1

      You didn't work for AT&T/WebFactory did you? That's when I worked for him in 1998. And totally agree with the whole patent thing. He tried to lay personal patent claim to the work I was doing on a Call-Flows project. I find it really funny that he we a mid level manager at AT&T through the 1990s, goes to Excite, kills the company, then comes back to AT&T as the head technology honcho.

    3. Re:Ex-AT&T Employee speaks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not that project. I was involved in TMAS and CADS though. He laid claim to all the RAPID patents. Hossein had a rabbi at the top of the company (President of NSD--name escapes me) that seemed to promote him constantly. But then Eslambolchi also had a way of strongarming him all the time too. Nothing demonstrates AT&T's fall into obscurity better than a low-life like Hossein being the CIO and CTO.

  42. Ink-on-newsprint would be more efficient by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    Why on earth would anyone want to have this kind of news delivered to them as a linear video stream of images of talking heads?

    Even ink-on-newsprint would be a more efficient way to deliver this, as it makes it easier to glance through the news and pick out the items of interest.

    Sounds like it would only be of use to what we used to call "magazine managers," people whose only knowledge was a shallow smattering of buzzwords picked from from BYTE and Datamation.

    Say! Maybe they could use this Internat thing, the World Wild Web I think they call it. I hear it has "links" that make it easy to "navigate" and you can even "download" files over it...

  43. Nahh, the PNN would have other news too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The Paranoid News Network would have other news too, like:

    Child kidnapped.
    New killer computer virus released.
    Adult kidnapped.
    Terrorist arrested.
    New killer human virus invades hospitals.
    Spyware on your desktop.
    Terrorist escapes capture.
    Spies get your SS#.

    Oh wait, we already have that.

  44. How useful is video? by mcc · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The adaptation of general journalism to film and television, as correctly noted by Dave Barry, has largely gradually taken the form where the journalistic entity will find something that a 'reporter' can stand in front of and then film them standing in front of it, talking about it. (Television journalism follows this idiom so strictly that if a story occurs which concerns something you inherently can't film someone standing in front of, television media will generally just not cover it.)

    I am just sitting here trying to figure out how, if at all, they will be able to adapt this idiom to computer security reporting.
    "...and we go to Sharon for the story."

    "Thanks bob. Well, as you can see, I'm standing in front of a TCP/IP packet and as you can plainly see, it is highly malformed."
    Aside from this, I wonder if they're going to adopt a Headline News style "looping tape" format, or if they'll have shows. I actually could totally go for a Snow-Crash-CIC-wet-work style "reality" show demonstrating various white and black hats at work.
    1. Re:How useful is video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can instantly imagine asian reporter Trisha Takinawa saying that line!

    2. Re:How useful is video? by mtenhagen · · Score: 1

      It could be brought as a weather report.

      "We have some zombie's spamming in the 43.23.x.x range which our likely to participate in a DoS tommorow evening"

      --
      200GB/2TB $7.95 Coupon: SAVE90DOLLAR
    3. Re:How useful is video? by springbox · · Score: 1
      It could be like:
      "...and we go to Sharon who is standing next to me in front of a blue screen for the story." (You know, like the Daily Show.)

      And if that doesn't work, they could just cut to people and have some random scenery behind them or the little bobbling opengl time screen saver

  45. This Idea Needs More Thought by ewhac · · Score: 1
    Congratulations. You've just created a broadcast forum for the disruptive antics of 5kr1p7 k1dd13s and h4x0r5:

    "Yo, b00tbl0ck!"
    "What up?"
    "My worm made ISN!"
    "Whoop-de-shit. Remember that AOL outage last week? Mine. ISN covered it for two days."
    "No way!"
    "Way. Props on your first ISN troll, dude, but l337 is not you."

    Just what we need.

    Schwab

  46. Some Good Points by Illix · · Score: 1
    Actually, come to think of it, would ISN consider doing investigative news? As in, checking the latest software for vulnerability, or investigating how companies are alerted to vulnerabilities and why and when they issue patches? If Microsoft knew that its latest vulnerability would be broadcast all over the internet, it would certainly force them to get working on a patch right away, or maybe even stop leaving so many in in the first place. ISN could even start covering the legal issues associated with network security, such as new laws to target crackers or virus writers or the prosecution of spammers or botnet runners.

    This might also be a great way for the technical community to start convincing the rest of the world that not all hackers are up to no good.

  47. AT&T shifting focus more to security by brennz · · Score: 1

    Disclaimer: I am an AT&T security employee

    Recently the talk has started about Aurora http://www.networkworld.com/news/2005/053005-auror a.html
    which was available internally for some time and more recently became an offering (in test).

    My own pet security project (OSS-based) within AT&T has recently been obtaining far more support too. I've also been in talks with some bigwigs about expanding some of our other security capabilities.

    Everyone I have been in discussions with has stated one thing clearly - AT&T is going to be moving seriously into security.

    1. Re:AT&T shifting focus more to security by mabu · · Score: 1

      Everyone I have been in discussions with has stated one thing clearly - AT&T is going to be moving seriously into security.

      If this is true, the first thing you need to do is filter all port 25 traffic from your broadband customers that isn't going to your SMTP relays. You do this, we'll have a noticeable drop in security problems on the Internet at large. Any other thing you do is trivial. Enforce your own TOS. If you don't allow broadband users to run their own servers, then you should be stopping infected machines from becoming zombies. You have the capability to do this. It doesn't require any major upgrades. AOL did it. AT&T needs to do it.

      FILTER PORT 25. If you do anything else, you'll not be taken serious. Wait a minute.. nobody takes AT&T seriously anyway, so maybe this is the first step in not being laughed at if you make claims about caring about anything other than raping customers financially.

    2. Re:AT&T shifting focus more to security by SComps · · Score: 1

      while I'm not a fan of AT&T, and even happen to agree that filtering port 25 would be a blessing... It does seem you're a little over focused here, and the parent poster may not have any influence on that particular segment of the business. Whether we like it or not, AT&T and most ISP's aren't mom and pop operations where one guy handles the entire security department, billing, and drives the rusty van to come out and check your router.

      Generally speaking if you've got a problem with an AT&T network, filter the particular networks at your border and get over it. That logic applies to any ISP or network. Really! If enough people start filtering networks their service becomes useless and changes have to be made. Do you honestly think AOL went about changing (some) of their ways from the goodness of their heart or as a reaction to all the *.ipt.aol.com blocks put on large network borders.

  48. why? by qwerbus · · Score: 1

    honestly. who will watch this? it doesn't sound interesting. it doesn't sound compelling. the best this could be is a nice altenative to msnbc as background noise.

    --
    the toothpaste is frozen
  49. Re:this is a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    feeding the troll. now, get back under the bridge.

  50. Hey, it's just like the weather channel... by feloneous+cat · · Score: 1

    But for the nerds that the OTHER nerds think are weird!

    --
    IANAL, but I've seen actors play them on TV
  51. Multiple Security Sources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To keep on top of activities, security wise, you need to get your information from multiple sources. This may or may not be a good source. It certainly won't be my only source.

    isc.sans.org
    cert.org

    are two good sources to start with...

  52. Re:I'm leaving for Miami in 10 minutes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bah, no it's not. Everyone knows Miami is the capital of Cuba. *ducks anonymously*

  53. There's thrill-a-minute TV for you by doc_traig · · Score: 1


    Coming up after the break, we'll go in-depth into the wild PHPNuke cross-scripting 'sploit released today by bl4ckh4t l4bz and ask experts if it really matters to anyone at all...

    --
    So long, michael. Don't let the door hit you...
  54. Like CNN--How Dreadful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Egads! Couldn't they have come up with a better analogy than CNN, the all-spin-all-the-time news network? CNN forces their propaganda on us in virtually every airport waiting area. It's like living under Stalin with speakers that can't be turned down in every village square. What sort of mind comes up with that?

    If they're like CNN, certain stories will be puffed much like CNN does environmental hysteria. If they're like CNN, other stories will be suppressed, much like CNN did Saddam's genocide. All done deliberately and willfully as part of a self-serving agenda. It's no accident that, given decent competiton, CNN's audience share has nosedived. Most people don't like being manipulated.

    No, if they can't think of a better analogy than CNN, they're not worth bookmarking on a browser. When someone draws a comparison to CSPAN, then I'll pay attention. I trust CSPAN to give all sides to a story.

    --Mike Perry, Editor, Eugenics and Other Evils

  55. How about ATH then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +++
    ATH
    NO CARRIER

  56. Can I make a suggestion? by AndyBassTbn · · Score: 1

    Can we get a web site traffic report?

    I can see it now - a web site describing who's recently been slashdotted or fark-ed. Hell, why not even include email updates with automatic mirrordot links?

    Yeah, I know, I know, not exactly security related per se, but nothing would help me out more sometimes than to know which direction the world's largest, legal, unintentional DDoS attack is pointing. :)

    --
    I hope the land around you yields, a crop like all the other fields, and then your waiting might make sense...
  57. Showcasing insecurity becomes laughing stock. by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    And of course this video+audio data will be delivered to viewers exclusively in a proprietary and/or patent-encumbered format which requires proprietary software to see and hear.

    Thus the irony: the software you will need in order to see the presentation is proprietary, and therefore, insecure by default--you can't legally inspect it to see what its doing when it runs. If you somehow learn that it is doing something you don't want it to do you can't legally improve it. And, to hold your community helpless, you can't legally share any improved version of the program with the community so that they don't have to live with the insecurity.

    No doubt, the self-licking ice cream cone of "popularity" will be offered as the rationale to lure users into this downward spiral.

    1. Re:Showcasing insecurity becomes laughing stock. by SComps · · Score: 1

      you would, of course, be completely free (in any sense of the word) to not view said production.

  58. AT&T and SBC Merger Not Complete by DavidDPD · · Score: 2, Informative

    For the lastest merger news. I believe is the public site for merger info.

    AT&T and SBC Merger is not yet complete, so the companies are suppose to proceed as still two companies.

    However, the time frame for this is after the merger SHOULD be complete - End of 05 or early 06. Though, this would seemly play very nicely with SBC IPTV plans for Project Lightspeed. Lightspeed PR

    All information in this post is based on public information released by SBC.

  59. Didn't Babylon 5 han an "ISN"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't ISN the Earth news network on the old Babylon 5 TV series? The one that got taken over by the Clark government, and turned into a propaganda service?

  60. AT&T uniquely qualified for this by mabu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Since a huge portion of their networks are the main source of security breaches. Maybe they can run 24-hour tickers showing the amount of spam, worms and viruses they are unable to control originating from their network, and at some point, one of their idiot executives will agree that port 25 needs to be filtered from their broadband users?

  61. Makes no sense by tedhiltonhead · · Score: 1

    What IT security admin has time to sit and watch a video feed during the day? Well-presented text is much more information-dense than video.

  62. President Clark 0wns ISN by FreeUser · · Score: 1

    11. Interstellar News

    Everyone knows ISN is just a mouthpiece for the Bush^H^H^H^H Clark administration, ever since they ordered the bombing of civilians in Iraq^H^H^H^H on Mars.

    I don't care what Sheridan says, anything coming from ISN should be taken with a grain of salt, post interregnum or not.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  63. Re:this is a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consider my blood pressure raised. When people like YOU, can just post crap like that the terrorists win! Your kind of scum make me sick, I'm going to go out and enact petty random violence and insult people because of that. Thanks for ruining my day.

    btw , that AT&T security channel sounds jolly good doesn't it. Now if the channel could be used to broadcast actual data/patches on a sidechannel that would also be neat.

  64. I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long it will be before black hats start using this as their toy. I mean, a lot of people have suggested the idea of the broadcast getting hacked. But, what about groups using it to taunt their rival hacking groups? Could this end up invoking more attacks so the groups get their names out more?

  65. Re:this is a troll by name773 · · Score: 1

    how very kind of you :)
    indeed it would be neat. does CNN's do that? i can't seem to find it...

  66. I can just see it... by dangrover · · Score: 1

    "A new Microsoft security hole threatens to kill you and your family. Film at 11!"

  67. I thought AT&T was dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought AT&T was bought out by Cingular and is no longer. Am I mistaken?

  68. Hacker's delight by tuxlove · · Score: 1

    Virus writers and script kiddies alike are going to love this channel. It will provide an awesome trophy for these losers. Getting your virus or exploit mentioned on the security channel will serve as great incentive to make ever more newsworthy attacks on the net. The more airtime it gets, the more successful you are...

  69. AT&T Mangled Security by krich · · Score: 2, Informative

    Having worked as a consultant for one of AT&T's Managed Security Centers, I can only weep for the people who rely on this "service".

    A few good people at lower levels, but middle and upper management was *completely* clueless about real security. Complete disorganization, and falsification of reports.

    But Hey! - now they'll be on video, so I guess that will make them the de facto experts.

  70. Re:this is a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It does.

    its called INFOTEXT or something of the sort.

  71. Will it have closed captioning? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    and if so, will the Second Language channel carry the byte codes of the virus defs themselves?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  72. Re:this is a troll by Mechcozmo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You mean, this is an idiot.

  73. Most. Boring. Channel. Ever! by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

    'Nuff said...

    --
    That is all.
  74. Replace "" with '" by tyrione · · Score: 1

    Subtle but when you quote an article quoting a commentary, piece of literature or any other possible scenario citing written word it would make Slashdot and any other site look more intelligent getting their punctuation fixed.

  75. Re:this is a troll by name773 · · Score: 1

    not quite. i was trying a new thing, you know, just to see how well it works. instead of going through all the trouble of spreading disinformation or saying something controversial, i decided to simply cut to the point and spare everyone the bother of getting ruffled up over something that really doesn't matter in the first place.

    apparently my new idea only served its intended purpose in the first two replies and not the third. oh well, i'm satisfied with two out of three :)

  76. oh really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will they also attempt to become as sensationalistic and irrelevant as CNN?

  77. Re:this is a troll by Mechcozmo · · Score: 1

    Parent is a trolling, idiotic genius.

  78. Memo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boss, I need a flatscreen TV...

  79. I feel by ResQuad · · Score: 1

    I feel safer knowing I wasnt the only one that when they first read "ISN" though "Interstellar Network News" from Bab5.

    I'd be really intrested in finding out if it was purposeful or not - Someone at ATT involved with this project is bound to be a B5 fan.

  80. Yes, that is what we need by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    Right when you network has crawled to a halt, you want ot tune into a broadband security video.

    RSS anyone? Just have some XML feed, and put effort into making the content so unbelievably timely and incisive that people will switch.

    That is where you money should go, the steak not the sizzle.

    Imagine, you want to know about *scriptkiddyvariant*

    20 seconds $1000000 video logo of A-T-&-T Security channel, bringing you security... blah blah blah - TTWENTY FOUR HOURS A DAY!!! baddab boom bom b de da deheda ede *jingle*

    And now, on todays *shit this has taken 1 minute already of streaming video*.....

    And now, the main event! !!!! ECHO ECHO ECHO

    Today *scriptkiddyvariant* was released, you are advised to like, you know, upgrade! I am ellen Feiss, whoring myself to a 2 bit internet tv venture!

    Lame.

    The people this would be aimed at would be execs, and lame ones at that. Think scaremongering and well placed, pay us you money, keep your job! ads.

    I just wait until they pay or use their influence to have them being watched on some up comin high tech hacker film.... you can imagine *insert trendy actor* (maybe female) is the worlds best security expert, knows EVERYTHING about computers,and is pitting her/his wits against some teen hackers we are h4cking t3h plan1t!

    However, if it wasn't for her broadband subscription to ATTsecuriTT.com videos, she would not win against them!

    dun dun duuuun! sucks

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  81. heck by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    At least it will provide kicks for those botnet operators...

    [Person Sitting At Computer]

    *click, click, click*

    [Phone rings, answered]

    Excited teenage voice: Hey d00d, look that's my attack on TV!

  82. New Windows secuity flaw discovered! by Strolls · · Score: 1

    More at 11!

  83. Re:this is a troll by SComps · · Score: 1

    It should be mod'd up to +5. That'll fix him!

  84. You can't help people by being willfully blind. by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    I don't know why people offer that as a viable option. It implicitly agrees with the parent stance by not criticizing its logic at all, yet simultaneously offers no course of action which allows people to help one another out of a fundamentally flawed situation. We should want to (and actually engage in) helping other people. My friends and neighbors might be amongst the viewers and, simply through ignorance of how computers work and what the free software movement proved is possible, might accept the bound-to-be-bad advice offered. I don't think they deserve to be treated that way.

    I've seen similar responses most recently around media criticism; point out how corporate news agencies will run government propaganda pieces as if they are news but they're really not, or point out how weapons manufacturers interests are served by the videogame-like war footage we see (Amy Goodman of "Democracy Now!" made this point in an intriguing talk she gave during a book tour), or point out an instance where pro-war voices are overrepresented in the popular news media and the almost non-sequitur response is "but you don't have to watch it! Just turn it off!".

    This response tries to reframe a systemic issue as a point of personal preference--it's not about how the proposed system is likely to fail people in making important decisions, ignoring objectionable behavior instead of pointing out its failings is about letting the system have its way with people unimpeded in the slightest way.