Slashdot Mirror


FCC Approves Sprint-Nextel Merger

Luke writes "Sprint and Nextel received approval from the Federal Communications Commission to merge to form the number three wireless company on Wednesday. FCC commissioners gave the companies unanimous support for the merger. The companies, which announced the merger on Dec. 14, 2004, expect to finalize the merger soon."

242 comments

  1. sprintel or nexprint? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    which is it gonna be?
    first post! ;)

    1. Re:sprintel or nexprint? by BrianRaker · · Score: 1

      Uh, this has been covered many times. It's going to be "Sprint Nextel".

      --
      As I walk through the valley of death I fear no one, for I am the meanest sonova bitch in the valley!
    2. Re:sprintel or nexprint? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its gonna be called notfirstpostel

    3. Re:sprintel or nexprint? by leon.gandalf · · Score: 0, Informative

      Actually its going to be Sprint Consumer (Current Sprint PCS) and Sprint Buesiness ( Nextel now that Sprint bought them)

    4. Re:sprintel or nexprint? by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      This worries me. Nextel rocks and sprint sucks. I have nextel, or specifically boost, their pay as you go service because the direct connect feature is just something I must have for my job. I have heard nothing but bad reviews from current and former sprint customers. I sure hope my prices don't go up while my service goes to hell. If so, no one else has direct connect. Everyone else's is just a phone. This could really suck!

      --
      How ya like dat?
    5. Re:sprintel or nexprint? by darth+dickinson · · Score: 1

      I'm glad you've had such success from Nexthell. At least here in the Birmingham, Alabama, US area, their coverage blows huge greasy monkey balls. I routinely drive through "dead areas" on major interstates, and the private 2-way service just stops working for hours at a time.

    6. Re:sprintel or nexprint? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like AT&T Comcast? That sure lasted long...

    7. Re:sprintel or nexprint? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another option is to take the last part of each company's name such as "int" and "tel," to give you Intel.

    8. Re:sprintel or nexprint? by BrianRaker · · Score: 1

      Is that Nextel or SouthernLinc? I know that SouthernLinc maintains a lot of the equipment south of Tennessee (i.e. South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama and Missisppi are big markets of theirs).

      --
      As I walk through the valley of death I fear no one, for I am the meanest sonova bitch in the valley!
    9. Re:sprintel or nexprint? by Icicle509 · · Score: 1
      Well, thats all relative I suppose, I for one am quite happy with SPrint.

      from what Ive read, your service will not change at all, they will still operate as two seperate customers, and poeple who had nextel will still have the exact same thing on the surface as they have always had... I believe that they plan on fitting nextel towers with Sprint techonology, and vice versa, so coverages for both companies should improve.

      I also read that they may be going with an all data network soon, which means your cell phone would basically be VOIP.

    10. Re:sprintel or nexprint? by whatch+durrin · · Score: 1
      I roll my eyes whenever I see a "Sprint sucks" or "T-Mobile" sucks comment.

      As many here are fond of saying, YMMV. It depends on where you are at any given time. I had Sprint for 2 years and changed to T-Mobile only because I wanted a cool phone. And the service stayed the same.

      Yes, I've had dropped calls with both carriers, but it's not to the point of saying the entire organization "sucks." And if you find that while at your house or office the coverage is very bad, you can contact the carrier and they will actually look into why that's the case. It doesn't mean they'll build a tower so you get coverage at your ranch in Wyoming, but they do want to improve their coverage in order to retain customers.

      For the record, I do not and have not ever worked for one of the carriers and own stock in none of them.

      --
      ***
      Radio Shack. You've got questions...we've got blank stares(TM).
  2. Yaaaay!! by xigxag · · Score: 5, Funny

    As we usher in a new era of reduced costs and consumer savings!!!!1!1

    --
    There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    1. Re:Yaaaay!! by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      not to mention the ever accelerating drain-circling spiral of layoffs, outsourcing, loss of employee moral, consolidation mismanagement, elimination of R&D, even poorer products and services, alienating customers, and plummeting stock valuation. w00h00, let the self-destructive dance of death begin!

    2. Re:Yaaaay!! by HardCase · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, when AT&T became Cingular, my rates went down, my minutes went up and my service got better. Of course, I was an AT&T customer, so the service couldn't have been any worse than it was, so anything would have been a step up.

      -h-

  3. Maybe I first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't wait to buy my first Sextent phone.

    1. Re:Maybe I first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      I can't wait to buy my first Sextent phone.
      I have one of those, it isn't all that great because it only works at night.
    2. Re:Maybe I first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So? For daytime hours I'll still have my Worktent.

    3. Re:Maybe I first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it isn't all that great because it only works at night.

      That's why you have two hands - 24 hour coverage.

    4. Re:Maybe I first to say by smyle · · Score: 1
      To the sibling posters (at least so far):

      You completely missed a perfectly good joke. Look at this definition

      --

      Sleep is just a poor substitute for caffeine, anyway. -Bob Lehmann

    5. Re:Maybe I first to say by Neward+Rylet · · Score: 1

      it's been a while since the last time I read a good Sextant joke on Slashdot.

  4. Fraternization by Seumas · · Score: 2, Funny

    So does this mean that people who work for Nextel are no longer allowed to fraternize with those who work for Sprint after the merger if that new labor law proposal passes? Or do they get some sort of grandfathered in "friendship/buddy" clause that allows them to still retain friendships and acquaintances in such an occurrence?

  5. The two worst. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe the shittiness of Nextel and Sprint will cancel eachother out?

    Ugh. Just what we need. This is like when your huge, fat, impotent, blubbering idiot of a third cousin marries your bitchy, chain-smoking, slut of a first cousin. Nothing can result from the union except terrible, retarded things.

    1. Re:The two worst. by Mr_Tulip · · Score: 1

      Hehe.. You made me chuckle aloud at work :)
      Keep up the good work!

    2. Re:The two worst. by Ruprecht+the+Monkeyb · · Score: 1

      If he's impotent, I don't think you have to worry about *anything* resulting from their union.

    3. Re:The two worst. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or as a friend of mine put it, "Sprint & Nextel: like two monkeys trying to fuck a football."

    4. Re:The two worst. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean to put the emphasis on *their*, not *anything*...even though you are wrong anyways. Point and shoot. Parasympathetic and sympathetic. Separate.

      iow, just because you can't point, don't mean you can't shoot. Of course, how long that takes to achieve, quality (rim shot versus dribble), where it goes, and how far up probably do factor in to the production of an *anything*.

    5. Re:The two worst. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, what?

    6. Re:The two worst. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mama's gonna be real mad at you!

  6. must be a slow day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    ... if this is what passes for "News for nerds."

    1. Re:must be a slow day... by whatch+durrin · · Score: 1

      You mean "The Nuts and Volts of News for Nerds"

      --
      ***
      Radio Shack. You've got questions...we've got blank stares(TM).
  7. Oh great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    So now we'll have lousy customer service (sprint) combined with that fabulous redneck mating call:

    {bee-deep} "Billy!"

    {bee-deep} "Yeah!"

    {bee-deep} "Where ya at?"

    {bee-deep} "At lunch!"

    {bee-deep} "What?"

    {bee-deep} "At luunncchh!"

    {bee-deep} "Where?" (...)

    1. Re:Oh great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FCC Approves Sprint-Nextel Merger

      I'm sure all the niggers will like this. Ever notice that they NEVER have any other service provider besides Sprint or Nextel? They're either too poor to afford a good service, or they're too retarded to get a GOOD service even when they can afford one. Fucking niggers.

  8. Just like K-mart/Sears by toddbu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can't believe that a great company like Nextel wants to merge with a crappy company like Sprint. It kind of reminds me when Sears merged with K-mart. The sad thing is that it's usually the weaker partner that wins out.

    --
    If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    1. Re:Just like K-mart/Sears by systemic+chaos · · Score: 1

      Obviously did it for the naming possibilities.

      Sextel?

    2. Re:Just like K-mart/Sears by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It kind of reminds me when Sears merged with K-mart. The sad thing is that it's usually the weaker partner that wins out.
      Out of curiosity, which do you think is the strong company in the Sears / K-Mart merger? One company in bankruptcy, and the other one on the brink...
    3. Re:Just like K-mart/Sears by Shimdaddy · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. Why a communications leviathan like Sprint would choose to merge with Nextel is beyond me. I think it would be really interesting to be in the Sprint board meetings to hear just what they think Nextel could bring to the pretty sweet deal Sprint already has going for it.

    4. Re:Just like K-mart/Sears by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Infastructure maybe? I can't iamgine what nextel might have that sprint doesnt though...

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    5. Re:Just like K-mart/Sears by swimin · · Score: 1

      Those annoying walkie talkie like phones.

    6. Re:Just like K-mart/Sears by covertlaw · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh God, I almost just fainted. I worked for Sprint before I went to law school, and then I worked for Sears during law school. Why do the companies I work for get so fucked up?

    7. Re:Just like K-mart/Sears by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, considering that Nextel has the best customer retention in the industry, makes the most money per hand-set, and the CEO of the new company will come from Nextel I have a feeling they see it differently than you.

      In all actuality, I believe this merger puts a lot of the spectrum in the hands of the new company. This will allow them to expand their markets to compete with DSL (potentially). Also if they can get private call working between their two networks, the economic "network effect" will bring the customers onto Sprint as the older Nextel technology shows its age.

    8. Re:Just like K-mart/Sears by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Well then, hopefully you are working for a law firm, and screwing that up would be a public service. :) :) :) (don't sue me!) :O :) :) :)

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    9. Re:Just like K-mart/Sears by shmlco · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know, but stay away from my company....

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    10. Re:Just like K-mart/Sears by Icicle509 · · Score: 1

      Sprint already has that..... its called ready link, and it sucks as bad as direct connect (nextel)

  9. What's the new name? by CypherXero · · Score: 3, Funny

    Spritel? Nexint? Vista?

    1. Re:What's the new name? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      PrixTel

    2. Re:What's the new name? by LinuxHam · · Score: 2, Funny

      Spritel? Nexint? Vista?

      Sprextel. Nint. Sprextint. Better yet, I'll see your "Vista" and raise you a "SpreXP".

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    3. Re:What's the new name? by Joe+Kepler · · Score: 1

      I work customer service for Nextel and we're all hoping for Sextel. ;)

    4. Re:What's the new name? by TMonks · · Score: 1

      They could always pull a cingular and just change the color of their logo.

      --
      I, for one, welcome our new karma-whore sig writing overlords
    5. Re:What's the new name? by august · · Score: 1

      >Spritel? Nexint? Vista?

      Sextel.

    6. Re:What's the new name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pull a cingular and just change the color of their logo

      I gotta admit, I do enjoy trying to spot all the places in their ads where they have "more bars". Whoever did that ad campaign did a good job, IMHO.

    7. Re:What's the new name? by Whizard · · Score: 1

      Everybody at Sprint was too. (I worked there up until last week, when I finally escaped.)

    8. Re:What's the new name? by blackmonday · · Score: 1

      Eventually the name will become SpriNextelMandriva.

    9. Re:What's the new name? by Mazaev2 · · Score: 1

      yeah, well.. no more fraternizing for you then.

    10. Re:What's the new name? by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      NextSex or Sprint 'n Tell.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
  10. Well.... by daspriest · · Score: 1

    ....so much for me switching my carrier to Nextel

  11. Mmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sextel?

  12. Technology by coflow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does anyone out there know what will happen from a network technology perspective? It seems to me that Nextel's iDen "standard" is entirely incompatible with Sprint. Will Spring just send Nextel customers new Sprint units? Then what happens to Push to Talk?

    1. Re:Technology by Wonko · · Score: 1

      Then what happens to Push to Talk?

      I would hope it would die, but unfortunately Sprint happens to have the same feature already anyway...

      Why do people bother with this? Why don't they just call each other? It is bad enough when I have to listen to half of a conversation. Now I get to sit in a restaraunt, or other public place, and hear:

      Phone: *BLEEP BLEEP* Hey, are you there?

      Guy: Yeah, I am here

      Phone: *BLEEP BLEEP* Where are you?

      Guy: I am at a restaurant.

      Phone: *BLEEP BLEEP* What did you say?

      Guy: AT A RESTAURANT

      Phone: *BLEEP BLEEP* Oh! At a restaurant!

      Does Nextel not give free mobile to mobile minutes? Do people not notice that they make their conversations so public like this?

      Lots of Nextel customers I have met actually think their phone works like a walkie talkie. They are amazed that it goes 300 miles, directly to the other cell!

    2. Re:Technology by coflow · · Score: 1

      I agree it's fairly useless for individuals, but the appeal of push to talk was mostly to companies that manage remote fleets.

    3. Re:Technology by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      "Does Nextel not give free mobile to mobile minutes?"

      AFAIK, that's true. Walkie-talkie mode is free, but dialing a phone number costs. I'm not sure why that is, but I think they should fix it.

      We all know how annoying W-T mode can be, but used correctly, it's very convenient.

    4. Re:Technology by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1
      Well many companies used, imagine a construction company and you don't have unlimited minutes to minutes and you need to have 10 people on one channel talking getting the order right there and then. I suspect that is what Sprint wants, the large Nextel contract with the many companies.

      But year "push to talk" is just stupid from a personal point of view, this is 21st century people should be just talking to each other over videophones soon.

    5. Re:Technology by damsa · · Score: 1

      I think Nextel has to switch technologies anyways as they are being removed from their current freq. So this makes some sense.

    6. Re:Technology by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would I want to look at people I am talking to over the phone?

    7. Re:Technology by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

      Does Nextel not give free mobile to mobile minutes? Do people not notice that they make their conversations so public like this?

      No free mobile-to-mobile minutes, but they are the only US carrier to offer unlimited free incoming calls 24x7 (like the rest of the civilized world) AFAIK. My friends have gotten used to me calling and saying "call me back!" or texting them to call me. I keep looking at a Cingular crackberry, but I use about 1600 minutes a month, and use only 200 of 600 plan minutes. My plan includes unlimited nationwide 2-way radio, but my wife's doesn't. So, to keep a short call free during peak hours, I alert her at home, she alerts me back, and then I initiate a DirectConnect with her. Unfortunately, if she takes more than 3 seconds or so to reply, then the call drops and she becomes the initiator, charging either minutes against her plan, or 10c/min if I'm in a different market.

      I'll need a metric assload of minutes if I'm going to give up free incoming calls. Besides, without Nextel, what am I going to hook up my aweseome yellow Nextel Cup pit crew headsets to? Its a joke, people.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    8. Re:Technology by wasted+time · · Score: 3, Funny
      Why would I want to look at people I am talking to over the phone?

      You must be new here.
      Think of the phone sex possibilities.

      On second thought...

      --
      The Stone Age did not end because humans ran out of stones. - William McDonough
    9. Re:Technology by CoderBob · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's called letting our phone work for us. With the two-way feature, I can talk to someone with the phone sitting on my chest while I'm laying down trying to track network cable. In the car, I can beep someone, and if they are available they can talk- if not, they aren't interrupted by a continuous phone ring.

      Some people misuse it, this is true. Explain to them that the little "speaker" button on the top of their phone turns off the speaker-phone aspect. This means they have to hold it like a regular phone, but when they are in public it doesn't irritate as many people.

    10. Re:Technology by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "Why do people bother with this? Why don't they just call each other? It is bad enough when I have to listen to half of a conversation. Now I get to sit in a restaraunt, or other public place, and hear"

      I absolutely hate the push-to-talk/walkie talkie Nextel and Sprint phones. It is turning all of their customers "ghetto fabulous" when it comes to public manners.

      The walkie talkie users should get a clue and understand that the rest of us don't even want to hear ONE side of the conversation from them.

      Instead of investigating steroids in professional baseball, perhaps Congress should pass a law banning such devices since they are public nuisances. Or at least restrict them to businesses.

      Then again, shutting down Sprint PCS itself would deprive pimps, bangers and hoods of legitimately purchased mobile phones since they couldn't pass Cingular's rather restrictive credit checks.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    11. Re:Technology by LinuxHam · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Nextel has to switch technologies anyways as they are being removed from their current freq

      Which is an important point here missed by many. Nextel, in effort to offer to step out of the way of emergency services was granted back in February the right to exchange the crappy frequencies they built their business on for awesome new ones for half off. Saved billions in the process.

      1. Buy up radio licenses from trucking companies operating in 800MHz all over the country.
      2. Build a cellular network with those frequencies geared towards business (i.e. markup city)
      3. Pound the emegency service radios until they beg the FCC to do something.
      4. Exchange the crappy, life-threatening frequencies for shiny new ones at fire sale prices.

      Maybe we'll get some interesting new services on those frequencies. Crap, I forgot "profit" somewhere in there.

      "Nextel, the #1 preferred carrier for delivery boys, tow truck drivers and construction workers in all 50 states. 51 if you count Canada."

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    12. Re:Technology by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

      Do you really think it should be that difficult to make phone calls?

      No, it sucks, you're right! I would gladly trade free unlimited national 2-way radio for free mobile-to-mobile calls and nights that start at 7pm. But its not there yet, and no one else can touch the free incoming calls 24x7 in the states. I'm not talking $250 totally unlimited plans, I'm talking $60/mo to never pay for an inbound call.

      Sometimes I wish I knew a number to call to leave a voicemail for my friends so they'd think they just missed my call ;) "Geez, I didn't even hear it ring!"

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    13. Re:Technology by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      You obviously have never done contract work in the field. The ability to ping people you are working with real quick without making an official phone call is great.

      Having said that, people who use the feature for purposes other than coordinating work (whether that be business work, or personal work) are retarded. You don't ping your buddy at the restaurant to see if he wants to go to the bar tonight. You call him like normal.

    14. Re:Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since no one has given a "real" response to the questions posed, I figure I'd chime in. I was a Nextel customer for the past 2 years so I got a ton of mail regarding the whole merger.

      What it boils down to: if you have a Nextel phone now, there's nothing to worry about because they won't be updating their network for a number of years (I think they said around 2010).

    15. Re:Technology by Wonko · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You obviously have never done contract work in the field. The ability to ping people you are working with real quick without making an official phone call is great.

      Text messaging is usually good for such things. The receiver does not have to respond right away, and they can read the message more than once. I would imagine a vibrating phone/2-way is less of a disturbance than a phone going '*BLEEP BLEEP* Are you there?'

      You may even be able to send out a quick text reply without interrupting anyone else.

      You don't ping your buddy at the restaurant to see if he wants to go to the bar tonight.

      Actually, text messaging is quite good for this. I do not need to know that he is going right this minute. He can likely tell me any time in the next few hours. Of course, I have no idea if he is in a meeting, napping, out to lunch with someone important. I do not need to know, he can respond any time.

      Please correct me if I am mistaken, but it seems to me that text messaging and push to talk are both best used for asyncronous communications. Don't push to talk messages disappear immediately after you hear them, or are they saved? I am under the impression that they disappear. For me, that would severely limit its uses...

      I have to admit though, text messaging was much easier on my old Motorola 2 way pager than it is on the average cell phone. I can probably thumb about 4-6 characters per second on those things... I imagine I am more like 1-2 on a phone :).

    16. Re:Technology by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1
      Well, you and your family could get a Verizon family share plan with 1000 minutes for $70 and free mobile to mobile. I talk to my wife everyday at least once during lunch time and don't have to worry about running over or counting days till the end of month.

      Chances are some of your friends will have Verizon too. You'll get good signal quality, good customer service and no need to ask people to "call you back", you can talk to you wife as much as you can. And no I don't work for them. I switched to Verizon after having ATT a while back and getting screwed with a huge bill, insance roaming charges while on vacation (I also got free roaming with V.) and only 500 minutes for about the same price.

    17. Re:Technology by Arthemys · · Score: 1

      I run Nextel credit checks for a living. Passing a Nextel credit check is much harder, and is practically the most stringent.

    18. Re:Technology by Arthemys · · Score: 1

      If the person you are trying to reach is a Nextel subscriber, then you can dial 1-(area code)-(their exchange)-MAIL

      Then it will prompt you for their phone number.

      For example, my phone number is 1-802-839-xxxx
      So the number to dial is 1-802-839-6245

    19. Re:Technology by Arthemys · · Score: 1

      Direct-Connect doesn't have to be as annoying as everyone makes it be if they used the privacy button. This disables the external speaker and makes it just like a regular phone call but utilizes the Direct-Connect feature.

      Direct-Connect and regular phone calls are very similar but they do use different types of equipment in the backend. DC calls use dispatch mode for the handsets and is billed to the second instead of to the minute if the rate plan does not include unlimited DC minutes.

      Certain handsets offer Direct-Talk, which is an off network version of Direct-Connect that works even if the phone doesn't have a signal from the tower. But then, you're limited to a four mile radius of contacting other Direct-Talk handsets.

      For sake of ease, "it just is."

    20. Re:Technology by thogard · · Score: 1

      You forgot:
      0. Be high up in the FCC when you get the idea.

    21. Re:Technology by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "I run Nextel credit checks for a living. Passing a Nextel credit check is much harder, and is practically the most stringent."

      Maybe so, but Sprint's credit check is not...

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    22. Re:Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very cool, thanks!

    23. Re:Technology by CarnivoreMan · · Score: 1

      lol, I know what you mean. Most my buddies seem to exclusively use Push-to-Talk on speaker, when I think you can even do it in non-speaker-phone mode... regardless, I just signed up for Nextel and got my phone yesterday... I hope I dont become one of... "those people" .. =)

    24. Re:Technology by romka1 · · Score: 1

      We don't have nextel in canada

      --
      Visit my site @ http://www.madtorrent.com
    25. Re:Technology by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      Sounds like Nextel has been doing a good job of investing in politicians -- which is a good idea since it has about a 1000% return for every "donation" dollar spent.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    26. Re:Technology by Moofie · · Score: 1

      This makes absolutely no sense to me.

      My phone has a speakerphone feature, and no two way feature.

      If I don't want to hear my phone ring, I turn it on silent mode. Again: No two-way feature required.

      The reason there exists a "two-way" feature is so that Nextel can charge you premium prices for a crappy half-duplex phone call.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    27. Re:Technology by CoderBob · · Score: 1

      Umm...charge me premium prices? I don't pay that much for my limited number of phone minutes + unlimited two-way.

      It isn't just like speakerphone, either. The time spent on two-way only accumulates as you TALK. I beep you, talk for a short period of time, and then wait for your response. I don't lose time waiting for you to get back to me. Also, the fact that it isn't a true speakerphone means that if there is noise on the other end, it doesn't interrupt what I'm trying to say. Try doing that with speakerphone.

      Until you have one and use it, you don't realize how convenient it can be. If people would be a little more polite about it, you wouldn't notice it as much.

      Regarding silent mode: Still, the fact that a single beep (or buzz, in silent mode) can let me know someone is trying to reach me is a lot nicer than the continual buzzing of a phone ringer while I'm talking to a client or in a line somewhere.

    28. Re:Technology by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      Text messaging? No way in hell. The last thing you want to be doing when you are on a roof balancing some equipment with your hands is try to punch in some text on a phone keypad. All you want to do is barely get 1 thumb free to press the talk button so you can yell "I need some help up here!". However, text messaging your buddies to see if they want to go to a bar tonight is fine.

    29. Re:Technology by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "The time spent on two-way only accumulates as you TALK. I beep you, talk for a short period of time, and then wait for your response. I don't lose time waiting for you to get back to me."

      If you're worried about me wasting your time, don't call me.

      "Still, the fact that a single beep (or buzz, in silent mode) can let me know someone is trying to reach me is a lot nicer than the continual buzzing of a phone ringer while I'm talking to a client or in a line somewhere."

      This is different from other phones how exactly? My Treo has a switch on the top. When I put it in silent mode, it vibrates once and leaves me alone. Why do I need the two-way?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    30. Re:Technology by r0dent · · Score: 1

      Nextel has stated they'll support iDEN and new handsets until 2010.

      --
      -rodent
  13. Who profits from it? by drgonzo59 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Sprint and Nextel have different infrastructures. Sprint is CDMA (like Verizon) and Nextel uses a Motorola proprietary standard. It would have made sense for Sprint and Verizon to merge.

    Would they have to privide dual chipset phones to take advantage of all the Nextel infrastructure? I suspect Motorola will lose out, because CDMA seems to be better suited for the future and is used more widely. Nextel will probably be converted to CDMA and Sprint will get the huge Nextel corporate contracts as soon as it can implement the local "walkie-talkie" feature that Nextel customers love so much.

    1. Re:Who profits from it? by bstreiff · · Score: 1

      Sprint has the 'walkie-talkie' feature. It's called Ready Link.

    2. Re:Who profits from it? by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

      I didn't know, it must be a recent feature. But I think the phones still don't work like real 'walkie-talies' they still have to go to the nearest cell tower. So if you are out in the woods, you still can't use it. But if you can reach a cell tower, why not just call other?

    3. Re:Who profits from it? by bstreiff · · Score: 1

      It's at least a year old; My Sanyo 4920 (sigh, the 4900 was so much better) is RL-capable, and I've had it for just over a year now.

      I've never actually used Ready Link-- full-duplex communication seems much more logical.

    4. Re:Who profits from it? by desenz · · Score: 1

      To be fashionable! But you're right, theres still a varying delay that depends on network traffic. THe worst i've seen though, is around half a second. At best, its almost unnoticable. I work for radioshack, and we tested the system by standing next to each other at various times of the day. The clarity is far better then nextels system though.

    5. Re:Who profits from it? by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

      But I think the phones still don't work like real 'walkie-talies' they still have to go to the nearest cell tower

      The i850 now has an off-network walkie-talkie. And the walkie-talkie vs normal cell calls is more useful than it seems. Don't get me wrong, I want to shove it down peoples' throats when they use it in restaurants, but it is useful at times.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    6. Re:Who profits from it? by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      I still have a 4900 but hey 95% of america will be 5 minutes working or living from a place they can buy a Nextel Phone VERY SOON NOW

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    7. Re:Who profits from it? by ki4iib · · Score: 1

      I hate to break it to you, but Nextels don't work like real walkie-talkies either. They still have to hit a NEXTEL tower. And, as a friendly note, they can ONLY hit NEXTEL towers, because, as advertised, you -can't roam-. This doesn't mean that NEXTEL eats the usage charges FOR you. It just means that, unlike every other carrier, if you're out of range of a NEXTEL tower, that's just too bad, no communications for you. I've never used Sprint's push-to-talk feature, honestly, but Nextel seems to have that market cornered. I used to sell both Sprint and Verizon phones (okay, okay - I didn't TRY to sell Sprint; I was just SUPPOSED to sell Sprint. I sold Verizon whenever I could), and the NEXTELs beat Sprint's handie-talkie feature. Because really - who do you know with Sprint Ready-Link?

    8. Re:Who profits from it? by blindseer · · Score: 1

      From what I understand the merger makes perfect sense because of the mismatched technologies. I heard that Nextel has to move out of its 800MHz spectrum to some where else, something like the FCC wanting to give the frequencies to public service two-way radio (police and fire). Nextel can't just go and buy all new equipment overnight so it put itself up for sale. Sprint is already using the 1900MHz PCS band for its phones so no worries about 800MHz towers. What is basically happening is that Sprint is buying the Nextel customer base. As Nextel customers upgrade phones they will be buying Sprint PCS versions to replace their old Nextel versions.

      I don't think that the new phones would vary much from what Sprint is already offering. Sprint phones already have roaming capability on other (non-PCS) towers.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    9. Re:Who profits from it? by kinema · · Score: 1

      I work indirectly for Nextel. The plan is that Nextel's iDEN network will be operated in place until 2010. In the mean time customers will be encouraged to move to Sprint's up coming EV-DO/CDMA2000 based net. After 2010 the iDEN network will be taken offline. Sprint's current net will have Push-to-talk (PTT) capability graphed onto it and users of both networks will be able to PTT each other. What do I think? I think it will fail miserably. In a few years I think that Verizon's bet on rolling out EV-DO coast to coast before anyone else will pay off and Sprint (the new Sprint-Nextel company is taking Sprint's name) and Cingular will feel it. (I'm not sure about T-Mobile as they provide basicly a low cost no frills phone only service.)

    10. Re:Who profits from it? by dieman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, nationwide EDGE (slowly rolling out in markets, its here in the Twin Cities and all of the Minnesota roaming) for $30 bucks. You keep on wasting that extra $50/mo!

      [I'm talking about standalone pcmcia card service, unlimited use. Yes, I know EV-DO is better, but its going to take a long time for coast to coast. By that time we're going to see Flash-OFDM deployed in major cities, anyhow]

      --
      -- dieman - Scott Dier
    11. Re:Who profits from it? by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      It would have made sense for Sprint and Verizon to merge.

      From a technical standpoint, this is true. However, as luck would have it, I bet if Verizon and Sprint merged, you'd get Sprint's terrible coverage combined with Verizon's terrible customer service!

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    12. Re:Who profits from it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad it costs an extra $15/month on top of my already rediculous monthly bill of $85.

    13. Re:Who profits from it? by YodaToad · · Score: 1

      Terrible coverage? From my experience Sprint has great coverage. Over the last 3 or so years that I've had sprint I've been all around the US and I've only lost my signal in places where I'd expect to (in the middle of nowhere in a valley, for example). There have been many times where I have an excellent signal and other people with me on different providers have little or no signal at all.

    14. Re:Who profits from it? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Look at the frequency plans for the nextel system. It goes through an analog repeater network. In other words, your walkie-talkie feature broadcasts everything you say in the clear, possibly across state lines depending on how the repeaters are linked. I assume that the repeaters are placed on the same towers as the cells because if they aren't, why not put a cell there once you have the tower?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    15. Re:Who profits from it? by CharlieHedlin · · Score: 1

      You must be lucky then. I have used VzW and Sprint, and the VzW network is consistantly supperior. I have found that network coverage varies regionally.

      In my office the only carrier that works is Verizon. Their customer service sucks though, and Sprint's is generally good.

    16. Re:Who profits from it? by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1
      Well that was the point of my post. Neither Nextel (except for a new Motorola phone i850 that some coment mentioned) nor Sprint's 'walkie-talkies' work without a tower. So if you are in Montana in the woods, you still need to get real 'walkie-talkies' (also watch for the bears!).

      But if you are close enough to the towers, why not just call the other person? With voice activated dialing, it is not much slower then 'push-to-talk'

  14. in other telco news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Verizon wants is in attempts to purchase MCI. Got it in a postcard from the state regulators yesterday...

    1. Re:in other telco news... by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      Wtf? Can anyone else read that sentence to me please?

    2. Re:in other telco news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it says that the parent poster got a postcard from state regulators saying that verizon wants to merge.

    3. Re:in other telco news... by shmlco · · Score: 1

      Sure. "Verizon wants is in attempts to purchase MCI. Got it in a postcard from the state regulators yesterday..."

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    4. Re:in other telco news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't decide whether to type "wants to merge with" or "is attempting to purchase." Thus, I typed neither.

      Forgive me, I wrote a four page term paper and nine pages of proofs in the last twenty four hours...

    5. Re:in other telco news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and here is the URL for the Verizon/MCI merger or purchase (the postcard mentions both terms):

      http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/proceedings/A0504020.htm

  15. iDen to Go? by Trip+Ericson · · Score: 1

    Based on the press release, it appears that Nextel will be dropping their iDen network in favor of CDMA (or rather migrating)... raising the somewhat stupid question of "why?" I would have expected them to migrate Sprint over to iDen.

    Can someone explain what sense this makes? Wouldn't Nextel have some interest in keeping the iDen network going instead of paying royalties over CDMA? Or is the cost of continuing to build out the iDen network more than the royalties? Or am I misunderstanding the whole thing?

    I'm very confused.

    1. Re:iDen to Go? by coflow · · Score: 1

      I'm confused too, although AFAIK, iDen is limited in terms of bandwidth capabilities when compared to 3G versions of CDMA and TDMA.

      I also know from having owned a Nextel and a Verizon phone, that the iDen network is fairly limited in terms of coverage across the country, but I've also heard from Spring owners that their network is equally limited.

    2. Re:iDen to Go? by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1
      CMDA is more efficient and I think Motorola is the only builder of the iDen technology equipment, while CDMA stuff is built by many companies (especially in Asia), even though Qualcomm still holds the CDMA patents. I've heard that CDMA is the next gen technology and that eventually even Cingular+ATT will have to migrate if they want to keep up (UMTS is a wideband CDMA) so that means huge costs for GSM providers to replace their equipment.

      I'll stick (or should I say - I am stuck for 2 yrs. ) to Verzon, == the Microsoft of wireless, for now. They are in the best position from engineering/technology point of view.

    3. Re:iDen to Go? by ckulpa · · Score: 1

      iDen is based on TDMA(Time Division Multiple Access), just like GSM. CDMA2001X (What Verizon uses) has a smoother upgrade path to 3G. TDMA has to go through GSM and EDGE to get to UMTS(WCDMA).

    4. Re:iDen to Go? by IronTek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Given that GSM is the defacto standard in Europe and many other parts of the world, and has covered a lot of ground in the US in the past couple of years, I think it's safe to say that GSM (and TDMA by extension) isn't going anywhere anytime soon.

    5. Re:iDen to Go? by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1
      From a technology point of view there are certain limitations that cannot be overcome. GSM was standardized in Europe by goverment control because they thought CDMA was imposible. Then Qualcomm developed the technology. It is much more efficient. So when it comes to fast data transmission, CDMA has more room for improvement. That means more customers, talking and sending data at the same time at a faster speed = profit. As of now GSM is still good enough, but in the future the US GSM companies are already looking at UMTS, which is CDMA based = big costs converting a lot of infrastructure, make no mistake they will pass that on to customers one way or another.

      This is a good read with illustration and such: umtsworld

    6. Re:iDen to Go? by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't Nextel have some interest in keeping the iDen network going instead of paying royalties over CDMA? Or is the cost of continuing to build out the iDen network more than the royalties? Or am I misunderstanding the whole thing?

      1. Are they not paying royalties on iDEN? CDMA is a more open standard, simply because more than one manufacturer is able to make equipment. All iDEN equipment is Motorola, because Motorola owns iDEN and won't make it available to anyone else.

      2. The iDEN network is saturated. It needs to be built out, especially if you are going to add users.

      3. The iDEN network is causing interference to other users of the band it is on, therefore it cannot be built out.

      4. CDMA, as implemented by Sprint, has better voice quality than iDEN. This is due to a higher bitrate (13kb/s vs. 8kb/s).

      5. CDMA, in the scope of a single cell, is less spectrally efficient than iDEN, but in the scope of a network is more spectrally efficient, because all cells in a CDMA network can use the same carrier frequency at the same time, vs. iDEN, which needs a separate carrier frequency for every 3 phone calls or every 6 PTT calls.

      6. Ready Link (Sprints PTT service) sounds better than Direct Connect (Nextel's PTT service). Presumably this is for the same reason as the better phone call quality.

      7. iDEN operates in the clear; CDMA is encrypted.

      The only thing that Nextel's iDEN network has in its favour is that it is operated on a lower frequency with better propagation characteristics. Nextel operates on 800 MHz, where Sprint operates on 1900 MHz, which is more succeptible to interference from reflections and has greater line-of-sight issues.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    7. Re:iDen to Go? by VeriTea · · Score: 1

      CDMA as implemented by Sprint uses 8kb/s vocoders. They replaced all of the 13kb/s ones in late 2000. The voice quality is still much better though since the EVRC (enhanced variable rate c...) benefited from several years of additional vocoder research.

      --
      --- There are two kinds of people, those who accept dogmas and know it, and those who accept dogmas and don't know it
    8. Re:iDen to Go? by ithicine · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for other carriers, but Cingular has placed WCDMA and HSDPA (an upgraded version of WCDMA often called 3.5G) in its upgrade path for the entire network.

      The main reason old AT&T customers still cling to TDMA was the better coverage. Using lower frequency bands than in the 1900/850MHz pair used in (Cingular's, at least) GSM, wireless devices could get a clear signal far further from a tower than 2.5G GSM ever could. With HSDPA, the band used is dropped to 850MHz, thus extending the coverage range per tower, all while offering 14.4MB/s data transfer rates.

      So yes, interestingly enough, TDMA will indeed be biting the dust relatively soon (as far as getting 2G coverage from AT&T, anyway). It's already extremely difficult to get a replacement for that TDMA phone from AT&T/Cingular; TDMA is being actively phased out by Cingular in an attempt to unify the network and simply absorb whatever is left of AT&T Wireless.

      As for GSM vs. CDMA... with each revision, GSM is becoming more like the latest CDMA. The specs are growing close enough together that transitioning from a limited 2.5G GSM system to a high speed HSDPA system with UMTS can be done relatively painlessly.

  16. My suggestion by Y-Crate · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The FCC should have mandated the removal of the "Push To Talk Feature" as part of the agreement. When you live in a society that has lost all concept of manners (and don't say the South is still some shining example, because I just lived there for 3 years and it is becoming just as vapid and rude as any place else) something that basically enables people to be even bigger assholes in public is the last thing we need.

    Inevitably, you have soccer moms and ghetto thugs (or wannabes) blasting their conversations across the entire room, and for some reason they feel the need to shout even louder than they normally would on a cell phone. (another thing that drives me nuts)

    1. Re:My suggestion by Ryosen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Interesting. You were modded as a Troll. Methinks some boarish, obnoxious, inconsiderate, soccer-mom driving, ghetto-thug-bangin', Boost mobile-using, louder-than-a-boom-box-talking, commuter-train-riding moderator doth protest too much.

      --

      Ryosen
      One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
    2. Re:My suggestion by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Isn't it bad manners to curse in a public forum?

    3. Re:My suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. What makes you think that?

    4. Re:My suggestion by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is sadly quite true.

      What began as a useful feature for business users, has become the height of obnoxiousness when used by individuals. It's unfortunate that it wasn't kept just to the expensive ruggedized Motorola-Nextel commercial handsets. You don't see regular people walking around using business two-way radios in public, and you shouldn't use a PTT cellphone either.

      The only thing more expensive, IMO, are polyphonic ringtones. Whoever thought that it was a cool idea to allow every idiot with a cellphone to subject everyone around them to their favorite rap song or cartoon jingle, needs to be shot.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    5. Re:My suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just lived there for 3 years and it is becoming just as vapid and rude as any place else

      I've lived here 24 years. It's not becoming vapid and rude. We've been bangin' vapid and rude my whole life, and apparently it's been so long before that, too. Our primary exports are vapidity and rudeness. Our food is rude, and the people who make it are vapid. Our government made rudeness our official state temperment, and vapidity a required trait for all land-owning males over the age of 10.

      You can be prevented from entering the South without proof of vapidity. Unvapid absences will count against your attendance grade. If you are rude to your teacher, you will go far.

      Our mamas are so vapid and rude, they go out of their way to crash your party just to loudly complain about how much fun it isn't on their cell phones.

      VAPIDITY IS A FUN WORD TO WRITE AND SAY VAPIDLY /South Louisiana

    6. Re:My suggestion by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "When you live in a society that has lost all concept of manners (and don't say the South is still some shining example, because I just lived there for 3 years and it is becoming just as vapid and rude as any place else) something that basically enables people to be even bigger assholes in public is the last thing we need.
      Inevitably, you have soccer moms and ghetto thugs (or wannabes) blasting their conversations across the entire room, and for some reason they feel the need to shout even louder than they normally would on a cell phone. (another thing that drives me nuts)."

      The correct term when referencing what you deed "rude" is "ghetto fabulous." Now, find the TPS Report cover for this memo.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    7. Re:My suggestion by jrboatright · · Score: 1

      Sprint _has_ push to talk technology (they call it "Readylink"

    8. Re:My suggestion by Y-Crate · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What began as a useful feature for business users, has become the height of obnoxiousness when used by individuals. It's unfortunate that it wasn't kept just to the expensive ruggedized Motorola-Nextel commercial handsets. You don't see regular people walking around using business two-way radios in public, and you shouldn't use a PTT cellphone either.

      Agreed, I would have been much happier if they had just migrated the ruggedized handsets to the consumer market and left PTT with the business types. I'm the kind of person who would love to get a really, really sturdy full-featured phone. There is nothing worse than the Black Screen Of Death from a cracked LCD. I'm hoping that they will wake up to the demand some day.

      The only thing more expensive, IMO, are polyphonic ringtones. Whoever thought that it was a cool idea to allow every idiot with a cellphone to subject everyone around them to their favorite rap song or cartoon jingle, needs to be shot.

      I hated polys, that is until I downloaded "The Pink Panther Theme". It just works so well and actually gets me compliments for its unobtrusiveness and pleasant sound. Then again, I've never met anyone who hated the "Pink Panther Theme".

    9. Re:My suggestion by albeit+unknown · · Score: 1

      What's far, far worse than the blasted chatter is the little "chirp" that precedes every transmission. Gaaaahh!

    10. Re:My suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. So go fuck yourself you worthless, shitty bastard.

    11. Re:My suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of attacking freedom (via government acting on your behalf, at the expense of everyone who couldn't care less about your personal problems), why not take responsibility for your own damn self and let the person know that they're offending you? Or are you one of those people who calls the cops first when the neighbor plays his music too loud, as if I and the rest of society owes you something for being offended?

      Personal responsibility. Learn to use it. Be your own person, not a salesman for more government.

    12. Re:My suggestion by dragonman97 · · Score: 1

      I have a Nextel, and would have to disagree with your call for the complete removal of PTT. Consumers should not be using Nextels - there is *no* question about that. I really do not understand why the hell anyone would spend $80/mo on a Nextel for personal use. I knew a few people who did that, and was annoyed by their stupid use of them.

      On the other hand, my Nextel is for business use, and it is invaluable at times. It's called "Direct Connect" for a reason - if I had to wait for a full connect via a regular phone, every single time I needed to reach someone, for a brief confirmation of something, I would definitely be less productive, as would my colleagues. However, if I had to call for a single feature's removal, it would be the "Alert" - oh how I hate that thing. (The /only/ thing it's useful for is finding your phone if you leave it someone and forget precisely where it's located (under a pile of papers.))

    13. Re:My suggestion by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Actually, one of the main reasons for the merger was so Nextel could roll out their next generation PTT which runs on the CDMA network. Merging with Sprint means they don't have to go out and build a completely new infrastructure to support the new features. That's also why Verizion cried foul last year when Nextel was allowed to buy frequency spectrum at a fraction of what is normally charged in return for selling back the lower frequency spectrum they use now (at reduced charge) so it can be used for emergency services. Sprint benefits by geting a much larger piece of the spectrum for its high speed initiatives
       
      How quickly they forget.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  17. Only Reason... by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1
    ...they did this was to combine their infrastructures to compete with Verizons 3G Initiative.

    Broadband Mobile Wi-Fi Enabled cars on the highway sound nice.

  18. And the new name of the compay is... by jvj1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sextel

  19. Sprint Campus made irrelevant by theurge14 · · Score: 1

    All the execs are moving to Nextel's Reston, VA location, making the massive, expensive Sprint campus a waste of time.

    Oh wait, sorry, it's still used for "operations".

    1. Re:Sprint Campus made irrelevant by 1310nm · · Score: 1

      Overland Park, KS?

      MCI's HQ is in Ashburn, VA now.

      I'm excited about this because I'm in a Sprint wireless contract for 2 years.

    2. Re:Sprint Campus made irrelevant by covertlaw · · Score: 1

      Wrong. They're moving to Reston to clean the place out. You really think they're going to flush the three-year-old Overland Park Campus down the toilet? Hell no. They laid off half the company just so everyone in Kansas City could fit on the campus. They're going to hand pick the people from Reston who'll remain to convert everything over to CDMA, then turn out the lights in Virginia.

  20. So hows does this work out... by tgd · · Score: 1

    When two sucky cellular providers merge is that bad because you've got one double sucky provider, or is it better because you've got one less sucky provider?

    1. Re:So hows does this work out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends on whether you want a sucky provider or a good provider.

      Does sucking more make it worse, or better?

    2. Re:So hows does this work out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this case the suckiness of Verizon has no impact on the merger because Sprint sucks so bad that it has long since collapsed into a suck hole with an inescapable suck horizon.

      Anything that comes near Sprint - affiliates, managers, customers, and other telecom providers will enter a region of time-like space and take a one-way trip to the suckularity.

      From the outside we may only see a slight increase in the mass of the suck hole and breadth of the suck horizon.

  21. Re:However, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, yes, yes. But what does this mean for the men in his parent's basement?

  22. NASCAR!! by PFritz21 · · Score: 1

    I don't think I can get all psyched up for the NASCAR Sprint Cup. NASCAR Nextel Cup rolls off the tongue so much better.

    1. Re:NASCAR!! by bluelip · · Score: 1

      Aren't Sprint cars an entirely different class than those in the Nascar Nextel Cup?

      --

      Yep, I never spell check.
      More incorrect spellings can be found he
    2. Re:NASCAR!! by rbinns · · Score: 1

      Depending on the final name of the new company, I'd say that they'd either change it to Sprint Cup (dumb idea IMO) or they would incorporate the name into the chase at the end of the season. Perhaps instead of the chase they'll call it the "Sprint to the Cup".

  23. The most important question by SetupWeasel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What will the NASCAR championship be called now?

    1. Re:The most important question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What will the NASCAR championship be called now?"

      A show for redneck idiots, 99% of whom should not be allowed to
      reproduce, because there are only so many blue collar jobs available.

    2. Re:The most important question by demachina · · Score: 1

      Sprint cars?

      Sorry, bad racing joke.

      --
      @de_machina
    3. Re:The most important question by All+Names+Have+Been · · Score: 1

      The Sextel Racing Cup.

    4. Re:The most important question by Leolo · · Score: 1

      Boring?

  24. Will things get better? by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm a Sprint customer right now, and I can honestly say Sprint sucks. Granted, everyone has horror stories about any one particular wireless provider (none are perfect), but the issues I've had with Sprint have been insane.

    It's not so much the service itself (which is not great, I still get dropped calls from time to time, but it's acceptable). It's their crummy customer service and problem resolution system. They disconnected my service 'accidentally', claiming I hadn't paid my bill when I had, despite the fact their customer service reps told me their computers showed a credit on my account followed by a "I don't understand why this happened. Don't worry, we'll fix it. Your service will be on within four hours." Four hours would pass, no service, I'd call again, same response with a "oh, this time it will be different". This lasted 3 ½ days. To make matters worse, every time I'd call their "customer care" number and punch in my phone number, they'd bump me to their collections department, where I'd wait on hold before getting to speak with somebody who would insist I hadn't paid my bill until I convinced them to look at their computer, then transfer me back into the queue for their regular customer service. To make matters worse, about one out of every three calls I made connected me with such a thick accent I couldn't understand them, and they had real trouble understanding me.

    There's a lot more; this is just the problem I've had in the last week. I'm stuck in this contract with them for another 11 months and to date fully expect to ditch them as soon as my contract is up.

    So my question is this: with Nextel, can I expect things to get any better?

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
    1. Re:Will things get better? by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      Do yourself a favour and login to your account @sprintpcs.com (phone number and account password) pull up the the "contact us" form and raise Hoe lee Ech ee Double Hockeysticks on this note. Or Pop into a RadioShack and have them get their Sprint Rep involved (you may want to burn $7 on doing a precash card so you have absolute proof that the payment was made) Final bit of advise if you get a bad accent/bad headset hang up and try again.

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    2. Re:Will things get better? by covertlaw · · Score: 1
      It's funny, the year I worked for Sprint they won some big award for best customer service. So what did they decide to do? Lay off all the good customer service people.

      Then they decided to try and boost morale in a call center by eliminating the dress code and having movies playing on plasma screens all day. They won some other award for boosting morale while at the same time their customer service ratings went down the shitter. Best to worst in 7 months.

    3. Re:Will things get better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Spring is a *terrible* cellular provider. I had the great misfortune of using them for one year. That year I had continual dropped calls, poor reception and loathesome customer service. I dropped them the minute my plan was up and went running to Nextel. Nextel was a tad more expensive, but I've had excellent service from them. The iDen network is clear and I have never dropped a call. I love my Nextel phone. The news of this merger is very disheartening to me. I think this will be the downfall of Nextel. Sprint sucks ass - their phones suck, their service sucks, their infrastructure sucks. Why why why did Nextel and Sprint merge?! Sigh, It doesn't matter, in the end the consumer looses out everytime.

    4. Re:Will things get better? by atayarani · · Score: 1

      When I first signed up for sprint, they screwed me out of a few days of service. I contacted the better business bureau, and as a result I got three free months of service.

    5. Re:Will things get better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To speed through Voice Mail Hell:

      Don't punch in your Sprint PCS number, use your (or any) land line number instead. The automoronic computer will give up and ask you what you want and you say "operator".

      At least it avoids the detour through canned billing messages.

    6. Re:Will things get better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True story:

      I was a contractor at Sprint last year. At one point, there was a support phone in rotation between about 12 of us. On a Friday afternoon, I was handed the phone. I took it home and dialed a number so I could make sure it worked. I got an automated message: "Your Sprint account has been deactivated because you have not paid your bill." Ha ha... Silly Sprint.

  25. Re: And the new name of the compaNy is... by waltznumber3 · · Score: 0

    Obligitory:
    I for one, welcome our new Sextellian overlords.

    --
    If you just took anything I said seriously, read it again.
  26. And people wonder why job creation is sluggish by MCTFB · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Corporate power is anathema to small business formation as the overaccumulation of capital in the hands of a small group of people who are more likely to hoard assets than invest them, makes it really hard for anyone who is not born with a silver spoon in their mouth to create a new business.

    Right now only five software companies create 75% of the revenues in the software industry here in the United States, and people wonder why the tech-job market is exploding in India and China, while laws like Sarbanes-Oxley which are ironically intended to curb corporate corruption, only enhance its power at the expense of small and medium sized businesses.

    I mean, at this rate the entire telecommunications industry will just be a monopoly in the very near future, or at the very least, a colluding duopoly like Visa and Mastercard which is arguably just as bad since it gives the false impression to the public that there is competition in the marketplace.

    And why does our government allow these kind of mergers to take place without even thinking twice about the long-term consequences? Oh yah, it is the mistaken premise by the leaders of both political parties that corporations need to get fatter in order to compete in the "World Economy" with largely state owned businesses in China and India as well as the oligarchy oriented super-massive corporations of old Europe and Japan.

    Until the United States (and the rest of the world for that matter) has a graduated corporate tax on revenues (not profits but revenues), things are going to get worse and worse for the worker as they will be stuck in a state of inertia slaving away in some cubicle at a super-massive corporation with no option of finding another job because no new jobs will be created due to small businesses getting the shaft by their own theoretically democratic government which constantly creates unnecessary laws which add relatively major costs of compliance to small businesses, while leaving large corporations relatively unscathed.

    How are small businesses so supposed to compete against large corporations if all their capital is being drained by their government while large corporations can use their political influence to get tax breaks and sweet heart deals to add to their bottom line.

    I mean seriously, when will the American public get the drift that corporate mergers are not some special unification to be joyous about as if corporate mergers should be treated as some kind of state wedding.

    1. Re:And people wonder why job creation is sluggish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're advocating...small-business nationwide cell phone service?

    2. Re:And people wonder why job creation is sluggish by mybecq · · Score: 1

      Until the United States (and the rest of the world for that matter) has a graduated corporate tax on revenues (not profits but revenues)...

      I'm not an economist, but that is about the dumbest suggestion I have heard for corporate tax reform.

      Take a $10 billion dollar company with a 10% margin. Currently we'll say they are taxed at 25% of their 10% profit. Their taxes are now $250 million. If you decide that equals a 2.5% tax on revenue, what happens to another $10 billion dollar company with only 2% profitability? They now have -0.5% profits, under your magical scheme. Sounds like job cuts will be needed...

      Perhaps you didn't explain yourself and I misunderstood your idea, but it won't work the way you've described. ... which constantly creates unnecessary laws which add relatively major costs of compliance to small businesses ...

      If you're referring to Sarbanes-Oxley, it only applies to public companies, and compliance costs are more directly related to the complexity/organization/scope of the business than company size.

    3. Re:And people wonder why job creation is sluggish by Gordo_1 · · Score: 1
      Corporate power is anathema to small business formation as the overaccumulation of capital in the hands of a small group of people who are more likely to hoard assets than invest them, makes it really hard for anyone who is not born with a silver spoon in their mouth to create a new business.

      Have you heard of venture captialists? How about Angel investors? They give money to people who have good ideas. You don't need a silver spoon to start a business.

      ...laws like Sarbanes-Oxley which are ironically intended to curb corporate corruption, only enhance its power at the expense of small and medium sized businesses.

      Huh? I work for a small startup business. Sarbanes-Oxley hasn't affected us in any severe way. We have a rent-a-CFO who consults a few hours a week and we chose to go with a smaller consulting firm to help us deal with accounting regulations. I think Sarbox is a bigger pain for large corporations than it is for us, since our accounting is pretty simple and straight forward comparatively. Incidentally, the feeling among experts is that Sarbox will be tweaked and toned down in the coming years as the whole Enron/Worldcom, etc. scandals come into perspective.

      ...things are going to get worse and worse for the worker as they will be stuck in a state of inertia slaving away in some cubicle at a super-massive corporation with no option of finding another job because no new jobs will be created due to small businesses getting the shaft

      Some would argue that as large companies merge and become even bigger, they react to customer needs slower and become bogged down by their own weight. This leads to opportunity for smaller businesses to pick up the slack. Obviously when you're talking about things that require large infrastructure like phone companies or natural gas distribution, it is difficult for small companies to make inroads, but there is still plenty of opportunity for small companies to serve different needs.

      I mean seriously, when will the American public get the drift that corporate mergers are not some special unification to be joyous about as if corporate mergers should be treated as some kind of state wedding.

      I don't sense that the American public is joyous over mergers any more than they're joyous over the war in Iraq. They're apathetic to both.

    4. Re:And people wonder why job creation is sluggish by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      Until the United States (and the rest of the world for that matter) has a graduated corporate tax on revenues (not profits but revenues), things are going to get worse and worse for the worker as they will be stuck in a state of inertia slaving away in some cubicle at a super-massive corporation with no option of finding another job because no new jobs will be created due to small businesses getting the shaft by their own theoretically democratic government which constantly creates unnecessary laws which add relatively major costs of compliance to small businesses, while leaving large corporations relatively unscathed.

      Uh huh. Or the government could eliminate business taxes altogether, since businesses don't pay taxes EVER, their employees, shareholders, and consumers do.

      How are small businesses so supposed to compete against large corporations if all their capital is being drained by their government while large corporations can use their political influence to get tax breaks and sweet heart deals to add to their bottom line.

      Ask Google, eBay, Yahoo, Skype, Vonage... need I go on? And believe it or not, Microsoft was a small company at one time. Are you claiming the business landscape has changed so much since then? Nope, people like you were bemoaning "Big Blue" back then, just as now.

      Same shit, different date.

      It's just capitalism. If you want to improve the situation, the answer is always the same: less government interference.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    5. Re:And people wonder why job creation is sluggish by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Or the government could eliminate business taxes altogether, since businesses don't pay taxes EVER, their employees, shareholders, and consumers do.

      To the head of the class! Although there are two good reasons to use corporations as collection points for taxes:

      - it's cheaper and more efficient than collecting them individually from every employee, shareholder, and customer; and

      - you also get to tax *foreign* shareholders, employees, and customers, if indirectly.

      A perhaps better tax scheme would be to tax only corporations and instead eliminate personal income taxes, property taxes, and sales taxes. Same result in the end, with the added benefit of smaller government combined with tax revenues from non-citizens.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    6. Re:And people wonder why job creation is sluggish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The irony is that government is the root cause of nearly all the problems you describe, yet you still call on government as the solution.

      Think of it this way. The overall size and scope of the US government (including total revenue and power over the people) has expanded near-exponentially over the past 100 years. At the same time, the problems you describe have expanded right along with government. Do you see a pattern here?

      Instead of running faster, you need to step off the treadmill, sit down, and think.

    7. Re:And people wonder why job creation is sluggish by tribentwrks · · Score: 1

      And this person wonders where you shop? Does everyone here on Slashdot shop at the local mom and pop? Probably not, including myself. The harderst part is getting people to vote with their dollars, AND not buy so much crap because the mega-corporations tell you need it. If the money started to flow towards small and medium businesses, then they would flourish just like the big businesses do. What can you do when people don't care about anything but the lowest price?

    8. Re:And people wonder why job creation is sluggish by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      it's cheaper and more efficient than collecting them individually from every employee, shareholder, and customer

      More efficient for the government maybe, but not more efficient for the people paying them, since the taxes would be obscured and it is not clear where/what/how much you're paying.

      It also would give lobbyists tons of ways to insert loopholes, so it's not a fair tax.

      you also get to tax *foreign* shareholders, employees, and customers, if indirectly.

      The FairTax allows us to tax foreigners directly.

      Plus it has the incentive of ENCOURAGING all businesses everywhere to setup shop in the U.S., whereas more corporate taxes would encourage all businesses to offshore or stay out of the U.S... which kills our economy.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  27. video phones??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if phones start having video then what would happen to the many phone sex companies...where fat ugly women with sexy voices tell u that they are 36-24-36???

  28. Like, whoa by defile · · Score: 1

    Aside from having shittier coverage in cities, these providers are better about embracing technology and opening their networks.

    I can't help but to wonder what this means for customers. Nextel has been pushing mobile devices as business tools for a long time (walkie-talkie feature, sophisticated pager-like functionality, etc.) whereas Sprint seems to focus more on casual use (they provide the dialtone for Virgin Mobile). Hopefully they continue to build on these areas instead of chip away at them...

    Consolidation in this area is kind of disturbing since these companies are already gigantic and impersonal, but if it leads to some standardization, perhaps ISVs can start rolling out useful content/functionality for mobile devices instead of just selling Britney Spears and N'SYNC ringtones.

  29. Same as always... by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    boring.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  30. Sprint-Nextel Merger - the name by KarmaBlackballed · · Score: 1

    The new company will keep the last three letters of each name and will be known as Int-Tel. They will be dropping the low end service plans and low end phones.

    Also, phone numbers will now be big-endian.

    --

    --- -- - -
    Give me LIBERTY, or give me a check.
  31. FFII Website Taken Offline by Court Order!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WARNING ---- CENSORSHIP!!!!

    ###########

    FFII Web site taken down
    Ingrid Marson
    ZDNet UK
    August 02, 2005, 15:40 BST

    Talkback
    Tell us your opinion
    Legal troubles have led to the anti-patent group's hosting company pulling the plug on FFII.org

    The FFII Web site has been taken offline, after a German software company obtained a court order against the anti-patent campaign group.

    The software company, called Nutzwerk, has been issued five provisional court orders and one preliminary injunction against the FFII, about allegedly false information that has been posted on the campaign group's Web site.

    René Holzer, the chief executive of Nutzwerk, said on Tuesday that when the FFII did not respond to these court orders, it asked the organisation's hosting company to take the FFII Web site offline. A spokesman for the hosting company, Teamware, admitted that it had turned off the site, but was unable to provide any additional details.

    The FFII did not say what if any changes it would make to its Web content, but claimed that Nutzwerk is trying to "cleanse the Net of critical reporting".

    It is unclear what information the FFII was asked to remove by the Hamburg court injunction. Holzer claimed there are "more than a dozen" things that are untrue on the FFII Web site, but was unwilling to go into more detail about particular claims made by the FFII.

    The FFII said on Monday that it has already found another hosting company, but the transfer of the FFII.org domain could take "up to 3 days". It advised visitors to go to nosoftwarepatents.com instead.

    This is not the only such case that Nutzwerk is tied up in; it is also pursuing a case against German news Web site Heise.de over an article the site published in October last year.

  32. No Such Thing As A Good Cell Carrier by netnomad · · Score: 2, Funny

    After reading all of these comments about Nextel and Sprint I have to wonder if ANYBODY with a cell phone in the US is happy with their service. And let's not even talk about Cingular's new slogan. A guy I know on IRC recently got a job with Cingular. The catch-line lately has been "Hey Ted? Whatcha been up to? Busy raising the bar, I'll bet." He still doesn't get it. That's what makes it so beautiful.

    1. Re:No Such Thing As A Good Cell Carrier by ki4iib · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I absolutely adore my cell phone provider. Almost physically. Verizon kicks serious ass in my neighborhood; it was up through Hurricanes Ivan, Dennis, etc etc etc. (include: all storms last year).

      'Tis beauty itself.

    2. Re:No Such Thing As A Good Cell Carrier by SaDan · · Score: 1

      Another very satisfied Verizon customer here. I carry a V710 for my personal cell phone, and the wife has a T720. Good stuff.

      I have to carry a Nextel phone for work, and hate this thing with a passion. Service is terrible, coverage is terrible, and the phones are junk.

      A friend of mine works for Sprint. He says Sprint bought Nextel so they could have more towers to hang CDMA equipment. They're going to phase out iDen entirely.

      Praise Jebus!

    3. Re:No Such Thing As A Good Cell Carrier by schotty · · Score: 1

      I own and use Nextel and am quite happy. Not the cheapest, but definitely worth the money.

      The only changes that I would like are a better browser on the phone and a better GPS capability. Now I am currently using the i736 which may be a crappy model, I dont know. Other than that, it is quite nice of a phone. It isnt small but just big enough to still be useful on all levels and still fit in my pocket without me "feeling" it like I have a hilt of a greatsword stuck in there.

      As far as what I have been told in a few Nextel forums, and with the Nextel mailed out propoganda, we are supposed to get the best of both worlds -- all of the coverage that Sprint has with a dual iDEN/CDMA network. Thats cool if it works out. But I have dealt with both Sprint's and Nextel's customer service, and goddamn do I hope that its Nextel's personnel not the goons at Sprint. At least the few non american folks are fluent and well adjusted to american english (had a few germans and indians, asia's india that is).

      Thats what I have seen. I would love to hear other's Nextel customer experiences here. I have been a sworn customer for life for 5 years now, and with this merger that _may_ change if Sprint is the dominant force here.

      --
      Sigs are nice guns ...
    4. Re:No Such Thing As A Good Cell Carrier by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Verizon. Their customer service blew until the class-action lawsuit, but now it's quite good. As in, prior to the lawsuit they actually tried to defraud my wife and I, but now they're one of the better companies we have to deal with.

      I have no complaints, even if it did take legal action to straighten the company out. And one of the best things about their customer service: no goddamned incomprehensible Indian accents!!!

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    5. Re:No Such Thing As A Good Cell Carrier by ki4iib · · Score: 1

      I can verify all of the above, and proclaim the V710 to be a seriously halfwaydecent phone. Especially for $100. I've got one.

      Also, your wife probably has a T730C, but it's hardly worth quibbling about, since it's just a carrier change and a new faceplace =) I gave my girlfriend my old one.

      By the way, pick up the Asurion insurance. It's worth the money; they do good work.

    6. Re:No Such Thing As A Good Cell Carrier by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Ditto. My Verizon phone works everywhere I need it to, and when my cable modem goes out or I'm out of WiFi range with my laptop, I can get online through Verizon at a decent speed. The phone itself (LG VX7000) was free, thanks to New Every Two and an online discount.

      The service costs more than, say, Sprint, but you get what you pay for.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    7. Re:No Such Thing As A Good Cell Carrier by ki4iib · · Score: 1

      True true. And by "more", you mean $5/month =) for markedly better service and support. At least on the voice side.

  33. Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    doesn't it require a real girl to work?

  34. SIMs by Stonent1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nextel uses SIMs, CDMA providers do not. From a corporate standpoint, SIMs give a phone a lower TCO because you can easily reuse handsets. Bob want's Joe's phone and Joe wants Bob's phone. A simple SIM swap is all it takes. For Sprint or Verizon, it's practically a week long process. Where I work, if someone gets fired or quits or turns in their phone. We just call Nextel or Tmobile and cancel the account then the phone (usually a Blackberry) gets put in a box. Then Joe Newguy, gets hired, we just put a working SIM from whoever most recently turned in a phone, in the phone and give it to him. Changing numbers is a snap with SIMs, just call up the provider and they can issue you a new number in 2 minutes. Verizon wanted me to key in a bunch of stuff in the phone to make it work.

    1. Re:SIMs by jim9000 · · Score: 1

      I don't have any experience with Sprint, but it doesn't take a week with Verizon Wireless. It is a simple process:

      1. Get the ESN from the back of the phone, under the battery.

      2. Call them or go to the online account management site. Go to the appropiate line and you will be able to enter the ESN there.

      3. Wait a few minutes. Then, dial *228 then Send from the wireless phone. Select option 1 when prompted.

      4. The phone is now programmed.

    2. Re:SIMs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make absolutely sure that you have identical SIM cards though... some of the SIM cards out there are barely powerfull enough to guide a spacecraft to the moon, and can't handle the multimedia capability of modern phones.

      Or, just don't move the cards. You can move the phone to any number you want, provided you own the phone and number, it takes 6 minutes with Nextel customer care. Counting troubleshooting, if it is required.

    3. Re:SIMs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. I work with Sprint and verizon and it only take 10 mins to do an esn swap.

  35. Sprint PCS is not Sprint by Kaenneth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From what I read while helping to build a case to defend a former customer from their bullying collection tactics (You shouldn't cash peoples checks, and not provide service.. then try to charge termination fees, when you were the one that turned off the customers phones even when the bills were paid.)

    Sprint PCS is a DBA name for Ubiqicom (sp?), apperently they licensed the Sprint name from the 'real' Sprint.

    Kinda like that "Lawnmower Man" movie, based on "The Story by Stephen King", which sucked so bad.

    Careful who you let use your business name.

    1. Re:Sprint PCS is not Sprint by covertlaw · · Score: 1

      You have no idea what you're talking about at all. Sprint PCS is now in fact 'the real Sprint'. The employees all work on the same campus and use the same resources. I designed computer software that all the Sprint divisions, PCS, LDD, LTD, used everyday for common accounting purposes. Back when Sprint PCS was first introduced, the subsidiary of Sprint that ran the PCS service was called Sprint Spectrum. It was a completely different group from the main company. They later merged that subsidiary back into the main company and now it is simply Sprint.

    2. Re:Sprint PCS is not Sprint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The confusion is in certain smaller markets, companies have licensed the Sprint PCS brand (affiliates) to provide service, so in those areas, it's not Sprint, but another company using the Sprint name.

    3. Re:Sprint PCS is not Sprint by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      From http://www.ubiquitelpcs.com/about/

      " UbiquiTel is the exclusive provider of Sprint digital wireless mobility communications network products and services under the Sprint brand name to midsize markets in the Western and Midwestern United States that include a population of approximately 10 million residents and cover portions of California, Nevada, Washington, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, Indiana and Kentucky. "

      As I live in Washington, I was dealing with UbiquiTel. Or whoever UbiquiTel outsources their customer support to.

      So perhaps were you are, Sprint does it themselves, but not here, and UbiquiTel is damaging Sprints name.

  36. RadioShack! by Mostly+Harmless · · Score: 1

    This whole thing is made worse by the fact that RS will stop carrying Verizon at the end of the year in favor of Cingular. So now they'll be carrying that along with Spring and Nextel. Radio Shack works on the Good, Better, Best principle. But what do they have now? Bad, Terrible, and Really Really Shitty? I'm only half-ticked. Sprint, contrary to what everyone else seems to think, has excellent phones and great service. Their customer support is the worst, though. They're perhaps the one company that would benefit from outsourcing their customer support. Their push-to-talk feature is hands down better than Nextels, too, fwiw. Cingular, imho, is terrible. Rollover minutes are nowhere near as useful as Sprint's Fair & Flexible plans. Sprint's network is everywhere (and to top it off, they roam on Verizon's network...if you don't get service with Sprint or Verizon, you won't get service ANYWHERE). Cingular tries to win people over by offering flashy phones that wouldn't get good reception if you were plugged in to a cell tower. And Nextel, well... Let's ignore the fact that business customers get prefferential treatment (find someone with a business accound and one with an individual account and see who gets better reception). 8 out of every 10 times I try to call a Nextel phone, it spends 5 minutes trying to locate it. And forget about the walkie-talkie. How many times do you have to push the button before it actually works? The Sprint-Nextel merger makes absolutely no sense to me. People are flocking from Nextel to Sprint on the premise that, once the merger goes through, the Nextel PTT with work with Sprint's. News Flash: Nextel plans on supporting their network until AT LEAST 2010. If I had to predict the future, I'd say that Nextel will be the business unit, and Sprint will be the individual consumer unit. I've heard it rumored that Nextel wanted to dump everyone but business accounts, anyway. I suppose we'll have to wait and see.

    --
    "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -Douglas Adams, THHGTTG
    1. Re:RadioShack! by CharlieHedlin · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I regularly vistit an area with no CDMA coverage. My Verizon phone goes into Analog (My plan covers this without a roaming charge because it is in state) while my wife's Cingular phone gets a GSM signal. Unfortunately the indoor coverage for both phones in the area is pathetic.

      I have to agree with a lot of the Nextel stuff. I would like PTT for some uses, but from what I understand Verizon's sucks, and I don't want to pay. It would be very usefull for quick converstations between vehicles or from the concesion stand to my wife in the stands at sporting events.

  37. Homeland Security by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    If anyone doesn't think the US government has a role in ensuring American markets and American corporations are controlled to protect consumers, look into how China's CNOOC dropped its attempt to take over American Unocal. The Congressional opposition was, of course, only due to its unacceptability to so many Americans. Chinese money is just as green as American - and since so much of that CNOOC money is American dollars bought up by China as American debt (mostly real estate), it's all really Chinese money. But we get to keep Unocal, for now.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Homeland Security by TheSync · · Score: 1

      How did keeping CNOOC from buying Unocal help American markets and consumers?

      Seems to me it just screwed Unocal stockholders, and upset the Chinese government at a time when Walmart and CityBank are trying to expand in China. Great going Congress!

      Oil is a global commodity. It really doesn't matter who owns what rights. The only people who can actually influence its price are two or three countries in the Middle East, but as the price goes up they actually lose control because other previously unprofitable sources (such as oil sands) come online.

    2. Re:Homeland Security by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      By not letting a big US oil company get taken over by the Chinese Communist mafia, which is looking to take oil away from the US everywhere it can, to feed its own needs. The vast increases in Chinese demand for oil are part of what's driven up the price in the past couple of years. And part of what sent Bush into Iraq, to ensure the remaining oil could be controlled by Bush and his oil backers directly, instead of having to deal with the Chinese. It's kept the US and other countries from stopping the genocide in Sudan, where China has made deals with the genociding government for access to their oil, and can't afford "instability" while they set up to exploit it.

      I can't believe that you really believe that "it doesn't matter who owns the rights". China has entered the global oil market as a consumer in the past 10 years, since their net oil status turned to "consumer". We are just getting started competing with them for oil. If you don't protect your country's ability to provide oil here, we're going to look a lot like Europe's economy, with its oil purchasing disadvantages. Starting with $5-10:gallon gas, and all the way to all our industries going to countries with cheap labor and cheaper oil. Eventually, we'll look a lot like China used to, while China starts looking a lot like Texas.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Homeland Security by TheSync · · Score: 1

      the Chinese Communist mafia, which is looking to take oil away from the US everywhere it can

      Unocal's oil and gas holdings do not belong to "The US", they belong to the shareholders of the company. Obviously Unocal shareholders believe that $20 billion is more than the net present value of future oil profits (plus risks), or why would they be willing to sell at that price?

      To say that Unocal's assets belong to the US is socialism.

      I can't believe that you really believe that "it doesn't matter who owns the rights".

      Well, I do, because it doesn't matter. Oil is a global commodity, priced pretty much the same everywhere.

      If you don't protect your country's ability to provide oil here, we're going to look a lot like Europe's economy, with its oil purchasing disadvantages. Starting with $5-10:gallon gas, and all the way to all our industries going to countries with cheap labor and cheaper oil.

      European consumers of oil pay the same price that American consumers of oil do. The reason why gasoline costs $5-$10 a gallon in Europe is due to taxation of gasoline at the pump.

      US gasoline taxes are about $0.50 per gallon. In Europe, gasoline taxes are $2 to $3 per gallon.

      European countries such as Germany and France have economic problems, but they are mainly due to restrictive labor laws and higher levels of taxation (aka, socialism). It is not due to differential availability of oil. Supertankers can go from anywhere, to anywhere.

    4. Re:Homeland Security by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Unocal doesn't belong to the US. It is, however, strategically important. Especially in the global economic system we have built. If it gets bought by a Chinese "company", Chinese industry will get preference in access to its oil. That will interfere with American industry, and our entire society.

      Supertankers that go to Europe send their Euros back in the opposite direction. As an example of how real this international oil competition really is, consider the money that France and Germany invested in Saddam Hussein's government - not to mention the British, who practically owned the place until Saddam. That's not just because they were buying oil as a pure commodity, but to ensure their primacy in access to those markets. And of course every industrial country, led by the US, makes those investments. That's why we've got so much invested in Iraq - monetarily, militarily, every possible way.

      In fact, it's worth considering the intertwined timing of China's dropping its Unocal bid in the face of Congressional skepticism, and Uzbekistan's kicking out the US military from its bases there. Uzbekistan is a strategic location for the Unocal pipeline across Afghanistan to the gigantic gas plant Enron built in Rajasthan. With Uzbekistan not playing along to get the US pipeline online, Unocal isn't as valuable to China.

      The commodity markets are the documentation of these business deals. Money flows through them, but the power that controls those flows are vested in the people controlling the countries. And thereby controlling the corporations which transfer the oil. Protecting the US oil markets from foreign competition, especially with oil at its highest price ever, with only greater demand, and shifts in supply, ahead, is a prime responsibility in protecting America's security. As demonstrated by the kinds of wars we're actively fighting. We have as much an obligation to protect ourselves from strategic weakness in the markets.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:Homeland Security by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Protecting the US oil markets from foreign competition, especially with oil at its highest price ever, with only greater demand, and shifts in supply, ahead, is a prime responsibility in protecting America's security.

      I demand a cost/benefit analysis. $400 billion spent on defense each year, along with the deadweight loss of those taxes, could buy a lot of oil. I belive the US only spends about $100 billion a year on imported oil.

      If there is really a risk to oil supply, why do countries which have almost no military expenditures pay the same price for oil that everyone else does?

      The US is certainly carrying on a lot of wars right now, but it is foolish to believe that they are in any way benefitting us from an oil supply perspective. Perhaps they are eliminating terrorism and ending corrupt dictatorships, but I don't think they are helping in terms of oil, if anything, they are raising the price of oil.

    6. Re:Homeland Security by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      The wars we're fighting do quite a lot of things. Otherwise, the Congressmembers who enable them wouldn't be organized into support. Even Republicans wouldn't be back them in such unison.

      One major effect is to protect the oil, and its distribution for "US interests". Which is not just a tactical operation for this year's oil, but strategic position as we approach "Peak Oil" production in a couple-few years, and inevitable decline, all while consumption grows dramatically, especially in China and India: 30-40% of all people. Another factor is that the US is run by politicians which have mostly all benefitted from Enron's corporate bribery, especially the closer we get to Bush. Enron's basic bizplan was to control the oil/gas business through the online market it ran (like a private NYSE for energy), as well as dominating the global pipeline business. Including the Afghan pipeline for energy to India, and eventually all South/Central Asia, one of the biggest growth markets for energy. So what if the US taxpayers spend $400B on Pentagon expenses to protect the oil? That's not oil company expenses, or industrial corporate expenses. It's individuals, much more easily convinced to pay taxes - or handle the debt later, while taxes at least appear to be cut - than to pay at the pump, and maybe demand change.

      Then there's all the other reasons. Like how much of that $400B is spent on corporate welfare, spread around the competing backers of the politicians who support the wars. And then there's the basic popularity of war with Americans, at least at first while the fireworks and macho strutting is all we get on TV. OK, how about a more reliable way to lock in the popularity Bush got after the 9/11/2001 planebombings than just a more effective, largely covert war against Osama and the Qaeda? Then there's the rest of the benefits, spelled out by the PNAC in their 1990s strategy document, of building new bases in the region. And the distractions from the economy, which is in bad trouble unless you're a bank, Walmart, or a few other big corporate owners who blow the curve, hiding the 35% of Americans out of work under a fake "average" growth.

      Now, I don't know how these wars are "eliminating terrorism". Terrorism is on the rise, by every actual count. We've handed terrorist lunatics exactly the PR they never could have produced, or bought, by themselves, by releasing a civil war in Iraq, while allowing Afghanistan to fester back into Taliban and Qaeda strongholds. North Korea's nuclear terrorism is unprecedented, and unchecked, running for several years. And even though that asshole Saddam, our old client and ally, is out of the picture, now it's the US torturing and tyrannizing Iraqis, even as so many Americans (and our dollars) are doing cleanup and rebuilding work to cover up our destruction.

      As to how they figure into the oil plan, I remind you that it is you and I who are paying these highest ever oil prices. The oil costs the same, about $12-15:bbl, to extract and sell. So, at $60, rather than its previous $20, the profit has at multiplied around sixfold. That sounds like a big win, not even including the extra profits from increased consumption that war, and its materiel (fuel, bombs, plastic components) requires. Then look at the energy policy bill just passed by Congress. Without these wars, and their insecurity, Republicans wouldn't have such an easy time scaring Americans into voting for them, and passing laws like that, made of handouts to the "threatened" energy industry. And then there's all the other power they get, too.

      Really, it's no surprise that the US is almost always at war somewhere. "War is good for the economy." If you sell oil, or any of the other products/services that Americans must pay for during a war. If you're just an American worker, it's all at your expense.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  38. CHIRP CHIRP! Where you at? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    Business tools? Let's don't forget that revolutionary new division of Nextel, Boost Mobile.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  39. Well, this certainly simplifies shopping! by Shag · · Score: 2, Informative

    As a general rule, GSM is usable places outside North America, while CDMA and iDEN aren't. A year ago, wandering around asking if phones worked anywhere else would result in three affirmative answers (from ATT Wireless, Cingular and T-Mobile), and three blank stares (from Verizon, Nextel and Sprint).

    After the ATT-Cingular merger and the Nextel-Sprint merger, we'll only have two of each kind of answer. This will make shopping so much faster!

    Ultimately we'll just have two monopolies: PhonesThatWork, Inc. and PhonesThatSuck, Inc. And they'll both charge an arm and a leg. Joy.

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    1. Re:Well, this certainly simplifies shopping! by Icicle509 · · Score: 1
      CDMA in my experience outperforms GSM hands down....

      I had ATT and I have Sprint.

      Sprints call quality, data network, and signal kick the crap out of ATT here in Spokane Washington

    2. Re:Well, this certainly simplifies shopping! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spokane, Washington: The center of the known universe

  40. Strip first by tepples · · Score: 1

    So does this mean that people who work for Nextel are no longer allowed to fraternize with those who work for Sprint after the merger if that new labor law proposal passes?

    No, it means they have to strip first. Take off the uniforms and put on street clothes and the recent ruling has no chance to apply make your time.

  41. Are you one crack? by mavantix · · Score: 1

    Nextel (and sprint) suck ass. If you could pick the to worst cell compainies, that would be them. Oh well, dumbasses keep paying outrageous rates to Nextel so they can have the redneck CB radio feature. Yeah, that will last long. Go Nextel!

  42. Re:iDen to Go? All roads lead to CDMA... by neurocutie · · Score: 1

    Nextel was facing a multibillion technology upgrade to keep up with the other major carriers, plus mandatory costs in moving its customers off spectrum (near emergency bands) the FCC has de-allocated to Nextel (as a result of a deal). iDEN is a deadend. All carriers will be using CDMA technology in the near future because it is most spectrum efficient (greatest amount of information carried for a given bandwidth allocation). Even GSM will move to CDMA, though the details (WCDMA) will make it non-interoperable with current US CDMA carriers. But it will be a major technology overhaul for GSM carriers as well, whereas current CDMA carriers will face only incremental upgrades.

    OTOH, it seems likely that all roads will probably also lead to VOIP, and wireless cell carriers will end up with wireless IP networks that carry voice and data via IP.

    The only thing that Nextel brings to the table is a bunch of customers with high ARPU (average revenue per user) (business/corporate) that expect good PTT (DC). Although Sprint presently has a fair implementation of PTT over CDMA, it is expected that Sprint/Nextel will implement QCHAT, a much better form of PTT (also developed by Qualcomm), that Nextel owned the rights to. This will give Sprint/Nextel the path to wean DC customers to PTT over CDMA. iDEN/DC though a dead end, will remain alive through 2010, so they say...

  43. This is too easy by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

    The Sprint around the corners?

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  44. So, monopolies are good after all, eh? by Magnus+Pym · · Score: 1

    Why is it that a de-facto monopoly is bad for operating systems, but wonderful for cell-phones?

    You would prefer it if the whole world adopts a mediocre, rushed-out standard whose only advantage is its installed base (GSM), over a well-thought out, high-performance technology (CDMA) that beats it hands down in every conceivable technological aspect, like support for much larger cell sizes, coverage, battery life, ease of deployment, capacity, frequency reuse and inter-cell handoff?

    Are you aware that the GSM community has been forced to adopt a CDMA-based technology (Wideband CDMA) as the basis for its third generation, at the expense of accumulating considerable amounts of egg on its face?

    As for your comments about CDMA not working outside Northern America... please educate yourself before spouting such nonsense. CDMA is widely deployed in Brazil, India, China, Russia, Australia, and dozens of other non-American countries. It has tens of millions of subscribers outside North America. I have used my American CDMA phone in India and Brazil. It works as long as your service provider has roaming arrangements with the one in the visiting country. The only geographic area where CDMA does not have a foothold is Western Europe (big surprise), where the various governments have passed rules to ban non-GSM technologies! Various operators who would otherwise have gladly chosen CDMA have been FORCED to adopt GSM. But CDMA is making an entrance now, through the 450 MHz band, and various politicians in Western Europe are scurrying around trying to pass rules to ban it in that band also.

    Or have you simply bought into the myth that "GSM is an open standard, CDMA is controlled by Qualcomm?" Let me educate you: if you are a small vendor trying to build a CDMA system, you indeed have to pay royalties to Qualcomm. If you want to build a GSM system, you have to pay royalties to more than one company (mostly Nokia and Ericsson), who collectively own patents that affect almost every aspect of GSM operation. This is because GSM is a "standards by committee" technology, adopted precisely because it enabled the dominant companies of the time to ensure that their patents were represented in the standard.

    Magnus.

    1. Re:So, monopolies are good after all, eh? by ahillen · · Score: 1

      The only geographic area where CDMA does not have a foothold is Western Europe (big surprise), where the various governments have passed rules to ban non-GSM technologies! Various operators who would otherwise have gladly chosen CDMA have been FORCED to adopt GSM.

      In western Europe, many network operators started before the first CDMA standard existed. Nevertheless, it's true that the European states specifically handed out GSM licenses, which makes sense if you want to ensure interoperability between the networks in different countries. After all, one problem the (at that time) new generation of networks was supposed to solve was that many countries used incompatible standards.

    2. Re:So, monopolies are good after all, eh? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      You would prefer it if the whole world adopts a mediocre, rushed-out standard whose only advantage is its installed base (GSM), over a well-thought out, high-performance technology (CDMA) that beats it hands down in every conceivable technological aspect, like support for much larger cell sizes, coverage, battery life, ease of deployment, capacity, frequency reuse and inter-cell handoff?
      That's the biggest amount of BS I've ever read. Are you a Qualcomm employee perchance?

      CDMA does beet GSM on larger cell sizes in theory, though in practice both find power levels end up having a bigger affect than GSM's timeslot protection imposed limits. It also has more capacity per cell. It's noticable that in order to highlight these real advantages of CDMA, you had to repeat both twice (larger cell sizes and coverage? More capacity and better frequency re-use? Gosh!)

      But it's CDMA that's poorly thought out, essentially a bunch of hacks based on a 1970s mobile phone model, GSM being a modern, ISDN based, network standard whose creators clearly thought about the problems earlier standards had and made significant, real, efforts to fix them. Qualcomm has had to play catch up (and for a time refused to do so) with GSM to get it to the same quality. And it's still not there. Personal mobility isn't available in the US implementation. Nor is location independence. Network services still have codes dependent on the operator you're using. You're either on your "home" network or "Roaming". What fun to an end user!

      Battery life is significantly poorer (I'm still bemused by the huge one Nokia had to supply with the 6185 to give it the same life as the other TDMA and GSM based 61xx phones) due to CDMA's constant broadcasting of redundant data (that's how CDMA works, alas, and unfortunately UMTS users whose operators chose WCDMA are going to have to put up with the same thing when it comes to battery life), "ease of deployment" is a nonsense (GSM is a fully integrated modern digital network designed to actually integrate with modern switching equipment, CDMA, again, is based on 1970s hacks), and there's nothing in practice wrong with GSM's inter-cell handoffs.

      To an end-user, it's pretty obvious which provides them with more freedom, a consistant experience, and more control. Clue, it's not the one where most of the phones don't support SIM cards, and most network operators will not allow the end user to have them anyway.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    3. Re:So, monopolies are good after all, eh? by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Informative
      That's more or less correct, though it's a little more complicated than that when you get to the DCS networks.

      In the mid-eighties, America had, essentially, a couple of mobile phone networks (in most areas) based upon a single standard, AMPS. This was largely the result of the AT&T monopoly and its legacy (clearly, the Baby Bells weren't going to suddenly switch standards for their wireless networks, and there was little point for the "A" carriers to use an incompatable standard.)

      The EU (or EC, or EEC, depending on what part of the story you're talking about, but as it's the same organization, I'll refer to it as the EC from here on) didn't have anything like that. Every country had one or two mobile phone networks, generally based upon custom standards. The UK, for example, used Motorola's ETACS. Functionally, the standards were similar, they just used different signaling methods, or had different operating parameters, that made them incompatable with one another.

      This didn't bode well for the emerging European Union, as it meant people travelling from one state to another wouldn't be able to roam, and the cost effectiveness of running this many incompatable technologies was clearly a problem. So the EU passed a decree saying that the mobile phone carriers had to adopt a single standard that they would run on their 900MHz bands. The EU didn't say what the standard should be, or that they should turn off their custom networks (though it made sense for them to do so if the new standard was better), simply that the industry had to decide on a standard and get it working across all 900MHz networks. And if a country didn't actually have a 900MHz network, it was to get one started right away.

      GSM started as a project by France Telecom's mobile phone subdivision and was created independently of the EU's directive. It was one of the standards considered by the various standards groups, and in the end was their choice.

      Now, where it gets interesting is when you fast forward to the early nineties. Britain felt that just having two networks didn't create enough competition, so sold off the 1800MHz band for "DCS" services. This had nothing to do with the EU, and Britain said it didn't care what standards were used in that band. The two mobile phone operators at the time, Orange, and one2one (now T-Mobile), ended up both chosing GSM. This was after Qualcomm created CDMA (IS95) and started lobbying for its adoption, so you can bet both operators saw it and evaluated it. Several other countries followed suit, and also opened up the 1800MHz band, and the companies that bought licenses also decided on GSM. It wasn't until a significant number of countries had done so that the EU decided that, because the 1800MHz players currently had a disadvantage over their 900MHz competitors, 1800MHz was to be opened up across the EU, and that GSM was mandated for the remaining operators.

      This wasn't a big conspiracy against CDMA. It was done because the existing operators had chosen that standard, and there'd have been no point in the EU opening 1800MHz if non-GSM operators could gain control of the bands in other countries. Had Orange and one2one choosen CDMA, or one choosen CDMA and the other GSM, and this pattern been followed by succeeding operators, then you can bet the EU would have mandated CDMA everywhere, or at least one CDMA network and at least one GSM network everywhere.

      The person you're responding to claims that some operators are now running CDMA on 450MHz. I haven't heard of that. But I'd expect the same behaviour from the EU as thus far, eg if it picks up steam, to prevent 900/1800/3G GSM/UMTS operators from having an advantage over an emerging network of 450MHz CDMA operators, the EU to open that band across the Union for CDMA operation (unless, of course, there are large numbers of operators using a competing standard on the same frequency)

      My belief is that much of the propoganda against GSM from CDMA proponents is based primarily on making use of a lack of

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:So, monopolies are good after all, eh? by kriston · · Score: 1

      Umm, no, W-CDMA is not the same as "CDMA technology". It is still based on GSM. It uses CDMA "techniques" for frequency-hopping among GSM channels.

      The name is unfortunate, but it's not CDMA. Underneath W-CDMA's covers is still GSM.

      It does not mean that GSM has been supplanted by CDMA. Industry buzz says that quite the opposite is happening and there's even a persistent rumor that Vodafone, the world's largest GSM provider and majority owner of Verizon Wireless, may eventually convert VZW to W-CDMA.

      --

      Kriston

    5. Re:So, monopolies are good after all, eh? by ahillen · · Score: 1

      GSM started as a project by France Telecom's mobile phone subdivision and was created independently of the EU's directive. It was one of the standards considered by the various standards groups, and in the end was their choice.

      Not quite. GSM was a group by CEPT (the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations). It was indeed independent of the EU's directive to reserve the 900 MHz band, because it was founded before (actually it seems that the directive was passed to allow this group finish its work).
      I just found a nice article about this here (PDF).
      (There are also some other articles about the creation of GSM.

    6. Re:So, monopolies are good after all, eh? by Magnus+Pym · · Score: 1

      > That's the biggest amount of BS I've ever read. Are you a Qualcomm employee perchance?

      No, but I do work in the CDMA industry... and used to work in the GSM industry before. I know what I am talking about, having had to mop up the problems with real deployments on either side.

      > though in practice both find power levels end up having a bigger affect than GSM's timeslot protection imposed limits.

      Absolutely incorrect. In GSM, it is theoretically impossible to have cell sizes larger than a few kilometers (I believe 16). There are working CDMA cells that provide commercial service and are 64 kilometers in radius. Boomer cells are planned now that are only limited by the curvature of the earth.

      > larger cell sizes and coverage

      Coverage has implications beyond cell size. Please refer a network-planning guide.

      > More capacity and better frequency re-use?

      There is more to having a frequency reuse of one than better capacity. Ease of cell planning is one. How do you add a cell to a congested area in a GSM network without having to re-plan your entire network?

      I notice that you did not respond to CDMA's soft handoff, and essentially 4 times the capacity as compared to GSM.

      > GSM is a fully integrated modern digital network designed to actually integrate with modern switching equipment

      And CDMA networks are analog? Please do some basic reading before writing such nonsense.

      FYI, W-CDMA is completely backwards-incompatible with GSM. There is nothing in common. None. Essentially, every upgrade is a forklift upgrade. There is as little in common between W-CDMA and GSM as there is between IS-95 and GSM.

      > I'm still bemused by the huge one Nokia had to supply with the 6185 to give it the same life as the other TDMA and GSM based 61xx phones

      Nokia does not use good CDMA chipsets (I believe they use TI's implementation). That is why their ass is getting kicked in the CDMA market. Take a look at phones from companies that use Qualcomm chipsets.

      > To an end-user, it's pretty obvious which provides them with more freedom, a consistant experience, and more control.

      In the US, it is pretty clear; that is why CDMA-based VzW is kicking the ass of the GSM-based operators. Cingular/ATT's coverage is a joke here.

      > You're either on your "home" network or "Roaming". What fun to an end user!

      And this is different for GSM operators exactly how? In the US, the GSM deployments work this way too! There are no SIM cards in the US for any technology. This is a deliberate decision made by the operators.

      I can use my CDMA-phone whereever I go in pretty much any CDMA-market.

      And nothing prevents SIM being used by CDMA phones, I believe the CDMA phones in china already use SIM cards.

      Magnus.

    7. Re:So, monopolies are good after all, eh? by sylvandb · · Score: 1

      I do work in the CDMA industry... and used to work in the GSM industry before. I know what I am talking about...

      There are no SIM cards in the US for any technology.


      Evidently you don't know as much as you think you do.

      A simple search on e-bay US would have shown a lot of sim cards for use in the US. My T-Mobile phones have SIM cards, and T-Mobile has had me switch cards between phones to troubleshoot issues in the past.

      Cingular (was AT&T) GSM phones also use SIM cards, and if you have an unlocked handset, you can switch it betweeen Cingular and T-Mobile just by inserting the proper SIM.

      sdb

    8. Re:So, monopolies are good after all, eh? by ahillen · · Score: 1

      In GSM, it is theoretically impossible to have cell sizes larger than a few kilometers (I believe 16). There are working CDMA cells that provide commercial service and are 64 kilometers in radius. Boomer cells are planned now that are only limited by the curvature of the earth.

      Normal GSM cells can have a radius of 35 km. It is also possible to extend the range of GSM cells to 70 km and more.

      And this is different for GSM operators exactly how? In the US, the GSM deployments work this way too! There are no SIM cards in the US for any technology. This is a deliberate decision made by the operators.

      As somebody else pointed out, this is not true. The GSM networks in the US also use SIM cards, and you can use any unlocked GSM phone that supports the US frequencies by simply slipping in your SIM card (and change as often as you like).

    9. Re:So, monopolies are good after all, eh? by Shag · · Score: 1

      CDMA is widely deployed in Brazil, India, China, Russia, Australia, and dozens of other non-American countries. It has tens of millions of subscribers outside North America. [...] It works as long as your service provider has roaming arrangements with the one in the visiting country.

      I have no doubt that all these things are true. However, I know - as you no doubt do, given your claimed expertise in the area - that the claims you are making are insignificant at best when looked at in relation to the actual needs of world travelers, the actual policies of service providers, and the actual deployment of GSM.

      Yes, CDMA has tens of millions of subscribers... but that's compared to over a half-billion for GSM.

      Yes, CDMA works in dozens of countries... but that's compared to almost 200 for GSM.

      Yes, CDMA will work overseas if service providers have agreements... but the salesfolk at most US CDMA providers are quick to state that their phones will not work most places overseas.

      The number of countries with meaningful CDMA infrastructure and user populations can be counted without taking one's shoes off. And the number of countries without meaningful GSM infrastructure or user populations can be counted on one hand.

      I don't in any way want to play down your knowledge or expertise, but I'm involved in things that can result in me being sent to any city in the world... and CDMA just isn't going to cut it for me, sorry.
      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  45. Oh man, what a great sig... by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1
    I can't believe that a great company like Nextel wants to merge with a crappy company like Sprint. It kind of reminds me when Sears merged with K-mart. The sad thing is that it's usually the weaker partner that wins out.
    --
    If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.

    I laughed out loud when I read your sig, because I've seen firsthand how government inefficiently is helping Nextel prosper and grow.

    I just quit my job at the county Parks and Recreation department, and everyone there has Nextels. We shared a building with the sheriffs, and they had Nextels too. Pretty much every county employee in the county uses Nextels, and from what I gather many of the neighboring counties use them too. This is because of the walkie-talkie feature, which theoretically saves a lot of money. It made sense, and I figured that Nextel must be offering them a pretty nice discount.

    Then one day I actually saw the bill for one of those things, and I nearly shit myself. FORTY CENTS A MINUTE. No free minutes at all, just forty cents a minute, PLUS A CONNECTION CHARGE of $0.75.

    Everyone in the county was on this same plan. So much for the discount. But hey, no big loss because we're all supposed to be using the walkie-talkie feature, right?

    Hah. First, the walkie-talkie was billed at around $0.15 a minute. Just for reference, there are PREPAID phones out that offer ten cents a minute for REAL phone capability. Second, we used the walkie-talkie feature maybe 10% of the time at best. Often we were calling land lines, but mostly we were just too lazy to search through the address book for the (often cryptic) walkie-talkie phone ID when we could just dial the number by hand. Oh yeah, and there were personal calls, too. They'd did monitor your bill, but as long as you kept each call under ten minutes they didn't care. Under their wonderfully discounted Nextel plan, a one-minute call was a mere $1.15!

    Incidentally, this is how I found out about the billing plan. I made a few hour-long calls to a girl I was interested in, figuring that it was worth the $10-$25 I'd have to pay (if I even had to pay at all... I assumed my plan had SOME free minutes.) Imagine my surprise when I was slapped with a bill that was well over $100...

    Somebody SOMEWHERE has got to be watching the bottom line...I mean fuck, given the size of our county, it must be in the millions. Either they're terminally apathetic, or they just can't tear their eyes off of the free phones (and cars?) Nextel keeps sending them.

    So um, yeah, if Nextel really isn't doing that well, I wouldn't be at all surprised if government inefficiency was to blame... maybe with a healthy dose of criminal activities on the side...
    1. Re:Oh man, what a great sig... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey stupid, why would every business in the country have the same dumb plan as that?

      when i had a nextel, our plan was $35 a month, that had 300 minutes, and unlimited direct connect. My brother-in-law has it and i know his plan is still the same rate.

    2. Re:Oh man, what a great sig... by jjhall · · Score: 1

      Maybe that was 10 years ago when Nextel was more of a cross-over from the radio service into cell phones, but their rates are nowhere near that now. I wonder if they were talking about Boost, which is the pre-paid spin-off of Nextel, the pricing sounds more in line if that is the case. I find it very hard to believe that a fleet (and government no less) would pay more than individuals. Or maybe those are the rates that they get billed at, then a big discount is chopped off at the end of the bill and the end user never sees it. Either way I'm raising the brown flag over that one.

      I have one of their "Free Incoming" plans, with 400 peak outgoing minutes, and free direct connect. I used my phone over 1200 minutes last month, and between the incoming calls, free nights and weekend outgoing, and direct connect, I only used 250 of my alotted minutes. Try that with any of the other carriers, it just won't happen unless you work nights and sleep all day. Under my old AT&T plan (before the Cingular merger) I would have had an overage of well over $200 if I used the phone the way I do now.

      Everybody has gripes about certain carriers. My wife and I tried Verizon, and they were the worst provider I've ever used. Worst coverage, and even worse customer service. We ended up just letting the phones sit idle for 3 months to ride out the contract after we switched to Nextel. On the other hand I know others that swear by Verizon and would never switch unless they went out of business.

      I've heard people in my area rave about Sprint's features and such, the only complaint is the coverage once you get away from the downtown areas. Since I have service with Nextel in more areas locally than I had with AT&T and Verizon, I'm thinking the merger should help both Sprint and Nextel if they use their heads.

    3. Re:Oh man, what a great sig... by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1

      No, this was more like four months ago.

      I found it very hard to believe too, but the numbers were staring me in the face, and a little asking around confirmed that everyone was on the same plan.

      Assuming this isn't a case of outright bribery, I think that the only explanation is that perhaps 10 or so years ago was when they first signed up with Nextel, and no one has bothered to change the plan since then. I'm not suggesting that this is the best Nextel has to offer, that'd be utterly insane on their part. But this was hardly the only case of government waste I saw at my job (though it is definitely the worst), and I'm guessing that Nextel is quite wisely remaining silent to milk this thing for all it's worth. If anyone actually stood up and threatened to switch, I'm sure they'd give them a a better plan in a heartbeat.

    4. Re:Oh man, what a great sig... by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why you guys think I'm attacking Nextel as a whole or saying that this sort of plan is the norm. I know they have better plans; I know they offer unlimited direct connect. My semi-OT point was regarding governmental inefficiency and stupidity, not the pricing policies of the Nextel corporation.

      I never implied that every business or government agency in the country has this plan, just our local government (and perhaps some other local governments, too.) If you guys are really going to insist that I'm a liar, I'll hunt down the bill. It's dated from around February of this year.

      From what I've seen, cell phone companies are more than happy to let you hang yourself. This is not unique to Nextel. Usually they only offer to transfer you to a new plan if you specifically ask--or threaten to cancel your service. Chances are this was a very old plan, and government inefficiency/apathy/bribery meaent that no one ever bothered to change it once the rates got better.

      If you wanna call someone stupid, let me go find that bill and scan it for ya... though I'm not sure who's dumber, the people in charge of our county telecommunications, or the taxpayers who let them get away with this crap.

  46. Sextel by mc900ftjesus · · Score: 0

    For all of the naysayers: Virgin Mobile gets the best ratings from its customers for its network over Verizon, Cingular, Sprint and Nextel. Guess who's network they use? Sprint. It's surprising that technical people get caught up in old hype about Sprint having a bad network.

  47. Dear Nextel, I almost pity you by gelfling · · Score: 1

    As a SprintPCs customer all I can say is too bad for you. You can kiss any notion of service, carrier, coherent billing or being able to rectify any problem no matter how small, out the window. Plus as an added bonus, virtually 100% of the known universe is DIGITAL ROAMING so whatever your plan you will be raped by charges.

    In customer satisfaction surveys SprintPCS usually comes out slightly above North Korean Prison Camps, but not always.

    1. Re:Dear Nextel, I almost pity you by doctorjay · · Score: 0

      Ive got to agree with dunc. I chose sprint as my first cellular provider and never looked back. Their customer service is very good, their coverage rocks, (unless you go to canada or live in a bomb shelter, the boonies, east bumblefuck, west bumblefuck or any of the other adjacent towns. The original poster must fall into one of those categories. Either that or needs to get a new phone.

    2. Re:Dear Nextel, I almost pity you by gelfling · · Score: 1

      I live in Raleigh North Carolina - hardly West Gopherfuck. And my problems have more to do with outright fraud from Sprint.

    3. Re:Dear Nextel, I almost pity you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have sprint in louisville ky, and rarely if ever go roaming, usually in basements and poorly wired buildings. If that is really your experience, I believe they offer unlimited roaming for $5 a month.

  48. "free market competition"? by whitroth · · Score: 1

    And how soon will it be before we only have one or two telecoms that control *everything*... except this time, they'll be unregulated.

    Bring back Ma Bell!

    Alternatively, let me propose an Act for Congress to promote free and fair competition:
        1) in any interstate industry, including but not
                limited to telecom, transportation, and
                retail, if mergers result in less than
                four companies controlling at least 85%
                of the market, that industry becomes
                a regulated monopoly.
        2) in those same industries, if further
                consolidation results in one company
                controlling at least 85% of the market,
                it will be nationalized.

    The intent is, of course, to scare them into free and fair competition.

          mark "and what's wrong with socialism?"

  49. The only reason this happened... by vertinox · · Score: 1

    Was because the CEO's and board of directors from both companies wanted to make a killing from stock options from the merger.

    Merging two large companies in no way benefits the consumers or the regular workers of those companies seeings that you are trying to combine two almost independendant organizations together in a larger less organized organization.

    Also trying to combine two incompatible network protocols would be very painful for all involved... In reality the smart way to merge with have just joint board of directors and keep the companies two serpate enities reporting to one group.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  50. FCC or SEC by camt · · Score: 1

    I thought mergers of public companies had to be approved by the SEC, not the FCC. Do they need approval from both commissions because they are telecom companies?

  51. Not my experience by dunc78 · · Score: 1

    As another SprintPCS customer, I don't feel the same as you. I have had them for 4 years or so and have never had any problems that I can remember. Also, in Maryland, I haven't noticed any holes in coverage. For some reason it just seems vogue to bash Sprint. Sprint also has their new fair and flexible plans, which I think are fairly nice in that they adjust the number of minutes you are purchasing each month (in 100 minute incretments) to the number of minutes you used that month so one doesn't have to worry about overage as much. Finally, after looking at other companies offerings, I like Sprints Vision service for wireless internet access (which allows unlimited downloads) better than other companies service where the users pays by the MB or whatever unit they select.

  52. am i the only one who thought "sextel"? by hammeredpeon · · Score: 1

    i'm still young..

    --
    best college pickem site ever: pickem.terrbear.org
  53. Template for fighting back corporate shafting by doctorjay · · Score: 0

    If thats the case, then just call them up and tell them talk a lot of shit... 1) You were going to tell your friends to switch to sprint and now you are going to tell them that their service blows 2) You will refuse to pay your bill unless they resolve this issue, that they will have to spend more on collection agencies than the amount is worth. 3) You will report them to the BBB, 4) try to make them sympathize with you "what would you do if you were in my shoes??" 5) ask to speak to a supervisor.. keep escalating till you get what you want. 6) ask for the person that you are speaking with's name .. that makes them feel accountable if they fuck up. some company tried to shaft me last year and I wouldnt let them off the phone till it got my issue resolved...

  54. Uh, actually Intel is little-endian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry to burst your bubble, but the Intel CISC architecture is little-endian (unlike most RISC architectures, which are big-endian).

    Actually it's kinda funny:

    small instruction set = big endian
    big instruction set = little endian

  55. Incorrect by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

    For Sprint or Verizon, it's practically a week long process. [...] Changing numbers is a snap with SIMs, just call up the provider and they can issue you a new number in 2 minutes. Verizon wanted me to key in a bunch of stuff in the phone to make it work.

    Are you saying it takes you a week to key in those numbers? :P

    Swapping phones with Verizon is a piece of cake. I don't have experience with Sprint, but it's the same technology. All you need to do is go to their web site, type in the new phone's ESN, and then dial *228 on the phone to program it over the air. You don't need to type any programming information into modern CDMA phones.. it all happens over the air.

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    1. Re:Incorrect by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      No, but verizon said it would take a week before the whole process would be complete. I called them on a Monday and the phone wasn't ready until the following Monday because they had to "schedule it"

  56. Re:iDen to Go? All roads lead to CDMA... by microbrew_nj · · Score: 1

    In addition to a lucrative customer base, Nextel also brings radio spectrum to the table.

    Nextel didn't have an upgrade path to mobile high speed data, at least in the air interface. As for the core network?

  57. Happy with your service... by Thesketchmaster · · Score: 1

    I have tried nearly every cell company out there and the only one I have been happy with so far is Metro PCS in South Florida, $55 a month unlimited local and LD in the whole region, for short trips just pay as you go, and the service is small enough and sound enough I rarely get dropped calls... When will one of the bigger companies give unlimited for a fee..