Slashdot Mirror


Extra Daylight Savings May Confuse the Gadgets

CrimeDoggy writes "In the energy bill to be signed by the President today (August 8), changes are to be made that extend daylight savings time. The bill would start daylight time three weeks earlier and end it a week later as an energy-saving measure. Many devices such as VCRs, cell phones, and watches would still operate on the previous schedule, potentially causing problems."

99 of 933 comments (clear)

  1. Time for a change... by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 3, Insightful


    Super. It's about time we monkey with the way we reckon time again...after all, we had almost gotten used to the current insane standard.

    I would propose a rather radically different option...eliminate time zones in the U.S. altogether. That's right, no time zones at all...everyone can just use GMT. I'm not advocating that everyone go to work at 09:00 GMT...business can determine what hours they want their employees to work, based on the amount of daylight available at that particular time of year, but the time standard would be the same everywhere. That way, there would be none of this bullshit confusion about 'what time is that here', or 'what is the time there'. It's GMT. The same damned time everywhere.

    We're already a global community...it only makes sense to adopt a global time. Of course, asking the country that still uses Imperial measurement units to spearhead this change might be asking a bit much...

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Time for a change... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      This would help so much. Just have internal time be in seconds, globally. Then just define days as XXXXXX-XXXXXX.

    2. Re:Time for a change... by Peyna · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Swatch started such an initiative a couple years ago.

      Internet Time

      --
      What?
    3. Re:Time for a change... by Doom+bucket · · Score: 2

      Ok, so our culture is to ingrained in the American system of meausrement to change. I can accept that. We can't change the side of the road we drive on because the infastructure is already in place. And we'd again, have to teach millions how to relearn how to drive. But explain to me the significance of daylight savings time. I mean really.

    4. Re:Time for a change... by wazootyman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But what happens when I'm in Michigan and need to call a client in California? It's still relevant that 9 am here is 6 am there. If you eliminate time zones, you'll still have to adjust your schedule based on the fact that their day is about 3 hours behind yours.

      We already use a global time in a sense; time zones make GMT into a format that's easier to understand. Knowing that it's 05:00 GMT doesn't necessarily tell you whether you're going to be calling a person in the middle of the night or not.

    5. Re:Time for a change... by SlayerofGods · · Score: 4, Funny

      And while on the topic... who thought up this crazy 60 seconds in a minute, 60 minutes in an hour, and 24 hours in a day.
      We need metric time damn it!

      --

      Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
    6. Re:Time for a change... by Nos. · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Move somewhere that doesn't use DST. I live in Saskatchewan (Canada). The time here is GMT -06:00, all year round.

    7. Re:Time for a change... by Otter · · Score: 2, Funny

      I took a marketing class last fall where the case study book had (along with several other can't-miss late '90s schemes, including Alloy.com and Onsale.com) a case on Swatch Internet Time. It's aged about as well as the rest of the Swatch brand has...

    8. Re:Time for a change... by Peyna · · Score: 2, Insightful

      .business can determine what hours they want their employees to work, based on the amount of daylight available at that particular time of year, but the time standard would be the same everywhere. That way, there would be none of this bullshit confusion about 'what time is that here', or 'what is the time there'. It's GMT. The same damned time everywhere.

      Of course, this also creates a similar problem, it just shifts it to a different area.

      Instead of "what is it there"? The question becomes "What time do you start work over there?" "What time do you wake up over there?"

      So you still have to remember the same information, except there's less standardization aside from being able to say "Meet me at 10:00" and everyone can look at their watch and understand it to mean the same thing no matter where they are.

      So we'll all have the same time on our watches, but we'll be doing whatever we want whenever we want and coordination would become even more confusing.

      --
      What?
    9. Re:Time for a change... by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you adopted this system you would be two steps behind China. They've had this sytem for a while now...

    10. Re:Time for a change... by brunson · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Anyone with a background in math will tell you base 12 or base 60 is much better to do math in. The more integer divisors your base has, the easier it is to do division without going into fractions. In a 12 hour day, what's half of that, or a third or a quarter? It's even better in a 60 minute hour where you have a factors of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20 and 30. What do you have for 10? 2 and 5. 100? 2, 4, 5, 10, 20, 25 and 50. Don't push for getting rid of base 60 time, push to change our number system to base 12.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      Jesus loves you, I think you suck
    11. Re:Time for a change... by badasscat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That way, there would be none of this bullshit confusion about 'what time is that here', or 'what is the time there'. It's GMT. The same damned time everywhere.

      I think you're missing the basic purpose of telling time. Which is to say that no matter what it says on the clock, it's the "same damned time everywhere", so your solution accomplishes nothing. Time is linear - you don't actually go back in time if you take a flight that lands in one place "earlier" than when it left (I know you know this, but your premise suggests otherwise). The purpose of having a time standard that we can all read is as a frame of reference. Your solution is to eliminate that frame of reference. I don't see how this makes things simpler.

      If it's morning where I am in NYC, it's still going to be night in Hawaii regardless of what the clock says. I still need to remember that if I want to call somebody there, or otherwise communicate. Just because my watch says it's 4 AM (GMT) doesn't mean all those Hawaiians are going to be awake.

      You're looking at things backwards. Time zones make it easier to deal with this issue, because we can easily say "oh, it's six hours earlier in Hawaii - that means people must still be asleep." Take away the time zones and you're stuck doing calculations about distance and solar cycles for every single place on the planet you've got to deal with. Is it really easier to say "well, Hawaii is 5,500 miles east, and the earth rotates at X miles an hour; therefore, Hawaii will have sunlight in 6 hours" than it is to just know that Hawaii's 6 hours behind us?

    12. Re:Time for a change... by guaigean · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is probably the most logical solution, but what would happen to all those famous songs like "Working 9 to 5"? Working 14:00 to 22:00 just doesn't have the same ring.

      --
      Microsoft Sucks, F/OSS Rocks. I get mod points now right?
    13. Re:Time for a change... by croddy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The only way that right-hand drive makes sense is if most people are left-handed.

      I, for one, prefer to shift gears with my right hand.

    14. Re:Time for a change... by brunson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The question becomes "What time do you start work over there?" "What time do you wake up over there?"

      You have to ask that anyway. Just because I start work at 8am in Denver doesn't mean I can assume that everyone everywhere starts work at 8am. I can't even assume that in the *same* timezone.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      Jesus loves you, I think you suck
    15. Re:Time for a change... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Time is clearly not meant to be decimal-based. You can of course separate a day into arbitrarily many sections and call these sections anything you like. A 1000 wobbles per day perhaps. The bigger units of time are the real problem: The year can not be described by an integer number of days. If you don't want to do away with months, these are based on the moon and the only way to have an integer number of months per year is to not have them be precisely synced to the moon phase. Then you have the problem that a reasonable good approximation of the moon phase leads to a number of days by which the number of days per year isn't divisible, so you get months with more days and months with fewer days by dithering the error over the year. It's really hopeless, in terms of numerical elegance.

      60 and 24 at least have some nice numerical properties:

      60 is divisible by 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15 and 30.

      24 is divisible by 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 12.

      Try that with 100: 2, 4, 5, 10, 20, 25 and 50. Much less flexible.

    16. Re:Time for a change... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Gosh, I'm sure glad it has one as a factor! I hope we never never use a base that doesn't.

    17. Re:Time for a change... by operagost · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You must be new here!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    18. Re:Time for a change... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But what happens when I'm in Michigan and need to call a client in California?

      You know his hours of operation.

      You work from 12:00-20:00, he works from 15:00-23:00. You keep that in your contact information from him. He publishes it in his .VCF.

      Your PIM tells you when you bring up his record if he's working now so you don't have to burn any neurotransmitters figuring it out.

      This is the same as figuring out if the Target down the street is open yet.

      It's also great in that it would let people work closer to their natural circadian rhythms. Here in New Hampshire people assume everybody works 8-5, but in New Jersey, people start work at 9. So, already the current system is broken.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    19. Re:Time for a change... by justfred · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, right-hand-drive originated for just that reason - because if you were approaching someone on a horse, you'd want to pass to the left so that your sword hand would be read.

      Napoleon taught his troops to fight with their swords in their left hands, to surprise the British. Which is why the continentals would pass to the right.

    20. Re:Time for a change... by jZnat · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's so that it's hidden from the normal users! We don't want anyone to mess with that timezone a la the US Government is doing right now, so we prefix with the dot and chmod it to 0700

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    21. Re:Time for a change... by lgw · · Score: 3, Funny

      A *real* math geek will tell you that balanced base 3 is the best way to go (i.e., the digits are -1, 0, and 1). The is the densest way to store and calculate numbers. After all, why choose a system that's easy for humans when it's not humans that do most of the calculating any more?

      In any cas, the one true system of measure - the Furlong-Fortnight-Firkin system - is easy in both base 10 and base 12, you can't beat it!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    22. Re:Time for a change... by lgw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ever try to choose a meeting time on a con-call with 3 or more time zones? It always turns into an incoherant babble until someone asks "OK, what time *EST* do we have the next call". The current system sucks for agreeing on a time.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    23. Re:Time for a change... by CrazyTalk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, but I'm Jewish ;-)

    24. Re:Time for a change... by moonbender · · Score: 4, Funny

      I once figured that we should just use Absolute Universe Time. Universe time starts at Zero (no unit)--the time when the universe started to exist--and the current moment AUT always is 100% (or just One). All other dates are given as a percentage relative to this. Dates in the past are between 0 and 1, moments in the future are larger than 1.
      Of course, this introduces a number of minor inconveniences. First off, since the universe started to exist, as far as we can tell, some 16 billion years ago but our typical time needs are in the manner of hours and days, this leads to extremely minor fractions: "I'll meet you at 100.00000000009%" or "I was born at 99.99999999999983%." Second, the refence to a given moment in time changes, ie 50% AUT isn't the same in 5 minutes or 5 seconds, since the total time between 0% and 100% AUT always increases. So you'd have to take that into consideration when using AUT.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    25. Re:Time for a change... by Schnee · · Score: 3, Funny

      I heard that the Babylonian king went to his most trusted advisors and asked what base should they keep time in. All six of the advisors simultaneously held up both hands, finger spread....

    26. Re:Time for a change... by leoxx · · Score: 3, Funny

      My car gets forty rods to the hogshead, and that's the way I likes it!

    27. Re:Time for a change... by Orne · · Score: 2, Informative

      But explain to me the significance of daylight savings time. I mean really.

      In the pre-electricity "modern" era, families that stayed up after dark would light their homes with candles and oil lamps, which could get quite expensive ... The idea was proposed by Benjamin Franklin (known for his strong work ethic), that if the clocks were moved earlier towards the dawn in the summer, then there would be plenty of daylight in the evening after work, and thus countless candles and barrels of oil could be saved.

      Extrapolating that to today, there is still a chronological swing to the usage of energy... in the bulk power industry, this is called a "load curve", and basically follows a sine wave... there's a valley in usage over the early morning period when everyone is asleep, and as people wake up, the load increases in the "morning ramp", reaches its peak in the afternoon, and drops off in the late evening as people head to sleep.

      Now, moving the clocks to line up with the daylight periods would shift the energy usage one hour earlier in the day. In the morning in the summer, the sun is already up, so you're not going to save much electricity. However, by shifting the evening clocks forward, it removes some of the "lighting" time in the evening, which lowers load on the system, allows the generators that match load to drop their output lower earlier, they burn less fuel, and the economy as a whole saves money on imported fuel.

    28. Re:Time for a change... by william_w_bush · · Score: 3, Interesting

      base 4. started using base 4 math in my head as an experiment a few years ago, so much easier, makes hex trivial. all addition has 4 possibilities, add quarter, add half, add 3/4 or shift up. the human brain is better at thinking in quarters than percents or 1/8'ths or 1/60's, whatever. seriously try it, takes like a day to figure out, and you can upconvert to hex by just grouping digits on top of each other
      ex.
                    0 3
      2f = 2 3

      just my 2c, but made math hella easier, and helps even more with higher dimensional math because you can visualize and manipulate halves and quarters much better than 2/5 and 7/10.

      --
      The first rule of USENET is you do not talk about USENET.
    29. Re:Time for a change... by Peyna · · Score: 2, Informative

      "OK, what time *EST* do we have the next call".

      Which will still confuse the people that know that "EST" does not mean "Eastern" but "Eastern Standard Time," and the only state that is on EST right now is Indiana. Everyone else is on CDT or EDT. (CDT and EST just happen to coincide at the moment).

      --
      What?
    30. Re:Time for a change... by Fnord666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder why Bill Gates had them change this?

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    31. Re:Time for a change... by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 2, Funny
      You don't need 12 digits to count base-twelve.

      I found this new book on Amazon: "Men are base-21 and women are base-20"

    32. Re:Time for a change... by mario_grgic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, base e (where e=lim (1+1/n)^n as n->+infinity) is the best base to use.

      --
      As the island of our knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance.
    33. Re:Time for a change... by JustOK · · Score: 2, Funny

      I tried to show my teacher how to do that up to 288. She said it was 2 gross.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    34. Re:Time for a change... by makomk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That'd be Relative Univerrse Time. Absolute Universe Time would probably be the time since the start of the universe, in Planck periods. It's as close to a universal measure of time as you can get. The only downside is that watches would have to be rather on the large side to fit the display on.

    35. Re:Time for a change... by sleppy1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The base 60 numbering system goes back to (at least) Sumeria, which is most likely where the Babylonians got it from. Changing to base 10 time would not be so easy, since many units in the metric system depend on the current definition of the second. I'm not sure why when the French created the metric system they didn't change the second too, but they didn't, and unless we want to change the whole metric system, the second will have to remain. Of course, the U.S., which still hasn't adopted the metric system, could just make its own new measurement system with decimal time, and units based on that, and leapfrog from having the most obsolete system of measure in the world into the avant-garde.

      --


      "Nobody's ever going to make any money on the internet"
      --VP of the company I worked for, circa 1995
    36. Re:Time for a change... by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps, but all of their base are belong to me.

    37. Re:Time for a change... by Feanturi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Silly mods. This shouldn't have been modded 'Funny' but 'Informative' See here:

      http://users.pandora.be/worldstandards/driving%20o n%20the%20left.htm

    38. Re:Time for a change... by HD+Webdev · · Score: 2, Funny

      You work from 12:00-20:00, he works from 15:00-23:00. You keep that in your contact information from him. He publishes it in his .VCF.

      I, for one, welcome our new computer tell-you-when-to-call-people-instead-of-using-our- brains overlords.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
  2. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  3. Moral travesty by fruity_pebbles · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Daylight savings time is an idiotic solution to a non-existent problem.

    (Yes, that's an opinion. Feel free to disagree.)

    1. Re:Moral travesty by js3 · · Score: 4, Funny

      It takes a big man to admit daylight savings time is idiotic but I am not a big man.

      --
      did you forget to take your meds?
    2. Re:Moral travesty by legirons · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Daylight savings time is an idiotic solution to a non-existent problem."

      And while every other aspect of the gregorian calendar can be described in just a few lines of code, the daylight-savings time requires a 450KB database just to find out which timezone you're in, with entries like "during the second world war, London experimented with double daylight-savings time..." (admittedly most of that 450K is comments)

    3. Re:Moral travesty by Overzeetop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Which seems to be the problem?

      8:30 is a fine time for the sun to set. It sets by six in the winter (Virginia) and there doens't seem to be outcry.

      7am and the sun is "high overhead"? I'm still trying to figure out why that would be a problem. I work a relatively normal 8-5 day, and I have a sunrise simulator that I use - even in the summer - to get up at 6 so I have time to have breakfast and get my kid out of bed / dressed / fed / off to school. If it were light out at 5am, that'd be great.

      Of course, I have TiVo, so I don't have to worry about all that "but I can't watch Jay Leno and get up at 5am" shit. (No, I don't watch late night tv anyway). I don't play evening (insert sport here), where light is a problem. I can't get in 18 holes of golf after work regardless of the sunset time, so evening play is a moot point.

      Now that I come to think about it, if it got cooler an hour earlier in the evening, it would probably be much nicer. Young kids could spend more evenings chasing fireflys insead of having to go to bed while its still light out. The fireworks on the 4th could start at a reasonable time.

      Tell you what...I'm still looking for a down side. Even my wife would have one less day to be in a bitchy mood 'cause she lost an hour of sleep each spring. (Yes, she seems to treat the extra hour of sleep the fall change offers as a holiday akin to Christmas)

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    4. Re:Moral travesty by ergo98 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The only other solution is to shift your work schedule to get back those lost hours of daylight in the summertime, like the company I worked for in Indiana did.

      This is exactly how people should adapt to the increased sunlight hours during the summer - get up earlier and go to the gym, do gardening, whatever, during the copious hours before work if your work hours are static throughout the year. Alternately if you're an employer then adapt your hours (or even better adapt flexible hours for the majority of workplaces where it isn't detrimental to do so).

      The idea of changing the clock to force it on everyone is ludicrous, and it's imperfect anyways as there remains tremendous sunlight "waste" during the height of summer (in my area the sun rises just before 8am in the height of winter, and at 5am in the summer). In the past, when life was much more synchronous and people needed direct and immediate contact with others to a vastly greater degree, it was necessary for this mass coordination, but today we live largely asynchronous, queued and disconnected lives, and everyone clogging the streets at 8am and 5pm is insanity.

    5. Re:Moral travesty by dave_mcmillen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is exactly how people should adapt to the increased sunlight hours during the summer - get up earlier and go to the gym, do gardening, whatever . . . The idea of changing the clock to force it on everyone is ludicrous . . .

      Ah, but you've pointed out one of the problems: Go to the gym? But it's 5am, the gym isn't open yet. Neither is anything else, unless everyone gets together and agrees to start earlier. You can do this by asking every business to change schedules, or you can do it all at once by changing the clocks.

      Not so ludicrous, I think. No, for ludicrousness, wait until someone reasons that if extending it by another month is supposed to save energy, just think how much we'd save by extending it to the whole year! Wait for it.

    6. Re:Moral travesty by wasted+time · · Score: 2, Interesting

      People also are even happier and more productive with a two to four hour nap in the afternoon. Where's that legislation is what I want to know.

      Heh. My last employer offered flexible scheduling. We could work a 8-hour day anywhere between the hours of 6am and 7pm, with our supervisors prior approval. One of my coworkers decided this was a great idea and submitted a request to change his schedule to 7-7. When our boss ponted out that he was requesting a 12 workday, the guy replied with a dead serious, "yeah, I know. I plan to take a 3 hour nap after lunch everyday." Come to find out, he was also a DJ for a AM station and worked 11pm-3am several nights a week.

      I already worked a 10-11 hour day, so I should have just closed the door and napped anyway.

      --
      The Stone Age did not end because humans ran out of stones. - William McDonough
  4. Artifact? by markmcb · · Score: 2, Funny

    What is this "VCR" you speak of?

    --
    Mark A. McBride -- OmniNerd.com
  5. Look on the bright side by drwiii · · Score: 5, Funny

    You'll have another hour to fix it.

  6. Please just drop it. by Phs2501 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hopefully this will cause more states to take the good example of Arizona and just do away with the daylight savings sillyness altogether.

    1. Re:Please just drop it. by cruff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. It seems to me that no additional energy will be saved by this stupidity, it will just shift the period in the day when it is used.

    2. Re:Please just drop it. by the+phantom · · Score: 4, Insightful

      May I also add that extending Daylight Saving Time even farther into the fall is a bad idea(tm). I work at an elementary school. The kids tend to show up between 8:30 and 9:00 am. Understandard time in November, the sun has been up for maybe 40 minutes by the time they get here. Extending Daylight Saving Time even further means that they will be walking to school in the dark, which just seems like bad policy to me. Furthermore, I bike to work at about 7:00. I really don't like being on the road when it is very dark, which it can be at 7:00. It will be even worse with more DST.

      In short, I think this is a bad idea. I think DST is a bad idea in general, and I wish that more states would do what Arizona has done (but not the Navajo Nation), and dispense with DST altogether.

    3. Re:Please just drop it. by telecsan · · Score: 5, Informative

      You have apparently never seen the typical electric load in the evenings for a large electric utility. Trust me, you can tell the difference between the day before daylight saving time (starts/ends) and the day after. There is a benefit. Personally, I don't think it's worth the hassle, but that's just me being selfish.

    4. Re:Please just drop it. by Steve525 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree that extending DST further in fall is bad idea. The problem is DST is very assymetric. The winter solstice is Dec. 21. If DST was actually about daylight, it should be close to symmetric around this date. However, we fall back only 2 months before this, and spring ahead 4 months after this. So, the fall transition happens too late, and the spring transition could stand to happen sooner.

    5. Re:Please just drop it. by Peyna · · Score: 2, Interesting

      May I also add that extending Daylight Saving Time even farther into the fall is a bad idea(tm). I work at an elementary school. The kids tend to show up between 8:30 and 9:00 am. Understandard time in November, the sun has been up for maybe 40 minutes by the time they get here. Extending Daylight Saving Time even further means that they will be walking to school in the dark, which just seems like bad policy to me. Furthermore, I bike to work at about 7:00. I really don't like being on the road when it is very dark, which it can be at 7:00. It will be even worse with more DST.

      Here in Dayton, Ohio, we're almost as far west as you can get in EDT (not including Michigan and half Kentucky.

      The last school day that will be during DST in 2006 will be November 17th. Twilight will begin at 7:55 am, the sun will rise at 8:24 am, noon will be at 1:22 pm, and the sun will set at 5:20 pm.

      Without DST, the same day would be sun rise at 7:24 am, noon at 12:22 pm, sunset at 4:20 pm.

      When the kids go back to school on January 4th, without DST, the sun will rise at 7:58 am, noon at 12:42 pm, sunset at 5:25 pm.

      I don't see it being that much of a difference. And actually, without DST, with the sun setting at 4:20 pm, you probably have some kids going home in the dark. Especially if they're in after school activities (something which I'm sure being a fan of doing things "for the children" you will support).

      So they either go to school in the dark in the morning, or they come home in the dark at night.

      --
      What?
    6. Re:Please just drop it. by sholden · · Score: 2, Interesting


      It can be hard to justify a the cost of a $3.00 spiral to a $0.50 incandescent bulb, though. Mine have been going strong for 2 years now, rather than replacing them every 6 months or so.


      Only another year and you'll break even...

      Ignoring the energy costs of course :)

    7. Re:Please just drop it. by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 2, Funny
      You would have to bike to work at 9:30 and leave by 3:30


      Works for me! Let's throw in a nice long three-martini lunch for good measure.
  7. Of all the things in the Energy Bill by bgfay · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems that this is the one that people are concentrating on. Nutty stuff, really. I keep thinking about how we're killing the environment, that we can't get our President to even mention the word conservation, that we are making little to no progress toward using alternative energy sources, and on and on. But the fact that my cell phone might get confused by the new Daylight Savings Time is what we're hearing about not just on /. but on all sorts of other media outlets.

    Alright, so I'm going off on this. I understand that /. is news for nerds and tech oriented. This story fits that. I'm not saying that this story doesn't belong on /. (Got that?)

    What I'm trying to say is that somehow this is the BIG idea in the energy bill as it is being reported and it doesn't deserve that status.

    The Energy bill is a mess the likes of which haven't been seen since the Patriot Act. That's where the focus needs to be.

    Oh well.

    --
    Yeah, I'm as old as my UID would suggest.
    1. Re:Of all the things in the Energy Bill by garcia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Energy bill is a mess the likes of which haven't been seen since the Patriot Act. That's where the focus needs to be.

      People only care about the here and now (I'm one of them although I don't care about how this might screw up my computer automatically correcting for CDT and CST).

      Global Warming is something that cooks and liberals care about and it doesn't affect anyone in the next two days so it doesn't matter. What's on TV is what matters to people right now.

      As long as the media and the Government can divert people's attention with stupid bullshit like their mobile phones and VCRs (remember anything that interferes with Survivor, The Bachelor/ette, and/or any other stupid reality TV show is far more important than anything else).

    2. Re:Of all the things in the Energy Bill by Buran · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you are going to claim that conservation does nothing good, back it up with sources. While not every conservation project is as successful as originally hoped, to say that all conservation is useless is ludicrous. If it were totally useless, no one would do it -- and instead there are many, many people -- paid and unpaid -- who work to ensure that conservation happens.

      The same is true for recycling programs.

      Also don't forget that many projects have long-term effects and take some time for the true effect to be realized. Your recycling example, for instance. While recycling processes are different from raw manufacturing, there's more to it than just that. Consider, for instance, the long-term effect of cutting down mature forests in terms of oxygen production, erosion, destruction of natural beauty, the effects on the biosphere as a whole, the destruction of habitat for animals that live in those forests, and so on.

      We can specifically point to the short-sighted actions of a logging company that destroyed the then-last-known habitat of the ivory-billed woodpecker -- in full knowledge of what they were doing as a result of information given to them by scientists. And look at how long it has taken to find out that the damage may not have been permanent after all -- but undoing their mess may not be possible if it turns out the birds have been wiped out to the point where the ones that have been sighted can no longer reproduce.

      You fall into the trap that so many others do of failing to think of the long term and thinking only in the short.

      Again, let's see some sources to prove those ridiculous accusations.

  8. Living in AZ by DigiWood · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...I don't have to bother with daylight savings. The heat sucks but hey it's a tradeoff.

    --


    Nothing is impossible. It just hasn't been figured out yet.
  9. Why? by Glendale2x · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm still waiting for someone to point out a really good reason why we need DST. All it does is irritate me having to deal with resetting clocks.

    Furthermore, what the hell does this have to do with energy conservation? I'm still going to turn the fracking lights on when it gets dark; I don't look at the clock and go "hey, it's 7, time to turn on all the lights."

    --
    this is my sig
    1. Re:Why? by Aidtopia · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'm still waiting for someone to point out a really good reason why we need DST.

      There are several studies that show Daylight Saving time saves lives (pedestrians and automobile traffic), reduces violent crime, and saves electricity.

      Here's one example.
  10. Re:Awful idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    "I use my mod points to rank down people who point out dupes."

    Good for you. We all appreciate your proactive stance for mediocrity.

  11. A great big DUH by jandrese · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course stuff that is hardcoded with the old DST dates is going to have trouble. Yeah, that's a lot of gadgets. What can we do about it though? Most of those gadgets are not upgradable, so you're going to have to change the time on them twice a year now (once they figure out how to turn off the automatic DST updates).

    I wish the president would have had the gumption to just extend Daylight Savings Time to all year long and ditch the date changes entirely. Nearly every device can be configured to ignore DST changes and it would have saved the world a lot of confusion each year.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  12. Re:I offer you my consulting services. by rovingeyes · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Stop the apocalypse! Hire me"

    Scare tactics always work in US. Tell them, doom is near and people will do anything, even hire you ;)!

  13. Daylight Saving...No "S" by chia_monkey · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just to clarify, it's "daylight saving" time...No "s".

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
    1. Re:Daylight Saving...No "S" by grunherz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, we 'Mericans make things possessive that aren't either!

      I just went to Target's to git some stuff 'cause Wal-Mart's is too crowded these days.

      Don't even git me started on Sears's!

      --
      Four weeks, Twenty papers, that's two dollars ... plus tip.
    2. Re:Daylight Saving...No "S" by corsec67 · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, you mean "daylight aving"?

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
  14. There is no problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Some US states have no DST, yet these devices work fine in them, why because you can turn off auto-DST and manage time manually.

    1. Re:There is no problem... by petermgreen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the other problem with manual DST is if people get it wrong.

      the windows user interface in particular pushes the idea that local time is all important and the timezone is just some internationalisation setting.

      if you have local time right and timezone wrong your computer gets the wrong idea of UTC which is a bad thing for any protocol that bases things like caching on UTC.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  15. Homer's Insight by woodsrunner · · Score: 2, Funny

    8:59, First time I've ever been early for work. --except for all those daylight savings times, lousy farmers!

  16. Re:I offer you my consulting services. by pete6677 · · Score: 2, Funny

    For best results, tell them to do it to protect the children from terrorists.

  17. Daylight Saving Time... by HEMI426 · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...Daylight Saving Time, not Daylight Savings Time...

  18. This is nothing more than a plot... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 2, Funny

    clearly the administration is in the thrall of Big Time!

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  19. It's simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Daylight Savings Time is a way for those of us too poor to afford an airplane ticket to be able to experience the joys of jet lag.

    Typical government, they have Datlight Savings in the half of the year that already has plenty of daylight. I'd really like it to not be dark when I get off work between xmas and new years eve.

    But DST in the winter makes too much sense.

  20. The gadgets are all confused... by OmgTEHMATRICKS · · Score: 2, Funny

    Except for Inspector Gadget, who is on the case.

  21. incredibly dumb theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    [Removes tin foil hat.]

    What if the whole "this will save power" is just an excuse? Isn't 2007 when we are supposed to be switching to all digital broadcasts and isn't the broadcast flag supposed to be coming out around then (if Congress passes it since its out of the domain of the FCC now)? What is this is all a ploy to irritate people because their VCR's (which they don't use much anyway, anymore) and TV's are out of synch for a few weeks, so they have to go out and buy new equipment? I'm sure most people won't care, but this might be one little more annoyance that would push Joe Q. User to upgrade his equipment, and further lock himself into the media conglomerates will?

    [Puts on tin foil hat.]

  22. Decimal time by Z-MaxX · · Score: 2, Informative
    Surprise!! There is actually such a thing! It's called Decimal Time!

    And I wish the world were so nice that we could all use metric things and other 10-based units to match our number system.

    --
    Dr Superlove 300ml. I use my powers for awesome
  23. Re:Time in the Day = Save Energy? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 2, Informative

    in the 1700's Ben Franklin rightly surmized(sp?) that by increasing the use of daylight during the summer, less candles had to be made, transported, and used thus there was a fairly good bit of savings.

    In early 1900s, if more daylight led to less electric light use (a sizeable portion of the electric bill) then there would be significant savings.

    In modern times however, it is but a blip on the monthly electric bill, with AC units, refrigerators, freezers, TVs, etc all demanding almost constant power draw. Lights simply aren't a huge area of savings anymore.

    Even more so this could actually INCREASE our electric costs: I have a programmable thermostat, that I set to be warmer in the summer when I'm not home, then turn on so it's cool when I return from work. Now I'm home more hours during the hottest part of the day which in turn uses more power for my AC unit which is wildly more expensive to run than a few lightbulbs.


    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  24. Re:Daylight Savings Time.. by spun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    New Mexico has DST. Arizona is weird, though. The state doesn't have it, but the Navajo reservation which takes up the northeastern corner of the state does. Even more confusing, there is a Hopi reservation entirely inside the Navajo reservation that doesn't, and another tiny Navajo reservation entirely inside the Hopi reservation that does. You could very well have to change your clock seven times just travelling in a straight east-west line across the state.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  25. Why is it so easy? by MikeDawg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is it so easy for lawmakers to make a change to the time, yet they can't make the freaking change to the metric system to be like "the rest of the world". I wish we (speaking as an American) would convert to the metric system. Even though it doesn't negate the S.A.E. completely, it will overtime take its place.

    --

    YOU'RE WINNER !
    Another lame blog

    1. Re:Why is it so easy? by RexRhino · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, the U.S. adopted the metric system in 1866. (and in 1975... and in 1988...).

  26. Re:Purpose? by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 4, Informative

    How is this going to save energy?
    How about this?.

  27. Solution: Move to AZ by cjmnews · · Score: 2, Informative

    In AZ we don't observe the current daylight savings time, so I expect we'll ignore the new one too. So my gadgets and gizmos will all continue to work, ignoring DST as usual. I'm sure there are other places that ignore DST too, feel free to move there if AZ get full.

    --
    You can lose something that is loose, so tighten the loose item so you don't lose it.
  28. OT: sig... by shmlco · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It is as impossible to steal "intellectual property" as it is to steal fire.

    And it's equally possible to extinguish both...

    --
    Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
  29. The only other solution... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And what exactly is wrong with this other solution? We shoudln't change the definition of the gallon to make our cars appear more fuel efficient and similarly we shouldn't change the definition of the time to give the illusion that we can have more time for barbecuing. We can have more time for barbecuing by going to work earlier and coming home earlier. Why is that so difficult for people to grasp?

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  30. Freemasons, Illuminati, and the True Origin of DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wonder if anybody who reads Slashdot has ever taken the time to read a real history book and learn the true reasons behind the creation of Daylight Savings Time? The Freemasons and Illuminati are a group determined to get world domination and they are based in Sweden. Back in the early 1500s they managed to dupe many prominent American founding fathers such as Ben Franklin and Kurt Russell into believing this idea about "conserving daylight."

    The original plan was that this would give farmers more time to plant their crops. (The justification today is that we will consume less energy, but this was the year 1500 and electricity had not been invented yet.) But even the farmer idea is silly .. moving the clock back one hour is not going to generate any extra daylight! Farmers always get up at the beginning of daylight anyway, which is when the cock crows.

    The true story is horrid. It's dark and scary. The idea was to get the American people to slowly and gradually begin to accept the idea that time is not absolute. First, they were able to get people to screw around with their clocks twice a year. Now, they've managed to convince us to change when we do that. Eventually, the Freemasons and Illuminati hope to get us confused to the point where everybody believes that every day is February 2nd -- Groundhog Day.

    Since one of the popular activities on Groundhog Day is planting trees, people will stay home from work and plant trees instead of going to the office and being productive. And since they will have tricked us into thinking that every day is Groundhog Day, planting trees is all that we'll be doing, day in and day out! Since people will stop going to work entirely, our economy will soon crumble. Not only that, but with all of those trees planted, sunlight will stop hitting the ground here and will cause all of our crops to die, starving the whole country en masse. Then the New World Order will be upon us and the Hindu god Kali-Mah will take over.

    This is their true agenda, world domination and the destruction of America, Daylight Savings Time is their vehicle for this agenda and I encourage you to vote no on this bill and this is a run-on sentence.

  31. Re:Purpose? by Steve525 · · Score: 2, Informative

    call me dumb, but i don't understand how. if it's cold, i'm still going to turn on the heat, if it's dark i'm still going to turn on the lights.

    OK, you're dumb. (Sorry, I had, too).

    It's a simple idea, really. Let's say most people go to bed at around 11:00. At dusk, everyone turns on their house lights. With daylight saving time (DST), dusk is 8:30, so lights are on for 2.5 hours. Without DST, dusk is an hour earlier, so lights are on for 3.5 hours. (What is really happening with DST is that we are sleeping through less daylight in the morning. In the winter there is no daylight to waste in the morning so this doesn't work).

    Having said this, I'm not sure the savings works out as well as the above would suggest. DST means that people like me have to run our AC's an hour longer at the hottest part of the day, wasting more energy than we save. (Presumably, the other place I would spend that time is work, at that will have AC running whether I'm there or not).

  32. Re:does canada have to follow this? by djdole · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, they don't. They'll do whatever England does, since they're still the Queen's bitch.

    /me puts on his hockey stick proof, anti maple leaf asbestos pants.

  33. People unclear on the concept... by DragonHawk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "What's the conservation endgame?"

    There isn't one. That's the point. As opposed to the endgame for not conserving, which is resource exhaustion.

    I find your question so absolutely hilarious that I just had to reply.

    (Note that "conservation", in sane circles, does not mean "abandoning everything but solar power", the way some nut-jobs (on both ends of the spectrum) seem to think. It means intelligent management of your resources. "Sustainable resource consumption" would be a better term, but that's doesn't roll of the tongue as well.)

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
    1. Re:People unclear on the concept... by WalrusSlayer · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Resource exhaustion is economically impossible.

      As resources become scarce, the price increases to balance their scarcity. At some level, substitutes become more economically attactive and use of the now-expensive, scare resource declines.

      Geology doesn't adhere to economic principles I'm afraid, but I digress...

      The point isn't that we'll use up every drop of oil---you are correct that economics will turn price/supply into an asymptotic curve. The problem is the steepness of the curve and what kind of alternative fuel capacity will be online, at what time, and at what cost. The catastrophic scenario is that fossil fuels could very well spike in price decades before alternative fuels are practical. Or even worse, the scarcity of fossil fuels means that developing the alternative fuel infrastructure is infeasible. We should be developing the technologies and building the infrastructure now while we can afford to do so.

      Or to put it another way---imagine that fossil fuels become completely unaffordable (say, $30/gal), and there is no alternative energy in sufficient supply to fill the gap. How, exactly, is that different to the consumer than the scenario where we've hit resource exhaustion? In either case, the consumer ain't going see no oil coming his way...

  34. The REAL point of DST changes: Retailers by standards · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ah! You're missing the point of this law! The point isn't saving energy. The point is increasing RETAIL SHOPPING HOURS.

    As a large retailer, we know that core shopping happens during daylight hours. As the sun sets, people start clearing out of the retail stores.

    In most parts of the country, retail stores open at a fixed time, either 9AM (or 10AM in some areas). Almost no stores open at "sunrise".

      Therefore, core shopping hours are from a 9AM until sunset. Maybe the store is open until 9 PM, but in general shopping activity slows way down at sunset. This is just a known fact in the retail industry.

    By changing the clock, sunset can happen later relative to clock time. Therefore, if we add a month of DST, we add about 30 hours of prime-time shopping to our annual retail calendar!

    To a retailer, this is huge news - this is almost like adding 3+ full shopping days to our calendar at almost zero cost.

    My management was amazingly happy by this rule change.

  35. How surreal! by Hosiah · · Score: 2, Insightful
    A program that does nothing is augmented to do even more nothing for reasons which have nothing to do with it.

    Daylight Savings was originally implemented by Ben Franklin (simplified version: "to get farmers out of bed and milking the cows"). When was the last time Daylight Savings had an impact on your life, except twice a year when you change stuff or check it? Or give you an annual convenient excuse to roll into work an hour late?

    And it's just plain Dadaism to think it has anything at all to do with energy consumption. Do y'suppose Bush actually believes he controls the seasons by moving the clocks and calandar pages around? Wouldn't surprise me in the least.

  36. Re:Awful idea. by AJWM · · Score: 5, Funny

    Coming into effect in 2007 ... but in under a year?

    Is it 2006 where you are? Can you send me some stock quotes?

    --
    -- Alastair
  37. Re:Conservation is stupid by GlassHeart · · Score: 2, Insightful
    What in the world are you talking about?

    It would improve my life to get from point A to point B. I can do so in an SUV, or I can do so in a car that uses half as much gasoline. Conservation is to use the least amount of resources to accomplish the same goal. Conservation is not the opposite of need, but the opposite of waste.

  38. Re:How will if affect my watch ??! by Nermal6693 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wish my watch (also a Casio) would automatically adjust itself. Computers can do it (even when not online), so a watch should be able to as well. Plus the "adjust" button on my watch is a nightmare to press, really need 2 hands to do it (before you tell me to just take my watch off, it's too much trouble, the band's broken so my watch is zip-tied on).

  39. Re:I also.. by dorsey · · Score: 3, Funny

    My friends, common sense and traditional time-tested dexterity prove that left-handedness is simply wrong. Writing with your right hand is natural law--WRITE MEANS RIGHT! Righteous people know the difference between right and left!

    According to the Encylopedia Britannica (1944), "The percentage of left-handedness . . . is much higher among inmates of institutions for the feeble minded and the psychopathic." Yet these "biological errors" are campaigning for special recognition as a legitimate minority to force you to accept their immoral behavior. Worse yet, the schools are encouraging deviant-handed diversity and facilitating the use of sinful southpaw scissors!

    The Bible says, "A wise man's heart is at his right hand; but a fool's heart at his left" (Ecclesiastes 10:2), and "Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into the EVERLASTING FIRE" (Matthew 25:41).

    "Theories relative to handedness vary in their treatment of it as an acquired or a native trait," says the Britannica. Many experts believe that left-handedness is learned and can be corrected. With repentance and reparative therapies, sinners caught in the lecherous leftist lifestyle can be converted and cured. Yes, right righteousness and healthy handedness is possible! Many ex-southpaws have become normal, happy right-writers. Some have even held hands, gotten married, and had children!

    But the militant leftist lobby says they were "born that way." They cite evidence that it's genetic, morally neutral, and normal! Well, that doesn't mean we have to teach children that it's OK to respect people who are different! Any nonjudgmental mention of left-handedness is "promotion" of wrong behavior, encouraging vulnerable young children to experiment with alternative handedness!

    Since right-thinking people believe that wrong-handedness is immoral, we will force the schools to teach only OUR beliefs to YOUR children!

    AGREE WITH US OR BURN IN HELL!

    -M. Dennis Moore

    --
    hinderfreude ('hin-dur-"froi-d&), n. The feeling of joy derived from being in the way.
  40. Re:Freemasons, Illuminati, and the True Origin of by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny
    Now if we [1] could just convince the ground where I live not to be frozen on Groundhog Day [2], our plan would be complete.

    [1] I'm a Master Mason.
    [2] My wife's and firstborn's birthday.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?