Slashdot Mirror


Server Based Slots of the Future

prostoalex writes "The slot machines of the future won't be dumb one-armed bandits anymore, CNet reports. New generation of slot machines, to be deployed in major Vegas casinos, will feature server-based gaming with games, new features and, most important, the odds being downloaded from a central server location, not determined by internal machine algorithm any more."

190 comments

  1. Safe and secure! by Savantissimo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Some cynics here may doubt the security of the system, but I'm sure none of the gaming vendors will hide any Easter eggs in their proprietary code. After all, if one can make software work reliably for something as complicated as counting votes, surely a simple application like a few hundred different kinds of casino games should be child's play to secure.

    --
    "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    1. Re:Safe and secure! by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not nervous. Casinos make your average government mint look insecure by comparison.

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    2. Re:Safe and secure! by doormat · · Score: 4, Informative

      The code that runs the slot machines is REQUIRED to be inspected and approved by the Nevada Gaming Board (for vegas anyways). So yes, it'll be safe and secure.

      --
      The Doormat

      If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    3. Re:Safe and secure! by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 0, Troll

      So yes, it'll be safe and secure.

      Ah, so that means it'll be open source!

    4. Re:Safe and secure! by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 2, Funny

      True. Casino software has far more inspection requirements, and is orders of magnitude more secure than any election software, for example, used in the USA.

    5. Re:Safe and secure! by JohnnyLocust · · Score: 5, Informative

      The code that runs the slot machines is REQUIRED to be inspected and approved by the Nevada Gaming Board (for vegas anyways). So yes, it'll be safe and secure. . This hasn't stopped previous successful exploits on slot machines. http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/1998/Jan-10 -Sat-1998/news/6745681.html Las Vegas has a history of falling prey to the very same people they use to keep gaming secure. As with any secure system, the weakest link is always the human factor.

    6. Re:Safe and secure! by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      Hmm yeah. Because the Nevada Gaming Board is not susceptible to pay-offs like politicians and voting machine manufacturers.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    7. Re:Safe and secure! by cafall · · Score: 1

      Even in a moral world where bribery isn't SOP in the gaming industry, there's still the issue of the NGB (and whatever boards inspect games in other jurisdictions) not having a clue about the technology they're testing.

      Just consider how much the USPTO knows about the patents they approve. Yeah, like that.

    8. Re:Safe and secure! by Fussen · · Score: 1

      Now this is organized crime.

    9. Re:Safe and secure! by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      The code that runs the slot machines is REQUIRED to be inspected and approved by the Nevada Gaming Board (for vegas anyways). So yes, it'll be safe and secure.


      Ah, my favorite kind of sarcasm.... so subtle that you can't tell whether the poster was serious, or not.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    10. Re:Safe and secure! by EvilMidnightBomber · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ok. I've written much of the system code for one of the big three slot manufacturers' boxes and actually had to go through the NGCB (Nevada) and GLI (Jersey) submission procedures. They do in fact inspect some of the code in great detail, particularly the random number generator and the process of using it to extract the final reel positions. This (c++) code is perhaps 2-300 lines out of about 15k. There is NO way they could secure this amount of code. Any software guy with a year of experience could hack something in that would look totally innocuous. RAM based pointers in completely different modules come to mind (not that I've thought about it much :) ). The NGCB/GLI process is really just a way for them to get copies of the code and say they did *something* to make the casino ops get a fuzzy warm feeling. What really keeps the software guys in check is simple math. Go into a casino and start winning on ANYTHING consistently and you WILL eventually be caught. You can't drop a stick of gum in these places without being taped from at least 3 angles, and both the slot itself and the central system it's hooked up to keep a very long gamelog. If you're stupid enough to make the machine jackpot, now they have your name (required for tax purposes). So perhaps you could make a few loose thousand without getting noticed but wind up risking all future employability. In addition, if word of the cheat goes public, you've just damaged your employer's reputation, and they can go after your ass financially for lost credibility. I hate to bow to "the man" but some things just aren't worth it.

    11. Re:Safe and secure! by mooncaine · · Score: 1

      Got me smiling with that one. I'd mod parent "funny". I can't help but think this is sarcastic -- and I like it.

    12. Re:Safe and secure! by madscientist003 · · Score: 1

      Inspection will certainly help reduce the number of exploitable vulnerabilities, but I would think it would do more to catch intruders more quickly after the initial break in than they would otherwise be caught.

      The important part will be if the inspection teams can work their magic before a sizeable sum is ripped off through some previously unseen vulnerability. Because we all know that in any reasonably-sized piece of software, there will always be a vulnerability.

    13. Re:Safe and secure! by EEBaum · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Slot machines are one of the very few computer applications that I'd trust the security of. There's too much money to be had in it, and any imperfection results in a loss of income for the casino, which translates to VERY BAD THINGS (both above and below the table) for the manufacturer. If they're lucky, they'll just lose business.

      For e-voting, there are many interests all around that will cause poor coding... malicious coders, crooked people, cushy government funding and lax oversight, and the fact that if it just works "pretty good," the government doesn't immediately dump all your machines but rather, at best, sends out a lengthy court-run investigation.

      For machines that make casinos loads of money on often as low as a 1% advantage, the slightest slipup can be devastating, so they're careful.

      Now, if THESE are routinely cracked, I'll have lost all faith in any sort of computer security, ever.

      --
      -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
    14. Re:Safe and secure! by shmlco · · Score: 1
      Actually, I'm more concerned about the OTHER side of the security equation. "Oh yes Mr. Inspector. This is the code, number generator, and payout schedule that's actually downloaded from the server to the RAM of each machine."

      "No... it is. Really."

      I'm sure the the operators can see lots of advantages in loosening up the machines on a slow Tuesday, and screwing them down on a Saturday night.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    15. Re:Safe and secure! by rigwit · · Score: 1

      This will be interesting. Currently, the IT and Slots departments within the casino industry have a rocky relationship already. Most casino's are currently using RS232 lines to communicate with the machines and ethernet to the machines is more prevelent in Class II gaming (Bingo halls, Lottos and such) than in the traditional casino. The IT staff is going to have to be beefed up considerably it accomodate the deployment of the "game on demand" concept and you bet the slot mechanics union is gathering together to keep the money from coming out of their staffing budget.

    16. Re:Safe and secure! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go into a casino and start winning on ANYTHING consistently and you WILL eventually be caught.

      ... and punished. Whether or not you're cheating.

    17. Re:Safe and secure! by magarity · · Score: 1

      Because the Nevada Gaming Board is not susceptible to pay-offs
       
      More likely: The cleverest programmers will go work for the casinos and get paid big bucks wile the inspectors sent around to check them will have gone through a one week training seminar while getting paid state government wages.

    18. Re:Safe and secure! by Joe123456 · · Score: 0

      Wms games have cows in them just like there pinball games had.

    19. Re:Safe and secure! by danbeck · · Score: 1

      Too many acronyms, didn't read.

    20. Re:Safe and secure! by cafall · · Score: 1

      SOP: Standard Operating Procedure
      NGB: Nevada Gaming Board (mentioned in immediately preceeding comment)
      USPTO: ... you do *read* slashdot, right?

    21. Re:Safe and secure! by CrashRoX · · Score: 1

      Oh its safe and secure. When they see little johnny with a laptop hooked up to a slot machine. big Tony, Vinny the slug and Jimmy the hand bring you in the back to introduce you to the hammer and the vice. Hows that for security?

  2. Improving the experience, sure by stefanb · · Score: 4, Insightful
    They won't have the ubiquitous spinning wheels of today's machines.

    Boy, when's the last time TFA's reporter has been to Las Vegas? My girlfriend and I had real trouble to find a machine that even took quarters, let alone being mechanical.

    "For instance, if on a Saturday night, they decide they'd like to change from a 94 percent pay table to a 90 percent table...right now it would take hours and hours to make that change. And now they'd be able to do that much more expeditiously."

    Ah, there we go! Just quickly change the odds behind the backs of the players so you can reek in more... and market it as "personalized" playing experience. There is no step two...

    I won't comment on the moronic reference to DoD encryption "to make it safe"...

    1. Re:Improving the experience, sure by dnoyeb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With basic odds you already are going to loose. Computerized odds is just in your face criminal.

      But it takes a certain type of person to truly gamble anyway. This will just speed them to their doom.

      Wasnt there a report and a website already out there that proved the casinos already have cheating software? Honestly, I don't even care. I wouldn't have gambled before, and this certainly wont entice me...

    2. Re:Improving the experience, sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree it's criminal.

      and, in the sense of "eye for an eye", i don't see anything particularly wrong about "criminal" activity vs the casinos either.

      any networking adds in the risk that someone, somehow will find a way to crack it, in a way that a standalone box cannot be. there's a reason so many server-hardening guides mention "the only way to make your server 100% safe is to unplug the cable" (and bury it, etc.).

    3. Re:Improving the experience, sure by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Interesting
      But it takes a certain type of person to truly gamble anyway.
      Yeah. Generally, they answer to the name "loser." Like the guy that was bragging that he "won" $400 at the track - but if you prod a bit, it cost him $900 to win that $400. And this guy was a former accountant. Guess that's why he's no longer an accountant - his numbers don't add up.
    4. Re:Improving the experience, sure by kesuki · · Score: 1

      Wasnt there a report and a website already out there that proved the casinos already have cheating software?

      http://gaming.nv.gov/

      I think that's the site you're looking for.

      Or course there is software written to cheat on gaming.. http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/1997/Sep-23 -Tue-1997/news/6110757.html
      People have died for admitting to programming the cheating directly into the slot machines.

      but in general, there are regulatory bodies who are in charge of making sure the casinos are obying state law as per payouts. Having a 'centralized' server allows payout odds to more eaily be controlled, so as to allow the casinos to legally 'adjust payouts to keep payouts always at the legal minimum...' that is in BOTH directions.

      Remember its not cheating to make sure that the machines are running 'in compliance with the law' if nevada law says your machines must pay out 92% of the money they take in, then this simply makes it easier to program the slots to make sure you're always averaging 92% payouts.

    5. Re:Improving the experience, sure by rm999 · · Score: 1

      Most casinos publish their payout ratio, and if they cheat, that ratio will be low and people won't play at that casino. I still think it kind of ruins the experience, but on the other hand I don't really like any kind of gambling so I don't care.

    6. Re:Improving the experience, sure by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Generally, they answer to the name "loser."

      Nice flamebait.

      Most of us prefer the word "enjoy entertainment". There really is no difference between spending $100 on a concert/play/sporting event, and dropping $100 in a casino for the evening, except for the fact that there's a very tiny possibility of winning more at the casino.

      Oh, and self-riteous folks like yourself who figure everyone at the casino is out spending their entire paycheque.

      Get over yourself. The vast majority of people at a casino know damn well that the house always wins. Otherwise, why would there even be a house? You can't use the few addicts out there to generalize the rest.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    7. Re:Improving the experience, sure by freeweed · · Score: 1

      No kididng. I think this article was written around 1994 or so.

      If the typical Las Vegas slot player wants to switch to playing "Wheel of Fortune" after hours on a "Monopoly" box, he has to take his cup of quarters and go trolling for a different machine.

      Um. Yeah. It's been a decade since multi-game, all digital slots appeared in CANADA, and as these machines all come from Nevada, I can only assume they were in Vegas sooner.

      It's to the point now that you can pretty much sit on any machine, and play any denomiation (1,2,5,10,25 cents, dollar), one of about 15 games (slots, cards, keno), and never move the entire night, getting in pretty much what you would have gotten at a smaller casino 20 years ago.

      And yeah, as a "me too", hardly any machines deal in coins anymore. It bothered me a lot at first, but it's far more convenient with the little bar-coded papers - feels more secure, too. Someone's a lot less likely to try a "grab n run" when they'd have to go to a cashier's wicket.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    8. Re:Improving the experience, sure by JDevers · · Score: 1

      Yea, but there is a big difference between going to a concert every three or four months and dropping $100 for tickets versus spending $400 a night for 7-10 nights a month at a casino.

      There are many people at a casino that are there purely for entertainment, you can tell who they are...they look like they are having fun. Look at the other 60-75% though and they look like drones trying for the big win so they can quit working at McDonald's or whatever...

    9. Re:Improving the experience, sure by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1
      Like the guy that was bragging that he "won" $400 at the track - but if you prod a bit, it cost him $900 to win that $400. And this guy was a former accountant. Guess that's why he's no longer an accountant - his numbers don't add up.

      Yeah, I suppose he's found that stint at Enron wasn't such a smart carrer move after all.

      --
      End of Line.
    10. Re:Improving the experience, sure by mosch · · Score: 1

      Did you ever seen the people who went to Phish concerts? Spending hundreds of dollars per town, while living out of a van and showering sporadically.. living in poverty just so they could hear some music. There are a few people who overdo everything. Pretending they're the norm is absurdist. Or to be more succinct: You're a fucking idiot.

    11. Re:Improving the experience, sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually work for IGT Advantage Systems ( once known as Acres Gaming - the creator of casino "bonusing" systems ) and I can tell you that "networks" have been in casinos all over the world for many years now. The only thing new here is that casino operators will have greater "remote" control of the games on the floor.

    12. Re:Improving the experience, sure by mosch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But it takes a certain type of person to truly gamble anyway. This will just speed them to their doom.

      Yeah, it takes the kind of person who enjoys gambling a bit.

      Oooooh right, I forgot that all gamblers are compulsives without any ability to understand odds, or to live life on a budget. You're so much better than them, since your hobbies include "being a self-righteous idiot".

      The funny part about gambling... nobody thinks a thing about a guy who drops $100k on a boat or a car, or the guy who spends $200/wk on golf. But if that guy goes gambling once a week, and loses $10,000/yr, suddenly he's some sort of low-life degenerate, even if he understands what he's doing and is playing within his means.

      I'm a gambler, and I despise compulsives, but they're an unfortunate reality, no different than drunks or bible thumpers.

    13. Re:Improving the experience, sure by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Informative
      Every study done shows that casinos hurt the local economy - higher policing costs, higher welfare rates (broken homes, suicide of the breadwinner, etc), more crime.

      Everyone's a loser because of casinos.

      Has nothing to do with "being self-righteous." People are addicted. Just like they're addicted to VLTs (Video Lottery Terminals). They wear Depends diapers so they can crap in their pants rather than risk losing "their" machine. They piss in their token buckets for the same reason.

      The newspapers here used to carry stories about the workers' complaints, about having to clean up these wonderful "tips". Now the casino fires you if you leak stories about the leaks.

      The three big days for the casinos?

      In order:

      1. Welfare Check Day
      2. Old Age Security Check Day
      3. Family Allowance Check Day.
      The rest is just filler. Don't take my word for it. Ask any casino worker ... or the taxi drivers that take them there, or the bus drivers that bring them back and look the other way when they get on the bus with less than half the fare, because they are TOTALLY broke ...

      Its the casinos that are "self-righteous" - saying they create jobs. Sure they do. Loan sharking. Pawn shops. Divorce lawyers. Embalmers. http://www.cpa-apc.org/Publications/Archives/Bulle tin/2003/december/bourget.asp

      Psychiatry and the Law
      Characteristics of 75 Gambling-Related Suicides in Quebec

      Dominique Bourget, MD, FRCPC, CSPQ
      Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario; Coroner, Province of Quebec.
      Helen Ward, MD, FRCPC
      Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario.
      Pierre Gagné MD, FRCPC, CSPQ
      Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec; Coroner, Province of Quebec.

      Objective: To describe the demographic, psychiatric and social characteristics of pathological gamblers who have completed suicide.

      Method: The authors examined 75 cases of completed suicide in which pathological gambling behaviour was implicated. The characteristics of these cases were extracted from the Quebec Coroner's files by two forensic psychiatrists.

      Results: Victims were married in 52.0 per cent of cases, and at least 45.3 per cent were employed. Only 25.3 per cent had made a previous suicide attempt, and most (64.0 per cent) had given no prior warning of suicidal intent to either family or psychiatrists. A history of substance abuse was present in about one-third of the sample, and one-quarter were intoxicated with alcohol at the time of death. Most victims had suffered financial and marital losses as a result of their gambling behaviour.

      Discussion: These results suggest that pathological gamblers who commit suicide differ from nongamblers. Major psychiatric illness and suicidal intent may be more difficult to identify, which potentially leads to underestimates of suicidal risk in individual pathological gamblers. The impulsiveness that characterizes pathological gambling behaviour, in combination with substance abuse and multiple losses, put this population at high risk for suicide. We suggest that, given the growing prevalence of pathological gambling, suicide and suicide prevention in this population should be further studied.
      Gee, sounds like they were having a lot of fun.
    14. Re:Improving the experience, sure by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, the "norm" for the casino is not all that great.

      I remember back when I was taking the "Psychology of Gambling" class back in college, and how, even if people won, they'd continue, because it wasn't the winning that was important - it was the high from the risk-taking behaviour. Of course, then there's the low from losing. So, how to get out of that low? Get another "high" from taking another risk. Sounds like another form of crack to me.

      Do you REALLY think these people are having fun, any more than the people I see sitting in the bar at 7 am for their first 3 beers of the day are "enjoying" their beer?

    15. Re:Improving the experience, sure by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I never got "video poker" or blackjack or whatever. If i want to play one of those games, I want the tactile feel of the cards in my hand, the weight of the chips, the funny looking people next to me. I want to watch the dealer..um..take the cards out of the magic sort machine..and flip them to their intended targets. If i'm going to spend money on casino entertainment, I don't want it to feel like i'm playing on yahoo games.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    16. Re:Improving the experience, sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people have other working hours then you do.

    17. Re:Improving the experience, sure by JDevers · · Score: 1

      OK, how many Phish concerts are their in a year? Even if you include the total of people for ALL the big groupie touring bands, the number of people that attend those things is microscopic compared to just Tunica....much less AC or Vegas. The "few people" that over do casino gambling are a minority compared to the overall population, BUT if you look at the people at a typical casino you will quickly see that a sizable minority are definitely the "waiting on the next pay check to go play" variety. While attending college I was a blackjack dealer at a local casino, so I have a pretty good idea of the people that play at at least THAT casino. I have been to most of the big casinos in all three of the big gambling destinations too. I'm definitely not a big gambler, I am probably in the majority of people. For people like me, it really is about entertainment and that is great. I also like a day at the horse track too, it can really be fun. Even at the horse track (which isn't nearly as bad as the casino) there are plenty of people around scraping up their pocket change to place that one last $2 bet so they can keep on going.

      Don't misunderstand my post, I don't think they should ban casino gambling. Quite the contrary, I believe that an adult should have the right to choose how to spend their money. That means if they want to buy crack, gamble, stay drunk all day, etc then so be it. I'm simply saying the typical casino has a sizable population of losers.

    18. Re:Improving the experience, sure by mosch · · Score: 1

      Everything can be abused. Off the top of my head I can think of the following serious addictions: fast food drugs and alcohol shopping eating sex porn computers and internet socializing working gambling religion another person (codependancy) It's a shame that some people become compulsive shoppers, drinkers or gamblers.... but that doesn't make any of the activities wrong or even particularly dangerous.

    19. Re:Improving the experience, sure by mosch · · Score: 1

      Everything can be abused. Off the top of my head I can think of the following serious addictions:
      fast food
      drugs and alcohol
      shopping
      eating
      sex
      porn
      computers and internet
      socializing
      working
      gambling
      religion
      another person (codependancy)

      It's a shame that some people become compulsive shoppers, drinkers or gamblers.... but that doesn't make any of the activities wrong or even particularly dangerous.

    20. Re:Improving the experience, sure by freeweed · · Score: 1

      I remember back when I was taking the "Psychology of Gambling" class back in college

      You know, instead of taking a class on something, and then using that to judge an activity, maybe try participating. If you don't like it, more power to you.

      even if people won, they'd continue, because it wasn't the winning that was important - it was the high from the risk-taking behaviour. Of course, then there's the low from losing. So, how to get out of that low? Get another "high" from taking another risk. Sounds like another form of crack to me.

      Sounds like most athletic behaviour to me, ESPECIALLY the so-called "extreme sports". No one ever seems to complain about skiing accidents in the same vein as gambling, however.

      Do you REALLY think these people are having fun

      I don't need to "think", because I am one of these people. I have a ton of fun gambling. I don't kill myself, I don't blow thousands of dollars a week at the track, and I most certainly don't sit around complaining about what other people do for fun on the basis of the few who can't control themselves.

      Believe me. I lived in one of the most nanny-state provinces in Canada, and even they admit that problem gambling is less than a single digit percentage of gamblers. This is nowhere near the majority of gamblers you seem to think it is.

      Want to crusade against something that actually is a problem for most of its participants? Go visit the local bar sometime.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    21. Re:Improving the experience, sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I went to Vegas (heh- I say that so casually. I've only been 3 times, and the last was many years ago) - I went out there with $2500 to gamble ($500 per day), and came home with $5000. Yes, I DOUBLED my money in vegas!

      Actually, it's better than that- The first day I got up to $1700, then lost it. The third day I got up to $3400 (promised I'd cash out at $3500) and lost it. But the second day I took the $500 and won $5000! So, I actually multiplied my money by 10x!

      I also got comp'd to 3 free nights in the hotel (when I was previously told there were absolutely no rooms available for the last 3 nights of my stay.)

      So, speak of "losers" all you want. I came back with lots more than I went there with.

    22. Re:Improving the experience, sure by blyloveranger · · Score: 1

      'm a gambler, and I despise compulsives, but they're an unfortunate reality, no different than drunks or bible thumpers.

      or "self-rghteous idiots" while we are at it.

    23. Re:Improving the experience, sure by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      They're old, retired people. This (having their 7am beer) is going to be their existence, day in, day out, until they croak. I'd rather be dead than be one of them.

    24. Re:Improving the experience, sure by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Want to crusade against something that actually is a problem for most of its participants? Go visit the local bar sometime.
      ... where you'll find people hooked on VLTs. Talk to the owner of a bar, and he or she will tell you that its a double-edged sword. They need the VLTs there, because they bring in business. No VLT, fewer customers. But at the same time. the VLTs are draining money from those same customers, and that a lot of the "players" share the same characteristics (ie - they are dependent on the government for their income, even when they win, they end up giving it back, etc.)
      I lived in one of the most nanny-state provinces in Canada, and even they admit that problem gambling is less than a single digit percentage of gamblers.
      But these single-digit "problem gamblers" provide an inordinate proportion of their revenue.

      Also, most of the customers at the Casino de Montreal are lower-income http://www.vivaconsulting.com/newsflash.html

      KEVIN DOUGHERTY
      The Gazette
      Saturday, June 25, 2005

      Economic Development Minister Claude Bechard says there will be no automatic green light for the $1.2-billion project to build a new casino, a permanent Montreal home for the Cirque du Soleil and a luxury hotel near the hard-pressed Point St. Charles district.

      -----8<-----8<-----8<-----

      Organiz ations working with problem gamblers point out that when Loto-Quebec got into the casino business, its stated aim was to attract tourists to Montreal.

      In fact, most of the existing casino's customers are lower-income Montrealers.
      So its nice to know the Casino is recycling those welfare and unemployment and old-age security bucks ... after all, we don't want them wasting it on luxuries like food or clothing.
    25. Re:Improving the experience, sure by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      I notice you don't say anything about the other 2 times ...

    26. Re:Improving the experience, sure by jurt1235 · · Score: 1

      And yet this is standard operating procedure with online casinos. The big casinos just follow suit.

      --

      My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
    27. Re:Improving the experience, sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Every study done shows that casinos hurt the local economy - higher policing costs, higher welfare rates (broken homes, suicide of the breadwinner, etc), more crime.
      I don't need a study to tell that, the reason is very simple: casinos do not produce anything, they just cycle and suck money.
    28. Re:Improving the experience, sure by rah1420 · · Score: 1

      You forgot slashdot. :)

      (Yeah, yeah, I know; Computers and Internet.)

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    29. Re:Improving the experience, sure by karstux · · Score: 1

      I still don't get it, though. A human "playing" a slot maching is such a sad sight to see: inserting coins and pushing buttuns like a trained monkey, and not even receiving food for his toil.

      The great humanists and educators like Lessing surely would despair at seeing a human lowering himself to such a level through his own free will.

      I truly pity those who think that slot maching gambling is fun, or a rewarding activity on par with doing sports or going to a concert. A human, as a creature of the mind, surely should see that it is not, and that he his only hurting himself.

      Ok, now mod me down...

      --
      Don't whistle while you're pissing.
    30. Re:Improving the experience, sure by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Do you REALLY think these people are having fun, any more than the people I see sitting in the bar at 7 am for their first 3 beers of the day are "enjoying" their beer?

      You said yourself they were getting "high" from taking risks. Can adrenaline be addictive? Sure. Can too much of it cause health problems? Yep. But is it as bad as crack? Hell no.

      Personally I enjoy gambling, but I never understood slots. I prefer to get my fix through poker and the stock market, both of which have given me more money back than I've actually spent. In fact, the in joke among poker players is that it's not gambling. Some people even believe it. But that doesn't make it true.

    31. Re:Improving the experience, sure by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      In fact, the in joke among poker players is that it's not gambling.
      The rule is very simple - it's not gambling if there's a pigeon ripe for the plucking. Sit down at the table, and look around. If you don't see the sucker, then you're probably "it."
    32. Re:Improving the experience, sure by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      "Yeah, it takes the kind of person who enjoys gambling a bit."

      You misphrased your sentence. You mean to say "it takes the kind of person who enjoys games of chance."

      There is a big difference. These people are not gambling because they are not risking anything. They are paying for a bit of fun.

      Gamblers are _gambling_ which means they are risking loosing something they cant afford to loose. If they coudl afford to loose it, then its not a gamble its just the price for fun.

  3. Dump by Dante+Shamest · · Score: 1
    The slot machines of the future won't be dump one-armed bandits anymore

    You meant to spell "dumpy" right? Yeah, those machines are too big.

    1. Re:Dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Git oaf Taco's K's. It past spall cheque, dint it?

    2. Re:Dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the context, it's likely he meant "dumb".

    3. Re:Dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he was trying to spell "Dumb".

    4. Re:Dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason they are so big is strictly psychological. Can't find the link but people seem to trust bigger slot machines oddly enough...

    5. Re:Dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dump

      Nope, someone's just had a go on that machine - the arm just hasn't returned to the start position yet...

  4. It's been like this for years... by AnonDotOrg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hasn't it? Harrahs black jack tables are computerized. You can see a CAT-6 cable running out of a computer under the table... They are obviously all going to one server. I'm sure it's the same with the slots there, too.

    1. Re:It's been like this for years... by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ... and been used as part of the plot in an Analog story ("Of Kings, Queens, and Angels" - Rajnar Vajra, Analog July/August 2005).

    2. Re:It's been like this for years... by Skim123 · · Score: 1
      I believe that cable is sending that 'loyalty club member' card data data to some server, keeping track of how long you're gambling at that table.

      I've always wondered, though, how 'useful' those loyalty cards are. I'm not a big gambler at all - prefer the $1 blackjack (at least they used to have it at Sahara's on the far end of the Vegas strip) or video poker. Actually, I much prefer not gambling, but when in Rome, I guess. But I've looked at those 'loyalty cards' and it seems like you have to spend an ass-load to get anything in return, so I can't imagine what kind of dollars you'd need to be dropping to get the 'free room' or whatever non-trivial crap they offer via those cards.

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    3. Re:It's been like this for years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I've looked at those 'loyalty cards' and it seems like you have to spend an ass-load to get anything in return

      My wife is a gambler, so I know something about this. It really depends on what kind of drive the casinos are making at the time you are in the casino to attract new loyal players.

      About 5 years back, she could get a very large nice suite at the Rio for several nights(any time of the week) with a personal concierge and free breakfasts at their buffet(My favorite thing above Vegas, the Rio Buffet) after gambling about 2.5k(not neccesarily losing that much, just gambling that much). My wife is very good about sticking to budget and she saves to have a good chunk of change. Anyway, she gambled about the same amount a year back and they offered us some midweek mediocre room with no concierge.

      OTOH, she spent less than that at New York New York, and recieved better offers. I understand from talking with other gamblers(not one myself, I have same 'when in rome' attitude, but I don't go much beyond a couple of hundred) that these point systems fluctuate with the casino's desire to attract back good customers.

      Locally, we have several indian casinos. The ones that are very close to us don't give much out in the way of incentives. The ones that are further out, consistantly send out 30-50 bucks worth of gambling money, based on my wifes 200/week gambling there. She also gets free gift offers once a week. The gifts are basically items worth about 20 bucks on the retail market. Things like grills, blenders, small TVs, silver coins, etc... Important to stress my wife doesn't actually lose 200/week. We calculated that based on the points she racks up. Her budget is about 100/week, but all the little wins along the way, and often some good sized to big wins, knocks that way up.

      Anyways, this what I've witnessed on the subject. Hope you find it interesting. And don't anyone feel compelled to lecture me about my wifes gambling, please. It is quite under control. She makes 140k/yr, so really, if she wanted to go apeshit she'd raid our savings account, which she hasn't done. Yet. LOL.

    4. Re:It's been like this for years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heheh, under control. Right - she can quit anytime she wants...she just doesn't want to! I'm pretty sure that they would call you an enabler.

      After taxes, social security and insurance, that $5200 a year is about a month's pay. When you're both old and gray, you'll be wishing that you'd socked that money away in a Roth IRA. Y'know that $5200 a year for ten years will give you something on the order of $100,000 in the bank - tax free! Instead, some poor kid will be supporting you with his 25% social security tax. Way to go.

    5. Re:It's been like this for years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a brilliant analysis you were able to do on me there. Given you don't know anything at all about my investments(which range from real estate, to stocks, metals, local businesses, and our own businesses), nor how much I make, you really don't have much business making that assessment, do you?

      For the record, our combined total monthly income, not counting rental incomes, dividends, or any of our recent capital gains in natural resources, has averaged a little under 20k a month for the last year. 5200 bucks a year is peanuts compared to what we invest and save. And thank you corporate america for your insatiable need for database development, we are quite happy to oblige!

      To be fair, you did have a good point about a Roth IRA. I should really be looking at dumping some money into one just because of the favorable long term tax advantages. But it hasn't concerned me given the current valuation of our assets combined with our montly ability to drop more money in one of our favorite assett classes. Some youngun paying for my retirement? Nonsense. More like they'll up my property tax so I can put his kids through school while he bitches about paying extra income tax to help social security recipients. Funny how people never see the big picture.

      Natural resources are the place to be for your IRA over at least the next year. Hope you take that advice. Thanks once again though, for your poor analysis, keep up the great work!

    6. Re:It's been like this for years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know how much fact is in your statement, but either you're bogus or you've never, ever looked into a Roth IRA before because, at your 'professed' income levels, you could not invest in a Roth IRA. If you make more than $150k/year as a couple, NO ROTH FOR YOU! (You can, however, do a traditional IRA, but you won't get to use any of the investment as pre-tax dollars... your investments will, however, grow tax deferred. (IANAA and IANAL, but my wife and I do reside in the income bracket that prohibits Roth IRAs. Boo.))

    7. Re:It's been like this for years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y'know that $5200 a year for ten years will give you something on the order of $100,000 in the bank

      Y'know $5200 * 10 = $52,000, which is only about half of $100,000.

    8. Re:It's been like this for years... by AEC216 · · Score: 1

      The Cat 6 is run into there "buy-in" and player rating systems. All 'comp' , as in free rooms and meals, related.

      --
      May I please have my frontal lobotomy if I bring back the ashtrays?
    9. Re:It's been like this for years... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      You're joking, I assume, but here in Tampa there were rumors that the poker rooms were going to actually do that. You'd play against other people in the same room as you, but you'd do so on a computer screen.

    10. Re:It's been like this for years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the power of compounding interest. Of course, the bank is going to have to have some pretty tantilizing interest rates (i.e., ~7.2%) to have your money double in ten years.

    11. Re:It's been like this for years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but either you're bogus or you've never, ever looked into a Roth IRA before because,

      Until you mentioned this, I did not know there was a cieling to Roth IRAs. Retirement accounts have honestly not been on my radar since watching my 401k take the swan several years back. At that time, when I did look into them, my income was substantially lower than that. Have since focused on investing my money directly.

      If you're in that income bracket, and you have enough dry powder, seriously consider the natural resources sector right now. A lot of people missing the boat by sticking with tech. Tech isn't going anywhere for a while longer yet. But we're all offtopic.

      Point in saying what I said was to rub it into that idiot who replied to me.

  5. Supercomputing slot machine servers by sidney · · Score: 1

    Imagine what you could do with a Beowulf cluster of these!

    1. Re:Supercomputing slot machine servers by Compholio · · Score: 1

      Imagine what you could do with a Beowulf cluster of these!

      Well, if you have/obtain access to the casino network then you could make yourself a beowulf cluster of them.

    2. Re:Supercomputing slot machine servers by LordHugeMongus · · Score: 1

      lose all the money i have and will ever make all at once?

    3. Re:Supercomputing slot machine servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Loads and loads of Monte Carlo simulations?

  6. Dear Vegas by digital.prion · · Score: 1

    I'll pass.

    Cheers

    --
    Smile.
    1. Re:Dear Vegas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GO WITH THE SIX OR EIGHT

  7. Official Slashdot Guide to Moderation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Greeting fellow /.ers! I fear for my life, so I must make this brief.

    At 0730 today, myself and fellow soldier of fortune Luke Genitals infiltrated the Geek Compound. Our mission - the "Official Slashdot Guide to Moderation." We finally procured a copy of this document from a pile of S&M oriented pornography and left to meet up with our buyer. Things went bad at the drop, we got set up, and now I am being trailed by both the Yakuza and Cmdr. Taco. If I should not make it through the night, I want you to know the truth so my life was not lost in vain.

    My friends, I have seen unspeakable things at the Geek Compound. I can never forget the horrors I witnessed...horrors that no amount of money can undo. If I live I might share some, but I must first escape my present situation. Here is an electronic copy of the stolen document. I have burned the original and ingested the ashes so please spread this around. I regret nothing and we cannot allow the truth to be censored.

    Official Slashdot Guide to Moderation
    rev. 3 5/29/00
    by Cmdr. Taco



    Introduction - Welcome sir to the fine world of being a Slashdot moderator! In this document we shall attempt to explain the ins-and-outs of moderation via the 4 key issues of what we taught you while at the Geek Compound.

    1 - Physical Changes - When we took you under our wing, you were but a boy. Now you are a fine specimen of manly wonder! To mark this right of passage we have, as you already can tell, altered your physical body. Do not be alarmed at this, rather embrace these changed to allow you to serve Slashdot better.
    • The Humor Bypass
      The humor bypass is by far the most important part of moderation. Humor, sarcasm, and wit are not good things to possess and only hinder your job as a moderator. By use of our high radiation emitting CRTs we have atrophied the humor portion of your brain. This enables you to see through the juvenile behavior exhibited in many posts to the -1, Offtopic nature they actually are.

      Remember - Humor is evil! We have freed you from the bondage of laughter forever.
    • The Castration
      Yes, you have been emasculated. While the mere thought of this would normally be disgusting, we here at Slashdot will supply you enough LSD and Xanex so you do not have to worry about this. Sex, like humor, is an evil unnatural thing. With your mind free to think not of sex, you now have more time to serve Slashdot.

      And lets be honest here...you didn't really have a girlfriend regardless of what you told your friends. Embrace your asexual nature and let us frolic in the meadows as eunuchs, together!
    • The Branding
      Take a good look at your chest now. Does the "property of /." branded across your scant, underdeveloped chest not look good? I thought so.

      By displaying this brand to a clerk, you are eligible for 10% discounts at the following stores: K-Mart, Phil's Discount Liquor and Methamphetamine, and Slutty Sally's Steakhouse. Clothes, entertainment, and food - all bases seem to be covered ;)

    2 - Crack - Smoking crack is an integral part of moderation. We will provide you with an unlimited supply of crack rocks, pipes, and lighters. We find that smoking crack enables you to mark posts in the more PC and friendlier image Slashdot needs to present. While you may be opposed to drug use, you must smoke crack to moderate.

    As you might have seen on your visit to the Geek Compound, we have a large room devoted to crack manufacturing. Our well-trained Malaysian slaves convert raw cocaine into crack just for you! Do not worry about the addictive properties of cocaine as will provide you with more LSD and Xanex if crack addiction troubles you.

    Please note - This is not freebase! Freebase is dangerous to produce if ethyl ether is used. This is rock cocaine, aka

    1. Re:Official Slashdot Guide to Moderation by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Informative

      Damn, but you're good! I salute you, good sir or madame (and linked to it from my journal).

    2. Re:Official Slashdot Guide to Moderation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Emad had been laying awake for about two hours. It was 10:00 AM and he had already missed two classes: Remedial Operating Systems - Linux and Diversity & Tolerance. Had Emad been totally awake he would have groaned. Today's Diversity & Tolerance class was teaching how to put condoms on erect penises, something right up Emad's alley. Well, at least the erect penis part; he knew nothing about condoms.

      Slowly, Emad lumbered out of bed. His joints ached. His head throbbed. What had happened the night before? He could feel dried feces in his pants and was pretty sure his asshole was ripped wide Oh! He remembered a little too suddenly as he almost tripped over a pile of spent whippits, several beer bottles, and a giant black 48" oil-filled dildo mounted on a chainsaw engine. He had had Michael Sims and CmdrTaco over last night for a "few cold ones" but it seemed that, par for the course, they had all ended up sharing a "few hots ones," ones being their euphemism for homosexual encounters.

      Emad made his way to the bathroom, and moaned. It was in complete disarray. The sink was filled with congealed diarrhea, the floor was sticky with drying piss, and the bathtub looked like a long-neglected water trough on a pig farm. It would take Emad hours to clean this mess. He tried hard to ignore the stench as he sauntered toward the toilet. Didn't Taco and Sims respect anything? Emad gave so much to them and their cause.

      Upon opening the lid on his broken toilet he saw the special gift Taco had left for him: An inhumanly giant turd. It had to be at least a foot and a half in length! Taco had been planning this one, as he saw unchewed peas, corn, and peanuts that all told the story of Rob Malda's special dinner the night before. The monster turd curled around the inside of his toilet. Not wanting to let Rob Malda's magical ass-gift go to waste, Emad reached inside the toilet and gently grasped the brown meat.

      Moaning, Emad began devouring the slimy but firm stool. He tasted the honey on the peanuts; he felt the peas pop as he chewed through the delicious crap-worm. His cock immediately sprang to life as he chomped down bite after bite of the mutant ass-birth. Could life get any better? Down to the last bit of his meal, he gagged and coughed. Needing to wash it all down quickly, Emad yanked his tiny Iranian dick and aimed upward, pissing hard, catching the golden rain in his mouth.

      After what seemed like a painful eternity, his bladder was empty and urine was running down his chin in rivulets. Emad, in the midst of his ecstacy, wondered. Could life get any better?

    3. Re:Official Slashdot Guide to Moderation by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Stop! You're killing me!

      *wipes tears from eyes*

    4. Re:Official Slashdot Guide to Moderation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why were these submissions rejected?

      • 2000-06-28 03:09:37 Hemos and Signal 11 Are Fags! (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-06-28 16:44:32 Rob Malda is Gay! (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-06-28 16:59:11 Emmett Chokes on JonKatz's Dick! (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-06-28 17:08:38 Slashdot Officially "Sucks" (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-06-28 17:44:39 Roblimo Went Down on RMS for $5!!! (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-06-29 03:10:29 Rob Malda Caught Sucking Off Bruce Perens (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-06-29 05:48:15 Vladinator Shits in Rob Malda's Mouth; Rob Eats It (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-06-29 05:22:24 Slashdot Is a Pile of Shit (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-06-29 05:27:59 RMS and ESR Gangbang Hemos and CmdrTaco! (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-07-17 10:19:41 You are Gay (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-07-27 22:02:53 Hemos Blows Out Rob's Ass (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-08-01 10:15:50 Slashdot Renamed "Band of Faggots," Malda Fucks ow (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-08-02 09:27:53 Malda and Hemos Involved in Major Gangbang (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-08-04 11:16:53 Rob Malda & RMS: First Gay-Geek Marriage? (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-08-04 11:23:27 Katz Drinks 1 Gallon of Semen a Day (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-08-04 11:28:45 Emmett Gives Rimjobs to the Entire FSF! (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-08-04 11:37:51 Anal Warts Have Slashdot Staff in Health Worry... (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-08-04 11:48:53 Canker Sore Halts Rob's Cocksucking Habits... (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-08-04 12:02:58 Fractured Penis Ends RMS's Reaming of ESR! (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-08-04 12:07:59 Gay Games 2000 to Be Sponsored by Slashdot... (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-08-04 12:13:41 ESR Seduces Emmett; Malda and Hemos Jealous (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-08-04 13:02:23 Slashdot to Sell Jelly Dildos for Gay Geeks? (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-08-04 13:08:15 ESR "Backwards Engineers" Malda's Rectum (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-08-10 20:28:04 Malda's Rectum? Nearly Killed'im! (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-08-10 20:33:09 Emmett "Opens the Source" to Timothy's Colon (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-08-10 20:39:29 Roblimo Glunks All Over Taco's Face; Taco Smiles (articles,news)
      • 2000-08-10 23:49:35 Malda Shaves Bruce Perens's Cock & Balls for Charity (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-08-15 14:42:54 RMS Renames FSF to "Free Sex Foundation" (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-08-15 15:01:47 Rob's Balls Smell Like Ass After He Fucks Hemos! (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-08-15 16:06:40 ESR Transmits Herpes to RMS; FSF Declares War on Open Source (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-08-16 08:42:26 Hemos Places Emmett's Ass-Virginity Under GPL! (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2000-08-16 08:49:12 Hemos Places Own Dick Under the LGPL; RMS Approves... (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2001-01-04 21:32:43 Malda Rapes Hemos; No Reports Filed (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2001-01-04 21:56:20 Hemos Changes Name to Homos, Blows RMS (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2001-04-23 04:29:46 A Nugget for You! (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2001-04-23 04:35:17 Taco Wraps Hemo's Burrito... in Ass Cheeks! (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2001-05-10 14:32:16 Michael is a Fucking Asshole! (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2001-05-17 18:37:41 CmdrTaco's Breath Smells of Feces (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2001-06-07 07:29:21 Problems at Home? (articles,news) (rejected)
      • 2001-06-07 14:08:05 Michael Sims: Censoring to Hide his Faggotry (articles,news) (r
    5. Re:Official Slashdot Guide to Moderation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha, stupid faggot

    6. Re:Official Slashdot Guide to Moderation by Doctor+O · · Score: 1

      Dear fellow assmaster,

      GEEZUS, stop it already!

      Or rather, don't. I haven't laughed that hard in a long time. Props to Tom for mentioning this golden nugget of slashdottery in his journal.

      --
      Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
    7. Re:Official Slashdot Guide to Moderation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It was dark in the Holland, Michigan office nestled deep within Slashdot's Geek Compound. Shifting and moaning, ESR laid sprawled over his filthy desk. Dried spittle stuck several Post-It notes to his cheek. His PC, running Linux, silently printed swap error after swap error to the screen, lighting ESR's sickly form. As he burped several times he attempted to recall the night before that had led to this stupor. Holding his head in his hands, he was interrupted by lights and doors slamming-- someone was in the office!

      As Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda walked past ESR, he noticed the several empty bottles of Jägermeister and what appeared to be fecal stains on the floor and walls surrounding the recovering ESR-- nothing new. He also noticed the some semen bubbling in the cracks of ESR's chafed lips.

      "Another all-night office orgy, Eric?" Rob asked coyly.

      Tilting his head gingerly toward Rob and raising his eyebrows slowly, ESR spoke softly. "Oh shit. Is that what happened last night? I believe I blacked out at some point-- I can't remember anything. Who was here last night?"

      "Well, CowboyNeil got there a little late last night, but he said that by the time he got there that Alan, Emad, Jamie, Michael, and Signal 11 were already pretty drunk," Rob said just a little too loudly for ESR's tender head.

      Closing and opening his eyes gently, ESR muttered to himself about having not invited Signal 11. He also started sniffing the air and licking his lips. "I can smell dried feces on a dick a mile away. Just where were you last night, Robbie? You get a piece of ass last night and decide to ditch my party?"

      "What's it to you? Your breath smells like semen and you don't hear me asking whose it is," Malda shot back.

      ESR smiled and swiveled with a gleam in his eyes. "Ah, but you see, this is my own sperm!"

      "And it must taste specfuckingtacular!" Rob shot back.

      Eric interjected before Rob could go on. "Ah yes. You see, I like to add a shot of Jäger to it to give it a little kick."

      "No," Rob replied with anger rising in his voice, "you fucking raging alcoholic. Your semen tastes like old motor oil. I think you may have ruptured both of your testicles and now your colon is shooting diarrhea out of your cock-hole."

      "What!? You little fudge-packing piece of shit!" ESR threatened, "Ditch one of my office parties because Hemos calls up and says he's lonely, will you? I bet that's what happened. Well, guess who I'll be recommending we lay off at the next LNUX board meeting? How do you like that, Taco?"

      "Whatever, Eric. You don't scare anyone except your parents," Rob said as he stormed out of ESR's office, his green plaid flannel whipping in the wake behind him. "You would be nothing without Slashdot."

      ESR stammered and shook. Ever since the LNUX stock had plummeted, things were so tense around the office. Relations were falling apart between he and the Slashdot admins. Last night, Michael and Jamie had pounded each other exclusively, ignoring ESR's crooked, erect penis, and Eric had to convince Emad and Alan to restrain CowboyNeil before he could engage in homosexual intercourse with him.

      With a flick of his wrist, ESR popped a dozen extra-strength Bayers down his stinking gullet and washed them down with some Jäger from the bottle he had woken up holding. Depressed, aching, and on the verge of vomiting up the entirety of last night's semen binge, ESR cried silently and went back to sleep at this desk, ignoring the pile of work that sullied the landscape of his desktop.

      Clapping twice to darken his office, ESR curled into fetal position as best he could and rested, preparing to do it all over again later that night.

  8. How secure? by m50d · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Could you plug your own cable in and pretend to be the server? Not that I want to face casino security, but it's an interesting scenario.

    --
    I am trolling
    1. Re:How secure? by timeOday · · Score: 4, Funny
      Could you plug your own cable in and pretend to be the server?
      Brilliant! You could win Internet blackjack the same way! Slight problem: since you're now playing your own, isolated game, you have to pay off your winnings, to yourself. Fun!
    2. Re:How secure? by Shawndeisi · · Score: 1

      Public Key encryption would solve this problem. Preshared keys would stop you from pretending to be the server. This would work along the same lines as a SSH or SSL connection. You would have to figure out how to exploit the software into accepting your key instead.

      It sounds like they've actually implemented that kind of thing, due to the encryption reference in the article.

    3. Re:How secure? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      Don't need to jack into their network... just sneak over to the set of Alias and steal one of those devices that can read the contents of a hard drive just by being in close proximity to it. It should be able to overwrite the drive, as well, so you can simply cache the old contents of the drive, upload your own system image, and then when you've won enough, put the cached old image back online, and they'll never notice.

      Is it just me, or does anyone else hate how stupid that show is?

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    4. Re:How secure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, every node on a casino floor and the servers they talk to use public/private key systems. It is not as simple as plugging into the network.

    5. Re:How secure? by Danger+Stevens · · Score: 1

      I can see the next Vegas problem now:

      undercover geeks find a game they like, disconnected it from the network and enjoy hours of free gaming.

      I'd be down for some of that.

      --
      World Changing - News for Humans, Stuff about our planet
    6. Re:How secure? by Monkeyman334 · · Score: 1

      Your browser does not store money, a slot machine does.

    7. Re:How secure? by m50d · · Score: 1

      AIUI the server isn't handling the money, just telling the machine what the payoff should be. So you pretend to be the server and tell the machine to raise the payout rate to 150%, then just keep playing it.

      --
      I am trolling
  9. S&P / Footsie here we come... by DamonHD · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hi, What about automatic day-trading in FX derivatives or equities with the collected monies of (say) each 100 players? In the short term this really would be pretty random, with the broker acting as "house" and guaranteed an income... Rgds Damon

    --
    http://m.earth.org.uk/
    1. Re:S&P / Footsie here we come... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm, isn't this what the market maker's on wall street do already?? The day traders are the suckers, and the MM's reorder and/or fill out of inventory to maximize their own profits?

  10. How about Vegas style FPS? by Sturm0001 · · Score: 1

    I occasionaly think about Quake 3 played for money.
    The missing ingredient here is the cheat proofing.

    If Vegas Inc develops the cheat-proof Quake 3 derivitive, then Vegas Inc conquers the world.

    Lot more fun to watch GTV than poker.

    1. Re:How about Vegas style FPS? by gregor-e · · Score: 1

      Cheat-proofing ain't the big problem. It's skill-balancing. Mostly if two given players go head-to-head, they'll figure out within a minute which one is better. After that, why bother? The weaker player might as well ask the stronger "want some of my money"? and be done with it.

  11. Call me old fashioned... by WonderSnatch · · Score: 1

    But I never really cared for the video slots.

    There's something about a real reel reeling that sends me reeling...

    Brett

    --"You keep using that word...I do not think it means what you think it means."

  12. Hmm, let's see by ravenspear · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm guessing there won't be an external port on any of the machines with a label "insert server spoof machine interface cable here" so you would probably have to take apart the machine to access some kind of internal port, assuming it has any ports at all.

    Unfortunately casino security would probably find attempting to dismantle the machine a rather suspect activity.

    1. Re:Hmm, let's see by styxlord · · Score: 1

      external ports? just use wifi! :)

    2. Re:Hmm, let's see by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing there won't be an external port on any of the machines with a label "insert server spoof machine interface cable here"

      Made me laugh!

      -kgj

      --
      -kgj
    3. Re:Hmm, let's see by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Ha! We'll just have to wait till they start using WiFi as the "next best thing".

  13. Just changing the angle of attack... by okmnji · · Score: 1

    So now, instead of trying to take a peek at/modify the machine guts, they try to peek at the communication, or just get a bunch of zombie computers to pwned! the servers. And aren't most of the scams with gambling machines inside jobs? Please, tell me how consolidating the working of a large group of slots into ONE MACHINE is going to increase the security? Just tell a bunch of your friends that row X of slots are going to be winning for 5 minutes starting at a certain time. Keep payouts small, but positive, and it probably won't be caught.

    1. Re:Just changing the angle of attack... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'd show up in the automated log processing as an irregular number of payouts and be flagged for a manual investigation. Due to the strict regulations in places by the various state gambling commisions every transaction has to be logged and stored for a significant amount of time. While you might be able to get out the door with some cash using this method the employee responsible would almost certainly be sacked and a quick review of the security tapes for that bank of slots would end your friend up on the casinos black list.

    2. Re:Just changing the angle of attack... by tacarat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, for one thing, it's a single point for security updates and monitoring. If the slots are basically dumb terminals, the software load can be re-installed regularly to help minimize the window of opportunity for injected code. If it's a normal client/server deal, then there can still be scans for software tampering. Given this is /. and that SuperSAS is an open gaming protocol, I think that the "many eyes" security concept they're using is very practical. We know the casinos will be more than willing to pay for expert programmers to review the code, and that more than one casino would want to have the code checked out (get your resumes ready!).

      As for the monitoring the communications, the casinos could use the strongest proven encryption possible and change the keys weekly, daily, or even hourly because they own the entire system. Each machine could even have it's own key, separate of the others (assuming PKI like implementation, the server could reply with a unique key to each node as well). Most people forget that the point of encryption is that the information assumed have been intercepted by a third party, but won't be useful by the time it's cracked. If crackers get to the point they can crack the casino's keys in 1 day, it wouldn't matter if the keys are changed hourly. Before that happened, though, they'd have long been investigating a new algorithm

      As for being vulnerable to an inside job, you're right. The hard shell always has a soft, squishy center. Thing is, that's something that will never change. The only thing for them to do is have audits in place to limit the ability for people to aquire the information or access to set up a job like that by themselves. If nothing else, they should be able to do an audit and figure out who was involved after the fact.

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  14. Forget the cynics, this is great news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I personally can't wait to see pictures of whole casino floors displaying banks and banks of BSODs!

  15. i thought it read by CSHARP123 · · Score: 1

    Server based slut machines.. My fault

  16. Frag for dollars? by slazar · · Score: 1

    What would be cool is if you had a first person shooter. The top 5 people with the most kills would win the pot?

    1. Re:Frag for dollars? by 54v4g3 · · Score: 0

      ...and then get high on said pot before the next round

    2. Re:Frag for dollars? by slazar · · Score: 1

      mmm yes, but would your fragging rate get reduced or enhanced after smoking the said pot? I guess it all depends on the person...

  17. This is new? by shotgunefx · · Score: 1

    I could have sworn I watched a show about this 2 years ago. Saying all the machines in this chain were controlled centrally from a warroom looking place, as well as the odds.

    --

    -William Shatner can be neither created nor destroyed.
  18. I bet... by Tiberius_Fel · · Score: 1

    I bet some geek figures out a certain pattern in which you can play that causes a buffer overflow (or something) thus resulting in the payout. :P

    --
    Join the Empire! http://www.empirereborn.net/
    1. Re:I bet... by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      I bet some geek figures out a certain pattern in which you can play that causes a buffer overflow (or something) thus resulting in the payout. :P


      I bet a few days after that a few other geeks from the software development house mysteriously dissappear...

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  19. Geek's dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will be fun to sniff. Hope they use wireless!

  20. I don't have vicious... by michelcultivo · · Score: 1

    ..., I only smoke and drink when I'm playing casino games... ...now wireless, at a bathroom near you.

  21. Typos by bantonj · · Score: 0

    Last time I checked this was a fairly busy and popular site. Shouldn't there not be typos? Perhaps I am asking too much. And while I'm on the subject would it really be that hard to get a spell check built into /. ?

  22. Damn, that, is, a, lot, of, commas, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read, the, summary, again, and, weep

    When replying to this message,
    confirm you're not a script
    by typing the word in this image: [<<</\/\/\jumper]

  23. The rules have now changed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because the "odds" may be set and/or changed at the whim of the casino and are no longer fixed (wildly on the side of the casino, sure, but fixed none-the-less), it is no longer a game of chance, but a game of asking the casino "pretty please, may I win today?"

    Because it is no longer a game of chance, it is no longer gambling. Therefore it is not covered under the gaming laws of the State of Nevada and is illegal.

    Oh, I'm sorry, did I say the word "corruption"?

  24. Gaming over Wi-Fi by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
    That would be possible, he said, because SBG systems could broadcast data via secure Wi-Fi networks anywhere on a casino property.
    Secure Wi-Fi?
    We all know WEP is pretty much worthless and WPA has proven to be crackable. What encryption are they planning to use that'll be secure?
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Gaming over Wi-Fi by tacarat · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine they'd run a VPN. Hack the wireless encryption to find much stronger one beneath it.

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  25. Moving the Winning Machines Easily... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

    Now that they can alter the odds quickly, they'll keep shifting the winning machine away from that Lucky Granny Blue Hair that always seems to win!

    Let's see you win NOW Gramma!

    --

    "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

    Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  26. You forgot one type of people... by Skim123 · · Score: 2
    Make that three: Or perhaps I'm being redundant. :-p
    --

    I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

  27. WPA2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stoopid

  28. Not new! by netik · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't see how this is anything new.

    Odyssey makes machines that do this already (boot from a central server, and play the games the server hands to it) and the majority of slot machines that exist on the casino floor already have ethernet and share the odds distribution between them.

    This keeps odds at 1:600, or whatever they need to be instead of NSlotmachines:600.

    1. Re:Not new! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in NY, they've used this same thing to sneak past the gambling laws. Instead of being a "casino", it's "video gaming." This kind of server based setup is all they can do though.. no table games or anything like that. It's pretty noticeable how they change the odds at different times of the day and weekends vs. weekdays. It's nice and close though so even with all that, it's still kind of fun to do once in a while.

  29. Nothing new by rhvarona · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This is old news...

    I have implemented one of these systems. Many of the newer slot machines have been getting results from a central database for at least a decade. The results typically are generated from a few days to a few weeks in advance, which lets the casino confirm the payout percentages before making the gameset go live.

    The way to look at it though is that the Casino does not care if you win big. In fact, the casino likes big jackpots, the bigger the better, because they more than make up for in the the extra attention they get. More attention = More players = More dollars played

    They win a certain percent of every dollar played. The more dollars that get played the more they win.

    1. Re:Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The results typically are generated from a few days to a few weeks in advance, which lets the casino confirm the payout percentages before making the gameset go live"

      Doesn't this imply that the inspector checking these pre-generated results could predict at what times the big prizes fall, and limit his/her playing to those times?

  30. The Best Games in Vegas... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    ...are to be found in the basement of the Excalibur Hotel and Casino.

    You have arcade games, Skeeball, and IIRC, bowling. One of the biggest arcades I've been to. If you're dragged to Vegas here's a chance to have some fun and escape the smoke and shouldn't-be-wearing-bikinis waitresses.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  31. Read it as.... by tktk · · Score: 1
    Server Based Sluts of the Future.

    Oh well, maybe in 10 more years then.

  32. Re:How secure? More than you think... by turrican · · Score: 1

    Sounds great... BUT since they're all sure to be paying out vouchers (as most machines there are now, a reason I don't play slots anymore) there's no actual cash in the local machine...

    So let's say you are successful at plugging in and forcefeeding yourself a win - you surely wouldn't be getting a correctly coded voucher, so you'd never be able to actually collect!

  33. Wrong by brunes69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ah, there we go! Just quickly change the odds behind the backs of the players so you can reek in more... and market it as "personalized" playing experience. There is no step two...

    You can't do that, it is illegal, at least in Nevada.

    If you would rad up on the subject a bit more, you would see the point of this change is that the casino can compute far in advance the results for every pull of the slot, so that they can know the payout percentages in advance. This way, they can schedule the big jackpots, for instance.

    Main point is, they cannot change the odds of machines on the fly - the odds need to be posted.

    1. Re:Wrong by khallow · · Score: 1

      Some of the smaller outfits with less to lose (or weaker controls over this stuff) might give it a try. But Nevada from what little I hear sounds like it has pretty effective enforcement.

  34. Oh man I hope they're wireless! by briancnorton · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they'd get suspicious if I brought in my laptop while playing?

    --

    People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.

  35. What OS? by slickwillie · · Score: 0

    I hope they use Windoze(tm). Imagine all those blue-screened slots.

    1. Re:What OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's AS400

    2. Re:What OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:What OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once ran into an electronic slot machine that refused to boot (it booted, then decided to reboot, endlessly). Sadly, it was running Linux.

  36. Loyalty by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

    The value of "comps" is almost precisely equal to your rate of gambling / the house edge.

    So, if the Casino's edge is 5% and you want that $300 room, you'll have to guarantee them that your time gambling will net them $300. So, if you sit around gambling for eight hours, you can probably get that comp if you throw $750 per hour across the table. However, if you spend most of the day between the pool and the buffet and maybe spend two hours at the tables, you'll have to be pushing $3k per hour at the dealer. Now, if you want the $1,500/night suite and dinner for two at the $100/plate restaurant and you're planning on gambling for four hours, you'll have to drop $10k per hour.

    The "benefit" here is that if your stats are up, you don't need a reservation -- there are always comp rooms because it makes more sense to comp a $300 room to someone who is tossing $6,000+ at the tables than to sell it to someone playing $500 on the nickel slots. and if you know what you're doing, your gambling losses won't far exceed your comps, but make no mistake, you're paying for them.

    This is one way the computers are your friend. At the tables, unless you're very conspicuous, you have to make an effort to make sure you're being rated. If you're playing the machines, every dime you bet goes into the comp calculation.

    1. Re:Loyalty by Skim123 · · Score: 1

      Hrm, that would explain why I don't get comped the penthouse sweet when playing my $5 at the nickel video poker. Damn.

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

  37. nyeh by l0rdpestilence · · Score: 0

    I sorta hacked a dime machine once, earned five bucks just by fidgeting with the weel just so. I don't trust video slots. The hard slots were/are cool because after a certain point their is no physicle way for them to not pay out, as they have to many dollers. The vid stuff is crap. Skip las vegas. If I want to gamble I'll ask the hot iranian waitress to kiss me. Otherwise close is for sex,dancing and handgrenades.

    1. Re:nyeh by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      Close only counts in horseshoes and hangrenades.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    2. Re:nyeh by grozzie2 · · Score: 1
      Close only counts in horseshoes and hangrenades.

      and dancing...

    3. Re:nyeh by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      Nope, it breaks the alliteration.
      Besides it's hyperbole, not an exhaustive list.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  38. Surprised nobodies said it by nsasch · · Score: 1

    1. Profit 2. Go to step 1

    --
    Make your computer faster: rm -rf /mnt/windows/
  39. Who cares? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    If the machines are insecure, it hurts the casinos because of tampering. If you're not committing the tampering, you will lose your money either way.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  40. AND.... by Demanche · · Score: 1

    It does it use unsecured wi-fi... :-D

    --
    Mod me down im a newf (wiki)
  41. Hated it at first, then stopped watching.. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    I stopped watching after the first ten minutes of episode 4. The previous 3 episodes had all ended with the characters in extreme peril. 2,3,4 all began with the characters safely back at home or home base. They either ignored the previous cliffhangers or made comments to the extent of, "Boy I'm sure glad I got of that okay"

    And that's when I realized: It was a spy show about a woman, for women. Or at least, for people who don't care about the details of the action packed fight, rather the intricate maneuverings of the skilled combatants leading up to the big event. .. But you should be able to intercept any bits being actively read out with complicated enough signal processing...

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  42. where have I heard of that game before... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Has anyone ever actually won keno?

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  43. Eric? by bullshit+detector · · Score: 1

    I see you payed attention during my first day lecture.

  44. What are YOU doing there. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    You see people at the bar getting beers at 7am. So you are in a bar at 7am.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    1. Re:What are YOU doing there. by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      You see people at the bar getting beers at 7am. So you are in a bar at 7am.
      No, I'm walking my dogs for 2 to 3 miles every morning, and the bar happens to be on one of the streets we take. It has these things called "Windows" that let me see inside. You know, the Non-Microsoft version, the ones that don't break all by themselves.
    2. Re:What are YOU doing there. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I'd think I'd want my bar windows to break themselves. Preferebly seconds before I get thrown through'em. Where I live people apparantly don't like to see the sun or something, the bars' windows are small, tinted, and usually obscured in some way so you can't really see in all that well.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  45. big loser for casino's and gamblers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I think that the casinos are making a big mistake because people go to the casinos to gamble on INDIVIDUAL machines that play one game..(ask yourself, why people all don't drive the same styled cars?).if you look at each machine, they are made to play that game and people like to try to figure out the odds of each type of machine (the odds vary for even the same type of machines by time of day, use etc), the machine manufacturers go to great expense to make a game machine a work of art and something pleasing to use, generic machines are something from a totalitarian state wet dream.

    If you replace these machines with a crop of generic mcgambling slot machines, then you take away a big part of casino gambling, if you can't identify each machine (you have 10000 identical "terminals" sitting there, then you might as well play one machine and leave because you have lost a big part of the casino experience.
    Why go to a casino if its just a terminal you are playing, the current crop of machines have a personality to them on their payouts, otherwise, go gamble on a lottery ticket or your home computer/cell phone. If people get used to the idea of a generic terminal, then they will see no advantage in trying to figure out the odds.
    I bet that this is orchastrated by one big machine manufacturer who wants to replace all the different machines by one "generic terminal" experience...it may make money for the machine manufacturer and the casino can save some small amout of money buying one type of machine, but if people don't find the experience exciting and it boecomes some generic "big brother" downloaded game experience, then the casinos should just close now and soave their money buying the "new, less exciting, generic game machines".

    1. Re:big loser for casino's and gamblers by lgw · · Score: 1

      There's no need to make the outside of each machine the same just because the computer in each one is the game.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:big loser for casino's and gamblers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why go to a casino if its just a terminal you are playing

      It's legal, real money comes out, there are bells and other pavlovian devices, etc.

  46. Insecure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I think that this will actually be more insecure. With a regular "dumb" machine, it's pretty hard to hack it, let alone alter it in any way or report its statistics to some other computer, because casino security is watching the floor. With a main server, even if the code is reviewed, there's got to be some holes. And once there's holes, there's hackers. Imagine a hacker connecting to the free broadband in the hotel room of the casino, hacking into the server, and changing the algorithim slightly and the code to make it so that one machine (and one machine only) spits out full jackpot at a certain amount of time. The hacker walks out of the room, plays the machine, and *bam* he's won.

    Plus, the reviewing brings up another interesting scenario - code reviewed by the Nevada gov't will be catalouged somewhere - what if a hacker got into the gov't system and stole the code that way?

    1. Re:Insecure by jrnchimera · · Score: 1

      Code images that are allowed on the floor and the servers in the backroom are all "check summed" so that every software component of the system can have it's signature checked. Any tampering that is done will be noticed. Authenticating the software signatures is done continuously.

      And further, the house network is NEVER connected to the casino floor network.

  47. Too Hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vegas makes its money on people who are too stupid or lazy to learn how the games work (or too rich to care). You wouldn't see many people lining up to play these games because they require skill, reflexes and very little luck. The person playing a slot machine obsessively waiting for that lucky payout is not going to exhibit the same behavior when they get whipped by veteran players as soon as they walk up to the machine.

    Its the same with MMORPGs: they pull in more people that play for longer than networked FPSs because you don't have to be skilled to play.

  48. More fair...? by posternutbaguk · · Score: 1

    Maybe this will make some slots more fair. I used to work as an engineer in the uk fixing fruit machines (as slots are known over here) and the scams involved are pretty nasty. We were always asked to set the lowest % win rate possible on all machines, regardless of what was printed on the legal notice on the front of the machine.

    We also used to put the machines in a mode that payed out big consistenly, spin the reels for 5 minutes or so, and then put the cash back in the chutes. This meant the machine thought it had paid out a ton in the recent past, further reducing the odds.

    I lasted 1 year in that job - boy, the kickbacks were good (I got paid 1g of cocaine for fixing some machines in an illegal gambling den one time), but the karma was seriously negative.

  49. Stomp-stomp-stomp by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    I love a good game of Dance-Dance-Slot-Machine!

  50. slot machines by medep · · Score: 1

    I know it's been said earlier here, but networking of slot machines is nothing new. I've been sorking in a pun in australia for a few years, and everything has been networked the entire time, they just have us manually check things seemingly for no reason at all. To turn a machine into an entirely new machine, the technician takes about 5 seconds changing the program, and changes the face plates.

    Then the customers come in and go "oh wow!, a new machine!"
    and they ask their friends "have you checked out the new machine mate?"
    and their friend goes "no, i haven't. let's go and see whether it pays out"
    my conclusion in that regard is that people are retarded

    On the changing of the odds "on the fly", that will just piss people off. there is also no need for it, as the laws of probability average out your profit, we never lose even if someone wins $4000 or so at one time

    1. Re:slot machines by Diag · · Score: 1

      I've been sorking in a pun in australia for a few years

      For the benefit of the non-Australians in the audience, that's slang for "working in a pub".

      --
      Serving Suggestion: Defrost
  51. Re:Who gives a damn? by Mike+Markley · · Score: 1
    High tech or low tech, only two kinds of people gamble: idiots or cheaters.


    No, those are the only people who gamble and expect to win. When I gamble (which is rarely), I do so in the company of friends and with a set amount of money that I completely expect to never see again. In that respect, it's no different than going to see a movie or a concert or even going out to a bar. It's a social activity which costs money. It just happens that sometimes it may cost less money than you planned.
  52. ARP Poisoning by pilotcam · · Score: 1

    This would be a good place to test that ARP poisoning tool I just installed.

  53. This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been done for more than ten years in australia. All of the poker machines have local network as well as country-wide links (stats and prize pool). Odds are set at 90% - 96% to win - however this is simply a chance of winning - NOT a chance of winning more than you bet.

    You may spend $5.00 on a bet, but win back $0.50c - this is considered to be a "win".

  54. Chaos by MikeWasHere05 · · Score: 1

    So now, all you need is one hacker and he can bring total chaos to the casino. I'm not old enough to go into casinos, but don't the number of slot machines go into the thousands? I can see it now... thousands of machines, all with blinky red lights and things that make noise when you win (or so the movies have led me to believe), all awarding jackpots at once. Also, aren't payout odds specified by law? So the casino switches to legal odds when the inspectors come, then when they're gone... with a couple key taps you now have machines that don't pay out anywhere near the legal odds.

  55. Yeah, except I did this in 1992... by audioblog · · Score: 1

    This is not news.. Back in 1992 I wrote a multiplayer bingo system in Las Vegas that kept all the logic in the server, and allows the "dealer" to manage key characteristics of the game prior to start. This kind of stuff has been happening there for the last decade.

  56. it'd be kind of cool by akhomerun · · Score: 0

    as long as vegas is switching to computerized slots, it'd be nice if some casinos got into gaming tournaments or maybe even slot machines where you could increase your chances of winning by getting high scores or getting killing sprees in halo.

  57. Old News by sofakingon · · Score: 1

    This is really old news. The U.S Army in Korea has had this in their game rooms for quite some time (since 2002, I believe). All of the machines have a smart card reader. You rent the card for a $1 deposit and then put your money into the machine. They're all networked and there is a central kiosk that's basically an ATM that you insert the card into to collect your winnings and the $1 deposit return (it keeps the card). Unfortunately, the payout ratio is something like 60%, which pales in comparison to the ~90% payout ratio of Atlantic City/Vegas. Your (if you're an American) federal tax dollars at work, swindling the soldiers and civilians living and working here...

  58. Why is this news? by Isbjorn · · Score: 1

    I have lived in Nevada for many years, and I see slot machines almost every day. The only mechanical slot machines left are maybe in Virginia City. Almost ALL gaming machines have been partially or fully electronic for at least as long as ATM's have been around. They've all been "networked" for at least a decade and a half. We're talking full blown LAN's and WAN's (how do you think Megabucks works?). Of course, no matter how lucky I've ever been, I always have better odds at the ATM. I agree with the chap from down under, most people who gamble seem to be complete morons.

  59. Mod parent up by Animats · · Score: 1
    Right. It's called "remotely determined gaming". Often this is done for regulatory reasons. A slot machine is considered "class 3 gaming", while a lottery terminal is considered "class 2 gaming", and is allowed in more places. So there's a trend towards packaging up remote lottery terminals to look and act like slot machines. You're actually playing against the other players active at the moment, not against the house.

    Bally has a line of Class 2 games.. They look like slots. But they're remotely determined pari-mutual systems.

    They even run Linux on the latest models.

  60. History...and clearing up some stuff by axoi · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've seen that the usual slashdot crowd is a little lax on history. Here are a few tidbits that I know:

    1. Gaming accounting systems started around 1978. It was a Bally that started it, I believe. Running on a PDP11 in the back room. Keeping meter, drop and win percentage histories as required by gaming control.

    2. Slot machines have been hooked up since that time using plain serial lines. Most use a form of encryption for the amounts and ticket validation ids.

    3. This server based gaming thing isn't new but its just now starting to get approvals from GLI and NGCB ( gaming commisions in the US. ) The hard part has always been getting a hard drive into the dumb terminal. My guess is they finally found a way around that. That way they could just download the paytables ( not the personality which is the hold percentage which is heavily regulated BTW ) and not all the graphics and game code.

    I do know that the NGCB looks at trend analysis of payoff data to confirm hold % over a period of time.

  61. Jeez... by Organism · · Score: 1

    I thought this was going to be something interesting, like bringing online gambling to slot machines.

    What a swizz.

    --
    -- My hovercraft is full of eels.
  62. wow...old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I live in Vegas and have done work for a certain casino and I can tell you that they've been on a computerized system like this for quite a while. I've been there at least a year and theyve had it the whole time. The system they have is made by ITG and slot machines send all their data to a cluster of MS windows servers. From there they can extract statistics, view statistical anomolies for investigation, change payouts (if they wanted), etc.
     
      BTW, the system some people refer to on blackjack tables is something separate completely. It is called Mindplay and basically uses a piece of software in the security office to detect 'card counting' patterns by knowing what cards have been played, what card are left, betting histories, etc. and alerts them by showing regular players as green seats at a table, suspicious players as orange seats and cheaters as red seats. These also have a small display about 2" sq in front of the dealer on the table to show them what the software sees.

    1. Re:wow...old news by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Since when counting cards is cheating? It's just playing in a non-mindless way.

      On the other hand, it is the casino who is cheating here.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:wow...old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my mistake...i meant "people who the casino dont want playing and when discovered will be treated like cheaters and shown the door"

  63. Re:How secure? More than you think... by m50d · · Score: 0

    Surely the machine has to be able to produce valid vouchers. If the machine thinks the server just told it to pay out at 120%, it won't question, it won't print "fake" vouchers - you'll just look to have been lucky.

    --
    I am trolling
  64. Casino by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > "Vegas casinos, will feature server-based
    > gaming with games, new features and, most
    > important, the odds being downloaded from a
    > central server location
    , not determined by
    > internal machine algorithm any more."

    The article continues: "An additional optional feature automatically feeds the coins back to a central location, one possibly as small as a pocket."

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  65. Charlie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see you are the one who stole my lecture.

    1. Re:Charlie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, your lecture sucks.

  66. Re:How secure? More than you think... by turrican · · Score: 1

    Perhaps, but that's assuming that vouchers aren't being kept track of on a central box - which is highly unlikely.

    So, again, even if the machine shoots our a voucher, your win would likely not be redeemable since as soon as you went to another machine or the cashier, a flag would go up saying it's a voucher the central system doesn't know about.

  67. Not THAT new by Doctor+Cat · · Score: 1

    In 1999 & 2000 I worked for Multimedia Games, which makes slots (and video bingo, poker, keno, etc.) mostly for Indian casinos. I helped develop their client/server based system that basically did the same things described in this article. The news is more that this kind of thing is being deployed in places like Vegas and Atlantic City now, not just in the smaller markets.

    --

    Furcadia - A free online game with user created content, DragonSpeak scripting, & more.

  68. Re:Who gives a damn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Correct. If you gamble very low stakes, you can make $20 last awhile (at the extreme, betting a single penny per spin easily makes that cash last over an hour). That's cheap compared to many forms of entertainment these days. The video slots are nice mindless fun, basically video gaming for the older crowd.

    And don't forget free alcohol and slot club benefits. You may even win occasionally.

    The original critical poster is under 21, for sure. Don't knock it until you try it. (Same goes for sex, for all you Slashdotters.)

  69. Why i had never lked slots? by grad34 · · Score: 1

    I had never liked the idea of slot machines much, I preferred the skill of poker and black jack, but, they had just installed a whole bank of new slot machines in the arcade down the road and there was a distinct lack of any other games going on.

    --
    Hot Slot Machines and Crisp Online Black Jack