Slashdot Mirror


Creative MP3 Players Ship With Virus

TheChillPill wrote to mention a Register article which reports that Creative has instituted a recall for some 5GB Zen Neeons. The reason? About 3,700 were shipped with the Wullik-B email worm. From the article: "Creative is reporting that the virus affects players with serial numbers between 1230528000001 and 1230533001680 that have shipped in Japan in late July. According to a translation of Creative's statement (in Japanese) on the security flap the firm has temporarily stopped shipping Zen Neeons players while its partners assist in the recall of the infected batch. The firm said it has identified the source of the outbreak and fixed the problem. Creative said the virus contamination issue was confined to Zen Neeons players and didn't affect any of its other products."

237 comments

  1. How many more times, Zonk??? by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Article is yet another dupe....original article can be found here.

    Seriously, Zonk...this shit just isn't funny anymore. Perhaps you view your endless dupe posts as some sort of clever social commentary...or perhaps you've just taken a few too many sniffs of the huffing rag. Either way, we're getting pretty damned sick of it.

    Do us all a favor and resign. While you're at it, wipe your hard drive and smash your modem.

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is even worse than the fact that this is a dupe of a very, very VERY recent article, is the fact that it's clearly a reactionary submission from the earlier piece on Creative's patent being used against Apple.

      At least pretend to keep a balanced opinion on things.

    2. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by dextration · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Utterly agreed.

      --
      http://www.mushoo.net/
    3. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree. Seriously, in every aspect I agree. We also think the same applies to you.

    4. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by justforaday · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, that story was dealing with worms, and this one is dealing with viruses, so they're very clearly different stories...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    5. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by garcia · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not as if Zonk isn't being notified.

      Think I'll get modded redundant this time?

    6. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh noes! Worst crime of the year! DUPING! Quick, everyone - get your pitchforks! We need to stop this monster before he reproduces and DUPES US ALL!

      Geez, get a god damned life, ya idjit.

    7. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet you still let yourself be whored out by CumTaco & KowBoiKneel by generating image-requests for their ads (no, dear Mozilla-zealots, Firefox does not block the requests)?

      Shithead.

    8. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Zab+UvWxy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And, sadly, the first poster - with a VALID comment - gets modded Redundant.

      *sigh*

      --
      "I don't get it." -- ObviousGuy
    9. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd mod you up some more, but I wasted all my mod points for today.

    10. Re: How many more times, Zonk??? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Informative


      > Seriously, Zonk...this shit just isn't funny anymore.

      1) Visit http://slashdot.org/users.pl?op=edithome

      2) Un-check "Zonk"

      3) Click "Save"

      4) See ya in another thread.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    11. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by defkkon · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Article is yet another dupe....original article can be found here.

      Normally, I can't stand when people bitch and moan about duped stories. Sometimes they're duped from months ago, and even I forgot they were ever posted.

      Normally, I would moderate such bitchings as "Offtopic" or "Redundent".

      This time, I'm very disappointed. This was:
      a) Very, very, very recently posted already
      b) Was a very distinct headline to begin with, about a major corporate SNAFU and not relating to Google, Xbox 360 vs. PS3, Microsoft is teh evil!, etc.
      c) Generated a lot of healthy discussion - this wasn't a topic that got ignored the first time.

      Oh well, I guess its technically not hurting anyone. Its just annoying as hell.

      Ok, I'm done ranting. Go ahead and moderate me Offtopic or Redundent.

    12. Re: How many more times, Zonk??? by cavtroop · · Score: 1

      Done. Thanks for the tip.

    13. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by dgos78 · · Score: 0

      Wow. Slashdot has gone to shit. I've had enough and I'm out of here. I'll get my news elsewhere. The moderators here are out of control too. All the negative moderation to TMM's post has finally driven me away completely.

      --
      SYS 64738
    14. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by robslimo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Has /. has ever pulled a story for being a dupe, hoax or otherwise bogus? ...thinkin' they ought to.

      OTOH, these blatent dupes seem to be one of the things that comprises slashdot's character. We certainly wouldn't want it to become a Fark clone or anything else as insipid.

    15. Re: How many more times, Zonk??? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > Done. Thanks for the tip.

      Hope it works; I just now did it myself. (Else I wouldn't have seen this thread.)

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    16. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, they just generally have one of the "editors" (Editors? Like they ever do anything even remotely worthy of that description. Approve-button-clicking monkeys could do the same job.) add a note to the story saying it's a dupe/hoax/etc, but usually it takes many hours. Often the story won't even be on the front page anymore when they do add the note.

    17. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by d_54321 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OK, yeah, it's a dupe, but

      a- the original article summary didn't mention an mp3 player. ("Creative Zens"? WTF's a Creative Zens? Who cares?!) I didn't give it a second glance and didn't know it was a dupe till just now

      b- the original article summary didn't mention serial numbers- NOR did the articles pointed to- this is very useful and important info. But yeah, that info should have been put in as a reply to the original post, just as the orinal post should have been clearer.

      ScuttleMonkey- you're not as bad as Zonk, but you're still a bad monkey.

    18. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the fuck modded this Insightful? Seriously Monkey, do you view your complaining about dupes as some kind of higher enlightenment for the slashdot community? Do you think that because you have so much free time on your hands to spend 8 hours a day reading slashdot and pointing out dupes that it makes you a better person then, say, someone with a real job? If you don't like the article, don't fucking read it. I am much more sick of the "Look at me! First Dupe post! Haha, slashdot editors you suck! I'm' smarter than you!" bullshit then the dupes themselves.

      Why don't you do us all a favor and stop being such a whining douchebag.

    19. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen it happen.

      I saw a trupe get pulled (and a dupe of something on the front page).

      Guess it was too embarassing to keep up.

    20. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, Zonk...this shit just isn't funny anymore.

      That's where you're wrong. I think it's actually getting funnier. You could go all 'Groundhog Day' with it. Don't post angry!

    21. Re: How many more times, Zonk??? by Jonny_eh · · Score: 1

      Does it change the entries in the RSS feed? If not, then the original poster is still correct to gripe.

    22. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1


      Nice try, Zonk, but we know it's you.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    23. Re: How many more times, Zonk??? by Trillan · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't. If it did, I'd still read slashdot. As it is, this is my last story and last comment.

    24. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      I missed it last time. I'm glad they duped it now I have two sets of replies to read.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    25. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, CowboyNeal pulled a dupe once after I notified him in #slashdot. There were just a few comments at the time though, so I doubt this one will get pulled.

    26. Re: How many more times, Zonk??? by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      Let's do the maths.

      1. Assume Zonk will post two hundred stories between now and the end of the year.
      2. Assume half of them are dupes.
      3. Assume half of the remainder are worth reading.

      Doing as you suggest will, at very conservative estimates, stop you reading fifty worthwhile stories between now and the end of the year.

      The problem isn't that every story Zonk posts is stupid, it's that a lot of them are, and we have no way of weeding them out. If Zonk resigned, then another, hopefully less dupe-prone editor would be posting the worthwhile stories. Your suggestion throws the baby out with the bathwater.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    27. Re: How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I unchecked all the ones that have posted dupes in the past so I do not have to see all their duping greatness. Great tip but how come I do not see anything on the frontpage anymore?

    28. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Bogtha · · Score: 4, Informative

      Has /. has ever pulled a story for being a dupe, hoax or otherwise bogus?

      No, but they occasionally update the story to bitch about the complaints. Quote:

      Update For for the dupe. Not going well. Appreciate all the hate mail. Really encourages improvement.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    29. Re: How many more times, Zonk??? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > Doing as you suggest will, at very conservative estimates, stop you reading fifty worthwhile stories between now and the end of the year.

      No problem; catch them when the other editors dupe his stories.

      And I'm not sure he's going to post 50 worthwhile stories anyway. His dupism was the straw that broke the camel's back, but I was already disgruntled about some of the ASSes[*] he puts up.

      *ASS: Annoyingly Stupid Story

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    30. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see why it's so difficult to avoid dupes.
      This site is wrote in perl, with just a couple of clever regexps a "dupe warning" flag could be raised.
      With links to recent matching stories the editor could check if it really is a dupe.

    31. Re: How many more times, Zonk??? by djdavetrouble · · Score: 3, Funny

      Heh thats what they all say. But looking at your post history (1000+ comments), I would say you have a fairly nasty addiction. I give you a week tops before you hit the /. crack pipe again. I'll be watching !

      --
      music lover since 1969
    32. Re: How many more times, Zonk??? by David+Horn · · Score: 1

      Done! Thanks, Black Parrot. ;-)

      --
      PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
    33. Re: How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can this be tracked? Can Grand Dupemaster #2, Taco, generate a report showing a significant percent of subscribers aren't viewing Zonk's posts?

      Taco: "Well Zonk it apprears that X% of people aren't reading your posts, it's time to can your ass. MMMMmmmm canned ass."

      Posting as AC. I just don't care anymore.

    34. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      I missed the original story on Slashdot, but figured it must be a dupe because it's a good slashdot story and it's several days old - saw it on some of my other RSS feeds.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    35. Re: How many more times, Zonk??? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > No, it doesn't.

      Well, now that no one is reading his articles anymore, maybe Zonk can spend his time implementing RSS support instead of posting dupes.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    36. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. It said "from the surprise-in-your-cereal dept." but I'm not surprised by this dupe.

    37. Re: How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ah yes, forget about making Slashdot a better site. Why get involved? Why speak up? Something you don't like? Something could be improved? Well, don't actually DO anything about it, and don't even SAY anything. That'd be, like, judgmental and stuff. Just uncheck the unhappy option, and viola, problem "gone". This can be applied to problems at any level, personal to global! And always remember, communication is BAD because you'll probably offend some incompetent boob like Zonk.

      At least the OP hasn't sunk to your level of apathy.

    38. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1
      That is standard procedure for the astro-mods.

      They will moderate down anything they disagree with.

      It's now +5 Insightful. Of course you were modded Flamebait even though you made a valid point also.

      Q.E.D.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    39. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps someone should submit a story that references all the Dupos posted by Zonk in the last month.

    40. Re: How many more times, Zonk??? by Back+Slider+1969 · · Score: 1

      Wow. Feel like I should pay you for that tip. Thank you!!

    41. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by dooglio · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I find this post to be offensive and downright rude. I can't understand why it was modded up +5 Insightful.

    42. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Evro · · Score: 1

      Blah, hit "submit" too soon. I meant to ask, how can someone have "Slashdot editor" as a full-time job? It's just a matter of saying yes, no, yes, no, and there's apparently no dupe checking, and certainly no prerequisite that you actually read the site you're employed to edit. So how do they manage to employ 5-10 guys to do this "job"?

      --
      rooooar
    43. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see why mods keep modding this asshole up. He's an obvious karma whore, everything he says is jut herd mentality agreeing with 99% of the slashbots... Fucking slashbots stop modding this guy up. Lame.

    44. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      I think the point is that this can be avoided by simple checks. If the staff of slashdot truly are tech savy like they portray themselves then why do we see duplicates? Most geeks I know pride themselves on attention to detail. So where is this?

      Also, it portrays them as not caring. If that's the case then we all understand. I don't care about a lot of stuff. But at my _job_ I'm expected to produce quality work, not slacker garbage. These guys are employed right? And they make money right by us all being here right? So WTF is the problem?

      End Rant. I won't bring it up again.

    45. Re: How many more times, Zonk??? by HairyCanary · · Score: 1
      I agree that the suggestion borders on extreme -- but it does make a very easy tally of who is frustrated with the dupes. I have zero knowledge of how Slashdot is administered, but if they are interested in finding out how many people care, they can watch how many people have Zonk unchecked.

      What they really need is an option to moderate the stories themselves, not just the responses. And then apply karma to the authors...

    46. Re: How many more times, Zonk??? by theraccoon · · Score: 2, Funny
      5) Profit!!

      ...oh, wait.

    47. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get your dick out of TMM's ass.

      The only thing worse than an asshat is the person who follows an asshat.

      Please get the fuck out of here and never come back.

    48. Re: How many more times, Zonk??? by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      > stop you reading fifty worthwhile stories

      hey, I'll risk it to avoid the aggravation

      not sure why it bothers me as much as it does, but I did just go and check him off my prefs

      I think the complaining about the dupes bothers me more than the dups themselves

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    49. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, this is your mom. I've told you 1000 times, you're not allowed on the computer until you're 12 years old.

      Now come here and give your mommy some head like a good little boy.

    50. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Armadni+General · · Score: 0

      What's even much funnier is that they somehow managed to dupe the word "for," as well.

    51. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good, they're getting the point.

    52. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by dratox · · Score: 1

      "Think I'll get modded redundant this time?"

      Moral: redundant topics will generate MANY redundant posts

    53. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its offensive to point out that this is a dupe?

      Thats rich.

    54. Re: How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there any way of applying preferences to the rss feed, or specifying options for the rss feed?

    55. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Mad_Rain · · Score: 1

      I don't see why mods keep modding this asshole up.

      Maybe because most of the time, they think he's right?It's not the "herd mentality" of the "slashbots" when they say "OMG, the Earth, it's ROUND!" and it's certainly not herd mentality when this many people complain that the editors aren't doing a good job (for which they're supposedly financially compensated for).

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
    56. Re: How many more times, Zonk??? by echucker · · Score: 1

      You have to subscribe to get advance notice of all of the dupes before they pulled ;-P

    57. Re: How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That involves being registered on Slashdot, which, considering the declining quality in both content and user-base, isn't really worth the effort.

      Oh well. If they have sense they'll ditch him like they did Michael and Katz. Of course then Malda would have to quit himself, since he's the almighty master of the dupe and advertisment posts.

    58. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      What sort of hypocrite do you think you are? Seriously Coward, do you view your complaining about TMM as some kind of higher enlightenment for the slashdot community? Do you think that because you have so much free time on your hands to spend 8 hours a day stalking a user and generating offtopic comments that it makes you a better person then, say, someone who can contribute to Slashdot? If you don't like the post, don't read it. I am much more sick of the "Look at me! I hate TripmasterMonkey! Haha, karma whores you suck! I'm better than you!" crap than the OPs themselves.

      Why don't YOU do us all a favor and stop being such a whining douchebag.

      --
      Trolling all trolls from 1992_Called to Zonk

    59. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by denelson83 · · Score: 1

      I don't know, TripMaster Monkey. The original article you linked to just reports that a virus or worm made it into the product stream. The article Zonk just posted notes a subsequent recall. I don't really see how this article could be a dupe.

    60. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude... Take a look at what you just wrote...

      You're saying that if the majority of the people are saying the same thing, it must be right.

      Welcome to the herd.

    61. Re: How many more times, Zonk??? by Bohiti · · Score: 1

      Can I have your stuff?

    62. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      Moral: redundant topics will generate MANY redundant posts

    63. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      Yes, they have pulled stories before. Michael used to do it often.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    64. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Not yet, but you do have a flamebait.

      Kids these days, don't know what a real flamewar is...

    65. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Kevin+Stevens · · Score: 1

      I really don't understand why dupes really get under people's skin so much. I mean yeah its a minor inconvenience when youre sitting there jonesing after an hour and compulsively hitting refresh waiting for that next story, and youve already read it, but.... Remember. Slashcode (http://www.slashcode.com/) is open source. This is an open source community. If it really gets to you so damn bad, add a feature to slashcode that works so well that all the editor has to do is click a button that says "check for dupes!" and poof it finds all the likely dupes.

      Anything less, and youre really just being a hypocrite imho. Do it, and you will forever have slashdot bragging rights that you saved the dupes.

    66. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The story linked to was posted six months ago. The duping has only gotten worse since then. I think they got the point and decided they don't give a shit.

    67. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by empaler · · Score: 1

      I think we can safely surmise that MANY redundant posts are generated by redundant topics.

    68. Re: How many more times, Zonk??? by empaler · · Score: 1

      If you're using your mail client for the RSS feed it's as simple as creating a filter for the naughty dupers.

    69. Re:How many more times, Zonk??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That story was months ago. Looks like he's deliberately posting dupes now. Sad individual.

    70. Re: How many more times, Zonk??? by Trillan · · Score: 1

      You were right. Damn you. ;)

      As lame as Slashdot is, none of my other feeds cover the same range of stuff...

      Maybe instead I should start a "break Zonk's fingers" fund instead.

  2. Windows TCO? by gbulmash · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Now the question is, will the next analyst who does a Windows vs. Linux TCO comparison include "gets viruses into your product, requiring a recall" as one of the factors in calculating the cost of Windows?

    - Greg

    1. Re:Windows TCO? by Beatbyte · · Score: 1

      wait 3 days for the dupe article, then argue your case ;)

      but seriously, how many other products have shipped with virii? i can think of 0 for linux/bsd/etc. but i can also think of 0 for windows also.

    2. Re:Windows TCO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if the linux TCO includes "IT workers turn into zealous freaks with no lives who masterbate over windows virus stories"..

    3. Re:Windows TCO? by Tassach · · Score: 1

      I can't remember specifics, but there have been a number of software vendors who've gotten burned by shipping a virus with their product over the years, going back to the early 90's.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    4. Re:Windows TCO? by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that no F/OSS product has ever shipped with a back door, trojan, or other nastiness? I'm not saying it's a common occurence, but it's certainly going to be harder to spot than a virus.

      Read the history of Ken Thompson's famous back door in the early Unix C compiler versions. Shows just what's possible when someone really knows what they're doing.

    5. Re:Windows TCO? by oh_bugger · · Score: 1

      I once bought an issue of a gaming magazine years ago, I think it was UltimatePC, and the demo CD had the CIH Virus on it. The next month came a warning and an apology.

      --
      Go home and shave your giant head of smell with your bad self
  3. Two in a Row! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    One more dupe and I get a tic-tac-toe!

    1. Re:Two in a Row! by Widowwolf · · Score: 1

      Bingo!

      --
      ~~"Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~~Dennis Miller
  4. Unbelievable by kneecarrot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh my, I just can't believe how irresponsible Creative is being. This is the second time that they have shipped 3700 of these players with this exact same virus in less than a week!

    --

    I always save my last mod point to mod up a good troll. You people are too serious.

    1. Re:Unbelievable by Cash202 · · Score: 0
      Rofl.

      The terror...this makes you think...who else could screw up and do the exact same thing in under a week...

      Like permit two identical pieces of news to be posted on the same site within a week...

    2. Re:Unbelievable by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1, Redundant

      It's strange how things reported by slashdot usually happen twice in the same week.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    3. Re:Unbelievable by Spaceman+Spiff+II · · Score: 1

      lol! That's quite simply one of the funniest things I've read in awhile! Thanks. :-D

      --
      I understand that life's not fair, just why is it never unfair in my favor?
    4. Re:Unbelievable by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 1

      Best. Dupe. Complaint. Ever.

  5. Dupe... once again by andersbergh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Stop the dupes!

    1. Re:Dupe... once again by HTTP+Error+403+403.9 · · Score: 1

      Fascinating, Creative seems to have embedded articles about the virus with a virus.

      --
      I'm not a Troll, it's reverse psychology.
  6. Screeech! by andrew1222 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wonder what a virus sounds like through those earphones? Ashley Simpson?

    --
    Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.--Carl Sagan http://yourmindshare.com http://www.quake4cash.net
    1. Re:Screeech! by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1
      Thats the real reason they're recalling it. It's not a virus at all, its just the unmastered version of her duet with Hillary Duff.

      B.T.W. who TF is Nick Cannon and why is he staring in a bad Beverly Hills Cop/21 Jump Street rip-off?

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

  7. Hmm by twocoasttb · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does their patent cover this too?

    1. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno, but I heard they're renaming the Neeon line to iWorm.

  8. But... by TheOtherAgentM · · Score: 3, Funny

    The question is, who owns the patent on shipping MP3 players with viruses? Will they take legal action?

    1. Re:But... by vertinox · · Score: 1

      I don't know about who owns the viruses, but my the iPod earbuds that i own might be growing a nasty bacteria culture.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    2. Re:But... by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

      I think Microsoft has prior art on this one.

      *ducks*

  9. Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant
  10. Patents by lilrowdy18 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Lets see if Creative will patent this.

    They could patent an idea of shipping units with preinstalled anti-virus testing software.

  11. No subscription for me by the_rev_matt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's been said a million times, but this is precisely why I won't pay for a slashdot subscription. Nor will I click on any ads. Even if I see an ad that looks interesting (which is fairly often, I'll open a new tab and browse there manually rather than give slashdot the traffic revenue. An occasional dupe is one thing, but when 25% of the stories on the front page are dupes from YESTERDAY, it's clear that OSDN doesn't give a shit about quality.

    --
    this is getting old and so are you

    blog

    1. Re:No subscription for me by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, /. looks more and more like TV each day. Ads, reruns. One of these days they'll start doing news items and weather forcasts.

    2. Re:No subscription for me by Saeger · · Score: 1

      I take care of MY cashcow!

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    3. Re:No subscription for me by tdsanchez · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Slashdot used to not suck. It seems when you add money and greed to -anything- it becomes a polished TURD.

    4. Re:No subscription for me by hustlebird · · Score: 0

      Are you seriously that self centered that you can't even support a site that you use. Nobody is asking you to be here by any means. I've never in my life heard somebody bitch so much about something that is completely free to them. It's one this to say that you won't pay for a subscription, but to be such an asshole as to go out of your way to not support a site you use, thats just bullshit. You, my friend, got to be one of the most selfish assholes on this forum. You should do us all one better and stop posting as well.

    5. Re:No subscription for me by meatbridge · · Score: 1

      how would denying slashdot ad revenue they deserve for serving you interesting ads help to improve the quality of their site? i understand not subscribing as a form of protest. even not visitng slashdot is a legitimate way of asserting yourself as a consumer. but to circumvent their ad revenue is just malicious, especially with the kind of traffic posting the same redundant complaint "a million times" would generate.

    6. Re:No subscription for me by robslimo · · Score: 1

      Ads, what ads? Firefox must be broken, cause I just don't see any ads.

    7. Re:No subscription for me by thebdj · · Score: 2

      i don't think he is alone, and boy I wish i still had some mod points to lower your score...Seriously the duping is a serious problem that no one has taken care of or seems like to ever take care of. This was posted with the last few days even. Besides, how many people you think have Firefox here and Adblock on. I mean really most of us don't see the ads, let alone click them, thats what they got idiots like you for apparently.

      --
      "Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb."
    8. Re:No subscription for me by arose · · Score: 1
      especially with the kind of traffic posting the same redundant complaint "a million times" would generate
      If only there was something they could do about it...
      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    9. Re:No subscription for me by hustlebird · · Score: 1

      I just dont understand the mentality of "Lets go out of our way to not support this place, because they do a few things we dont like" Sure, dupes are annoying, but to say you avoid clicking the ad's even when they apply to you is effectively boycotting a web site that you use and enjoy. I guess people just expect everything for nothing.

    10. Re:No subscription for me by ediron2 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'm not responsible for the GP, but I'll play Devil's Advocate:

      Last time I checked, I don't get reimbursed for slashdot comments I make. Slashdot gets a few thousand comments per day, so that's several hundred man-hours of donated content they get per day.

      Meanwhile, half a dozen so-called editors have done very little to improve the site lately and only marginally more to improve editorial quality. There's the disconnect: They cover servers and bandwidth, we provide 99% of the content.

      Barrier to entry: being the behemoth it is, slashdot (like Microsoft) is partly to blame for the lack of competition. A lot of competitors have tried, few can get critical mass because everyone still uses slashdot.

      I paid (once!) for a subscription, but have watched slashdot editorial quality actually go down. Heck, even their new countermeasures suck: when I go out of my way to notify the editors of dupes or egregious factual errors, they make tabloid-caliber alterations ("WidgetCo is dead!" becomes "Is WidgetCo Dead?") rather than fix or cancel the news story outright.

      To carry the Microsoft analogy a step further, being forced by circumstances into depending on Slashdot, I'll find ways to rebel. I go out of my way to avoid enriching Microsoft, whenever some small step is possible. This ranges from avoiding MSN and other Microsoft products, to advocating alternatives whenever company needs are flexible enough. Dialing down my subscription settings and bypassing Slashdot's ad revenue would be an equivalent protest against Slashdot editorial laziness.

      Given the above, boycotting Slashdot stands a better chance of helping *my* situation than the alternatives.

      Now, how am I'm selfish when I donate my writing without compensation? How am I being selfish when I punish a vendor that refuses to improve after an implicit contract for improvements was made with my donation? How exactly am I being selfish to deny that same vendor any additional income from advertising to me? I AM being selfish to want slashdot to either fix itself or die, but it is a selfishness that is the utter essence of capitalism or evolution: things should have more than marketing or inertia as their means of existing.

      If none of that sways you, it'll probably not matter if you reread your rant, changing context to Microsoft (or the RIAA) and adjust the circumstances:

      " Are you seriously that self centered that you can't even leave your browser homepage on MSN, after all Microsoft and IE do for you? Nobody is asking you to use Microsoft by any means. I've never heard anyone bitch so much about something that is completely free to them."
      or
      "... but to be such an asshole as to listen to the radio and yet go out of your way to not support the RIAA labels, that's just bulls**t."
      (disclosure: the above opinions weren't mine until 5 minutes ago, probably won't be 10 minutes from now. Why? See Devil's Advocate. I own 10 shares of Microsoft. I donated to Slashdot. Neither gives me any satisfaction.)
    11. Re:No subscription for me by hustlebird · · Score: 0

      Wow, this has definately enlightened my views, but I still find your analagy's a little off.

      First, I've never considered /. to be like microsoft or any other, apparently they are, and for anyone looking at them in this light, I can completely relate to your point of view.

      I guess I always saw the dupes as just a petty annoyance, and I've always just lived with it. I've also never considered all the content provided by everyone, which /. does absolutely nothing as far as reimbursment goes.

      Reflecting upon this discussion, if you do consider your posts and comments truely to be worth something (which I do agree that they make up 99% of the content) then I suppose that the ad-revenue they generate is actually in fact in additional income for them.

      In hindsight I have read slashdot for many years now, but never bothered registering or posting because the content was much better. If the only way to improve the quality of the site is to boycott, then I guess I should probably join the bandwagon. I just get frustrated reading all these complaints that are modded insightful, when I really just want to read and discuss TFA and any spinoffs directly related.

    12. Re:No subscription for me by pimpimpim · · Score: 1
      You know, I started reading slashdot not too long ago, and I actually see that there are often user contributions are pretty good, and that a lot of the stupid memes aren't posted anymore, or are just downmodded very fast, really the user comments have made quite an improvement in the last years. On the whole, I have the impression that a lot of the slashdot readers are competent, grown-up, people.

      So apparently the modding system works good, the people visiting here are serious about nerdish stuff, but then why-oh-why do the editors manage to screw up with these dupes? There have been outcries for this for a long time, and nothing seems to be done. That even the notice system for subscribed users didn't got fixed (it apparently isn't working) is sad.

      I would like to suggest an "ask slashdot" asking why they don't care about wasting the time and effort of the people coming here. Yes, it's their own decision to come here, so they could just not come, but isn't the purpose of slashdot to provide interested "nerds" with "stuff that matters"? If slashdot doesn't care for their viewers, then who do they care for? Or else it should be an idea to ask if anyone knows promising alternatives to slashdot.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    13. Re:No subscription for me by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      To be honest, there's enough ambiguity that I almost can't tell if you're meaning any of this as sarcasm. Lets hope not. After all, I only half-agree with the stuff I wrote.

      I recognize that there's a LOT of good I get from slashdot. But the chaff/crap (dupe stories, sensationalism, etc) is horribly undermanaged. And comments modding needs a little love, since some cleverness there could make it stronger, too.

      If the slashdot owners worked to fix these, they'd be a force to be reckoned with. Instead, they're coasting. How lame is that...

      I hate to think one day slashdot will evaporate... but watching them glide along on inertia is almost as bad.

  12. care to wager? by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1


    Care to wager if Creative has a patent on shipping MP3 players with pre-installed viruses? :)

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    1. Re:care to wager? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got an ipod mini with preinstalled virus, hence there seems to be prior art here.

  13. On the question of what happened to Slashdot by Haiku+4+U · · Score: 5, Funny
    I remember when
    Slashdot gave me articles
    that weren't day-old bread.

    Eat them anyway!
    Karma be dammed, you'll read them
    and come back for more!

    1. Re:On the question of what happened to Slashdot by BJH · · Score: 1

      Front page dupe again
      Finger on left mouse button
      Click the x - goodbye!

    2. Re:On the question of what happened to Slashdot by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      You were looking for new, interesting articles? Try some other site.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    3. Re:On the question of what happened to Slashdot by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Gah, that was supposed to be a haiku.
      You were looking for
      new, interesting articles?
      Try some other site.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  14. Good to see by justforaday · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's good to see that Taco worked incredibly hard to make Zonk the editorbot in his own image...

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    1. Re:Good to see by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      Perhaps this is a side-effect from his being cloned? :)

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
  15. Don't blame Zonk! by asdfasdfasdfasdf · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, the virus causes reposts on the slashdot homepage. Apparently, he bought himself a Zen recently.

    1. Re:Don't blame Zonk! by jcenters · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, the virus causes reposts on the slashdot homepage. Apparently, he bought himself a Zen recently.

      --

      vi ~/.emacs

    2. Re:Don't blame Zonk! by yoris · · Score: 1

      You mean, he bought himself _several_ Zens

  16. Had to say it... by KoolDude · · Score: 2, Funny


    Now, *that's* Creative.

    --
    getSexySig(); /* returns sexy signature */
    1. Re:Had to say it... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      not really, it's been done before, yesterday

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  17. Well, I have to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    They're sure getting creative with their viral marketing.

  18. Creative MP3 hardware in general sucks... by leather_helmet · · Score: 0

    I have a zen micro 5gb and have had to send it in twice for repair due to the infamous headphone jack problem.(same problem occurred twice...) (check their message boards, major issues with minor and major defects)

  19. In related news: by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Slashdot dupe posts with virus.

    To late, folks.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:In related news: by justforaday · · Score: 5, Funny

      To late, folks.

      *raises glass*
      To late!

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    2. Re:In related news: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ELL OH ELL ;)

    3. Re:In related news: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LMAO!

      Excellent.

    4. Re:In related news: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thankfully you have made Zonk's dupe post worthwile.

  20. Creative Worm has infected /. by spicydragonz · · Score: 1

    No /. endlessly repeats the same storys.

    1. Re:Creative Worm has infected /. by troon · · Score: 1

      No /. endlessly repeats the same storys.

      This one does.

      And it's "stories".

      --
      Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
  21. Come On, Slashdotters by linguae · · Score: 2, Funny

    Come on, Slashdotters. What's with the frowns on everyone's faces. Why is everyone taking these dupes so negatively? Just think of these dupes as reruns. We would love to crack jokes about Windows viruses, talk about how Linux should be used for everything, talk about how "creative" stuffing viruses in MP3 players are, and....

    Oh, scratch the sarcasm. These dupes really are annoying.

    1. Re:Come On, Slashdotters by w98 · · Score: 1

      me too!

    2. Re:Come On, Slashdotters by DrHanser · · Score: 1

      I have submitted material many times that has gotten rejected. Stuff that hasn't been posted and that would be interesting to people here, and it gets denied by some fucktard editor. So if there was a decent story for every dupe, slashdot would be a marginally better place. I'm sure there are many other users who have submitted worthwhile stuff that's gotten denied as well.

      --
      What is humor if not pain tempered by time?
    3. Re:Come On, Slashdotters by empaler · · Score: 1

      I've actually seen stories I've got rejected run a few weeks later. Duping the rejected?

    4. Re:Come On, Slashdotters by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1


      I've actually seen stories I've got rejected run a few weeks later.

      I've submitted a total of 15 stories...received 15 rejections. Four of these 15 stories were subsequently run days or weeks later, under another submitter's name.

      Misery loves company, I guess. Glad to see that I'm not the only one who's getting cornholed by the editors.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  22. Ugh ... by Sonic+McTails · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So how long until we see a dupe of this dupe?

    Seriously, searching the site doesn't take long, and now uses Google to do it, A quick search of Creative and virus would have found the original. You see?

    --
    This signature was left intentionally blank.
    1. Re:Ugh ... by mopslik · · Score: 1

      Seriously, searching the site doesn't take long, and now uses Google to do it, A quick search of Creative and virus would have found the original.

      Even easier -- just click on the "worm" icon, and you'll see the story sitting right there beneath the dupe.

  23. Sorry, I had to say it by Xerp · · Score: 1

    An excellent article, sir, with only two minor drawbacks: One, we already know about this FREE virus shipment and two, we we already know about this FREE virus shipment. Now I know technically speaking that's only one article, but I thought it was such a big one, it was worth mentioning twice.

    (Modified. Original from Red Dwarf, Holoship)

  24. Dupes? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
    Your post IS A DUPE of:

    This, this, and this post in this very story.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  25. Duplicate you say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    --------------------
    Posts above this line already RTFA.

  26. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stop posting dupes you moron

  27. Nope.. she sounds more like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wonder what a virus sounds like through those earphones? Ashley Simpson? ... bacteria, not virus.

  28. Have virus, will travel. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    When I was working at Atari, an XBox master disc had to be recalled from manufacturing because a PC virus was found. It was caught early enough that there was no significant delay for the product. I'm surprised stuff like this doesn't happen more often.

  29. Once Again, Creative Beats Apple to the Punchline! by FFFish · · Score: 1

    Betcha they patented this innovative new interface, too: Method and Apparatus for the Propagation of Computer Viruses Via Music Player!

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  30. Fixed the problem? by polyhue · · Score: 1

    "The firm said it has identified the source of the outbreak and fixed the problem."

    So they're not running Windows anymore? ha.

  31. They're creative alright! by bmgz · · Score: 2, Funny

    What a wonderfully Creative way to distribute virii!

    1. Re:They're creative alright! by ShibbyShagDeluxe · · Score: 2, Funny
      What scares me about this is if you can distribute viruses via mp3 players, imagine what will happen when normal household appliances get computerised!

      My car will drive itself to Mexico without me, the door will let salesman into the house, and worse of all, my satellite box will make me watch through commercials as the sofa straps me in and winches my eyelids open...

      Now I know why the amish community reject technology altogether.
      --
      Mr Spanky, the erotic goldfish
  32. Dear Slashdot, by sootman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know, with just the tiniest bit of effort, it would be SO easy for you not to suck out loud.
    - take two seconds to see if a story has been posted before. sounds hard, but I hear computers can do amazing things these days.
    - proofread submissions. you're allowed to change them. you know, like an editor.
    - don't put an obnoxious slant on every little thing. more reporting, less commentary. if you have something to say, I hear slashdot allows comments nowadays. (comments, commentary... hmm. note to self, investigate possible connection.)
    - cache. for fuck's sake, it's not funny anymore. if you don't want to put yourselves at risk, use coral or a similar service. They exist for a reason.
    - contact small sites. which would you rather do: "scoop" other sites by an hour and reduce the server to molten rubble after 15 minutes, or contact the admin ahead of time and post the story two hours later? this is what separates responsible adults from behaviorally-challenged fuckwads.
    - and once you've earned some credibility back,
    - ???
    - Profit! Until then, I refuse to pay to subscribe until you behave like a responsible outfit. one you quit behaving like retarded woms, I'll happily subscribe, knowing that you're a great source of links to interesting stories that I *didn't* see two days ago on the same site.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:Dear Slashdot, by djh101010 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      For the record, subscribers _do_ see stories before they're posted to the world. And, there's a link to click "If you see a serious problem with this article, click here" which is a mailto: to someone "at" slashdot.

      That said, I've used it twice, and both stories went green "as-is" with the glaring problems, so I don't know if that goes to the bit-bucket, or if anyone is listening. Maybe nobody said "Hey, this is a dupe" at that point, or maybe, just maybe, nobody is reading those messages. Any internal slashdotty-type person care to comment?

    2. Re:Dear Slashdot, by rhizome · · Score: 1

      Any internal slashdotty-type person care to comment?

      lol. that'll be the day.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    3. Re:Dear Slashdot, by heatdeath · · Score: 0

      If I had moderator points, I would mod this up.

      --
      I'm sorry. The number you have reached is imaginary. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try again.
    4. Re:Dear Slashdot, by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Yer kidding me, they actually have a mechanism for subscribers to point out a dupe and they don't use it? Are they insane?

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    5. Re:Dear Slashdot, by Spaceman+Spiff+II · · Score: 1

      Well to be fair this duplicate did allow additional discussion. Look at all the "Patent the Virus!" posts in this thread that were made possible because of that story a couple days ago...

      --
      I understand that life's not fair, just why is it never unfair in my favor?
    6. Re:Dear Slashdot, by Phroggy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yer kidding me, they actually have a mechanism for subscribers to point out a dupe and they don't use it? Are they insane?

      That's correct. When a new story is posted, it is first available only to subscribers, with a red title bar so you can see it's a preview, posting is disabled, and there's an e-mail link for subscribers to report problems. I've never received a reply to anything I've sent there, and although they do sometimes withdraw a story after posting it for subscribers but before making it available to the rest of you, I haven't seen any evidence that anyone actually monitors that e-mail address, and certainly not on any sort of regular basis.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    7. Re:Dear Slashdot, by nmg196 · · Score: 1

      Do you think that about half a million subscribers didn't notify them that that story was a dupe? They don't actually read those e-mails you know. I'm pretty convinced there's no such thing as the "on duty editor" at slashdot (not 24hrs anyway).

    8. Re:Dear Slashdot, by mibus · · Score: 1

      I had a little more difficulty a while ago... an ISP I happened to be using frequently at the time had their transparent proxy banned from posting, due to mis-usage "by the user".

      Multiple emails to the displayed email address ("if this is incorrect etc. etc.") had no effect, the block vanished after about a month. Same thing happened to a friend a couple of months later.

      I can understand the banning (they can't identify all proxies) but it would have been nice to have had an email back...

  33. MOD PARENT FUNNY by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

    Good times!

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  34. Dupe Checker? by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Article is yet another dupe

    I'm disgustipated.

    I can't post from home because some crud-bucket on my ISP has misbehaved and slashdot is blocking me from posting there. Such creativity and innovation! Examples:

    • Bar posting due to a spate of negative mods (never mind net total is positive.)
    • Time delay for initial post
    • Time delay between posts, longer for AC
    • Content check for CAPS, too few letters per line, oddball characters appear too often, etc.
    YET(!) no dupe checking code to help the editors avoid this common pitfall. You can see where the priorities lay.
    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  35. Zonk Exposed by p0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First take a look at his Slashdot page : www.slashdot.org/~zonk

    There is a link to his blog: http://www.randomdialogue.net/

    His Mini Biography: http://www.randomdialogue.net/aboutme/minibio.php3

    His Blogger Profile: http://www.blogger.com/profile/10483795

    His About Page: http://www.randomdialogue.net/aboutme/basicinfo.ph p3

    The rest is upto your imagination!

    --
    This is my sig. There are thousands more, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Zonk Exposed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he like Tori Amos bahahaha what a GIRL

    2. Re:Zonk Exposed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Slashdot Mainpage Editor - Beyond the Pale: Offered position as a mainpage editor on Slashdot.org, 01/05. Gave notice at DSC.

      wait, does this mean he's paid to do this?

    3. Re:Zonk Exposed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That explains it! He from the GPRM (Glorius Peoples' Repbulic of Madison). Well known for their intollerance and inability to learn new things.

    4. Re:Zonk Exposed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to forget: His 83-item Amazon wishlist

      So whaddaya say guys - anyone feel like forkin' up some dough for Buffy The Vampire Slayer: Season One? I think he deserves at least Roller Coaster Tycoon 3 - y'know, like a thank-you-for-all-the-dupes kinduw thing..
      </sarcasm>

  36. /. hit with Zonk Virus by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

    It creates duplicate stories daily!!!

    --
    http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
  37. Backlash against patent? by geekee · · Score: 1

    So was this bad press for Creative dupe put here as revenge because the editors love Apple and hate any company that would dare challenge Apple, especially with a frivolous patent?

    --
    Vote for Pedro
  38. At least they have a patent on mp3 UI ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... to distract everyone from their crummy products and loser position in the marketplace. I'd be surprised if M$ wasn't bankrolling their pathetic attempt to grab share.

    Bastards.

  39. Worm vs Virus? by cciRRus · · Score: 2, Funny

    This article refered to a virus, while the previous "dupe" refered to a worm. Maybe the guy thought that the 2 cases are different? Heh.

    --
    w00t
  40. Get more current by cnerd2025 · · Score: 1

    Saw this on CNET 2 days ago. Get with the program, /.

  41. "dupe"? by abiessu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Normally I'd side with all those screaming "DUPE!", but this is a new article on theregister about this issue (1200 GMT 2005-09-01), so it's not like the links or even the summary are duped. Especially since this time they're talking about the recall rather than the discovery of the virus.

    As an aside, what was up with the first article? A link to a babelfish translation... was no english version available? If that's all we had two or three days ago, it seems to me that this new article reference is a good thing.

    --
    Let S_n = {nst+us+vt : s,t in Z \ {0}, u,v in {-1,1}}. For all n in Z where |n| > 2, Z \ S_n is infinite... right?
    1. Re:"dupe"? by wiggles · · Score: 1

      this time they're talking about the recall rather than the discovery of the virus
       
      In that case, this story belongs in a slashback, not a new article. Honestly, why Zonk hasn't yet been fired for incompetance is beyond me.

    2. Re:"dupe"? by bskin · · Score: 1

      In that case, this story belongs in a slashback, not a new article. Honestly, why Zonk hasn't yet been fired for incompetance is beyond me.

      The same reason JonKatz wasn't fired? Incompetent editors aren't exactly new.

      --
      hot foreign sheep.
  42. I wonder... by pwnage · · Score: 3, Funny
    Will Creative patent this "method for the distribution of malicious software code via aninferior hardware entertainment device."

    They could license it and make millions!!!

    --
    Reminder: Apple owns 1/255th of the internet.
  43. MOD PARENT UP by swillden · · Score: 1

    I agree completely. Lots of us don't have time to read /. every day, so we often appreciate dupes. In my case, at least 75% of the time I see complaints about a duped article, it's the first time I've seen the article.

    Dupes are valuable for the casual reader, and the bulk of slashdot readers are casual readers. The editors know their audience.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by meatbridge · · Score: 1

      i doubt the dupes are intentional, and we, the casual readers could go into older articles. however a dupe here and there doesn't warrant the anger that is being displayed here.

  44. How man more times, TripMaster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent is yet another TMM first post....posting history can be found here.

    Seriously, TMM...this shit just isn't funny anymore. Perhaps you view your endless reposts of article text and throwaway, redundant observations as some sort of clever social commentary...or perhaps you've just taken a few too many sniffs of the huffing rag. Either way, we're getting pretty damned sick of it.

    Do us all a favor and stop posting. While you're at it, wipe your hard drive and smash your modem.

  45. When "News for Netrds" Mattered by amichalo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have resisted bandwagoning the dupe article issue but my spin is a little different...

    How do the dupe articles make it through when I submit articles that get rejected - like news on non-volitile MRAM replacing volitile DRAM and how Freescale is getting closer and closer to this being reality.

    That's something nerds can sink their teath into, but the editors reject it for "more of the same".

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    1. Re:When "News for Netrds" Mattered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that your articles aren't sensationalistic enough. It seems like the only articles that get green lit around here are the ones that were written to evoke some sort of religious software debate(e.g. Windows vs. Mac or Microsoft vs. Open Source) or argument.

    2. Re:When "News for Netrds" Mattered by BigBadBus · · Score: 1
      I agree absolutely. I have submitted stories on quite a few occasions - often I am the firts by quite a few hours, but my posts never make in favour of other people. When I complain, I get the usual "Oh well" reply. Favouritism? Or are the editors twats?

  46. news items by wiredog · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but they'll probably be aimed at nerds.

  47. patent? by jshaped · · Score: 0

    Can Zonk patent the act of duping?
    Does it so well.

    But I'm sure there's plenty of prior art here on /.

  48. Dupe Checking by lullabud · · Score: 1

    What's amazing to me is that it took me two seconds to find the dupe in my RSS reader. If I were the editor of a site which syndicated news, I would definitely keep a long history of articles cached in my RSS reader for quick referencing. It's the best way to see if the tidbit has already been posted, and also to find related articles from the past.

  49. Hey, Zonk: I speak your language: please read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story is another f lash bAc k, maaaaannnnnnn....

  50. What site to the editors hang out at? by ave19 · · Score: 1

    It can't be slashdot. They clearly don't read the articles here. So where are they? Is it better? Is it cool?

    -ave

    --
    ...or maybe not.
  51. Slashdot Club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    First rule about Slashdot Club is you do not talk about dupes in Slashdot Club.
    Second rule about Slashdot Club is you DO NOT talk about dupes in Slashdot Club.
    Thrid rule about Slashdot Club is someone yells Dupe!, points out a dupe, or comments on a dupe, story is over.
    Forth rule, two admins to a dupe.
    Fifth rule, one dupe at a time, users.
    Sixth rule, no search, no google.
    Seventh rule, stories get duped as long as they have to.
    And the eighth and final rule, if this is your first night at Slashdot Club, you have to dupe.

  52. oh shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the virus is causing repeat stories on slashdot!

  53. 3700 affected??? by The+Woodworker · · Score: 0

    Do the math based on serial numbers. They have 5001679 affected.

    For those of you with no sense of humor (slashbots, I call you), that was a joke, even if was sad.

    --
    Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach him to fish and he'll wipe out the species.
  54. Awesome. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd get a +1, Underrated if you weren't already full and I had mod points. Hehe.

  55. Time to outsource by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
    I've heard some hospitals in the US are outsorcing analysis of X-Ray plates nowadays. Surely the OSDN keiretsu can fire timothy, michael and Zonk to afford a couple of dozen semi-computer literate Indonesians or Chinese to run a simple 1-line regexp against the article database to see if it's a fscking dupe.

    They could also handle submission filtering, with the added benefit that more interesting stories would get posted more often to the front page.

    Then Taco and that CowBoyNeal dude (in true CEO fashion) could give themselves 70% raises, pop open the bottle of gin and toast the wonders of globalization while actually delivering some value to their paying subscribers.

    Hey, maybe they could even outsorce the site remodelling as well - PHP would be a good choice. Surely basic HTML3.2 compliance in 2005 is not much to ask.

  56. Best post ever! by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    I salute you :D

    To justforaday!
    *drinks*

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  57. We wouldn't all be saying dupe if... by David+Rolfe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We wouldn't all be saying dupe if the title wasn't:

    Creative MP3 Players Ship With Virus
    Zonk in Slashdot

    The last one was titled:

    Creative Zens Ship with Worms
    ScuttleMonkey in Slashdot

    Now, what would maybe make this not a dupe, or would irritate me less, is if the new title was "Creative Announces Recall for Infected Players" (including text like "Tuesday we reported that Creative sucked, but today ...". At that point it would seem like this is a followup and not just another indication that the editors don't even read their own site.

    --
    Read Heinlein's 1953 Revolt in 2100, now more than ever.
  58. NSFW!! by freeweed · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just so y'all know, it links to a porn link site.

    Might have the courtesy to warn people next time, asshat. Thankfully, I took today off.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    1. Re:NSFW!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm using noscript with Firefox so the image was "safe for work" for me. Just a huge fuel tank being tranported by a truck.

  59. topic image? by signingis · · Score: 3, Funny

    I want to know when we're going to have a topic image for Dupes. :)

    --

    I prefer a void in conversation to a vacuous one.
  60. Another antivirus appliance by Cascading · · Score: 1

    More delays for their new product

  61. Alternatives? by Pulzar · · Score: 1

    I'm not so pissed off at dupes, they just tell me that they don't really care, especially after being notified and after all the screaming slashdotters after every dupe. It's kind of a first sign that I should look elsewhere.

    But, since the number of bogus stories, advertisements presented as stories, and link summary stories have really gone up recently, I've been looking more and more at other similar sites...

    What do you guys recommend as good alternatives? Something with good/relevant or at least funny commentary, something like Penny Arcade but for all things nerdy?

    --
    Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
    1. Re:Alternatives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since Slashdot seems to like posting dupes I do the following

      1) press Shift+Reload on original story about 20 times, just for fun[1]
      2) press Shift+Reload on the dupe about 20 times, just for fun[1]
      3) ???
      4) NO PROFIT!

      [1] with ad-blocker of course.

    2. Re:Alternatives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      technocrat.net

      needs more readers + article submitters but good start so far

    3. Re:Alternatives? by Anonymovs+Covvard · · Score: 1

      What do you guys recommend as good alternatives? Something with good/relevant or at least funny commentary, something like Penny Arcade but for all things nerdy?

      Have you considered submitting this as an 'Ask Slashdot'? It'll probably slip past the "editors"

    4. Re:Alternatives? by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1


      needs more readers + article submitters

      It just got one more.

      See you there.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  62. My desklet RSS reader shows by smoker2 · · Score: 1
    the title like this -
     
    Creative MP3 Players Ship With ....

    I guess I was right
     
    .... == DUPE

    ;-)

  63. Not a Dupe by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    It's a self-replicating article virus which ships with some copies of slashdot.

  64. Re:Dupe... once again (and a tip to prevent them) by hackstraw · · Score: 1

    Although slashdot's search is not very good, there is a decent search engine called google.

    I just searched for site:slashdot.org creative mp3 and the 6th hit was the duped article.

    If your as lazy as Zonk and don't want to type all of those characters into a search, you can click here.

  65. enough already!! by compro01 · · Score: 1

    i never saw this article the first time. and something of this nature warrents being duped, if only to make sure that more people read it and be careful. this is a freaking VIRUS WARNING!

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  66. Fire Zonk! Hire me :) by antdude · · Score: 1

    Gah, I remember this dupe! Sheesh, I think Zonk is slacking off. :( Maybe /. should hire me! [grin]

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  67. d00p by Brunellus · · Score: 1

    This post is a second-order dupe.

  68. Stop complaining about dupes! by Cervantes · · Score: 1

    Seriously folks, we should be happy for the OSDN team. I mean, it takes serious guts to continually hire "special" people as editors. And perhaps, by being constantly exposed to ADD and ADHD sufferers, we can learn to understand and help these poor people. Because that has to be the only fudging explanation for this constant piss-poor stuff. Seriously, would it be so hard to set some ground rules in place?

    - Thou shalt do a basic keyword search before posting an article to see if it has been done before.
    - Thou shalt use a spellechecker.
    - Thou shalt ensure that the writeup is not a copy/paste of the first paragraph of the article.

    Would that be so fscking hard?

    Heh, I just noticed the "Important Stuff" notes under the edit box here. Point #3:

    "Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said."

    Heh.

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  69. Deja Vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or is this a dupe? I've got 5 mod points to spend and wouldn't mind spending them marking the story down rather than user replies ;)

    Especially after a story on Creative getting a patent on MP3 devices relating to sorting tracks by artist/album/track etc got bounced with no reason.

    (Yes I know grouching about story submissions is frowned upon but as that was a new story and this isn't its a valid moan ;) )

  70. Bug Patent by theoneknuckles · · Score: 1

    I hear Apple has a patent on shipping MP3 players with a bug and is thinking about suing Creative for licensing fees...

  71. Serial numbers by d_54321 · · Score: 1

    affects players with serial numbers between 1230528000001 and 1230533001680

    Is that inclusive?

  72. Topic image! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to know when we're going to have a topic image for Dupes. :)

    Here you go. :)

  73. How? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come to think of it, how does this worm manifest itself on a player device?

    "W32.Wullik.B@mm is a mass-mailing worm that attempts to send itself to all the contacts in the Outlook address book. The worm makes numerous copies of itself in random locations, and moves to a new location when Windows Explorer browses to the folder from which it runs. It can spread to floppy disks and shared network drives under some conditions.
    I doubt it executes on the player itself. Can it infect the PCs that you connect the player to for syncing?

  74. Plays For Sure by Vandil+X · · Score: 1

    Well, with regard to Microsoft's "Plays For Sure" logo campaign, I suppose this also includes viruses.

    --
    Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
  75. Why are you here? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    it's clear that OSDN doesn't give a shit about quality

    Look, it's fine if you think Slashdot sucks. But find something more interesting to do than bemoan the fact.

    Find a better site. (Technocrat?) Start one. Use a Bayesian Classifier from the RSS feed. Learn to speak Swahili.

    But don't continue to make your life miserable.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  76. Come On, Slashdotters by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 1

    Yes, these dupes really are annoying.

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  77. What pisses me off more than a dupe... by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Is a dupe with changing information. Anyone note that the whole article describes the same problem as both a virus AND a worm? Umm... according to every other anti-virus company, a worm is not a virus, just like a trojan horse is not a worm.

    People without clear concept on the differences between the malicious programs out there should not even be allowed to write these kinds of stories.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  78. Every time you dupe an article... by ChesterTanuki · · Score: 1

    ...God kills a kitten.

    Please, think of the kittens.

  79. Far superior by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 2, Informative

    A far superior site is Digg.com. Users decide what gets posted, and just a scan of today's front page reminds me of the old Slashdot frontpage of yesteryear.

    There's even an interview with one of the Mythbusters! Cool.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
    1. Re:Far superior by blanks · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link, I forgot about that site.

      The only thing is that the firt article I see when I check out the site has a post here
      "I believe this was on the front page before..."

      :)

  80. ...AND IT'S STILL NOT 3,700 UNITS; IT'S 5% OF THAT by ickoonite · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...as I commented the last time this was posted (full translation here).

    Idiots.

    iqu :|

  81. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Link is a referral.

  82. CITOKATE! by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Really encourages improvement.

    Would Zonk stop posting dupes if they didn't get pointed out to him? Would he be getting hatemail if he were, y'know, doing his fucking job? I think not.

    Like David Brin says---CITOKATE! Criticism is the only known antidote to error. Criticize away, fellow Slashdotters.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca