Slashdot Mirror


BitTorrent Gets $8.7 Million in VC Funding

Brandon writes "BitTorrent just got a massive infusion of cash from venture capital firm DCM Doll. It looks like BitTorrent is hoping to cozy up with the content creators. From the article, 'Neither BitTorrent nor DCM have publicly stated how a legitimate service would work, but industry insiders have been busy speculating on how the distributed peer-to-peer service could help movie studios and filmmakers make for-pay content available.' Will this awaken Microsoft's Avalanche?"

97 of 151 comments (clear)

  1. Two in a row! by LoganAvatar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dupe: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/09/27/183246 can we go for 3 dupes in a row?

    1. Re:Two in a row! by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 5, Funny

      can we go for 3 dupes in a row?

      If we did, that'd be 26.1 million in funding. w00t!

    2. Re:Two in a row! by dnoyeb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Its not even funny. Its like Slashdot bombing or something. We should keep a list of the number of dupes each 'editor' posts. It should be for their karma!

    3. Re:Two in a row! by yppiz · · Score: 4, Funny
      Someone needs to set up a torrent to serve up the dupes. Think of all the money OSDN could save just from reduced bandwidth!

      --Pat

    4. Re:Two in a row! by Omniscientist · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Eh I'm pretty sure bandwidth==money for OSDN, with the Ad's and all.

    5. Re:Two in a row! by jargoone · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I started up my laptop, and thought for sure that I had forgotten to refresh all the tabs on my browser. Sure enough, I had. I should have known better!

      Slashdot needs a "last refreshed" time on the page, so that you'll know if you've left your browser open, or if you're seeing a dupe.

    6. Re:Two in a row! by Glendale2x · · Score: 2, Funny

      Damn... this is the first time i checked slashdot today, and for a second there I thought I'd gone back in time.

      --
      this is my sig
    7. Re:Two in a row! by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      Well, now that BitTorrent has $17.4 million, they should be able to crank out something TWICE as good!

      Way to go /., let's go for 3 in a row!

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    8. Re:Two in a row! by ChazeFroy · · Score: 1

      Why not "employ" the people who subscribe to slashdot to vote on whether an article is a dupe? If an overwhelming percentage of subscribers vote that it is, delete the post and don't run it for the general public.

    9. Re:Two in a row! by sunwolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wonder when the people who are so immensely annoyed by dupes will just stop going to slashdot. It doesn't seem likely - it's still /. and complaining's fun anyway.

      But still...the incessant noise about it can get irritating.

    10. Re:Two in a row! by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      The "last refreshed" time is basically already there: look at the time of the story at the top of the page. If it's more than a couple hours ago then likely it ... was last refreshed a couple hours ago.

      (Or perhaps you meant within the story; you're right, that would be a feature request.)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    11. Re:Two in a row! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      They already do keep lists.
      CmdrTaco's karma is so bad nowadays he can't even read the site anymore ;)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    12. Re:Two in a row! by jargoone · · Score: 1

      I wonder when the people so annoyed by people complaining about dupes will just stop reading the posts about dupes.

      Subscribers expecting more might be irritating, but that's /.'s fault, not ours.

    13. Re:Two in a row! by sunwolf · · Score: 1

      If I hadn't replied already, I'd mod you insightful.

  2. Where have I seen this before? by tepples · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Slashdot Search: bittorrent yields this article, which claims a $8.75 million figure. Has the funding been cut by $50,000 or something?

    1. Re:Where have I seen this before? by Kjuib · · Score: 1

      NO... But details are lost as stories get Duped... or maybe it is a bad rounding error. I think it is the Slashdup effect though.

      --
      - Your stupidity got you into this mess, why can't it get you out? -Will Rogers
    2. Re:Where have I seen this before? by Rei · · Score: 1

      Don't worry - google is going to help NASA come up with a solution to bad rounding errors. I submitted an article about their recent collaboration - it should be coming up shortly!

      --
      So, apart from that, how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln?
    3. Re:Where have I seen this before? by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1
      "Slashdot Search: bittorrent yields this article, which claims a $8.75 million figure. Has the funding been cut by $50,000 or something?"

      That's the value today, in real terms - accounting for the deprectaion due to inflation - since the last time this story was posted on /. two days ago.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    4. Re:Where have I seen this before? by flamingiceclone · · Score: 1

      nope it cost them $50000 to get it reposted on slashdot.....

    5. Re:Where have I seen this before? by MobyDisk · · Score: 2, Funny

      The problem is that Slashdot reports one kilobucks as $1024, while USA Today uses $1000

  3. When will it stop? by rduke15 · · Score: 4, Funny

    So that's 17.4 millions now?

  4. -$50K? by embo · · Score: 1

    What happened to the other $50K that we just read about two days ago?

    1. Re:-$50K? by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

      It was spent on the marketing that brought us this dupe....

      --
      In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  5. $17.4 million by dameron · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow, it doubles every day.

  6. Wow... by powerlinekid · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Editors, we going for a new record today?

    Speaking of which, what is the record for dupes in a row? I would guess 3 - 4 (April fools doesn't count).

    Come on guys, you can do it... almost there.

    --

    can't sleep slashdot will eat me
  7. Cut 'n' paste job - Cowboyneal makes it TOO easy!! by Linker3000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot EeziPost (TM) MK I

    #NB: For obvious reasons, the first option is ENABLED by default - remember to turn off if you are NOT responding to a dupe

    [X] Another: [X] Dupe [ ] Slashvertisment [X] WTF [X] $editor is a dork

    [ ] Frist psot [ ] link to GNAA [ ] Link to goatse [ ] $random_drivel

    [ ] I Haven't RTFA, but... $random_opinionated_comment

    [ ] Slashdotted already!. I bet their server runs on $topic_item too

    [ ] Soul_sucking registration required

    [ ] Mod Parent [ ] up [ ] Down

    [ ] Fsck: [ ] SCO [ ] Micro$oft [ ] DMCA [ ] DRM [ ] MPAA [ ] RIAA [ ] Google [ ] Bush [ ] You all

    [ ] I for one welcome our new $topic_item overlords

    [ ] Imagine a beowulf cluster of those

    [ ] In Soviet Russia, $topic_item owns you!

    [X] Meh!

    [ ] Netcraft confirms $topic_item is: [ ] dead [ ] dying

    [ ] But have the inventors thought of what will happen if $random_amateur_insight

    [ ] Once again the USA is clamping down on my [ ] Amendment rights.

    [ ] You insensitive clod

    [ ] But people who download music from P2P networks are more likely to buy the album

    [ ] Cue DVD Jon-type crack in 3..2..1

    [ ] Torrent, anyone?

    [ ] Here's a link to a patch: $random_linux_distro_url

    [ ] Profit!!

    [ ] Still no cure for cancer

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
  8. No, really? by Rodness · · Score: 1

    "Though the application has found legitimate uses, the company wants to distance itself from any association with piracy."

    You mean they're not jumping up and down screaming "Hey publishers, we made it really easy for people to pirate your products!"

    Napster tried to distance themselves too, but it didn't work out so well for them. At least these guys had the foresight (thanks to Napster's trailblazing) to have a decentralized architecture.

  9. Re:All together, class. by WilliamSChips · · Score: 4, Funny

    WHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINE. (Would you like some cheese and crackers, dupewhiners?)

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  10. Slashdot Funding. by lexsco · · Score: 2, Funny

    How much funding would Slashdot require to stop posting so many #$%$@^ dupes ??

  11. Good on 'em by Johnno74 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This sort of thing legitimizes p2p networks.

    I have a 4-month old daughter at home, so my wife and I don't really get to go out to the movies any more - so I download new releases and we watch them at home, and we can still keep up with our childless friends who go to the movies :)

    I do this without any guilt, because if the MPAA etc would get off their arses and build a decent delivery system where I could pay (a reasonable fee - not the full cost of a cinema ticket!!) to download the latest movies then I would.

    1. Re:Good on 'em by Frodo+Crockett · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I do this without any guilt, because if the MPAA etc would get off their arses and build a decent delivery system where I could pay (a reasonable fee - not the full cost of a cinema ticket!!) to download the latest movies then I would.

      Actually, the full cost of a cinema ticket ($8ish dollars where I live) would not be a bad price for a high-quality non-DRM'd movie. Consider that if you went to the theater, you'd have to pay for two tickets, unless the wife is young enough to get in for free. ;) You'd also pay ridiculous prices for sodas, popcorn, and candy at the theater.

      --
      "The newly born animals are then whisked off for a quick run through a giant baking oven." --heard on Food Network
    2. Re:Good on 'em by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but people said the same thing about iTunes on Slashdot, and now those same people are still pirating music. Want to hear the secret? It's because of the "reasonable fee" clause! See, to the average Slashdotter, the "reasonable fee" of a music track is somewhere in the vicinity of 10 cents, and the "reasonable fee" of a movie is around maybe half a dollar. So no matter how good the service that comes out is, Slashdotters can continue pirating with inpunity because the product isn't offered at a "reasonable fee!"

      Brilliant.

    3. Re:Good on 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So because they have yet to deliver the product you desire, you feel no guilt in stealing the the product they already have? I'm failing to see how that absolves you of any moral wrongdoing.

    4. Re:Good on 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah man. If BMW would just get off their ass and build an awesome car for $15,000 I wouldn't have to steal the really expensive ones.

      So lets get this straight - you do not feel guilty about breaking the law, because it is THEIR fault that you have to break the law because they didn't make something convenient for you in the way YOU see fit.

      Nice logic.

      I download movies because I have no respect for the movie industry and am a selfish bastard and just don't care for them to get my money. At least thats being honest about why I do it. Pathetic justifications are really lame dude.

    5. Re:Good on 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I do this without any guilt, because if the MPAA etc would get off their arses and build a decent delivery system where I could pay (a reasonable fee - not the full cost of a cinema ticket!!) to download the latest movies then I would.

      Have you considered that it's their content and that they should get to decide how they want to distribute it? What you would do in some alternate universe simply doesn't enter the picture, at least not as the moral aspect is concerned.

      I download movies too. I don't pretend I have some moral justification for doing it though.

    6. Re:Good on 'em by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Yeah man. If BMW would just get off their ass and build an awesome car for $15,000 I wouldn't have to steal the really expensive ones.

      Nope, you missed it completely. If BMW would make the M6 available in the US, he wouldn't have to violate customs laws to import one illegally. It isn't about the price, it is about the complete lack of availability. Though I do agree that his demand for the price to be under $8 is arbitrary, I can get any number of DVDs from Wal-Mart or other discount store for $5.50 or less, so a price of $8 for it would be unreasonable. Not to mention that electronic delivery would greatly reduce their costs.

    7. Re:Good on 'em by Johnno74 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ok, I worded that badly - I don't mean to be taking some moral high ground here - I don't have much of a problem downloading movies, but if there was a legitimate alternative, I'd take it.

      I beleive they should be (financially) rewarded for their efforts. But having to compete with a free service should hopefully make them eventually provide an alterative that isn't too pricey or restrictive.

      If that free alternative wasn't there, or people didn't use it, then the movie industry would have no incentive to start making these deals.

    8. Re:Good on 'em by nanoakron · · Score: 1

      Theft of a car in the manner in which you describe it deprives the owner of the ability to use their own property in perpetuity.

      Illegally copying a file from the internet however, does not impinge upon anyone else's ability to enjoy the use of said file, be it a movie, mp3 or whatever.

      See a difference?

      Good.

      Pathetic justifications are pretty lame. So are straw-man arguments.

      -Nano.

  12. Legitimate service? by malkavian · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, the great downloads of the software demos, the linux distros and so on haven't been legitimate?
    Again, I'm left feeling rather let down by statements that seem to indicate that unless somethings signed off and tide up by the content cartels, it's somehow illegitimate.

  13. MOD PARENT FUNNY! by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And if you can please add it to the subculture wikipedia item. Thank you :)

  14. THE VC?!?!?! by rel4x · · Score: 1

    WHY bring the Viet Cong into this? WHAT GOOD WILL COME OF IT?! ...oh yeah...dupe...and yet...I don't mind...there's no news like good news...twice....

    --

    Before you mod me funny, think, perhaps I was insightfully funny?
  15. VC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    How will filesharing *ever* have credibility now that the VietCong supports it?

    1. Re:VC? by ki4iib · · Score: 2, Funny
      THE VC?!?!?!
      (Score:1)
      by rel4x (783238) Alter Relationship on Thursday September 29, @05:27PM (#13680404) WHY bring the Viet Cong into this? WHAT GOOD WILL COME OF IT?! ...oh yeah...dupe...and yet...I don't mind...there's no news like good news...twice....


      Uh, dupe. ;)
    2. Re:VC? by Cerdic · · Score: 1

      How will filesharing *ever* have credibility now that the VietCong supports it?

      Hey, if communism means free music and movies, I'm all for it. Screw capitalism and its "downloading is stealing" attitude!

      --
      Advice for my fellow geeks: before seeking out that threesome you dream of, you might see what a TWOsome is like first.
  16. Re:All together, class. by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1

    Yeah, put them in their place, grammar nazi. I'd rather see dupe whiners than someone who only corrects people or posts many extremely in-depth comments. All in a 3 day period.

    Which is worse? He that whines about dupes or he that whines about the whiners? Or perhaps I'm worse. At least I don't try correcting trolls, though.

    --
    You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
  17. Clearing Internet Cache by hagrin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... oh wait.

    I seriously thought for a second that I was having a browser caching problem when I saw 2 dupes in a row.

  18. How do I make sure my own songs are legitimate? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Again, I'm left feeling rather let down by statements that seem to indicate that unless somethings signed off and tide up by the content cartels, it's somehow illegitimate.

    Given the precedent of liability for infringement through subconscious copying in the United States, those statements might unfortunately be accurate.

  19. fill in the blank by bedroll · · Score: 1

    [insert random bitching about dupes here]

  20. Why do I get the feeling.. by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    .. that I read Slashdot more than the ops do? Just a thought.

    --


    "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
  21. Dupe by dbhankins · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Slashdot: Dupes for dopes, stuff that matters so much we gotta tell you again!

    1. Re:Dupe by Elad+Alon · · Score: 1

      Slashlaugh: Dupes for dopes. Stuff that's so funny, we just have to tell the joke again.

      --
      News for merdes. Shit that matters.
      Ask me about my sig.
  22. MOD PARENT DOWN - PLAGIARISM by Johnboi+Waltune · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is an exact copy of a post by 'popo' from the previous BitTorrent/venture capital thread.

    --
    "The advanced societies of the future will be driven by competing systems of psychopathology." -JG Ballard
    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN - PLAGIARISM by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Thank you Captain Obvious! *thunk*

  23. Re:Piracy by besenslon · · Score: 4, Funny
    This have to be a new feature of /. - dupe not only the story, but the comments as well. Is it automatically enabled or I have to select a checkbox somewhere?

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=163583&cid=136 60672/

  24. Re:All together, class. by F_Scentura · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it's not like people pay for slashdot or anything...

  25. Re:Cut 'n' paste job - Cowboyneal makes it TOO eas by Stephen+Williams · · Score: 1

    You, sir/madam, are hysterically funny. Biggest laugh I've had all week. Thanks! :-)

    -Stephen

  26. Re:Cut 'n' paste job - Cowboyneal makes it TOO eas by boise_bagpiper · · Score: 1

    But... if it weren't for those types of comments there wouldn't be any comments to read!

  27. Re:Piracy by bedroll · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sadly, it appears that it's just plagarism and karma whoring. It would be great social commentary if there were a least some form of attribution. I should be noted that he did the same thing in response to the last duped story.

  28. Re:Cut 'n' paste job - Cowboyneal makes it TOO eas by fliplap · · Score: 1

    Oh man, quality stuff there. I knew there was a reason I still read slashdot.

  29. Re:Piracy by ki4iib · · Score: 1

    In that case, it seems to be social commentary anyway.

  30. Slashdot just saved a lot of money by KalvinB · · Score: 1, Funny

    by switching to CSS which saved them as much as 15% on their HTML usage.

    But they're still trying to save even more money by reusing articles which allows for higher compression rates.

  31. Re:Cut 'n' paste job - Cowboyneal makes it TOO eas by Wah · · Score: 1
    [X] Still no cure for cancer.

    /fixed it for ya.

    --
    +&x
  32. Why would I give up my bandwidth if I have to buy? by barfy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Peer to Peer works when it is *SHARING*. Anything else and it is stealing. Cripes.

  33. Re:Piracy by bedroll · · Score: 1

    It is. Read his journal. He's doing this as an expose on the community and failures of moderation. Sadly, in some ways he's rather insightful.

  34. Oh, forgot the linux one too by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    [ ] "Yeah, but does it run Linux?"; if($summary has 'linux') add "Oh, wait..."

    1. Re:Oh, forgot the linux one too by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      Thanks - added to next version.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
  35. Re:Echo !!!! by DaveCar · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... day ...

  36. Re:Echo !!!! by DaveCar · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... day ....

  37. Bullseye by geneing · · Score: 1

    Now RIAA will have one more target for lawsuits.

  38. Dupeg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    details are lost as stories get Duped

    It's called Dupeg (it's lossy duping format).

  39. Dupayola by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Judging from the editor's comment at the end of the previous dupe acknowledging its dupeness, these dupes are in fact deliberate. But maybe not for the reason stated.

    Think about the slashdot effect for a moment. You've seen what happens when a site that can't handle traffic gets slashdotted. Now think what happens on a site which has ad-supported stories that can handle the traffic. Especially if it is a deep-pocketed advertiser.

    Then consider how a site that didn't get the slashdot-effect ad impressions for a particular story because slashdot linked to another else first. Give them a dupe and maybe a commitment for a few more linked stories to make them happy and keep the kickbacks coming.

    Makes you want to run your own news aggregating site, huh?

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    1. Re:Dupayola by Antonymous+Flower · · Score: 1

      the slashdot effect is a myth. no one actually reads the articles. nice theory otherwise.

      man, google+nasa AND bittorrent going corporate?

      the revolution is imminent! it truly is a marvelous time to be alive!

  40. Re:Cut 'n' paste job - Cowboyneal makes it TOO eas by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

    [X] You're welcome. L3K (Male)

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
  41. Re:Dupe! by Elad+Alon · · Score: 1

    Wasn't this said a message ago or on the post before?

    --
    News for merdes. Shit that matters.
    Ask me about my sig.
  42. You think THAT's a dupe?? by lullabud · · Score: 1

    You must not subscribe the the RSS feed! I don't know what they're doing, but I have like 3 copies of every single story.

    Oh, and speaking of RSS, again I say that if the freakin editors would subscribe to the RSS feed and glance at it before posting they wouldn't post nearly as many dupes.

  43. Re:Cut 'n' paste job - Cowboyneal makes it TOO eas by portscan · · Score: 2, Funny

    don't forget:
    [ ] This is so American-Centric! What about me in [ ] Europe [ ] Australia [ ] Antartica [ ] Outer Space ?

    [ ] I swear I have a girlfried!

    [ ] I swear I have a job at a good company, I just can't mention it here.

    [ ] Check out my website, which is mostly off-topic.

    [ ] I am not a lawyer, but here's some legal advice.

    [ ] I am not an accountant and my mom still buys my clothes, but here is some financial advice.

    [ ] I am not a doctor but here is some medical advice.

    [ ] d00d, I 4M TEH K3WL! 0N133 UZE LUNIX! H00 C4R3Z AB0U7 WIND0Z3?! SC0P3 TEH P3R1 SKRIP7 I JUS7 WR0T3!

  44. Re:Piracy by Da_Biz · · Score: 1

    I don't know if I necessarily agree with that. I've posted things on Slashdot which were contrarian in nature.

    That said, I find your comment recycling quite amusing--nice job.

  45. Re:Cut 'n' paste job - Cowboyneal makes it TOO eas by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

    Wow, it's posts like that one that make dupes worthwhile. Thanks for the laugh.

  46. This may be a dupe, but I wonder... by LePrince · · Score: 1

    how many of the people who whine actually PAY to support Slashdot...

  47. Following the Urge to Hack by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 1

    This guy, Bram Cohen, followed his urge to hack. For a while now he's been living off donations for his work. And now this windfall.

    This is inspiring!

  48. Re:DUUUUPE. by Rei · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Top four posts reporting a dupe:

    5:14: 5, Insightful
    5:15: 4, Insightful
    5:15: 0
    5:15: 0, Redundant

    Come on, mods - play nice. That's only one minute's time; it's not like the parent posted "Dupe!" 15 minutes after the story was posted. They actually took the time to grab the link, at that.

    --
    So, apart from that, how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln?
  49. PO'd subscriber by EmperorKagato · · Score: 2, Informative

    WTH is this editor asleep at the wheel?

    From: (EmperorKagato)
    To: 'daddypants@slashdot.org'

    http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/09/2 9/120241&tid=236&tid=217&tid=126&tid=14

    Seems to be within the same subject as this article.

    Should this be an update of the subject?(Google and NASA To Collaborate On Technology)

    --
    ----- You know you have ego issues when you register a domain in your name.
  50. Ads by PromANJ · · Score: 1

    "This may be a dupe, but I wonder... how many of the people who whine actually PAY to support Slashdot..."

    Ads.

    (Unless you block them.)

  51. What are we paying for? And them? by ardle · · Score: 1

    Let's see: so we'll be paying the content suppliers for the right to download content from our neighbours. This content will presumably be DRM'd, so we won't typically be able to do anything with it except play it a specified way on a specified platform.
    The content providers will not be paying us for the bandwidth used in passing that content on to our neighbours, nor for the disk space used in storing it. How much does disk space cost these days?
    Maybe they should pay us?
    No, I didn't read the article...

  52. Is my browser cache broken? by EvilSS · · Score: 1

    Oh, wait, I'm reading /.

    Never mind!

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  53. w00t! by dark-br · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nevermind the article, I've clicked "read more..." only for the bashing ;)

    1. Re:w00t! by dotpavan · · Score: 1

      hey it makes me wonder: if dupes are pathetic, then what about the mirrors that mirror the dupe? greater sin?

  54. no more photo? by iriefrank · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this mean I don't have to look at the photo of Bram and his baby anymore?

  55. Re:Echo !!!! by chrisbtoo · · Score: 1

    No it didn't.

    --
    Registering accounts later than some other chrisb since 1997
  56. More importantly by dspisak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Will this new funding spur a third and perhaps even a fourth dupe of this story on Slashdot?

  57. Netflix by cpeterso · · Score: 1


    I don't have much of a problem downloading movies, but if there was a legitimate alternative, I'd take it. But having to compete with a free service should hopefully make them eventually provide an alterative that isn't too pricey or restrictive.

    Netflix is such an alternative. They have many memberships from which to choose, as cheap as $10/month for "unlimited" DVD rentals. You don't even have to leave your house to fetch or return your DVDs. If you don't consider that to be a legitimate, price-competive alternative to downloading free movies, then what would be a fair alternative?

    1. Re:Netflix by Johnno74 · · Score: 1

      I subscribe to a service here in NZ which works exactly the same way, and its great.

      But for the big new release movies, such as Revenge of the Sith, Mr and Mrs Smith, and War of the Worlds, I want to see them the same as my friends and workmates do, not 3-6 months later. So I download them.

      I want to see the big new release movies, when they are still new releases, and yet its not practical to go to the cinema. So I download them.

    2. Re:Netflix by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      Netflix is not an on-demand service, but my Netflix movie queue has 500 movies I *know* I want to see. I get 3 DVDs at a time, so while I'm waiting period for the next DVD arrive, I still have 2 other DVDs to watch.

  58. I know its a dupe but.... by Rooked_One · · Score: 1

    if you were skeptical, you could say bram cohen designed this for the RIAA to look at and say "Shit... we better do something, lets buy him out" - it would be a quick way to make some cash.

  59. Re:Piracy by flynns · · Score: 1

    I dare say he might even be interesting and funny, too.

    --
    'If you're flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit.'
  60. Ok, This is getting ridiculous... by EddyPearson · · Score: 1

    Microsoft have done it again! It seem every 4 or so weeks i hear about another un-imaginative ripoff from microsoft making out that its all new and all theirs!! And recently they havn't even been re-hashing the names properly!!! i cite as my examples:

    Macromedia Flash - Microsoft Sparkle
    BitTorrent - Avalanche

    Give it a few months we'll be seen Microsoft BackupExec...utive! Microsoft Delphoid! The mIcroPod Nanop!

    --
    You feel sleepy. Close your eyes. The opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever felt otherwise.
  61. Re:Cut 'n' paste job - Cowboyneal makes it TOO eas by Cocodude · · Score: 1

    [X] Another: [X] Checkbox list