Slashdot Mirror


China Going Up and Coming Down

SoCalChris writes "The BBC writes that China has just completed the world's highest railroad, climbing to 16,640 feet (5,072 meters) above sea level. The cars will be sealed to help passengers cope with the pressure changes from the altitude. The line is expected to begin carrying passengers next year." This news comes at the same time that their Chinese taikonauts return from their spaceflight after just 115 hours in orbit.

78 of 400 comments (clear)

  1. First Prime Factorization Post by 2*2*3*75011 · · Score: 4, Funny

    SoCalChris writes "The BBC writes that China has just completed the world's highest railroad, climbing to 2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*5*13 feet (2*2*2*2*317 meters) above sea level. The cars will be sealed to help passengers cope with the pressure changes from the altitude. The line is expected to begin carrying passengers next year." This news comes at the same time that their Chinese taikonauts return from their spaceflight after just 5*23 hours in orbit.

  2. Safety? by mfh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This just seems unsafe to me. Imagine something goes wrong and the train is stuck up at that altitude. Then what?

    I remember riding a train that had colided with a truck a few years back. This wouldn't likely happen at that altitude, but what could happen would be wildlife and environmental blockage.

    It seems like a challenge to me.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Safety? by QuasiEvil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would assume that, like other rail systems that operate in harsh climates, there are backup systems. Figure when BC Rail built their all-electric Tumbler Ridge line, they included a small diesel engine in each locomotive in case the overhead power failed so that the crew wouldn't freeze to death (winters in the Tumbler Ridge area are absolutely brutally cold). While the Qinghai-Tibet Rwy isn't electrified, there just have to be backups for such things. In this case, supplemental heat and bottled oxygen would be the two I'd worry about. Based on what I've read, the average elevation of the line is something like 13,000 feet, which is still perfectly breathable, especially to those accustomed to thin air. (I live at about 7,000, and spend weeks during the summer above 10000-11000.) It's only going to be on the high passes that you have issues with air. I'm guessing that it's not built to Western-type standards of redundancy (because, after all, this still is *China*, who was still running mainline steam locomotives until this year), but I'm sure they have something in case of failures. Figure each coach probably has its own systems, so if one fails, you pile everybody into the working coaches. My guess is that they'll probably get away from the Chinese way of one locomotive per train as well - anything running in those nasty conditions, I'd want at least two units in case one died somewhere en route.

      Add yet another railway to my list of lines I have to go photograph at least once in my life...

    2. Re:Safety? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This just seems unsafe to me. Imagine something goes wrong and the train is stuck up at that altitude. Then what?

      Then what? No different than what they do right now. Drive a jeep. C'mon, 5,000meters is high, it causes altitude sickness, and COULD be fatal, for some people. However, the pressurization of the cars is for COMFORT, not safety. Right now the only way to get up to Tibet is to either fly, or take a jeep/bus combo over the same 5,000meters. And no, those jeeps are not pressurized. The floors are, however, littered like crazy with empty aspirin packages...

      Get real. People live up there. When I read about this train, the oxygen was the least on my mind. The first thing I thought of was how the Tibetans have been fighting this railroad, without much success (a few people have disappeared, a monk was sentenced to death and then later reduced to life in prison after Amnesty International went ape shit) since it's another permanent infrastructure put in place which makes the Chinese occupation of Tibet more and more permanent.

      Free Tibet!

    3. Re:Safety? by smvp6459 · · Score: 2, Funny

      [U.S.-centric ignorance]30 degree heat? Wouldn't those poor people be hypothermic and not hot?[/U.S.-centric ignorance]

    4. Re:Safety? by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 2, Funny
      [U.S.-centric ignorance]30 degree heat? Wouldn't those poor people be hypothermic and not hot?[/U.S.-centric ignorance]
      You have to remember that the British measure their temperatures in centipedes, not fairyheights like sensible people.
      So you have to convert from centipedes to fairyheights.
      Let's see, 30 centipedes, multiply by 666, dance naked around the altar, carry the one, sacrifice the virgin, run the units program, type "30C<CR>F<CR>", and you get, uh, "conformability error", which is pretty damn hot I guess.
      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    5. Re:Safety? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I visited Tibet in April this year. We stayed mainly in Lhasa and Tsetang, but on an excursion one day we hired a 4x4 and (with our rather too close-watching guide) drove 5 hours to a sacred lake. Interestingly most of the journey was on a road that followed the tracks of the new railway (although there wasn't much actual track laid when we visited).

      The lake was the highest point of our journey, at (IIRC) 5,100 metres (the same height as Everest base camp, higher than any part of the railway). We had no trouble breathing at rest, but pounding headaches were our reward for any kind of exercise (jogging up a hill to get a good photo etc). The Chinese are more susceptable to altitude sickness (our Chinese friend who travelled the silk-road part of our China trip with us refused to come to Tibet for that reason), which may explain the worker's need for oxygen (especially as they were probably doing a LOT of heavy lifting and labouring).
      I don't think getting stuck at that altitude at rest for a day without cabin pressure would cause anyone any serious problems.

      The main problem would be in rescuing passengers and clearing the line after a crash. 30 minutes outside Lhasa on our drive to the lake we came to a long traffic jam (very unusual in Tibet!). Two trucks had collided on the narrow road, both drivers dead, what was left of their vehicles strewn across the road. We were able to get around the mess by some insane 4x4 driving (thank God we paid for the upgrade from minibus!). When we returned nine hours later (after our visit to the lake) the jam was still there, just about being cleared with help from one of the railway cranes and about 50 military trucks that had mysteriously appeared from nowhere. This was just 30 minutes outside of Lhasa, what if a train crashed on one of the more remote parts of the line?

      But yes, the real REAL issue is the affect this will have on Tibetan people and wildlife. The railway line runs within metres of many villages, and will make them completely uninhabitable. And it runs the full length of many valleys, how will this impact the migration of grazing animals? (Much of the line is on raised embankment, and so entirely separates one side of a valley from another.) Tibet is a beautiful country with a wonderfully diverse range of people and cultures. But already Chinese-led tourism is ruining the most famous areas, and the increased number of visitors from the railway will only exacerbate the problem.

    6. Re:Safety? by balloonpup · · Score: 2, Funny
      Actually federal aviation regulations require that all civilian aircraft have a redundant subsystem that automatically returns them to low altitude in the event of a total engine failure.


      Remember, kids, 9.8 m/s^2 isn't just a good idea, it's the law!
      --
      I sing the doggie electric!
  3. Great by nihilogos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well that seals the cultural genocide of the Tibetan people.

    --
    :wq
  4. Mixed feelings by jmorris42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, goody for them. Having a third player in space is probably a good thing even if they are the communist Chinese since they probably won't remain communist a lot longer. On the other hand it is just another doomed government 'prestige' program that won't actually acomplish much before being abandoned the second the cost exceeds the publicity value and that always happens long before anything longterm good can happen.

    Nope, the only hope of our species getting off this rock is private enterprise.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
    1. Re:Mixed feelings by Damer+Face · · Score: 2, Funny

      >The name of the game is the conquest of space and unmanned just doesn't get it done.

      Yeah you're right, we need big burly space marines to beat all that vacuum into submission.

  5. YYYYEEEEAAAARRRGHH!!! by soapdog · · Score: 5, Funny

    World biggest roller coaster?

    --
    -- Por mais que eu ande no vale das trevas e da morte, meu PowerMac G4 Não Travará!!!
  6. Good stuff by alucinor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm glad China's having good progress (in many respects). I do hope their government loosens up (maybe money'll soften them like it did ours) so they allow freedom (since it means more money) to speech and internet and whatnot. Just tell them that!

    Now, I really really do hope China doesn't make giant killer robot, and I'll be fine with them for good.

    --
    random underscore blankspace at ya know hoo dot comedy.
    1. Re:Good stuff by JediLow · · Score: 2, Informative
      I was there this summer, and actually China's government has opened up a ton (I wasn't there as a tourist... and I spent quite a bit of time in Qinghai Province with their college students). While it doesn't have nearly any of the freedoms that we have to the extent we do, its not the closed country that it was 30 years ago... or even 10 years ago. The opening up of China in the 70's and the second opening up in '96 really has changed the political scape of the country - and with the Olympics comming to Beijing in '08 China's opening up even more.

      It'd be great to see real freedom being given there, but the Communist party has come a long way.

    2. Re:Good stuff by bm_luethke · · Score: 2

      One of the great things about this type of progress is that it always leads to removal of repressive govts (the bad news is that it has pretty much always been bloody and long).

      Essentially they require an uneducated, uninformed populace for control. They need an educated informed populace to move forward. They are trying the impossible right now - to have them educated and informed about 85% of the world and totally ingorant of the rest. It doesn't work - you notice when you aren't allowed to talk about things and an educated populace can very accuratly guess what they are being censored from.

      China, as is, is something of a threat to the free world. It has the man power to be a real bitch if they wanted too - enough that if they felt like WWIII they could do so (and if the govt sees it as that with a chance to win or definatly die they could even try it).

      A fairly free china will be great for the world - lots of manpower and resources coming to market. Just imagine a free prosperous China, US, britain, and EU working together (really together, not just lip service) in space exploration or heck, pretty much anything. There are basically four great regions - the US, Europe, Old russia, and china (to be a "great region" you need both population and resources - places like South America lack the manpower and Africa lacks much of the resources - though that could change over time) - between them you have the vast majority of manpower and resources. If they could ever all be free, educated, and pretty much on the same page it's hard to imagine what we could do. I don't know if that is possible in my lifetime, but the current chinese govt falling and them and old russia rebuilding is pretty much what is needed.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
  7. simulation pictures by pikine · · Score: 4, Informative

    In case if someone doesn't realize, the lower four pictures are simulated artwork, which is what the blue heading indicates in Chinese. Please don't shout "they're fake."

    --
    I once had a signature.
  8. How much did it cost? by clockwise_music · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It also comes at the same time that the number of Chinese people living in extreme poverty rose by 800,000 last year.

    1. Re:How much did it cost? by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Lets put that in perspective.

      America

      China

      These are both about a year ago. Which country has done better in the last year?

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:How much did it cost? by 2Bits · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why don't you turn a little bit of your viewing angle, and think maybe, the whole point of building infrastructure is to help less developed areas to catch up, and hence, reduce the poverty level as a whole?

      Why does everything have to be negative? This is not like building a Liberty statute which serves nothing but for display. This is a modern railway to a remote area which is almost cut off from the world. This might be a catalyst for more economic development, along the line of that railway, from Qinghai all the way to Tibet.

      No one seeems to scream bloody when the US built their railway system link the east and the west over 100 years ago, which had an amazing effect on the development of the country, in terms of economic, social, cultural, etc. No one screamed bloody when the US built the national highways and other infrastructures, in the 1930s amid the biggest economic crisis when people were lining up for soup.

    3. Re:How much did it cost? by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It also comes at the same time that the number of Chinese people living in extreme poverty rose by 800,000 last year.

      Put that in proportion for me, though. How much did the number of Chinese people total rise last year?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    4. Re:How much did it cost? by CagedBear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No one seeems to scream bloody when the US built their railway system link the east and the west over 100 years ago

      Noone except the natives who had been inhabiting this region for a few thousand years. And we all know what happened to their way of life.

  9. The Asian Century by JymBrittain · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While we [the /. crowd] bitch and moan about Microsoft and while the great herd worry more about Britney's spawn than credible science, more about the latest American Idol than engineering and while China and India graduate more scientists and engineers than the US...you can expect many, many more reports like this. The 21st century just may be when the Sino-Communist brand of capitalism eclipses lAmerican power and influence.

    1. Re:The Asian Century by e2d2 · · Score: 2

      The 21st century just may be when the Sino-Communist brand of capitalism eclipses lAmerican power and influence.

      I for one don't really care. My life goals do not include "maintain America as the premier super-power". I would like to think most Americans think the generally the same.

      Besides, the world is now joined at the hip when it comes to economic and social prosperity. There isn't gonna be a powerful China without the US, and vice versa. We are all in this together, the sooner everyone realizes this the better.

    2. Re:The Asian Century by nido · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Besides, the world is now joined at the hip when it comes to economic and social prosperity.

      By "joined at the hip" you're refering to, of course, the present condition where the rest of the world manufactures stuff and sells it to Americans.

      Chinese factories produce widgets. Americans buy them. Americans don't produce anything the Chinese can't make themselves for less, so the ships are filled up with raw materials (including, ironically, cardboard for recycling from all the boxes they just sold us), which the Chinese turn into fancy tech gadgets to sell to Americans.

      China takes all the dollars they earn in trade and buy U.S. Treasury bonds. Georgy Boy uses the money China lends him to pay for his stupid "war" (real wars are declared by an act of congress), and all the other pork-barrel programs politicians pass to get re-elected.

      Trade is only a good thing when it's a two way street.

      The future I 'see' leaves America on the sidelines.

      I buy 'american' when I can, but even so, that's more a symbolic gesture than anything else.

      there's more, but not tonight. Subscribe to America's Last Real Newspaper (American Free Press) for the news you won't get anywhere else.

      --
      Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
      www.teslabox.com
  10. Re:Big Week for China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    Your slashdot geek membership is revoked.

    You missed the link to the chicks http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2005-10/15/conte nt_3618725.htm at the bottom of the page.

  11. Boy am I pissed by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I actually rode on the Central Rail Line in Peru which was the former highest. Now I am going to have to go to China to ride this thing.

    DAMN.

    I will say the Peruvian one seems still a bit more challenging - no wussy sealed cars. You get to experience altitude sickness in all its glory.

  12. Must be light-weight trains by Got+Laid,+Can't+Code · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are they talking about funicular trolleys or actual heavy rail? Because heavy rail generally sees a 4% grade as a maximum due to, well, physics. Since I'm not aware of any fantastic engineering innovations, this must be some sort of light rail--or at least lighter than standard heavy rail.

    --
    Asparagus has many and excellent powers.
    1. Re:Must be light-weight trains by mnemonic_ · · Score: 3, Informative

      Grade is a measure of terrain slope. The story says that the trains go to high elevations, but not necessarily at steep grades.

  13. Re:Real shame... by nihilogos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    with expanded access to new goods and services, educational opportunities, and contact with the outside world

    All of the above could have been accomplished without destroying a millenium of scholastic and artistic works. Not to speak of the execution and incarceration of its living representatives.

    Real shame that the standard of living in Tibet has risen steadily from the subsistence level ever since the CCP took control, huh?

    For the Chinese immigrants. The native population are treated as second class citizens. Hundreds of thousands died of starvation when collectivism was first introduced, and most survivors suffer from various disabilities caused by malnutrition.

    --
    :wq
  14. Re:Big Week for China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ooops, the last 4 pictures are really fakes, but the Chineses are too lazy to remove the word 'mo2ni3', which meanings "simulated photoes", from these pictures' titles. otherwise, some stupid slashdot readers may think these pictures are for real.

    **grin**

  15. I'm not a transportation engineer... by ThaFooz · · Score: 2, Informative

    but what advantage does the railroad have over trucks/busses or planes? I was under the impression that they're rather dangerous and costly in comparison. I mean, here in the US Amtrak is struggling because of the derailings and the fact that it just isn't cost efficent... am I missing something?

    1. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by KiranWolf · · Score: 5, Informative

      I would hardly call Amtrak representative of rail transportation as a whole. Amtrak is a joke, both to Americans and to the rest of the world and, outside of the Northeast Corridor between D.C. and Boston, and maybe somewhere out on the west coast, is useless.

      Meanwhile, rail forms the backbone of most developed nations, including France, Germany, and Japan. In case you weren't paying attention, a train also now links England and France via the Channel Tunnel. Bluntly put, America is the exception, not the rule.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is, then realize that half of 'em are stupider than that!" - George Carlin.
    2. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by spitzak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Trucks and busses are only cheaper if there is already a highway going where you want. Highways are not free, even though a lot of Americans seem to think they are a natural feature of the landscape.

    3. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by FredGray · · Score: 4, Informative

      Railroads generally use a whole lot less energy (i.e. fuel) per passenger or unit of cargo than a truck/bus (not to mention a plane). There are economies of scale in running one large engine (or electric motor) relative to lots of smaller ones, and with a metal wheel you don't dissipate energy into the tires. Amtrak's problems come from several sources: (a) they don't own the tracks, but have to lease them from private owners on very poor terms; (b) the management isn't exactly clever; (c) the labor costs are extremely high; (d) they operate under an immense set of regulations. It's nothing fundamental about railroad technology, just that we aren't willing to run one sensibly in the US.

    4. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by CommieOverlord · · Score: 2, Informative

      The US system is horribly mismananged I would guess.

      Up here, I can make a round trip Ottawa-Kingston via train for $45. The same by car would run $40-50 at current gas prices. Not to mention, saving 400km in wear and tear on the car, which would be another $100-$120 or so in hidden costs.

    5. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by slazar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Amtrak is struggling because trains take so damn log to get from place to place. Airplanes are much faster.

      A trip from San Jose, CA to Atlanta, GA on Amtrak costs $344 and takes about 4.2 days.

      The same trip on Delta costs between $260-$326 and takes 4-7 hours.

      Cost is a little bit more for the train, both types of travel have accidents...

      This was leaving December 19th.

    6. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by jgc7 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Yes. Trains are neither dangerous or costly.

      This is way off-topic, but a little backgroung on the realative merits of different modes of transportation.

      In the US and the UK deaths per passenger mile are approximately 1 order of magnitude lower on trains than by trucks/buses.

      Trains cost 1 order of magnitude less to operate than an autos. There are numerous reasons why Amtrak is not viable in the US that don't necessarily apply to this case. Amtrak has to compete with the autos whose owners benefit from free roads. In areas with user fess for the roads, trains and other modes of public transportation are viable enterprises. Also, the rail and public transit network is not extensive enough to allow people to opt out of buying a vehicle. In Western Europe, it is possible in most places to have a high standard of living and not own a car. With the exception of NYC, Boston, Chicago, DC, and a few other cities in the US, a car is practically a necessity in the States.

      Furthermore, in the case of China which is desperate to secure its necessary energy needs, fuel efficiency is important. Planes get roughly 40 miles per passenger gallon, trains get roughly 80, and cars vary from 15-120 based on the vehicle and number of passengers. So unless everyone travels 4 deep into a Honda CRX, trains aren't so bad when it comes to efficiency.

      --
      70% of statistics are made up.
    7. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Informative
      As I understand it, passenger rail service in the US has almost never been profitable since day one. The only reason the railroads offered passenger service at all was because they were required to do so as a condition of their original free government handouts of right-of-way. When the government offered to take up responsibility passenger rail service with Amtrack, the railroads were more than happy to unload it and focus on their profitable freight business.

      My guess is that passenger rail is no more profitable in most other countries, but government subsidies make up the difference. Here in the US, the people don't seem to like the idea of government subsidies for passenger rail for some reason; they only want subsidies for roads and airports. Thus, those modes of transport can make a profit with relatively cheap fares. In the mean time, the rail service languishes with such low volume due to stingy government subsidies (relative to other transportation modes) that it lacks economies of scale, and the ticket price stays high.

    8. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by LeadfootCA · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your missing freight. As the above posters have said, the U.S. passenger rail system sucks. However, we have the best freight rail system in the world, hands down. Trains here are rarely less than a mile in length, transport huge amounts of cargo, and do it all at a profit. Our freight railroads are private industries, after all. Oh, and the biggest growth area in the railroad industry right now? Intermodal, i.e: truck trailers and shipping containers. Railroads here compete with trucks, and they're winning. Take a look at BNSF Railway's stock price, if your sceptical.

      Now as for China, they're probably going to use this rail line for shipping out mineral ores and other raw materials. I doubt that the native people will see any benefit from this rail line.

    9. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by Malc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And there you go, that's the two major parts of the joke that is N. American railways. The trains can't even keep to the schedule, to the point that you're expecting it to take 20% longer. And secondly the trains are so bloody slow. Eugene to LA is between 800 and 900 miles, which at 60 mph would take 15 hours. You're talking about them averaging 30 mph!!! Most modern countries have their intercity trains running at over 100 mph. The London to Edinburgh trains in the UK top out at 140, and the London to Paris even more on the French side. The UK doesn't have the fastest rail networks either. Your journey by rail should be taking well under 10 hours. At least you will get to enjoy the view, which is very nice in that area.

  16. You idiot, Matt Drudge is not a reporter by michaeltoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The images on Xinhua are meant to demonstrate the capsule landing. They're not pretending to be actual photos. You should know better than to trust headlines with a question mark at the end of them.

  17. Chinese "American" Idol by katharsis83 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Haha maybe this'll cheer you up:

    http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2005-05/2 7/content_446335.htm

    "The name may not roll off the tongue quite like American Idol does, but that hasn't kept the Mongolian Cow Sour Yogurt Super Girl contest from sweeping China. Zhao Jingyi, 17, the "schoolgirl" candidate won the Changsha competition.

    Like Idol, which named its winner Wednesday night, China's Super Girl gives aspiring singing stars a shot at televised fame and fortune."

    Looks like American culture has spread far and wide...

  18. Now you can... by elzurawka · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...join the mile high club without ever leaving the ground!

    --
    -EL
  19. Mod Parent Down by michaeltoe · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This guy is just a sucker who reads more into the headlines on DrudgeReport than he does actual articles anywhere else. There are no 'faked pictures', there are merely CG images meant to demonstrate the landing, very similar to how NASA demonstrated the landing of the mars rovers, where no one was there to photograph it.

    This type of thing goes on all the time in western media, and there was no attempt to pass off the images as actual photographs. It's just a misconception put forth by xenophobic conspiracy nuts.

  20. Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Reading comments here saddens me.

    The sheer arrogance emitted from some posts are really not worthy of slashdot, and/or its readers/posters.

    What China has done, - in terms of the Qinhai-Tibet rail-line, or its spacecraft, - is not better, nor worse, than those from other countries.

    Do we see any comments like the

    " Some of the images of the spacecraft look fake"

    and

    "and the ones that don't look fake show damage on the spacecraft"

    and

    "This just seems unsafe to me. Imagine something goes wrong and the train is stuck up at that altitude?"

    and

    "Well that seals the cultural genocide of the Tibetan people"

    and

    "Wow, you are finally almost to the point where the USA's space program was over 40 years ago. That is impressive"

    and

    "It also comes at the same time that the number of Chinese people living in extreme poverty rose by 800,000 last year"

    ad nauseum

    if the spacecraft or railway is from the United States of America or Russia ?

    This development of sheer arrogance, is not checked, might even venture into the territory of racism.

    I'm an /. old-timer, and I'm really sad to see /. goes to the dog because of these type of postings.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by ZombieRoboNinja · · Score: 2

      I don't really see your point. Are you saying that 800,000 people living in extreme poverty and the cultural annihilation of Tibet AREN'T bad things? Or perhaps that these are minor issues compared to the glory that is a high-altitude railway system?

      Just as you see a bunch of posts related to the US government every time there's a NASA article, you're gonna see the same for the Chinese space agency. I can't imagine anything fairer.

      And just FYI, disliking the Chinese government is in no way "racist." As far as I can tell (and in the posts you quoted), nobody even mentions race or ethnicity (except in reference to the Tibetan culture being exterminated). I guess your idea is that since China has Asian people in it, a criticism of that government is an implied criticism of the Asian race? Would you say I'm prejudiced against Anglo-Saxons if I criticized England's foreign policy? If there's anything "disappointing" about Slashdot, it's that idiotic assertions like that will get you an Insightful rating.

    2. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by p2sam · · Score: 2, Funny

      Same can be said of the United Stated of America.

      it _IS_ wrong that their spending billions on developing a space program with the amount of poverty there...
      it _IS_ wrong what they have done, and continue to do to the iraqi people, etc...

      FUCK YEAH!!!

    3. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by lysergic.acid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously. Our war on drugs/terror/Iraq has killed far more people than anything China has done recently, and the Bush administration has openly admitted to lying/presenting falsified data to the U.N. and to the public on more than one account to proceed with our own imperialistic foreign policy. Right now, least of all, Americans should not be criticizing other governments when we should be focusing on keeping our own "democracy" on the right track.

      China announces that they've succeeded in putting a man in space, and our first reaction is that they're lying. But when Bush tries to claim a connection between 9/11 or Al Qaida and Saddam Hussein, the only secular ruler in the Arab world--one which Bin Laden had offer to assassinate for the U.S. when we were allied with his militants, we believe it unquestioningly against the face of all logic.

      I think America's arrogance and ethnocentrism has reached an all time high since the 80's with the post 9/11 surge of blind nationalism. It's sad how caught up our society is in all the superficial displays of patriotism that we blindly following our government leaders into war yet relinquish our democratic perogative to think critically about the actions of our government. It's no wonder that a nation so arrogant and self-righteous faces the problem of intellectual stagnation and is quickly losing its competitive edge in academic and intellectual spheres to other cultures.

  21. Re:Real shame... by Angry+Toad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Real shame that the standard of living in Tibet has risen steadily from the subsistence level ever since the CCP took control, huh?

    If I could trust a totalitarian government to do anything other than lie, maybe so. As it is they may as well be claiming that Tibetans are made of cheese for all the validity it has.

    Anyway the song that "we're doing it all to raise the natives" has been the standard line of the conqueror all through history, and the natives always get the shaft in the end.

  22. Har har. by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You had me until the 'capitalist' part. Chinese have so few freedoms, and businesses are no exception. I researched them for a human right project last year and, while there are many successful businesses in China, it happens falsely most of the time with heavy government interference. Without it much of their economy would crumble. Most of the big names in Chinese business are at least partially government owned or run. While they are not entirely 1984, i wouldn't go so far as to call them capitalism either, I'd rather not soil that name.

    --
    I am Spartacus
    1. Re:Har har. by Subotai · · Score: 2, Informative

      Obviously someone doing a research project from afar is an expert. From living in China, let me tell you. This is the most free wheeling economy you will ever see. And while human rights may not be in the forefront of people's thoughts, making money is, with or without government help. They will truly bury the US.

      --
      "The only way to catch tiger cubs is to go into the tiger's den."
    2. Re:Har har. by Stonehand · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He may have a valid point, however, about the government playing a large and not necessarily fair role. Capitalism to a large degree depends on even-handed enforcement of certain rules, such as prohibitions on outright fraud and sanctions for breaches of contract. In addition, the greater the government is directly involved as a buyer or seller and the more unified it is, the less you might trust its ability to objectively investigate possible malfeasances when you consider conflicts of interest and assorted entanglements.

      Beijing tacitly acknowledges this through the occasional high-profile crackdown, and the occasional extreme severity such as sentencing a former governor to death.

      http://www.transparency.org/cpi/2004/cpi2004.en.ht ml#cpi2004
      http://www.abc.net.au/ra/news/stories/s1471412.htm
      http://english.people.com.cn/200509/09/eng20050909 _207609.html
      http://www.carnegieendowment.org/events/index.cfm? fa=eventDetail&id=284

      It's a reasonable concern if you're thinking about a large capital investment that you can't simply take with you if local officials decide to squeeze you after you're committed -- perhaps demanding direct bribes, or using governmental powers against you if you don't throw business to somebody, or so forth. Granted, it's probably not nearly as foolhardy as trying to run a high-profile independent media network in Putin's Russia...

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  23. way to go slashdot! by minus_273 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am really starting to hate the China apologists on /. Way to go! you mention the railroad but you dont mention WHERE the railroad was made. If you read up on it you see that it was made to link China to TIBET where the local population is being wiped out by the chinese communists. Of course they are going to invest in somthing that provides more places for an over crowded china to move people to.

    No, I am not a stoned "free tibet hippie", i happen to come from that part of the world.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
    1. Re:way to go slashdot! by ZuggZugg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The original reclamation of Tibet was brutal. But what the Chinese did to the Tibetans is no more brutal than what the "Americans", "Canadians", "Mexicans", "Peruvians", "Bolivians",...etc did to the natives in the Americas. If anything the Tibeting history is more complex and less brutal.

      Humans seem to me to be territorial and prone to violence. I'm not really condoning it, but why else would you explain the sordid history of humanity killing each other over the same piece of dirt over and over again.

      I not sure I would say that I'm as hard on the Chinese communists as you are. I think the Chinese people in power woke up about 20 years ago and realized that communism and a state run economy were not going to work. They are quickly opening up their economy and they are gradually making the political transformation into something less brutal than what it was 40 years ago...will they fully eliminate communism...time will tell. Maybe they'll succeed with a new hybrid style of government where others have failed?

    2. Re:way to go slashdot! by minus_273 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      i like how you move from ethnic cleansing to politics. I will ignore that for now. Consider what happened in the americas was over a hundred years ago in most cases. What is happening in Tibet is right now. Just becasue something happened somewhere else some time back does not make it ok to do now. I find it amazing that there are people around here defnending the systematic destruction of a religion, race and culture.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
  24. Re:Congratulations China! by ngsayjoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Never forget Egyptians built the first Great Pyramids 5000 years ago, and now they have tumbled to the point of technological weaklings. And this tells me that even tough US is the technology leader now, but things can change over time. I'll just sit back and see how China will take over the world (in terms of technological advancement). With over 1 billion smart people, this will only happen sooner or later.

  25. Space is great. Tibet is Tibet. by Baldrson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If there is any payoff to the destruction of US industrial might by moving it to China, their greater space activity is it. They are to be congratulated for a positive application of their growth and I hope they put the US to shame for the failure of its pioneer heritage. But the railroad, for all of its engineering prowess, is just another nail in the coffin of Tibetan self-determination. There are things more important than economic development.

  26. Re:Big Week for China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wow.

    >You've said that it looks like an "aluminium motor home from..."
    Do you know if it works ok for the job it was designed for? How do the looks matter here?

    >It looks like it can barely support its own weight. Granted, gravity is very weak in orbit, blah blah blah, but doesn't this thing get strapped to the top of a rocket?

    Ignorance is bliss. For things you have no clue about, its best to remain silent or do your own research.

    >It's got burn marks all over it
    >And no apparent heat shielding

    You are speculating. You obvisously have heard the word "heat shielding" and thats about what you know about it.
    "Its got burn marks all over it" - must be the funniest sentence
    I've heard.

    I could continue to post all your trash but I guess we aren;t contributing in a meaningful way on this.

  27. Historical Retrospective by rlp · · Score: 4, Funny

    I understand that in the early 1940's Germany had a pretty good rail system and was making remarkable progress with rocketry. Can't wait for the Slashdot retrospective on that.

    Oh! Excuse me, have I triggered Godwin's Law?

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
  28. This place really sucks by xs650 · · Score: 4, Funny

    When the conductor opened the pressurized train car door for the first time in Tibet, the pasengers were heard to exclaim, "This place really sucks!" as they blew out the door.

  29. Re:Oh Really? by Silicon_Knight · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They look fake because the little caption on top, in Chinese, says "Simulated Rendering".

      The rest of the images, they must have filmed in the same sound stage that faked the Apollo moon landings.

    -=- Terence

  30. 5000 Meters isn't that high by spinfire · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've been to nearly 5900 meters while climbing Kilimanjaro, and I can tell you the air is pretty thin up there. We obviously spent a fair amount of time adjusting, but not the timeframe on Kili is rushed and you definitely feel it. On the final day we climb at a rate of several seconds per step breathing like we were running a marathon. Very exhilarating :)

    The article makes it sound like oxygen/pressurized cabin is neccessary at this altitude. It isn't. We spent our final night higher than this altitude and I never even had a headache. I assume the reason why the workers received oxygen was to assist with the heavy labor they had to do.

    The pressurized cabin on the train is merely a matter of comfort for most people, although that altitude is high enough to cause problems for some people susceptible to Acute Mountain Sickness or AMS. Since the purpose of the railroad is to reach those high altitudes, I'd assume most people are somewhat accustomed to it.

    Here is a picture from the crater rim of Kilimanjaro's larger peak Kibo at sunrise. The smaller peak you see is Mawenzi, and the view is towards Kenya. I would love to visit Tibet some day.

  31. Real purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A friend of mine returned from China and Tibet two years ago and mentioned the train and how many Chinese made no bones about the fact the train would be used to move many Chinese into Tibet to shift the demographics and help dillute/destroy Tibet as an independent culture.

  32. None of the above by bluGill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The US rail system is well managed, with one exception: Amtrak. The US railroads have realized that freight does not care too much about how fast it is going, sitting still waiting for another train to pass, and not taking the shortest route point to point.

    So the US rails have decided to focus on freight where they hold nearly 2/3rds of all traffic (compare to less than 1/3rd for Europe's rails). That is good management: do what you can do well, and let someone else deal with what you cannot do well. I would argue that Europe's rails are mismanaged, spending all their energy on moving people when it is much easier to move freight.

  33. Re:Real shame... by p2sam · · Score: 2

    s/Chinese/Americans/g
    s/Tibetan/Native Americans/g

    good day sir.

  34. People moving in? by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Although not quite innocuous, I fail to get overexcited about people moving in.

    When people from Northern California (where I live now) bitch about people moving in from elsewhere, I don't exactly sympathize with them. So I don't automatically sympathize here.

    Should I go and bury I-80 at Donner Lake because it just makes it easier for people to come over the (formerly protective) Sierra Nevada mountains and settle here?

    Or should I go and pry out the "golden spike" in Promentory Point, Utah, because rails made it easy 100 years ago?

    Of course China is investing in infrastructure to move people. We do it too.

    Now, that being said, I'm not in favor of ethnic cleansing or killing of any sort. But just people settling? Well, there's a lot of people on this planet now. Everyone has to make a little room for closer neighbors.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  35. not sure about that... by Quadraginta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First the average person is just fine at 16,500. Yeah, they will be a bit light headed, but nothing too bad...

    I don't know about that. When I climbed Longs Peak in Colorado, about 14,000', I was sick as a dog and couldn't really think straight. And that's after living two months in Boulder (5150'). I recall recently climbing Mt. San Gorgonio in Southern California (11,500') with someone else, and we had to turn back at about 10,000' because she got seriously disoriented and out of breath, the first signs of altitude sickness.

    Now, it could be I don't know any average people, but my personal experience says that 16,000' would be pretty serious without acclimatization, especially if, like me, you're no longer that young. I would certainly hesitate to try it without knowing I had oxygen standing by.

    For one thing, the *first* thing that goes wrong when you have altitude sickness is your judgment. You start to make dumbass decisions, and lose track of time, and wander in your thoughts. Indeed, this mental dullness is suspected by some people for the climbing disaster on Everest in 1996 described by Jon Krakauer in his absorbing book, Into Thin Air.

  36. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  37. Cheap gasoline by Goonie · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Fuel is much more expensive in Europe than the United States, so your $20 in gas is probably closer to the equivalent of $40 in much of Europe (though Europeans generally drive smaller, more fuel-efficient cars to compensate).

    The second thing to keep in mind is that because the public transport systems within cities are so much better (New York is a bit of an exception, as the subway on Manhattan is very good), a lot of Europeans simply don't own a car even if they can afford it. Therefore, even if the train is a bit dearer in terms of variable cost, the money saved by not owning, garaging and servicing a car more than makes up for it.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  38. Fuel by Palal · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't forget that Europe uses electricity when we use Diseasel. That also plays a part in speeds and in costs.

    --
    -Palal
  39. If they need some labor... by areadan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe U.S. manufacturing workers who have been canned because their factories were outsourced can be a source of cheap labor for building the railroad. They can settle in China and become a vibrant minority, opening up 'american' restaurants on every corner. I can see it now: General Franks' Chicken.

    --
    http://www.areadan.com
  40. Re:This brings back the Soviet-era joke by Viol8 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Errr , sorry , you're going to have to explain that punchline. Don't get it.

  41. Re:They beat him until he was lifeless by Eunuchswear · · Score: 2, Informative
    Funny how he's still alive though.

    Seeing and believing in China



    The initial report containing what were quickly exposed as gross errors and exaggerations was written by the Guardian's newly appointed Shanghai correspondent, Benjamin Joffe-Walt...


    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  42. Re:Free Tibet? by emh0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Which history books have you been reading? For most of recent history (prior to 1950) Tibet was in effect an independent state. It certainly wasn't considered part of China when Britain invaded Tibet in 1903! Britain then gave it to China because all they wanted was a secure trade route through it. The Tibetans then overthrew the Chinese and by 1906 had regained effective independence. China then descended in to civil war and Europe in to WWI and so everybody lost interest in Tibet until China had become communist and invaded in 1949-50.

    Most of China's historical claim to Tibet is based on the fact that from the 1300s Tibet was ruled by Beijing, which is technically true - but it was not ruled by the Chinese! The Mongols (Ghengis Khan, et. al) invaded China, Tibet, Korea and most of the rest of South East Asia and ruled the whole area from Beijing. That hardly gives China a legitamate claim, and it gives them no more of a claim to Tibet than it to Korea.

    Since the invasion in 1950 vast numbers of Chinese people have been moved in whilst similarly vast numbers of Tibetans have died of starvation or fled to India, Nepal and Bhutan. The Chinese government has systematically sought to destroy the Tibetan culture, religion, and identity, to the point where Tibetans are now outnumbered by Chinese in their own land. This railroad will only accellerate that process.

  43. Re:Rising temperature? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Informative
    I don't understand. How would rising temperatures affect a railroad at 16,640 feet, much less affect any railroad?

    Metal expands when heated. Here's what can happen: http://www.charmec.chalmers.se/railtech/suncurves. html

  44. Impressive, but... by spreer · · Score: 2, Informative

    It beats the previous holder of the record, a railroad in Peru that passes over 4843m, by only a couple of hundred meters, taking away a record it held since it was completed in 1912, almost a hundred years ago.

    The fact is, not many places have much use for a railroad that high. Both the current and the former holders of the record would pass over the highest point in Europe or the lower 48 states.

  45. Native Tibetans have been dreading this ... by coherentlight · · Score: 3, Informative

    China's policy over the last few years has been one of population dilution. By trucking in native Chinese, they were diluting native Tibetan population. With this new railroad that process will accelerate dramatically. I spent a month in Lhasa last year and spoke with some of the Tibetans (technically you are supposed to have a Chinese guide present at all times, but since there were no other tourists there .. none .. the guide just took off to a bar), and they were very depressed about the finish of the railroad. Their culture is being coopted by China and western influence. So very sad. -coherentlight

  46. Soiling capitalism is best left to capitalists! by Tungbo · · Score: 2, Insightful


    They've done a fine job too: Bhopal, US tobacco industry, Pinkertons, South Africa, Love Canal...

    It's most ironic that you were researching for a human rights project.
    Do read some Upton Sinclair and Dickens. Without other moderating
    cultural influences, capitalism have run rough shod over human rights for centuries. The benefit of capitalism is economical, not the promotion of a more humane society.
    Historically, corporate interests attempt to use governmental influences to gain benefits for themselves as often as they want to be left alone. Look at trade tariffs, agricultural subsidies, the East India Company (Is that a company or an arm of the government?) !

    There has never been pure lassiz faire capitalism and there probably never will be. If it comes to be, it's not obvious that you would want to live there.