Slashdot Mirror


iTunes Australia to Launch Next Week

daria42 writes "It looks extremely likely that the iTunes music store will launch (finally) in Australia next week. Apple confirmed that its vice president of iTunes Eddie Cue, and vice president of iPod product marketing Greg Joswiak will be flying down under for a press conference on Tuesday morning. Cue has been prominent in a number of launches around the globe of the online music store, which is now available in around 20 countries worldwide. Australians have been waiting for the launch for more than a year now. It is believed Sony's Australian division wanted to block the launch."

129 comments

  1. Niice, mate! by jbreidbord · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Wooo!

  2. Variable pricing? by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From the article:

    The iTunes Australia store is expected to provide largely the same offerings as its US and European stores, delivering access to almost one million songs at between AU$0.99 and AU$1.69 per song.

    Crikey!

    1. Re:Variable pricing? by cerebis · · Score: 3, Interesting
      At current exchange rates, thats $0.75 to $1.25 US. We didn't fair too badly after all. I know one of the debated points has always been the price of a song. The music industry wants to charge more.

      I have a feeling the disagreement was that the music moguls are stuck with the misperception that if the RRP is still $30AUD, then they simply have to divide that price by the averge number of songs to get the download price. This ignores the fact that most Aussie music stores are regularly pricing new CDs at $19.95 and older ones at as little as $10.

      It turns out that $10-$20 / [average number of songs per album] actually works out quite close to the publicized pricing, with space for an extra reduction at the top end since it is just an mp3 with real licensing limitations due to the copy protection.

    2. Re:Variable pricing? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I really don't have a problem with variable pricing on its own, though I suspect that the owners would exploit the variation to price their stuff higher than current pricing, and never lower. I'll buy tracks at fifty cents USD, but not $1.49 or $1.29, and frankly, I haven't bought at $0.99 either.

      I don't buy music online, either by download or CD, but rather a local used CD store. Still, it's my hope that the ability to buy single tracks would lead to a pressure that improves the entire album. In the past, people complained about the bundling of hits with the throw-aways, the ability to buy the desired track and leave the undesired behind means that the undesired tracks would final getting the fiscal beating they deserve rather than be considered track count padding.

    3. Re:Variable pricing? by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      in other words, between $.74 and $1.10 according to the current exchange rates.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    4. Re:Variable pricing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this variable pricing, or just uncertainty about the final (single) price?

    5. Re:Variable pricing? by clifyt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "I'll buy tracks at fifty cents USD, but not $1.49 or $1.29, and frankly, I haven't bought at $0.99 either."

      "but rather a local used CD store."

      This just proves you really aren't a target candidate for this type of online store and there is nothing wrong with that.

      Folks that buy used this way really don't want complete selection nor are they worried about the timeliness of their purchase. I buy online BECAUSE I want something that I can't get used (and believe me, most of the stuff I buy IS used) because no one has sold it yet, OR because I need it now and don't feel like getting into my car and driving across town to save $4 on the purchase (lets see...a couple weeks ago with gas prices of almost $3, 15 miles there and 15 miles back to the closest USED store -- 30 miles city to the gallon means at least one gallon was wasted, ok -- I could have saved a single $ considering most used is $5.99 -- unless its newish, then its between 8.99 and 10.99 and I LOSE money on the deal).

      But you aren't the target audience for this stuff. As someone that has worked in music (and still occasionally does the odd project when I can take enough time away from my research and other university duties to head towards lalaland for a week or two) at $.99 you are getting things cheap...on average. Even the 'throw aways' are not throw aways to fans...most of the time, they just don't fit with the stereotype of what it being played on the radio (or would you rather the music industry demand ALL tracks be devoid of artistic integrity so long as they can make it on the radio). Over time, I generally end up loving the throw aways more than I do the hits...then again, if you are talking 'popstars', you might be right. And at the same time, deserving what ever crap you may be buying. I don't think I've *EVER* bought an album that had filler except maybe the odd popsong that got caught in my head and I felt it would be well worth the price of admission to spend $14.99 to exorcise it out through the over playing of that one song (its happened before).

      But you are right about used stuff...as a consumer, I don't care how much something cost to make, if I can get it *legally* cheaper I generally do (though these days, its ordering off of Amazon and grabbing used from there....found a $30 double cd import for $5 the other day almost new looking...and it only cost me $4 in shipping). Past that, I love the iTMS.

    6. Re:Variable pricing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Australia may become a testbed of variable pricing heh? The rent/price extraced from economics 101 is being fixed, so arbitrage cannot devalue other established markets. Thus the numbers will no doubt prove it to be a success, but the numbers will not yet show future sales lost by 'non impulse' buyers.

      An examination of Australia post items would tell the local music pigopolists, their sales are being Amazoned and bought from 'Asian Grocery Stores'. The music and book shops in .au are going broke - because the pricing model is broken.

      In terms of disposable income, the greedy sods have decided to hold the line and set prices too high relative to spending power after taxes. We'll see what ACCC does to them over artificial market arbitrage restrictions later.

      No iTMS Latin America, Africa, China, Indonesia, Russian Bloc. The arbitrage problem has been delayed, but eventually these countries will wake up. So far, only India has proved responsible when it comes to books and 'local edition reprints'.

    7. Re:Variable pricing? by Vombatus · · Score: 1
      provide largely the same offerings as its US and European stores, delivering access to almost one million songs at between AU$0.99 and AU$1.69 per song

      Most replies to this comment have completely missed the point (this is slashdot after all).

      The iTunes stores across the globe seem to have settled on a 99 unit price point - be it US cents, Euro cents, British pence, Pacific Island Bananas, etc. I might be wrong about the price point across all the stores, but the principle is the same.

      The variation in Australian prices from $0.99 to $1.69 merely reflect the different exchange rates of those other currencies.

      Nothing to do with variable pricing at all.

      --
      This sig is intentionally blank
  3. About time! by ZzzzSleep · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hoo-bloody-ray!

    ZzzzSleep

  4. I'm not convinced by the_unknown_soldier · · Score: 1

    For the past year, every single month the iTMS "is going to be released this month!" Sony BMG Are bitching like they did for Japan... There were technical difficulties... And it never happens.

    When it's up. It's up. Until then it's just like the usual apple rumours - Fake.

    1. Re:I'm not convinced by Aenema · · Score: 3, Funny

      Almost like the Video Ipod, right?

    2. Re:I'm not convinced by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      Sony BMG Are bitching like they did for Japan.

      What is it with Sony and their obsession with screwing Australians? Crippled Playstations, DRM'd CDs that won't play in cars, mod chip wars, ridiculous region coding, Anthony Callea, and now this garbage. What did we do? Let a dingo eat their CEO's baby?

      Those pricks must own more Australian politicians than USCIB and PMA combined...

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    3. Re:I'm not convinced by rworne · · Score: 2

      What do you mean? It's not like the rest of the world didn't put up with each of those as well as a UFIA by Sony.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
  5. Re:A few days ago... by fracex · · Score: 1

    Do you by any chance live in Australia? Slashdot is an American based website.

  6. Finally... by cerebis · · Score: 1

    Finally. I would love to hear the whole "behind the scenes" story about why and who made it take so long. It must have been rather frustrating, but professionalism appears to have reigned despite that, I don't recall much gossip leaking out to the public.

    1. Re: Finally... by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      IIRC, Sony didn't want to sign.

  7. This is untrue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    this is tosh invented by the pathetic rumour mill that has never maneged to get a rumour correct, Appletalk Australia. They first fabricated this rumour on Wednesday this week and like the sheep they are Australian media outlets picked it up again. Remember their fake russell crow article that media outlets picked up? this is the same thing like the other ten times they told us the itunes store was opening in australia.

    read more at andrew's blog about what to expect from these people. iTunes music store australia will come eventually but just give it a rest with the fake rumours people.

  8. and the drummer plays on.... by zappepcs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is high time that the drum beat of the digital age began conquering the lands it has not yet subjegated. That sounds harsh, but what I mean is that until digital content, and more importantly, digital distribution is ubiquitous (I dislike that word) there will be no revolution in the digital entertainment world. Until the entire world holds the *AA business model up for ridicule there will be no change worth reporting on the common man's news channel.

    I really don't care who makes digital music available in any country, I just care that it happens. Hoooray for music... horaayyy for music unfettered by malicious middlemen distribution companies. It is aobut time that musicians began getting paid for their music without all the middleman crap. In this case, the digital age moves ahead of current technology to support the small businessman, small business, and the artist.

    Copyright and patent be damned, this is a *GOOD* thing.

    Personally, I've not listened to commercial radio for a long time, it SUCKS. I do support Internet radio with my money, its worth it. Its time for all of the old business model to crumble, and crumble fast and hard... fsck the *AA and their Italian sports cars... (okay, that wasn't really PC)

    I'm just glad to see the old model breaking!!! :-)

    1. Re:and the drummer plays on.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ubiquitous (I dislike that word)

      I know I've seen that somewhere else before, and your post history confirms it. But now I wonder if you're not the only one that says that.

  9. About bloody time by aussie_a · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So what was the hold up? They wanted to try to secure Sony's agreement to supply Australians with their music?

    The Seven Network has said it will start distributing popular television shows such as Dancing with the Stars to the Internet and portable devices by mid-2006.

    That's good to hear (not that particular show, but that australian shows will be uploaded), but do we get American shows, and if so, when do we get them? American shows are often delayed in Australia, with some episodes merely not shown at all (or shown out of order), while entire seasons can just not be shown at all (we never got Enterprise Season 4, the best bloody season of the lot and it wasn't aired). We also have to put up with sci-fi shows being stopped mid-season for rubbish like this.

    It's better for people to just wait for the season to be released on DVD half the time (although not only do we get those delayed, we get shafted with those as well compared with the American one.

    If Apple can offer American shows to Australians at the same time as they offer it to Americans, they'll find a market ready and primed for them. Heck, if it weren't for the small screen size I'd include myself in those who would readily leap at the chance to buy the shows from Apple. Unfortunately I can just see the government and/or television companies trying to stop Apple :(

    1. Re:About bloody time by asdfrewq · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is probably the reason Australia is second largest downloader of TV programmes from the web at 15.6% ahead of the UK(18.5%) and the US(7.3%), according to figures from the linked article. Rather astounding considering our relatively small population.

    2. Re:About bloody time by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Wow, that really does show that a lot of people download television shows not because they're filthy scum who want everything for free, but because of frustration.

    3. Re:About bloody time by AussieVamp2 · · Score: 1

      or Spooks come to that?

    4. Re:About bloody time by AcidDan · · Score: 1

      Here Here!

      It's about time that we said:
      1. No, I don't want to watch (insert whatever "decent" show you want to watch) at 1am in the morning
      2. No, I actually don't want the TV that I watch to to the Timeslot Dance - BSG died on channel 10 this way going from 8:30 (for about three eps), then some "time off" or week skipping then moved later to about 10:30. I think they even changed the day! (Way to go channel 10 - you actually made the biggest sci-fi hit in the last 5 years flop!) I'm not even sure if they will show season 2 now...

      Frankly, I'm willing to pay to get the TV I want to watch, when I want to watch it. Television companies in Australia *should* be scared - because they've been dicking us around for so long...

      On another note: Does anyone know if Apple is suppling thier download information to show the true "ratings" for shows? Will these affect ratings in general just like when music downloads started contributing to the the top 40 ratings?

      -- Dan

  10. Re:Finally? by aussie_a · · Score: 1

    You're wasting your money, Apple of America.

    Depends on whether or not they can offer American shows to Australians at a decent time (not when the Australian networks decide to show them). There is a market, it just depends on whether or not Apple will be allowed to fill it.

  11. Let's only hope by cdtoad · · Score: 3, Funny

    that Paul Hogan & Jackko never made it to mp3

    --
    when they ban enctryption only criminals wi$21*J *#JF$%!@#$':
  12. This just in... by aussie_a · · Score: 5, Funny

    Duke Nukem Forever will also be released in Australia within the year.

  13. $1.69 a track?! by coljac · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I think US$0.99 is already too much and is stifling the market. AU$1.69 (US$1.26) is ridiculous. Although I'm sure Apple lobbied for lower prices, the end result is robbery and I hope Australians vote with their feet. Why should the price discrepancy be so large between the two markets?

    I wish the Slashdot-foretold Music Industry Apocalypse would hurry up and happen.

    --
    Everyone knows that damage is done to the soul by bad motion pictures. -Pope Pius XI
    1. Re:$1.69 a track?! by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Why should the price discrepancy be so large between the two markets?

      Because I'm assuming that Apple and to renegotiate for permission to supply music to Australians, so they had to renegotiate the price.

    2. Re:$1.69 a track?! by Fex303 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Why should the price discrepancy be so large between the two markets?

      That's a pretty standard markup for media or content in Australia. Remember we're still paying A$99.95 (US$74.88) for a new-release video game. Sometimes higher. A$33 for a CD isn't unusual either. So a ~25% price hike is pretty good by our standards.

      I'm suprised it wasn't around the A$2.50 per song mark...

    3. Re:$1.69 a track?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember we're still paying A$99.95 (US$74.88) for a new-release video game

      not everyone... some of us gave up on being legit as we got sick of getting assfucked

  14. Thank Bloody God by glowworm · · Score: 1

    And it's about bloody time too.

    We have been struggling with the pathetic excuse for a music service MSN offers for far too long.

    Time for some real choice in music, not that Bob the Builder vs. Eminem crap Micro$oft offer us.

    --
    Orationem pulchram non habens, scribo ista linea in lingua Latina
  15. Brilliant! by miknight · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I submitted this story earlier this week (news.com.au article) and it got rejected. But I'm not bitter, just glad iTunes is finally coming! Even if it is without Sony/BMG initially.

  16. iTunes in NZ by usmc.spitfire · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It will be nice when they finally open iTunes to New Zealand. People here have only owned iPods for what? 1½ years?

    1. Re:iTunes in NZ by natd · · Score: 1

      18 months? I'm amazed the shops didn't give up stocking them when they sat on the shelf for the first 2.5 years without a single sale :)

      --
      Only big ligs use sigs.
    2. Re:iTunes in NZ by martinX · · Score: 1

      No. You can't touch iTMS.au

      Not until you admit we play rugby AND cricket better than you.

      We are the champions my friend...

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    3. Re:iTunes in NZ by usmc.spitfire · · Score: 1

      You can load mp3s onto an iPod from audio CDs... that's the primary method people put music on their iPods over here. I suppose downloading from BitTorrent is probably a big source of the music too =)

    4. Re:iTunes in NZ by usmc.spitfire · · Score: 1

      I don't care about the sports... I just want our internet connection speeds to catch up to yours. That is one thing you definitely do better =)

  17. Now if they will just... by otomo_1001 · · Score: 1

    Let us buy songs from other countries.

    This is my biggest gripe about iTunes, I will pay the exchange rate difference just let me buy songs from other stores.

    1. Re:Now if they will just... by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      Yeah seriously. Now I am a USian that has never owned an iPod or a single piece of DRMed music, but I don't understand what stops Australians or anyone else from visiting the American iTunes store. Can't credit card companies just automatically do the currency conversion?

      I'm guessing it's like DVD country codes, a completely artificial restriction put on the download to try to manipulate the markets. If this is the case, then it seems to me that all the people here posting that widespread iTunes use subverts the old **AA distribution model are badly mistaken.

    2. Re:Now if they will just... by galven · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Differing copyright issues for different countries. Lots of complications and headaches. That's what stops...

    3. Re:Now if they will just... by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

      so explain why i can order the physical cd from america without a problem?

      --
      TIAEAE!
    4. Re:Now if they will just... by natd · · Score: 1
      so explain why i can order the physical cd from america without a problem?

      And more to the point, why the government specifically brought in parallel import laws to allow you to do exactly that (ie a proper Australian shop can import and sell American CDs) yet we still can't do it digitally.

      --
      Only big ligs use sigs.
    5. Re:Now if they will just... by martinX · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: I know nothing.
      I think it goes like this:

      Band in US signs a deal with a manager. Manager gets a recording/distribution deal with US record company. US record company takes care of recording, pressing, promoting and distributing in the US. That's their area of expertise so that's what they do. That's a separate pile of money.

      Then US record company arranges to have music distributed in Country X by Company B. Company B then assumes all promotional responsibility (and costs) for this band in this country. They make money (pile B), some of which goes back to US Record Company.

      Enter iTMS and globalisation...

      If the band's music can be bought from the iTMS (US) by anyone in the world, Company B is going to say "Sheeeit, bro, ain't no way I'm takin' on dat sukka" so the music never really gets promoted in Country X so the band (may) sell LESS music than before.

      It's not really an artificial market, but it's dividing the bits up so (for example) Sony AU can do the best for it's local area and Sony JP can do its best for its local area and so on. I suppose it all comes down to promotion. Except for a few exceptional bands, everyone requires promotion and this may be geographically based. No-one in the US cares about Grinspoon and AFAIK, only three people in AU know about Phish. The internet is not the great leveller we all think it is. Maybe in time, but not now.

      Disclaimer: I know nothing.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  18. What's up with the name? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    "Joswiak"

    Was he able to climb up through the ranks because he's only one of six people on the planet whose last name rhymes with "Wozniak?"

    I mean, I realize with my last name it's a pot/kettle thing, but come on!

    1. Re:What's up with the name? by questamor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Joswiak is obviously the product of secret genetic experiments at Apple in the early 1980s to combine the best of Jobs and Wozniak in the one beast.

    2. Re:What's up with the name? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      But... but... he's in marketing!

    3. Re:What's up with the name? by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      Genetic engineering is a young science. Mistakes were made. Hell, we're still trying to engineer a /. poster who will RTFA.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
  19. One word. by dangitman · · Score: 1

    Hoofuckingray!

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  20. Re:Finally? by dangitman · · Score: 1

    *Raises hand*

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  21. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MOD PARENT UP. It's true. AppleTalk needs debunking every time one of their rumour story's makes it to news and ends up disappointing people.

  22. Err... by The+Fanta+Menace · · Score: 1
    Australians have been waiting for the launch for more than a year now.

    Have we? I haven't. I have no intension of paying over $2 for a single, especially one that is DRM-crippled.

    --
    -- Even if a god did exist, why the fsck should I worship it?
    1. Re:Err... by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      And your other option here is..?

      Every provider in Australia sells DRM-ed music online - you can't buy anything else - and it's much more restrictive than Apple's DRM. And the laws are only just beginning to be examined in light of the fact that it's still illegal to convert media format under Australian copyright law (ie illegal to go from CD to mp3). We have no fair use rights. There is no other option for portable music other than a portable cassette or CD player.

      There will probably *never* be a DRM-free option here in Australia, and pretty much every other option is illegal. Given that that situation is true, Apple's iTunes Music Store is the best of the lot.

      Hold out all you like, but at some point you either have to give up and join in, go illegal or just opt out of the whole portable music thing. Why cut off your nose to spite your face?

      And where did the $2 figure come from anyway?

    2. Re:Err... by The+Fanta+Menace · · Score: 1
      And your other option here is..?

      Buying CDs. Ripping them to MP3 for personal use. Sure, the ripping part is illegal under Australian law, but it would be a brave government indeed that tried to enforce that. Even Fuehrer Philip Ruddock himself has made noises about fixing that.

      And where did the $2 figure come from anyway?

      They're 99p in the UK. That's more than $2 Australian. They're unlikely to be cheaper here, and I did say over $2.

      --
      -- Even if a god did exist, why the fsck should I worship it?
    3. Re:Err... by flosofl · · Score: 1

      They're 99p in the UK. That's more than $2 Australian. They're unlikely to be cheaper here, and I did say over $2.

      You did read the article...right? If you did you must have missed this part:

      The iTunes Australia store is expected to provide largely the same offerings as its US and European stores, delivering access to almost one million songs at between AU$0.99 and AU$1.69 per song.

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    4. Re:Err... by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      They're actually 79p in the UK. But that doesn't support for Apple-bashing.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    5. Re:Err... by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      And your other option here is..?

      Buying CDs. Ripping them to MP3 for personal use. Sure, the ripping part is illegal under Australian law, but it would be a brave government indeed that tried to enforce that. Even Fuehrer Philip Ruddock himself has made noises about fixing that.


      Exactly.

      So the choice is currently - join in, go (or stay) illegal or opt out entirely.

      Maybe in future our crack team of bozos (aka the federal gov't) will manage to change copyright laws here, but the noises currently being made mean exactly nothing until a bill is produced. Expect a *lot* of opposition from well-funded industry groups to any introduction of Fair Use rights. I just don't believe it's going to get up at all.

      Going (or staying) illegal is not a choice we should have to make, and in my mind it's the greater of the evils.

  23. Oh no - no no no no no! by NoMaster · · Score: 1
    --
    What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
  24. Re:Finally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously. eMule is much cheaper.

  25. A Guilty Proposal... by jason_hutchens · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's frustrating to have to wait for the iTMS to be released down here, knowing that the songs I want to buy are one (illegal) click away. The same goes for TV series and DVDs. There's a whole heap of stuff out there that us non-pirates have to patiently wait for, even though there are perfect digital copies of that same stuff floating around, ready for the picking, for free.

    A colleague of mine suggested that I (illegally) download the stuff I want, then send a cheque for the RRP direct to the artist, along with a letter explaining my predicament and suggesting that the developer hands over whatever percentage the publisher would normally take from them. The artist would thereby be compensated for one "stolen" copy of their work, and it would be up to them to decide whether or not to compensate their publisher in turn. I realised that this model could be extended to other kinds of digital content (movies, TV series, music, software), and that a lot of people out there would be happy to pay off their "guilty conscience".

    This got me thinking. How about a website (guiltyconscience.com) that accepts anonymous donations (via credit card or paypal or whatever) to allow people to pay-off the guilt they have for illegally downloading music, movies, games and so on? The website would tally up the donations received and make regular "royalty" payments direct to the artist. A user could donate $10 and spread it over 100 songs, if 10 cents a song is enough to offset their guilt. Products could be identified via their Amazon ID or similar, to allow the artist to be easily tracked down. The result would be a perfect marketplace, in that each individual defines how much they're willing to pay for something they want without knowing what others are paying. The website wouldn't promote piracy (i.e. it wouldn't help people locate and download illegal content), but it would help to offset the damage it causes. After all, aren't we constantly being told that piracy is "ripping off the artist"?

    Imagine how things would change if a good proportion of those who pirate movies, music and software actually DID pay the artist for what they "stole".

    1. Re:A Guilty Proposal... by MasterB(G)ates · · Score: 2, Interesting

      a great idea! But I would change the name of the website. Usual paranoia feelings - if the web site owners ever got sued and were forced to hand over user details then suing your arse in turn might be too easily as you've kinda already admitted guilt. Just a donation/thankyou site where you can give money to artists because you know they are getting ripped off by the music industry would be better methinks - thanksforthemusic.com???

      --
      In the Slashdot moderating system, humourless based offenses are considered especially heinous.
    2. Re:A Guilty Proposal... by the_unknown_soldier · · Score: 1

      This sounds great. I'd love to help artists but the idea of giving money to the **aa is just disgusting, i refuse to do it.

    3. Re:A Guilty Proposal... by wootest · · Score: 1

      Awesome.

      Maybe at the end of this particular road is a better name for people who 'illegally' downloads music, and a 'fessing up (if indirect) from **AA that what they were so annoyed with all the time isn't us ripping the artists off, but them missing a chance to rip their artists off themselves.

    4. Re:A Guilty Proposal... by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Thing is, paying "conscience money" doesn't legalize your original action. Copying restrictions are as much about controlling the release of content as they are about getting a payment for each copy of the content. You might say that's nonsensical: media companies are entitled to a reasonable profit on each copy, but aren't entitled to play games with distribution in order to maximize that profit. I would certainly agree with that — but the law doesn't.

      Which leads me to a question that probably seems lame to iTunes users (can't afford it myself): what's to prevent an Aussie from using iTunes, even if there's no Australian iTunes server? Does the software check packet routing or something?

      The same goes for TV series and DVDs.
      That pisses me off too. Even in the U.S., there are movies and TV shows that you can't watch even though DVDs for them are available. (Of course, you can get a region-free player, but not cheaply.) And it leads to some bizarre situations. Like in 1999, I dropped a Farscape reference in an email to an Australian colleague. He didn't get it. Even though the show was produced in Australia with Aussie writers, locations, and mostly Aussie actors, it was financed by the Jim Henson Company — which took years to get around to releasing it in the country in which it was made!
    5. Re:A Guilty Proposal... by wootest · · Score: 1

      Which leads me to a question that probably seems lame to iTunes users (can't afford it myself): what's to prevent an Aussie from using iTunes, even if there's no Australian iTunes server? Does the software check packet routing or something?

      The fact that you need a credit card with a billing address in a participating country (like the US, Canada, France or Sweden, for example) or a form of alternative payment (like PayPal accounts linked to a credit card with a US address in the US store and Click & Buy in european stores) to buy songs or videos from it in the first place. If you have access to those ways of payment, you can still buy even if you don't live in a country with its own store.

      (I take for granted that you by iTunes meant iTunes Music Store - the iTunes software is a "jukebox" that hosts the Music Store and was able to play, for example, normal MP3s for three major versions before the Music Store part, so there's certainly no cost in just using the software outside of the store.)

  26. Re:A few days ago... by sisko · · Score: 1

    Just another example of Americans think that feringers don't exist. Guess what? The internets lets us Aussies view Slashdot too!

  27. Re:Next thing you know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's wrong with gay marriage? Or gay sitcoms, The Pet Shop Boys or Abba? While it's true that most iPod and iTunes users (well ok, Apple users in general) are gay, so what?

  28. Re:Next thing you know by thedogcow · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    For a troll you certainly know a lot about the gay community, stereotypes or not...

    Gay Marriage? Check.
    Abba? Check.
    Pet Shop Boys? Check.
    Bette Midler? Check.
    iPod? Check.

    Yes, I like all those. But you forgot:

    Cher.
    Madonna.
    Dorris Day.
    The Golden Girls.
    Goldie Hawn.
    and Susan Surandon...

    So maybe this is not really a troll for homophobia but a troll for not completing the list. How dare you young man!

    --
    Yes! I listen to NYC Speedcore and do math at 3AM. I suggest you try it too.
  29. Re:Finally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait there's an Apple of America?
    I thought Americans were all shaped like pairs.

    Obviously they must be some sort of fruit,
    since they're trying to count raised hands over the internet.

  30. Re:Next thing you know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple's customers are like no others -- a rich blend of the most sociologically elite with those seeking elegant, simple computing. ... Unlike users of Intel/Windows computers, a significant portion of Apple's users are active, exploratory, avant-garde and early adopters. The activities they enjoy are unique in the the way that they more often incorporate rich media such as video and music as well as more active prosumer behavior than many more passive Windows users.

    -- MetaFacts, Inc.


    With above-average household income and education levels, the Mac population [is] very attractive [intellectually as well as physically.]

    -- Nielsen/NetRatings (as quoted by C|NET)


  31. Too Late Apple by craznar · · Score: 2, Informative

    Already signed up here in frustration http://www.allofmp3.com/

    Only 2 weeks ago.

    --
    EMail: 0110001101100010010000000110001101110010 0110000101111010011011100110000101110010 0010111001100011011011110110
    1. Re:Too Late Apple by natd · · Score: 1
      Already signed up here in frustration http://www.allofmp3.com/

      What's different/interesting about that? Everyone else has been illegally downloading for years too. The point is that when iTunes comes out we have a legal option, just like you will.

      --
      Only big ligs use sigs.
    2. Re:Too Late Apple by craznar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's different is that it isn't illegal for me to buy music legally in another country .... in Australia.

      --
      EMail: 0110001101100010010000000110001101110010 0110000101111010011011100110000101110010 0010111001100011011011110110
    3. Re:Too Late Apple by craznar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seems to be alot of moronic yanks that don't realise that SOME countries allow you to buy music OUTSIDE that country.

      It's legal in Russia - it's legal in Australia.

      Live with it moron.

      --
      EMail: 0110001101100010010000000110001101110010 0110000101111010011011100110000101110010 0010111001100011011011110110
    4. Re:Too Late Apple by natd · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What's different is that it isn't illegal for me to buy music legally in another country .... in Australia.

      You're missing my point - deliberatly or otherwise.

      Most of us probably avoid illegally downloading (aka stealing) music on principal - I know I do. I buy all my music on CD really, I've no interest in scrounging around for torrents etc. To use 'allofmp3' is just as wrong on that same principal because your money isn't going near the artist - likely just into some Russian mafia crooks war chest to fund other more sinister activities.

      So the point is that if you're going to take an artists music without giving them ANYTHING (yes, I know the label takes most) then you would be doing every one a favour by just stealing it the normal way instead of maknig a charitable donation to a crime ring.

      --
      Only big ligs use sigs.
    5. Re:Too Late Apple by craznar · · Score: 1

      You should feel lucky that you can buy all your music on CD, however - around 70 tracks are currently unavailable to me on CD, so electronic is all that is left.

      Now - because the allofmp3 money is going to the artist (as much as buying a CD is) .... I feel that getting a quality MP3 from them (legally) is acceptable given that the only other option is NO MONEY going to the artist.

      So the point is - that given the choice of giving the artist ZERO DOLLARS (Bittorrent) and giving them 2c (AllofMP3) ... one is obviously significantly better.

      Now once the music companies pull their finger out and let the market buy the music ANYWHERE... then that is the best option available to me.

      So - in summary, you are wrong.

      --
      EMail: 0110001101100010010000000110001101110010 0110000101111010011011100110000101110010 0010111001100011011011110110
    6. Re:Too Late Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Most of us probably avoid illegally downloading (aka stealing) music on principal...


      AkA stealing to those who either really morally feel it is opinion wise, or, more commonly by the idiots who are played for as saps and are taught this by people who can't distinguish copyright infringement, theft, copying, and taking away. ^_^

    7. Re:Too Late Apple by craznar · · Score: 1

      Luckily, it's very hard to commit theft in relation to music, only in relation to physical items (CDs etc).

      As for copyright infringment - that may be something one just has to live with as part of the process of eventually getting money to the owner.

      That is - until the dufus bosses of the recording companies actually LET ME BUY THEIR FUCKING SONGS.

      --
      EMail: 0110001101100010010000000110001101110010 0110000101111010011011100110000101110010 0010111001100011011011110110
  32. no - IT'S FOR REAL - & Australia is a GREAT sc by linuxbaby · · Score: 4, Informative
    No - it's for real. I know because my company CD Baby is the provider of over 500,000 songs to iTunes, through our Digital Distribution program. Apple just contacted us again today to make sure we were all OK with the Australian launch. They only ever do this a week before a new country launches (as we did with Japan, Europe, Canada).

    I have to say, I'm very impressed with the independent music scene in Australia. There's a great spirit of independence there, helped by Triple-J Radio, a gov't-sponsored nationwide radio that actually plays a lot of truly-independent local artists, QMusic - a gov't-sponsored non-profit to develop and help local musicians, AIR, the Association of Independent Record Labels, which is run by a few passionate punks in Brisbane.

    (I'm SO impressed, in fact, that we're going to be setting up a CD Baby office in Australia in a couple months!)

  33. Re:no - IT'S FOR REAL - & Australia is a GREAT by AussieVamp2 · · Score: 1

    You are? Cool! Hopefully that is a Slashdot story!

  34. Re:A few days ago... by freakybob · · Score: 1

    Read the parent to this comment, which got modded down. Parent said that he heard this on the radio days ago and that /. was getting slow on tech news. What he heard on the radio, besides being speculation at best, would have been extremely localised. Fracex wasn't being a stereotypical arrogant american; his comment makes sense in context.

  35. iTunes South Africa by JStrike · · Score: 1

    Now this hust begs the question of where is iTunes South Africa and what is causing the holdup? Although, there isn't even an official Apple South Africa, just one guy that has the distrabution rights who makes an obscene profit. There is just no understanding Apple.

    --
    -- Hot User Submitted deals, Discounts and Coupons
  36. New Zealand? by LadyLucky · · Score: 3

    Apple NZ seems to just be a branch of Apple Australia. I wonder if this means we will be getting iTunes Music Store in NZ some time soon!

    --
    dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
  37. Too little, too late... by EvilCabbage · · Score: 1

    Karma to burn here.. shame on Apple, should have launched this 18 months ago when I actually gave a shit.

  38. Re:Finally? by carlfish · · Score: 1

    "Finally?" Who here from Oz has actually been waiting for iTunes?

    /me raises his hand

    Provided the store charges something close to the US$0.99 of its overseas counterparts, I'm going to be a happy (but maybe slightly poorer) little consumer next week. Legally purchased popular music in Australia comes in one of two forms: massively overpriced compact discs, or massively overpriced WMA downloads that won't play on my iPod.

    If Apple can launch a store where I can buy only marginally overpriced music that will play on my iPod, I'll be ecstatic.

    Charles

    --
    The more I learn about the Internet, the more amazed I am that it works at all.
  39. It's ARIAs week, by the way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... for those who don't know, the ARIA awards ceremony is Sunday night. Australia's equivalent of the Grammies.

    So we might even expect an announcement as part of that?

    If not, it's still a week when people will be focused on music as opposed to movies, TV etc.

  40. Re:no - IT'S FOR REAL - & Australia is a GREAT by Bobsledboy · · Score: 1

    Heh... Set it up in Perth, and give me a job I can work around studying ;-)

    What? Don't look at me like that everyone.

  41. Re:no - IT'S FOR REAL - & Australia is a GREAT by Bobsledboy · · Score: 1

    Also... yes, Triple J is a fantastic radio station, I don't actually listen to anything else.

  42. Re:and on by JulesLt · · Score: 1

    But digital distributors ARE the new middlemen. There is nothing (much) to stop musicians setting up sites allowing their songs to be downloaded as MP3s in return for payment. So why, instead, do they want to be on a digital music store - whether a locked in one like iTunes or a non-DRM one like bleep.com? It's been possible to (fairly easily) record and distribute your own music since the distribution lock-in was broken in the 70s, and it's got easier with every year. While in the 70s you still had to persuade shops to stock your records, stockless stores like Amazon have also leveled the field further - everyone's virtually equal, even micro-labels. To me there's been no excuse for musicians to complain the music industry is stacked against them for a long time. And many don't - many do make a healthy living. I know one guy whose been playing instrumental guitar stuff for 25 years now and he's got global sales of about 50,000. Because his costs are low - built a home studio years ago - that's enough to make a healthy living. It also turns it into a day job, which is what a lot of people go into 'the music scene' to avoid. I think a lot of these people are actually in the pop and fame business rather than music - and these days it's promotion, not distribution, that's the issue there. That's possibly because as the major labels have lost control of distribution they've focused on the one thing they will always be able to do better - throwing vast sums of cash into promotion. The cost of 'breaking' an artist has rocketed since the 70s - but it's obviously working, or we'd actually have the occasional No.1 that didn't have a video.

    --
    'Capitalists of the world, unite! Oh ... you have' (League Against Tedium)
  43. Re:and on by JulesLt · · Score: 1

    Damn. Must remember to change from HTML formatted or use the Preview!

    --
    'Capitalists of the world, unite! Oh ... you have' (League Against Tedium)
  44. Re:Next thing you know by Dan-DAFC · · Score: 1

    Are you sure that it's not just that they really like shiny white plastic?

    --
    Suck figs.
  45. Re:More free ads for Apple, because we are Open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where does it say it /. is an open source community? it says NEWS FOR NERDS.
    i'm a nerd and am hyped up for Itunes Au.

  46. Re:no - IT'S FOR REAL - & Australia is a GREAT by martinX · · Score: 1

    There's only two stations I listen to: Triple J and Classic FM.

    Long live independent government funded radio!

    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  47. Re:no - IT'S FOR REAL - & Australia is a GREAT by blackest_k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Facinating, I read your links and CDBaby does seem to be a great way for musicians to make the transistion from being a Pub band to semi pro or pro status.
    Your Site and Concept sell themselves well.

    If I wanted to get listed on Itunes purely to get listed provided I didnt use samples and was completely original didn't do a cover of an existing song I could be there for pretty much the cost of my time producing 2 cd's and 55 dollars (pretty much vanity publishing but for music).
    might never get downloaded but hey I am published ...

    For those musicians that want to get further then there is still a lot of work to be done. unlikely that someone will download your song by chance. I guess a musician could try p2p and give away some songs.

    legally covers you can't give them away since you have to pay the publishers for a licience although it does seem that if i covered "what becomes of the broken hearted" and only ever got 10 downloads on Itunes then I would owe the publishers 90 cents.

    I wonder what my liability would be if a few 1000 copys of my performance of this song got downloaded free on p2p. If it was deliberate on my part or just released by my "Fan".

    Samples/mixes seem to be another huge minefield that will incur an overhead.
    mixes might never be legal and samples seem to have a dollar value that assumes a minimum quantity of 500 to 2500 copys.

    if your making sales it also seems likely that tax will be paid somewhere and it also means making accounts your friendly song publisher will want to ensure you really only did get 10 downloads.

    however given all that I don't think CDBaby can be held accountable for the taxman the publishers or that fox fella for taking a slice from your sales.

    The only negative I could see was a comment about cdbaby taking a fixed price from a Cd Sale

    http://www.gnutellanews.com/article/6830

    " Author: gdZiemann
    Posted: June 6, 2003 at 7:46 PM EDT
    Well, I've been writing to Apple for months before they started iMusic.

    MacWarehouse has called me three times in the 2-3 weeks to update their records. They keep talking about their Apple "champs."

    You know, I really have nothing against CD Baby. I think they're a great deal for a lot of artists still basically going the traditional route.

    But if I use them, it will double my $5 retail price, because they charge $4 per unit. I'm not doubling my price to get in the club, so I can cut the price back to $5 on iMusic.

    It might be the yellow brick road, but that damn witch is still hanging around.
    "

    Derek can you explain what this guy is talking about?

    do you take submissions by people other than musicians
    say i heard a good local band or a bad one for that matter and organised getting thier unpublished recordings to you. would you deal with me as thier representative or
    would they have to come direct to you?

    sorry if this takes away some of the wow factor from cdbaby but i would be interested to see your reply.
    please correct any inaccuracys in my understanding of what cdbaby is about and the reality of publishing via cdbaby to itunes ect.

  48. Re:no - IT'S FOR REAL - & Australia is a GREAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please, If your great "spirit of independence" is based on Triple J then you have a problem - Heres a hint Melbourne is not the centre of the world. All they ever play are poser punk bands like The Living End and Green Day. The only people who listen to that shit are 16 year olds who spend all their time hanging around Westfield's because they don't know any better.

    If you want to know what good radio sounds like buy a ticket to London and tune into Soulwax.

  49. Re:A few days ago... by kahanamoku · · Score: 1

    Also, that /. provides you the ability to 'Submit A Story'. If you heard it on the radio days ago, then why didn't you submit the story to /. and claim some 'better than first post' kudos for being the person who actually provided some 'news' instead of complaining that it's now 'olds'!

    --
    ----- Concentrate on promoting more than demoting.
  50. Re:no - IT'S FOR REAL - & Australia is a GREAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple haven't made you sign NDAs? I'm surprised.

  51. Probably not by AnEmbodiedMind · · Score: 3, Informative
    The thing holding up iTunes rolling out in each country is not Apple's presence in that country, but the existence of independent music publishing groups in each country.

    This means that Apple has to reach agreements with the groups in each and every country before they can roll out the iTunes store in each of those country.

    While NZ and Australia share the same song rights group (APRA - The Australasian Performing Right Association), this is different to publishing rights which is governed by other groups.

  52. all of mp3 = 0.00 to artists by acomj · · Score: 2, Informative

    Artists aren't seeing penny one from allofmp3. not even the 2 cents of wich you speak. Its basically piracy, but because Russia is ... well Russia the laws only cover physical copying.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4328269.stm

    Just pirate it if your not going to support the artist. That way your supporting criminals as well

    1. Re:all of mp3 = 0.00 to artists by craznar · · Score: 1

      Well - in that case the artists are no worse off with allofmp3 than with the current arrangement of not being able to buy it at all.

      At least I'm not breaking the law now.

      So - back to my original point.... if and when the music companies stop playing silly buggers and let me buy the music I want to buy, then I'll just have to deal with allofmp3.

      PS : In Australia I can buy music/movie etc from any country that can legally sell it (i.e. as if I was in that country).

      PPS: You need to investigate further about where the 2c goes.......

      --
      EMail: 0110001101100010010000000110001101110010 0110000101111010011011100110000101110010 0010111001100011011011110110
    2. Re:all of mp3 = 0.00 to artists by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the RIAA/record labels take in .95 cents for every .05 cents that the artists get? Best way to support the artists is to go to their concerts.

  53. Re:Most Record Companies = 0.00 to artists by craznar · · Score: 1

    By the way, most artists see $0.00 from the record companies as well - so if getting money to the artist is the issue I'd much prefer to pay the russian mafia than the US mafia.

    --
    EMail: 0110001101100010010000000110001101110010 0110000101111010011011100110000101110010 0010111001100011011011110110
  54. Re:Finally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would who ever let's apple sell the shows let aus. users download them before they show on local tv when americans can not download them before they are on local tv?

  55. Sound Quality? by Archades · · Score: 0

    if only i had broaband:( but seriously, does itunes offer lossless songs? like a .flac, for $1.50 a song i want the same thats on the cd. the cd costs $30, has around 10-15 songs, sometimes 20, which works out to be $15-20 if you bought each single from itunes, so i'm hoping it's of a high quality

  56. what do you think Apple will think of this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple doesn't take kindly to companies stealing their thunder. After ATI pre-announced Apple's Macs by 24 hours one time, NVidia became the primary video card vendor for Apple.

    It seems kind of odd that you would go on record on the internet preannouncing one of Apple's moves.

  57. so where's the twin? by boomerny · · Score: 1

    everyone knows when you splice genes you end up with twins, one good and one bad(see movie 'Twins'). Joswiak is in marketing, so is the good twin creating the next gen Powerbook in some dank dungeon beneath 1 Infinite Loop?

    1. Re:so where's the twin? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      You must be referring to Wobs, aka the man with the iron pocket protector.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  58. Re:no - IT'S FOR REAL - & Australia is a GREAT by linuxbaby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    blackest_k: Thanks for the nice comments. Yes when we sell the physical CD (where we warehouse it, ship it, etc) then we keep a flat $4 per CD sold/shipped, no matter whether the selling price is $10, $15, $20, whatever - that's how much it costs to do everything we do. It's actually a much smaller cut than Amazon, for example. For our digital distribution, we only keep 9%, paying 91% of all income directly to the artists. But I feel weird answering a customer-service question on Slashdot comments, so please feel free to email us (cdbaby.com/contact) for any details - I'd be glad to help.

  59. Re:More free ads for Apple, because we are Open... by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

    where does it say it /. is an open source community? it says NEWS FOR NERDS.
    i'm a nerd and am hyped up for Itunes Au.


    You must be new here, but true... This isn't the Slashdot it once was... Very Sad....

  60. Re:no - IT'S FOR REAL - & Australia is a GREAT by AussieVamp2 · · Score: 1

    Right, so some never heard of station in London will play heaps of Australian, and more particularly, new, Australian bands?

    Surrrrrrrrrrrrre...........

  61. Re:Finally? by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

    Who here thinks that was a silly way to make a point? Show of hands?
    Everyone? Thought so. Of course, it's only me here right now, as I suspect was the case with the AC's post.

    I've been looking forward to the iTunes Music Store. There are no legal options for me at all. Sure, there are some music stores out there, but they don't provide any options for Mac users or iPod users. The industry has intentionally ignored the biggest portable player market segment for no apparent reason. Looking past that roadblock, they still don't offer good selections - a recent survey in The Age showed that none included the current top 40 singles. That's not just weak - that's crap.

    Apple may well be wasting their money, but it depends how much they've sunk into this venture and how good the uptake will be. In other countries with actual, real competition (ie not Australia) they've done very well indeed. The only differentiating factor here *may* be the lower population resulting in lower sales numbers. I don't know yet though.

    We'll just have to wait and see.

  62. At last - something legal to put on an iPod by Namarrgon · · Score: 3, Informative
    This will probably mark the first moment any iPod user in Australia can stop breaking the law.

    Last I checked, it is still illegal here to make a copy of the music on a CD you own, for any reason at all - personal uses of any type included, even for an MP3 player. We have no fair-use provision in our copyright laws, nor (AFAIK) are we getting any as a result of the Free Trade deal with the USA (though copyright terms are being drastically lengthened to match the US). We own the media, but have no "license to the music".

    There are already a few online music stores in Australia, but to my knowledge they only sell songs in WMA format, not much good for iPod owners. iTMS will be the first useful site.

    I can imagine that all of our iPods would be desperately looking forward to playing something other than crappy bootlegged highschool bands, home-recorded birdsong & the occasional scroungings from Creative Commons.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
    1. Re:At last - something legal to put on an iPod by Doyle · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, it is still illegal here to make a copy of the music on a CD you own, for any reason at all

      So if you burn your freshly-purchased iTMS tracks to a CD in Australia (as permitted/suggested by Apple), are you breaking Australian law?

    2. Re:At last - something legal to put on an iPod by Namarrgon · · Score: 1
      I would imagine that, if iTMS explicitly allows you to burn your purchased tracks to CD, there's probably something in the site's legal notes that you have permission from the copyright holder to make that particular copy, which would be fine. It's certainly implied, IMHO.

      This is presuming that the forthcoming Australian version of iTMS actually does grant you that right...

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  63. Just like the usual Apple rumors. . . by Iron_Yuppie · · Score: 0

    Just like the switch to Intel, the two button Mighty Mouse, and the Video iPod. Nope, no music store for Down Under.

  64. wow by newslover · · Score: 1

    wow that s a good news... Australia has a good market for that.. === http://www.thewebbrains.com/

  65. Re:Durrr - AUD and iTMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RTFA!

  66. How do you know? by Darius+Jedburgh · · Score: 1
    I've not listened to commercial radio for a long time, it SUCKS

    I guess you're just going along with what everyone else tells you.

  67. Article Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At first glance, I thought it read, "iTunes Australia to Launch Next Wank."

    That I believed.

  68. finally australian podcasts by child_of_mercy · · Score: 1

    this is a bit of a relief, australian podcasts can now get registered on iTunes.

    Hasn't been much fun watching iTunes take off as the leading podcatcher with no australian listings.

    --
    'There is a Light that never goes out.'
  69. Apple hate NZ by spir0 · · Score: 1

    I just had some pain trying to register quicktime pro here in New Zealand. Apple don't want to know me. I think i'm going to go back to using an Amiga.

    --
    The reason girls and Windows users don't understand UNIX is because all the documentation is in Man files.
  70. Music Store Arrives! by wetscalpel · · Score: 1

    Well - it IS here people. Go to iTunes music store and open up the list of international sites - AUSTRALIA heads the list! So far it looks like Aus$1.69 per track but haven't had a good look yet. Videos are up to $3.39. Albums $16.99. Pixar also $3.39. NO TV episodes yet. AT LAST!

    --
    Wet Scalpel The first cut is the deepest.......