Slashdot Mirror


Madison Rolling Out City-Wide Wi-Fi

It doesn't come easy wrote to mention the announcement that Madison, Wisconsin will soon be home to the newest Municipal Wi-Fi network. From the article: "'I made a commitment in 2004 to bring Wi-Fi to Madison,' said Madison Mayor Dave Cieslewicz in a statement. 'This is an important new service for Madison residents and businesses.' The Madison network will be rolled out at no cost to the city and the providers have secured initial funding from service agreements from ISPs. The initial phase of the Madison network will cover users in the downtown region of the city with plans to later cover the entire city." I love my town. Zombies and Wi-Fi. What more could you want?

153 comments

  1. Thanks Zombie Lurch! by conJunk · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, it looks like yesterday's zombie lurch accomplished something for the city!

  2. Zonk a zombie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    It would certainly explain a lot.

  3. Windows by cachimaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now even the Windows boxes will turn into zombies

    1. Re:Windows by LordMaxxon · · Score: 1

      i thought they already were...

  4. Hum... by Chickenofbristol55 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I could just imagine this scene. Brainnnnssss......Brainnnnsss.... Oh my god run for your lives! ZOMBIES.... Wait, what are they doing now? I think they are reading their e-mails, whooo... thank god we are safe for now.

    --
    public class null extends java applet { System.out.print ("Tabula Rasa"); }
  5. Done right for once, I think. by Ironsides · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Madison network will be rolled out at no cost to the city and the providers have secured initial funding from service agreements from ISPs.

    Hmmm... No tax dollars being used, sounds good to me. How are they getting funding? A subscription fee or what?

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    1. Re:Done right for once, I think. by Bastian · · Score: 1

      If I remember right, service will cost $5/mo.

    2. Re:Done right for once, I think. by Ironsides · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Any ideas on if they are capping download speeds, blocking ports, or max download per month? Is this going to be an always on 100k speed or what? This probably won't be for anyone beyond the Joe Sixpack user of email, IM and websurfing. I'm pretty sure no one downloading a linux distro over bittorrent isn't going to be using this.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    3. Re:Done right for once, I think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's rather supposed to handle just e-mails & IM during your coffee break. If you want to download sth more, get back to work or get internet at home.

    4. Re:Done right for once, I think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In other words, don't bother looking for free WiFi hotspots in Madison anymore if you are from out of town. All possible incentive to provide it has been squelched by a monopoly, established propped up by the municipal government.

      Yay, socialism!

    5. Re:Done right for once, I think. by utnow · · Score: 1

      I've felt this way about Fire protection for a long time... Sure you would FEEL like an ass-monger forcing people to pay in exchange for showing up to douse their homes with water but it just seems like a private company could do this better for the people who are paying. I'm thinking a month/annual subscription would be nice.

      I'm sure the less-priviledged would be hurt because they can't afford to protect their assets and families... but then again... I'm hurt because I can't afford a 500 teraflop supercomputer. gimme! gimme!

      No. I don't need scores of people citing various reasons why this is unconstitutional or a bad idea. I don't care. It's my idea and I like it. :D

    6. Re:Done right for once, I think. by Bastian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nah, I think you'll be fine. Almost all of the current wi-fi hotspots in the downtown area (coffee shops, mostly) get most of their business from students at the University. All of the students I know are way too bandwidth-obsessed to be content with municipal wireless, and since they tend to crowd 4 or 5 people into an apartment, a 3Mbit cable/DSL connection isn't particularly expensive to them. Assuming that the municipal wi-fi will be billed per user or per computer rather than per household, it really wouldn't be much cheaper than what they're already getting from the cable or phone companies.

      In fact, I'm really not entirely convinced that Madison's municipal wi-fi program will be successful. I'm pretty sure they did almost no marketing research before starting the program (The city's motto, as far as I can tell, is "Ready, Fire, Aim.") Most of the area they are covering is just too saturated with free hotspots and people whose unprotected networks are named 'linksys.' As someone who lives outside the coverage area, I certainly wouldn't pay for it. I'm already getting pretty much exactly the same service for free, though I'll grant I'm not getting it from anyone in particular.

    7. Re:Done right for once, I think. by SeventyBang · · Score: 3, Interesting



      Dvorak had a fit a few issues ago because (Philadelphia?, Pittsburgh?) was going to put up a muni.net and some of the commercial enterprises realized they could earn a lot more by charging what an ISP is expected to charge instead of some paltry sum (or nothing). He later said these folks created some leverage^w^w a PAC and convinced the state legislature to pass some bill which would give the commercial folks the right of first refusal for any of these setups (and IIRC, something ungodly like fourteen months to decide). The Gov signed and Pennsylvania now looks to be locked tighter than a nun.

      Can anyone substantiate this? (and how would this affect the apparent plans of a nationwide Google muni.net?)


    8. Re:Done right for once, I think. by Bastian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Nobody really knows. The city government and the company they contracted are being very tight-lipped about the whole deal.

    9. Re:Done right for once, I think. by MacDork · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Any ideas on if they are capping download speeds, blocking ports, or max download per month?

      Any ideas on what they plan on logging and censoring 'for the children?'

    10. Re:Done right for once, I think. by cpeterso · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Nobody really knows. The city government and the company they contracted are being very tight-lipped about the whole deal.


      Transparent government always inspires confidence.

    11. Re:Done right for once, I think. by SeventyBang · · Score: 1



      Isn't this what taxes do?


    12. Re:Done right for once, I think. by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Most of the area they are covering is just too saturated with free hotspots and people whose unprotected networks are named 'linksys.' As someone who lives outside the coverage area, I certainly wouldn't pay for it. I'm already getting pretty much exactly the same service for free, though I'll grant I'm not getting it from anyone in particular.

      On that note, how are they going to deal with interference from other wireless users? Are they going to use something other than 802.11b/g? Is the city going to (try to) trump the FCC and force locals not to use the same frequencies?

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    13. Re:Done right for once, I think. by utnow · · Score: 1

      No. Taxes are a way of providing things for people who can't afford them, while getting the wealthier members of society to foot the bill. This constitutes a very small percent of the population personally funding something that is being used by all of the population. The result is that nobody gets decent service because it's grossely underfunded.

      It also has the byproduct of ripping off the wealthier members of society by taking WAY more than it gives back.

      I can understand why the police-force needs to be state-run. Every person can't hire themselves an agent that sits by their door with the power to incarcerate intruders and such. But fire protection, with proper regulation and over-sight, could be quite effective in the private sector. Hell... I think something like school-vouchers (but for fire) would be damn cool.

      Want to take your chances? Fair enough. Here's your voucher good for one year's worth of fire-protection from any of these state approved companies. Done deal. Next time disaster striked Bay Area Fire and Rescue Co shows up. And because they'll have a smaller clientelle, the response-time should be shorter. :D

    14. Re:Done right for once, I think. by fontus · · Score: 1

      This is a good thing (to the city of Madison anyway.) I am a DSL victim here in Madison and the thought of a relativity cheap alternative to the local telcos would be great! I worked on the University of WI campus for 10 years and the idea of an alternative option would rock. If they fail, they'd fail because they can't provide. I have TDS, and I am pretty happy. The idea of a company having sole access to a market to a market frightens me. The more options the better! Now the way it sounds, if you pay, you get access. If I am willing to pump up the "volume" of my signal to access it downtown (I have local hub with WiFi); no harm, no foul. But for a campus and city population of 200k+, God bless ya. The rate the city is asking ($20-30/month), is about equal or to or less than local tecos. Less then five years ago, for $30 a month all I could get was 128k asynch and a prayer for no traffic at 5am! I teach at a local tech college, and the biggest complaint is no access. If the poor bastards don't pay for access, make them. If they don't, I will (pay, for my share anyway)!!! If I can roam the city and get WiFi, well the revolution was worth it. The tech ain't hard. Schlotzskys and Starbucks did it, so why can't anybody else. From a fiscal conservative and social liberal! I pay the taxes, so I should have some say!

    15. Re:Done right for once, I think. by Golias · · Score: 1

      On that note, how are they going to deal with interference from other wireless users?

      That's easy. They'll flood the area with so much RF signal that no other network will be useful, and all other wireless nets will simply go away, as the grandparent AC predicted. Problem solved, and everybody gets to become a paid subscriber to get something which they once got (better) for free.

      Congratulations, Madison.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    16. Re:Done right for once, I think. by lordsid · · Score: 0

      "No. Taxes are a way of providing things for people who can't afford them, while getting the wealthier members of society to foot the bill. This constitutes a very small percent of the population personally funding something that is being used by all of the population. The result is that nobody gets decent service because it's grossely underfunded. It also has the byproduct of ripping off the wealthier members of society by taking WAY more than it gives back." Bet you weren't bitching when Bush gave those "wealthier members of society" a tax break? you know by taking WAY more then giving? get your head out of your ass

      --
      IMAGE VERIFICATION IS EVIL!
    17. Re:Done right for once, I think. by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      The Joe Sixpack user of email, or 40,000 UW Madison students with their laptops sitting around choking bandwidth with myspace profiles and itunes.

      Speaking of, if they don't block Itunes, it's going to be a copyright wasteland like it already is inside every campus building with a wireless network.

    18. Re:Done right for once, I think. by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      This is really stupid, like 70-80% of people have access to a computer, way more than have access to a car. (Because Duh Kids)

      Most people use less than 1% of their theoretically bandwidth and you are complaining about using tax dollars on this?

      You'll get it back in lower fees from the teleco's that don't have to run last mile connections.

      People who don't think AT ALL about how this benefits everyone before complaining about taxation, well I guess they are right wing.

    19. Re:Done right for once, I think. by Bastian · · Score: 1

      They're planning on covering the whole city. This is meant to be how you get your internet at home.

    20. Re:Done right for once, I think. by WaterBreath · · Score: 1

      From a fiscal conservative and social liberal!

      No need to repeat yourself. You already mentioned that you lived in Madison. ;)

      *ducks*

    21. Re:Done right for once, I think. by uncreativ · · Score: 1

      Price point is way off. Equipment, management, access rights costs more than $5/user/mo let alone the cost of internet service itself. This is not going to be a freebe, but rather a competetive option in the market place for internet service.

    22. Re:Done right for once, I think. by utnow · · Score: 1

      Ohhh... you're talking about when he lowered the amount of taxes they were paying for 1-2%? So you mean the wealtiest 2-5% are still paying nearly half of the total? Still not the way it should be... but no I wasn't bitching. I was cheering for a tiny little victory.

      I just can't get over your stupidity. They have more money than you. They're paying orders of magnitude more taxes than you (assuming you're from the US). The highest tax-bracket is paying a higher percentage of their income in taxes than you are. You're enjoying the benifits of their money. The gov't gives them a tax break, which in the grand scheme of things is a very VERY small consolation and is still a higher % of their income than you would be paying, and you get pissed off because...... why? Because they only pay 10 times your current yearly salary in taxes a year? I just really don't understand where your anger comes from.

      Want to make sure these things aren't underfunded? Maybe try to increase your OWN income. Then you could start giving a greater percentage of everything YOU earn to the government and pay for the people who aren't making as much to goto school, have fire protection, for homeless people to surf the web in the library, and for gov't scientists to measure the viscosity of ketchup. THEN I would understand the anger...

    23. Re:Done right for once, I think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is Madison we're talking about! Read some history of the city if you're worried about that kind of thing.

    24. Re:Done right for once, I think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dumb fuck! How do you cut taxes on any segment of a poplulation other than THOSE SEGMENTS THAT FUCKING PAY TAXES?!?!?! You can't cut taxes on people who DON'T PAY ANY TAXES!

    25. Re:Done right for once, I think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF good is a laptop with no CD-ROM or NIC?

  6. Milwaukee To Get Better Treatment by SEGT · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Midwest Fiber Networks is going to build a wifi system for the city at no cost to tax payers. Once the system is up they will rent it out to various service providers who can then charge whatever fees for access they wish. More information found here.

    --
    10: SIN 20: GOTO HELL
    1. Re:Milwaukee To Get Better Treatment by SEGT · · Score: 1

      My bad, I did not realize that both systems are being created by a private organization, both resulting in no cost to tax payers.

      --
      10: SIN 20: GOTO HELL
    2. Re:Milwaukee To Get Better Treatment by ltm · · Score: 1
      NOT better treatment. The installation from Midwest Fiber Networks for Milwaukee will only be for a SIGNAL, not access to the internet. -- If you want to surf, you'll need to contract with an ISP who will provide the 'net over MFN's wireless signal. -- In other words, BFD. It's NOT a free wi-fi type rollout.

      The media did a crap job explaining this, as it is the equivalent of shooting a new satellite into space. Everyone can get the signal, but you need to subscribe to actually get value out of that signal.

  7. Freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Freedom only comes when the government stays out of business affairs. Who is it that tells you you cannot act freely? The government. They should stick to providing a world class military to defend us from those who would attack us so cowardly as the 9/11 terrorists and allow business, a.k.a. us, to be free.

  8. Re:Rah-rah Madison by admdrew · · Score: 1
    Even with the university, Madison is >86% white people.

    ...just like a lot of non-metro-sized midwest cities. It is unfortunate, though, that the myth of diversity (or even semi-diversity) is perpetuated by a lot of places around here (the UW included).

  9. Re:Rah-rah Madison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is nobody's fault except the non-white people who have not yet moved there.

    Get walkin'.

  10. Re:Rah-rah Madison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    But they are very diverse white people.

    -sparX

  11. What more could you want? by Kohath · · Score: 0

    I love my town. Zombies and Wi-Fi. What more could you want?

    Maybe if winter wasn't 8 months each year?

    1. Re:What more could you want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Maybe if winter wasn't 8 months each year?

      Who cares? You've got fresh cheese pouring in and the largest waterpark in the world an hour north. Not to mention that you've got some great indoor waterparks up in the Dells as well. (For wintertime fun.) Now if only the "New China International" restaurant had not gotten sold and renamed to the "Zodiac". That used to be like the best Chinese Buffet in town. Now it's just so-so.

    2. Re:What more could you want? by Vskye · · Score: 1

      Maybe if winter wasn't 8 months each year?

      Obviously you've never been there, or you wouldn't make such a dumb ass statement. Winter has been pretty mild around WI for quite awhile now. (must be that global warming thing) Now, if you go up north.. that's a different story! I relocated to Montana and winters are much more mild. Of course, you do not have ANY professional sports, (as in NFL, NBA, MLB) no decent cheese, snacks, and alot of other stuff I miss. Yep, I'll be moving back soon. ;)

      Dana

      --
      Life was hell, then I discovered Linux...
    3. Re:What more could you want? by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Obviously you've never been there, or you wouldn't make such a dumb ass statement.

      I'm bitter about how long winter is. I want summer back.

    4. Re:What more could you want? by Beer+Moon · · Score: 1
      Maybe if winter wasn't 8 months each year?

      Man, you have a lot to learn about seasons in Wisconsin.

      Winter is only 4 months.

      The other 8 months are Construction.

    5. Re:What more could you want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice try. lived here for 34 years and the ratio is more like 6 months Winter, 2 months Manure, 2 months Mosquitoes, and 2 months Asian Lady Beetles. Construction overlaps Feb.-December.

  12. Re:Rah-rah Madison by carambola5 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How about a competitive marketplace for cable television? Charter sucks. Lots. Some of us Madison residents lease their dwellingplaces and are not allowed to mount satellite dishes. Therefore, I, and many other Madisonians, are stuck with over-the-air standard TV or Charter Cable.

    Fortunately, I occasionally hear IPTV radio commercials for nearby towns. Hopefully those will make it to Madison before too long.

    --
    IWARS.
    People, in general, disappoint me. Politicians even more so.
  13. Madison by magicsquid · · Score: 1

    Slashdot. All about Madison, all the time!

    --


    "Chances of RHIC-induced Armageddon are exceedingly rare, but... you never know." - MIT Physicist Bob Jaffe
    1. Re:Madison by Drathus · · Score: 1

      I hope not.

      I've lived here my whole life and can only take so much.

  14. Incentive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There needs to be a reason for a small town to become ethnically diverse. A lot of non-whites live in larger cities because there are lots of jobs and lots of non-whites with whom they can relate. What you're suggesting is more drastic than bussing folks around for a mix of races at schools.

    1. Re:Incentive by Karma_fucker_sucker · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      Agreed.

      For the "Conservatives" and the "Liberals" here:
      There's a couple of neighborhoods here in Atlanta that are 100% African-American. The lowest price house is about $1,000,000.00. They live there out of choice and they can live anywhere they want. Oh, there's no poor housing at all in these neighborhoods. So why do you suppose that they live in an ethically "un-diverse" neighborhood? How about this: a lot of people like to live with people that they have something in common with. And it's not just white and black. It's also: French with French, Poles with Poles, Spanish with Spanish, Chinese with Chinese, Vietnamese with Vietnamese, etc ... And even then, how many neighborhoods are even more segragated than that?

      What I'm getting at is if government isn't segregating out of policy - why is it a problem?

      --
      Evil people don't think they're evil. - George Lucas, Making of Ep III
    2. Re:Incentive by StewardsHaveMoreFun · · Score: 0
      There needs to be a reason for a small town to become ethnically diverse. A lot of non-whites live in larger cities because there are lots of jobs and lots of non-whites with whom they can relate. What you're suggesting is more drastic than bussing folks around for a mix of races at schools.
      The public school system KISSES people around? That is going to cause some serious sexual harassment lawsuits
    3. Re:Incentive by RingDev · · Score: 1

      "How about this: a lot of people like to live with people that they have something in common with. And it's not just white and black. It's also: French with French, Poles with Poles, Spanish with Spanish, Chinese with Chinese, Vietnamese with Vietnamese, etc ..."

      Lets not forget the biggie: Rich with Rich. My personal theories point to a significantly smaller impact of racial based prejudice, and a significantly larger impact of fiscal bigotry.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  15. Wired Zombies by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 2, Funny

    Put a server chip in each of them. Then we can play zombie wars.

  16. Comming to a city near YOU by u2pa · · Score: 2, Funny

    .... i wish :/

    (untill then i will just have to stick with my $2 a month, 100mbit internet)

    --
    Officially: "No comments"
    1. Re:Comming to a city near YOU by u2pa · · Score: 1

      ... why are these offers always somewhere else :)

      --
      Officially: "No comments"
  17. Re:Rah-rah Madison by Ironsides · · Score: 1

    How about a competitive marketplace for cable television?

    Why do you think the phone companies are building out fibre networks? It's not for pure internet. They want to compete with the cable networks for TV as well. Verizon is one of them.

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  18. Re:Rah-rah Madison by GXFragger · · Score: 1

    Yes, more choices for TV would be nice and it would help lower the costs. My family has Charter in our house and the costs are very expensive (about $120 a month for high speed internet and hi-def cable). Hopefully, it would also encourage faster internet speeds, as we are still at only 3mbits.

  19. Good news by cdrguru · · Score: 4, Informative
    This is perhaps a competitive service to cable and DSL. Unfortunately, it is probably just that, with lower capacity. Let's see, what happens when there are 20 people on the same accept point? You get something that works fine for someone in a Starbucks trying to read email and something that doesn't work at all for downloading the latest 12MB update from Microsoft.

    WiFi even at G levels has a maximum bandwith of 54Mb/sec, which translates to about 6MB/sec. Wow, 6MB a second, that's better than most cable systems, right? Wrong. 6MB a second for the access point. This is divided up amongst all the users within range, and possibly over a significant area if each individual access point doesn't have it's own 6MB/sec Internet connection.

    In a real-world implementation with some kind of mesh network and relatively few hard-wired connections between them, you are going to quickly run out of bandwidth when people use this as an alternative to a wired connection. Therefore, this isn't any competition at all and serves to just allow people to connect when away from home.

    The likelyhood that this will be used as a cheap alternative to a hardwired connection is high. Therefore, there is a high likelyhood that the service will suck from the moment it is turned on.

    1. Re:Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      54 Mb/sec is the capacity of the wireless bandwidth surrounding the router. The actual connection to the internet is a wholly different number. If you have 20 users who are all downloading at the same time, there would be problems. However, typical network usage for things such as email is not like that - or even IM, it's conceivable to that 20 users can be supported - even with 11Mb/sec.

    2. Re:Good news by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1
      Wow, 6MB a second, that's better than most cable systems, right? Wrong. 6MB a second for the access point. This is divided up amongst all the users within range, and possibly over a significant area if each individual access point doesn't have it's own 6MB/sec Internet connection.

      You've forgotten about contention ratio. Basically, users aren't using all their bandwidth all the time.

      Common contention ratios are 20:1 or 50:1. In other words one 6MB link can proved 2M service for up to 150 users simultaneously. Or 500K service for 600 users. And that's just one access point... (In practice that access point may not be able to support that many users for other reasons, but bandwidth isn't the problem.)

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    3. Re:Good news by Atmchicago · · Score: 1

      The speed may be poor to you, but you have to realize that a system like this one should self-regulate itself in terms of the number of users and the speed. Much like traditional supply and demand, each person in Madison will have a point at which he/she finds the price/speed ratio to be favorable. For some, low prices are enough incentive despite low bandwidth. To others it isn't, and they will stick to their hardwired services.

      --

      You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

    4. Re:Good news by DavidD_CA · · Score: 1

      Most DSL/cable service, especially in the US, is rated in megabits, not megabytes.

      So, the 54 mbps that you get on wireless is compared to the same 1.5 mbps that you're likely to get off DSL.

      Doesn't matter anyway, because unless they have multiple T1s or a T3 connected to those access points, it's not going to support a wide number of users.

      However, let's give a little faith to the people that put this together. They aren't the first city to figure out wireless, and likely will learn from many other mistakes.

      One would hope they're using higher-end equipment which doesn't bottleneck as easily as your average $80 Linksys access point. Likewise, they've probably got a number of access points spread throughout the region, so each one can probably support 50-100 users.

      If a dozen or so APs are spread around, and all linked back to 1 or 2 primary internet feeds at T1 or T3 speeds, then the city has a great reason to be celebrating.

      --
      -David
    5. Re:Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      I'd be happy with an N! (540MBs)

      Here in Fishers, IN[1], we've got Insight and they advertise 2Mbs or a plus 4Mbs. Unfortunately, they've got a tendency to play with the "Favorites" in the cable's set-top box. For three or four days, they're here, then they're gone a day, and so on. It's tough to approach anything near the max (400Mbs-500Mbs tops) because it's essentially a huge [residential] neighborhood and everyone is busy all of the time[2]. DSL isn't that much of an option for most, because the local loop just isn't quite there.

      As far as municipal activities go, they've got a new stadium under development for the Colts and to help finance it, they decided to get the Gov to twist the arms of seven of the eight of the surrounding (Marion) counties, and get them to pay a 1% sales tax for all prepared|served food. I predicted this about 3-4 years ago, when the stadium v2.0 talk was starting to heat up (the missus suggested I not give anyone else this idea)...Indy's had problems with finances, so they had to pass the buck (to themselves) somehow. Marion County instituted a 1% tax in 1984 and it didn't have a sunset clause. So if the current dome is paid for, where's the 1% going? And if it's not paid for (and using the 1%), why are they tearing it down? So they added another 1%, with a thirty-year sunset. The problem is that most stadiums built today only have a lifespan of 14-15 years. I can hardly wait to see how they handle a muni.net.

      The funny part about my prediction? Whilst there was a lot of arguing about whether the other counties should pay or not, they were referred to as "doughnut" counties. When I wrote my essay (about two years ago), it featured (and focused upon why the lady in the middle would be taxing the family ;)


      Three sides around the barn to get here: has anyone else seen any financially strapped cities make a muni.net work?


      [1] Believe it or not, a town of (projected for 2006) 60k people. Special census cost us $500k in 2003, showed enough increase in headcount (total 52k) to bring another $2M/year from the state. Another $500k next year should show that much more growth. Fortunately, our taxes are lower than Indy's.

      [2] And now I'm going to have to track down which two neighbors have unprotected WiFi connections named "Linksys" and tell them they're a bit exposed.

    6. Re:Good news by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      WiFi even at G levels has a maximum bandwith of 54Mb/sec, which translates to about 6MB/sec. Wow, 6MB a second, that's better than most cable systems, right?

      Am I misreading what you wrote or are you confusing megabit and megabyte ? A 54Mbps local wireless networks are a magnitude faster then a DSL, Cable or T-1 connection (128Kbps - 6Mbps).

  20. What more could you want?? by SuperDuG · · Score: 1
    I love my town. Zombies and Wi-Fi. What more could you want?

    How about this Halloween you don't have RIOTS ??

    Kudo's to Madison thought, I have a chance to park between Monona and Mendota everytime I go visit the folks. Downtown Wisconsin is actually a rather nice place to hang out with a lot of eateries, coffee shops, and "bars". Not to mention with UW Madison sitting in the heart of downtown as well, this network will see heavy useage.

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:What more could you want?? by r_benchley · · Score: 1

      I'm going to call bullshit on this one. I live in downtown Madison, and the "riots" during the Halloween bash are blown way out of proportion. Last year it was a group of about five jackasses visiting from some other Big 10 school (Purdue, IIRC) that got a little rowdy. The other 80,000 - 100,000 people behaved themselves just fine.

    2. Re:What more could you want?? by SuperDuG · · Score: 1

      There were 250 arrests and 20 people were hospitalized ... forgive me if I think you are a bit naive.

      --
      Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    3. Re:What more could you want?? by J-B0nd · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of those arrested do not attend the university.

      According to the Badger Herald: "A total of 448 arrests were made, with only 57 identified as UW students, a figure representing 12.8 percent of the total arrests."

    4. Re:What more could you want?? by SeventyBang · · Score: 1



      It's because they don't let the Purdue people out loose very often.

      Here are the usual directions to Purdue: "go North until you smell it, West until you step in it."


    5. Re:What more could you want?? by Golias · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm not a brilliant UW-Madison student, but I'm pretty sure that 57 is more than 5 (which is what the grandparent post claimed was the TOTAL number of rioters.)

      And that's just the number who were actually arrested. If you think only 57 UW students rioted, you've clearly got cheese in your head.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    6. Re:What more could you want?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And all those arrests were for "riots" and not for such severe crimes as underage drinking or open container, etc., right? I was actually arrested last year when I was tackled from behind by someone from another school & charged with disorderly conduct (charges later dismissed).

    7. Re:What more could you want?? by Golias · · Score: 1

      And all those arrests were for "riots" and not for such severe crimes as underage drinking or open container, etc., right?

      In Wisconsin? I thought an open container was a manditory part of the driver's test over there, especially for underage drinkers.

      (I keed! I keed! I love the Wisconisin!)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    8. Re:What more could you want?? by fingerfucker · · Score: 1

      Kudo's to Madison thought

      Who is this Kudo fellow you speak of? And why did he have thoughts about Madison? Are you sure you know WTF you're saying?

  21. Re:Rah-rah Madison by handmedowns · · Score: 1

    If you lease a property or own a home, no HOA or Management can restrict you from having a dish installed in a private living area. "Effective January 22, 1999, the Commission amended the rule so that it also applies to rental property where the renter has an exclusive use area, such as a balcony or patio." Read it yourself. http://www.fcc.gov/mb/facts/otard.html It's federal mandate, if someone is telling you its against the rules or local laws to mount one, they're violating federal law.

    --
    The road between democracy and tyranny is paved with secrecy in the name of security.
  22. Re:Rah-rah Madison by mjh · · Score: 4, Informative
    I thought the FCC made a rule saying that no such restrictions were allowed:
    The rule applies to individuals who place antennas that meet size limitations on property that they own or rent and that is within their exclusive use or control, including condominium owners and cooperative owners, and tenants who have an area where they have exclusive use, such as a balcony or patio, in which to install the antenna. The rule applies to townhomes and manufactured homes, as well as to single family homes.
    The deal here is that you have exclusive use of the area. I've even read of people placing their sat dishes inside a south facing window in order for this rule to apply to them.

    Of course, if you don't have any view to the south you're still screwed.

    --
    Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
  23. Brains! by fm6 · · Score: 1

    Brains!

  24. ...and Halloween by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Madison has Zombies, wifi..... and the annual Halloween bash.
    The U of M(n) and UW boarder brawl continues next weekend as thousands of gophers migrate from Minnesota to get trashed and dress up in rickety costumes in the land of badgers.

    I hear Madison is cracking down on visitors this year so the dorms do not turn into brothels and riot headquarters. They make such a big deal about burning man, but someone should really report on Halloween in MadCity.

    1. Re:...and Halloween by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the official policy is no guests allowed in the dorms this year (as opposed to a one guest policy last year). It's not like it makes a difference though, everyone is just staying in apartments or student houses instead of the dorms.

    2. Re:...and Halloween by Sebilrazen · · Score: 0, Troll

      I for one welcome our Brothel House running, kegger holding, drunken Badger overlords.

      ...and I'm from the Gopher state

      --
      "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
    3. Re:...and Halloween by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I see you are still recovering from the blocked punt :P

      ( all in good fun :) )
       

      /at the game

  25. Re:Rah-rah Madison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You won't be happy until it's 0% white people will you?

  26. Whoa! by Comatose51 · · Score: 1
    'I made a commitment in 2004 to bring Wi-Fi to Madison,' said Madison Mayor Dave Cieslewicz in a statement. 'This is an important new service for Madison residents and businesses.'

    A politician who kept his word!? What is this world coming to? First open source software, then municipal WiFi, and now an honest politician. You know it is getting a little chilly right now. I better get my spare blankets ready; Lucifer might want his favor returned soon.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  27. Re:Rah-rah Madison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Madison has enough diversity. Any more and it wouldn't be such a nice place.

  28. Wireless Bandwidth on a single VHF frequency by NewKimAll · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From what I understand, the standard bandwidth for VHF television will be going away pretty soon to get re-allocated. If the FCC were to allow the bandwidth for just one television station to be used wirelessly, how much bandwidth would that be per channel? Does anyone know?

    Could this be a possibility when people decide that 54G is still too slow to serve enough people at any given access point?

    1. Re:Wireless Bandwidth on a single VHF frequency by NeuralAbyss · · Score: 1
      Well, IIRC, it's 7MHz per channel.. depends on your modulation and coding.

      I've found a link with a bit of information on what bitrate digital TV over CODFM achieves:

      e.g. 64 QAM code rate 2/3 and guard interval 1/32 equals a rate of 24.13 Mbit/s


      http://64.233.187.104/search?q=cache:wjCVgZM_gDgJ: www.theiabm.org/pdffiles/digital.cofdm.pdf+codfm+b andwidth+bitrate&hl=en&client=firefox-a
    2. Re:Wireless Bandwidth on a single VHF frequency by necro81 · · Score: 1

      An interesting question: one which I don't know the answer to offhand. For what it's worth, the latest issue of IEEE's Spectrum magazine has a good article on the reallocation and what the end of analog TV will mean.

      In the end, I doubt that municipalities will be able to get ahold of much of the allocated spectrum for this kind of use. They will get a large slice of it for their own use, but will mostly be given over to emergency bands - like 911. On the open market, I doubt that municipalities will be able to compete with the bids of larger telcos for the commercially-available pieces of the spectrum.

  29. Re:Rah-rah Madison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Remember Madison is mostly a campus town, unlike say... here in Minneapolis, Chicago, or other Midwest cities of the ilk. That is not to say white people are the only educated people in the world, but there is not a large portion of people there (non-white or otherwise) who are not there for either the government work or the schooling. (sorry about the double negative...)

    If it makes you feel any better, I am from a little dinky town in northern Wisconsin with 4K people where 1/3 the population is either Mexican or (mostly) Somali. That is pretty good diversity percentage-wise. However, it is a factory town and the "non-whites" are not there for education as they are in Madison - they are there to work at low paying crappy farm/industrial jobs right alongside white people stuck in the same position.

    Is this the sort of diversity you are looking for?

  30. I planted this idea by bmasel · · Score: 1, Informative

    in Cieslewicz' brain, when we were both running for the State Assembly in 1992, he in the Dem. primary, where he lost to now Congresswoman Tammy Baldwin, while I was just fooling around in the Republican Primary.

    --
    Ben Masel: 51,282 votes for US Senate in the Wisconsin Democratic Primary
    1. Re:I planted this idea by McLusky · · Score: 1

      You go Ben.

    2. Re:I planted this idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that rat bastard. I thought of that other idea he had about that thing. Let's make a law that prohibits any politician from implementing any idea that is not 100% original.

      Who wants a mayor that doesn't listen to good ideas from others?

      Get over it. You lost. Republicans sux0r.

  31. Re:What more could you want?? No Riots? by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

    No riots?

    What would a State Street Halloween be without drunk college students having keg parties, peeing in the lawns, burning couches in the street, smashing store front windows, and then choking on a little teargas and pepper spray?

    I mean... shesh - it's like you were expecting a civilized town or something?

  32. I live here, this is a WASTE! by dangermen · · Score: 1

    I live here. This is a waste. The city has been in the RED for years now and it wants to take this ON!?!?? WTF Madison is a pretty connected city. It needs to save the money and put it towards other things instead of this crap.

    1. Re:I live here, this is a WASTE! by jwilhelm · · Score: 1

      That's probably where the "...the Madison network will be rolled out at no cost to the city..." part comes in.

    2. Re:I live here, this is a WASTE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in downtown Madison and can't wait for this thing to go through. Way to go Mayor Dave! And as far as being in the red... allow me to correct you. Against all odds, the city is operating on a balanced budget. If they can offer WI-FI, and at no cost, then I applaud them for it.

  33. One Cool Town... by Revenge_of_Solver_Ta · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    If I'm not mistaken, Madison has a pretty healthy party scene for the kiddies?

    Add wireless and the possibilities are endless. Real time advertising of the night's 'all you can drink' specials: expect to a see a entrepreneur marketing a 'live ratio' (M/F) count app of the establishments to avoid a night of Octoberfest (plenty of beer and plenty of sausage).

    This is like Strange Brew meeting Snowcrash.

  34. Re:Rah-rah Madison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My family has Charter in our house and the costs are very expensive

    It's expensive for one reason. People will pay it.

    I would love to have cable or satellite, but I'm not willing to pay for it until the price is reasonable. As long as people pay what they're paying, it's not going to change.

    Either stop complaining or stop paying.

  35. Re:What more could you want?? No Riots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a student at the UW-Madison, I have to comment:

    Most of these destructive "drunk college students" are students from neighboring states, and some aren't students at all, they just come with an attidute that wearing a mask and being away from home turf allows for drunken destruction.

    It is a very civilized place when they leave.

  36. this will be interesting by ScottSCY · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm very interested to see how this plays out and how effective it will be. I've spent a lot of time in madison (my girlfriend lives there), and it's one of the most spread out cities I've seen. They apparently have a law there (or city ordinance?) that no building can be taller than the capitol. It seems like having a city be so spread out would present some problems to deploying wifi on a large scale. Another thing is the UW campus takes up a large part of the downtown, and a large percentage of the people who hang around downtown are students. So, don't most already have wireless through the university? Is there really a need for city-wide wireless? Just a few thoughts.

    1. Re:this will be interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm fairly certain some of the buildings on the capitol square are taller than the capitol. I've never heard of said ordinance.

    2. Re:this will be interesting by ScottSCY · · Score: 1

      From http://althouse.blogspot.com/2005/03/worrying-abou t-skyline.html, the author also mentions the restriction:

      "... city and state laws that limit building height to 187.2 feet within one mile of the Capitol."

      Searching around the internet you can also find mention that a few buildings are slightly taller, but that is because they were build before the law went into effect.

  37. Mayor Dave is an Asshat. by RingDev · · Score: 1, Troll

    That's about the sum of it. If there is anyway that municipal WiFi can go bad, he will find it. This man is driving our cities bars out of business, shooting small business owners in the foot, and only increasing the likelihood of the holloween riots. In addition to numerous other incidents that he has handled in the worst possible way.

    Luckily there are a few local groups that are pushing for an impeachment. Its doubtfull that they will succed, but hopefully they'll put enough heat on the city alders that Dave's remaining time will be wasted.

    Also, the lack of diversity does not imply racism. Especially in Madison. The rest of the state refers to Madison as "A pocket of librals, surrounded by reality". I was born and raised in the Madison area, spent some time in the military, and can honestly say I don't give a crap what color you are, what god you pray too, or where you are from, if you're an asshole, your an asshole. With the exception of Texans, everyone from Texas starts with the check in the 'asshole' box ;)

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:Mayor Dave is an Asshat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awwww... Izzums mad oo can't smoke inside the city's bars anymore?

  38. People! by yamum · · Score: 1

    Just call people people. Stop this rubbish where you refer to them as their skin colour. I feel so happy that in Australia we don't refer to people as "Oh that black baseball pitcher" or "this white such and such. If someone wins a race or has a job and are citizens of Australia then they are Australian regardless if their origins are from Lebanon, China or Europe.

    The US reckons that they are culturally diverse but they all seem like a bunch of racists.

    Yes. Mod me down. Show even more of your ignorance

    1. Re:People! by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      The US reckons that they are culturally diverse but they all seem like a bunch of racists.

      I'm willing to bet that if you looked around without the rose-colored glasses you'd see a few racists within your community. The U.S. doesn't have a lock on that. There are racists in every country and culture.

    2. Re:People! by yamum · · Score: 1

      Mate. I understand there's racists found everywhere. It's just the US seems to make it so acceptable in public forums, TV, radio.

    3. Re:People! by Profane+Motherfucker · · Score: 1

      You're white. It's pretty obvious. White people have the luxury of ignoring race because they can. You'll never hear a black person say, "Oh, I just view everyone equally!" That's a white myth.

      Let's not kid around here. There's a shitload of advantages to being white. I'm a white male. I can walk into a store and not have people think I'm going to fucking rob the place just because I'm wearing a hoodie. I can stand next to a chick in a line without her thinking I'm going to rape her.

      Get with it, man. If you're white, you need to understand and acknowledge that you have certain priveledges that minorities don't. If you want to take advantage of your white priveledges, you need to know what they are. I'm not kidding here.

    4. Re:People! by notthe9 · · Score: 1

      I can't believe you would make such a negative blanket statement about every country and culture like that. You are quite possibly the biggest racist on earth.

    5. Re:People! by yamum · · Score: 1

      Dirka dirka Mohammad Jihad

    6. Re:People! by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 1

      OMG, do you live in the same Australia I live in? Australia is one of the most racist places I've ever spent time in.

  39. No, just for now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot is usually about Australia, or at least it is on weekends. Can't imagine why...

  40. Free city WiFi - 2yrs and still going, by Graemee · · Score: 1
    http://www.fred-ezone.ca/

    Fredericton, my home has been running and expanding it's free WiFi for the last few years. Cisco just did a film showcasing the work. For the record, both cable and DSL are offered by paid services in the city. AFAIK the free wifi has not affect them too much and if anything as maybe prompted them to offer much faster speeds to compete.

  41. Re:Rah-rah Madison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Madison is >86% white people."

    What's wrong with that? Somehow I doubt you'd be complaining that cities like East St. Louis or Compton aren't "diverse" enough.

  42. Re:Rah-rah Madison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    P.S. Please do not tell me how diverse the university is. Even with the university, Madison is >86% white people.

    That's a goddamn lie!

    According to the US Census, Madison is 84% White.

    Hah. That told him!

  43. Re:Rah-rah Madison by DaltonRS · · Score: 1
    "What more could you want?"

    Gee, I don't know. Ethnic diversity?

    P.S. Please do not tell me how diverse the university is. Even with the university, Madison is >86% white people.
    So what? What, if anything, does that have to do with the wi-fi rollout?
  44. Re:Rah-rah Madison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you think it's a little racist to base your opinion of a city on the skin color of its inhabitants?

  45. Re:Balkin diversity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And when a white family moved into a black part of town the neighbors said "there goes the neighborhood". Damn man, when are you going to realize that people are more naturally comfortable around their own. Diversity, simply for the sake of having it solves nothing any more than diversity advocates predisposed to the concept that all such and sundry offers some big advantage inherently. Diversity when naturally occuring can be all well and good, often it is not and you can reference New York city as a full spectrum example, however diversity should not be a goal or an anticipated solution anymore than some perceived lack of diversity being an indicator of a problem. Universal social harmony being achieved simply on the basis of homegenious dispersal of weighted racial population ratios is not likely. The opposite is and you'd be wasting time and money trying to artificially adjust the social fabric otherwise.

    That said, Madison Wisconsin has enough diversity to be socially interesting. Pretty much everybody regardless of stripe can lead the good life with the possible exception of the "drive by brothers" down in the hood. Thankfully it's a small "hood". The biggest problem Madison has is drunken college students. In the grand scheme of things that's not a problem at all. Kinda like littering except more amusing.

    All in all a pretty poor example of xenophobia. For that I might suggest a red state. Oklahoma would be a good place to start. Then work your way due east.

  46. Re:Rah-rah Madison by aywwts4 · · Score: 1

    Yes, because when your sole access point to news and information is only available through one hopelessly inept overpriced monopoly, surely its your fault for not mounting a boycott. I shouldn't be able to read this news right now, I should be protesting by not paying a company who wouldn't even notice if I wasn't a subscriber (They didn't get me hooked up for over a month and a half, so I'm going to say thats the case) Luckily I can get TV over the air and I do; But its terrible how little you have access to without the Internet.

    The problem isn't how long we keep paying, the problem is how long it will take to get an alternative. And hey, look at that, we're getting an alternative.

    Trust me, I went completely unplugged for two months, its not a protest, its sitting in the dark expecting the power companies to notice.

    Now god damn them for trying to let us get our Internet over the air as well.

    Funny charter story. While they were hooking up our modem they got a call...

    Intercom:Hey could you guys maybe come back to that house you just hooked up sometime tonight, he says he isn't getting any channels.

    Stooge #1: ah thats the guy who was on his balcony shouting at us to come back as we drove off

    Stooge #2: Just say no man.

    Stooge #1: Sorry we cant get out there tonight.

    (they then sat with us for 20 minutes watching the Sync Light blink in error while watching that 70s show over the airwaves, they left without getting our modem working, said they would get maintenance on it and no one ever showed up for a month even with calling them.)

    --
    Web Developers: Celebrate to our roots! Animated Gifs and Tiled Backgrounds, dont let our history die!
  47. What about wi-fi in rural?? by bdulac · · Score: 1

    I live in a mountainous regoin that makes it really hard to have any type of wi-fi implemented. When will there be options for the rest of us?

    --
    Peace is not the absence of trouble but the presence of God.
  48. What more... by Tom7 · · Score: 1

    Zombies and Wi-Fi. What more could you want?

    Cheese?

  49. And the WiFi Access Points be networked by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Bridges of Madison County!

    Oh boy that joke was so bad I posted as AC...

  50. reallocation by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    It's the UHF spectrum which is being reallocated, above channel 51. VHF is channels 2-13.

    A TV channel is 6MHz (not the 7MHz below). Theoretical throughput depends on the signal to noise ratio (as Nyquist says). Practical throughput also depends on additional factors like the signalling and ability to spatially share bandwidth (i.e. co-interference between users). But perhaps you could assume that if the 5MHz bandwidth of a 802.11g/a channel can do theoretically 54MBits (and actually 25MBits), then a 6MHz channel could give 65MBits (and actually 30MBits).

    Actually, it'd probably be a little different due to the difference between UHF and the microwaves used by 801.11.

    But either way, a TV channel's worth of bandwidth isn't a panacea, especially if turned over to unmanaged transmissions. I think the biggest prolbem with municipal WiFi is the inability to share bandwidth well. I mean, the guy next door to me will download movies off the internet all day, because it's free. And that means I lose out.

    Finally, I've said it before, I'll say it again. It just doesn't make sense to try this anyway before the deployment of WiMax/802.15. The backhaul costs will be very significant using wires.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:reallocation by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      I think the biggest prolbem with municipal WiFi is the inability to share bandwidth well. I mean, the guy next door to me will download movies off the internet all day, because it's free. And that means I lose out.

      Not necessarily. While there may be an aggregate bandwidth of 6 Mbps, it's pretty easy to throttle bandwidth so that each recipient gets an equal, or perhaps a maximum amount of bandwidth.

      I'd suggest breaking down muni service to two levels:

      1) Free for all, anonymous. 128 Kbps without questions, except maybe a click-thru "I agree not to do bad stuff" web page, like I've seen often in hotels.

      2) Extra speed - pay $$$. Requires a credentialled VPN, or PPPOE or similar. This is for the guy who wants to down/up load GB of stuff every day. (Like me, with 1.5 Mbps DSL, averaging about 40-50 GB of traffic per month, almost none of this is porn/mp3/warez - yes, GBYTES)

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    2. Re:reallocation by aywwts4 · · Score: 1

      Wow GBytes!?! Thats incredible... That certainly doesnt put you in the majority of slashdot users or anything. Heh, I always wanted to say this, I just checked my statistics and its true. I downloaded gigabytes before breakfast. (also not piracy and whatnot)

      --
      Web Developers: Celebrate to our roots! Animated Gifs and Tiled Backgrounds, dont let our history die!
  51. Re:Rah-rah Madison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think that is true at all. Where did you get that from? I live in madison and I will tell you it is plenty diverse. I am white personally, but there is a large population of hmong people that live just a couple blocks from me, as well a s lots of hispanic and black, both rich and poor, often living just a couple of blocks from each other. Maybe downtown is a little less, but as a whole, I would say madison is very diverse. I also went to East High school and I will tell you that that is an extremely diverse school. Any type of background is there. Rich white people, poor white people, black people, a variety of asians, all different religions and income levels. Don't try to tell me Madison isnt diverse. There's even an anual festival called "Celebrate Diversity."

  52. private fire fighting by zogger · · Score: 1

    Interesingly enough, fire protection in ye olden dayes was like that, no pay, your house burned down. It got to be a protection racket with the local fire department company/corporation/gang showing up whilst the flames were climbing and demanding an additional fee, and etc shenanigans. The public eventually squawked enough to go volunteer and muni public driven.

    With that said, today, heck ya it might work, we have a model already with private security companies and guards to do what people *think* cops are supposed to do. An all inclusive contract for security, including private fire fighting, might work. who knows, bet it would be spendy though. That equipment is not cheap, and seeing as how it is hazardous duty and requires continual training, etc, neither would the labor be all that cheap. It might theoretically help on insurance and mortgages though, so as to balance out your costs, if the private companies insisted on better than norm "building codes" and inspections for your structure in order to get their services. You could take that cert once you aquired it back to your insurance carrier and negotiate for better rates. Possible, interesting biz idea though.

    1. Re:private fire fighting by Bastian · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I'm not so sure about that. There are problems with providing public safety and health stuff through private companies. In the case of insurance companies, it's pretty obvious to anyone who is paying attention that market forces are not keeping prices down; in many segments of the insurance industry insurance prices have been going up much much faster than the bottom line.

      But that's a digression. There are plenty of reasons why privatized fire protection is a bad idea. For one, a company's primary motive is to make money, not to provide quality or cheap service - those are side effects that pop up under certain circumstances. Now, there are two ways to make a lot of money - you can increase profits by increasing revenue, or by decreasing costs.
      Increasing revenue in this situation could only come from raising prices. It would be insane to allow people to go without fire protection, as you have to keep fires from spreading from building to building. This means that the number of customers will be fixed, so there's no option to attract new customers by dropping prices or anything like that.
      Decreasing costs can come from increasing efficiency, but that can only take you so far - to get further than that, you have to start cutting services (or making previously packaged services cost extra, or something like that), or reducing the quality of existing services, stuff like that.

      Of course, the immediate response is that we can limit these things by regulating the industry. That might work in the short run, but if you look at any other industry that is dominated by local monopolies - cable TV, local phone services, electricity, etc., it's pretty obvious that all of these industries have enough lobbying power to have quite a lot of control over their own regulations. Has regulation kept the US from having internet access that is massively more expensive than parts of the world where access is provided as a public utility or by competetive markets? Nope. They often get massively more bandwidth, too. Or take a look at California's energy crisis from a few years back.

      Now, I've been talking about this as if there aren't any market forces affecting this theoretical fire protection company. The reason is that there would be no market forces affecting the fire protection company. We've already established that everyone would have to buy their product. It's also true that this company would have no competitors. It wouldn't make sense to have every other house on a block be protected by a different company; that situation is what led us to making fire protection a public service in the first place. So you'd have to have local monopolies. At that point, the fire company you use is based on your street address, meaning that even if there is more than one company in town, they aren't in direct competition with each other, and since they have absolutely no reason to worry about some new start-up trying to take over their business, they have plenty of reason to set up a cartel so that they don't have to worry about competing with each other at all. Bingo, market failure.

      So yeah, in short, the problem with a lot of privatization strategies is that the market doesn't work when there is no market.

    2. Re:private fire fighting by zogger · · Score: 1

      You don't necessarily have to have either/or, you could theoretically have both, just like my analogy, you got cops, then a plethora of private security firms and services.

      Another model would put it out for competition, municipally paid for, but based on criteria and price. In addition, many areas have gone to private water provision and sewer from bids, rather than have government run it directly now.

      In other situations, it might even be preferable to having it mostly private, but universally accessible, say in areas that are forced to rely 100% on volunteer fire departments. If there was at a minimum a small core of fully funded firefighters available, then the augmentation by the volunteers would just add additional backup, and the residents would know that they would be guaranteed a higher level of potential service.

      This is all theoretical, but I still think it's possible, What is political reality though, is governments first and overwhelmingly primary job is perpetuation of itself, witness Katrina and the fight over "who's in charge" being more important than anything else as a recent blatant glaring example. Any "services" governments in general provide are secondary and tertiary concerns. That is a very generalized statement, but is mostly true as well. Certain situations definetly seem better with governmental intervention and lead, others do not, and some like this situation *could* be approached with a blend.

    3. Re:private fire fighting by Bastian · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I'll certainly agree that the driving force behind most government agencies is people wanting to defend their territory. I have some experience working with government beauraucracies, and it's worse than a lot of people even realize.

      But I don't think it's a natural feature of government; mostly it seems like a by-product of the spoils system. The head of any agency ends up being appointed by whoever just run the election. The previous head gets fired, and the choice of who replaces him/her has as much to do with mutual backscratching as it does anything else - meaning that promotion from within is out of the question. To the guys at the top tier are given absolutely no incentive to excel. Instead, they have absolutely every reason to do as little as possible. You often don't have any more than four years between boss changes.

      Long-term projects are out of the question; within four years some new yahoo who doesn't know sticks from flowers about what's going on is going to come in and twiddle them beyond recognition. Shorter-term projects are a bad idea, too, because making changes involves taking risks. You may not have a prayer of getting promoted based on merit, but you sure as hell can get fired for one screw-up, even if that was your first mistake in an otherwise stellar career.

      Anyway, I've babbled enough, so suffice it to say I think that though this effect is most obvious at the top tiers, it does trickle down through the entire beauraucracy. All because of the spoils system.

      There are some jobs that just should not be on a 4-year cycle.

    4. Re:private fire fighting by Golias · · Score: 1

      In the case of insurance companies, it's pretty obvious to anyone who is paying attention that market forces are not keeping prices down; in many segments of the insurance industry insurance prices have been going up much much faster than the bottom line.

      Out of curiosity, when have market forces ever applied to insurance companies?

      My auto liability insurance is mandated by the state. My health insurance is collectively purchased by my company (because the state offers tax incentives to company plans they don't offer to private buyers.) Most people use the home-owner insurance offered by their mortgage lender.

      I can't remember the last time I even heard of anybody I know shopping around for insurance. The tax code guides all our biggest insurance decisions. The poor in my state don't even bother with health insurance, because they qualify for government-sponsored coverage.

      I can't think of an industry which is less exposed to market forces than insurance.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  53. Charter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those ass-fucks at the Charter can go fuck the corporate teat some more. I know they won't like this. Suck it, Charter, suck it. Fascist pieces of fuck. Or, fucks. It's your choice, Charter whores-employees.

  54. Mayor Dave = Fascist by pbr7379 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    WiFi, smifi! This Mayor and City Council are destroying a once interesting city by making it an elitist mecca. This myth about Madison being liberal is about as far fetched as a free hot lunch. TANSTAAFL! All the liberals sold their homes and moved out of town because they couldn't afford the proerty taxes anymore.

    Look for the new signs that should be going up soon when you come into Madison, they will read "Welcome to Boulder Colorado".

    pbr7379 - Once proud lifelong resident of Madison. But one day it will be mine again! Free Madison!

  55. Re:Rah-rah Madison by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1
    Even with the university, Madison is >86% white people.
    And this is a problem exactly why?
  56. same company working on madison and google wifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Did anyone notice that wireless facilities is working on both the madison and google projects for city wide wifi? Guess that they must be big players inthis.l

  57. Re:Maybe by symbolic · · Score: 1


    You never know...is there any privacy policy associated with this network? I'd be worried about invasive spying by various agencies...to track dissi^Wterrorists, of course.

  58. Re:Rah-rah Madison by FireBreathingDog · · Score: 1
    Too many white people for ya? Want to get rid of some of them, do ya?

    the folks who worry the most about enforcing diversity of appearance are often the ones who strive the hardest to enforce uniformity of thought...which is exactly what you'd expect in a university town

  59. Interference by Councilor+Hart · · Score: 1

    Do these kind of wireless tech cause a lot of interference for HAM's or scientific frequencies?

  60. Authentication and encryption? by cyberbrown · · Score: 1

    What kind of authentication and encryption protocol will they use? IEEE 802.1x? PPPoE? (Just WEP? :P)

  61. Re:Rah-rah Madison by admdrew · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...and the folks who worry the most about opposing ethnic diversity are often the ones who strive the hardest to spin the words of those they think they disagree with.

    Reread the words you originally commented on: I care far less that there is little diversity here than I do that university and city officials pretend there is diversity where there is not.

    If you want uniformity of thought, visit the hard-line conservatives that make up the majority of the rural and small town areas outside of Madison (and exist throughout most of the 'small town midwest'). Representatives from those areas are (and always have been) strongly bothered by the notion that a fairly progressive city (Madison) and county (Dane) exist right in the middle of them.

    This cultural clash between the rural conservatives and the 'urban' (heh, as urban as Madison can be...) liberals is also one of the main reasons why this area is so minority unfriendly. Conservatives hoping to keep minorities out and liberals urging the importance of bringing minorities in debases the fact that we're all human, and ideally should be treated as such.

    [/rant]

  62. More Girls by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1
    I love my town. Zombies and Wi-Fi. What more could you want?

    A drum and bugle corp with girls
    http://madisonscouts.org/main.asp?corps=madisonsco uts
    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  63. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  64. This is not the Municipal WiFi you're looking for. by Beer+Moon · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This is not the municipal WiFi a lot of people seem to think it is.

    There is no free service for anyone.

    Two companies are paying the local power utility Madison Gas & Electric (MG&E) to place the antennae on street lights. At first, it will just cover the downtown area and expand later.

    There is no free service. Pricing is still unknown, but it is supposedly going to be competitive with local DSL and Cable services. In other words: Expensive.

    Visiting business people will not be able to simply sit in a cafe and hook up. Low income Madison residents will not get access.

    This is not a public service. Nobody put up a fuss when Charter started offering Municipal Broadband over cable or local phone companies started offering Municipal Broadband over phone wires, so I don't get why this is such a big deal. This is not a municipal program, it's a commercial endeavor and we're handing over our city to these two companies so they can charge us for WiFi. Won't COST us anything? They SHOULD BE PAYING US!!!!! We should force them to offer a free service to our low income residents to help get them better access to job opportunities.

    I fail to see what's revolutionary about it. One can only HOPE it helps to bring down the ridiculously high broadband prices, but I doubt it.

  65. Got any more idea seeds, Ben? by AnonymousMous · · Score: 1

    Lots of fallow brains out there, Ben. Lay one on us!

  66. Not for residents, WiFi attracts hi-tech business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't about the residents. Madison has a growing hi-tech economy and Mayer Dave wants to keep it growing. Madison has many reasons why a business would want to choose it as a place to start up.

    Picture yourself as a hi-tech businessperson considering which city to locate. What is the first thing you look for when you open your laptop when you sit down on a park bench or in a restaurant?

    Madison has an advantage because it has a smaller area to cover than the larger metropolitans.

  67. Re:Rah-rah Madison by FireBreathingDog · · Score: 1

    So what you're saying is effectively, conservatives are racist. Thanks for helping prove my point. You "open-minded" liberals can't even accept the possibility that people who disagree with you are evil people. You can't imagine that people with good intentions would somehow come to a different worldview than yours. You define yourself as "progressive", because progress is good, right? Therefore, anyone who isn't "progressive" is somehow opposed to progress, a racist, etc. Funny that open-minded folks like you are some of the most closed-minded people in the world.

  68. The good thing about Madison winters is... by dexter+riley · · Score: 1

    ...at least it makes the zombies sluggish.