Slashdot Mirror


Snooping Through Walls with Microwaves

denis-The-menace writes "According to an article from newscientist, scientists have devised a system to use microwave energy for surveillance. If people are speaking inside the room, any flimsy surface, such as clothing, will be vibrating. This modulates the radio beam reflected from the surface. Although the radio reflection that passes back through the wall is extremely faint, the kind of electronic extraction and signal cleaning tricks used by NASA to decode signals in space can be used to extract speech. Although, I doubt it would work in this room"

59 of 217 comments (clear)

  1. 1st sign the feds are onto you... by titla1k · · Score: 5, Funny

    is there's a van sitting outside your house, with a whole lot of kitchen appliances pointing at it.

    1. Re:1st sign the feds are onto you... by pilybaby · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...owned by the company

      Flowers
      By
      Irene

    2. Re:1st sign the feds are onto you... by moviepig.com · · Score: 4, Funny
      If people are speaking [then] clothing... will be vibrating.

      So the hell with eyes... it's actually possible to undress her with your diction...

      --
      Seeing bad movies only encourages them. Watch responsibly
  2. Invest in AA by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think I'm going to buy stock in Alcoa Operations...with shenanigans like this going on, they can only increase in value.

    In the meantime, here's some telltale signs you might be under microwave surveillance:
    • You feel slightly warmer than is normal.
    • Your food seems to be cooking itself.
    • Metal objects in your house give off sparks for no good reason.
    • Your coffee remins hot for a very long time.
    • Your beer remains cold for a very short time.
    • All your CDs are covered with tiny cracks and will no longer play.
    • Your house pets smell delicious.

    Watch for these signs and protect your privacy...cause the government certainly isn't going to.
    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Invest in AA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Aside from the fact that farmers and subsidies have all but shut down Alcoa in the US, Aluminum is a poor choice, and hence wouldn't be used. Lead. That would be the metal of choice. It has properties which make it excellent at sound proofing. Vibrating aluminum would modulate their signal quite nicely.

    2. Re:Invest in AA by MacGod · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On the plus side, it should automagically explode all the super-evil RFID tracking tags in your razors and potato chip bags and whatnot. It's nice to trade one form of surveillance for another, and this sure would be faster than putting each individual item in the microwave oven one at a time!

      --
      "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
    3. Re:Invest in AA by mikiN · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is no such thing as the English language. There are, however, at least two widely spoken dialects, both of which use different spellings for the word aluminium.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    4. Re:Invest in AA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The element was discovered by an American who named it Aluminum. The British rejected this and gave it the name Aluminium for their usage (so it would end in "ium" just like HeliUM, LithIUM, BerrylIUM, etc). Aluminum is the standard American spelling. Aluminium is the standard spelling in British Commonwealth countries. While I appreciate the British desire for consistency, the Americans can legitimately argue that the person who discovered it should be able to name it whatever they bloody well want.

      I say this as an Australian.

    5. Re:Invest in AA by mikiN · · Score: 2, Insightful
      In the meantime, here's some telltale signs you might be under microwave surveillance:

      Add to this
      • Your WiFi connection becomes erratic, to the point of being unusable
      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    6. Re:Invest in AA by goosman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On the contrary lead is excellent at sound proofing. Studios are sometimes built with lead sheathing in the walls. 1/64th sheets are common. Google "lead soundproofing" and you'll get a bunch of info.

  3. Just Friggin' Great by SecureTheNet · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now, when the NSA spies on me, my wi-fi network will be unable to work due to interference!

    --
    SecureThe.Net - Practical Resources for Securing Systems
  4. oh no by NoGuffCheck · · Score: 5, Funny

    luckily my parents basement has thick walls.

    --
    serenity now!
  5. Makes little difference by polysylabic+psudonym · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How many criminals protect against laser audio surveillance, where a laser beam is bounced off a window or other rigid surface, and the sound from the room vibrates the surface, wobbling the beam, the wobble being translated into audio by the snooper.

    The laser can be defeated by double glazing (I think), devices to vibrate windows and laser detectors (to tell you if you're being listened to).

    A microwave device can be defeated by the good old tinfoil hat - by which I mean wallpapering in foil or otherwise turning the room into a faraday cage.

    1. Re:Makes little difference by cheekyboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If the crims are making 100's of millions, spending 0.01% of counter measures is INSURANCE

      hence, the drug lords of south america spend tonnes of tonnes of cash on goodies.

      The best crims are never found out hence, their success and covertness.

      a) buy gold
      b) hide in 50% legit 5% return businesses
      c) learn sign language
      d) study tonnes of tonnes of history of cold ware espianage
      e) never ever talk , paint a false picture to everyone including your wife/kids
      f) cover tracks and never park anywhere, unless you own the govt, or they owe you billions.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    2. Re:Makes little difference by Jetboy01 · · Score: 4, Funny

      With all these new snooping devices being invented, I think it's time someone devised the 'tinfoil flat'.

    3. Re:Makes little difference by jolyonr · · Score: 4, Funny

      Therefore anyone listening to rap music must be a criminal!

      Arrest them straight away!

      Jolyon

      --


      Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    4. Re:Makes little difference by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Funny

      The best crims are never found out hence, their success and covertness.

      a) buy gold
      [..]
      e) never ever talk , paint a false picture to everyone including your wife/kids

      Doesn't that include not discussing it on Slashdot either? Plus, you forgot...

      (g) Don't give away all your secrets.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    5. Re:Makes little difference by Talas213 · · Score: 5, Funny

      A microwave device can be defeated by the good old tinfoil hat - by which I mean wallpapering in foil or otherwise turning the room into a faraday cage.

      I'd suggest lining the walls with bags of popcorn. That way you'll know when you're under survellance and have a nice snack readily available.

    6. Re:Makes little difference by iphayd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The best criminals get their friends elected President. That way they don't have to acquire money through "illegal" means, they just get it allocated from the government.

  6. In analogue phone days by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some associates were spied on by the telephone.

    Just because the receiver was on the cradle didn't mean that the microphone wasn't active.

    The cops played stuff back in interviews/court that was off topic but was the occupants bitching about each other to try and divide and conquer them.

    This was in Leeds, UK.

    I can't remember many more details or find a link. I didn't know them at the time and only heard about it later as a warning.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:In analogue phone days by ettlz · · Score: 2, Informative

      I didn't think that sort of evidence was admissible in a UK court.

    2. Re:In analogue phone days by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Interesting

      MI5 developed this in the 1950s, and called it Special Facilities. All it required at the start was a modification to the phone - a single washer, and the phone could be used as a surveillence device. Later versions enabled activation using high frequency radio waves to activate the telephones microphone and required no modification to the phone itself.

      Survellience was also carried out against embassy cypher machines using unshielded telephone cables picking up eletromagnetic emissions from the cypher machines, in many cases enabling the reading of both the en clair message and the cypher material.

      None of this was admissable in a UK court. Phone tap evidence still isnt.

    3. Re:In analogue phone days by IIH · · Score: 4, Funny
      I didn't think that sort of evidence was admissible in a UK court.

      Evidence?? Court?? You are running an old version of UK, please upgrade where these bugs have been removed in an effort to improve security.

      --
      Exigo spamos et dona ferentes
  7. Not new tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't think this a new technology. I think that this is just a new take on a technology that Léon Theremin (inventor of the Theremin instrument) was working on for the KGB in the 50-60s. He was using infrared bounced off of windows to detect conversations inside (or something). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Léon_Theremin

    1. Re:Not new tech by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unfortunetely, he never did get all the bugs out of his device. People always knew they were being listened to when the creepy music started. "Quiet, it's the KGB .. or the Krell."

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  8. Fluff piece by gtoomey · · Score: 4, Informative
    This "story" is just a reference to a patent application.

    Even at 100GHz, the wavelength of microwaves is 3 mm. But sound waves inside a room would cause a surface to vibrate perhaps 0.001 mm. You cant modulate a 3mm wave to record 0.001 mm changes.

    1. Re:Fluff piece by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 4, Interesting
      >"You cant modulate a 3mm wave to record 0.001 mm changes." You're partially correct. It would be difficult to detect the modulations, EXCEPT that if you're also the sender of the original signal, you can mix the incoming and outgoing signals and extract the phase difference. Subtraction is a VERY powerful signal-extraction method!

      There's an anecdote in the engineering field: where some poor sods at Racal-Dana had a phase detector at 50MHz that was so sensitive to vibration they had to stop their experiments whenever a plane took off from Orange County Airport (quite a few miles away). They eventually had to get special thick aluminum wall castings to enclose the phase detector to block the vibrations. And this was at just 50MHz. Phase detectors get more sensitive proportional to operating frequency, so a 5,000 MHz phase detector is *mighty* sensitive!

    2. Re:Fluff piece by pz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even at 100GHz, the wavelength of microwaves is 3 mm. But sound waves inside a room would cause a surface to vibrate perhaps 0.001 mm. You cant modulate a 3mm wave to record 0.001 mm changes.

      Interference detectors, more commonly known as interferometers, can detect distances far below the wavelength used to make the measurements. For example, 800 nm infrared laser light can readily be used to resolve 5 nm differences (I've worked on the development of such a system). Further, the distances being considered for measuring the movement of things like clothing or the throat and chest of the speaker are far above one micron (0.001 mm): put your finger on your throat and speak; think that's one micron you're feeling?

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  9. It was news... 45 years ago. by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Soviet KGB have been doing exactly this since before 1960. Windowpanes make good microwave reflectors. All it takes is a simple microwave source and mixer. Nothing new to see here.

    1. Re:It was news... 45 years ago. by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Uh, not quite. For many reasons.
      • There were no "lasers" in 1960. At least not the very stable continuous-wave lasers that you need for this, and especially not in the USSR.
      • Think-- do lasers go through glass? Do lasers bounce off glass? Might other wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation act similarly?
      • Microwaves bounce off most anything, if you pick the right angle. Conveniently, most buildings have the windows recessed a bit, and any concave corner makes an EXCELLENT "corner reflector", which has the amazing property of bouncing any incident beam right back to the sender.
      Not only did they bounce microwaves off glass-- they had the hutzpah to give the US ambassador a honorary plaque, which he hung on his office wall. Unbeknownst to us, there was a little diaphragm inside the plaque, just the right wavelength to reflect K-band microwavesm, which vibrated very nicely to every word spoken in his office. Look it up.
    2. Re:It was news... 45 years ago. by Technician · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not only did they bounce microwaves off glass-- they had the hutzpah to give the US ambassador a honorary plaque, which he hung on his office wall. Unbeknownst to us, there was a little diaphragm inside the plaque, just the right wavelength to reflect K-band microwavesm, which vibrated very nicely to every word spoken in his office. Look it up.

      I looked it up. 330 MHZ is not K-Band microwaves. It's UHF. HF is from 3-30Mhz VHF is from 30-300...

      The bugged seal had a resonant quarterwave antenna tuned to 330 MHZ. This used 1946 technology, not K band microwaves. K band is near 20 GHZ. There wasn't much in the 1 GHZ and up band then. Vacuum tubes just didn't work that high.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  10. How long? by xor.pt · · Score: 3, Funny

    How long till they incorporate this feature into an iPod?

  11. Food fun by Snamh+Da+Ean · · Score: 4, Funny

    Man, I knew that burrito I put in the microwave last night when I came home from a party was speaking to me...

  12. This isnt new by MrEcho.net · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This tech has been around for a very long time, just not in the public sector.

    If you look at any high security building(NSA, etc) they will have multi layers on the outside and inside of the buildings.

    Not only is it physical security, but sound and wireless security.

  13. foil vibrates too by dwater · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wouldn't the sound in the room vibrate the foil on the wall? Said foil would reflect microwaves very nicely, I suspect...

    --
    Max.
    1. Re:foil vibrates too by polysylabic+psudonym · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're right. The foil will have to be glued to the wall sheeting, egg cartons to the foil, another layer of foil over the egg cartons.

      Let 'em try then!

  14. Microwave Eavesdropping by hardburlyboogerman · · Score: 2, Funny

    My preference to microwaves transmitted in order to invade my privacy is to send hot lead back,at high speed

    --
    Geek Hillbilly
  15. Very dangerous!!! by elgatozorbas · · Score: 3, Informative

    The summary mentioned microwave ovens, so some may be tempted to play around with a DIY radar. Don't!!! Of all domectic appliances a microwave is about the most dangerous to take apart. The RF radiation has a very high power and is invisible. When exposed to the electromagnetic field, currents start to flow inside the human body (mostly close to the skin) giving rise to burn-like wounds. Especially the risk of eye injury is significant. Don't try this at home.

  16. I can see the RIAA using it!! by AnonymousYellowBelly · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, they listen to the music playing inside your house. Say you are hearing the latest hit from Britney Spears but the RIAA has no record of you buying it, well they turn the 'volume' to 11 on their microwave emitter and fry your balls, burn your house and kill your dog. Justice has been served, right?

    --
    Disclosure: I'm stupid
  17. Tinfoil hats by Jerom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Funny thing is, with this kind of device tinfoil hats will actually improve "the black suits" reception, since tinfoil easily vibrates and reflects radiowaves really well.

    *Sigh* what now?

    J.

  18. Foil Room fallacy by obfuscated · · Score: 3, Informative

    The "Foil Room" won't help against snooping as you'd like to believe. (Prepare to ditch all your foil hats!!).

    To truly block signals, you'd need to build a actual Faraday "cage" built with the smallest possible 'holes' so the waves created inside (be it voice, the sound of you typing or even waves emitted by the blinking LED from your Ethernet card) will be cancelled out. This is the same technology that the intelligence agencies employ against counter intelligence. That with foil (which is properly grounded) will work.

    Solid surfaces such as foil can actually act as large AMPLIFIERS if implemented incorrectly since the waves will

    Note that your microwave is surrounded by a Faraday cage to protect you from the rays; not foil.

    A quick Google to back up my post yielded this page discussing similar topics.

    --

    -- dK ... Narf Poit!
  19. Re:Coral Cache sucks by bellers · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While annoying to a small number of people who can't connect to them, the coralcache links are vastly better than the alternative of slashdotting a site that cannot handle the load of a million nerds with refresh buttons.

    When that happens, NO ONE can get to the page, not just those with lame firewalls.

    [ObNerd]
    The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.

    --
    This space for rent.
  20. Not quite microwave by Ge10 · · Score: 4, Informative

    This has been around for a long time. In the book "Spycatcher" by ex-MI5 agent Peter Wright, he describes a bug used by the KGB to spy on the American ambassador in Hawaii (I think). There was a metal membrane hidden inside a wooden carving, which would passively vibrate with sounds in the room. A strong RF beam of around 900 MHz (details are hazy again, and it's not quite microwave) was directed towards the office from a fair distance away, then the signal would be minutely modulated and reflected by the metal membrane. It was able to work for several years, and this was in the 1960's. You can only guess what's available now.

  21. Electronic signal cleaning technhiques by kilodelta · · Score: 2, Informative

    I guarantee they're using a MASER. You can thank RADAR pioneers from M.I.T. and Bell Labs for that.

    That being said it is easily defeated. For example - short wavelengths below 1cm start resonating with water vapor. That's why doppler radar has been such a boon to meteorology.

    But there are ways to stop it. Metal impregnated and grounded cement walls that are, oh, 6 to 8 feet below grade level would be reasonably safe. Of course don't put any windows, just ventilation.

    And if you're really that much of a target they'd bug the place before they resorted to using microwave to listen in. BTW, for a good fantasy view of using microwave to peek in I highly recommend watching "The Siege" with Denzel Washinton and Tony Shaloub.

  22. OT: Einstein quotes... by stupid_is · · Score: 2, Informative
    Google it and there's lots of site who're convinced he did. Granted that some of the origins seem to stem from an unsubstantiated chain mail, but he did seem to come up with all sorts of soundbyte gems.

    Here is one such site.

    --
    -- Intelligence is soluble in alcohol
  23. Maybe I am missing something... by data64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    but wouldn't the simple precaution of turning up the radio/TV defeat this ? Humans can pickout certain noise and filter out everything else quite easily. How does tinfoil and other "vibrating surfaces" fare in this regards ?

  24. Re:Tinfoil hats out, team! by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Tinfoil is an excellent reflector. Therefore I'm sure tinfoil hats will actually help the snooper by creating much better signals.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  25. old hat by fliptout · · Score: 2, Informative

    The president at one of my former companies was a colonel in the Army Security Agency. He used to tell me all sorts of things, including how the Russians bombarded the US embassy with radiation to get signature signals back. And this was in the 60s or before. The surveillance technology available to intelligence now must be quite interesting.

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
  26. Perverting Technology by rhkaloge · · Score: 2, Informative

    I actually know researchers who have been working with what they call "wall penatrating RADAR" and it sounds a lot like this - it more detects movement and sound then being able to image what is in a room. The big things they claim it would be good for is detecting fires from a distance, finding people trapped in places (it can detect a heartbeat) and, yes, seeing that sniper around the corner. I don't think they considered audio survallence, or at least they never told us about it. But I suppose once you have a patent, you can use the tech for any purpose, noble or sinister.

  27. Microwave Impulse Radar / Ultra Wideband Radar by jhhl · · Score: 3, Informative
    You are (are you?) probably talking about Microwave Impulse Radar, the miracle technology that was supposed to change our lives years ago. It's tiny bursts of microwave radar, able to be transmitted/received at short ranges at tiny power levels by an on-chip transmitter.
    Here's a typical article about MIR. Last I read, there were legal battles about shoddy treatment of potential vendors by the LLNL. Slashdot readers would probably do well to track this technology!

    A taste of this from http://www.eurekalert.org/features/doe/2004-09/dln l-etu091604.php

    UWB's data capacity, speed, low power requirements, and resistance to interference have attracted the attention of major electronic corporations who recognize the technology's commercial potential. Because UWB can penetrate walls, it could become the center of all communications within homes and small offices. UWB signals could carry voice, data, and video. Products could speed downloading images from a digital camera to a computer, connecting printers to computers, and routing high-definition signals to televisions. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) currently restricts commercial UWB applications to between 3.1 and 10.6 gigahertz because of a concern they could interfere with existing transmissions, especially flight radios, beacons, and the Global Positioning System. FCC rules also limit UWB commercial devices to less than 1 watt, which prevents them from working beyond a relatively short distance (about 10 meters).

    Using an experimental license, Livermore has developed numerous UWB systems in frequency bands ranging from 200 megahertz to 100 gigahertz. Tests at Livermore have shown that the devices do not cause undue interference with other electronic devices operating in this broad frequency range. Livermore efforts are directed at developing UWB devices for the government that operate both above and below the 3.1- to 10.6-gigahertz band designated for commercial devices.
    --
    -- Real Stupidity is the Artificial Intelligence of the 21st century
  28. Old news by Technician · · Score: 3, Informative

    A wodden copy of the Great Seal of the United States was bugged. Part of the seal was used as a diaphram and was used as a passive resonant reflector. This would pass most bug sweeps as the device was not active, but passive. When painted with a 330 Mhz signal, it would modulate it.

    The only update in the article is now they use microwaves and common materials already in a room.

    Details here;
    http://www.spybusters.com/Great_Seal_Bug.html

    This bug is was delivered in 1946 and discovered in 1952.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  29. Tin Foil Hat Designs by Mr_Perl · · Score: 2, Informative

    Greetings, You may feel free to borrow my design:

    --

    My poetry site welcomes the unusual.
  30. OLD NEWS:This has been in active use since the 50s by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The first sign the Fed's are listening to you is when they give you a nice small bust of lenin for your mantle peice. That's exactly what the British did to the russian ambassador back in the post world-war two era. They gave him a a gift of a small statue and inside it they had mounted a corner cube which is a passive device that enhances the retro-reflection of microwaves beamed at it. (read about it is Peter Wright's (banned in UK) book Spycatcher--wright was the science officer for MI5 and inventor of the technique)

    The second sign is when you feel toasty warm and the chair feels cold. In the 70's and 80's the carter and reagan administrations were perpetually complaining that the level of microwave energy measured inside the US embassy exceeded the OSHA limits for exposure. Eventually the US built a new embassy with enhanced shielding. UNfortunately the Soviet's put listening devices into the bricks. The embassy had to be knocked down and rebuilt. Of course, peter wright did exactly the same thing to the Soviet embassy in canada. Each night he snuck into the construction site and pulled wires up the inside of the walls to his microphones in specially made window sills. The soviet's learned about it from a mole in MI5 and had to build a second interior wall so that no rooms were near the windows.

    Doppler microwave spying is quite old. As is laser vibrometry on windows.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  31. In the dot-matrix printer days by zardo · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It used to be that the old dot matrix printers used to require heavy shielding, because the solenoids inside the printer head would generate a certain radio "sound" for each letter. A van could sit outside an embassy, focus in on the location of a printer, and reproduce a duplicate.

    The United States used this against the soviets for quite a while.

  32. Used Here by waldoj · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here in Charlottesville, home of the National Ground Intelligence Center (you might know them for a little kerfuffle involving their providing bad intelligence about nuclear weapons to some president...something about a war?), they've long had a thick wire mesh covering all of their windows. A former employee told me, when I was a kid, that it was designed to reflect microwaves for this very reason.

    -Waldo Jaquith

  33. maybe this is the only option... by doyoudig · · Score: 2, Funny
  34. Doing this with my research project... by qwertykid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm actually making devices to do this as part of an undergraduate research project. The devices I'm making are passive with frequency response up to the 100 GHz range. The best part these is that they don't require any DC bias and as such aren't subject to 1/f noise like schottky diodes. Right now we're looking at applications for security (really advanced metal/explosives detector) and aviation (water vapor is transparent in that frequency range).

  35. Re:OLD NEWS:This has been in active use since the by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This stuff has been happening since the fifties. Nothing new here.

    The russians did that to the US, too. With a nice giant carving of the Great Seal - with a device behind a small hole beneath the beak.

    Consisted of a cavity resonator about the size of a stack of 10 or so dimes, with a tuning post up the middle, a diaphragm for one end (to detune it according to air pressure) and a wire antenna maybe a foot long coupled into the cavity. Excite it with a microwave signal near but not dead-on the resonance and the reflection is amplitude modulated by the sound from the room.

    Better yet: Put a diode in a movable surface. Excite it and it returns harmonics (easy to sort out from other reflections because they're on a different frequency), phase-modulated by doppler shift from the object's motion (like its variant FM, PM is very noise-resistant).

    Russian laborers constructed an embassy where the walls were FULL of thousands of diodes - embedded in the construction material. US had to abandon the building and build one of their own. News items suggested the diodes were to make it hard to sniff for bugs. But IMHO they were the bugs themselves, using the harmonic-generation/doppler/PM trick.

    Like the posting in the root article, this makes every surface a bug. You have to get diodes into them, but the return is cleaner and stronger than echoes from a passive reflector.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  36. Re:OLD NEWS:This has been in active use since the by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Informative

    Consisted of a cavity resonator ...

    Oh, yes. They also did one on that pattern that was disguised as an olive-on-a-toothpick, to put in a martini glass and carry around or leave sitting about at embassy parties.

    And the diode trick also turns anything with a diode in it into a bug.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way