Slashdot Mirror


Xbox 360 'Must Sell Out' on Release Day

tlhIngan writes "According to a Norwegian retailer (as reported by Gizmodo), Microsoft's making some peculiar demands during the XBox 360 launch. In particular, each retailer is to get 20 XBox 360 consoles (6 core editions, and 14 premium editions). However, to get the full allocation, they have to ensure they will sell out on the day of release (December 2nd over there)! Plus, each console must leave the store with at *least* two games each. Is Microsoft marketing like the beanie babies again - using 'Sold Out!' as a way to hype the popularity of their machine? It may appear to be, since Microsoft recently slowed down production of the XBox 360 as well."

132 comments

  1. If they really wanted to sell out... by djflipstarx · · Score: 1

    Then shouldn't they give a lower amount of X-Boxes to the stores? Like, maybe 15 or 10?

    Either way, this is pretty dumb of Microsoft, but I suppose it could work for people who haven't read this article. After all, generally, sold out = damn good/necessary/useful, right?

    Oh Microsoft, you clever bastards.

    --
    Y helo thar
    1. Re:If they really wanted to sell out... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I don't get how they want to enforce that, either. I mean, you get something under the condition that a FUTURE event happens? WTF?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    2. Re:If they really wanted to sell out... by tepples · · Score: 1

      I mean, you get something under the condition that a FUTURE event happens?

      That is, you get something under the condition that you make sure that such an event happens. The penalties for not selling out are probably spelled out in the contract, which remains confidential.

    3. Re:If they really wanted to sell out... by radicalgrande · · Score: 1

      I really don't see why it's limited to twenty systems per store. At the gamestop that I work at we easily have more than twenty reserves for the premium pack for people that were "guarenteed" to be on first shipment. My store isn't nearly the busiest store, either, there's plenty of stores that likely have considerably more of the first shipment reserves on hand.

    4. Re:If they really wanted to sell out... by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

      The story (or at least the preview...damned if I'm gonna actually RTFA) mentioned that it was in Norway.

      I would guess that the demand for an Xbox 360 is lower in Norway than it is in a place where they spell Gamestop without umlats.

      --
      No reason to lie.
  2. That's so frustrating! by Spaceman+Spiff+II · · Score: 2, Interesting
    As an avid gamer I eagerly await each new console's release. I remember how frustrating it was back when the PS2 launched, and darn near impossible to get one on opening day, but it sure looks like that's what's happening here. With Walmart and Target getting between 20-60, I believe, and shortages all over the place, it looks like only a few lucky gamers will get one. Maybe if they cooled it on all the "Win an Xbox 360" things they have going on, more people who really want one can get one on launch day.

    Oh well, I feel for people who want one on launch day, but for the first time ever I think I won't be one. I'm probably gonna hold off until Halo 3 to pick up my 360.

    And of course, I'm getting a Revolution the day it comes out, if I'm here in the States. :-D

    --
    I understand that life's not fair, just why is it never unfair in my favor?
    1. Re:That's so frustrating! by BRock97 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's funny, as a guy who has owned and played nearly everything from the Atari 2600 through the Gamecube, I can't help but comment on how underwhelmed I am with this launch. To be honest, there isn't one title that is compelling me to go out and get the 360, which is somewhat surprising. PS2 had Tekken 4, Gamecube had Star Wars, and the XBox had Halo (all fantastic games and worth the price of admission), but nothing is trippin' the old game thumbs this time around.
       
      To be honest, I wish Microsoft would have gulped down a ittle pride and pushed the release back six months. All the press is pointing to the PS3 not being a threat until later in 2006 so Microsoft would still have had that window to establish a strong first response. I would get excited about some of the other features such as the online stuff for FPS and the integrated Media Center functionality, but my mouse and keyboard are too cherished (hear that Microsoft! Let us use our mouse and keyboards and you would have me at "hello") and from what I have read, the Media Center functionality is limited to 720P playback for HDTV content from the media center PC. (Note: I said HDTV playback, not games. I am aware that the 360 can do games up to 1080i, but I would want my video there, too. Plus, they aren't even going to upscale DVDs!)
       
      So, I too will probably wait from something really high-profile like Halo3 to come out. As much as I wanted to get to my local Best Buy at 5 A.M., I think I will pass this round.....

      --

      Bryan R.
      The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, or $12.50 as seen on eBay.....
    2. Re:That's so frustrating! by interiot · · Score: 1
      But there are some consumers who want to get the console ASAP. If the hardware is release-quality, what's the problem if Microsoft releases it on Nov 22? As others noted, more choice is always good for consumer. (on the other hand, if launch games aren't release quality, then they should push back the dates for the individual games)
      Plus, they aren't even going to upscale DVDs!
      If you have a decent scaler in your TV, you don't need it.

      Also, the PS3's Cell processor looks like it might have enough horsepower to be a decent deinterlacer/scaler, so hopefully that'll be a good option for that.

    3. Re:That's so frustrating! by BRock97 · · Score: 1

      "If you have a decent scaler in your TV, you don't need it."

      I guess if you aren't serious about the picture quality, then yeah, I could agree. The problem is that on a 65" screen, I can tell a huge difference. Take a 480p player and have the resolution blown up to a TVs native resolution by the set itself versus running an HTPC at the screen's native resolution with an application like TheaterTek upconverting for you. Night and day. I have not seen a set yet that handles this as well (I have taken a look at the Diamond series from Mitsubishi and the Bravia line from Sony).

      --

      Bryan R.
      The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, or $12.50 as seen on eBay.....
    4. Re:That's so frustrating! by interiot · · Score: 1
      Define "serious". :)

      Don't you have problems with SD OTA/television/cable content on a 65" TV too? If so, isn't it better to have a proper scaler either in your TV, or as an external box right before your TV? (FWIW, that price is better than what was previously available at the top-end)

    5. Re:That's so frustrating! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      PS2 had Tekken 4

      PS2 didn't have Tekken 4 at launch. Nowhere near it.
    6. Re:That's so frustrating! by BRock97 · · Score: 1

      Sure, SD cable is horrible. SD off the air is far better. Both are only 480i, though, and will pale when compared to a true 480p DVD (plus DVDs have been greatly cleaned up compared to a standard broadcast). Plus, the TheaterTek software I mentioned before is a miracle working when it comes to all of this stuff. Incredible software. I pipe all of this through a Media Center Edition PC that is upscaling the picture to 1920x1080p. Additionally, the latest Catalyst drivers for ATI are performing image enhancements within the GPU itself. Switching back and forth between the TV's tuner and the MCEPC is hugely different.

      As for serious, I have spent over 6 hours calibrating my TV with the AVIA disk (which doesn't make me a huge fanatic, but I believe I am pretty serious about it). Any serious Home Theatre person wouldn't be caugth dead without one....

      --

      Bryan R.
      The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, or $12.50 as seen on eBay.....
    7. Re:That's so frustrating! by BRock97 · · Score: 1

      Ugh.... right. Tekken Tag. My bad....

      --

      Bryan R.
      The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, or $12.50 as seen on eBay.....
    8. Re:That's so frustrating! by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      "To be honest, I wish Microsoft would have gulped down a little pride and pushed the release back six months."

      And they would have if they cared about us. Thing is, they observed that PS2 sold better, and a big reason for that was its early launch. So they're like, if we put a console on the market, a lot of people/parents are gonna get even if there isn't anything marvellous for the console yet. What they want is cold, hard, market share. Period.

      (Not to say they don't care about gamers, but I'd say they were more interested in getting the thing out this Christmas than spending a little more time developing an even better console).

      Well, since I'm posting on a game related thread, let me get my 2 cents out about this generation:

      Xbox360, boring so far, PS3, boring so far, Revolution, really enticing. If the Revo ends up getting really bad 3rd party support (heaven forbid a Nintendo console get bad 3rd party support!) and Nintendo doesn't deliver on their concept (which I really hope won't happen), I'm honestly just gonna sit out with my Cube and PS2 for a while and see what happens.

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    9. Re:That's so frustrating! by Babbster · · Score: 1
      As interiot pointed out, an external scaler would be a MUCH more elegant solution since it would a) be useful with all signals (if you truly are displaying 1080p, a good external box could probably even improve 1080i over your display's internals) and b) offer you better choices in terms of DVD playback. I would further wonder why someone who claims to have a 65" 1080p display (something that had to cost SERIOUS money) would even consider using a game console for DVD playback, upconverted or not.

      Finally, why would you ever care? You say that you're using an HTPC so you already have upconverted DVD playback. Methinks someone just wants to take a cheap shot at the new console...

    10. Re:That's so frustrating! by BRock97 · · Score: 1

      Or me thinks someone foolishly thinks I have only one 1080p set....

      --

      Bryan R.
      The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, or $12.50 as seen on eBay.....
    11. Re:That's so frustrating! by superpulpsicle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is the most overhyped launch of video game consoles ever. It is almost sickening how much frosting is being tossed around by marketing with no games at all. People are just debating over hardware potential. Talk about arguing over vaporware.

      I need to see at least 5 great games on a console before even considering an investment. Keyword is "great".

  3. Bundles. by Guspaz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "each console must leave the store with at *least* two games each."

    In other words they are FORCING the $700+ bundles that stores like GameStop are trying to force on customers, except Microsoft is ensuring that EVERY retailer in the country does this so that consumers have no choice. Nice.

    1. Re:Bundles. by Otter · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Well, the "choice" is to wait 24 hours instead of jumping into the mosh pit to be one of the first 20 Norwegians in the door on December 2.

      I certainly regard these schemes to use consumer frenzies for PR as degrading to human dignity, but it's not like you have to be one of the idiots trampling each other at 5 am on "Black Friday".

    2. Re:Bundles. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well put!

    3. Re:Bundles. by grub · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's right, be a man and buy one only when there's a mod chip available. The longer the wait the less you really care.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    4. Re:Bundles. by Allison+Geode · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and i got called a troll for saying the cost of the system was $500. (the core system is *not* what most people will want to buy (and even if they do, you still have to buy a memory card, since it has no hard drive, so kiss another $30 away for that, and then you have a function system without a game), and yes, you do need to get at least one game, but if you're getting one, why not two, or at least an extra controller so your friend can play too?

      the cost of a launch console isn't the price on the box. you have to have a game to use with it.... expect to spend at least $500 (in the states at least) before you have an xbox 360 that you can actually do anything with.

      me? i'll stick with last generation until the prices drop to the realm of sanity. i expect that to happen fairly quick. you hardcore people can blow your cash however you like, but the masses won't likely be dropping $500 for a new xbox for little Bobby this x-mas.

    5. Re:Bundles. by Trepalium · · Score: 1
      Exactly. Once the system price gets to around the $200 mark, things might change a bit. But expecting people to shell out $300 for the console (which won't even run any of the older games you might have -- you need the $100 hard disc for that), plus $50-60 for a game (there aren't any used or classic games yet), and $40 for a memory card. You're already at nearly $400, and you only have a single game to play on it. If you're stupid enough to go to EB/GameStop, they'll gouge you for at least $600 for the basic system since they require you to buy their bundle of four games with it.

      I suppose snob appeal might apply, but I just get the feeling it's a little too expensive. It was the same thing with the PSP. I've met people who've purchased a PSP, but they're no where near as popular as the GBA was (the DS hasn't done terribly well either, but the DS is just strange). Entertainment items really should fit within the limits of most people's disposable income. I shouldn't need to get a loan to afford these promotions.

      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
    6. Re:Bundles. by MrBigInThePants · · Score: 1

      This is funny, but that is what many people will be doing. one of the considerations is which console is more "modable".

      Of course I wont be....nooooo....no mod chip here...

    7. Re:Bundles. by PhoenixOne · · Score: 5, Funny

      Am I the only one that got excited reading this? Microsoft expects to have at least two games ready by launch!!!

      --
      Spell cheek you've failed me four the last thyme!
    8. Re:Bundles. by Hott+of+the+World · · Score: 1

      I doubt the price will ever do so, at least in primary retail outlets. I'm sure MS will release "Value Packs" with 1 or 2 games to try and justify prolonging the initial retail price.

      When we do see a $200 dollar version (that isn't crippled, aka no HD) it'd have to be a serious reason for it, and those reasons are never good.

      --
      | - | - |
    9. Re:Bundles. by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      PS3 = built in HD = teh modding win!

    10. Re:Bundles. by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      $399 for the console plus Microsoft requires it be bundled with two games (Let's say $100), that's $500 for the non-crippled version, and $400 for the crippled (sans-harddrive) version.

      That's a lot of money for a console. Now, if I go to Ye Olde Videogame Shoppe, I'm going to see a new XBOX bundled with 2 games for $179. I'm going to see a 360 with 2 games for $600. Does the 360 really offer me three times the value? I really doubt it.

    11. Re:Bundles. by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Waiting is a bad idea. The longer you wait, the longer the chance Microsoft has to change the internals to be less moddable. By default, the earliest models are going to be the most moddable.

    12. Re:Bundles. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarily. It could be the same game twice.

    13. Re:Bundles. by DanthemaninVA1 · · Score: 1

      I'm going to do a little math, since you obviously don't know how.

      I'm going to buy an Xbox 360 Premium bundle...who wants just the core system? That comes to $400.
      I'm going to buy two games. I'll say they'll both be expensive, and say they'll be $60 each.

      $400 + $60 + $60 = $520

      So....how is this a $700 bundle, again?

    14. Re:Bundles. by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      I was referring to the enormous bundles that many stores are forcing on us. As in, the stores that don't sell the core or premium packages, but ONLY sell their bundles.

      The only xbox 360 hardware for sale at Gamestop is currently priced at 1999.99$. Yes, two thousand dollars. That's the only one that isn't listed as sold out. Well, unless you count the $4499.68 bundle that comes with the plasma screen TV.

      Yes, Microsoft's actual forced bundle is not that high compared to those(Though, price it in Canadian dollars and you're talking $600 or more for the harddrive version).

      I'm just trying to point out how rediculous all this forced bundling is. My ideal launch would include the premium 360 (The hard-drive model for $399 US) as the only option, priced at $299. A consumer would then be able to purchase as many games as they want to go with it. Don't forget that the 360 is more than just a game console, it also has extensive media capabilities. Considering that the core xbox 360 costs the same as the Linksys Windows Media Extender does (did at launch, $300), and does a lot more, it IS possible that somebody would want to purchase it without any games.

    15. Re:Bundles. by Bobsledboy · · Score: 1

      That's what I'll be doing anyway. Mmmm, cheap HD ready media pc...

    16. Re:Bundles. by merdark · · Score: 1

      It's unlikely that MS will go making major changes before a mod chip exists. Simply wait for a mod-chip, and then buy as soon as it's released. With Live though, you always run the risk of future troubles anyways.

      Besides, one should NEVER buy into corporate whoring that is release day. People forget that us consumers are the ones with power, if only we could act more intelligently than horny apes.

    17. Re:Bundles. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I think you mean they expect everyone to go home with two copies of the same game =/

    18. Re:Bundles. by Belgand · · Score: 1

      Damn... and to think I remember the old days where a console came with everything you needed: system, cables, two controllers and at least one game. While R.O.B. never worked when I got my NES Deluxe Set I was getting two games (Gyromite and Duck Hunt), two controllers, a light gun, and a goddamn robot with his own accessories.

      The more recent idea where you buy the console itself, with no game, and only one controller is pretty damn crappy. Especially when you consider that most consoles are selling for much more than the previous generations. They just come with far less.

    19. Re:Bundles. by plumby · · Score: 1

      It depends on whether you got a choice about the two games that come with it. In reality, these games are not free - the price of them is simply included in the base price of the console. You pay for them whether you want them or not.

    20. Re:Bundles. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      XBOX = unlimited HD space = teh modding win

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  4. Ah, those crazy retailers by Keeper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sounds very much like the retail chains' requirements, not Microsoft's.

    1. Re:Ah, those crazy retailers by interiot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The "must sell with 2 games" might possibly be reatailer-initiated, but the "must sell out" certainly isn't... if you're a retail store, you want to have slightly MORE stock than is necessary, to make sure that when the n+1 person walks in your door with a fist full of cash, that you have a console to sell them.

    2. Re:Ah, those crazy retailers by Keeper · · Score: 1

      Your assuming that the store can actually order more stock than is necessary. If you have limited stock, would you rather send it to a store that only sells half of it, or to a store that will sell all of it?

  5. Possible reason by theantipop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Another possible reason they are doing this is that they want to get the machines only in the hands of the hardcore gamers and Xbox fans. Doing so will generate a lot of positive buzz. Along with the beanie baby type marketing mentioned, it could result in a huge second push of sales. That seems a bit far-fetched and conspiracy like, but you never know when it comes to MS marketing.

    1. Re:Possible reason by Bastian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That seems a bit far-fetched and conspiracy like

      No, it seems to me like exactly what you would want to do if you were a huge corporation pushing a huge product but wanted to create a huge viral marketing campaign without *too* much effort on your part.

      If it really is what MS is trying to do, I think it's a master stroke on their part. The 360 is launching way ahead of any console in its generation, so Microsoft has plenty of time to sacrifice initial launch sales in favor of higher sales in the long run.

    2. Re:Possible reason by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The drawback is that word of mouth has more time to spread. So if the launch games suckl and the guys who got one are disappointed they have enough time to tell all their friends before they buy one.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    3. Re:Possible reason by Gulthek · · Score: 4, Funny

      So far I've been labelled as a Sony fanboy, a Nintendo fanboy and an XBox fanboy. Go figure.

      That's crazy. You are obviously a videogame fanboy.

    4. Re:Possible reason by theantipop · · Score: 1

      That's true, but I don't think it would be any worse than having 10 billion xboxes with crappy games in the hands of gamers. In fact, it's probably better to sell fewer consoles if your launch titles are subpar. The more I think about it, the better this scheme sounds.

    5. Re:Possible reason by MilenCent · · Score: 1

      If it really is what MS is trying to do, I think it's a master stroke on their part.

      A master stroke? Fact is, everyone wants to be able to say their stuff is a sell-out hit. Nintendo pulled these shenanigans with copies of Mario 3 back in their "evil period." If Microsoft were confident in the 360's success, they wouldn't have to do this.

      Fact is, Microsoft is worried about pulling a PSP on launch day. No matter what Sony said about it being a runaway hit from day one, all those boxes lying around Target and Walmart told a different story.

    6. Re:Possible reason by David+Nabbit · · Score: 1
      Another possible reason they are doing this is that they want to get the machines only in the hands of the hardcore gamers and Xbox fans.
      Those are the only people who will buy the system on release day anyway. It's not exactly priced to be an impulse buy.
      --
      "Her idea of wit is nothing more than an incisive observation humorously phrased and delivered with impeccable timing."
  6. Then lower the prices by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This sounds silly, but the traditional way to "sell out" of an item is to lower it's price. Keeping the price high by artificial fixed prices means that it's hard to "sell out".

    I briefly considered buying an Xbox360, but then I saw the price. Forget it. My 3 year old computer provides enough game power for my needs. Maybe I'll buy a used console in a year or two.

    1. Re:Then lower the prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Even if Microsoft lowered the price of the Premium bundle to $199.99 I think they would have a great deal of difficulty selling out a reasonable innitial shipment of systems; the reason for this is that there are no really compelling games at launch. In a lot of ways I am reminded of both the Dreamcast launch and the PSP launch when I think about the XBox 360's launch. The 360 is being released with the timing of the Dreamcast, with the launch line-up and cost of the PSP; I can't see how this will turn up successfully.

    2. Re:Then lower the prices by Alamoth · · Score: 1

      I thought the traditional way to sell out your platform was to make a good system with good games. I believe it took several years for the PS2 to drop from $300. This isn't Nintendo we're talking about, who will just cut prices because it's Monday.

    3. Re:Then lower the prices by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "This sounds silly, but the traditional way to "sell out" of an item is to lower it's price.

      That's the traditional way to sell out an overstock. The 360 won't be overstocked, it will be intentionally understocked.

      "Keeping the price high by artificial fixed prices means that it's hard to 'sell out'."

      They aren't keeping the price high by artificially fixed prices. They are keeping the ideal pricing point high by limiting supply.

      MS needs to justify the high MSRP for the 360... and the high wholesale price. MS doesn't want to reduce the price until late next year. The best way to do that is by showing that there is enough demand that you still sell out at the current price.

      Producers of a unique commodity often limit supply to keep demand and price (by extension) high. My understanding is that MS will be taking a loss on each unit anyway... so if they have to drop the price in the short-term, they'll be hemorrhaging instead of slowly leaking.

      This isn't artificial price-fixing. This is manipulation of the market by restricting supply. It's done all the time with unique goods, and preserves the profit incentive to continue producing innovative goods.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:Then lower the prices by Saige · · Score: 1

      The 360 won't be overstocked, it will be intentionally understocked.

      You honestly believe that line? "Hmmm, there seems to be all this demand for our system, so LET'S SHIP FEWER OF THEM TO SELL!"

      People sure are reaching to find ways to attack Microsoft.

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    5. Re:Then lower the prices by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      I'm not attacking MS, I'm explaining what they are doing. Did you bother reading my post?

      If you had an understanding of supply vs demand and how it affects pricing, maybe you'd realize why it is good for MS to intentionally understock. Never mind all the other reasons that understocking may help increase demand, not just allow a high price point for longer.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    6. Re:Then lower the prices by Saige · · Score: 1

      Claiming they'd even consider intentionally understocking the console can be seen as an attack, since it's suggesting they're wanting to leave some people without a console that they really want to buy.

      Any theoretical benefit to understocking is surely not as big a benefit as trying to make sure as many people as possible who want 360s will be able to get them. The more sold, the more games and accessories sold, the quicker the installed base increases, and the better the head start over the PS3.

      Not only is there not going to be intentional understocking, there is going to be an almost constant resupply to the retail channels. Meaning that someone who doesn't get one at launch might be able to find one a couple weeks later, instead of a Sony-style couple months between each shipment.

      I wouldn't buy the intentional understock story even if I didn't personally know people on the Xbox team. But I especially do not buy them because of that.

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    7. Re:Then lower the prices by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      You might see it as an attack, but that's because you are looking for an attack. Doesn't mean that it is one. You are also working from the assumption that responding to the market in the most profitable way is a bad thing -- otherwise, why would this be negative?

      "Any theoretical benefit to understocking is surely not as big a benefit as trying to make sure as many people as possible who want 360s will be able to get them. The more sold, the more games and accessories sold, the quicker the installed base increases, and the better the head start over the PS3."

      Not so. The goal is not to sell the most units at release. The goal is to sell the most units this quarter, or to sell the most units prior to PS3 launch. Undersupply now will increase the incentive for people to purchase the product when it is no longer undersupplied -- such as immediately before the winter holidays. This is a strategy that has worked again and again for unique goods, and if done properly, does not lead to fewer users -- it leads to more users, many of whome have paid more than they would have otherwise.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    8. Re:Then lower the prices by ExpressCode · · Score: 2, Insightful
      They aren't keeping the price high by artificially fixed prices. They are keeping the ideal pricing point high by limiting supply.

      I don't think getting a high price was their main goal with restricting the availability. They don't have to restrict the availability of 360s in order to get $500 (or whatever it is). They can simply refuse to sell it for less than their desired price. I think the point is (as an earlier poster commented) to make sure the only people who get a 360 is the person willing to stand in line at 5AM . . . the Microsoft fan who believes the system will be great without having heard the buzz from friends who already own it. This kind of consumer will be more likely to go around bragging about their great system and feed the viral marketing.

    9. Re:Then lower the prices by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 1
      Simple psychology 101 stuff. People want what they can't have, they more they can't have it, the more they want it.

      Microsoft ships a small amount of 360s for a period of time, this builds hype because it will be in an state of "sold out" for some time, people see this and think "hey, this must be pretty hot stuff, I want one", eventually supply will increase to a more reasonable level, but only after the hype has been built.

      Don't you watch South Park?

      Hey, everybody! Check out the all new Cartmanland! It's our Graaand Opening! Cartmanland has over a hundred fabulous rides, six roller coasters, and tons of great surprises! And the best part is: You can't come!! That's right, because at Cartmanland, only I, Eric Cartman, can get in! That means only I can ride the all-new Tornado Twister, a roller coaster that splashes in the water! Wow! It's the greatest amusement park in the Colorado area! And nobody can go!! Especially Stan and Kyle!! HAHA!! So come on down to Cartmanland now! But don't plan on getting past the parking lot, 'cause remember: So much to do at Cartmanland, but you can't come! Especially you, Stan and Kyle.
      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    10. Re:Then lower the prices by plumby · · Score: 1

      You honestly believe that line? "Hmmm, there seems to be all this demand for our system, so LET'S SHIP FEWER OF THEM TO SELL!"

      Are you seriously denying that this happens? It's exactly what's happening with PSPs in the UK at the moment. They've been out for over two months. I got one pre-order, which arrived a couple of days after launch, but a mate has had his on order since the week after go-live and it still hasn't turned up yet. They are being delivered to stores in ones and twos, and the backlog is slowly being worked through.

      I refuse to believe that Sony so badly misjudged stocks (if they had, I would expect to have seen a story about Sony UKs MD being sacked), and don't have any available anywhere that they could ship. The only possible reason that they are doing this is to push up the hype. One of the shops in town had a poster up last week with "3 PSPs in stock today" which had disappeared about half an hour after it went up.

    11. Re:Then lower the prices by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      "They can simply refuse to sell it for less than their desired price"

      But that's not the ideal price point. I'm sure they've analyzed the market to determine their strategy for sales and pricing, it's not like any mass-produced good is just put onto the market with a number pulled from a pie.

      In terms of the early adopters (the segment of the market at the highest part of the dmeand curve) affecting the future demand curve, I agree with you and the earlier poster.

      However, this is also an anecdotal explanation of limiting supply to maintain demand, which is kind of what I was pointing out.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    12. Re:Then lower the prices by ChocoBean · · Score: 1

      Any theoretical benefit to understocking is surely not as big a benefit as trying to make sure as many people as possible who want 360s will be able to get them. The more sold, the more games and accessories sold, the quicker the installed base increases, and the better the head start over the PS3.

      Red Fleyer is right, y'know. The principles of supply -vs- demand will tell us that if you mark something a "Rare!" people will want to pay more for it. Example: not everyone who wants a couple thousand shares of Google will be able to afford them. it's not an attack so much as an observation on how the "free market" operates.

  7. It Isn't Really Such a Challenge by Alamoth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is this really so lofty of a goal for Mircrosoft to set for their new system. Retailers should have no issue finding 20 reservists for the system. This is similar to the numbers of reservists for most other consoles (XBox, GC, PS2) and is probably a very small portion of the consumer base for any given retailer.

    Each customer must also purchase 2 games. It's obviously a given that everyone will be buying at least one game (Halo 3) and then why not any of the other promising titles that come out with the release. Most (if not all) gamers like to diversify their playing experience.

    The big issue here is the money of course. The premium system already will run $400 and games (I haven't checked the exact price yet) will probably run the standard $50. Anyone who is going to shell out the $400 (or $300) for the system will probably manage to scrounge up another $100 for two games.

    I'll be surprised if Microsoft doesn't manage to sell out the 360 on the first day.

    1. Re:It Isn't Really Such a Challenge by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Informative

      Halo 3 won't be a launch title, MS announced they'll release that for the PS3 launch. Elder Scrolls 4 Oblivion was delayed as well so how many launch titles do you really want?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    2. Re:It Isn't Really Such a Challenge by Alamoth · · Score: 1

      I think we'll easily see a lot of people going out and getting the system with Project Gotham Racing 3 and Madden '06 as their first two titles. They were very popular on the XBox and will most likely be so for the 360. Sports titles, remember, are still one of the dominant genres of console games and Madden is one of the most prominent of them.

    3. Re:It Isn't Really Such a Challenge by scolby · · Score: 1

      I can see the full version selling out no problem...but who in their right mind would want the "core system" that doesn't come with a hard drive? I guarantee every retailer's shelves will be full of those mistakes.

    4. Re:It Isn't Really Such a Challenge by captaincucumber · · Score: 1

      $60 has already been pretty well established as the price for next gen games (hopely only until they realize that people aren't excited about paying that much) and Halo 3 won't be available at launch.

      As for the rest, I totally agree, 20 XBox 360's per site? They'd sell out if they had 100. However, this info is not for the U.S., perhaps stores here will get more inventory.

    5. Re:It Isn't Really Such a Challenge by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure. I know a few people interested in the 360 eventually, but none who are willing to pay release prices. Especially with the lack of games available on day 1 (their big games have almost all been pushed out). I think MS may be setting themselves up for disappointment here.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    6. Re:It Isn't Really Such a Challenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, have you looked at Madden for the 360? Do you really want to pay 500$+ just to play a game which is marginally better than its old gen counterpart ?

    7. Re:It Isn't Really Such a Challenge by NicciYahweh · · Score: 1

      They are launching worldwide, something that no one else has done before. I read one interview where J Allard said that they probably wouldn't have done the worldwide launch if they had known what they were getting into. Whatever the case, and whatever one might say about admitting that after the fact, I think the worldwide launch was gutsy, and that I'd rather have limited supply than no supply at all. If they HAD postponed the launch it wouldn't necessarily have translated to a better box; they were planning on launching in Nov. and as such already had the hardware finalized--significant enhancements would not have been likely. Not to mention they would have taken heat for that as well, and probably from the same people.

      Here's how I see the "must sell out" thing:

      If I were Microsoft and knew I had limited product supply at launch (and they DO have limited supply; the big reason they are not shipping all at once is because they don't want to sell out and then have no box on the shelves for a time [see URL] http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20051028/tc_nm/ltech_mi crosoft_xbox_dc ), I would ship more systems to the stores with the most pre-orders (which is the best way to guarantee a sell-out). Not only does this ensure that I make money faster, but also that the gamers who are most excited about the system will have the best chance of getting it. If there were so many pre-orders that it wasn't an issue, then I would ship more heavily to stores that had the most GAME pre-orders, for about the same reason. If you have a limited supply and a huge demand, it seems to me that the smart thing to do is either to raise the price, or to supply more here and less there according to the degree of demand.

      By the way, and in agreement to the post I'm replying to, I don't think that two games for each console is as big as it's being made out to be. If you average things, each costumer will not necessarily need to buy two games. Two games for each console would probably still be a push, but not a huge one; still a pretty strict figure, but not strict enough to make Microsoft evil or whatever. If they have those kinds of pre-orders elsewhere, then why not divert some of the supply to where they will make the most money and please the most eager of the costumers?

      In summary, if I were Microsoft, I would probably do the same thing. I'm not an expert; it's just my opinion.

      I can't believe I said that in my first /. post. I wonder if I'll be going to Macintosh Hell or Linux Hell... or maybe just an open-source version.

  8. Illegal by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Plus, each console must leave the store with at *least* two games each.

    I'm pretty sure this is illegal in a lot of places. (at least in the nehterlands)

    1. Re:Illegal by Alamoth · · Score: 1
      Do you have any evidence of the legality of such a system?

      It seems this is a system that will be run through reserves anyways. In order to reserve a system you'll simply have to reserve two games as well. I suspect retailers will attempt to sell out through reserves only so they don't have to actually sell any systems when it releases. Then they can go back to normal business on the following day of selling systems and games.

    2. Re:Illegal by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      They will make it legal...

    3. Re:Illegal by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      How? You can tell the customer, "We have a limited number, so we'd like to put it in the hands of people who'll use it more. If you want, you can come back a few days later and see if it's still available." Isn't that valid?

    4. Re:Illegal by caitsith01 · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, grandparent is correct. It is illegal in many places to force a person to purchase one product if they want to purchase another. However, this is typically only the case where the product they actually want (the 360, in this case) has significant market power that is being abused in the sale of the secondary product (the games).

      Fairly typical competition law stuff.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    5. Re:Illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, in Belgium we have (thank god) a law against the sale of bundled items.

      In theory bundling Windows XP with a computer is against the law but it seems nobody has gone to the trouble... . Apple will be also in trouble in the near future with there bundled locked in x86 computers.

  9. Oh well by dtfinch · · Score: 2, Funny

    I guess I don't really need to buy an Xbox 360, given the shortage and all.

  10. I'd like to read the agreement by max+born · · Score: 3, Funny

    each shop or chain has to sign an agreement saying that they will sell out of all 20 consoles on the release date (which is December 2 over there).

    Wonder what the penalty is if the retailer can't sell them all?

    1. Re:I'd like to read the agreement by ronjeremysjohnson · · Score: 2, Funny

      They are given shelf space for Nintendo's Revolution.

    2. Re:I'd like to read the agreement by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1


      They gey less than 20 Xbox 360, thus making it more likely that they will sell out if they don't manage to sell 20 consoles and 40 games.

      So either they sell everything and sell out or they get less so they are almost sure to sell out.

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  11. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  12. How will they enforce it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will they have some goons at stores to force people buy Xbox360:s if they don't seem to sell on their own? Traditionally, lowering the price is the way to increase the sales but I guess Microsoft believes in "New Economy" or what ever the cool kids believe in these days.

  13. Lack of choices always bad for consumer by Jtheletter · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This is the kind of thing that has always pissed me off about consoles, they bundle the console and force a certain package on you. This means that you end up spending more than you want and getting things you're not interested in. When I got my first xbox it was bundled with Clone Wars/Tetris (no interest) and before that the family xbox was bundled with Jetset Radio (again zero interest). If these games were free with the system, or if there were a choice of games it would be ok, but as it was you were basically forced to pay and extra $55 for games you probably didn't care about. And because of the (IMHO) crappy play value of these games coupled with the huge number of them out there, you could get maybe $5 reselling them to the store.

    Now not only are gamers going to be forced to buy price-inflated bundles yet again, but the store won't even sell them the system if they don't drop another $100+ right then and there for two other games. I suppose if you're set on being a first adopter you'll find something you want but if you really don't care for the release titles and would rather save the extra $65 for Halo3 or something, well tough titty you're out of luck, no system for you.

    Console manufacturers need to find a better way to make back costs w/o screwing over the consumer. If I want to buy just a plain console, one controller and a single game of my choosing then I should be able to. Bundles just artificially increase system prices so M$ can take less of a loss on first-sales. This is no way to treat the customers who are your primary supporters (the first-to-have crowd), although they tend to buy at any price - only making it easier for M$ to take advantage of them. And the artifical scarcity tactic only disgusts and insults me as a consumer. Either sell your product or don't but screwing around with supply to inflate demand only serves to alienate and disappoint people who are already interested in buying your product. Sorry for the rant.

    --
    -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    1. Re:Lack of choices always bad for consumer by brkello · · Score: 1

      It seems like the fairly obvious solution is wait until you can buy the things unbundled. Sure, you might have to wait a few months but you get rewarded by being patient. You get a better price, you have more of a selection, and the hardware is usually a later rev and has less of a chance to fail. Let early adopters suffer. And if there is just no way to find any console without a bundle, I imagine you can track down used systems eventually.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    2. Re:Lack of choices always bad for consumer by Damvan · · Score: 1

      No game stores that I know of will take a bundled title (one that came inside the console), such as Clone Wars (bundled with Xbox) in trade in for any amount of money. Hell, most won't even take it for free, and if they do, will immediately throw it away.

    3. Re:Lack of choices always bad for consumer by Tsunayoshi · · Score: 1

      At least they are not going to the extreme the corps do in this book

      Short run down:
      1. Uber-hype a new pair of shoes,
      2. Only deliver 4 to a single store in each city to create psycho demand, hire a gunman to cap a kid in the crowd to give the shoe "Street Cred".
      3. PROFIT!!!!
      4. Then avoid the government coming after you... :-)

      That is not the whole book, just one sub-plot. Really great book.

      --
      "Get a bicycle. You will not regret it, if you live." - Mark Twain, "Taming the Bicycle"
    4. Re:Lack of choices always bad for consumer by porcupine8 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Of course, their employees also don't have the last name Microsoft. So (hopefully) we shouldn't be surprised that they're not acting like the corporations in that book.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    5. Re:Lack of choices always bad for consumer by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Early revs typically have better support for user made hardware.

      Cough

    6. Re:Lack of choices always bad for consumer by Spit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now not only are gamers going to be forced to buy price-inflated bundles yet again,

      Nobody's forcing you to do anything. If you don't think the options are worth the money, don't buy. It's that easy.

      --
      POKE 36879,8
    7. Re:Lack of choices always bad for consumer by tepples · · Score: 1

      if you really don't care for the release titles and would rather save the extra $65 for Halo3 or something, well tough titty you're out of luck, no system for you.

      Then just wait until Head Like A Halo 3 comes out before you buy the system. Is there a problem with that?

    8. Re:Lack of choices always bad for consumer by ExpressCode · · Score: 1

      I would think you would be happy with this system (or happier than you were with the historical scenario you mentioned), given that you no longer have to accept the bundled games that Microsoft thinks you will like, but get to choose which 2 games you will buy at launch. The only shortfall is that you don't have the option of just buying 1 game. But seriously, are you only going to buy 1 game?

    9. Re:Lack of choices always bad for consumer by dootbran · · Score: 1

      Interesting, my buddy picked up a like 3 of the tetris/clone wars games from gamestop.com and I've got one of the Sega GT/JSR discs from them as well. They all looked pretty used to me.

      If they got them for free, then I guess that $5 I payed was a ripoff. I hope they at least handed out a buck for them, JSR was pretty sweet on the Dreamcast.

    10. Re:Lack of choices always bad for consumer by iq+in+binary · · Score: 1

      Either sell your product or don't but screwing around with supply to inflate demand only serves to alienate and disappoint people who are already interested in buying your product.

      Ask yourself something, are you alienated and disappointed by Ferrari, Maserati, Aston Martin or Lamborghini? How about the makers of Cristael? The good 'ol boys at Orange County Choppers? All of their products come with high price tags. They have to in order for their business to survive. Consider this, if a Lotus only put you back $35,000, EVERYONE would have one. Thus the value of the vehicle would drop, costing you even more money. This is one of the situations where EXTREMELY contrasting supply/demand ratio is needed in order for the venture to thrive.

      Microsoft may be a bunch of evil bastards, but they're still trying to get a product to the market. They're also going to LOSE THEIR ASS for a substantial period of time to make sure the product stays on the market. It could very well be that restricting the supply of the product to stimulate demand is going to be essential to prevent hemmorhaging funds. If they lose their ass too much, they have to cut the product line, and everyone who would have bought it is going to be in a very bad place. Screwed, jewed, and tattooed, with pretty much no recourse.

      This isn't just about elevating demand, there are long term goals this move is geared to accomplish. If they can slowly trickle to a steady flow of systems heading into the market, with demand remaining pretty much constant for a period of time generous enough to let miniaturization catch up in their manufacturing; they can essentially keep the loss of funds constant until such a point they can actually break even on the system even at a lower price. This is a calculated move designed to keep the first year or so of sales and resulting red ink from sinking the entire operation. This move isn't under-handed, abusive or diabolical, it's crucial and defensive.

      Don't worry, you'll have one in your hands if you want one bad enough, maybe even for less than $300 if you're willing to wait a year. But give them the benefit of the doubt that they're doing what's necessary for the system to thrive and produce good content in the long run for the first year.

      --
      Of all the Universal Constants, here's one I know: Nice guys finish last ;)
    11. Re:Lack of choices always bad for consumer by metamatic · · Score: 1
      This is the kind of thing that has always pissed me off about consoles, they bundle the console and force a certain package on you.

      They're just doing it because it's a good strategy, and it's a good strategy because dumbasses like you keep falling for it. So you ought to be pissed off at yourself.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    12. Re:Lack of choices always bad for consumer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Consider this, if a Lotus only put you back $35,000, EVERYONE would have one.
      Yeah, so ummm why don't you have one? MSRP of $40k, surely you can do better than that example you twat.

      Don't worry, you'll have one in your hands if you want one bad enough
      Yeah, that really applies to an audience of 1 or 2 per city.. people have SEEN the kiosks. Demand is dropping. This is a stunt to create more demand. Look at MSFT over the last 3 months.... time to sell it short.
    13. Re:Lack of choices always bad for consumer by Jtheletter · · Score: 1
      They're just doing it because it's a good strategy, and it's a good strategy because dumbasses like you keep falling for it. So you ought to be pissed off at yourself.

      The two xboxes I mentioned receiving in my post were gifts, and both were purchased after price drops in the system, so no, I nor the people who bought the gifts "fell for it". By the time I received an Xbox for Christmas it had been on the market for over 20 months, yet no systems were available for purchase w/o getting a bundle.

      That's my point, you get stuck with their package unless you wait for so long that it's almost time for the next generation of consoles to be released.

      But thanks for assuming things in my post that I didn't put there, insulting me, and then being wrong, that's a great strategy.

      --
      -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    14. Re:Lack of choices always bad for consumer by Jtheletter · · Score: 1
      First, thank you for the well-written, reasoned reply, it can be rare.

      I do have a few points I'd like to rebuke though. First, the other products you mentioned are extremely high-priced high-end products, and are well outside of the majority of people's budgets so it's a bit unfair to try to compare their scarcity with a video game system. (I do understand the 360 is essentially the console equivalent of the top-end, high priced hardware for its market segment, but I think we can both agree that most people above the poverty line are far more likely to be able to afford a 360 than a custom car/chopper in their lifetimes.) Additionally, those luxury items are intended to be scarce, whereas the 360 is expected to sell tens of millions of units worldwide, so already there is a discrepency here. Microsoft is telling the world they want everyone to have one and that is their sales goal, yet then they turn around and intentionally limit supply simply to artifically inflate demand further. Also, we're not talking about MS sending only 100 or 50 consoles to stores, the articles referenced put the numbers at more like 15 to 20 consoles per store. In most places the demand is already much higher than that, so they are limiting the supply to the point of choking it off. It's one thing to send a number lower than expected demand, it's another to cut that number in half or more. That is specifically what I mean when I say that this tatic is insulting to the customer. MS knows that demand is much much higher than what they are making available and there is a good chance that more than half the demand that is already there will not be satisfied. Why not provide twice the number they're currently planning, meet 75% of the current demand and still sell out? MS doesn't want to create scarcity, they want to create rabid unfulfillable, tooth-and-nail demand like previous season's rushes on talking elmos and power ranger toys. They are wholly manipulating people, they are going to create severely overpriced second markets, and yet their stated aim of scarcity could still be acheived w/o such overkill.

      I should probably note at this point, I've never been a first-adopter and certainly didn't plan to be for the 360 even well ahead of these shinanegans (sp?). So I don't represent the demographic that is willing to get the system at any price, but then if this sort of market scramble weren't being perpetrated then maybe the system would be easier to get and be a more reasonable price and then I would buy one when it first comes out.

      As to MS's short/long term goals with this, thank you for the well-written explanation, however I already understand it quite well. It's the same strategy that has been used for almost every new system for about a decade, and I understand there are huge costs to overcome and they are taking a loss. For that matter, aren't they still technically taking a loss for the current xbox hardware? Perhaps they recently passed breakeven but I though the last I had heard the xbox division was still deep in the red.... What I think we're seeing in this round is version 2.0 of the take a loss/create huge demand tactic. They've taken the lessons of past releases and are applying them much more forcefully this time around, probably because they're taking a bigger loss. What I can't help but wonder is if there isn't a better way to do this? I just can't help but think that with all the resources that MS has at its disposal this is the best way they could come up with to make this product work for them? I think there has got to be a better middle ground for the consumer. But as long as early adopters are willing to spend upwards of $1000 for systems on ebay then MS is going to keep taking advantage of that fact. And with no backlash to this policy I predict this sort of thing is only going to get worse in the coming years. Just imagine this tactic applied this liberally to other products. It doesn't take long to see that such manipulation of the system (yes it's capitalism so this is essentially how ev

      --
      -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    15. Re:Lack of choices always bad for consumer by metamatic · · Score: 1

      If Xboxes were only available in bundles, maybe you should have, oh, perhaps gotten a PS2 instead?

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    16. Re:Lack of choices always bad for consumer by Jtheletter · · Score: 1
      If Xboxes were only available in bundles, maybe you should have, oh, perhaps gotten a PS2 instead?

      Although the comparison is apples to apples, some people still prefer green apples over red ones, PS2 was never my cup o' tea. Plus I wanted to play Halo, and no I didn't have a PC that could play it well.

      --
      -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
  14. At least two games? by KDR_11k · · Score: 5, Funny

    Plus, each console must leave the store with at *least* two games each.

    A thief grabs an Xbox 360, tries to run away. Security holds him. "Sorry mister, but I'm not allowed to let anyone leave with an XBox 360 and less than two games for it!"

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  15. Applied Marketing Research by blueZhift · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well it just looks like Microsoft is making use of what marketing research seems to be telling us about human behaviour. Things that are in short supply, no matter the cause, tend to be valued more. There also seem to be more than enough hardcore gamers to create buzz on the first day no matter how much those first 20 360s cost or what the bundles are. You'd think that if people know they're being manipulated this way, they would choose not to participate, but in the end, people want what they want. So it really doesn't matter how artificial the manipulation is, some shops are still going to be mobbed.

    But, given all of the above, they could still come out weak like the PSP launch if they're not careful. As the mantra goes, it's the games that really matter. If they get things like Perfect Dark Zero out on launch day then they've got a shot at a strong launch, if not there will be plenty of 360s on the shelves on days two and three.

  16. Smart move, MS by tsa · · Score: 1

    Think about it: they sell all their X-boxes to the idiots who have to have this new plaything the minute it gets into the stores. These people will whine and bitch about the faults it has. MS has time to correct the faults, and then all of a sudden the X-box is available for everyone, and most people are happy with it.

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:Smart move, MS by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Hey, why not. Charging insane amounts of money for beta-quality software works in their PC market. Why not do it with the hardware too?

  17. Other sources? by MMaestro · · Score: 1
    Mighty interesting to get a first-hand account from an irate shop owner. Thanks SilverSnake!

    So a report from one shop owner suddenly applies to massive retailers and small retailers globally? I'll believe it when I hear a similar report coming from Wal-Mart, Target or EBGames (or whatever they're called now).

    For all we know, Microsoft simply wants this one retailer to sign to this agreement because they ordered an unusually high number.

  18. Maybe I'm Missing something... by hotgigs · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is the distributor of the product. Target, Best Buy... etc. order and pay for the units at a fixed negotiated rate, right? Yes they want software sold but what do they care if all 20 get sold the first day or not? The demand is there and their bill is paid. It's not like they are getting a percentage of first day sales... they should be getting their money up front from the retailers. Plus, wouldn't they want THEIR launch games to go with the console rather than just ANY of the titles at launch? It will be sold out regardless. Demand in the US and Japan will sell it out almost immediately. If Norway can't sell enough consoles, big deal.

    --
    I'm not clever enough for a sig...
    1. Re:Maybe I'm Missing something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Demand in the US and Japan will sell it out almost immediately.

      Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah ahaha!!!! Xbox, Japan and demand in one non-negative sentence? You, dear sir, just won the award for funniest comment of the day. *pinks away tears of laughter*

    2. Re:Maybe I'm Missing something... by MeanderingMind · · Score: 1

      Being in Japan now, and having recently traveled all across it, I can assure you that the number of people interested in the Xbox360 is pretty analogous to the number of people in America interested in immigrating to Micronesia. Visiting even the largest of stores with huge sections devoted to video games will usually end without seeing anything related to the Xbox, although occaisionally an original Xbox and a copy of Ninja Gaiden will be lying around.

      --
      Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
    3. Re:Maybe I'm Missing something... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "The demand is there and their bill is paid."

      The retailers' bills may be paid, but not Microsoft's. You're forgetting that Microsoft is selling these devices at a lost, and they want to "sell out" as fast as possible to jump to Phase 3 before Wall Street starts to ask too many questions about Phase 2.

    4. Re:Maybe I'm Missing something... by dootbran · · Score: 1
      If Norway can't sell enough consoles, big deal.

      Actually, depending on how many console Norway and other countries get at launch it could matter. At the moment, MS makes no money on the consoles themselves, every bit of profit will come from the software and accessories and, believe it or not, consoles sitting on the shelves of stores don't move software or accessories..

      If those consoles would have sold in say Denmark or Germany and sold 2 games at launch with the possibility of more before the end of the year then MS has lost an opportunity to make more money by miss allocating units to a country with lower demand.
  19. I call BS. by Killrig · · Score: 1

    Forcing bundles is a common retail tactic. EB has been doing it for years. Anyone remember the Game Doctor that they forced you to get with your PS2? I do. I was one of the poor bastards that was forced to sell it to you. As far as MS is concerned, if you pre-ordered an Xbox360 you can walk out of the store with JUST the console. But that isn't up to MS, if the pre-order is at GameStop or EB. In that case, you have no choice. And a Norwegian source? Give me a break. How far do you need to go to get bullshit? -- K-rig

  20. It's the games, Stupid by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 2, Informative

    I really don't give a frosty crank about the system. It's the games that matter, and there's nothing out there right now that makes me want to go buy a 360 so I can play it. Right now, I'm far more inclined to put the substantial cost of the latest gen console toward a new HD TV.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  21. enforcement by nmec · · Score: 2, Interesting

    how exactly is this going to be enforced, how do they intend to check up on retailers? Surely they could report back to microsoft that they'd sold two games as promised, but just hold the ones people didn't want in the stock room then order a few less over the next few weeks as the excess is sold off 'naturally'

  22. Use the...force? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I'd want to get a good look at this agreement as well. It doesn't sound as if Microsoft is "forcing" consumers to do anything -- they've just decided (for whatever reason) that they want their hot new console to sell out on launch day, and they want to ensure that this happens. So they ask retailers not to take on more than they can sell through in 24 hours and impose a maximum allowance and minimum requirement. BFD.

    Be they tiny Mom'n'Pop stores or huge chains, retailers know their customers. They know what will sell through and what won't. They know how many games walk out with how many consoles whenever a new one launches. It smells like some of them know they could make a hell of a lot more money off of this console on launch day and they're pissed off that the supplier isn't meeting their demand for more product. They're worried that Microsoft is going to cost them money by limiting their capacity to sell at launch.

    I work for an international toy distributer. As someone who deals with Mom'n'Pop type joints all day, I can say this: I pity the fool who'll tell the owner of a small retail store what s/he can and can't sell.

  23. I wonder.. by Strell · · Score: 1

    When they were writing this, did a paperclip pop-up and say "It looks like you're writing an intimidating press release..."

    --
    I'm not scared of anonymous cowards.
  24. What the hell is wrong with you people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's common knowledge - as with any major launch of an expensive and complicated product - that there is going to be a greater demand than supply. It comes down to the question of how much manufacturing capacty Microsoft has - ie: how many Xboxes they can make in a week vs how many they are going to be able to sell.

    They're going to be building capacity to sustain sales *after* the launch. They will have built up an inventory to sustain the initial rush of the launch - but three months after launch they want to be making Xbox 360s at the same rate that they're able to sell them.

    And so we come to first-day sales allocations. There are already stories that many outlet's entire allocations have been pre-sold. So it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever to send inventory to stores that are going to have them sitting around for a couple of weeks before they well. Hence the orders. They sound almost exactly like the following:
    "If you can't sell out your stock of 360s on launch, that's bad because we could have given them to stores that *will* sell out on the first day. So if you've ordered some, make sure you're damn well going to sell them."
    This makes perfect sense if you ask me. They're trying to make sure that the initial shipments get sold to gamers rather than lingering on a shelf at an unpopular store. This exact scenario happened with previous launches (including the Playstation 2 launch) - game stores sell out but the department store has stock that it can't shift (and is wasted) because gamers don't shop there.

    As for the "2-game minimum", you forget that "bundle-only" deals have been commonplace for several console launches from major retailers. The Playstation 2 and PSP launches included. If you don't want to buy 2 games in order to get an Xbox 360 at launch, I'm sure someone else will gladly take your place in line, and you'll be able to get an unbundled console in a few weeks.
  25. Nice work Microsoft, you really are better than... by kinglink · · Score: 1

    Google now. use making it so on launch your system MUST be packaged with 2 games? Good work.

    Seriously now, am I an idiot or does this type of totalitarian tactic not jib with any one else's morals? This "sell out or you'll not get anything from us" sounds a lot like their other dealings. Personally I'd be suprised if in the future it's "sell Halo 3 with a bigger sign then the ps3 or don't get the game"

    What Microsoft needs to realize is that Pre-order isn't NECESSARY to force. These companies would kill themselves to get pre-orders because they guarentee business. But even more so, they don't make that much on sales of consoles or games, doing package deals helps the company, the system, and the retailers as more units are moved. If it was only one or the other there'd be little point to do so in the past, and the last console was done with this repeatidly.

    But even more than this let's say store A gets NO consoles, would they cry? Maybe the employees would for they don't have their systems themselves but then the manager would shrug. The retail stores make more money from traded in games than they ever would make on consoles. I'm willing to bet that they'd be happier if you bought an Xbox 360 and 3 used Xbox Games than an Xbox 360 and a single 360 game... Hell even better if they sell an Xbox and 3 used games plus some extra used periphes.

    But overall I gotta say Microsoft who has constantly been trying to say "we're the nice guys now" has just fallen back into it's old hated work with just a little nudge.

  26. Speaking of Sell Out... by vettemph · · Score: 1

    Speaking of 'Sell Out', who is actually going to by this microsoft product? :)

    --
    The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
  27. A Dangerous Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a logistician, I can tell you that stock-outs can be very costly, and are usually something to be avoided, even in a very lean system.

    It seems they're willing to take that risk in order to generate viral marketing buzz. I just hope they know what they're doing, because it sounds like a strategy that could easily backfire.

  28. It's true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for a video game retailer, and we were told that we were being allocated roughly 30 units per store across the chain. The majority of the units sold remain the premium pack, with some regular bundles being included in the mix.

    To help move units, we're giving an instant discount on the purchase of a game with the system, to help in fulfilling our contract with Microsoft to sell-through the majority of the units and games.

    Microsoft wants hype.

  29. My predictions... by Max+Nugget · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't wish ill on the XBox, I think it's generally been a positive influence on the gaming industry. Here's what I think might happen though:

    1. XBox 360 is released, and immediately falls into the hands of the "hardcore gamers." Invariably, most people buy a copy of Perfect Dark Zero as one of their two bundled games.

    2. Those who didn't buy PDZ will tend to be disappointed, as the rest of the XBox 360 game line-up will fall somewhere between "pathetic" and "not bad but I feel like an idiot for spending $700 to play this. Where are the "OMG THAT'S AMAZING!" games???

    3. These gamers, having already spent $700, will be very hesitant to spend money buying any additional games. They MIGHT be convinced to buy PDZ via word-of-mouth, hoping it's the magic game to help them justify the new system the bought.

    4. Many will try to return or sell the 360, looking to back out of their $700 commitment. Anyone who *can* jump ship will try their damndest to do so.

    5. Those who bought PDZ will either be happy with their system purchase, or majorly disappointed, depending on whether the game turns out to be good or not. If they're disappointed, Microsoft's word-of-mouth strategy will backfire. A consumer who is on the fence, thinking "hmmm it's $700 should I go for it," it's only gonna take a tiny little bit of negative buzz to turn them away.

    6. Instead of "it must be awesome it's sold out everywhere," the mindset will be "I'm glad *I* wasn't so crazy as to spend $700 on an XBox 360. That would've been CRAZY." This means they'll need even MORE motivation to buy the system than they did at launch date. The "sold out" strategy, too, has now backfired.

    7. By now it's time for the holidays. At $600-700, the 360 systems won't appear under that many Christmas trees. The ones they do appear under, the people who REALLY wanted them and pushed the limits of holiday funds to get them, will also be the first to return them, when the pendulum swings back the other direction. This is especially the case when these people consider that the PS3 launch is only 4 months away and that $700 of holiday money is the only way they'll be able to afford the PS3. It's a chance at redemption from a bad holiday shopping move.

    8. At this point it's around January. By now, some more "killer apps" or pseudo-killer apps have hopefully hit the market, bolstering the 360. MS will now have 1 or 2 months to build momentum before the PS3 launch starts to loom near. They now have to fight the initial negative buzz AND the additional negative buzz from the holiday season (which will be a disappointment both in sales and marketing effect).

    9. Now it's ~February. Hype is building around the PS3. Pre-orders are piling up. The next-generation graphics the XBox 360 failed to deliver are now the promise of the powerful Playstation 3. Most importantly, XBox 360 sales will grind to a halt for the simple fact that nobody is going to buy the 360 when they can take a wait-and-see approach by waiting 2 months to see what the reaction is to the PS3. And of course the 360 will probably have a price drop to try to better compete with Sony's debut.

    10. The PS3 is released. Sony will no doubt make sure they've got some killer apps on launch, most notably Metal Gear Solid 4. The PS3 will likely live up to most of its hype, or at least definitively deliver to gamers what they thought they were getting with the 360 last year. If Blu-Ray high-definition movies have seiged the market by April, this will be another feather in Sony's hat, even amongst those that don't have HD sets. It's a tipping point, a useless tech spec that makes you nervous about buying the "other" system that only plays mere DVDs.

    11. The console war "proper" begins. Microsoft, battle-worn, will have its cushy lead, but that lead advantage could easily be wiped out if initial PS3 sales are strong, making all of Microsoft's marketing efforts over the past 6 months all for naught. Also of note, targeting the "hardcore" gamers may prove less lucrativ

    1. Re:My predictions... by darc · · Score: 1

      Halo? XBOX launched with a killer app by that name. I believe you're neglecting it.

      --
      Tired of legitimate data sources? Try UNCYCLOPEDIA
    2. Re:My predictions... by Max+Nugget · · Score: 1

      Ermm, fair enough. I had recalled Halo hitting after-launch but I just looked it up, it was released in November 2001 with the system. My bad.

    3. Re:My predictions... by Max+Nugget · · Score: 2, Interesting

      An addendum: Microsoft may face another obstacle, in that Perfect Dark Zero, regardless of whether it turns into a killer app via word-of-mouth, it does not currently have the hype or awareness level of a killer app game. The Perfect Dark series is not well known in the mainstream, and the hype level just isn't there right now, a mere 2 weeks from launch time. PDZ, thus, won't reach "killer app" status at least until it's been on the market for a couple weeks. This may in some part explain MS's strategy for limiting supply: consumer demand is more likely to peak a few weeks after launch than at the initial launch, and they're just not likely to sell out the large supply they have instantly on launch, given the lack of a pre-established killer app.

      In short, this is the Halo approach, the same approach used on the first XBox. Halo ultimately did generate the kind of buzz that moved lots of systems. Will PDZ do the same?

      If it doesn't, that puts the 360 in the company of the PS2, Dreamcast, Jaguar, 3DO, 32X, Sega CD, and Genesis. What they all have in common is that they all failed to launch with a title that proved to be a killer app. Some of them didn't even attempt to launch with one. Of these, only the Genesis and PS2 would qualify as successes. They both managed to break out the killer app before they were wiped out by their competitors.

      Don't forget, though, for a lot of consumers the Genesis was their SECOND system. The Genesis launch failed to catch their eye, the SNES did (effectively, Nintendo "won" the console war for those people), and then they bought the Genesis. But Microsoft, unless they REALLY get some serious exclusive killer apps late in the game, is not going to manage to sell many PS3 owners on the 360. It's just too expensive. So MS has only a limited time to nab 360 buyers, and the price they pay is that they won't be on equal footing to duke it out with the PS3 on its launch date, because PS3 will have all the limelight at that time.

  30. Dreamcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The 360 is launching way ahead of any console in its generation, so Microsoft has plenty of time to sacrifice initial launch sales in favor of higher sales in the long run.

    Need I say more than the subject?

    Wait, I do need to say more. The Dreamcast had Sonic Adventure, Soul Calibur, Powerstone, Tokyo Xtreme Racer, House of the Dead 2, and Hydro Thunder at launch. Compared to... uh... what launch titles does the Xbox 360 have? A licensed game and some military FPS?

    (Uh... the captcha for this post is... "crotch." Slashdot, what are you trying to say?)

  31. Buy a PC instead by tepples · · Score: 1

    Early revs typically have better support for user made hardware.

    PCs at similar price points to the Xbox 360 complete version have even better support for user made hardware. You can probably build a $400 PC that's overkill for surfing the web, playing videos, and emulating classic video game systems.

  32. It will work... by Stormeh · · Score: 1

    I think this strategy will get them more sales in the long run. People are stupid. Sold out = I need it because it's a hot seller!

  33. Japan-style launch by cgenman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Thank you for saying this.

    The Xbox 360 seems like the first Japan-style worldwide launch: Out of the gate early with few supporting games. Japanese consumers are notoriously technophilic, and in the past have bought systems on the promise of future titles and little else. US consumers have appeared the opposite: punishing the N64 for releasing with just 3 titles (even if one was one of the greatest games ever), and the Saturn for a similarly non-stellar launch.

    Both were going up against competition, though, and that is where the key lies. If Microsoft knows the battle is ahead, as they are waiting for the PS3 to launch Halo 3. For now, they seem contented to launch with what appear to be underwhelming but nice games, and get a few buys before digging in their heels for the PS3 and Revolution launches. Once great games start being sold, we'll have a real battle on our hands. Expect to see blood in Christmas 2006 and 2007. This? This is just the pre-show.

    1. Re:Japan-style launch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would that be blood in the games, in the aisles of stores, or both?

  34. XBOX Link up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont know if this has been sugessted before, but, why didnt they just have a way for a current Xbox act as a hard drive for the new one? I know 20 gigs is more than 8 gigs, but, Im just sayin. Would have saved a lot of money, and, made people keep both systems.

    Ok, its a dumb Idea.

  35. No Surprise by Tom · · Score: 1

    Shady business tactics - in other words, business as usual for M$.

    What part of this constitues news? ;)

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  36. How to get one by KlaroBerger · · Score: 1

    Of course this is a simple but pretty nice strategy from Microsoft to sell their X-Boxes. They want to produce the impression that the whole world wants one and for this everyone has to hurry up to get one. What can we do to get one? Choose a casino strategy (like e.g. http://www.quarks-robots.com/) and win enough money in the next days to be able to pay the seller more than the normal selling price to be sure to get one? One strategy! Or: we confederate with each other at the selling day and nobody buys it to build up a complot against Microsoft's business strategy. Someone should create such a complot website ...