Slashdot Mirror


Salon On The Anti-Gaming CSI Episode

On Monday we mentioned an upcoming CSI episode using GTA as a prop in a tale of violent gamers on a murder-spree. Well, via Gamepolitics, Salon has a feature on the episode in all its game-hating glory. From the Salon piece: "In conjunction with the venom and disgust that infuses the word 'gamer' when it's spoken by star David Caruso, aka 'Horatio Crane,' it is made clear... that people who play games are but one step removed from pedophiles or suicide bombers in the social hierarchy of evil."

77 comments

  1. Re:FIST SPORT! by jclast · · Score: 2, Informative

    Methinks that Gabe and Tycho prove you wrong. Gamers have the capacity to be good people, just like everybody else.

    --
    e2 | LJ
  2. What a riot.. by Cyberglich · · Score: 4, Funny

    I love CSI but this one was so bad it was funny watching the guy play the game. What they never herd of gamefaqs.com?

    1. Re:What a riot.. by jaredmauch · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my wife and I were both saying 1) Internet, 2) Buy the Guide. Would have shortened the episode by half an hour though.

    2. Re:What a riot.. by chrish · · Score: 1

      Surely you know that the Internet is only for child pornographers and terrorists plotting destruction via email.

      Hasn't the Dept. of Homeland Security taught you anything?

      --
      - chrish
  3. Why should we care? by readin · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Getting infuriated by bad TV is a spectacularly useless kind of rage, an exercise in futility akin to bemoaning the badness of "Star Wars'" romance scenes or the stupidity of intelligent design advocates. It's always better to just change the channel.

    But getting mad about bad TV depictions of video game culture takes such pointlessness to truly stratospheric heights of inanity.


    He's right you know. So why are we here? If seeing stuff on a TV screen influences your behavior, then they're right that video-games are a bad influence. If seeing stuff on a TV screen doesn't influence your behavior then why do gamers care if gamers are depicted negatively on TV?

    So why am I posting? I noticed only one person posted before me and I'm hoping an early post will get modded up and help my karma :)

    --
    I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    1. Re:Why should we care? by ivan256 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      So why am I posting? I noticed only one person posted before me and I'm hoping an early post will get modded up and help my karma :)

      Welcome to the gaming section of slashdot. The only way you're getting moderated in here is if you say something good/bad about the Xbox/PS2. And then the only way you're getting modded is down by the fanboys that you piss off, regardless of whether or not you had a valid point.

    2. Re:Why should we care? by Shad_the_protector · · Score: 1

      would I've been a mod I would have mod your answer as insightfull.....

    3. Re:Why should we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If seeing stuff on a TV screen influences your behavior

      I've never really questioned that. My little brother would watch some power ranger or ninja turtle junk on tv then come and try to "ninja kick" me. No, what I question is whether what we see and do in game worlds trains us for violence in the real world.

      Does pressing WASD over and over while pointing a gun using a mouse and clicking to fire anything from blobs of slime to nuclear warheads actually teach anyone how to kill anything? Can a mal-adjusted 13 year old really run around with a full-size chainsaw without cutting his own legs off thanks to years of experience with chopping up demons? Can anyone fire a heavy revolver for the first time without having the gun fly out of their hands?

    4. Re:Why should we care? by Krater76 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...then why do gamers care if gamers are depicted negatively on TV?

      The reason that gamers should care is because the TV show is saying that playing video games does influence behavior.

      You seem to be mistaking behavior (someone actually doing something) for image (the perception of someone doing something). This episode can influence the audience's image of gamers and strengthen the falsehood that games alter behavior. And although I don't personally think it could happen, the result could be lawsuits against game makers or sanctions against certain 'undesireable' game content. Lucky for us, CSI: Miami isn't the ratings hog that the original is.

      Ask Twisted Sister what they think of a negative image. Their 'We're Not Gonna Take It' doesn't have a single violent, sexual, or vulgar lyric in it yet was used in a Congressional hearing to promote explicit lyrics stickers on music. Dee Snider got chewed out by Al Gore just to be saved later by John Denver who trashed the sticker when he said that people mistake his 'Rocky Mountain High' song as a pot-smoking song.

      Image is all you have and once it's gone it's almost impossible to get back. Gamers should protect it whenever they get the chance.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    5. Re:Why should we care? by Catnapster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's all about context. Games can influence behavior; so can TV. Someone who, for some reason, doesn't understand that it's bad to mow down people with an automatic rifle may well be influenced by a video game to do so. Someone who has been normally socialized and understands that murder is bad will not be swayed by said video game.

      Similarly, someone who doesn't understand that gamers are generally civilized human beings like everyone else will be swayed by a TV show that (by my understanding) effectively uses "gamer" as a euphemism for "murderer." The difference here is that many people actually don't know much about gamers or gamer culture, and are likely to believe that gamers are murderers - and treat them as such.

      The key here is that influences on one's behavior or viewpoint are filtered through pre-existing knowledge first. If a source that is perceived as credible gives misinformation, and there is no pre-existing knowledge that contradicts it, the misinformation will take root because nothing suggests that it would be untrue. It's the same reason why Internet hoaxes last as long as they do.

      While I'm on the subject, I should point out that I do not consider it possible for games to turn the average kid into a murderer because (one) most kids don't treat games as a credible source of information, and (two) most kids have been properly socialized to know that the acts in the game are unacceptable in reality. In the absence of factor (one), the kid knows not to commit the acts anyway; in the absence of factor (two), the kid is as likely to be influenced by a violent movie, violent song, violent book, or violent scene in nature as the video game.

      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
    6. Re:Why should we care? by kamapuaa · · Score: 0, Troll

      Oh I see! You're not splitting hairs at all! It can manipulate image which then causes behaviors, but not manipulate behaviors! It's all so clear!

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    7. Re:Why should we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I see! You're not splitting hairs at all! It can manipulate image which then causes behaviors, but not manipulate behaviors! It's all so clear!

      Don't be an idiot, you know what he means.

    8. Re:Why should we care? by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've played quite a lot 3D shooters and some time ago, I got the opportunity to try out a simulator the police uses to train on using a handgun. This simulator has a screen on which a situation is played (in real video) and you use a gun fitted with an IR light. Now compared to a standard FPS the "levels" are quite easy. (only 5 bad guys and a hostage) But it's a whole different matter to use a "real" gun instead of a mouse pointer. And this simulator doesn't even have the recoil or the painfull noise that comes with firing a real gun.
      Not to mention that it's a real eye opener when the instructor points out you fired 8 rounds while the (real) gun holds only 6...

      Games don't train people to be better killers, if it was the army wouldn't waste so much money using real ammo for traing soldiers.

    9. Re:Why should we care? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Games don't train people to be better killers, if it was the army wouldn't waste so much money using real ammo for traing soldiers.

      In less well-funded armies you don't get live ammunition for targeting practice because that's too expensive, you only get the simulator (with two or three live-ammo exercises thrown in).

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    10. Re:Why should we care? by grumbel · · Score: 1

      ### Games don't train people to be better killers, if it was the army wouldn't waste so much money using real ammo for traing soldiers.

      Games don't train you to use a real gun, I agree on that, however I believe that they *do* help you to be a better killer. The thing is that a human normally won't shoot at another human, in many past wars that resulted in plenty of men never firing a single shoot[1]. These days the army does practice a lot to get away from that no-shooting-'reflex' and trains plenty of shooting at human silhouette. There is some study[2] says that video games do pretty much the same, they train you to shoot at human silhouettes. Of course that doesn't help you a thing if you don't have training with a real gun in addition, but if you stuck a non-gamer and a gamer into combat and only give them some basic gun training, I believe that the gamer would be more like to actually fire, simply because he trained to do that a lot, while the non-gamer might thing twice.

      [1] Seen on some discovery channel docu
      [2] Sorry don't have a link at hand

    11. Re:Why should we care? by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

      The answer to the last one is: easily, but their arm will probably be sore. The weight keeps a lot of the kick down. My question would be, could anyone fire one of those way-too-light titanium crap revolvers for the first time without having the gun fly out of their hands?

      That aside, I'm tired of heavy cartridges, and lately I've had a good (although overly expensive) time target shooting with FN's five-seven.

  4. Because we all know... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    that children play games and anyone who wants to play a game must be doing it to get close to children to impose their evil desires on them.

  5. Gamers are... by cyberbob2010 · · Score: 5, Funny

    but one step removed from pedophiles or suicide bombers
    or bad television...

    --
    We seldom regret saying too little but often regret saying too much.
  6. gamer's violent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'll carjack them and shoot them in the head!

    1. Re:gamer's violent? by uberjoe · · Score: 1
      i'll carjack them and shoot them in the head!

      You forgot to rape them first, and take their money too while you are at it.

      --

      The days of the digital watch are numbered.

    2. Re:gamer's violent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always forget the order of these things... Is it murder them rob them sodomize them rape them or is it the other way around?

  7. Re:FIST SPORT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry, don't you mean I thinks?

  8. Recently by FidelCatsro · · Score: 4, Funny

    Us evil gamers are getting bad press on slashdot . Not all gamers are good upstanding people who just enjoy playing games to de-stress and have a good time . Some of us gamers actually do go on killing sprees , eat babies and Worship Satan whilst sacrificing virgins .
    I cheer CSI for giving us forgotten gamers some press .

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    1. Re:Recently by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Some of us gamers actually do go on killing sprees , eat babies and Worship Satan whilst sacrificing virgins ."

      This is Slashdot; we are the virgins.

    2. Re:Recently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe by "sacrificing virgins" he meant suicide

  9. Re:FIST SPORT! by jclast · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    e2 | LJ
  10. Hrm... Sounds like a joke I heard. by vertinox · · Score: 3, Funny

    that people who play games are but one step removed from pedophiles or suicide bombers in the social hierarchy of evil.

    Stop me know if you heard this one.

    So a priest, terrorist, and gamer all walk into a bar...

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    1. Re:Hrm... Sounds like a joke I heard. by Jaeph · · Score: 1

      The priest looks around, proclaims the place a "den of filth", and leaves.

      The terrorist looks around, and likewise proclaims the place a "den of filth", and leaves.

      The gamer catches up, and asks "What, are we too low level for The Den of Filth?"

      -Jeff

      --
      Please learn the difference between a dissenting opinion and a troll before you moderate.
    2. Re:Hrm... Sounds like a joke I heard. by vertinox · · Score: 1

      LOL! Good one ;)

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  11. OH the Humanity!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    CSI is a TV drama program - you know, FICTION or more specifically ENTERTAINMENT. I'm not going into the worth or quality as fiction or entertainment, because it's irrelevant.

    The problem with this whole position is that it reinforces the premise that you get your values from TV and that willful ignorance is "normal".

    The fact that a majority of the (voting) population get all their information from the media is the outrage here. Complaining about the values conveyed is just as mindless as "The war on terror" (coined by foxnews hours before the first government statement on 9/11).

  12. Oh! NO by Shad_the_protector · · Score: 1

    Damn, video game is like the One Ring, you can't escape its influence and it will put us all in beserk trance and we will all destroy the world....

    *going to check if my DOOM'S DAY device will be ready for this date*

  13. Bruckheimer's School of Entertainment by xenomouse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When trying to figure out why some form of entertainment is made in a certain way or made to promote a certain message, the obvious and usually most simple reaction is to follow the money. Who writes the checks to get CSI: Miami made? Jerry Bruckheimer, the number one purveyor of non-cerebral entertainment in the U.S. He's been responsible for such gems as: The Rock, Con Air, Armageddon, Enemy of the State, Coyote Ugly, Kangaroo Jack, and more. Not all his projects are bad; in fact, I really enjoyed Black Hawk Down and Pirates of the Caribbean. However, all his movies are highly dependent on manipulating his viewers' emotions into what he thinks they should feel and rarely do they engage the viewers' intellect. He does this voluntarily and overtly, and his quotes listed on imdb even allude to that philosophy.

    All that being said, when someone makes entertainment this way, his product is going to be emotionally engaging (either positively or negatively). Obviously, the write of the article was affected very negatively. On the other hand, i'm sure there were many people who were affected in a way that they did take the viewpoint of the show: that gamers are sheep and game companies will promote murder in order to sell games.

    1. Re:Bruckheimer's School of Entertainment by prichardson · · Score: 1

      You enjoyed Black Hawk Down?

      Why?

      I know this seems antagonistic, but I'm legitimately curious. I thought it was total rubbish.

      --
      Help I'm a rock.
    2. Re:Bruckheimer's School of Entertainment by Babbster · · Score: 1

      However, all his movies are highly dependent on manipulating his viewers' emotions into what he thinks they should feel and rarely do they engage the viewers' intellect.

      Virtually all fiction is designed to "manipulate" the viewers' emotions. Otherwise, what's the point? Even good documentaries are edited so that they will entertain (which requires an emotional reaction) as well as inform. If you dislike Jerry Bruckheimer for generally creating fiction with a ham-handed approach to said manipulation, that's cool, but manipulating emotions is what entertainment - smart or dumb - is all about.

    3. Re:Bruckheimer's School of Entertainment by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      I think he meant to type Water Ship Down.

      But I might be wrong.

      --
      resigned
    4. Re:Bruckheimer's School of Entertainment by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "However, all his movies are highly dependent on manipulating his viewers' emotions into what he thinks they should feel and rarely do they engage the viewers' intellect."

      So what you're saying is that Bruckheimer is the Acclaim of movies and television?

      Seriously, it feels like it's time to whip out the overused "pot/kettle" metaphor.

    5. Re:Bruckheimer's School of Entertainment by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      Well, they sell CSI video games, and video games are definitely a few intellectual steps below your average Jerry Bruckheimer flick. Claiming video games are some intellectual pursuit is a joke.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    6. Re:Bruckheimer's School of Entertainment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, that film is in my bottom 10 films of all time list. Utter nonsense. Apart from its revisionist, racist undertones it was also boring. I was utterly unsympathetic towards the US soldiers by the end, couldn't have cared less what happened to them. Awful film.

      I do however love 'Without a Trace' which I think is a Bruckheimer opus..

  14. "I love having this cake... by jeblucas · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...and eating it too! Heaven forfend someone pick up and play one of the 5 CSI games (for three platforms mind you). The ones that have been rated by the ESRB are all rated Mature(17+) and feature healthy things like Bood and Gore, Violence, and , ooh hey, Sexual Themes if you pick up the CSI:Miami one.

    --
    blarg.
    1. Re:"I love having this cake... by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1

      Nice catch.

      But when you have actors portraying gamers who are acting out in real life the things they do for fake in games why not make a machinima/mod where the main character is an actor who acts out in real life the things that he do for fake in movies/tv shows?

      Then we can have CSI making an episode out of it to form an infinite loop.

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  15. article text please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can someone post the text so others dont have to go through that hideous ad?

  16. Hmm.. dont you think they are over reacting? by AzraelKans · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I just saw the cbs blob and it doesnt quite sound as an "anti gamer" episode to me, it clearly mentions "psychopats acting out a game" the bad guys are the "psychopaths" not the game, the game is just something they are imitating, if it had said "teens" or "innocent children" or "my innocent, innocent clients" then we will had a Jack Thompson like statement in all its glory. CSI is looking for some idiot serial killers acting out a game.

    I would like to reserve judgement until I see the episode (which is difficult because I dont watch that show, not because is bad, I just find it too morbid for my taste.)

    feel free to correct me Im im wrong. I ussually am

    --
    Go ahead MOD my day!
    More opinions here
    1. Re:Hmm.. dont you think they are over reacting? by Nutria · · Score: 1

      I would like to reserve judgement until I see the episode

      I saw the episode last night, and to say that it was anti-gamer is total BS.

      The CSI shows always have a range of psycopaths, sociopaths, mobs and generally not-nice people on it. So, what do you expect when the plot "hook" is video games? Mother Teresa playng Pac Man?

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    2. Re:Hmm.. dont you think they are over reacting? by McCarrum · · Score: 1

      She was more of a Frogger type of gal.

    3. Re:Hmm.. dont you think they are over reacting? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Sure Cane didn't like the guys he was chasing, but they really were psychopaths. It turns out in the end that they weren't just acting out the game they played, but were encouraged to do so by the CEO of the company selling the game.

    4. Re:Hmm.. dont you think they are over reacting? by Golias · · Score: 1

      I saw the episode last night, and to say that it was anti-gamer is total BS.

      The CSI shows always have a range of psycopaths, sociopaths, mobs and generally not-nice people on it. So, what do you expect when the plot "hook" is video games? Mother Teresa playng Pac Man?


      BDSM freaks objected just as loudly to the CSI episode with the dominatrix suspect.

      It's all just harmless entertainment until it's your ox being gored.

      Great, now I've gone and pissed off fans of bull-fighting!

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  17. Video Games Have An Image Problem! by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

    I keep saying this, and people keep denying it:

    Video games have an image problem!

    *We* know what the truth is, but we're involved in games, either as players or makers. The perception outside the gamer niche is that games are involved with crime, murder sprees and all sorts of bad things. Enough mud has been slung at video games that the general perception seems to be negative.

    Sooner or later, politicians will do their usual 'tough on crime' thing, and crack down on the gaming industry.

    What can we do? Plenty! Game makers need to start focusing more on realism and less on caricatures shooting the crap out of each other. Stuff like Hot Coffee should *never* have been included in the game, even if the code wasn't enabled. Extreme content like that is nearly always weak compared to even a cheap movie, and only serves to reinforce the negative image about games and game players.

    Video games have an image problem.

    1. Re:Video Games Have An Image Problem! by Grey_14 · · Score: 1

      Why should company's censor their work? I agree that gaming has an image problem, but making all games "Family Friendly" is not the way to do it, instead the family friendly games should be made more well known, but also mainstream is just gonna have to learn to accept violent and graphic games, just like they learned to accept graphic movies, TV and music.

    2. Re:Video Games Have An Image Problem! by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      You're right - games shouldn't have to be family friendly. But on the other hand, it's not good that content like Hot Coffee was hidden away - when it was exposed, it became a "think of the children!" moment, even though the game should never have been sold to kids.

      One issue isn't that games should have to conform to a model, but instead that they should be rated fairly based on content and those ratings communicated clearly to the media. This is sort of being done anyway, but letting media go on a PR offensive against games while giving the response that "it's their problem, not ours" is a quick way to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

      Whenever the media put up crap like that CSI show (which is, in every single respect, crap TV of the smelliest order anyway) then the deafening silence from the industry reinforces the media's line. If people really look hard, they can find gamers speaking out, but few if any gamers make headlines for any positive reason.

  18. The show isn't the problem... by illumina+us · · Score: 1

    The show isn't the problem. Anyone who watched this episode knows it's a joke and most gamers (I'll wager 99.9% of gamers) will never act this way. However, there is a problem with society. The majority of people watching this episode who are compliment to the set of gamers will now have a very skewed view of the set of gamers. Ths is the problem. Jack Thompson's of the world rejoice.

    --
    -illumina+us "I put on my robe and wizard hat..."
  19. Bad at the things you know, bad at everything by Kris_J · · Score: 1

    If you notice things that are wrong with a TV show, fiction or non-fiction, or book or movie, in your area of expertise, you can be damn sure that they're getting heaps of stuff wrong in areas that you know nothing about. You can keep watching in ignorance, or you can write it off as junk. More often than not I do the latter.

    1. Re:Bad at the things you know, bad at everything by Soybean47 · · Score: 1

      Heh...yeah. I'll be watching a show, and thinking, "Wow, they can do that?" or "Wow, is that how that works?"

      Then they'll start talking about their computer. "I'll just boot prompt the slash rom and reformat the accessor bridge, and then we should be able to hack into their hard drive."

      That's about when I start to feel like an idiot for being impressed by the first part.

  20. sound about right to me by aminorex · · Score: 1

    Let me see, we have (1) people who love children, (2) people willing to give their lives for the greater good, and (3) gamers.

    Personally, I'd say it's much easier to care about children than to sacrifice your life for the greater good, so I'd peg them (2), (1), (3), but I think there's a big gap between (2) and (3) in this case.

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  21. Stop complaining - CSI had game culture nailed by Liquidrage · · Score: 5, Funny

    I often see hot girls make huge efforts to fit in with guys that are addicted to video-games. When the female actress in CSI was crying and said (paraphrasing), "You don't know what it's like. If you're not a gamer they don't care about you" to explain why she went along with the guys on their crime spree, nothing more true has ever been said. We live in a culture where hot women are forced to conform to the video game habits of young men. When I'm out at a bar or club I can't help but feel sorry for all the rejected hot young women I see. They just didn't have what it takes to conform to the gamers they so desperately want and they flock to bars in packs to drown their sorrows.

    This is a major problem in America. Young women should not be forced to "fit it" with the gamers just to get some self-esteem. I don't know about you, but tonight when I'm out at the bar I'm going to make it my duty to help out some of these rejected non-gaming women.

    1. Re:Stop complaining - CSI had game culture nailed by kc32 · · Score: 1

      Where the hell are all these hot girls?

    2. Re:Stop complaining - CSI had game culture nailed by Raseri · · Score: 1

      It's called "irony," sir. :)

      --
      Writhe your naked ass to the mindless groove.
    3. Re:Stop complaining - CSI had game culture nailed by Corbu+Mulak · · Score: 1

      I think most of them are gagged and bound in my closet.

  22. Silly plot. Don't take it seriously. by techstar25 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wow. It looks like somebody is taking the show too seriously. A crime show always makes "somebody" look like satan. One time is was a housewife, once a judge, a few times a lawyer was the criminal, sometimes it's a child, a delivery man, postal worker, convenience store clerk, whatever. I watched that episode (as a game fan), and I thought, "they sure made COLLEGE KIDS look like low self esteem morons". The opinion on Salon is flat out wrong. Gamers in general were never presented in a negative light. To call the episode anti-gaming is quite naive, and is like calling every other CSI:Miami episode anti-boating (because it seems people always seem to get killed on or around boats) or anti-beach (for the same reason), or anti-college student (for the same reason). I think it's irresponsible to call it anti-gaming. The producers of CSI know who their audience is, and guess what...it's gamers...guys who like action and enjoy movies like The Rock and Armageddon.

    1. Re:Silly plot. Don't take it seriously. by CoolGuySteve · · Score: 1

      I think CSI: Miami is total soccermom porn. The 40-something raspy detective drives around Miami in a hummer killing alligators and nogoodniks while arresting ethnic people. I think a large portion of their audience just might be retarded in just the right ways to take it seriously to some extent.

  23. It's Good That Gaming Is Misunderstood by cmotd · · Score: 0

    It means that it is still a non-mainstream industry! As soon as everyone understands and accepts gaming it will become as boring, banal and mundane as Hollywood. Viva La Difference!

    BTW Games are also a direct competitor to Bruckheimer's style of TV, he may not like that.

  24. That's it! by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now that we've had this accurate portrayal of crime and gaming in Miami, I think now we can all understand where Miami-resident Jack Thompson is coming from!

  25. even lower on the social hierarchy of evil... by unitron · · Score: 1
    "...that people who play games are but one step removed from pedophiles or suicide bombers in the social hierarchy of evil."

    Actually I was fairly normal until some malevolent force put David Caruso back on prime time TV. I swear it's enough to make anyone an axe murderer.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  26. Can't say I'm surprised by agraupe · · Score: 1

    David Caruso and his character are both flaming wads of shit. Don't believe me? Watch one episode of CSI: Miami, and you will be treated to what is possibly the worst acting on primetime TV. I like the original CSI, but the spinoffs all suck. Showing a controversial issue like this is a last ditch attempt to get people to watch. CSI: Miami is dying, and I'm sure Netcraft will confirm it any day now.

    1. Re:Can't say I'm surprised by PastaLover · · Score: 1

      I sorta agree. I've never really liked CSI:M, especially compared with CSI. What I've always thought is that not only the acting is worse, the political undertones are also much more conservative in CSI:M. It's more the 'tough on crime'-show than the original CSI. Perhaps this all sells a bit better with the somewhat older (florida-based?) population.

      Me, I can't help but cringe whenever they get 'tough' on crime.

    2. Re:Can't say I'm surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Watch one episode of CSI: Miami, and you will be treated to what is possibly the worst acting on primetime TV"

      Thats exactly how many I watched. You've hit the nail on the head there sir.

  27. i stopped reading the article... by aneroid · · Score: 1

    ...at "Readers beware: Motivated by pure venom, I'm going to spoil the hell out of this episode."

  28. Gamers should have seen it coming by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

    Gamers should have seen this coming around the time "Fur and Loathing," the anti-furry episode aired.

    --
    Help us build a better map!
    1. Re:Gamers should have seen it coming by Sheetwakahn · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly, I've seen a few episodes and it seems like the standard plot device is to take some offbeat and supposedly under-represented subculture and make fun of them throughout an episode, Goths, Furries, UFO um, whatever you call UFO people. They've all been used for a cheap laugh, or portrayed as villianous freaks. It smacks of a lack of creativity, sort of like a bully picking out a new target each week for derision. The only really interesting episode I saw was the one that Tarentino did, which ignored this contrivance, otherwise they are cookie cutter crapfests.

  29. The character is bad not so much the actor by LordZardoz · · Score: 1

    The character of Horatio in CSI Miami is intended to be a very one note charcter. He is Intense. And not much else.

    Horatio sounds grim and intense when going after murders. Or drug dealers. Or pornorgraphers. But he also sounds grim and intense when going after gamers, parking tickets, littering, and jay walking.

    I bet he also sounds grim and intense when doing a presentation about bike saftey to kindergarten students. Or when he is playing with a box full of puppies. Or when he is squeezing on off while reading pornography. Or when he orders a pizza. Or when he talks about the weather.

    Anyway, this particular CSI episode is no worse then the comparable Law and Order episodes. All crime dramas try to use current events to seem relevant and pop a rating when they can.

    END COMMUNICATION

  30. Oh the Irony! by a_peckover · · Score: 2, Funny
  31. I could only watch 5 minutes of it by Sizzlean · · Score: 1

    The kids running around the bank shooting it up to the latest mall punk/Xtreeem soundtrack made me choke with laughter and I had to turn it off. Seriously, CSI: Miami is even worse than the New York one (is that still on?) Caruso is a ham that could put Pacino to shame, the nasty orange filter they put over every goddamned shot that takes place outside a building gives me a headache and the plots are contrived by Joey standards.

  32. Nick and Greg from CSI:LA are gamers themselves. by Dear+Diary,+My+Teen · · Score: 1

    In the pilot episode, there's a brief conversation between both when Nick asks Greg if he has a Dreamcast. I got this from "Elyse: CSI Site" (http://members.aol.com/JRD203/csi-episode-000.htm ): "Nick is apparently a videogame buff. He asked Greg if he'd gotten the NFL-2K for Dreamcast yet. Of course he had. He got it the day it came out! Greg's team is the Falcons, while Nick chose Randy Moss." -C2

  33. So in accordance.. by Electr!c_B4rd_Qu!nn · · Score: 0

    If I play GTA, Prince of Persia, AND Burnout 3....I will become a dagger-using thug who thinks he can turn back time while driving into other cars in the hopes of making them explode so I can get more cars in my garage? I love these shrinks who wholly believe in that kind of drivvel. The games may influence the weaker minds, but that does NOT make all of us who play them one step away from rampaging psychopaths. BTW, I thought we denounced all this in a previous Slashdothttp://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=99/12/1 0/2223202&tid=149/?

    --
    " i r 1337. j00 a l0z3r "
    That talk kinda makes you cry, doesn't it?
    That's right..cry those nerdly tears
  34. Games can misrepresent but TV can not? by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    So it is OK when games are overdramatic, unrealistic, and misrepresent reality in order to tell a story or to contrive a desired situation, but it is not ok for TV to do so? And god forbid that gamers be the target of this artistic license. The majority of posts on slashdot seem to either (1) make the CSI episode earn an "insightful" rating for depicting gamers as a selfabsorbed and antisocial or (2) reveal gamers to be a whiney childish lot that can dish it out but not take it, that others can fairly be portrayed in a negative light in their art but go ballistic when they are portrayed in a negative light in someone else's art. Perhaps some of the gamers around here should reflect on how they reacted when various police orgranization attacked GTA. Wasn't the prevailing attitude "its just a game, no one takes it serious"? Well shouldn't gamers be saying "its just a TV show, no one takes it serious, every family has a gamer or two and people know they are not really like that"?

    Yes, I've spent a lot of time playing games. Yes, I realize that the majority of gamers do not share the whiner's attitude and that they don't really have a problem with things like the CSI episode, that they don't take it any more seriously than the games they play.

  35. I saw the episode... by ssand · · Score: 1

    I saw the episode and it wasn't that bad. They weren't nessesarily blaming the game, but they did keep some very strong sentiments towards the game, in both the visuals and the dialogue. To start, there were only a few partial shots of the box, which was suprisingly similar to the GTA boxes. CSI members had quotes along the lines of "I had this game but stopped after the first hour, it's horrible of society blah blah blah". What I find particularly amusing is the sort of weapons these teens had. Being from Canada, and living without guns I'm not aware of what people can get, but it seemed a little extreme. It was also funny that they touched on people who have died from playing too many video games...