Slashdot Mirror


EFF and Sony Disclose New DRM Security Hole

Dotnaught writes "The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and SONY BMG Music Entertainment said on Tuesday that SunnComm is offering a patch to fix a security vulnerability with its MediaMax Version 5 content protection software on 27 SONY BMG CDs. Security firm iSEC Partners discovered the hole following a request by the EFF to examine the SunnComm software. The vulnerability involves a directory installed on users' computers by the MediaMax software that could allow a third party to gain control over the affected Windows PC. The EFF and iSEC delayed disclosing the problem until SunnComm could develop a fix."

71 of 258 comments (clear)

  1. yes we all know by scenestar · · Score: 3, Funny

    How big of a drama it is.

    Sue the bastards and get it over with.

    --
    perpetually dwelling in the -1 pits
    1. Re:yes we all know by saskboy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Patience...

      http://www.boycottsony.us/ has the latest news on developments in the Sony case, and www.sonysuit.com lists the lawsuits.

      A New lawsuit for Candians is being opened by http://www.glynhotz.com/ an Ontario lawyer. The XCP CDs appear to still be on many store shelves, more than a week after the recall was announced in Canada.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    2. Re:yes we all know by cloudkiller · · Score: 2, Insightful

      let me see. I have a crappy OS (Windows) that I have to patch once a month. I have many crappy browsers that also need to be patched from time to time. I have a software firewall that needs patching plus antivirus, anti-spyware, office apps, email clients, photo programs, games... And now I also have to patch my CD's. Great! Hey, I have a better idea, why not just sell us an upgraded music CD that has a patched DRM? As long as it's at least $5 more than the first one I bought I'll have the assurance of spending the most money possible while also having 16 copies of Jessica Simpson's new CD.

      --
      [an error occurred while processing this sig]
  2. Useful indeed by Renegade+Lisp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And to think that only yesterday, there was a slashdot story wondering whether the EFF had outlived its usefulness... So there's your answer, I guess.

  3. Assume the Position by xmuskrat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hopefully the fix is them turning around, bending over, and grabbing their ankles.

    --
    activestudios web design
    1. Re:Assume the Position by BushCheney08 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hopefully the fix is them turning around, bending over, and grabbing their ankles.

      I really don't want to know what the plug for the hole looks like.

      --
      Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
    2. Re:Assume the Position by Soruk · · Score: 3, Funny

      Large stick of dynamite, with any luck.

      --
      -- Soruk
  4. Quick Question... by parsnip11 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Who in their right mind would voluntarily install something from SunComm or SonyBMG given their track record?

    Their software phones home and cripples your computer. Would anyone here actually trust them?

    1. Re:Quick Question... by jc42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who in their right mind would voluntarily install something from SunComm or SonyBMG given their track record?

      Most of the victims have no idea that they're installing software on their computer. They're just playing a CD that they bought.

      We geeks and nerds on /. understand the issue. 99% of the population don't even know what "installing software" means, have never done it (intentionally), and aren't to blame for being victims of such things.

      Blame the criminals, not their victims.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    2. Re:Quick Question... by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, reliance on binaries without source is blind faith too.

      Reliance on binaries WITH source is blind faith, too, if you can't read hundreds of thousands of lines of source yourself, since taking someone else's word for it is just as much "blind" faith.

      That's the answer! Only unemployed programmers should use computers!

    3. Re:Quick Question... by jc42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It just doesnt make sense. Would you hire the burglar that broke into your home to install your security system?

      Ah, but the great majority of victims of the first Sony rootkit still have it installed. They haven't heard about the problem, or head and didn't understand at all. If you take a look at the removal instructions, you'll see that there isn't a chance that your typical Joe Sixpack could ever follow them. If he tried, the result would probably be a machine that didn't boot.

      But most of the victims haven't tried to remove it, because they don't have any idea it's there.

      You might well hire the burglar if you had no clues that he was the burglar, and if friends and the BBB recommended him. This is an old sort of scam.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    4. Re:Quick Question... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No but if you insert a mod chip it will sprout legs and walk back to Sony corp headquarters.

      In Japan.

      Across the water.

      Yes really.

  5. Thank you Sony! by Suzumushi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sony has done more damage to the DMCA and set back DRM farther than the combined efforts of the EFF and like-minded people around the world. We should all thank them.

    1. Re:Thank you Sony! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, but the one thing they haven't been successful in is pointing out the danger of DRM to Joe Sixpack. A number of people I've spoken with have never heard of the Sony 'rootkit' case and had no idea that playing a recent Sony DRM-protected CD on a Windows PC could be dangerous to their computer system.

    2. Re:Thank you Sony! by VitaminB52 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes, but the one thing they haven't been successful in is pointing out the danger of DRM to Joe Sixpack.

      Antivirus software reporting the Sony DRM software as a virus should take care of that.
      Oh yes, and popular DJ's on national radio should warn their audience about the Sony DRM shit^H^H^Hoftware.

    3. Re:Thank you Sony! by Phisbut · · Score: 2, Informative
      A number of people I've spoken with have never heard of the Sony 'rootkit' case and had no idea that playing a recent Sony DRM-protected CD on a Windows PC could be dangerous to their computer system.

      I dunno about the media where you are, but up here in Québec, the Sony DRM screwup made the evening news bulletin on more than one occasion on two of the most watched channels, even clearly stating that the music CD's installed spyware without your agreement. Although not everybody knows what a rootkit is, many people know what spyware is, so the choice of words was appropriate.

      I love it that our media isn't sold (mostly) to the big corps. They even reported that the Xbox360 might have a heating problem that prevents some consoles from functionning. The Sony screwup is big enough a deal that the general public deserves to be informed.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
  6. Build it into the OS by Phillip2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    It is clear that DRM software is going to be as open to bugs as any other
    software, and some of these will constitute a security threat.

    Surely the solution is obvious. If they built DRM software directly into the
    operating system, then it could be happily updated with all the rest of the
    software, using whatever update mechanisms your OS provides.

    I'm sure that the security minded folks on slashdot will be the first to
    support a legal requirement for DRM in all OS'es, so that we can solve this
    problem before it becomes really serious.

    Phil

    1. Re:Build it into the OS by /ASCII · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's obvious that you are joking, but the problem is that this is exactly the solution that will be proposed, and in politics it is the preferred type of solution.

      --
      Try out fish, the friendly interactive shell.
    2. Re:Build it into the OS by eggoeater · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It is clear that DRM software is going to be as open to bugs as any other software...
      Actually...much more so.
      DRM software has to do more than regular software to prevent users from circumventing it, with the latest craze being OS hooks.
      Insecure software + OS hooks = HUGE security risks.
      If you ever want to release a worm that takes advantage of a DRM security hole, just put it on a web site that tells you how to disable that particular DRM. People will google for a way to disable their DRM, go to your site, and WHAM.

    3. Re:Build it into the OS by meringuoid · · Score: 2
      I'm sure that the security minded folks on slashdot will be the first to support a legal requirement for DRM in all OS'es, so that we can solve this problem before it becomes really serious.

      * applauds *

      Bravo! It's been far too long since I've seen a really good troll on /. - too many people think it's sufficient to copy and paste classic trolls of the past, or don't understand trolling and just post obscenities and flamebait, so it's wonderful to see a new, proper troll from time to time.

      Good trolling is, to my mind, a legitimate artform closely related to the best forms of satire, and should aim to receive torrents of outraged replies from people who've completely missed the joke. The best of them that I've seen here ended up with both Troll and Funny mods being applied, leading to what may well be the highest accolade Slashdot can grant, the super-rare +5 Troll. Good luck, and may the Force be with you :)

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  7. Sorry to be rude by FidelCatsro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But first you install stealthy and quite possibly illegal software with one hand , and on the other you install DRM with a Security hole that hardly anyone will patch because they will likely not hear about it.
    Way to go Sony , you truly are a bunch of arse-holes .
    Well at least if this gets major press coverage it may cause an even large headache to ever encroaching wave DRM

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    1. Re:Sorry to be rude by hokeyru · · Score: 2, Informative

      Agreed. We can argue about whether evil is worse than incompetence, but the combination of the two is truly fearsome.

      If you have have any of these CD's, return them. If you're a fan of any of these artists, write them a letter:

      Trey Anastasio, Shine (Columbia)
      Celine Dion, On ne Change Pas (Epic)
      Neil Diamond, 12 Songs (Columbia)
      Our Lady Peace, Healthy in Paranoid Times (Columbia)
      Chris Botti, To Love Again (Columbia)
      Van Zant, Get Right with the Man (Columbia)
      Switchfoot, Nothing is Sound (Columbia)
      The Coral, The Invisible Invasion (Columbia)
      Acceptance, Phantoms (Columbia)
      Susie Suh, Susie Suh (Epic)
      Amerie, Touch (Columbia)
      Life of Agony, Broken Valley (Epic)
      Horace Silver Quintet, Silver's Blue (Epic Legacy)
      Gerry Mulligan, Jeru (Columbia Legacy)
      Dexter Gordon, Manhattan Symphonie (Columbia Legacy)
      The Bad Plus, Suspicious Activity (Columbia)
      The Dead 60s, The Dead 60s (Epic)
      Dion, The Essential Dion (Columbia Legacy)
      Natasha Bedingfield, Unwritten (Epic)
      Ricky Martin, Life (Columbia)

      List from EFF.

  8. Effective DRM by faqmaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Root kits, Serial Copy Management, Macrovision, Content Protection for Prerecorded Media, Advanced Access Content System, blah, blah, blah. The most effective DRM is for the lables to continue to put out crappy music. Eventually we'll all find something better to listen to.

    --
    Are you...Are you some kind of genius?
    No, ma'am, I'm just a regular Slashdot reader.
  9. the paranoid ac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "The vulnerability involves a directory installed on users' computers by the MediaMax software that could allow a third party to gain control over the affected Windows PC. The EFF and iSEC delayed disclosing the problem until SunnComm could develop a fix."

     
    I've never understood how any userland bullshit software could manage the complexities of opening up a hole *on accident*. Call me paranoid, but, when shit like this gets 'found', they call it being 'found' because someone put it there.
    1. Re:the paranoid ac by ergo98 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've never understood how any userland bullshit software could manage the complexities of opening up a hole *on accident*. Call me paranoid, but, when shit like this gets 'found', they call it being 'found' because someone put it there.

      To install the software originally the user had to be an administrator (a lot of software requires admin rights because most of the system won't allow a basic user to install system-wide software. e.g. It could add files in your user directory and the like, but not in Program Files). From then on the software is running as System, operating as a part of the system (which is why it's called a root kit).

      My guess is that the folder where the software is stored has the ACLs set to Everyone with Full Control, or something similar. Because this root kit is run as System when the system boots up, a simple user exploit could circumvent user isolation by overwriting some of the rootkit files, and on next boot it'll be running as System, with full local permissions.

    2. Re:the paranoid ac by jc42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Call me paranoid, but, when shit like this gets 'found', they call it being 'found' because someone put it there.

      Hey, Paranoid, you're not paranoid enough.

      I keep noticing the same misuse of the passive voice to avoid saying who's to blame. As a programmer, it's perfectly obvious to me that no computer ever installs software by accident. It takes some significant software to install something like this, and (as the Intelligent Design folks like to point out), this software doesn't get there by random flipping of bits from alpha-particle impacts. Someone spent a lot of time writing the software that does the installing, and they knew what they were doing when they wrote it.

      Something else I noticed: Before seeing this article on slashdot, I'd just been reading the coverage of the story on news.google.com, and I was a bit bemused by the fact that I couldn't find mention of the kinds of computers that were vulnerable to this exploit. Now, call me paranoid too, but I'll make the wild surmise that they were running Microsoft Windows.

      Anyone know? Is this one infecting OSX, linux and Solaris boxes? Or maybe PalmOS or Symbian smartphones?

      Inquiring minds want to know ...

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    3. Re:the paranoid ac by SillySlashdotName · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Something else I noticed: Before seeing this article on slashdot, I'd just been reading the coverage of the story on news.google.com, and I was a bit bemused by the fact that I couldn't find mention of the kinds of computers that were vulnerable to this exploit. Now, call me paranoid too, but I'll make the wild surmise that they were running Microsoft Windows.

      I have posted this before - almost always it isn't an INTERNET worm, it is a MICROSOFT I.E. worm, it isn't an EMAIL virus, it is a MICROSOFT OUTLOOK email virus, it isn't a trojan, it is a MICROSOFT WINDOWS exploit...

      I really think the MICROSOFT name NEEDS to be presented when an exploit THAT ONLY RUNS ON MICROSOFT software is found.

      --
      Acts of massive stupidity are almost never covered by warranty. --me.
  10. Revised titles for Sony Rootkit CDs by digitaldc · · Score: 5, Funny

    Since they are redoing the CDs, maybe they can change the names too?

    Alicia Keys - Unplugged, but still Infected
    Amici - Forever Defined as Dishonest
    Britney Spears - Hitme, but Don't RipMe
    Cassidy - I'm A Hustla in Your PC
    David Gray - Life In Slow Motion Since your PC has a Rootkit
    Faithless - Forever Faithless Sony
    Imogen Heap - Speak For Yourself, I Love Rootkits
    Leo Kottke/Mike Gordon - Sixty Six Steps to Uninstall the Rootkit
    Raheem Devaughn - The Hate Experience
    Santana - All That I Am Allowed to Copy
    Stellastarr* - Harmonies for the Haunted PC
    Various - So Annoying: An All Star Tribute To Rootkits
    Wakefield - Which Side Are You On? Sony or the Public?
    YoungBloodZ - Everybody Know Me, Nobody Copy Me

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  11. I wonder.. by LilWolf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ..did they also fix that little issue where the DRM installs itself even if the user doesn't accept the EULA?

  12. No more money for Sony by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Great, now not only do I have to make sure all my users' applications are patched, but I have to track patches on every frigging DRM implementation out there as well.

    Well, payback is a bitch.

    I have already steered a friend away from a Sony stereo to another brand, making it clear that Sony is not a good "citizen" and they would do well to stay clear of any Sony products.

    Yes, I am only one puny person, but I've already cost them a couple of hundred bucks, and will continue do so at every opportunity.

    --
    A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    1. Re:No more money for Sony by Artifakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In fact, if Sony's hardware division loses marketshare, the board of directors will give more emphasis to the music division. They will pay higher saleries to the upper management of that division, give it a bigger budget, and so on.
                Sony needs to see hardware as a source of potential profits, and music, (especially DRM'ed music), as a source of losses that threaten to drag the whole company down. The lawsuits already filed and in process will definitely do that, if they don't grow big enough to actually destroy the company and not just threaten it. There is no way a huge fine from various state and national governments can be misinterpreted as either a general market condition, a consumer resonse to poor marketing, or piracy, so in this case, a boycott is superfluous at best and negative at worst.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  13. Re:Bad Music by FidelCatsro · · Score: 2

    I don't agree that anyone deserves to be owned , bar the creators of the DRM with a lawsuit.
    I may not like most of the music there and can see your point .Come on though ,how can you say everyone , Santana are still cool and are up there with Barry White on Music you play for romantic evenings

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  14. Perhaps not (Was Re:Useful indeed) by Billosaur · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From EFF: "We're pleased that SONY BMG responded quickly and responsibly when we drew their attention to this security problem," said EFF staff attorney Kurt Opsahl. "Consumers should take immediate steps to protect their computers."

    As if Sony, which already has a boatload of negative publicity, could do anything else. I think even the stuffed shirts there must now realize that they can't let anything else fall through the cracks or their music business might collapse. Don't be surprised in Sony divests itself of BMG music at some point in the future, to keep from losing customers for its home electronics business.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:Perhaps not (Was Re:Useful indeed) by CaptainZapp · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Most surprising is the change of Tune of Mr. Hesse, from:

      "Users don't know what a rootkit is so why should they care"

      to

      "We are taking the concerns of our customers very seriously, blahblahblah"

      Could it be that Mr. Hesse is full of shit?

      --
      ich bin der musikant

      mit taschenrechner in der hand

      kraftwerk

    2. Re:Perhaps not (Was Re:Useful indeed) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Don't be surprised in Sony divests itself of BMG music at some point in the future, to keep from losing customers for its home electronics business.

      They already lost me. And when a company loses my business, they lose it permanently.

      I had a Technics CD player in the mid-80's that had to be fixed repeatedly for the same problem under warranty. When the problem recurred shortly after the unit went out of warranty and they refused to fix or replace it, I sent a polite letter to the head of Panasonic USA explaining the situation and telling them that if they didn't replace the unit I'd never buy a another Panasonic product. They declined to fix or replace the unit and twenty years later, I still don't have another Panasonic product.

      You can be sure that there will never be a Sony product in my house in the future.

      Of course, this could be their attempt to implement DRM by fear. If your PC gets compromised every time you put a Sony audio disk in the drive, maybe you'll stop doing it. If you don't put the CD in your PC, they don't have to worry about you copying it.

    3. Re:Perhaps not (Was Re:Useful indeed) by IAmTheDave · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Don't be surprised in Sony divests itself of BMG music at some point in the future, to keep from losing customers for its home electronics business.

      Why, because Sony's other electronics shops won't be including any DRM built in, like DRM on HDMI and new high def TVs, DRM in new Blu-Ray DVD players, DRM in game machines and on game discs, DRM on Blu-Ray discs... I can almost guarentee that some of this DRM will prevent users from using the content they purchase the way they want to use it. Sony needs not to divest itself of BMG as a solution, because the problem exists at a much higher level - the perception that DRM is a "Good Thing." Until they resolve THAT issue, Sony is in for some hurt.

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
    4. Re:Perhaps not (Was Re:Useful indeed) by pete6677 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I had a similar experience with a fairly new Sony monitor. Even though it was under warranty, they tried to make excuses about why the repair wouldn't be covered. After much pulling of teeth, I finally got it repaired 3 months later. No more Sony products for me. They have run their formerly good name into the ground.

    5. Re:Perhaps not (Was Re:Useful indeed) by chrish · · Score: 5, Funny

      To answer a question with another question:

      Is he a corporate executive?

      --
      - chrish
  15. Here's another by Yolegoman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Switchfoot - Nothing is Sony

  16. Re:Bad Music by Flyboy+Connor · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...you play for romantic evenings

    You must be new here.

  17. Onion article by BushCheney08 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    --
    Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
  18. Re:Bad Music by Chaffar · · Score: 2, Funny
    Come on though ,how can you say everyone , Santana are still cool and are up there with Barry White on Music you play for romantic evenings

    On romantic evenings I turn off the music to make sure no one's home.

  19. Re:You know... by Renegade+Lisp · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Maybe I should spend some time listening to some top-40 radios. But then again, maybe not.

    You might wanna check out last.fm instead. Not exactly to get more top-40-ish in your musical taste, but to find all sorts of cool music you would never come across otherwise. Just type the names of those bands you don't know into their interface, and listen to some preview tracks. Or let them analyze your listening habits and suggest music to you. They even give you your own personalized radio station.

    No, I'm not affiliated with them, just an amazed user for a couple of weeks now.

  20. Now lets see by Ilex · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I could drive into town and spend £12/$12 on a DRM'd malware infected CD which may or may not play in my cars CD player / Ipod

    Or

    Sit here and rip the whole thing off the net for free and burn it to CD and copy it to my IPod.
    <sarcasm>
    Yeah DRM is a great way to stop piracy.
    </sarcasm>
    Maybe they should try offering value for money instead.
  21. The only real fix ... by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sony is really setting DRM and copy-protection back by several years. And with each annoucement, they are making more and more people dislike DRM. That's not a bad thing, I suppose, but they're making it painfully obvious that the only fix for this is the complete removal of the software for people's systems with instructions on how to prevent the software from being loaded again in the future. (Sadly, a huge number of people don't know about the Shift key as an autorun disabler.)

    Frankly, I want to see a major mea culpa from Sony on just about every TV and radio station that targets the audience from all of those DRMed audio CDs complete with previous said instructions and a promise (that will be kept) that such DRM techniques will never be used in the future.

    Considering that even artists themselves are starting to fight back against DRM stating that it does nothing but hurt the fans, which is true, it's about time for the heads of these companies to realize that Sony has crossed the line and that DRM for audio CDs is not only useless but can have dire consequences. I'm not going to use that silly "information wants to be free" dogma that is used too often on /. but it's become clear that negative reactions like DRM are not what keep CD sales going.

    Maybe they should - gasp! - try adding value that the customer wants and cannot get over the Internet through downloading rather than trying to add chains to a product that we want to legally buy. For example:
    * Buy the CD and get the concert DVD for 1/2 price
    * Buy the CD and get a discount on concert tickets and merchandise
    * Buy the CD and accumulate points that can be redeemed for other items

    Tactics like these, where items that cannot be downloaded are offered as incentive, is a much better alternative to increase sales than pissing off the customer base by nefarious methods such as DRM. This is particularly true because DRM can be defeated by one simple method: CD line out --> PC line in.

    In short, make it worth my while to buy the CD and not download it. DRM, particularly the kind that Sony implemented, does the opposite.

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
  22. iSecPartners by under_score · · Score: 2, Informative

    FWIW, I have known one of the founding partners at iSec, Jesse Burns, since high school. He's a very very smart guy with almost instinctual understanding of security issues and problems. This is a shameless plug for my friend's company: they're great and you'd do well to hire them if you want a good security audit or training done.

  23. Funny but I feel safer with "disreputable" sources by guidryp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Corporations are sometimes their own worse enemy. It has gotten to the point that I feel safer downloading my music from complete strangers on the internet than buying it in a store.

    The other farce in this fiasco is that these methods of protection are so easy to defeat that "anyone" who actually uploads music would not be slowed down for even a second.

    So we have an extreme example of a rights denial system that penalizes in the extreme the clueless who never were going to upload anyway, and does nothing, not one iota, to stop uploaders.

    Earth to idiots at corp HQ. Sony will feel the pain for years to come on this one. If I were an artist, I would be looking for a "no DRM" clause in my contracts when dealing with these morons.

  24. EFF by Kev_Stewart · · Score: 5, Funny

    Never underestimate the awesome power of pale vegetarian lawyers.

  25. Sony Software by Ankou · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This may be a little off topic, but with this whole Sony root kit thing has anyone checked their Sony software lines for the same exploits? I had been an avid user of Sony Vegas software since they bought out Sonic Foundry, but now I am scared to install it again. There goes about 400 dollars just cuase I lost trust for Sony. It was great software much faster and more stable than Premier Pro, probably becuase Sony didn't write it. It makes you wonder what else they have corrupted in their control game.

    1. Re:Sony Software by Ankou · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good call, that may work for network trasmisions, but there are other possible scenarios to take into consideration. For instance, how do I know if when I create a training video and burn it with their software, I dont propagate their root kit on that CD/DVD. The software does come with all kinds of protection options, so it isn't crazy to think of that kind of scenario. You are right 400 dollars isn't something to write off so fast. Imagine though being sued later by a client who's computer got infected with one of those videos. This is all hypothetical, just something to consider.

    2. Re:Sony Software by jackbird · · Score: 3, Funny

      I upgraded to vegas 6.0c about 3 days before the rootkit story broke. I checked my system for the $sys$ rootkit according to the Sysinternals site and found nothing.

  26. Re:Everyone should have known... by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sauerbraten and sashimi?

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  27. Wake up Artists by 4Dmonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

    Someone should go and tell the artists that they dont need these greedy evil middlemen to sell their music nowadays. They can simply create their own portals.
    That should solve a lot of problems.

    --
    God created man in his own image, but somehow he evolved into a hairless monkey.
  28. Did you catch the best part? by rbochan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    According to this report at CNET,
    "Sony said it will notify customers though a banner advertisement directly in the SunnComm software"

    So now you get banner ads with your audio cd+DRM.
    Nice.

    --
    ...Rob
    The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs; it's Don't Tread On Me.
  29. The patch is flawed by Ch*mp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The patch prevents you from 'innocultating' your PC against the risk of future 'infection'.

    The gist of this press release is that I now have to keep a list of all the titles that might be affected just in case I, or anyone in my family decides to buy a MediaMax protected CD (or are given one as a gift) - Yes you can still buy a flawed CD. Even if Sony issues a recall on ALL affected CDs that does not give me 100% protection from this mess.

    I now have to keep monitoring my PC forever more in case someone obtains an 'original' CD with the flawed DRM.

    How exactly is this announcement and patch supposed to help me?

    - All they've done is made my home admin tasks more complicated by heaping another problem onto me and they haven't given me an adequate solution.

  30. Doubly Screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The most interesting part about the whole Sony BMG rootkit fiasco, and now this, is that it seems as if Sony is doubly screwed from now on, because whenever they put out a new product, it's going to be hacked from all sides, to find little holes like this. I'm sure there are plenty of other products out there that behave similarly or have holes in them, that are from other companies, and aren't getting exposed because they didn't piss off the internet community.

    It's this kind of backlash now that is bustin Sony, because anything they put out from now on better be bullet-proof, or else it will wind up being counterproductive

  31. Not far enough by Havenwar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Until they make a patch for the crappy music on most of those CD's, I'm not purchasing. Oh, and while they're at it, make a patch for their distribution, since it seems something is faulty with their current method of forcing me to walk to the store and buying the physical disc... when I don't even have a regular cd-audio player.

    Of course this is a needed step for the "average joe" out there that didn't even know he got a malicious rootkit for free when playing a cd on his pc, but then again, does this average joe even know there is a patch out?

    as for the rest of us... too little, too late.
    they have to start with digital distribution without drm, or they will fail.

  32. DRM by Kaenneth · · Score: 3, Funny

    Some people say 'Digital Rights Managment' is good for the consumer.

    Some doctors used to recommend cigarettes.

  33. How About a Removal Tool Instead! by Junior+Samples · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't want a security patch for Sony's DRM malware. Just give me a removal tool and the problem will go away on it's own.

  34. Third party? by tehshen · · Score: 3, Funny

    The vulnerability involves a directory installed on users' computers by the MediaMax software that could allow a third party to gain control over the affected Windows PC.

    This is Windows we're talking about; I wouldn't be surprised if we're on to the seventh or eighty party by now.

    --
    Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
  35. Not just age, also artificial narrowing of choices by Morgaine · · Score: 4, Informative

    why the new acts can't all sound like Lionel Richie or Billy Ocean.

    I think that you missed the poster's point, since you mention old pop chart stars. The problem isn't that today's pop charts don't feature yesterday's pop chart music nor soundalikes --- expecting that would be totally dumb.

    The problem is that today the music scene is ruled 99% by the pop charts as a result of the ruthless efficiency of the Big Business side of the music industry, to the extent that almost all other musical styles are marginalized to near extinction. Musicians no longer come out of art school wanting to do something novel for their own niche audience; greed has overcome artistic integrity.

    Back in the day, the studios and labels were comparatively amateurish and ineffective, so public tastes were strongly influenced by radio station jockeys, through student union gigs/concerts, and by music tabloid reviews of live acts. These have almost no effect today. The image makers and immense marketting machine hold the scene in a vice-like grip.

    So it's not old age, only. It's also that musical horizons have been slammed down tight all around us, with only a few wonderful exceptions to the rule offering a temporary escape.

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
  36. One thing that isn't clear in this announcement: by merc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The article states that " SunnComm is offering a patch to fix a security vulnerability with its MediaMax Version 5 content protection software on 27 SONY BMG CDs. "

    Does this mean that once the SunnComm DRM software is patched it will go back to working as designed -- that is, do the DRM restrictions continue to constrain the end users' freedoms to use the music? Is the SunnComm software "fixed" or removed?

    I would have been happier to have heard they designed a removal tool.

    *grumblecakes*

    --
    It's true no man is an island, but if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie 'em together, they make a good raft.
  37. The Hits Just Keep On Coming by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Insightful
    SunnComm is offering a patch to fix a security vulnerability with its MediaMax Version 5 content protection software on 27 SONY BMG CDs.

    I am still waiting to see how you patch a CD -- short of replacing it entirely, that is.

    For now, I wouldn't trust Sony to patch my Tinkertoys properly, let alone my computer.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  38. Re:Apple/iTunes - "the Safe way to buy music" LESS by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Insightful
    finding a way to enable users to buy the entire album all at once instead of individual songs, for the same price as the typical retail physical CD.

    I think I should be paying less than in-store retail when I download my CD album. After all, in addition to the content I'm paying for my bandwidth to download it, my time in downloading, my hard drive space to store it on, any cover art or inserts that I have to print myself, as well as the blank CD I burn to play it outside of my computer and the jewel case I need to buy to store it in.

    The record company selling me this album does not have pressing, materials, distribution, or record retailer profits to pay in the process.

    So stop encouraging record companies to think they can sell me less for the same price! They're already doing that well enough on their own.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  39. Seems to be some confusion here... by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is not the "rootkit" DRM software that were talking about here. This is the other DRM crapware that Sony/BMG has on its discs. I buy a moderate amount of music on CDs, then rip them to MP3s to play on my Rio and car stereo. I was planning to buy Carlos Santana's new disc when this whole flap came up. I checked, saw that Santana wasn't on the rootkit list, and briefly considered buying it, although I have avoided all DRMed music to this point. No worries, I'll rip it on my Linux box anyway.

    I changed my mind, and I'm glad I did. One less bit of malware in the stream of commerce. I did go to Carlos' website and told them I had decided not to buy the disc and why. From the notes there, it seems they have been getting a lot of that. This may be the most effective way to deal with this issue. Tell the artists that you will not buy their art, if it comes packaged with such crap.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  40. Re:Big List of DRM CDs? by spot35 · · Score: 3, Informative

    **Clicky - Google - Clicky**

    MediaMax titles @Sony BMG website

    XCP titles @SonyBMG website

  41. Re:No way that article was serious by budgenator · · Score: 2, Insightful
    in other news from the register
    • Celine Dion fights mutant rats on Xbox 360
    • Mutant rats menace Belfast
    • Killer squirrel pack guts dog
    • Youths strap hamster to rocket
    • Al-Qaeda probes enemy on Google Earth
    • Japan triumphs with MP3 toilet seat
    • Entire porn outfit for sale on eBay
    • Slashdot practises safe sex
    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  42. Re:Bad Music by Chaffar · · Score: 2, Funny
    If you move out of your parents' basement you won't have to worry about their being home.

    Wow, a woman with a fast car, uses Linux, AND a sharp sense of humour... No doubt about it, you must be very ugly :D

    (kidding, only kidding!)

  43. Confusing the Consumer by micron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I walked in to my local record store TWO DAYS ago with the Sony/BMG list of XCP titles. I asked the counter clerk if they had pulled the titles yet.

    The response was, "Which one do you want".

    The clerk knew of the issue. He even helped me confirm that the catalog number for the disk was a match. The titles were still on the shelves for sale. The store was replacing the disks as new disks came in from Sony.

    Two out of three record stores that I checked that day had the titles available for purchase.

    This is a recall?

    Also, it is not as if you can look on the spine of the CD to find out that it is a Sony disk. These disks are sold under other label names. I believe that the one I got was an Electra. Sony/BMG is in the really fine print on the back, as well as the XPC URL.

    1. Re:Confusing the Consumer by TheDormouse · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The retailer I worked for pulled all the copies the morning after the announcement. I know because I did it myself. It took 3 hours since many of these new titles were on multiple displays. And I had 10 cartons of daily shipment to process the same day.

      Thanks Sony.

  44. Patch suffers from same security flaws... by Robotech_Master · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...as previous patches. In other words, it leaves your computer even more vulnerable than before.

    Don't see any mention of this on the entire last page of comments listed most recently first, so I figured it was worth risking a possible karma hit for duplication.

    It seems Sony and SunComm just can't come up with a "real" fix to save their lives.

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org