Slashdot Mirror


Blog Services Outgrow Their Data Centers

miller60 writes "The growth of the blogosphere is straining the infrastructure at popular service providers. TypePad is having serious problems again today, the latest in a series of outages and malfunctions as it switches to a larger facility. Bloglines is also apologizing for performance problems, and says it too will move to a larger data center to accommodate growth. There's been no sign of a mass migration from either service. Are bloggers and blog readers willing to accept rocky performance from popular services?"

153 comments

  1. Problems accessing... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Funny

    Damn! I can't access my blog! I have to blog about this... uh... damn.

    1. Re:Problems accessing... by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
      > Damn! I can't access my blog! I have to blog about this... uh... damn.

      4:16PM up 4 days, 6:24, 2740 users, load averages: 8.44, 7.42, 3.38

      Mood: Slashdotted.

    2. Re:Problems accessing... by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lucky for me, I can post on CmdrTaco's Blog and laugh at your misfortune.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Problems accessing... by lynzh · · Score: 1

      Bloggers are willing to stand by the unstable service, because their friends are using it too. Take win32 for an example. That has been rocky and unstable for many years, yet here we are..

    4. Re:Problems accessing... by afidel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Damn, this kind of deserves an insightful mod. If you had been around since the beginning you would realize that slashdot kind of started out with Rob posting one of the origional blogs =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:Problems accessing... by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      no kidding, most of them need something to write/complain about anyway

    6. Re:Problems accessing... by pipingguy · · Score: 0, Offtopic


      Classical Slashdot mispelling, this guy must be for real!

    7. Re:Problems accessing... by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      And, please don't forget, sadly lacking in a realistic alternative.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    8. Re:Problems accessing... by rodgerd · · Score: 1

      Well, there's a legitimate reason for that, in that if your friends are using it, it becomes a hell of a lot easier to manage comments, protected entries, and the like. Hence the popularity of LiveJournal.

  2. Aboslutely Not by Drakonian · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Are bloggers and blog readers willing to accept rocky performance from popular services?

    Absolutely not. They will all stop blogging en masse and the blogosphere will cease to exist. What a brilliant question.

    --
    Random is the New Order.
    1. Re:Aboslutely Not by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2
      While I know you meant your post tongue in cheek...what will most likely happen is that the services that CAN provide good performance that does away with these problems will most likely see a large influx of transfers from bloggers...now if only there was an easy way to transfer your blog between services...

      Actually, thats a pretty good question...DOES anybody know of a good way to transfer your blog between services? Especially if you want to retain your previous posts and comments?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    2. Re:Aboslutely Not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Absolutely not. They will all stop blogging en masse and the blogosphere will cease to exist.

      We should all be so lucky.

    3. Re:Aboslutely Not by baadger · · Score: 1

      With the ease of setting up Wordpress/<insert favourite blogging script here> with just any old host anyone who really cared about their blog content would be doing so (and making regular database dumps).

      Theres loads and loads of choice for webhosting out there, I don't see what Blogger etc offer over these for anyone but newbies. Maybe i'm wrong, I don't blog.

      Spreading the blogger load across a thousand different webhosting companies would make sense, and hey it'd give them something else to blog about: 'Firefox 1.5 released! get it now!' ...'My host is awesome!' etc.

    4. Re:Aboslutely Not by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      Are bloggers and blog readers willing to accept rocky performance from popular services?

      I figured the answer was "clearly not, since the services have chosen to upgrade to stop the problems. Seems like if the bloggers were willing to accept it the service providers wouldn't feel any obligation to do that.

  3. Rocky Performance, here I come! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Are bloggers and blog readers willing to accept rocky performance from popular services?"

    Yes.

    Please reference: the Microsoft product line

    1. Re:Rocky Performance, here I come! by kesuki · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please reference: the Microsoft product line

      I think you meant Reference: Slashdot.org error 503 service not available

      more relevant to the current discussion ;)

    2. Re:Rocky Performance, here I come! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody please mod this guy funny. It's funny when we laugh at others, but laughing at ourselves can be a lot funnier (and being a slashdot reader I regard myself as "part" of slashdot sometimes).

  4. What are the other choices? by Hulkster · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The submitter asks "Are bloggers and blog readers willing to accept rocky performance from popular services?" so I would answer that with what are the other choices available for the common public?

    Yea, there is Google Blogspot ... but even the big "G" has had performance issues in the past. An option for /. readers is to host a blog on your own site ... but that's not realistic for the average Joe. This stuff is all free, so I think most people are willing to grin and bear and suffer through some outages. Plus I don't think the world is going to end if we are unable to blog for a short while ... ;-)

    P.S. Per my /. username, I did get a chuckle out of this quote from Bloglines - "Bloglines has been busting at the seams like the Incredible Hulk" and yea, getting angry and transforming into a Big Green Monster can really wreck your clothing budget.

    1. Re:What are the other choices? by PavementPizza · · Score: 1

      Typepad is not free, it's actually relatively expensive.

      --
      Viper is the preferred editor of the Emacs operating system.
    2. Re:What are the other choices? by m85476585 · · Score: 1

      "An option for /. readers is to host a blog on your own site ..." But if you use a blog service you still rely on them some of the time to generate the pages to send to your server. It isn't as much load as hosting pages, but it is probably still significant. The ideal option would to use a blog tool that is hosted and runs off your server. My Yahoo website includes MoveableType (http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/pricing). I haven't used it yet, but it seems OK. For non-Yahoo users it is fairly expensive.

    3. Re:What are the other choices? by timeOday · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do people have a way to migrate their blogs to a new site, even if they wanted to? Do they even provide a way for bloggers to back up their literary masterpieces on their own media?

    4. Re:What are the other choices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course. You can get an entire dump of your TypePad database with one click. Mine was nearly 60 megabytes of raw text when I migrated to my own server earlier this month.

    5. Re:What are the other choices? by lachlan76 · · Score: 2, Informative

      IIRC, they allow you to send it to an FTP server so that you can host it yourself.

    6. Re:What are the other choices? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Well, one option would be for them to just run their own "blog". Not every "blog" has to be hosted on some corporate cookie-cutter cut-and-paste site. There was a time on the internets way back when that you would actually make your own sites and not just pump some lame content into text area fields on someone else's site to create your own.

    7. Re:What are the other choices? by ryanov · · Score: 1

      LiveJournal is pretty cheap and has some deals every once in awhile... I got myself a permanent account for a lot less than several years would have cost. Generally, they compensate for even the smallest outages though -- many of which I didn't notice.

    8. Re:What are the other choices? by TheDarkener · · Score: 1

      I just installed b2evolution on my little webserver - incredibly easy install, I was up in no more than 2 minutes from apt-get. Themes and all, it's really nice.

      And I can do whatever the &$#@ I want with it, and it was free!

      Anyone can do this if they have broadband from their own line. Almost reminds me of the old BBS days... >sigh =)

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    9. Re:What are the other choices? by UltraAyla · · Score: 1

      Livejournal allows you to back up individual months in XML format - Although, they currently offer no system to import it. However, it would be simple for most(granted, not all) average programmers to write a script or something that dumps it all into a database of choice.

  5. submitter, you suck by PavementPizza · · Score: 5, Informative

    Your summary implies that the latest Typepad outage has something to do with their datacenter move of October. It does not. They had a hard drive problem that they noticed during routine maintenance.

    --
    Viper is the preferred editor of the Emacs operating system.
    1. Re:submitter, you suck by tsmoke · · Score: 1

      That's even worse! My faith in their engineering was shaken a bit by the fact that they couldn't migrate their systems reliably. It's even worse that they roll back data two days.

      And I'm not a script kiddie that hasn't worked with large systems. Shit happens, I know that. But this is some nasty shit that typically is avoided.

    2. Re:submitter, you suck by multipartmixed · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know, I've noticed that hard drives fail quite often, and take a lot of data with them.

      Somebody really should invent some method of making a single disk failure a non-issue; perhaps, by using a redundant array of independant drives...

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    3. Re:submitter, you suck by nsasch · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sounds like a good idea, but the name? RAID (according to your initials) would never catch on, it's like the bug spray.
      Maybe there should be different types, or versions optimized for speed, reliability, redundancy, hot swapping, etc.

      --
      Make your computer faster: rm -rf /mnt/windows/
    4. Re:submitter, you suck by aiken_d · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny thing is, a single drive can take a RAID down. The data is still there on the other drives, but a misbehaving/fried drive can trash the SCSI bus and bring down the entire thing.

      The answer, of course, is a seperate controller per drive, with logic on the host to close down a controller that's gone berzerk because of bad input from the drive (electrical or logical). But that's not the way the fast majority of RAID systems work, and therefore, it's not all that uncommon to crash a server when a single drive fails. Heck, I've had hot spares fail and crash an array (crash = lock up, not lose data). The humorous irony is usually not really appreciated until days later.

      Cheers
      -b

      --
      If I wanted a sig I would have filled in that stupid box.
    5. Re:submitter, you suck by multipartmixed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Funny thing is, a single drive can take a RAID down.

      Which is why when *I* do RAID for production systems, I run RAID 1+0, with one stripe per enclosure, one enclosure per host bus adapter, and separate hot spare pools for each stripe (co-located within the same enclosure). If I'm running something like Sun A5x00 arrays, I sometimes go even further and use two HBAs per loop and split the array down the middle (which eliminates most single points of failure within the array -- "split loop mode"). The extra cost of the HBA is more than worth the piece of mind (those boxes can hold 22 disks); the mild performance boost is icing on the cake.

      BTW, your comments about one disc taking out the bus also applies to FC_AL... even though it shouldn't. I took have had hot spare "accidents", but have yet not lost any data, nor had a serious outage. Knock on wood. I have even done live drive-replacement on multi-hosted SCSI-II, *non-hotswap* without downtime -- but I had good backups and it still gave me an ulcer (break the mirror, power down the enclosure, cold-swap, power-up, restripe).

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    6. Re:submitter, you suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to those in the know the Typepad guys were putting in a redundant head for their filer and it scribbled all over the active drive -- forcing them to bring in the backups. :(

  6. Expression by Da3vid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It just seems that more and more people are finding a new way to express themselves. This started off just as a trend but has grown like wildfire. This has replaced the use of the diary, and for many people, it also replaces idle chit-chat of catching up on, "So what did you do today?" This leaves a lot of conversation on more focused conversation. As well, it also lets people keep in touch with each other easier than before. I mean, is anyone surprised that these things continue to grow with popularity? It doesn't seem like an unnatural progression to me.

    Are we really surprised? How many people use the Internet on atleast a quasi-regular basis? I'm willing to bet that currently a large percentage either writes or reads a blog (likely both), and that those numbers are going to continue to increase.

    -Da3vid-

    1. Re:Expression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first time someone responds to the question "So what did you do today?" with "read my blog", I'm no longer talking to that person.

    2. Re:Expression by ryanov · · Score: 1

      I find that an unfortunate part of blogging if you mention what you did today and make it public (which yes, not everyone may be interested in, but down the line maybe I will be... so there's no need to jump down my throat about that which I'm sure some folks will) is that people who previously had to talk to you in order to find out what was new no longer need to. I guess one could say if it really mattered, they would find a way, but with people busy and living far apart, sometimes the effort isn't made. I guess it could go either way... help to keep better in touch or cause you to fall out of touch.

  7. Oh no teh 870905p43r3 i5 b0rk3d! by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 4, Funny

    In other news, world continues to turn, sky still up there. Film at 11.

    --
    It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  8. As longtime readers of Slashdot know... by shawnmchorse · · Score: 5, Funny

    Our willingness to accept rocky performance from popular services is the only reason we're still reading Slashdot today...:-)

    1. Re:As longtime readers of Slashdot know... by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that question was just an open invitation for that joke :)

  9. Oh please God. by Changa_MC · · Score: 1, Insightful
    They will all stop blogging en masse and the blogosphere will cease to exist

    I'm not saying the blogosphere is the most useless thing on the net, because I really favor slashdot.

    I will say that at least we slashdotters don't think we're "journalists."

    --
    Changa hates change.
    1. Re:Oh please God. by dada21 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I will say that at least we slashdotters don't think we're "journalists."

      Yet the word journalist is more apropos for a blogger than a media careerist. Going back to the dawn of the printing press, you see much more emotion and variety until fairly recent times.

      The media now seems locked in with one another. It is all Reuters and UPI regurgitation.

      Bloggers that focus on consistency float to the top. My favorite 5 bloggers offer 80% of the news I read -- some of them are ex-media writers. I also read some blogs just to get a sens of alternate opinions.

      My 5 blogs (2 public, 3 private) replace my e-mail newsletter (2 years running) that replaced my print newsletter (3 years before the e-news). My readership is down 95% as I attempt to transition, but I'm getting a much better view on who is reading and who isn't.

      I'm committed to writing 7 days a week. I already spend 2-3 hours reading links mailed to me, why not set those links up for others with similar ideas? Is my attached opinion wanted by the readers? Only time will tell.

    2. Re:Oh please God. by wootest · · Score: 1

      I will say that at least we slashdotters don't think we're "journalists."

      The people who have any ambition to call their own writing journalism probably have a streamlined posting system. This doesn't mean that everyone that has a streamlined posting system - call it a news page or a weblog or a journal or a column - thinks that they're journalists. If I had to make such an extremely sweeping generalization, I'd much rather assign them the label "casual writers". But I think that in reality, very few people consider themselves either just because they're able to write on a web site, and I believe it's a label that's forced upon them by people somehow upset with a precious few.

    3. Re:Oh please God. by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      I'm committed to writing 7 days a week.

      Do you feel an urgent need to fill whitespace?

    4. Re:Oh please God. by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      Going back to the dawn of the printing press, you see much more emotion and variety until fairly recent times.

      Yes, we call that "journalistic ethics" and "balanced reporting."

      Sure, you could say that it was more interesting when newspapers were blatantly communist or uber capitalist, or blazingly socialist, but to say the least, it's NOT cool to go around lying to the public and whipping up a panic for your own personal gain.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    5. Re:Oh please God. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No, it was simply more honest.

      The idea that journalists are unbiased is pure propaganda. It is clear that bias in reporting exists and the notion that this isn't so is dangerous because some significant portion of the population appears to believe it.

      Wouldn't you much rather CBS disclose its bias to you straightforwardly so you could evaluate it honestly? For a filthy rag like Fox News, I suppose, the point is moot: the louder they scream about fair and balanced, the more painfully obvious it is that they aren't. But, this is a matter of degree. Most of the media is trying to pull the wool over our eyes with "fair and balanced" whether or not they are effective at it.

    6. Re:Oh please God. by s1ashd0twh0r3 · · Score: 0
      Sure, you could say that it was more interesting when newspapers were blatantly communist or uber capitalist, or blazingly socialist, but to say the least, it's NOT cool to go around lying to the public and whipping up a panic for your own personal gain.

      Which is exactly what today's MSM does!

    7. Re:Oh please God. by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      Which is exactly what today's MSM does!

      There's a difference between "trying" and "succeeding". Trying is what MSM does (in no small part because I've never even heard of them, unless you mean MSN). Succeeding is what Hermann Goering and Benito Mussolini did when they were journalists. Although Fox does tend to do a decent job on occasion - for example their moon hoax show - generally they tend to look like kooks when they do the news. Geraldo, anyone?

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  10. Hmm... by deathbyzen · · Score: 2, Funny
    I think the blogging community, in general, is more tech savy than the average citizen. Hence, they understand that the difficulties are only temporary and, in the end, will be beneficial for the community.

    I'm sure xXxDragonTearsQTxXx, however, is quite pissed.

    1. Re:Hmm... by xXxDragonTearsQTxXx · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bite me.

    2. Re:Hmm... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      I think you're being sarcastic, but you got modded informative instead of funny...

      Anyways, the vast vast majority of blog/journal nonsense is hosted by a very limited number of sites (compared to the vastness which is the internet)

      From my experience, once you take away the sites with stupid simple interfaces, you have a very limited number of people with technical knowledge, and their friends.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Hmm... by DogDude · · Score: 0

      I think the blogging community, in general, is more tech savy than the average citizen. Hence, they understand that the difficulties are only temporary and, in the end, will be beneficial for the community.

      I'm quite tech saavy (or so I'd like to think). I run several web servers (one has a medium load). I see performance issues as being very unprofessional and quite easily fixable. Personally, I have no patience for services that can't keep basic web servers going because I know how simple it really is. Even on my low-traffic websites, I would never allow performance issues to impact the user experience. To me, if a service can't keep web servers up and working 99% of the time, they're not worth visiting.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    4. Re:Hmm... by MKalus · · Score: 1

      I'm quite tech saavy (or so I'd like to think). I run several web servers (one has a medium load). I see performance issues as being very unprofessional and quite easily fixable. Personally, I have no patience for services that can't keep basic web servers going because I know how simple it really is. Even on my low-traffic websites, I would never allow performance issues to impact the user experience. To me, if a service can't keep web servers up and working 99% of the time, they're not worth visiting.


      Wow. I see you have absolutly no idea how complex large Systems are..... But that's okay, after all you host several webservers and one of them even has a medium load .

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    5. Re:Hmm... by TallMatthew · · Score: 1
      I see performance issues as being very unprofessional and quite easily fixable. Personally, I have no patience for services that can't keep basic web servers going because I know how simple it really is. Even on my low-traffic websites, I would never allow performance issues to impact the user experience. To me, if a service can't keep web servers up and working 99% of the time, they're not worth visiting.

      This is so tempting, but I'm going to abstain.

    6. Re:Hmm... by DogDude · · Score: 1

      No, please. Explain to me the mind-boggling complexity of running a web server, or even multiple web servers. Apparently, there's more to it than I'm aware of.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    7. Re:Hmm... by TallMatthew · · Score: 1
      It becomes complex when you add a database layer that's slow and an application layer that's slower.
      It becomes complex when you push out 100 Mb/s or more around the world and suddenly you get complaints about slow connectivity to Poland.
      It becomes complex when you start getting targeted by 13-year old hackers with a bevy of compromised Windoze boxes at their disposal.
      It becomes complex when you have to figure out how to conserve state information across a few dozen web servers and a dozen or so app servers, particularly when one of them goes down.
      It becomes complex when you have several thousand simultaneous connections choking up your load balancers and you're on the phone with a vendor trying to convince some punk that their gear isn't working.
      It becomes complex when you have to pause and explain why such-and-such is such-and-such to some underclued ass who insists otherwise because they're convinced they're much more knowledgeable than they actually are.

      Stay in your small pond.

  11. Yes. by shobadobs · · Score: 1

    Are bloggers and blog readers willing to accept rocky performance from popular services?"

    if they believe the rocky performance is temporary
    then Yes
    else No

    1. Re:Yes. by game+kid · · Score: 2, Funny

      I always thought bloggers were pre-programmed robots that spilled out random text. This source code proves it, I tell ya! ;)

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    2. Re:Yes. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      "if they believe the rocky performance is temporary
      then Yes
      else No"


      I'd say thatmost bloggers will be pretty resistant to changing providers. Like changing email addresses, or telephone numbers, it's a pain -- especially if you have an established blog.

      Bloggers identify with their blog, and moving to a different site, with a different mechanism and layout, just doesn't feel 'right.' So they will choose to believe it's temporary... only prolonged crappy service will make them move.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  12. who cares about the bloggers? by Stevyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's the advertisers who should be angry. They're the ones paying for these services. They rely on the readers to view the web pages and buy their products.

    1. Re:who cares about the bloggers? by deathbyzen · · Score: 0, Funny

      George Bush doesn't care about bloggers!

    2. Re:who cares about the bloggers? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      no, typepad costs money the bloggers are paying for it.

      ad supported services have better incentive to keep performance up because when the system is annoyingly slow people visit fewer pages and see fewer ads before they leave to do something else

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    3. Re:who cares about the bloggers? by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      I don't know. Livejournal, at least, has paid accounts, too - and what's more, there is absolutely no advertising on the site (other than what some users might post, of course), so it's not as if anyone else is paying for the service through ads, either. Those with paid accounts at least *are* paying for the site on LJ.

      But of course, LJ is only used by pseudo-emo and -goth teenagers who post about how dark and tortured they are, right? I kinda anticipate responses of this kind, so let me just say that it ain't so - LJ is a blogging service like any other. And in fact, there are some very high-profile people on LJ, too (Dave Jones of Linux kernel fame comes to mind, for example. Look him up; his username on there is "kernelslacker").

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  13. Will Bloggers Accept This? by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Of course not. They'll give money to the guy who can host their blog with better performance and reliability, perhaps by soliciting donations from readers (like every webpage does). A few new businesses could even open and employ people just to host blogs, at least until the fad dies down. Everybody who invests with intelligence wins.

    1. Re:Will Bloggers Accept This? by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

      Maybe somebody else has decent value-added stuff that people would actually want to pay for, but at LiveJournal, there is virtually zero difference between a free LiveJournal account and a paid LiveJournal account.

      The main difference is that a PAID account should (but doesn't) have some sort of better performance compared to a free "you get what you pay for" account that loses posts, fails to update friend's posts, hoards emails, etc.

      In other words, I had a free LJ account. I tried paying for it for a few months just to see what was what. Nothing was any better with a paid account. When LJ broke, it felt like I was throwing away money. I went back to the free one. When LJ breaks now, it's eh, well, it's free. No big deal.

      Oh my blog is all about how much I hate the world, of course. Wouldn't be a blog without that now would it? LOL

      ++++NO CARRIER

      --
      Sig for hire.
  14. Keep in mind .... by shri · · Score: 1

    That most blogs are inactive and only used by blog spamming scripts. Also keep in mind that people this is a slow time. Most people have other stuff to do (don't know what bloggers are doing.... do bloggers have families?) and if there is such a thing like a good time to redo stuff, it is in the next two weeks.

    Finally, I'm sure Bush or someone will cockup and give the bloggers something more substantial to complain about other than the speed and performance of typepad.

  15. Aboslutely Not-A successful retreat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Agreed. It's a silly question. It's like asking; will bloggers accept the problems that come with growth? Do they have a choice?

    1. Re:Aboslutely Not-A successful retreat. by tokaok · · Score: 1

      Have you stopped beating your wife?

    2. Re:Aboslutely Not-A successful retreat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you stopped putting your balls in your dog's mouth?

  16. I don't by maxrate · · Score: 1

    I don't blog - does this mean I'm a loser?, or does this mean I can keep my high-speed?

  17. Yes they will by kramthegram · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Because you're looking at it all wrong, it's not just a service, it's a community. For the Same reasons people won't just let New Orleans go they won't leave these communities at the first sign of trouble. Sociology is a science that needs to be applied to the web more and more...

    1. Re:Yes they will by Kelson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. When LiveJournal has technical problems for a few days, people don't leave LiveJournal en masse -- they wait it out. Because the whole point of being on LiveJournal is the community. Their friends, readers, etc. are all on the same service, and moving to a new one is going to involve dragging them along. On the other hand, if you and a bunch of friends do decide to leave, you'll probably end up migrating together.

      Ever tried using a LiveJournal account to comment on a Myspace blog? Not gonna work. (Ironically, the people behind LiveJournal are the ones who set up OpenID, which may make this possible some day.)

      This is, of course, a generalization. You can find blogs on LiveJournal, TypePad, Blogger, etc. that are aimed at a general audience and have simply chosen a hosting provider. But in most cases, you'll find that the active readers -- the ones who hold conversations in the comment threads -- are all on the same blogging service.

    2. Re:Yes they will by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While it may be a community, I think the main thing that prevents most bloggers/journalists from leaving is the fact that they already have a lot invested in their current site.

      I don't know if this has been done already or not, but I imagine that one of the big providers could steal a lot of dissatisfied users from the competition if they made a stupid simple transitioning tool.

      E.G. Type in your username and password, select your old blog/journal and hit enter. Ideally, it'd backdate old entries so it looks like you've been at the new site all along.

      I know that a large part of it is the community, but I don't imagine it would be hard for groups of friends to defect.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Yes they will by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sociology is a science...
      Hahaha. You had me going for a minute there.
  18. Singularity? by qualico · · Score: 2, Interesting
  19. Heh by geekdom04 · · Score: 2

    Stories like these make me happy that I am the one person who doesn't have a blog.

    1. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a blog?

    2. Re:Heh by Propaganda13 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That makes two of us. I'll have to make an entry in my personal wiki about this.

  20. Good for them! by redelm · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The only reason they're outgrowing their servers and links is that more and more people are finding them popular. Whether I agree or not with their viewpoint, I'm always happy to see people finding what makes them happy. Even moreso, because the growth is likely to be from moderates -- the real fringies were already there.

  21. All things may be equal. by daviddennis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I remember that when ISPs first started, they were all flaky, but we loved what we could do on the net. We tolerated outages because we knew that all ISPs had roughly the same failure rate and so switching wouldn't improve much.

    The current situation with blogs looks about the same.

    Blog services are sticky when they form a community of sorts. If you like the people you know through those services, you stick around. And if your web address is based on their site (i.e. xxx.blogspot.com), well, moving will cause you to lose all your readers, too.

    So I would say the answer is yes, that people will stick to the services they enjoy, because they know that if they move, they'll get about the same level of service.

    D

    1. Re:All things may be equal. by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      i have used both myspace and xanga, i have never had xanga behave weird or run slowly, while myspace is slow or messed up several times a week. there certainly is a wide variety of performance and quality.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:All things may be equal. by radiotyler · · Score: 1

      We tolerated outages because we knew that all ISPs had roughly the same failure rate and so switching wouldn't improve much.

      Dude. They're called domains. That example there: I pay about $100 a year for the managed hosting and bandwidth. TANSTAAFL. You want something reliable, you pay for it.

      And come on, no-one likes being a sub-domain anyway.

      -Tyler

      --
      hi mom!
    3. Re:All things may be equal. by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      Most people are on myspace because their friends are all on myspace, and they value that very time-consuming to set up network.

      They also know that's where the hot girls and buff guys are.

      So it remains popular even though its software engineering is truly abysmal.

      D

    4. Re:All things may be equal. by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      I thought NAMBLA had absolutely nothing to do with girls.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    5. Re:All things may be equal. by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      If you click on the link, you'll find that it's this very funny guy who created the myspace worm.

      He said that he joined Myspace to look at the pictures of cute girls, thus the link.

      D

  22. Just get hosting by drakethegreat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seriously just spend the 3-5 bucks a month and get some basic hosting. Its worth the cost cause you don't even have to know how to build a site. You can just install the solutions given to you by the host or one you download. I think more people should consider this because I'm less interested in blogs from websites like blogger.com because it requires just blabbing once a day and nothing else so I tend to think the quality is slightly lower. This may just be in my head but I think this is a really good reason for people consider homebrew blogs.

    1. Re:Just get hosting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of those "3-5 bucks a month" hosting places have bigger uptime issues than the services mentioned here.

    2. Re:Just get hosting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How will I EVER find new and exciting blogs to read if they're not all on the same site??!!

    3. Re:Just get hosting by rfunches · · Score: 2, Informative

      One problem with hosting is that some companies, especially those in the budget range, frown upon CPU-intensive processes. Movable Type, Six Apart's blog publishing system for servers, was known to be CPU-intensive until recently, and several hosts banned MT (along with message boards like YaBB). While there might be roughly equivalent uptime, you might be limited in your options -- the hosting company might only provide a crappy version of blog software, or disallow them entirely.

  23. Cruel by gibbo2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bloglines is apologising for performance problems, and you're going to Slashdot them on top of that? Guess that shows what people think of bloggers around here :)

  24. A free soap box is good for most... by xoip · · Score: 1

    It's important to keep in mind that the bulk of Bloggers have no interest in setting anything up from scratch and less interest in paying for it if they know it will be relatively reliable. Top tier Bloggers are already running their own sites and invest in connectivity and design and for the most part are untouched by service interuptions. So...the cynic in me wonders if these service interuptions are used as a catalyst to get some people to pay for a premium service. Just a thought.

  25. *cough* by Kawahee · · Score: 1

    I dunno how much foresight went into this question: "Are bloggers and blog readers willing to accept rocky performance from popular services?", but it obviously wasn't enough.

    People who use these popular services probably aren't smart enough to set up their own blogs, like 'professional' bloggers do. 'Pro' bloggers host their own blogs, and consequently aren't going to max out their webhosts data center.

    And let's not forget, it's only temporarily 'rocky'.

    --
    I'll subscribe to Slashdot when I see a month without a dupe, a typo, or an article the "editors" didn't read.
    1. Re:*cough* by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      actually centralized services are better in many ways, they allow reasonable spam protection within comments and take care of all the hosting and upgrade concerns for you. rather than finding out too late that there was a security patch for jRandomBlogSoftware AFTER someone goes in and changes all your graphics to hello.jpg

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:*cough* by cmacb · · Score: 1

      You mean like this:


      Warning: mysql_fetch_array(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in /var/www/html/lanlocked/home.php on line 26

    3. Re:*cough* by Kawahee · · Score: 1

      I don't keep my /. account up to date. I disbanded that site and moved onto http://kyve.net/, not that I use the domain for anything other than FTP/SMTP/POP/VPN.

      --
      I'll subscribe to Slashdot when I see a month without a dupe, a typo, or an article the "editors" didn't read.
  26. Money Money Money by Rac3r5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My big question is where on earth do these ppl get the money to run these services??

    Sure they have ads and stuff.. but do ppl really click those ads? Very rarely do I ever click ads.

    1. Re:Money Money Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, I make a few hundred bucks a month from advertising on my weblog, and it's non focused and pretty crappy (but the readers seem to like it).

    2. Re:Money Money Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      CmdrTaco?

  27. The Other Six-Apart Hosted Service Is OK by rpk · · Score: 1

    Livejournal has its problems now and then, but it's been pretty reliable.

  28. Of Course We Stay by JenovaSynthesis · · Score: 2, Informative

    If the outage was every other day or something, I could see a mass migration but when you've built up a blog/livejournal/etc. you cannot just pack it up and move it most of the time so you just stay an deal. Plus there is the social networking factor involved as well.

    Plus it is not like users are getting shafted. LiveJournal has had problems come up once in a while and they compensate thier users for it with things like an extra month of service free and stuff like that.

    Outages happen and it are a fact of life on the Internet.

    --
    Anonymous Cowards generally receive no replies because you're a coward and I'm a bitch :)
    1. Re:Of Course We Stay by PenGun · · Score: 0

      Well I post at 0 so I gues I'm just a brave AC.

        The reason "you cannot just pack it up and move" is 'cause you are an user idiot and you would drown without a floatation device.

        Users should be punished when useful and ignored the rest of the time. The ones that can type should be punished on a regular basis.

        Outrage is what makes it all worthwhile.

            PenGun
          Do What Now ??? ... Standards and Practices !

    2. Re:Of Course We Stay by JenovaSynthesis · · Score: 1

      It's not about whether or not the user is "an idiot" but rather if the system allows it.

      --
      Anonymous Cowards generally receive no replies because you're a coward and I'm a bitch :)
  29. Blog Proffesionals by PenGun · · Score: 0

    I dunno the failure of the borken services at least gives us a chance for humour. I get a kick out of the "IT Professional Solution" guys. There are quite a few out there who have learned to set up "Moveable Type" etc and now advertise themselves as "IT Professionals". Priceless, but they never get the joke.

        PenGun
      Do What Now ??? ... Standards and Practices !

  30. Kind of a stretch... by Urusai · · Score: 1

    ...to call blog content "data".

    1. Re:Kind of a stretch... by multipartmixed · · Score: 2, Funny

      > ...to call blog content "data".

      They still call all that stuff between the genes "DNA"

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    2. Re:Kind of a stretch... by petrus4 · · Score: 1

      True. For the most part, "line noise" is the term I generally use. ;)

  31. The Upside by KrackHouse · · Score: 1

    I grabbed some huge satellite photos from the tsunami devastated areas and had 300,000 visitors in a couple of weeks using blogspot. I used bittorrent to host the media files but that much traffic would have killed most other hosts regardless. I'm now on my own server using Wordpress because blogger.com did start to get frustratingly slow but if I got hit with another traffic spike I'd be toast.

    --
    What if Digg added local news and a Slashdot inspired comment karma system? ---
    http://houndwire.com
  32. Like World of Warcraft? by All_Star25 · · Score: 1

    Are bloggers and blog readers willing to accept rocky performance from popular services?

    Like the legions of users who cope with the sometimes-rocky performance World of Warcraft? If some of these users are one and the same, the answer is yes.

  33. If self hosting, what to use? by ChicoLance · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I see several comments here about paying the $5/month and hosting the site yourself. Makes since to me, and I've been doing that for quite a while now. I've recently starting using blogging software from blogger.com for my personal site instead of writing my pages from scratch because it makes it really easy to put up new pictures of the kids. However, I'm not sure how I feel about committing to a particular site like Blogger, even if I do host the site myself, as the blogging community shifts and twists as it grows.

    What software is out there that's easy to set up that's more of a homegrown solution? I know of Moveable Type, but is there something else that the Slashdot crowd uses?

    BTW: Am I the only one who thinks the term "blog" grates on his nerves much like "information superhighway" does?

    --Lance

    1. Re:If self hosting, what to use? by wootest · · Score: 1

      WordPress (PHP) is an amazing piece of software. I used to use Movable Type, and their respective pros and cons tend to cancel each other out, so it's really a matter of taste and priorities. There are tons of other solutions - TextPattern (PHP) and Typo (Ruby on Rails) are also popular and widely supported, and if neither will do, check your favorite search engine's index.

      And yes, the word "blog" is an amazing eyesore, and it's just a contraction for the hell of it. "Weblog" or even the accepted ancestral "log" means so much more that it's hard to believe why people would use the four letter alternative other than to feel special.

    2. Re:If self hosting, what to use? by Qbertino · · Score: 1

      I don't like WordPress like some others here do. I think there's to much of an unjustified hype about it. I consider both b2evolution and Pivot superiour in terms of quality, features and usability. Pivot is database free which can be a big performance plus if you're only powering a single blog. I'd actually suggest you check out Pivot. It's backend is approachable and extremly easy to use and the available templates are a wonderfull groundwork to get rolling with your own style.

      Of course all these are GPLd blogtools. If you insist on spending money for a commercial blogtool licence I'd strongly recommend Expression Engine over Movable Type or others.

      A third alternative are payed blog services. You might want to check out Squarespace which looks like solid functionality crossed with a designers wet dream.

      --
      We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    3. Re:If self hosting, what to use? by rhandir · · Score: 1

      I'll second Wordpress.
      1. It's free.
      2. It's fast and simple to set up. (You don't have to spend all day tweaking it, unless you want to.)
      2. The stuff under the hood is both simple and elegant for nerds like us. (If you know how to write for...while loops, you can customize the behavior of wordpress in excruciationg detail. Note that the html templates use php inline.)
      3. The management interface is dead simple for total n00bz - anyone can make a blog out of it, and almost anyone can make it look pretty with different themes (skins).

      Con:
      It doesn't generate static pages.
      But if you are using cheap shared hosting, the account is probably "virtual" anyway, and performance benefits from static-page caching and tweaking aren't an issue. If you are running your own server, there are some cacheing tweaks* you could probably use, but that's beyond the scope of my expertise.

      *the most heinous tweak would be crawling your own site and constructing a mirror every time something changed. _That_ is one hell of a kludge.

    4. Re:If self hosting, what to use? by wootest · · Score: 1

      The very best way to serve up 'baked' pages using WordPress is Staticize Reloaded, which also allows some parts of a page to stay 'fried' on load, with other pages 'baked' for you. This is a way better solution than building your own caches.

    5. Re:If self hosting, what to use? by rhandir · · Score: 1

      Excellent! Thank you! Have you used it? How heavy a bandwith load does it take to notice a difference?

    6. Re:If self hosting, what to use? by wootest · · Score: 1

      I have it on a server that *could* get very busy very quick, but haven't so far. However, there's some fairly impressive benchmarks...

    7. Re:If self hosting, what to use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Nucleus. I've set it up for 4 blogs for myself and friends and have had no problems. It's easy to use, has lots of templates/skins, lots of plugins for customizaiton, and best of all it's free.

    8. Re:If self hosting, what to use? by ChicoLance · · Score: 1

      See, that's why I post to Slashdot. Thanks for all of these interesting links to software I hadn't heard of before. Several of these look interesting.

      Thanks!

          --Lance

  34. Blah Blah Blog! by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    When you consider the amount of inane chatter on blogs this really doesn't come as a surprise. I'm contributing to the chatter by posting this.

  35. It's strange... by shaneh0 · · Score: 1

    ...that MySpace is also having "database issues" today. There was (is?) a message up preventing me from logging on about an hour ago...

    Shane

    1. Re:It's strange... by billy+reuben · · Score: 1

      was the message you saw "This user's profile has been temporarily disabled for special maintenance. The profile will be available again shortly. Sorry for the inconvenience"?

  36. Blogs.. by stimey · · Score: 0

    Who cares about blogs, too many blogs. Everybody including the latest sony robot writes a blog.

  37. Perhaps this is their chance.... by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 1

    to go outside for a change.

  38. What are they talking about?? by marcushnk · · Score: 1

    I don't see any problem with my immensely popular Blog :-P 09:11:22 up 29 days, 1:04, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00

    --
    "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
  39. BLOG???? by Hexxon · · Score: 0

    Ok... somebody please fill me in... What is a blog? Is it a forum? Is it an article? Is it something only the 14-18 year old crowd is into? What exactly is a "blog" because im just old and this terminology is beyond me. I have only recently (within the last year) seen all this shit about "Blogs". They even talk about this shit on the TV.

    I ran a BBS back in the early '90s, does that make me a blog master?!?!?

    1. Re:BLOG???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ran a BBS back in the early '90s, does that make me a blog master?!?!?

      No. You are an idiot who doesn't know how to use google.

    2. Re:BLOG???? by psykocrime · · Score: 1

      Is it something only the 14-18 year old crowd is into?

      Definitely not. CEOs and high-ranking executives of some of the world's biggest companies blog. Blogging is very popular with software developers, who post all sorts of interesting observations, solutions to problems, etc. For example, I was recently struggling to work out how to share a Spring ApplicationContext across web applications in an app server. My first instinct was to store it in JNDI, but it turns out the class isn't Serializable, so you can't really store it in JNDI. I found the solution in some guy's blog, who spoke of the NonSerializableFactory class that JBoss provides. While I probably would have eventually stumbled into a similiar solution on my own, a blog saved me a lot of time, because someone chose to share their experience.

      --
      // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
    3. Re:BLOG???? by JLS-UK · · Score: 1

      For a good example of a commercial blog, check http://www.tompeters.com/

  40. TypePad blogs are up, but are missing... by tcopeland · · Score: 1

    ...recent posts. Hopefully they'll be restored in due time.

    Ah well, at least my fascinating StringBuffer.append() post is safe!

  41. Blogosphere...more like Borosphere! by cheesy9999 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can handle certain word inventions like blog, blogger, AJAX, even Web 2.0 ... but for god's sake ... BLOGOSPHERE?

    --
    -tom
  42. this is how you run a data center by monkey-thoughts · · Score: 1

    "Along Interstate 5, in the heart of San Diego, you can still see the scars of that deluge; they're the remains of long trenches in the pavement dug as part of a frantic push to add more lines to the Sony facility."
    See the report on sony data center that backs Everquest.

  43. Why I like WordPress... by martinultima · · Score: 0

    There's a very good reason I use WordPress myself... in fact, there's several, partially because I got fed up with Blogger and partially because it lets me run everything on my server, on my terms.

    The one problem is that this server is a single 700MHz Duron system with 256MB of memory that my friend and I have running out of my house (it was at his originally, long story about why it moved). And it doesn't help that it's on my home Internet connection, and also running (along with my blog) the homepages of Ultima Linux, several other, smaller projects, and not to mention the rest of my homepage.

    Hmm, maybe if I had my own data center... ;-)

    --
    Creative misinterpretation is your friend.
  44. Networks. by Mr.+Spontaneous · · Score: 1

    A lot of bloggers put up with the outages and rockiness because they've got an established "community" on their servers. Blogs are becoming more and more itegrated with social networking. If you were already in one with many friends, would you migrate at the drop of a hat, or would you ride it out?

    --
    Its all fun and games until someone loses an eye... then its just fun.
  45. Blogging is a passing fad... by Rick+Richardson · · Score: 1

    Blogging is a passing fad.

  46. Gee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How will I ever get on with my life, knowing some blog sites are down? Oh I just don't know how I can cope. Oh... ah... ah. Oh, there. I'm coping. Oh well.

  47. Are bloggers and blog readers willing to accept... by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 1

    Doesn't matter - They've got no choice. Very few of these bloggers are going to just say "Screw this" and get their own webhost/domain name. Most will just put up with "Gee, my lj has been laggy lately. Oh well."

    --
    http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
  48. What's the "Btogosphere"? by Traegorn · · Score: 1

    Can you mispell something in 1337?

    1. Re:What's the "Btogosphere"? by Headcase88 · · Score: 2, Funny

      No... just makes it more 1337.

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
  49. Self Hosting by Noodlenose · · Score: 2, Informative
    Er, why use the so called "professional blog services" at all, when you can host your own blog for a couple dollars?

    My setup:

    Setting up taught me things I didn't know about MySQL, Apache and Ubuntu and I don't have to rely on a third party provider.

    Profit???

    1. Re:Self Hosting by ScottCooperDotNet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most people are happy to put up with ads in exchange for not having to setup a server and DynDNS, power, etc. You get the geek accolades, but the average blogger is not a geek, it's someone who posts soupy drek.

    2. Re:Self Hosting by daverabbitz · · Score: 1, Informative

      Are you serious? In New Zealand? 128K Upstream is the best I can get for under $500 p/m.
      Hosting anything on that is likely to nuke your connection if you have anything remotely popular.
      I'd rather pay $20 p/m for colo and be done with it.

      --
      What could be better than a jet powered motorcycle? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8l6GTHLSWE
  50. Of course! by Martin+Foster · · Score: 1

    deviantART is a site that allows people to post their 'art' to the site. Its not necessarily down, however the site tends to get unresponsive, images appear and dissapear and the service continues to grow. Its not about service, quality and speed its about being in with the 'it' crowd.

    A coworker recently quoted an article where someone had five iPods of various generations. All of them had broken and had been replaced, again obviously for this man it was not about quality but about having the rep of holding the newest nanon in his hands to show the coworkers.

    People like to feel like they belong, these places allow them to congregate into flocks of sheep. Nothing new really and its going to take a LOT of puishment before they move off to any other alternative out there!

  51. wonderful... by anatoxindustx · · Score: 1

    Great thinking, lets put links to services that are already complaining about having bandwidth problems and ./ them...brilliant, bloody brilliant

  52. Bah! by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

    That's not a slashdotting. That's just getting warmed up. This is a slashdotting:

    4:16PM up 2 minutes, 1 user, load averages: 0.1, 0.27, 0.51

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  53. MySpace? by ScottCooperDotNet · · Score: 1

    Such as the downtime and issues that pestered MySpace until the Fox Empire bought it?

  54. A typical blog....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    4:16PM up 4 days, 6:24, 2740 users, load averages: 8.44, 7.42, 3.38

    Mood: Slashdotted.

    Music: Funeral March

      "well today my boyfriend told me that he wants to kiss my pineapple, ROFLMAO-COPTER.
    He's so k3wl and l33t, I think I'm going to suck his r0d after engrish class, LOL!
      My girlfriend stole my sanwich today, I'm going to kill her, the bitch, I can steal a can of gass from #8%@78)

      SERVICE UNAVAILABLE
      hit refresh or try again later.

  55. One solution: euthanasia by LittleBigScript · · Score: 1

    This wouldn't be a problem is Bloglines and Typepad had euthanasia for its bloggers. It would definatly improve the service.

  56. Um... if the system's down they're not paying... by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Pay per view/click... Or does anyone actually pay flat rate for web page ads?

    --
    Deleted
  57. Take one more step forward by Escogido · · Score: 1

    and imagine what if they created such "stupid simple" tools to keep the journals everywhere in synch. That way, a blog can be seen in all communities no matter what its "home" provider is. It's a lot like open standards for office documents.

    I'm absolutely positive this will happen one day, and LiveJournal's OpenID project is the first step towards it. It will probably take at least five years though.

  58. try print for a week by ChrisCampbell47 · · Score: 1
    The media now seems locked in with one another. It is all Reuters and UPI regurgitation.

    I realize that this wasn't the point of your post, but you really shouldn't make blanket statements like that, especially with a Slashdot user number as low as yours that implies that you're not a idiot teenager.

    Try this: for one week, get the print New York Times (available at newstands nationwide) and spend an hour reading it. Just start on section A page 1 and try to read every article. Don't just bounce around pages, really try to read at least the first paragraph of every story. Chances are that you will be completely sucked into, and perhaps even enlightened by, several stories in that day's paper. So much so that you'll find yourself later thinking about the story, quoting it in conversation, blogging about it, etc. Food for the brain.

    And don't think that reading your regular local paper (wherever that is) is the same ... you really need try one of the old stalwarts like the NYT, WSJ or LAT.

    A good newspaper is more than just a regurgitation of the wire services, and far more than the opinion-heavy/content-lite blogosphere. Sure everyone's entitled to their opinion, but don't think it's a substitute for a real newspaper experience.

    This isn't likely to get modded up, so really the only person that's ever going to read this is you, Mr. Dada21. I urge you to just try the print NYT for a week.

    Trying to give a clue one person at a time,

    Chris

  59. Mod Parent REDUNDANT! by mikefe · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    There: Something at a specific location.
    Their: Owned by someone.
    Please make sure your english compiles.