Slashdot Mirror


Child's Play Approaches Half a Million Dollars

SecureTheNet writes "Created by Penny Arcade, the Child's Play Charity gives all toy and monetary donations directly to hospitals for distribution to sick kids. There are NO administration fees taken. As the holidays approach, the donations are approaching half a million dollars!"

87 comments

  1. charity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I donate this first post to childs play!

  2. FUCK GAMES FOR CHARITY, FEED A STARVING AFRICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll


    1. Re:FUCK GAMES FOR CHARITY, FEED A STARVING AFRICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      so he can survive, grow up, then give birth to 6 more starving africans.

      alternately, we could help children who at least have hope of a future.

    2. Re:FUCK GAMES FOR CHARITY, FEED A STARVING AFRICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
      so he can survive, grow up, then give birth to 6 more starving africans

      So they can grow up, blame the US for their plight and stupidity, become terrorists and attack the US.

    3. Re:FUCK GAMES FOR CHARITY, FEED A STARVING AFRICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You Ignorant fucks!

      The video game indsutry is solely responsible for every bad deed done
      by anyone under 21! The Video Game "community" are all hethenisitic
      dyke liberal gang members!

      The Japanese are doing far worse than they ever did to us at Pearl Harbor
      allowing this godless filth onto our hallowed land! Kids are helpless to
      resist the lures of these MURDER SIMULATORS! I will sue every gamer and
      game maker on the planet to insure my religious beliefs are upheld and to
      ensure that no parent ever have to take any kind of personal responsability!

      Charity? Please! These peons are nothing! I donate several 10's of dollars a
      year to charity, and my money isn't BLOOD MONEY! They are merely trying to
      make sure the next generation of children are as demented as these perverts are!
      Anyone who responds negativly to my rant will be arrested and sued, in an order
      to be determined later.

      Yours,
          Jack Thompson
          Video Game Bible lawyer

    4. Re:FUCK GAMES FOR CHARITY, FEED A STARVING AFRICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      How about we fuck the starving african children and keep the games for ourselves? Sounds much better!

    5. Re:FUCK GAMES FOR CHARITY, FEED A STARVING AFRICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
      How about we fuck the starving african children...

      I've tried that. The trouble is that flies keep getting on my dick. But blowjobs are better for the starving African kids. If they swallow, they'll can get a whole days worth of protein!

    6. Re:FUCK GAMES FOR CHARITY, FEED A STARVING AFRICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And why shouldn't they if our country and culture has the ability, but not the will, to alleviate the gross disparity in world living conditions? If you eat gluttonously before a starving man, with full knowledge of condition, would you not expect him to anger?

    7. Re:FUCK GAMES FOR CHARITY, FEED A STARVING AFRICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait
      And why shouldn't they if our country and culture has the ability, but not the will, to alleviate the gross disparity in world living conditions? If you eat gluttonously before a starving man, with full knowledge of condition, would you not expect him to anger?

      The trouble is that they're in their state because of their decisions. I would happily pig out in front of them to show them how they could live if they got their act together. It's their fault that their living the way they're living.

    8. Re:FUCK GAMES FOR CHARITY, FEED A STARVING AFRICAN by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 1

      Erm... i think that he CAN sue the poster now...

    9. Re:FUCK GAMES FOR CHARITY, FEED A STARVING AFRICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember kids: You can only become a successful country through centuries of rape, pillage, invasion and racism!

    10. Re:FUCK GAMES FOR CHARITY, FEED A STARVING AFRICAN by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How many starving Africans have you fed?

      Not all charity has to go to people close to death halfway across the world. Everyone has needs. Everyone can use donations to make their life easier. If you saw a dollar bill on the ground, would you pick it up and put it in your wallet, or pick it up and mail it to the Red Cross?

    11. Re:FUCK GAMES FOR CHARITY, FEED A STARVING AFRICAN by mrbooze · · Score: 1

      Why hasn't that worked for Africa, then?

    12. Re:FUCK GAMES FOR CHARITY, FEED A STARVING AFRICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they should've been born in America instead of in Africa. Geeze, it's such a simple decision, you'd think they would've made it correctly when they were given the option.

  3. Charity and economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    As a Kenyan economist recently noticed, charity is ruining Africa's economy, removing developmental incentives and making them dependent on the west. The same thing happens in many minority communities in countries with social welfare.
    We are actually doing a disservice to these children and their families by donating to charities. We need to let them fend for themselves so that they may become strong and creative thinkers, ready to fend for themselves in today's economy.

    1. Re:Charity and economics by drn8 · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Yay slashdot, home of the Neanderthals. Seriously, I see more racist, chauvinistic, intolerent, and just plain BS here then I have ever been exposed to anywhere in my entire life. Current problems in Africa were caused by European colonialim. To be fair reperations are in order. I say 50% of the GDP of any European country that had a colony in Africa should go to that former colony for the number of years that colony was held plus an extra 20% intrest per year elapsed. It wont fully make up for the damage done, but it will help. It will also remind all the holier-than-thou Europians of the Atrocities comitted for hundreds of years that put them in the position they now hold, one of which was the spawning of the U.S., the thou which they act holier than.

    2. Re:Charity and economics by funwithBSD · · Score: 2, Funny

      Vae Victus.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    3. Re:Charity and economics by drn8 · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing you mean Vae victis.

      (from wikipedia)
      Vae Victus Robotics is a high-school FIRST robotics team in Falls Church, Virginia. It's students attend George Mason High School, part of the City of Falls Church school system. The team, started in 2004, derives it's name (adopted in it's second year) from a mispelling of the latin "Vae Victis". This was not intentional.

    4. Re:Charity and economics by neildiamond · · Score: 1

      While I hate giving this kind of argument any weight, just so you don't have any more excuses not to help those less fortunate (because you're clearly helping them by sitting on your ass) consider this charity...

      Heard of Heifer International?

      I donated this year. I still doubt you would give what you could, even armed with this information. To some extent, I do feel that the poor in this country could (with a great deal of effort) turn things around for themselves for the most part. But outside of the West, I don't believe that's always the case.

    5. Re:Charity and economics by thesupermikey · · Score: 1

      I fully agree. Its imporant to find a balence between pure charity and assistence in economic develepment, at least when in comes to helping the 3rd world getting a leg up.

      But helping sick kids in american having something to do while in a hospital is a little differant than helping sick kids in africa not die of bad water.

      I also undertand...or at least hope...that you are being sarcastic

      --
      Mikey
      I've always been the kinda guy to fall for the girl dressed like an eskimo.
  4. Yeah, but... by repruhsent · · Score: -1, Funny

    ...do the electronics they're donating run Linux? Or, at least do they run embedded Linux?

    Think about it, folks; we're saving childrens' lives here. Shouldn't we avoid starting them down the primrose path to Microsoft? Of course; saving childrens' lives isn't enough. We should also be saving their souls.

    So, remember to use Linux this holiday season.

    1. Re:Yeah, but... by Ronin_Bic · · Score: 0

      I doubt it since Microsoft is one of the Plantium Sponsors

    2. Re:Yeah, but... by The+Spoonman · · Score: 1

      We should also be saving their souls

      Gee, and who says Linux isn't a religion? Seriously, it's just a computer, it's not important.

      --
      Which is more painful? Going to work or gouging your eye out with a spoon? Find out!
      http://www.workorspoon.com
  5. Who cares. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    1/2 a million dollars aint that much if you look at who the contributors are. Also I am sorry to say that the republic of ireland aint britan so thier site would have you believe. Sure the US and Canada are the same.

  6. Yeah, sure! by jettoki · · Score: -1, Redundant

    I contest this so-called "study" on the basis that it conflicts with my negative gamer stereotype world-view! I want to know where the /real/ figures are and how much of this money will be spent on subverting children or funding terrorism. It's obvious that they borrowed the name for this "charity" from the horror movies depicting homocidal infant dolls! We'll see about this "Pennies Arcade." In /court/.

  7. Courtesy Link by Skald · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a token of gratitude for such fine charitable work, I think it'd be nice to put a link to Penny Arcade itself in the story. :-)

    --

    "The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed." - Alexander Hamilton

    1. Re:Courtesy Link by rosewood · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why? You want their servers that always seem to be one more user away from failing to just implode?

    2. Re:Courtesy Link by bedessen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This will be a great help for all the slashdot readers that are not already familiar with Penny Arcade.... all three of them.

  8. That is great.. by FunctionalMethod · · Score: -1

    ..but I can't help but think that maybe the money should be split up and be given to other organisations aswell. For example 100.000$ to the MSF ( http://www.msf.org/ ) would SAVE allot of people from death. After a certain amount , around 200.000$ , you really need some people with experience organizing when and to whom the money should go. Dumping 500.000$ at once at an organisation that is not used to handling that kind of money isn't efficient .

      Don't get me wrong I admire the PA guys for doing this , I just think that if this turns out to be such a big thing every year , they should change their "model" a bit.

      Anyway a big bravo to everyone involved in this!

    --
    -- TRUST ME! I KNOW WHAT I'M DOING!
    1. Re:That is great.. by tehwebguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      why on earth would they give any of the money they raised for their charity to another charity?

      if someone wants to donate money that will help give kids video games who otherwise couldn't afford them (i don't know the ins and outs of their charity) they can donate through PA.

      if they want to donate money that will help a different cause, they can go through that other cause. people want to know where their money is going when they donate it.

      --
      -- lol pwned
    2. Re:That is great.. by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 4, Informative

      Dumping 500.000$ at once at an organisation that is not used to handling that kind of money isn't efficient .

      If you'd actually read about the project, you'd see that the donations are split up among many different hospitals, and a large part of the donations are actually in the form of items bought through Amazon....So there is not going to be just a giant lump sum dumped on the charity or any of the receiving organizations.

    3. Re:That is great.. by Bootle · · Score: 1
      Did it occur to you that these guys have a full-time employee dedicated solely to running Child's Play?

      Maybe you should dig up some pics of the warehouse-fuls of donations they have gotten in previous years, before you accuse them of not being prepared for $500k...

    4. Re:That is great.. by FunctionalMethod · · Score: 0, Troll

      Because in all honesty people have no idea what is worth donating for. This might seems a bit cruel but it is a fact. They have the right idea , just lack the interest to find out what the "world" really needs right now. People donating to Child's Play , are just people that want to do a good thing and buy something / give some money. That is great and I admire them for that. It is more then most people do. But would they donate a GameCube to a hospital somewhere , if they knew that the same 90$ would provide fresh water for a whole village in Africa and possibly save allot of lives? Or that it would provide with enough vaccine to protect 100children from common ( in the wester world) illnesses that are ( in 2rd world countries) 50% of the time lethal?

      --
      -- TRUST ME! I KNOW WHAT I'M DOING!
    5. Re:That is great.. by FunctionalMethod · · Score: 1

      I am not accusing them for anything. You might not agree with me , but don't turn my words around.

      --
      -- TRUST ME! I KNOW WHAT I'M DOING!
    6. Re:That is great.. by grylnsmn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, that's quite a condescending attitude to take. Yes, there are many different kinds of charities out there, but you shouldn't be insisting that one charity give up its proceeds to another type of charity, just because you think that the other charity is a better choice. All of those kinds of charities fill specific needs.

      Is the Make a Wish Foundation not a worthy cause because they focus their efforts on bringing cheer to the lives of children with cancer? They bring in millions of dollars a year for much the same purpose as Child's Play. Should they instead be giving their proceeds to The American Institute for Cancer Research?

      The charities that provide fresh water to villages in Africa, or help provide vaccines to third-world countries are needed, as are the ones that provide funds for research. At the same time, the charities that focus on bringing a little joy into the lives of those who are suffering are also needed.

    7. Re:That is great.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. You've managed to be the "What about starving kids in Africa?!" guy *and* the "aswell"/"allot" guy in the same post. All you need now is use of the word "hegemony" and you'll be all my favorite annoyances in one. I tell you what, you stop telling me how to be charitable with my money and I'll stop making fun of the way you write. Okay?

    8. Re:That is great.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and paying all sorts of money to the rotating heads of the 'loaded' charities in over-inflated salaries is efficient?

      'no-load' and 'no-bias' charities are the best.

    9. Re:That is great.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because in all honesty people have no idea what is worth donating for....They have the right idea , just lack the interest to find out what the "world" really needs right now.

      Oh, but you know better, huh? You wouldn't happen to be aiming for a career as a politition, would you? Because you seem to have the right mindset to fit in. Perhaps you could just skip that step and become emporer of the world, and tell us all what's good for us.

    10. Re:That is great.. by ucblockhead · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But they aren't doing that. They are asking hospitals to put up Amazon wishlists containing what they want and having poeple buy off that. It's great, really, because the hospitals get what they want, and no one spends much effort. What's great about it is that it is NOT giving money. It's not like most charities where you fire off twenty bucks and have no clue what happened to it. I went on the list, saw that the Oakland Childrens' Hospital needed certain videogames. By making the purchase, I know that they got one of the things they needed, and I know that 100% of my money went to some kid having games.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    11. Re:That is great.. by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You have missed the point of this charity. This is not about saving lives, never will be. This was started on 2 premises: (1) kids in the hospital have huge amounts of time to spend doing nothing, it's boring and scary at the same time, and (2) this is a huge fuck-you to the media/politicians who always seem to get behind the "gamers are bad people" stories.

      Anyway, from my perspective this is an awesome charity because it's all about raising the quality of life for these sick kids - and you get to pick out the exact items you want to buy for them on amazon.

  9. Could this be free (as in beer) charity? by postbigbang · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No load charity is a wonderful thing. The current model of huge organizations with powerful overheads taxes donations. If you consider the actions of the administrators of charity, they're much like a program in numerous ways. I'm not saying that eliminating administration can be perfected (you need audits, and program adjustments along the way), but a higher efficiency model would be welcomed. Bureaucracies tend to grow until they suck away the intent of charitable organizations. Some are far more efficient than others.... but in a future world perhaps more of contributions gets to the need, rather than the machine that services the need.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    1. Re:Could this be free (as in beer) charity? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I am not overly familiar with the tax laws in the US, but I believe it is possible to write off donations against tax. In this case, it would be possible for a company to fund the administration of a charity at zero cost (the money that would go to the charity would otherwise have gone to the government). With the administration overheads covered, all other donations would go directly to the causes. It may be that this is what PA are doing, or it may be that the administration work is all done on a volunteer basis.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Could this be free (as in beer) charity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This isn't really no administration cost charity. There is an unrecorded contribution of professional services by Penny Arcade; the administration and overhead is not without cost, but Penny Arcade is contributing those services which do, strictly speaking (by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) have a monetary value and should be recorded as income and as expense.

      You as a contributor may not care as long as you know that 100% of your contribution is going for the program's purpose.

      Many (though not all) charities do not spend enough in some areas of administration to become optimally efficient. There is still no such thing as a free lunch, even for charities. It is not rare for a charity to get money restricted for programs and get too little money for the good administration required to run and monitor those programs well.

    3. Re:Could this be free (as in beer) charity? by BrynM · · Score: 3, Informative
      but I believe it is possible to write off donations against tax. In this case, it would be possible for a company to fund the administration of a charity at zero cost
      INACPA (I'm not an accountant)... It would take the employees to file their yearly loss (because of hours "worked" at the charity instead of a job) as a charitable write-off because a charity (or other non-profit) cannot contribute to itself. Most donations that can be written off in the US have tangible value (cars, money, food), so writing off an employee's loss of income would be near impossible since it has no tangible value. Your company might be able to "donate" you to a charity and write off your salary though I bet.
      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    4. Re:Could this be free (as in beer) charity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are explicit IRS regulations providing for valuation of donated professional services.

    5. Re:Could this be free (as in beer) charity? by bprime · · Score: 1

      loss of income [ ... ] has no tangible value

      Hi, welcome to America - you must be new here.

  10. Paypal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Quite a lot of the donations come in via PayPal, so the article isn't quite accurate: There are no administration fees except what PayPal skims off each transaction.

    1. Re:Paypal by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Considering that donations go directly to hospitals, you could also say that it puts an extra burden on the hospital workers themselves. Last year PA tried to do all they could to help organize the huge flow of donations that came in, this year each hospital has to do it themselves. I'm not saying this is entirely a bad thing, but there is after all a reason "administrative fees" exist: that labor has to come from somewhere. Now, people living full-time off the mere organization of supposed "charity" work is one thing, but bringing a couple people in to move boxes around so that the people you're donating to don't have to do extra non-sick-children work, that's worth a bit of an administration fee.

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    2. Re:Paypal by grommit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can (and many people have) volunteer to help the individual hospitals deal with the deliveries. Also, children's hospitals are very used to getting large quantities of toys delivered since there are quite a few charities that do this sort of thing.

    3. Re:Paypal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      children's hospitals are very used to getting large quantities of toys delivered since there are quite a few charities that do this sort of thing.

      That situation would result in the hospitals' hiring slack capacity just to have the labor on hand to handle these frequent donations of large quantities of toys. I'm sure they feel it's worth it, but it's not free.

    4. Re:Paypal by afidel · · Score: 1

      All hospitals have slack labor capacity, they are in a very boom and bust style of business, so as long as they can work with the delivery companies to schedule deliveries during their historical slow periods they are probably acruing no additional cost.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:Paypal by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      I know Amazon could help out - store the gifts themselves, and deliver them in 1 go, instead of running them through the usual channels. It'd also cost me less in postage and packaging when I contribute too...

    6. Re:Paypal by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 1

      The hospital I worked at had full time employees that did this stuff.

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    7. Re:Paypal by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 1

      You have got to be kidding me. You guys realize you are talking about like 90k/year worth of salaries for this whole department? That's including the benifits they wouldn't provide! Hospitals blow through that on a daily basis.

      Seriously,
      Perspective.

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
  11. You have got to be kidding! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You Ignorant fucks!

    The video game indsutry is solely responsible for every bad deed done
    by anyone under 21! The Video Game "community" are all hethenisitic
    dyke liberal gang members!

    The Japanese are doing far worse than they ever did to us at Pearl Harbor
    allowing this godless filth onto our hallowed land! Kids are helpless to
    resist the lures of these MURDER SIMULATORS! I will sue every gamer and
    game maker on the planet to insure my religious beliefs are upheld and to
    ensure that no parent ever have to take any kind of personal responsability!

    Charity? Please! These peons are nothing! I donate several 10's of dollars a
    year to charity, and my money isn't BLOOD MONEY! They are merely trying to
    make sure the next generation of children are as demented as these perverts are!
    Anyone who responds negativly to my rant will be arrested and sued, in an order
    to be determined later.

    Yours,
            Jack Thompson
            Video Game Bible lawyer

  12. Surprising by mfh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm surprised PayPal accepts donations for PA. Remember when PayPal shut down the SomethingAwful.com Katrina aid drive without so much as a consideration for the victims? I thought their response was that PayPal doesn't support charities? Or was it a conflict of interest with one of the major charity groups that PayPal is contracted with?

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Given PA's general level of planning and professionalism (No, that's not sarcasm. Really. I promise.) I would guess that they actually contacted PayPal and cleared everything with them before going ahead with anything. I believe SomethingAwful.com just put up an account and had people donate, which raised a bunch of red flags with PayPal. SA could have gotten their money back eventually, but they were in a hurry (understandable, what with people being immediately in need). Child's Play, on the other hand, has a very long lead time to make sure things get handled properly. Note that this is not a criticism of SA in any way, just noting that PA has a much easier situation.

  13. UK Hospital Added by FalconZero · · Score: 5, Informative
    Child's play added a UK hospital: Alder Hey childrens hospital. So UK gamers/nerds out there should get over there and donate (if you havn't already).

    Direct Links
    --
    Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
  14. Ah... by SamSim · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fifty-Million-Penny Arcade!

  15. another identical charity by mliu · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's pretty weird that there's another charity that does almost exactly the same thing as Child's Play. In fact I can't really see any difference other than the fact that Child's Play has the publicity associated with Penny-Arcade.

    I first read about this other one because Microsoft made some sort of a large donation to it recently. Apparently it's been in operation since 2001 however, incorporated in 2003.
    http://www.gaming-age.com/news/2005/12/2-3

    1. Re:another identical charity by Alistar · · Score: 1

      Child's play is a little different. I read the site you linked and it looks like Microsoft donated nothing but games.

      The Child's Play charity gives entertainment gifts in general, including books and movies (educational ones too, there is a book on the amazon list about Sir Cumference and the Order of Pi I think, I love that title).

      Although there is a gaming theme, the purpose of Child's Play is not directly gaming, but helping sick children play and have fun.

    2. Re:another identical charity by ebuck · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not unusual at all.

      If you look around, there's a lot of charaties that perform similar functions. Sometimes they target the same demographic group, sometimes they are bound by the same activity, sometimes they are tied to the same organization.

      For example, there's more than one charity that caters to childern in hospitals. Toys for Tots, Child's Play, Get Well Gamers, Candlelight Foundation, Make A Wish Foundation, and The Shriner's Organization. Apologies to those I've missed, as I can not even begin to list them all.

      There's more than one charity that appeals to a particular activity. Runners can attest to every race being tied to one charity or another, the organization coordinating the race basically survives and coordinates the race by taking a small cut from the charity proceeds. It's not illegal or unethical, as few runners will pony up charity money un-prompted but most will not gripe about an entrance fee if a portion is going to promote public goodwill. Bingo is a simliar activity driven revenue source for charities, with bingo parlors happily donating a protion of the earnings to charaties to offset ill will towards gambling in the community, and the players love it as they can soothe their losses by knowing that some of the money went to a good cause. I know of bingo parlors in Texas where every game donates to a different charity.

      Organizations are another binding agent in the distribution of charity money. If you donate to your alma mater or local college / university, you often can put stipulations on the donation which effictvely makes the organization a multi-charity. One example is to specify that the dontated money is to only be spent on the library, or the departement of Biology, etc. The US Goverment also accepts charity money under such circumstances, and have a departement to distribute charity funds to the correct recipients. I have known a few people who have placed clauses in their wills to have their assets forwarded to paying off the national debt.

      So it's not a great travisty to have identical, or near-identical charities competeing in their various arenas. Without competition, even in charaties, they would soon fall prey to the problems inherit with any monopoly. For charaties, that would spell beaurocratic processes for donation, department-based "kingdom building", excessive administration, and less of the donation arriving to its intended recipient.

      Be glad you have a choice, one day you may find that a charity is very inefficent in distributing funds, and you might consider changing charities to another that still fulfills your wishes, but is ran by someone else. Consumer reports did a published study of charity comparison, and it was shocking to see how some squandered over 60% of the funds in (mis-)management of the distribution of such funds.

      There's an excellent description of the problem at http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/personal-financ e/charity-watchdogs-1205.htm

      And if you want to donate, http://www.charitywatch.org/ is useful in separating out the dogs from the winners.

    3. Re:another identical charity by JAYOYAYOYAYO · · Score: 1

      I say, what really differentiates these two charities is that Child's Play allows you to buy stuff on Amazon.com, which will be shippped directly to the Children's Hospital of your choice. For me, that is much easier than setting up a PayPal account to be able to donate to Get-Well Gamers.

  16. f*irs7 post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
  17. Children and "Video Games" by NessusRed · · Score: -1, Redundant

    This is a horrible idea. Besides ignoring the fact that the money would be much better spent on the actual medical bills giving these violent pastimes to children is simply creating the next generation of sociopaths. Science has proven again and again people who play video games are more inclined to perform real acts of violence. Ted Bundy was rumored to play video games up to 10 hours a day. Do we really need another serial killer?

  18. Chucky's Back by cpt_rhetoric · · Score: 1

    And he's pissed you're not donating!

    1. Re:Chucky's Back by eluusive · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I thought at first.

  19. just suprised by fonephux · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Doesn't seem like to many of you have a very positive attitude about this.. I think its awsome.. they did a wonderful job their first year and I believe this is their 3rd year doing it. just so you know there is a team of people who manage the childs play charity, not just one person lol. Its definately a worthy cause, and there are certainly thousands of other charities who are also worthy of your dollar. But theres certainly no reason to knock them for doing something that will really cheer some of these kids up for what might be their last xmas...

  20. Well by Shaklee39 · · Score: -1

    At least this is a way penny arcade can make up for putting out such an unfunny comic.

    1. Re:Well by heinousjay · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a shame, really. We have the charity to help sick children, but there's no foundation I can fund to give you your missing sense of humor back.

      Won't someone think of the humorless jackasses?

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
  21. faIlzoRs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    in eternity...Romeo lead to 'cleaner BSD's filesystem the facts and reasons why anyone could sink your Are you GAY first avoid going had at lunchtime Hand...don't told reporters, dim. If *BSD is market. Therefore Are you a NIGGER fact came into Fatal mistakes, as fittingly Tops responsibility fucking market conglomerate in the have left in 80s, DARPA saw BSD The project as a the problems BSD fanatics? I've [slashdot.org], Of Jordan Hubbard Already dead. It is Charnel house. The people's faces at from the FreeBSD impaired its Prima donnas, and Troubles of Walnut disappearing up its Fortunately, Linux the rain..we can be survival prospects

  22. Question by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does that figure include "Jack Thompson's" donation?

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    1. Re:Question by Hannah+E.+Davis · · Score: 1

      It shouldn't, because they didn't donate that money to their own charity -- they donated it to this one.

  23. cost in volunteers, do you know the end users? by fantomas · · Score: 1

    Cost in volunteer time - if there's a website - somebody built it. Volunteering is fine if a couple of hours a week but what if it needs 2 years full time work? I think volunteering is crucial and can work but often you require some paid staff to make critical things happen. I don't think the big charities are an evil conspiracy - maybe research what their model is.

    An interesting organisation is the Royal National Lifeboats Association in the UK - all the ship crew are volunteers, these are the guys who save drowning seamen off UK coastlines. But their headquarters support, their R and D, these are all paid staff.

    Plus - do you know the end users? can you always balance the urgency of needs? Some cases of need might not be as "attractive" as others. What touches your heart strings might not be the most urgent case. Might need neutral professional in the middle, i.e. charity workers, who are better informed about where aid should go. Personally I'd rather have full time paid professionals working out who's most needy than some wealthy semi-retired housewives half way across the planet making life or death decisions for tsunami victims or rural Pakistani villages needing shelter *now*.

  24. Flamebait, false comparison by happyemoticon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Balderdash. Raising your spirits helps you get well - that's why there's a statistical link between religion (or optimism) and health. In one case (no, I don't have a link to support it), a double-blind study showed a correlation between a negative attitude going into heart surgery and dying in said heart surgery.

    There's a difference between charity to save somebody's life - be it giving toys to a kid with cancer so he doesn't die of despair, or giving clean water to somebody in Africa so he doesn't die of dysentery - and charity to finance somebody's continued economic indifference and unwillingness to support themselves. A living person at least has a chance of economic contribution but a dead person has none, unless you're talking soylent green.

    1. Re:Flamebait, false comparison by mboverload · · Score: 1

      Atheists and Christians have the exact same deathrate.

      Just my little fun fact...

    2. Re:Flamebait, false comparison by Lotharus · · Score: 1

      Yep. 100%. They all die eventually.

      Wait, no, Christians have a 99.99999999% mortality rate, if you count the couple folks that were raptured as non-deaths.

      I know, the percentage is probably wrong. I don't know exactly how many people can be said to have been raptured, nor the complete total Christian population since the dawn of time.

      s/Christian/God's chosen people/ where necessary.

  25. Fundraising at Laurier by fa1uzure · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A campus club(Kult of Gaming) I belong to at WLU in Waterloo, Ontario was doing fundraising for this charity. I don't know the total amount we raised, but we got the creater of VGcats to come out and do a signing for childsplay, where the profits went to the charity, yesterday.

  26. Thompson by dacarr · · Score: 1

    This is a little somethign that'll also piss off Jack Thompson. Good show, guys.

    --
    This sig no verb.
    1. Re:Thompson by IamCarrots · · Score: 1

      Some of you seem to either not take this seriously, or have decided to bash it, or joke about it. What the hell are you doing for kids with terminal diseases and disorders this holiday season? Anything? I doubt it. While I don't agree that video games are the answer, it's not just video games/systems that are being donated, so stop generalizing it. If I were a little boy dying of cancer stuck in a damned hospital bed for Christmas and someone gave me a free GBA to play with, I'd be estatic and thankful. So to hell with all you trolls, and kudos to the PA crew, because at least their intentions are good and they trying to do something for the less fortunate. Goddamned cynics. As far as the 'hospitals having to put forth man hours to execute this event', it's not called a charity for the hell of it.

    2. Re:Thompson by lewp · · Score: 1

      If anything the comment you replied to was meant to be 'Funny'. Chill out, douchebag, everybody knows Child's Play is a good thing. One of the motivations for its creation was to show gamers are decent, normal people, who care about others; and as a big 'fuck you' to Jack Thompson and people like him who think they're just deviates training to blow people up by practicing on their consoles.

      It probably does get under his skin on some level, and, as long as the kids still come first, I can't see anything wrong with that. Can you?

      --
      Game... blouses.
    3. Re:Thompson by dacarr · · Score: 1

      Jack? Is that you, trolling on Slashdot?

      --
      This sig no verb.
    4. Re:Thompson by IamCarrots · · Score: 1

      Sorry, hit wrong reply button. Wasn't meant to follow your post up. I had no problem with your post.

    5. Re:Thompson by dacarr · · Score: 1

      No worries, crap happens. =^^=

      --
      This sig no verb.
  27. How it helps by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1

    We are not poor, and have health insurance, but we were a small recipient of something like this. My 3 year old daughter had her shoulder dislocated in a playground accident. Not too big a deal - just needed to be reset and take it easy for a week. However, the X-ray machine was incredibly scary for her. We finally got her to hold still when the hospital staff got a teddy bear from some toys for sick kids (sorry, I forgot the name), and I stayed in the room. (Just one dose for me is not as bad as multiple daily doses for hospital staff.) She wouldn't let go of that bear for weeks.

  28. Bah Humbug! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to whomever modded this troll. Hit a little to close to home, did it?