Slashdot Mirror


New Way to Stimulate Brain to Release Antioxidants

Neopallium writes "A joint research effort between researchers at the Burnham Institute for Medical Research in La Jolla, CA, and a team from Japan (Iwate University, Osaka City University, Gifu University, Iwate Medical University) has discovered a novel way to treat stroke and neurodegenerative disorders. This approach works by inducing nerve cells in the brain and the spine to release natural antioxidants that protect nerve cells from stress and free radicals that lead to neurodegenerative diseases."

98 comments

  1. Very promising research - but is it just PR? by filenavigator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The research even suggests that this therapy could help in the treatment of Lou Gehrig's, and Alzheimer's disease. This is some very interesting and promising stuff. Lets hope that this is not just some press release for a pharmaceutical company trying to push a drug they are working on.

    1. Re:Very promising research - but is it just PR? by frybacon · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Burnham Institute is a non-profit academic research facility.

    2. Re:Very promising research - but is it just PR? by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lets hope that this is not just some press release for a pharmaceutical company trying to push a drug they are working on.

      Considering that the article linked to is on an investment site which also reports lottery numbers and the article itself seems little more than a troll for donations put forward before the study itself has even been published. . .

      I wouldn't get my hopes up too high just yet.

      KFG

    3. Re:Very promising research - but is it just PR? by kfg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      . . .a non-profit academic research facility.

      Whose raison d'etre is to patent and license their discoveries:

      http://www.burnham.org/TechnologyTransfer/Overview .asp

      Where on earth do people ever get the idea that a nonprofit is without profit motive? Trust me, I've served as an executive officer/director in both profit and and nonprofit corporations and they are both equally businesses before all else primarily concerned with grubbing money.

      KFG

    4. Re:Very promising research - but is it just PR? by the+original+m0nk · · Score: 1

      maybe it's just the after-effects of reading through the story and comments on "study: waking up like being drunk".

      but i kept reading that as "whore raisin". i had to blink a few times to see the "s" in "whose" wasn't an "r".

    5. Re:Very promising research - but is it just PR? by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Without the money they fade out of existance. Organizations are organisms that compete, those that use certain methodologies survive, those that don't wither.

      Ecosystems are a fact wheter ecological or economic.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  2. Woo-hoo... by codeshack · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... pomegranite juice injections in my spine. Why don't they hook me up with a white wine IV and save themselves the trouble?

    1. Re:Woo-hoo... by gbobeck · · Score: 1

      Forget the wine, go for the green tea IV instead.

      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
    2. Re:Woo-hoo... by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      A spinal tap isn't that fun. I've had over 40.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lumbar_puncture

    3. Re:Woo-hoo... by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Funny
      But did theirs go to 11?

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  3. even if they can do 50% of the article claim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Stimulating the brain on its own would be a great achievement for todays couch potatoes.. let alone releasing anti oxidants.

    -Sj53

  4. Amazing research by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    According to the article, they use NEPPs (NEurite outgrowth-Promoting Prostaglandins) to activate the pathways to release the stress-reducing antioxidants. That's like how R2D2 is frequently used to run the elevators while Luke and Han are running around the Death Star.

    1. Re:Amazing research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chuck Norris can also be used to roundhouse kick the NEPPs into releasing their stress-reducing antioxidants.

  5. Not a Cure by Voltageaav · · Score: 4, Informative

    This won't cure anyone who already has it though. It's a preventative measure. It may get rid of these diseases in 30 years once it's been used widely, but it's not going to help anyone right now.

    --
    Someone save me from this sanity.
    1. Re:Not a Cure by drpimp · · Score: 1, Insightful

      None the less it could be very good for those whom haven't acquired it yet. Let's be honest, even if you get cured for one disease, odds are you are going to get another to which a cure has not yet been discovered. So let's face it, there are more preventative medicines that there are cures. Preventative medicine is sometimes just as good as a cure.

      --
      -- Brought to you by Carl's JR
    2. Re:Not a Cure by janek78 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not necessarily. If you have an ischemic stroke, some of the tissue will be lost beyond saving and undergo necrosis. There will however be a much larger region, called "the penumbra" (shadow) that will be subjected to a certain degree of ischemic damage. Much of this region will be damaged not by the ischemia itself, but by oxidative stress at reperfusion when blood with oxygen and nutriets starts flowing back into the tissue.

      Much as been tried to limit this reperfusion damage, including calcium channel blockers (e.g. nimodipine) and different antioxidants, but to no great success. You could argue that enhancing your antioxidative capacity before the reperfusion damage appears could limit the extend of damage to your brain. I remain carefully optimistic.

    3. Re:Not a Cure by nacturation · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But do you really want it as a preventative measure? FTFA:

      "At normal concentrations, glutamate acts as a neurotransmitter that nerves use to communicate. However, at excessive levels glutamate is toxic, resulting in over stimulation of nerve cells, known as excitotoxicity, and causing excessive stress on the nerve cells eventually ending in cell death."

      So if you counteract this, your nerves communicate less. Sounds like a tradeoff between higher mental capacity resulting in increased likelihood of nerve damage -vs- lower mental capacity but you get to use your brain longer. I know my brain works in rather strange ways at times -- I believe it's my quirks that give rise to periods of intense creativity -- and I wouldn't trade that for having a "normal" brain if that means also being more stupid and losing the benefits I experience.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    4. Re:Not a Cure by denebian+devil · · Score: 1

      What's your evidence that overstimulation of nerve cells = higher mental capacity? Considering that this overstimulation is occurring in stroke and Alzheimers victims, and their mental capacity (or at the very least their ability to make use of their mental capacity) ultimately plummets, I'd say that's just wild speculation.

    5. Re:Not a Cure by denebian+devil · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that many of these diseases such as Alzheimers and Lou Gerhigs disease are slow and progressive, so that if you start showing early signs and are diagnosed, you still have time to take potentially "preventive" medicines to stop any further progression, even if you can't reverse what's already happened.

    6. Re:Not a Cure by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Normally, glutamate is a neurotransmitter which allows for communication according to TFA. I'm speculating here that less glutamate means less communication (hence slower thinking) and that more glutamate means more communication (better thinking). Just like caffeine enhances mental focus and physical performance, but too much will kill you. As long as you don't have too much glutamate and cross the threshold to where your nerves suffer damage, wouldn't increased amounts lead to better mental performance? I'm certainly no neurologist so maybe it is wild speculation.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    7. Re:Not a Cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too much caffeine kills you because of its effects on your heart and blood pressure, not your brain.

    8. Re:Not a Cure by (negative+video) · · Score: 1
      So if you counteract this, your nerves communicate less. Sounds like a tradeoff between higher mental capacity resulting in increased likelihood of nerve damage -vs- lower mental capacity but you get to use your brain longer.
      The article is about preventing the damage caused by glutamate, not changing its levels. Besides which, IIRC a big part of glutamate toxicity is caused by failure of the pumps that suck it away from neurons. A drug that kept those working would simply keep the brain working normally (although that in itself might be damaging, if what the neurons need is rest and relaxation).
    9. Re:Not a Cure by denebian+devil · · Score: 1

      First, you're making an unproven leap in logic to compare less communication to slower thinking and more communication to better thinking. While it may *seem* like an obvious and logical conclusion, there are many things in the world that seem like they should logically be one way but in reality are the exact opposite. For example, while ritalin is a stimulant, it calms the behavior of people with ADHD. There is of course a logical and scientific explanation for this effect, but from a layman's perspective the cause and effect seem to contradict each other.

      But let's look at the quote from the article:

      "At normal concentrations, glutamate acts as a neurotransmitter that nerves use to communicate. However, at excessive levels glutamate is toxic, resulting in over stimulation of nerve cells, known as excitotoxicity, and causing excessive stress on the nerve cells eventually ending in cell death."

      Let's assume that, all other things equal, your belief that more communication = better thinking is true. The reason your argument still wouldn't work is because all other things are *not* equal. While the extra communication may lead to better thinking, the extra stress and eventual cell death lead to worse thinking. You don't gain the benefit of one because you are at the same time paying the cost of the other.

    10. Re:Not a Cure by nacturation · · Score: 1

      While the extra communication may lead to better thinking, the extra stress and eventual cell death lead to worse thinking.

      The candle that burns twice as bright burns half as long? :)

      Ah well, it was an interesting thought while it lasted. Thanks for the explanation.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  6. This can't be good. by Spazntwich · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps for treating specialized diseases, but like most drugs, if you force your brain to do things it normally shouldn't, like release more of a certain compound, you'll run into production and resistance issues, eventually requiring more and more for the same effect until bad things happen.

    I remain skeptical.

    1. Re:This can't be good. by plantman-the-womb-st · · Score: 0

      A few years ago there were a few studies that showed similar, if not the same, results from the patients doing tai chi and a few other low impact non-aerobic relaxation style exercises. Now they've made a drug that does it too. I agree, to hell with the drug, just do tai chi. If you can stimulate your body to do this manner of thing naturally it will usually take care of all the other chemicals it needs, that we have no clue about, on it's own.

      --
      Say bad words about my book, in cold oatmeal, or I shall sue!
    2. Re:This can't be good. by avasol · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Let me philosophize, for a second. Imagine that you had the choice between being physically crippled but mentally fit, or mentally broke versus physically ablebodied; what would you pick?

      I can say with some safety among numbers that most of us would choose the first. To keep your mind functioning is after all much closer to the real you. Therefore, any positive news on this front is, well, positive news. No need to be such a pessimist. :-)

      ---
      If Lucifer was God's best Angel before his fall, is it okay to be a fan of Lucifer during that particular Era? Mainly making the comparison to, say, Elvis fans.

    3. Re:This can't be good. by catahoula10 · · Score: 1

      I remain skeptical also. Forcing (or tricking) the body into having a specific chemical reaction could cause other reactions that may not be wanted. Then another drug would be needed to suppress that, and so on and so on. Which is good for drug profits, but not always good for the patient.

      What has gone by the wayside in the last 100 years are natural herbs and plants used for cures. Plants have been used for thousands of years around the world with good success.

      An example of a plant used to help the body heal itself would be 'Ginko Biloba'. Ginko has a well documented hisory (The AMA did a piece on ginko also)of increasing peripheral blood flow in the body, as well as increasing blood flow in and around the brain and eyes. And, it did it better then the drugs without side effects. Ginko has also slowed the progress of Alzheimer's Disease and when caught early enough halted it. Ginko has helped stroke patients recover faster.

      Another herb that has been documented to relieve a diease is "Saw Palmetto" and "Nettle". These herbs naturally slow the hormone that causes some cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia not caused by bacteria.

      I say skip tricking the body into health with man made chemicals and give the body what it needs to heal itself.

      --
      This has been another valuable and informative opinion from:
      Catahoula!
  7. Sounds familiar by snookumz · · Score: 5, Informative

    This sounds like protandim. Protandim was a nutritional supplement that was being touted as a life extension drug a while back. The idea was that the human body could never swallow enough anti-oxidants to make up for the fall off with age. Besides, acids in the stomach ruin most anyways. The researcher who made protandim got the idea of restimulating the bodies natural production of anti-oxidants. I believe they claimed a 400% increase in naturally produced anti-oxidant levels. There were quite a few scientific papers that showed beneficial effects to mice suffering from strokes. Unfortunately the company seems to have wavered on what their claims are. Over time, they stepped down from that less provable statement that it could extend lifespan. Still, I don't think anyone has refuted the positive effects. They just shouldn't have targeted the I want to live forever market.

    1. Re:Sounds familiar by weisen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Protandim" does not exist, at all, in MEDLINE (www.pubmed.gov), which means that there is essentially zero peer reviewed medical research on the drug, at least under its brand name.

      I had actually never seen the error message before:

      > The following term was not found and ignored: protandim.

      This work presently under discussion, at least, seems to involve a published line of investigation.

    2. Re:Sounds familiar by snookumz · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ah. While I was searching, I found this about it. So I guess it was proven as just another hoax. Probably should have looked it up before posting. Oh well. :)

    3. Re:Sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anyway, from my knowledge antioxidants are to extend lifespan.
      but im not really sure they should mess with this.
      afterall if that'd be that easy it would evolve naturally.
      from my point of view it would require a lot of energy so that other things would degradate.
      things like intelligence for example =)
      also if the lifespan would increase over the whole population it'll likely decrease our innovation rate and other stuff as death is your last deadline to finish things up.
      however, that's the case only if they would try to extend the thing genetically and global. That could be done not only by cloning but also by crafting a virus that would hack the dna in every cell so fast that you wont die half way there and the changes taking place shouldnt reqiure that much of phisiological morphing like in Resident Evil lol, couse that would kill you first. There are problems with that technique as well. Virus will mutate. So it should be crafted to be checked every now and then and then be injected to each willing(read paying) individual and after it does it's job, it should die. The whole proccess must take a few hours.
      and what actually would happen in case of contineus drugging is the resistence effect as usual.

    4. Re:Sounds familiar by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 1

      I congratulate you on your honesty and thorough research. You are a real scientist. Those mods who gave the original post points, though, need to mod your older and newer posts properly now.

    5. Re:Sounds familiar by optimus10 · · Score: 1

      I see a huge loophole in this thinking. Free radicals and reactive oxygen species, while bad in excess, are involved in numerous signaling pathways of the body and are enormously important in phenomena like immune activation. Massive supplementing of anti-oxidants may address the suspected negative role of oxidative stress in shortening telomeres , but raises tons of others. If you dose yourself with anti-oxidants and screw up the normal thresholds for oxidant-related signaling, who knows what myriad of negative effects may arise?

    6. Re:Sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      protandim is not a hoax....a new study was published 1/17 in the leading antioxidant journal, Free Radical Biology, go to www.protandim.com to view the study....by the way...not an anonymous coward--just don' feel like going thru the hassle

  8. I wonder if... by Hyperkinetic · · Score: 1

    It would reverse the effects of years of smoking pot??

    1. Re:I wonder if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pot is probably not an issue. Extasy, WAY TO GO... H8ohhoo,, s8rry.... I mean, that's irrevocable brain damage! 8-/

    2. Re:I wonder if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, THC, the chemical in pot that makes you stoned, is a powerful antioxidant. I also read in a large newsweek article a while ago that THC helps to prevent alzheimers by "working out" the cannibinoid receptors, where plaque can form (and cause alzheimers). It's like making sure that you run your car so the battery/engine stay in good shape.

    3. Re:I wonder if... by GWSuperfan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      More likely is that years of smoking pot would make this less necessary. The most current research indicates that cannabanoids (delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol being chief among them) stimulate processes in the brain that protect against both damage from chronic causes (i.e. Alzheimer's) and acute trauma. A Google search for "Alzheimer's" and "Marijuana" should yield some good starting points. And, pot has the added bonus of probably being much cheaper than any new drug or treatment that the pharmecutical companies are likely to come out with anytime soon. Just remember to fight terrorism and buy domestic.

      --
      Fight psychopharmacological mccarthyism. http://www.norml.org/
    4. Re:I wonder if... by centipetalforce · · Score: 1

      Ahem, your ideas are intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

    5. Re:I wonder if... by wytcld · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Off topic, but reminds me of the recent research showing that those who smoke nothing but pot have lower lung cancer incidence than those who smoke nothing at all. Although the smoke does do some damage to the lungs, chemicals in it actually are protective - the opposite of the chemical effects from tobacco smoke.

      It would be appropriately weird if something that has added so much particularly to the musical culture of the last century has also been the preventer of both brain damage and lung cancer for many thousands of people, just as a side effect.

      I know if my back's out badly - which in the theory of many osteopaths restricts the flow of cerebro-spinal fluid and thus puts some pressure on the brain - pot is a great help in thinking more clearly (including thinking about how to get my back better). This would fit with the recent finding that people with recurrent back trouble evidence some brain shrinkage. The question would be: Would people with recurrent back trouble who are regular smokers exhibit less?

      --
      "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
  9. Oh come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a bunch of crap! There's never been a substance for which that has been true. I mean, wfagfagggdf... Excuse me, I've gotta go shoot up before the shakes get worse.

    All aboard the H-train to Methadone City!

  10. Only preventative? by Rhinan · · Score: 1

    So what you're saying is start injecting myself now just in case I was going to have a stroke in 30 years...

    --
    Sure, you may be disappointed with your lackluster weight-loss results, but keep your chin up, as it helps to prevent th
  11. Joint research by skraps · · Score: 1

    Yeah, sometimes I releive stress with "joint research" too.

    --
    Karma: -2147483648 (Mostly affected by integer overflow)
  12. Tampering by Da3vid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You have to ask yourself, at what point is it time to just let it go? Is there a point to let it go? Maybe the point exists, maybe it doesn't, I expect its a relative outlook of moral perspective, but it seems that if there is a line somewhere, it can't be far away from where we are.

    -Da3vid-

    1. Re:Tampering by denebian+devil · · Score: 1

      I would expect this kind of talk about issues relating to sacrificing one life (or potential life) to save another, but not over just some new drug. Yes, it may seem at times that a person is suffering more than living, and that maybe in that state they would rather just let life take its course, but that doesn't mean we can't still strive for a future where that condition or disease can be combatted. It may not be now, but if we did everything for the now, then nothing would get done.

  13. A better kind of stimulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find that a nice and healthful stimulation is achieved by watching Sania Mirza's excellent tennis-playing skills.

    [example]

  14. Igor! by Bananatree3 · · Score: 1, Funny
    ****BZzZzzztt!!*****

    mad dr: IGOR! what is that I smell?!? ****BZzZzzztt!!***** (fumes)

    Igor: Massstr!! Thaphts your attempt at stimulating neurological antioxidents!

    mad dr: You imbasol! I told you not to use electricity! I told you to use electrolytes!!. You nimwit!

    igor: but,...MASssssterr! I swwear you said electricity! ****BZzZzzztt!!*****

    mad dr: this is the last time I let you help me with my experiments!

    1. Re:Igor! by PsikeOmega · · Score: 1

      As a failed mad scientist myself (we'd all be pretty well cooked if any mad scientist was successful) I just wish to state that it is impossible to find help that is... well... helpful

      --
      "For the last time your computer Does not run off of black Magic..." -Me to a customer
  15. There is no line by aepervius · · Score: 1

    You can sir, have my place in the line, if you so think. Me on the other hand, I do not care if it is wrong morally, ethically, or whatnot, I want to avoid crossing the line as long as possible.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:There is no line by Da3vid · · Score: 1

      No line whatsoever? What about legends about bathing in virgin's blood to maintain youth? If something like that even had a chance of working, if it was feasible, would that be acceptable? It seems clear to me now that a line exists somewhere. The survival instinct is not absolute.

      -Da3vid-

    2. Re:There is no line by snookumz · · Score: 1
      No line whatsoever? What about legends about bathing in virgin's blood to maintain youth? If something like that even had a chance of working, if it was feasible, would that be acceptable?

      Doesn't seem to stop people like Christoper Reeves from advocating stem cell research.

    3. Re:There is no line by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      Doesn't seem to stop people like Christoper Reeves from advocating stem cell research.

      No. Death does that.

      Christopher Reeves is deader than a doornail that fell off a horse, broke its neck, became paralyzed from the neck down, and then died several years later from cardiac arrest after falling into a coma.

    4. Re:There is no line by fLameDogg · · Score: 1
      Christopher Reeves is deader than a doornail that fell off a horse...

      I'd say he is exactly as dead. What a doornail might be doing on a horse is another matter.

      BTW, s/Reeves/Reeve/. He was a remarkably courageous man.

      --
      fD
    5. Re:There is no line by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      What about legends about bathing in virgin's blood to maintain youth?

      Gimme a break. If every Slashdotter contributed half a cc, you'd be drowning in the stuff.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    6. Re:There is no line by zippthorne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why is everyone that suffers some hardship described as "courageous?" Isn't it enough that they suffer the hardship without having to have some kind of character building personal revelation as a result? The next time you see a similar patient described in such a way, think about the question, "Does he have a will to live or a fear of death?"

      Does the answer to that question really matter?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    7. Re:There is no line by fLameDogg · · Score: 1
      Why is everyone that suffers some hardship described as "courageous?"

      While I don't have have an answer to this rhetorical mini-rant, my impression of Mr. Reeve was that he was very courageous, indeed. I did hesitate a little about adding that bit, since it wasn't germain to the discussion, but I respected him a lot, and I didn't want to let it go just yukking on about doornails.

      --
      fD
    8. Re:There is no line by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Courageous he may have been, I have no real information to judge that by. I'm just a little bit disappointed by the fact that we seem to have to mention how brave people are that are suffering this that or the other. as if the disease itself somehow diminishes them as a person. Either that or i've been watching too many Quenton Tarrantino movies and the "edgy" dialogy style is starting to rub off.

      Also, I don't think it's particular brave for famous people who have <insert tragic disease> to come out in support of research for it. Now if Reeve had come out against stem cell research, that would've been news.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  16. Not much use yet... by themysteryman73 · · Score: 0

    Yet another medical breakthrough that we'll have to wait another 15 years to even sample.

  17. Jumping the gun by denebian+devil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems in this situation, such a complaint is jumping the gun a bit. First of all, this *is* talking about treating specialized diseases (as it says in the article, "stroke and neurodegenerative disorders". And in these cases, the brain is already "doing something it normally shouldn't." The drug is merely trying to restore it to a state of functioning normally.

    Second, while the possibility of resistance is always looming, a stroke or Alzheimer's patient may be willing to take that risk if it means even a slightly longer period of lucidity. Would you rather risk the *possibility* of the drug eventually causing problems or losing its effectiveness, or take instead the *certainty* of a progressive and insidious neurological disease?

    Certainly a new drug should not be taken lightly. For example, it may not yet be appropriate for someone who has learned of their diagnosis but have not yet degenerated very far. But once you've reached such a hopeless condition as to be completely debilitated, you (or those caring for you) may ask "What's the worst that could happen? At least with this there's hope."

  18. I'm all stressed out.. by Combas · · Score: 2, Funny

    "excessive levels glutamate is toxic, resulting in over stimulation of nerve cells, known as excitotoxicity, and causing excessive stress on the nerve cells eventually ending in cell death"

    Who knew stress was bad for you, eh?

    1. Re:I'm all stressed out.. by kfg · · Score: 1

      Who knew stress was bad for you, eh?

      I once had the pleasure of having Hans Selye, the "discoverer" of stress, for a teacher.

      It's interesting that while most people intuitively know that stress is bad for them most intuitively cannot identify stress when it happens to them.

      Winning the lottery, for instance, is highly stressful.

      KFG

  19. Thank God... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can protect me from Free Radicals

  20. Wildly out of context by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There is a very big difference between discovering a new technique for activating a cells stress response and developing a novel therapy for humans. Time and time again, the media (slashdot included) takes scientific reports completely out of context. The authors tested their compounds in tissue cultures, nothing more.

  21. Awesome by arvindn · · Score: 1

    Sounds interesting, although I'm more interested in what this type of approach can mean for anti-aging, which is also focused around combating cell degeneration and promoting regeneration. Maybe someone with more medical knowledge can clue me in?

  22. if you want more antioxidants in your brain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...why don't you just take a dozen grams of ascorbic acid per day ?

    1. Re:if you want more antioxidants in your brain... by Mprx · · Score: 1

      Because it's not fat soluble, so it will have limited effect on the brain.

  23. Brain antioxidants by possible · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One really has to wait for the study to be published before making any judgements.
    However, there have been quite a few promising studies (in both rats and people) showing that antioxidants dramatically reduce the extent of damage to the brain in both diseases of the brain and traumatic brain injury.

    Some of the studies I have read indicate that it should be possible to dramatically boost levels of brain antioxidants simply by ingesting antioxidants that are capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier. Compounds such as alpha-lipoic acid (which is both fat- and water-soluble) and curcumin (a component of the popular curry spice turmeric) are cheap, safe, and very powerful antioxidants that have been studied.

    From the press release, it sounds like the methods used in the study are pretty invasive expensive. I would like to see more long-term research using widely available antioxidant supplements. Unfortunately, since most medical research is funded by drug companies these days, we aren't likely to see lots of grants going to scientists who want to study non-patentable things like turmeric or vitamin C.

  24. Oxygen is needed... by Rickler · · Score: 0, Troll

    The free-radical element called oxygen; it's needed in the brain. So while decreasing brain tumors and other cell mutation defects we also decrease our intelligence. There is always a positive and negative reaction to everything. This anti-oxidant drink fad is somewhat like oxygenated water in a way. But I do like people drinking green tea instead of coffee. I hate coffee drinkers more then smokers some times; horribly breath and their cars smell like coffee makers.

    --

    The human race is artificial intelligence created using object orientated programming.
    1. Re:Oxygen is needed... by geobeck · · Score: 3, Informative

      The dangerous free radicals that antioxidants decrease are not simply oxygen, but hydroxyl ions: OH-

      A great deal of biochemistry is governed not by stong covalent bonds, but by comparatively weak ionic bonds. You have dozens of different types of ions flowing through your body, all fulfilling different roles.

      Unfortunately, ordinary body processes produce ionic waste, such as free radicals. If you have too many free radicals in your bloodstream, they can bond with positive ions that would otherwise interact with other negative ions.

      A simple example of ions in your bloodstream is table salt. (There are many types of salt in your body, but everyone understands table salt.) When you eat salt (sodium chloride, NaCl), it dissolves in your body fluids and disassociates into its component ions, Na+ and Cl-. I'm not sure of the numbers; it's been a long time since high school biology, but different ions have different amounts of charge. I'm pretty sure Na+ and Cl- are both single-charge ions.

      So antioxidants don't rob your brain of valuable oxygen; they remove a harmful ionic waste product.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    2. Re:Oxygen is needed... by epl · · Score: 1

      Actually, a radical does not have to be an ion.

      From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_(chemistry):

      "In chemistry, radicals (often refered to as free radicals) are atomic or molecular species with unpaired electrons or an otherwise open shell configuration. These unpaired electrons are usually highly reactive, so radicals are likely to take part in chemical reactions."

      Molecular oxygen is of course required for your brain to function, but oxygen radicals are not.

    3. Re:Oxygen is needed... by optimus10 · · Score: 1

      dont forget NOS and related species that it pumps out. also enormously important in signaling of the brain.

  25. The Bad News by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, the brain is induced to that state using Oxygen.
    The Oxygen Channel.

  26. A guaranteed way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...to stimulate the brain. Pr0n. Next problem, how to desensitize it.

    1. Re:A guaranteed way... by sakitepinkoe · · Score: 1

      Having sex does help according to this forbes.com article: http://www.forbes.com/2003/10/08/cz_af_1008health. html Here's a scrape from the article: "Wilkes University in Pennsylvania says individuals who have sex once or twice a week show 30% higher levels of an antibody called immunoglobulin A, which is known to boost the immune system." ...just be careful on doing it with. You might get the anti-immune system desease. :-)

  27. usage by dartarrow · · Score: 1

    This approach works by inducing nerve cells in the brain and the spine to release natural antioxidants that protect nerve cells from stress

    So technically it can be used to counter depression...?

    --
    I love humanity, it is people I hate
  28. The stuff of old wives' tales by Tab+is+on+Slashdot · · Score: 1

    I recently (4ish months ago) started smoking pot (age 18 at the time). It took awhile to get the THC flowing, or maybe my technique right, I don't know. Either way, it took a few times before I got high. That worked just fine for awhile.
    Then, two months ago, I got REALLY high. I don't know why this experience was so much different, but it was, and it's been the same way all of two times I've smoked since then. The problem is that ever since that experience two months ago, I haven't felt the same. At all. For awhile I had thought I had somehow suffered some kind of minor brain damage, because of how fucked up things felt. My attention was shot. My memory was shot. I couldn't focus -- and I don't mean the usual "oh, too distracted" couldn't focus. I mean I was no longer mentally capable of zoning in. It was a very real and very scary phenomenon.

    Since then I've managed to adapt to this altered state of mind, and I'm getting along decently, but I can still tell that something is distinctly amiss whenever I really focus on it. I know for a fact that others have gone through a similar transition, although most have simply adapted and forgotten about it. The thing is, either only a very small percentage of people are susceptible to this, or only a very small percentage actually notice it. I don't know which. The lack of any sort of medical documentation on such a phenomenon is the disturbing thing. I've been looking for an explanation for two months now, and I've come up blank. There are a few very rare medical papers describing cases of a "cannabis psychosis" which seems to roughly emulate what I experienced, but all of these are decades old and seem to have gone nowhere. So what's the deal? I'm not sure if I'll ever find out.

    1. Re:The stuff of old wives' tales by Laura_DilDio · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a couple of things are going on...

      1) you may have finally obtained some kind bud, whereas you may have initially been smoking grass clippings (or equivalent);

      2) you need to learn to manage your buzz -- getting rocked out of your mind may be entertaining every once in a while.

      Try a more conservative approach -- like having one or two glasses of wine versus swilling a fifth of whiskey.

    2. Re:The stuff of old wives' tales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of the time me and some friends got some weed and was told later that it was laced with pcp. We smoked a little at lunch and we were high for hours. We called each other after school because we were all still high, and it didn't feel normal. The next day, the guy who sold it to us said "Oh, I thought I told you it was laced with pcp." I am pretty sure I felt normal afterwards though.

    3. Re:The stuff of old wives' tales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do stuff while you're high.. that's the key. Go outside, walk around.. that's why disc golf was invented.
      also, it could be that you're not sleeping enough or well enough, or not eating enough or well enough. If you smoke CONSTANTLY, honestly, it can be easy to forget to eat well and to sleep well. And then there's the whole.. 'pot withdrawal' thing. It's entirely mental, not physical at all, but if you smoke a lot, and then stop, it takes a bit of time to adjust to being sober.. during which time you may not be able to focus your attention too well, might be irritable.. yeah.

      the cannibis psychosis you're thinking about is Reefer Madness... a funny movie and totally not true. Though honestly? Maybe you've got a bit of a brain-problem.. like ADD, or scizophrenia, or.. well you get the picture. It might be fine just fine and mild enough you'll never really have a problem, but there's some things that might only start to really appear when you're in your late teens. Not to worry, though, unless it's a big problem -- tons of people are a 'little' crazy, and undiagnosed, and fine just fine. It's the people who are a bit more than a little off that stand out.

    4. Re:The stuff of old wives' tales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pot does have the potential to bring out underlying psychological disorders, such as schizophrenia. Incidentally, 18 is the most common age for schizophrenia to surface in males, whereas in females it usually develops a little bit later. Although schizophrenia that is brought out by pot is usually associated with heavy users, rules always have exceptions. You might want to try looking into research on the links between marijuana and schizophrenia. My psychiatrist mentioned to me that there was some rather recent research and a pretty big article about it in the LA times a couple weeks ago. If you're worried, you might want to try seeing a doctor, just in case.

      The chances of schizophrenia being the case are also a lot higher if you have any relatives diagnosed with it--the more closely related, the greater the risk. Despite all of this, it's still a rather small risk.

      There was one period of time when I was smoking every day, and when I would be talking or writing I wouldn't be able to remember a word that I wanted to use. It was rather frusturating, but it's now gone, and I still smoke multiple times a week. Weed affects everybody differently, and it just might not be your thing.

    5. Re:The stuff of old wives' tales by runderwo · · Score: 1
      Are you taking vitamin supplements? I've heard of this and most people chalk it up to a vitamin deficiency. You will be a little fuzzy during the day if you are a regular stoner, (you would be if you got drunk every day too). If you aren't sure of the permanence, lay off the weed entirely for a month or two (the time it takes for the cannabinoids to be completely metabolized and cleared from your system) and see if the condition improves. Of course, by that time you may be used to your present condition enough to not know what it used to be like...

      Something else you might think about is whether those experiences changed your thought process not by altering your brain chemistry in any way except through the learned experience. For example, I know that my connection with my senses was strengthened quite a bit from getting high on a regular basis, because I became aware of things that my senses were picking up but that I was ignoring. Then I could apply that knowledge to non-high experiences, resulting in a "different" approach to life using that knowledge. I don't know if that makes any sense or not. I think what I'm trying to say is that any experience will change you to one extent or another, and getting high for the first time is one of the most profound of experiences. So I wouldn't worry too much about being "damaged" and simply adjust back, and if you feel weed is getting in the way of your goals, quit.

    6. Re:The stuff of old wives' tales by Tab+is+on+Slashdot · · Score: 1

      Good advice. I've only touched the stuff twice since that experience, but I'm planning on laying off completely for awhile. I don't take any vitamins, and it's quite possible that it might relate to that -- I take awful care of myself (diet consisting mostly of pepsi and cafeteria trash). Maybe I'll look into supplements. What I'm interested in is the idea of it being a learned change. The experience was extremely intense and terrifying, so it is a possibility that I got kicked into a mild state of post-trauma something or other. Thanks for the suggestions. If nothing else, it's at least an interesting problem to try to figure out from the inside, even if it does fuck my life up a bit.

    7. Re:The stuff of old wives' tales by runderwo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, chill out for now. If you want to do it again, you'll know. In the meantime, a store-brand multivitamin is around $12 for a year's supply, so see if that helps any. When my diet is crappy, I perform crappy. Used to get by on junk food, but as I get older that just doesn't work anymore (25 now) - junk food including fast food and frozen/processed stuff. Whether it's the placebo effect or not, I seem to function much better/more consistently if I take a multivitamin every day.

  29. TANSTAAFL! by Maxmin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The body's closed-loop system requires that the ingredients for making the anti-oxidants be available in good quantity. Today's hospitals are not exactly outposts of healthy nutritious food, and regular "allopathic" doctors are not very knowledgeable about nutrition. Last time a relative was in the hospital (my mom), they were serving white bread, processed turkey loaf, and what had to be frozen vegetable bits - your basic CHON food, but devoid of the phytonutrients the fresh fruits and veggies we're told to consume would contain.

    In other words, the same results can be obtained from the outside - the antioxidants already available in your food.

    --
    O lord, bless this thy holy hand grenade, that with it thou mayest blow thine enemies to tiny bits, in thy mercy.
  30. Abstract by daigu · · Score: 2, Informative

    The abstract is available and the whole article is available for purchase for those interested.

  31. So what do I eat then? by crhylove · · Score: 1

    What kind of foods might, ""Activate the Keap1/Nrf2 Pathway for Neuroprotection by Electrophilic Phase II Inducers." Or what kind of food has phase II inducers? What are we humans not getting enough of in our diet that inhibits us from destroying enough glutamate? Or is there something IN our diet that simply produces too much? These are more relevant and interesting questions to me.

    rhY

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
    1. Re:So what do I eat then? by crhylove · · Score: 1

      So I did a little more research and they seem to suggest turmeric and green tea. I'm half way there, now pass the curry!

      rhY

      --
      I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  32. How about.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Baked beans? A huge cup of it?

    Oh wait.. did you mention for brains??

  33. So, what happens if you go to an Oxygen bar? by AlanKilian · · Score: 0

    So, antioxidents are good for you and going to an oxygen bar is good for you.

    Do they multiply together to get good^2 or do they add to get good*2

    Or do they fight like little daemons in your body like Sybil?

  34. The Natural way - Breathing by Steeltoe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Art of Living is promoting breathing techniques which has similar effects. The main breathing technique is called Sudarshan Kriya, and I will heartily recommend it as an all-round way to promote better health in an unique, efficient and safe way.

    More on research for Art of Living here: http://www.aolresearch.org

    To pharaphrase the aolresearch-site:
    Independent research has shown that SK&P significantly:

            * Reduce levels of stress (reduce cortisol - the "stress" hormone)
            * Benefit the immune system
            * Reduce cholesterol
            * Relieve anxiety and depression (mild, moderate and severe)
            * Increase anti-oxidant protection
            * Enhance brain function (increased mental focus, calmness and recovery from stressful stimuli)
            * Enhance health, well-being, and peace of mind

  35. Re:Not a Cure - more a misdiagnosis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    nonsense. You might want to have a background in phypergenerology first before you spout off such crap. Clearly, an ischemic stroke has been proven in clinical studies to be an inaccurate diagnosis due to the ionic deficiency of the isobienic cortex of the cells. The studies posted in the New Anglican Journal of Medicine show that a more accurate plunum diagnosis would be psydontrical metonemia. Dr. Yuramoron in the clinical studies was able to reverse the effects of the mitochornial damage by oxidating the subfluous DNA with high levels of gamma rays which, while successfully coaxing the cells into correcting the eroutation damage, also caused the cells to display a verte pigment. IIRC, this was documented in some widely distributed papers by Dr. Stan Lee in the 70's.

  36. flamebait?! by Maxmin · · Score: 1

    Dear mod-gods, how on earth was my post flamebait? 50% insightful, 50% flamebait? No attacks on anybody? Please explain.

    --
    O lord, bless this thy holy hand grenade, that with it thou mayest blow thine enemies to tiny bits, in thy mercy.
  37. Near-death; New How-to heals patients too by newpath4comVersion2 · · Score: 0
    If a doctor REALLY wants to help their patient, they'll come out with some really cutting edge, innovative ways to force a patient close to death. It triggers the body & mind to enter into a healing condition. My doctors did it so much and for so many years that it eventually helped me to learn how to write webpages. I wanted to share their newfound great healing tricks with others:

    http://www.newpath4.com/fraudinauschwitzvirginia_w oodrowriley1989.htm
    http://www.newpath4.com/fraudinauschwitzvirginia_w oodrowriley1989_1975%2B2005_update7142005.htm .

    Why, it proved to be such a lifesaving method I then went on to write a series of page all of which I refer to as my "How to Live Anyway" pages! just to make for darn sure the whole wide World learns of this amazing new hospital & doctor combined miracle therapies. If it hadn't been for them never giving me steroids I might have been able to walk again in 5 years and go to work but thank God in Heaven they didn't do that. But since their new treatment involved heavily where they did NOTHING FOR ME it allowed me to search supermarket, Wal-Mart shelves, online nutrition products, spending $4,000.00 over the last 5 years trying various products many of which didn't help. Not because they weren't any good! Just because bottles of Vitamin-C complex with bioflavonoids aren't steroids, that's all.

    It wasn't their fault. So, I ended up hobbling around, trying to take care of my Mom in her last days til she passed away May 16, 2000, after thank God again my doctors had convinced her & my wife I was able to return to work, just too lazy that's all. So Mom passed away thinking I was a real shit turd faking my injuries. I hobbled around, my feet muscles never rebuilding. The 24/7 pain helped build me stronger, you know, ON THE INSIDE WHERE IT COUNTS. As I would do the grocery shopping -with little to no muscle between the toes- feet bones scrubbing together & against each other in my feet, kind of like walking on shards of splintered glass sticking up through my feet. This wasn't my first experience with glass shards but it gets much better when you're OLD ENOUGH TO FULLY APPRECIATE IT.

    Heck fire! It was a much better training than money could EVER BUY! Beat th heck outta that Carradine fellow with the hot coals in the bucket between his forearms. hehehe Carradine's a baby, a wuss. Besides, look how far he had to walk -all the way out to Hollywood for the training- while I got mine RIGHT HERE in my very own hometown, Roanoke Virginia, U.S. of A.. No travel expenses. I found out some important lessons too. I found out that if you really want to keep doctors happy (feeling superior) all you have to do is let them talk down to you, smile, pat you on the shoulder pretending they care, pretending they're yer friend. Yep, that does it for doctors.

    Take it from someone who went through this new type of healing guys. Near-death, mucho doses of pain, strangulation of what you used to call YOUR LIFE, is better than all the tea in China.

    http://www.newpath4.com/03271989stillondisabilityh eydoctorhowsthebankaccountinroanokevirginiacomingd oesyourfamilylikegoodwillstoreslowpricesonsaledirt cheapfreeware12252005.htm

    It is, admittedly, a heavy burden telling others how great the healthcare & doctors are in Roanoke Virginia, but you know, someone has to do it. I seem to be one of the top graduates in my class so I suppose Fate & Destiny must have played a role. Or gee, what d'ya think?? I may be the only graduate who lived through their 16 ye

    1. Re:Near-death; New How-to heals patients too by newpath4comVersion2 · · Score: 0
      I'm Woodrow Marshall Riley of Roanoke Virginia, and I approve that post >

      http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=173722 &cid=14461505 .

      May my dear Mom rest in peace knowing I left NO STONE UNTURNED, no plow left standing un-used by the barn, til those who messed up what time we had left together learned of what damage they had done. Now in 2006, the pain begins to go away. But, not yet, not yet. heh heh heh heh One day, but not yet. You gotta love Russel Crowe in Gladiator but mostly using the telephone. "Not yet"; worked in the movie for the black dude, anyway.

      Crowe doesn't believe in not yet.
      As I don't believe in failure to Give Credit where Credit is Due.

    2. Re:Near-death; New How-to heals patients too by newpath4comVersion2 · · Score: 0
      Giving proper credit is a worthy goal so when I have time
      being on disability does have its positive side, I like
      to try and make sure people knows what happens to a truck driver
      after he has been in an accident >

      http://www.newpath4.com/doctorcopperheadandbrerrat tlesnakelawyer19892006thedheamemoryexpress_http_ti nyurl_com_9v452.htm

      Leave no stone unturned. My family was trashed.
      Boomerangs do what bommerangs always do.
      They come back home.
      http://www.newpath4.com/doctorcopperheadandbrerrat tlesnakelawyer19892006thedheamemoryexpress_http_ti nyurl_com_9v452.htm#httpwwwgentrylockecomGentryLoc keRakesMoorePage1
      http://www.newpath4.com/doctorcopperheadandbrerrat tlesnakelawyer19892006thedheamemoryexpress_http_ti nyurl_com_9v452.htm#httpwwwgentrylockecomGentryLoc keRakesMoorePage2
      http://www.newpath4.com/doctorcopperheadandbrerrat tlesnakelawyer19892006thedheamemoryexpress_http_ti nyurl_com_9v452.htm#httpwwwgentrylockecomGentryLoc keRakesMoorePage3
      http://www.newpath4.com/doctorcopperheadandbrerrat tlesnakelawyer19892006thedheamemoryexpress_http_ti nyurl_com_9v452.htm#httpwwwgentrylockecomGentryLoc keRakesMoorePage4
      http://www.newpath4.com/doctorcopperheadandbrerrat tlesnakelawyer19892006thedheamemoryexpress_http_ti nyurl_com_9v452.htm#httpwwwgentrylockecomGentryLoc keRakesMoorePage5
      http://www.newpath4.com/doctorcopperheadandbrerrat tlesnakelawyer19892006thedheamemoryexpress_http_ti nyurl_com_9v452.htm#httpwwwgentrylockecomGentryLoc keRakesMoorePage666

      Gentry Locke Rakes & Moore wasn't the only ones. They're barely the tip of the iceberg. When they apologize to my wife in a Court of Law and make things right with the Riley Family they trashed in 1991 or 1992 whichever it was. It's in my records somewhere. I'll leave them alone then. I won't touch em. I'll avoid em like the cowpies they showed themselves to be.

      Question is, are they honorable men able to suck it up? Are they as honorable as those flashy gray colors on their website makes them look to be? Well, I intend to find out. I also intend to carry this torch til every coal miner, every truck driver, every ditch digger's family, wife & children who ever got caught or gets caught in a cave in of an accident, CAN KNOW FOR DAMN SURE THEY ARE NOT GOING TO BE ACCUSED OF TRYING TO COMMIT SUICIDE BY STAGING THEIR G-DAMN ACCIDENT AS I WAS.

      16 YEARS, FRIENDS. SIXTEEN YEARS. IF I WAS
      SO SUICIDAL WHY TH' HELL AM I STILL HERE?!