Slashdot Mirror


Computers Top BBC List of Stress Producers

twitter writes "The BBC is reporting results of a poll by UK charity Developing Patient Partnerships that shows crashing computers to be one of the most common stresses and that it's actually killing people by driving them to drink and smoke. The quoted list has: 1. IT problems - 30%, 2. Change in financial status/personal injury - 24%, 3. Commuting - 20%. I've seen people take a smoke break when their computer pops a window and they lose an hour or two of work and admins taking their break straight from the bottle."

286 comments

  1. Save your health... by mrchaotica · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...buy a Mac!

    (sorry, couldn't help it)

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    1. Re:Save your health... by urbanRealist · · Score: 1

      That's so true. I work with Windows at work. Today I struggeled with Symantec corperate edition server pushouts to clients. Very frustratring. Now I sit at home with my Gentoo machine, completely content and stress-free. Computers running Windows and software that is specific to Windows is the number one source of stress in my life. I like computers.

      --
      I've seen a lot of things, but I've never been a witness.
    2. Re:Save your health... by fsterman · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hate too sound like a troll but I am trying too reistall my mac becuase it destroyed two hours of work the other day from a kernel panic. Oh well, once in 6 months too a year isn't bad right?

      --
      Is there anything better than clicking through Microsoft ads on Slashdot?
    3. Re:Save your health... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think your brain crashed.

      OH NOES!

    4. Re:Save your health... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What did you possibly do to your Mac to get it to kernel panic?

      I've been using OS X since the public beta, and I haven't had one do the old black-scrolling-text-screen-of-death in years now. And when it did happen back a while ago, it was mostly because I was using some (at the time) very shady drivers.

      Whatever software you were running ... you should submit a bug report to the developer. That shouldn't be happening with production code.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    5. Re:Save your health... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I doing something wrong with my Macs? ..because I hear people say that windows crashes all the time and macs never do, but I use both at work here (mostly photoshop, after effects & Final Cut pro on the Mac) and my experience is that the G5's crash the most..
       
      This is not one, but 4 different machines that every day or so give me the spinning beach-ball of doom in after effects (different versions) or final cut pro requiring a force quit.. It just doesnt seem any more stable than windows.

    6. Re:Save your health... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Are you using Firefox?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    7. Re:Save your health... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      old black-scrolling-text-screen-of-death
      Mac OS X has nicer-looking kernel panic screens now.
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    8. Re:Save your health... by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I also made my life a lot less stressful by switching from Windows to Mac.

      and I had similar results by switching from a car to a motorbike.

      this "computers cause stress" is the same inaccuracy as "computers affected by viruses" - it's not *computers*, it's just Windows.

    9. Re:Save your health... by kabz · · Score: 1

      Wow, had a powerbook for ages, and not seen that. Cool.

      Mind you, My Dell Precision M60 blue screened for the first time the other night. It was provoked, a screw had fallen out and I accidentally pulled the hard drive out while the machine was on. Oops.

      No harm done though!

      --
      -- "It's not stalking if you're married!" My Wife.
    10. Re:Save your health... by mcsnee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Software crashes. A stable operating system doesn't mean that the applications that run on it will never crash. It does mean that, generally speaking, you can force-quit the application and reopen it without it hosing your entire system and forcing a computer restart.

      MS-Word crashes on my mac nearly as often as it does on my PC, but the difference is that I can generally open it right back up and keep working on my Mac, whereas it takes a huge dump in memory on my PC and slows everything else down.

    11. Re:Save your health... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 3, Funny

      You had one kernel panic so you're reinstalling? What, do you think you're running Windows? ;)

    12. Re:Save your health... by alan.briolat · · Score: 1

      Wow, looks like all the grumpy mods ran out of points before you posted this - earlier you would have been modded "Troll" :P

      I would agree, up to a point, however I would be more inclined to say "stupid users affected by viruses". Stupid users are cross-platform compatible, and all that, however Windows really does thrive on a lack of education - the whole MS ploy (if their interface is anything to go by) is that "You don't need to know how to use a computer to use Windows!"

      --
      I swear we should be allowed to give mod points to sigs... "-1, Offtopic"
    13. Re:Save your health... by jdeluise · · Score: 1

      Interesting, have you ever tried to put a scratched CD in a G5 running Panther and watch it crash the entire system? I've seen it happen at least 5 times at work on different machines. Clean the CD and everything works fine. But, I've never noticed this happen on either Windows or Linux. In my experience, OS X is only stable when used for the most minor of tasks. Push it too hard and....well, if it's never happened to you you must be a very light user of your computer

    14. Re:Save your health... by alan.briolat · · Score: 1

      I would agree - I am happy that I've been using Linux-only long enough to (almost) honestly say "I don't know - I don't use Windows" when someone asks me something. I use Gentoo too (that was strange to type) and yeah, sometimes things don't work just right - but the beauty of it is that most things can be fixed because you can find out what the hell went wrong. Try getting useful information from a Windows application crash (excluding those that are cross-platform FOSS with decent debugging practices) :P

      Hell yes its stressful when it "just crashes" for no apparent reason, without the damn courtesy to give a debug output! Yet more evidence that Windows is marketed to morons _

      --
      I swear we should be allowed to give mod points to sigs... "-1, Offtopic"
    15. Re:Save your health... by alan.briolat · · Score: 1
      whereas it takes a huge dump in memory on my PC and slows everything else down.
      To be completely honest, that sounds like most of Windows to me... One of the things I have noticed through all the years I've used it is that even without a crash you need to reboot it periodically to clear out the RAM, because it DOESN'T GIVE IT BACK! Or use some 3rd-party app that has a 50/50 chance of either cleaning the RAM or crashing something you are running because Windows just sticks crap wherever it feels like it.

      Sounds kind of like the way it treats disk space - just sticks a file in the MIDDLE (not the beginning) of the BIGGEST gap it can find. And then provides a defrag tool that works only 10% of the time - the rest of the time it either NEVER finishes, or crashes, causing some nice corruption. Yay for Windows!

      I'm not stressed - I dropped Windows like a bad habit 5 months ago.
      --
      I swear we should be allowed to give mod points to sigs... "-1, Offtopic"
    16. Re:Save your health... by badspyro · · Score: 1

      get openoffice... compatable with Microsoft Office and less than a 1000th of the price (aka free) If it doesn't work, BIN IT thank goodness for that...

    17. Re:Save your health... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Of course, Linux is completely stress free, especially for novice users.

    18. Re:Save your health... by mcsnee · · Score: 1

      "Compatible" my ass. I spend several hours every day cleaning up the garbage that results from conversions between .doc and .sxw files.

  2. Suspect Studies by Scareduck · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Ah, my computer's crashed. Time to nip off to the pub..."

    --

    Dog is my co-pilot.

    1. Re:Suspect Studies by Kesch · · Score: 3, Funny

      DWI: Debugging While Intoxicated

      --
      If this signature is witty enough, maybe somebody will like me.
    2. Re:Suspect Studies by shut_up_man · · Score: 1

      for (crap = 1; crap <= stupid_wanker; crap++) {
          if (crap == i_hate_you) {
              printf ("ERROR YOU BLOODY BASTARD");
              log_error(boss_sucks);
          }
      }

    3. Re:Suspect Studies by Travis_Tennies · · Score: 1

      This is why those of us who can handle the stress get the big bucks.

  3. I work in IT... by DreadSpoon · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... and I put alcohol in my cereal I eat before going to work.

    (And yes, I'm quite serious.)

    1. Re:I work in IT... by IsThisNickTaken · · Score: 2, Informative

      I tried beer on Frosted Flakes once in college when I was out of milk.

      Not good.....

    2. Re: I work in IT... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny

      > ... and I put alcohol in my cereal I eat before going to work.

      Isn't merely waking up sufficient?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:I work in IT... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      I tried beer on Frosted Flakes once in college when I was out of milk.

      Not good.....


      Beer and Fruit Loops is even worse, yuck.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:I work in IT... by optikSmoke · · Score: 2, Informative

      A friend of mine put a bunch of beer in a mini-fridge that he also used for vodka (thus it was on the coldest setting). Next day, some had exploded. Result? Beer cereal! Ate the beer slush from a bowl with a spoon.

    5. Re:I work in IT... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Thank GOd I thought I was the only one!

      ThinkGeek should show off their new line of accessories for the stressed computer coworker: a mug holder (okay, all-new meaning now) and a USB lighter next to the cigarette dispenser. What adds to hours of fun is aiming the dispenser so it shoots the cigarette right into your waiting lips.

    6. Re:I work in IT... by Lord+Ender · · Score: 3, Funny

      I could see Bailey's in yout Cocco Puffs, but anything else and you've got a drinking problem...

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    7. Re:I work in IT... by jbrader · · Score: 1

      I've done this with Guinness Draught, delicious.

      --
      You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
    8. Re:I work in IT... by VanWEric · · Score: 1

      My buddy swears by orange juice on frosted flakes. Perhaps you should try a frosted screwdriver?

      --
      www.olin.edu
    9. Re:I work in IT... by everphilski · · Score: 1

      Lactose intolorent, as a child my mom used to feed me orange juice and Rice Crispies...

    10. Re:I work in IT... by RussR42 · · Score: 0
      Bullshit! What, you ate glass shards?

      Oh, wait, perhaps you just drink shitty beer out of a can. Sorry. You should just shell out the extra buck or drink less. Cheaping out means you have a drinking problem. You junkie you.

    11. Re:I work in IT... by optikSmoke · · Score: 1

      Er, well. It didn't explode as in "blow the bottle apart". More like the cap came off. And I actually don't remember what it was, frankly (wasn't my beer).

      And as to my taste in beer.... Well, I tend to drink more scotch, and generally buy it when it comes to out-of-bar consumption. But I try to avoid shitty beer when drinking that -- Steamwhistle is a damn good choice, IMHO.

    12. Re:I work in IT... by Darby · · Score: 1

      I could see Bailey's in yout Cocco Puffs,

      Damn, Dude.
      That sounds like it might actually be good.

    13. Re:I work in IT... by tommy_traceroute · · Score: 1

      Swear to God, may FSM strike me down if I lie:

      Several years back, my best friend came to visit me at college - when we woke up after a monstrous night of partying, he shuffled in to the kitchen to forage for food. This was college, so there really wasn't any food to be had.

      He found a bottle of Everclear grain alcohol in the cupboard, and after finding no cereal to pour it on, located the unexpired carton of milk in the refrigerator. He then sat down at the kitchen table, and had himself a bowl (yes, a bowl, people) of Everclear and milk for breakfast.

      As my stunned roommates and I stared on in hungover disbelief, he looked up from his breakfast, smiled broadly, and said "Ahhhh!! All the vitamins and minerals of fresh milk, along with the wholegrain goodness of Everclear: an important part of your well-balanced diet!"

      And to everyone's amazement, he didn't even die.

      --
      o 1 Sig beneath your current threshold
    14. Re:I work in IT... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the most horrible, messed up demented combination of foodstuffs I've ever heard.

      Now, on an unrelated note, I must visit Kroger and the liquor store...

    15. Re:I work in IT... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I could see Bailey's in yout Cocco Puffs, but anything else and you've got a drinking problem..."

      The problem being too much cereal not enough alcohol?

    16. Re:I work in IT... by RussR42 · · Score: 1
      Right on, I was just kidding you anyway. I've been known to drink crappy beer, after having several good ones - you don't really notice it then.

      Oh, and right after I hit submit I saw a reference to guiness, which is good and comes in a can. Oops.

  4. Solution by Kesch · · Score: 1, Troll

    They should have been more specific. I think they meant that Windows was the largest cause of stress.

    --
    If this signature is witty enough, maybe somebody will like me.
    1. Re:Solution by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      And since nobody's posted it up until this point while reading it threaded: Les Barker's Reinstalling Windows, a talking word comedy tape from England (the words to which are on the page I linked to) seems to fit (espeically given that this is from the BBC).

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  5. Hmm... by doxology · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. IT problems

    3. Commuting

    What about telecommuting?

    --
    sigfault. core dumped.
    1. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What about telecommuting?

      Means you can smoke at your desk.
    2. Re:Hmm... by dangitman · · Score: 1
      What about telecommuting?

      I hear what you're saying. The other day I was so traumatized by an accident on the Information Superhighway that I couldn't work for a week.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    3. Re:Hmm... by chrish · · Score: 1

      Drive-by goatse?

      --
      - chrish
  6. Seen on side of Windows package: by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Funny

    Surgeon General's warning: This product is an unstable, insecure piece of shit and will most likely drive you to suicide in sheer frustration.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  7. are you kidding? by dotpavan · · Score: 5, Funny

    kidding right? because sometimes when I am stressed, porn on my comp is a great stress reliever

    1. Re:are you kidding? by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 1

      kidding right? because sometimes when I am stressed, porn on my comp is a great stress reliever

      Yeah sure, unless that pr0n is goatse or tubgirl on your desktop background "helpfully" installed by a co-worker... Unless that floats your boat... Ew...

      --
      Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    2. Re:are you kidding? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      because sometimes when I am stressed, porn on my comp is a great stress reliever

            But then again, porn on your comp when your wife/girlfriend/boss walks in the room is a fantastic source of stress...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:are you kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or if that porn is on your boss's suspended notebook that he lent to you for the day....

    4. Re:are you kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ya... it's a great stress reliever... till the comp crashes as the most critical moment...

  8. I wonder... by ilvg2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    what is the frustration level of mac, linux, and microsoft users of all computer users.

    1. Re:I wonder... by GoatMonkey2112 · · Score: 1

      Well, Linux users generally know what they are doing if they've gone to the effort of using Linux over something else. So, their stress level is probably lower.

      Mac users don't really care if their computer works or not as long as they can get it in a cute color.

      And Windows users are everyone else, which is what this article covers.

  9. Shouldn't that read... by iopha · · Score: 0, Troll

    Windows the top stress producer? Could a comparative study be done with, say, MacOSX users?

    1. Re:Shouldn't that read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Am I one of the few remaining Slashdot users that sees criticism of Windows etc whenever there's any kind of link to crashing or unreliability as excessive? OK, it's an easy way to get modded up, but the state of Microsoft's software hasn't reached the point where it *must* be mentioned at any available opportunity, and this isn't a story about them.

      I remember reading that Windows users make up most of the Slashdot demographic anyway, and that the Linux-using majority is a myth.

      Thoughts?

    2. Re:Shouldn't that read... by dnixon112 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What is with the fixation on trying to pin everything on MS? The things that stress average people out are not platform specific. Average people can barely SAVE A FILE or install a program. These are the stresses that would apply. No matter what platform you're on people will have a stressfull time doing anything.

    3. Re:Shouldn't that read... by Ashinberry · · Score: 1
      I agree that trashing windows is a bit overdone, especially for the number of people running windows but it is not entirely undeserved. Personally, I use debian on all my machines and I've seen exactly one crash in the three years and many machines I've had on pure linux. A year ago I was the resident computer technician in a college dorm housing approximately 120 students, of those 120 there were my one (at the time) linux machine, roughly 7 OS X machines, a 98 machine, two 2000 machines, and the balance of xp machines. In that year I had to completely rebuild the 98 machine and one of the 2000 machines, which one might say is acceptable for a four and six year old OS in the hands of nontechnical users. Of the macs, the most trouble I had was showing their nontechnical owners how to install one application or another. I had to fix well over half of the xp machines from some thing or other that caused crashes. In most of the cases the culpret was a virus or particularly nasty piece of spyware. There were many xp machines, however, that suffered regular crashes not related to any infection or buggy application and a complete reinstall was necessary.


      Not a good statistical distribution or scientific study, just my personal experiences with a large and mostly homogenous (i.e., they all had roughly the same skill level usage patterns) userbase. Plus it's always irked me that application crashes can (not always, but can) cause instability in windows. Only kernel and system level applications should have that risk and I hope msword.exe isn't running as system.

      --
      I have no .sig
    4. Re:Shouldn't that read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use both Linux and Windows. Let me tell ya, if I didn't have to use Windows so often, I wouldn't FSCKING HATE IT SO BAD!

      There's nothing weird about having a lot of Windows users and a lot of Microsoft bashing in a forum. I see comparitively very little of it on most Linux mailing lists, and it's almost always from people who are in the process of leaving Windows behind because of how badly it just pissed them off. The folks who don't use Windows, don't talk about it much. Maybe a commiserating horror story when the aforementioned Linux newbie tells his tale of woe, but mostly they seem to have more important and useful things to discuss.

      Slashdotters have a lot of Windows-induced pain to relate.

    5. Re:Shouldn't that read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you are old enough to get a job in the corporate sugar fields, you to will understand why so much browsing is done from windows machines.

      Get to it worker bee.

    6. Re:Shouldn't that read... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Cars are complex machines, yet auto maufactures have managed to put some sence of consistency and intuitivness into their controls. Many people get stressed out in traffic jams, but you don't normally hear complains about the controls. Yeah, computers are much more complex to interact with by nature, but Apple and others have showen that it can be made easier if maufactures are willing to put in the effort.

    7. Re:Shouldn't that read... by iopha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, okay, I indulged in a fairly typical Slashdottian bit of gratuitous MS-bashing and got a 0, Redundant only 8 posts in for my troubles. Still, I'd be quite honestly curious to see if there are any platform-based statistical correlations in the data.

      The frustrations that my family exhibit (and bring to me to fix) are almost always spyware, worm, or other malware-related, followed in close second with registry issues caused by legitimate software. Both these things are almost solely found on Windows. Thing is 'computer' means 'windows box' the way 'kleenex' means 'tissue' these days, so it's hard to get a sense of what the study is really showing here.

      (Well, anyway, that's my attempt at being reasonable and salvaging karma from my admittedly knee-jerk attempt at getting a first post.)

    8. Re:Shouldn't that read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your new here arn't you?

    9. Re:Shouldn't that read... by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I would call apple's interface "intuitive". If you learn Mac first, perhaps, but I don't think any computer interface is intuitive. CLI may be the closest to an intuitive interface as it is just like typing. Any GUI has some learning curve as moving a small puck on a cord to make a dot on the screen bounce over a little picture is not something that corresponds to anything in the outside world.

      --
      Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
    10. Re:Shouldn't that read... by metamatic · · Score: 1

      I refer you to http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,4149,1210067,00.as p

      Yes, it's the Dvorak troll, but the stats from Bill G are enlightening.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    11. Re:Shouldn't that read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the article is about stress and computer crashes seem to be an issue. I have seen an insane amount of Windows (ranging from NT4 SP6 to XP SP2 - although never seen a crash on 2000 SP4) crashes in a corporate environment. And I would also like to the same for Mac OS 9.x.
      The real problem is not that the software, that cost the company several hundred thousand dollars, crashes sometimes, but that it takes the whole OS with it in the fall. I've seen this with SAP for Windows and Photoshop for Mac.
      I know that people in "the team" at work get very annoyed, frustrated and sometimes angry when that happen. Myself I take the reboot time as a timeout long enough to get a cup of coffee in the canteen. I don't mind, I get payed the same salary anyway.

      I've seen quite a few application related crashes in Linux* as well, but the OS itself has never gone down.

      *Linux in this case mean "Desktop Environment that run on top of the Linux kernel"

    12. Re:Shouldn't that read... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      If you think that CLI is the closest thing to an intuitive interface, I'm sorry, but you're really not at all qualified say what makes an intuitive user interface. CLI is not intuitive. Surely I don't need to explain why?

    13. Re:Shouldn't that read... by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1

      You are under 25, aren't you? If you didn't grow up with the smalltalk-esque gui paradigm, there is nothing intuitive about sliding a puck with a button around. As I said, CLI is akin to typing, so relatively easy transition. The mouse has no outside world analogy, so it is not inherently inuitive.
      Or do I have to explain this to you at much greater length?

      --
      Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
    14. Re:Shouldn't that read... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      You are right. I'm 24 and 10 months. Just like I said, you obviously don't know what you are talking about. If I were to use your logic, I would say that cars are unintuitive because I don't see many other devices with a steering wheel.

      GUI is intuitive because you move around the mouse and manipluate things with it like you would do in real life. So, for instance, to scroll down a page, you drag a bar. To adjust the volume, you move a slider. To move a file to a different folder, you drag its icon onto the folder. If you want to do this on a CLI, you need to know the commands. If you don't know the commands, you can't do jack shit, and it is therefore the opposite of inuitive. I don't know of any cases in real life where I need to type a command to adjust the volume on my stereo. Not everyone knows how to type, anyway.

      What do you do for a living, BTW?

  10. I am going to go way out on a limb here by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And guess that the 27% of men and 23% of women who would "light up in such a situation" roughly coorelates to the percentage of smokers in England.

    1. Re:I am going to go way out on a limb here by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Oh gee...26% of the adult population smokes in England. Talk about a lucky guess. It's almost like winning the lotto with a guess like that. I think I'll go buy some tickets.

    2. Re:I am going to go way out on a limb here by tarawa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So essentially the story is saying that percentage of population that already smokes or drinks turn to those things when the computer acts up. Probably no different than when the car acts up, when finances are coming up short, or anything else that causes them stress.

    3. Re:I am going to go way out on a limb here by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Probably, and I think the point that you are overlooking is that it may cause smokers to smoke more, not nessesarily cause non-smokers to start smoking.

    4. Re:I am going to go way out on a limb here by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      yes, because the article is not talking about computers causing people to smoke and drink.
      It's talking about how people turn to alcohol and cigarettes when stressed. It barely mentions computers at all, and mostly talks about the smoking and drinking bit.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
  11. Relief by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 4, Funny

    The BBC is reporting results of a poll by UK charity Developing Patient Partnerships that shows crashing computers to be one of the most common stresses

    The study also shows smashing computers to be one of the most common stress-relievers.

    --
    Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    1. Re:Relief by Kesch · · Score: 1

      I have coated everything on my computer desk with foam. My head thanks me.

      --
      If this signature is witty enough, maybe somebody will like me.
    2. Re:Relief by hazah · · Score: 1

      Mother, should I trust the editors?

    3. Re:Relief by silverburn · · Score: 1

      It's not the desks that need foam to protect from head inflicted damage...it's the brick walls.

  12. Which is it? by Dekortage · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the article: "1. IT problems - 30% ... 2. Change in financial status/personal injury - 24%" Then later: "Over two thirds thought stress was simply having a 'bad day', 63% said it was dealing with difficult people and 58% saw stress as having too much to do." Okay, so which is it? 30% said IT problems were the top problem, but 63% said dealing with difficult people? Maybe the IT problems are caused by difficult people...?

    Elsewhere: Considering that most people - 79% - believe they have been stressed in the last year.... ONLY 79%?! Who are these 21% of people who haven't felt stressed in the last 365 days?

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    1. Re:Which is it? by tktk · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Who are these 21% of people who haven't felt stressed in the last 365 days?

      The ones that are high?

    2. Re: Which is it? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      > Who are these 21% of people who haven't felt stressed in the last 365 days?

      In the coma ward.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:Which is it? by Dunbal · · Score: 1, Funny

      Who are these 21% of people who haven't felt stressed in the last 365 days?

            Those are the people who deal with their stress by lying when they participate in surveys...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:Which is it? by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Who are these 21% of people who haven't felt stressed in the last 365 days?
      When I was doing stupid things on the side of mountains on weekends I rarely felt stressed in any other situation.
    5. Re:Which is it? by jbrader · · Score: 1

      Nope, waiting for your dealer is hugely stressful ;)

      --
      You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
    6. Re:Which is it? by RobertF · · Score: 1

      I love how parent is modded Insightful. O.o

      --
      And that, my liege, is how we know the Earth to be bannana-shaped.
    7. Re:Which is it? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      Okay, so which is it? 30% said IT problems were the top problem, but 63% said dealing with difficult people?

      Both. 33% of people anthropomorphise their computers.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    8. Re:Which is it? by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Lawyers.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
  13. mac stress video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I saw a video on youtube.com featuring a guy parodying the Mac commercials, slamming their interface. Lemme see if I can find it...

    Here it is... and I know, I know, slashdotters are supposed to be above social bookmarking type sites, but... um.... I know - it has great porno. Yeah! That's it, it's the porno! Because, you know, I'm a nerd, and I got no girlfriend, so that means I'm a real leet slashdotter to be modded up... yeah!

    1. Re:mac stress video by pjbgravely · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here is the real mac parody site.
      http://www.happynowhere.net/mac_parody.php

      --
      Star Trek, there maybe hope.
    2. Re:mac stress video by Hosiah · · Score: 1

      OK, that was funny as hell. I don't hate Macs, they're not as bad as the guy makes it out, but he's still funny. He'd be funnier if he was slamming Windows.

  14. Blame Windows by lheal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My wife called me today to try to recover a couple of hours work she lost when her computer crashed. It gave no warning, just rebooted. I tried walking her through finding any temp files that might have her work, but to no avail.

    "Sorry," I said, "that's just Windows. It crashes. That's why I don't like it." I looked up the uptime on the Sun workstation where I was: 121 days. RHEL4 Server: 122 days. Oh yeah, I did patch those last summer, around Labor Day.

    Computers don't crash: Windows does.

    If admins were honest with their users and didn't try to defend Windows or say that all operating systems crash just as much, the world would be a better place.

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    1. Re:Blame Windows by VX1984rr3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I work on linux (redhat 7.2) and although I'm constrained to older libs due to company reasons, I have mozilla and system crashes at least once a week. My bro is a IT director for a book company and he has shared many a tale of apple system crashes too. Windows is crap, but it isn't the only software that crashes. I suppose even WinTel running VIM all the time prob won't crash (until it is hacked).

    2. Re:Blame Windows by oscartheduck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From one who works as a sys admin to one who evidently doesn't: every stupid fucking user under the fucking sun seems to work for MONTHS without making a backup of their files, and when one day their computer suddenly starts to "misbehave", they THEN want their data recovered. It's the same principle in both cases, the difference is like that between microevolution and macroevolution. This is why we take backups FOR you: because you're not going to do it for yourself until it's way too late.

      --
      How to use coral cache: http://slashdot.org.nyud.net:8090/~oscartheduck
    3. Re:Blame Windows by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Windows doesn't crash.

      Applications crash. Drivers crash. Hardware crashes. Windows itself is quite stable. I had a 150-day uptime on the box I'm typing on right now (WinXP) until I had a power outage.

      I've seen drivers crash, and I've seen flaky hardware cause problems, and I've seen combinations of the two become an issue. But Windows itself? Pretty damn near rock solid. It gets a nice reputation for instability because so many manufacturers put it on bottom-basement gimpy hardware, but I seriously doubt Linux would fare any better.

      Linux might have better drivers, of course - as long as you don't ask it to do anything heavy in 3d.

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    4. Re:Blame Windows by westlake · · Score: 1
      My wife called me today to try to recover a couple of hours work she lost when her computer crashed

      You haven't said anything about what program she was running, why an auto-save was not enabled or what caused the crash. To say "that's just Windows" is a bit of a cheat.

    5. Re:Blame Windows by dc29A · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Sorry," I said, "that's just Windows. It crashes. That's why I don't like it." I looked up the uptime on the Sun workstation where I was: 121 days. RHEL4 Server: 122 days. Oh yeah, I did patch those last summer, around Labor Day.

      Computers don't crash: Windows does.


      My dual BP6 Celeron 500 running on Windows XP sp1 crashed only when the ancient motherboard had some diodes that died. It ran my SSH server, IM client and Email client 24/h a day. Oh and it was my main download machine since it was on 24h a day. My longest uptime was something around 6 months, but I figured I rather install those 500000 patches waiting and I had to reboot it.

      My current online 24h/day PC is pretty much same setup, current uptime: about 1.5 months, but I got some patches to install so I'll have to reboot it.

      PS: Tell your wife to hit the save icon a few times per hour.

    6. Re:Blame Windows by KidHash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you've ever had a 150 day uptime on a windows box, you're clearly not patching enough

    7. Re:Blame Windows by Flammon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey, I love Linux as much as the next guy. I've been using it on my desktop since 1996. Check out my Slashdot UID to see what I mean. Anyway, I just want to say that I've had ATI drivers - the proprietary closed source ones - crash my Linux box many times. The drivers can definitely lockup your PC no matter what OS you're running. You can even crash Linux with a simple one line bash script. I just want to say that the Windows crashing can't all be blamed on Windows. The drivers deserve some of the blame.

    8. Re:Blame Windows by chocotof · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Are you using a different version of windowsXP than I ? I run 99% of the time under Linux. Once in a while a game or so under XP. This is the list of current problems
      1. dit.exe popping up saying that I have media missing ? (about 10 dialogs)
      2. Although I have windows desktop keyboard I cannot get a non windows media player application to use the media keys.
      3. I use Window Powertoys desktop switching and once in a while (especially when I am using VC++ it takes literally half a hour or so to switch desktops.
      4. You cannot imagine what I have to do to view a movie on my TV connect to my TVOut. (Involves switching desktop preferences, refreshing desktop icons and not forgetting to leave the TV on while switching back to main display)
      5. Sometimes windows changes the drive letters on my (external) disks causing shortcuts to break.
      ... just out the top of my head since I type this under linux.
    9. Re:Blame Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Applications can crash on any operating system.

      On Windows, they sometimes take the OS with it.

      On Linux, they don't.

      Any questions?

    10. Re:Blame Windows by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      It is much more common to find Windows on flakey hardware. Much of the reputation Windows gets for instability should be directed at the hardware. Have you ever run Windows and Linux on the same hardware, and gamed from both of them? Linux games are MUCH more likely to lock up your interface than Windows games are.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    11. Re:Blame Windows by necro2607 · · Score: 1

      No kidding dude. I've been using Windoze PCs exclusively for about 4 years now and have gotten entirely used to crashes, freezing, etc.

      Then I just bought a new Mac laptop last week (it's an iBook, for those of you about to laugh at me for getting a PowerBook when the new one was just released)...

      Now I remember why I used to so adamantly defend the Mac back in elementary school when all the kids made fun of me for using a Mac and thinking it kicked ass. It did. They still do. Now I remember why I told them they were the only ones that should be made fun of - for actually thinking Windows 95 was somehow better than Mac OS 7.5.

      But seriously, this new laptop is running great, hasn't crashed once (and I don't think it's been off for more than a few hours one night when I was sleeping - I usually just close the lid on the machine and put it to sleep, leaving it running so I don't have to wait for the [short] bootup of the machine).

      I'm impressed as hell with how great it runs and how intuitive the OS is. I feel like I've been living in the dark ages for the past 3 or 4 years using what was supposedly a high-end PC.

    12. Re:Blame Windows by necro2607 · · Score: 1

      That's the thing though. He doesn't need to list the software. Software on Windows crashes so often and so badly (in comparison to any/all software on his Sun machine) the name of the software is redundant.

    13. Re:Blame Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      A bit meaningless to say such things about Windows compared with Linux, which is a total non-sequitur. One has to consider what applications were running and a whole lot of other issues before assigning blame for a crash, and your comment makes no mention of those.

      btw, I don't think Linux is actually all that stable in an apples to apples comparison with Windows, if such a thing were even possible. If Linux actually had the same number of users, applications, and capabilities as Windows, it would likely be exponentially more prone to incompatibilities and crashing.

      Sure, a programmer or IT person's Linux box with only a few applications is going to be more stable than a Windows box run by a grandmother installing applications of the web. But what does that prove? Nothing at all. People always complain about what they have. A large part of exaggeration about the virtues of Linux stem simply from the fact almost nobody uses it, and anyone can speculate about how great it might be if everyone ran Linux, without accounting of how that would change things. That's just intellectual laziness and maybe dishonesty.

      BTW: Linux is great for some things, when for example I want an environment with only a few key apps to run, or when I just want to play with the OS. I'm not so fond of Linux zealots with unrealistic claims about how Linux could supplant Windows without having all of Windows fundamental issues which stem from scale. I think my POV is pretty typical regarding Linux and it's most extreme supporters, not that they'd ever hear that of course.

    14. Re:Blame Windows by kesuki · · Score: 4, Informative

      That reminds me of the bug windows 95 had where it you left it running for 40 days it would crash. it only took them 6 years to reproduce the bug so they could fix it.

      XP at stock is very stable, though, but there is a wider problem in computing than just the 'OS' the electrical grid can have spikes (no problem a good PSU can protect you) and worse, undervoltages. there is Nothing (other than having massive redundent arrays of capacitors) that can be done about under voltaging, and even then it's just a matter of time before the undervolateges cause the capacitors to all blow... then we have people trying to plug everything on one 15 amp breaker that was designed when people had like a living room radio as 'entertainment'

      PC power and cooling is selling a PSU that can draw 38 amps from Each 12 volt rail. Dude, my OVEN only operates on 60 amps. but i guess if you want that quad sli setup so you can run battlfield 2 at full resolution on a 40" LCD screen... call an electrician, and have em put in some 60 amp wiring to where your pc plugs in...

      er, well there is more than just power issues there are 'reliability' a lot of technology is built on a 'pump and dump' model make it cheap as possible and who cares if it blows up, or sucks etc. they'll just buy more of the junk. still more hardware is designed and engineered broken, but it seems to work fine so they ship it and then find that it seems to work fine but only with one configuration of hardware etc.. it takes a lot of time and energy to really find out who's got a good solid product, and who's selling the flimsy ones.

    15. Re:Blame Windows by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Insightful
      My wife called me today to try to recover a couple of hours work she lost when her computer crashed.

      The main problem here is that your wife is an idiot. She worked for a couple hours without saving her work... not even once during that time? Then she deserves to lose a couple hours' work. This is like complaining that your precious family heirlooms were stolen when you left them unattended in a busy location for a couple hours. I don't care if you're using Windows, Mac OS X, Linux, or even some high-availability OS that Never Crashes. Unless your apps were written by God Himself, they will fail on you. This is a fact that anyone who has used a computer for more than a few months should understand. And if you can't be bothered to press Ctrl-S or Command-S from time to time, I can't be bothered to feel sorry for you when you lose your work.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    16. Re:Blame Windows by The+Notorious+ASP · · Score: 1

      1 - I agree
      2 - Last company I worked for I came across a Win2k machine with a 500+ day uptime. Obviously had escaped our patch management infrastructure as it was quite buried in the network (which I'm sure is the same reason it wasn't swamped with viruses).

    17. Re:Blame Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've ever had a 150 day uptime on a windows box, you're not connected to the internet.

    18. Re:Blame Windows by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1

      I use Firefox and Thunderbird, and have a very restrictive BSD firewall between me and the Internet.

      I never said Windows was great on security - just that the core OS was stable.

      (Amusingly, I actually had to reboot my Linux server more recently than my Windows box - Debian updated glibc.)

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    19. Re:Blame Windows by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1

      I've only seen them do so on Windows if they're extremely invasive (to the point where you need administrator privs to run them, because they do stuff on the kernel level) or if you have flaky drivers.

      For that matter, recently the only problem along those lines I've had was flaky-drivers.

      Seriously - 80% of the time, it's the drivers. 19.9% of the time, it's crappy hardware. And 0.1% of the time, it's cosmic rays.

      Obviously all these numbers go out the window if you have spyware.

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    20. Re:Blame Windows by Helish · · Score: 1

      Glibc doesn't need reboot, you can just run 'init 1; init 3' this way all the daemons will load with the new lib.

    21. Re:Blame Windows by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1

      How, exactly, is this substantially different from a reboot? :P

      Okay. The kernel doesn't reset. So what? If all the servers go down, I don't much care about the kernel. And, y'know, not all servers shut themselves down properly in all cases . . . it's just safer, simpler, and less error-prone to reboot the damn thing. Windows *or* Linux.

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    22. Re:Blame Windows by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      If you need to download every patch, it's time to invest in a firewall.

    23. Re:Blame Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying that it was *his* fault data was lost because auto-save wasn't enabled?

      What the hell?

      The program shouldn't crash!

    24. Re:Blame Windows by pilkul · · Score: 1

      Pshaw, unix variants crash all the time when you try to use them for desktop (i.e. graphical) applications. If not the whole kernel than at least X. Yes, in server/command line land it's rock-solid but that's not the whole story.

    25. Re:Blame Windows by pilkul · · Score: 1

      You could just as well blame the application developers for providing no autosave feature.

    26. Re:Blame Windows by typicallyterrific · · Score: 1

      I can't offer you first hand experience, but I'm told (by a dude who runs his own hosting company) that you don't need to reboot on comps with two procs.

      Apparently you can do something equivalent to reloading the kernel in one proc while the other one is running, one proc at a time.

      I run linux; perhaps someone else can confirm?

    27. Re:Blame Windows by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      You could just as well blame the application developers for providing no autosave feature.

      If you're going to go to that extreme, you might as well blame them for not coming over and pressing CTRL-S for you. Ultimate responsibility for saving documents lies with the user.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    28. Re:Blame Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure telling his wife that would greatly aid his chances of getting laid in the forseeable future.

    29. Re:Blame Windows by Darby · · Score: 5, Funny

      Unless your apps were written by God Himself, they will fail on you.

      Don't rely on it even then, heck Jesus saves.

    30. Re:Blame Windows by dickens · · Score: 1
      there is Nothing (other than having massive redundent arrays of capacitors) that can be done about under voltaging


      My aging APC SmartUPS-600 claims to be able to take incoming power as low as 108V and output 117V.

      I actually saw incoming power that low once at my last job, during a heat wave. It burned out the building's well pump and we all had use porta-potties for a couple of days. We had dozens of these SmartUPSes and I was watching the monitoring sw since we had been warned of brownouts.

      Dual-conversion may be inefficient but it's clean power.
    31. Re:Blame Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless your apps were written by God Himself, they will fail on you.

      No worries then. I'm on emacs =)

    32. Re:Blame Windows by SuperSnooper · · Score: 1

      Unless your apps were written by God Himself, they will fail on you.

      Even that's not true - Jesus saves...

    33. Re:Blame Windows by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      This is like complaining that your precious family heirlooms were stolen when you left them unattended in a busy location for a couple hours.

      Precious family heirlooms are usually stored in a safe place and only brought out in private once or twice a year. Computer programs are something we have to work with constantly, and having to deal with their failure is unreasonable. They don't have to be written by God himself; cars weren't built by God himself, but manage to be vastly more reliable.

    34. Re:Blame Windows by SameBrian · · Score: 1

      Windows itself is quite stable.

      The other day I re-installed Windows XP on my home PC (I never touch it, as I have a laptop, but the fam dam does), and before I had installed anything (other than Windows), it crashed on me. All I was trying to do at the time was get on the internet in IE. Restarted, and bam!, crashes again (this time while it was loading the tray icons [the ones I had were all XP related...I can't remember which ones exactly}).

      And, as someone else stated, if you've been up for 150 days, you're lucky you didn't get hacked into (although it is arguably (sp?) easy for someone who knows not to click on suspicious links and open weird e-mails to not get virus'/trojans/spyware installed on their computer).

      I realize that it's not really Windows that's crashing, but it's still Windows' fault. Firefox doesn't crash on any other operating system I use (UNIX at school and I used to have the box in question dual boot into various forms of Linux at one point or another), but in Windows it crashes at least once every two days or so.

    35. Re:Blame Windows by llZENll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A huge reason linux doesn't crash as much as windows is its users are far more knowledgable about computing. Another huge reason is not 1% of the malware that exists for windows is on linux, if linux had to endure all of what windows does it would be just as faulty if not moreso. I have used a windows 2000 server for webserver/filesharing/printing and it hasn't crashed once in the last 4 years, my average uptime between reboots for patches is probably 2-6 weeks i'm guessing. Once windows doesn't have to reboot for patches (maybe with vista) uptime will be just as good.

    36. Re:Blame Windows by heletek · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No. I expect my computer to be stable, not to crash every few hours, so I don't save every 15 minutes. I do not think this is an unreasonable expectation. This is a typical windows mentality, where one expects the machine to go down at any moment. And no, I'm not flaming, I said one expects, not does.

    37. Re:Blame Windows by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Ummm, it's not his Sun machine it's his employers and a bussiness could reasonably be expected to have a more stable IT system than your average g/f.

      Also if the data is actually worth recovering, the applications and their settings do matter in any recovery attempt on any O/S. But what the hell it's cool to be clueless and blame your ignorance on Windows.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    38. Re:Blame Windows by Hosiah · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Gnarly. I explain patiently to someone how to do something, and get flamed about it. You call people idiots for not doing something that the computer is supposed to do all by itself, and get modded up insightful. I'll never believe in the Slashdot moderation system again.

      Before I go to the detail of pointing out what a complete bastard you are, you need to get somebody to help you (because you're too fucking stupid to do this yourself) run the Emacs text editor on any Linux system. Have them create a file (with Ctrl-X Ctrl-F), name it, and begin typing away in it as fast as they possibly can without saving at all. While they are doing this, go around to the back of the machine and UNPLUG IT WITHOUT WARNING. Wait a few and plug it back in. When the machine has it's wits back and has auto-fscked the hard disk, go look for the file. You will find it by it's name with a '~' after it, showing the file as of the last auto-save. Open it up and look at it. You should have it up to within 100 characters or less of what was typed.

      I know this works because I've had a power outage due to the house being hit by lightning in the middle of my work. An act of that God whom you say couldn't himself make a foolproof app (and whom was doubtless aiming at you), severe enough to weld two electrical cords into the sockets, fry my surge protector, blow up a transformer on my street and keep the neighborhood dark for half the day was not sufficient, when I brought my file back up, to cause one single character of my work to disappear.

      Emacs was written in 1975. Doubtless, it's technology is still too cutting-edge to expect everywhere, right?

    39. Re:Blame Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless your apps were written by God Himself, they will fail on you.

      That's why the apps set up a signal handler to save the document in case of a crash.

      And no, I don't press save all the time, except when I'm on Windows. And yet I have lost more work on Windows (it never crashes right *after* you press save), than on *nix systems, where I save when I close the program.

    40. Re:Blame Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of your users keeps all their important customer emails archived in Outlook PST files. They go back years and are invaluable to this person. Gigabytes of the things. Because this person travels, they keep them on their laptop hard drive. Because they are so big, they asked that these files were not backed up by the automated network backup system (They have an older laptop, and backing up several Gb of data slowed them down). Despite our protestations, the user insisted that these files were not backed up.

      Guess who's hard drive failed? I don't mean corrupt filesystem, I'm talking dead hard drive. Doesn't even spin up.

      The invoice for the data recovery is not going to the IT department.

    41. Re:Blame Windows by mathi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nonsence. You cannot build an application and expect the user to do an administrative task that can be easily done by the program. The whole point of a computer for most people is to take over stupid tasks, and in my book, regular saving is one of them. The whole saving thing is a ridiculous leftover from the days when disk-access was much slower, floppies needed to be swapped, memory was too low for decent undo, and building an application was just wrapping some sort of interface around system calls. The lady you were calling an idiot because she did not use ctrl-s all the time was probably working with MSWord, a program that has had almost no interface improvements (except macros) since its first version for the macintosh, and that program is a great excemple of bad interface design. Sometimes it uses an autosave function every few minutes, but you cannot rely on that and you never know where these will be saved. I know there are settings for all those things and that you can find them in Options, Extra, Settings, Tools, Advanced and/or Miscellaneous, but the ordinary people who expect an "user-friendly" product might not be able to find them. Please do not call people you do not know idiots, just because they have not developed some habit that is a workaround for a bug in the software they use.

    42. Re:Blame Windows by soliptic · · Score: 1
      Funny how nobody said the same thing to the guy bosting about 120+ day uptime on Sun and Linux boxes, eh.

      For all you know his Windows box is completely offline so patching isn't really an issue.

      Slashdot's classic - when it's Linux, long uptime is proof of stability. When it's Windows, long uptime is proof of inadequate maintenance.

    43. Re:Blame Windows by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

      `` "Sorry," I said, "that's just Windows. It crashes. That's why I don't like it." ``

      Yeaa..so it doesn't crash because of faulty software or hardware (the reason fro most crashes and restarts, usually blamed on Windows), but it crashes because it's "just" Windows.

      If someone'd help me in that way I'd be stressed too.
      No offence, though, just it's true (reason for crashes/restarts).

      My PC hasn't been restarted for months, no crash, no hang, no restart. It's XP. But I also don't install random software on it and I'm careful what hardware I buy (well venitlated, good PSU etc.)

    44. Re:Blame Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? Since when does installing a Windows Service Pack require a reboot?

    45. Re:Blame Windows by TallMatthew · · Score: 1
      Drivers crash.

      If you define "Windows" as the kernel, then you have to include drivers as being part of "Windows." Anything that facilitates the use of hardware should be considered part of the operating system.

      If you define "Windows" as being the kernel and only those drivers written by Microsoft then what you said makes some sense, but even then the reason third party drivers crash may very well be buggy Microsoft libraries.

    46. Re:Blame Windows by tverbeek · · Score: 0, Troll

      I didn't flame you; I flamed the idiot you're married to. The one who - despite the fact that she uses a piece of equipment that is world-renowned for losing people's work - went two hours without saving her document. You can shriek all you want about how computers shouldn't lose your work if you don't manually save it, but anyone without a learning disability should know that they do, and take some measures to avoid it if that concerns them.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    47. Re:Blame Windows by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      But when a car hits another vehicle because the driver didn't exercise common-sense safety precautions, we don't blame the car. We blame the operator whose recklessness led to their accident. "I should be able to hit the brakes and have the car stop immediately," isn't a valid defense against being ticketed for failing to keep a safe distance from the car in front of you.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    48. Re:Blame Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus saves...but Pele scores on the rebound

    49. Re:Blame Windows by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

      It gets a nice reputation for instability because so many manufacturers put it on bottom-basement gimpy hardware, but I seriously doubt Linux would fare any better.

      In fact, Linux does quite a bit better on flaky hardware. I have a pool of test machines in a special projects lab that is composed entirely of "repeat offender" computers that would crash with Windows often enough to be pulled from the user PC pool. None of them has ever caused a problem with Linux. I am using one as an internal web server. It has been running for over 200 days.

    50. Re:Blame Windows by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

      The main problem here is that your wife is an idiot.

      Do you shut the engine off and recrank it periodically while driving? Do you unfasten and refasten the seatbelt? Only an idiot would expect a user to intuitively engage in such ridiculous behavior with a computer.

    51. Re:Blame Windows by ArwynH · · Score: 1
      Windows doesn't crash.

      Yes it does.

      Applications crash. Drivers crash. Hardware crashes. Windows itself is quite stable. I had a 150-day uptime on the box I'm typing on right now (WinXP) until I had a power outage.

      Applications crash, yes, that's thier fault. If they can bring down the OS when they do it's the OS's fault. The OS should not crash because an application developer made a mistake. This happens in Windows XP, not as often as in older Windows, but it none the less happens. This can also happen in linux, but it doesn't happen nearly as often.

      You are correct however in pointing out that hardware and driver problems are not techniquely the OS's fault. Sometimes they can be, but not most of the time. That said the majority of crashes in Window, at least in my experience, have come from application problems not hardware problems. Maybe I just use decent hardware...

    52. Re:Blame Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That reminds me of the bug windows 95 had where it you left it running for 40 days it would crash. it only took them 6 years to reproduce the bug so they could fix it.

      A few years ago I was working at a Bond Broker and asked the junior SA to 'take the screen off the broker's desk'. He did just that, and left the Windows 95 PC behind while running a market information application.

      Later, when checking the server, I found there was a Win95 PC which had been connected for upwards of 110 days. After a search, I found the PC under the desk, where only the monitor had been removed, the keyboard and mouse were on top of the pc. I shut the machine down properly, and the PC was running OK

    53. Re:Blame Windows by I+Like+Pudding · · Score: 1

      Linux patches do not necessitate a reboot, barring kernel updates, so a large linux uptime does not necessarily mean a machine is going to be rooted at any second.

    54. Re:Blame Windows by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Computers don't crash: Windows does.

      That's funny, the machines I've used at work (first with 2000, then XP) have never crashed, in four and a half years (I used NT for about a year before that, which crashed once or twice). Maybe I should troll out my story about how I once tried Linux, and it sometimes crashed causing me to have to reboot.

      My machine at home (running 2000) did crash sometimes due to a driver problem, though this was a machine built from a load of different bits of hardware (the problem piece was a really old sound card, made long before 2000 was around) - whether it's right or wrong that it crashed, this is simply incomparable to Macs where you don't have that option to pick-and-mix hardware yourself.

      If admins were honest with their users and didn't try to defend Windows or say that all operating systems crash just as much, the world would be a better place.

      The world would be a better place if people stopped peddling anecdotal evidence as if it were some kind of replacement for actual research.

    55. Re:Blame Windows by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1
      This is a typical windows mentality, where one expects the machine to go down at any moment.

      No, common sense. Just like wearing safety belts, storing weapons in different places than the ammo, wearing helmet whilst driving a bike: I could go on if I felt it would be of any use.
      Owned computers for over a decade, yet never used windows.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    56. Re:Blame Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't listen to these dumb fucks who insist the cheap PS or mobos, etc are the cause of your crashing Windows problems. I have always use a cheapo p/s, mobos, etc. and my linux boxes don't crash, so how could you not blame Windows and blame PS, or whatever?

      And those who say their Windows have uptime of anything more than 3 weeks, are they insane? Not patching Windows and bragging about it is not the way to promote yourself! FCS, get some self esteem! Why do these people bash themselves in order to make Bill Gates look good?

    57. Re:Blame Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Immitating what Linux users say about the stability doesn't make Windows users look good for 2 reasons.
      1. All know that it is not possible, or a long shot if the said user ditched IE, but IE is the part of the OS according to MS anyway.
      2. You should patch your Windows more than once a month, and reboot.

        And please remember your OS is supposed to handle all those apps you throw at it. It is not your 3 year old kid, or your very expensive china. I have seen far too many people buying into voodoo style habits to keep their windows from crashing, or treating like their babies. You sound like the both.

    58. Re:Blame Windows by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 1

      Well, 38 amps at 12 volts. Your oven is 60 amps at 220 volts.

      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
    59. Re:Blame Windows by MentalMooMan · · Score: 1

      How, exactly, is this substantially different from a reboot? :P
      You get to keep your awesomely 1337 uptime :)

      --
      43rd Law of Computing:
      Anything that can go wr
      fortune: Segmentation violation -- Core Dumped
    60. Re:Blame Windows by Hosiah · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I didn't flame you; I flamed the idiot you're married to.

      Lookit the name on the post of the guy you replied to the first time. Now lookit my name. I think we have found the root of your problem: you are unable to focus on any particular thing for a length of time, and hence this make you the ideal Ctrl-S presser...in fact, that's ALL you press! Yes, this explains a lot...

    61. Re:Blame Windows by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      So?

      She was using Word. Everyone, *everyone* knows that you should CTRL+S in word. She wasn't using emacs.

      Being paranoid about your data is what keeps it safe, not some software feature.

      --
      I don't get it.
    62. Re:Blame Windows by legirons · · Score: 1

      "The main problem here is that your wife is an idiot"

      Ahhh, Slashdot diplomacy. Can't beat it...

    63. Re:Blame Windows by Hosiah · · Score: 1
      So? She was using Word. Everyone, *everyone* knows that you should CTRL+S in word. She wasn't using emacs.

      So Word is an ill-designed piece of shit, like every other MS product, that's what "So". Wise-ass.

    64. Re:Blame Windows by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      But the car in that instance worked precisely correctly. It stopped within specs, and any problem with that is due to things outside the car's control. A better analogy is a tire blowing out. I don't expect my computer to work when I pour water into it, but under normal operating conditions crashing is soley the computer's fault.

  15. Sometimes it takes a long time... by Anna+Merikin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    to see the obvious.

    It was not the GPL or being able to Use the Source that led me to Linux; it was Windows' misbehavior. I learned to love those other things later, after I found Linux to be much better behaved.

    I would much, much rather spend time learning and configuring Linux to my liking -- a positive feeling of success and pride -- than put up with Windows' flaws -- a feeling of failure and helplessness.

    Frankly, I didn't care whether I used BeOS (which I was considering at the time) BSD or Linux as long as it didn't crash all the time or get viruses (boot sector trojans were popular then.) As chance had it, my local computer store had a 5-linux-distro boxed set for sale for $20 USD, so Linux it was.

    I have been an enthusiastic Linux user and contributer ever since.

    1. Re:Sometimes it takes a long time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah- it's called VLC media player. For Windows.

    2. Re:Sometimes it takes a long time... by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

      "it was Windows' misbehavior. I learned to love those other things later, after I found Linux to be much better behaved."

      Dude use DOS, it has never showed blue screen on me.

  16. Playing the Percentages by rirugrat · · Score: 1

    IT problems while commuting as a result of personal injury - 74%

  17. X-Bender: What I don't do is none of your business by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny

    Leela: Bender? My God, you're a mess!
    Bender: Leave me alone.
    Leela: Look at the 5:00 rust. You've been up all night not drinking, haven't you?
    Bender: Hey ... what I don't do is none of your business.
    Leela: Please, Bender, have some malt liquor. If not for yourself, then for the people who love you.

  18. Google realized Windows users needed autosave by VX1984rr3 · · Score: 1

    Seems Google email realized they have Windows users... that auto-save has been great for retaining those important emails to my drinking buddies.

  19. Cheers! by scolby · · Score: 1

    Nothing washes away a day of Windows being stupid and users being oblivious like one part gin plus one part tonic. Lime optional.

  20. Ugh by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    I RTFA and what a load of crap. Only mentions IT in the first paragraph. And we all know correlation != causation. On with the typical /. discussion!

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  21. Root causes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Other people
    2) Work

    Can you think of a stress issue that can't be traced back to one or both of these?

    1. Re:Root causes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, 'work' is also caused by 'other people'. Hmm, that gives me an idea: maybe ... sorry, gotta go.

  22. OH SHIT! This had to happen someday. by gd23ka · · Score: 1, Funny

    I somehow forgot to click on the post anonymously button. Now I'm caught redhanded posting a stupid story to slashdot. Oh well.. shit happens. In future I will make sure that I am not logged on to slashdot when I want to post anonymously, okay? Hey but you should have seen me jump up and yank the ethernet cable out of my machine... :-)

  23. Re:X-Bender: What I don't do is none of your busin by Kesch · · Score: 0

    This sort of light-hearted humor is what promotes irresponsible drinking.

    People, for your own sakes, check that what you are drinking isn't the ruler of a planet or something. Drink responsibly.

    --
    If this signature is witty enough, maybe somebody will like me.
  24. Today is when by dapho · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Spam "stopped" and I got exactly 1,337 emails, but 10 minutes later it changes to 1,338.

  25. Yay for awful conclusions by Council · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The logic distilled:

    When you're stressed, do you smoke or drink? [read: do you smoke or drink? This is an awful question for establishing a link. Possible alternate question: "do you like a massage when you're stressed?"]

    What stresses you? Do crashing computers stress you? ["Yeah." Of course they do.]

    Therefore, computers drive people to drink.

    Nowhere have they established a causal link between the group that is stressed and the group that drinks, aside from what you'd expect from pretty random overlap. This has the smell of a bad study and results blown up to sound outrageous. The article reads like a bunch of observations about overlapping groups concluding with inflammatory statements about two of the groups which are only vaguely linked in the actual data.

    Another analogy: IT problems lead to sex. Well, IT problems lead to stress, stressed people are more likely to get massages, and a nontrivial number of massage parlors offer sex services. IT problems lead to prostitution! Please give us more funding.

    --
    xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    1. Re:Yay for awful conclusions by kbielefe · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the same kind of logic I've heard all week in Alito's confirmation hearings. Ever thought about running for Senate?

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    2. Re:Yay for awful conclusions by freeweed · · Score: 1

      I just think it's yet another example of stupidity feeding stupidity. Well, that and everyone loves to gripe about their computers these days (thanks Windows!).

      Seriously, this "study" actually claims that a computer crashing is more stressful for people than bodily injury. Who the hell are they surveying, stunt men? I'd say seeing a BSOD is a ton less stressful than, say, a broken limb.

      Then again, maybe their computers are crashing right in the middle of something more important to these people than their physical health. Like that winning solitaire hand.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    3. Re:Yay for awful conclusions by scrwvwls · · Score: 1

      ...computers drive people to drink

      Does this liken Bill Gates to a sort of contemporary Capone?! Seriously though, what might be the ramifications of pushing sub-par software and what entail those secret business dealings at MS?!! I bet if it were up to microsoft they would push data entry and databasing software in their office suites so inefficient that using them to any serious extent would bring about a case of serious carpal tunnel so severe it would require serious medical attention! Ergo your average worker bee would become hooked on a new class of meds (MS reaping the $$ somehow) spawning a new breed of addict comprising an entire class so easily mobilized politically that there's no holding back the dystopian mess that would subsequently ensnare us. Sleep tight!

  26. Now that's news by cpuenvy · · Score: 0

    "...admins taking their break straight from the bottle."

    Jeez! I always figured we were a bunch of happy go lucky party animals.

    You learn something new everyday!

    --
    DISCLAIMER:

    I don't believe what I write, and neither should you.

  27. Good for 4 minutes to going home time by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Les Barker's spoken word poem seems to fit this story:

    I bought a new computer.
    It cost a thousand pound,
    But every time I switch it on
    It keeps on falling down.

    I used to think it was my friend,
    But now it drives me 'round the bend.
    You'd be surprised the time I spend:
    REINSTALLING WINDOZE.

    I switch it on -
    What is this?
    Something wrong with CONFIG SYS
    This isn't my idea of bliss:
    REINSTALLING WINDOZE.

    I want to share my printers and
    I want to share my files.
    I want to share my anger
    'Cause it drives me blooming wild.

    My songs, they say, are sublime;
    I've conquered cadence, mastered rhyme.
    But now-a-days I spend my time:
    REINSTALLING WINDOZE.

    Reinstall - oh what fun!
    It says it helps you get things done.
    Every day now, everyone's
    REINSTALLING WINDOZE.

    Look again. It will say
    All you do is plug and play.
    How do I spend every day?
    REINSTALLING WINDOZE.

    It can't find my printer and
    It can't locate my mouse.
    The other day it drove me
    Right out of the bloomin' house.

    Still unplugged, still unplayed,
    I e-mailed God in search of aid.
    He's far to busy, I'm afraid...
    REINSTALLING WINDOZE.

    Up at dawn for one more try
    Will it work? - Can pigs fly?
    How do I expect to die?
    REINSTALLING WINDOZE.

    I used to like a drink or three.
    No time now - don't call for me.
    How will I spend eternity?
    REINSTALLING WINDOZE.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Good for 4 minutes to going home time by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2, Informative
      This should be sung, to the tune of "When I'm Cleaning Windows" by George Formby.

      Sample (sadly, not Mr Formby).

    2. Re:Good for 4 minutes to going home time by patio11 · · Score: 1

      Linux fans should not criticize Windows for failing to find a mouse or a printer. Seriously, when was the last time this has happened to anyone with Windows? 1993? As compared to Linux, where when a given distribution correctly autoconfigures all the equipment on a non-custom mid-line Dell its a minor miracle worthy of sacrifice to Tux The Terrible, God of Unspeakable Configuration Issues.

    3. Re:Good for 4 minutes to going home time by nixdix · · Score: 1

      Does a standard Windows installation usually work on Dell? I thought everything had to be custom for Dell computers. Times that I've needed to re-install windows on a Dell machine, I've needed to download special drivers first.

  28. Programmers do Have it worse by ChaserPnk · · Score: 1

    How often do you have to deal with programs that you yourself have written not doing exactly what you want? I know I do all the time. Language and technology restrictions really frustrate me.

    Try writing a PDA todo list where the "done" items are indicated by a strikethrough. Too bad! Microsoft Compact Framework doesn't support strikethrough font for labels. But try explaining that to your boss.

    As a young programmer, I guess I have to learn to not get frustrated by these things, but it's hard when your job and career depends on it. Anyone have any other stories of programmning frustration or tips to deal with them please post.

    --

    "A diplomat is a man who always remembers a woman's birthday but never remembers her age." -Robert Frost
    1. Re:Programmers do Have it worse by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 3, Funny
      Your job depends on whether or not a particular line of text, written on a PDA, has a strikethrough or not? And there is no other possible way to write this line of text?

      You need a new job, son. Maybe something in the french fry delivery category.
      And your boss needs a new worker.

    2. Re:Programmers do Have it worse by ChaserPnk · · Score: 1

      Oh, I was just giving an abstract example. I guess it could have been misundestood. I personally write engineering software and I'm happy with it. Although I did have a frustrating experience with programming PDAs a few years ago.

      --

      "A diplomat is a man who always remembers a woman's birthday but never remembers her age." -Robert Frost
    3. Re:Programmers do Have it worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh by the way--you're an asshole.

  29. I work in IT too by Mushdot · · Score: 1

    And im sat reading /. while smoking a fag and drinking a beer. Oh dear

  30. Re:X-Bender: What I don't do is none of your busin by talksinmaths · · Score: 1

    I hate the people who love me, and they hate me!

    --
    Don't you have someone you'd die for?
  31. It's the industry!!! by maxrate · · Score: 1

    They make them frustrating so you will break them, then buy a new one.

  32. That's why they call it ... by K.B.Zod · · Score: 1

    the Blue Screen of Death. I tell ya, these jokes just write themselves.

  33. Yes Indeed by Anti-Trend · · Score: 0, Troll
    In my case, I had the wife's PC dual-booting Windows 2000 Pro (more stable than XP, for the record) and Linux. One day she asks me, "Honey? Can you reformat my PC?" Here I'm thinking she's going to want me to remove her Linux partition to make more room for Windows, right? On the contrary, she thought Linux was "prettier" and "didn't crash all the time" and saw no reason to run Windows at all. Sweet. Since my wife's fateful judgement call a few years ago, we've been an all Linux household since - 6 systems at current count. The beautiful part is that I don't have to be the IT guy for my own home, everything just works. In fact she's been running the same installation for 2 years now, still runs as lean as the day it was installed. Now that I'll drink to. ;-)

    Cheers,

    -AT

    --
    Working in a DevOps shop is like playing in a band made up entirely of keytarists.
    1. Re:Yes Indeed by syousef · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, so you're telling me your wife who couldn't reinstall the OS on her own and who chooses an OS based on how pretty it is hasn't needed your help with her system in 2 years.

      She's either doing nothing more than reading email and surfing the web (with the occassional card game thrown in for good measure) or you're flat out lying.

      If she was doing more she'd have come across a word document whose layout your office sweet had stuffed up, an excel spreadsheet with a macro it couldn't render or something else like that. You're not going to try to tell me she's admining the firewall herself or upgrading any secure components. Or are you going with the myth that Linux is impervious to attacks and security threats???

      I'd love to....absolutely LOVE to go Linux only. When I can run my flight sims, chess software (and I'm not talking Winboard here!), open up my work documents without the formatting going to hell, not have to worry about the next upgrade installing draconian password security by default (that incident was fun. PAM with ridiculous security for my 'lil old home PC) etc. Then I may just think of ditching Windows.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    2. Re:Yes Indeed by Anti-Trend · · Score: 1
      Hmmm, so you're telling me your wife who couldn't reinstall the OS on her own and who chooses an OS based on how pretty it is hasn't needed your help with her system in 2 years.

      I simply *love* being called a liar for sharing being stupid enough to share personal information on Slashdot, thank you for reminding me of this fact. Nobody's asking you to ditch Windows. If you're too dumb to figure out what my non-technical wife had no problems understanding, blame yourself.

      --
      Working in a DevOps shop is like playing in a band made up entirely of keytarists.
    3. Re:Yes Indeed by syousef · · Score: 1

      I simply *love* being called a liar for sharing being stupid enough to share personal information on Slashdot, thank you for reminding me of this fact.

      Oh a pity party??? And I'm invited? Fantastic!

      Lets see what brought this on:
      She's either doing nothing more than reading email and surfing the web (with the occassional card game thrown in for good measure) or you're flat out lying.

      I said either blah or you're a liar and you took this to mean I called you a liar. A little touchy are we?

      If you use a computer system you need to administer it. The only systems that don't require this are ones that do the same simple things day in and day out (retrieve email, display web pages etc). If you're generating new data you need to keep it sorted and organised. If you're adding new software you have to install, upgrade and if there's a problem solve it. That's just a fact. There's not a system on the planet let alone a desktop OS that administers itself, so stop peddling that fairytale.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    4. Re:Yes Indeed by Anti-Trend · · Score: 1
      If you use a computer system you need to administer it. The only systems that don't require this are ones that do the same simple things day in and day out (retrieve email, display web pages etc). If you're generating new data you need to keep it sorted and organised. If you're adding new software you have to install, upgrade and if there's a problem solve it. That's just a fact. There's not a system on the planet let alone a desktop OS that administers itself, so stop peddling that fairytale.

      I think a good part of the problem here is that you're equating all OSes with your Windows experience. *nix != Windows. I initially setup the system with the software she wanted, wrote a few scripts to keep everything updated (runs every morning at ~4:30am), and that's pretty much it. Done. It keeps itself shiny and updated, and that means all the software on the system, not just core OS updates. Linux uses a package manager to keep track of software and keep it updated, so there is no real need to manage software updates individually unless you install something that is not in your disto's repositories.

      --
      Working in a DevOps shop is like playing in a band made up entirely of keytarists.
    5. Re:Yes Indeed by syousef · · Score: 1

      Your assumption that I'm unfamiliar with Linux is just wrong. I've installed and run Linux on numerous occassions. The gotchas each time with each new distro, especially when things go wrong and you're stuck hand editing XConfigs, dealing with a new version of PAM locking you out until you change to a hideous password, are stuck hand writing rules to facilitate connection to your ISP etc. (all actual experiences I've had).

      The Linux package managers are all mediocre. You have to be aware that one thing will break another, that this library is incompatible with that etc.

      When is the last time your wife installed a major new piece of software on her system? Did she get you to do it or did she do it herself? How often does she do this? What does your wife actually use the system for? Email, web browsing and the occassional openoffice document is my guess. Perhaps instant messaging too? Maybe a little graphics editing ala gimp if she's adventurous? I'd guess that's about it. Answer these questions if you want to retain any credibility.

      My problem is that my experience with Windows has been awful but in the end I've been able to do what I wanted to with the system. With Linux I've installed a lot of distros each with their own intriciate problems that in the end have just been broken for the things I wanted to do. You can argue all you like that this is due to my own lack of sysadmin skills and I'll agree with you. I don't want to keep up with the latest and greatest.

      With XP I learnt about a handful of utils (most GUI driven so you don't have to be familiar with 100 command line options) - I know the control panel well. I know a handful of network utils, and a handful of disk utils. Oh yes I do run a good piece of antivirus software, and a firewall. (The only pain comes when I install new hardware - my last graphics card was hell to install and it's still not quite right but that's either NVidia drivers or my motherboard and/or graphics card are faulty - I'm still not sure which).

      These days I only run Linux when there's a good reason. If I'm fiddling with astronomy analytic software that only runs on Unix variants for example. Occassionally I might try out a distro on an emulator like VMWARE if I've got access to one.

      Under windows I'm always installing and uninstalling software. I've played with flight sims, games, music and video editing software, and plenty of development tools. I do much more than browse and edit word docs, and there's always something new to explore.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    6. Re:Yes Indeed by Anti-Trend · · Score: 1
      "Your assumption that I'm unfamiliar with Linux is just wrong. I've installed and run Linux on numerous occassions..."

      Being familiar with something and being proficient in something are two entirely different things, wouldn't you agree?

      "The Linux package managers are all mediocre. You have to be aware that one thing will break another, that this library is incompatible with that etc."

      Ever heard the phrase 'DLL Hell'? What about 'VXD Hell'? Windows equivilents of library incompatibilities. As for all of Linux's package managers being mediocre, you're right, I concede. Urpmi, yum, apt, etc. are all crap compared to Windows' package manager called... oh wait. Windows doesn't really have a package manager, all software is responsible for its own installation and removal. Didn't install right? Too damn bad. Won't uninstall? Tough titty. Installing software in Windows is only as good and trustworthy as the software you're installing. Apps like Norton Antivirus and AOL for instance are nearly impossible to remove completely because their uninstallers do not have your best interests in mind. Doesn't it make more sense to have a package manager be responsible for how software is added and removed? Besides, a modern distro's package manager handles all dependancies and conflicts automatically. It basically boils down to clicking a static box next to a discription of the program you want to install from the package manager's list and clicking "Install". It will handle all of the dependancies automatically. In urpmi, my update script consists of only two lines, it works unattended and it never fails.

      "When is the last time your wife installed a major new piece of software on her system? Did she get you to do it or did she do it herself? How often does she do this? What does your wife actually use the system for? Email, web browsing and the occassional openoffice document is my guess. Perhaps instant messaging too? Maybe a little graphics editing ala gimp if she's adventurous? I'd guess that's about it. Answer these questions if you want to retain any credibility."

      The last time she installed software on it was probably Cedega. Yes, it's not difficult, she did it herself. She uses her system for all the things most people use their PCs for... finances, internet, games, email, IM, office, photo editing, music, photo albums, scheduling, and she plays the occasional emulated SuperNES game as well (with a PSX Controller no less -- how geeky!). So aside from the emulators, pretty normal I'd say. But the whole point was that she has average needs and no problems. I manage several SOHO networks for my workstation, which is probably not an average need, but Linux suits my needs quite well also.

      "With XP I learnt about a handful of utils (most GUI driven so you don't have to be familiar with 100 command line options) - I know the control panel well. I know a handful of network utils, and a handful of disk utils. Oh yes I do run a good piece of antivirus software, and a firewall. (The only pain comes when I install new hardware - my last graphics card was hell to install and it's still not quite right but that's either NVidia drivers or my motherboard and/or graphics card are faulty - I'm still not sure which)."

      So let me see if I got this straight. You don't know Linux at all, you don't even know XP very well by your own admission, and yet you refuse to believe that a properly configured Linux system can run without issues? Incredible. At this point I realize what an ass I truly am for having wasted my time arguing with you to this point. If you cannot or will not see the folly in your own argument, how can we have a rational discussion on the matter?
      --
      Working in a DevOps shop is like playing in a band made up entirely of keytarists.
  34. Windoze XP on a PII by badspyro · · Score: 1

    Hi, Sadly, I'm olny 17, so I have (allas) only ever realy experienced Windoze and OSX at collage, although there are a fiew things that the students use in Windoze to their advantage.... I learnt infinite patents when all our family had as a computer wasa 10 yr old Pentium 2 running XP. You soon learn that there is nothing you can do. no tricks to stop it crashing, just sit and PRAY. Now I have a P4, and it still crashes as often. Shows its not the hardware at least...

    1. Re:Windoze XP on a PII by merreborn · · Score: 1

      I see you've still yet to learn to use a spellchecker.

      Hi, Sadly, I'm olny 17, so I have (allas) only ever realy experienced Windoze and OSX at collage, although there are a fiew things that the students use in Windoze to their advantage.... I learnt infinite patents when all our family had as a computer wasa 10 yr old Pentium 2 running XP. You soon learn that there is nothing you can do. no tricks to stop it crashing, just sit and PRAY. Now I have a P4, and it still crashes as often. Shows its not the hardware at least...

    2. Re:Windoze XP on a PII by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, are you really seventeen? Is english your native language? Your writing is riddled with misspellings/typos. Words that I see incorrect. olny (only), allas (alas), collage (college), fiew (few), learnt (learned), patents (patience), wasa (was a)

    3. Re:Windoze XP on a PII by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very good, except that "learnt" is the correct word if you are not in America. People outside America do use "learned" as well though; except it is used to mean "wise" or "knowledgeable".

      I'm not the OP, but before you try to correct someone's spelling, you had better check that they are really mistakes.
      (But other than that, good call on the various errors).

    4. Re:Windoze XP on a PII by Jeng · · Score: 1

      He wanted to get the post done before the next crash. Spellchecker be damned!

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  35. I like to ramble :-) by MaXiMiUS · · Score: 0

    Windows itself isn't truely flawed. Hell, it runs great for me. It could run better if it was modular, but what can I do? It isn't like I have a second harddrive just laying around. The only reason Windows fucks up for so many people is because they don't know jack shit about computers. They still teach the fucking tag in IT classes at High School, that's just fucked up. [/endn00bhate]

    --
    It's never just a game when you're winning. - George Carlin
    1. Re:I like to ramble :-) by MaXiMiUS · · Score: 0

      Erm.. it showed up fine when I previewed, "tag" was supposed to have [center] before it.

      --
      It's never just a game when you're winning. - George Carlin
  36. Commuting? by JanneM · · Score: 1

    I'm a bit surprised as many as one in five feel commuting is a source of stress, actually.

    I find it relaxing. In the morning, it gives me some time where I can't really work, and can't rush around looking for things, or doing last-minute household stuff. Instead I can sit (well, stand) on the train and sort oease into the day by reading a book or a bunch of saved webpages on my computer, or just listen to the radio.

    In the evening, likewise, I can sit and wind down, again with a book or radio. I get some time to go over the work in my head, in a sense summarizing it and deciding what to do the nesxt morning. By the time I get home, I've left my work behind and can relax.

    Here's somebody with the right idea: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jannem/22329391/

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    1. Re:Commuting? by absinthminded64 · · Score: 1

      30 minutes on a train where everyone had to exhale for the doors to close. . . oh. . and can't forget the hangover that has you wondering if you're going to start doing Linda Blair impersonations on the train. .

      FUN. . That one in five may not ride the same train you do!

    2. Re:Commuting? by osmodion · · Score: 1

      During a summer internship I had a one hour train ride every morning and evening. Although I would much rather have had the extra hour of sleep or more time with friends, it was rather relaxing to just sit and read or stare out the window.

      Now I have a 2.6 mile drive from my apartment to a parking lot where I go to grad school. Normally it takes about 30 minutes, but today it took an hour, not including time lost when an asshole at the gas station decided to get 2 gallons of gas so she could park her car at the gas station and walk to the dry cleaners. So yeah, commuting can be a relaxing downtime, but it can also be extremely stressful.

    3. Re:Commuting? by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Now I have a 2.6 mile drive from my apartment to a parking lot where I go to grad school. Normally it takes about 30 minutes, but today it took an hour, not including time lost when an asshole at the gas station decided to get 2 gallons of gas so she could park her car at the gas station and walk to the dry cleaners.

      2.6 miles is about 4 kilometers. You can do that on an ordinary single-speed foldable commuter bicycle in twenty minutes - without going fast enough to break a sweat. You can walk it in less than an hour. Or did you mean 26 miles?

      The difference is that you now drive yourself. Driving is stressful, if nothing else because you need to be constantly on your toes in urban traffic, and morning congestion of course just makes that vigilance worse.

      But that's not a problem with commuting, but of using a car. :)

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    4. Re:Commuting? by Builder · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't commute on UK public transport. Imagine a carraige at 41 degrees centigrade where it is physically impossible to stand without pushing up against at least two people. Add to that the fact that bathing seems to be considered optional and there are regular delays on most of the lines I travel on, and you have a recipe for stress.

      I either end up at work half an hour early to make sure I get here on time, which means I work 2.5 hours a week for free, or I end up at work late and stressed because of delays and hassles.

    5. Re:Commuting? by osmodion · · Score: 1
      Actually, I did consider biking since I did that a lot in high school. It would be fine on campus, but it's just too dangerous on the streets around here. I take all major roads since there aren't any back roads that avoid the major ones. I have a choice between Sunset, which is two lanes averaging 40mph and ungodly windy, and Wilshire, which is 7 lanes of congestion/40mph and freeway entrances and exits. It's LA - anybody not in a car is basically a target.

      If anything, I think biking would be more stressful due to unsafe road conditions. And that's without the people I've seen tailgating bikers by about 5 feet.

  37. Crashing Problems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If IT problems are the bad thing, OpenBSD users must be quite mellow. OpenBSD doesn't crash, as long as you keep the load low.

  38. good to know.. by myfootsmells · · Score: 1

    i'll now be intoxicated during the hours of 9-5pm, except during lunch where you'll find me outside smoking.

  39. MOD parent up by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    ROFL

    p.s. for non brits its a fag packet related joke.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    1. Re:MOD parent up by donscarletti · · Score: 3, Funny
      p.s. for non brits its a fag packet related joke.
      For non brits "fag" means something else.
      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    2. Re:MOD parent up by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm glad at least somebody around here appreciates my humor...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:MOD parent up by EnglishDude · · Score: 1

      Err, we DO get that sort of warning on our fag packets but titled "Chief Medical Officer's Warning:". We even have large labels on them saying "Smoking kills!" - I think legally tobacco companies has to print them covering about 50% one of the largest sides. Like this and this.

  40. See the tips for avoiding stress? by Soko · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's a second box along the side of that page, showing one how to avoid stress. Cool! Let's take a look:

    1. Live a healthy lifestyle

    Well, duh. OK, maybe someone under stress needs the bleeding obvious told to them. Whatever.

    2. Don't take too much on

    Too much what? Stress?

    3. Decide what causes you stress and change it

    OS9 causes my stress. The Accounting Dept. says I can't change it either.

    4. Avoid unnecessary conflict

    So, one should just smile at that luser and say "Yes, you're right - it's a virus I let in through the firewall. Your kids music collection acquired through Kaaza - on our corporate laptop - has _nothing_ to do with all those strange pop-ups. No sir. I'll have it all fixed up in a jiffy."? OK.

    5. Manage your time better

    Good. Hang on, cell phone ringing again...

    6. Practice saying "no" without feeling guilty

    Me: Hullo?
    Them: Hey - the server's down
    Me: *checks with ssh* Odd - it was runnig like a top when I left for home.
    Them: Well, with the construction going on in here, the electricians kinda shut the power to the server room off.
    Me: Ummmm... The server is on UPS. Why's it dead?
    Them: They shut it off a 5. It's now 8. The drill they plugged into the UPS didn't help either. Can you come in and fix it?
    Me: NO. Get them to fix it - it's thier fault! And nothing you say will make me feel guilty enough to come in.
    Them: Suuuure. Get your ass in here or your fired! The CIO golfs at my country club, you know.
    Me: Yeahyeahyeah. Be there ASAP. As soon as I explain to my wife why I'm going to work during her birthday celebration.

    Yup, no stress there....

    7. Take time out to "recharge your batteries"

    Me: Yup, the batteries aren't charging. You guys fried the my UPS batteries with your drill. You've trashed my DB and destroyed a 3000VA UPS. I need to see the foreman now - you guys owe us for all this.
    FatAssSparky: Fuck you.

    8. Talk about problems so they do not get out of proportion

    Me: I'd like to talk to you about your workers killing power to my server room, and...
    Foreman: Sorry 'bout that, buddy. Now, we want we should take 4 days to finish up here, or an extra week with similar 'mishaps', if you wanna start sqwaking about our little boo-boo dis evenin'?
    Me: *WINCE* ...Have a nice evening.

    9. Make time to see friends

    Friend: Soko, if your just going to bitch about your day, I'm leaving. I hate that geeky stuff. Oh, and you pay the tab.

    10. Do not use alcohol, nicotine or caffeine to cope with stress

    Are they FUCKING KIDDING?? WHO ARE THESE MORONS?? I'll FUCKING SHOW THEM STRESS. WITH A SNOWSHOVEL CAVING IN THIER FUCKING SKULL!!!

    AAAAAAAAAAAUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGGGGGGGGGGGGGHH HHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!

    Soko

    --
    "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    1. Re:See the tips for avoiding stress? by dodobh · · Score: 1

      OS9 causes my stress. The Accounting Dept. says I can't change it either.

      Perhaps you need a few ... accidents. May I recommend this tutorial for starters? The next time they piss you off, bring the server and the CEOs desktop down. Then spend the next couple of days restoring the desktop. Remember, things dont work because the CEO is having problems otherwise.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    2. Re:See the tips for avoiding stress? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the best posts I've seen in a long time. Thanks.

  41. Teh List of Stressors by pvera · · Score: 1

    1. Your ops manager drowns on a glass of water.
    2. The three staff PhDs together can't team up to figure out how to submit a web form.
    3. The CEO knocks you out of a revenue project to work on his pet project.
    4. After 6 months of dissing the CEO, his pet project starts making as much money as he predicted. Yes, you were wrong. Yes, the CEO was actually right.
    5. For the 14th day in a row SQL Server Agent decides to magically, and for no reason, saboutage your carefully orchestrated maintenance plan for SQL Server.
    6. Upon deploying a new server, you remembered to upload the hosts file in the smoothwall firewall. You also remembered to update the rules so only the bare minimum services are exposed. You are happy, so you go home. 12 hours later your junior employee informs you that you forgot to update the external DNS(which means you are missing some 12 entries), and the new server has been sitting pretty much idle all along.
    7. The new sales guy uses "paradigm shift" during a meeting that had NOTHING TO DO WITH SHIFTING PARADIGMS.
    8. To counteract #7, the marketing manager starts talking about "search engine optimization" in the same meeting. Yeah, the meeting wasn't about that either.
    9. You just walked a person thru a very simple sequence of actions ("click here, now click here ...") for the 100th time. She has been at that job for about 100 days. Nope, she still doesn't get it.
    10. The old nasty coffee urn dies, so the company buys a nice drip maker with a shutoff timer. After 2 hrs the pot shuts down, which forces people to brew fresh coffee instead of keeping it warmed thru the day with the expected nastiness. Of course, your coworkers are too lazy to brew fresh coffee, so they figure out how to turn on the coffee maker so it can keep the same batch warm all day, with the expected nastiness.

    --
    Pedro
    ----
    The Insomniac Coder
    1. Re:Teh List of Stressors by LardBrattish · · Score: 2, Funny
      9. You just walked a person thru a very simple sequence of actions ("click here, now click here ...") for the 100th time. She has been at that job for about 100 days. Nope, she still doesn't get it.

      Can't you see it? She wants you bad

      :)

      --
      What are you listening to? (http://megamanic.blogetery.com/)
  42. A Big Shame, Regardless. by twitter · · Score: 1
    Nowhere have they established a causal link between the group that is stressed and the group that drinks, aside from what you'd expect from pretty random overlap. This has the smell of a bad study and results blown up to sound outrageous. The article reads like a bunch of observations about overlapping groups

    TFA:

    The poll by UK charity Developing Patient Partnerships showed more than a third of men and a quarter of women have a drink to cope with stress. Of the 1,000 people polled, 27% of men and 23% of women said they would light up a cigarette in such situations.

    Was it really Windoze crapping out on them? It's hard to tell but the indicators are there. We only know what they told the poll and what a third of respondents told the poll was that their crashing computer was their problem. That was more than being fired, because most people are not fired. Other things, like the death of a loved one or crime did not make the list though they might create much greater problems for individuals because those things are rare. IT was more bothersome than listed commuting, though everyone has to commute and it's not fun. Notice that working longer hours, and greater demands from work did not make the top three though most people are doing that. There have been other studies that show that people would rather have their teeth pulled or pay Federal Taxes than fix their broken computer. As Bill Gates is who most people talk to when they turn on their computer at work, we can confidently say that Windoze is a great creator of stress. Bill should be ashamed to have made the top ten because he's nudged aside other common things like co-worker interaction, workplace noise and lack of privacy in the workplace and all the usual things that drive people to self destructive behavior like smoking and drinking.

    The root cause of Windoze's power to annoy is that it's linked to number 2 and the user is helpless in a non free environment. If your computer craps out, you might just find yourself looking for another job and there is NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT. The computer spys on them and it does not work right and it can hurt them but they have to sit still and take it. Worse, the Wintel press always blames the user. Is there anything else more humiliating than being blamed for things you hate but not being able to do anything about it? The rest is speculation, but humiliated people have a tendency to engage in destructive behavior.

    Are more people drinking and smoking? Women are, especially working women who have to use computers all day. Smoking is also one of the few work sanctioned ways to get away from the computer.

    Is it killing people? Yes, smoking is the leading cause of preventable death in the world. As more women smoke, their rates of lung and other cancer is catching up with men.

    Is it all Bill's fault? No, but his help is something most can do without. His "sharp business practice" attitude has been an inspiration to assholes everywhere and his software is responsible for the answers to the above poll. I wonder how much of the "improved efficiency" of IT is due to outsoutsourcing, H1Bs and fewer people forced to do more work, which is more a function of tax structure than anything else. There's real efficiency in electronic records, but there's more with software that does not suck.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  43. Re:Not really. This is what happened to me on tues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ROFL. The parent is an excellent demonstration of the kind of **stress** that can result from posting to Slashdot whilst logged in.

    Textbook. Another life destroyed. ;-)

  44. we all know that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    throwing chairs is way to relieve computer stress

  45. 1337 5pee|? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't need a comma in the word 1337, and, quite honestly, I have no idea what 1338 is supposed to mean.

    Seriously, does anyone here know what a 'leeb' is?

    LTFL, n00b. ;)

  46. I have a severe case of WPTSD by trinomial · · Score: 1

    Windows Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Tried meds, but no luck. Tried drinking more, but that only caused other problems. So haven't found the answer to my problem, although I can be relatively symptom-free if I stay on OSX or linux.

  47. It's turned out nice again: the tune to sing it to by NZheretic · · Score: 1
  48. Perhaps reverse is true also by dbcad7 · · Score: 1
    In my drinking days, I often went to work with a hangover, and spent way too much money at the bar. To work with a hangover is stressful, and to juggle the finances and get your bills paid is also stressful. Maybe it could also be concluded that drinking causes stress
    As they say, drinking doesn't solve any problems. You still have the problems, plus the drinking.

    I do get your point about the survey though,

    --
    waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
  49. Depends on what you're smoking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The DPP is urging people not to look to smoking, eating junk food and drinking alcohol, as these activities do not help stress levels.

    I wonder though, if the substance being smoked is marijuana (rather than tobacco), how that statement would look (assuming compulsory honesty). Somewhat related, there was some recent study (just one! oh noes! no link! must be bogus!) linking moderate-to-high marijuana use to decreased incidence of depression (and decreased incidence of posting links to studies). Taking a puff certainly seems to ease the stress of posting anonymously (obligatory parenthetical) (here's another).

  50. Re:Shouldn't that read M$ by Kludge · · Score: 1

    The things that stress average people out are not platform specific.

    I have to disagree. The article specifically said "crashing computer". That is an MS specific feature. Other OSes don't do that nearly as often, which is one more reason I don't use MS products.

  51. Not a fair test by syousef · · Score: 1

    A challenge for you: Put your wife in front of your precious Unix/Linux boxen. Put the equvialent applications on those boxes and let her run loose with them. Give her the same connectivity. Oh and don't forget she gets to be admin too. Lets see how stable they are in a month.

    See that's the problem. Narrow minded people like you that have managed to get a box stable for their own needs and automatically assume that if everyone else can't do the same for their purposes it must be because they've chosen an inferior OS.

    If Linux were so stable as you describe AND did everything people wanted to do with windows (WITHOUT requiring a computer science degree to administer), just how long do you think it'd be considered a geek's OS? People aren't using Windows because they're all morons. They're using Windows because despite its flaws it does what they require more than other operating systems. That doesn't mean I love the damn system but I'd sooner ask a non-computer person to hang off a cliff by a piece of sewing thread than suggest they switch to Linux to resolve all their problems.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  52. Re:X-Bender: What I don't do is none of your busin by absinthminded64 · · Score: 1

    Even Bender found a way to 'releive his stress'

    Bender. .. Are you jacking on in there?!

  53. Re:Shouldn't that read M$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually the term used in the poll said "IT-related problems". The article then extrapolated that to mean crashing computers.

  54. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Troll

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  55. Lack of education is the real stressor by caller9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would say that the people I support get stressed by their lack of understanding of typical software flow. Want to change a default behavior 90% of the time thats in Tools->Options. Though recent trends are leaning into Edit->Preferences. Hell just mouseover all the things at the top and look for something that says Options or Preferences under it. Just as long as (true story) they dont set both the font and background colors to white and masterfully save this as normal.dot How they figured out this feat of ingorance is beyond me. First, that is STUPID. Second, how the hell with that level of brain seepage did they manage to replace their normal.dot? Its almost like they knew what they were doing and just wanted some attention from someone...anyone...IT will do.

    There's something to be said about MS lock-in due to vendor lock-in and the vendors are writing their apps...or I should say bought the company that wrote their apps.. and adding features that break 10 others. I shit you not, the latest version of one application we must use and pay gobs of cash / year for runs on a 16 bit subsystem and is a VB App as far as I can tell. It meshes a combination of Access 97 databases and a homebrew TCP widget that's about 5% reliable with a butt ugly UI. If the access databases haven't soiled themselves due to a lockup of the VB...likely related to an indefinate wait on the TCP widget...then the GD license file LIKE ANYONE WOULD STEAL THIS SHIT is corrupted and their data goes to who knows where without the slightest notice to users or admins. Atomicity for these guys has something to do with Hiroshima as far as they know. Something else thats cute? That server has reissued over 50 times the number of seats we have, not because we're thieves, because it doesn't even keep track and every crash and burn requires a reinstall. THAT CAUSES STRESS.

    So don't shove this off on Windows, sure it's not the best OS, but without all of the applications and hack drivers it's really a good OS. I bet the above poster's wife forgot to mention the sudden boot of the system roughly coincided with her trying to print it on that brand new laser printer she plugged into the UPS.

  56. Brings back memories.. by everphilski · · Score: 1

    I threw out my BP6 yesterday. Wife and i live in a 1 bedroom apartment and we were running out of space. I have such fond memories of that thing.

  57. Applications crash. OS's crash. Even Linux by everphilski · · Score: 1

    I have 2 identical boxes at work. Very nice boxes. One runs FC4, the other runs XP. I have to generate some documents on the FC4 box and then move them to the XP box. Please tell me, why has OO.org crashed 4 times in the past 4 months? And why hasn't Office 2003 ... ever crashed? I'm performing the same operations. If anything I perform the more intensive operations on the XP box.

    My coworker has 1 box - FC4. For awhile it refused to boot - he'd have to restart it several times, it would hang up on mounting the file system - the FILE SYSTEM. But kick it and reboot a few times and it would work.

    I repeat, my windows box works fine.

    I submit to you, two factors.

    The first is the user. A compotent user will have a better experiance in any environment. Your wife was an idiot. If you can lose "a couple hours of work" by not going to File->save every once in awhile, well, you kind of get what is coming to you. Sorry.

    The second is the software and operating system. Particularly the configurations, although some software is doomed from the beginning. Doesnt matter if it is Windows or Linux. It will f*ck up. I've seen both. Again, I've had more problems with OO.org than Office 2k3. And my coworkers FC4 wouldn't boot on the first 3-7 tries (reformat solved it. Couldn't pin the problem). And I've seen NT4 machines with damn near 2 year uptimes. Windows doesn't crash. Stupid users and poorly written software does. There are enough cases of windows servers lasting godawful long times (And don't tell me I should be patching - back in the NT days we didn't, there were only 6.5 major service packs, and nowadays you don't need every little patch anyways if you have a good firewall) and I've seen Linux boxes that can't stay afloat. IF you set it up right it will last. So it all comes back to the user. If your dumb, well you get whats coming to you.

    Sorry if its a rant. I use Windows and Linux. Right tool for the right job. My windows box works just as well as my Linux box. Guess I'm just better than you at setting it up and keeping it running. I have no other explanation. Stupid users, stupid problems.

  58. In related news... by geobeck · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...Captain Obvious has been named President of the BBC.

    --
    Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
  59. YEAH! by AlienGoods · · Score: 1

    That's why I drink and smoke. Computers! When do I get to sue Microsoft and use the money for stress-relieving hookers?!

    --
    Lighten up. Its only a post.
    1. Re:YEAH! by rob101 · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, of the 500+ people that started the programming stream I was in at uni, i believe that at the end of it a good 1/3rd (ball park guesstimate) started smoking by the end of 3rd year.

      I know I kept the coke vendor rich buying caffine and going on sugar trips.

      Not sure about the increase in alcohol comsumption, bar night was never for me.

  60. I frag stress by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

    Computers also give you FPS games to frag your worries away...

    1. Re:I frag stress by alan.briolat · · Score: 1

      Actually, its funny you mention that - its one of the more common defenses I give when someone mentions violent games. Its an excellent way to remove stress/anger/frustration/homocidal tendancies, without having a potentially damaging verbal and/or physical explosion at someone you live or work with.

      Violent video games don't kill people - people dropped on their head at birth and given access to firearms kill people!

      --
      I swear we should be allowed to give mod points to sigs... "-1, Offtopic"
  61. Re: Anything but that! by Psykechan · · Score: 1

    ...and a USB lighter next to the cigarette dispenser.

    What next? A USB space heater? USB was not designed to power your little trinkets especially not one that's primary purpose is to convert power straight to heat. This will just drive you to more drinking and smoking after your USB port melts down.

  62. Add murder to M$ rap sheet by bhav2007 · · Score: 1

    So not only is Microsoft monopolizing the software market, costing millions in virus damage through lousy security, and destroying competitors with the crushing power of the dark side of the force, but they are also killing the American workforce.

    Thus undermining capitalism.
    Thus causing recession.
    Thus starving the orphans of the office workers they killed.

  63. Re:You're darn right it's not a fair test by Psykechan · · Score: 1

    Oh and don't forget she gets to be admin too.

    What? Make her run Linspire? /sarcasm

    Why the heck would you grant administrator rights to a person that doesn't know how to admin the machine? I allow all of my friends to ride in my car but only people that can drive are allowed to operate it.

    If I configure a Windows system for someone I don't make them an admin unless they can actually handle the responsibility. Sadly, it doesn't stop all of the malware that can take down the whole system, not just things that the user has access to.

    This is why I recommend people go with MacOS or Linux or BSD. Yes, you can't run everything on other platforms but when the user just wants to browse the web, check email, and play movies/music, Windows is definately not the best choice.

  64. Why we need reform by Jaxoreth · · Score: 1
    I learnt infinite patents when all our family had as a computer wasa 10 yr old Pentium 2 running XP.

    So it's not just big companies. Everybody abuses the patent system.

    --
    In general, it is safe and legal to kill your children. -- POSIX Programmer's Guide
  65. IT workers don't care. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you very much.

  66. See... by TechnoGuyRob · · Score: 1

    There you have it. You killed my mother, Bill Gates.

  67. IT + Smoking = Sore Throat by protocoldroid · · Score: 0

    Umm.... the forgot to ask those smokers what other computer issues make them light up a butt. Being an IT smoker let me start to list them...

    while (true) {
    print "users";
    }

  68. An Analogy by 3seas · · Score: 1

    High Frutose Corn Syrup is very bad for you as it adds as much as 1/3 to your triglicerides --- causing you to gain alot of weight. Its in alot of junk food, soft drinks, etc...

    Remove it from your diet and you will be healthier.

    This computer stress thing... its alot teh same....

    Simply remove Microsoft from your computer diet and your stress level will decrease.

    Its the MS user frustration function. Its pervasive...junk food...

    1. Re:An Analogy by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

      It also makes you a nicer person. Since cutting out HFCS, I am not a bitch... most of the time. PMS excepted. :P:P:P It's also caused me to drop 2 pants sizes and 10 pounds. Go figure! :D The only problem is... wtf do I mix my alcohol with now? So I found Wild Oats natural soda, and only get it for boozing. It's made with natural cane sugar, instead. It's quite good too. :D

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
  69. Switching by nsayer · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Give this one a try.

    And you thought YOU were going to get moderated troll...

    1. Re:Switching by alan.briolat · · Score: 1

      Flamebait, troll... who gives a f**k today? There are plenty of almost-identical posts on this thread where one is modded troll and the other insightful.

      Anyone for a case of MUI (Modding Under Influence)? I guess they will just blame it on the most recent Windows crash, or some Windows user from Marketing complaining that Spider Solitare "Won't Work (tm)".

      --
      I swear we should be allowed to give mod points to sigs... "-1, Offtopic"
  70. Well by christoofar · · Score: 1

    At least you can go to a porn site when the computer comes back up and masturbate. That relieves stress.

    1. Re:Well by alan.briolat · · Score: 1

      As long as you have a decent pop-up blocker, not to mention a browser that DOESN'T install every little thing the website wants it to (IE 5.5 anyone?). Otherwise its another trip to the land of "Out of memory" as all that malware eats your soul!

      --
      I swear we should be allowed to give mod points to sigs... "-1, Offtopic"
  71. Re:Blame France by drakewyrm · · Score: 2, Informative
    That reminds me of the bug windows 95 had where it you left it running for 40 days it would crash. it only took them 6 years to reproduce the bug so they could fix it.

    I remember that. Or, more accurately, I remember reading about that. I never managed to keep a Windows 9x machine alive for the requisite span of time.

    there is Nothing (other than having massive redundent arrays of capacitors) that can be done about under voltaging, and even then it's just a matter of time before the undervolateges cause the capacitors to all blow...

    That's not entirely true. A well-designed power supply which provides a maximum of 12 volts DC can work with an input of just a bit more than than 12 volts RMS. A power supply could actually be designed with step-up capability such that, so long as the source will provide adequate current, the required ouput voltage can be maintained with any input voltage.

    This is a bit beside the point, however, as power supplies for computers are not designed with such silliness in mind. Enter the line conditioner. This handy (albeit usually expensive) device will provide a stable AC output voltage for a wide range of input voltages, and also acts as the mother of all surge suppressors. You plug it into the wall and plug your equipment into the line conditioner. I have one inline with my UPS. When power drops out altogether, my UPS covers me. When the voltage drops far too low to safely run my equipment, my conditioner protects me. The better UPSes actually have integrated line conditioning, so read the specs before dismissing that horribly expensive UPS. Me? I'm a cheap bastid, so my setup is a bit goofy.

    PC power and cooling is selling a PSU that can draw 38 amps from Each 12 volt rail. Dude, my OVEN only operates on 60 amps.

    Not all amps are created equal. Your 60 amp oven is drawing 14.4 kilowatts of power (Electric ovens operate on 240 volts RMS here in USAnia, times the stated 60 amps, times an assumed power factor of 1 since ovens are a resistive load). The two twelve volt, 38 amp power rails combined can supply 912 watts of power to a load. On the source side, that ammounts to only 7 amps of current (the 912 watts, divided by 120 volts RMS, divided by a power factor of 1 just to make the math easier). This is not nearly so significant.

    --
    Batou: Hey, Major... You ever hear of "human rights"? Major: I understand the concept, but I've never seen it in action
  72. That's ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's ironic... I've been weaning myself off nicotine addiction and alcoholism by becoming an internet addict.

  73. Someone messed up this dude's mac, I feel sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using a mac without any problems. Now using the outdated adobe premiere was another story. It did flake out and crash a lot. But as long as you hit the "save now" quick key combo about every 5 minutes the crash wasn't too disruptive. Final cut has never crashed on me, not once. Media 100 never crashed on me, nor has Avid.
    The video made me laugh. Dragging files from a cd to the desktop doesn't make an alias on my machine, it coppies the file over. Also inserting music cds won't auto play. I don't think I ever changed any settings, everything seems to just work. My powerbook has been running for 65 days now. I do shut it down from time to time.
    If this guy really has these problems, he needs to find a mac user to fix his machine. unfriendly behavior is unusual

  74. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  75. It is SOFTWARE, not 'computers' by StonePiano · · Score: 1
    Computers very rarely crash. SOFTWARE CRASHES.

    In the bad old days:
    • Open Office would crash regularly.
    • MS Word would occasionally crash.
    • Windows 98 enjoyed crashing
    • X running on linux crashed reluctantly

    Now:
    • Open Office almost never crashes
    • Word might crash, I neither know nor care
    • Windows seldom crashes
    • My Linux distro never crashes

    However, if your boss makes you run a crash-happy application don't blame your drinking on 'computers'. There is good software available. It is the decision making in software selection that is often at fault.
    1. Re:It is SOFTWARE, not 'computers' by bipolarpinguino · · Score: 1

      Windows seldom crashes Come again? My dell running XP (used just for games) blue screens faster than I can pop open a can...

    2. Re:It is SOFTWARE, not 'computers' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      check your USB ports... My PC did the same thing, and the fix was moving my gamepad from one USB port to another. Haven't crashed in months since...

  76. Public Health Warning by Obi-w00t · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Warning! Windows is dangerous to your health! It is extremely advisable to move away from the Windows box and switch to a Linux machine.

  77. I dont know what your taking about by jimmypw · · Score: 0

    I've seen people take a smoke break when their computer pops a window and they lose an hour or two of work

    You surely cant mean MS word users suffer this problem... We all use Autorecovery.

  78. They worked in IT... by Teun · · Score: 4, Funny
    The management of our US subsidiary decided to do a drugs test, everyone had to piss in a jar and as a result nearly the whole (7man) IT dept. was fired.

    The network hasn't been the same since.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    1. Re:They worked in IT... by LanMan04 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      [sarcasm]It's a good thing there's such a strong correlation between drug use and being a bad employee.[/sarcasm].

      Management needs to wake the fuck up, I know plenty of PhD's, lawyers, and all manner of highly intelligent people who use drugs on a regular basis, and are all fine, upstanding citizens who go to work on time every day and do a great job.

      If you want to see who is a problem employee based on non-work behavior, you're looking in the wrong place.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    2. Re:They worked in IT... by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      Increasingly, every year, it seems the world is run by tee-totallers.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
  79. Doesn't everyone? by HangingChad · · Score: 1
    ...and admins taking their break straight from the bottle.

    Almost sounds like he thinks that's a bad thing.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  80. Number One Tip For Avoiding Stress by TallMatthew · · Score: 1

    Clue up so you don't have to do enduser support.

  81. Re:The List of Stressors by 16384 · · Score: 1

    I found out that in such situations of having to explain repeatedly something is to have them write down the steps to achieve that task.

  82. Reminds me of a conversation I had by AppyPappy · · Score: 1

    VERY large corp in 1997. Manager comes in to my convertible office (cubicle), very pale and sweaty because a phone mail reporting system was out.
    ---------------------
    John's on vacation. Figure out what is wrong with this system. He usually works on it. Here's the documentation.

    What? That's not documentation. That's a Dbase II manual.

    Well, that's what it is written on.

    On a Windows 3.1 box I bet.

    Yeah. So. It works.

    DBase II disappeared a decade ago.

    We've never seen the need to upgrade. FIX IT.
    ----------------------

    You all guessed it. Rebooted and Bob's your uncle. Man, that John was a piece of work. That poor manager was stressed out of his mind thinking the world would discover he was nursing a dead legacy app. John could die in that job. I would have given my left nut to see that manager poring over that Dbase II manual thinking it was documentation for the system. 'Wow, this is impressive work but I can't find anything on the phone mail system'.

    --

    If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

  83. Re: Use DOS by Anna+Merikin · · Score: 1

    I do -- DOSEmu. WordPerfect-5.1, dragmax, pipemax (auto racing development programs), mercury (the old Borland graphical maths solver) and grammatik-2 run perfectly on it. I have used DOS since ver 3.1.

    No blue screen of death in DOS, that's true. Just don't use extended memory or you'll get instant death-crashes without the blue screen warning.

    I know you were trolling...you just didn't know you were half right, did you?

  84. Re: Use DOS by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

    "I know you were trolling...you just didn't know you were half right, did you?"

    Take it as you wish. I'm just being real. Windows has no magic "crash" API, there's always a rational reason for a problem - overheating, bad hardware, bad electricity, bad software, wrong configuration.. OR last: bug in the OS.

    You'll be surprised how stable Windows is if you handle it properly (first hand experience). But of course it's much easier to just say "Hey, Windows sucks that's why it crashes" and be done with it.

  85. stress? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stress producer, i thought it was supposed to be your plastic pal who's fun to be with.

  86. Re: Use DOS by Anna+Merikin · · Score: 1

    I am not a newbie. Windows' problems with respect to stability (I am speaking of 9x, the only versions I have used) are endemic, and IN THE OS. I have had a new installation of W98 go south in less than an hour with NO APPLICATIONS YET INSTALLED simply by playing a video through MPlayer.

    Once apps are installed and .dlls replaced, anything can (and will) happen.

    I am not going to buy Windows again. Ever.

    End of story.

    As for you, do what you like.

    NB: Do you realize you sound like a Microsoft shill?

  87. Re:Not really. This is what happened to me on tues by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1

    The best part is the associated URL, landoverbaptist.org.

    --
    Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
  88. Re: Use DOS by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1

    No. There is an inherent problem in the OS. Window's refusal to compartmentalize memory and Window's insistence on running everything in one big memory segment creates a greater likelihood a catastrophic crash than Unix/Linux systems.

    --
    Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
  89. Re:Not really. This is what happened to me on tues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think my church can deal with that. They didn't excommunicate me btw but I can recommend two people to be crucified to both sides of me. Would you like to come?

  90. Re: Use DOS by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

    "I am speaking of 9x, the only versions I have used"

    Oh ok, that's pretty different. Microsoft knew very well that 9x is problematic, which is why the goal was from the very start to transition to NT. 9x was just a short term strategy.

    9x was the best that could be done at the time (to ensure full compatibility with the plethora of DOS/Win3.11 apps that were present at the time). As you know, compatibility plays crucial role in the success of the Windows series.

  91. Re: Use DOS by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

    "No. There is an inherent problem in the OS. Window's refusal to compartmentalize memory and Window's insistence on running everything in one big memory segment creates a greater likelihood a catastrophic crash than Unix/Linux systems."

    You don't realize we're talking the same thing. The "one big memory segment" issue where one program could poke the memory of another program and crash it (including system critical drivers etc.), is present only in 9x series and it was part of ensuring DOS apps can run natively, since they don't understand 32-bit protected mode.

    This problem is non-existent in NT since it only emulates DOS mode instead of making it part of the core OS... NT works like Unix instead, where the address space of a program is local to the program (so even with the best of intentions, the program can't touch the memory outside its own space).

    And FYI Microsoft was fully aware, but it was apparent the casual users won't jump on an OS that doesn't run their Windows 3.11 apps (where Win 3.11 is really a graphic shell over DOS, W 3.11 has no its own API for file access for example and instead uses DOS's one).

    NT 3.51 and 4.0 was available at the time, so it's not like NT was invented post factum.

    You see, it's good to know things, but when you don't know the whole story it's easy to blame and come up with the wrong conclusions.

    Microsoft just did whatever was necessary to transition the users to the NT experience and keep its market share.

    BTW, if you had random crashing while playing MPlayer after fresh 9x install, it's most likely bad hardware. I remember at the time VIA was selling a bunch of terrible mobos, I had to return my VIA motherboard after repeated BSOD's on fresh Win98 and switched to Intel mobo and never had such serious issues on that PC since.

  92. Re:Blame France by kesuki · · Score: 1

    Well, it's true i wasn't taking converion into account for the stated amps etc, but then there is efficiency to calculate, and and the 5 v rail, so by the time you have it all figured out having the PC plugged into a 15 amp line, that also powers a monitor can cause a breaker to trip every time. even if no other devices are on the same line, and most houses are wired so that each room or worse each floor has a single breaker for outlets. add in a UPS to deal with undervoltages and brownouts and the amperage requirement goes up yet again... it's pretty easy with high end equipment to wind up with a setup that exceeds the 15-20 amps normal wiring uses.

    Anyways, i know how easy it is to trip breakers etc because i was on fuses, and replaced a 15 amp fuse with a 20 amp fuse to take care of problems i was having with power going out on me, and this was 4 years ago and i only had 4 computers (none of them high end) running. the high end has drastically increased power requirments because of dual graphic cards, dvd burners, affordable raid setups etc.

    still, bad power does cause a lot of stability issues with a lot of electrical devices, including computers.

  93. Re: Use DOS by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1

    OK> Your response in the last paragraph is basically "If you install fresh and have exactly the right hardware it is rock solid". Well, um, that isn't exactly a stable OS. I installed FreeBSD on flaky hardware, ancient hardware, everywhere, and I have left it running unpatched for a year or more, and it doesn't crash. A 2 month old install of XP, on the otherhand, crashes 1/day if I dare to use mozilla.
    To anticipate your response, yes, Mozilla is crashing it, but my argument is: The is no way Mozialla should be able to take out the entire OS/UI. THAT is a design flaw.

    --
    Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
  94. LSD? by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

    You must be talking about LSD?

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com