Slashdot Mirror


Smart Elevators Coming to Seattle

coaxial writes "Fujitec has unveiled a new elevator system for Seattle's Metropolitan Park West Tower. The new system uses touchpanels to group users by destination. Riders may wait slightly longer for the proper car, but the overall ride is shortened because the car stops less."

59 of 364 comments (clear)

  1. Sweet Zarquon by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know, down is nice...

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:Sweet Zarquon by gold23 · · Score: 5, Funny

      My sole reason for clicking on this article was to see how far down the page I would need to go to get to the HHGG Sirius Cybernetics Corp. reference.

      Thank you for not making me scroll at all.

      --
      Trust not a man who's rich in flax / His morals may be sadly lax
    2. Re:Sweet Zarquon by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Before opening a story, I sometimes bet myself how far down the obvious comment will appear. Within ten, three, etc top level comments. I didn't even bother this time! Still, where are these smart elevators coming from and if they're so smart, why are they in Seattle??

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  2. Real World may hold surprises by RobertB-DC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From TFA:
    "One lady walked up to the kiosk, and I told her to enter her floor number, and she said, 'That's ridiculous,' " said Tim Mooney, Fujitec's west regional vice president, who was in Seattle for the launch.

    The real-world functionality of this system should be an interesting battle between computer-simulated idealism and human greed. Ideally, everyone will be happy if their overall travel time decreases. But in reality, each one of the riders wants to have the fastest possible time all to himself, to heck with averages. The easiest way to game the system might be to simply enter your floor number over and over, to fool the computer into thinking there's an increased demand for that floor. Voila, private elevator!

    It's almost like a test case for the collapse of communism. If everyone simply gave according to their abilities and received according to their needs, everyone would get to work sooner. But as soon as one guy punches his floor a dozen times and gets his private car delivered, the whole darned thing breaks down.

    Or to put it another way, in Soviet Russia, Elevator calls YOU!

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Real World may hold surprises by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, it would work the same way as the elevators do now. The more you press the button, the faster it comes. :)

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:Real World may hold surprises by Otter · · Score: 4, Funny
      The easiest way to game the system might be to simply enter your floor number over and over, to fool the computer into thinking there's an increased demand for that floor.

      Heck, I do that now! The elevator definitely gets there faster!

    3. Re:Real World may hold surprises by yobjob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You actually bring up a good point - what's to stop a single user from registering 10 full lifts worth of demand for his own stop by repeatedly entering the destination floor at the kiosk? Maybe if sensors are installed in the doorway, it can estimate how many people leave the elevator at a floor, and compare that to the demand originally registered at the kiosk. The predictive logic software could then learn which floor has the highest number of selfish arseholes, and adjust their service accordingly :)

    4. Re:Real World may hold surprises by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I see people all the time who hit both the down and up buttons on an elevator, just to get the car to come faster.

      And what do these people do when they are trying to go down, but get into an up elevator and have to ride up 30 floors before it turns around?

      As a funny aside, if there were five people doing this on different floors in a row, and, say, one person going down five floors above them who doesn't do this, along with a person next to them going up, they'd all get on the up elevator, which would slowly collect them all and move upward. Meanwhile, the down elevator goes all the way up and collects people downward...except they already left on the up elevator by the time it gets there..

      I can't quite figure out the logic of getting on elevators going in the wrong direction:

      If you're the only person using the elevator at all, you can, indeed, direct it wherever you want, but if you're the only person using it, you might as well get it going in the right direction.

      If there is heavy use in direction you want, all the elevators will be going that way, and you should punch the correct way.

      If there is heavy use in the other direction, you certainly will get an elevator faster...and you certainly will have to go way out of your way, too.

      Have these people not realized that if you get into an up elevator, and punch a direction that is down, it will do the upward stuff first? I mean, it seems like it would be pretty obvious.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    5. Re:Real World may hold surprises by BinaryOpty · · Score: 2, Informative

      The system, at least from the blurb, seems to squeeze people into elevators by floors, so instead of stopping on every floor the way up you just stop on one or two. Since elevators have size and weight constraints, this means the elevator needs to know how many people want to go to a particular floor so it can fill the elevator properly. If it didn't have this data it would have to assume the amount of people, and assumption is not a good thing when it comes to elevators.

    6. Re:Real World may hold surprises by kiatoa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No where in the article did it say that the number of people headed to a particular floor was a factor. I suspect 10 pushes of the 10th floor button is equal to 1 push of the 10th floor button.

      --
      90% of the wealth is in 2% of the pockets. Bummer to be in the majority.
    7. Re:Real World may hold surprises by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Try holding the door-close button while pressing your floor.

      http://www.engadget.com/2005/08/02/elevator-hackin g/

      A friend of mine got a job with the elevator repair union (you have to know someone to get in) and he's confirmed this is true for some models.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    8. Re:Real World may hold surprises by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I do this.

      I've been in super-busy hotels during conventions and the best advice you can give anyone is to just get in the elevator if there's space.

      Doesn't matter if it's going up or down, just get in. It will get where you're going eventually.

      From my anecdotal experience, I'd be coming back past the floor I had been on and I'd see the same people I had left behind. Only now the elevator is full.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    9. Re:Real World may hold surprises by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pretend you're in a busy hotel, like during a convention.

      Imagine that you're staying on the 7th floor of a building with 30 floors.

      By the time the elevator gets down to your floor, it will almost always be full.

      I've been there and done that.

      My advice: Get on the elevator when you can. Even if it's going up, because it will save you time.

      Elevators fill up and you seem to have ignored that small point in your mildly insightful comment.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    10. Re:Real World may hold surprises by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny
      If you want ridiculous, try the double-decker elevators in tall buildings like the Scotia Bank Plaza in Toronto. It's a two-story elevator and you have get on at the right floor at the bottom depending on if you want an odd or even destination. (Not a problem if it's a daily routine, of course.) Coming down, there are frequent stop and waits while someone on the other floor of the elevator gets on/off.

      Maybe the elevator should have an elevator?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    11. Re:Real World may hold surprises by MindStalker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Note historical data could definatly come in play here, if its a known fact that around 9:30 every day a large group of people are heading from the lobby to the 5th floor prioriety could be given as its common. And of course, if some jerk every day comes in late at 9:30 and presses the button 10 times.. Oh hell with it, can't we just have the elevator operators of yor.

    12. Re:Real World may hold surprises by rjstanford · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ironically, I wonder if this would be the case if it wasn't for people like you cheating the system? It reminds me of one of my favorite lunch places. As they get close to their seeting capacity, people will start splitting up when they walk in, one person to hold a table and another person to wait in line and order food. This takes a non-existent problem (almost always there are enough tables for people-with-food to eat at) and turns it into a huge problem (now, instead of people-without-food standing in line, there are people-with-food standing waiting for a table). If it wasn't for the "optimization" there would be no problem, or a greatly reduced one.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    13. Re:Real World may hold surprises by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If there's there are no other destinations, and you pressed 'up' and got the elevator, you can use it to go down.

      Of course, in all likelyhood, you would have gotten the same elevator had you pressed down.

      Interestingly enough, this appeared to be the sole situtation where this logic makes sense. Let's say there are 15 floors, you are on five. You want down, as do people on floors 3, 6, 7, and 8. There two elevators (It doesn't work with one.), and one just dropped someone off in the lobby, and the other at 15.

      If you press down, the elevator at the top will go 8, 7, 6, 5, and 3. Or possibly the one in the lobby will grab 3 and 5.

      If you press up, or down and up, the elevator at the top will start grabbing people on the way down, and the elevator at the bottom will come up and get you. At which point you can rocket to the bottom. (Well, you'd grab the person at 3 also.)

      So, in theory that worked faster.

      In practice, however, if people do this, the person at 6 will also push up and down. Now the elevator comes and gets you, and then goes and gets the person at 6. Meanwhile, he's possibly gotten on the other elevator, or possibly not. Regardless, by the time the doors have closed on the 6, the other elevator has certainly passed you.

      Of course, you've managed to slow that other one down, because you pushed the button for 5, and it will stop there. Meanwhile, you'll probably end up getting 3, and you'll hit the bottom at the same time.

      If the person on 6 and 7 do it...

      Interestingly, looking at the logic, it's not just you you're slowing down. You're also slowing down the other elevators.

      Basically, you're screwing up the 'elevator movement reduction' where it's grabbing up people going in the same direction in the same car, and instead trying to get your own car, which does, indeed, work when there's a car to spare, and it doesn't hurt anything too bad. However, when there is not a car to spare, someone else will picked to be placed in your car, and you will go halfway around the world and slow everything around, and it's even more absurd when you realize others get queued in your car by doing the same thing. (In addition to people just legitimately trying to get somewhere.)

      Of course, this only works in elevator banks with at least two elevators. It never makes any sense with one, because the elevator will transverse exactly the same path...you just will get in it sooner, and it will stop back at your floor on the way down, wasting time. There is no 'movement reduction' logic in those things, they basically bounce back and forth between the currently highest and currently lowest requested floor.

      And people laughed when that guy made SimTower as an elevator simulator. I want an actual elevator simulator now, with programmable people, so I can actually watch all this.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  3. Felon Car coming right up! by 0110011001110101 · · Score: 4, Funny
    "The predictive logic in our software acts like neurons in our body, parking (the elevators) at certain floors, knowing where the demand might be at certain times."

    Hmmm, I smell an upgrade coming.. incorporate fingerprint scanning software into the touchpad.. and send an elevator car full of convicted felons crashing to the earth...

    *EXCELLENT*

    --
    Don't anthropomorphize computers: they hate that.
  4. Oh God... by john83 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Next, they'll give it a personality. A cheerful personality.

    At this rate, Douglas Adams will overtake Clarke as the SF writer who predicts the future.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Oh God... by Golias · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was in LA once.

      Heh. Don't feel bad. Many of us have been in LA "once."

      Few are foolish enough to be in LA twice, if it can at all be avoided.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:Oh God... by ch-chuck · · Score: 2, Informative

      Our local pharmacy chain changed their telephone ordering system - it used to just ask you to wait while it retrives your records. Now it asks you to wait, then goes "wocka wocka wocka wocka" instead of dead silence, I guess to let old ladies know something was happening. Frankly, I'd rather it said "Working" in a Star Trek computer voice then make a bunch of cliche' SciFi computer beeps. That should be an option when you open an account, select your automated telephone reordering system theme ;)

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  5. Finally! by scovetta · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's so good to be alive these days. The hours I spend each day riding up to the 9th floor of my building could be exchanged for time spent waiting on the ground floor with dozens of other (now happy) travelers.

    Thank you, Smart Elevator Company!

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
  6. Waiting by decipher_saint · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "Riders may wait slightly longer for the proper car"
    To me, once you're riding time appears to go by quickly, it's the waiting for the damn thing in the first place that's frustrating.

    Human nature I suppose.
    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
    1. Re:Waiting by Politburo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not true in taller buildings when you're going to/from the upper floors and you have to stop at every. damn. floor. on the way up/down.

  7. Hey, that's my idea! More things to consider... by dada21 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Way back in the day I used to do some IT work for a company that made elevator buttons for the big elevator companies. It was one of the oddest companies you had ever seen.

    I used to ask them why the basic "up/down" button was never replaced with a better control system -- you could request the floor you wanted to go to on the outside of the elevator instead of the inside. Sure it would cost more (needing buttons at every floor) but you could prioritize the elevator's path, saving money and time in the long run.

    They told me it would never happen -- elevators would always be as they were. I guess he was mostly right, since it is now 10 years later and we still have up/down buttons, long waits, and no real efficiency in destination planning. I actually used to consider about once a year writing a paper on sorting the elevator destinations real time based on where people were and where they would be heading.

    I'm surprised it finally happened.

    A few things I wish elevators had (some jokingly just out of frustration):

    1. On/off toggle. The idiot that hits the call button ten times would only toggle the button on and off 5 times. Let him wait, I hate the clicking sound.

    2. On/off toggle in the elevator. Have you had the kid hit 10 buttons? I have. Many times. Have you had some idiot hit a few buttons by accident? I get it every week. Not that I'm in a rush, but come on, think before you hit a button.

    3. Early elevator arrival notification. Tell me which elevator will be the one I'll be entering. I've been in some buildings where I'll miss 3 elevators because they don't notify you which one to wait by. Maybe they do this to prevent people from crowding the doors, but I'd rather people learn etiquette than have the crazy rushes you see in some Chicago lobbies.

    4. VIP floor access. Pay $1 and get to your floor immediately.

    5. BING muting. Have you been in these elevators that have to BING at every floor, even when you're going to the 33rd from the 1st? Yeesh, give me a mute button.

    6. Free spray deodarant in each elevator. Talk about needing to teach people etiquette.

  8. Oblig. Simpsons by truthsearch · · Score: 2, Funny

    Homer approaches an elevator somewhere in the plant and pushes the down button.

    Homer: Whew! I made it the whole day without seeing her again.
                    [The elevator arrives and Homer gets in. The door closes and he notices he's crammed in with Mindy]
                  Aah! I mean, hello!
    Mindy: [awkward] Heh...I guess we'll be going down together -- I mean, getting off togeth -- I mean --
    Homer: That's OK. I'll just push the button for the stimulator -- I mean, elevator.

  9. This is NOT New technology... by RedLeg · · Score: 4, Informative

    The elevators in the Marriott Marquis on Times Square work exactly like this, and they have been there for a while.

    --RED

    1. Re:This is NOT New technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm staying in the Marquee as I write this, and I can say this is the stupidest system for elevators I've ever seen.

      When it gets very busy, which is in theory when this system should be most effective, it breaks down completely. Here's what happens: All the people who are confused and tired of waiting for their elevator rush to any elevator that opens, not realizing it may not be going to their floor. Then the people who actually know how the system works can't get on their elevator, and have to rekey their floor and then be told to wait for a different elevator. And then the whole process repeats.

      It is somewhat hilarious to watch people get on the elevator, reach for the non-existent floor buttons inside the car, then look around confused as the doors close and they are whisked off to some random floor nowhere near their destination.

    2. Re:This is NOT New technology... by aralin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We had this at the university dormitory for the math and physics department for at least 20 years now. It's a 20 stories high building so it was necessary. The solution didn't require any special hardware though, just a bit of thinking. Half of the elevators had the buttons for the first 10 floors blocked. :)

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
  10. wait time by vortigern00 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, the wait time for an elevator will be shorter. However, because the user will not get to ride the first elevator whose door opens, the perceived wait time will be longer.

  11. best solution by minus_273 · · Score: 4, Funny

    i think the best solution to this problem would be to upgrade it to web 2.0 using AJAX and an RSS/Atom feed.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  12. heh by Moby+Cock · · Score: 4, Funny

    "One lady walked up to the kiosk, and I told her to enter her floor number, and she said, 'That's ridiculous,'

    Apparently my mother-in-law was in Seattle this week.

  13. Sounds like the Marriott in Times Square by everyplace · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the Times Square Marriott here in NYC, in the lobby each elevator has a keypad where you key in the floor you want to go to, and then it shows you on an LED display which elevator number you want to go to. It is actually kind-of confusing, because you type in one number and it gives you another, but after you clear that hurdle, it works great. You get in an elevator, it stops on your floor without further input, and continues to its next destination. I think about that elevator system a lot, despite only ever having used it twice.

  14. Re:Hey, that's my idea! More things to consider... by Politburo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    5. BING muting. Have you been in these elevators that have to BING at every floor, even when you're going to the 33rd from the 1st? Yeesh, give me a mute button.

    The dings aren't for you. Be glad that you can fucking see.

  15. Re:Hey, that's my idea! More things to consider... by generic-man · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think the BING sounds are for the benefit of blind riders, who can count the number of BINGs to determine which floor they're on. The same goes for the one-BING-for-up, two-BING-for-down tones that accompany each door opening.

    --
    For more information, click here.
  16. They had this back in 2001 by ndansmith · · Score: 4, Funny
    Open the elevator doors, HAL.

    I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.

  17. Oh, it's you again. by krunoce · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So this means you'll have to see the same people everyday in the elevator? That sucks. I enjoyed seeing the attractive women from the other floors every once in a while.

  18. Re:Hey, that's my idea! More things to consider... by MiKM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    7. A button to temporarily override that godawful buzzing sound if the door is left open too long.

  19. Social Psychology by tktk · · Score: 4, Interesting
    In one of my social psychology classes, my professor told us that had been called in as a consultant to the college's elevator system. The elevator system in one building was extremely slow and it would take too much work to replace it.

    Instead of messing with elevator, my prof used a bit of social psychology. He had mirrors installed next to the elevator on every floor. Apparently, the self-absorbed students and faculty looked at themselves in the mirrors while waiting for the elevator, and lost track of their waiting time. From what I remember, complaints about the slow elevators got reduced to about 1/2.

    1. Re:Social Psychology by shinghei · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Let me guess...those who stopped complaining must have been identified as being more "self-absorbed" than those who kept complaining.

    2. Re:Social Psychology by spoonyfork · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He had mirrors installed next to the elevator on every floor.

      I had an industrial organizational psychology course at university and our prof told us the same story. I was going to share it until I read yours. I somehow doubt we attended the same university much less had the same professor. Could this be a psych course urban legend?

      --
      Speak truth to power.
    3. Re:Social Psychology by jsac · · Score: 2, Funny

      The University of Arizona Mathematics department installed chalkboards near the elevators on each floor in the math building. They were a huge hit.

      --
      "The urge to fly from modern systems, instead of moving through them to even greater, fairer things is, I think, an indi
    4. Re:Social Psychology by kenj0418 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What you're describing sounds like one of the examples from "Are your Lights On: How to Figure Out What the Problem REALLY Is" by Donald Gause, a book about problem solving and solving the REAL problem -- not necessarily the problem reported. In the example the building management tries various solutions like this one to reduce complaints about the elevator. (Until someone from the elevator company eventually sees that the elevator was configured incorrectly and drastically reduces the wait time).

    5. Re:Social Psychology by Peldor · · Score: 4, Funny
      Instead of messing with elevator, my prof used a bit of social psychology. He had mirrors installed next to the elevator on every floor. Apparently, the self-absorbed students and faculty looked at themselves in the mirrors while waiting for the elevator, and lost track of their waiting time. From what I remember, complaints about the slow elevators got reduced to about 1/2.

      If he put the mirror on the floor, I bet no one would have complained about the elevator.

    6. Re:Social Psychology by kidgenius · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I heard the same story in my freshman engineering class some years ago. And our prof said that this situation occurred in a hotel.

  20. Re:Hey, that's my idea! More things to consider... by Politburo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How about just anouncing the floor number before the elevator stops?

    How about putting an overly complex electronics system into what is a simple mechanical device? The ding can be triggered by simple mechanical means. KISS. I'm sure you'd bitch a lot more when the elevator had to be taken out of service to troubleshoot the voice system.

  21. not everyone is so impressed... by bigbigbison · · Score: 2, Informative

    When they changed the elevators at the Marriott Marquis Times Square, not everyone was impressed.

    --
    http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
  22. Re:Hey, that's my idea! More things to consider... by dada21 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A voice system is complex? My neighbor had a Halloween pumpkin that said 50 different phrases in gorgeous clarity that he paid around $10 for at the drug store.

    Sorry, but I don't buy it. In fact, I bet in 10 years the bing WILL be gone. Voice response makes more sense than trying to count bings.

  23. Re:Hey, that's my idea! More things to consider... by Politburo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Also not to mention the matter of language. 33 isn't "Thirty-Three" in every language. But 33 dings is 33 in any language.

  24. Oblig. Family Guy by Radres · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Stewie: "Yes, we all love 'Mr. Plow'! Oh, you've got the song memorized, do you? SO DOES EVERYONE ELSE! That is exactly the kind of idiot you see at Taco Bell at 1 in the morning!"

    Seriously, just because there was a Simpsons about Homer riding in an elevator, does it necessitate quoting?

    1. Re:Oblig. Family Guy by HomerNet · · Score: 2, Funny

      Seriously, just because there was a Simpsons about Homer riding in an elevator, does it necessitate quoting?

      For heavens sake, YES! If we didn't, the universe would collapse!

      --
      I have no tag line
    2. Re:Oblig. Family Guy by shut_up_man · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wow, you just zinged Simpsons quoting by using a Family Guy quote. I don't know whether I should mod you up, down or sideways. Maybe +1 Reflexive?

  25. Re:Hey, that's my idea! More things to consider... by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative
    • On/off toggle in the elevator. It's a standard Otis option, but it's not ordered much.
    • Early elevator arrival notification. Tell me which elevator will be the one I'll be entering. It's common to have lobby level "This car up" signs, controlled by the dispatching system. But above the lobby level, it's rare.
    • VIP floor access That's more common than you might think. It's called a "priority hall call station" in the elevator industry, and is usually an RFID or swipe card reader.
  26. Re:Hey, that's my idea! More things to consider... by dada21 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm fucking sick of people who bitch about things that are put in place to help our disabled neighbors

    I sick of people like you who force people like me to do something against our will.

    First, my brother-in-law is fully disabled, and we will be taking care of him when my mother-in-law passes on.

    Second, my other brother-in-law had MS (and died recently) and he was wheelchair bound.

    I deal with disabled people in my family, and I have some friends who are disabled as well. They agree with me that the ADA laws are made in order to control businesses and take care of cronies (who own many companies that handle ADA compliance).

    My experience as a business owner:

    A bar I used to go to was upstairs. They had no elevator. The 2 wheelchair bound customers was always helped up the stairs by the bouncers, and they never had a complaint. The bar had $1 beers. When they had a small kitchen fire, they had to close down because the repairs couldn't be performed without updating the club to ADA compliance -- requiring $150,000 in upgrades. The building to this day is unused for this reason.

    My church received a $1 million donation of a building we needed to expand. The building was built in 1953, like an old fashioned church. It has great acoustics (I direct video and sound). We need to knock out a wall to handle the additional 100 people we're expecting to come. We can't. The previous church installed a $50,000 elevator, but the ADA compliance people say we need to put one in the front of the building (there isn't room). We can't expand.

    A neighbor of mine recently became disabled. He called a company to build a ramp so he can get up to his home. Because of government mandates of ADA compliance, the price of building ramps is over 3 times higher than it should be given the amount of work that is being performed. Companies know they can charge more because they are mandated to do work.

    The law doesn't help the disabled, it helps the enabled who happen to have on bigger disability: they're friends with those in office.

  27. Re:Hey, that's my idea! More things to consider... by dada21 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's simply false and doesn't even merit a response.

    Let's see how I can pwn this comment with a response of some articles covering how the disabled are hurt by the ADA laws and complaince regulations:

    If You Weren't Disabled Before the ADA, You Are Now by Greg Perry

    ADA Success? At What?

    What is disabled?

    These are my top 3 favorite articles (different authors, same website that keeps a good list of pro-liberty pieces). Read them and you'll see that the ADA is not helpful.

    By the way, I have disabled friends and family who all agree it is harder to get a job and costlier to be disabled now than 10 years ago. What is your basis to repudiate what they've told me? Are you disabled? Do you live with a disabled person? Do you employ disabled people? I have a full time IT tech that is deaf who has worked for me for 3 years, and I pay him double what he received at his previous job. I also have a blind sales person who travels for me (he's legally blid 20/400 in his best eye) internationally. I do think I have something to say over what you do, my "theory" is based on facts in dealing with the disabled. Your "theory" seems to be based on class warfare.

  28. Re:who's the stupid one by kpang · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's stupid in that it doesn't take into account user stupidity.

  29. Smart elevators not so smart by HooliganIntellectual · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This sounds like another high tech effort to solve a problem which really isn't a big problem. There are probably many large buildings where a system like this makes sense, but from personal experience I know that this tech sometimes causes more headaches than it solves.

    In the late 1990s, I worked at the AAAS building in Washington, DC. AAAS is the publisher of Science magazine, which most of you have heard about. The AAAS headquarters building is this sleek 12-story high tech edifice designed by famous architect I.M. Pei. It was built it the mid-90s and it features a smart elevator system which requires that people select their floor and then the elevator bunches people up for rides.

    The elevator system was pretty cool, but the "smart" system wasn't so smart. Over several years of operation it became obvious to the staff that the elevator system was contributing to a dysfunctional organizational culture. People in different departments on different weren't interacting in the same way they would if they had been randomly grouped together for "inefficient" elevator rides. There were two bunches of three floors which had an atrium with an open staircase, but the building also discouraged using the stairs between floors because of security reasons. We were always rescuing people who couldn't get out of the stairways.

    The joke became that the only time the staff in the association mingled was at Christmas parties and at the annual meeting. The smart elevator system actually worked against people in the organization getting to know each other through casual and chance elevator encounters. The "smart" elevator did a good job of putting co-workers together for rides to the same floor, but it also worked against social cohesion in the organization.

  30. Re:who's the stupid one by Baikala · · Score: 2, Informative

    This system works for an office building like the one I work in (we have it since last summer) where every body understand how it works and there are security people to explain the system to the ocational visitor. For a public access location like an hotel where 90% of the people is new every week it's a nigthmare.

    --
    16,777,216 comments ought to be enough for any forum!
  31. Re:Hey, that's my idea! More things to consider... by Godeke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But the point is that government should guide the majority, not inconvenience everybody.

    So you are part of the "majority wins, minorities eat it" crowd? I hate to break reality to you, but while you seem willing to help and employ people with disabilities, not everyone is so kind hearted. Such as the time I saw a blind man attempting to cross a street and got off course and just about killed when the light changed and instead of someone assisting the man, they just raced off the line taking the *cane* out of his hand when they clipped it. Or the many horn honking engine revving idiots when a wheelchair isn't getting out of the intersection in time... while pedestrians walk right by the struggling chair user.

    Inside buildings it isn't much better, with people stampede out of elevator shafts and showing *none* of the concern for the blind potential passenger. I say potential because after they stampede out, a stampede goes in, leaving the blind man in the dust.

    Perhaps these problems are unique to our snowbird + college student landscape here and you live somewhere that has fluffy bunnies and rainbows are forever in the sky. Or perhaps you simply choose to see your kindness as all encompassing. It isn't, and I get so infuriated with the way people treat others that it hurts. Yet... you suggest that the things that help the disabled be *self sufficient* (when clearly the people around them aren't interested in bearing the burden of even a second's courtesy) should not exist because "it inconveniences everyone".

    So, when you figure out how the heck to form a "better society", could you notify the rest of the world so they could suddenly take others into consideration instead of existing in their self absorbed world? In the meantime, could you *stop* attempting to pretend that a few bumps on a sign somehow injures you? The blind that *I* knew in the college environment were *very* dependent upon the accommodations that were made, and when they had to enter a legacy building without such accommodations they had great difficulty making it to classes: to the point where they would cancel the class and hope it would be rescheduled somewhere they could get. Because the classmates had better things to do than "walk the gimp" (actual quote) to class.
    --
    Sig under construction since 1998.