Slashdot Mirror


Getting Fingerprint Readers to Read Your Prints?

crypticgeek asks: "I recently obtained a new job, and I'm already at my wit's end. Many of the doors in our facility have finger print readers because they are high security areas. No matter how hard I've tried, I can't get the system to read my prints very well, since they aren't well 'defined'. This means I don't have access to the areas I need to. I have to have someone else let me in to secure areas. I've tried using lotion thinking they were too dry, but that didn't work. In fact, most of the time my hands are really sweaty. Someone suggested I use nail polish remover and that would 'raise' the print, however I'm skeptical. Has anyone else had problems with finger print devices, or know of some possible ways of getting a better read?"

88 comments

  1. In the old days by 2.7182 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The FBI has a special recommended way to clean hands before getting prints. You washed your hands in soap, then rinsed in alcohol, and then air dryed, no towel.

    1. Re:In the old days by Feminist-Mom · · Score: 0

      My Dad worked at the FBI in the 1960's and then they also experimented with the Gel stuff that is used by car mechanics to get grease off of their hands. It's pretty common but I forget the name - smells like kerosene.

    2. Re:In the old days by Monte · · Score: 1

      My Dad worked at the FBI in the 1960's and then they also experimented with the Gel stuff that is used by car mechanics to get grease off of their hands. It's pretty common but I forget the name - smells like kerosene.

      GoJo? DAP?

    3. Re:In the old days by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      Techniques to get a one-time dye transfers that can sit in a warehouse without degrading are probably different than techniques to get an electronic scanner to read your prints every day.

    4. Re:In the old days by macadamia_harold · · Score: 1

      I'll have to try this when I get home.

  2. Get some Play-Doh by Monte · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...and make a fake finger. I read here on /. that Play-Doh can fool a fingerpint scanner. Might be worth a try.

    1. Re:Get some Play-Doh by MagicDude · · Score: 1

      Then you lose said fake finger and somebody can sneak into the secure area. If they thought that a simple lock and key security mechanism was suitable, they would have done it. The fingerprint system probably isn't meant as an inconvenience to be circumvented, but to make sure that only the proper people can get in, and the key can't be accidentally lost or fall into the wrong hands, at least not without a great deal of trouble.

  3. Rub your fingers together by chewedtoothpick · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If I have problem with my fingerprint readers, I usually scrape two fingers together (one being the referance print) to try and bring up the print ridges much like you would to get the nap in your flooring carpet to fluff up... Usually works for me...

    --
    Erutangis ym si siht.
    1. Re:Rub your fingers together by MalaclypseTheYounger · · Score: 1

      You could also try programming in some other fingers? If they are having trouble reading your print to get in, they should also be having trouble reading your print to program the scanner. Does it retry more than twice when programming / reading your print the first time? Try another finger that doesn't retry as often when programming the scanner...

      --
      Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
    2. Re:Rub your fingers together by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      I recommend using the middle one, as a show of how stupid a fingerprinting policy is.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  4. Sensitivity Threshold by mgreider · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You might have already tried this, but what about increasing the sensitivity threshold on the fingerprint reader. I know our system has the ability to increase or decrease this threshold.

    --
    -- Best Greetings Cards Ever :: www.sm-mancards.com
  5. Don't these things... by Bin_jammin · · Score: 2, Funny

    work on a charge differential between the reader and the body? Perhaps your biological clock is running down, try plugging yourself into 110AC.

    1. Re:Don't these things... by heavy+snowfall · · Score: 1

      But be sure to commit the perfect crime, leaving no prints before you recharge you identifiability.

  6. Dude... by BigZaphod · · Score: 3, Funny

    You need to watch more James Bond movies.. Everyone knows you can get a little hand-held device which reads your finger prints and then electronically displays them on a little screen which all finger print readers can read. Just get yourself one of those, have it read your prints, and then carry it around with you in your pocket! As a bonus: when you're bored at work you can go around using a print dusting kit and grab the prints of everyone else in the office, too, and snoop around in high security areas that you don't normally have access to during the night. Duh!

    1. Re:Dude... by FidelCatsro · · Score: 2, Funny

      No no no, everyone knows the best way is to find a security guard with high clearance, Shoot him in the back of the head with a silenced pistol and either chop off his hand and use it on the pad or drag his corpse around

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    2. Re:Dude... by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      In the real world, it's easier to give a 6-pack to the cleaning crew. Cleaning people are usually outsourced these days, and usually get issued keys.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    3. Re:Dude... by clifyt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Cleaning people are usually outsourced these days, and usually get issued keys."

      You ain't kidding.

      I've done work for a company that had my office retrofitted with a new cardkey access and as official policy -- we needed a key'd entry as well to ensure that in power failures and otherwise police or maintence can get in. We had a key made for maintence that was supposed to under no circumstances be let out of the locked keybox and signed for when it was.

      Within a week -- every man, woman and child on the cleaning staff in my building was issued a key to my office so that they could get in. I've asked that the lock be changed and the security be reinstituted and was told that if we change the lock without giving it to the building supervisor -- they'd take a torch to it and cut it down.

      I offered to make available magnetic keys to a specific number of staff (with specific times they can get in) but their union won't allow that because I can then track the goings and coming of the employees and this is unacceptable.

      So yeah, you are exactly right -- give a 6 pack to the cleaning crew and you will get in.

    4. Re:Dude... by Harik · · Score: 1

      So, have they figured out who used the physical keys to unlock your office and steal your company laptop yet? No? Well, here's hoping they figure that one out eventually.

  7. Jelly Bears by johnjones · · Score: 3, Funny

    try sticking Jelly Bears over your thumb and placing over the reader

    works most of the time just dont look at who had access...

    regards

    John Jones

  8. Not your problem by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sit at your desk with no work to do, buddy. Just be sure to set something in motion to get someone else who's job it is to fix these sort of problems on it.

    Why should you trouble yourself if the company's assclown policies are preventing you from doing work?

  9. You need to use someone else's finger by badfish99 · · Score: 1

    Just make a fake finger using the fingerprint of one of your colleagues: instructions here.

  10. MOD PARENT UP by mkcmkc · · Score: 1, Informative

    Basically this is correct. This is not a problem that you can solve, and it's not something you should worry about, aside from notifying your superiors that it's a major problem for you.

    --
    "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Heh, I was being silly. Though I appreciate your support

      While at my place they're generally instantly forgiving if I'm loafing because someone else has locked the database or neglected to make a bugfix for a deadline, you'll still lose prestiege in the eyes of some bosses even if it's completely out of your hands. Regardless of even being aware that its not your fault, they'll still subconsciously be thinking "well, he is getting paid for nothing..."

      You also run the risk of the boss discovering he actually didn't need you in the first place. They might be doing fine even if you can't get access. So you gotta be proactive after a certain point. Start going over people's shoulders and sneaking access (like he said with getting a friend to let him in) to prove you're willing to break a few unimportant protocols to better the company.

    2. Re:MOD PARENT UP by HalWasRight · · Score: 1

      But seriously, if these people are paying you, but locking you out, should you really be asking slashdot about it? Don't you think your BOSS should be who you talk about it with?

      --
      "This mission is too important to allow you to jeopardize it." -- HAL
  11. Some folks are just SOL by Peterl · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sorry, but you might just be hosed. I work for a company that does biometrics, and a few people who work for us just don't have well-enough defined prints to make the sensors read reliably. Sometimes you can help that by pressing harder or lighter. Also, some readers can be adjusted for sensitivity. The problem with cranking the sensitivity up on a public reader is that can make it *less* reliable for people with normal prints.

    Are the sensors chip-based or optical? If they're chip-based, I've found that having clean fingers helps, but if I *just* washed and dried my hands, it's harder to get a good read than if I wait a minute for some sweat/oil to form on the skin again.

    1. Re:Some folks are just SOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably the best advice would be to try enrolling into the system again. No one seems to have suggested this but a poor enrolment will always cause lots of problems later on.

      Ask to see whether you can either re-enrol that finger or enrol a different finger. After that, it could be poor software that only takes one reading for enrolment.

  12. Suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Have you tried taking your gloves off?

  13. Use another finger by chenski · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why not "change your password" by using a different finger?

    1. Re:Use another finger by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, I'm thinking by this time he'll be using his middle finger! :-)

  14. Fake your own prints by nerd65536 · · Score: 2, Informative

    If your actual fingers don't work, then make your own out of play-dough or other materials. The success rates with spoofing systems may be better than with your real finger. Also consider that the problem is compounded by the fact that their original copy of your fingerprint may also be poorly defined.

    Are your other fingers equally poorly defined? Compare them to each other (and other people's as a control group) to see if one of your fingers works better (hopefully your middle finger for added irony). Then get the company to switch to your new finger.

  15. Whooa! by pmc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You have to have someone else let you into secure areas? This strikes me as very risky indeed - for your career that is. Among other things, the point of such systems is to audit who enters the areas, and you are circumventing it.

    Get them to fix the system so it lets you in - don't put yourself at risk by breaking the rules.

    1. Re:Whooa! by MrWa · · Score: 1

      Or use that as a reason to implement a better system - obviously the expense of setting up a fingerprint reader that does not work reliably was way too much if it is so easily circumvented. They might as well just put up a sign letting people know they are not allowed in without proper authorization...would probably work as well.

  16. Check your finger positioning by Baron_Yam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It appears the loops and whorls of my fingerprints are a little lower than average - so when I first tried to use a fingerprint reader I couldn't register with the system, nevermind authenticate with it later. Then, I finally loaded up an admin utility that showed the scanned image that the recognition engine was using - and I noticed the print didn't look complete.

    Solution: I put almost half of the required fingertip over the top of the imaging sensor, so the stupid little device gets the part of my print it really wants.

    Anyway, it might be worth a try to play around with finger positioning.

    1. Re:Check your finger positioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any link to said utility?

      I'd like to see this.

    2. Re:Check your finger positioning by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      It was part of the vendor's hardware solution. I suspect there should be a similar utility with almost any fingerprint reader... it's done as a 'gee-whiz' gimic with the cheaper consumer solutions.

  17. finger on a string by nomax · · Score: 5, Funny

    Easy - get yourself to some local med school and barter for a finger from some leftover dissection class (there's gotta be tons of extra fingers right?). Make sure it has a nice print. Anyway, retrain your work security system on the new finger, and pop that baby around your neck on a string. If the system has one of those annoying "it has to be warm" features just stick it in your mouth for a minute before use.

    1. Re:finger on a string by david.given · · Score: 1
      If the system has one of those annoying "it has to be warm" features just stick it in your mouth for a minute before use.

      Oh, please. Do you know how ridiculous it would be for an adult IT professional to go around sucking his thumb in public?

    2. Re:finger on a string by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Yea, he should wear it on a small clip on his belt. Then if it needs to be warm He could just tuck it into his zipper. That way he just has to unzip his pants and pull out the little stiff finger.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    3. Re:finger on a string by hab136 · · Score: 1

      Do you wear your pants backwards or something? Because the insertion point isn't near the zipper on most people..

    4. Re:finger on a string by papercut2a · · Score: 1

      But then he might be subjected to ridicule by any female coworkers who see this.

      Then again, maybe he already is, and a cadaver's "stiff little finger" would be an improvement for him....

    5. Re:finger on a string by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Eww, I didn't mean to stick it there, that would be gross.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  18. raise the ridges by B00yah · · Score: 2, Informative

    by soaking your finger in some water, then drying it off. They key is to do it long enough that the ridges rise, but stop before you've got raisin's for finger tips. annoying, but doing it first thing in the morning should leave them like that all day.

  19. Employer's problem by alyosha1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Surely this is your employer's problem, not yours, given that they're the ones who've implemented a faulty security system? As it's impeding your ability to do your job, it's costing them money and so is in their best interests to fix.

    1. Re:Employer's problem by hab136 · · Score: 1

      It is. However, the employer will most likely find it easier to replace the employee than fix the security system.

    2. Re:Employer's problem by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      That's a rediculous assumption. Most business organizations aren't evil. Most companies actually value their employees. Not only that, but if this guy is having the problem, there are probably others having it too. Short of a drop of blood, nobody has come up with a biometric system that is actually completely reliable yet, or even close to it depending on what you consider 'close'.

    3. Re:Employer's problem by hab136 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most aren't intentionally evil, agreed. If he works in a 15-man shop, he is indeed very valuable.

      If he works in a 80,000 person organization like I do, he will be fired for failing to comply with the security policy - regardless of whether he is able to comply.

      Just ask Chuck Strickler, a welder with no remaining fingerprints.

      http://www.whistlestopper.com/forum/archive/index. php/t-2731

    4. Re:Employer's problem by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Informative

      And it never occurred to him to invoke the ADA?

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    5. Re:Employer's problem by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > However, the employer will most likely find it easier to replace
      > the employee than fix the security system.

      Not if he invokes the ADA. He is obviously disabled, and they must accomodate him.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    6. Re:Employer's problem by hab136 · · Score: 1

      I'd question whether "ill-defined fingerprints" is a disability, as would the courts.

      Besides..

      http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/q%26aeng02.htm

      "In addition, an employer is not required to make an accommodation if it would impose an "undue hardship" on the operation of the employer's business."

      Such as compromising security, having to redo their entire security system, etc.

      "Q. Can an employer consider health and safety when deciding whether to hire an applicant or retain an employee with a disability?

      A. Yes. The ADA permits employers to establish qualification standards that will exclude individuals who pose a direct threat -- i.e., a significant risk of substantial harm -- to the health or safety of the individual or of others, if that risk cannot be eliminated or reduced below the level of a oedirect threatî by reasonable accommodation."

  20. Safecrackers by rot26 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This isn't an instant solution but it will probably work in the near-term. Try sanding down the pads of your finger(s). The skin will grow back thicker, i.e. it will callous, and your prints will be more distinct. I play guitar and the pads of my left fingers are about 1/16" thick. Last time I was fingerprinted (for a concealed weapon permit, if you're curious) the cop who did it told me I had the best prints he had seen in a long time.

    --



    To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target
    1. Re:Safecrackers by fbjon · · Score: 1

      I assume you will be concealing the weapon in your guitar case then?

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    2. Re:Safecrackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep it in my hat.

    3. Re:Safecrackers by ebbe11 · · Score: 1
      First...

      (for a concealed weapon permit, if you're curious)

      ...and then...

      To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target

      No further comments...

      --

      My opinion? See above.
  21. One piece of advice... by general_re · · Score: 2, Informative

    No idea what you should do, but soaking your fingers in nail polish remover (acetone) or some such is not an especially good idea - it gets absorbed through your skin and into your bloodstream, where it's awfully hard on your liver.

    --
    ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
  22. ridgebuilder solution by spineboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    There's something called Ridgebuilder - it's designed to temporarily enhance fingerprnts. I'm a surgeon and typically 'cause we scrub our hands so much we have ill-defined fingerprints. Part of being medically licensed, requires us to be fingerprinted, and many of us have difficulty with this part due to the polished nature of our hands. Ridgebuulder is one of the products recommended to help us become successfully printed.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  23. Fake finger by metamatic · · Score: 1

    I'd be very tempted to make a fake finger that the system would accept, carry it around for a while... then demonstrate to management that the stupid biometric system will read a fake finger, but not a real one.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    1. Re:Fake finger by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      A good way to get fired and perhaps arrested as well.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:Fake finger by paultwang · · Score: 1
      A good way to get fired and perhaps arrested as well.

      Get arrested for gaining access to what you are already authorized?

    3. Re:Fake finger by Frodrick · · Score: 1
      "A good way to get fired and perhaps arrested as well."

      "Get arrested for gaining access to what you are already authorized?

      Absolutely. And although the official reason would be "spoofing the security system" and the arrest would be for "possession and use of illegal access devices" the real reason would be what it always is: making your bosses look like idiots.

  24. Have you considered the possibility... by JumperCable · · Score: 1

    ...that you aren't human?

    Robot, Alien, Alien-hybrid, clone, some poor shmuck who has replaced the real you with implanted memories waiting for the trigger to set you off.

  25. Re:ridgebuilder solution by Otter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It's one thing to use something like that once a year, but the submitter is talking about daily use. (Or at least enough use to allow daily scanning.) His idea of nail polish remover (i.e. acetone) strikes me as potentially destructive to skin as a long-term solution, and your suggestion (which turns up nothing in Google so I don't know what it is) doesn't sound much healthier.

    I agree with the people who say this is his bosses' problem, not his...

  26. Consider yourself lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now go rob some banks, steal a car, or something.

  27. Wrong finger ? by TheMegalomaniac · · Score: 0

    Did you try giving the instrument the middle finger ... instead of the thumb or index fingers?

  28. Try breathing on the glassy thingy by TheLink · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You might be able to enter as the previous person ;).

    On many fingerprint readers there's usually this glass thingy where you put your finger. Usually the oils from the previous print will be left on the glass, by breathing on it, you can often fog up the glass to create an image which can be read by the reader.

    With most biometric systems you need a human or something monitoring that no funny business like this is happening.

    Anyway, you should just make a distinctive mold, register it and put it on your keychain.

    --
  29. DO NOT USE ALCOHOL UNTIL YOU ARE SURE by snooo53 · · Score: 3, Informative

    A big warning about the previous post.. many fingerprint scanners and touchscreens are actually damaged by alcohol, especially older ones. So unless you want to ruin it for everyone, make darn sure with the manufacturer that it won't cause damage.

    There is a lot of bad advice in the thread. Some things I have found that really work
    1. The number 1 cause of bad prints is dryness. Make sure your finger is moist. You can do this with lotion or simply rubbing your fingers together
    2. Press firmly but don't mash your finger into it.
    3. If it doesn't work after a second or two, lift it up and try it again.
    4. Make sure you are covering the scanner completely. Don't just scan the tip of your finger. The more area you can cover it with the better.
    5. If it still doesn't work, try scooting your finger higher up on the scanner to get the better prints towards the bottom of your pads.
    6. Most setups have the option of registering a different finger. Try your middle finger or your thumb instead.
    7. If a lot of people are having trouble, they probably have the match settings too high or the scanner is defective. But more than likely, it is probably you.

    --
    The sending of this message pretty much inconveniences everyone involved.
    1. Re:DO NOT USE ALCOHOL UNTIL YOU ARE SURE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      many fingerprint scanners and touchscreens are actually damaged by alcohol, especially older ones.

      source?

    2. Re:DO NOT USE ALCOHOL UNTIL YOU ARE SURE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second #4 & #5. I'm currently working on a development project and I have a scanner here. It looks at the subcutaneous print, so surface dryness or even scum on the reader really shouldn't matter. However, whatever technique it uses can't read the print if there's not enough finger behind it.

      If you use the tip of the finger it doesn't register well, but if you use the part immediately across from the cuticle it seems to be happier.

    3. Re:DO NOT USE ALCOHOL UNTIL YOU ARE SURE by Wolfger · · Score: 4, Insightful
      many fingerprint scanners and touchscreens are actually damaged by alcohol, especially older ones. So unless you want to ruin it for everyone...
      Ruining it for everyone doesn't sound like a half-bad idea, actually. I mean, how much security can there be if people who can access these areas are letting you in because you can't? Maybe if the readers are an abysmal failure, they will be replaced with something more sensible.
  30. Fingerprint readers by TREETOP · · Score: 0, Funny

    (1) Go to Wendy's, buy a large cup of chili..... (2) never mind.

  31. Yup... by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My wife essentially has no fingerprints due to having had some severe eczema in the past. Her fingertips are fairly smooth with the occational crack or line, but those move week to week. At her last job they had fingerprint locks to keep the animal rights protesters out (when you make new drugs the FDA makes you test on animals... No way around it, but try telling that to the protesters.) and they never worked for her. When she got to work she had to call security to let her in and do an ID check every single day.

    Fingerprint locks should be used as a highish security convienience. There should always be a backup system too. Even if that backup system is a big thug checking photo IDs.

    1. Re:Yup... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      fingerprint locks are stupid. they are nothing more than an unchangable password that you leave on everything you touch.

      a smart card with a PIN key is more secure and easier to use.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:Yup... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      fingerprint locks are stupid. they are nothing more than an unchangable password that you leave on everything you touch.

      Like I said, they're nothing more than a convienience. Any implementation that doesn't have a PIN along with the fingerprint is completely broken anyway. You should never have a system where just the fingerprint gives you access.

    3. Re:Yup... by dhasenan · · Score: 1

      Why didn't she try the back of her finger? Or did that also have changing markings?

  32. In the old days-Carbon Black. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe he's refering to GOP. A chemical based cleaner, as opposed to an abrasive one (pumice).

    There's one thing he could try. Take powdered carbon black (lock lubricant) and rub a little on the finger used.

  33. Easy Way by Shadow_139 · · Score: 1

    Find somebod y inthe office with full access that nobody likes and get them drunk and just cut off there finger with a big ass knife...,

    Just made sure to cut it at the Proximal Phalanx (see pic) under the nuckle (see pic) for easy drilling of bone to attach onto keyring.....

    Or send it to me and I'll make it up for you for a small fee

  34. Fingerprint locks don't work anyway by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Informative
    Fingerprint scanner locks are totally bogus security anyway. Employers that use them are just stupid technology suckers.

    That said, here's some documentation for that claim, some of which include suggestions for how to easily bypass such systems, perhaps one of them will work for you, although I don't recommend the first one:

    Malaysia car thieves steal finger

    DHS and UK ID card biometric vendor in false ID lawsuit

    Unsupervised biometric scanners more toys than serious security

    Impact of Artificial Gummy Fingers on Fingerprint Systems

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  35. Cold dry hands by InternetVoting · · Score: 1

    You said "my hands are really sweaty." If you often have sweaty hands, this may also indicate that your hands and specifically your fingers are to some degree swollen. In my experience, I've found running your hands under cold water can be a solution to finger print scanner.

  36. This is a problem. Here are some ideas. by swillden · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been doing biometrics related stuff for the last several years, and I can tell you that there are a *lot* of people who don't have easily-scannable fingerprints. Many people who do a lot of work with their hands basically keep their fingertips polished smooth. One colleague of mine has a grandmother who quilts a lot and the constant rubbing of fingertips against cloth erases her ridges. A national ID project in Nicaragua (IIRC) ran into lots of trouble because most of the women cook tortillas and frequently grab the hot tortillas with their fingers to flip and remove them, burning their fingerprints off in the process. People who do hard labor often have thick, cracking callouses which cause problems.

    It also appears to be a bigger problem for women than for men, women seem to have naturally fainter ridges than men, and asians seem to have fainter ridges that other races. I've met lots of asian women who have basically no ridges at all.

    Other people have a different problem. Most fingerprint recognition algorithms want to look at some nice whorl patterns, which is where the most identifiable splits and changes in the ridges are found, but this "central" portion is not very centered on some peoples' fingers. For some, it's closer to the fingertip or closer to the knuckle, and I even met one man who got the best readings by tilting his finger about 30 degrees to one side.

    Finally lots of people have problems using fingerprint scanners because they don't know how to use them. "What's to know?" you might think. Actually, you do have to learn how to position your finger on the sensor, and how much pressure to apply. Bad positioning, or too much or too little force, will give you poor scans.

    So, to find a solution (other than getting your employer to fix or get rid of the scanners), I suggest you firse see if you can figure out what the problem is. Some things to look at/try:

    1. Play with positioning. If there's a scanner somewhere that actually shows you the image it scanned, play with that. Look at your finger and figure out where the most "interesting" part is and try to get that centerd on the scanner. Figure out how much pressure to apply so that you get nice, clear ridges that are distinct and well-separated.
    2. Make sure the template is good. When you scan your fingerprint, the scan has to be compared against a template that is stored somewhere. Maybe you didn't get a very good scan when the template was created? Usually, enrollment systems scan your finger multiple times and either combine the results or take the one they estimate to be the "best", but it may be that you still didn't get a good template. Try re-enrolling after you've figured out the ideal way to position your finger.
    3. Think about what you do with your fingers. If your ridges are just very light, perhaps they're not naturally that way. Is there some activity you engage in that wears them off? If so, you might consider stopping that activity. On the other hand, if it's something you do so much that it polishes your fingertips, it's probably something you really like doing (or something you do obsessively...).
    4. Experiment with moisture. It sounds like you're already doing this, but try a few different things.
    5. Consider making a fake finger. If worse comes to worst, it's supposed to be pretty easy to make fake fingerprints, and there are recipes on the web. I've never done it but I've seen it done, and it looks easy. Making a fake will allow you to do whatever it takes to get one really good print from your finger, and then you can just use that. If you need to, maybe you can even use someone else's fingerprint ;-). The security folks may not like this approach, of course, but you can always try pointing out (after you've learned how to do it) that if it's so easy, then their security technology isn't much good anyway.
    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  37. Sounds like a way to lose one's job by gknoy · · Score: 1

    Consider making a fake finger.

    The security folks may not like this approach, of course, but you can always try pointing out (after you've learned how to do it) that if it's so easy, then their security technology isn't much good anyway.


    At many organizations, the security people will definitely NOT like it. Most security people tend to want to play things as strictly by the book as possible. I'm pretty certain that using a fake finger would be a clear breach of policy, and could land you in a HEAP of trouble.

    Even if you get out of the trouble eventually, you would still be seen as a "troublemaker" by many in security. At best, Security will never like you (you made them and their system look bad), and at worst you can lose your job. If it's at a federal or military facility, it might be worse than that, but I'm not sure.

    If you MADE the finger, but never actually used it for access, and then showed it to them, demonstrated it, and asked if you could use it as a solution to your problem, they might accept it... but I'd wager that they won't.

    1. Re:Sounds like a way to lose one's job by swillden · · Score: 1

      If you MADE the finger, but never actually used it for access, and then showed it to them, demonstrated it, and asked if you could use it as a solution to your problem, they might accept it... but I'd wager that they won't.

      Oh, I'm sure they wouldn't. I thought it was obvious my suggestion was toungue-in-cheek. Now obvious enough, apparently :-)

      Even if you get out of the trouble eventually, you would still be seen as a "troublemaker" by many in security.

      I usually am. That's shy they hire me to design the security systems.

      BTW, I would never deploy a fingerprint-only access control system. It's not very secure and is frequently so inconvenient that people will do all sorts of things to bypass it. I haven't heard of an actual workplace incident of someone using a gummy finger, but I wouldn't be surprised if it has happened.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re:Sounds like a way to lose one's job by cgenman · · Score: 1

      One of my old jobs had a fingerprint scanner that was so terrible you could foil it with a warm hot dog.

      I'm still not quite sure what, if anything, it was scanning for. It wasn't even a beef frank.

  38. Don't you think... by jalet · · Score: 1

    ... that maybe what didn't work was when you registered your fingerprints for the first time, instead of when you try to make the scanner check them ?

    If the original fingerprint was bad, you can put as much shit as you want on your finger, this won't make the scanner think your actual fingerprints match the original one.

    Or am I writing something stupid ? (I've never seen a fingerprint scanner in my life)

    --
    Votez ecolo : Chiez dans l'urne !
  39. Re:ridgebuilder solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Part of being medically licensed, requires us to be fingerprinted

    Really? What state(s) require that? I have a few MD friends and they never suffered that indignity.

    many of us have difficulty with this part due to the polished nature of our hands.

    Fingerprints are images of your fingers. If your fingers aren't very distinguishable, well, then that's the way they are. I wonder what a Dremel could do!

    And frankly, while fingerprints are generally regarded to be unique to the individual, it has never been scientifically proven (according to most courts definition of valid scientific evidence), particularly for partial prints.

  40. DO NOT USE dna UNTIL YOU ARE SURE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Maybe if the readers are an abysmal failure, they will be replaced with something more sensible."

    Semen tests for the guys. Vaginal swabbing for the girls.

  41. Ask for a different type by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am currently working for a fingerprint device manufacturer (though you aren't using our product). My suggestion is to ask if the vendor has a different type of fingerprint sensor - there are a plethora of different technologies out there (various forms of Optical sensors, direct-silicon contact placement or swipe sensors, audio(!!!) based sensors, etc). A fingerprint which is problematic on one type of sensor may not be a problem on another type. For example, I have seen fingers which don't register at all on our sensor, but which look perfect on an optical sensor, and fingers that are nothing but a smudge on an optical sensor that look great on ours. If you have any information about the sensors and software installed for this purpose, post it. I may be able to help.

  42. scar! by aberson · · Score: 1

    i'm late on this, but... give yourself a scar on your fingertip. Will add a new feature that the scanner can pick up on.

    (ok, bad idea)

  43. Re:ridgebuilder solution by spin2cool · · Score: 1

    Here's a link to a place selling Ridge Builder: http://www.tritechusa.com/fingerprint/LC-RB.htm It's light on the details, though, so I'm still not sure how it works or if it's safe.

    Another site had this to say: "The ridge builder works by temporarily "puffing" or raising the fingerprint ridges. I'm fairly sure it sounds like something you wouldn't want to use on a daily basis.

    Maybe you could use it once, get some clear prints, then use those to build a latex model of your finger print. You could get your access and comment on the insecurity of their biometrics at the same time!

  44. May be the refrence prints are bad? by UnifiedTechs · · Score: 1

    All these comments and it didn't occur to a single person to suggest he get new refrence prints taken? Probably the glass was dirty when security took your original prints so now the system dosen't recognze them?

    The simplest answer is often overlooked.