Slashdot Mirror


Sun to Give Niagara Servers to Reviewers

abdulzis writes "Sun Micro's Jonathan Schwartz says that Sun is giving away free servers to bloggers who do a good job reviewing their servers. From the blog article: 'if you write a blog that fairly assesses the machine's performance (positively or negatively), send us a pointer, we're likely to let you keep the machine'" Mr. Schwartz, if you're reading this, feel free to send us one with "Attn: CowboyNeal" on the label.

182 comments

  1. Oh good. by 0racle · · Score: 0

    Now I know what to do tomorrow.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    1. Re:Oh good. by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 1

      Why do you need one for anyway? You've already gotten FP with what you've got.

    2. Re:Oh good. by Rosyna · · Score: 1

      Well, all the better for you. I don't think CmdrTaco will get one as /. is about as fair and balanced as Fox News.

  2. ahhh... dyslexia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sun to Give Nigeria Servers to Reviewers
    hello my friend! i am a humble nigerian prince with millions of dollars and have selected you to....

    1. Re:ahhh... dyslexia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      and this, folks, is why i try not to post anything funny logged in. +3 funny, +0 karma. -1 overrated, -1 karma. being funny just aint worth the risk

    2. Re:ahhh... dyslexia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the best laugh of the day :-)

    3. Re:ahhh... dyslexia by pato101 · · Score: 1
      Sun to Give Viagra Servers to Reviewers

      Now I see why SUN logo is blueish.

    4. Re:ahhh... dyslexia by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 0

      i think i'll just play the game where i try to have the lowest karma instead of the highest i'll call it Karma Golf

  3. Reminds me of Chile... by raehl · · Score: 3, Funny

    Pinochet used to have this deal for journalists too - if you wrote an article that fairly reviewed the Chilean government, he wouldn't kill you.

  4. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  5. Server vs PC by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In this day and age of super fast personal computers, what is to differentiate a server from a PC?

    Is it the CPU architecture? That can't be the case because many servers run on plain old x86 motherboards.

    Is it the OS? While you can say that we can delineate Windows servers into Windows Server and non-Windows Server versions, many places stick Linux on as the OS which blurs the line completely.

    Is it the speed? A decade ago, we were looking at servers which weren't half as fast as our low end PCs today. If it is speed, do we have some magical cutoff which just keeps moving forward?

    So I get a server from Sun. Does that just mean I get a fast computer with a shitty audio and video card? Limited expansion slots?

    I'd rather get a PC.

    1. Re:Server vs PC by mmclure · · Score: 3, Informative

      The primary differentiator is not CPU power, but I/O bandwidth. Even with SATA drives, PC architectures still don't handle the I/O bandwidth that servers can handle. That's the same reason mainframes are still around - although raw CPU power on a mainframe is not as much as on a server or even a workstation, they can throw data around like nobody's business.

    2. Re:Server vs PC by PornMaster · · Score: 1

      When done right, servers should have considerably faster I/O and considerably higher reliability than desktops. And yeah, shitty audio and video. Video, if you've got it on a server, is there for administration, not for playing games. And who could hear anything from audio on a box that belongs in a noisy server room?

    3. Re:Server vs PC by elmegil · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'd rather get a PC.

      I think there's a good reason your name is "BadAnalogyGuy". Can you say "you're not Sun's target market"? There are plenty of bloggers who aren't just some slashdot reader sitting in his parent's basement, but actually use real equipment in real datacenters and they're the ones Jonathan is probably trying to reach out to (can't read his mind after all). By all means, get the tool you need. Server class x86 systems are typically way louder than you'll want to play World of Warcroft on too.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    4. Re:Server vs PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather get a PC.

      Fine. No soup for you!

    5. Re:Server vs PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RAM slots, reliability of the components, power supply quality, etc. Yes, you can move apartments using your prius, but it's better to go rent a diesel truck.

    6. Re:Server vs PC by Brandybuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So I get a server from Sun. Does that just mean I get a fast computer with a shitty audio and video card? Limited expansion slots?

      I don't know anything about these Niagara servers, but if they're anything like other Sun servers, here's what you'll get: a power supply that will last longer than two years; a motherboard with a chipset and layout designed for high high data throughput; harddrives that are hot-swappable and will handle years of heavy use without crapping out; etc. In short, they're designed for constant heavy use and high reliability. You can get away with Best Buy's weekly special for a small file or web server, but once it starts handling mission critical data, you'll want a server that was designed to be a server.

      Yes, you can avoid the eMachines and build a kickass server yourself. But that's not what companies want, they want them prebuilt with warranty and service.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    7. Re:Server vs PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) You're a dipshit.
      2) The difference is bus design and bandwidth.

    8. Re:Server vs PC by styrotech · · Score: 1

      In this day and age of super fast personal computers, what is to differentiate a server from a PC?

      Most of the time: The case.

    9. Re:Server vs PC by dillee1 · · Score: 1

      - Server mobo usually have 2 or more separate PCI bus(not slot, but 2 channels with dedicated bandwidth). This separates high traffic systems(HDD,NIC) from the rest of the system. Single PCI bus will cause a lot of contentions in server environment. - Server mobo often don't have AGP but have integrated cheapo GPU. This save some wiring which would otherwise need a extra layer on mobo. Who need 3D gaming on a god damn server anyway. - Server usually are MP. They usually have larger no. of applications/threads running concurrently, which suits better with MP. In contrast, most Desktop applics are single threaded, and they are better off with single high clock speed CPU. - They have more RAM for the same reason as above. - They have redundant components/hot swap capability (CPU/RAM/HDD/PSU), which is seldom seen on PC. - Firmware/BIOS having some diagnostic/remote management capability. - And in general, all their HW are of higher quality and design to last longer than PC.

    10. Re:Server vs PC by Foerstner · · Score: 1

      If you're an average Joe, a good PC will make a good web/email/file server. But if you're a corporate IT department, and your server runs anything "mission critical," then you get a purpose-built server. Which should have, depending on your specific requirements:

      - Blinkenlights. Not pretty neon-and-blue-LED light shows, but honest-to-god diagnostic lights for disks, NICs, and CPUs. On the front, where you can see them.

      - Hot-swappable everything. Every component, from individual CPUs to the power supplies, should be redundant, and designed in such a way that it can be removed and replaced without shutting down the machine. (Though some servers are less robust)

      - Monitoring software. If a fan, disk, memory module, or power supply is on the way out, something should blink a light, send an automatic email, and (possibly) call the vendor for a service call should anything go wrong.

      And of course, a a sturdy case, effective cooling, and ECC memory.

      --
      The US free market: two halves of a government-granted duopoly are free to set the market price.
    11. Re:Server vs PC by timeOday · · Score: 2, Informative
      In this day and age of super fast personal computers, what is to differentiate a server from a PC?
      The Niagra is about the most specialized server chip around: it can't run a single thread especially fast, but it can run 32 of them concurrently! That makes it a server chip if ever there was one.
    12. Re:Server vs PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't hold your breath. Google won't be calling you to manage their data center any time soon.

    13. Re:Server vs PC by ChrisGilliard · · Score: 5, Informative

      So I get a server from Sun. Does that just mean I get a fast computer with a shitty audio and video card? Limited expansion slots?

      Since this particular server is a Niagara Server, it has the Ultrasparc T1 chip. That's the big difference. This chip has 8 cores and each core can run 4 threads at the same time for a total of 32 threads of execution. So, IF you're running a web or application server, you will be able to support a LOT more users than a single core or even dual core processor for about the same price of a high end Wintel or Lintel box. Also, this chip uses a fraction of the power that a PC uses. Since servers are always on, this is a big deal for saving money in a data center. The total power consumption is about 70 watts. The Intel Chips use more than 100 watts. I don't know about expansion slots or video card actually, but if you care about that on this box, you're missing the point.

      --
      No Sigs!
    14. Re:Server vs PC by SeeMyNuts! · · Score: 1

      One T2000 server (T1/Niagara based) running at 1 GHz trounces a two-way Xeon server at 2.8 GHz for serving dynamic websites (PHP in this case). This was discussed at OSNews this week.

      Sun really needs to get the message out about the T1 servers. I'd like to make some money off of my SUNW shares sometime this decade...

    15. Re:Server vs PC by stuuf · · Score: 1

      One thing that's simple to understand and obvious just from looking at basic specs is that servers are built to handle a lot of data and a lot of tasks at once. Instead of one or two fast CPU cores they have 4 or 8 (The idea with the Niagara is to consolidate all of these onto a single die, making the whole machine cost considerably less). Memory sizes are around 16-32 GB (servers have used 64-bit alpha/ultrasparc/itanium architectures for years in order to support this). I haven't seen a PC motherboard that supports anywhere near that. Hard drives spin FAST, have large buffers, and are configured in arrays for redundancy and even more speed.

      --

      Everyone is born right-handed; only the greatest overcome it

    16. Re:Server vs PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      01:40AM CST.

      Comment is still modded +2, Interesting. Why has this not been modded into a hole in the ground yet?

    17. Re:Server vs PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SunFire T2000 Expansion Slots:

      3x PCI-Express (PCI-E) low-profile, 2.5GHz lanes card slots with up to X8 data lanes per slot.

      2x PCI-X low-profile, 64-bit, 133 MHz card slots.

      4x Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) Hot Swappable hard disk slots

      16x DDR2 @533Mhz DIMM Slots (accessed by FOUR on-chip memory controllers)

    18. Re:Server vs PC by TallMatthew · · Score: 1
      This chip has 8 cores and each core can run 4 threads at the same time for a total of 32 threads of execution.

      Cool! More threads to wait on I/O! I love system wait.

    19. Re:Server vs PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      given that one Niagara cpu is 8 logical cores [...]

      Otherwise you are correct, but it's not 8 logical cores, it's 8 physical cores ;-)

      (With "logical core" people usually talk about virtual core systems á la Intel's HypeThreading.)

      I'm not sure if they show as 32 logical cores or just 8 cores with incidentally very good thread and branching management...

    20. Re:Server vs PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it cannot run (execute) 32 threads in parallel. Each core can manage four threads and execute one of them. Sun (McNealy & Shwartz both) have been intentionally vague about this. The "32-way" advantages come in branch delay and I/O wait situations. Them special purposes people keep mentioning...

      For most tasks I'd prefer a quad Turion64 system. Good x86-64 core with muscular FP units, and only 25W at 2 GHz (the MT-40 model), thus roughly 100 W for a quad system -- and good for most every task. AMD, put those two more HT links in there, and have a decent socket there too; I'd buy in a heartbeat

      Okay okay, this chip (Niagara) looks very cool, and I love the tech. Can't wait to see Rock with the "missing" 7 other FP units.

    21. Re:Server vs PC by Splab · · Score: 1

      The point of having more threads is when one needs I/O it the core shifts to the next thread and tries to work on that. Yes you might end up with 4 threads waiting on I/O but you are more likely going to have something being processed all the time.

      Ohh and on that topic.. Why only 4 hw threads? why not 8 or 16? Think of the power you would have with c++csp, occam or jscp! *drooool*

    22. Re:Server vs PC by Octorian · · Score: 1

      And on a "real" server, you have neither audio nor video :-) Audio is pointless, and Video is replaced by a serial console.

      Serial consoles have always "just worked" and have been a standard means of console connectivity on Suns and most machines in their category. (Heck, even Apple Xserve machiens support serial consoles.) In the PC world, it is less common at the BIOS level, but that depends on what sort of PC you buy. My friend's 1U Dell server (which I'm hosting for him) does support serial console straight from the BIOS.

    23. Re:Server vs PC by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Give me a break. Bandwidth? What bandwidth? Network I/O? Throw in as many Gb network cards as you need. Disk I/O? Throw in a relatively cheap RAID card and 5+ drives in RAID 5, and you too can throw around as much data as your system can handle. (Hint, in a PC system, you can easily exceed the CPU data bandwidth capability with well-designed RAID5 systems, even on "economy" PCs) Memory bandwidth? That's a much harder problem, and you only get major gains when going to big iron.

      At this point, servers are whatever use you put your system to, not what's in them nor what they're sold as. Some "servers" come with additional features that make them more scalable for certain tasks than your plain jane PC, but your PC generally will handle the task within reasonable specs for at least low numbers of users.

      And to counter the "what about..." arguments, large or complex DBs may require multiple drives, and possibly 64 bit CPUs and more than 4GB of RAM. 64 bit CPUs are no longer the realm of "servers" thanks to AMD, nor is the 4GB limit, with a little help from *nixes. All of these items are now available in sub 2K PCs. Yes, it costs more than $1K, but if you're going over 4GB of RAM, you're going to have to pay for it.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    24. Re:Server vs PC by thrillseeker · · Score: 1
      Think of the power you would have with c++csp, occam or jscp!

      Occam? There's a name I haven't heard in awhile - and it sounded so good way back when - is it still alive?

    25. Re:Server vs PC by _Quinn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, bandwidth. Up until the PCIe bus, a pair of GigE ethernet cards saturated a PC's expansion bus. Until AMD built memory controllers into their chips, servers (read: non-x86 UNIX) crushed PCs in memory bandwidth. Until NCQ, SCSI drives crushed IDE drives in effective bandwidth.

      So basically, yes, until very recently, there were very large and substantial bandwidth differences. They've gotten smaller. More important, however, are the "lights-out management" features. If you can't reinstall the OS from four floors away, it isn't a server.

      --
      Reality Maintenance Group, Silver City Construction Co., Ltd.
    26. Re:Server vs PC by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      As you just noted, all those bandwidth issues are no longer the case for off-the-shelf PCs. There are some plusses for non-PC machines, but those plusses are becoming less relevant every couple of months, as the next wave of PC hardware comes out for most uses.

      Also, you can buy for little cash some of the same eq for PCs that are used for specialty servers. And with some knowledge, PCs can be setup to emulate many of the hot-swap features of big-iron, and sometimes even exceed them. (It's not trivial, but it can be done)

      The lights-out issue is a different thing, and the real question is whether your company values your time @ midnight more than the difference in cost for the specialty servers you'd like to be running. Many don't.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    27. Re:Server vs PC by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I will use the classic car analogy for you :)
      PC = Corvette.
      Workstation = Porsche.
      Server = Semi.
      A server has to run forever and move as much data as it can for as little money as it can. Imagine if every time you had to reboot your PC, install a new driver, replace a hard-drive, or replace your power supply it cost you $10,000 a minute. That is the enterprise world that servers live in.
      As far as video cards or sound cards? Servers don't need sound cards and often don't need video cards. You use ssh or some remote admin function or if things are really bad you may use a serial port. When a server does have video it is often on-board video. You don't play Doom3 on a server.
      I will admit it has been a while since I have worked on enterprise class machines. Frankly I see a lot of KVMs and have to wonder those are mainly for Windows admins or have things changed a lot.
      Servers also tend to be used longer than PCs. You will probably find a good number of PIII Xenon servers still being used today. Speed isn't all the most important thing up time is. If your database, DNS, or website is fast enough why upgrade your server? There are only three reason to upgrade a server
      1. If the new server will save you resources. For example if it will allow you to use less resources like people, power, and or space.
      2. If the new server will provide a new capability that you need. For example a new website or inventory control system.
      3. If not replacing your server will cost you money. It is old and you can no longer get support. Downtime costs. Better to plan to replace it before it fails that have to do it after.

      BTW Servers look boring, I have never seen one with a window in the case or lighted fans. They tend to be black, grey, or beige. And never have cool fan grills. And you are right you don't want one.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    28. Re:Server vs PC by boner · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but you're only partially correct. Most '32-way' advantages actually come from memory waits. The core will move to the next thread if the current thread is in a wait state. When you miss in the caches and have to get the data from main memory, the next thread gets executed. Since memory delay is the main inhibitor to performance there is a significant total gain. Not just branch delays or I/O waits.

      The Niagara will seriously whip the Turion64 for a workload like SPECweb2005. As far as the remark goes on the 'missing' FP-units. Sun recommends that you not consider Niagara if you have more than 3% floating point instructions. For less than 1% FP the unit will not be a delay. Most webserving tasks are well under the 3% threshold.

    29. Re:Server vs PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are so stupid I could cry!

    30. Re:Server vs PC by mnmn · · Score: 1

      When you first look at a server, you see a PC. I did wonder that too, why are we paying $10,000+ for x86 IBM servers each?

      Look at a nice big server, minus the CPU, RAM and disks. Its cheap. So the basic structure is not TOO much expensive over desktops.

      Next open it up and take a look around. Its designed to keep running. I run Linux and solaris at home and most of my downtime is caused by either a hardware problem or hardware change. Servers have redundant everything, plenty of space to upgrade and designed to keep running.

      Disks are a major issue. A SCSI disk costs way more than IDE.. I know since I run SCSI disks in my desktop. They are also bulletproof. I've lost more IDE disks than SCSI... and 8 SCSI disks lined up and running 24x7 is more of a peace of mind than 8 IDE disks constantly being hammered. Theyre also much faster.

      Many motherboards have RAID of some sort. They cant compete with servraid and the likes found in servers. You dont have to reboot on every change and the bios that come with these disk controllers allow you to get out of trouble with no OS or boot disks around.

      Servers keep things running. A company can lose $10,000 a day of downtime ( a small company mind you), so a single day of downtime will be more expensive for you if youre running a PC as a server. Sure PCs can perform well, especially given SCSI disks. But you can also find real cheap $500 servers out there with IDE disks which are hardly different from PCs. OTOH larger servers allow you to change a disk in a raid volume on the go without hardly a performance bump. You dont get 100ms of downtime. Thats worth real $$$ to some people.

      And go higher, you can hotplug PCI, even CPUs and memory in mainframes. In fact with real logical partitions you can move a constantly running OS with apps in realtime to another server, without a burp. PCs can kick ass, give it an Athlon 64 FX60 or something, 500GB disk and you can say in raw resources it beats any server for the price. But companies still run AS/400s and VMS machines after 20 odd years in lieu of your FX-60, paying more $$$ simply because they keep running their businesses.

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    31. Re:Server vs PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, right now I'm using a `server' with 16 opterons and 64gigs of ram (and 20T of space). My "puny" desktop is just a 3.2Ghz P4 with only 2gigs of RAM.

      (ie: performance diff between the server and my puny desktop is -huge-)

      Ironically, my "image word" to post this is: Tandem!

    32. Re:Server vs PC by Jonboy+X · · Score: 1

      A server is a machine that serves more than one user. A Personal Computer is a machine that is generally used by just one person at a time. The types of applications that are better suited to multi-user environments (serving web pages, databases) are different from single-user apps (word processors, web browsers, games). Servers machines tend to have hardware that is optimized for multi-user apps. This usually means memory, I/O bandwidth, storage space (if local and not SAN or NAS), and fast integer operations. Personal computers are optimized for games and multimedia experience, which means faster floating-point operations and more powerful sound and graphics processors.

      Think of "server" and "PC" as adjectives that describe a machine rather than nouns that define them.

      --

      "In a 32-bit world, you're a 2-bit user. You've got your own newsgroup, alt.total.loser." -Weird Al
    33. Re:Server vs PC by Robear · · Score: 1

      -----
      I'm not sure if they show as 32 logical cores or just 8 cores with incidentally very good thread and branching management...
      -----

      Each thread shows up as a seperate cpu in the system utilities, and can be turned off as required. Thread management is simple, which is why there is little cache involved.

      --
      French - The lingua franca of Europe!
  6. damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    send one my way

  7. Bold Move by Comatose51 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm keeping my eyes on SUNW. I've been eyeing that stock for a long time now. Sun has a lot of valuable assets. Their intellectual assets and knowledge are first class. I think some analysts don't understand the value of it and count Sun out too early. They also have a ton of cash that give them a lot of time and resources to develop a good long term strategy and take risks like this. It's not as incredible/stupid as it sounds. This shows confidence in their own product. What is $5000 to SUNW? Say they send them to 100 reviewers (probably less since we tend to concentrate on a few popular sites) who basically help them get the word out. Sun losts $5mil. That's drop in the bucket, less expensive than a Superbowl ad but with more credibility among those who count. Their return will be many times that cost. More importantly, once a relationship with a customer is established, more products will follow. It's getting the floor in the door that's tough. My company is a customer and their reps are very willing to work with you, unlike some other vendors.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    1. Re:Bold Move by DeathElk · · Score: 1

      Sorry bro, $5000 * 100 = $500,000, not 5mil. Valid points though.

    2. Re:Bold Move by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I need one of those machines for: arithmetic. Long day man...

      --
      EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    3. Re:Bold Move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for SUNW. Sun will continue to have profit problems for a very long time. They have lost their cash cow (Solaris/Sparc) and are now turning to compete with Dell in the x86 space where there are no margins.

    4. Re:Bold Move by jadavis · · Score: 1

      Perhaps that's the reason that they are innovating. If this processor is what they say it is (and SPEC seems to indicate that it is), they will be the only ones to go to for this type of performance. And most likely, for similar performance, it will be way cheaper and more reliable then trying to throw together a cluster of cheap machines.

      I'm sure we'll know once the numbers come out. If they really have done something powerful, their profits will return.

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    5. Re:Bold Move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you need to get the floor in the door, man ;-)

    6. Re:Bold Move by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      What is $5000 to SUNW? Say they send them to 100 reviewers (probably less since we tend to concentrate on a few popular sites) who basically help them get the word out. Sun losts $5mil.

      I think you need to re-do your math. You really mean "Sun losts $500,000." Better yet, run a grammar check while you're at it... ;-)

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
  8. ulterior motive? by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 1

    They could get this participation just by asking for it [in #debian]. I bet what's going on here is Sun is hopping on the wagon of companies that are "reaching out" to The Community, just like Yahoo did recently by handing out those relatively obscure web programming tools. I'm not sure why this is a valuable thing to do.

    1. Re:ulterior motive? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      No, they are sending you the hardware on the assumption that you will buy it. If you keep it past the terms of the agreement, you've bought it.

      It's more like the Mafia where they do one little nice thing for you and you're beholden to them for the rest of your life.

  9. Uhh yeah by paulius_g · · Score: 0, Troll

    You guys have to realize, this is called marketing.

    To get your "free" server you need to signup with their trying out thing. Which seriously, I'm pretty sure that they ask for credit information or money sources if you don't return it on time. This itself proves that they are wanting to push the whole "Buy it... And return it if you don't like it" theory.

    And also, I higly doubt that they'll be distributing these around like candy. They'll probably be only 10 big blogs who will win a servers and all the others will have to suck up and return the servers. I would be impressed if they'd actually be giving out many of these units.

    I've talked to my superiors, and nobody seemed to fall in for this.

    Ah, if I was older, if I had more time and if I had my blog online...
    But, once again, nothing is free in business.

    I'll be waiting for comments and checking this story. I'm really interested to know what people think of this.

  10. Bad review? by DeathElk · · Score: 1

    I wonder what they'll send if someone submits a poor review (not just "negative") - a pre-paid return label and a ticking consolation prize?

  11. I donno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want one.
    But are they gonna give it to every blogger out there?

  12. Obviously no enterprise experience by Fished · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Obviously, you've never been a sysadmin in an enterprise environment. First of all, I don't give a shit what kind of audio or video card a server has. In fact, if it's my server, it doesn't even have a monitor or speakers. Instead, it has a serial cable plugged into a terminal server, and that's all. All your fancy video card does is burn power and make heat that I have to spend money to pump out of the rack.

    The difference between a server and a PC is:

    1. A server is designed to serve data, and has nothing I don't need for it. That means that that damn video card that's not even hooked to a monitor can't break and take my website down with it's million dollars a day revenue.
    2. A server is designed to serve data reliably, and has enterprise class components. That means no cheap-ass western digital hard drives. If you don't think there's a difference, you've never used Enterprise hardware.
    3. A server is designed to serve data cheaply. This means low TCO, not low purchase price. Which means an OS that pushes the most bits per cpu, while requiring the least system administrator time. Is Solaris that OS? Debatable, since time has ensured that Apache is highly optimized for Linux. But if you can't run Linux on these yet, you will be able to soon. However, the CPU architecture on these is pretty highly parallel, and Solaris may work better than Linux. Sun is presenting some impressive numbers for these. And they're cheap (as servers go).
    In other words, this may be a good time to buy SUNW, at least if you can grow a beard.
    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
    1. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you have to be an arrogant prick?

    2. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by ShadowFlyP · · Score: 1

      Well stated. Funny that the anonymous coward called you names. I didn't think you were being arrogant at all. Since I work on the i/pSeries firmware, it's good to be reminded there are Enterprise-minded people that read this site once in a while. The large percentage of slashdotters have no clue beyond the "server" they built from spare parts.

    3. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by PenGun · · Score: 0

      Because of people like you ;). A LART if you will, probably wasted though ...

          PenGun
        Do What Now ??? ... Standards and Practices !

    4. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, I basically agree - although what are these "enterprise class" hard drives you refer to? Last time I checked, companies like Sun were charging outrageous prices for hard drives that were just your run-of-the-mill Seagate SCSI's in proprietary hot-swap trays.

      Sure, you wouldn't build an "enterprise server" with SATA just yet, but I'd say some form of SATA2 (or who knows, maybe SATA3?) will be the future replacement for SCSI. The hard drive makers are consolidating and IMHO, will soon reach a point where everything is either "budget priced" (EG. junk, suitable for PC resellers to use in low-cost systems for consumers and so-ho settings), or "better quality" which is used for everything from the largest enterprise systems to hobbyist PC's built with performance and quality parts in mind.

      Right now, you pay a ridiculous premium for all things SCSI, simply because it's a dying standard, only used and respected by those building large servers for people with deep enough pockets to pay the prices without question. SCSI has disadvantages though, including the difficulty in making the high-density cables and connectors. (Ever try crimping a connector onto a SCA-80 cable, for example?)

      The drives themselves tend to be built from pretty much the same parts as their SATA counterparts, lately. They can just stick a different type of controler board on the bottom and call it SATA vs. SCSI. We're no longer in the era where companies like Micropolis and Fujitsu built obviously better-constructed and better warrantied drives intended for server use only.

    5. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem smart, maybe you can help me out.

      What's the equivalence between Niagara MHz and Intel MHz? I've
      got an app that has a processor bottleneck (integer), and going to
      a "slower" machine (only 1GHz per core) could actually slow down
      responses for individual users, even though I could handle more
      users with that box.

      Any thoughts?

    6. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by nbahi15 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would like to add to the above post that Sun equipment has more than just a simple serial cable output. Lights out management (Sun's name for out of band management via RJ-45 serial port and Ethernet) is a must have for anyone that does serious enterprise server administration. Console ports allow you to power on and off the machine, and run diagnostics even if the machine is otherwise dead. Sure you can get it for some PC servers, often via an expensive add-on card, but every Sparc machine has this built-in from the desktops to the servers. Until PC servers break from the legacy BIOS, and add features like this as standard equipment they will just be PCs that happen to be running a server OS.

    7. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by Ravatar · · Score: 1

      Obviously, you've never been a sysadmin in an enterprise environment..

      I couldn't read beyond the parent's first paragraph without being reminded of this video.

    8. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      That server from spare parts is fine for a home system and/or a departmental server (that is _not_ for mission crit data). For example I support a development lab and we have a set of SPAs that have some wierd requirements for data transport (it's that or floppy) so they sit on an isolated network with an IBM workstation (running SOLinux and SAMBA). Technically this is acting as a server, though I stress that all files are deleted in 24 hours (they are really just moved to a folder, and aged out slowly, but don't tell my users that).
      In a datacenter or even as a primary server for a small/medium business that is on-line centric there is no substitute for a real server.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    9. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Micropolis

      Now there is a name I haven't heard in a while. I still remember the 700MB ESDI tank that was my second server's drive. (First one had 3 160 MB WrenIII ESDIs).
      ESDI, now that was performance.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    10. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sun, please send your free server to amphigory@gm[ ].com ['ail' in gap]. kbyethx!

    11. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats funny, I just finished installing a 4TB EMC/Dell CX300 array with guess what kinda hard drives? Thats right folks, 500GB Sata 2, certified by Dell/EMC to last forever and ever and ever ( with 4 hour replacements guranteed ).

      I love how the jackass IT guys** start off with:

      1. You don't know what the fuck your talking about cause your not ENTERPRISE! MOTHERFUCKING ENTERPRISE! YOU HERE ME! IT'S A STARSHIP AND I'M CAPTIAN KIRK OR POSSIBLY PICARD! ENTERPRISE MOTHERFUCKER! Now you slashdot hippy fucker fucking fuck fuck grow up! blah blah hippy.. blah blah beard! Grow a beard!

      2. Some other extranous techinical information that looks like it came out of IT weekly.

      3. ENTERPISE MOTHERFUCKER!

      **IT - Information Technology - I referring to the IT department in a companies that do internal work only. The workers slowly become overbearing drones who enforce policy and get in the way of the company trying to get any real work done.

      ENTERPRISE MOTHERFUCKER!

    12. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      If it's my server, I don't bother with the stupid serial cable - no serious server today ships without some kind of lights-out management. Most even support SSH, remote display, and media emulation for doing recovery/installs remotely.

    13. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by ciroknight · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "A server is designed to serve data reliably, and has enterprise class components. That means no cheap-ass western digital hard drives. If you don't think there's a difference, you've never used Enterprise hardware."

      I think Google would argue with you there. They designed their business around not using expensive hardware, but instead the principals of RAID applied across all of their hardware (they believe it's cheaper to have a LOT of less reliable, cheaper systems than a few, super reliable systems). And it seems to be working brilliantly for them.

      I'm not saying it works in every case, but I think you're just complicating the issue; A server is a machine that serves data. Whether it be a $300 Dell box running a copy of Win2K serving up some libraries index server or a multimillion dollar, grid cluster of Apple XServes running OS X Server serving up a database for your customer service department, the key element here is that the machine is serving the data.

      So, going back to the grandparent's issue, there really isn't much stopping a current PC from being a server. A server is a role not a item. In this specific case, the Sun Niagra Servers are high power, high throughput machines, tasked better for a mega dollar installation where speed is critical, or in your business where uptime seems to be the more desired feature. But as Google has shown us, it really isn't the box that makes the application, it's the programmers.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    14. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But as Google has shown us, it really isn't the box that makes the application, it's the programmers"

      This is the whole problem. 95% of the applications out there are NOT able to work in an architecture like Googles. Don't use their 20K-30K (whats it at these days, anyways?) server farm (read: very expensive total cost, but extreme IO) as a "shining" example, while it works great - their implementation has its own "pains" - you just don't see it.

    15. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by Wiz · · Score: 1

      It's standard too on all HP servers these days too. I believe Dell have a RAS console as standard, although I'm not big on Dell servers so I could be wrong.

      This isn't a SPARC thing though, even the Sunfire v20z has it as well and that is Opteron. Of course, technically it was made by Newisys and not Sun. I've not seen the newer Sun Opteron server's LOM yet, but from the specs it looked the same.

    16. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you write your email address in a less error prone way, e.g xxx@gmail.com or mailto:xxx@gmail.com . That way Sun can just click on it when they decide to send you your Free /V1agra Server!!!

    17. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      the principals of RAID applied across all of their hardware

      What, so they ground up David Patterson, Garth Gibson and Randy Katz to a puree and smeared them all over their data center? Hmmm, a blood sacrifice, could explain their success, although it does conflict with their official "do no evil" policy....

      Or did you mean they applied the principles of RAID across their enterprise? Now that would make more sense, but it's not what you said.

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    18. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Google has a big, complicated solution. It works, because they can lose nodes without having to care. On the other hand, deciding where data has to live in order to be distributed widely enough both a> to survive hardware failures and b> to fulfill demand has got to be one serious bitch of a decision.

      Clusters vs. Megalithic hardware. There's reasons for both. Sounds almost like a commercial:

      Some things yuo just can't parallelize.
      For everything else, there's Beowulf.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Sure, you wouldn't build an "enterprise server" with SATA just yet, but I'd say some form of SATA2 (or who knows, maybe SATA3?) will be the future replacement for SCSI.

      Yeah, or maybe it'll be Serial Attached SCSI.

      OT aside: I tried to comment on this article, because they claim that SAS allows "small 2.5 inch hard drives" using SCSI - but I have owned no less than three laptops which used 2.5 inch SCSI drives. I wonder what the connector looked like, I never opened any of them. One of them was an IBM Thinkpad Power Series 850, a PPC603e@133MHz (IIRC) running AIX 4.1.something. I probably woulda kept it if I'd had the video camera, but hard drive and memory upgrades were outrageous. Regardless, the hard drive was SCSI, and it had a SCSI-II port out the back.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    20. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Parent never claimed it was a SPARC thing, but a Sun thing. IIRC even the old-ass Sun/386 (whatever it was called, I forget) had the same familiar Sun boot loader.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Google can afford to lose data. Financial groups in organisations can't.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    22. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly that's because you're an arrogant prick too.

      Love,
      A different AC

    23. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by Wiz · · Score: 1
      GP did claim it was a Sparc thing:

      Sure you can get it for some PC servers, often via an expensive add-on card, but every Sparc machine has this built-in from the desktops to the servers. Until PC servers break from the legacy BIOS, and add features like this as standard equipment they will just be PCs that happen to be running a server OS.


      See but every Sparc machine has this built-in, after saying that only some PC servers have it. That isn't really fair, as I think these days you'll struggle to find a server from a tier 1 vendor that doesn't have some sorts of lightouts management.

      Also there is confusion. Sure, every Sun I can remember also console redirection to keyboard that it is NOT lightsout management. You can't power on a Sun from it's keyboard console. This was a useful feature in it's day, but a LOM is far more useful and I agree with the GP, is essential these days.

      As I point out, the crufty BIOS isn't a limitation. I can use lightsout management on a Sunfire v20z just fine thanks!

    24. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by jadavis · · Score: 1

      In this specific case, the Sun Niagra Servers are high power, high throughput machines, tasked better for a mega dollar installation where speed is critical, or in your business where uptime seems to be the more desired feature.

      From what I read, these servers are only $5k. That's not in the super-cheap realm, but it's not expensive either. These servers are also supposed to get a lot more throughput, meaning that maybe the combined processing power of 10 cheap systems in a cluster might be less than 1 Niagara. You avoid all the clustering overhead, and every thread of execution (32 threads at once on one chip!) has local access to all the memory (unlike a cluster, where the memory is broken up and needs to be sent over the network for processing).

      If this chip is what they say it is, it's going to target everyone who wants good price/performance.

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    25. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're only making a million a day on your website, you're not very big. We do a billion a week, once you start reaching those numbers you can talk about what type of hardware should and should not be in a data center.

    26. Re:Obviously no enterprise experience by Fished · · Score: 1

      I've not done much with Niagara servers yet (should be getting one in the next few months) but from what I understand the processor in the Niagaras would not be well adapted to CPU intensive, single user use. It's supposedly got a multitude of "little" cores, which makes it well adapted to applications that are heavily multithreaded. This is especially good when combined with Solaris, which has got multiprocessing overhead down more-or-less to theoretical minimums. So, it would make a good web server or database server for a large number of users, but not so good as a compute server for a single user.

      --
      "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
  13. Dell was slower, who would have thought? by MikeRT · · Score: 2, Funny

    import java.util.Date;

    public class Benchmark
    {
    public static void main(String[] args)
    {
    Date start, end;
    start = new Date();
    try
    {
    for (int x = 0; x 5000000; x++)
    {
    if (args[0].equals("DELL")) Thread.sleep(x * 2);
    else continue;
    }

    } catch (Exception e) {}
    end = new Date();
    System.out.println(end.getTime() - start.getTime());
    }
    }

    So where's my free hardware? (Tabs were killed by the compression filter)

    1. Re:Dell was slower, who would have thought? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a joke, but I can't help commenting on the code! Working as an assistant teacher has damaged me forever. Oh well, at least I can post anonymously to hide my shame:

      Always catch the most specific Exception possible, in this case InterruptedException. Catching general "exception" can mask other bugs.

      Also, I would use
        long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
      instead of new Date(). There are only two objects initialized so there no performance penalty to speak of, but it gives cleaner code. You really don't need to save the end variable, you can use
        System.currentTimeMillis() - start;
      directly instead of declaring "end" early in the code and then do

        end.getTime() - start.getTime();

      With Java 1.5 you also get System.nanoTime() on systems that support that resolution.

      HTH. I'll go sit in the shame corner now.

    2. Re:Dell was slower, who would have thought? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, using Date for that is clunky at best! Use System.currentTimeMillis() or better yet, with 1.5, use System.nanoTime().

  14. Sun business model by melted · · Score: 0, Troll

    1. Give away hardware for free to geeks who live with their parents and blog from the basement
    2. ???
    3. Profit

    If I were a Sun shareholder (which thanks god I'm not) I'd be pissed.

    1. Re:Sun business model by kitejumping · · Score: 1

      1. Have high up person working for Sun talk about giving away hardware for free to geeks...
      2. Get posted on Slashdot
      3. Profit

      If I were a Sun shareholder (which I wish I was) I'd be pleased.

    2. Re:Sun business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its going to be around $500k in giveaways. A couple of full page ages in national newspapers and magazines cost that much, if you include prep time for the ads.

  15. Won't run WoW, CBN. by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Funny
    Mr. Schwartz, if you're reading this, feel free to send us one with "Attn: CowboyNeal" on the label.

    But you wouldn't be able to run World of Warcraft on it...

    1. Re:Won't run WoW, CBN. by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      I doubt they can run WoW on their current servers.

      http://slashdot.org/faq/tech.shtml#te050
      What kind of hardware does Slashdot run on?

      Type I (web server)
      PIII/600 MHz 512K cache
      1 GB RAM
      9.1GB LVD SCSI with hot swap backplane
      Intel EtherExpress Pro (built-in on moboard)
      Intel EtherExpress 100 adapter

      Type II (kernel NFS with kernel locking)
      Dual PIII/600 MHz
      2 GB RAM
      (2) 9.1GB LVD SCSI with hot swap backplane
      Intel EtherExpress Pro (built-in on motherboard)
      Intel EtherExpress 100 adapter

      Type III (SQL)
      Quad Xeon 550 MHz, 1MB cache
      2 GB RAM
      6 LVD disks, 10000 RPM (1 system disk, 5 disks for RAID5)
      Mylex Extreme RAID controller 16 MB cache
      Intel EtherExpress Pro (built-in on motherboard)
      Intel EtherExpress 100 adapter

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  16. Install slashdot on one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if Sun would foot the bill to 'upgrade' slashdot to this new line of machines...

    1. Re:Install slashdot on one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too bad the shitty perl code would make the servers seem slow

    2. Re:Install slashdot on one? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I wonder if Sun would foot the bill to 'upgrade' slashdot to this new line of machines...

      Maybe. All CowboyNeal really needs to do is order a free machine for a test drive and write his review. If the marketeers like it, he gets to keep it at no charge. If he doesn't want it, he can return it with postage paid. If he still wants it anyway, he can fork over the cashola and enjoy his new server upgrades. From where I'm sitting, it sounds like a win/win situation. :-)

  17. I'll pass a pointer... by mkiwi · · Score: 1
    if you write a blog that fairly assesses the machine's performance (positively or negatively), send us a pointer

    ok

    SERVER *SUN;
    char HappyNerd[1337];
    HappyNerd = sendToBlog(*SUN);

    ....
    Don't forget the & on the other side :)

    1. Re:I'll pass a pointer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sendToBlog(*SUN); dereferences the pointer, so you're sending the entire SUN, not just a pointer to it. And they wouldn't want to use an & on the other side. That's just silly.

    2. Re:I'll pass a pointer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SERVER *SUN;
      char HappyNerd[1337];
      HappyNerd = sendToBlog(*SUN);


      Dude, this is the first time I tell someone to stick with .NET or Java...

      Please stop writing (and probably releasing) C code...

  18. On the Application.... by insane_machine · · Score: 1

    It also asks if you have a Solaris application, and whether it is multithreaded.

    I don't think they were asking for credit information, though don't quote me on that.

    1. Re:On the Application.... by paulius_g · · Score: 2, Informative

      Correct. They probably want to attract some enterprise buyers who actually own servers and possibly already use some Sun applications.

      But then, why add blogs to the equation? I don't know many companies who have a blog and would be ready to post this totally random review of a server on it.

      Perhaps they're trying to get big blogging sites who own their own server racks to post a review. I bet you that Ars Technica is up for this :-)
      Never the less, I like the Ars reviews. These guys are ammazing, it would be awesome if they could score a server from Sun.

      Also, as for the credit information, if you look at their pages correctly. They state that they'll automatically bill you for the machine if it's not returned within 60 days. Trust me, they wouldn't give away a 5000$ machine without asking any credit or monetary information!

  19. Re:Oh good. (5core: -99 Troll) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    This is worse than goats.cx. Remember, you're on the internet, so anything goes. Be prepared to have nightmarish recollection of what you will see if you click on this. And remember, you were warned:

    http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/8765/cortacabea2i q.jpg

  20. IBM has had tryout program for years by mytrip · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been doing AIX admin work for years. IBM has long had a program to let people try out their stuff first that they thought was very compelling. Most people wound up buying rs/6000 gear because it simply toasted other unix boxes. IBM actually let a dot com I worked for try out a fully loaded M80 ($250,000), 2 B80s and an F80 and we bought the M80 and 2 B80s because their Java implementation and 64bit copper chips toasted Sun at the time and IBM was willing to put their money where their mouth was... Sun has to be very confident that this will generate much needed postive press and reviews for them.

    --
    Contrary to popular belief, Unix is user friendly. It just happens to be particular about who it makes friends with.
    1. Re:IBM has had tryout program for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always found the IBM AIX gear to be space consuming, HOT, overly consumptive of OpEx to maintain and a pain to get applications running well on, i.e. performance tuning tools are obtuse and machivellian to use...

      When you actually look at the TOTAL REAL TCO/OpEx for IBM setups, even MSWin looks better... B^(

  21. Re:Oh good. (5core: -99 Troll) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bah, that's not a big deal. I do that every weekend.....

  22. Re:We'll send you a free server & we're buying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blo GW Rite Force OS? What the hell kind of name is that?

    PowerGen Italia, indeed.

  23. Re:Oh good. (5core: -99 Troll) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hah. So it grows back by moring? How nice.

  24. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    almost worth sucking dick

    1. Re:hmm by boy_afraid · · Score: 0

      Almost? I'll suck 2 for 1 Niagra Server. My standards are low. :) I'm a technology whore.

  25. Niagara is a very interesting tech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What we have here is an eight core CPU, running four threads on a single core. Total power consumption at peak? 80 watts. (CPU only, of course; the system itself will need more -- 220 to 400 watts, depending on the specs.) Clock speed is "only" 1 GHz or so. One floating point unit on the entire chip.

    So for scientific work, or other stuff that's seriously hammering the FPU, it's going to be a dog. Sun has never denied this. You're not going to take weather simulations and throw them on this thing; it'd be a waste of money. But for other applications -- database; web server; maybe financial simulations -- there's a hell of a lot of grunt, for very little power consumption.

    Sun has effectively opened up a new niche. Anything you have written for Sparc before will still run on this thing, but if you can manage to get a good degree of parallelism in your workload, it will positively fly.

    In my opinion (not having seen one of these in action), it's going to be either a massive flop, or a massive win for Sun. My money's on a massive win. They've thought long and hard about common workloads, and have come up with a CPU optimised for those workloads, without too much overhead from making a "general purpose" CPU that can handle anything you throw at it reasonably well. I can't help but wonder how long it will be before we see similar designs out of IBM and Intel.

    The other question I have is: what's the IO on these systems like? Poor IO would cripple it, but again, it depends on your workload. The T1000 has a single expansion slot (PCI-E), but four gigabit ethernet ports; the T2000 has three PCI-E and two PCI-X with four gigabit ethernet. On paper, it looks good; time will tell, though, if the systems live up to the expectations.

    1. Re:Niagara is a very interesting tech. by hutchike · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Don't forget the on-chip encryption - and now you're really flying! Dave Miller has got Ubuntu Linux running on this thing too.

      Niagara version 2 has taped out and will have 8 floating point units (or so I hear). It should arrive in early 2007,

      The later "Rock" processor offers true SMP capabilities, as a Sparc IV+ replacement for the really big boxes. (But expect a Fujitsu Sparc processor to fill in the gap while we wait for this).

      PS I hold a few SUNW shares

      --
      Zen tips: Pay attention. Don't take it personally. Believe nothing.
    2. Re:Niagara is a very interesting tech. by jadavis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They've thought long and hard about common workloads, and have come up with a CPU optimised for those workloads

      In order for this chip to take over the world, it needs to push developers to parallelize their applications more. That's a good possibility, since every chipmaker is moving toward multiple cores, etc., and so developers need to change their ways eventually. If this chip is what Sun says it is, it may give developers that real push into parallel applications.

      In 5 years, it's possible that making everything parallel will be a basic principle just like making modular code.

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    3. Re:Niagara is a very interesting tech. by therus121 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just a quick reply here... i've been beta testing the T2000 for 2 months now, and recieved our shipment of 13 for production recently (ebay have been buying all that they can get their hands on!). On the slots, there are 2 PCI-X and 2 PCI-E slots. However at the moment 1 of the PCI-X slots is take up with a SAS disk controller - this controller will be build on to the motherboard in the next hardware update (march to april time), so freeing up the other PCI-X slot. On the benchmarking front, it's pretty impressive. As long as your tool is multi threaded, or you run many single threaded daemons (eg old Apache), and there's not much floating point ops (check http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/mrbenchmark/20051 207 for more info) it's an absolute screamer - in relative terms we're getting 5 to 7 times the performance of a quad CPU v440. Very nice boxes... and just wait until the 'Rock' line of CPU's come out. Cheers. ps and yes - there's no graphics card! this IS a server after all.

  26. " Mr. Schwartz, if you're reading this" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Mr. Schwartz, if you're reading this, feel free to send us one with "Attn: CowboyNeal" on the label.

    CowboyNeal, if you read the fucking article, you'd know how to apply. Hint: it was in the second paragraph.

  27. "Try & Buy" program by cvd6262 · · Score: 1

    Yeah. Read the comments on the post.

    If they decide not to let you keep it, which the agreement apparently doesn't say they will, you have 5 days to get the unit back to Sun at your own expense.

    It's not unlike the trial magazine subscription where you get the first six months free, but can cancel just by sending the seventh issue back. They say they never got it, and stick you with a year's bill.

    Here you'd have to pay through the nose to get insured, confirmation of delivery shipping back to Sun.

    --

    I'd rather have someone respond than be modded up.

    1. Re:"Try & Buy" program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure it says they'll send someone to pick it up (I assume a UPS or FedEx call tag.) And they pay shipping both ways, did you RTFA?

    2. Re:"Try & Buy" program by McPolu · · Score: 1

      Hum... I have the same feelings. In TFA you can read:

      And free seemed like the right price to drive adoption among developers (honestly, we're not too worried about folks who elect not to buy failing to return a $5,000 server (we cover postage both ways)).
      But in the "Try & Buy Agreement" you can read:
      The purpose of this Exhibit is to provide Company, who has expressed a good faith interest in purchasing Sun Products, with the opportunity to borrow and use certain Loaned Products for a period specified by Sun, prior to making a final purchasing decision.
      and later on:
      Company shall insure the Loaned Products against, and upon receipt of an invoice reimburse Sun for any damage to the Loaned Products sustained during this time period.
      Still more:
      Upon the termination of this Exhibit or an attached Appendix for any reason, except purchase of the Loaned Products under Section 6, herein, Company shall immediately terminate use of the Loaned Products, and within five (5) business days, return the Loaned Products at Company's expense to Sun.
      So, TFA talks about average Joe Blogger while the lawyers talk about a company interested in purchasing
  28. Offer valid in these countries: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    https://www.sun.com/secure/servers/coolthreads/tnb /agreements/index.jsp

    Try and Buy Agreements

    Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom (Great Britain), United States of America

  29. BAH, Sun, Apple are a stingy bunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been trying to get both Sun or Apple to let me borrow a machine
    to try our application on. No luck at all from either company. I'll
    guess I'll stick with Dell.

    Does anyone know how a small company can get some service?

    Maybe I'll call Sun again... Apple made it plenty clear they have no interest
    in my business.

    1. Re:BAH, Sun, Apple are a stingy bunch by ingenthr · · Score: 1

      Bummer... Sorry to hear that. My recommendation would be to first try going through the Sun Store (store.sun.com) 800 number. When you reach them, tell them you're looking for a local reseller.

      Sun's model leverages partners for nearly all customers, especially for getting access to things like loaners.

    2. Re:BAH, Sun, Apple are a stingy bunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the tip. Our next upgrade cycle is in may-june, so it's been a low priority. I'll try calling again.

      What do you think the equivalence between Sun MHz and Intel MHz is? That T2000 only runs at 1.2GHz, so while I could handle more users with it, at first glance it looks like my app would be less responsive (against a 2.8MHz Intel). I have a processing/memory bandwidth bottleneck right now which leads to users having to typically wait 10 to 20 seconds for a reponse. Doubling that would be bad :-).

      That right there is my biggest worry and the reason that I don't feel like I can just go off, order a T2000 and hope for the best.

    3. Re:BAH, Sun, Apple are a stingy bunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone know how a small company can get some service?

      My advice would be if you're a small company, deal with small companies. Apple may not not want your business, but perhaps a smaller local Apple reseller does.

    4. Re:BAH, Sun, Apple are a stingy bunch by JollyFinn · · Score: 1

      But luckily sun has changed and you get one for free upto 60 days to test your application on.

      --
      Emacs is good operating system, but it has one flaw: Its text editor could be better.
  30. Here's my pointer about using pointers. by woolio · · Score: 1

    What you did would not have sent a pointer. If "SERVER" was anything other than an integer-type, this wouldn't even have compiled under C. And if you did send "*SUN" to the "sentToBlog" function, there is no way that function could get the address, since using "&" there would just return an address pointing to the temporary copy on the stack, which is not what was intended.

    What you meant was this:

    SERVER *SUN;
    char HappyNerd[1337];
    HappyNerd = sendToBlog(SUN); ....
    void sendToBlog( SERVER *s )
    {
          printf("Whoo-hoo! The pointer points to %p\n", s);
    }

    1. Re:Here's my pointer about using pointers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you just take a pointers in C lecture today?

      It would have compiled. You are allowed to pass structures by value as arguments to functions.

      The rest of his post was nonsense, I'll give you that. Your "corrected" version isn't
      much better though. To start with, you use SUN uninitialized.

      SERVER sun; ...
      blah(&sun);

    2. Re:Here's my pointer about using pointers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention, you both allocated 1337 (static) bytes in HappyNerd, but then you trash the pointer to that array you created by assigning it the return value of sendToBlog(). Why bother with the 1337 bytes storage at all?

    3. Re:Here's my pointer about using pointers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He can't even assign a pointer to the array in the first place (a static array is not a pointer proper, just an alias for the arraysize*sizeof(element) bytes of storage...)

    4. Re:Here's my pointer about using pointers. by mkiwi · · Score: 1

      Ok ok, so my C is rusty. I have had to program in Java for the past year so it's easy to forget things like that. Sorry to all the C people out there who I thoroughly offended, just trying to have a little fun.

  31. Re:Oh good. (5core: -99 Troll) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he didn't say he does it to himself.

  32. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  33. Also need an "& l t ;" [no spaces] by mosel-saar-ruwer · · Score: 1

    Tabs were killed by the compression filter

    From mucho experience posting code to the Slashdot filter, you also need to use an " & l t ; " ["left tag escape character" or whatever - oh, and lose the spaces] so that your less-than sign " < " doesn't get mis-interpreted as the beginning of an HTML tag and thereby deleted:

    for (int x = 0; x 5000000; x++)

    becomes

    for (int x = 0; x < 5000000; x++)

  34. Sun's customer "service" is piss-poor by Robber+Baron · · Score: 1

    I'll be only too happy to give Sun's customer service a piss-poor review!
    We ordered one of Sun's new Galaxy servers and after nearly 4 months, it still hadn't shown up, with nothing resembling an adequate explanation, coming from from Sun. I had to chase them to get them to promise new delivery dates that they then failed to follow through on. So we cancelled our order and we went and ordered a couple of boxes from a competitor! We wanted a hardware support contract to go along with it, but if they can't deliver the box itself in nearly 4 months, how can they be expected to support the box in a timely fashion if something goes wrong?
    If that's the way Sun treats it's customers, they deserve to go titters. A few blogs I've read on the subject tell me I'm not the only one to have this experience either!

    BTW the other boxes we ordered only took two weeks to arrive.

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

    1. Re:Sun's customer "service" is piss-poor by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      Mind they're also the same company who thinks it cant just remove dtrace (or just leave it at the feature level that a sun4m can understand) and just let the high end 32bit'ers in. I'm not surprised you got the treatment you did. Break compatibility all over, and not care a dang. IBM however, at least gave their Microchannel RS/6000 machine equivalents from the same era a better shot at things.

      I wonder if they(IBM) were the "competitor you ordered from", being the last of the solvent high-performance "cheapness is weakness" solution providers.

      Sun just seems to be wanting to move to the 1u/2u knockoff level, and fast.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    2. Re:Sun's customer "service" is piss-poor by forq · · Score: 1

      I've bought >20 Galaxy servers from Sun, and they have all arrived in 10 business days or less. I don't know if you're purchasing through a reliable channel partner or Sun directly, but you should work on your relationship with your vendor. If they aren't a volume customer of Sun's, they will have difficulty finding high-traffic items. The Galaxy servers are hot and the waiting list is long, my vendor gets it through their channel partner, GE Access. I've got some comments about GE Access's Integration services, as they tend to be pretty sloppy about jamming extra memory/cards/etc in the machines and their packaging is attrocious, but all in all, we get what we ordered, and we get it quickly.

      If you ever reply to this, let us all know who your channel vendor was, so we can avoid them.

    3. Re:Sun's customer "service" is piss-poor by Robber+Baron · · Score: 1

      This was directly from Sun...

      --

      You're using her as bait, Master!

  35. Re:Oh good. (5core: -99 Troll) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be warned indeed. So you really think he's a serial killer? Does that make you more comfortable? The idea that only someone so sick that he kills people over and over could ever amputate his own flesh for the fun of it? What about the other person involved? The person who took the pictures? What about their vice?

  36. Re:Oh good. (5core: -99 Troll) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For that matter, he didn't say he was a he.

  37. Re:Oh good. (5core: -99 Troll) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who says that he needs someone to take the pictures? There's this really neat new invention that they call a tripod that might help with that problem. Oh, you've never heard of it, I see. Well, he could be using, er, a vice...if he was short one tripod? What's a vice's vice? You've got me on that one.

    You don't need to be a killer because you mutilate yourself, but people who mutilate themselves are FAR more likely to murder in their lifetimes than people who don't, they're also far more likely to kill themselves. It's quite obvious that this activity has been rooted in sexually for from the beginning, and it's quite clear that this man is escalating the magnitude of his fetish. If you disagree, then you're full of it. Serial killers are people that follow a progressive path, often guided by their sexual screwups. They receive gratification out of killing, and sometimes mutilation. By definition, this is not healthy behaviour.

    Having the want, need, and reward system in place for amputating all of one's fingers and toes, and other limbs, and then having the will to consciously carry it out on one's self is by definition not healthy. The body and mind have instincts that prevent normal people from doing these things to themselves. Self preservation dictates that this dosen't happen, unless it is preceived that it's in the best interest of preserving life. If this is the case, one's will can overpower the insticts, because they're weakened. If your arm's trapped under a boulder, for example, you might be able physically and emotionally to cut it off. If the instinct just isn't there, or it's deviant from that of the vast majority of people, then one dosen't even need a great deal of willpower to do such things.

    To most people, the thought of murdering another in an extremely violent way for no good reason is something that they cannot fathom, and neither can they fathom this. They just can't imagine. Doing things to yourself like this, or to animals, means that one's at least 95% complete on the path of mental screwed-uppedness that will let a human do this to another human. If this guy isn't fucking around with other people, I'd be very, very, very suprised. I'm no behavioral scientist, but I bet that most would agree with me.

  38. Regular vs. Enterprise storage by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Informative
    Right now, you pay a ridiculous premium for all things SCSI, simply because it's a dying standard
    WRONG

    The main cost driver for SCSI/Fiber drives is testing.
    The drives themselves tend to be built from pretty much the same parts as their SATA counterparts, lately. They can just stick a different type of controler board on the bottom and call it SATA vs. SCSI
    WRONG

    Before leaving the factory, the platters on every single enterprise class drive receive extensive testing. That is why SCSIs still have a 5 year warranty from Seagate, because every single drive has been tested and meets certain criteria.

    ATA/SATA drives are not given the same testing.

    Several drives per batch might get an indepth screening, but the rest get a relatively quick scan and then they're out the door.

    Your Ignorance Is Showing.
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Regular vs. Enterprise storage by nacturation · · Score: 4, Informative

      Before leaving the factory, the platters on every single enterprise class drive receive extensive testing. That is why SCSIs still have a 5 year warranty from Seagate, because every single drive has been tested and meets certain criteria.

      In case you weren't aware, Seagate's SATA drives also come with 5 year replacement warranties.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    2. Re:Regular vs. Enterprise storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I,d also like to add that because a drive receives more attention before being packed doesn't mean it's not sharing parts and design with a cheaper one. Just ask the car manufacturers.

    3. Re:Regular vs. Enterprise storage by msobkow · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm not aware of any manufacturer outside the milspec arena that guarantees to test every component individually.

      Modern manufacturing is statistical. You test n components out of each lot of 1000. If more than m fail, the lot is "rejected". In the case of high-cost manufacturing, the "rejected" lot will be individually tested so any good pieces can be salvaged.

      If you want tested components, the "grey" refurb/retest units are the ones that have actually been tested. Those which "passed" the lot sampling were not individually tested.

      Warranties are also purely statistical. They don't guarantee the drive will actually last that long, they just provide MTBF numbers, figure 24x7 server operation, and that provides the number of years the drive is expected to survive. You still get occasional failures, hence RAID-5/6 storage servers.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    4. Re:Regular vs. Enterprise storage by msobkow · · Score: 1

      Thinking about how the manufacturing and MTBF stats actually work, I think the real difference between enterprise and PC-class systems is that enterprise systems assume everything is going to fail sooner or later, and make allowance for it. PC systems are disposable components with downtime acceptable during replacement.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    5. Re:Regular vs. Enterprise storage by ErikZ · · Score: 1


      The previous poster said that the drives are pretty much identical except for the controller board. You shouted WRONG, and then said nothing to prove him wrong. Testing the drives does not have anything to do with them being nearly identical.

      And do you have a problem with ignorance? It's just a long word for "I don't know". Perhaps you leaped out of your mothers womb knowing everything, but the rest of us are learning as we go along.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  39. Sun to Give Viagra Servers to Reviewers by scdeimos · · Score: 1

    Oh, *Niagara*... my bad! :)

    1. Re:Sun to Give Viagra Servers to Reviewers by Zerbs · · Score: 1

      well, I suppose Viagra could be good for a server if it helps keep it up

      --
      "22 astronauts were born in Ohio. What is it about your state that makes people want to flee the Earth?" Stephen Colbert
  40. Re:Oh good. (5core: -99 Troll) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you think the number of people who would amputate themselves is anywhere near the number of people who would kill themselves? In other words, which one is more common? I mean, are there a lot of people walking around with self amputations than one would normally assume?

  41. I need a speelchecker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else read that headline as "Sun to give away Viagra Servers to Reviewers"?
    I really need to quit reviewing my email spam folder.

  42. Expansion Slots... by temojen · · Score: 1

    You may care very much about the expansion slots in a server if you need a lot of telephony cards (and this seems to be an application where the Niagra design would excel).

    1. Re:Expansion Slots... by davecb · · Score: 1
      If memory serevs, they just announced a telco (TCA) packaging of the T1...

      --dave

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
  43. Sun is Schizoid by spycker · · Score: 0

    One day McNeally says privacy is out the door get over it then he says customers want privacy and deserve it. On another day he hates Microsoft and is going to sue it into the ground and then settles. Yet on another day hardware and software are the most precious thing and Sun will charge an arm and a leg for both and then the next day they are giving it away.

    Remember Star Office? They couldn't give away so they had to fork it and try to sell it at a reasonable price. Want to buy a workstation from SUN? Don't bother. Despite great quality (i.e. the case won't cut your hand) you can get a good bang for the buck from Vision Man or SystemMax.

    Sun still has enormous potential, but they are all over the place. Hey, dumbasses. Charge a reasonable price for your software and hardware and people will buy it. Get a real business plan for Christ sakes!!!

  44. Enterprise Class Drives by raftpeople · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are differences in the hardware of mainframes, unix/as400 servers, pc servers and pc's. Most differences surround reliability (redundancy etc.) and parallel processing (multiple CPU's, multiple specialized processors controlling IO, etc. etc.) Here are a couple examples:
    IO controller cache with error correcting checksum in memory and redundant power supply to ensure zero loss of data short of taking a sledgehammer to the thing.
    Mainframe CPU - parity checking with automatic transaction rollback on error detection at the hardware level (on the CPU). This is why banks use mainframes, so they know the transaction completed, or didn't, no in between.

  45. Wrong Definition of Speed by raftpeople · · Score: 1

    "Is it the speed? A decade ago, we were looking at servers which weren't half as fast as our low end PCs today. If it is speed, do we have some magical cutoff which just keeps moving forward?"

    I'm not sure what you consider a server, but even the low to midrange servers I deal with (including the 10 year old ones) blow away any PC in transaction volume and data throughput. You have no idea how much hardware exists in these servers (mainframe, as400 and unix) aside from the CPU to do all of the tasks required to get good performance in a multi-user business application/database environment.

  46. The advertising campaign. by klofkorn · · Score: 2, Funny

    Free N1_agra click here!

  47. Niagara Throughput by dunstan · · Score: 1

    The advantage you get from the Niagara servers depends very much on the workload you put on it. Remeber, this is the first stop on the move into "Throughput Computing", with the Niagara architecture being "network facing", while the subsequence Rock architecture will be "Data facing".

    What this means in practice is that Niagara has blistering performance for stuff which is basically integer intensive, but ain't so exciting for anything which is floating point intensive. But for the right workloads, a single Niagara socket can produce performance similar to a quad Xeon system, in a fraction of the space, and using a fraction of the power.

    Now, how significant is the power saving? Well, I've been into datacentres where the owners have invested heavily in blade technology in order to optimise the space only to find that the power and air-conditioning requirements mean they can only half fill their blade enclosures. The problem for datacentre managers now tend to be not space, or weight, but power and cooling. And for systems in colocation facilities, it's not unusual for power to cost as much as (GBP)1,000 per month for a 30A feed (at 230V), so if you can get may times the data throughput for the same amount of power then it's exciting news.

    --
    The last scintilla of doubt just rode out of town
  48. Parallel Workloads by dunstan · · Score: 1

    Niagara isn't designed for a single highly parallised workload, it's designed for where you have hundred or thousands of autonomous threads which can be horizontally scaled - think Google, or eBay, or Wikimedia. If your current architecture needs dozens of middleware and web servers, Niagara is likely to massively reduce the amount of power needed for this function, here and now. Some of the most striking results have been for web facing middleware running on top of a JVM, as so many of these things do, without any significant modification.

    They've made a bet that this sort of workload will increasingly be the norm - for example, as more and more stuff has RFID tags in it the amount of shovelling and processing of small bits of data will mushroom.

    --
    The last scintilla of doubt just rode out of town
    1. Re:Parallel Workloads by jadavis · · Score: 1

      From the processor's perspective, how is a parallelized workload different than autonomous threads? How are they different at all, except for the points in a parallel workload that require communication between the threads?

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    2. Re:Parallel Workloads by dunstan · · Score: 1

      Hmm, maybe I could have been clearer. I see two distinct situations:

      a) a workload which is essentially a single task which has been parallelised
      b) a workload which is a single server handling a whole bunch of different requests

      Now, when the parent posting suggested a need for app developers to parallelise their applications, I would see that as falling into category (a), while the bulk of middleware servers are actually running flat out doing type (b) workloads. The big difference is that for a type (a) workload you can write it so that you get a single thread causing a bottleneck, while for a type (b) workload this intrinsically cannot happen. In the Google/eBay/Wikimedia scenario, the workloads are essentially type (b) workloads, as there are basically farms of servers dealing with loads of autonomous requests.

      The picture that Sun used of Niagara falls drives the point home: it's not that the water goes over particularly fast at any point, it's just that the falls are very wide, so a whole bunch of water gets over.

      --
      The last scintilla of doubt just rode out of town
  49. nice try SUN by unixman99 · · Score: 1

    Too bad the newer SAS SCSI drives don't have a proper RAID controller yet. The company I work for was just about ready to get one until I found out you need a 10k storage array, worth more than the whole server.

    1. Re:nice try SUN by buvic2 · · Score: 1

      A new mainboard revision will be out (expected) late Q1 or early Q2 2006. Of course you're SOL on raid controller support under Solaris anyway until Solaris 10 update 2, expected Q2/Q3 2006, unless they release a seperate patch or package earlier. Solaris applies to both sparc and x86 versions by the way, for example X2100 and X4100/4200 series do have the controller on board but currently not supported under Solaris/x86. We've got 3 T2000 running, and I'm trying to hold off on purchasing more until the new mainboard's out. They're nice test boxes. I hope there will either be an upgrade/recall or some creativity with the maintenance contracts to upgrade the boards of the current ones.

  50. dyslexia redux by eclectro · · Score: 1

    Sun to Give Nigeria Servers to Reviewers
    hello my friend! i am a humble nigerian prince with millions of dollars and have selected you to...


    It came accross to me as "Sun to give Nigerians Servers" and I shrieked in horror at the empowerment Nigerian scammers were about to receive.

    Then I realized that they just had fallen prey to one of those emails.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  51. Sweet! by wetfeetl33t · · Score: 1

    Could someone please tell me how to set up a blog ASAP?

    --
    Register the editry.
  52. To Serve Data? by krygny · · Score: 1

    I thought it was "To Serve Man".

    --
    Research shows that 67% of those who use the term "research shows", are just making shit up.
  53. Inaccurate headline. no free servers by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 3, Informative
    Ahem, it's not a free server, if you read the fine print.

    You get a LOANER server. At the end of 30 days, you have the option of buying it, or mailing it back, insured, at your expense, or taking the chance they like your bribed-for review. For 99% of the people that read Slashdot, that means you're out $60 bucks. That's a *long* way from getting a free server.

    1. Re:Inaccurate headline. no free servers by Inositle · · Score: 1

      For one thing, it's a 60 day trial period. Also, as the blog post says, they'll pay to ship it back to Sun (I e-mailed customer service on my order to confirm this as well). So, if you take what the blog post says, he makes it sound like you have a high chance of them liking your review (as long as it looks nice), so the chances of a free server aren't that low (at least, you'll have a free server for 60 days until they ship it back).

  54. In Soviet Russia by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, servers keep you.

  55. Sun: servres U cannot give away by fputs(shit,+slashdot · · Score: 1

    What happen to support when IBM sues Sun for role in teh fiaSCO?

    --
    I am the bastard of base minus 12! Turing was the ejaculate of my complete machine!
  56. couldnt resist... by DeathByDuke · · Score: 1

    May the Schwartz be with you!

  57. Re:No RAID necessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sun's new filesystem ZFS doesn't need RAID.

  58. I've been testing a T2000 and have been Blown away by nocwage · · Score: 1

    Sadly I'm not in this blogging program BUT I have had the opportunity to test one of these T2000 and I have to say that I have been BLOWN away.

    (T2000, 1.2Ghz, 32G Ram, 2x72Gig HD)

    I work for a company which trades stocks (no, you probably haven't heard of it, it's a private company). We have branches all over the world and about 1000 full time traders. We've got about 10 Sun V880 servers, a few 480s and another 10 420s. Most of the V880 servers are dedicated to streaming and parsing all the quote data from various exchanges around the world as well as risk protection and trader management.

    Like many of you we have this equipment at a data centre, and like many of you we've been told that we have reached the limit for power consumption and heat. They specifically told us NO MORE.

    The T2000 is our saviour.
    Our one quote feed application generally ran at 30-40% CPU utilization on a V880 with 8 1.2Ghz UltraSparc III processors.
    On the T2000.. 3%

    Total power consumption is around 300W.. FOR THE WHOLE BOX.
    I'm probably wrong but I think the power requirements for the V880 is around 1500W...

    All of this from a 2U unit.
    One rack with 5 of these things would be 10x more powerful (with our application) than our 5 racks of V880s.

    The FPU issue is a problem though, sadly we cannot run our reporting software on this box but if the FPU utilization is low you won't have a problem.

    Sun has seen a problem (space, power, heat) and solved it. We don't have a large web farm here but anyone who does should VERY SERIOUSLY look at this box. And even with the FPU issue you can just buy a more powerful "traditional" Sun (or other) server to handle any back end floating point calculations and leave the T2000 to serving web pages.

    Simply blown away.

  59. Serving data by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

    ... is only 1 facet of a server's purpose. Matter of fact, serving data may only be an incidental purpose. Generally, processing data and requests are usually the forte of servers. It all depends upon what purpose your servers are put to. (If you doubt this, think about the number crunchers or search sites robots, not everything is about serving static web pages)

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  60. 12342.000203492933 by justins · · Score: 1
    What is $5000 to SUNW? Say they send them to 100 reviewers (probably less since we tend to concentrate on a few popular sites) who basically help them get the word out. Sun losts $5mil.

    I can see you're using a pentium to do your math.
    --
    Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
  61. Do you mean WoW client or server? by Bernie+Fsckinner · · Score: 1

    I bet it would run a WoW shard pretty well. How many instances of Blackrock Spire could one of those puppies handle?

  62. Re:I've been testing a T2000 and have been Blown a by ajdowntown · · Score: 1

    hmm, i think you need to have your review on a blog to get the free machine, not sure a posting on /. will work...

  63. "giving away Niagara" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "giving away Niagara", my spam filters almost stopped that one...

  64. Let your dollar float! by fm6 · · Score: 1
    So for scientific work, or other stuff that's seriously hammering the FPU, it's going to be a dog. Sun has never denied this. You're not going to take weather simulations and throw them on this thing; it'd be a waste of money. But for other applications -- database; web server; maybe financial simulations...
    Provided, of course, you don't make the common mistake of using floating point to represent currency values! Of course, if you do that, your numbers will come out all wrong anyway. Makes me wonder about some of the "economic models" I hear about...
  65. Not that simple by fm6 · · Score: 1
    In 5 years, it's possible that making everything parallel will be a basic principle just like making modular code.
    Uh, no. Parallelism is just a special case of concurrent programming, and trust me, that will never be as basic as modular programming. Not that it won't be important, what with cheap multicore systems. But breaking your program down into threads will always be much harder than breaking your program down into modules. You will see more use of compilers and runtimes that handle common multithreading use cases (such as unrolling a loop so it executes as multiple threads) for you. But that kind of thing will not be managed by the individual programmer.

    I've been tasked with re-writing this document so that it describes Java concurrency in terms of JSR 166 instead of the more primitive thread management currently described. It only took a little research to convince me that I'll not be able to do more than scratch the surface. It's a huge topic. What I plan to do is guide the reader to a simple use case involving caching in a ConcurrentHashMap. (I still haven't figured out what to cache: it has to be resource-intensive enough to make the example realistic, but not too complicated. Ideas, anyone?) Then I'll point people to several thick, dense books such as this one, this one, and this one. After which they're on their own.

  66. Re:I've been testing a T2000 and have been Blown a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Our one quote feed application generally ran at 30-40% CPU utilization on a V880 with 8 1.2Ghz UltraSparc III processors.


    I've heard this new fangled Opteron processors are much quicker than those anyway.
  67. Starting a blog right away! by fbg111 · · Score: 1

    Sweet, I'm starting my new tech review blog right away, it's called Niagra For Me, and it's hosted at http://niagraforme.blogspot.com/. Everybody go visit it and leave a comment so it will look popular and get me a Niagra server!

    --
    Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
    1. Re:Starting a blog right away! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm getting a 404 on that blog. ;)

      Oh, I got this email this morning. :D

      -----

      We are pleased to inform you that you have been accepted into the Sun Microsystems Try-and-Buy program for Sun Fire T2000 CoolThreads servers, the world's first eco-responsible server. This revolutionary server offers incredible performance on multi-threaded applications, while dramatically reducing power and space requirements.

        Here is what some of our other customers and ISV's have said about the product:

              http://www.sun.com/servers/coolthreads/testimonial s/
              http://www.sun.com/servers/coolthreads/testimonial s/isv.jsp

      Your CoolThreads server will be arriving within the next 2 weeks depending on your location in the world. For contact information on your order, go to http://www.sun.com/servers/coolthreads/tnb/status. jsp