Slashdot Mirror


Enzyme Computer Could Live Inside You

dylanduck writes "New Scientist reports the creation of an enzyme-based computer that performs AND and XOR calculations, and combinations of the two, based on the presence or absence of specific chemicals. If they can be engineered inside living cells, they could measure a patient's metabolism and deliver just the right amount of drug at just the right spot, the researchers reckon. I'm worried about the viruses." Ba-dump *chink*.

155 comments

  1. Ha! by qw(name) · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm worried about the viruses." Ba-dump *chink*.
    OMG, that was funny. It gives new meanign to "Safe Hex" from years gone by.
    1. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I wouldn't be worried about the viruses... The time invested in developing a virus will be more than a few days hacking code in a computer. It will require a lab, thousands of dollars of reagents, an education, and more than likely a multidisciplinary team.

      As opposed to a geeky 14 year old who is too scared to talk to girls.

    2. Re:Ha! by lanswitch · · Score: 1
      It will require a lab, thousands of dollars of reagents, an education, and more than likely a multidisciplinary team.

      Something like a small but well-focused group of terrorists?

    3. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm worried about the viruses." Ba-dump *chink*.

      Some slashdotters might think this was "funny", but well-informed people realize that it is actually a quite hurtful and insulting expression.

      You wouldn't find it so amusing if Zonk went around writing Ba-dump *honkey* or Ba-dump *n----r*, now would you?

    4. Re:Ha! by c_forq · · Score: 1

      Rainbow Six anyone?

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    5. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell would you censor 'nigger' but not 'honkey' or 'chink'?

    6. Re:Ha! by Melfina · · Score: 1

      Shiva FTW~ As long as I have my 'B' Vaccine, you guys can do what you want :p

      --
      :3 rawr.
    7. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was referring to the drum rollup traditionally done to emphasize a corny joke, moron. Did you think he was smacking some random minority person standing next to him? Why?

    8. Re:Ha! by chawly · · Score: 1

      Chinaman's chance ?

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  2. Logical sequencing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    If the "computer" can do more than simple combinatorial logic, what controls the flow of execution?

    Random chance encounters with the right substances??

    Thanks - I'll wait until version 2.

    1. Re:Logical sequencing? by WhiplashII · · Score: 1, Informative

      Um, the basis of all computers is two gates that allow oposing actions. For example, a Not gate and an OR gate. (And=not(or(not(a),not(b)))) Everything else is built from these gates - so this is already more than enough to build a computer. (Not=xor(a,a)), (or=not(and(not(a),not(b))))

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
    2. Re:Logical sequencing? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with a Turing machine with a double-helix tape?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Logical sequencing? by EMeta · · Score: 1

      Yeah, how unstable would a system be that depended on random encouners with chemical substances? About as unstable, I imagine, as almost all life on Earth.

      While in truth this isn't completely stable, it's still the best we're ever going to do in biological reprogramming, so we need to start the work sometime. Sure beats having to rely on EM sensitive devices all the time.

    4. Re:Logical sequencing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'll find that you cannot get NOT(a) from XOR(a,a), given that XOR(a,a) will always give 0.

    5. Re:Logical sequencing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmmm.....therapeutic treatments equated to the outcomes and same time scales as evolution of life on earth??

      Why not dump a bunch of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen and oxygen in your body and let the random interactions fix what ails you??

    6. Re:Logical sequencing? by Boronx · · Score: 1

      XOR(a,a) != NOT(a),

      XOR(a,TRUE) == NOT(a)

      You don't need two types of gates.
      NAND gates alone are logically complete.

      NOT(a) == NAND(a,a)
      AND(a,b) == (NOT(NAND(a,b)))
      OR(a,b) == (NAND(NOT(a),NOT(b)))

    7. Re:Logical sequencing? by WhiplashII · · Score: 1

      Whoops! I was thinking nor, not xor - my mistake. I just wanted to point out that this is really all you need, providing that it is cascadable with a fan out greater than one (one output can drive at least two inputs).

      For those that care, binary addition of A and B into C1 and C0 is C0=AND(OR(A,B),NOT(AND(A,B))), C1=AND(a,b)

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
    8. Re:Logical sequencing? by chawly · · Score: 1

      OMG you mean that ? Bill Gates is not inevitable ?

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  3. In Related News by ReidMaynard · · Score: 2, Funny

    Core Dump takes on new meaning..

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

    1. Re:In Related News by EntropyEngine · · Score: 3, Funny

      Presumably then, when something goes badly wrong, you end up with the blue spleen of death...

  4. In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    enzyme computer live inside you!

    Oh wait...

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia... by lucaslucaslucas · · Score: 1
      enzyme computer live inside you!

      Oh wait...

      Whereas, in capitalist america, you live inside enzyme computers?

  5. Yes, but ... by nmccart · · Score: 3, Funny

    will it run Linux?

    --
    Funny sigs make your Karma go down.
    1. Re:Yes, but ... by include($dysmas) · · Score: 3, Funny

      and, can you imagine a beowulf cluster of these things? oh wait....

    2. Re:Yes, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it will run Linus.

    3. Re:Yes, but ... by coreyb · · Score: 1

      Well, in Cory Doctorow's 0wnz0red, I think it did.

    4. Re:Yes, but ... by nganju · · Score: 2, Funny

      More like "Yes, but will it run Linus?".

      --
      There are 2 kinds of people in this world. Those that can keep their train of thought,
  6. I dunno by dtsazza · · Score: 2, Insightful
    OK, so they've got a computer that works on enzymes, which is pretty clever. And from TFA:
    "This is basically a computer that could be integrated with the human body," Willner told New Scientist. "We feel you could implant an enzyme computer into the body and use it to calculate an entire metabolic pathway."
    But can't you do that already with standard computers (we can make them pretty small these days, so I'm told)?

    My guess is that they instinctively think "Ooh, it's made of enzymes, instead of all that nasty enzymes and electricity, so it must be better to put in people." But then we've been putting pacemakers etc. in people for years without any problems. And if they're suggesting that these wouldn't be self-enclosed units and would actually interact with actual human enzymes that may come and go as they please... then they've got a lot of contingency planning and 'wiring' work to do...

    I don't see this having any real impact for a long while yet.
    --
    My, that was a yummy potato!
    1. Re:I dunno by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And if they're suggesting that these wouldn't be self-enclosed units and would actually interact with actual human enzymes that may come and go as they please...

      Well, otherwise, what good are they? But you're quite right that this is very far off. I can imagine the technology being used to putter around with animals for years before it's a good idea to start screwing around with humans. The fact is that we just don't understand all that much about the basic functioning of some of these systems - or basically any of them - and so anything we do now would be just groping in the dark. That can be fun, but it can also be dangerous :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:I dunno by tempest69 · · Score: 1

      I don't see this having any real impact for a long while yet.


      How about this, imagine that you have a metabolic disorder such as diabetes, hypoglycemia, hyperthyroidism, etc...



      With a bit of engineering you could induce color changes in a few skin cells in "minute time" where specfic darkening would occur in a regular grid, perhaps on the inside of your wrist, gauging your blood chemistry. The dots would need to be applied like tatoos, and each dot would need a specific mix, and the dots would need to be re-applied probably every couple weeks/months depending on the proteins used (assuming they would skip the shorter lived proteins or use plasmids).



      This is pretty do-able. But I agree that there is some contingency planning involved.



      Storm

  7. I'm more worried ... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... that Microsoft might enter this business. Would give a whole new meaning to Blue Screen Of Death ...

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    1. Re:I'm more worried ... by PFI_Optix · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just wait til Apple enters the market.

      It'll cost twice as much, and only models will be able to install it.

      (lol cliches)

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    2. Re:I'm more worried ... by geobeck · · Score: 1

      ...and you won't be able to uninstall the bundled software like Alimentary Explorer and Windows Memory Player.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
  8. Isn't there already one in your body? by LM741N · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think it is called the brain. Although it might work a little bit differently that what they are doing.

    1. Re:Isn't there already one in your body? by BecomingLumberg · · Score: 1
      How many /.'rs will start waddling like Tux after they install Linux on their brain.

      Then again...

      How many already waddle due to poor health choices?

      ::Run and hide from the flame!::

      --
      If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.-TJ
    2. Re:Isn't there already one in your body? by BewireNomali · · Score: 1

      what of the pregnant women on slashdot? *shrugs*

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    3. Re:Isn't there already one in your body? by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      I, for one, wouldn't mind having a digital computer interfaced with my brain, to help me with mathematical calculations. And it wouln't hurt to have digital memory, either, so I can remember things my brain thinks are unimportant. I suspect that if it could be connected properly to neurons, a brain will simply incorporate it as part of itself. As for problems, I think that powering and cooling a chip might be the worst problems, but maybe an enzine computer would be easier.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    4. Re:Isn't there already one in your body? by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      No shit. I've wanted an FPU upgrade to my brain since high school. That would be my second cybermod after superhuman cyborg eyes.

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    5. Re:Isn't there already one in your body? by billcopc · · Score: 1

      I guess retards would pwn us all with their watercooling rig! *rimshot*

      Thanks, I'll be here all week!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    6. Re:Isn't there already one in your body? by c_forq · · Score: 1

      Pregnant women on slashdot? Are you telling me there are women on slashdot? And are you telling me women don't have to leave their parents' basement to have sex?

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    7. Re:Isn't there already one in your body? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming you had a digital computer interfaced with your brain, how would that be significantly faster than using a calculator? It's not like your nervous system has significant latency to your fingers...though such an interface might be of aid to the physically disabled.

      A digital computer, unlike your brain, is a "dumb" device -- it doesn't have a subconcious to interface directly with yours, so it would just sit there idly and wait for explicit instructions, connected to your concious mind. Stick with the calculator for a while yet. ;)

    8. Re:Isn't there already one in your body? by Intron · · Score: 2, Funny

      We have this, but we're still working on the DRM issues. Obviously, if you could have perfect memories of a concert, that would violate our copyrights.

      -- Sony

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    9. Re:Isn't there already one in your body? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      A penny to access your own thoughts?

      Or $2.95?

      Whatever.

      --
  9. Old News... by Ancil · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If they can be engineered inside living cells, they could measure a patient's metabolism and deliver just the right amount of drug at just the right spot, the researchers reckon.
    I already have one of these. It helps me to live, so I named it a "liver".
    1. Re:Old News... by Programmer_In_Traini · · Score: 1

      yes but as you know, not everyone's liver works properly, if at all, thus, the good news of finding something that can do it in its place.

      --
      If you look like your passport photo, you're too ill to travel. - Will Kommen
    2. Re:Old News... by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

      That's the crazy thing about people, we all don't work the same, and we all don't work properly. I mean call me crazy but maybe, just maybe, some people need certain hormone, enzyme, and drug levels artificially maintained because their bodies have a deficiency of some sort that does not allow their bodies to properly regulate themselves.
      Regards,
      Steve

    3. Re:Old News... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      >I already have one of these. It helps me to live, so I named it a "liver".

      I have one of these too and live in a network. I often interface and exchange data with the one called "wife." Its like sneakernet, but you use something other than your feet.

    4. Re:Old News... by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

      So, does that make you or your wife the server? I do hope she's a thin client.

      I hope you both take adequate precautions before opening one of your ports.

      Does your network require a username and password- I bet your username was 'marry_m3' and the password 'i_d0'

      If you ever have trouble logging on, chocolate and flower patches tend to help ease network restrictions.

      Also, if you're feeling adventurous, you may seek to interface with an alternative port, but you may be met with resistance.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    5. Re:Old News... by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      This is slashdot. You're supposed to say "Those whose livers don't function right are weak and thus deserve to die." Then you yell and ask mommy for a glass of water.

    6. Re:Old News... by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      I already have one of these. It helps me to live, so I named it a "liver".

      Really? You still have one those old things?
      I thought that's what a good college education was meant to fix.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    7. Re:Old News... by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      w3rd

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
  10. Reckon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are these researchers ranchers by any chance? When I hear the word reckon, I imagine some cowboy talking about herding cattle, not scientists creating wonder drugs and biological computers.

  11. Anybody here read by i_should_be_working · · Score: 1

    Blood Music by Greg Bear?

    In it someone's "enzyme computers" got too smart.

    1. Re:Anybody here read by mfrank · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it got extremely weird at the end. Although Cory Doctorow's "Ownz0red" is more topical.

  12. Er... by AWhiteFlame · · Score: 1

    I'm not worried about viruses. I'm worried about hackers or these in the wrong hands. >.>

    --
    "Everything worth innovating today will go to court tomorrow."
    1. Re:Er... by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

      Simple solution: don't make them programmable, and don't network them. No communication + no writing = no virus risk.

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    2. Re:Er... by dtsazza · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine any possible reason to having external interfacing on these computers, so with any sense they'd be autonomous once built and released.

      In theory someone could still change their program physically... but if someone you don't trust is up to their elbows in your kidneys, you've got more pressing concerns! :)

      --
      My, that was a yummy potato!
    3. Re:Er... by trparky · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I keep thinking about Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex and the case known as the "Laughing Man."

    4. Re:Er... by jonbritton · · Score: 1

      Right...there are already hackers that can harm us. They're called axe-murderers.

      What would enzyme-hackers do that couldn't be done by a sharp, pointy stick?

  13. I wanted to write a sci-fi story on this... by vertinox · · Score: 1

    I had a brain storm about an idea for a sci-fi short story in which a team of college grads figure out a way to turn their dna into computers. This would enable them to form huds in their mind and use their brains for neural computers instead of say... Cybernetic implants...

    Then one student learns how to break the code and then start to modify all his DNA and becomes a superbeast consuming all life and then the good guy nerd transforms into some physic dragon ball-esque character (who can also modify his dna to turn into a female supermodel) and fights it out in an anti-clamtic battle and then my story goes down hill from there... So I sort of never bothered to even to try to start writing down the story.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    1. Re:I wanted to write a sci-fi story on this... by radarsat1 · · Score: 1

      Instead of giving away your story idea on slashdot, you should write it. ;-)
      (I'm serious.) I know we all need a little push once in a while, but once you get started it'll roll..

    2. Re:I wanted to write a sci-fi story on this... by paiute · · Score: 1

      I had a brain storm about an idea for a sci-fi short story in which a team of college grads figure out a way to turn their dna into computers. This would enable them to form huds in their mind and use their brains for neural computers instead of say... Cybernetic implants...

      Then one student learns how to break the code and then start to modify all his DNA and becomes a superbeast consuming all life and then the good guy nerd transforms into some physic dragon ball-esque character (who can also modify his dna to turn into a female supermodel) and fights it out in an anti-clamtic battle and then my story goes down hill from there... So I sort of never bothered to even to try to start writing down the story.


      Greenlight! I got Woo at the helm, Gyllenhaal as the good guy. I've got calls in to Carrey's agent - if he's available to play the heavy we go, if not we fall back on Busey. He's cheap, and what the hell, it's going to be all latex and cgi anyway, right? We do a reading tomorrow for the female lead, Rachel McAdams, Johansson, Beyonce. Beckinsale keeps calling me, but I think she's done. What say you have a first draft on my desk by Friday?

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  14. good ol' zonky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't it supposed to be the sound of a drum cymbal zonk? Like during standup comedy there is a guy from the band that just played, or is waiting to play, or is providing musical accompanyment that goes "badump *pisssh*" (kick, cymbal or something a drummer will inform us of, but that *pisssh* sound)

    Seriously zonk, I don't want to make you feel bad, but there are like a zillion people more qualified than you that would happily do what you are doing for free. I don't know how you got there, but I suppose that's a special skill in itself that you must have (or someone you know or sucked up to).

    Slashdot has gone downhill, I mean it's obvious why zonk was appointed, cause the other editors (as they have openly stated) don't give a damn about spelling, proof reading, checking links or anything. If they appointed someone with half a clue it would have made them look bad. Oh well.

    I will await people pointing out my spelling mistakes and using the "don't come here if you don't like it" argument. Thank you for your time.

    1. Re:good ol' zonky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. He was calling the submitter a 'Chink'. Zonk, you racist bastard, you!

    2. Re:good ol' zonky by c_forq · · Score: 1

      Google results:
      ba dump chink: about 11,000 results. (Using ba-dump *chink* gets 242, putting quotes around it gets 39)
      badump pisssh: No results. (Also no results for ba dump pisssh.)

      I'm sorry, I think you lost this round. Better luck next time.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    3. Re:good ol' zonky by enjerth · · Score: 1

      I was going to say, isn't "chink" a racial slur??

  15. Soylent PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The computers are made of people!

    1. Re:Soylent PC by natedubbya · · Score: 1

      Hey who modded this parent down? All Soylent Green references should be instantly modded up +5 without hesitation.

  16. now if only it had a shifter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it had a shifter as well, it could do addition. (x + y = (x^y) + ((x&y)<<1), just repeat until the second term is 0)

  17. Beer by i_am_the_r00t · · Score: 5, Funny

    If Day=Friday AND time="5:30:00" then Deliver_Beer() Function Deliver_Beer() If Bank_Balance > $300.00 then Beer="Sam Adams Boston Lager" Else Beer = "Stroh's" Endif end Function

    1. Re:Beer by forkazoo · · Score: 1
      If Day=Friday AND time="5:30:00" then Deliver_Beer() Function Deliver_Beer() If Bank_Balance > $300.00 then Beer="Sam Adams Boston Lager" Else Beer = "Stroh's" Endif end Function


      You have made a classic blunder. You don't want to check for exact equality with a continuous variable.

      If Day=Friday AND ( abs (time - BEER_O_CLOCK) < epsilon) ) ...

      This way, you don't risk missing beer time just because the function ran a fraction of a second too late. Actually, it'd probably be even better to set a flag.

      if (!BEERFLAG)
          if time > 5:30:00pm && time < CLOSING_TIME && !HAVE_BEER
          BEERFLAG = ! BEERFLAG

      if (BEERFLAG)
          Deliver_Beer()

      and modify Deliver_Beer to set HAVE_BEER when it arrives.
    2. Re:Beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should also avoid hard coding values such as Beer. Instead, select them from a relational database for the specified user:

      SELECT preference INTO beer FROM preferences_table
      WHERE user = sys.current_user AND preference_type = 'BEER' AND bank_balance > minimum_balance;

      My preference in beer is not the same as your preference in beer.

  18. Forget viruses... by aardwolf64 · · Score: 1

    Forget viruses... I'm more concerned with software bugs. You think the Pentium Pro floating point errors were bad? Try developing a nervous twitch or not being able to walk because of some software engineer's typo...

    1. Re:Forget viruses... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      I'm not worried.

      try
      mainbiohandler;
      except
      on E: EBioError do
      begin
      DeliverTranks;
      PhoneHome('We''re hosed man! '+E.Message);
      end;
      end;

      I can't be worried.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  19. Greatest advantage of human computers by jack79 · · Score: 1

    "Hello world" program requires ZERO lines of code. Textbooks all one chapter shorter.

  20. Cool ... by kitzilla · · Score: 1
    ... a cup of stain-fighting detergent, and your Maytag is a supercomputer.

    Don't tell Microsoft, or pretty soon we'll all be crashing the spin cycle.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
  21. Of course it runs NetBSD ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course it runs NetBSD ;) No hype required :D

  22. Ob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new microscopic, drug-dispensing intralords.

  23. Human upgrades, here we come! by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 4, Funny

    This could lead to some great human programming! Think about it!

    New GEEK YOGURT with Enzymatic-Action (TM)! Comes in new exciting arrangements!

    Now you can become a Perl expert with our Perl Programming yogurt! Comes in the convenient beer flavor!

    Our new BFG2000 yogurt with Hyper-Enzymatic-Action (TM) will help you to maintain focus and alertness during those long, overnight CS or BF2 sessions! Comes in Jolt and Penguin Mint flavors!

    Our C++ yogurt doesn't come in one package but instead comes in several small packages that work together!

    Our Increase Your Attractiveness To Girls yogurt is still in development, but we're working on it. It's not as easy as we thought.

    We've given up on our .NET yogurt because it's too difficult to swallow.

    Increase your memory with our RAM super-enzymatic yogurt! Just remember that you'll need to eat a good helping of this every year or so as life's base requirements keep increasing.

    Finally, our Microsoft yogurt with BSOD enzymes with help you to learn to do new and amazing things that you've been able to do for a long time with competitors' yogurts, but now you won't have the extra expense of buying theirs! (Why, no, that's not anti-competitive. Why do you ask?)

    Hey, it's Friday. Gotta have some fun. :)

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    1. Re:Human upgrades, here we come! by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 3, Funny

      This would kill Open Source.

      Would you put the yogurt of some guy named Linus in your mouth?

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    2. Re:Human upgrades, here we come! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ewww! I'd bet that it would sell really well in San Francisco, though!

    3. Re:Human upgrades, here we come! by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Hey, it's Friday. Gotta have some fun. :)

            Perhaps I'm cynical, but:

            Marketroid #1: And the great thing is, because our clients are not able to synthesize these enzymes for themselves they will have to continually buy our yogurts to keep their skills honed since the enzymes denature and lose their ability over time.

            Marketroid #2: Wouldn't it be even better if one of the by-products of the enzyme degradation was in fact toxic, so they would have to keep buying the product one they've tried it, or die?

            Yeah ok too many big words for marketing people, but you get the idea ;)

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:Human upgrades, here we come! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our new enzyme Sony rootkit innerlords!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:Human upgrades, here we come! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " This could lead to some great human programming! Think about it! "

      Anybody know where the extra TP is? I gotta take a core dump. :*(

    6. Re:Human upgrades, here we come! by Doobie+Dan · · Score: 1

      I like Perl and all, but you're going to have a hard time getting me to eat beer flavored yogurt...

  24. Enzymes are not alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Therefore, an enzyme-based computer will not "live" inside you.

    It will only "function" inside you.

    Yes I know it is just a detail, but since we are all-grokking geeks we should hold ourselves to a higher standard.

    1. Re:Enzymes are not alive by wolff000 · · Score: 1

      "Yes I know it is just a detail, but since we are all-grokking geeks we should hold ourselves to a higher standard."

      Fan of "Stranger In A Strange Land" by robert a heilein, me too. that book actually changed the way I look at a lot of things.

      anyways I am not worried about terrorists messing with this kind of thing cause the equipment it would take would most likely be far beyond that of a terrorist. nuclear power on the other hand is something rather easily attainable and for a terrorist much better option. a dirty bomb is way easier to make with almost no skill. where as coding a biological computer takee a whoe lot of education and training, from what i understand of it anyway.

      --
      WTF?
  25. overheating could be a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'd be worried about overheating, like the drummers in diamond age by neal stephenson

    1. Re:overheating could be a problem by chawly · · Score: 1

      Could be at that. Might have to fit it with a fan. Where to put the fan could be a problem - except in Soviet Russia, of course.

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  26. Kurzweil's vision by CRCulver · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Raymond Wurzveil has been writing for years now on the coming merger of man and machine (as in his highly recommended book The Age of Spiritual Machines ). The general idea is that eventually our minds will be transferrable to silicon and external means of storage, but this idea of humans being augmented with biological computing is an interesting short-term solution. I wonder if he'll make some comment about it.

  27. *blows the horn* by PeterSomnium · · Score: 0

    Let's start the distro-wars!

    --
    I rm -rf /*, therefore I am?
  28. Nano terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Intelligent drug delivery? More like intelligent terrorism if it came into the wrong hands. Anyone remember this article circa 2000: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy.html

  29. Paging Steve Mann! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    Someone better tell Steve that wearable computers are so passé.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  30. Thanks Neal Stephenson by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    The computer will be called CryptNet and will be used to calculate The Seed

    1. Re:Thanks Neal Stephenson by X · · Score: 1

      HeHe. Kind of funny how the young 'uns quote Stephenson instead of his predecessors. Herbert's Lazarus Effect comes to mind immediately, but I'm pretty sure he wasn't the first to think along these lines.

      --
      sigs are a waste of space
  31. Well, I see potential by aphoenix · · Score: 1

    I'd say Willner's thinking small (if you don't know who Willner is, then RTFA). Why make cures for sick people, when there are rich people out there who want to get fixed, too? I mean, if you can make a computer that would make you thin, or muscular, or change your hair colour permanently, or stop hair production in your legs... then go for it and make a ton of money. Heck I'd pay for something so that I didn't have to wax my back...

    Worrisome, though, is the computer that you accidentally ingest that has a real bug, like, say, a Y2K bug (if that had actually been a big deal).

    1. Re:Well, I see potential by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What they need is a protection system so that if the computer doesn't get regular external "handshakes", it'll shut itself down. (This is not for your safety, understand. This is so that the VIAA [Viagra Implant Association of America] can get its large licence fee.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Well, I see potential by aphoenix · · Score: 1

      Wow, I hadn't even thought of the extort... I mean, uh, licence fees that could be had using this system...

      Just think about it - you wouldn't want to miss your renewal costs on your "lungputer".

    3. Re:Well, I see potential by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Especially if you owe big weekly payments to your friendly lungshark.

      Or a twist for tv show plots: "This man will die unless we can get him to an ATM!"

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Well, I see potential by darkfire5252 · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm missing some fundamental biology, but why stop there? If these computers are made out of enzymes, and a cell will produce enzymes according to DNA, would there not be a (very complex) DNA sequence that will instruct a cell to produce this computer?

      On another note, once we are able to measure biological signs, select a medicine, and distribute that medicine all from within a living part of the human body, what's to stop us from using that to artificially create happiness and sadness, and use these as tools to enforce obedience? We already know what chemicals release dopamine, and we already know what chemicals hinder this release. Why not make a 'obediance collar' that will use happy and sad to re-inforce the belief that you want to do what I tell you? If you get happy every time you do, and sad every time you don't, I no longer have to directly force you to do something, because you already want to.

  32. BSOD jokes getting old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you use crappy hardware .. I havent had a reboot worthy crash in XP in years. Actually I cant even remember ever having one. Apps may crash on occasion but never the whole OS. Maybe you are using old or non standard hardware with driver issues? My boxes have over 512 MB RAM etc. Plus an HD with gigs of free space for swap etc.

  33. imagine... by pulse2600 · · Score: 1

    a beowulf cluster of these!

    1. Re:imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The kids these days with their electronic orgies...

    2. Re:imagine... by chawly · · Score: 1

      In the hands of an ancient Korean person ......

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  34. Chink? This is offensive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot editors should think before using words in the article.

  35. talk about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...monitoring system resources

  36. Omg.. by DerCed · · Score: 1

    They are assaying some enzymes in vitro and are speaking of a "biological computer"? This is not really fascinating for a biology undergraduate like me.

    "Protein engineering" is much more interesting! Customly made proteins which perform specific operations in the body of an organism.

  37. fascinating by SolemnDragon · · Score: 1

    in soviet russia... you assimilate the computer!

    Now, with that out of the way: i'm wondering whether this can be turned to practical application in the near future with cancer treatments. How far away is this?

    And what happens if the markers used go awry? How easy would it be to end up with the wrong dose in the wrong place? I know if this were being used on me, i'd only agree to be an 'early adopter' in one of two circumstances- illness with a high risk of fatality, in which case the risks of treatment would outweigh the risk of dying without it, and very minor complaints with very safe remedies, because that way the risks even in the even of misfire are still low.

    That leaves a lot of room for serious illnesses to go untreated in the middle, so i'm going to be very curious to watch this technology and see what happens with it.

    1. Re:fascinating by AlterTick · · Score: 1
      in soviet russia... you assimilate the computer!

      Or alternately,

      "In Soviet Russia, Matrix lives inside YOU!"

      --
      Conclusion: the Empire squashes the Federation like a bug. Accept it.
  38. Overclocking gone wrong.... by Kn1nJa · · Score: 1

    If you overclock this computer, there's no reflashing the BIOS to recover.... Besides, LN2 isn't exactly good to be running though your cardiovascular system.

    --
    [Insert Witty Sig Here]
  39. Need torrent! by nblender · · Score: 1

    Torrent needed for Ebola vaccine! Please hurry!

    1. Re:Need torrent! by Firehed · · Score: 1
      Do you really want me to seed for you, though?

      Wow... some once-tech terms can get really dirty when mixed with real people. Especially considering where your options to connect the monitor are.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  40. And The Singularity Draws Ever More Near by MCTFB · · Score: 1

    Just imagine if the average script kiddie could harness this technology with easily accessible tools to basically play god. Maybe that sounds cool to some people, but it sounds more like the potential death of mankind to me.

    I mean, if you thought Spanish Fly and Roofies were a big deal on college campuses, just wait till you have people tailoring these substances to programmatically alter a woman's body chemistry in a way which makes the average Slashdot geek irresistable to all of the women on the planet.

    1. Re:And The Singularity Draws Ever More Near by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And of course, there are probably downsides to this, too!

    2. Re:And The Singularity Draws Ever More Near by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...the potential death of mankind ....

      ...makes the average Slashdot geek irresistable to all of the women on the planet.

      So irresistable slashdot geeks will be the downfall of mankind? Makes sense to me.

    3. Re:And The Singularity Draws Ever More Near by kadathseeker · · Score: 1

      Well, be sure to have your "anti-virus" "soft"-ware "installed".

      --
      The 'Net is a waste of time, and that's exactly what's right about it. - William Gibson
  41. Battlestar by CMiYC · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else read this and think, "I could be a Cylon?" ...

    1. Re:Battlestar by Mr+Sausage · · Score: 1

      No but I did hear the mutiple voices sayin: "Resistance is futile" "It is real I've seen it on TV"

      --
      "Hello, I'm a british person"
    2. Re:Battlestar by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      Didn't they say 'EXTERMINATE'?

  42. Chemical DeCSS by ion_ · · Score: 1

    If i make a body part of mine run DeCSS and the Motion Picture Assho^H^Hociation of America® hears about it, will DMCA allow them to amputate it?

  43. OT, but it's "ba-dum ching", you nitwits. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take it from a musician: bass drums (or toms) don't go "dump", and cymbals certainly don't go "chink".

    1. Re:OT, but it's "ba-dum ching", you nitwits. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and cymbals certainly don't go "chink".

            They do in China...

  44. Outside the body first... by Necromancyr · · Score: 1

    I was looking into doing research into these and DNA computer systems when I first started looking into going to grad school a few years back. Essentially, things are still (after 5 years) only at the very basic levels. Work in vitro (outside the body, in a tube) isn't at the 'fully functional' level yet and until you can make a progammable style 'computer' that works in a tube...it's simply not ready to be put into a person where one error in genetic code could result in life threatening consequences.

    And, once there...removal may be fairly difficult if something does go wrong. All in all...decades and decades away.

    1. Re:Outside the body first... by Lozano · · Score: 1

      Pfft. That's what monkeys and convicts are for.

  45. In Soviet Russia... by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1


    ***Runtime Error 200 - Division by Zero***

  46. two words by jonathan_95060 · · Score: 1

    hitchhiker's guide

    1. Re:two words by qray · · Score: 1

      I was just going to say that the mice are going to be very upset about this discovery.
      --
      Q

  47. Actually, not so funny as you might think by edraven · · Score: 1

    Many forms of virus do in fact reproduce themselves by hijacking enzymatic processes in living cells. The idea of a virus subverting one of these computing systems would be a very real concern. The terminology appears to have come full circle.

  48. Balance for human immune system! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is great especially if it could potentially lead to letting people live normal lives such as SLE/Lupus victims. It could actually stop people's immune system from going haywire and tell the virus tagging proteins to stop targeting healthy tissues for white blood cells to destroy. My knowledge of lupus is limited to peer reviewed published research and 2 female friends. It's odd to know at least of 2 sufferers, because they so rarely acknowledge it to *anyone* especially at work or with relatives.

  49. Enzyme systems to study cellular systems - Neat! by bsw149 · · Score: 1
    This is potentially very cool.

    The complexity of biochemical pathways has to do with differential concentrations of substrates and products. These enzyme logic systems sound like they have the potential to "light up" cascades of cellular "output". Very cool tools, from a research perspective.

    Perhaps this technology could be used to examine some of these pathways in more detail: Cellular metabolism - gluconeogenesis, citric acid cycle, stuff going on in mitochondria and chloroplasts, diabetes, etc.

    Cancer - Pathways of loss/gain of function mutations which result in tumor formation

    Make no mistake - systems like these have the potential to "hack the cell" in a much more standardized fashion.

  50. The body's pretty a hot place, so... by parvin · · Score: 1

    where'll they put the fan? Wait, I don't want to know.

  51. Horseradish? by Reed218 · · Score: 1

    The team built their computer using two enzymes - glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) They built it using horseradish? O_o

  52. the problem i see is... by optimus10 · · Score: 1

    enzyme activity isn't completely binary.

  53. Older News by umbrellasd · · Score: 1
    I also have one of these and it's called an immune system.

    "If we can just create a complex system in the human body that monitors status and catalyzes restorative chemical responses we might really have something!"

    "Uhm...sir? I asked the French, and they said they've already got one."

    "WHAT? What did they say?"

    "That they...that they already have one, sir."

    "Well ask them if we can see it?"

    "I did, sir."

    "What did they say?"

    "They laughed at me and then they threw vegetables and chickens at me. Then they said, we already have one, too."

  54. Win ME? by ultimadj · · Score: 1

    This certainly gives Windows Personal Edition a whole new meaning.

    How many new users will attempt to install DOS programs on their new biological operating system. After all, the programs are supported by Windows ME.

    I want to see the first enzyme brain logger... now you can't even think about your password without being vulnerable.

    Spyware Bio Edition: It not only knows what websites you've been too, it knows what you've eaten for dinner.

    Sales line: "Not only can it balance your checkbook, it can also brush your teeth!"

    I'm going to hate to see the first freeware alarm clock... Agh! System error! Now I have to change my friggin sheets.

  55. Threshold Switching? by BioCS.Nerd · · Score: 1

    Much like gates in computers, enzymes can have certain thresholds where they activate. However, unlike computers, enzymes can be made to react sooner under different conditions, e.g. heat, cofactors, coenzymes.

    Suppose a drug is implemented and given an enzymatic computer to trigger when it should be released. How do we know this will work across all of human physiology given the aforementioned factors that can alter the threshold of execution?

    I'm skeptical that about this idea, but curious about how it could be implemented. I don't foresee it used in the near future.

  56. "Ba-dump *chink*" by kronocide · · Score: 1

    Choo-choo BLAM!

  57. Obligatory by AeroIllini · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In Soviet Russia, computer .... um .....

    I've got nothing.

    --
    For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
  58. Say goodbye to viagra by packetmill · · Score: 1

    I mean, who would go for chemicals when you have a *processor* putting those nuts to work? I don't know much about this issue, but I would imagine any tinkering in this particular area will lead to catastrophe. Just think:

    Cell A: Ejaculation initiated.
    Cell B: All processing threads halted, stand-by for eject.
    Cell A: Freeeeeeeeedoooooooooooom!

  59. CHINK? by slummy · · Score: 1

    Racist bastards!

  60. resistance is futile by Fedarkyn · · Score: 1

    maybe this is how the borgs started

  61. Enzyme Computer Could Live Inside You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it could. But it won't.

  62. Seriously, this could be useful by Dukeofshadows · · Score: 1

    Diabetes checks would be radically simplified, imagine an age without blood sugar sticks. For sexually transmitted diseases, perhaps a computer could be created to tell you if you had one of the (n) most common ones the morning after. Patients with hypertension would always have blood pressure monitors, and those with heart disease would know what theier status was at the check of a computer.

    If it's not used for tracking or behavior-monitoring purposes, I say it could be a very handy tool for patient and doc alike.

    --
    As long as there is a Second Amendment, there will always be a First Amendment.
  63. the world of synthetic biology by bleppie · · Score: 2, Informative
    Check out the world of synthetic biology

    From the FAQ:

    Synthetic biology studies how to build artificial biological systems for engineering applications, using many of the same tools and experimental techniques. But the work is fundamentally an engineering application of biological science, rather than an attempt to do more science. The focus is often on ways of taking parts of natural biological systems, characterizing and simplifying them, and using them as a component of a highly unnatural, engineered, biological system.

    Neat comic strip by Drew Endy: http://mit.edu/endy/www/scraps/comic/AiSB.vol1.pdf

  64. slashdot: Now for REALLY old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enzyme based computing has existed for millions of years. *yawn*

  65. More details about these enzyme-based computers by rpiquepa · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    For many additional details and references about these chemical computers, read this overview on ZDNet.

  66. Ba-dump *chink* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drumrooooooooolllll.... cracker!

  67. Excuse me, but you're already a DNA computer by the+Haldanian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Apologies, pished, but after someone spotted that there was more RNA interacting in the body than DNA it was messenger for; why aren't people noting that we already run bio-computation devices.

    Forget the why, we're already lousy at that bit. Why not? If there's a gain for little loss, nature tends to grasp and experiment along those courses. An RNA computer that computes and records in next-gen DNA is an ultimatley sensible thing for Nature to do. Not that hard either.

    Never mind the gigantic neural hash lookup algorithm that we call intuition...

    Humans annoy me. They won't accept there's a question *until* they have an answer.

    Pfah!

    *Hic*

  68. Missing the point by Tannor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think most people criticizing this article are completely missing the point. The computer based on enzymes is not being built to compete with your desktop. It doesn't matter if its basis is unstable and slow. Bsw149 attempted to make this point but was mostly ignored.

    -Imagine your cells in a certain organ system alerting you that the concentration of a needed medicine has fallen too low.
    -Someone with Diabetes could get a read out of sugar concentrations without taking a blood sample.

    From the article it definitely seems anything useful is a long way off... But I'm guessing the people involved aren't looking for a way to get more fps out of quake.

  69. Investment opportunities by RM6f9 · · Score: 1

    In aluminum foil companies - it's not just about the hats anymore!

    --
    Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
  70. Hitch-Hiker's Guide by tepples · · Score: 1

    you live inside enzyme computers?

    Has the answer "forty-two" been decoded yet? If not, then yes we do live inside a computer. And given that our brains run on enzymes...