Slashdot Mirror


Zombie MMORPG in the Works

Warcry has a very short blurb about a just announced Horror-genre Massively Multiplayer game. Titled Exanimus, the game looks to be set in a post-apocalyptic zombie setting. From the piece: "While most of the world is dead, there are small pockets of survivors that exist in barricaded cities across the globe. Players of Exanimus will have the option of playing as a living survivor or as one of the dead roaming the earth. Exanimus will allow players to experience a MMO based in a horror genre by creating a dark and visually "intense" environment. Exanimus is expected to be rated "Mature" and not intended for anyone under the age of 18."

19 of 102 comments (clear)

  1. Urban dead? by Ligur · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sounds like a beefed up version of Urban Dead.

    --
    Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast.
    1. Re:Urban dead? by Cy+Sperling · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Pikman is a great example. The player could have a certain amount of points, relative to their level, that they could spend on their mob. Certain zombie types would have different costs allowing the player to customize the makeup of their mob. High level players would be powerful by having larger and more diverse mobs. The zombies themselves could be relatively easy to kill as individuals, but the emphasis for zombie players is the horde. I think the way they handle player death is really a tough nut to crack. Urban Dead does make dead players become zombies. The Necrotech skillset allows other living players to revive zombies back into living characters. I kind of see this as a bit of a cheat. Though this does lead to the fun concept of dumping the freshly dead outside before they wake up as zombies, people wanting to play as living characters don't behave as flesh hungry zombies- they simply head for the nearest advertised revive point. Player death is very tricky in this context... Perhaps player death would lead to a temporary NPC status where for a short time, the reanimated corpse would run wild. Players could respawn but would teleport back to a hub of some sort- leaving a doppleganger NPC zombie in their place. Either way- to actually recreate the threat of the freshly dead reanimating to attack their companions, they can;t leave the zombie-behavior of the freshly dead purely in the hands of the players. Granted some hardcore roleplayers will stick to the fiction of it, most won't.

    2. Re:Urban dead? by ReverendLoki · · Score: 3, Interesting
      You know, that could be the start of an interesting mechanic... The zombie player starts with one zombie - will call him the "Zombie Lord", for lack of a better term. He gets knocked down, he gets back up, maybe with a penalty, maybe not. He kills a human, the human player goes back to a spawn point of some sort to start again (again, with or without penalty). Meanwhile, the corpse he leaves behind stands up, and becomes the first minion in the Zombie Lord's horde. He follows the ZL around, attacks his targets, etc. Next corpse left by a human he kills becomes the second minion in his blossoming horde. Now, if a minion gets knocked down, does it get back up? Maybe, maybe not. Maybe only after a period of time, and maybe only for a finite amount of time.

      Now if they come out with this game and it uses any of these mechanics, we'll have to point back to this thread and demand royalties...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    3. Re:Urban dead? by ultranova · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Though this does lead to the fun concept of dumping the freshly dead outside before they wake up as zombies, people wanting to play as living characters don't behave as flesh hungry zombies- they simply head for the nearest advertised revive point. Player death is very tricky in this context... Perhaps player death would lead to a temporary NPC status where for a short time, the reanimated corpse would run wild. Players could respawn but would teleport back to a hub of some sort- leaving a doppleganger NPC zombie in their place. Either way- to actually recreate the threat of the freshly dead reanimating to attack their companions, they can;t leave the zombie-behavior of the freshly dead purely in the hands of the players.

      Simple solution: there's a limited number of lives in the game. In order to have a life, you have to take it from someone who has it. That is, kill a living player and you become one, and he becomes a zombie. Now you just need to have the server control the ratio between living and dead by automatically making some people living and some zombies at the start...

      A zombie cannot be permanently killed, but will always raise back up again after a short while. However, a zombie can't earn exp, and will always be "level 1" - if you had levels as human, you lose them when you become a zombie, and regain them when you regain your humanity. Same for items. That way, all the zombies will desperately want to become humans, and because they are so much weaker, pretty much have to attack en masse. Since zombies can't level, the various grinders are sure to fight tooth and nail to become human again.

      As a practical matter, you don't immediately become a human when you kill one, it takes five minutes (with a running countdown). That way you have time to escape from the fight - otherwise you'd just be killed as soon as you turned human in the middle of the battle.

      Logged-of humans fall unconscious. An unconscious human can obviously be easily killed by any zombie, so better find a safe location. No place is inherently safe (zombies can attack you everywhere), but of course the players can establish player-guarded resting areas in the ruins of abandoned cities (in fact I'd put the entire game into such a city), and of course zombies would consider those their main targets. People will still have to leave them to get exp, to scavenge for resources, and so on.

      Oh, and the zombies can see in the dark, while the humans can't. To avoid cheating, a zombie in suitably deep shadow is invisible to the client as well - that is, the server won't send the geometry at all.

      Of course all this requires a game engine that can take a lot of people in the same area at the same time. It would also require pretty low lag, since zombies hiding in the dark leads to surprise attacks. Alternatively, you could perhaps determine a "guard location", so that your character shoots as soon as a zombie pops to the guarded area - this would make the game more strategic than reflex test.

      Anyway, that's how I'd do it.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  2. Hey! by MyLongNickName · · Score: 3, Funny

    Players of Exanimus will have the option of playing as a living survivor or as one of the dead roaming the earth.

    It is based off of my experiences at work. I demand royalties!

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  3. Un! by tehshen · · Score: 3, Funny

    Players of Exanimus will have the option of playing as a living survivor or as one of the dead roaming the earth.

    Sheesh, how many times is this? Undead, not dead! Zombies care very much about these things. You should too if you like your frontal lobe.

    --
    Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    1. Re:Un! by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 3, Funny

      In my experience, zombies care very little about much of anything except the frontal lobes of pre-zombies. I guess I've been associating with the wrong zombies.

  4. Is it possible to "win"? by khasim · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Given that the zombies will not breed (except by converting the living), there would be a finite number of them.

    Would it be possible to "win" this by killing 6 billion + zombies?

    Before you start laughing, remember, we're talking an online game here. It is possible to kill thousands and thousands of "monsters" in other games. Five years into this, will the few remaining living be searching for the few remaining zombies?

    1. Re:Is it possible to "win"? by tehshen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That actually sounds like a clever marketing ploy - five or so years after its release, the game will suddenly get many more players who want to be the final zombie-killer.

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    2. Re:Is it possible to "win"? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 3, Interesting
      What I would love.....and what would never happen...is to have "rounds" of the game. You start off the world, and you have a single zombie running around and he converts a few NPCs. Then it spreads....the world would start off very heavy on the human side, but gradually, if things went smoothly, it would convert to zombies only....depending on the organization of things. Of course what you can't account for is griefers who might get converted to zombies and try to prevent them from killing humans, or humans who try to get other humans killed.

      After all of one side had been killed off, the game would "reset".

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  5. PKers by Eightyford · · Score: 3, Funny

    So they finally found a solution to pkers eh? It's pretty hard to kill something that is already dead.

  6. Oh for shame! by murderlegendre · · Score: 4, Funny

    Shame on you, you should know better than to call them "Zombies"... what is this, 1965?

    They prefer to be called the living impaired

    I suppose you think they should stick to eating the back of the head, too..

    --
    There's a Starman, waiting in the sky / He'd like to come and meet us, but he hasn't got the time.
  7. That's funny, I was actually just going to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That it sounds to me more like MySpace

  8. Weapon of choice for zombie slaying by TrickFred · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just let me have a cricket bat, and I'll be the first in line. :D

  9. "Mature" by jayeates · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Exanimus is expected to be rated "Mature" and not intended for anyone under the age of 18."

    So my guess is it'll be filled with 14-16 year old idiots then...

  10. ooer... by ameoba · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Exanimus is expected to be rated "Mature" and not intended for anyone under the age of 18.

    If they can enforce this, I'll definately start playing.

    --
    my sig's at the bottom of the page.
  11. Re:WTB [Brains] by Jubetas · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I doubt it would be very hard to have integral trade skills for survivors, i.e.- scavenging, security, various knowledges, etc. Knowing how to run a base that has an electrified fence with a few motion sensors off of a diesel generator you patched together seems like it would be a useful skill. I can only hope that this MMO, which is based on the MMO premise of my dreams, can live up to even a few expectations.

    As for zombie skills, that might be a little more difficult, but they could take a little influence from Land of the Dead, where the zombies are able to develop some rudimentary communication. Perhaps you would see WTB [Brains], so that way your zombie could learn how to turn doorknobs or wield melee weapons. I admit that I see very little in the way of actual trade skills for zombies, but I don't really see that as hindering my fun when I'm gnawing people's brains out.

  12. Zombie Themes work well... by miyako · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I DM a regular tabletop game based around a zombie-themed variant of the D20 system called Year of the Zombie (disclaimer: I did some artwork for the book...so buy it and help a fellow slashdotter get some royalty checks) and I've found that the general theme works very well among roleplayers. Specifically, in a lot of the games that I run, I've found that people who can roleplay well get a lot from the games, though powergamers tend to lose interest quickly. I've never let a player actually play as a zombie, and I'm curious as to how the mechanics for it will work in this game (if it is included in the end). What I think could really make the game interesting is if they play up the need to survive. In most of the games that I run, the zombies are more of a complicating issue than the real problem at hand. In general, most of the conflict, and interesting gaming, comes from the need for food, water, and shelter. It would be interesting to set up a system where there are heavily infested cities, and groups of characters have to go on raids to get supplies. PVP also is particularly interesting in this scenario. In my games, players often have to choose between trying to get supplies from heavily infested cities, or try to steal food or supplies from other groups who may be smaller in numbers, but also can shoot back.
    I'd love them to make a Mac or Linux port of this so that I could play it...I might even have to consider setting up a windows machine for this game if it looks promising as it gets nearer to launch.

    --
    Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
  13. Let the Zombies play for free. by neo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously.

    Nothing like a bunch of undead zombie griefers to make life hell for the living/paying players. Charge me $4 per live character I play. Make him/her randomly, with skills and equipment randomly assigned so I have a chance to be a soldier or a banker... and let the bodies hit the floor. You wouldn't need any NPCs. People playing zombies would line up to get a crack at killing some paying players... and the paying players would line up to see who could survive and live the longest.

    Eventually the free zombies would want to try it on the other side, so it's the perfect demo to get them into the game.