Slashdot Mirror


British Rail's Flying Saucer

Dynamoo writes "The Register is carrying a story about a patent for a fusion powered spacecraft filed by British Rail in the 1970s. While the concept may seem silly for a public railway, it seems that the British Rail Research Division employed a large number of aircraft engineers who presumably had some spare time between projects such as the Advanced Passenger Train."

155 comments

  1. Fluxcapacitor by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Unfortunately, the Fluxcapacitor has already been patented (Fig. 1 & 2).

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Fluxcapacitor by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, you know you can still get a patent on using an existing invention in a new and non-obviously way.

      Sure, the obvious use of the flux capacitor is create a time travel vehicle to go back and fix your parents lives so they aren't such pathetic losers. On the application of its time warping capabilities to, say, making sure your train arrives in the station on time aren't so obvious.

      Likewise, the obvious use of a sustainable fusion power might be ending the world's dependeny on fossil fuels, powering a spacecraft is not an obvious idea. The only reason the patent is likely improper (at least as described) is that somebody else had already thought of it.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  2. Other patents... by gowen · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Pedrick bombarded his former employers with legendarily screwball designs in the 60s and 70s - one of which was a catflap fitted with a colour sensor to allow his cat Ginger through, to the exclusion of his neighbour's black moggie.
    Screwball? That's freaking genius!
    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    1. Re:Other patents... by PFI_Optix · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What's more interesting is a system I saw years ago that was supposed to recognize whether a cat was carrying something in its mouth (like a mouse) by looking at its profile. No more "presents" left for you to step on when you get out of bed in the morning.

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    2. Re:Other patents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google it... they sell these. Runs on a small radio tag you put on the cats collar.

    3. Re:Other patents... by Zarhan · · Score: 4, Informative

      What's more interesting is a system I saw years ago that was supposed to recognize whether a cat was carrying something in its mouth (like a mouse) by looking at its profile. No more "presents" left for you to step on when you get out of bed in the morning.

      You mean Flo control is patented? (See picture on page 2, ie. click next)

    4. Re:Other patents... by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

      haha that's it. I didn't think it was patented, I just remembered seeing it a long time ago (2000?)

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    5. Re:Other patents... by joranbelar · · Score: 1

      Instead the presents are left outside your front door for you to step on! ;)

    6. Re:Other patents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not suggesting I get my own breakfast are you ?

    7. Re:Other patents... by kilodelta · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That wouldn't help me. I need one that constantly scans to see what my smallest cat has in her mouth. She's been known to rip the little suckers open and then stuff them under the couch cushions.

      She's a very sweet cat otherwise and she does keep the rodent problem in check to some degree so I've decided to keep her. After all, it's been 13 years.

    8. Re:Other patents... by pcraven · · Score: 1

      I think you were talking about Flo-Watch:

      http://www.quantumpicture.com/Flo_Watch/flo_watch. htm

      It recognizes if the cat is bringing in something that it caught from outside.

    9. Re:Other patents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember reading this patent. In it he talks about how his cat devised an invention for thermonuclear weapons and talked to him about it. It starts half-sensible, then goes off into madman's territory.

    10. Re:Other patents... by isny · · Score: 1

      Is that the same Ginger that Dean Kamen was going to have us rebuild cities around?

  3. Prior Art! by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 4, Funny


    This design was made in 1965.

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Prior Art! by Syberghost · · Score: 1

      Looks more like this one.

    2. Re:Prior Art! by fm6 · · Score: 1

      How is that prior art? The Jupiter II wasn't launched until 1997!

    3. Re:Prior Art! by MK_CSGuy · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who thought 1965 was an hyperlink to 1965?

    4. Re:Prior Art! by srmalloy · · Score: 1

      TFA doesn't mention that this is merely a variation on the Project Daedalus spacecraft, which used fusion devices instead of fission devices, as in the original Project Orion design; Frederick's spacecraft, from the image in the article, looks to be missing many of the important components -- radiation shielding, shock dampers, etc. -- that the Orion and Daedalus spacecraft had.

  4. British Rail by pubjames · · Score: 5, Interesting


    Is this the same British Rail that can't even keep a train running on time? What chance have they got with a flying saucer?

    "British Rail would like to announce that the 17.34 UFO to Mars has been delayed due to a slight wind and a few leaves blowing in the air..."

    1. Re:British Rail by pubjames · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry that should have been:

      "British Rail regret to announce... We are sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused you."

      The b*stards.

    2. Re:British Rail by xfletch · · Score: 2, Interesting
      In case you don't understand that reference to the the Advanced passenger train it was British Rails "leaning train" . The train-spotters' answer to Concorde, but was a catastrophic failure. Leaning over to take corners at speed is cool unless it throws everyones coffee into the isle. The story is in the BBC archive

      , and you can see pictures here You used to be able to see one rotting in the sidings at Crewe railway station. Does anyone know if it it still there?

    3. Re:British Rail by DarthChris · · Score: 2, Informative

      British Rail don't exist, and haven't existed for years. The trains were privatised even before New Labour came in, and it's the shitty private companies who can't turn up on time.
      My parents tell me that BR were normally pretty punctual, even if the trains weren't so great to look at.

      --
      Don't you just hate it when people reply to your signature?
    4. Re:British Rail by dotcher · · Score: 1

      There was one there as of July last year.

      (As an aside, I happened to spot it whilst on board a Pendolino, which I thought was quite appropiate - the Pendolinos are also tilting trains, and make use of tilting technology developed for the British Rail APT.)

    5. Re:British Rail by bombadillo · · Score: 1

      I believe British Rail was privatised in 1993. So no it is not the same British Rail....

    6. Re:British Rail by Bazzalisk · · Score: 2, Insightful
      British Rail were a public joke. The trains were late, crowded, and falling apart.

      So the Major government privatised them ... and the trains managed to get later, more crowded, and even more motheaten - not to mention a series of spectacular rail disasters caused by the private companies cutting costs on pointless things like track maintainence. As a result the current labour government partialy renationalised the company which owned the tracks (but left the trains themselves privitised) and imposed much stricter saftey regulations on the private rail-companies. The result? things are now only slightly worse than they were when British rail was a national joke (and as a regular trian user I'd say they were actualy improving) - but now we apreciate quite how much worse things could be ...

      --
      James P. Barrett
    7. Re:British Rail by Richard_at_work · · Score: 3, Insightful

      'British Rail' hasnt existed for a decade, they arent to blame for the current problems - the previous Tory and the current Labour governments are the ones to blame.

    8. Re:British Rail by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Leaning over to take corners at speed is cool unless it throws everyones coffee into the isle

      It didn't do that. The ride was very smooth (when the tilt mechanism worked). Too smooth actually. People got motion sickness from going round a corner without feeling like they were going round a corner.

      You used to be able to see one rotting in the sidings at Crewe railway station.

      It was still there last August.

      Some of the technology made it to other trains. Sadly, not the tilting mechanism .

    9. Re:British Rail by bombadillo · · Score: 1

      I heard the same thing about the rail privatization. I am American. However, I lived in London from 2001 to 2002. People told me that prior to privatization the trains were punctual and there were fewer accidents.

    10. Re:British Rail by Bazzalisk · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Actualy ...

      The tilting system worked fine, and didn't throw people's coffee around - it was practicly every other experimental system on the train that failed. Virgin trains are now running a tilting train service between London and Birmingham ... which makes me seasick, but everybody else seems to be happy with it.

      --
      James P. Barrett
    11. Re:British Rail by TehHustler · · Score: 1

      Still there as of a few weeks ago. It's the railway museum at Crewe, isn't it?

      --

      TheHustler
      http://www.elmarko.org/ - Useless bilge
      http://www.asylum-games.co.uk/ - Co-Founder
    12. Re:British Rail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not true, you run the luck of the line. E.g. Waterloo to Portsmouth had at least one cancelled train per day in the rush hour back when I was using it, which was years before privatisation.

      British Rail came into being because the previous separate rail entities couldn't get a decent service together, so the govt of the day stepped in. They failed, and then passed the wreckage back to the private sector, who thought they'd be able to turn the survice around. Unfortunately for them, the govt controlled B.R. had near zero investment for decades, so the private sector has to rebuilt the entire infrastructure. That is going to take billions of pounds and several years to complete, if ever.

      When B.R. was created people harkened back to the pre B.R. days.

      Other than the aging rolling stock and tracks, you have to factor in population growth over 40-50 years, lack of living space in the cities, almost no new lines being laid thanks to "not in my back-yard", it's no wonder the rail system is pathetic.

    13. Re:British Rail by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Funny

      The BR time dilation effects may be useful for interstellar travel.

    14. Re:British Rail by ricepudd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you think they'd encounter the wrong sort of snow in space?

    15. Re:British Rail by sa1lnr · · Score: 1

      IIRC "British Rail Engineering" was rather good at what it did. And was sold off well before the "Rail Network" was privatised.

    16. Re:British Rail by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Live in the USA for a while - then you'll be happy that your trains run at all...

    17. Re:British Rail by Half+a+dent · · Score: 1

      It uses time travel to ensure it is always on time - the journey may take 7 years though!

    18. Re:British Rail by AlecC · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Leaning over to take corners at speed is cool unless it throws everyones coffee into the isle.

      On the contrary, tilting over stops the passengers coffeee spilling. Like leaning into the corner on a motorcycle or banking a plane - if you get it right, everything feels perfectly normal to those inside.

      The problems come if you fail to tilt when you should - then everybody's coffee does get thrown around, and you have to slow down to non-tilt speed, making you very late. Or more dangerously, if you fail to untilt or tilt when you shouldn't, becasue then you could be tilting into the other guys track just as he comes towards you tilting into your space. It really has to be very, very reliable - and it wasn't.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    19. Re:British Rail by Obi-w00t · · Score: 1

      Luckily people have pointed out the inaccuracy in your statement. Unluckily for me I no longer have anything intelligent to contribute. I should probably say that travelling around London on the trains isn't that bad, people make out like it is living hell. I've often had to wait longer for a bus to come along than I would have to wait for a train to the same place. They don't look very nice (the older ones, I mean) and the tracks are a bit dodgy but apart from that it's a decent service. Would rather it wasn't privatised but that's what you get if you let a nutjob like Thatcher alienate her party and the public. On an even more off-topic note you can blame Mrs. Thatcher for pretty much every problem facing British politics today, if you can be bothered to do the research.

    20. Re:British Rail by gowen · · Score: 1

      Hey, that's not any old decrepit siding.
      That's the former site of "Crewe Heritage Centre", opened by her Majesty the Queen. Needless to say, it's now a bloody great Tesco. The rusting APT and the old signal box are all that remains.

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    21. Re:British Rail by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Are you guys sure you're not Americans?

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    22. Re:British Rail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      which makes me seasick, but everybody else seems to be happy with it.
      The trick is not to look out of the windows, especially on bends. The motion sickness is caused by perceiving bends without physically experiencing them.
    23. Re:British Rail by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      On an even more off-topic note you can blame Mrs. Thatcher for pretty much every problem facing British politics today, if you can be bothered to do the research.

      I'd like to hear your "research" in more detail.

      Mrs Thatcher made some mistakes, but that's a pretty wild assertion you are making there.

    24. Re:British Rail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I was waiting for this. :-)

    25. Re:British Rail by Bazzalisk · · Score: 1
      You can blame her whether you do the research or not :)

      --
      James P. Barrett
    26. Re:British Rail by Andy_R · · Score: 1

      British Rail's legendarily lazy staff do still exist, and they are the reason that no matter who owns the various parts of the system, our British train service will always be laughably bad.

      The notoriously socialist 'strike-at-the-drop-of a-hat' RMT rail union are the cause of British train service's problems, it's hardly fair to blame recent centre or right wing governments for the actions of an organisation that thinks promotions should be given to whoever has worked in a job the longest!

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    27. Re:British Rail by ryanov · · Score: 1

      I'm somewhat surprised that no one has mentioned Acela Express in the United States. This train features active tilt, which seems to work very well for them as far as reliability goes. However, they are not allowed to use the tilt for a substantial portion of the trackage in NY State for the very reason you illustrated above: conventional trains that do not tilt are a danger there, and the clearances are not such that that tilt trains can successfully mingle with non-tilt trains.

    28. Re:British Rail by BovineSpirit · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yawn, no it's a completely different one. British Rail was the nationalised company that was given no money to keep our railways going. Thatcher made them reduce costs by 30%, and, when they were successful made them do it again. The trains were still very reliable.
            The railways were privatised in the early 90s, leading to vast increases in fares, delays and cancellations. Inexperienced managers were brought in to replace the old BR staff and they wasted alarming amounts of money buying crap. Railtrack gave up on track maintainence until several fatel accidents. They then went to parliment begging for money to do what they were supposed to have done anyway. Rather then closing one lane at a time they used 'blockades' in which whole sections of track are closed at once, leading to mass cancellations and severe inconvienience for passengers.
            Oh yes, and tax-payer subsides have more than doubled since privatisation. The private companies can't even sort out the signalling at Waterloo, let alone think about UFOs.

    29. Re:British Rail by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      It's the railway museum at Crewe, isn't it?

      This is Britain, where nothing goes in a museum until it is 300 years old.

    30. Re:British Rail by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

      The result? things are now only slightly worse than they were when British rail was a national joke

      That's a tad unfair. The sandwiches have at least doubled in quality, and the prices only trebled.

      Everything else is true, though.

      (Oh how I wish we were joking. Britain's railways are only acceptable if you never travel on any other country's rail network).

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    31. Re:British Rail by Alioth · · Score: 3, Informative

      Every railway suffers from leaves on the line; in the BR case it was more of a PR problem (they told the truth, where other railway companies may have just said 'operational problems' or some other nondescript reason) and the dolts who didn't understand laughed.

      The problem is this. Wet leaves can accumulate during heavy leaf falls. When a train rolls over these, it turns the leaves into an incredibly good lubricant. The moment the driver applies the brakes, hundreds of wheels all lock up. This leaf lube isn't all that good though - quickly wearing off, and when it does, metal to metal contact with the rail head is restored. Except now the wheels are stopped even though the train is still going. The friction burns a flat spot in the wheel - and the rolling stock has to be immediately taken out of service to have the wheel repaired.

      BR (or more accurately, Network SouthEast) made a similar gaffe when they told the truth about the snow (the infamous 'wrong kind of snow'). British snow is typically heavy and wet. This snow was like the finest powder in Utah which people love to ski on. It got sucked into traction motors, shorting them out. If they had just lied and said the track was blocked by snow, everyone would have forgotten about it by now.

    32. Re:British Rail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have any idea how FUNNY it sounds to an American to hear Brits complain about how bad their trains are?

      After two weeks in Britain last August, I'm ready to move there just for the trains. (The rest of my family is not too crazy about this idea. . .)

    33. Re:British Rail by DJCF · · Score: 1

      I don't know anything about this, but why couldn't they apply some kind of ABS anti-brake-locking technology?

    34. Re:British Rail by titzandkunt · · Score: 1


      "...Every railway suffers from leaves on the line..."

      Also, bear in mind that leaves anywhere near the line are a relatively modern phnomenon: In the days of yore, sparks from the smokestack would ignite any accumulated leaves and brush near the line. Obviously this don't happen with diesel an electric locomotives.

      --
      Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable...
    35. Re:British Rail by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      I heard the same thing about the rail privatization. I am American. However, I lived in London from 2001 to 2002. People told me that prior to privatization the trains were punctual and there were fewer accidents.

      I lived there for a couple of years in the mid-'80s, and I don't recall late trains being a big problem at the time. At least they weren't running late the three or four times we took them into London (we drove everywhere else, but one drive into London (with its traffic and parking problems) was enough to swear off of that).

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    36. Re:British Rail by sr180 · · Score: 1

      Not true. The Tilting mechanism is being incorporated into modern trains around the world. An example is the Queensland Rail Tilt Train, which is currently the fasted train in Australia, having been comissioned here in 1997.

      --
      In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
    37. Re:British Rail by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Is it a direct descendant of the technology? I thought other tilting trains used some of the basic research but totally reworked the entire tilting mechanism.

      Interesting that Australia has a high speed service on narrow gauge. I think that makes it more unusual than the tilting trains.

    38. Re:British Rail by wertarbyte · · Score: 1

      Indeed, the information of your equilibrum sense in your inner tube does not match the visual impressions you receive from your eyes, just like it happens when you start reading a book in a car on a winding road. You brain will suspect something strange going on, perhaps food poisoning - and will try to get rid of it.

      --
      Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
    39. Re:British Rail by Alioth · · Score: 2, Informative

      When 'leaves on the line' was a frequent issue (up into the early 1990s) most of the rolling stock and traction had been built in the 50s/60s when anti skid brakes hadn't been invented. It's only the really new stock that has anti-skid. There's still a lot of old rolling stock out there, though. Last time I was in the south of England (probably about 2 years ago), the recently deceased Connex was still running old EMUs which were built in the mid 50s.

    40. Re:British Rail by rdoger6424 · · Score: 1

      You british don't know the meaning of late trains. I live in a suburb of philadelphia, and it's assumed that a train will run late. I have never been on an on time SEPTA train, ever.

      --
      "Hello 911? I just tried to toast some bread, and the toaster grew an arm and stabbed me in the face!"
    41. Re:British Rail by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      You british don't know the meaning of late trains.

      Where in my post did I say I'm British? Nowhere, because I am not. That I said I lived there a couple of decades ago for a couple of years implies that I went there from somewhere else and eventually left.

      (I suppose I could've said we were over there because Dad was stationed at Upper Heyford. That would've made it more clear where we're from, but I didn't think that tidbit was relevant at the time.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    42. Re:British Rail by arwel · · Score: 1

      I can't stand Maggie Thatcher, but to be fair to her I have to say that she had more sense than to privatise British Rail - that was entirely John Major's idea/fault.

    43. Re:British Rail by arwel · · Score: 1

      Ho hum, so the old BR Flying Saucer story flies again, eh?

      Sorry to spoil a fun story, but BR didn't spend any money developing that patent - the designer worked for the BR Research department and was interested in UFOs and developed the design as a hobby in his own time. The standard BR contract of employment stipulated that any patents you acquired while you worked for BR belonged to BR, even if they weren't developed on company time. I know - I had one of those contracts back in 1979, too.

    44. Re: British Rail by gidds · · Score: 1
      The railways were privatised in the early 90s, leading to vast increases in fares, delays and cancellations.

      Not everywhere. On my line, for example (c2c), fares didn't change much, and although the service was patchy for the first couple of years, since then it's been very good: there are lots of trains, they all have modern sliding-door carriages, and they're practically always there and on time.

      I know that the experience of passengers elsewhere has been lamentable, but credit where it's due.

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    45. Re:British Rail by Obi-w00t · · Score: 1

      *sigh* OK give me a while and I'll post a short list. I just need to gather some of the notes I've got somewhere. You'll have to wait a while for me to post my messy, disorganised notes from a while back. In the meantime you can always just go watch Antiques Roadshow or something.

  5. Matt Helm was on the case. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good to see that Matt Helm was on the case. I saw that documentary about him running down that flying saucer carried on a train car.

  6. Daedalus by Phanatic1a · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "The thermonuclear fusion will take place in a series of pulses, each pulse being triggered by laser energy, and/or energetic particles reflected from a previous pulse. The system will be arranged so that the fusion process will decay after each pulse so that the stability of the system is maintained."

    Pulsed inertial confinement fusion is just a fancy version of Orion, and is what the British Interplanetary Society used in their Daedalus spacecraft concept. Given the 1973 date, the same year as the start of Project Daedalus, I imagine the 'inventor' was a member of the Society.

  7. Ambitious projects by Mattygfunk · · Score: 3, Funny

    While this may get shot down (NPI) as all a bit of movie inspired silliness, it's people who attempt these very ambitious projects and designs that change the world. Hey - commercial spaceflight is a reality today so why not?

    __
    Laugh DAILY funny adult videos

    1. Re:Ambitious projects by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While this may get shot down (NPI) as all a bit of movie inspired silliness, it's people who attempt these very ambitious projects and designs that change the world. Hey - commercial spaceflight is a reality today so why not?

      It isn't just the people who attempt ambitios projects who change the worls. Keep in mind that Frank Whittle was laughed at when he offered his Jet engine to the British MOD, the Brits only began to allocate real resources to jet engie research when their photo intelligence analysts found prints showing working jet fighter prototypes on the tarmac on research facities in Germany. It has been debated to what extent Whittle influenced his German counterpart Hans von Ohain but the point is still that sometimes the person who spots the potential of an ambitious project/idea (in this case Heinkel, Junkers and BMW), picks it up and develops it further is just as important as the original inventor. Many ambitios ideas lay unused for decades or even centuries before their potential was reckognized.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
  8. This solves nothing. by harriet+nyborg · · Score: 4, Funny

    The fusion powered spacecraft is delayed due to a signal failure at Camden Town. Passengers are advided to board the next fusion power spacecraft and change at Saturn.

    1. Re:This solves nothing. by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Will they be able to at least keep it on the same platform? I've walked into Leeds City Station some days and seen a platform change for almost every service.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    2. Re:This solves nothing. by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's hardly surprising in a metropolitan area. Whenever one train has to be re-platformed, the train that was going to use the platform that train is now using also has to be re-platformed, and so on, until there is a big enough time window to get one train out of the way before the xext comes in.

      It's worse in the South because there are two electrification systems in use; the old Southern Electric, third-rail DC system and the modern, overhead AC system. Not all vehicles are dual-powered, and neither are all tracks, so re-platforming options are limited. Of course, since {as every Londoner knows} there is no electricity in the North of England, this will not be a problem in Leeds :)

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    3. Re:This solves nothing. by ross.w · · Score: 1

      That's of course, always assuming that the driver shows up for work.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
  9. Little Green Men by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The thermonuclear fusion will take place in a series of pulses, each pulse being triggered by laser energy, and/or energetic particles reflected from a previous pulse. The system will be arranged so that the fusion process will decay after each pulse so that the stability of the system is maintained."

    After using the saucer, you are so full of radiation that you will begin to glow green.
    This is helpful when trying to reproduce all aspects of 'alien' saucer lore, as well as to scare the crap out of your neighbours.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Little Green Men by cul8r · · Score: 1

      psst... fusion

      --
      I think it would be totally inappropriate for me to even contemplate what I am thinking about. - Don Mazankowski
  10. They will have had lots of spare time... by jjeffrey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ....BR canned the Advanced Passenger Train project because apparently the test subjects didn't like the tilting inherent in a tilting train design.

    They came up with the InterCity 125 (because it could do 125MPH) instead. This didn't tilt and was far less revolutionary, but is none the less still in service on our express lines, especially where the line hasn't been electrified.

    It was at least the first train in the UK to have a DVT allowing it to be operated in either direction without being turned round and driven from either end

    Annoyingly, the rights to the APT design were sold to an Italian firm (I think it was Bombardier) who turned it in to the commercialy succesful pendolino - which we have had to buy lots of to run on our West Coast Main line.

    Shame we didn't finish the job ourselves really.

    If you would like to find out more about the APT, visit the National Railway Museum in York UK!

    1. Re:They will have had lots of spare time... by jeremyp · · Score: 2, Informative

      BR abandoned the APT because they couldn't make it work reliably. It kept breaking down.

      The 125 was actually a simultaneous project which got into service before the APT was abandoned.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    2. Re:They will have had lots of spare time... by johneee · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can't comment on anything else in your post, but Bombardier is actually a Canadian company. They do make lots of choo-choos though.

      --
      - ------- There are ten kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who... Huh?
    3. Re:They will have had lots of spare time... by jjeffrey · · Score: 1

      Having checked it out you're right. Alstom made the Pendolino's, Bombardier made the non-tilting Voyagers.

    4. Re:They will have had lots of spare time... by jjeffrey · · Score: 1
      "But for the stimulus and competition of APT, HST would not have been in service as early. It might not have existed at all as its development was initiated as a low risk conventional response to APT."

      See APT - With Hindsight by Professor Alan Wickens

    5. Re:They will have had lots of spare time... by PerfectMark · · Score: 0

      The APT is the one that kept breaking down. The APT-E is the one at the York Railway Museum that made people sick when going round corners.

      (I used to be into trains when I was a kid).

    6. Re:They will have had lots of spare time... by brightloudnoise · · Score: 1

      FYI Bombardier is a Canadian Company http://www.canadianheritage.org/enterprises/bombar dier/ not Italian

      --
      brightloudnoise.com
    7. Re:They will have had lots of spare time... by raddan · · Score: 1

      I rode a tilting train once from Berlin to Munich, the "ICE-T" (BTW, Germans find it mildly hurtful to their collective pride if you laugh about the name). Anyhow, as least compared to the Amtrak and MBTA trains I ride, this thing was a work of art. You didn't even notice the tilting unless you had to get up and walk somewhere (or use the WC... but that's another story).

    8. Re:They will have had lots of spare time... by MROD · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually...

      The APT-E was the experimental gas turbine powered test train built in 1973/4. At the same time the prototype HST (Intercity 125 as it became) with the prototype (253001) running by 1975, the production versions (class 253 (great western) and the slightly more powerful class 254 (east coast mainline) going into service in 1977 as a stop-gap as the APT would take a while to come into production.

      The HST vehicles (and the Mark 3 coaches) used technology developed in the APT project, such as high speed bogies, wheel design and brakes, the designs for which were licensed throughout the world.

      In 1979/80 the APT-P vehicles were produced. These were the prototype technology test/demonstration machines and were electricly powered.

      Due to the new Conservative government wanting to see a return on the money already spent on the APT project (which was in total less than 1Km of french TGV track) a political decision was made to force the prototypes into regular service before they were ready.

      The inaugural journey was a comedy of errors. Firstly, it was known that the tilt system was not fully debugged and test had shown that some people became "air sick." So, the PR office plied a load of Fleet Street journalists with alcohol, piled them onto the train along with some minor celebrities and then gave them more drink.

      Strangely enough the journos go sick and wrote about it. One car had a tilt failure half way through the journey and properly rotated upright and locked itself there. Strangely, the guard on the train agreed to a certain minor celebrity to stop the train at Carlisle to get off. Because of this the train lost its high-speed slot on the track and arrived late, which pleased the journos even more.. Fleet Street loves stamping on anything new and painting it in the blackest terms.

      So, a PR disaster.

      After being withdrawn from front-line service (for which the protoypes were never designed) they were used on and off on the West Coast Mainline until 1985, by which time all the bugs had been sorted out, they were reliable and it had been determined that the reason for the "air sickness" was due to the tilting being too good and not giving the brain enough hints that the person was going around the corner.

      One set of the APT-Ps has been bought by a private buyer and the last I heard was sitting at Crewe.

      The Pendolino trains are actually a decendant of a separate tilting train projetc in Italy, which initially used passive tilting. The technology and information gathered during the APT project was used by the italians after the APT project closed.

      It is an interesting point that the West Coast Mainline had been given the green light for 155mph running for the APT in the early 80's using the existing lines and signalling. Yet in the late 90's it was stated by the railway authority that the new pendolino trains could only run on that line at 125mph until new signalling was designed, built and installed.

      --

      Agrajag: "Oh no, not again!"
    9. Re:They will have had lots of spare time... by Alioth · · Score: 1

      On a point of pedantry, the Intercity 125 (HST) does *not* have a DVT - it has an actual locomotive at each end. A DVT is a driving van trailer; by definition unpowered. Both ends of an HST are powered.

      The Intercity 225 has a DVT, however. But by then, DVTs were already in use (most notably on the Edinburgh to Glasgow route).

    10. Re:They will have had lots of spare time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "One set of the APT-Ps has been bought by a private buyer and the last I heard was sitting at Crewe."

      I know Crewe well. Last I heard, you could rent it for children's parties, a bit like at McDonalds.

  11. I always knew... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...only British Rail could have landed that UFO in my backyard, come out, and say
    "Excuse me, we are Martians and we are here in 1950 to speak to you, President": wrong destination, wrong time...

    Sigh..

  12. The other articles... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Very strange one at the bottom. "Readers may recall back in 2002 there was an awful fuss kicked up when Rusi Taleyarkhan announced he had achieved one of science's holy grails: tabletop fusion. The claim was met with understandable scepticism"

    What the hell? The Farnsworth Fusor's been working for four decades, what skepticism???

  13. Anorak Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you a spotter?

    1. Re:Anorak Alert! by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Probably not. The 125 came before the APT. And was diesel electric rather than overhead electric. The 225 was the replacement electric locomotive.

    2. Re:Anorak Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't say it was overhead electric.

      I would say "It'll be interesting to see what replaces the 125 in the next couple of years" but we all know that isn't going to happen. Hell, I've seen a Class 50 hauling a service from Cornwall up the WCML at Bristol Temple Meads, so no one seems to have any plans to replace much of the current rolling stock.

    3. Re:Anorak Alert! by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      No, but the point is it would be a bit daft electrifying the routes, and then going backwards to diesel when electric is better.

    4. Re:Anorak Alert! by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also, the 225 referred to kmph, not mph like the 125. Good marketing there....

    5. Re:Anorak Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, of course.

      I do wish someone within BR back in the 70's had had a thought attack and electrified the entire network (With overhead, not this daft third-live-rail crap thank you very much Southern!) Ah well, at least we got some nice big eletro-diesel freight locos out of the deal.

    6. Re:Anorak Alert! by MROD · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. I'd like to see how long overhead electric cabling would last on the sea-cliff section around Dawlish. I'm guessing one winter storm.

      I've heard they had to take off the new trains on that route due to them getting swamped by sea water than the electrics failing. Looks like the old HSTs are going to have to run that route for some time.

      --

      Agrajag: "Oh no, not again!"
  14. Power Source by Billosaur · · Score: 3, Informative
    British Rail patented a design for a flying saucer powered by thermonuclear fusion back in 1973. The public transport body submitted Charles Osmond Frederick's maverick contraption, the Guardian reports.

    The fact that sustainable fusion hasto this day eluded scientists was no deterrent to such a ferociously inventive mind. Frederick explains how to dodge the scientific watershed: "The thermonuclear fusion will take place in a series of pulses, each pulse being triggered by laser energy, and/or energetic particles reflected from a previous pulse. The system will be arranged so that the fusion process will decay after each pulse so that the stability of the system is maintained."

    And according to a related report, the fusion required to run the thing may not be ready anytime soon

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
  15. remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it was British engineers who came up with the first hovering jet!

    With its' lights and hovering at night and from far enough away it's probably routinely mistaken for a UFO.

  16. "News"?? by BigBadBus · · Score: 1
    I first heard about this in 1982 in "The Unexplained" magazine! Slow day for the news I suppose...

  17. first contact by user24 · · Score: 3, Funny

    so... when the aliens finally meet up with us, the first words between our race and theirs will be a notification of patent infringement and intent to sue said little green men for every neutrino core they've got... :-)

    1. Re:first contact by ross.w · · Score: 1

      NO, it will be a complaint about the lateness of the service and the quality of the coffee.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
  18. fly your own by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 1

    More interesting still is Hammacher Schlemmer's remote control UFO. It's not the one with the camera but the price is right.

  19. Announcement by telchine · · Score: 2, Funny

    Due to technical difficulties, this spaceship will terminate here at Uranus, a bus service will be along shortly.

  20. I don't believe it! by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 3, Funny

    Someone beat Microsoft and Amazon to an insane patent!

  21. Better picture here... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    There is a nicer picture and discussion with what looks to be text from the patent itself HERE.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  22. British Patent System by Rac3r5 · · Score: 1

    So does this mean the British patent system is broken too. They issued a patent without a working prototype. Or unless, they did get it working??

    1. Re:British Patent System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's British, therefore it doesn't work when it rains.

      Since it rains a fair amount in the UK, they've never managed to get enough consecutive sunny days to actually try the saucer.

      (This is a sly reference to the way many classic British sportscars and motorbikes would fail to operate when it was the slightest bit damp.)

    2. Re:British Patent System by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 1

      Under UK patent law there is no requirement that there be a prototype - the invention must be capable of industrial application but no prototype or working model is needed.

      That said, the patent is plainly not capable of industrial application as it does not explain how the fusion drive would work. It should therefore not have been granted. The UK patent office is normally fairly good at spotting things like this.

  23. Going to have to take issue here by FoamingToad · · Score: 1

    The HSTs do not have a pair of DVTs, DVT being a shorthand term for Driving Van Trailer - they are 2 x 2,250HP Driving Motor Brakes (DMB).

    As for two driving cabs on either end, the technology was already well used on various multiple units. It was unusual to have two diesel-electric power units used in this fashion, although the "Tadpole" DEMUs in use in the South-East of England had been around for about 20-30 years beforehand.

    I really must get out more.

    1. Re:Going to have to take issue here by jjeffrey · · Score: 1

      I didn't say they had a pair of DVT's, I said they had *a* DVT. RTFC :-)

    2. Re:Going to have to take issue here by jjeffrey · · Score: 1

      You were right to pick me up on the multiple units though :)

    3. Re:Going to have to take issue here by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Tadpoles? Never head them called that (I assume you are talking about the class 207 DEMUs). We called them 'Thumpers'. We called standard mechanical DMUs 'bog units'.

  24. To be fair, all the goverments were to blaim by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Insightful
    A rail network isn't cheap and it doesn't make money. It is part of the infrastructure however that countries need to others can use them to make money.

    Lets just take a small rail network like the london underground. It is hideously expensive to build and maintain. There are only two ways to operate it.

    See it as a commercial company. Nice idea but doesn't work. Why? Because commercial companies A got to earn their costs, their future investments and a bit extra. But how can you do this when you run a company that has to maintain loss making lines?

    What?

    Well it is simple, it is very easy to make money on the mainlines during peak times. Then the trains are packed and you can easily get your money even with reasonable ticket prices. But how many people would use those mainlines at peak times if there werent any feeder lines at non-peak times?

    Simply put, to get on the mainline I need to take a bus from my house that is half empty. No way that bus makes a profit BUT if it wasn't running I would have no use for the mainline.

    Think of it like this, a supermarket that only sells butter and cheese and jam and peanut butter but NOT bread wouldn't be much use now would it?

    A rail network, or public transport in general will always be spending the money it makes on those non-profit lines. The moment you try to cut money by getting rid of unprofitable lines you gut the service meaning fewer people can use it.

    This practice of cutting unprofitable lines and thereby cutting off whole parts of the country from public transport started long ago. The more it happens the less people can rely on public transport, the less they will use it, the more unprofitable lines you will have, and so on.

    Only in those countries where public transport is seen as an vital part of the infrastructure still have a working system. Spending billions on keeping it all running year in and year out however is very difficult and it is very tempting for a goverment to just cut the budget for a term and hope it will all keep to gether and next term there will be money for the back maintenance. Off course that never happens and so the system is neglected for decades until people die.

    Nothing new, the dutch railnetwork is going through similar problems, our politicians asure us that the we won't have the same problems as the brits and the fact that recently we have had a whole series of accidents is just coincendence.

    Who is to blaim? People that believe in tax cuts. A goverment tax cut is like your landlord saying he will charge you 100 less. Just now you got to pay the elec bill of 200 yourselve. I never seen a tax cut that wasn't offset by an increase somewhere else.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:To be fair, all the goverments were to blaim by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      The problem is that the moment public transport doesn't work for people, they need a car. Once they have a car, the economics of train travel (which seems to be pitched against costs including running costs, not petrol costs) fall apart.

      Also, cars are generally a lot more convenient, unless you are travelling at peak times, when the speed of the train is better. I actually prefer trains, because I can read or have a coffee, but too often the door-to-door time is easily beaten by a car. On some lines into London, the price is ridiculous. A return journey that costs about £14 by car costs over £50 by train, and that doesn't include my extra costs in taxis/buses.

    2. Re:To be fair, all the goverments were to blaim by hey! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Once they have a car, the economics of train travel (which seems to be pitched against costs including running costs, not petrol costs) fall apart.

      Which in part is due to irrational hopefulness. You hope you aren't going to get stuck in traffic when you go downtown. That hope is repeatedly dashed.

      However, when the government buys into this irrational hopefulness by shifting investment to support cars, what happens is that the market responds accordingly. You get sprawl, which cannot be served economically by public transportation, and demands people to use cars to travel ridiculous distances, and they're still stuck in traffic.

      Once you've reached this point, you're screwed. You can wish things had happened differently, but there's no way to fix them overnight.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:To be fair, all the goverments were to blaim by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      As a non-dutch living in Holland for the last 5 years can most definitely say that the current dutch govrenment is NOT cutting taxes.

      Actually they're doing the reverse - increasing taxes. Notice for example the new mandatory health insurance (as soon as health insurance became mandatory prices jumped 30%) - a tax in all but name.

      They are however cutting on PUBLIC SERVICES, which is probably one of the reasons they just lost the municipal elections.

    4. Re:To be fair, all the goverments were to blaim by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      In a competitive market, you are going to pay a lot less than paying a government agency which doesn't have to provide good service to make money. More than that, though, it is your right to spend your money as you please, and your right to not have it stolen from you (Taxes, while necessary to a certain degree, is larceny committed by a state.) More money is not an effective means to make a government agency function well. Even with more money, there is no incentive to do so. If the market cannot support a rail transport system, it shouldn't exist.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
  25. Perhaps they should have spent the time ... by anaplasmosis · · Score: 0

    ... making the Advanced Passenger Train work?

  26. Re:Anorak Alert! --- East vs West by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, the IC225 was destined for the West Coast Main Line ... the tilting of that train wuold help it corner better.

    The HST125 was the prime workhorse to replace Deltic-hauled express trains on the East Coast Main Line. Presumably, though, the IC225 could have been used on the East Coast, but the next generation modfel would have been prime replacement for the East Coast (and maybe West Coast too - who knows)

  27. Fight security... by Masq666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A plane crash is bad enough, and this thing has an onboard Nuclear Reactor. I don't wanna be any place even near a crash site.

    --
    Bits of News Giving you the latest bits.
    1. Re:Fight security... by barefootgenius · · Score: 1

      At one point the American Navy was trying to build nuclear powered planes http://www.aboutnuclear.org/view.cgi?fC=Space,Hist ory

      --
      /. bug #926803 - Why I can post.
  28. Lifter Project by adius · · Score: 1

    Here is something to consider for those that like to poke fun at UFOs.

    http://jnaudin.free.fr/lifters/main.htm

  29. Rails?! by consumer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Since I switched to Ruby on Rails, I can develop fusion powered spacecraft in half the time! With no code at all! And it all tests itself!

  30. You mean FIAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean FIAT, not Bombardier (who are Canadian). I am not sure that the rights were even sold - the result of years of British Rail research were largely in the public domain.

    I was close to the APT project - I worked in the lab at Derby where first the experimental version (APT-E) and then the prototype version (APT-P) were built and serviced. The FIAT Pendalino which UK railways now buy is a different design but benefited from the basic research done at Derby on the behaviour at the wheel-rail interface and on rail vehicle dynamics (as did French and German rivals).

    BR did not "can" the APT, Mrs Thatcher did. It was one of many engineering projects canned by her "Buy Off-the-Shelf Commercial Products" policy. The APT was in fact very successful as new tech goes. When axed, the only problems were fluid leaks from the hydrodynamic brake drums (due to loosening bolts, a trivial engineering problem to solve) and motion sickness due to the tilting algorithm. It was FIAT who discovered just after this that motion sickness is avoided by somewhat under-correcting the centrifugal force, a piece of tuning that could easily have been applied to APT.

    A disasterous publicity trip was held in the winter of 1978 or 79, on a day when the whole railway came to a standstill because of icing of the overhead electric wire. Also, the motion sickness caused the press hacks to spew up the excessive volumes of whisky and soda they had consumed, and the resulting bad press (British hacks hate railways at the best of times) gave Mrs T her excuse to axe it.

  31. You're thinking of The Flo Control Project. by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 1

    You are looking for The Flo Control Project. A photograph of a silhouette of the cat entering the device is taken and compared to images of the cat with and without an object (usually a dead rodent or bird) in its mouth. If the photograph matches approximately with the image of the cat without any extra baggage, it is allowed to enter.

  32. Re:Anorak Alert! --- East vs West by jjeffrey · · Score: 1

    The APT was the tilting train - the 225 is the combination of a Class 91, a DVT and a load of MK4 rolling stock and is the most common train on the East Coast Main today. It dosen't tilt.

  33. Not a new 'discovery by snap2grid · · Score: 1

    This has cropped up in the Guardian newspaper as well as the BBC's website, because it was just 'discovered' by a student (IIRC). Of course this isn't news since it was revealed in Unexplained in the 80s complete with some speculative artwork! I wonder what other old stuff it's possible to 'discover' to make a headline?

  34. Hmmmm... by rspress · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I thought Al Gore invented the flying saucer........or at least came from one?

  35. Footfall! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone here read Niven+Pournelle's "FootFall"?

  36. This is not news by CdBee · · Score: 1

    this story gets "discovered" every few years by journalists looking for copy to fill blank pages.. I can recall it being "reported" 3 or 4 times spread over the last 10 years

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  37. Slashdotted by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    Ah well, looks like they pulled it. Too bad, it was a much better pi and the text of the patent. Shared hosting... I'll bet they had one of those "unlimited bandwidth" accounts...

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  38. Sobering experience. by Thedeviluno · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I used to laugh at UFO freaks....Until I actually saw one during a BBQ several years ago, with a small gathering of friends late one night outside my house. What we witnessed was a disc visible only by the absence of light in an eliptical shape. The perimeter of the disc had pin-holes of bright white light and I can only guess at the size due to the lack of landmarks in the sky, but the collective opinion seems to be somewhere around 100-200meters in diameter. When I first spotted the disc I could not understand what I was looking at. The eye must associate what it sees with what the brain knows (optics) and so I would have never reconsidered the matter had the UFO not passed directly over my house. From a distance of several miles it appeared to be a flock of white birds heading south. Hardly uncommon, as it slowly drew closer to me I thought maybe I was looking at some kind of helicopter.(I had by now alerted my guests to the event) Once it was on top of us we could see that what had been mistaken for white geese migrating was a ring of bright white lights slowly rotating just enough to make out a sillouhette of the disc against the nightsky, nobody could speak. My small gathering of friends had become a herd of deer in front of headlights. Certainly a once in a lifetime experience. I immediatly called the first aeronautical authority I could think of; the airport laughed at me, the laughter hasnt stopped. You cant talk about this shit without people labelling you a crackpot and why not? Isn't it easier to believe that thousands of eye witnesses are fools or madmen? I always thought so, just keep your eyes on the sky. Everything I've reported is true and I dont care if anyone besides the guests at my BBQ laugh themselves to death. I know what I saw.

    1. Re:Sobering experience. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you get probed ?

    2. Re:Sobering experience. by Jerry · · Score: 1

      In 1962 I was at a 5 frat spring outing at a lake not far from York, Ne. We were playing king of the mountian and had stipped to our skivvies to protect our shirt and pants. There were probably 50 or 60 buys there. It was a moonless but clear night. While guarding our flag I happened to look into the northern sky and saw a long, tube shaped craft with a few orange portholes along the side. It passed by silently, amost overhead. I estimated it to be about 100 feet long and 20 feet in diameter. I wasn't the only one to see it. It scared us all and there was a mad dash to get back to the campus. Some of us forgot our clothes. It was a warm spring night (pre-air conditioning) and, as it turned out, some the girls were sleeping on the roof of the dorm. They had binocculars and it took us guys a while to figure out where the giggling was coming from.

      Twenty years later while I was taking flight training my instructor happened to chose the "olive branch route", which was the route the B52's took when they were training for low level (under 200 feet) penetration. As I was heading south on a particular leg of the route I noticed below the lake at which we had our frat outing so many years previously. Running with internal red lights to aid in night vision, the light exiting the portals would have appeard to be orange. I don't know what technology the USAF has to muffle jet engine noise, but in researching the nighttime photos of B52s they looked very similar to what I remembered passing overhead.

      --

      Running with Linux for over 20 years!

    3. Re:Sobering experience. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I really don't believe you have friends.

    4. Re:Sobering experience. by Thedeviluno · · Score: 1

      haha You gotta be kidding me? You think I saw a plane? I said fucking flying saucer buddy. what part of SAUCER sounds like plane? Im talking lots of other people there and we are all educated sober individuals. I understand you want to discredit my experience because I used to do the same thing, seeing is believing.

    5. Re:Sobering experience. by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Actually, seeing is not believing.

      Your brain isn't just seeing a bitmap your eyes are presenting - what your conscious mind sees has gone through a tremendous amount of image processing first. If you concentrate hard, you will notice your vision is really only a very tiny point of sharp, focused vision - barely big enough to fit a word on a page (that's why you have to scan the page with your eyes). That is your fovea. The rest of your eyes are very low resolution. However, the image processing part of the brain fills in all the gaps, and turns most of your vision into a sharp coherent picture (rather than a tiny area of sharp vision surrounded by fuzzy blurred colours). It also fills in shapes that are uncertain. Suggestions from others can help to fill those shapes. This is why people see ghosts. It can be extremely convincing. Just the other night I was walking to my dad's and I was convinced I could see a man ahead, bent down putting a collar on a small dog. When I got closer, it turned out to just be the combination of poor light from a distant streetlamp and the juxtaposition of a wheelie bin and some railings. Had I been going into a house on that road instead of past that area, and someone the next day had asked me if I'd seen anybody in the street that night, I'd have told them about a man and his dog - who didn't exist - because the visual processing part of my brain simply filled in the blanks from a dimly lit scene.

    6. Re:Sobering experience. by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 1

      That'll be the MS licensing team scanning your pc.

      Find that tinfoil hat!

      --
      throw new NoSignatureException();
  39. Re:Anorak Alert! --- East vs West by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm ... mind was in a tangle

    s/APT/IC225/ and all looks better...

    8)

  40. Google Cache by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  41. Sounds familiar by alanw · · Score: 1, Informative
    I thought I'd read about this before - a long time ago. A quick google for "British Rail" "Flying Saucer" turns up several references, including this New Scientist article from 26 July 1997.

    There are other possible earlier ones as well.

  42. Without a working model... by Jerry · · Score: 1

    patents should be disallowed.

    If those "research" or "technical" firms whose only employees are lawyers filing submarine patents had to demonstrate working models of "their" inventions before a patent could be issued, we'd have less of this kind of patent nonsense.

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  43. Maybe it's still "classified?" by gekman · · Score: 1

    As of 2:05 P.M. EST, The Reg has no mention of this article on it's homepage. The link from /. still works, though.

    --
    Look at all the happy creatures dancing on the lawn...
  44. Time for tea? by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    Does it come with a tea cup?

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  45. Not so crazy...tested at White Sands by b_dover · · Score: 1

    Well...something which sounds very similar has been under development for some time: http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology /laser_propulsion_000705.html

  46. Re:Anorak Alert! --- East vs West by MROD · · Score: 1

    Of course, the class 91 was build as a modified APT power car, of course.

    --

    Agrajag: "Oh no, not again!"
  47. Amazing really by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 1

    The British find it hard enough building a railway that works, but yet finds the time to invent flying saucer!

    Anyone else seeing a link here?

    --
    throw new NoSignatureException();
  48. Clouting Tilt Trains, and Sea-Sickness by nukenerd · · Score: 3, Informative

    The APT could not tilt into the path of another train. Its whole tilt motion envelope fell within the envelope of a non-tilting train; or in other words, within the loading gauge. True, if the tilt failed the train would have to slow to the speed of a non-tilting train, not for any technical reason but for passenger comfort or so as not to alarm the passengers. This would not be a huge problem - the tilt system would be pretty reliable and even if it did fail the train would only need to slow on the sharper curves.

    As for causing sea-sickness, this depends on the tilting algorithm. When the APT came out little was known about passenger response and the APT was given a very simple algorithm that aimed for zero lateral g in the passenger saloon. Later knowledge, particularly aquired by FIAT with their Penulino development, made great improvements such as leaving a proportion of the centrifugal force uncorrected by tilt, and also better handling of the transitions. Given any programmable tilt control system (such as the APT had) such tuning could have been applied retrospectively.

    As it was, the APT on its first publicity run made a bunch of press hack vomit their whisky-and-soda, leading to the bad press that caused the myth that the APT was some kind of total disaster, a myth that Mrs Thatcher seized upon as an excuse to can the project, and a myth which quite a few Slashdotters seem to have bought too.

  49. Check out the lifter project by adius · · Score: 1

    If you are interested in the technology behind their "antigravity" I highly recommend googling for "lifter project". I think their craft uses the same principles for propulsion as described in the web site. http://jnaudin.free.fr/lifters/main.htm

  50. No blaim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From dictionary.com:

    No entry found for blaim.

    Did you mean Baalim?
    Suggestions:
    Baalim
    balm
    Belam
    Blum
    blame
    blimy
    blain
    Balaam
    Bloom
    bloom
    Blair [.. it goes on btw]

    No entry was found in the dictionary. Would you like to search the Web for blaim?

    1. Re:No blaim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is your first language English? Yes? Then stop complaining about this Dutch guy's spelling. Let's see how well you can write in Dutch.

  51. Brilliant... by McFadden · · Score: 1
    From the article: Hilariously mutton-chopped space wurzel Professor Colin Pillinger - of Beagle 2 infamy

    Damnit... I've just revealed I was covertly surfing on my laptop during an extremely boring meeting, by screeching with laughter at that line. That's one of the funniest things I've read in months.

  52. Slow News Day At The Guardian? by vain+gloria · · Score: 1

    I've seen this story complete with diagram in a UK newspaper before, a good 5-10 years ago. The Reg article mentions finding the story in The Guardian, but doesn't go so far as to link to it. I wonder in what context it was originally reported, since this certainly isn't news in the "newly discovered" sense. Perhaps as a 2-page piece on "Amazing Inventions That Never Got Off The Ground"? ;)

    No problem with the story turning up on Slashdot though. Hell, how could it not? It involves patents and flying saucers, the only thing it lacks is definitve information on whether or not the saucer runs Linux.

    1. Re:Slow News Day At The Guardian? by Ibix · · Score: 1
      I wonder in what context it was originally reported

      The appropriate link is http://www.guardian.co.uk/frontpage/story/0,,17295 79,00.html. Note the "frontpage" in the URL, and guess where it was...

      I

  53. Dr. Brown has prior art. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    On the application of its time warping capabilities to, say, making sure your train arrives in the station on time aren't so obvious.

    Eh? The second prototype vehicle using the flux capacitor was a locomotive. Surely nothing is more foremost in the mind of the Engineer than being on time!

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)