Slashdot Mirror


Unique and Productive or Just More Eye-Candy?

4ndys writes "A guy who goes by the name MacSlow is currently working on a project he calls LowFat. This is a photomanager with a twist. Rather than just viewing you pictures one at a time, you spread the pictures out over your desktop and can manage them in a much more natural way. He is hoping to release this on multiple platforms inc. Linux, Mac and Windows."

111 comments

  1. A little fishy to me by winkydink · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1. Write blog entry about cool product
    2. Do demo of cool product
    3. Get cool product and blog mentioned on Slashdot
    4. Just happen to have tip jars at bottom of blog page.
    5. Profit.

    I'm not against throwing a few bucks in the direction of something useful,
    but I usually wait until said useful thing is in my possession before
    deciding.

    For all you know, this guy has no intention of finishing this thing and is
    just looking for a way to make a quick buck.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:A little fishy to me by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This guy is doing nothing more than anyone standing in front of a VC.
      HE has a concept, he wants to make it, he thinks it will work.

      My bet, he will make it, we will use it and it will be a success.
      It looks like the kind of app that a tablet is dying out for and looks so natural and easy to use.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:A little fishy to me by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 5, Informative
      I'm not against throwing a few bucks in the direction of something useful, but I usually wait until said useful thing is in my possession before deciding.

      Don't worry. Any random donations from slashdotters will be FAR outweighed by his bandwidth bill this month. For Chrissakes, he posted *movies!* Sure, he pulled them now, but the damage is done.

    3. Re:A little fishy to me by 13bPower · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nah, This guy is an ubuntuforum regular. We've seen this project and his other little projects before. More donate-ware than rip off slashdot I'd say.

    4. Re:A little fishy to me by vrwarp · · Score: 1

      This was posted on the Ubuntu forums quite a few days ago and I think the tips jar was already there.

      --
      --vrwarp
    5. Re:A little fishy to me by SirSlud · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Speaking as a games programmer, thats a lot of work for a quick buck.

      I really dislike how negative people are about this kind of thing. Its certainly not a quick buck. All that work, with no garauntee of any donations. If you want to talk about making a quick buck, you're probably better served talking to management of the company he's employed at.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    6. Re:A little fishy to me by 4ndys · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You could consider it fishy, however I'm not actually affiliated to him at all. I found the blog after following a link through from Ubuntu Forums. He has also mentioned to me that he would keep track of who had donated what, so if you were to donate you *could* end up getting it for no extra charge once it's complete.

    7. Re:A little fishy to me by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1
      Any random donations from slashdotters will be FAR outweighed by his bandwidth bill this month. For Chrissakes, he posted *movies!*

      Then again, he had the sense to use coral cache.
      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
  2. That's all well and good ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    ... but are there any photo editors or filters that can make my not f*cking ugly?!

    1. Re:That's all well and good ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

      It's a "filter" called "delete." Apparently, it's so popular that it may even be on your keyboard. Click your image and apply this "delete" filter, and within a fraction of a second your ugliness will be gone. Make sure to apply this filter on any and all pictures of you (even those in which you are in the background), just for safe measure, of course.

    2. Re:That's all well and good ... by hotarugari · · Score: 1

      Yes. In Photoshop CS (or CS2) they have this new nifty "localized" blur that makes you look like a model, or anime depending on settings. -Alex

  3. So, basically, its Picasa? by patio11 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hate to discourage folks from trying to be innovative, but competing head to head with a company backed by Gooooooooooooogle when they're releasing their product free isn't likely to be very successful. And Picasa is actually feature-complete...

    1. Re:So, basically, its Picasa? by winkydink · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Feature complete compared to what?

      Did you even watch the demo? Because I don't recall Picasa allowing me to organize my pics in the manner shown in the demo. Also, I don't recall this guy saying that in order to use his stuff, I'll have to allow him to index all of my pics for some vaguely defined reason.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    2. Re:So, basically, its Picasa? by sinclair44 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortuantely Picasa is Windows only. According to the summary, this one should be fully cross-platform.

      --
      Omnes stulti sunt.
    3. Re:So, basically, its Picasa? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Can't see the demo, videos are down, but the description is of a lightboard. Aperture has this feature, and I'd be very surprised if lots of other photo software doesn't. I seem to remember using a little shareware app back in the day that did it too.

      This isn't an innovation unless there's something surprising in that demo.

    4. Re:So, basically, its Picasa? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      I've tried Picassa, tossed it, and purchased a photo app. Have you ever tried to scroll through a few hundred photos in Picassa? Google has a whole new (and bad) way for the scroll bar to work.

    5. Re:So, basically, its Picasa? by Coryoth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      From what was actually demoed he's aiming at something more interesting than a simple photo sorting application. Photo-sorting is the initial demonstration, but it's really all about the interface and ability to manipulate and sort objects with an easy to use interface in a very visual way. For instance, he talks about building a next generation file management tool out of it, which certainly could make a lot of sense. Based on what was demonstrated it certainly looks like it could provide very interesting and intuitive new file handling abilities.

      The downside is what you don't get to see in the demonstration: how the interface actually works. You can see photos being grouped, changing layout schemes, being zoomed and rotated etc. which is great, but the real question of exactly what the interface to all those things is: how do you use keyboard and mouse to tell the computer to perform all those actions? How do you zoom instead of dragging the photo? How do you manipulate a group instead of an individual item from the group (and vice versa)? If it's an exclusive modal system switched by keyboard commands then it's clunky, but if it's based on modifier keys and buttons then, given the rnge of actions demonstrated, it may become equally clunky.

      None the less it looks like an interesting idea, and if the demo actually shows fully implemented work (as opposed to being rendered and edited together) then it is indeed a promising project.

      Jedidiah.

    6. Re:So, basically, its Picasa? by badasscat · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've tried Picassa, tossed it, and purchased a photo app. Have you ever tried to scroll through a few hundred photos in Picassa? Google has a whole new (and bad) way for the scroll bar to work.

      You do realize there's a scrollbar on the right and a scrollbar on the left, didn't you?

      The scrollbar on the right can be used in several ways as well. You can pull the slider up and down, you can click anywhere in the scrollbar, you can use the arrow keys at the top and bottom, or you can click the "=" buttons to quickly move p and down a grouping of photos.

      If you don't like this, you can use the traditional scrollbar on the left to quickly navigate folders.

      I wonder what "photo app" you "purchased". Have you tried actually navigating through a large collection of photos in Photoshop? I actually use Picasa as a front-end to Photoshop; it blows the doors off Adobe Bridge, which is supposed to do some of what Picasa does but does it all very, very poorly (mostly because it takes about five hours for it to do simple things like display a thumbnail collection).

    7. Re:So, basically, its Picasa? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
      You do realize there's a scrollbar on the right and a scrollbar on the left, didn't you?

      Yes. I had an email conversation with the Picassa support people, who (after I upgraded to the latest version, as they requested) admitted that the scroll bars do not work well. Hopefully they will fix the problem because Picassa is otherwise a fairly good app.

    8. Re:So, basically, its Picasa? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
      I wonder what "photo app" you "purchased".

      Sorry, forgot to reply to this part.

      ACDSee 8 Photo.

    9. Re:So, basically, its Picasa? by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      Picasa is photo management software, not photo editing software. It would be 100% worthless if it didn't index your photos.

    10. Re:So, basically, its Picasa? by winkydink · · Score: 1

      My comment isn't directed toward whether or not it indexes but where the indexing takes place

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    11. Re:So, basically, its Picasa? by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      It takes place on your PC. Where else would it take place? No data is sent to google from picasa apart from an auto-upgrade check the first time you launch it. YOUR images never show up in a google.com or images.google.com search.

    12. Re:So, basically, its Picasa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps unsurprisingly, Apple Computer's done it before, and better (though it'll cost you a pretty penny!)--check out the screenshots of Aperture's light table (second and third screenshots on that page). There's probably a better description of the light table in the "Quick Tours" section.

    13. Re:So, basically, its Picasa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't this very similar to the light table in Apple's Aperture?

    14. Re:So, basically, its Picasa? by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      The screenshots don't tell me a lot about the intereface and whether it is as dynamic and flexible as what the LowFat demo displayed. Perhaps it is, and the videos would tell me, but it rfuses to let me view them without quicktime 7, and then links me to a ownload page with MacOS X and Windows versions. Having Linux and Mplayer (which happily plays Quicktime 7) it won't work, so I guess I'll never know. In the meantime LowFat does have some impressive interactive interface features and a willingness to bring those to more interesting problems than just photos: his "near term goals" include integration with nautilus and beagle for general file management.

      Jedidiah.

    15. Re:So, basically, its Picasa? by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Have you ever tried to scroll through a few hundred photos in Picassa?

      Yes, I have scrolled through nearly a thousand photos in Picasa. On a 333MHz machine with 192MB of memory. Running Windows 98.

      All I can say is that I wish iPhoto could do things as smoothly, even on far faster hardware. :-)

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    16. Re:So, basically, its Picasa? by JazzCrazed · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's changed by now, but he's got a fully GNU/Linux-friendly OGG Theora video. Theora should play fine in MPlayer (although, I used Totem). The app looks plenty cool to me, and the idea of tying it into file management in general makes me wish really bad that there were Linux driver support for my 3D accelerator on my laptop.

    17. Re:So, basically, its Picasa? by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      His LowFat demo videos, in a variety of formats played just fine. It was Apple's demonstration of Aperture's light table that refused to work.

      Jedidiah.

  4. I have already done this (sort of) by Psionicist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To sort my (ehm) porn, I hacked togheter this 8 kb python program using wxPython and pyGame a couple of months ago. Here it is: http://psionicist.online.fr/pile.py.txt

    The code is god awful, but it works. Some screenshots here: http://forum.sweclockers.com/showthread.php?s=&thr eadid=504073

    1. Re:I have already done this (sort of) by winkydink · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, that's not porn in those screenshots!

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    2. Re:I have already done this (sort of) by rjstanford · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ya know, its funny what turns some people on.

      [shudder]

      I mean, really. This is a family forum, for chrissakes.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    3. Re:I have already done this (sort of) by CottonEyedJoe · · Score: 4, Funny

      Do not underestimate the power of scantily clad ladies to advance software design and development.

    4. Re:I have already done this (sort of) by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but ... did you see some of those screenshots? That's just wrong. As wrong as Kryten with a vacuum cleaner manual.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  5. ideal way to manage photos (cool video) by mcguyver · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is how you manage photos:

    Crazy Multi-Input Touch Screen

    Althought likely vaporware, it would be cool to have a multi touch screen...

    1. Re:ideal way to manage photos (cool video) by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Hey, no fair. You just made my new 24" LCD cry. And electronics aren't supposed to cry.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    2. Re:ideal way to manage photos (cool video) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative


      The attribution can be found here:

      http://mrl.nyu.edu/~jhan/ftirtouch/index.html

    3. Re:ideal way to manage photos (cool video) by timeOday · · Score: 2, Informative

      For the lazy, the linked video shows a user shuffling around photos on a virtual desktop using a touch screen, so it is highly relevant.

    4. Re:ideal way to manage photos (cool video) by Daxster · · Score: 2

      They're called tablet notebooks or tablet PCs :-P

      --
      Death by snoo-snoo!
    5. Re:ideal way to manage photos (cool video) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Apple hasn't done it yet?

      Seriously, the company was (for all intents and purposes) the first to use a touchpad, and the first to position the keyboard towards the display so that the mouse could go in front. What makes you think it'll be any different with multitouch displays such as the one in that video? Apple holds several key patents on the technology that are just now starting to come to light.

    6. Re:ideal way to manage photos (cool video) by rs79 · · Score: 1

      "Can someone tell me why laptops don't come with touch screens as standard equipment?"

      Only if you tell me first how long you expect you LCD screen to last.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    7. Re:ideal way to manage photos (cool video) by evilsofa · · Score: 1

      Just think of the possibilities for the porn industry! That would give a whole new meaning to "sticky fingers"...

    8. Re:ideal way to manage photos (cool video) by hobobeaver · · Score: 1
      --
      wtfsig?!11
    9. Re:ideal way to manage photos (cool video) by biglig2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's called "gorilla arms".

      Want to test it yourself? Easy. Wash your hands, then take your exisiting laptop screen and draw, with your fingertip, a smiley face or a letter A or something. OK, easy enough. Now keep drawing things. Spell out your name, play tic-tac-toe; basically imagine you are using a touch screen interface. Every 5 minutes, make a mental note of how your arms feel.

      I reckon a man like you might make it as far as 20 minutes before you start to cry with the pain.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    10. Re:ideal way to manage photos (cool video) by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      I cannot believe the demo did not include a LCARS set-up. I want my money back!

      --
      -
    11. Re:ideal way to manage photos (cool video) by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Eh? I don't think I have gorilla arms and don't have serious trouble with a touch screen interface.

      I interface with the real world (which requires much more arm movement) and don't really get fatigued from just doing stuff.

    12. Re:ideal way to manage photos (cool video) by biglig2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not moving your arms that is the problem, it's holding them out up in front of you for sustained periods of time. Seriously, try it and you'll see what I mean.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    13. Re:ideal way to manage photos (cool video) by BruceCage · · Score: 1

      I tried it, and yes... after a while (even when adding support using your elbow) your arm starts feeling more and more like a brick. Exercise would probably help though, but that's probably just stating the obvious.

      --
      Perfect is the enemy of done.
  6. Or.... by Starker_Kull · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Here's hoping that the /. effect will spur him on to get this finished in record time!" ...or blow his monthly bandwidth limit to the moon. Hope he's ready.

  7. A little human nature to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "For all you know, this guy has no intention of finishing this thing and is
    just looking for a way to make a quick buck."

    Well it could be worse. He could publish something. Lots of people find it useful and not send him any money. Then complain that it doesn't do things exactly the way photoshop does.

    1. Re:A little human nature to me by winkydink · · Score: 5, Funny

      Naww... then it would be named The Gimp. :)

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    2. Re:A little human nature to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Score: -1, Obvious

  8. PhotoMesa by bederson · · Score: 1

    Or you can use an existing free mature project that lays out all your photos at once, groups them by whatever metadata you have, and adds smooth zooming to the mix.

    Try PhotoMesa - www.photomesa.com

    --
    - Ben Bederson Professor Computer Science, Human-Computer Interaction Lab University of Maryland
    1. Re:PhotoMesa by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      How exactly do you select the images together to apply tags?

      Whenever I do it, its "that one, that one, that one and ermmmmmm that one"

      Then I realise that I wanna see one closer and double click on it to view and the selection goes away...

      This initial sorting and management will save so much time.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:PhotoMesa by texroot · · Score: 1

      Looks interesting, but only if you run Windows. The web site says PhotoMesa only runs on Windows.

    3. Re:Photomesa by grumbel · · Score: 1

      I have never used Photomesa, but from the screenshots it looks just like a regular Thumbnailviewer, LowFat is a different beast, since it tries to give the feeling of a real staple of photos, you can zoom, you can drag photos around, rotate them and stuff, pretty much the same as you would in real life, thumbnail viewers can't do that.

  9. Is this what you're looking for? by svunt · · Score: 0, Redundant

    OMG, I will totally buy this upon release, keep up the good work, *pat on back* let me check my wallet for change, good sir, if you need something to eat while you develop. How did this make it to /. exactly?

  10. Videos by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Videos by Heembo · · Score: 1

      Hey those downloads are just fine.... if I had a dialup line. But I'm getting about 6.7/Kb/sec on my phat cable pipe - only 1:49:04 remaining for a 39.1 MB file! BWAHHAHHAHAHAHHAHA

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
    2. Re:Videos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's odd... cause I was getting it at just over 1MB/s.

  11. Re:Seriously? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Technically, it should be possible to view your tiny datasets in pretty much realtime.
    I manage it with terrabytes of data covering thousands of real mile data - over the internet.

    You might not make thumbnails, but with efficient caching you won't need to.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  12. Already Down by Admiral+Trigger+Happ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It appears that the /. affect has already hit him

    --
    Admiral Trigger Happy
  13. Photomesa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This is a photomanager with a twist. Rather than just viewing you pictures one at a time, you spread the pictures out over your desktop and can manage them in a much more natural way."

    How's this any different than PhotoMesa?

  14. more mirrors by alienfluid · · Score: 4, Informative

    I managed to get the .avi and .wav files off the server before it blew up/melted.

    http://www.cribot.com/preview-1.avi
    http://www.cribot.com/preview-1.wav

    1. Re:more mirrors by happymark · · Score: 1

      This could be a fake video. Anyone can sync their fingers with a carefully crafted video production. Just like the GUI in "Minority Report".

  15. Just an Apeture knock off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called Apeture. That's one of it's big features so it's hardly a new idea. To an old school photographer Apeture is pretty stunning and amazingly powerful. The real power though is in working with RAW files.

  16. No Thanks... by telstar · · Score: 1

    You build it ... then I'll consider paying you for it.

  17. Not just for Photo's by shelterpaw · · Score: 0

    Everyone seems to gear this towards photo's, but it can be used for much more than that. You can soom in on an file and sort through them in a visual manner as opposed to a file structure, just like they said above about laying things out and orgainzing them. It's pretty cool and if it matures, I'd be interested.

  18. iPhoto? Picasa? by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

    What's new? Look at more than one picture at a time? OK ... even Windows Explorer has a filmstrip slide show. And in Thumbnail view you can set them to any size you want (with a little TweakUI setting).

    I'm not getting it.

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  19. Point missed by xvalentinex · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A lot of you guys including the Original Poster missed the point of his program (Could be that his server was ./ed so fast). He is wanting this to be more of a file-manager than a photo program, or even integrated with the file manager. Like explorer, nautilus, or konqueror. I think it's a great idea to moving to a new UI. I am bored with the current thumbnails way of management. I wonder how resource intensive it will be though, because that doesn't interest me in a file-manager.

  20. Link to the real video page by aurther_dent · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://mrl.nyu.edu/~jhan/ftirtouch/index.html The concept is really really cool with the potential to completely change the UI as we know it. I am surprised that this has not been covered on slashdot

    1. Re:Link to the real video page by CottonEyedJoe · · Score: 1

      >The concept is really really cool with the potential to completely change the UI as we know it.

      I disagree... It looks neat, like Tom Cruise in Minority Report, but I dont think this is where the UI is going. I mean, thats not a UI thats exercise! I race bicycles for fun and I can hold my own against most people in the exercise department, but I dont want to be doing the "wax on, wax off" (showing my age) when I'm sitting at a computer.

      Imagine having to reach out and hit a links with your finger everytime you wanted to follow a link in a web browser. Moving a mouse takes a tiny ammount of movement I can sit back and lounge and with a flick of my fingers and a click I can move files, click on links, etc... I'm hardly moving as I type this message. I agree, the video looks cool as hell, and this will definitely have its place in childrens/science museums (maybe even EPCOT!) but its not an effective UI, its DDR (that dancing thing) for the hands, and thats not how I want to work.

      Theres a reason we're still using keyboards and mouse/pointing devices. They work extremely well together. The next revolutionary UI device will not require any movement at all... or perhaps subtle eye movement. Maybe some type of neural link. Dont bet on something that makes you work harder to get less done, no matter how cool the demo is.

    2. Re:Link to the real video page by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      it was

    3. Re:Link to the real video page by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      Actually it completely depends on what you consider "work". Frankly, I think a multipoint touch screen would be great if you're a network engineer manageing a large network and you have a total graphical layout of your gear. However, if you take away the touchscreen and interface this with datapoint sensors on each digit of your hand, the applications expand tremendously. However, if you're a coder, this would be a terrible UI or at best a waste since you only flip between source code files every so often. I think the best application for it would be a full sized table that people can gather around. Each person having a unique ID implanted in their right arm (RFID) or on their forehead (laser scan) so that when they interact with the table they would be seen as a distinct individual from the other fifteen people using the table. Could be used for group work in a graphic design department. Could be used for playing virtual poker. Could be used for boardrooms (very likely the first application since the suits always get this stuff first). Could be used virtual foosball! THe point being that multiuser UIs don't exist yet and they should...

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  21. Well, it's not unique ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. but it is probably cheaper than Apple's offering

    http://www.apple.com/aperture/

  22. Eye-Candy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody please tell Tomahawk, looks like they are very much interested in eye-candy.

  23. Natural Is Overrated by GlassHeart · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The human way of dealing with the real world is limited by many factors, including the size and strength of our hands and arms, and the inability of our eyes to see through opaque things. This makes, for example, finding a picture in a pile of 1,000 a difficult task. In the same way, finding a picture in a computer-simulated pile of 1,000 is a difficult task. I'm generally fond of novel user interface ideas, but this one just smells like a lot of manual work (both sorting the pictures according to your personal criteria, and remember that criteria later). Is this really an improvement over iPhoto's "primitive" folders, for instance? I don't see how this solution would not degenerate into several piles of pictures called "vacation 2005", "dog", "birthday 2003", and so on once you are organizing hundreds or thousands of shots.

    Handwriting is a very natural way of entering text, but the keyboard is a far more efficient one. Real world mail from your friends would not be naturally threaded, or sorted by date. Real world spreadsheets don't recompute when you change a value. Real world typewriters can't correct a typo as if it never happened. Real world metaphors (like folders, for example) can be very useful, but they don't belong everywhere. I can find a picture in iPhoto quite a bit faster than I can from the shoebox that Lowfat seems to simulate.

    1. Re:Natural Is Overrated by villy · · Score: 1

      I think, on the other hand, that this type of zooming interface would be very useful for photos that haven't been named/organized via text attributes (which I believe is part of Macslow's ideas here). Think of non-text (visual-based) attribute searches... color/shape/subject/etc.

      I think an interesting experiment would be to measure the amount of time it takes to find a unique photo from various size groups of photos 10/100/500/1000/etc to find out where the sweet spot is for lowFat versus any other file sorting/mgmt system.

      It would be like having a music mgmt system that could find/organize music files by humming a melody or riff.

      Whoa.

    2. Re:Natural Is Overrated by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      I think an interesting experiment would be to measure the amount of time it takes to find a unique photo from various size groups of photos 10/100/500/1000/etc to find out where the sweet spot is for lowFat versus any other file sorting/mgmt system.

      Your experiment will depend largely on how well the picture is organized, how visually unique it is, and so on. An advanced amateur photographer can easily have dozens of very similar shots made while looking for that perfect shot, especially in the age of digital cameras. Professional photographers may not even have the time to swap memory cards, opting instead to hire an assistant to reload an identical spare camera while they shoot. They generate a staggering number of very similar shots. On the other hand, the one shot you remember taking with the big red umbrella is probably really easy to pick out from a "pile".

      Now, just because a pro might not use it doesn't mean it's a bad idea, but it does mean that scalability beyond the nice demo might be a problem.

      It would be like having a music mgmt system that could find/organize music files by humming a melody or riff.

      Don't rush to the patent office. Heard of it as early as 1995. :)

    3. Re:Natural Is Overrated by jlarocco · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It would be like having a music mgmt system that could find/organize music files by humming a melody or riff.

      Not to detract from your point, but in my mind, the image file equivalent of finding a music file by humming would be finding a photo by drawing a rough sketch of it. THAT would be really cool.

    4. Re:Natural Is Overrated by villy · · Score: 1

      Key word is "having". 11 years later... and?

      It's the grok factor. Demo videos? High grok. Autocorrelation & Cepstrum Analysis? Low grok.

      Personally, I like Macslow's approach. Build it (webify/create videos w/links) and they will come (feedback/donations).

      You can't deny he's got a great demo.

    5. Re:Natural Is Overrated by villy · · Score: 1

      Maybe Glassheart could help on the prior art/patent search before we get too carried away...

      I. Couldn't. Resist.

    6. Re:Natural Is Overrated by iamdrscience · · Score: 1
      Not to detract from your point, but in my mind, the image file equivalent of finding a music file by humming would be finding a photo by drawing a rough sketch of it. THAT would be really cool.
      This software exists. I really don't remember at all what it was called but I found it a few months ago when looking for something else. It's a very interesting idea, but it didn't seem like it worked particularly well for most things. Still though, very cool. I'm sure if you spent a little time, you could caress a link to the page I'm thinking of out of Google.
    7. Re:Natural Is Overrated by Tom · · Score: 1

      It has potential. For example, different from the real world, the same photo can be a member in multiple piles. That alone would make sorting and finding stuff a ton easier.
      Likewise, the thing seen in the videos, the ability to spread out the pile in an instant, allows you to find a specific picture fairly quickly.
      Now if I can also group piles together (i.e. subfolders), things start to be interesting.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    8. Re:Natural Is Overrated by grumbel · · Score: 1

      There is nothing that stops you on adding some automatic categorization or searching on top of such a zoomable interface, the point however is that you have a zoomable interface to begin with, since zoomable interfaces are a lot more natural to use, since they give you space to play around with, which a normal thumbnail view doesn't give you. And this space to play in is quite important, since it can both act as space for organisation as well as for presentation, it also makes the application much more mode-less, there no longer is a special view for each and every task, if the thumbnails are to small, you zoom in and job done.

      Its true that zoomable interfaces might be slower as a well categorized collection, but most people don't have a well categorized collection to begin with, so nothing is lost. In the end however zoomable interfaces mainadvantage is probally that they are fun to work with, they work as you expect them to work, you can browse and sort through a foto collection as you would do with a staple of photos in real life, categorization doesn't give you that.

  24. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  25. Re:A little fishy to me - OT by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 1

    Your sig is actually Mitch Hedberg paraphrased. Get into it.

  26. Good Idea, Where's the Product by rkitchen · · Score: 0

    The demo video showed a very interesting way to sort a lot of photos quickly. I have a lot of photos, and somehow there always seems to be one or two out of place, or they could be broken down granularly/better etc. The trouble is making file folder trees and using a browser of some sort(like the picture view folder option in winxp) always seems clunky. I like the idea of dragging and dropping into piles... with a toggle option for a grid that -unpiles- and shows in more structured way what you've accumulated. It looked faster and easier than anything else out there. Problem is, I can't get the code to try it out, because lo and behold it doesn't exist -yet-. It does seem a touch suspect. I want an announcement when its ready, not before... Still, too many people above this post are spending more time trying to sound cerebral than they are actually LOOKING at what the product seems to d0. Its pretty dern neat!

  27. resume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    blablablablablabla

    Gimme 5 bucks

  28. window manager by saturnism · · Score: 1

    wow, i wish my window manager could do that..
    metacity? compiz?

    --
    it is me
  29. I have already done this (sort of)-Tube tied. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I mean, really. This is a family forum, for chrissakes."

    Proving the power of test tubes.

    ---
    And the "are you a script" word for today is tubing.

  30. Aperture... by w4rl5ck · · Score: 1

    This is just the top feature of Aperture, isn't it?

    *scratching his head*

    Not that innovative, I'm afraid. Can he handle raw files? If not, well, it's Aperture for "normal" users.

  31. not to you maybe by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    ...but there's some pretty hot stuff there for odonatanists everywhere.

  32. Re:Seriously? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

    You are assuming I have a soul to steal...

    I sold mine for a donut.
    Incidentally, the datasets I meant were google earth, panning and zooming and rotating on tiled images downloaded as required from the net.
    If your graphics are storeed in raw format, extracting the cached thumbnails is much simpler than for compressed large format images.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  33. OT: Wonder how he recorded it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how he recorded a demonstraion on the screen to a movie. any ideas?

  34. Demo, please by Tom · · Score: 1

    I'd really like to have a demo of that in my hands. No matter if it's beta. I'll even forgive it crashing every now and then, but it looks interesting enough to make me want to play with it.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  35. Half now, Half Later by s31523 · · Score: 1

    I think I will send him a $20 bill torn in half with a note that says half now, half when the product is available for public consumption.

  36. Scaling to 10,000+ objects? by rlk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a neat idea, but how well is it going to scale to 10,000 or more objects (say, 6-16 megapixel images)? A lot of interfaces of this kind seem to work very well on small sets of images (or whatever), but founder when they scale up.

    I only have about 12000 images, but professionals might easily accumulate 50,000 or more images per year, in some cases using medium format backs with 35 megapixels and 16 bit color depth. While the storage requirements for something like that might still be a bit daunting (each image of that size would be 200 MB if stored in uncompressed TIFF format, so this would be 5 TB/year), any good image management tool has to handle large scale.

    I like KPhotoAlbum (formerly KimDaBa) myself. While not particularly elegant visually, it's fast and has excellent search capabilities and metadata organization.

    1. Re:Scaling to 10,000+ objects? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Looks interesting, and I could see myself using it (I generate about 3500 digital images a year, give or take some)

      Too bad there's no win32 binary

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    2. Re:Scaling to 10,000+ objects? by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 1

      Whenever I see stuff like this, I always wonder about the pathological high-resolution situations. Professionals will *not* be sorting small 72dpi images. They'll be sorting 300 or 600 dpi photos, and they'll be dealing with hundreds, if not thousands of them.

      I don't know the specifics of how this guy's app gets the pixels on the screen -- from what I recall looking at this from Digg a few weeks back I think he's using Cairo, which implies glitz, which implies opengl. Now, I don't know about you, but my powerbook has only 64mb of vram. Sure, gamerz out there will have 256 or 512, but still, that's only enough for a handful of full, high-res professional photography.

      As a game programmer, I've seen ( and profiled ) a lot of what happens when you hit the vram limit. Your app goes to shit. Sure, it still runs, but ( on OS X, at least ) the whole system slows down since every window's back buffer gets paged to system ram.

      I'm not saying this can't be done -- it can -- but not trivially. I mean, doing this right would probably result in such complex code to page and transition between low res and high res that a "free time" developer might just give up.

      Consider, Apple's got some serious programming resources; lots of talented people. And look how badly Aperture performs. People are screaming about how slow it is. This is non-trivial stuff.

      But, hey, if all you're doing is sorting 72 dpi pr0n and desktop wallpapers, knock yourself out.

      --

      lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
    3. Re:Scaling to 10,000+ objects? by grumbel · · Score: 1

      All such an app requires is a clever way to store cache data, sure loading a large multiple megabyte photo is no fun and loading a hundred of them at the same time will cause your machine to halt for quite a while, but as long as the app makes sure that the photo is only loaded at a resolution close to that that is equal to the screen resolution at the current zoom level there should be little problem and a reasonable way to store such intermediate thumbnails should solve the problem. Its not really an unsolvable problem, but it might require to use a bit of extra space on the harddrive to cache the data efficently.

  37. kinda like photomesa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds a little like photomesa with drag-n-drop....
    using that code, he'd be over halfway there before he started!

  38. Other alternatives are worth checking out by fritzk3 · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that PhotoMesa has nearly the exact same layout as, and many common features of, Canon's Zoom Browser program that they include with their digital cameras. CZB is a pretty decent program - decent enough that I don't even bother loading Picasa or anything else when importing pics from my camera. I think it's freely available through Canon's website. Another decent photo-browsing / lite editing program I like is FastStone Image Viewer. It's got a pretty cool interface, tons of options, and best of all, it's free as in beer.

    --
    All your sig are belong to us.
  39. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  40. New? by pcp_ip · · Score: 1

    Am I missing something? Maybe I'm mistaken, but it appears it be the same as Apple's Aperture Lightbox, Adobe's Lightbox or the new iview media 3 lightbox.

  41. Check out retrievr ... Re:Natural Is Overrated by mingrassia · · Score: 1

    >> finding a photo by drawing a rough sketch of it.
    >> THAT would be really cool

    It is really cool, albeit this implementation is not perfect, check out retrievr.

    --
    OS X, Linux, Tivo, Amiga, my fascination with cult-like technologies would intrigue any psychiatrist.
  42. Yes, I saw the multipoint touch display demo too by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

    I mean, this concept isn't even original. A few months ago a company displayed technology allowing up to 8 points of contact on a touch screen display. One of the demo videos shows a bunch of photo images scattered on the background where the user could drag photos around, scale them, rotate them, etc, all in a simple environment using 2 fingers.

    Apple even has a patent on multipoint touch displays, I am sure some future version of iPhoto is already patented with this concept in mind.

    If your going to hype about some new concept or idea, make sure you thought of it first, otherwise you look like an ass. Anybody that sponsor's one penny to this crack will deserve the feeling of being duped.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.