It seems as changeable as the bios clock is, that a timestamp on a computer would be considered totally unreliable as evidence unless of course they could find something on his harddrive with nearly the exact timestamp in question. Bios time is much too easy to change generally.
This kit has nothing over Vex robotics unfortunately. I find it rather sad that a group of MIT kids came up with this one. It says nothing positive for the MIT crowd.
If you need to make a cute looking robot, you should buy the decor you need at a craft shop instead of being given an inadequate robotics kit with some flowery design elements you can add to it.
Notepad++ is opensource, available on most platforms, allows tag/function/logic expansion, has preset color coding for most all popular languages. The find/edit capabilities are comprable to Dreamweaver's allowing regular expressions if your into that thing. It does color labeling to find snippets you ran a find on, of you can do the traditional up and down find. If anything, if has too many features.
It is what you would expect the microsoft people to produce if they were trying to sell notepad/wordpad on the featuresets like they used to in order to engulf the market.
Once again freshman prove they have the right stuff... to be total losers.
Oh, I forgot....everyone needs a "party" button because the average lame a$$ isn't capable of selecting music, turning out the lights or making bass noises.
What is also not always utilized are the "define" tags that php supports (not too different from the C language). So, if you come against a harda$$ that has to have templates, it should in theory be able to be written similarly to those templates. You might have to be clever about it, unless you decided just to do XML manipulation which PHP does fine with as well.
I would say the only thing profound is the creator's willingness to make a game for which he will either get sued for or possibly threatened/killed himself for making.
The problem with google today is that it has very little convenience when it comes to finding the context of the word you are looking for.
If you were doing a search on "first base" for instance, you could easily be talking about baseball or the first step in sexual intimacy. Although google sets does a nice job of helping you find similar words, it doesn't do enough of helping you find things in the context you need, nor is it integrated well with the rest of thier search engine.
Also, there is the problem with exact matches. If I did a search for motherboards, I might well want mainboards as well without realizing it. Since people that refer to them as motherboards don't call them mainboards, you'll seldom if ever find one by doing a search on the other.
What this is ultimately calling for is a new kind of search that is as much about context as about the word itself. Google is not ready for the human language (let alone html). "You're killing me" and "you're killing me" are not the same thing and if I have to parse the instances of murder to find the things about humor, I no longer have a real search engine. It does great as a pattern matching algorithm with link weighing.
Of course, I suppose google desktop will alleviate this by weighing which links people have open the longest. The ones I either leave open or bookmark are generally the ones with the greatest amount of validity in my searches.
"Automatic F-22 updates now completed." displays on one of the HUDs. Screen flickers for a second and then US planes, etc. are indistinguishable from UK ones.
Maybe all we really need to do is make sure the UK and Australia agree to the EULA.
Now everyone can take the very same "pictures" using their computers at home as long as they have double the 5 terabytes of ram needed to run Windows 2k15.
Debating about anything that you don't have all the information for is stupid. It's like arguing about life on other planets or in other dimensions.
Juan Oró, in 1961, took some of the materials that were produced in the Miller experiments and he took hydrogen cyanide, one of these compounds produced, along with ammonia and left out the aldehyde. So he kind of organized the experiment in a certain way. He produced some amino acids but he also got some adenine, one of the nitrogen containing bases. Later experiments by him and others were actually able to produce the other nucleic acid bases. So now we see there's another area of chemical evolution experiments going on to get at replication. Also, it was found that sugars could be produced. Formaldehyde is one of these monomers produced in the Miller experiments and other experiments. The formaldehyde could polymerize to form a ribose. And indeed, in various kinds of experiments, ribonucleotides are more readily synthesized than the dioxyribonucleotides. Therefore, it started to appear that maybe, if that's the case, the ribonucleotides, that RNA may have appeared early, that the early world was an RNA world.
But this leads to a paradox because today nucleic acids are only synthesized with the help of proteins and the proteins are synthesized only if their corresponding nucleotide sequence is present. So we have sort of a chicken and egg problem. It's improbable that proteins and nucleic acids arose spontaneously, at the same time and at the same place. It seems implausible to have one without the other.
2 days picking up the soap you dropped is alot different than 5 years of dropped soap, even if the man was selusional about his own life.
Clearly though, the man has not recovered completely if now he is something on the order of a pathological liar.
It surprises me to think that ID would be taken so harshly. No one seems to think ill of the possibility that aliens could have populated the planet, so why couldn't they have engineered us?
Of course, speaking of some kind of creating being, anything with the intelligence to create a universe that is self creating (evolution) would have to be termed intelligent. After all, isn't easier to have a building that builds itself rather than have to be attendant to every part of the process?
I agree that the price of ring tones is exorbant and the marketing is corrupt. They make it sound like you're getting the whole song and for the price, that is what anyone would expect.
There are a handful of tools out there that will allow you to make your own ring tones, however. Most of the programs are pay to register, but a few processes (not very well documented) will allow you to make the conversion to mp3 without wasting any of your own hard earned money.
You gotta love all these new technology companies that claim to have something so innovative that they have to slashdot it. And then when it's all said in done, it reads more like a headline story from the Enquirer or something. The product is supposed to clone people, remove unwanted hair, reverse the aging process, and create gateways into an alternate dimension. In the end however, and after really reading the press release, you're lucky if their so called discovery is capable of making Julianne fries.
I understand the promotion of programs/apps/etc. on slashdot in the "ask" sections, but is it totally necessary to whore out slashdot for corporate press relaeases?
The Chip Merchant has sucked monkey's a$$ as long as I've even heard of them.
People that know - newegg.com. Of course, I would generally go by the manufacturers warrantees vs. any corparate reseller.
I guess your warranty was good for the life of the management of the company.
Subtlely..I am reminded of the following:
Tommy: Hey, I'll tell you what. You can get a good look at a butcher's ass by sticking your head up there. But, wouldn't you rather to take his word for it?
Mr. Brady, Customer: [confused] What? I'm failing to make the connection here.
Tommy: No, I meant, you can get a good look at a T-bone steak by sticking your head up a butcher's ass... No, wait. It's gotta be your bull.
Richard: [embarrassed] Wow.
Slashdot Mirror
I think they mean inspired BY the brain, not inspired to work AS the brain. Unless of course, you're playing twister.
Sounds more like a Brownberry or a dinkleberry to me.
lmao
It seems as changeable as the bios clock is, that a timestamp on a computer would be considered totally unreliable as evidence unless of course they could find something on his harddrive with nearly the exact timestamp in question. Bios time is much too easy to change generally.
This kit has nothing over Vex robotics unfortunately. I find it rather sad that a group of MIT kids came up with this one. It says nothing positive for the MIT crowd. If you need to make a cute looking robot, you should buy the decor you need at a craft shop instead of being given an inadequate robotics kit with some flowery design elements you can add to it.
Well, I for one welcome our new wiki overlords.
Notepad++ is opensource, available on most platforms, allows tag/function/logic expansion, has preset color coding for most all popular languages. The find/edit capabilities are comprable to Dreamweaver's allowing regular expressions if your into that thing. It does color labeling to find snippets you ran a find on, of you can do the traditional up and down find. If anything, if has too many features.
It is what you would expect the microsoft people to produce if they were trying to sell notepad/wordpad on the featuresets like they used to in order to engulf the market.
Once again freshman prove they have the right stuff...
to be total losers.
Oh, I forgot....everyone needs a "party" button because the average lame a$$ isn't capable of selecting music, turning out the lights or making bass noises.
The fact that stem cells reside "permanently" in the heart which provide the ability to rejenerate to some degree.
Everything else you will find in a modern A&P textbook.
What is also not always utilized are the "define" tags that php supports (not too different from the C language). So, if you come against a harda$$ that has to have templates, it should in theory be able to be written similarly to those templates. You might have to be clever about it, unless you decided just to do XML manipulation which PHP does fine with as well.
I would say the only thing profound is the creator's willingness to make a game for which he will either get sued for or possibly threatened/killed himself for making.
> As a small apple shareholder, I request that the company become less litigation happy.
Why not show up at shareholder meetings and start mentioning it?
Apple's probably not stupid enough to sue its own shareholders.
Solution: Somethingawful needs to purchase one share of Apple!!!!
Anyone who is still a Madonna fan deserves to be fleeced!
The problem with google today is that it has very little convenience when it comes to finding the context of the word you are looking for.
If you were doing a search on "first base" for instance, you could easily be talking about baseball or the first step in sexual intimacy. Although google sets does a nice job of helping you find similar words, it doesn't do enough of helping you find things in the context you need, nor is it integrated well with the rest of thier search engine.
Also, there is the problem with exact matches. If I did a search for motherboards, I might well want mainboards as well without realizing it. Since people that refer to them as motherboards don't call them mainboards, you'll seldom if ever find one by doing a search on the other.
What this is ultimately calling for is a new kind of search that is as much about context as about the word itself. Google is not ready for the human language (let alone html). "You're killing me" and "you're killing me" are not the same thing and if I have to parse the instances of murder to find the things about humor, I no longer have a real search engine. It does great as a pattern matching algorithm with link weighing.
Of course, I suppose google desktop will alleviate this by weighing which links people have open the longest. The ones I either leave open or bookmark are generally the ones with the greatest amount of validity in my searches.
It doesn't even work on IE 6. How is that cross platform?
Yes. In Photoshop CS (or CS2) they have this new nifty "localized" blur that makes you look like a model, or anime depending on settings. -Alex
"Automatic F-22 updates now completed." displays on one of the HUDs. Screen flickers for a second and then US planes, etc. are indistinguishable from UK ones.
Maybe all we really need to do is make sure the UK and Australia agree to the EULA.
If their software was smart enough to do validation checks, it would flag things that were outside of the standard deviation per size and area.
Now everyone can take the very same "pictures" using their computers at home as long as they have double the 5 terabytes of ram needed to run Windows 2k15.
2 days picking up the soap you dropped is alot different than 5 years of dropped soap, even if the man was selusional about his own life. Clearly though, the man has not recovered completely if now he is something on the order of a pathological liar.
It surprises me to think that ID would be taken so harshly. No one seems to think ill of the possibility that aliens could have populated the planet, so why couldn't they have engineered us?
Of course, speaking of some kind of creating being, anything with the intelligence to create a universe that is self creating (evolution) would have to be termed intelligent. After all, isn't easier to have a building that builds itself rather than have to be attendant to every part of the process?
I agree that the price of ring tones is exorbant and the marketing is corrupt. They make it sound like you're getting the whole song and for the price, that is what anyone would expect.
There are a handful of tools out there that will allow you to make your own ring tones, however. Most of the programs are pay to register, but a few processes (not very well documented) will allow you to make the conversion to mp3 without wasting any of your own hard earned money.
You gotta love all these new technology companies that claim to have something so innovative that they have to slashdot it. And then when it's all said in done, it reads more like a headline story from the Enquirer or something. The product is supposed to clone people, remove unwanted hair, reverse the aging process, and create gateways into an alternate dimension. In the end however, and after really reading the press release, you're lucky if their so called discovery is capable of making Julianne fries.
I understand the promotion of programs/apps/etc. on slashdot in the "ask" sections, but is it totally necessary to whore out slashdot for corporate press relaeases?
The Chip Merchant has sucked monkey's a$$ as long as I've even heard of them.
People that know - newegg.com. Of course, I would generally go by the manufacturers warrantees vs. any corparate reseller.
I guess your warranty was good for the life of the management of the company.
Subtlely..I am reminded of the following:
Tommy: Hey, I'll tell you what. You can get a good look at a butcher's ass by sticking your head up there. But, wouldn't you rather to take his word for it?
Mr. Brady, Customer: [confused] What? I'm failing to make the connection here.
Tommy: No, I meant, you can get a good look at a T-bone steak by sticking your head up a butcher's ass... No, wait. It's gotta be your bull.
Richard: [embarrassed] Wow.