Slashdot Mirror


RIM Rejects More Patent Infringement Allegations

SilentOne writes "Waterloo based Research In Motion is facing new allegations of patent violation. Visto Corp. of Redwood Shores, Calif., said Monday that it had won an infringement case against Seven Networks, also of California, and is now targeting RIM for infringing four patents, including three involved in the Seven action. "Our case against RIM is based on similar technology, law and patents as the case we have just won," Visto said in a statement. "

127 comments

  1. More lawsuits... by Beuno · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone else have the feeling the focus is more and more on legal battles instead of tech innovation?

    1. Re:More lawsuits... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This seems to have been the trend for a while. It's less and less about competition, more and more about meta-competition.

      Rather than produce the best product at the lowest cost, you buy the legislation to give you a competitive advantage. Rather than create something new, you file some patents and claim other people's work as your own.

      It's difficult to find a solution; the interwoven laws and old-buddy networks are so deeply entrenched that it'll take some major overhaul to set things straight. I really hope that the pseudocapitalists who strap on our shackles notice the chains hanging from their own ankles, as well.

    2. Re:More lawsuits... by rts008 · · Score: 1

      *BONK*
      Hit the nail on the head, you did.
      It's a competetive market out there, yes, I understand that.
      But get innovative (ie:stop trying to rest on your laurels), or get left behind. This has nothing to do with consumer's rights, nothing to do with justice, this only came after the recent trial. Why, if this is really an issue, did it wait until now?
      Smacks of oppurtinism to me, not legitimate in my book.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    3. Re:More lawsuits... by Brushfireb · · Score: 1

      Granted, I dont really believe in software patents.

      But there is more litigation ALSO becuase there is more theft. Using your logic, its not OK for a small company to fight back against a bigger company, just becuase that bigger company put out a product first.

      Thats not fair, and that ruins innovation too.

      Small companies with patents have little recourse in the marketplace outside of lawsuits if a big player starts using their tech. It takes big money to compete with deep pocketed companies, and its just not possible without legal help.

  2. WTF?! by PygmySurfer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Under the law, which protects consumers from products that contain infringing technology, RIM should not be able to sell the BlackBerry system."

    Since when do patents do ANYTHING to protect consumers from anything?

    1. Re:WTF?! by Basehart · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm betting there are a lot of kids out there who will stay as far away from inventing something as they can (at least in the USA anyway!)

    2. Re:WTF?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It "protects" you in the same way that the PATRIOT act "protects" you... from the terrifying responsibilities that you might have faced as citizens of a free country.

      Wake up, America! Your laws won't change for the better unless you change your lawmakers for the better. For fuck's sake wake up, get down to the ballot boxes, and vote for someone who cares about freedom.

    3. Re:WTF?! by uniqueUser · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Our copy-right and patent laws were orginaly set up to protect the small people. But it has backfired. I think that it might be time to completely re-think how the current implementation should be. Big Money has just gotten too big.

      --
      GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
    4. Re:WTF?! by Yartrebo · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about patents, but copyrights were set up to hand out business favors to the monarch's friends and for censorship (early forms controlled who was allowed to operate a printing press).

      And they have never functioned to help out small artists, not that I would care anyway since copyrights cost me easily 10x the dollar cost of what they're paid, along with substantial freedoms.

    5. Re:WTF?! by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      ...(at least in the USA anyway!)

      This is key. Innovation will simply come from countries that don't have as restrictive laws, who will then be able to capitalize on their inventions. There are many brilliant people in the world; the patent system of the United States is going to be their scientific and innovative downfall.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    6. Re:WTF?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blackberrys are from Canada.

    7. Re:WTF?! by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't, but newswriters are so used to sprinkling the word "consumer" throughout their stories that they went ahead and used it here as a filler word, whether it made sense or not.

    8. Re:WTF?! by kajl_astaroth · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify; it appears as though the comment was a qoute of Brian Bogosian. He is Visto's chairman, president and CEO. I don't believe the newswriter is responsible for it being a filler word

    9. Re:WTF?! by typical · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Our copy-right and patent laws were orginaly set up to protect the small people.

      I don't know about that. They were set up with the intent of funding content creation. Copyright laws may still do that -- abused and stretched as they may be -- but software patents are actively harming the ability of engineers to function in the United States.

      (And engineers who want to make a product that can be sold in the United States, which is damn near everyone.)

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    10. Re:WTF?! by rpbird · · Score: 1

      American patent and copyright laws were created to foster innnovation by allowing the authors and inventors to prosper from their work. This isn't a matter for speculation, as the US Constitution demonstrates:
      "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries." It's been a while since I read Jefferson's works, but I do believe he echoed these ideas. Wikipedia's nice article on the subject even points out that the French class copyrights under "Rights of the Author." Though we'd all like to live in an X-Files universe, not everything was created in a conspiracy to screw over the human race. That good intentions lead to muddled results over time is the more likely scenario.

    11. Re:WTF?! by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

      Patents seem to have backfired, but I would debate the point that copyrights have backfired. If you are saying that the RIAA is draconian with its copyright. Fine so be it, I wont argue with that. DON'T BUY ANYTHING FROM the RIAA. I am amazed at how people like sheep continue buying records, etc. These days there is more than enough choice. The problem is that one has get off their butt and find that choice.

      The problem with patents is that one entity controls access to the source. Whereas copyright controls access to the interpretation of the source. Don't like the interpretation? Get another source, as copyright allows that, but not patents. I would even say with copyright we have an industry in books, music, art, whatever you can think of.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    12. Re:WTF?! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the United States likes to push it's laws on the rest of the world so their broken patent system is going to hurt innovation around the world. Except in "renegade" countries, of course.

  3. This is what many knew would happen by DarkFencer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is why RIM fought so hard against NTP. They could have settled early on for far less then the recent settlement + legal fees. They didn't want to give in early (or at all if possible) so they didn't end up as a target for a dozen more places like NTP.

    1. Re:This is what many knew would happen by FuryG3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I disagree, I think that if they had a do-over they would have settled that case much earlier on. 612 million USD is a lot of cash to spend on discouraging other people from filing similar law suits.

      In any case, it certainly didn't work. The moral of the story (for companies like Visto) is not "it costs a lot of money to sue RIM" it's "suing RIM gets you $612 million."

    2. Re:This is what many knew would happen by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      But in the end, didn't they settle out of court?
      Doesn't that make them an easier target for future lawsuits?

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    3. Re:This is what many knew would happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now they are the target of one other company, who went up against some small fry for some spending cash before taking them on. How many companies would have been after them if they were a pushover?

    4. Re:This is what many knew would happen by sconeu · · Score: 1

      But in the end, didn't they settle out of court?

      Only because the judge told them to do so.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    5. Re:This is what many knew would happen by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      No. Out-of-court settlements are not binding precedent.

  4. Using Patents by Metabolife · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "Our case against RIM is based on similar technology, law and patents as the case we have just won," Visto said in a statement. So instead of using the patents they have to make money, they wait for other companies to use them and file suit. When will the patent system be amended to finally make sense?

    1. Re:Using Patents by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

      as soon as it is completely removed

      --
      The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
    2. Re:Using Patents by AgNO3 · · Score: 1

      Hmm use there pantents to make money? Oh you mean like they do.

      http://www.visto.com/partners/wireless.html

      --
      OMG Ponies!!! with Glitter!!!! I miss Pink :-(
  5. Well, I knowing first hand.. by LeddRokkenstud · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As an employee of RIM, knowing about this first hand is kind of scary. I work as the manager of material processing, and I'm actually afraid of the outcome. The whole company is frustrated/fearful of this whole situation, and we just want to keep our jobs. I don't think the suits will stop.

    1. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 5, Funny

      The whole company is frustrated/fearful of this whole situation, and we just want to keep our jobs

      Well, I sure hope you all don't lose your RIM jobs.

    2. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I could mod you up I would =D

    3. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by popo · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. "+11 Brilliant!"

      --
      ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    4. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Cut your losses. Take the blackberry service out of the US. Instantly. Leave every single blackberry owner, including the entire government, hanging out to dry. Use RIM patents to prevent anyone else from servicing them, ensure that where this is concerned, they are well, truly and permanently fucked as a consequence of their screwed up society. Refuse to penny up a dime. That's what should have been done in the first place. The US is not a suitable place to do business. On the contrary, to do business with the US is to fund the most aggressive nation in the world and contribute to global unrest. Just don't do it.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    5. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey, it's a Slashdot cliché. I'm surprised I was first. It's a bit of a risk everytime someone uses a still-funny cliché. You always struggle with "But is it still funny?". I mean, at any time, that cliché could fall, and join the ranks of formerly funny clichés about Linux-running hot grits and old Korean beowulf clusters.

    6. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Well if you think freeing millions from the clutches of dictators and deposing tyrants makes the US the most aggressive nation in the world, then we take that as a compliment, thank you.

      We are the greatest military power the world has ever seen, don't be so jealous because you don't have our cool weapons and bombs. We are happy to come to your aid when you get invaded, that's our honor to come save your asses when you need it.

    7. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realise that, well, some of us LIVE in the US. And, migrating isn't an option (At least not for a few years, and even then, family ties keep me here.)

      And there is always a PDA with Wi-Fi, or those new cell networks.

    8. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by Reverend528 · · Score: 1

      I think the parent was suggesting that RIM should screw the US for making it damn near impossible to produce and market useful technologies without getting sued.

    9. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man. What a TROLL. Modded insightful. I guess a shitton of europeans got mod points this week...

      Its too bad that the US and China are the only places really even DOING business....Everywhere else is socialist BS, suckling at the teat of US + China real economic growth.

    10. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by MustardMan · · Score: 1

      The danger with the cliches is the broken mod system - you get modded funny at first, then get overrated and lose karma... observe:

      http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=176138&cid =14635504

    11. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by thrillseeker · · Score: 2, Informative
      Cut your losses. Take the blackberry service out of the US.

      Thank God you're not the guy in charge of insuring shareholder value for RIM - you know - the people that own the company - yeah, they bought it, with their own evil money. Wanna see how far an $80 stock price can fall when you remove the source of the majority of its revenue? Wanna see if it makes any difference to a Canadian company if a US court rules against 'em? Think the Canucks are gonna send the mounties to the border, or enforce the US ruling? Really hard to figure out why you'll never run a major corporation.

    12. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Union Suits.

    13. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      You mean those dictators that the U.S. set up and armed?

    14. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nice to finally see an aggressive Canadian rant!! Why didn't they just let the US carriers stop selling BB's if the court had the balls to impose an injunction instead of paying NTP for useless patents? How long does it take to lose 600 million? However, perhaps Visto does have some good patents. I guess we'll see.

    15. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by typical · · Score: 1

      And for people who don't sympathize, remember -- if you work at a successful tech company that makes unusual products, you're liable to be put in this guy's shoes any day.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    16. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by darkmeridian · · Score: 0, Troll

      EUers say that the US really sucks, are bullies, etc., but without the United States, there would be no world economy. The American consumer overpays to bring products to market, and the rest of the world gets it at a cheaper price. Furthermore, the American market provides a crucial incentive to bring products to market. The sum of these effects that that without the United States, the world would be at the Stone Age, and it has nothing to do with American innovation but rather the utter idiocy and feckless spending of its citizen-consumers. No one would make drugs, illicit or prescription, if the American consumer was not dumb enough to overpay with American dollars--which other country drives up the price by illegalizing marijuana? The same goes for "entertainment" and pop "culture"--who else would may $20 for a music CD with spyware and put up with **IAA? Only the American consumer. Would Airbus try to bring the A380 to market if it couldn't sell to the good ol' USA? Probably not--wouldn't make the initial R & D outlay back.

      Conclusion: it's hard to have an economy without the American market and its consumers. Walmart must be fed.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    17. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because thanks to people like you, we can't take out the dictators you worship and put on your t-shirts and bedroom walls.

    18. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 1

      But then the terrorists^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hlawyers win.

    19. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, then, you should hope your executives stop being such fucking idiots and settle when they are obviously going to lose. Or click your heels and chant "theres no place like home, there's no place like home". The choice is yours.

    20. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by prezkennedy.org · · Score: 1

      This comment is waaaaay overrated.

      --
      It started back in Team Fortress Classic
    21. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has anything changed? I worked there 5 years ago and it was the same environment, only further depressed by the bursting of the bubble. At that time RIM was doing legal battle with Glenayre, and we were given seminars about IP and the legal positioning of the company. Since I was only there for a 4 month work term it didn't concern me greatly, but the mood amongst my co-workers was quite sullen.

      When management is trying to sell the employees on the legal team, you know that you're in for a rocky ride.

    22. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by iplayfast · · Score: 3, Interesting
      EUers say that the US really sucks, are bullies, etc., but without the United States, there would be no world economy. I don't think so...

      It would just be a smaller world economy. US debt is well on the way to making this situation anyway. Ever wonder why the Canadian economy gaining against the US? The US has a larger growing season, Canada has a population of California, but Canada is gaining.

      Look to
      1. Bad policies in regard to the public ability to do what it wants. For example, you buy software, but are limited to what you can do with it, and this is accepted because it's called a license. If you were to license a pen, would you only be able to use it on one sheet of paper?
      2. Bad policies in regard to patents, software patents in particular.
      3. Bad policies in regard to copyright. (Copyright lasts for how many years?!?!)
      4. Bad policies in regard to foreign policy. (The war was a stupid waste of tax payers money, now the whole economy is paying for it).
      5. Bad policies in regard to how politions can be swayed by corperate desires.


      The Chinese are gaining ground as well, not to mention the Japaneese and European countries. The US is in sad sad shape compared to what it should be, and you've only your government to blame.
    23. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The American consumer overpays to bring products to market, and the rest of the world gets it at a cheaper price. [...] who else would may $20 for a music CD with spyware and put up with **IAA? Only the American consumer.


      No.

      While I am not familiar with the price differences taken over the entire spectrum of products (and too lazy to investigate), you are wrong, at least about specific products, and my guess would be that you are wrong in general, as well--at least when comparing US prices to prices where I live.

      Your specific example of a music CD, I did look up--you typically see new CDs for 24.90 EUR here, or about 31.31 USD.

      Another thing, which I believe is more expensive here, is gasoline. At this very moment, it's listed at 1.373 EUR per liter (dm^3) at the gas station next door, or (evidently) 5.20 USD per US gallon.
    24. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by ScouseMouse · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately what goes around comes around.

      I'm sure the employees of Handspring know exactly what you feel.

      http://www.pdastreet.com/articles/2002/9/2002-9-19 -Research-in-Motion.html

    25. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by ScouseMouse · · Score: 1

      Personally, i think this should be moderated insightful rather than funny like its going to be.

      What other group had done more to scare the h*ll of out of the ordinary citizen than Lawyers? and usually in a personal way rather than in a general "we hate the US/UK/EU/UN/Bagels way"

      Terrorism, while being a real threat, is statistically, not nearly as dangerous as a drunken moron in a SUV, How many of us spend our time worrying about that?

      I doubt I would want to be an innovator in a field controlled by any large interests. You can be sued over nothing. Even if you win, you loose. Thats the power of Lawyers. They have the power to destroy your life, leave you penniless and witha mountain of debt, and if they get caught doing anything like that, the most they are likely to get is a slap on the wrist, and in most cases, they dont even seem to get that.

      Anyway rant over. I know most Lawyers are decent people trying to make a living, I do after all work at a legal firm. However, there is a large minority who feel that Money is more important than Truth, and that to me is a general contempt of the court system than anything else i can think of.

    26. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a great idea! Illustrate the final end game of this patent crap. Let's get it overwith. Take all those CrackBerries away from the US Govt users, and see how fast we get patent reform. Finally.

    27. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by Chemicalscum · · Score: 1
      Would Airbus try to bring the A380 to market if it couldn't sell to the good ol' USA? Probably not--wouldn't make the initial R & D outlay back.

      As of April 6 2005 of the 159 orders placed for A380 Airbus aicraft, only 30 were for US airlines. This is about proportional to the the US's economic weight in the world, about 20% of the global economy. So I guess we don't need you and that Airbus would have gone ahead as a project even if there was no US.

    28. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. I bet nobody at RIM has ever heard that before. Good one!

    29. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by burnin1965 · · Score: 1

      "Cut your losses. Take the blackberry service out of the US."

      Better yet, open source the software, open up the blackberry to community developers, sell the hardware as an empty shell if necessary, flood the market with the devices and still provide subscription services but let the community provide the software.

    30. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by duffer_01 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a great idea in theory, but I expect there are a few 1000 people in Waterloo that would disagree with you when they lose their jobs. US is a HUGE market to RIM and there is no way the board would approve such a thing.

    31. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever wonder why the Canadian economy gaining against the US?

      Not really, the Canadian resource industry is doing phenomenal. The oilsands are doing awesome, there's nearly a solution to the softwood lumber dispute, and recent BSE incidents haven't completely shut the border to cattle exports.

      Sure, America isn't doing so great but give Canada some credit.

    32. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by SillySlashdotName · · Score: 1

      What an ass.

      RIMM had Income of $361.2 Million on sales of $1.9 Billion in the last 12 months.

      Of that $361.2 Million, they paid out $612 Million in the last litigation, plus how much in future licensing fees? Now another hyena is sniffing.

      Yeah, I just bet the shareholders are happy to be going in that direction!

      Really hard to figure out why you'll never run a major corporation.


      Somehow I have the same feeling about you.

      --
      Acts of massive stupidity are almost never covered by warranty. --me.
    33. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by iplayfast · · Score: 1

      ok, point taken. Canada does deserve credit.

      My point was, a population 10 times the size, with all the advantages geographically that the US has should be doing way better then Canada.

    34. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      The only one doing any serious invading at the moment is the US. Who is going to save our asses from YOU?

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    35. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    36. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2

      Recent BSE incidents were the best thing to happen to the Canadian economy in a long time. Prior to those incidents, we were just shipping off our cattle to the US to be slaughtered and marked up. We didn't have the plants to slaughter and pack the meat.

      Since the US closed the border, now we do. Now we have the jobs, now we have the markup, now we can sell frozen steak to the EU and make all the profit.

      The US are not our friends. They are nothing but a weight around our neck, and when incidents like this arise, it becomes obvious even to the most conservative that selling off all our natural resources to the US is NOT in our best interest.

      The US needs us. We do not need the US. And after every painful transition period where we do not have the US market available for our resources, we come out better off for it.

      Personally, I'd like to see economic sanctions against the US. But when all the old fuckers with the money have all their retirements invested in US companies, it's a hard sell even when people do understand.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    37. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a great idea in theory, but I expect there are a few 1000 people in Waterloo that would disagree with you when they lose their jobs.

      Only if they lose. This isn't softball, and they've already shown that they've got the stones for hardball at RIM.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    38. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by iplayfast · · Score: 1

      There's two sides to that coin.

      The flip side is, in the past, Canada would get a lot of manufacturing jobs because the dollar was cheaper. Over the years wages between Canada and the US have achieved some sort of parity. A Candian welder get's paid more Canadian dollars then his US counterpart, but the per US dollar amount is fairly close.

      Now the dollar is rising and the Canadian wages are suddenly more then the US workers. Guess what happens to those jobs. Alberta is doing great. Ontario (the manufacturing part of Canada) is starting to hurt. You can see it coming. Plants are starting to shut down and move to.... Mexico.

    39. Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      While I am not familiar with the price differences taken over the entire spectrum of products (and too lazy to investigate), you are wrong, at least about specific products, and my guess would be that you are wrong in general, as well--at least when comparing US prices to prices where I live.

      Your specific example of a music CD, I did look up--you typically see new CDs for 24.90 EUR here, or about 31.31 USD.

      Another thing, which I believe is more expensive here, is gasoline. At this very moment, it's listed at 1.373 EUR per liter (dm^3) at the gas station next door, or (evidently) 5.20 USD per US gallon.

      Most things are more expensive in Europe do to taxes imposed by governments. Take the gas example,
      todays price, May 10, 2006 - Austin, Texas, is about $2.70 per gallon or approximately 67.5 cents for not quite a liter. Of the 67.5 cents only 9.5 cents is combined city, state and federal tax.

      Taxes in the UK and Germany, were atleast 50% of the price a few years ago.. I would presume it to still be the case or worse.
  6. terrorists! by Feyr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    that's why there shall be no negotiation with terrorists! as soon as you cave in to their demands they'll just make more of them!

    1. Re:terrorists! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Really, though, in this case the comparison to terrorism is weak. I'd say it's more like dealing with a school of really hungry piranha. Or maybe a programmed death machine ... to quote Reese when he was describing a Terminator to Sarah Connor:

      Listen. Understand. That Terminator is out there. It can't be reasoned with, it can't be bargained with ... it doesn't feel pity or remorse or fear ... and it absolutely will not stop. Ever. Until you are dead.

      That's kinda how I look at these patent-wielding law firms. As long as you have the money to pay prote^H^H^H^H^Hlicense fees they absolutely will not stop. Ever.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:terrorists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, openly fighting "the terrorists" also creates more terrorists.

      It's really a case of damned if you do or damned if you don't. Sign of the times.

    3. Re:terrorists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually terrorism is a decent analogy and fits in fine with what you said. Listen. Understand. That Bin Laden is out there. He can't be reasoned with, he can't be bargained with ... he doesn't feel pity or remorse or fear ... and he absolutely will not stop. Ever. Until you are dead.

    4. Re:terrorists! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Okay. I'll buy that. I just wanted to work in that quote.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  7. +1 funny +3 gross by BigChiefMunkey · · Score: 0

    But still funny. *(:=

  8. This is the danger of paying an extortionist... by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it brings all the others out of the wordwork and encourages more extortion. Granted, RIM is no angel, but this is just getting silly.

    1. Re:This is the danger of paying an extortionist... by AgNO3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You did see that Visto does sell a product right? They DO SELL a product and it is in common use.

      http://www.visto.com/partners/wireless.html

      So uh maybe RIM is just getting its just rewards for all the sueing it did.

      --
      OMG Ponies!!! with Glitter!!!! I miss Pink :-(
  9. Those who can, do. by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Those who can't, sue.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Those who can, do. by DaveInAustin · · Score: 1

      This is exactly right. Patents are biased against the do-ers and towards the thinkers. You can't infringe unless you are being productive. The do-ers thought that they could protect themselves against frivoulous patent lawsuits by getting some frivoulous patents themselves. Patents won't you protect you against an entity that make anything but patent lawsuits. Part of me would like to see the Blackberrys shut down for a few days to wake some people up to what is going on.

      --
      --- http://davidnehme.blogspot.com
    2. Re:Those who can, do. by dc_dog · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute... I read the story and these guys seem like a different animal than NTP. They have contracts with major carriers to sell the product and claim to employ 400 people. If I remember correctly NTP just bought their patents and went hunting--without running a traditional business. If these guys actually invented this stuff as they claim, and have been making a go at it for 10 years, you'd think entrepreneurial folks on this board would support them.

    3. Re:Those who can, do. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      When they invented it, then why the heck didn't they build it?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  10. Those who can, do. Those who can't... by FFFish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...sue the asses off those who do.

    What a wonderful world we'll live in when it becomes so financially risky to try anything new, out of fear of some obscure patent-camping leech stealing the investment and work it took to make that new thing.

    We need patent reform: use your patent, or lose your patent.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  11. Re:Coincidence? by Firehed · · Score: 1
    My thoughts exactly. How that company exists when clearly both "Vistx" and "Redx, Cali." are IP of Microsoft is well beyond me. Obviously this lawsuit is so they'll be able to defend the MicroSuits when they come a-knocking (granted they win this lawsuit, of course).

    And to think how close I was to getting myself modded Redundant. Gotta love big displays.

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  12. Feeling? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    No, its plain and obvious this is how the market works now.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  13. patents? by CommanderEl · · Score: 1
    Im going to patent walking.
    So I can sue anyone I see walking to work or going for an afternoon stroll. You are allowed to drive or catch the bus, but not walk.

    So its happened in Germany too :S
    If Da Vinci Patented his ideas, we would all be screwed.

    1. Re:patents? by superflyguy · · Score: 1

      No, he was more than 17 years ahead of his time, so we would have been safe...

    2. Re:patents? by PygmySurfer · · Score: 1

      That's ok, everyone's in a such a hurry they're practically running all the time now anyway.

      I hope it's not too late to patent running.

  14. From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Waterloo, Ont.-based RIM (TSX:RIM) recently settled a long-running patent infringement case by paying NTP Inc. $612.5 million US.

    NTP owns a stake in Visto, Bloomberg News reported.


    Coincidence? I think not.

  15. We need a linux based RIM alternative SOON!!! by crazyjeremy · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Lawsuits like this will happen whenever a company rakes in hundreds of millions of dollars where others have tried and failed. These lawsuites have permanently damaged Corporate America's trust in RIM (or any single point of failure for Corporate Mobile Communication).

    HOWEVER! This has actually produced a fertile field for alternative devices. With WindowsMobile getting more secure and more devices being wireless / wifi capable, the blackberry is no longer the only choice for corporate america (nor should it be). Microsoft is trying to play catchup by pushing Windows Mobile as real alternative to Blackberry. There is no comparison. Microsoft simply doesn't offer an end to end service like RIM. BUT if we got a VERY stable and VERY secure linux alternative (handheld and server?) it could save companies hundreds of thousands. But the service must be able to sync with Exchange / Domino and other corporate mail clients.

    Coming from a company with over half a million dollar budget for mobile devices and working closely with management, I saw many in Senior management that are very AFRAID to stay with RIM. They are looking for other alternatives just in case something ELSE happens to RIM and there IS no way out the next time. They are just now looking to not "put all their eggs (for mobile email) in one basket".

    Bottom line? Windows is now in the market with crappy devices (any 240 x 240 screen, Palm 700). Palm is in the market with a good device (treo 650 with 320 x 320 screen). But there is room to grow in this market.

    As soon as a developer gets one of these wifi/cell-enabled devices to run a solid linux distro and get some good encryption on it, mark my words, SOME in corporate America will eat it up, especially with the cost savings. RIM proved this in a way. Blackberries are wonderful email devices. They faltered (till recently) as phone devices. They are NOT PDAs. Corporate America doesn't necessarily need all their employees to have PDA's, but many if not most need email and a viewable calendar 24/7.

    Botom line: RIM made lots of money from an email device and now that corporate America is afraid of RIM someone else can cash in if they beat Microsoft to the punch..

    1. Re:We need a linux based RIM alternative SOON!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Visto is also suing Microsoft over their newewst Windows Mobile platform. They are also suing Good Technologies.

      No company is safe from the fear of patent infringement in this case.

    2. Re:We need a linux based RIM alternative SOON!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hail our new Visto overlords.

  16. sharks by cahiha · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The sharks seem to be circling each other: RIM, NTP, Visto, etc. Let them all sue each other out of existence, while the rest of us keep using our wireless E-mail based on standard protocols and standard servers.

  17. Shoot the lawyers by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 2, Funny

    No matter which company wins this round, the lawyers win, ALWAYS. I say we take'em out of the equation.

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    1. Re:Shoot the lawyers by spun · · Score: 1

      How about we round them all up and put them on a big space ark with all the marketroids, politicians and telephone handset sanitizers. We could tell them all that a giant space goat is coming to eat the planet.

      On second thought, lets keep the telephone handset sanitizers. They may come in handy some day.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    2. Re:Shoot the lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, you can't do it.

      Heinlein already has a copyright on the idea from "Number of the Beast"... (The day they shot all the lawyers)

      His estate will just sue you for stealing the idea.

  18. Advice for RIM: Help abolish Software Idea Patents by billybob2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    RIM's Chairman recently said he will work to bring an end to Software Idea Patents.

    It would be great to see RIM financially support initiatives like NoSoftwarePatents.org and SWPat.ffii.org, whose aims are to stop the legalized extortion by the Patent Leeches and Patent Mafia.

  19. Re:Coincidence? by frdmfghtr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No, what I find interesting is this:

    NTP owns a stake in Visto, Bloomberg News reported.

    I can't place it, but something just doesn't seem right...why does the idea of NTP using RIM's money to go after RIM again come to mind?

    --
    Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
  20. Fight it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RIM needs to fight this battle so that if they end up losing, they can just shut down their network for a few days. Let's see how the US government feels, and maybe that will get their attention and maybe we can have some patent reform?

    I am probably dreaming, but it would be interesting to see.

  21. The saddest part... by HaloZero · · Score: 1, Informative

    ...is that NTP Inc, and Visto don't even have products. I'd never heard of NTP before the Research In Motion fiasco. Come to find out, they're a 'patent-holding' company. What the hell? So you're a bunch of campers. Nice.

    Just read that NTP has a large stake in Visto. This just keeps getting better.

    I hope to see NTP and Visto get driven into the ground, and RIM come out on top.

    --
    Informatus Technologicus
    1. Re:The saddest part... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Camping is a good word for it. Squatting, however, is an even better word. Given the legal assaults against domain squatters, why can't the same sort of force be applied to patent squatters? It's fundamentally the same damn thing, or is the USPTO just too addicted to the constant stream of patent filing fees from patent holding companies?

    2. Re:The saddest part... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wow, Visto has no products. I guess their clients will be surprised to hear that. Clients like AT&T Wireless, Bell Mobility, KPN, Manitoba Telecom Services, Nextel Communications, Inc., Rogers Wireless, SaskTel Mobility, SmarTone, TELUS Mobility, Vodafone Global, Vodafone Germany, Vodafone Italy and Vodafone Spain (lifted from http://www.visto.com/about/index.html). "Visto's products are used by over 200,000 mobile professionals globally. Our enterprise customers include GE, Sara Lee, USA Credit Union, and Xerox."

      And what are their products? Again, same web page:
      "Visto Mobile(TM) is Visto's patented, operator-grade platform for mobile access to corporate and personal email, calendar, contacts (PIM) and other corporate data. Visto Mobile provides secure, IP-push, continuously synchronized, real-time access to email/PIM data for POP3, Microsoft Outlook/Exchange and IBM Lotus Notes/Domino servers via GPRS and CDMA 1x wireless networks. Visto Mobile Enterprise Server and Visto Mobile Personal Edition solutions support WAP and most other browser enabled phones or PCs, along with smart phones using Symbian OS, Palm OS, Windows Mobile for Smartphone and Pocket PC Phone Edition, and J2ME operating systems, as well as IMAP and SyncML-based clients. Visto's customized, brandable solutions are available through to mobile operators worldwide as a hosted service or a fully licensable and integrated platform."

      Not exactly NTP....

    3. Re:The saddest part... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, Visto's products suck and they are losing customers left and right. The only kind of company that sues everyone else in their same market is a dying company and that's what Visto will hopefully be doing. I hope the big dogs eat them alive!

  22. Yea, software patents are bad. by Inoshiro · · Score: 3, Informative

    Straight from the innovations in software page, we have: "As patentability has increased, there's good evidence that the number of software innovations has decreased. Bessen and Maskin also demonstrated a statistical correlation between the spread of patentability in the United States and a decline in innovation in software. In particular, between 1987 and 1994 , software patents issuance rose 195%, yet real company funded R&D fell by 21% in these (software) industries while rising by 25% in industries in general. This paper gives additional evidence that software patents are inversely related to innovation; it's hard to not notice that as patenting become more common (e.g., 1987 and later) that the number of major innovations slowed down and are almost always not patented anyway."

    The link supplied is to this PDF about patents. It's worth your time to read about this research.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  23. Dont trust them by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Dont trust statements like that, they will find another way to take control.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  24. patent squatting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like .com squatting.

  25. three in the Seven? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 0, Troll

    Is that a new Star Trek character?

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  26. and this..... by wap911 · · Score: 1

    me thinks RIM should tell Vista, *similar technology* this ,,!,,

  27. Forget the Sirius Cybernetics marketing division by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

    Bastard companies that abuse software patents should be first against the wall when the revolution comes.

    Or perhaps the fools in government that legitimized them in the first place. Both at once?

  28. Once you pay the Danegeld... by russotto · · Score: 1

    Not only do you never get rid of the Dane, you attract more of them.

  29. Re:Forget the Sirius Cybernetics marketing divisio by GrueMaster · · Score: 1

    To save even more, line them up front to back. I'm not sure how many deep could be taken out at once, but I do know that a bullet fired from an SKS assault rifle at 40 yards will go through 4 hard drives (2cm from the spindle - two platters per drive). Should be good for about 5-6 with a head shot (empty space).

  30. The solution, the general strike. by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    May 1, some groups in some countries strike, but then they go back to work the next day. What if enough people got together and even salaried people went on strike. There'd be more to it than that, like having an alternative proposal for government all ready to go, but that's the core of the solution.

  31. Why innovate when you can litigate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully the people that can actually do something about are starting to pay attention. Looking at all the innovation that wouldn't have happened if the industry was like 20 years ago it makes me wonder at all the innovation that isn't happening now..

  32. Re:Forget the Sirius Cybernetics marketing divisio by Zaphod2016 · · Score: 1

    Please, my fellow revolutionaries- PATIENCE!

    I promise you: give these fools enough rope and they will hang themselves. Give 'em a few more years and most of our work will be done for us.

  33. You can't hide from a business method patent. by twitter · · Score: 1
    The sharks seem to be circling each other: RIM, NTP, Visto, etc. Let them all sue each other out of existence, while the rest of us keep using our wireless E-mail based on standard protocols and standard servers.

    These trashbags will shut down anyone. If you are making money, they will take it. If you are not they will shut you down so someone else can take it. If what people familiar with the case say is true, NTP never had a patent on a non obvious invention, they had a patent on obvious business methods. Such patents can be used on anyone who tries to do anything.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  34. It does make a difference by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    You sir seem to have missed the past 20 years of trade agreements; American laws, especially those concerning business with the US, are certainly valid here.

    Not that I think this is right, mind you, but we did elect the "let's bridge the imaginary gap between Canada and the US that 9-11 caused" conservatives, and minority government or not there will be nothing but red tape to protect RIM at this point.

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  35. Re:this FP 7or GNAA by cheese-cube · · Score: 0

    Marvellous.

  36. The WTO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and the hardon that big international business has for globalism will insure software patents become universal. Follow the financial news for awhile, you'll see. The big bankers and corporations get what they want, because they are organized, and buy and sell governments. Little pipsqueakers remain scared, disorganized, fragmented and squabbling, they lose.

    The nature of the beast. It's just the way it is. Want to change it? You need labor and social organization. You have numbers, just zee-ro cohesion, and very little effort towards it at this time. Look around what happened today for an example once you get just a little cohesion, millions of people all saying NO very loudly. they got noticed. And thatis just *one day*. think about it if it was for a week, two weeks, a month..

      IT people run the planet,they are one of the top factors on how things get done, yet they allow globalist PHBs and their sock puppet politicians to push them around constantly. Once it is realised that they need YOU more than you need them, you'll see the solutions.

    1. Re:The WTO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not that worried about globalism. It will be dead in the water once we don't have cheap petroleum to support it. $70 a barrell is still cheap. Guess how willing companies will be to ship cheap manufactured goods from places like China when oil starts hitting $150, $200 and more.

      What I'd worry about is China dumping US Dollars on the world market at that time and killing our economy. Although without as much international trade, that won't be as big of a deal as our local manufacturing base being almost non-existant. Not that factories would be profitable to run without cheap oil anyways...

      Yeah... the global economy is well on the way to being dead. I doubt we will find some magic replacement for petroleum before it is no longer economical to use. Well, we might be able to stretch it for a bit if we go back to coal. There's a decent amount of that lying around.

  37. Patents save children by Aceticon · · Score: 1

    I can see it now, little Billy, without their parents knowing about it, makes a small rocket out of firecrackers and matchheads. He takes it ouside to try it out and immediatly gets stopped by an army of patent lawyers armed with patents on any and all details of rockets, for example "a means of accelerating an object in a direction by ejecting gases at high-speed in the opposite direction", thus saving little Billy of the disapointment of seing that is rocket actually doesn't work or even from bodilly harm if the rocket exploded.

    In other news, patent lawyers armed with patents on all forms of causing bodilly harm are reducing terrorism!!!

  38. shake em down! by Danathar · · Score: 1

    They caved once, now the other muggers are enboldened to try it again.

    Moral of the story..When the bully comes after you the FIRST time, defend yourself to the end. Use a baseball bat if nessessary.

    "Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't" - Thomas Jefferson

  39. The problem is not software patents, its the court by markdj · · Score: 1

    For those of you railing against software patents, in this case that is NOT the problem. The fact is that up until recently one had to have a working prototype to get a patent. The Constitution allows patent protection to foster innovation by allowing a company to recoup R&D investment during the early years of a product. Recently courts have allowed patent infringement cases to proceed when there was no product to protect and no product ever intended. By patenting an idea and fiercely protecting it without ever making a product you essentially take that idea and any innovation around that idea off the market. If the courts required a working prototype to get a patent and an actual product to defend a patent, this wouldn't happen.

  40. Suck it, fascist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kneel before your masters and say "aaah!" you fascist scum.

  41. Re:Advice for RIM: Help abolish Software Idea Pate by IAmTheDave · · Score: 1

    From FAS (and a submitted yet rejected post)... The FAS has obtained a CRS report titled Patent Reform: Issues in the Biomedical and Software Industries (PDF warning) which discusses some of the evil that is software patents. From TFPDF:

    "...computers are ubiquitous -- and as a result, so is software authorship...Thus, a patent on a drug creates potential liability for those companies in the pharmaceutical business, while a software patent creates potential liability for any company with its own website or software customizations, regardless of its business."

    --
    Excuse my speling.
    Making The Bar Project
  42. Pete Ashdown? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the Utah Senator had his hands in some related issues, such as the DMCA. Pete Ashdown is running for the Senate in Utah and is probably a better choice than Hatch on these issues. Unfortinutely, Ashdown is a Democrat and Utah is largly Republican.

  43. RIM by certel · · Score: 1

    Companies are targeting RIM because they're based out of Canada. It's a conspiracy I tell you.