Slashdot Mirror


First Ever Wild Grizzly/Polar Hybrid Shot

tavilach writes "Jim Martell has a license to hunt polar bears, but when his latest kill had "white fur [that] was spotted brown and it had the long claws and slightly humped back of a grizzly," officials seized the body in order to conduct DNA tests. These tests confirm that the dead bear had a polar bear mother and grizzly father, the first documented grizzly-polar hybrid in the wild. This was lucky for Jim, who was facing a fine and jail time for possibly killing a grizzly. Scientists who would have liked to study the bear are not so lucky."

49 of 227 comments (clear)

  1. Good job... by facelessnumber · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now we'll never know what kind of mystical skills and powers it had.

    1. Re:Good job... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Cold Damage Resist +30 and Grizzly Maul lvl 8.

    2. Re:Good job... by RsG · · Score: 2, Funny

      True. Does a hybrid bear shit in the woods, or on the ice flows? Inquiring minds want to know!

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    3. Re:Good job... by reddalek · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apparently being able to avoid or dodge bullets isn't one of the skills.

    4. Re:Good job... by Thalin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Apparently it couldn't stop bullets.

      --
      What? You want a sig?
    5. Re:Good job... by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Funny
      Dunno, but as the old pun says... the easiest way to catch a polar bear is to cut a hole in the ice, then wait and hide. When the bear goes to the hole to catch some fish, sneak up from behind and kick him in the ice hole.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    6. Re:Good job... by stebe · · Score: 3, Funny

      > True. Does a hybrid bear shit in the woods, or on the ice flows? Inquiring minds want to know!

      I do not know where it poops, but I imagine the hybrid bear would have lower emissions than conventional bears.

      Ursus maritimus + ursus horriblis= ursus prius

    7. Re:Good job... by SEWilco · · Score: 5, Funny
      Apparently it couldn't stop bullets.

      It did stop bullets.

  2. Lovely for science... by pdes · · Score: 4, Funny

    But how does it taste?

  3. Re:Was it a mule? by RsG · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "If the two types of bear can mate and produce fertile offspring, then
    they are really the same species."

    Nah, different species can interbreed and produce fertile offspring. Look up "ring species" for examples where A can breed with B, and B can breed with C but C cannot breed with A.

    Mostly this reflects the fact that the term "species" is a fairly arbitrary distinction that goes back before our understanding of evolution.

    --
    Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
  4. Re:Was it a mule? by lubricated · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the two types of bear can mate and produce fertile offspring, then
    they are really the same species.

    That's really an older view of things. There are many animals that are concidered different species even though a fertile rare hybrid appears. The most obvious is wolves, coyotes and dogs. But also different species of abalone, cicklids(sp?) are other examples. Biologists have a hard time defining on what exactly makes a species, because horizontal gene transfer among what are considered species happens surprisingly often.

    --
    It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
  5. new name by mayns · · Score: 2, Funny

    The burning question: was it a Pizzly Bear or a Grolar Bear?

    1. Re:new name by CptNerd · · Score: 2, Funny


      It's called "you stand there naming it, I'm running thataway..."

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
  6. oblig by lubricated · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's pretty much my favorite animal.

    --
    It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    1. Re:oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's a Polizzly Bizzle fo' shizzle, my nizzle.

    2. Re:oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please never post on /. ever again.

  7. So typical! by CODiNE · · Score: 3, Funny

    genetic tests showed the bear had a polar bear for a mother and a grizzly bear for a father.

    Those grizzlys... always going after the blondes.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    1. Re:So typical! by Supurcell · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah. As soon as they become the least bit successful, they turn their backs on their own kind and go find themselves a white bear.

  8. Pathetic that this animal was shot... by Entropius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So it's apparently legal to shoot polar bears in Canada, despite the fact that they're considered one of the animals facing increasing threats in the future from withdrawing sea ice?

    And it's also legal to shoot a half-grizzly, even though shooting grizzlies is illegal?

    What a waste of a magnificent (and apparently rare) animal. I'm probably one of the more pro-hunting folk around here; I grew up eating deer and gamebirds shot by my father, and have a bunch of respect for people who know how to turn a shotgun shell or rifle bullet into dinner. But these wealthy big-game trophy hunters, who look for rare and wondrous animals only to shoot them and turn them into rugs or wall ornaments, make me sick.

    Imagine if some guy wandering around the Antarctic finds a meteorite with evidence of Martian life in it, and whacks it with a sledgehammer...

    1. Re:Pathetic that this animal was shot... by Hannah+E.+Davis · · Score: 4, Informative

      As I understand it, polar bears are huntable in the arctic at least in part because they eat people. They're extremely dangerous animals -- apparently, they're known for showing no fear around humans and having no qualms about eating human flesh, so there are parts of Canada where you actually do have to go around armed in case one comes by looking for dinner.

      I'm still not a big fan of shooting them, but I can see why it might be allowed, especially near human settlements.

    2. Re:Pathetic that this animal was shot... by MagikSlinger · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So it's apparently legal to shoot polar bears in Canada, despite the fact that they're considered one of the animals facing increasing threats in the future from withdrawing sea ice?

      Polar Bears around that area are so numerous they're getting to be a big problem and they have to be culled. Mostly because Polars like to supplement their diet of seals, fish and walrus with fresh dump pickings. I've heard stories of smoldering polar bears wandering through the dump at Churchil Manitoba.

      And it's also legal to shoot a half-grizzly, even though shooting grizzlies is illegal?

      Apparently. But I guess the F&W folks felt it was sufficiently polar bear to count as a polar bear.

      What a waste of a magnificent (and apparently rare) animal.

      Understandable, but from TFA, they've created the exact same hybrid in captivity and even gotten them to breed. Which, to me, completely goes against the definition of species I learned in school. Go figure.

      But these wealthy big-game trophy hunters, who look for rare and wondrous animals only to shoot them and turn them into rugs or wall ornaments, make me sick.

      Yeah, but since Jimmy the Toucan went out of business, what else are you going to do with them? :-)

      Imagine if some guy wandering around the Antarctic finds a meteorite with evidence of Martian life in it, and whacks it with a sledgehammer...

      As I understand it, that's what scientist do until they find out AFTER they whacked it open. :-)

      --
      The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
    3. Re:Pathetic that this animal was shot... by Dachannien · · Score: 5, Funny

      But they're adorable and they like Coca-Cola. How could they possibly be vicious?

    4. Re:Pathetic that this animal was shot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      But they're adorable and they like Coca-Cola. How could they possibly be vicious?

      Let me introduce you to my ex-girlfriend...

    5. Re:Pathetic that this animal was shot... by Brandybuck · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It sounds like you're not so much pissed that a trophy hunter shot it, but that a wealthy trophy hunter shot it. This is class envy masquerading as ignorant environmentalistm.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    6. Re:Pathetic that this animal was shot... by cgenman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So it's apparently legal to shoot polar bears in Canada, despite the fact that they're considered one of the animals facing increasing threats in the future from withdrawing sea ice?

      It's only illegal to kill something pointlessly if you're not rich enough to waste 45,000 dollars to do it.

      That's your lesson for the day boys and girls. Everything is moral if you have enough money.

      I'm not entirely opposed to hunting, but he'd better eat that fucking bear.

    7. Re:Pathetic that this animal was shot... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed. And polar bears are huntable because they're in rifle range.

    8. Re:Pathetic that this animal was shot... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Naw, he's just trying to hit a few extra buttons by bringing class warfare into it. That's how political agitators 'build coalitions around issues.' It's how Marxists in the 21st century manage to draw people to rallies. (i.e. International A.N.S.W.E.R.)

    9. Re:Pathetic that this animal was shot... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wealth only came into it because 1) this guy was wealthy, as he would have to be to buy the tag to shoot the bear and 2) only wealthy people have the time to waste to travel to far away locations just to shoot things to bring back as souvenirs.

      You apparently didn't "hear" the real distinction, which was people who shoot things to make dinner versus people who shoot things to make decorations for their den.

      I have family who hunts for sport -- as in they don't need to hunt in order to eat -- and likes a good trophy, but they also get a year's supply of venison out of the deal. That, to me, makes all the difference between connecting with our hunter past and killing things to feel like a big shot.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  9. trophy "hunters" by loomis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This was previously discussed at another forum yesterday, and the general consensus was what a complete travesty it is that this animal was killed by a "trophy hunter."

    Interestingly, the people who were most offended were other hunters. Not trophy hunters, but those who hunt legally as a means to control herd populations and to feed their families. In my experince, standard hunters aren't so inexperienced and quick to shoot at anything that moves than a normal hunter. I mean you've got to get somethingto show for your 45K right?

    And now, because this "hunter" didn't know the value of this animal, it is dead before it could be studied further and / or protected.

    --
    "The television is the retina of the mind's eye" - Videodrome
    1. Re:trophy "hunters" by Miraba · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Hate to break it to you, but this wasn't a unique animal. If scientists want to study a polar/grizzly cross, all they need to do is go to a zoo that already has one.

      As others have pointed out, conservation biology says that this cross is a bad thing, meaning it has very low value and should not be protected. See controversy over the conservation of various big cats through cross-breeding for more info.

  10. Must be a really rare spawn by Winlin · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder what it drops? And if it's something good, when does it pop next?
    Note to self...really gotta take a break from MMORPGs

  11. Canadian Polar Bear Hunt by yankpop · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Some details for your consideration:

    Inuit communities are allowed a certain number of polar bear tags each season, based in part on the idea of sustainable yield (how sustainable I can't say). This is in recognition of the importance of the polar bear hunt in their traditional culture.

    Each community decides how to allot their tags. Some places use all of the tags internally for subsistence hunting. Others sell a portion of them to big-game hunters, which brings a lot of money to the community. This is arguably a more efficient form of subsistence hunting: What's a better use of the resource, a) killing a bear and eating it or b)selling the chance to shoot a bear to a rich hunter and then spending the tens of thousands of dollars raised on feeding your community? Tags for outsiders are only available through the Inuit communities.

    And yes, it's true that polar bears are dangerous, and anyone working in the arctic needs to carry a rifle in case of emergency encounters. Government research projects are extremely touchy about this (my wife's been up a few times) - spotting a bear anywhere near a camp results in the camp being moved rather than risk the death of a bear or a human. However, the suggestion by another poster that the hunt is necessary to keep communities safe is bullshit. Which is not to say nuisance bears won't get killed, but it certainly won't be part of the hunting tag system.

    yp.

    1. Re:Canadian Polar Bear Hunt by ElMiguel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If the reason why Inuit communities are allowed to hunt polar bear is because this is deemed to be part of their traditional culture, why are they allowed to sell their "polar bear tags" to non-Inuits? Is trading their traditions for money also part of their traditional culture? Or is Inuit traditional culture just Canadian government's pretext to explain why polar bear hunting is allowed, the real reason being that it brings good money into Canadian economy?

      Just wondering.

    2. Re:Canadian Polar Bear Hunt by yankpop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I expect that the amount of money polar bear hunting brings to the Canadian economy is trivial. However, it is far from trivial for the native communities involved. And given all that the Canadian government has imposed on the Inuit, I think it's a good thing that they've allowed them to make their own decisions in at least this one aspect of managing their resources.

      If I recall correctly, Scotland (could've been another north Atlantic country, my undergrad is a long ways back now) adopted a similar policy with respect to their salmon fishery, ie. limiting the number of tags available to locals to take advantage of the much greater return available by catering to rich overseas fishermen. Again, I think it's a responsible decision: given that an animal is going to die, is it better that it feeds a few people directly, or many people through the sale of a much sought-after tag?

      Of course, not everyone agrees with this. That's why some Inuit communities don't sell any tags to outsiders.

      yp.

    3. Re:Canadian Polar Bear Hunt by ElMiguel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To restate my point, if you allow Inuit communities to trade their "polar bear tags" for money it means that polar bear hunting is nothing but an economic subsidy.

      Given that polar bears are now considered an endangered species, that makes a big difference.

      I don't know Inuit traditions, but it is possible that the role of a polar bear is irreplaceable in some of them. If that is the case, I can understand the argument for allowing some hunting, even if I may not agree.

      However, if hunting is just intended as a money making resource, then it is just looks completely irresponsible on the government's part. I'm sure the Canadian government can think of other ways of making money that do not involve hunting endangered species.

  12. Re:Headline misleading by Who235 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Read it again, friend. It says "First Ever WILD Grizzly/Polar Hybrid Shot" (emphasis mine).

    Wild in this case certainly means not bred in captivity.

    So maybe Parent should have spent less time reading TFA and more time reading TFH.

  13. What does Hanso have to say about this? by EddieBurkett · · Score: 2, Funny

    Could this just be part of the "Repatriation Accelerated De-territorialization of Ursus Maritimus through gene therapy and extreme climate change?"

    --
    The only thing I hate more than hypocrites are people who hate hypocrites.
  14. Re:Slashdot FUD by djchristensen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nowhere in the article does it say anyone wanted to study the carcass. They've crossbred polar and grizzly bears in captivity before, I'm sure they have all the data they want from those experiments.

    You've got it exactly backwards. Sure, no one is interested in studying the carcass, because they've done all they need on captive hybrids. But I bet there are plenty of scientists who would love to get the chance to radio-tag a live one and follow it around in the wild for a while. Does it behave like a grizzly or a polar bear? Does it get along with others of either type of bear? And many more questions.

    A dead bear tells no tales that haven't already been heard. A living bear would be intensely interesting to the scientific community.

  15. I can explain it by greg1104 · · Score: 3, Funny

    That might explain how a grizzly got to the region, but few can explain how it managed to get along with a polar bear long enough to mate.

    Clearly none of the people speculating spend much time drinking. You can mate anything with enough Tequila.

  16. A reasonable altyernative by mangu · · Score: 2, Insightful
    polar bears are huntable in the arctic at least in part because they eat people.


    Then why not make the areas where polar bears live off-limits to humans? We inhabit every single part of the Earth, why not leave some space for other animals? If an animal species is being driven to extintcion due to habitat encroachment by humans, then it's only reasonable that humans stay off that species' natural habitat.


    IMHO, a polar bear is justified in killing a human because it's in his nature, but a human is supposed to be "rational", which means, logical reasoning should prevail over his instinct to kill.

    1. Re:A reasonable altyernative by Firethorn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Then why not make the areas where polar bears live off-limits to humans?

      Because then the bears breed and expand their population, which expands their territory and suddenly the bears are threatening our enclaves again.

      I believe that the limit is something around a hundred bears a year. That's why you get the rich 'big game hunters' as they're the only ones who can afford the resulting high fees.

      If an animal species is being driven to extintcion due to habitat encroachment by humans, then it's only reasonable that humans stay off that species' natural habitat.

      They're not endangered, though their population density is tiny. And their 'natural' habitat is anywhere there's food, minus areas where more warm climate adapted bears take the territory.

      IMHO, a polar bear is justified in killing a human because it's in his nature, but a human is supposed to be "rational", which means, logical reasoning should prevail over his instinct to kill.

      We haven't wiped out the Polar Bears entirely, nor that many other large species recently in the northern hemisphere. I'd tend to say we are controlling it, and death/predation is both part of nature and man.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  17. same domestic problems as humans by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2, Funny

    "That might explain how a grizzly got to the region, but few can explain how it managed to get along with a polar bear long enough to mate."

    alcohol

    --

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  18. there's more, you know by DemiKnute · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Scientists who would have liked to study the bear are not so lucky.

    Maybe the scientists who would have liked to study a grizzly/polar mix should go to a zoo, where they already exist, as mentioned in the article. I think that would be a lot easier.

    --
    .
  19. Sounds like a job for Animal Of The Week by Bertie · · Score: 3, Funny

    Who needs Wikipedia when you've got this sort of expertise?

    " animal of the week today is the polar bear which is pretty much the king of the animal kingdom because it is a cross of the best bits of a tiger, a shark and a Hulk Hogan. if you think that you can imagine how strong a polar bear is then think again because you are wrong. it is stronger than that and it is probably stronger than your next guess. we are talking about an animal that can leg press over 500kg and curl 200kg with ease. pretty much the only thing that it cant do is squat thrusts but they are gay anyway. polar bears have a furry bellend to protect it from the cold."

    Animal Of The Week

  20. we'll never know by aapold · · Score: 2, Funny

    if it drank coca-cola or pepsi....

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
  21. Re:Was it a mule? by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Wolves and dogs are the same species. There is absolutely no doubt about it. Feral dogs, and even some domesticated dogs, breed with wolves all the time. It's not some rare event that only happens in a blue moon or through delibrate meddling. Ergo, same species. It's only the fact that dogs live with humans and wolves don't that keeps them from merging back into one group.

    What's really interesting is, because of that, wolf-dog hybrids are more likely to attack humans than wolves. Wolves, while sometimes willing to attack human-sized prey when pretty hungry, like deer and even cows, have had the fear of humans genetically instilled into them, and thus a human being is literally the last thing they will attack for food. All the ones that were willing to attack humans got killed ten thousand years ago.

    Dogs, OTOH, are not generally willing to attack any prey larger than themselves. Note I said prey. Even vicious tamed dogs don't eat humans. Dogs, however, aren't afraid of humans at all, and hence feral ones will attack humans. So a wolf-dog hybrid is basically a dog that comes pre-feraled.

    Coyotes are a different story, as are foxes. There are reports of interbreeding, and some species even seems be the result of interbreeding in the past. But they don't appear to breed with wolves/dogs normally or easily.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  22. From overlooked-irony dept by carpeweb · · Score: 2, Funny

    Scientists who would have liked to study the bear are not so lucky.

    Well, they were luckier than the bear.

  23. Kinda like a liger by whoop · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... bred for their skills in magic.

  24. Re:Was it a mule? by MadMidnightBomber · · Score: 2, Informative
    that would explain how the polar bears survived the previous warm periods (like the 8000 BC to 4000 BC "climate optimum").

    Wow! Homo Sapiens was destroying the planet that far back?

    Er, around then.

    "On Great Britain shade tolerant species like oak and ash are replaced in the pollen record by hazels, brambles, grasses and nettles. Removal of the forests led to decreased transpiration resulting in the formation of upland peat bogs. Widespread decreased in elm pollen across Europe between 6400-6300 BP and 5200-5000 BP, starting in southern Europe and gradually moving north to Great Britain, may represent land clearing by fire at the onset of Neolithic agriculture."

    --
    "It doesn't cost enough, and it makes too much sense."