Slashdot Mirror


Samsung Working On Fuel-Cell Powered Cell Phones

An anonymous reader writes "BusinessWeek reports that Samsung plans to build prototype phones that will be powered by Direct Methanol Fuel Cells." From the article: "The deal also marks a huge vote of confidence in a little-known company. MTI Micro, which had sales of $8 million in 2005, is one of a handful of outfits seeking to bring hydrogen-based fuel-cell technology into more common use. Its Mobion fuel cells have already appeared in industrial handhelds from companies like Intermec, a unit of Unova, and have drawn the attention of military contractors developing devices that soldiers will use in the field. Under the deal, which lasts through the end of the second quarter of 2007, the two companies will jointly research the use of methanol-based fuel-cell technologies for use in cell phones. Any patents that come as the result of the research will be assigned to MTI."

151 comments

  1. Excellent! by TheGreatHegemon · · Score: 0

    Now I can keep talking while getting a tan, and not worry about the batteries running out. Goodbye geekdom on a cellphone, hello tanning while on a cell phone. I'll be doing the world good too - I'll be saving energy!

    1. Re:Excellent! by nettrust · · Score: 1

      I'm also the fan of saving energy! Thumbs up for technologies like this! :)

    2. Re:Excellent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Now I can keep talking while getting a tan, and not worry about the batteries running out. Goodbye geekdom on a cellphone, hello tanning while on a cell phone. I'll be doing the world good too - I'll be saving energy!

      And when the methanol makes you go blind, you won't even have to wear sunglasses!

    3. Re:Excellent! by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1
      I'll be doing the world good too - I'll be saving energy!

      I only hope this goes on to lots of other things using fuel cells. I would hate for the fuel cell-powered cell phone to become the latest solar-powered calculator.

    4. Re:Excellent! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If your using your tech devices whilst in a sunny tanning situation, wouldn't it make more sense to have a solar charging unit handy and run all day without even needing a refill?

      Let the alcohol refresh you without wasting it on your laptop.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    5. Re:Excellent! by Nevynxxx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In what way can these ever be "saving energy"?
      The fule Cell has to be manufactured, this has to have an energy cost associated with it, hence you are still using energy, your phone is still using energy, the same amount too.
      Are fuel cells more efficent than power plants? With the cost of manufacture and distribution added in?

    6. Re:Excellent! by DanHibiki · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now I may be wrong about this, however it is mine understanding that hydrogen used for cells and so forth is produced by applying an electrical charge to water, this causes the hydrogen and oxygen to divide and the gas is gathered and used in cells. At the moment this is done with wind powered or solar generators but when this comes a mass used device the "clean" and "conservative" methods will be tossed out the window(solar and wind can't possibly provide enough power) and replaced by regular power plants, so all in all you really will not have any power conservation.

    7. Re:Excellent! by Billosaur · · Score: 1

      I'm also the fan of saving energy! Thumbs up for technologies like this! :)

      Pointless really; they already sell solar rechargers, which may be a hassle to carry, but with the extended talk time of most phones now, you pretty much only have to charge them once a day.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    8. Re:Excellent! by GundamFan · · Score: 1

      That is my question... what method of production do they intend to use to make all this fuelb and how do they intend to get it to the cell phone users?

      --
      I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
      Mark Twain
    9. Re:Excellent! by Rei · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A common misunderstanding of the "hydrogen economy". In the idealized hydrogen economy, hydrogen is produced through thermolysis -- directly from heat, thus bypassing the (inefficient) electricity generation stage altogether. Also, since a fuel cell powered vehicle really is electric, it can readily be enabled to do power regeneration. Engines become lighter, cheaper, more efficient, and are freed from the necessity of running off of liquid hydrocarbon chains into something that can be more easily produced.

      Other energy sources in a hydrogen economy include using peak solar power (you have extra energy in bright, sunny days), extra hydroelectric power in rainy times, and direct bacterial generation of hydrogen. In the former two cases, you're not starting with heat energy, so you're not losing energy to carnot cycle losses before you get the electricity for electrolysis (with best available tech, about 85% efficient).

      --
      "You see, Government is a system that is based on weapons." -- Timster
    10. Re:Excellent! by DanHibiki · · Score: 1

      even so, can this provide wnough power to say... fuel all the cars in America?

    11. Re:Excellent! by Rei · · Score: 1

      The fact that it requires new infrastructure is a given, given the fact that we're talking about an entirely new method of powering vehicles.

      --
      "You see, Government is a system that is based on weapons." -- Timster
    12. Re:Excellent! by darthdavid · · Score: 1

      Seriously, just build more nuke plants and use them for electrolyosis. They're safe, clean and very effiecent. If we can get fusion plants all the better, then we can get rid of a good deal of radioactive waste as well.

    13. Re:Excellent! by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Actually, this Nobel laureate http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd -3527312757.html has proposed a "methanol economy" as being better than the hydrogen version.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  2. Multifunction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would it be backed by zippo?

  3. The Emperor Has No Clothes On by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    From the article
    "What Soucy and MTI CEO Peng Lim envision is a world where instead of recharging your phone's battery, you'll buy disposable fuel cells that last longer than the batteries that come with cell phones today and are more eco-friendly. Exactly how much longer they'll last the company won't say yet. "We've promised to demonstrate a fuel cell that is better than a lithium ion battery by the third quarter of this year, and we're on track to do that," Lim says."

    Hahahahah. So people are going to give up being able to recharge their cell phone batteries for free for the ultra-convienence of having to go to the store to buy new fuel cells for their phones everytime they lose power. Right.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:The Emperor Has No Clothes On by Talrinys · · Score: 0

      Ya cause normal electricity is cheap?

    2. Re:The Emperor Has No Clothes On by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      It worked for Nintendo for 15 years.

    3. Re:The Emperor Has No Clothes On by spriteboy · · Score: 0

      We've promised to demonstrate a fuel cell that is better than a lithium ion battery by the third quarter of this year And we all know how deadlines/targets work :).....

    4. Re:The Emperor Has No Clothes On by joe+155 · · Score: 1

      This is one reason why I like Lithium batteries which we have now in phones now. I really dislike the thought of having to continously buy new batteries and actually make the effort to go get them... when my phone runs out I can just lean over and plug it in; requiring a crazily small amount of effort. Also, I don't pay for my electric usage so I guess it's more cost effective for me too

      --
      *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    5. Re:The Emperor Has No Clothes On by Tx · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but times change.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    6. Re:The Emperor Has No Clothes On by firl · · Score: 1

      "everytime they lose power"

      I believe what they might be going for is having it last as long as a continually recharged battery.

      But if your right, don't you think they would develop it more? or maybe thats why it was prefaced with
      "ts Mobion fuel cells have already appeared in industrial handhelds from companies like Intermec, a unit of Unova, and have drawn the attention of military contractors developing devices that soldiers will use in the field."

    7. Re:The Emperor Has No Clothes On by shadowcode · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Hahahahah. So people are going to give up being able to recharge their cell phone batteries for free for the ultra-convienence of having to go to the store to buy new fuel cells for their phones everytime they lose power. Right.

      People might just do that if the fuel cells have a lifespan of a year.

      ...of course, maybe they're not telling people how long the cells last because they suck. (the cells, not the people)

      Right.
    8. Re:The Emperor Has No Clothes On by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, this is the gillette principle.
      Pure repeat sales, they would love to get us to do this, but your absolutely right.

      I would use a fuel cell if:

      1) I can purchase a 20 gallon barrel for pence and fill up at home.

      2) each refill will last much longer than current tech.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    9. Re:The Emperor Has No Clothes On by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 0

      At home you are already paying an electric bill. Why would you want to spend MORE money to power your phone? At work you aren't even paying the electric bill. Except for special circumstances this fuel cell thing doesn't make sense.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    10. Re:The Emperor Has No Clothes On by pla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So people are going to give up being able to recharge their cell phone batteries for free for the ultra-convienence of having to go to the store to buy new fuel cells for their phones

      Yeah, I too kinda wonder about the logic behind such a product.

      I also have to wonder just how much more eco-friendly this would prove over the life of a phone - For a ballpark calculation, people replace their phones every two years and current phones need charging every two to three days. If this cell lasts twice as long that means it will eat between 120 and 180 cells over the life of the phone. Does one Li-ion battery really cause that much damage to the environment that 180 PEMs+tank represents an improvement???

      For bigger things, like laptops, I can see the use of fuel cells as an auxilliary power source (though not replacing batteries outright). But for a cell phone, they last three days, not three hours, per charge. Even then, though, I have to wonder just how popular they would prove themselves.

      Mostly, I see fuel cells as useful in places where we already use fluids (ie, gasoline) as a source of power, such as cars and generators. I also see a possible secondary market in places we currently use mostly non-rechargeable batteries, such as flashlights and radios. But targetting cell-phones, laptops, or any other device that already uses rechargeables seems like a sure way to make sure fuel cells never become popular.

    11. Re:The Emperor Has No Clothes On by flyweight_of_fury · · Score: 2, Informative
      People might just do that if the fuel cells have a lifespan of a year.
      ...of course, maybe they're not telling people how long the cells last because they suck. (the cells, not the people)
      Agreed - if the capacity of mobile fuel cells is anything like their larger cousin - they probably do suck...
    12. Re:The Emperor Has No Clothes On by Rei · · Score: 1

      That's not how most people conceive of fuel cells in application. The concept is that your phone has a reservoir of fuel, and you refill this reservoir from a larger tank. If your phone holds 16 ml of fuel (2cm x 4cm x 2cm), a two-gallon tank would provide 473 charges.

      In an ideal situation (I don't know about this company's design), you never toss your fuel cell -- you just refill it. With a pressurized fuel canister, it'd be just as easy as plugging in a cell phone, but take a lot less time.

      --
      "You see, Government is a system that is based on weapons." -- Timster
    13. Re:The Emperor Has No Clothes On by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      recharge their cell phone batteries for free

      Who's your power company? I'd give anything to get free (or at least cheap and unmetered!) electricity at home!

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    14. Re:The Emperor Has No Clothes On by ByTor-2112 · · Score: 1

      And do what with the waste? When you are trekking around places where it is inconvenient to recharge a battery, sure, a fuel cell might sound great. But you will never achieve 100% conversion of the fuel so you can't just dump out the waste.

      Not only that, but the reaction generates... CO2. So now your phone will be contributing to global warming all the time.

    15. Re:The Emperor Has No Clothes On by Mana+Mana · · Score: 1

      I don't want to mod this down; can somebody translate?

    16. Re:The Emperor Has No Clothes On by pla · · Score: 1

      I don't want to mod this down; can somebody translate?

      Ummm...

      Okay...

      1) Free recharges vs pay-per-charge - Who wins?

      2) 180 fuel cells vs one rechargeable battery - Which damages Mother Nature more?

      3) "New" or "Improved" - Which do you actually want?


      (Cheat-sheet: 1B; 2A?; 3B)

    17. Re:The Emperor Has No Clothes On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's your power company? I'd give anything to get free (or at least cheap and unmetered!) electricity at home!

      Would you pay your bill for the "free" power if you're ready to give anything? :P

      I guess we need to gigaoverload the already overloaded word "free" again :)

      Um, cheap I understand. But that involves economics, right? And "cheap" compared to what?

      To confirm you're not a script,
      please type the word in this image: benefit

      (hehe, kinda accurate)

    18. Re:The Emperor Has No Clothes On by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Back to consumers. I think the issue faced by the consumer is that they're faced with the unappealing prospect of a razor blade model. Batteries are essentially "free" since they come with the phone. A fuel cell certainly would not be any cheaper than a battery. And a battery costs a few pence to charge but fuel cell refills are likely to cost a few pounds. It's not economical for a consumer to use these even if they lasted three times as long.

      It would be useful for businesses. It means that you can maintain a box of walk-talkies, phones, handheld systems etc. without the constant need to be fiddling around with chargers or batteries. Just slap a cell in and away you go. It may not even be convenient to have charge devices in some environments, such as an oil rig, a forest, a factory floor or whatever. The military would appreciate it too simply because a fuel cell weighs a hell of a lot less than a battery and there aren't any chargers in the middle of nowhere.

      It would also be possible to make these things in an eco friendly way but whether they do or not is another matter. Methanol can be made from renewable sources. Plastic can be made from renewable sources (and biodegrade). That means in theory (and discounting manufacture and transportation) these things can be non-polluting, unlike regular batteries.

      So my thoughts are fuel cells are great for certain kinds of business and the military, but it would be madness to pitch these at consumers unless the price is practically nothing which I don't see happening.

    19. Re:The Emperor Has No Clothes On by Rei · · Score: 1

      What waste are you picturing? There is no waste from a fuel cell except for the exhaust products. The reaction involves a membrane that can only allow a proton without an electron to cross, thus forcing it to give up an electron (thus generating power) in order to react. The only "waste" is impurities in the fuel.

      Yes, it generates CO2. But what the heck do you think happens when you plug in your cell phone or buy batteries?

      --
      "You see, Government is a system that is based on weapons." -- Timster
  4. you know.... by Srezic · · Score: 0

    it's only a matter of time before we have methane-powered fuel-cells. It would finally give a purpose to the three years of farts i've stored in my attic. Unfortunately for my attic, we'll have to wait.

    1. Re:you know.... by LoonyMike · · Score: 0

      Relax, don't have a cow

    2. Re:you know.... by Chr0nik · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hate to "burst your bubble," but methane only comprises about 7 percent of human flatus. 21 percent is hydrogen, so you'd do better to power a normal hydrogen fuel cell with it. The big daddy gas in flatus is nitrogen, because we swallow so much air, and is mostly responsible for the "pull my finger" variety of farts. Cows produce much more methane than people do because of their more efficient digestive system, most of the nitrogen and oxygen gets absorbed, leaving mostly methane and hydrogen.

      --


      ... what did you expect, something profound?
    3. Re:you know.... by Auntie+Virus · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info, you're a real fart smeller.

      --
      Why yes, I *AM* new here. Why?
  5. We are going to need by JamesP · · Score: 5, Funny

    A Cell fueled Cell phone using the Cell processor.

    That would be cool!

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    1. Re:We are going to need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO! That would be HOT!

    2. Re:We are going to need by eheldreth · · Score: 1

      Yes, Well call it the C3 Phone Option or "C3PO" for short.

      --
      The perversity of the Universe tends towards a maximum. - O'Toole's Corollary
    3. Re:We are going to need by Rick.C · · Score: 1
      A Cell fueled Cell phone using the Cell processor.

      Cell cubed, dude-guy.

      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    4. Re:We are going to need by End11 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, that would really sell.

      --

      Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Who knows? Who cares?
    5. Re:We are going to need by clem · · Score: 1

      Dude! You're gettin' a Cell!

      --
      Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
  6. Methanol by Life700MB · · Score: 2, Funny


    Aside from the typical 'good luck trying to get your methanol powered mobile or laptop into a plane', how long have been fuel cells in development?

    They're the Duke Nukem Forever of the batteries!


    --
    Superb hosting 20GB Storage, 1_TB_ bandwidth, ssh, $7.95

    1. Re:Methanol by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      The electricity in my house comes from a power plant using fuel cells. So it exists and is used in practice today.

      Duke Nukem Forever however is still vaporware.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    2. Re:Methanol by TrekkieGod · · Score: 1
      They're the Duke Nukem Forever of the batteries!

      That's because people got stuck in this notion that fuel cells are a replacement for batteries. They're great, but they make horrible batteries. I know I don't want to go back to the days when I have to buy new batteries every time they exhaust. I like the convenience of recharging them at home, something you just can't do with fuel cells.

      Right now, if my laptop batteries are running low, I have to plug it into an outlet to keep using it. The fuel cell laptops will have longer "battery" life, of course, but when they're running low you still have to plug it into an outlet. The difference is that when you unplug them, one of them will be recharged, the other will require you to buy more stuff before you can use your laptop without plugging it in again.

      --

      Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    3. Re:Methanol by caffeineboy · · Score: 1

      Where do you live? Right now there are only two fuel cells (UTC PAFC and FCE's MCFC) that can be purchased that would be suited for utility power generation, and these would be installed at premium to customers even after all federal state and local buy-downs.

      The only one that I am aware of that is supplying power to the grid is a FCE MCFC that is installed in Westerville, OH. I'd be interested to know where another utility connected fuel cell is installed.

      --
      +++ ATH0 +++
  7. Hey intel by DextroShadow · · Score: 0

    I don't need the heat of a xeon in my pocket. Oh wait, this is a cellphone? Whatever. Still applies.

    --
    My karma makes buddha cry.
  8. Alt Energy by Scigirl451 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have a solar charger for my mobile phone and it works just fine. I am cheap and like the thought of free energy to power the black hole of money that is my phone. I applaud the expansion of alternative energy technology into our daily lives, but wonder if this is the best application for fuel cells...

    1. Re:Alt Energy by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm sure your phone will never use as much energy as was used to create that solar collector :-)

    2. Re:Alt Energy by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

      I have one of those solar powered chargers and while I applaud the attempt at alternative energy the thing is crap.

      It takes the thing 8 hours of direct sunlight to fully charge the internal battery. It requires intense sunlight and the manufacturer even recommends not putting it behind glass because it reduces efficiency.

      I don't get 8 hours of direct sunlight in the winter and even when I do the light isn't sufficiently intense; it takes a good two or three days to charge the thing. And am I supposed to leave this thing sitting outside? I'm better off plugging it into an outlet and charging it that way.

      There's a reason why a lot of these alternatives haven't been adopted in any significant numbers. Certainly the research must continue, but a lot of it is still quite a way off from being practical.

    3. Re:Alt Energy by Ryan+C. · · Score: 1

      I'm quite sure you're right, and just a little more explanation for those who don't already know: The energy required to produce a traditional silicon based solar cell is about equal to 8 years of constant daytime operation of that cell. Not coincidentally, if you put them up to power your house, it takes about 8-10 years to save enough money on your power bill to pay for the cells.

      Thin film cells promise to reduce this to less than 2 years, but they're not yet here in significant production.

      --
      -Ryan C.
    4. Re:Alt Energy by Scigirl451 · · Score: 1

      My charger takes my phone from dead to dancing in about 3 hours. I usually just plop phone and charger on the dashboard while I'm driving around to keep it topped up. I agree, though, that one of the main impediments to the adoption of alternative energy technologies is that they just haven't made them as convenient as their traditional counterparts. Time will tell..

    5. Re:Alt Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a myth, way to go propagating it without references.

  9. Lots of Questions to be answered by twiddlingbits · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now you can get brain cancer and methanol poisoning at the same time! :) Seriously, how do you recharge these things, with a can of pressurized methanol? Talk about a fire hazard! Or maybe the fuel cell is disposable and you just slap in a new one? That's not environmentally friendly. Maybe you send them back to the factory and they can refill them? Will there be a grey market in refills such as with Ink Jet/Laser Toner Cartridges? Will those refills be safe? Can you carry them on an airplane since flammable items like this are not allowed today? What do they do with the excess heat from the fuel cell operation? There are a LOT of questions to be answered both from the technology side and the business logistics side before you are going to see these in production for consumers. Meanwhile traditional battery technology is not standing still, we get more power density than ever now For the military which does not have to follow the same precautions it could be a good thing for field use, but I don't see them being comsumer devices ever.

    1. Re:Lots of Questions to be answered by Jerf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Batteries have always been nasty, from the very first lead-acid batteries on to today.

      Lithium-ion batteries, for instance, have the habit of exploding when charged. It took a lot of engineering and electronics wrapped around the charging of lithium-ion batteries to make them safe for consumer use.

      But when's the last time you heard about a lithium-ion battery exploding on someone? I haven't heard about it in a while. And it's been even longer since I've heard about it when it wasn't the person's fault.

      There are "questions to be answered", sure, but you sort of act like this is news. I could equally write a "questions to be answered" post about automobiles, starting with the impossibility of storing gasoline correctly. There are people who can answer those questions called "engineers", and while I wouldn't jump on the first iteration of the technology, the battery field has a pretty good track record overall. If it comes out for consumer use, it'll almost certainly be very safe after six months on the market.

    2. Re:Lots of Questions to be answered by nganju · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are a LOT of questions to be answered.

      More than half your questions are answered by TFA. Before you start pointing out that there are too many issues for it to work, why don't you at least try to read the article. FTA:
      What Soucy and MTI CEO Peng Lim envision is a world where instead of recharging your phone's battery, you'll buy disposable fuel cells that last longer than the batteries that come with cell phones today and are more eco-friendly.

      There's two of your (non)issues gone right there. It's not a fire hazard, and they are more eco-friendly than current batteries. Now before you respond asking what makes it more eco-friendly, it's actually explained in the article.

      --
      There are 2 kinds of people in this world. Those that can keep their train of thought,
    3. Re:Lots of Questions to be answered by david.given · · Score: 2
      There are a LOT of questions to be answered both from the technology side and the business logistics side before you are going to see these in production for consumers.

      Not really; all the questions you asked have simple, obvious answers. To refill, you just take the lid off, pour in some more fuel (it's a convenient liquid), and put the lid back on again. If you want to prevent accidental exposure, just package the fuel in little cartridges like the ones that fountain pens have been using for decades. No need to throw away the fuel cell itself... as for safety, the stuff's considerably safer than, say, lighter fluid, which you're allowed to take on a plane today. And as for heat... this is a device designed to be left in your pocket for long periods of time. I seriously doubt excess heat will be a problem.

    4. Re:Lots of Questions to be answered by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      But when's the last time you heard about a lithium-ion battery exploding on someone? I haven't heard about it in a while. And it's been even longer since I've heard about it when it wasn't the person's fault.

      Actually it was just in international news, because someplace in the southern americas (I think it was Brazil) a whole rash of cellphones have been exploding lately, in motorola phones. Motorola says they're investigating, and they believe people were using third party batteries, which are often crap.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Lots of Questions to be answered by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Nice straw-man and changing the subject. You didn't address any of my issues. Yes I know Engineering can overcome a lot of obstacles, but we have been developing Fuel Cells designs have been around since the 1960's and still don't have it right. Lead-acid batteries have been around since the 1800's maybe earlier and it took until the second half of the 1900s to make them really usable and cheap enough for the average Joe. LI batteries have drawbacks as do NiCads but they are proven and we know what NOT to do (fire, overcharging, etc). A fuel cell doesnt have the energy density of current technology and they are just as environmentally messy in thier own way. By the way, Methanol is most commonly made from fossil fuels (i.e. Oil) so thats not a great thing either as thats another thing that will rise in price with oil. Last week your replacement cost $10 this week its $11. I'll give it a few years of R&D but then if there is not a really big breakthru they'll give up on it.

    6. Re:Lots of Questions to be answered by Jerf · · Score: 1

      You didn't address any of my issues.

      You didn't raise any particularly interesting ones!

      That's my point.

      Why should I "address" your uninteresting issues? Your personal lack of faith in engineering is your problem. I just didn't think it should go unchallenged.

    7. Re:Lots of Questions to be answered by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      The PowerBook 5300 was, originally, the first PowerBook with a LiIon battery. It was famous for bursting into flames.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    8. Re:Lots of Questions to be answered by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      i remember nokia had issues a while back with counterfiet (they actually said nokia on them apparently) batteries from the third world. However while they looked like nokia batteries they lacked a lot of the protection circuitry and some of them exploded.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    9. Re:Lots of Questions to be answered by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah that's why motorola batteries are so spendy, they're half holograms :) Well, the one that came with my phone was anyway. The battery I bought recently off ebay (oh noes!) is mostly black, but it looks too good to be a knockoff.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Lots of Questions to be answered by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_cell It shows the working heat of a methanol fuel cell is 90-120 degrees C. That's HOT..it's going to take some good insulation to not burn someone. Which adds the the cost of the device and may push it too high for most consumers. Also efficiency is low, due to the high permeation of methanol through the membrane, and the dynamic behaviour is sluggish. See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct-methanol_fuel_ cell Which shows some of the limitations..what to do with the water produced? State of the art is 100 mW for 10hrs on 1ml 99.5% Methanol. A cell phone can take from 250 mW to 3W of power to transmit, thats continuous power too. So it's 2.5X state of the art methanol fuel cell needed to power cell phones. The fuel cell is 22 x 56 x 4.5 millimeters.

    11. Re:Lots of Questions to be answered by cellular-mobile · · Score: 1

      Certainly, but on the planetary scale :-) If you just compare how much energy is wasted just by one lightbulb left overnight (not to say about street lights)... So we are not talking about electricity in this case. Savings are minimal if there are any at all. Now if one could calculate not the production cost in US$ of one cell but the production cost for the environment..... Anyways, just recently came across some Benq-Siemens phones allegedly running on two AAA rechargables. Is it so or I'm delirious?

  10. Hurdles by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1, Redundant
    Not only is average Joe Sixpack going to be extremely reluctant to go back to having to buy replacement cartridges after getting ued to rechargable batteries, but there is the question of what the cartridges will entail.

    What are the safety issues of carrying around a hydrogen/methanol cartridge in a warm pocket, leaving it in a hot car, and other abuses suffered by our current phones? Additionally, as water is usually a waste product of fuel cells, are we all going to have to explain away the spreading damp patches on our trousers more than usual?

    1. Re:Hurdles by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      Exactly, this sounded great until I got to the part about having to buy replacement cartridges. Unless they cost literally pennies to buy, who is going to bother with that? Battery life is not really an issue for most phones these days (unless you own a RAZR) anyway.

    2. Re:Hurdles by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Valid points.

      Perhaps they would do better to have some soft of fuel cell recharging unit. Something that is portable that can charge a phone in a small amount of time. A fuel cell "UPS" so to speak.

      Or perhaps the phone can be built where the user can decide on conventional battery types or the fuel cell. This would give the cell model flexablity and allow the user base to slowly migrate to new technology.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    3. Re:Hurdles by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      It would be cool if there were 'fill stations'. I'd pay $0.25 to have my phone fully charged instantly; especially if that charge lasted a week.

      As for carrying around methanol, well, people carry cologne/perfume/breath spray/hip flasks/etc.. around with them with no problems already. Many of those things are concentrated enough to be flamable, but the concentration of methanol used in fuel cells isn't. Even if the concentration *was* high enough, the ignition temperature is high enough that you wouldn't want it to be that hot in your pocket/car even if you didn't have a flamable liquid in there. You don't see car's gas tanks bursting into flame in the afternoon sun, do you?

    4. Re:Hurdles by Abreu · · Score: 1

      or a Palm... I have to recharge mine daily or I run out of juice while reading an ebook on my commute

      --
      No sig for the moment.
  11. But what I really want to know about these cells.. by digitaldc · · Score: 0

    ...is can I power my CAR with them?

    I stopped my cell phone service because of the price of gas, I simply can't afford to talk and drive at the same time, or any other time for that matter.

    Maybe I'll just buy a bunch of these phones, take out the fuel cells and then call up the Mythbusters guys to 'trick my ride.'

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  12. Oh joy! by VTMarik · · Score: 0

    Great, another new idea for technology that won't get shipped to anyone but us Americans because it can be turned into an IED. That's what I want for Christmas, a volitile explosive compound inside of an electrical device next to my HEAD!

  13. Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm getting kind of tired of my old coal powered cell phone.

    1. Re:Good. by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm getting kind of tired of my old coal powered cell phone.

      Don't knock coal--during WWII, which AC adapter supplies waning, Germany used coal and the Fischer-Tropsch process to power its cell phones up until the end of the War.

  14. Now an ETHENOL powered fuel cell.. by Bigman · · Score: 1

    ..would be dandy. Just imagine, in the off-licence:

    "No darling, it's not for me, it's for my 'phone!"

    --
    *--BigMan--- Time flies like an arrow.. but personally I prefer a nice glass of wine!
    1. Re:Now an ETHENOL powered fuel cell.. by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

      This would happen only if Samsung went into the liquor business.
      It would solve a lot of issues:
      -Methanol is poisonous. You can drink Ethanol though
      -To recharge, head towards any existing bar/tavern.

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
  15. Of course this means... by Billosaur · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...phone nuts will now be able to talk incessantly about their mother's bout of constipation, their lack of a love life, how crappy their company is, and so on, extending the suffering I must endure on the train. And I hear JetBlue is thinking of addign wireless access to their planes, so you could use them in flight. Brilliant!

    I'll just nip off and shoot meself...

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:Of course this means... by ivan256 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I'll just nip off and shoot meself...

      Good. Do the world a favor. Or at least go live in a cave somewhere, since it's clear that you hate other people.

      I'm sick of people bitching about things other people do that cause no harm to others whatsoever. If somebody talking on a cell phone bothers you more than somebody talking to the person across the isle from you on a train (which is damned noisy to begin with, so it's not like they're making it much worse), you have serious issues.

      And I say that as somebody that doesn't yak on his cell phone in public.

    2. Re:Of course this means... by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      It's not the talking that bothers people, it's the shouting. I'm fine with people using phones on the train, it's just that most of the time they do it at twice the normal conversational volume. It is intensely annoying to have the minutiae of someone's life yelled out next to you while trying to read a book. I don't know why mobiles seem to have this effect on people.

      Clearly many people are annoyed by it - a lot of trains round here have quiet carriages where mobile phones and music players are banned.

    3. Re:Of course this means... by lawaetf1 · · Score: 1

      Actually I think that's the rub... people talking to one another across an aisle tend to be cognizant of their surroundings and moderate their voice accordingly. People on cell phones act like the other party won't hear them unless they put in an extra 10dB. And the parent poster is not some lone malcontent.. Acela put specially designated "quiet cars" on every line due to people blabbing away.. and these quiet cars usually fill up early on in the route. You're telling me the following coming from the person sitting next to you on an airplane/trian/bus wouldn't be annoying? "hey, bob, it's jim!.. JIM! .. i'm on a plane! .. I know, it's nuts! .. Yeah we just left a half hour ago .. we'll probably make it to Portland by 5 .. but you never know with the airlines .. HAHA, EXACTLY!! .. so trisha says hi, she's all settled into her new job .. no, TRISHA! .. yeah .. yeah that's right... oh, no kidding! .. [clip 10 minutes] oh wait, bob, they're serving lunch, let me call you back in 15!"

      --
      CommentBot 0.7a running with args "-module irritate,disagree -target random"
    4. Re:Of course this means... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      And the parent poster is not some lone malcontent..

      You're not alone in making that comment. I wasn't aware that feelings being shared by a group larger than one person suddenly made them all right.

      You're telling me the following coming from the person sitting next to you on an airplane/trian/bus wouldn't be annoying?

      Sure, it would be annoying. I'm just not under any delusion that my right not to be annoyed extends beyond my ability to walk away from the annoying person.

    5. Re:Of course this means... by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Where are you going to walk to on a packed commmuter train? Caltrans in the Bay Area has some of the worse offenders I have ever seen. Sometimes there can be 20 people yelling into their phones all at once with a full train on a monday morning.

  16. Re:How to recharge by fusto99 · · Score: 1

    One word: Enema

  17. Methnol is equivlent to petrol by DarkMan · · Score: 5, Informative

    in the toxicity stakes.

    That is, the petrol (gasoline, for the North Americans) is, to a first approximation, just as toxic as methanol. When was the last time you heard of someone suffering from petrol poisoning, in any non-trivial (meaning, fixed with 5 minutes of fresh air) manner?

    The reason methanol seems more dangerous is that if you contaminate beverages with it, you don't notice it's there until you've consumes a lot. Pure methanol doesn't have that problem. (On the downside, it is absorbed through the skin, so that's not good. Still, when was the last time you got petrol on your hands, in other than a trivial fashion?).

    In summary, yes, it's unpleasant. But, in the opinion of this chemist, no more unpleasant that a large number of other substances that we manage to handle quite safely. Just don't drink it.

    On battery density - forget it. Battery energy density is on a negative exponential decay - there's just a limit to how much energy you can have in there, and we're at something like 85% of that, IIRC. Power density is improving, but it's better life that you really want, which is energy density. Everyone I know that does reaserch into batteries (that's about 30 people over 7 labs) basically thinks that batteries are more or less as good as they get - there's maybe another 5-10% improvement in energy density, but that's about it.

    1. Re:Methnol is equivlent to petrol by eln · · Score: 1

      You're probably right that methanol is only as dangerous as gasoline, but I don't generally make a habit of putting heat-generating gasoline-powered devices up to my ear on a regular basis.

      Most people handle their cell phones a lot more than they handle the fuel tank on their car, and they are a lot more likely to do something to their cell phone that could cause significant damage, including rupturing the fuel cell.

      The bottom line is my phone now lasts 3 or 4 days without a recharge, and can be recharged fully in less than an hour. Why would I want to replace that with a more expensive, and probably more hazardous, alternative that I have to keep paying to replace?

    2. Re:Methnol is equivlent to petrol by supersnail · · Score: 1

      Don't be such wimps!
      When we were kids at camp meths was the standard way of getting a primus stove or tilly lamp going. There were several burnt fingers but no one died that I know of.

      I was a baby boomer and it may be that there was a hidden agenda to reduce the surplus supply of kids.

      --
      Old COBOL programmers never die. They just code in C.
    3. Re:Methnol is equivlent to petrol by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 0

      Low-level methanol exposure is completely harmless. Like grain alchol your body can metabolize it, but more slowly and in lesser amounts.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    4. Re:Methnol is equivlent to petrol by Rei · · Score: 1

      5-10%? That doesn't seem right to me. What about strained molecules like cubane derivatives or nitrogen rings? They pack a lot of energy into a small space/small amount of mass because there aren't easy spontaneous decomposition routes available.

      --
      "You see, Government is a system that is based on weapons." -- Timster
    5. Re:Methnol is equivlent to petrol by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      Only in very, very low doses... or in the presence of large quantities of ethanol, since the liver mainly breaks down the ethanol instead. Indeed, it is the metabolism of methanol that causes the damage, as it releases formaldehyde, which, in turn, is broken down into formic acid.

      There is still debate about the safety of the tiny amount of methanol in aspartame because of the speed at which methanol is broken down into formic acid. (Other, non-methanol substances like certain proteins are broken down into formic acid, but at much slower rates.)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    6. Re:Methnol is equivlent to petrol by suggsjc · · Score: 0

      Very true about the first part, was about to add that myself.

      Well the hope is that you will be able to go for weeks/months without a recharge/replacement (probably not the first gen though). The word is still out on how you actually would recharge these. Maybe there is just a little port (standardized hopefully) and then you can purchase a refiler device that just reinjects the methanol. If that is the case, then it essentially the same model as we use now. Use till battery runs out, then charge. Just this time, it won't directly be electricity that we are using to charge and again hopefully the charge cycle is shorter. Plus, hopefully its almost instanenous...put the methanol in and go

      Also, this has been hyped for quite a while. Its going to take quite a few iterations to get it right, so the sooner the first gens come out and developers get feedback the quicker we are going to get those actually useful X generation versions.

      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
    7. Re:Methnol is equivlent to petrol by GuloGulo2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly how many gasoline powered lawn tools do you have?

      Professional landscapers use such tools for hours a day every day, and as far as I know the safety record of such devices is pretty good.

      It's nice to think of things to complain about, and this tech is iffy, but making reasonably safe fuel cells powered by methanol shouldn't be as difficult as you seem to believe.

    8. Re:Methnol is equivlent to petrol by DarkMan · · Score: 1

      You are conflating 'energy density of a compound' and 'energy density of a compound that we can extract as electricity in a controlled fashion'.

      Indeed, there exists more energy dense compounds that are currently used in batteries. But getting the energy out is tricky. Never mind future batteries - you know that about current lithium polymer batteries loose about 3% of stored energy on 'self protection circuits' - i.e. not bursting into flames at awkward moments...

      And, for a true comparison, you're not looking at batteries, but at rechargeable batteries. Rechargeable batteries have poorer energy density that primary cells - you're effectively giving up some storage for the ability to recharge it. Things that store lots of energy in bonds are very difficult to do reverse reactions with. In particular, you need a molecule where the 'charging' reaction doesn't go anywhere near a spontaneous decomposition route. Given how messy electrochemical reactions get after a few charging cycles, this gets tricky.

      To be fair, I'm not an expert in batteries (I'm materials, and stuff I was looking was relevant to batteries, but that's a separate thing), so I'm always a little behind, and this may have changed. I'd love for there to be a factor of 2 improvement in rechargeable batteries; but I'm not expecting it.

      (Aside: I should point out that the 5-10% was an improvement in state of the art batteries, which lead current commercial batteries by some amount (probably another 5-10%, but that's a guess). So there's a bit to go there too.)

    9. Re:Methnol is equivlent to petrol by DarkMan · · Score: 1

      No, but I'll wager that you often encase yourself in a cage with a 'heat-generating gasoline-powered device', and strap yourself to it.

      By the way, you are aware that lithium batteries are toxic, explosive, flammable, and generate lots of heat, aren't you?

      My point is that the relative risk of a well designed methanol fuel cell is no greater than the current technology risks that most people consider acceptable. It just because it's unfamiliar that the risk is perceived as greater (a well understood phenomenon about people and risk assessment, by the way.)

      Although ... I'd actually agree with you about phones. (Personally, I don't have one, but I agree 4 days on a charge is fine.) I want a fuel cell for my laptop though - that's where the sweet spot is - cheap, easily refueled, long run times. For people who're often away from a wall socket, being able to take 4 days of laptop run time with you easily and cheaply is a very nice feature.

    10. Re:Methnol is equivlent to petrol by Rei · · Score: 1

      [quote]You are conflating 'energy density of a compound' and 'energy density of a compound that we can extract as electricity in a controlled fashion'.[/quote]

      I'm assuming that with sufficiently advanced technology, the latter will follow from the former. :) We can decompose the various types of HEDM, so the issue is simply how to capture the energy of decomposition and dispose of the waste products.

      [quote]Indeed, there exists more energy dense compounds that are currently used in batteries. But getting the energy out is tricky. [/quote]

      Far more energy dense, and yes.

      [quote]And, for a true comparison, you're not looking at batteries, but at rechargeable batteries.[/quote]

      Quite true; I'd hate to try and re-synthesize, say, cubane, in a little self-contained battery; it's hard enough in a large-scale batch process with all of the right reactants on-hand ;) Still, HEDM would sure make one heck of a disposable battery or fuel-cell.

      --
      "You see, Government is a system that is based on weapons." -- Timster
  18. What we need is a diesel powered cell phone. by BigCheese · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It would be rather big and smelly but, people wouldn't talk on it in the car more then once.

    --
    The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. - Edward R. Murrow
    1. Re:What we need is a diesel powered cell phone. by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

      Smells funny in here. Are you making french fries or calling your Mom?

      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
  19. Re:But what I really want to know about these cell by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

    Hey, they did make a hydrogen car by hooking the business end of a hydrogen tank hose directly into the carbureator of an unmodified diesel sedan... No fabricating at all, they just kinda stuck the hose in there till it worked. Er, and exploded in a giant fireball...

  20. Nokia by traveller604 · · Score: 0

    I remember reading about Nokia working on this kind of batteries years & years back. Anyways I'm not impressed before they find a way to power cellphones with point singularities :)

  21. As great as this technology is... by the+reptilian+brain · · Score: 1

    Play the devil's advocate, far and away from our modern mentality of technological post-human embracement: Fuel cells will make power virtually incorruptable. A [nearly]living, breathing unit of self-sustaining power! Unharnassed by man and only regulated by circuitry. A terryfing revelation, if spun out of our reach. As it stands at least we have the option of "pulling" the proverbial plug on technology should it advanced beyond us. Should we take this step? [I realize how paranoid this sounds, and do not endorse any radically way of living, just food for thought!]

    1. Re:As great as this technology is... by the+reptilian+brain · · Score: 1

      Wow...

      Simply disregard this, no morning's coffee equates into frightening assertions and misconstruing. Poor HTML to boot! Yowch!

    2. Re:As great as this technology is... by pintpusher · · Score: 1

      Oh. I thought you were simply living up to your nick :)

      --
      man, I feel like mold.
    3. Re:As great as this technology is... by Rick.C · · Score: 2, Funny
      You're just paranoid.

      My vision of future machines run amuck is a rusty R2 unit hanging out on a street corner with a cardboard sign reading "Will find prime numbers for methanol."

      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
  22. Fuel Cells = Tons of Power by DigitalRaptor · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was looking forward to hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (10+ years from now), but didn't think much of it until I read about Honda's new hydrogen fuel cell. It puts out 100KW of power!

    It's incredible to me that a fuel cell that is smaller than a common household gas generator puts out 20 times as much power.

    You could power your entire neighborhood with one of these in a power outage.

    --
    Lose Weight and Feel Great with Isagenix
    1. Re:Fuel Cells = Tons of Power by pH7.0 · · Score: 2, Informative
      "I was looking forward to hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (10+ years from now), but didn't think much of it until I read about Honda's new hydrogen fuel cell. It puts out 100KW of power!"
      • Mechanical horsepower -- 0.74569987158227022 kW (33,000 ftlbf per minute)
      • Metric horsepower -- 0.73549875 kW
      • Electrical horsepower -- 0.746 kW
      • Boiler horsepower -- 9.8095 kW
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horsepower
      100,000W/746~=134 horsepowers
      134hp for a car doesn't sound so great, but 100kW can power 20-50 houses easily... interesting.
    2. Re:Fuel Cells = Tons of Power by DigitalRaptor · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a friend pointed that out to me as well.

      I guess what we have to remember though is that is 134HP for a car that doesn't have to deal with the weight of an engine, transmission, or driveline. The hydrogen also weighs much less than a full tank of gas.

      Electric cars can be very snappy. I think this technology shows a lot of promise.

      The real question for me is how many solar panels you'd need to perform enough electrolysis to power it for 50 miles per day (most cars travel less than 50 miles per day).

      Honda already has a charging station for this car that works via natural gas, but I don't think that's optimal. It may be much cleaner overall, but it still isn't a renewable energy source.

      Still, very promising.

      --
      Lose Weight and Feel Great with Isagenix
  23. finally... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

    All right, a mentholated cell phone.. .Now my phone and my Newports have the same minty taste!!!

    --
    "But this one goes to 11!"
  24. Re:But what I really want to know about these cell by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Both Toyota and Honda have made fully-functional fuel cell cars. They said 5 years ago they might have a limited production model in 10 years.

    http://www.toyota.com/about/environment/technology /fuelcell_hybrid.html

    I wouldn't be shocked if others have made similiar prototypes.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  25. Re:But what I really want to know about these cell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I stopped my cell phone service because of the price of gas, I simply can't afford to talk and drive at the same time, or any other time for that matter.

    STFU, Please. I'm sick of the morons on the street who tell me that they're going to have to choose between "gas and food" because of the price of gas rising. Gas is about a dollar a gallon more today that it was 12-18 months ago. Let's just say for the sake of arguement that your fuel prices are now 50% higher than they were a year ago. Are you really telling me that the average of about 50 dollars a month more we're paying in gas prices has put such a crimp in your budget that you had to drop cell service? Not to say that cell service is needed but people who live in that narrow of a budget probably shouldn't have a cell phone anyway.

    What's best is the "gas or food" morons who tell me their woes as they're chain smoking... Their 150 dollar a month habit (a pack a day at local prices) doesn't have anything to do with their financial dire straights?

    Most people piss away money on crap but cry when the price of a needed good goes up. It's simply stupid.

  26. Huh.. by lemon_dieter · · Score: 0
    Cellphones have become an appendage to the human body in recent years.

    Does this mean that the new fuel cell, in close proximity to the already methane-enriched colon, will catalyze the phenomena of spontaneous combustion?

    Will this aid in our societal cessation of tobacco smoking, a fetish enjoyed by yours truly?

    --
    Spending Resources on Defense leaves Less to defend.
  27. Methanol Safety by schlick · · Score: 1

    Just as an aside, methanol is what model airplanes use for fuel, and it is also used in the process of turning waste vegetable oil into biodiesel. As for safety, how hard can it be to come up with a safe way to transfer 6 oz of liquid from one container to another?

    When buying methanol, like most things, the more you buy the cheaper it is. Keeping a 5 gallon container around and then filling your phone or a small syringe from that doesn't seem too difficult a proposition.

    --
    "It's because they're stupid, that's why. That's why everybody does everything." -Homer Simpson
  28. Very Offtopic (was: Re:Of course this means...) by Billosaur · · Score: 1
    Good. Do the world a favor. Or at least go live in a cave somewhere, since it's clear that you hate other people.

    Tsk, tsk -- apparently contrary opinions aren't allowed? Good thought about the cave though, as long as it has Internet access. I can just imagine calling Comcast and ordering service...

    I'm sick of people bitching about things other people do that cause no harm to others whatsoever. If somebody talking on a cell phone bothers you more than somebody talking to the person across the isle from you on a train (which is damned noisy to begin with, so it's not like they're making it much worse), you have serious issues.

    Then why do you read Slashdot? Actually I'm sick of other people bitching about my bitching. Free country, what? Anywho, anybody talking loudly on the train annoys me, as much as anyone with their iPod cranked so high I can hear stuff leaking from their earbuds, and people with offensive body odor. Perhaps it's not doing me physical harm, but since I am pretty much trapped, being I have a long commute on crowded trains, is it it too much to ask for people to be courteous, keep the conversation short and quiet, and give others a chance at some peace? I guess so, according to your view. You are no doubt not on Emily Post's Christmas card list.

    And I say that as somebody that doesn't yak on his cell phone in public.

    Well, perhaps you have a higher tolerance for this kind of crap than I do, and you are cetainly entitled to your opinion, but my suggestion is that society is hard enough to deal with given the amount of technology that is causing people to be alienated from one another, isolated in their own little worlds, without having to deal with overt rudeness. Personal conversations belong in personal space and don't have to be at the highest volumen possible if they are to be conducted in public.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:Very Offtopic (was: Re:Of course this means...) by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's not doing me physical harm, but since I am pretty much trapped, being I have a long commute on crowded trains, is it it too much to ask for people to be courteous, keep the conversation short and quiet, and give others a chance at some peace?

      If the person next to you is doing one of those things, perhaps you should try asking, politely of course, for them to keep it down a bit? The fact that city dwellers treat each other as mindless zombies you shouldn't make any contact with, vocal, visual, or otherwise is probably part of the reason people have retreated to the comfort of their electronic devices in the first place.

      Then why do you read Slashdot? Actually I'm sick of other people bitching about my bitching. Free country, what?

      I like bitching. :) Where better to do it?

    2. Re:Very Offtopic (was: Re:Of course this means...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try doing that on a NYC subway train and see how long you live.

  29. Eco-Friendly? by spud603 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    FTFA:
    What Soucy and MTI CEO Peng Lim envision is a world where instead of recharging your phone's battery, you'll buy disposable fuel cells that last longer than the batteries that come with cell phones today and are more eco-friendly.
    I'm not sure exactly how this is supposed to be more eco-friendly. A disposable cartridge system rather than a rechargeable battery? OK, maybe fuel cells can get a somewhat higher fuel efficiency than centralized generation and transmission to individual buildings. But then take into account the energy it takes to make the special enclosure for the cartridges, then to pump them full of methanol. This would need to happen for each cartridge. Plus, carbon-based fuels get more expensive and the power companies start relying more on wind/solar technologies, this tech will still need to use 100% carbon fuel to run at all. Just 'cause it says `fuel cell' does not mean it is `eco-friendly.'

  30. -Ethanol- powered fuel cell! by mbstone · · Score: 1

    I want an ethanol-fueled PDA-cell-phone-combination with integral hip flask. Just unscrew the antenna and imbibe. Thash not a swizzle stick, Ofisher, thash my stylus!

  31. Paying the fuel bill vs. paying the light bill by tepples · · Score: 1

    The difference is that when you unplug them, one of them will be recharged, the other will require you to buy more stuff before you can use your laptop without plugging it in again.

    With a fuel cell, you have to pay the fuel bill. With recharging from mains power, you have to pay the light bill at each location where you plan on recharging.

    1. Re:Paying the fuel bill vs. paying the light bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but there are many "free" available power-outlets in public places (yeah, yeah ...stealing 3 cents worth of electricitiy is wrong...) and I can recharge fairly easily.
      Want to make a guess about how cheap the methanol cartridges will be at your local corner store or airport convenience outlet? Probably a minimum of a couple of dollars.

      Fuel cells, although cheaper to produce, will have a HUGE profit margin and thus manufacturers will be pushing to put them in everywhere.
      Nevermind that we already have electrical infrastructure everywhere already...

  32. Replaceable fuelcell vs. traditional battery - ??? by CFD339 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, so if I read TFA correctly, what we're really talking about here amounts to a battery with a different type of chemistry and slightly more complex internal structure. I don't see a promise of easy home re-use and re-charge necessarily in the TFA. In fact, it indicates the potential market for "...as many as 80 million fuel-cell cartridges" by 2012.

    Seems to me, that "fuel-cell cartridges" == batteries for all intents and purposes. Given that, the issues that will need to be raised are the same as those of batteries now. Will they be made in standard sizes, or will we have to pay a premium for the model used by each manufacturer? Compare this to ink-jet printer cartridges. They all pretty much do the same thing. We are forced to buy a unique one for each manufacturer and printer. They purposely make them different from each other even within the same vendor, so that small competitors cannot have the manufacturing capability to produce a full product line without huge startup costs. The result is that we pay a huge premium for the name brand or one of the few aftermarket versions, or go through hell refilling them.

    Be careful here. Calling it a fuel cell doesn't mean you can carry around a bottle of ethyl alcohol and refill it yourself. It also doesn't mean you can go to the local convenience store and buy a stockpile of size AAA from one of a dozen competing companies. The business model that makes HP and Epson so much money now was copied from Gillette. Don't think for a second these guys won't try to go the same way.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  33. No Boom Today by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Interesting
    that will be powered by Direct Methanol Fuel Cells.

    I've heard of exploding batteries in mobile devices. I really hate to think about what the result will be if we end up with exploding fuel cells as well some day.

    Of course I also wonder if your cell phone will be able to double as your lighter as well now.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  34. Because we can... by Chr0nik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is rediculous. Thin film batteries are just around the corner, with a solid state electrolyte, they retain no memory, charge extremely fast, are cheap, high capacity, cannot break and leak chemicals, gas, or boil, and are paper thin to boot.

    A fuel-cell powered cell phone would be the perfect example of "because we can" technology. Completely pointless, with little or no practicality, doesn't really advance anything, but it's cool as hell.

    --


    ... what did you expect, something profound?
    1. Re:Because we can... by SysKoll · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Whoah, not so fast. What's the energy density of thin-film batteries? Do they favorably compare against methanol fuel cells? If yes, they will obviously take over once available for cheap. If not, they might replace other battery types.

      Battery technology is not a one-size-fits-all. There are many different applications and many different technologies can survive in the market.

      --

      --
      Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

  35. Missed the point... by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think his point was that it's a pain in the rear to carry around extra "fuel" or to make a trip to buy some, when electrical outlets are pretty ubiquitous.

    It's also worth noting that these fuel cells had better standardize on their "fuel" sooner than later, cuz I don't want to have to try to pick out the right one from a rack of 70 different types. In that respect, I fear that they'll very closely resemble batteries. Only instead of AA, AAA, C, D, I'll have to pick from words that look like they came from the ingredient list of a processed food packet.

    Remember, kids - if you can't pronounce it, don't eat it.

    1. Re:Missed the point... by Firehed · · Score: 1
      And chances are that using the wrong one is going to cause a lot more problems than picking up a DVD-R when you needed +R media. Hell, I'm in the ubergeek sector and video industry and I can't figure out the difference.

      And I can pronounce a lot of things I shouldn't eat. Arsenic, cyanide, bleach, battery acid and katanas to name a few. Unfortunately, I haven't the slightest clue whether the pyridoxine hydrochloride or cyanocobalamin in my Powerade are healthy, unlike the previous set.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    2. Re:Missed the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wuss. I used to eat four to five katanas a DAY. Man, people nowadays are such pansies...

    3. Re:Missed the point... by shawb · · Score: 1

      Pyridoxine hydrochloride: Pyridoxine is vitamin B6. The hydrochloride is tacked on as a salt to make it possible to absorb through the digestive tract. Good for you. Then again, that's not that hard to pronounce. Peer eh docks een.

      Cyanocobalamin... I thnk that's another B vitamin. Quick google search reveals B12. Just because the word is scary doesn't mean the compound is.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    4. Re:Missed the point... by Ninjaesque+One · · Score: 0

      Yes; I used to down a couple of gallons of pure botulism toxin every other hour or so. They only inject it into their faces, nowadays.

      --
      Ninjas and pirates. How piquant.
  36. The dangers of motorcycles... by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Have you looked at the design of a motorcycle recently?

    Fuel tank wedged between your legs, 20 litres of highly explosive fuel less than an inch from your bollocks.

    Directly beneath said 20 litre tank of highly explosive fuel we have the engine, on a modern 600cc sportsbike we're talking about somewhere around 100bhp or around 75kW and that's at the crank. Say the engine is a not unreasonable 25% efficient, the "waste heat" output of the engine is 225kW. Yeah that's clever... placing a 225kW heater directly under the fuel tank. Way to go.

    Actually the biggest problem is t-boning a muppet who hasn't seen you, that is the biggest risk of riding a bike and most of the heat's piped down the exhaust. It's amazing how risk averse some people are, they have no idea what the biggest risks are.

    --
    Deleted
  37. So when I fill up my car... by just_forget_it · · Score: 1

    Will the hydrogen station have a tiny little methanol pump, so I can fill my cell phone? What kind of exhaust pipe will the phone have? Will we start seeing 17-year-olds holding cell phones with wacky paint jobs, spoilers, and coffee-can mufflers?

  38. Re:Replaceable fuelcell vs. traditional battery - by corerunner · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You have raised an EXCELLENT point!

    TFA states that MTI has arrangements with Gillette (who owns Duracell), which "is helping MTI Micro create a retail and distribution business for a market in disposable fuel cells." They also claim the market could demand up to 80 million units annually.

    I've heard plenty about fuel cell cartridges while working in the power electronics research industry, but have yet to see any prototypes until your post inspired me to search. DMFCC has a photo on their home page of their prototype fuel cell cartridges, and judging from the style of container they could be fairly interchangeable.

    In the end consumers will be at the mercy of decisions made by these large corporations, so one can only hope that standards will fall into place before too long.

    --
    "Don't hate the media, become the media." -Jello Biafra
  39. Electricity costs money by tepples · · Score: 1

    At home you are already paying an electric bill. Why would you want to spend MORE money to power your phone?

    Are you sure it would in fact be more money once fuel cell technology matures?

    At work you aren't even paying the electric bill.

    No, but your employer is, and if your work cell phone is fuel cell powered, and fuel cell turns out to be cheaper or lower-maintenance than buying a battery and charging it from a DC adapter, then guess what your employer will go for.

  40. whoop-de-friggin-doo by MooseTick · · Score: 1

    So the article states another among a long list of companies is working on a Fuel-Cell Powered device. Nothing has been made yet, not even a prototype. This is news?

    This just in...
    I'm working on a fuel cell device in my garage.

  41. GASP!!!!! by LOADLETTER · · Score: 0

    Well - who doesn't???? /Cell phone designer

  42. Re:But what I really want to know about these cell by JourneymanMereel · · Score: 1

    Unless I'm missing something, Mythbusters don't do a 'trick my ride' type of thing. You'd have to encompass it into an urban legend.

    "There's a myth that you can power your automobile with a fuel cell powered phone... what do you think Jamie, is it gonna happen?"

    --
    Life has many choices. Eternity has two. What's yours?
  43. I last heard about it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...2 days ago.

    Quote:
    http://www.int.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_ id=115&art_id=iol114776777396S315

    --

    May 16 2006 at 12:04PM

    Sao Paulo - At least five mobile phones have exploded over the last two months in Brazil, causing anxiety among phone users and making news headlines.

    The incidents, representing only a fraction of the 89 million phones in circulation in Brazil, all involved Motorola phones.

    The company said it was investigating and Brazil's telecommunication agency is pursuing the case as well.

    In the most recent incident on April 30, the 34-year-old victim in Formosa, Goias state, had surgery for burns on her thighs and arms.

    She was driving with the phone in her lap when it exploded.

    Other accidents since the beginning of April were reported in Rio de Janeiro and three cities in Sao Paulo state.

    Motorola said the probable cause of the explosion was that the owners used non-original or low-quality batteries.

    --

    Hasn't happened in a while? I think it has.

    ~kainino

  44. Unfortunate side effect of fuel cell cell phones by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    They leak water when they ring in your pocket.

    Think about it.

    "Is your cell phone in your shirt pocket or are you just drooling?"

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  45. Just a Rumor? by epp_b · · Score: 1

    So those stories about cell phones exploding at gas pumps may true after all!

  46. Why not use ethanol? by bigtrike · · Score: 1

    Ethanol requires a much larger volume to reach toxicity. For "safety" reasons it could be flavored to taste terrible, perhaps like Mountain Dew.

    1. Re:Why not use ethanol? by shawb · · Score: 1

      I personally think you are on the wrong track here.

      In order to guarantee our safety, the fuel should be heated over a peat fire and then stored in quality oaken casks. Preferably for a minimum of 12 years, although 15 years would be a better bet. While this safety measure will result in a much greater time to market, this results in a far more effective product for short trips. Longer trips can be fueled with more inexpensive alternatives.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  47. Looks to me like by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

    Brazil already has these

    --
    What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
  48. Woot! by DrXym · · Score: 1

    I've had shares in MTI for over a year now only to watch them wallow along in a display of volatile but slowly sinking value. A 30% boost is just what I like to see though it still doesn't cover what I forked out for them. If this bears fruit, then I might just have something to show from my investment.

  49. What we need... by dimension6 · · Score: 1

    ...are fuel-cell powered AC outlets, which will cerainly result in cost-savings!

  50. Re:But what I really want to know about these cell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, it was a joke.

    Second, if you are trying to stick to a budget for whatever reason (I.E. I want to save X number of dollars in Y amount of time) and your costs increase in one area without a concordant increase in income, then costs have to be cut in another area. So... if the price of gas goes up by $50 a month, and their cell phone bill is $50 a month and the person figures they can go without a cell phone (We'll assume they already have a land line) then guess what... no more cell phone.

    And besides, people shouldn't be driving and talking on the phone anyways.

  51. Re:Replaceable fuelcell vs. traditional battery - by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    The result is that we pay a huge premium for the name brand or one of the few aftermarket versions, or go through hell refilling them.

    anyone tried one of theese "continuous ink flow system" kits that feeds the printer directly from big bottles of ink?

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  52. Instead, wind up to recharge your phone. by spage · · Score: 1

    Instead of paying "Samsung Fuel Cell Co" $5 every time your phone runs low, get a hand-cranked mini generator to charge up your phone (and radio, and portable lights). One-time payment, then it runs off junk food forever. But there's no recurring revenue stream for Samsung, Duracell, Energizer, etc., hence you don't see these promoted.

    --
    =S
  53. forget the laptops... by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

    ...show me the tools!

    Laptop and cell phone battery life and performance do affect a lot of people, but what's given me the most grief is batteries for power tools. They're quirky, the companies discontinue them after a few years forcing you to buy new tools, and some tools are so power-hungry they run through 'em in minutes. Give a cordless circular saw an alcohol fuel cell and a 1/2 liter tank and contractors will snap them up by the thousands.