Slashdot Mirror


It's Yahoo Plus eBay vs. Google

Octagon Most writes "Yahoo and eBay have announced a broad partnership in their efforts to compete against Google and Microsoft." From the article: "In addition, Yahoo Web search features will be integrated into a co-branded version of the eBay toolbar, and the companies said they would explore developing 'click-to-call' ad technologies on their respective Web sites. 'Click-to-call' provides a link inside an advertisement that allows consumers to directly call the advertiser to pursue a transaction."

113 comments

  1. Ad wars, shmad wars by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's all pretty irrelevant to me how hard these companies are working for my eyeballs. I don't even use the internet.

    1. Re:Ad wars, shmad wars by neonprimetime · · Score: 0

      Me neither ... I just use my pc for email and Slashdot ... but I don't use the Internet.

    2. Re:Ad wars, shmad wars by Poltras · · Score: 1

      What's this Internet thing you're talking about?

    3. Re:Ad wars, shmad wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know...AOL

    4. Re:Ad wars, shmad wars by bxbaser · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think its some type of pornography

    5. Re:Ad wars, shmad wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure -- but I've heard you can get it on CD ROM.

  2. eBay on Google by goldaryn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This begs the question: have eBay now stopped (or stemmed at least) their ubiquitous Google search ad campaign? I did a few quick searches and didn't see as many eBay links as usual...

    1. Re:eBay on Google by maotx · · Score: 0, Troll

      This begs the question: have eBay now stopped (or stemmed at least) their ubiquitous Google search ad campaign?

      No, it is still there.

      --
      I'm a virgo and on Slashdot. Coincidence? Yes.
    2. Re:eBay on Google by christopherfinke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I heard an interesting statistic yesterday regarding this method of advertising: eBay is the single largest buyer of search terms for these search engine ads; apparently they have bought ads for 15 million different search terms. (Although I'm not sure why they want to target people looking for outcasts...)

    3. Re:eBay on Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't beg the question, it raises it.

    4. Re:eBay on Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It doesn't beg anything. It raises the question.

      http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/begs.html

    5. Re:eBay on Google by D+H+NG · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ads with the label "aff" are not made by eBay themselves, but by their "affiliates" (ie. people who get a percentage for each sale).

    6. Re:eBay on Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha, that is humor at its finest!

    7. Re:eBay on Google by Kelson · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why they want to target people looking for outcasts...

      Or Nigerian scams.

      My old theory was that they had a blanket deal on two-word combinations, until I found some combos that didn't show an ebay ad.

      Now I think they dumped the contents of a spellcheck dictionary, removed the obvious bad ideas, and submitted it as their keyword list.

  3. AN interesting question... by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 4, Funny

    If eBay dies and they decide to auction off the assets, how would they do it without themselves? Juast another paradox...

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:AN interesting question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess they'd have to use Yahoo! Auctions http://auctions.yahoo.com/

  4. attn bargain hunters by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I think the threat of Microsoft and eBay to Google is overstated CNBC hype and that the stock market is overreacting to this. Keep in mind that Google's fundamentals include a 65 price to earnings ratio, the improvement of which has exceeded their market cap's growth, and has a one-year projection of under thirty. A 65 P/E is pretty good for a company whose revenues tend to double a lot. Even more impressive, GOOG's earnings-per-share is almost five times that of MSFT's and eight times eBay's. Regarding brand power, you can count on MicroEBay not making it into the dictionary.

    When news like this hits and people start selling their GOOG shares, scoop them up because the price has solid support in the fundamentals.

    1. Re:attn bargain hunters by Xichekolas · · Score: 1

      Uh... shush... don't give everyone the same idea!

      Besides, it is Yahoo and eBay teaming up... Microsoft is doing their own thing as usual, since Yahoo rejected their offer to partner up a while back. So the new word in the dictionary will either be Yahbay or eHoo... I'm voting on eHoo... that could totally be a verb. Go eHoo it!

      Yahbay sounds like something a yak would say...

      --

      Self-referential Sigs are cool on /. these days...

      54

    2. Re:attn bargain hunters by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Google's fundamentals include a 65 price to earnings ratio...When news like this hits and people start selling their GOOG shares, scoop them up because the price has solid support in the fundamentals.
      But you may want to think about this
      [a P/E ratio of] 28+ - A company whose shares have a very high P/E either really does have an exceptionally rosy future or the stock may be the subject of a speculative bubble.
      A high P/E ratio may *reflect* a company's good fundamentals (e.g. high expected revenue growth, innovative business model, great workforce), but it's silly to say that it is in itself a fundamental.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:attn bargain hunters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. Go ahead, piss away your cash on goog. Hope you're not one of the tens of thousands left holding the bag later.
       
        price has solid support in the fundamentals
       
      LOL OMFG! That was even cuter than a pony. Dude, I don't think you're a shill because you don't even come off as intelligent enough to be one.
       
      Love those google/apple/oss fanbois.

    4. Re:attn bargain hunters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you smell bad.

    5. Re:attn bargain hunters by CaymanIslandCarpedie · · Score: 4, Informative

      WARNING!!!! Above is a good example of why you should never take stock tips from the internet! Lets just take a look at a couple of my favorite nuggets ;-)

      Keep in mind that Google's fundamentals include a 65 price to earnings ratio, the improvement of which has exceeded their market cap's growth........Even more impressive, GOOG's earnings-per-share is almost five times that of MSFT's

      OK, first about the P/E ratio. The above makes it sound like a high P/E ratio is a quality you should look for in attractive investments. DON'T DO THAT!!!!! The P/E ratio is basically how much you have to pay for $1 in earnings. Its price per share over earnings per share. So a high P/E means your paying more for each $1 in earnings. The next confusing part is about Goggle's earnings-per-share being almost 5x's what MS has. While that is true, it is completly meaningless by itself. To put it in perspective Google's earnings-per-share (eps) IS just over 4.5x MS's (eps). However, since Google's stock price is over 16x what MS's is you are paying over 16x the price to earn 4.5x more per share.

      I am not here to make any recommendations on any stock, but the above is just complete non-sense. A stock with a high P/E ratio could be a great investment (as could a stock with a low P/E). The thing to remember a high P/E ratio generally relates to higher risk. The higher the the P/E ratio the higher expectations the market has for the stock. Now its easy to see that and think "well if the market has that high of expectations, it must be a good investment!" but you must remember (as the P/E ratio points out) those expectations are already factored into the stocks current price. So for the stock to raise, the company has to surpass those already high expectations. However, if the company has completely amazing results but still don't quite match expectations then the stock will dip (or fall).

      Another MAJOR thing to consider when looking at any stock in the internet search sector is the expectations (and thus current stock price and P/E ratio) aren't completly based on "who will win" type questions between Google, MS, Yahoo, etc. A large portion of those expectations for each company is based on the forcasted growth of the entire sector. The forcasts are really amazing and that points for good times for companies in that sector but again introduces risk for an investment in any company in that sector. I forget the exact numbers but just for an example lets say its forcasted that spending on on-line advertising has 10x todays number being spent annually by 2010. Now lets say Google wipes everyone else off the board and is the lone on-line ad provider by 2008. Now thats great news, but if in the interm the forcasted growth for the sector just isn't meeting expectations you could still see a drop in Googles price because expecations as a whole aren't being met.

      OK the sample scenerio is a bit ridiculous, but it does hopefully show the complexity of the market and the types of things which must be considered in contrast of the original posters wacked out ideas about the market ;-)

      --
      "reality has a well-known liberal bias" - Steven Colbert
    6. Re:attn bargain hunters by danpsmith · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, but if I were to trust you I wouldn't take stock tips from the Internet, including your own...

      Just another paradox.

      --
      Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
  5. If Yahoo and Google want to make me happy... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...they can stop trying to install toolbars into my frickin' web browser. No, I don't want another upteenth widget that reduces my vertical viewing area, I don't want your special Yahoo! browser bundled with Internet service, and I don't want you to install your toolbar when all I want is desktop search! Someone stop the insanity!

    That's my opinion, anyway. I'm sure there are those people out there who looooove their toolbars.

    1. Re:If Yahoo and Google want to make me happy... by shawb · · Score: 1

      And most of all, I really don't want the spyware associated with your toolbar.

      I guess my days of purchasing off Ebay may be just about over.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    2. Re:If Yahoo and Google want to make me happy... by lawpoop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "I'm sure there are those people out there who looooove their toolbars."

      I doubt it. I think it's people who don't understand computers that well, and wait on the genius computer experts to give them the next great computer thing that will make their lives happier. Right now the answer is the toolbar.

      Most people don't understand computers well enough to apprehend the potential. They can't fully understand the UI problems they face, and therefore they also can't think of creative solutions to those problems.

      So the management of companies like Yahoo! and eBay, in the effort to increase marketshare and make more money, tell their developers to create newer and better toolbars, which are just devices to improve the marketshare of the toolbar owners. Mom & Pop computer users hear about the great new toolbars that are in the pipeline, and think all their problems will be solved in short order.

      We are still in the glow of the vast communications improvements that computers have afforded the average person -- email, websites, online banking. That revolution hasn't yet been fully co-opted by marketers who aren't making new revolutionary technology, but instead just fight for existing marketshare. So people still see computers as having the potential to revolutionize their life, and haven't yet become jaded to the constant barrage of marketing and sales pitches that will eventually take over computers, too.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    3. Re:If Yahoo and Google want to make me happy... by loconet · · Score: 1

      I agree. These flood of useless toolbars seems like the the new lame excuse for a poor business plan. Give up Yahoo/Ebay! We don't want them. Heck, I don't even care for Google's.

      --
      [alk]
    4. Re:If Yahoo and Google want to make me happy... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess my days of purchasing off Ebay may be just about over.

      Why? Who says you need an eBay or Yahoo toolbar to buy (or sell) stuff on eBay? Unless eBay or Yahoo absolutely require the installation of such software (not likely, since requiring such software usually prevents some class of users from being able to use the service) there's nothing that says you have to accept their spyware.

    5. Re:If Yahoo and Google want to make me happy... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I have no use for the yahoo toolbar but I do have the google toolbar in my firefox. Well, part of it anyway... I'm using google's search box/button and the autofill button. I've moved them to my other toolbars, so I can use them without wasting space. I also have the web developer toolbar, and leave it displayed constantly, because I'm frequently poking around the source of other sites than my own. (Obviously... MINE looks like crap. Getting assigned the website at work and not having broadband at home can have that effect.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:If Yahoo and Google want to make me happy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you can just get a new monitor on Ebay that will let you have 1500% more toolbars on your screen!

    7. Re:If Yahoo and Google want to make me happy... by ZeroEpoch · · Score: 0

      I am glad that I'm not the only one who hates those toolbars.

    8. Re:If Yahoo and Google want to make me happy... by big+dumb+dog · · Score: 1

      Right on! Down with toolbars! Power to the people!

      ...I have some PTO saved up, anyone want to have a march or a sit-in?

      --
      "Seven years of college down the drain. Might as well join the f-ing Peace Corps." - John 'Bluto' Blutarsky
    9. Re:If Yahoo and Google want to make me happy... by mojine · · Score: 1

      toolbars are strictly for tools...

      --
      "It's not how many people I've killed - it's how I get along with the ones that are still alive."
  6. What will they name it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yabay or eHoo?

    1. Re:What will they name it? by PFI_Optix · · Score: 2

      Yahoo + eBay = YeHay. For ease of use, they will instead merge the sites and call the new entity YEHAW!

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    2. Re:What will they name it? by soundoff · · Score: 1, Funny

      This is 2006, and these guys have seen Nintendo's press attention.

      It'll be "Eoo", pronounced "You". Because the internet is all about you.

      Then Livejournal will want to get in on the action, and they'll merge and call it "Eoola", pronounced "EULA". Then Sony will sue, claiming theft of brand identity and loss of profits.

    3. Re:What will they name it? by lordmoose · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting for GooTube

    4. Re:What will they name it? by SlackLagg · · Score: 1

      I would totally use eHoo just on principle of the name.

    5. Re:What will they name it? by Spike_cb · · Score: 1

      yabai and aho ? That's "oh shit!" and "idiot".

      =Spike=

    6. Re:What will they name it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't 'aho' kansai-ben?

    7. Re:What will they name it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eWho!?

    8. Re:What will they name it? by rHBa · · Score: 1

      boo hoo :(

    9. Re:What will they name it? by Evro · · Score: 1

      I read the headline as Yahoo + Ebay + Google and instantly thought "YeBagle".

      --
      rooooar
  7. Heh.. by goldaryn · · Score: 5, Funny

    TFA: Yahoo and eBay said they do not expect the partnership to have a material impact on their financial results this year.

    Expect a statement soon from Google saying they agree :-)

    1. Re:Heh.. by rs79 · · Score: 1

      " TFA: Yahoo and eBay said they do not expect the partnership to have a material impact on their financial results this year.

      Expect a statement soon from Google saying they agree :-)
      "

      Translation: Aww goog, just buy us, it's better than rolling your own. Please?
      Goog: We only buy things that work. Go away.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
  8. IE Only? by BiggyP · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And do they plan to continue confusing ebay users into sticking with Internet Explorer and leaving them more at risk than users without the false sense of security offered by the Ebay toolbar?

    1. Re:IE Only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its sort of funny that you point out IE when Firefox has just as much if not more vulnerabilities as of late than Internet Exploder

    2. Re:IE Only? by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

      That may be so, but Firefox isn't an integral part of the OS so its vulnerabilities are a lot lower risk (typically)

      Not to mention IE loses a lot of points for its utter failure to comply to web standards.

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    3. Re:IE Only? by BiggyP · · Score: 1

      Well that and FF vulnerabilities have this tendency to get fixed in a timely fashion.

  9. I'm rooting for Google by CokeBear · · Score: 1, Funny

    Google is one of the good guys (along with Apple and Nintendo). Always will root for the good guys over evil such as Microsoft, Sony, Yahoo et al.
    (Yes, I know I see the world in black and white)

    --
    Reality has a liberal bias
    1. Re:I'm rooting for Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on what? Google seems like a very young Microsoft, except that they're in the age of the Internet, whereas MS was before the widespread use of computers.

    2. Re:I'm rooting for Google by damiam · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What exactly makes Google less evil than Yahoo? I like Google too, but there's really not that much of a moral difference. Sure, Yahoo caved in to the Chinese thought police, but then again so did Google.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    3. Re:I'm rooting for Google by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

      The really sad thing is how many people are going to miss the humor in this post :(

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    4. Re:I'm rooting for Google by donutello · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People want a Good (tm) hero to root for. Google is the closest they can find.

      They have "Don't be Evil" in their corporate manifesto. The rest is mostly idealization by their fans. Google has been smart with their PR not doing too much blatant (Chinese censorship was their lone misstep here) to violate the image built up by some.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    5. Re:I'm rooting for Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nintendo isn't evil? People might be overwhelmed with nostalgia nowadays, but their stranglehold on developers in the NES-generation was pure evil. They crippled the competition, and used that monopoly to release clearly inferior hardware with a high defect rate. Sometime in the countless hours of my life wasted trying to get that console to properly run a game, I thought I noticed [Made In Hell] stamped in the plastic....

    6. Re:I'm rooting for Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google seems like a very young Microsoft
      No, a very young Micro-Soft sent cease-and-desist letters (containing typos, mind you, that's professionalism) to college clubs (who thought it was ridiculous to pay the price of a PS3 just for the software to run basic), and claimed that the hobbyist community would never be able to develop their own software, so they must rely on corporations...

      Google has donated hundreds of thousands of dollars (if not more) to open source. That's different.

    7. Re:I'm rooting for Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google will eventually suck. As they get bigger and need more money they will add more crap on their site. they will have to find more ways to sqeeze more cash out per person. I call this the get big and suck paradigm.

    8. Re:I'm rooting for Google by MrCopilot · · Score: 1
      --
      OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
    9. Re:I'm rooting for Google by eraser.cpp · · Score: 1

      It's pretty obvious actually, Google is run by nerds. The founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin are University dreamers and not cut-throat businessmen. Everybody touts that Google, like any other major corporation, must be vicious. I don't entirely disagree, I'm sure that Google will defend its bottom line. At the moment however the company is quite profitable, and is producing some great products.

  10. Amen! by mpapet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Partnership" means flashing ebay ads in the Yahoo toolbar. Phuleeze!

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  11. Click-to-call... Hmm... by pla · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Click-to-call' provides a link inside an advertisement that allows consumers to directly call the advertiser to pursue a transaction."

    As opposed to, say, providing a phone number right in the ad that people could call, which an actual human will then answer?

    Oh, No! I'd much rather give them my phone number and have them call me back, thereby establishing a "relationship" and exempting them from the DNC list.

    Riiiiiight...

    1. Re:Click-to-call... Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that how it works? I thought the ad itself would dial using some VoIP type tech

    2. Re:Click-to-call... Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but you're likely establishing the relationship with the Advertisement agency, which will then have all of their customers call you... :-)

    3. Re:Click-to-call... Hmm... by bob_herrick · · Score: 1

      Just a guess, but perhaps Skype has a role in this?

    4. Re:Click-to-call... Hmm... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Funny

      You know what would be even better? If, when you clicked on an ad you were interested in, you were taken to the "INTERWEB HTTP SITE" of the advertiser, so you could "pursue a transaction" in the same medium you're currently engaged in, instead of having to switch to talking on the phone.

      I'm surprised no one has tried implementing such a "hot link"-based system yet.

    5. Re:Click-to-call... Hmm... by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      Indeed, that seemed tailor-made for Skype (which eBay owns).

    6. Re:Click-to-call... Hmm... by senatorpjt · · Score: 1

      Don't people generally buy stuff on the internet so they can avoid having to talk to some salesman on the phone?

      I certainly don't miss the endless "Is that C as in Charlie, or E as in Echo?" bullshit I have to go through every time I have to do some phone transaction with a business that hasn't made it to the 90's yet.

  12. yahoo!!! no, really, yahoo!!! by MrSquirrel · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Another fun bar to add to my bro... oh wait, I use Firefox (not to mention I'm not a case of PEBKAC). I rarely see the situation where this could be remotely helpful (as in, I would rather take the few seconds to look up the number via the hundreds of online phonebooks then to have an ugly bar clunking up my interface). E-bay and Yahoo, please dispose of bars in the proper location, your... well... you know.

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
  13. does this mean... by amazon10x · · Score: 1
    Yahoo and eBay have announced a broad partnership in their efforts to compete against Google and Microsoft.

    Does this mean Google and Microsoft will now form a broad partnership to take on their new, consolidated, streamlined enemies?

  14. Fees? by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does this mean that Yahoo! will start raising it's fees every 3 months and making its sites work better if you have an Intel processor?

    1. Re:Fees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, moron, it means they will start bitching about Steve Jobs all the time like you do...

  15. YahBay vs. Microsoft vs. Google by TrueXtremeIcon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is reminding me of some DBZ style stuff now. Everytime someone gets extremely powerful towards the later episodes, it comes down to two of the other characters merging together into one being who is all their power combined. YahBay is the internet business equivalent to Gogeta (Goku + Vegeta)

    --
    T-X-I
    1. Re:YahBay vs. Microsoft vs. Google by Kuukai · · Score: 1

      No, Gogeta was strong and cool. It's more like what would happen if Mr. Satan fused with King Kai: Fat, annoying, and utterly useless.

      --
      Sendou Wave Kick!!
    2. Re:YahBay vs. Microsoft vs. Google by orielbean · · Score: 1

      Is this like the Power Rangers? Is global conglomeration the equivalent of Megatron?

    3. Re:YahBay vs. Microsoft vs. Google by Alzheimers · · Score: 1
  16. mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    interesting comment would buy form agian A++++++++++

  17. What do you mean? Giving them nothing by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Oh, No! I'd much rather give them my phone number and have them call me back, thereby establishing a "relationship" and exempting them from the DNC list.

    What the hell are you talking about? Why would you not prefer to click on any ad that comes up through Yahoo, or a listing you've looked up through Yahoo yellow pages, and call a business through skype with no number that be traced or ID'ed back to you and thus provides no means to form a business relationship with your "real" number?

    The situation and use for this is exactly the opposite of what you fear.

    With this partnership the eBay purchase of Skype makes way more sense.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  18. Re:yahoo!!! no, really, yahoo!!! by jpling · · Score: 1

    Unless the toolbar offers me remote service to my refrigerator, it is useless.

    --
    jappleng.com - News best served with breakfast.
  19. Tool bars how lame is that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Just put this on your home page.
    You do have a home page, as a file on your desktop?

    <form action=http://www.google.com/search>
    Google: <input name=as_q >
            <input type=hidden name=num value=50 >
            <input type=hidden name=hl value=en >
            <input type=submit value=Google>:
    </form>

  20. It's a matter of degree by FhnuZoag · · Score: 1

    Well, Google is censoring its own output, but Yahoo is actually sending people to jail. While Google's crime is not fighting the power and keeping its own mouth shut to abuses, Yahoo shows a more active collaboration, and so is more evil.

    In Godwinny terms, Google represents the ordinary Germans who turned a blind eye to the Nazi regime, while Yahoo represents the slimeballs who reported their neighbours for hiding Jews, or being disloyal to the regime.

    1. Re:It's a matter of degree by everphilski · · Score: 1

      They are both just "following orders" ...

      One of them (google) attempts to aggregate my life and store it indefinitely. The other does not. I'll let you gues which one I think is evil.

  21. Ah, just all merge dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then I can use Yahooglebay, which will possibly be up against by WalMicramazaolsoft. Maybe Apple could join in and then we can all use Yapplhooglebay - all the best bits together as one happy family of fun...
     
    If only it was this simple...

  22. Click to call by ronanbear · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Doesn't really seem like too bad an idea to me. There are plenty of times where calling is much faster and more effective than web or email based requests. Since ebay own skype it might be handy to be able to instantly call businesses through skype. You could talk to ebay sellers (If they want to include that option) to sort out product details and shipping etc. quickly. Another option would be yellow pages style ads where a local restaurent would have a facility to call and make a reservation from their website or ad. Many restaurants aren't bothered with web based reservation systems (and rightly so). Sure I can order a pizza online or check if a DVD is in stock but sometimes a phone call is just easier. It's usually much faster.

    --
    the more they over-think the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the pipe
    1. Re:Click to call by lamber45 · · Score: 1

      I'd rather they just list tel:// URLs in messages and webpages where appropriate, but integration is a good thing. I haven't signed up for Skype because, between Yahoo!, MSN, ICQ and my cell phone, there are already too many ways to contact me instantly. Besides, I just use gaim for 90% of my IMing anyway...

  23. What about yahoo auctions? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know reporters don't have the time or energy to research and just cut-and-paste press releases, but why would they 'write' this article without even *mentioning* yahoo auctions? Is it staying? Going? Yahoo auctions have less restrictions than eBay - For example I can buy cigars on Yahoo, which I can't do on eBay.

  24. Googlezon by StarEmperor · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Googlezon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw. You beat me to it.

      Good game.

  25. If my math is correct... by dr_dank · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yahoo plus eBay vs Google = Zombo.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  26. Re:What do you mean? Giving them nothing by pla · · Score: 3, Informative

    What the hell are you talking about?

    How they actually implement this. As in, I read more than the FP summary and discovered how it really works.

    You click the link. It asks for your phone number. You enter your phone number. Someone calls you. As the basic premise, you don't need to go through a menu system to get to a human (admittedly good), and don't need to pay LD charges for the call (does anyone not have unlimited LD these days?).


    Why would you not prefer to [...] call a business through skype with no number that be traced or ID'ed back to you

    First, consider what percentage of people use VOIP, nevermind Skype specifically (yeah, like EBay would support Vonage for this?). Do you really think they plan to spend a good bit of PR-allocated money to target less than one percent of their market?

    Second, if you consider VOIP even remotely "anonymous", I have a bridge to sell to you.

  27. Join the queue by linvir · · Score: 4, Funny
    Seriously, just how many companies have joined forces into pairs to defeat Google by now? It's getting old already.

    And Yahoo can keep eBay for all I care. eBay's ads are irrelevant bullshit, and don't fit in with Google's stricter relevancy for other companies. I posted this image a while back (so if you must mod this up, make it Funny so I don't get karma from the same thing twice) , though it's not exclusively eBay.

    One thing though - I can see it being a loss for Google. I bet that it's a pretty sweet deal they have there, using eBay links as filler when no more relevant ads are available.

    1. Re:Join the queue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      RTFA. Yahoo is only getting exclusivity for ebay's graphic ads.

  28. eHo is better! by drewzhrodague · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think just shortening it as eHo would be better. Soudns like a porn site!

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  29. TO HELL WITH YAHOO! by transami · · Score: 0

    Yahoo sucks! They deleted all my mail! Then said I would have to pay a monthly fee if I wanted to protect it from deletion in the future. Word of warning: you have 90 days to check your email or they delete it. And logging into YAHOO itself doesn't count --you have to actually go into your email (appearently that was my "mistake").

    I would like to sue them. I had very important emails backed up their and I purposfully made an effort to log into Yahoo every so often to ensure they stayed there. Now there gone for ever! *very mad*

    --
    :T:R:A:N:S:
    1. Re:TO HELL WITH YAHOO! by linvir · · Score: 0, Redundant
      Wow, it's kinda unfair that my spam-filled scammer honeypot address on Yahoo survives to this day, despite near inactivity, and your important mail got deleted on you...

      Come to think of it, I don't see how this post will help you or cheer you up at all.

    2. Re:TO HELL WITH YAHOO! by MobilityLead · · Score: 1

      All of my critical and important e-mails, that I waited over 90 days to read, were deleted as well. I mean really...what's the big fat hurry Yahoo!?

  30. MOD AC PARENT UP by linvir · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up (no, not my post, the AC). He's right. I'm a big moron. I yield to his incredible knowledge of TFA.

  31. Zombo Trumps All! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weeeelcome to Zombocaahmmm.

    Achieve the impossible...at Zombocaahmmm.

  32. Where did you read that from? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    You click the link. It asks for your phone number. You enter your phone number. Someone calls you. As the basic premise, you don't need to go through a menu system to get to a human (admittedly good), and don't need to pay LD charges for the call (does anyone not have unlimited LD these days?).

    What is the source for those details, the article used the phrase "Click to Call" which that would not be (it would be more like "click to be called"). I am not doubting you read it, I just can't see any further references from the story.

    First, consider what percentage of people use VOIP, nevermind Skype specifically (yeah, like EBay would support Vonage for this?). Do you really think they plan to spend a good bit of PR-allocated money to target less than one percent of their market?

    Yes but part of the appeal of the arrangemnet would be to grow the base of skype users if people could start using skype to call advertisers (or at least that would be the theory, I have doubts on how many people would do so).

    I do kind of like the idea of using Skype to call businesses though instead of using a real phone.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Where did you read that from? by pla · · Score: 1

      What is the source for those details

      Your friend and mine,


      I just can't see any further references from the story.

      Actually, the linked article didn't say anything more about it, which prompted me to do a search of my own for info.

      I do agree with you that it seems like a very misleading name, though. I too originally expected something like a link that activates your VOIP - which made me really curious of how they did that without bringing "autodialer" malware back with a vengeance. But it appears they do no such thing. Just sort of an inversion of "Operators are standing by!".

    2. Re:Where did you read that from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they were to use Skype, would that mean that both the business and consumer need Skype's software to connect the call? How is that easier than dialing a phone number?

    3. Re:Where did you read that from? by nandhp · · Score: 1

      Here's how: callto:+18884335788 or callto:echo123 (For some reason, Skype refuses to auto-dial a SkypeOut number, even if it's free)

  33. Does It Really Matter? by InsomniacMK5 · · Score: 1

    Honestly, does this really matter for the consumer? The amount of times I have clicked on an advertisement by choice compared to the amount of advertisements I have viewed are about 1 for every 100,000. Then again, I am an experienced computer nerd who isn't the average consumer.

    --
    Truth resides in every human heart, and one has to search for it there, and to be guided by truth as one sees it. But no
  34. I hate toolbars. by milatchi · · Score: 1

    Man, I really hate toolbars.

    --
    Slashdot = -1 Redundant, Asperger, kdawson FUD, Libertarian, and Linux
  35. Its about time by pjgeer · · Score: 1

    I can't believe these companies think I'm going to evidence any sort of loyalty to their brand when it comes to the Internet. When I want to buy one gross of used underpants, I don't care which infomediary points me to the merchant. This is good for eBay I guess, but it looks like a tradeoff for Yahoo. It's great for Google because now when I google for "one gross used underpants" I'll get more results. Soon I'll be able to discriminate between Fruit of the Loom and BVDs. And then... something. And THEN- profit!

  36. Aha, but the advertiser still sees no data... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    So it is a callback, but from this link:

    "But Google has published a FAQ. According to it, when searchers click on the phone icon, they get a prompt to enter their phone numbers, then click a "Connect For Free" button. Google calls the number provided, then, when the searcher picks up, connects the searcher with the advertiser." ...
    "Google said the advertiser can't see the searcher's phone number, and it promised to delete the number from its servers after a short period of time. However, the phone number is stored in an encrypted cookie placed on the searcher's computer, so that next time, he or she won't need to re-enter the phone number. The company suggested that users who don't want their phone numbers stored should refuse the cookie."

    So it's kind of in-between - you are giving up your phone number, but only to Google and only for a short time. The advertiser still does not see it as it's Google calling them and you.

    I still really like the idea of direct Skype links though.

    Thanks for pushing me to read further, I assumed too much from the name.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  37. Yaheebooay by Kelson · · Score: 1

    On the website, the mighty website,
    The auction ends toniiight....

  38. Re:yahoo!!! no, really, yahoo!!! by emjoi_gently · · Score: 1

    I hate toolbars.
    From Google, Yahoo, eBay, SaveNow or anyone else.

    If I am fixing a spywared infected computer, then part of my cleanup is to remove the toolbars.
    They take up screen realestate, provide rarely used features.

  39. Oh, goody. by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

    A crap search engine that prefaces each result with L@@@@@@@K!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  40. Yaho and eBay ugh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't much of a problem with Yahoo, they have brought services which I find useful and try to solve problems I have incountered. I am not saying it is the best out there, but it works well.

    eBay I can't stand! they have an attitude problem. They have screwed up too many times and said too bad. we don't care!

  41. Yahoo uses google??? by z00lander · · Score: 0

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't yahoo USE google for their search data? How can you be at war with something when you are using their service? Oh wait, isn't that what the US is doing with Iraq's Oil?