Slashdot Mirror


Pakistan Plans Mobile WiMax Network Rollout

OneInEveryCrowd writes "Pakistan is apparently ready to move ahead of the USA in the deployment of a mobile wireless network." From the article: "The deployment is a milestone in the spread of WiMax, a superfast wireless technology that has a range of up to 30 miles and can deliver broadband at a theoretical maximum of 75 megabits per second. The 802.16-2004 standard, which is used in fixed WiMax networks, is being skipped in favor of a large-scale introduction of 802.16e, which was only recently agreed upon by the WiMax Forum. 'We made the decision 18 months ago to jump over (802.16-2004) and go straight to 802.16e,' Paul Sergeant, Motorola's marketing director for Motowi4, told ZDNet UK on Tuesday. 'We've been working on it for a while, which is how we're able to ship so soon after agreement.'"

165 comments

  1. i hear competition by jpling · · Score: 1

    I don't know how USA is reacting to this but i'm sure they want to be bigger and badder. Good job pakistan :P

    --
    jappleng.com - News best served with breakfast.
    1. Re:i hear competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      will bush go there and bomb them to get the money for the oil ^H^H^H^H wimax business ?

      and ofcourse officially mark it as freeing pakistan.

    2. Re:i hear competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Score: -1 Troll

      I find it amusing how the world hates on the US because of some notion that big == evil... all while they're wearing their Nike shoes and eating at Mc Donald's.

    3. Re:i hear competition by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I predict as the world develops more, the US will shrink rapidly in technological power. As an American, I hate seeing this happen (although I'm not an obsessive brainwashed patriot that thinks the US is #1, I do have pride because it is my country). In the past, we have been a large driving force in bringing some truely great inventions into the mainstream, but It has been a while since we have done anything like that.... We aren't getting any smarter (we might actually be getting dumber some studies have indicated), and developing nations are educating very quickly. I'm glad to see Pakistan has some initiative. Much like another distasteful comment said, I never thought very highly of Pakistan (I know little about the area other then it neighbors Afghanistan). But I may think differently now since I know they are adapting technology beyond what the US is doing at the moment. In some ways i think the American lifestyle is the epiphany of how a country can live, but due to this, many here are becoming fat, lazy, and unambitious......

      --
      In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
    4. Re:i hear competition by ELProphet · · Score: 1

      Oh, we're long ahead where it "counts." How much money are Pakistani ISPs making off this? Less than (the) US! Seriously, without a way for the ISPs to make money, their lobbyists will never let these networks get beyond a city/community level.

    5. Re:i hear competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In the past, we have been a large driving force in bringing some truely great inventions into the mainstream..."

      Interesting way of putting it! In fact the US has been very poor in inventing new technology, but quite good at marketing it. A mixture of a safe, stable currency and a large home market made it ideal for commerce. The US has had a 50 year economic lead prompted by WW2, which closed down all major competitors (though they are now beginning to come back). This is what is happening rather than the US declining rapidly.

      For some reason, though, the US seems to think that it leads the world in innovation as well, and this is certainly not true. Mobile phones are a case in point - the US has been trailing behind in every mobile phone development since they started. Why should it be any diferent with 802.16e?

  2. With all this increased bandwith in Pakistab by nihilistcanada · · Score: 5, Funny

    Osama Bin Laden can finally now upgrade to higher quality video for his latest release.

    1. Re:With all this increased bandwith in Pakistab by Timesprout · · Score: 1

      No, I can exclusively reveal that from now on using the increased bandwith Bin Ladens rantings and ravings will be broadcast Bollywood style. Marketing advisors close to Bin Laden feel his message is too much doom and gloom and would achieve broader appeal if it was presented with some more singing and dancing.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:With all this increased bandwith in Pakistab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure bin Laden will use his own Internet broadcasting servers from now on.

  3. The NSA is happy by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 3, Funny

    30 miles? Now they don't even need a presence on the ground, unless the antennas are very directional.

    1. Re:The NSA is happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are very directional. That doesn't stop the NSA.

  4. Ahead of the US? by damian+cosmas · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hopefully this new wireless technology will help them crack the 50% literacy milestone. I'm sure the 4% of the population with internet access will really appreaciate it, though.

    1. Re:Ahead of the US? by flobberchops · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its only for the rich, like most technology that Bill Gates always spounts hot air about technology revolutionising people's lives like them. No, its for the rich mostly. They even have to share mobile phones between communities in some areas, granted its at least better than nothing but its not enough.

    2. Re:Ahead of the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The summary clearly mentions "ahead of the USA in the deployment of a mobile wireless network."

      How is mentioning the literacy relevant? Be objective.
      Or is that something your prejudiced mind can't achieve?

      Anyway, what good is literacy if you're going to vote for Bush?

    3. Re:Ahead of the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      true - but also consider that the availability of high speed internet access can facilitate education and increase literacy. While it is questionalble how the government of Pakistan will handle almost certain opposition from the mullahs et.al., in itself, such networks can be used to help in education, marketing etc. Many pilot projects in India, Africa have shown that this is possible.

    4. Re:Ahead of the US? by wenchmagnet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are many challenges Pakistan faces, but this is progress... cheap wireless broadband access for the masses is GREAT! Whatever your preconcieved notions about Pakistan, the literacy rate in the urban areas is quite high and a LOT of people will benefit from this.

      It also helps in getting the literacy rate up as more people take an interest in becoming literate. You might not believe it but many rural communities can limp along quite well without any need for widespread literacy - this will change that by showing them a bigger wider world that is out there for them to explore once they start to read!

      Broadband internet access means access to a multitude of different views which means its a counter against fundamentalism and brainwashing.

      As a Pakistani, I am very excited about this!

    5. Re:Ahead of the US? by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      How is mentioning the literacy relevant? Be objective.

      Perhaps because without the ability to read, the Internet is nothing more than pretty pictures. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    6. Re:Ahead of the US? by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      Thats why theres 4chan.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    7. Re:Ahead of the US? by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      I work in Pakistan for a US company.

      So I am really getting a kick out of most of these replies.

      Some of you guys are very good at making it sound like you know what you are talking about.

      But trust me.... You don't.

      I think you just want to make yourself sound smart, when in reality you dont know what you are talking about.

      This is how bad info gets passed around.

      If you dont know about the topic....Dont make yourself sound like you do.

      Cuz some /.'ers believe anything they hear.

    8. Re:Ahead of the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...you dont know what you are talking about..."

      So, enlighten us. Give us facts.

    9. Re:Ahead of the US? by enrevanche · · Score: 1
      I hope you do realize you've actually said nothing here.

      Maybe you should consider correcting the errors instead being smug.

    10. Re:Ahead of the US? by hyfe · · Score: 1
      Hopefully this new wireless technology will help them crack the 50% literacy milestone.

      Well, I'm functionally illiterate and I'm perfectly capable of using the internet (atleast, I think I'm functionally illitereate. Yesterday f.x. I visited this cool site and couldn't understand a word of what people wrote in their user profiles.. even so, I could still enjoy the pictures and vidoes of fat chicks showing body parts I really didn't want to see! yay me!).

      I'm sure the 4% of the population with internet access will really appreaciate it, though.

      Well, the whole point of improving the infrastructure is to, well, get a better infrastructure.

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    11. Re:Ahead of the US? by GIL_Dude · · Score: 1

      Right, once they get power to the many area in Pakistan that have no electricity they may have wireless access.

    12. Re:Ahead of the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe you should consider learning what a cliche is

      wooooooosh

    13. Re:Ahead of the US? by TorAvalon · · Score: 1

      I hope you do realize you've actually said nothing here.

      See I am 9 years old and can act just like you.

    14. Re:Ahead of the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't think Pakistan is in danger of getting ahead of the US anytime soon. They ought to concentrate on returning democracy to the people of Pakistan (instead of their usual military dictatorship), stop proliferating nuclear weapons, control those madrassas where foreign born Pakistanis get training (London bombing July 7th 2005), stop allowing the Taliban and Al-Qaeda elements refuge in Western Pakistan, stop interferring with the internal affairs of Afghanistan as they have done in the past and stop being such a damn failed state.

      Pakistan 'is a top failed state. Yeah, they have a long way to go. WiMax is not going to be their salvation.

    15. Re:Ahead of the US? by mapkinase · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Let me rephrase beyond "Informative" tag in two words what the parent said: "Pakistan is a developing country". Duh!

      Scenario: /.er reads the only positive article in the history of Slashdot about subject country, digs out two negative facts about subject country, gets 5 mod points Informative from a moderator who counts number of references and % signs iin the post to base the moderation upon.

      The big mistake of the original poster was to compare to US. God forbids to do it ever!

      It is funny how citizens (residents, sympathizers) of the most powerful nation in history of the humanity get upset when instead of 100.0% domination they got only 99.999%.

      What did you want to tell us, Damian? That Pakistan is a developed country? That is "Informative"?

      Way to go, Pakistan!

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    16. Re:Ahead of the US? by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      I am glad for your country. Way to go!

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    17. Re:Ahead of the US? by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      What a bunch of nonsense...

      Why are you repeating like a parrot what you read in Western media?

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    18. Re:Ahead of the US? by s.fontinalis · · Score: 1

      If you can say "Porn was not the internet killer app" with a straight face I might believe you.

    19. Re:Ahead of the US? by mnmn · · Score: 1

      Very useful this connection will be since Pakistan implements a 700ms latency to all Internet connections so Paktel maintains a telecom monopoly. Thats the reason why you dont find gamers from Pakistan online.

      Not to mention many things in IT have been promised since 1997, none properly implemented, if at all. As a Pakistani I'm HIGHLY skeptical.

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    20. Re:Ahead of the US? by rplacd · · Score: 1

      Very useful this connection will be since Pakistan implements a 700ms latency to all Internet connections so Paktel maintains a telecom monopoly.

      700ms latency? I don't know where you get your news. Try pinging lg.nexlinx.net.pk; that's a machine on the ISP side of my DSL ISP.

    21. Re:Ahead of the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure this will help them increase the rate of beastiality there.

      http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/002 161.html

  5. Just so I understand: by DysenteryInTheRanks · · Score: 5, Funny
    I want to make sure I understand this correctly: Osama bin Laden is about to get faster broadband Internet on his laptop in some mud hut in Pakistan than I could possibly buy at home in the U.S.?

    p0wn3d, man. Fucking p0wn3d.

    1. Re:Just so I understand: by the_masked_mallard · · Score: 1
      why has the parent been modded troll ?

      perhaps this might shed some light on it : http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/05/bin_la den_on_th.html

    2. Re:Just so I understand: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hereby I am asking you to promptly cancel your internet connection, because there is some criminal hiding in your country.

      If you say pakistanis are less a human than you are, then let me congratulate you to your nazi thinking. Maybe you'll get born as pakistani in your next life, who knows, reincarnation isn't proven nor unproven.

    3. Re:Just so I understand: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, people like this one makes the world think that in US people think that they are the only that deserve the best, and they don't give a s*t about the rest.
      btw, maybe Osama is in US, coz they searched the rest of the world and it isn't.:P

  6. In dense areas.. by pthor1231 · · Score: 1

    I don't know how well it's going to work. For a coverage range of 30 miles, at theortical maximum of 75 Mbps, that's not much per user. Sometimes my cable connection could get slow in my house, with my other roomates using it, and thats an 8 Mbps connection, wired. Also, does a 30 mile range maximum mean in each direction, so a sphere of radius 30 miles? God I would hate to be on that.

    1. Re:In dense areas.. by alfs+boner · · Score: 1
      There is no reason to think that a government body, or quasi-government body like most public utiltiies couldn't set up a good network.

      A lot of it is in hiring the right people. Right now there are large nubmers of very skilled people that are unemployed or underemployed. These people could be snapped up at a good price.

      Also, as many developing countries have learned, it's cheaper to invest in modern technology than to maintain and upgrade older networks. A wireless network that uses off-the-shelf modern parts should be much cheaper than a custom network built over a much longer time. Look at all the articles about growth in South Korea and similar places.

      --
      Listen p*ssy. I'm sure your the same homo that posted earlier about alf's boner and you just want to remain anonymous fo
    2. Re:In dense areas.. by Teun · · Score: 1

      30 mi. is the maximum radius, nothing prevents the use of smaller cells in build up areas.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    3. Re:In dense areas.. by petecarlson · · Score: 2, Informative


      For a coverage range of 30 miles (You)

      has a range of up to 30 miles (TFA)

      Reality: There are PTP applications that can hit 30 miles. Users will never be on a point to point link as it would take one AP per subscriber. For mobile applications, you are looking at a range of about two miles with six access points creating a 360 degree cluster. Assuming we get half of the theoretical 75 megabits per second, we have ~35 Mb/s per AP and 225 Mb/s per cluster.

      Sometimes my cable connection could get slow in my house, with my other roomates using it, and thats an 8 Mbps connection, wired.

      First, I would like to remind you that it is highly unlikely that you have an 8Mbps connection. It is more likely that your connection maxes out at 8Mbps and is best effort. It is also likely that you are maxing out your upload queue which is making your connection appear slow. Lets compare your connection to our theoretical connection above.

      Comcast or other cable provider.
      Up to 1000 subscribers per node with 100 Mbps per node.
      (This is limited by Comcasts backhaul. Bandwidth on the coax is shared)

      Theoretical WiMax deployment:
      Up to 1536 (6X256) Subscribers per node with 225 Mbps per node
      (Most likely limited to less by the backhaul. Bandwidth per AP is shared)
      (It is unlikely that they will pull this many subs in a 15 sq mile node.

  7. -1 redundant... by Duncan3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "ready to move ahead of the USA"

    We get it already, 30% of high school kids drop out, our President has an IQ of 60, and smart kids are beaten in the streets, what the hell do you expect?

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    1. Re:-1 redundant... by suv4x4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We get it already, 30% of high school kids drop out, our President has an IQ of 60, and smart kids are beaten in the streets, what the hell do you expect?

      War with Iran by the end of the year. Was this the right answer?

      (what do I win btw?)

    2. Re:-1 redundant... by david.given · · Score: 1
      (what do I win btw?)

      The undying enmity of half the population of the planet?

    3. Re:-1 redundant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mahmoud Ahmadinejad approves of your answer... and you win a big, wet, slurpy kiss from him!

    4. Re:-1 redundant... by Zaphod2016 · · Score: 1

      Sure, funded by VISA and AMEX I guess?

      Or, perhaps they intend to start a draft in a country where 30% of the electorate are demanding the President's impeachment.

      Nope. The only reason Iran has even grown such big balls in the first place is because they understand our quagmire, even if some Americans don't.

      Reagan Republicans UNITE! Let's get our party back under control.

      As the Gipper said: Government is not the solution to our problem- Government *is* the problem.

  8. Red Face by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

    It was bad enough when South Korea got DSL lines ten times faster than our cable modems, but now this is just embarassing.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    1. Re:Red Face by flobberchops · · Score: 1

      Its even more embarassing that New York, the center of the worlds finance has alot of very poor people without. I say SHAME ON YOU. The distrubition of wealth there is pathetic.

    2. Re:Red Face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was bad enough when South Korea got DSL lines ten times faster than our cable modems

      Yes, but at least those were only for old people.

    3. Re:Red Face by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      As long as there is scarcity, there will always be uneven distribution
      of wealth. There is no other way.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    4. Re:Red Face by TheKidWho · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No not embarassing at all, those poor people are lazy bastards. Pretty simple eh?

  9. Consumer adoption by alfs+boner · · Score: 1

    Though I do honestly hope WiMax succeeds, there's absolutely no gaurantee that they will be able to get the consumers to buy these things like hotcakes. Quite franky 802.11b at 11MBit/s is good enough to carry (US anyways) consumer broadband which averages around 1.5Mbit down 384kbit up. Until broadband reaches the speeds where a consumers WiFi link is what's slowing them down, that's when we'll get the upgrades. But in the meantime, unless people suddenly have a real use for the increased speed/distance, I can't see think taking off so quickly.

    --
    Listen p*ssy. I'm sure your the same homo that posted earlier about alf's boner and you just want to remain anonymous fo
    1. Re:Consumer adoption by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      There's no such thing as "too much bandwidth".

    2. Re:Consumer adoption by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      There may be no urge for an increase in speed for now, but distance is a big gain for most people. I don't know what it's like elsewhere, I don't get around too much, but at these ranges you can have access practically anywhere.

    3. Re:Consumer adoption by zogger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's the distance, man. WAY too many places in the US have no broadband at all with cable/wires/fiber and wifi is too short a range and trees and hills just muck it up.. WiMax is about the only way I'll get broadband, even then it will be iffy, and there are millions and millions more people in the same boat. the US is not just the top major urban areas afrter all and even a lot of suburban areas have little to no choice in broadband. If some companies get wimax out there, they WILL sell it. All these people still on dialup will go to it if it works and it is at least a reasonable cost. As it is now I pop for a phone line just to get net access, I don't *need* the land line phone, my cell works fine for phone calls, so wimax would maybe be cheaper than dialup!

    4. Re:Consumer adoption by Sparkle · · Score: 1

      Darn right we will take it. I have been hounding verizon for years and have even twice entered ISDN orders only to have them cancelled. No way they will bring DSL in my lifetime. We have some Wifi offerings not too many miles away but the wiMax ought to doit.

      If Osama can have it why can't I? It is not just a little embarrasing to have nothing but POTS just a few miles away from a big metro area.

  10. Wireless upgrades by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    Really the technology for this was available to do this in cities with the 802.11b spec if the last mile net connections were actually neutral (which they are supposed to be in most cities).

    G seemed like a good spec, obviously it wasn't fast enough to run a corperate or even a power users connection off but if they could have hit the theoretical maximum it would have been fine, these new specs won't allow small deployments which can service many users so they aren't a huge improvement over local wireless points (Also increased security concerns as it's not just neighborhood traffic but potentially whole city traffic which will be available for packet sniffing) it just centralizes a system which is only important if you're commited to an upgrade cycle (Which would actually be nice after we got borked by the western isps).

    At some point the range will be there and I really hope they have backwards compatability worked out by then, users don't know anything about the interoperability of the wireless standards and they shouldn't have to.

    Also the security standards are pretty stupid as well, routers support wireless security features that don't work AT ALL... why bother!

  11. U send me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    U send me more jobs to me 4 ur outsource plz.

    I clean out ur augean stable 4 u.

    http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_runner_060 525_h1_b_visa_foreign_it.htm

    Send me 2 my id slash@spambob.com

    Thx 4 ur jobs.

  12. Hey cool by rivetgeek · · Score: 1

    Now they can oppress women and demand total religious cultism without those pesky wires!

    1. Re:Hey cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some would argue you're talking about the Christian Right in America...

    2. Re:Hey cool by rivetgeek · · Score: 1

      Last I checked the American Bible thumpers don't stone to death women that talk to men other than their husbands. They also don't prescribe raping a young girl as effective justice for an unpaid debt.

    3. Re:Hey cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes a certain kind of personality to only see the negative. Some how Pakistan elected a woman as the leader of the country, somehow that slipped your mind? Do women never get raped in America? Does America not have little cults (people who don't believe in medicine, people who mess around with snakes in their church, etc.)

  13. Might finally get Bush's attention... by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    Wireless rollout has been pretty bad in USA and even basic services like cellular phone are not available in many ruralareas. A comparison like this could finally get some attention from the "leadership".

    Of course the opposite could also happen: the Administration could equally spin this up that wireless networking == antiChrist == terrorism.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  14. OT: Jr and IQ (was:-1 redundant...) by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1
    ... our President has an IQ of 60 ...
    The article linked http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bliq-bush.ht m claims Lovenstein Institute research (which is not to say that said research or the reference isn't biased) estimates Jr's IQ to be 91. For comparison O'Reagan's IQ was estimated to be 105 and FDR was 147.
    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    1. Re:OT: Jr and IQ (was:-1 redundant...) by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

      Well, that turns out to be an e-mail joke that has been in circulation for the past five years. Do I feel stupid now (DUH.)

      --
      ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    2. Re:OT: Jr and IQ (was:-1 redundant...) by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      That link is bogus. Your an idiot too for spreading that FUD.

      FYI, Bush's four year grade average was the same as Kerry's at Yale. You can read about it here.

      From the linked article... "Bush went to Yale from 1964 to 1968; his highest grades were 88s in anthropology, history, and philosophy, according to The New Yorker article. He received one D in his four years, a 69 in astronomy. Bush has said he was a C student."

      History and philosophy are subjects all presidents should be proficient in.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:OT: Jr and IQ (was:-1 redundant...) by rlp · · Score: 1

      It's a hoax. See Snopes

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
    4. Re:OT: Jr and IQ (was:-1 redundant...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      History and philosophy are subjects all presidents should be proficient in.

      Despite doing decent in History class, Bush still seems doomed to repeat it. Perhaps he didn't pay as good attention as one might hope?

    5. Re:OT: Jr and IQ (was:-1 redundant...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, Bush's four year grade average was the same as Kerry's at Yale.

      And this is supposed to make me feel better about having a C student lead the "free world"?

  15. Not just for the Internet by cam762 · · Score: 3, Informative
    WiMAX 802.16e isn't used just for Internet connectivity, but also competes against cellular technologies (GSM/UMTS and CDMA2000) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wimax#Similar_technol ogies

    While 802.16e is mainly a mobile technology, it also supports "Fixed" access and mesh networking, which means that signals can be relayed from one access point to another instead of needing to hardwire every connection.

    This should help implementation and penetration of the region by reducing the overall amount of infrastructure required.

    1. Re:Not just for the Internet by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      It might bring in more competition to the mobile service provider market aswell. If you consider that the german government managed to make 50 billion Euros selling the spectrum for UMTS, you can imagine what kind of fair competition and pricing there is.

      "Old" Wi-Fi is in a sense competition for cellular technologies when those new "hybrid-phones" come out, that switch to WiFi access points when they find them.

  16. A question of infrastructure by dj245 · · Score: 1

    I think this has much more to do with the fact that 2nd and 3rd world countries never had telephone infrastructure to begin with, so it would make sense that they just skip it and go right to wireless technologies. And as long as you're going to a wireless technology, might as well make it the cutting edge one.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:A question of infrastructure by Peyna · · Score: 1

      I think this has much more to do with the fact that 2nd and 3rd world countries never had telephone infrastructure to begin with

      "Second World" countries would be those allied with the USSR during the Cold War.

      "Third World" countries historically was everyone that wasn't allied with either the US or the USSR during the Cold War, but has, in the media, come to mean "undeveloped country."

      --
      What?
    2. Re:A question of infrastructure by RotateLeftByte · · Score: 1

      You are spot on with your observation.
      I do and have done a lot of biz in 2nd & 3rd world countries. With the fall of the Soviet Union the newly independant countries went for the latest tect in a big way. Those were the days. I had to get a Supercomputer export license to hand carry an Alpha to Kazakhstan.
      Their lack of POTS for the majority of the population enables the take rapid up of Mobile phones. After all, who would ewait months to get a land line installed when you could get a mobile in minutes.

      For the accountants/bean counters amongst us, a wireless infrastructure is far (by orders of magnitude) to install and maintain than a wired network.

      I remember some prominent 1st world IT companies being shown the door when the proposed "not leading edge" tachnology whereas the company I was working for proposed 64bit Risc CPU's (this was in 1995) Guess who got the biz?

      Unfortunately, the average Americans view of the world ends at 48 states. the 2nd & 3rd World are just savages with an IQ approaching zero. (this is a simplistic view but I hope you get the point)

      Just my 0.02tenge ( tenge is the currency of Kazakhstan)

      --
      I'd rather be riding my '63 Triumph T120.
    3. Re:A question of infrastructure by Detritus · · Score: 1

      A friend who worked in Pakistan said that they had numerous problems with telephone and data line outages. Some of the more enterprising local residents would steal the cable right off the poles.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  17. Mobile telephony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, a country that is ahead of the United States in implementing wireless technology. That's something extraordinary. I'm glad that didn't happen with mobile telephony.

  18. Elsewhere in the sub-continent ... by moanads · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Alcatel is teaming up with the Government of India to set up a WiMax development center in the South Indian city of Chennai and the products developed there will be marketed worldwide. It appears that parts of Asia prefer to rollout wireless data networks as opposed to wireline ones, probably due to the fact that it is easier to deploy wireless networks. With Europe going ahead with the adoption of UMTS and HSDPA, it looks like wireless data networks are going to become pretty ubiquitous in many parts of the world. I wonder what new applications we will see once the pipe to the phone/wireless device gets much bigger than what it is today.

    1. Re:Elsewhere in the sub-continent ... by slack_prad · · Score: 0

      FTA, this news is dated 05 September 2005

      --
      Sent from my desktop computer
  19. Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This is great to see that instead of trying to educate people about vices of their Mulla-infested education which in turn creates bunch of people who believes non-muslims have no right to live they are creating spending on some gizmo.

    No, I am not talking about the wimax, I am taking about F16, missile program, nukes ... great country!

    1. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to stereotype. I'm sure the millions of Christians and Hindus, Sikhs, and even Parsis in Pakistan would love to hear you try to explain how Pakistanis allegedly don't want them to live. They get along ok, for the most part, so quit making stuff up.

    2. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by XchristX · · Score: 1

      He's not stereotyping. Pakistani Hindus live in mortal fear of their lives. They are publicly stoned to death, forced to wear armbands (like the Jewish people during the Nazi Ausrotten in Poland), and Hindu women often get gang-raped and molten metal poured into their eyes and ears and buried alive for wearing makeup in public or for not following the Islamic 'hijab'. These are state sanctioned atrocities advertised as "blasphemy laws".

        The wikipedia article is just the tip of the iceberg:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinduism_in_Pakistan# The_future_for_Pakistani_Hindus

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    3. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by Statman · · Score: 1

      XchristX --- Doesnt get any better for those Muslims living in Kashmir that are being masscared by Indian forces everyday. Two wrongs dont make a right.

      http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-551772270 2246333713

    4. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by XchristX · · Score: 1

      In retaliation for muslim ethnic cleansing of Hindus in Kashmir:

      http://www.panunkashmir.org/fundamentalism.html

      http://64.233.179.104/search?q=cache:vkcaOQjIS9MJ: www.kashmir-information.com/fundamentalism.html+Is lamic+Fundamentalism+in+Kashmir&hl=en&gl=us&ct=cln k&cd=1&lr=lang_en&client=firefox-a

        Two wrongs don't make a right ideally. However, the only feasable way to deal with terrorism and islamic mob savagery is to retaliate tenfold. America's success in Afghanistan against the Taliban, and Israel's successes in defeating the PLO, and Fatah, and Hamas are proof of that.

        Best I recall, Indians don't do these:
      http://www.rawa.us/f-hang.htm
      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f9 /WTC_attack_9-11.jpg
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/d ecember/13/newsid_3695000/3695057.stm
      http://www.rediff.com/news/2003/oct/21franc.htm

        or ram planes full of people into buildings full of people. Nor do they blow up parliaments, or teach hate ahead of maths in schools, madrassas and qutbas. Indians don't behead journalists or anyone. We don't have state sponsored rape gangs.

          India has history, art, science, technology, the world's largest democracy and third largest army.

          If anything, Indians are doing a poor job of taking care of the terrorists. The incompetent and corrupt UPA government seems to learn nothing. If it were the Israelis in Kashmir, the Jihadis would all be urinating in their pants by now, gibbering for mercy like retarded people.

        Great to see some more anti-Hindu sock puppets of Pakistan on slashdot though.

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    5. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Interesting examples of victorious nations. Israel is known for being a bit of a paranoid society and deals with frequent bombings. I met an Australian who was working in Israel. His contract prohibited him from going to large public gathering places like clubs and restaurants because he was too valuable to lose in a bombing.

      The paranoia is growing by leaps and bounds in the US.

      Maybe there isn't a better approach, but the "two wrongs" one isn't working so well.

    6. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by XchristX · · Score: 1

      >Interesting examples of victorious nations. Israel is known for being >a bit of a paranoid society and deals with frequent bombings.


      Can you blame them? They're a small but prosperous country surrounded by countries that hate them and want to destroy them.

      Pew global statistics reports that anti-semitism in neighboring Jordan is 100% today...

      I'd be paranoid too if I were in their shoes.

      >The paranoia is growing by leaps and bounds in the US.


      I think you're exaggerating a bit. Don't believe everything the liberal media in the US spits out of it's propaganda factories. Nor should you believe every bit of Saudi-Lobby backed US-bashing spewed out by terrorist-sympathetic cabals like C.A.I.R or F.O.S.A or whoever about 'rising hate crimes against muslims' or 'racial profiling'. It's mostly hogwash...

      I mean, look at me. I'm a brown dude and been in the US for 4 years now. I've gone through the airports and the screenings. No problems...


      Ths US is more guarded now after 9/11 than before, true. But a little healthy paranoia is a good thing. Keeps the society vital. It's better than the miserable apathy that has engulfed Indian society since the 80s and leads the mulish electorate to vote away our rights and our safety to the bloody spineless crypto-communists of the UPA government, who bend over and take it up the arse while islamists and christian missionary-thugs try to overrun our country.

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    7. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sure do talk a lot of shit.
      Anyone remember Gujrat? Where state sanctioned massacre and rape goes on by hindus everyday?
      India is the real terrorist.

    8. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "He's not stereotyping. Pakistani Hindus live in mortal fear of their lives. They are publicly stoned to death, forced to wear armbands (like the Jewish people during the Nazi Ausrotten in Poland), and Hindu women often get gang-raped and molten metal poured into their eyes and ears and buried alive for wearing makeup in public or for not following the Islamic 'hijab'. These are state sanctioned atrocities advertised as "blasphemy laws".
      "

      This is a complete misrepresentation of the true situation.
      I live in the capital of Pakistan. And Hindus live here respectable lives. In the current Governing Cabinet there is a Hindu minister! Hindus have been a major part in Pakistani Cricket.
      In the street I live, their is a Hindu government officer, but here in pakistan we dont think in terms of religion!! I dont know hows its in hte rural areas. What armbands are you talking about???? There is no discrimination with respect to religion here, noone is asked to wear armbands for their religious believes.
      Right here in the capital there is a Hindu Temple, just as their is a Masonic lodge and two Churches. In Karachi there's even a Synagogue!
      There are more attacks on groups of other religions in India then their are in any other country, Kashmir, Gujarat etc..

      And What Islamic Hijab?? Pakista n is not Afghanistan or Iran only a minority of women wear that thing! Just visit the Capital you'll see women going around the street in jeans!!

      Thanks for pointing to that wikipedia article I'll update it with the true facts, it has to have been made by some one who has no knowledge of the ground realities!!

    9. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by XchristX · · Score: 1

      Sure,sure, and Israelis are secretly trying to poison muslims and secrtetly conspire to take over the world, right?

      So much for terrorist propaganda. Islamic fundamentalists are victims only in their own minds.

      Godhra was a legitimate retaliation for a massacre started by muslims when they set fire to a tain consisting of Hindus, leading to women and children being burnt alive.

        Like I said before, muslim mobs murder hindus, we retaliate tenfold. Same as the US did in Afghanistan after 9/11.

        I know you muslims hate Hindus. No flaw in that. We all need somebody to hate, and it hasn't been one day in a thousand years when muslims didn't houst a few drinks and attack Hindus on the streets. It gave life meaning to so many of them...

        Enjoy yourselves. At this point we are sufficiently powerful and well-connected to not care about what you think.

      This is what they did to us:

      http://www.faithfreedom.org/Gallery/terror.htm

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    10. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by XchristX · · Score: 1

      Changing the wikipedia article won't change the truth, only that Islamic terrorists are good at lies and propaganda...

        And, of course, vandalism on wikipedia. Good thing there are NPOV tags and google cache backups...

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    11. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I don't blame them at all. The point of my post is that if you make a habit of using violence against your enemies they tend to respond in kind. Israel has a very good reason for taking security so seriously. So does the United States. My point was, perhaps they shouldn't be used as an example of "violence can solve your problems" since it does not seem to have worked well in those cases. Were there other options? I don't know. My point is simply neither country is a good example of achieving victory via violent means.

      As for the US, I didn't say anything about harassing Muslims or anything of the kind. Do you disagree that the average American is more afraid of attack now than they were, say, ten years ago? Has the military campaign made their enemies want to attack the US less?

    12. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by XchristX · · Score: 1

      TFA before being vandalized:
      History of Hinduism in Pakistan

      See Also: History of Hinduism, Indus Valley Civilization, Vedic civilization

      Hinduism, once the main religion in Pakistan, has endured many conquests and invasions, different rulers, and ultimately political separation from the Hindu-majority India.
      [edit]

      Ancient Ages

      What is today Pakistan is where the ancient Mehrgarh and Indus Valley Civilization thrived. Various archaeological finds such as what appears to be like a "Pasupati" image that was found on the seals of the people of Mohenjo-daro, in Sindh, point to early influences that may have shaped Hinduism. The Elamo-Dravidian arrived from Eastern Iran and settled in Indus valley. According to a widely prevalent theory, a group of people known as Aryans migrated from regions like Iran or Eastern Europe, crossed the river Sindhu, and mingled with the Dravidians and indigenous people. The religious beliefs and folklore of the Indus valley people have become a major part of the Hindu faith that evolved in this part of the South Asia.

      The Sindh kingdom and its rulers play an important role in the Indian epic story of the Mahabharata. In addition, there is the legend that the Pakistani city of Lahore was first founded by Lava, the son of Rama of the Ramayana. The Gandhara kingdom of the Northwest, and the legendary Gandhara peoples are also a major part of Hindu literature such as the Ramayana and the Mahabharata.
      [edit]

      Buddhism

      During the reign of Ashoka, Buddhism grew and thrived in the area, especially under the later rule of Kanishka, king of the Kushan Empire. With the ascent of the Gupta Dynasty, many Buddhists were returned to the Hindu fold in India, as Hindus adopted many of the teachings of the Buddha such as non-violence to all life, vegetarianism and proper treatment of fellow men. A substantial Buddhist community that rivalled the Hindus would remain in Pakistan until the Islamic conquests.

      Some scholars believe that Vedic Hinduism was never very strong in Pakistan, but records left by scholars like Alberuni, do not provide any such hint. In addition, a large Buddhist population remained in the Punjab and Sindh as Arab invaders attest to having encountered many 'Buddh' statues of gold throughout the region. Due to the nature of the region as a borderland on the edge of South Asia many people more open and receptive to radically different ideologies like Islam and other Semitic faiths.
      [edit]

      Under Islamic and British Rule

      People in this region were exposed to Islamic teachings when the country came under the control of Muslim rulers. Though many Hindus voluntarily became Muslims, many Hindus also believe that a large number were forced to become Muslims. Alberuni states in his book, that Hindus who were forced to become Muslims, were not reaccepted into their community, when they escaped to places like Varanasi. He in fact laments, that due to Islamic conquests, many great Hindu scholars left this region. In over one thousand years of Muslim rule in the Punjab and Sindh, the population of Muslims outpaced the growth of Hinduism and Buddhism virtually disappeared, although relationships between people were peaceful and much more friendly than in modern times. Many Muslims still retained many of the traditions and cultural influences of the times when some were a part of the original Hindu population. It was not uncommon at all to hear a Muslim greet a Hindu or another Muslim with the traditional northern Indian greeting of Rama, Rama.

      In August 1947, at the end of British Raj, the population percentage of Hindus in what is today Pakistan was perhaps as high as 30-35%, but would drop to its current total of less than 2 % in the years since partition.
      [edit]

      Hinduism and Partition

      When Pakistan gained independence in August 1947, over 7 million Hindus and Sikhs from what was East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) and Pakistan's Punjab and Sindh provinces left this new state for India, and a similar number

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    13. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by XchristX · · Score: 1

      They're not acting violent in America anymore, they're too scared to, and rightly so.Their violence is primarily in weaker Europe, and, of course, in my own poor but rapidly growing nation.

        I agree that American military campaigns have stirred the hornet's nest so to speak, and it has made muslims blow shit up more. However, what the Americans have successfully achieved is taking away the ability of the muslims to attack America any further (which they haven't been able to do,despite their posturings in their propaganda videos), nor will they ever, since the US has clearly shown what it will do to the muslims if they harm Americans again...

        The muslims can blow up whatever they want in their own countries, nobody cares. If they do so in mine, we will retaliate, even if our idiotic government is too myopic to do so themselves, which is what we pay them taxes for.

        And the Israelis will quickly defeat the Palestinians. Their IDF is significantly superior and more battle-hardened to the terrorists. It is only a matter of time...

        So, overall, barring the situation in iraq, America has been successful, as have the Israelis. The only people who are failing against muslims are us bloody Indians, and there are those of us who mean to change that.

        Getting muslims rattled is a small price to pay for the security of civilized countries. Don't be such a hopeless liberal please. Hopeless liberals don't see the facts (or maybe they do, but hate conservatives so much that they don't really care, just so long as their ad-hominem attacks keep viewers riveted to the television;
      most liberals are useless nincompoops anyways) and live in a goody-goody fantasy world of shamrock fields and lotus ponds and pretty butterflies.

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    14. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by XchristX · · Score: 1

      State-sponsored abuse of women in pakistan:

      http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/engASA3301819 99

        Now, I am aware that there are remote parts of India where women are mistreated as well. The difference between us and Pakistan is that the atrocities in Pakistan are endorsed by the state (there are clauses in Pakistani Law that can be used to legally commit honor-killings). Local regions in pakistan are run by clansmen and religious mullahs, who harbor terrorists and commit human-rights violations all the time. No Hindu priest has this much political power.

        We are a democracy, you are not. It's that simple...

        anti-semitism, anti-zionism, racism and xenophobia in pakistan (bttom of TFA)

      http://www.axt.org.uk/antisem/archive/archive1/pak istan/pakistan.htm

        anti-semitism in India: ZERO (except by muslims like Lashkar-e-Toiba, big surprise)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Jews

      Mukhtar Mai:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mukhtar_Mai

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    15. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by rplacd · · Score: 1

      They are publicly stoned to death

      Are they? For what crime? For just existing? That is an outright lie.

      forced to wear armbands (like the Jewish people during the Nazi Ausrotten in Poland)

      No, their passports list them as Hindu, just like Christians' passports list them as Christian and Muslims' passports identify them as Muslim. They are not forced to wear any identifying clothing, nor are other religious minorities.

      Hindu women often get gang-raped and molten metal poured into their eyes and ears and buried alive for wearing makeup in public or for not following the Islamic 'hijab'.

      1. Gang rape, as it occurs, affects more Muslim women than Hindus. 2. Having molten metal poured into ears is a Hindu punishment for a religious crime, not a Muslim one. 3. Why would Hindu women be punished at all for wearing makeup in public or not wearing Hijab when at least 50% of all Muslim women in Pakistan are guilty of the same?

      These are state sanctioned atrocities advertised as "blasphemy laws".

      Nope. Wrong again!

      You're just another confused Muslim-hater. It's sad that you need to invent reasons to hate them, but hey, as long as you get people riled up against Muslims, it's all good, right?

    16. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by rplacd · · Score: 1

      Changing the wikipedia article won't change the truth, only that Islamic terrorists are good at lies and propaganda...

      You've lied about everything you've said about the treatment of Hindus. Either back it up, or accept that your post was just what you accuse others of: lies and propaganda. Every single thing: the bit about the armbands, the molten metal, the hijab thing.

      Ball's in your court.

    17. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      omg, lmfao, i can't believe it.. a f*ckin indian terrorist is speaking about Hindus right in Pakistan? omg.. after writing up all the false information on wikipedia, he is giving the links to the same article! oh and just look at the level of jealousy of these indians! they simply can't believe it that Pakistan is developing the worlds largest WiMAX network! hahahahahaha! he surely is in denial. Now you talk about democracy? tell me where is democracy? Your nazi facist terrorist Goverment kills thousands of innocent kids and rape women in Kashmir, there are uncountable Freedom movements in India, for example in Assam, Kashmir etc. How a nation can be a democracy when there are strict caste rules? It's India who have done the largest Muslim genocide in world's history. THOUSANDS of Muslims were massacred in Indian Gujarat. These racists and hypocrites just try to name the freedom movements as terrorist organizations. i'll uncover the truth, WITH SOLID Proofs and some wikipedia links with all false information.

      "Documentary India Final Solution: True Face of Indian Nazism
      By rakeshfilm.com

      Final Solution is a study of the politics of hate against Pakistan and Muslims. Set in Gujarat during the period Feb/March 2002 - July 2003, the film graphically documents the changing face of right-wing politics in India through a study of the 2002 genocide of Muslims in Gujarat. It specifically examines political tendencies reminiscient of the Nazi Germany of early/mid-1930s. Final Solution is anti-hate/ violence as "those who forget history are condemned to relive it".

      WATCH THE VIDEO HERE: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8892825445 819740962
      ------

      Church Burned, Christians Attacked in Manipur, India: http://www.christianresponse.org/articles/161/chur ch-burned-christians-attacked-in-manipur-india

      "Lower caste hindus convert to Islam and become Christians on daily basis because of the fact that their own hindu Brahmin Extremists do not treat them as humans. Now, we have Hindu extremists attacking others for choosing their own faith. Sadly, the victims this time are the Christians in India. Brahmin terrorism continues, does any body care?

      BHUBANESWAR: Christians in several tense Indian states were weighing their options Tuesday, January 17, after churches were attacked and believers apparently pressured to return to Hinduism.

      In the Indian state of Orissa at least 136 persons of 25 families returned to Hinduism Monday at a what nationalist Hindu groups described as a 'home-coming' ceremony in Sundargarh district, about 400 kilometres (250 miles) from the state capital Bhubaneswar."

      http://www.india-facts.com/indianterrorism/hindute rrorism/article000074.php
      ---

      INDIAN MUSLIMS - AN OPPRESSED MINORITY: http://www.india-facts.com/indianterrorism/hindute rrorism/article000021.php
      --------

      Heres a video showing what's really going on in Kashmir - The indian terrorism.

      http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-551772270 2246333713&q=India+is%3Afree
      --------

      and about all the militants, which india brag about, actually, they are the agents of their own army and intelligence agencies..

      Surrender by fake militants embarrasses Army: http://www.tribuneindia.com/2004/20041205/j&k.htm# 1
      -----

      Police admits killing of civilians by armed agents:

    18. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by XchristX · · Score: 1

      >Are they? For what crime? For just existing? That is an outright lie.


      Yes, and no. I have provided proof in previous posts of human rights abuses of which Hindus are victims in Pakistan. Sorry, your propaganda only works on liberal westerners, not on me.

      Hindus are regarded as "Kaffirs" and "Dhimmis" in Pakistan. Pakistani muslims regard all non-muslims as animals and deserving only death. Pakistanis love death. I wonder why they wail so much when our armed forces give it to them.


      >Having molten metal poured into ears is a Hindu punishment for a religious crime, not a Muslim one

      No, my friend. It was invented by Tamurlang, a muslim. Hindus retaliate, never instigate. We are people, not beasts.

      Again, Islamofascist propaganda doesn't work on me. You're wasting your time, my terrorist sympathizing friend.

      >but hey, as long as you get people riled up against Muslims, it's all
      >good, right?


      It's about time people learnt the truth about you terrorist sympathizers and mass murderers.

      Support for bin-Laden and al-Qaeda is rampant in Pakistan. Pakistani schools teach how to hate ("Yahood aur Hanood ek sikke ke do hisse hain") before they teach how to read, and Hindus don't harbor suicide bombers.Muslims have murdered over 80 million hindus over the course of their hegemony in South Asia. From Aibak, to Iltutmish, to Babar, mir-Baqr, Aurangzeb and the Bahmanis they have made mountains of Hindu skulls all across the north. During partition the majority of the victims of the riots were Hindus, not muslims:
      http://koenraadelst.bharatvani.org/articles/irin/g enocide.html
      South Asian muslims spread usury, bribery, Jihad, and how to reproduce by rape. Now they can't stand the fact that we are free, and they are not.
      India is us, you are them.

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    19. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by XchristX · · Score: 1

      Links that support my claims are on orevious posts. I win, you lose.
      Like I said, you can fool the westerner into believing something other than the truth, but WE know what you are, and you can't change that truth.

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    20. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by XchristX · · Score: 1

      My,my. Such acute schizophrenia. What a pity. You know, if you had been a little more articulate, and not posted as an AC like a terrorist-sympathizer afraid of being tracked by NSA would, people would actually have believed you. Thank you for proving my point about your hatred for Hindus. I have no further use for you. Like I said, Osama bin-Laden is in your country, not mine. American troops are in your country, not mine. And I don't care about your dumb wimax network, RIM and BSNL already have more cell-towers in Northeastern India than all of Balochistan, and our GDP has been higher than yours for years. We don't hate you, we just don't care about you any more. You're unimportant.

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    21. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by rplacd · · Score: 1

      Yes, and no. I have provided proof in previous posts of human rights abuses of which Hindus are victims in Pakistan. Sorry, your propaganda only works on liberal westerners, not on me.

      And not one of the links substantiated any of the claims you made. Sorry, but no. Try again. Surely such abuses can't be that hard to find documented, if they actually occurred!

      Hindus are regarded as "Kaffirs" and "Dhimmis" in Pakistan. Pakistani muslims regard all non-muslims as animals and deserving only death. Pakistanis love death. I wonder why they wail so much when our armed forces give it to them.

      Wow, so much hate towards Pakistanis. I'd say you're a bigot, and openly proud of your bigotry.

      >Having molten metal poured into ears is a Hindu punishment for a religious crime, not a Muslim one

      No, my friend. It was invented by Tamurlang, a muslim. Hindus retaliate, never instigate. We are people, not beasts.


      Obviously history is not your strongest point. Having molten tin or lead was the punishment meted out to lower caste Hindus who had simply overheard a Veda recitation. I am not making this up. You can read about it in Dharma Theertha's History of Hindu Imperialism.

      South Asian muslims spread usury, bribery, Jihad, and how to reproduce by rape. Now they can't stand the fact that we are free, and they are not.

      Obviously not free from racism or bigotry, as evidenced in your comments.

    22. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is utter and complete nonsense. You are either an Indian troll or a Southern Baptist fool. I live in Pakistan. I have lived for many years in the USA and the UK as well. I can tell you that Hindus do live peacefully in Sindh and there is no state-sanctioned presecution of Hindus. I know Christian Pakistanis who are happy here, even if some people are prejudiced against them. As for Hijab, most urban Pakistani women do not even do it. The Muslims. They wear all the makeup they want. Another innaccuracy that needs to be corrected is that Pakistan does not fully implement shariah law in any substantive way. There are a few laws and a half-hearted commitment to implement some modernized version in the future, but it is nothing like Saudi Arabia and Iran. And there is no legal or officially condoned "stoning" of anyone and there are NO arm-bands, And yes I have travelled extensively in rural Pakistan. As for your Wikipedia link, Wikipedia is full of a lot of biased nonsense. It is only good for technical information.

    23. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by XchristX · · Score: 1

      Oh, and furthermore, this AC gave links to 'india-facts.com', a well known watering hole for Hindu haters. So much so that they need a disclaimer on their page:

      http://www.india-facts.com/

        Now why would a legitimate website need a 'disclaimer' I wonder quietly to myself? Does BBC, CNN or anyone have such 'disclaimers'?

        His citing of such hate sites is as discrediting to his point of view as a neo-nazi citing "www.jewwatch.com' to tout his anti-semitism...

        and as for the other articles. Well, those problems do exist. See?

        At least we ADMIT we have problems and are working to solve them. We live in a poor but free nation. We elect our government (useless fools that they may be). I'd rather be a poor but free Indian than a wealthy mameluk (slave in muslim-speak).

        Pakistanis have an oppressive military regime where they sweep all their problems under the rug and deny access to BBC, CNN and international news agencies (other than the propaganda leaflets tha their government hands out to them). Even then their lies are exposed by international news agencies.

        Muslims in India steal Hindu taxpayers' money to make their little "hajj" to their "Holy Land" (that's Mecca) and whie Hindus try to pilgrimage to their holy land in Ambarnath (that's in Kashmir), muslim slit their throats and watch while Hindu women and children twitch to death while bleeding freely.

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    24. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by XchristX · · Score: 1

      Yes, well. I too have been to Pakistan (Paki-Punjab and the NWFP) and have seen first hand what you do to Hindus and Sikhs there. I've seen Hindu women being blinded, deafened and buried alive "with my own two eyes" as Mohamed Ibn-Battuta would have put it.

      The wikipedia article I referred waa written and is maintained by a "Farhan Ahmad Siddiqui"

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Siddiqui

        himself a Pakistani muslim. Why would he be biased AGAINST Pakistan? The only logical solution is that it is the truth.

        Pakistan is a country whose raison d'aitre has been to wipe India off the map, as Zia-ul-Haq used to say on public television.

        And again, we don't harbor terrorists.

        And like I said, we don't hate you. You hate us. We retaliate when you kill. That's not hate, that's self-defense. You want the fighting to stop? Fine, don't attack and murder Hindus and we'll leave you alone. Then you people can build a mini-Iran.

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    25. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by pkphilip · · Score: 1

      hey, your xenophobia and deep rooted bias is showing!

      Godhra was not a "legitimate" reaction at all. How can you consider the brutal rape and murder of approximately 3000 innocent people "legitimate"? Your sense of right and wrong are completely messed up, pal. (NOTE: If you want to dispute the 3000 number, please go ahead, but the best reports filed by the NGOs independently indicate that number)

      Also, haven't you been read the investigative reports on the train incident? - there is nothing to indicate that the train was burned by the muslims as you seem so keen to point out. This was proven by multiple teams - by an independent group of engineers as well who stated quite categorically that no liquid inflammable substance was used in the train.

      If you would rather believe the "investigative" reports filed by the Gujarat government - a government widely regarded to be extremely sectarian and which has no respect for the fundamental rights of citizens, then that is upto you. Please also remember that the Gujarat government is considered complicit in the massacre that followed even by the Supreme Court of India which indicted it. Also, the court moved cases out of Gujarat for fear of bias - another first in the history of India.

      I am an Indian and make no bones of the fact that a lot of the terrorism around the world is perpetrated by those who do it in the name of islam - and this is something the muslims must address without hiding under the dubious claims that it is just a minority who is involved in terrorism (this can be disputed because the minority actually carrying out the terrorist attacks are funded by the majority who participate in fund collection drives etc).

      But that does not mean that I can look away when Hindus in India behave like animals and people such as yourself who should know better have their heads buried up their ass. What happenned in Gujarat is unforgiveable and it was the work of hindu fundamentalists - there is no question of that, so please stop trying to white wash something we should all be ashamed off.

    26. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      In general it is impossible to defeat committed guerillas if there is a significant population that supports them. Ask the British. Or the Israelis for that matter. The more you kill, the more there are.

      Force has it's place but it's not the right answer for every mess you need to clean up. My argument is that neither the Israelis nor Americans have been successful since they are not able to live the way they would prefer. The Israelis may not have any better options but the Americans probably do. Or did. That's also the problem with violence -- the more you use it, the harder it is to reverse the effect.

      The "terrorists," who aren't terrorists anymore by definition since they've had war declared on them, have plenty of Americans to blow up in Iraq, why should they go all the way to the US to do it? That doesn't mean they won't. Look around the world -- ethnic hatred can fester for generations before exploding again.

      Congratulations! You've mastered the political lingo! A great way to avoid thinking. I wish you'd put your last paragraph first though. Then I would have known there wasn't any point in replying to you before I typed all this. Oh well.

    27. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by XchristX · · Score: 1

      Before you resort to more ad-hominem attacks and liberal dialectic consider the following:

        The big difference between my humble self and the far-right nutters you implicitly accuse me of being associated with is that, unlike them, I believe in retaliation, not instigation. I believe in tolerance, pluralism, and all that gay stuff, provided those beliefs are reciprocated. The Islamic fundamentalists have not responded tolerance with tolerance. They have responded with hate everywhere, and such, do not deserve your (or anybody else's) sympathy. They need to be wiped out, all of them, by pure force.

        Some of the things you say are true. There have been many negative side effects of Americas war on terror, and US soldiers are being killed by "Insurgents" but to imply that they're "winning", or that their point of view has been legitimized somehow, is being completely out of touch with reality. They are killing US soldiers, not civilians (least, not since 9/11). Killing soldiers is different from killing civilians because soldiers can fight back, women and children can't (and you would realize that viscerally if you saw the 9/11 video footage).

        THAT is the result of American retaliation, which has "levelled the playing field", as you Americans say...

        Your implicit suggestion of using some sort of Gandhian "Ahimsa" against terrorist bombers can't work, any more than it couldn't have worked against Nazi Germany.

        Like I said, shamrock trees, lotus ponds, and pretty butterflies...

        I suggest, for your own enlightenement, that you look at the present situation after removing the liberal lens in front of your eyes that distorts many things that you see.

        I have been raised in a more liberal atmosphere that most people may have. I was born among leftists, raised by leftist, went to a leftist school, a leftist college, and a leftist university. I was as liberal as they came. Until my awakening was achieved when I simply looked at the facts and figures, and sow how inconsistent they were with liberal claims. It was my awakening that led me more to sympathize with neocons than with liberals. Liberals, I now realize, are a very grave threat, and far more racist, exclusionary, violent, and negationist than the conservatives you seem to dislike.

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    28. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by XchristX · · Score: 1

      >there is nothing to indicate that the train was burned by the muslims as you seem so >keen to point out
      >

        I am not a self-hating Hindu. I know there are millions of them. I see the truth beyond what the incompetent and islamofascist-sympathetic Indian media says. There's plenty of objective third party evidence to suggest that the burning down of Sabarmati express was no accident, and deliberately instigated by muslims. It is only part of a pattern of muslim behaviour and is consistent with their thinking and their way of life. The only reason why the media and the "OMG! Supreme bloody court" says otherwise is for political correctedness and to secure the muslim vote-bank while they slaughter hindus like they slaughter cattle.

      >
      >even by the Supreme Court of India which indicted it
      > ...proving that Gujrati RSS, like the Maharashtrian Shiv Sena have the balls to call a spade a spade and fight them on their own terms.

        And win. They have put the fear of "Allah" into Gujrati muslims, and imparting fear into the fearmongers was the goal in Godhra, just like it has been in Afghanistan with Americans, or Isrealis in Palestine.

        Speaking for myself, if you are for muslims in Godhra you are for an Islamic theocracy in India.

      Who has his head up in his ass now I wonder quietly to myself.

        Remember, no muslims=> no violence
                            no hindus=> no India.

        We are at war with muslims, and in war, these things happen. Don;t like it? Try to convince a muslim to stop supporting terrorists and get your throat slit...

        Francois Gautier was right. By-and-lare, muslims are bullies and Hindus are cowards (as you have illustrated). We bend over and accept islamic terrorist propaganda while they annihiliate our entire society. I'm sure muslims love people like you. Why don't you convert and save us the agony of calling you one of our own?

        Unless you , in reality, are a crypto muslim, in which case bugger off.

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    29. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by pkphilip · · Score: 1

      I would prefer to carry on this conversation elsewhere since it is way off topic - email me on pkphilip at yahoo.com if you don't mind.

    30. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by spotaun · · Score: 1

      Love what you've done with this thread. Not! Are you gathering troops for a hate-club? It's quite interesting how you talk about muslims instigating, and you here are pretty much doing the instigation. Clown! Relax man, there's much more to life than wasting time googling all these links up - I doubt anyone has even bothered clicking on them. You talk about using force blahdeeblah, against muslims - what're you doing sitting here in the US? Go back to India and do something about it. You're 'all-talk' - lets see some action punk! when are we going to see your name in the papers? One more question, why so much hate? Were you harrassed by muslims at some point in your life? I bet you're one of those pesky little indians plotting your revenge... sitting in a hole in your curry-stinking apartment... everyone around you probably thinks you're a goody two shoes - shy 'n humble, cos you don't have the kahunas to stand up to anyone. So you spend your time writing up wikipedia articles and posting them on slashdot. Get a life... camel jockey!

    31. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by veeren76 · · Score: 1

      hey "Anonymous Coward" decide .... if you are paki or indian... some posts you say u are paki and some posts you are a Indian..... I have nothing against pakis.... but try to be firm on ur position....why unneccessarily change every now and then for individual posts.....???

      --
      Common sense is not common
    32. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by XchristX · · Score: 1

      >lets see some action punk
        You did in Godhra. Muslims are scared shitless of Hindus there now, so much so that they dare not carry any more terrorits attacks anymore. I can't help it if it gets your pants in a twich when some Hindu niggers choose to defend themselves...

        You will when Pakistan is surrounded by America, Israel, and India. Soon, they will answer for their hate.

        Again, thank you for proving that it's muslims and their sympathizers who disseminate hate-speech, not Americans, as CAIR would have people believe.

      >bet you're one of those pesky little indians plotting your revenge... sitting in a hole in your curry-stinking apartment

        Coming from whom I'll bet is a camel-shit stinking raghead sandnigger who makes a living throwing rocks at Jews, and has a Yankee boot up his ass, that's rather amusing.

        I have some advice, seeing your virulent Hindu-hatred for what it is, why don't you go troll in the neo-nazi forums like stormfront.org, David Duke's personal blog and the KKK website? They love muslims there now. That alone is proof positive of what muslims really are...

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    33. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so now instead of being an open-minded realist you are a hindu fanatic

      bonus points for you, your rhetoric is no different than any random deluded idiot trying to spin this thread into their hate mongering agenda

    34. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by XchristX · · Score: 1

      No, instead of being a clueless liberal I am a Hindu revivalist, and that is why you hindu haters hate us.

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    35. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by spotaun · · Score: 1

      Haha! Let me make a few things clear... contrary to your "assumption" (which would cover most of the crap you spit out) I am not a hindu or jew hater. In fact, a few of my best friends from college are hindus, as well as Sikhs. The kind I do hate is your kind... the kind that instigate and provoke hatred, be it Muslim, Hindu, Jew, Christian, whose sole mission in life is to make sure there is no peace on the planet. Brainwashed nincompoops, who don't have a mind of their own, but instead read articles all over the web, and form their opinion based on that. Do you even know the ground realities? Have you ever been there? Have you been with the people who did suffer? Be it Muslims, Hindus or Jews? From your previous posts, you seem to think Hindu's are above all... does your religion not teach you that all mankind is equal? I'm sure it does... but you don't follow that religion do you? You have your own religion going on slashdot... schmuck lord. Don't get your panties in a bunch, you little pansy, sitting behind your computer screen. If you're that concerned, go start something... pick up a placard and start a protest. Damn fool! Haha!

      >You will when Pakistan is surrounded by America, Israel, and India. Soon, they will answer for their hate.
      Mmm... as for that lousy threat... pffft, you wish. :) Maybe you'll lead that front? Yeah right! I'm sure your range is limited to the 5 foot (your height I'm assuming - oh crap, im getting your disease) radius around your computer.

      > makes a living throwing rocks at Jews
      I didn't you could make a living throwing rocks at Jews?! Thats news to me! Dude, you're quite well-tapped into... land-of-sucky-information, aren't you?!

      > and has a Yankee boot up his ass, that's rather amusing.
      I have nothing against "yankees" and they have nothing against me. You're the one with all the hatred against the world so you must speak from experience? Must've been painful! Wait... but then you probably got yo' momma's heels up yo' ass so many time that you didn't feel them yankee boots at all (please spare me the details, i really don't want to know) :)

      >I have some advice, seeing your virulent Hindu-hatred for what it is
      Again, I have no idea how you came to the conclusion that my hatred for Hindu's is virulent... did you really go to university? It almost seems like you went to some Hindu brainwashing bootcamp where you have been led/forced to believe that all Muslims are evil and must be annihilated. :) You must be a Hindu MULLAH!

      Now I have some advice for you... get a life. Yeah, really there is such a thing... and it's beautiful. A few pointers on how you can make a difference. And writing up articles on wikpedia and promoting them here isn't one of them. Go teach people in India about AIDS, and how to prevent it from spreading. Fix all the problems in your house before you go out trying to fix the world's problems. Go make a difference where you will be recognized for your efforts. Don't sit around provoking anger, violence and hatred, through meaningless posts, cos all you'll get is grief... it won't get you ANYWHERE buddy. Do you really think that your rants will solve the hate issues?

      Really, I wonder where all your hatred stems from, cos it sure makes you sound like you're part of some cult.

      Alright, I've had enough... I'm out. Take it easy man... get out of your stinky hole and go breathe in some fresh air. Enjoy life... or soon you'll get a terrible headache. :) And nothing in life is worth a headache I say.

      See ya! Peace! Mmm wait... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace. Just so you get an idea of what it is... yeah, you can find some GOOD stuff on wikipedia too.

      PS. Don't bother replying back, as you won't be getting a response. This was fun! :) Happy Hating!

    36. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by XchristX · · Score: 1

      The difference between a mullah and myself is that I won't impose my beliefs on others. I will speak the truth, but I won't send missionaries into your country to commit genocide unless you convert to Hinduism. The very notion is ridiculous to us.

      Muslims, however, spread their disease through war. From the Umayyid Caliphate to Iran they are a people who created a military industrial complex that spread Islam through death. Now, they distort the historical facts and lie, portraying themselves as victims when they are the ones killing innocents.

        Muslims, aim to slaughter all non-muslims unless they convert, as instructed in their book:

      Bukhari (Translator) 4:52:220 Allah's Apostle said "I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy)"

        Ibn Ishaq (Translator) :572 "Muhammad is the man, an Apostle of my Lord. Evil was the state of our enemy so they lost the day. Fortunes change and we came upon them like lions from the thickets. The armies of Allah came openly, flying at them in rage, so they could not get away. We destroyed them and forced them to surrender. In the former days there was no battle like this; their blood flowed freely. We slew them and left them in the dust. Those who escaped were choked with terror. A multitude of them were slain. This is Allah's war in which those who do not accept Islam will have no helper. War destroyed the tribe and fate the clan."

        There are worse lines. You will never see such violent hate-speech in Hindu scripture, and they want to wipe *US* out? We have every right to defend ourselves.

        Theres are ayahs in the Quaraan which say that infidels are dumb ,deaf, blind and stupid. I am sure at least this verse has come from this "Allah" person muslims yap about so much. Otherwise how it is possible that hundreds of thousands of Hindus from Kashmir are refugees in their own country and muslims have taken over their properties, terrorist selectively slaughter hindus and the hindu majority country and the govt. of India remains a dumb spectator.

        Thousands of madrasas turn out koran spouting fanatics ready to kill and be killed and again a democratic govt. is a mute witness .

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    37. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by spotaun · · Score: 1

      You're obviously up at the oddest hours watching your e-mail, aren't you? I couldn't help but respond. :)

      Here's the sad part about this whole thing. The meaning of infidel is so fluid, and I, as would be other people, am of the opinion that it is a misunderstood interpretation amongst Muslims and non-Muslims alike. For example, there are so many parts of the Quran which talk about religious freedom and honoring lives of other souls, that are ignored by Muslims and non-Muslims when understanding Quranic teachings. I certainly wasn't brought up to believe that all non-believers, etc must be wiped out off the face of the earth - the only time I feel something similar is when I'm watching a Pakistan v India cricket match, but that is only limited to wiping the Indian cricket team out of the series. FYI, my wife supports India, being from India. Back to the original point I was trying to make: It is unforunate that the actions of Muslims have often been thought of as what Islam itself is. What a group of Muslims does is not what Islam preaches. Islam is against killing of a single soul without justice - it detests killing, as the Quran addresses: "... whoever slays a soul, unless it be for murder or for mischief in the land, it is as though he slew all men; and whoever keeps it alive, it is as though he kept alive all men; ..." (Al-Maidah 5:32)

      Here is what moderate (contemporary) Muslims believe in, with respect to indfidels:
      "... belief is that this word is a synonym for the word 'Kaafir' in Quran with respect to the question under discussion. If that is the case, it needs to be said that non-believers who live in the age of messengers of God are a different class and category than non-believers otherwise. It is for this reason that in the history of mankind, whenever a messenger of God came to a nation, he proved his messenger ship clearly and plainly to his nation so much so that they had no confusion about him being a bearer of truth. As a result, those people who, after having known the truth, still denied the messenger were passed on a judgment in this world by the Almighty. In case of polytheists, this judgment was in form of their annihilation, for example the great flood on Noah (pbuh)'s nation when those who rejected his message were drowned. A similar fate was decided by the Almighty on the people of Lot (pbuh), Abraham (pbuh), Salih (pbuh) and other messengers.

      It needs to be understood in this context that at the end of the mission of Muhammad (pbuh) when God, in his absolute Knowledge, knew that those who were rejecting faith were not rejecting because they had any confusion with regards to it, rather they were rejecting out of mere arrogance and pride, He commanded Muslims to slay down those 'infidels' from amongst the polytheists. The Jews and Christians, on the other hand, because they belonged to monotheistic faith, were to be fought against until they became politically subservient to Muslims. This was done after providing both the idolaters and the people of the Book (Jews and Christians) sufficient time to understand whether Muhammad (pbuh) was a real messenger of God and the message he brought forward was actually the message from God.

      This is God's law specific to messengers as I have explained above. Since a messenger of God is not living with us anymore, and we do not know that which is in the hearts of people, we cannot call them 'infidels' and commit such acts (9/11, etc). In a time such as today, every soul must continue to strive to find the truth and live by it."

      With the above in mind, I hope you don't classify all Muslims as "evil". Your fight should not be against Muslims... your fight should be against people who promote violence, and not all Pakistani Muslims hate Hindus. You might not believe this but we had quite a few hindu's in my school in Pakistan. One of them is quite a close friend of mine... and was never made to feel that she was any different from us... in fact, we never felt that she was not a part of ou

    38. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by XchristX · · Score: 1

      Well boo yaa. Fine and Dandy for you. The reality is that most of the muslim world does not believe as you do. They do hate, and kill, and you can't blame that on America, since they have been hating and killing since before 1776, when America was born.

      Hindus were simple farmers, nothing more when bin-Qasim invaded the subcontinent and made mountains of Hindu skulls across what today is Balochistan.

      We had no conception of religious hatred. All the wars we fought before with the Greeks, Scythians, and whever were political and territorial in nature. Even when Alexander invaded he didn't massacre or depopulate India. Your ancestors did.

      When Al-Ghazni sacked temples and holy places and hindus resisted, he massacred them. That is the reality of Islamic history.

      However you choose to interpret your doctrine, the actions of your people are reprehensible, and have been throughout history.

      Now I'll admit theat Christians have been only slightly better in the past, but there have been no blatant acts of genocide among Christians since Milosevic, while your brethren in Kashmir, Afghanistan, and Darfur are murdering people even as we speak...

      At this time, secularism is accorded the place of prestige in India. During the freedom movement, the holders of this snobbish label, pandered to the minorities (Islam and Christianity). Following independence, this supercilious snobbish label has been casting the same magic spell on the Brown Sahibs (the phony-liberal Hindus) who are camouflaging their minority pandering as secularism. What these Brown Sahibs (BS) are saying is that Indian Culture is a Composite Culture and that Hindus should be thankful to the Muslims for the latter's contribution to the composite culture. These BS secularists pay glowing tributes not only to the Moslem masses but also to the erstwhile barbaric persecutors of the Hindu for centuries, who destroyed everything that is Hindu. The Brown Sahibs conveniently forget that Pakistan was created because the Moslems did not want to live with the Kafir Hindu in the Kafir Hindustan.

      While looking at the social outlook of the Brown Sahibs and their concept of the composite culture and the pluralistic society in India, the important question to ask is this:

      Has there ever been peaceful co-existence between the Hindus and the muslims at anytime or were they constantly at war with each other in the several centuries gone by?

      An unbiased observation would reveal that peace was the exception rather than the norm, during these past centuries. The partition of the country itself between the Hindu and the Moslem countries of India and Pakistan, is a standing challenge to the Composite Culture theory.

      Of course, cultural give-and-take among the various communities of India (to form a broad unity), has been taking place in India since the Pre-Vedic periods. But this inter-cultural fusion has not occurred since the arrival of Islam and Christianity, both of whom refused to blend and integrate, prefering to maintain their separate identity and power. Thus Indian Culture, even today, continues to remain largely a Hindu Culture and Moslems and Christians want no part of it. Moslems want to carve out further areas of Pakistan and Christian Home-lands out of the truncated India that we have left for us now.

      The Brown Sahibs who are wearing their Secular Blind-Folds, are unable to see the deep interior of Islam and Christianity and come out with disastrous prescriptions, which only accomplish the melt-down of Hinduism. It is particularly odd to notice that these BS secularists, when they push for secularism, seldom talk about the great Pre-Islamic period and the Culture of ancient India, in fact, they malign it implicity, sometimes even explicitly. As for the Moslem writers, few Moslem thinkers or writers consider it even fit to delve into or take a peep into the Pre-Vedic period of India; their Islamic religion dismisses this Pre-Islamic p

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    39. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by spotaun · · Score: 1

      Hmm, how come your points start at 4? :) Forgot to delete the numbers off the rest of the numbers you copied off of:
      http://www.hinduweb.org/home/general_sites/essays/ compculture.html

      It's great that you have so much passion. If only you could focus it into promoting peace, you could achieve wonders.

      Anyways, we have to stop living in the past, and try to work towards peace for the future... it won't happen if we keep digging up graves. It is quite unfortunate if all that the essay mentions happened in the name of Islam, by people who believed themselves to be ambassadors of Islam. I still believe that the root of all problems is Man... we need to fix ourselves and stop using religion as an excuse to kill or promote violence and hatred.

      I would really like to see us co-exist peacefully... and be tolerant and respectful of other cultures, beliefs. I dunno what else to say to you, but the only way towards a solution is educating people... don't know how and when that will happen... but I hope it does, so the generations to come can live in peace.

      I don't think it's either you or us... it's all of us. People who want it fixed the right way are too scared to speak up, cos they know they will be hunted down by their own kind and called bigots. People who do speak up, are the ones who believe in using force / weapons to fight, which will never work, unfortunately. And the wheels... turn turn turn.

    40. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by XchristX · · Score: 1

      Why should force and weapons not work? It works in Israel, where these so-called "Palestinians" cower and cry like little babies when IDF missiles teach them a lesson, or in Afghanistan, where towelheads get napalmed and gibber in fear before US soldiers.

        It worked when your "Holy Jihadi Army" of Pakistan led by the cause of "Allah" against the Hindu "infidel" surrendered to the Indian Army in 2 weeks in '71 when we made your country pay for what you did in Bangladesh, and it worked in Gujrat. Muslims in Gujrat now know better than to attack Hindus.

        Force is the only solution to deal with animals who have no respect for anything but hate. The only way to deal with terrorists and mass-murderers is to give them a taste of their own medicine. That is why muslims are losing everywhere.

        Even as we speak, there are millions of muslims who do nothing but spread hate and lies. Even here in slashdot, whenever an article about India's prosperity comes up, most hate-speech modded down at -1 is from Pakistanis, as if your country is soooo advanced and developed. As if there are no pakis starving to death on the streets of Lahore and Islamabad while your government is too busy spending money on guns and suicide squads than on their own people...

        What do "moderate" muslims like you do? Nothing. You claim you love all mankind and hate terrorists, but you continue to send them money. Your mullahs and imams chant hate-speech on the streets and advocate Holy Jihad against India, simply because you hate us for trying to make our country a better place by rejecting a medeival and backward religion like Islam and embracing modern values and ideals.

        Anti-Semitism, Hinduphobia, Anti-Americanism, Luddism, Femicide, Democide, Pederasty, recruiting child soldiers, ethnic cleansing all take place in muslim countries in overwhelmingly greater amounts that in India or any other non-muslim country. You say it's "all people" that cause this, but it's only people in Muslim countries who do 90% of the killings. Arabs who spread Jew-hatred on television, and madmen like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad who want to "wipe Israel off the map", and terrorists all over Pakistan who want to masssacre all Hindus.

        No other countries or societies expresses this much bile and hate for those not of their own flock.

        Face facts, we are economically and militarily superior to you, as well as culturally (there are more muslims in India then Hindus in Pakistan, even though all of them hate us and want to kill us). Our education systems are superior, and we do better professionally than you pakis do here in the US, or the UK, or anywhere we compete for business...

        The only way your country will improve is if you accept this as truth and try to do well yourselves, instead of spening your lives in a mosque flagellating each other bloody and hating India more than white people do.

        If you truly want your country to prosper, abandon religious theocracy, Islamic blasphemy laws and stop sending money to Kashmiri animals. Then we can dialogue peace. Until then, the only way for India to achieve peace is to win it through war.

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    41. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by spotaun · · Score: 1

      Let me repeat one more time - you'll never win it through war :) So good luck there.

      And as for doing so good professionaly... kudos to you. More power and success to you man. Rock on tampon! Considering the copious amounts of Indians all over... its good to know that a tiny percentage is making it through. ;)

      As for your vastly broad generalizations about Muslims, life, and everything else... they carry absolutely no weight. Stop flailing your arms so blindly... you'll only end up hurting yourself :)

      As for sending money... please provide proof as to which moderate muslims you know of sponsor terrorism... I really would like to know. Your claims are baseless.

      Relax a bit, or you'll spontaeously combust (I'm sure you'll blame every Muslim for it too). Cry baby.

    42. Re:Sure - better for all the Jihadis ... by XchristX · · Score: 1

      >provide proof

      The Council Of American islamic relations (a front for the terrorist lobby):

      http://www.cfr.org/publication/10356/tracking_down _terrorist_financing.html#2
      http://www.anti-cair-net.org/
      http://www.danielpipes.org/article/3437
      http://www.danielpipes.org/article/394

      Enough proof there...

      They even tried to shut anti-cair up, but no dice

      http://www.danielpipes.org/article/3511
      http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.a sp?ID=18919

      Some Muslim organizations in the United States have also condemned CAIR. Sheik Muhammad Hisham Kabbani of the Islamic Supreme Council of America (ISCA) denounced CAIR, saying: "There are many Muslim organizations that claim to speak on behalf of the Muslim community but that in reality are not moderate, but extremist."

      Seif Ashmawy, an Egyptian Muslim and peace activist, who published the "Voice of Peace" newsletter about Muslim affairs, said: "It is a known fact that CAIR has defended, apologized for, and rationalized the actions of extremists groups ... The real challenge for moderates like myself is to prevent my Muslim brethren from being deceived by extremist groups that pretend to represent their interests."

      Steven Pomerantz, former FBI assistant director and chief of the FBI's counter-terrorism section, once charged that CAIR's activities "effectively give aid to international terrorist groups." Other American Muslim leaders have raised questions about their possible alliances with radical groups, and many academics are disturbed by the groups' prominence.

      On February 2, 1995, CAIR advisory board member Imam Siraj Wahaj was accused by the United States Department of Justice as one of several "unindicted persons who may be alleged as co-conspirators in the attempt to blow up New York City monuments," including the World Trade Center in 1993. He was a character witness during convicted Islamic terrorist Omar Abdel-Rahman's World Trade Center bombing trial.

      Convicted Members of CAIR

      A number of other CAIR officials have been charged with, and some convicted of, offenses related to the support of Islamist terrorism.

      In December, 2001, Rabih Haddad, a CAIR fundraiser, was charged and deported from the United States because he was the executive director and co-founder of Global Relief Foundation, a terrorist front organization that for financing Al-Qaeda and other terrorist organizations.

      On December 18, 2002, Ghassan Elashi, a founding board member of CAIR-Texas and a co-founder of the Holy Land Foundation, was arrested by the FBI on charges of having ties with front groups that fund Islamic terrorism. In 2005, Elashi and two of his brothers were convicted on 21 counts of federal terrorism charges related to funding Hamas and the illegal export of electronics equipment to U.S. State Department-designated state sponsors of terrorism.

      In January 2003, CAIR's director of community relations and founder of the Islamic Assembly of North America, Bassem Khafagi, was arrested by the FBI on charges of having ties to front groups that fund Islamist terrorism. Khafagi pleaded guilty to charges of visa and bank fraud, and agreed to be deported to Egypt.

      In August 2003, CAIR's former civil-rights coordinator, Randall "Ismail" Royer, along with ten other men known as the "Virginia jihad group" were indicted on 41 counts, including training and participating in jihad activities overseas. The group had connections with Lashkar-e-Taiba and five of them possessed AK-47-style rifles and hundreds of rounds of ammunition. Four of th

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
  20. More info by ashvagan · · Score: 1

    A US based company in Pakistan is using WiMax for its call center. Sales Rep will be sitting at home working with WiMax and will be monitored by a webcam (I know it sounds lousy and 1984ish, hope it works). This will introduce a whole new way for outsourced companies to work here.

  21. Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good to see Pakistan has it's priorities in order.

  22. +1 Sarcastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the article didn't even mention pricing, which will have to be pretty low if they expect the average Pakastani to be able to pay for it.

  23. presidents have little power or control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Presidents get told what to do. His next set of marching orders will be coming after the next bilderberg conference, which is soon in some city in canada I think. That meeting and a few more with the planetary bankers and controllers is where the real power on the planet is. Presidents and prime ministers, etc are chosen there, they get their orders from those sorts of people through their personal handlers. This election stuff is for show biz purposes.

  24. Competing with India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps the whole WiMax thing was pushed to ensure decent connectivity and pipelines for luring Outsourcing business to Pakistan. Considering the perpetual inferiority complex Pakistan suffers because of India, this is a last ditch attepmt to rev up the infrastructure so that they grab a pie of the dollars pouring into India, China and Phillipines.

    I wonder how they plan to use it. Most likely Al-Qaeda employees will now have faster access to Google Earth.

    Expect to see more webcasts from Bin Laden when the Pakistanis finally roll out the service.

  25. Repeat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So is this just and Ad for another country with WiMax, because i'm pretty sure its been rolled out elsewhere before.
    Not to mention the places planning on rolling it out with trials already in place.

    At least it'll prove to certain trolls that its not vaporware and always has been a long way from it.

    The advantages I see in this are of mainly areas where conventional phone lines cannot carry a signal well; Eg. Rural Areas or Certain Buildings.

  26. Who said 'cheap'? by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Parent says: "..cheap wireless broadband access for the masses is GREAT!"

    True, but I rtfa and I don't recall anything about pricing. I suspect that the masses will not benefit anytime soon.

  27. MOD PARENT UP!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get the word out!

  28. wonderful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Great milestone. seems like mobility is becoming very popular in south-asian countries where it's very hard to develop and maintain cable infrastructure.

    There's a HUGE market for highspeed connectivity and other telecom + economic sectors in Pakistan. After a big boost in cellular/telecom industry, Pakistan is soon going to see a broadband revolution. Here in Pakistan, Prices are very very high for a good high-speed connection.. it costs more than 50$ to get a 128kbits shared connection with no bandwidth caps. But looks like things are changing rapidly.. big players are coming into the broadband market and soon we'll see a price PLUS quality competition, which will obviously benefit the end-user. Same happened with mobiles/cellular industry, and now we have one of the most low-cost tariffs with quality of service being high.

  29. WiMAX hype and hope by bananaendian · · Score: 1

    AT&T did its bit to puncture the WiMAX hype today, while providing an update on three of its trial WiMAX deployments. Behzed Nadji, AT&T's Chief Architect, debunked stories about 70 Mbit/s throughput over distances of 70 miles for WiMAX. "There's little reality to that," he said. A range of 3 to 5 miles and 2 Mbit/s was closer to reality. In fact, one of AT&T's three deployments rarely saw throughput rise above 500 kbit/s, he said. Source

    I can already provide point-to-multipoint 360 coverage with megabit connections simultaniously to over a hundred customers with 802.11g using three channel sector antennas. The range depends on how big a receiving antenna they have. WiMAX isn't about revolutionizing speed and coverage. It's about intellegent contention, load control and QoS, which the existing 802s are lacking. Better for real mesh networking and reliable VoIP.

    --
    www.tribalnetworks.org - helping tribal people around the world to own their own means of high-tech communications
  30. Osama to pay for entire venture by BocaJuniors · · Score: 1, Troll

    Evidently, a pious Islamofascist can only go so long without broadband pr0n.

    1. Re:Osama to pay for entire venture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We all need our pr0n, don't we!? That's what's driving this wireless technology like in the West. :)

    2. Re:Osama to pay for entire venture by alfs+boner · · Score: 1
      Evidently, a pious Islamofascist can only go so long without broadband pr0n.

      Evidently, you've outsourced your thinking to a cabal of virginal basement bloggers. Kudos for controlling yourself and not calling someone an "asshat," just because you were writing a sentence.

      --
      Listen p*ssy. I'm sure your the same homo that posted earlier about alf's boner and you just want to remain anonymous fo
    3. Re:Osama to pay for entire venture by BocaJuniors · · Score: 1

      Evidently, my joke about pr0n, not Islamofascism, sucked. ;)

    4. Re:Osama to pay for entire venture by alfs+boner · · Score: 1

      Correct; you're not funny.

      --
      Listen p*ssy. I'm sure your the same homo that posted earlier about alf's boner and you just want to remain anonymous fo
    5. Re:Osama to pay for entire venture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, not to worry though, the OP was still a funny joke.

  31. All five Pakistani internet users are joyous by melted · · Score: 2, Funny

    All five Pakistani internet users are joyous.

  32. They've been hiring this last month by anticypher · · Score: 1

    There are a bunch of low-cost no-name recruiting agencies searching around for engineers to go to Pakistan for a WiMax project the last month or two. It doesn't hold too well for the project that they are trying to pay Paki prices, but expect to find experienced first world engineers.

    I had a twisted conversation with one of them two weeks ago. They want all the usual impossibilities, such as 5-10 years of WiMax experience, 15-30 years industry experience but only 18-25 years old, have to be able to program in PowerPoint, etc. I played along, and tried to convince the HR droid to at least pass my CV on, as people closer to the core of the project are probably more competent and my chances of scoring the contract much higher. I told her that they needed to contact me soon, as I was also being recruited by Motorola to do another WiMax rollout so they had only 5 days to get back to me. The deadline has passed, so I guess my holding out for minimum wage was too much for them.

    the AC

    --
    Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
  33. The sky is falling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who the f#ck cares about this piddly installation....except for Osama who is can finally go wireless in his cave.

  34. Does the USA care? by MMaestro · · Score: 1
    Considering the size difference between the two countries alone, the fact that these countries are leaving the U.S. in the dust in terms of wireless internet service is no surprise.

    And if you want to nitpick, Pakistan has a much more hostile terrain, a lack of already existing infrastructure and by doing this they kill two (or three) birds with one stone. (A cheap easy voice-over-IP telephone infrastructure, cheap easy wireless national internet service and arguably a relatively cheap investment in the long term future.) Whereas the U.S. has a (relatively) friendly terrain, a pre-existing infrastructure of both phone lines and cable lines and would cost far, far more than what Pakistan is paying because of the political attention it would recieve (read : political mess).

  35. Re: Sure Better for all the Jihadis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "He's not stereotyping. Pakistani Hindus live in mortal fear of their lives. They are publicly stoned to death, forced to wear armbands (like the Jewish people during the Nazi Ausrotten in Poland), and Hindu women often get gang-raped and molten metal poured into their eyes and ears and buried alive for wearing makeup in public or for not following the Islamic 'hijab'. These are state sanctioned atrocities advertised as "blasphemy laws".
    "

    This is a complete misrepresentation of the true situation.
    I live in the capital of Pakistan. And Hindus live here respectable lives. In the current Governing Cabinet there is a Hindu minister! Hindus have been a major part in Pakistani Cricket.
    In the street I live, their is a Hindu government officer, but here in pakistan we dont think in terms of religion!! I dont know hows its in hte rural areas. What armbands are you talking about???? There is no discrimination with respect to religion here, noone is asked to wear armbands for their religious believes.
    Right here in the capital there is a Hindu Temple, just as their is a Masonic lodge and two Churches. In Karachi there's even a Synagogue!
    There are more attacks on groups of other religions in India then their are in any other country, Kashmir, Gujarat etc..

    And What Islamic Hijab?? Pakistan is not Afghanistan or Iran only a minority of women wear that thing! Just visit the Capital you'll see women going around the street in jeans!!

    Thanks for pointing to that wikipedia article I'll update it with the true facts, it has to have been made by some one who has no knowledge of the ground realities!!

  36. The only reason they would do this is because by beoswulf · · Score: 2, Informative

    The government is expanding internet access in an attempt to maintain Pakistan's top rank amongst nations that search Google for "sex".

    http://www.google.com/trends?q=sex&ctab=1&sa=N

  37. Pakistani Perspective by alijsyed · · Score: 1

    I spent much time in Pakistan (over 3 years) and I have had first hand experience with the limited growth of the internet in rural Pakistan. Outside of the mega cities of Karachi, Lahore and Rawalpinidi(twin city Islamabad), rural areas had very limited access to the internet via 56k modem based internet.

    During my last visit (last may) I witnessed a massive surge in cell phone use and purchases by the middle class and dare I say lower income brackets (very parallel to us in Canada and America). Access to information and technology should never be restricted to income or literacy.

    Do you really think the people of rural USA or rural Canada are any better or worse than those in rural Pakistan. Hardly, I grew up in rural Ontario and I can not see a major difference (apart from religions though the rural south west of Punjab province in Pakistan is dominated by Christian populations). Regardless of country, income, class information and access to it should always be free.

    Shame on use for thinking anything else.

    The real boom behind this is the fact land lines require a position on a waiting list which means a heavy bribe. Cell phones and wireless technology have side stepped dated briery practices because there is so much competition in Pakistan for this to take root. While WiMax may not better the poor it gives the poor rural population a technology they would have had access to otherwise. This in turn leads to education (in various forms) and an increase in job potential.

  38. Expected.. by damneinstien · · Score: 1

    More development of wireless access in developing nations seems expected. These nations don't have the resources to make everything landline and so they spend the money trying to improve their network prevalence through wireless methods.

    I'm not just making this stuff out of my rear-end. Look at the land-line phone vs cellular phone use in the United States vs. a developing country like India or Pakistan . Cell phone use in developing countries is more prevalent than land-line phones. Why should we expect something different for wireless vs. land-line internet connections?

  39. Brave, you are by Clueless+Nick · · Score: 1

    bhrataha...

    --
    Chat with other atheists http://secularchat.org
  40. Re:it would be by kadnan · · Score: 1

    I have worked in one of company of Abu Dhabi group who owned Warid,Wateen and Bankalfalah.They launched free creditcards 3 years back and literally captured the entire Pakistani market.I expect similar thing by Wateen as well.

  41. Re:so ?? by kadnan · · Score: 1

    you could comeup with facts to support your statment that Pakistan is not a developing country rather whining for no reason.Can you? I am here

  42. Re:no no! by kadnan · · Score: 1

    He has been relying on satellite connection by US.Didnt u know tht??? I am here

  43. Re:No Google wickedness by kadnan · · Score: 1

    First off in all the searches Pakistan's bar was way bigger than the one in second place, and I find it quite unusual for that to be the case. In all my years living here I've never noticed any unnatural tendencies of anybody towards the sexual habits of an animal of any type. Then Secondly, in these lewd term's results, if you go into the languages tab, it shows Arabic. Now, logically speaking, if the country on top was Pakistan, then surely the language on top should be English. I don't think too many people in Pakistan use google in Arabic...and this seems to be the case only if you enter some lewd terms like the ones I mentioned. If you enter 'Pakistan', top rated region is Pakistan, and top language is English (which should be expected). But if you enter something like donkey sex, top region is Pakistan, and top language becomes Arabic. How google trends comes up with the connection of donkey sex, pakistan and arabic is beyond me. So by keeping these two factor,its not difficulty to get that google *might* engineer the trends specifically for Pakistan and Arabic(due to Islam)?

  44. Re:OH boy oh you whiner... by kadnan · · Score: 1

    why r you wasting your energy to prove yourself pious and saint while we know things happen in India like gujrat riots,babri mosque destruction,selling baby foetus(Opps) etc etc etc.calm down,take a beer and enjoy defeat of India in cricket series. p.s:Deepak parwani is the biggest fashion designer in Pakistan and He is a ummmmm *Hindu*

  45. Re:OH boy oh you whiner... by XchristX · · Score: 1

    And I wonder why YOU are wasting YOUR energy trying to portray Pakistan as a pious country while we all know that it is dominated by mad mullahs with a Koran in one hand and a submachine gun on the other, and you treat your women like you treat your cattle, and train terrorists to fight in Kashmir, where they bury Hindus in mass graves after torturing them to death,and mobs burn down the US consulate over some silly cartoon,and that Pakistani immigrants in the UK and US are mostly poor, or in jail, or both, while ours are industrious and wealthy and help their country of origin constantly.

      Why don't YOU face the fact that we are better-connected doing better economically than you, and actually have a future in the modern world?

      Oh, and the "Babri Masjid" is called the Ramjanmabhoomi. The mosque was built over a Hindu temple, destroyed, together with it's worshippers, by Mir Baqr in the 16th century in a fit of genocidal mania. Our rightful claim to it is no different from the right of the Israelis to reclaim their holy shrine, the "Temple Mount" from muslims.

      And no muslims were harmed physically during it's rightful demolition, while the Islamic terrorist attacks on it have killed Hindus. Agsin, the subsequent "riots" were in retaliation to islamic murders.We retaliate, never instigate.

      So there you are, more Islamic terrorism, right under the noses of the liberal socialists who love them so dearly.

    --
    l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
  46. Re:so ?? by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    Do you speak English?

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  47. You snooze, you lose... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unfortunately, Britain's industry snoozed all through the ultra-Conservative Thatcher years and now has very little industry to speak of. Steel - all gone. Coal - all gone. Engineering - damn near all gone, even the mighty BAe Systems only has a tiny site on the Clyde these days. Computers - well, in Scotland we have a fairly healthy games industry in Dundee I suppose.

    It all went wrong on the Conservative's watch. The US might do well to learn from that.

  48. Re:OH boy oh you whiner... by kadnan · · Score: 1

    I am not wasting any word to potray my country is a developing country because it Is. its so funny that this post was all about WiMax connection in Pakistan and ppl like you start discussing politics,ignoring evil facts of your own country. Keep your lame stories about janam bhoomi and other shits in your lungi because nobody believe in it at all.I know it hurts when something good happen in Pakistan because u guys never accepted Pakistan as a seprate state and I am glad when that you guys have been suffering for Pakistanfobia for last 55 years,keeps suffering and keep making such posts so that we keep getting updates of Indian attitudes *wicked smile*. If you really love your India,do something for thousands of ppl who sleep on streets of Mumbai,your big econ is failed to feed them,Curse on such development.

  49. Re:OH boy oh you whiner... by XchristX · · Score: 1

    And I pity your people for focusing more on Hindu-Hatred, anti-semitism, and general purpose islamic mania when huge chunks of your population starve to death, same as ours. The difference is that we acknowledge the problem and are working to fix it, which will take time. I personally prompted Indian-owned companies in the Bay Area to send over $150,000 to cuddalore during the Tsunami last year, and regularly donate to the India Development and Relief Fund from my meager stipend as a graduate student. Did you do anything during the earthquake in your country? I'll bet not. Too busy with anti-Hindu pogroms and rioting over cartoons of Moha-MAD the rapist pedophile prophet.

    --
    l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
  50. Re:OH boy oh you whiner... by XchristX · · Score: 1

    Oh, and plenty of people sympathise with the Ramjanmabhoomi. Hundreds of millions of Hindus, and many educated and informed westerners as well:

    http://www.danielpipes.org/article/368
    http://koenraadelst.bharatvani.org/articles/ayodhy a/notemple.html
    http://koenraadelst.bharatvani.org/articles/irin/g enocide.html

      You're right about one thing. Mine is a poor country (though not as poor as your Islamic Sharia law infested sewer). We have mud huts, you have yours. The difference is that our mud huts will not remain mud huts because we are building factories and cities in their place. Your mud huts will no longer remain mud huts because Americans are bombing them into little holes in the ground in Waziristan while you people scurry like ants and hide behind Osama bin-Laden. Hah! Pakistan's great hero, bin-Laden, isn't even a Pakistani.

    --
    l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
  51. Re:OH boy oh you whiner... by kadnan · · Score: 1

    as I said,i hit the mose senstive part of your body and I am really enjoying this.You can continue to preach your lame theories about your country and others,oh I say,baseless too.You are ignorant too,not something new since you are an *indian* [Slang]. regrding what pakistanis did during EQ in last year.You dont need to ask me,search Internet resources like BBC etc and you will learn something new. Thanks for showing me *Indian face* again,its still same,filthy. *grin*.Lets see how long do you babble on in a *wimax* post about Pakistan.

  52. Re:OH boy oh you whiner... by XchristX · · Score: 1

    Thank you for proving that it's muslims, not Americans, who troll the internet spreading hate-speech and ad-hominem attacks...

    --
    l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
  53. Ahem.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What part of ...

    1. Returning democracy to the people of Pakistan (instead of their usual military dictatorship)

    2. Stop proliferating nuclear weapons

    3. Control those madrassas where foreign born British Pakistanis get training (i.e. London bombing July 7th 2005)

    4. Stop allowing the Taliban and Al-Qaeda elements refuge in Western Pakistan

    5. Stop interferring with the internal affairs of Afghanistan as they have done in the past

    ... is nonsense, fallacious, propaganda as you allege? Are you smoking crack or are you simply in complete denial? Excuse me but I happen to read a really broad spectrum of newspaper and even read the crappy Pakistan newspaper Dawn (lousy standards of journalism) where 3 out of 5 of the above where reported on Dawn itself and different Pakistani analysts working at think tanks across the world have talked about #4 and #5 on my list. So before you call me a bloody parrot I suggest you start grounding yourself if fucking reality buddy.

  54. Re:OH boy oh you whiner... by kadnan · · Score: 1

    me a troll?lol,look who's talking,dude it was you who started whining about every irrelevent thing in a telecom POST.Watch out! you just spitted on your own face.Keep babbling! *grin*

  55. Re:OH boy oh you whiner... by XchristX · · Score: 1

    I hope you will remain as jovial a hindu hater when your country ends in a radioactive fireball.

    --
    l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
  56. Re:OH boy oh you whiner... by Ben_Ephraim · · Score: 1

    >You are ignorant too,not something new since you are an *indian* [Slang]

      Go to hell you stupid Paki. Indians are ignorant, are they. We didn't seem so ignorant when your "Abbajaan" and one lakh others surrendered to India in 1971.

      I am a Bnei Menashe Jew, and I *know* that I would be lynched and massacred in any part of Pakistan, whereas in India (I'm in Israel now) I lived in peace all my life in Assam until I emigreated.

      You muslims rendered the entire subcontinent into a flaming wasteland, for who? For a prophet who lived 1500 years ago who doesn't know Pakistan or doesn;t care about you any more than India does?

      You pathetic cabal of ignorant servile fools!